United States Army Corps of Engineers · RECEIVED 1988 M COEKCCHST SUPERFUND BRANCH CONTAMINATION EVALUATION AT THE U.S. COAST GUARD STATION (FORMER ENGINEERS SCHOOL) FORT TOTTEN

RECEIVED1988

M COEKCCHSTSUPERFUND BRANCH

CONTAMINATION EVALUATION AT THE U.S. COAST GUARDSTATION (FORMER ENGINEERS SCHOOL) FORT TOTTEN

FINAL ENGINEERING REPORT

CONTRACT DACW41-86-D-0112PROJECT NO. C02NY005700

Prepared by:

Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.10 Harvard Mill Square

Wakefield, Massachusetts

Submitted to:

Department of the ArmyKansas City District, Corps of Engineers

700 Federal BuildingKansas City, Missouri

March 28, 1988

M3EMHcaN&Eddu 2 0 0 - l c

C02NY005701 01.09 0001

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a e

1 .0 EXECUTIVE'SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 .1 Summary of Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 .0 GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 .2 Project Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 .3 Site Location and Physiography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 .4 Ownership and Prior Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

3 .0 SITE INVESTIGATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 .2 Monitoring Well Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

3 .2 .1 Boring Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 .2 .2 Geologic Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 .2 .3 Monitoring Well Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 .2 .4 Well Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 .2 .5 Water Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 .2 .6 Hydraulic Conductivities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

3 .3 Sampling Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 .3 .1 Work Plans . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 .3 .2 Sampling Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 .3 .3 Sampling Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

3 .3 .3 .1 Groundwater Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 .3 .3 .2 Soil Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 .3 .3 .3 Wipe Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

3 .4 ANALYTICAL METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303 .5 Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

3 .5 .1 Field Sampling and Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . 303 .5 .2 Laboratory Analysis, Systems and

Performance Audit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343 .5 .3 Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373 .5 .4 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

4 .0 ELECTRO-MAGNETIC SURVEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 .2 Subsurface Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 .3 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 .4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424 .5 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

5 .0 BUNKER (BUILDING #619) PENETRATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455 .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455 .2 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455 .3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465 .4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

6 .0 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476 .1 Analytical Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476.2 Water and Soil Standards and Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Page

7 .0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557 .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557 .2 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557 .3 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 567 .4 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

8 .0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

Appendix A Well Logs and Field DataAppendix B Monitoring Well Completion DiagramsAppendix C Well Survey DataAppendix D RAI Analytical DataAppendix E Quality Control Sample ResultsAppendix F New Jersey Soil Cleanup Approaches

ii

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

3 .1 Finished Well Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

3 .2 Well Development Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

3 .3 Water Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

3 .4 Well Purging Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

3 .5 Analytical Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

6 .1 Aqueous Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

6 .2 Soil Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49-50

6 .3 Sediment Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

6 .4 Wipe Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

6 .5 Water Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

6 .6 Soil Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

iii

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

2 .1 Map of General Vicintiy of Fort Totten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2 .2 Base Map of Fort Totten, Coast Guard Property . . . . . . . . . . 6

3 .1 Sampling Locations Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

3 .2 Cross-Section of Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

4 .1 E .M . Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

iv

1 .0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A preliminary contamination evaluation has been conducted at

the U .S . Coast-Guard Station property at Fort Totten, Queens,

NY . This evaluation was performed under the Department of

Defense (DOD) Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) to

confirm or deny the presence of environmental contamination

onsite . The methods by which this evaluation was performed are

outlined in this report .

Contamination was found to exist on this site . The

contaminants detected consist of lead and chromium in

groundwater, mercury in soils and marine sediments, petroleum

hydrocarbons in marine sediments, and pesticides (DDD, DDT, and

DDE) in buildings #619 and #624 . Lastly, there does not appear

to be any buried ordnance and drums onsite, nor does there appear

to be a sealed room in building #619 .

DERP CONFIRMATION STUDYAT

ENGINEERING SCHOOL, FORT TOTTEN

DERA PROJECT #C02NY005700

1 .1 Summary of Findings

Groundwater, soil, sediment and building surface

contamination has been encountered at concentrations which may

require regulatory review for this location . The contamination

is reasonably suspected to have resulted from activities which

took place during the period of DOD control and therefore should

be referred to the appropriate office or agency for determination

of a future course of action .

1

2 .0 GENERAL

2 .1 Introduction

The Department of Defense (DOD) conducts maintenance and

manufacturing operations at defense installations . To assess

possible environmental contamination resulting from these

activities at former DOD sites, the Defense Appropriation Act was

adopted in 1984 and the Defense Environmental Restoration Program

(DERP) was begun . Responsibility for the management of DERP was

given to the Secretary of Defense to assure a consistent

approach .

The Huntsville Division of the Army Corps of Engineers is

responsible for the inventory phase of the investigation of

former DOD sites. This phase entails the collection and chemical

analysis of groundwater, surface water, sediments, and soil

samples to assess possible environmental contamination . Results

of these studies will be employed to compare, evaluate, and rank

individual DOD sites .

This report describes the inventory phase investigation

performed at the U.S . Coast Guard Station (previous DOD property)

at the Fort Totten Engineers School in Queens, New York . Project

objectives and background information are presented in

Section 2 . Details of the sampling program are described in

Section 3 . Results of an electromagnetic survey are included in

Section 4 . Bunker penetration in building #619 is described in

Section 5. Summary of analytical results is presented in

2

Section 6 . Conclusions and recommendations are discussed in

Section 7 . Well logs and field data are included in Appendix A,

monitoring well completion diagrams in Appendix B, well surveying

data in Appendix C, chemical analytical data in Appendix D,

quality control sample results in Appendix E, and New Jersey soil

cleanup approaches are presented in Appendix F.

2 .2 Project Objectives

The objectives of this investigation were to provide a

preliminary determination of the presence or absence of chemical

contamination which may have resulted from former DOD activities

at this site and to determine the potential of contamination to

local groundwater . To accomplish this objective, the following

work was conducted :

1 . Site visit for collection of background information andestablishment of preliminary monitoring well and samplinglocations .

2 . Installation of five groundwater, monitoring wells .

3 . Collection and analysis of groundwater, soil, sedimentsamples, and wipe tests .

4 . Performance of an electro-magnetic survey .

5 . Coring into bunker #619 to determine its contents .

6 . Evaluation of physical and analytical data to determinethe absence or presence of contamination .

2 .3 Site Location and Physiography

The U .S . Coast Guard Station at Fort Totten is located with

the U .S . Army Engineers School on the Fort Totten military

3

installation . Fort Totten is approximately 20 miles east of New

York City at the mouth of the East River in Queens, New York

(north shore of--Long Island) as shown in Figure 2 .1 . Access to

Fort Totten is via the Cross Island Parkway to Bell Boulevard .

Fort Totten is a 147 acre site and has been owned and

operated by the DOD since 1857 (at that time called Willets

Point) . From 1857 to 1944, Fort Totten was used by the U.S . Army

for national defense and engineer training purposes . From 1944

to present, Fort Totten has been operated by various U.S . Army

commands which includes a training center for U.S . Army reserves

and engineers . Today Fort Totten still functions as a training

center . However, the land which composes Fort Totten is now

owned by several federal agencies along with the DOD .

The U.S . Army still owns and operates the largest tract of

land on Fort Totten (92 .4 acres) . The General Services

Administration now owns and operates 45 acres, and the Department

of Transportation (DOT) owns 9 .6 acres which is operated by the

U .S . Coast Guard.

The U.S . Coast Guard operated property at Fort Totten (which

is the target of this investigation) occupies the north-west

portion of the peninsula and is bounded by U .S . Army property on

the north, east and west as shown in Figure 2 .2 . Access to this

property is gained via Willets Street which branches off of

Totten Avenue .

This site contains fifteen buildings and a pier . Grassy

lawns surround the station buildings in the southern half of the

4

t

00

Cost Guard St.STATE MARITIME COLL'EG ~ , " IS ,

`- -,,light141W T"It 06OUAORI LOCA11d1 Throgs Point O~~ `~O

Jr

14

a ~\r O /O 61 ,r N r U "" ~ ~\

. . J ,' I O~\\Its

Jl +~ C`

,p ~' A Willets , .1Point ~'

L It Qyeens oing- ' . espl~

" FORT 7Y1T1'mLittle ' flay A'* " 111. 10.94.11\'ATI114

mospo

.,. ,ee h'atS' . " ' " ~:to fItow say

A;NTERGHANGE` ~"4'I

.o,tom., ~ .a-- . - :..r7 I�Arr ... c_ r ~._.33

C "16

SOURCE : U.S. COAST GUARD

FIGURE, 2 .1 MAP OF GENERAL VICINITY OF FORT TOTTEN

s

LITTLE NECK BAY

16 a

°r ,

IJ~

J51 . .. . . ....o

4

U

a oo~ .s7~ 6 A SCALE

loo o mono goo

6-E3 Coast Guard Property

i1 _ ~p~r

SOURCE U S . COAST GUARD

o FIGURE 2 .2 RASP. MAP (1F FORT TOTTEN, COAST GUARD PROPERTY

site and northernmost areas . The northwestern area is heavily

overgrown and wooded . Most of the station buildings are grouped

along an axis boarding the waterfront on the western boundary .

These buildings consist of a station barracks and administration

gallery, workshops, storage spaces, and several vacant

buildings . A single structure which houses married Coast Guard

personnel is situated in the western section of this site and a

large frame building (sublet to a civilian organization) is

positioned in the center . Lastly, three small out-buildings are

located in the north-eastern section of this site . The site

elevation ranges from 10 to 60 feet above mean sea level .

2 .4 Ownership and Prior Use

Fort Totten has been used for military purposes since the

French and Indian War . However, the land on which Fort Totten is

built first came into public record in 1640, when it belonged to

a farmer named Thomas . From 1829 to 1857, the land passed

through the hands of many owners until purchased by the U.S .

Government in 1857 .

In 1857, Congress appropriated the funds to build a

fortification on Willets Point (Fort Totten) and in 1862

construction of the fort was initiated . This fortification was

part of what was then known as the "Third System" of seacoast

fortifications which began during a period of peace in 1817 . The

Fort Totten fortification complex was built and designed to

protect New York City from naval forces of the confederate states

during the Civil War. At that time, the fortification was built

7

at sea level from massive granite stones which were brought in by

barge from quarries in New York and Pennsylvania . Above the

stone fort on top of the hill, powder and munition magazines were

built. In 1864, construction of this fort was discontinued and

the partially completed stone fort can still be seen today on the

northern tip of Fort Totten facing Long Island Sound.

During the Civil War, Fort Totten was used as a training

post for troops enroute to the front even though its gun

batteries never fired in anger.

- In 1864, a hospital was built on Fort Totten which treated

sick and wounded patients until closed in 1865 . During this

time, the first permanent garrison for the fort was

established . This garrison consisted of 350 men and officers

which represented most of the Engineer Corps of the United States

Army at the time . In 1868, the War Department established Fort

Totten as an Engineering School and in 1869 another general

hospital was established on the property . During this period,

Fort Totten was the only military engineer depot in the United

States and became the arsenal for all mining, sapping tools,

school for submarine mining, arsenal for pontoon material, and a

depot for all material pertaining to the system of torpedo

defenses . Submarine mine defense systems, seacoast searchlights

and seacoast mortar batteries were also developed at Fort Totten

during this time .

During the Spanish American War, a second set of

fortifications was constructed on the hill in back of the first

8

set of fortifications . The second fortification sat 80 feet

above sea level and again was designed to defend against naval

attack penetrating into Long Island Sound. At the same time, a

skirmish line of torpedoes was laid from Fort Totten across the

channel to Fort Schuyler which was located on Throggs Point .

These torpedoes were designed to detonate by means of electric

batteries located at each end of the line . In addition, two

groups of submarine mines (22 per group) were positioned as anti-

ship weapons to assist in the defense of New York City . These

improved defenses were once again never used since an attack on

New York never occurred .

On July 23, 1898, President McKinley ordered that the fort

at Willets Point be named Fort Totten as it is called today. The

fort was named in honor of Brigadier General Joseph G . Totten,

Corps of Engineers, United States Army who designed and planned

many of the improvements of the United States coastal defenses .

In 1903, the Engineering School moved to Washington D.C . and

later to Fort Belvoir, Virginia where they remain today. At this

time, the Coast Artillery took over Fort Totten .

During World War I, additional guns were added to the

fortifications at Fort Totten and troops enroute to the front in

Europe were concentrated here .

In 1922, the 62nd Coastal Artillery Regiment was stationed

at Fort Totten . The 62nd Coastal Artillery Regiment was equipped

with anti-aircraft artillery and later became the mother unit for

the entire United States Anti-Aircraft defense system .

9

Between 1937-1942, many improvements were made at Fort

Totten . This included remodeling of buildings, new roads and

filling in marshland areas . These improvements made Fort Totten

one of the most attractive army establishments in the United

States at the time .

During World War II, Fort Totten became the headquarters for

the Anti-Aircraft Artillery Command of the Eastern Defense

Command . It was then charged with the defense against air attack

for the entire east coast and in 1941, the first radar system

used on the east coast was installed here .

The Army Anti-Aircraft command was deactivated in 1944 and

Fort Totten then became the base for the North Atlantic Wing of

the Air Transport Command. Aircraft under this command operated

from LaGuardia Air Field. In 1945, Fort Totten became the

headquarters for the entire Atlantic Division of the Air

Transport Command and functioned under the Army Air Corps . until

1947 when Fort Totten was designated as an Army Medical Center .

At that time, the old hospital was reconditioned, refurnished and

named the Fort Totten General Hospital until closed in 1949 .

When the hospital closed, Fort Totten became the headquarters of

the New York-New Jersey subarea of the army, and functioned as a

training facility for the organized Reserve Corps. and the

National Guard in the New York-New Jersey area .

Since 1967, Fort Totten has been a sub-installation of Fort

Hamilton, Brooklyn, New York and is still used today as an

engineering training school for the army . However, the land

10

composing Fort Totten has been sub-divided for use by other U .S .

Government agencies . The majority of Fort Totten (92 .4 acres) is

still owned and--used by the U .S . Army . The remaining tracts of

land are now in the possession of the U.S . Coast Guard

(9 .6 acres) and U.S . General Services Administration (45 acres) .

The land (9 .6 acres) which makes up the U .S . Coast Guard

Station at Fort Totten is now being investigated under the

Defense Environmental Restoration Program to determine if any

environmental contamination exists on this property from past DOD

activities .

At present, the U .S . Coast Guard operated property at Fort

Totten is used as a small boat station for search and rescue

activities, and tending aids to navigation .

3 .0 SITE INVESTIGATION

3 .1 Introduction

This site investigation was conducted to determine whether

contamination exists at the U.S . Coast Guard Station at Fort

Totten and whether this contamination appears to be related to

past DOD activities at this site . A contamination evaluation,

based on environmental samples collected at this site, has been

performed in an effort to assess levels of any constituents found

on site . The following subsections describe the methods employed

to make this determination . Specific items discussed include

drilling operations, geology, well construction and development

procedures, and the sampling program.

11

M&E conducted a preliminary site visit prior to beginning

any field activities . The preliminary site visit was conducted

in order to collect existing information regarding the history of

Fort Totten and to determine prospective sampling locations on

the Coast Guard property at Fort Totten . The site visit was

conducted on October 28, 1986 . Well locations and sample

locations were selected based on local geohydrology, known areas

of past DOD industrial activities, and visual observations .

Monitoring well/groundwater and soil sample locations are

illustrated in Figure 3 .1 .

Surface soil samples were taken near suspected areas of

hazardous materials handling operations . Groundwater monitoring

wells were positioned near suspected areas of contaminant

infiltration and migration to provide samples representative of

groundwater beneath the site and groundwater flowing off the

site . The wells were also positioned to gain a more accurate

understanding of the groundwater flow direction beneath the site .

3 .2 Monitoring Well Installation

Five shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed at

the U .S . Coast Guard Station in Fort Totten . All wells were

installed and completed as outlined in the approved well

Installation Plan of December 1986 . The following sections

briefly discuss the drilling procedures, geotechnical

information, well installation, well development and testing for

hydraulic conductivities .

12

r

LEGEND

® MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

O SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS

0 WIPE SAMPLING LOCATIONS

]~c SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATIONS

PCO SAMPLING LOCATIONS

FIGURE 3.1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS MAP

13

! U UNORTH LOOP n /

NOT TO SCALE

wnCALF 0 coo .

3 .2 .1 . Boring Operation

Drilling-at the Fort Totten site began June 2, 1987 . A

mobile CME 75 drill rig was used for the drilling program. The

method employed 6 1/2 inch hollow stem augers which yielded an

approximate hole diameter of 11 inches through the unconsolidated

deposits .

The hollow stem auger method involved advancing 5 foot

flights of hollow stem augers into the ground . As the augers

were rotated into the overburden the wings on the augers carried

the drill cuttings to the land surface . As cuttings arrived at

the surface they were shoveled into a 55 gallon drum .

Two foot split spoon samples were continuously collected to

a depth of 10 feet or to the top of the rock surface, whichever

was encountered first.

The drill rig was steam cleaned according to the procedures

and protocol outlined in the approved Well Installation Plan .

All tools, flights of augers and accessories used for boring each

hole were steam cleaned prior to commencing work on side and in

between work on each of the boreholes . Split spoons were cleaned

with live steam and a natural bristle brush .

3 .2 .2 . Geologic Data

The unconsolidated deposits encountered during the drilling

of the five holes (Figure 3 .2) were similar in each of the

holes . Generally, a thin surface layer of brown silty sand with

14

70-

00-

50-

40 .

30 .

r

20 .

10 .

-0

MYV-5

T

" MW-1 "MialwoWELL I0

T ® sMENEO mrtm~MW-1 ; Q WaTIM UKe EWAUX"0w

NW-2 mW.3 0* emw

4, trnAncduPOC tart

ELI

® y VIA F: ML; Trwrxir VewowaoMC j Clld wr Code. STOWS Awo OWN

r. TWL: WOWN rn! aver NowrFEW.OCCASSOM PcsM$

MW-5utne amr M wAW.4 `-1 , w Mt : si q

150' 1 : Mfl!10@tDM FM lWM AM 9"RELATIVE

LOCATION PLAN B G aW. GWV CUW.OMOMrorncs, TWILT «WNXrco

FIGURE 3-2. STRATIGRAPi11C CROSS-SECTIONS, FORT TOTTEN, NY

MW-1

MW-2 -`MW-3

BOA T ~.

" 70

.60

.40

.30f

mm

-20 Omm2O

O-10

"0

occasional stones and organic matter overlay deposits of glacial

till of Pleistocene age . The layer of unconsolidated deposits

ranged from twelve to 33 feet thick . Most split spoons revealed

samples composed of brown fine sands and silts with occasional

pebbles and less commonly stones . Cinders were also encountered

during drilling in samples taken from wells MW-2, MW-3, and

MW-4 . Laboratory tests performed on soil samples (water content,

after boring limits, sieve analysis) in accordance with ASTM

methods, confirmed field observations . Soils were chiefly made

up of (SM) silty sands, poorly graded sand-silt mixtures and (ML)

organic silts and very fine sands with slight plasticity . In

accordance with task #6 (Scope of Work paragraph 3 .4 .1) bedrock,

which was not encountered upon refusal, was not cored and

therefore not analyzed in this report . -

3 .2 .3 . Monitoring Well Construction

Five monitoring wells were constructed on the U.S . Coast

Guard property at the Fort Totten site in accordance with the

well installation plan . All monitoring wells were constructed

with approximately 10 feet of screen set below the water table .

MW1, MW2, MW3, MW4, and MW5 extend to depths of 33 feet, 25 feet,

30 feet, 12 feet, and 25 feet respectively .

Each monitoring well was constructed with 2-inch, threaded

flush joint, No . 10 (0 .010 inch slot) PVC manufactured well

screen ; 2-inch PVC (schedule 80), threaded, flush joint, solid

riser pipe, No . 1 silica sand, bentonite pellets, grout mixture,

16

steel protective coverings with locking cover (or for MW4, one

road box cover) and concrete pads with steel protective posts .

Well construction plans for each monitoring well are presented in

Appendix B, and well survey data in Appendix C.

Drill holes were reamed and washed out with onsite potable

water in cases where obstructions existed at depth . Monitoring

wells were constructed by placing PVC screen and riser down the

hole . Sand was slowly added to the hole and periodically checked

to assure that no bridging occurred and that a proper interval of

sand pack filled the annular space between the PVC screen and the

borehole well . A minimum 2 foot bentonite seal was placed atop

the sand pack and the remainder of the hole was filled with a

grout mixture comprised of portland cement and bentonite

powder . A 3 foot square concrete pad was constructed on the

ground surface and a steal protective surface was emplaced on all

wells with the exception of MW4 which was constructed flush with

the land surface through the emplacement of a road box. Three

guard posts were placed around each steel protective casing .

Table 3 .1 summarized the Characteristics of each well .

TABLE 3 .1FINISHED WELL SPECIFICATIONS

U .S . COAST GUARD STATION, FORT TOTTEN, QUEENS, NEW YORK

Well Depth Screen Sand Bentonite GroutNo . (ft) Length (ft) pack (ft) (ft) Layer (ft)

MW-1 33 10 13 2 18MW-2 25 10 10 2 10MW-3 30 10 13 2 15MW-4 12 10 7 1 2MW-5 25 10 8 2 11

17

3 .2 .4 . Well Development

All grout seals in the monitoring wells were allowed to cure

a minimum of 48-hours prior to development . Monitoring wells

were developed using teflon bailers . After a well was bailed

dry, the well was allowed to recharge and bailed dry again . The

purpose of the well development is to assure the removal of fine

particles from the well, to assure a good hydraulic connection

between the well screen, filter pack and formation, and to remove

any contamination inadvertently introduced during the drilling

process . Well development information is summarized in

Table 3 .2 .

TABLE 3- 2WELL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS


Well Development Approximate Volume Development TimeNo . Process Of Water Removed (gal) (hrs)

MW-1 Bailer 30 4 .0MW-2 Bailer 45 4 .5MW-3 Bailer 45 4 .0MW-4 Bailer 25 4 .0MW-5 Bailer 100 4 .0

The monitoring wells at the Fort Totten site were developed

without incident . The depth and amount of recharge varied within

each monitoring well . Therefore a variety of well volumes were

required to develop each different well . The technique used to

develop the wells removed silts from the screened section of the

well and created a secure connection between the well screen,

filter pack and fractured formation .

18

3 .2 .5 . Water Levels

Water level measurements in each monitoring well were

recorded after-the completion of each well and prior to

sampling . This information is presented in Table 3 .3 . Surveyed

horizontal control positions and elevations of each monitoring

well are present in Appendix C of this report .

TABLE 3 .3WATER LEVELS


Land Water Level Water HydraulicWell Surface *TOC Below TOC Elevation ConductivityNo . **(NGVD) (NGVD) (ft) (NGVD) (ft/day)

MW-1 61 .50 63 .40 17 .09 46 .31 0 .1MW-2 58 .90 61 .06 16 .99 44 .07 0 .3MW-3 57 .10 59 .13 14 .56 44 .57 0 .4MW-4 12 .15 11 .87 5 .54 6 .28 0 .5MW-5 25 .0 27 .01 19 .04 7 .97 0 .3

* Top of Casing** NGVD = National Geodetic Vertical Datum

Water level elevations vary significantly with each

location . Water elevations ranged between 46 .31 feet and

6 .28 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) .

Inferred groundwater gradients across the site, based on those

elevations, indicate that groundwater flow is generally to the

northwest downgradient toward Long Island Sound .

19

3 .2 .6 . Hydraulic Conductivities

Slug and bail tests were conducted at all five monitoring

well locations in accordance with the approved well installation

plan . Slug and bail tests were conducted as follows : The

initial water level was recorded . Both tests were initiated by

inducing a sudden change in water level and measuring the

response of the well . The change in water level was accomplished

by introducing a known quantity of previously bailed well water

(slugging the well) or removing (bailing the well) a known

quantity of water with a bailer . Data were recorded using a

water level tape . Data were analyzed using the Hvorslev method

when the well screen remained submerged during testing . The

modified Hvorslev method was used when data gathered from a well

whose screen was not submerged throughout the test .

The hydraulic conductivity (K) values which are based

specifically on slug test analysis are presented in Table 3 .3 .

The rate at which the monitoring well responds depends upon the

rate of recharge that occurs . This rate can vary by several

orders of magnitude depending upon the characteristics of the

formation in which each well is installed . Values for K (Table

3 .3) range from 0 .1 tc 0.5 feet per day which is less than one

order of magnitude of difference among the five wells . These

values fall into the standard range of values given for glacial

till deposits .

20

3 .3 Sampling Program

The preliminary contamination evaluation conducted by

Metcalf & Eddy-included the sampling and analysis of the

groundwater monitoring wells, soils, sediments, and wipe tests on

the structures . The field sampling episode was conducted from

July 18 - July 24, 1987 . Sampling protocol and procedures were

presented in project work plans submitted to the Army Corps of

Engineers in April 1987 .

The parameters chosen for analysis were outlined in the

scope of work provided by the U .S . Army Corps of Engineers . The

analyses selection reflect possible contamination expected

resulting from past DOD activities, and includes the measurement

of volatile compounds, petroleum hydrocarbons, selected metals,

PCB, pesticides, pH, conductivity, and temperature .

3 .3 .1 . Work Plans

After the site visit and prior to actual field work, work

plans were developed to outline site investigation procedures .

These work plans included :

Site Specific Health & Safety Plan

Site Specific Well Installation Plan

Site Specific Sampling Analysis and Quality AssuranceProject Plan (S&A/QAPP)

COE approval of these work plans was obtained prior to

commencement of well construction, sampling, electro-magnetic

survey, and coring into the bunker (Bldg. #619) . The field team

adhered to procedures described in the above work plans .21

The specific work plans were submitted to the COE as

separate documents and have not been presented within this

report . However, a summary of field techniques employed during

the investigation has been included in Section 3 .3 .3 . The

analytical methodology is provided in the SA/QAPP and is

summarized in Section 3 .4 . The analytical results of the QC

samples have been evaluated and compared against the goals stated

in the S&A/QAPP . A quality assurance summary for the project is

included in 3 .5 .

3 .3 .2 . Sampling Locations

The individual sampling locations were selected to assess

particular areas of the site . Each location is briefly described

to indicate the selection rationale . Sampling locations that are

described which could not be sampled during this program are

indicated as such . Sampling locations are illustrated in

Figure 3 .1 and are described as follows :

onitoring Wel

Monitoring Well MW-1 was installed in the eastern portion of

the site at the corner of Abbot Road and North Loop . This well

position was selected as an upgradient "background" monitoring

point to determine groundwater quality prior to movement through

the U.S . Coast Guard Station at Fort Totten . This well position

is located on the sites highest elevation with surrounding

vegetation consisting of grass and trees. It should also be

22

noted that a battery of gun mounts "Battery Ring" was

decommissioned and buried below the recreation field just

upgradient of MW-1 .

Monitoring Well MW-2

Monitoring Well MW-2 was installed downgradient of

building #624 . This well position was selected to intercept

potential groundwater contaminants which may have been released

in and around this building . Past DOD activities performed in

this area include vehicle repair, and electrical equipment

maintenance . In addition, there is some evidence that the area

behind building #624 was used as a solid waste "trash" dump .

onitoring Well MW-3


building #625 . This well position was selected to intercept

potential groundwater contaminants which may have been released

in and around this building . Past DOD activities performed in

this area include fuel storage in above ground tanks. Dark

colored fuel stains were observed on surface soils near this

building during the site visit .

onitoring Well MW-4


building #619 "bunker" . This well position was selected to

intercept potential groundwater contaminants which may have been

23

released in and around this building . In addition, this well

location would also intercept any contaminant migration from

building #624 and #625 . Past DOD activities in and around

building #619 may have resulted in the release of solvents, oils,

pesticides, and mercury .

itoring Well MW-5

Monitoring Well MW-5 was installed in the vicinity of

buildings #610, #611, and #612 . This well location was selected

to detect potential groundwater contaminants which may have been

released in and around these buildings . In addition, this well

location would also intercept any contaminant migration from

buildings #624 and #625 . The past DOD activities that took place

at this location were primarily administrative in nature with

some light industrial maintenance . However, this area is

contiguous to the waterfront area where torpedoes, mines, and

search lights were developed and maintained .

oil Sam

Soil Sample S-1 was collected in the eastern corner of the

U.S . Coast Guard Station at Fort Totten near MW-1 . This location

was selected as an upgradient location to serve as a background

sample .

24

Soil Sample S-2

Soil Sample S-2 was collected near MW-3 down slope from

bldg . #625 . This location was selected because of dark colored

fuel stains (possibly paraffins) on surface soils which were

observed during the site visit.

Soil Sample S-3

Soil Sample S-3 was collected at the east corner of building

625 down slope of MW-2 in an area of past oil storage/use

activities, and possible spills and leaks.

Soil Sample S-4

Soil Sample S-4 was collected near MW-2 located down slope

of building #624 . This location was selected due to past

maintenance and repair activities which took place in this area .

Soil Sample S-5

Soil Sample S-5 was collected approximately 40 feet behind

building #623 . This sample location was selected due to

suspected solid waste dumping "trash" in this area during past

DOD activities .

Soil Sample S-6

Soil Sample S-6 was collected at the corner of Willets

Street and the access road leading shoreside into the U.S . Coast

Guard Station at Fort Totten . This location was selected to

25

detect potential contaminants down slope from buildings #609,

#610, #611, and #612 .

Soil Sample S-7

Soil Sample S-7 was collected near MW-5 . This location was

selected to detect contaminants down slope of buildings #624 and

#625, and to detect contaminants in the area of buildings #610,

#611, and #612 .

Soil Sample S-8

Soil Sample S-8 was collected approximately 30 feet down

slope of building #619 "bunker" and in between buildings #615 and

#614 . This location was selected to detect potential

contamination which may have been released from and around these

buildings . This is also the area where past DOD industrial

activity was the greatest .

Soil SamRle S-11

Soil Sample S-11 was collected near building #609 . This

location was selected for PCB analysis because an electrical

transformer station is and has been located there for some years .

Soil Sample S-12

Soil Sample S-12 was collected on the east corner of

building #625 . This location for a PCB sample was selected

because of past oil storage activities and accidental spills or

leaks which caused staining on surrounding soils.

26

Wipe Test W#1

Wipe Test W#1 were taken in the left room facing the bay in

building #619 .---This location was selected because of past DOD

storage activities of DDT in this room .

Wipe'Test W#2

Wipe Test W#2 was taken in the right room facing the bay in

building #619 . This location was selected because of past DOD

storage activities of DDT in this room .

Wipe Test W#3

Wipe test W#3 was taken in the right room facing the bay in

building #624 . This location was selected because of potential

past DOD storage activities of DDT in this room .

Wipe Test W#4

Wipe test W#4 was taken in the left room facing the bay in

building #624 . This location was selected because of potential

past DOD storage activities of DDT in this room .

Sediment Samples (Sed-1, Sed-2 . & Sed-3)

Three sediment samples were collected in the bay along the

seawall at the U.S . Coast Guard Station . The three samples were

taken at 100 foot intervals between the pier and the back of

building #615 . The samples were collected at a depth of 6

inches . These locations were selected to detect potential

27

Cc,, 1-o r,"~ , vâ ,\t"t run-off from shore which might have occurred during

past DOD activities .

3 .3 .3 . Sampling Methods

Detained sampling and analytical procedures are provided in

the S&A/QAPP . Brief summaries of methodology are presented in

the following section and include methods for groundwater, soil,

and wipe tests .

3 .3 .3 .1 . Groundwater Sampling

At least 5 well casing volumes were removed from each

monitoring well prior to groundwater sampling . This was

necessary to assure that the samples collected were

representative of the water quality in the aquifer. Table 3 .4

presents well purging data . Sampling of the five monitoring

wells involved the following steps:

measurement of static water level

purging out 5 well casing volumes

allow groundwater to recover to static level

collection of sample

A teflon bailer was employed for well purging and sample

recovery .

28

TABLE 3 .4- WELL PURGING DATA

SWL WELL VOLUME VOLUME PURGED WELL VOLUME(feet) - (gallons) (gallons) PURGED

MW-1 14 .70 2 .40 12 .00 5MW-2 18 .35 1 .25 6 .25 5MW-3 16 .09 2 .45 12 .30 5MW-4 10 .85 0 .758 3 .79 5MW-5 19 .75 0 .905 4 .60 5

SWL = Standing water level to top of casing

3 .3 .3 .2 . Soil Sampling

Soil samples were collected at 10 locations throughout the

site . A hand-driven soil auger was employed to collect each soil

sample from a depth of approximately 6 inches . Samples were

scooped with a stainless steel spoon into a pyrex bowl and

homogenized prior to aliquotting into sample containers .

Volatile Organic compound samples were collected prior to

homogenization to minimize loss of volatile components .

3 .3 .3 .3 . Wipe Tests

Wipe tests were collected at four locations by wiping a 2" x

2" hexane rinsed gauze pad over a 9" x 9" area on each floor area

tested . The gauze pad was handled with forceps . The wipe test

sample "gauze pad" was then returned to its container "VOA Vial"

for analysis .

29

3 .4 Analytical Methods

The analytical methods employed to analyze samples are

presented in detail in the S&A/QAPP . Table 3 .5 summarizes the

specific analytical methods used .

3 .5 Ouality Assurance

As required by the Fort Totten S&A/QAPP a quality assurance

summary report was to be prepared upon the conclusion of all

sample collection, analysis and data reduction activities . The

purpose of such a report is to "summarize and present all

pertinent quality control data and discuss the influence of

quality assurance issues on the overall data quality." This

report consists of the discussion and results provided in this

section .

As applied to field measurements and laboratory analyses

performed during this project, Quality Assurance is the

demonstration and documentation of data quality. These

procedures include the recording of all quality control

activities undertaken by the field team, and the assessment of

analytical performance of the subcontract laboratory through the

analysis of internal and external control and audit samples.

3 .5 .1 . Field Sampling and Measurements

All field sampling was in compliance with the S&A/QAPP : all

field samples and QC samples were collected as planned; all wells

were surveyed before sampling, proper decontamination procedures

were utilized, field analytical parameters of conductivity, pH,

30

TABLE 3 .5ANALYTICAL SUMMARY

Sample Sample EPALocation Date No . Parameters Method No .

MW-1 7/22/87 2332-301 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 625Total Metals 200 Series

MW-2 7/22/87 2332-302, Volatile Organics 8240(triplicate) 2332-306, Extractable Organics 625

2332-307* Total Metals 200 Series




Well 7/22/87 2332-308, Volatile Organics 8240Sample Blk 2332-309* Extractable Organics 625

Total Metals 200 Series

Well 2332-310, Volatile Organics 8240Travel Blk 2332-311*

Well Travel 7/23/87 2332-360, Volatile Organics 8240Blk #2 2332-359*

S-1 7/20/87 2332-320 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 8270Total Metals 7000 Series


S-3 7/20/87 2332-322, Volatile Organics 82402332-328, Extractable Organics 82702332-329* Total Metals 7000 Series


31

TABLE 3 .5 (Continued)ANALYTICAL SUMMARY


S-5 7/20/87 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 8270Total Metals 7000 Series




S-11 7/20/87 2332-330 PCBs 3540 & 8080

S-12 7/20/87 2332-331, PCBS 3540 & 8080(triplicate) 2332-358,

*2332-332

Soil Sample 7/20/87 2332-332, Volatile Organics 8240Blank *2332-333 Extractable Organics 8270

Total Metals 7000 Series

Soil Sample 7/20/87 2332-337 PCBs 3540 & 8080Blank #2

Soil Travel 7/20/87 2332-335, Volatile Organics 8240Blank #1 *2332-336

Sed-1 7/21/87 2332-341, Volatile Organics 8240(triplicate 2332-344, Total Metals 7000 Series

*2332-345 Petroleum Hydrocarbons 503 A,DStd Methods

Sed-2 7/21/87 2332-342 Volatile Organics 8240Total Metals 7000 SeriesPetroleum Hydrocarbons 503 A,D

Std Methods

Sed-3 7/21/87 2332-343 Volatile Organics 8240Total Metals 7000 SeriesPetroleum Hydrocarbons 503 A,D

Std Methods

32

TABLE 3 .5 (Continued)ANALYTICAL SUMMARY


Sediment 7/21/87 2332-346, Volatile Organics 8240Sample *2332-347 Total Metals 7000 SeriesBlank Petroleum Hydrocarbons 503 A,D

Std Methods

Sediment 7/21/87 2332-348, Volatile Organics 8240Travel *2332-349Blank

Wipe #1 7/21/87 2332-350 DDT, DDE, DDD 6082332-354,*2332-355

Wipe #2 7/21/87 2332-351 DDT, DDE, DDD 608

Wipe #3 7/21/87 2332-352 DDT, DDE, DDD 608

Wipe #4 7/21/87 2332-353 DDT, DDE, DDD 608

Wipe Sample 7/21/87 2332-356, DDT, DDE, DDD 608Blank 2332-357

* Note these samples were sent to MRDED-L for QA and have not beenincluded in this report .

33

and temperature were recorded as required, and chain of custody

procedures including sample labeling were adhered to .

3 .5 .2 . Metcalf & Eddy Laboratory Analysis, Systems and

Performance Audit

An on-site laboratory systems audit would normally be

performed by Metcalf & Eddy to assure that the subcontractor

laboratory is capable of maintaining the necessary minimum levels

of instrumentation and levels of experience of personnel, and

that laboratory quality assurance/control procedures are in

conformance with the requirements of the QAPP . However, since

the Army Corps of Engineers, Missouri River Division Laboratory

(MRD) decided to conduct a performance and system audit of

Resource Analysts, Inc . (RAI) to validate their ability to

perform work under this contract, Metcalf & Eddy did not schedule

any additional audits . The independent performance audit

conducted by the COE involved preparation and analysis of QA

samples prepared by the Army COE Missouri River Division (MRD)

Quality Assurance Laboratory. The purpose of those QA samples

was to provide an independent determination of any problem areas

in sample handling, analysis, and reporting by the subcontract

laboratory . The program also provided data to document

performance of the various measurement systems . Quality

assurance samples were submitted as blind samples to RAI for

comparison of results . The QA samples submitted had been

selected by the MRD QA Laboratory to include analyses of

duplicate standard pairs, low and high range standards, as well

34

as blanks . The QA samples were prepared in certified organic

free water, not actual site samples . The results of the MRD

audit were not.made available to M&E, only that MRD had approved

RAI Laboratory to conduct the required analyses under this

contract . The laboratory related quality control activities

undertaken during the course of this project were designed to

assure that measurement systems as well as activities specific to

a given site evaluation were under control .

The ongoing laboratory related quality control activities

consisted principally of the evaluation of data obtained from the

following sample categories : (a) calibration standards,

(b) working standards, (c) field samples, (d) laboratory

duplicates, (e) laboratory spikes, (f) laboratory methods blanks,

(g) trip blanks, (h) laboratory split samples. Procedures to be

used to evaluate that data would include calculation of

arithmetic means, standard deviations, relative percent

differences for duplicate samples and comparison of differences

between standards of spiked and experimentally determined values

expressed as percent recovery . Identification and treatment of

outliers was not appropriate as no marked deviations were noted

in the data set . The information used to evaluate the laboratory

quality control activities was to be obtained from the

subcontract laboratory performing the analytical work . An

assessment of the laboratory's compliance with stated objectives

presented in the Fort Totten S&A/QAPP is summarized below .

Quality Assurance data are presented in tables F .1 through

F.5 in Appendix E. The tables include results for field

35

duplicate analysis, laboratory sample spikes, laboratory

replicates, laboratory sample spikes, surrogate Recoveries and

laboratory control data .

All Field Duplicate Analysis with the exceptions of Chromium

and Lead in MW-2, Silver and Cadmium in S-3, and Silver and

Barium in Sed-3 were within QA objectives as presented in

Table F .1 . Laboratory Sample Spikes were within QA objectives

with the exception of selenium in MW-1, S-1, and S-7, Arsenic in

S-7, and petroleum hydrocarbons in Sed-1 field duplicate, as

presented in Table F .2 . Laboratory replicates, as presented in

Table F .3, were within QA objectives with the exception of Barium

in MW-l . The Surrogate Standard Recoveries for volatile

compounds as presented in Table F .4-were within the control range

with the exception of D(4)-1-2-Dichloroethane in S-3, D8-Toluene

in MW-2, MW-2 Field Duplicate, MW-3, MW-4, MW-5 Lab Replicate 2,

Well Travel Blank, and Lab Controls D0027, and D0012 . Surrogate

Standard Recoveries for Extractable organics were within control

ranges with the exception of 2-Fl-Phenol in S-3 Field Duplicate,

S-5, Blank A014 S-8, and S-8 Lab Duplicate, Nitrobenzene and

2-Fl-Biphenyl in S-1, S-2, S-3, S-3 Field Duplicate, S-7, Blank

A014, S-8, and S-8 Lab Duplicate, and Terphenyl-d14 in S-8 as

described in Table F .5 .

36

3 .5 .3 RAI Ouality Assurance

Well s

Spike recovery was below control limits for selenium . Since

both the calibration and verification and the laboratory control

sample were well within control limits, this probably represents

a matrix effect .

Silver recovery was low in the laboratory control sample,

however, since spike recovery was well within control, the data

was accepted for the series .

Silver, barium, cadmium and chromium for all samples and

lead for "Well #4 2332-304", (our laboratory number 10465-12)

were analyzed by method 7241 (Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption

Spectroscopy) .

Surrogate recoveries for d8-toluene were consistently low

for these samples . Some fell just below acceptance levels . This

would not have effected the detection of toluene however. No

toluene was found in the samples . Methylene chloride was found

in an instruments blank at 11 ug/L . It was not found in the

samples . One of the laboratory replicates had higher than normal

recovery for methylene chloride . This elevated level is likely

due to lab contamination . Matrix spike recoveries were

acceptable .

BIS-2-ethylhexyl phthalate was found in the blank for

semivolatiles at a level equivalent to 100 ug/L . Some samples

contained this compound at similar levels . These values should

be considered suspect . Matrix spike recoveries for the

37

semivolatiles ranged from 38 to 134% recovery . While some values

were outside project limits, they fell within EPA CLP acceptance

criteria .

Spike recoveries were below control limits for arsenic in

the soils samples and selenium in both the soil and water

samples . Since both the calibration verification and the

laboratory control sample were well within control limits, this

probably represents a matrix effect .


however, since spike recoveries were well within control for both

the soil samples and the water sample, the data was accepted for

the series .

Silver, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, and Lead were analyzed by

Method 6010 (Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma Spectroscopy) ICP.

No problems were encountered for Volatile Organics .

No problems were encountered for Acid/Base Neutral Extractable

Organic Compounds . No analytical problems were encountered for

PCB's .

Sediments

Spike Recoveries were below contract limits for arsenic in

the soil samples for the selenium in both the soil and water

samples . Since both the calibration verification and the

laboratory control sample were well within control limits, this

probably represents a matrix effect .

38


however, since spike recoveries were well within control for both

the soil samples and the water sample, the data was accepted for

the series .

Silver, barium, cadmium, chromium, and lead were analyzed by

method 6010 (Inductively coupled Argon Plasma Spectoscopy) . Lead

was analyzed in the water sample "2332-346 FT Sed Sam Blk", (our

laboratory number 10,430-13) by method 7421 (Graphite Furnace

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy) .

Recoveries were low for the volatiles laboratory control

sample . Methylene chloride was found in the water blank at 13

ppb but was not found in the samples . Toluene was found at 0 .7

ug/g in the soil blank but was notfound in the samples . The

duplicate water matrix spikes showed higher than expected

recoveries (113 to 171%) . The detection of volatiles was not

effected however, and no compounds were detected in the

samples . Surrogate recoveries for all samples were acceptable

except for BFB in 2332-346 FT Sed Blk which was 83% with an

acceptance limit of 86% .

Matrix spike recovery for oil and grease was 156% and 6

for the two soils spiked . Inhomogeneity of the soils contributed

to the error.

Wines

Wipes were analyzed for pesticides by electron capture gas

chromotograph and confirmed using Hall Detector . Interferences

in the wipes may have been present and raised detected

39

quantities . These samples could not be subsampled for precision

and occurance determination . Laboratory Control Sample results

for pesticides were within CLP acceptance limits except for

Endrin and DDT which showed 51 and 27% recovery . CLP criteria

are 56 and 36% respectively . The calibration for DDT is updated

with each calibration check sample to compensate for changing DDT

breakdown characteristics . This is reflected in the reported

concentration for DDT in the mid-range calibration QC data .

3 .5 .4 Summary

The above observations are minor in nature, thus the

analytical sample data presented within this report is

satisfactory and completely usable for the original purpose of

this site characterization .

4 .0 ELECTRO-MAGNETIC SURVEY

4 .1 Introduction

An electro-magnetic (EM) survey was performed at the U .S .

Coast Guard Station at Fort Totten on December 8-10, 1986 . The

purpose of this survey was to detect potential buried ordnance

and drums, and to verify that groundwater monitoring wells could

be installed safely without drilling into buried obstructions

such as water lines, power lines, and communications lines .

The instrument employed in this survey was a GEONICS

EM-31 . This instrument is direct "continuous" reading in

millisiemens per meter (ms/m) . It has an effective exploration

depth of about 6 meters and is composed of a self-contained

40

dipole transmitter and dipole receiver which operates on a

9 .8 kHz frequency . The EM-31 is powered by alkaline "C" cell

batteries and has conductivity ranges from 3 to 1,000 ms/m .

4 .2 Subsurface Conditions

Prior to performing the EM survey, research at the Post

Engineers office at Fort Totten was conducted . This research

consisted of obtaining all known drawings of underground

utilities which included communications lines, potable water

lines, fire fighting water lines, electrical service lines, storm

drainage lines, and sewer lines . During this research, some

utility drawings were obtained . However, it was learned that

many drawings of underground utilities at Fort Totten were

destroyed during a fire . It was also learned that the U .S . Coast

Guard Station property at Fort Totten is a maze of abandoned

underground cables which served the old gun emplacements and

overall communications for the site . During the EM survey, some

of these cables could be seen in various states of decay

penetrating above the ground surface . Drawings of these

abandoned cable positions were not available .

4 .3 Method

The U .S . Coast Guard property at Fort Totten was mapped as a

grid system prior to performing the EM survey . The grid

consisted of 12' x 12' squares which were measured off in

horizontal and vertical lines with cloth tapes . The horizontal

and vertical lines were then walked while carrying the EM-31

41

which was set on 500 my at a maximum detection range of

30 mmho/m . All readings at or above 30 mmho/m during the survey

were marked with a wooden stake. Consistent readings in straight

lines were verified with utility location drawings or assumed to

be abandoned undocumented utility lines. Single non-consistent

EM hits were marked and later re-surveyed in an attempt to

establish a pattern.

4 .4 Results

As expected, the EM-31 detected all known utilities as well

as undocumented abandoned utilities . Many abandoned utility

lines detected were discussed with personnel of the U .S . Coast

Guard Station. Their local knowledge of this area verified the

existence of these abandoned lines . U.S . Coast Guard personnel

recalled unearthing many of these lines during station

improvements and maintenance .

The only major EM hit which could not be explained was in

the northeast area of the recreation field as shown in

Figure 4 .1 . This area covers a buried fortification "Battery

King" which might account for the unexplained EM hits . It was

later learned that Battery King still contains the metal ring gun

mounts, although the guns themselves were removed during the

battery's demobilization . It was also learned that a mini-

railway system existed between Battery King and the underground

bunker munitions storage facility on Fort Totten*s northern

tip. The railway was used to transport munitions to Battery King

and may still exist in whole or in part . Metal pieces of this

42

railway would include axles, wheels, tracks, spikes, and rail car

bodies .

4 .5 Conclusion

The subsurface area below the U .S . Coast Guard Station at

Fort Totten is a maze of utility lines and debris . This was

ascertained from old and new site drawings, interviews with Coast

Guard and Army personnel, visual observations, and EM survey

results . Historically, ordnance has been unearthed along the

waterfront of the U .S . Coast Guard Station and on U .S . Army

property to the north . This was ascertained by interviews with

U .S . Coast Guard and U .S . Army personnel . However, no buried

ordnance or drums were found on the U .S . Coast Guard Station

property by ME or the present U .S . Coast Guard personnel at the

station . In addition, the majority of the EM survey data

resulted in continuous and consistent detections which are

interpreted to as buried utilities . The exception to this is the

northeast area of the recreation field as shown in Figure 4 .1 .

This area contains magnetic anomolies which could be the remnants

of a buried rail road system that serviced Battery Ring . It can

not be concluded with certainty that buried ordnance or drums do

not exist on this property without performing excavations .

However, it is unlikely that buried ordnance and drums exist on

the U .S . Coast Guard property . This is based on interviews with

U .S . Coast Guard personnel presently assigned to Fort Totten,

results from the existing EM survey data, drawings and past DOD

activities that took place on this property .

43

FIGURE 4.1 EM SURVEY GRID SPACING

44

NCTCALF a Woo.

x / UNEXPLAINED EM DETECTIONS

5 .0 BUNKER (BUILDING #619) PENETRATION

5 .1 Introduction

The bunker (building #619) which stands at the east corner

of the U.S . Coast Guard property at Fort Totten across from

building #615 was thought to have a sealed room . This assumption

was made due to the fact that approximately three-fourths of the

structure has usable space and the remaining one-fourth (east

corner) appears to be sealed with concrete aggregate . Concrete

aggregate was also used to construct the entire bunker .

The bunker was constructed in the early 1900's . It was used

first as a communications center and later as a storage area .

DDT was once stored in this structure, but now it is used by the

U .S . Coast Guard Station as a general equipment storage area .

5 .2 Method

A 6-inch diameter diamond tip barrel coring devise powered

by a 6 hp electric motor was used to core through the front

outside wall and interior wall of the suspected room . During the

coring, operators used supplied air breathing systems and

continuously monitored the ambient air for organic vapors,

radiation, and explosive levels . Air monitoring was performed

and supplied air was breathed in the event wall penetration

resulted in a contaminant release .

The length of the coring barrel was 36 inches at full

penetration . A 36-inch barrel was selected since the average

thickness of the bunker wall in usable spaces was 18 inches .

45

5.3 Results

The coring barrel penetrated the front outside bunker wall

to a depth of 36 inches without reaching an interior space.

Coring was again performed on the inside bunker wall which was

accessed through the interior space. During the coring of the

interior wall, a 2-inch void was encountered at 16 inches of

penetration . The coring barrel passed through the 2-inch void

and continued coring into the next wall until a depth of

36 inches was achieved . At this depth no interior space was

found to exist in the suspected room .

5 .4 Conclusion

The east end of the bunker (building #619) does not appear

to be a sealed room . This area of the bunker appears to be solid

reinforced aggregate concrete . The matrix of the aggregate in

the suspected room is identical to that of the usable rooms and

walls . This probably means that all parts of the bunker were

constructed at the same time and that a room was not later sealed

off . In addition, construction of the bunker appears to be

prefabricated . Walls were probably pre-formed in pieces and

later assembled by a crane . This would account for the 2-inch

void between the bunker interior wall and the suspected room .

Lastly, the east corner faces Long Island Sound which would be

where a potential attack would come from . It is, therefore,

suspected that the east wall of the bunker was given extra

strength as was the roof . Both the roof and the east bunker wall

"suspected room" are constructed to a 7-foot thickness of

reinforced concrete aggregate .46

6 .0 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

This section-contains a summary of sample analysis results

and a presentation of groundwater standards and soil clean up

criteria associated with the analytes measured . The analytical

results are discussed and compared to the standards and criteria

in Section 7 to determine the presence or absence of

contamination at the site .

6 .1 Analytical Results

Table 6.1 summarizes the monitoring well and other aqueous

sample data . Soil sample data are presented in Table 6 .2,

sediment sample data are presented in Table 6 .3 and Wipe sample

data is presented in Table 6 .4 . Only analyte concentrations

greater than detection limits were reported in Tables 6 .1-6 .4 .

The complete analytical results are presented in Appendix D .

6 .2 Water and Soil Standards and Criteria

To present a basis for comparison of analyte concentrations

measured to those acceptable or suggested for groundwater and

soils, National Priority Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant

Levels (MCLs) and Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs)

developed under the Safe Drinking Water Act, NY State groundwater

standards, US soil background metal levels, NJ soil cleanup

objectives and NJ surrogate or action levels of organics in soils

have been presented in Tables 6.5 and 6 .6 .

The NJ objectives are presented to place the concentrations

of metals and volatile organics detected in soil at the site into

perspective, because no New York State Standards or criteria were47

TABLE 6 .1 . AQUEOUS SAMPLES

/mm-1 Nw-2 mw-3 NW-4 Nw-5 lamp Ilk trw Ilk /1 Trw Ilk Q2332-301 2332-302 2332-303 2332-304 2332-305 2332-308 2332-310 2332-360

1loletile 0190 Ice NO NO No ND ND NO NO, No

Sao-1lolatlto Of ON leg4

"1s(2 ~be"lphth@I*t!) UEll 120 120 17d 120 120 110 IA NA

total petals

is Aranle w A" us/l 410 16 <10 <10 410 'CIO NA NAswim u N uo/L 200 230 4100 150 4100 <1OO 4A NACbra~iu~ u Cr u0/t 31 97 32 72 425 410 NA NA

Ls Lead s Pb w11. 7 30 7 330 <5 a NA NA

°° FIELD WAlME1ENTf

1111 ON u,Ito 6.6 6.4 7.5 6.9 5 .6teneuetirltr une. 430 210 a0 ' 790 210tompariture C 14 1. 13 17 14 QII 1111 IIM

IM - list "IYOd for this p8rWgttw" units uefnote: wily wal)rto earcwftrntlwr Wfttw then deteetlon limits how been reported101 " llet Afop elk " :wpls, "lurdtTrw elk " Travel "lwtIIO . not detected

waadaN0NNam̀4E+

as:p16

m:

+os'

^.

...^

._..

vvvv~:

vvw

^

ss=r~*'~~v

v

167$3~~sX~1J

C~K$~_~$$

"w'~

wv

sit

~iRRR7LiJ

iiia=ia

t

="s

'Ci`~~

~#

~~

49

49?0

x7!~

i

Wrrr

Nr

ms's

w1#t

!'i'9~?'~~4'~Y9

sssaast~f

49

TABLE 6.2 (Continued) . SOIL SAMPLES

O

f-11 l-12 sup Ilk 02 Lob Ilk 1 t2332-330 2332-331 2332-337 s-"102

u4/k'' tq/k4' u0/t ul/k''

pas

PCB-1242 40 40 go tooPO-1254 4160 4160 4160 4160PO-1221 40 40 400 -Cep

-1232 q0 400 q0 'Coono-1248 40 40 too 40M-1260 4160 4160 4160 4160!CO-1016 40 c0 q0 40

Ntretlen ltwits of sqiwous mplss or* low then soi l samples*ft wt bootsVA - Not snslpeed far this pa smetK

TABLE 6 .3 . SEDIMENT SAMPLES

Fr

total petals

SeA-1 Sod-2 Sed-3 Sed Sample Ilk Sed Trawl elk t2332-341 2332-342 2332-343 2332-356 2332-348

volatile 0190 leg 00 NO ND No* W*

Arsenic as As ug/kg 4,900 5,000 2,800 CIO*"eriuw so se uq/kg 00,000 18,000 10,000 <100&Chromium as Cr by/kg 13,000 19,000 12,000 CIO*Mercury es 019 u9/kg 270 200 1,500 < .5"Led h Pb u9/kg 210,000 225,000 270,000 CS*

Petroleuo Nydroeirbm» u,/kg 220,000 21+0,000 150,000 <1,0W

a - got analyzed for this parameter" units us/l.Note: only w+elyte concentrations greeter then detection limits be" been reportedOM " Not wessuredsap Ilk " Sample "lsnk1rw elk " travel W enk0 " Not detected

NANANAQANA

NA

TABLE 6.4 . WIPE SAMPLES

nsl.

rt-ss1

wipe"as:-su

w,. wusa-"s

"gawks suam %

Oowmthtlww fttwtlm Chit("/<>11M1 (UWl/M)

Otrsw left("hlpl

Ntatlw tidetwelve)

toeeotntlon NtsSt1w that(aVw1po1 (Us/Wipe)

twiewothtlw t+oteetiww thit(whop! (mvelp!

toemotMlon t+naetitw Mot(yhlr! (whhlpf

4,40 " w<4s " " In

4.11 .1 ~.n0.01

1.741 .290.42

0."0.010.61

9.110 .030.93

0.n0.�

4.10.20.4

0.nf."0.01

11., n »~t,~ 1~ 9.101r w 0.01r to 0.61

mean wt~et~+

NN

TABLE 6 .5 . WATER CRITERIA

ww

NATIONAL

MCLCK;IG

PRIMARYWATER

MCLYz'TIONS GROUNDWATRASTANDARDS (3) RANGES

ug/L ug/L ug/L

Arsenic 50 50 25 (10-M

Barium 1,500 - 1,000 (10-16

Chromium 120 50 50 (10-91

Lead 20 50 25 <5-330

bis(2ethylhexylphthalate) - - 4,200 110-170

Footnotes :

1 . MCLG - Maximum contaminant level goal ; proposed values taken from 50 Federal Register 46936(November 13, 1985) .

2 . MCL - Maximum contaminant level ; interim guidance levels .

3 . Water Quality Regulations, New York State Department or Conservation 11/29/84 and Environmental 8/31/78 .

TABLE 6.6 . SOIL CRITERIA

A

DATA RANGES NJug/kg Action Levels

Volatile Organics (500 1,000

Extractable Organics (300-1,700 10,000

NJ Background(192) U.S Background(3) Data Ranges NJ Cle~puplug/kg ug/kg ug/kg Levels ,

Silver NA 90 (1,000-4,500 5,000

Arsenic NA 1,100-16,700 2,700-20,000 20,000

Barium NA NA 16,000-100,000 NA

Cadmium 1,000-4,000 10-1,000 (500-1,200 3,000

Chromium 5,000-48,000 1,000-1,500,000 8,600-39,000 100,000

Mercury NA 10-4,600 70-1,200 1,000

Lead 1,000-180,000 2,000-200,000 45,000-250,000 250,000-1,000,000

Selenium 10-40,000 10-5,000 09000 4,000

Footnotes :

1 . NJ Dept. of Environmental Protection, Summary of Approaches to Soil Clean Up Levels, January 1987 .

2 . NJ Cleanup Objectives cited to put the level of soil contamination into perspective . No New YorkGuidance is available .

3 . NJ established surrogate or action level (1 ppm volatile organics in soil) .

identified . The NJ regulations listed are in no manner

applicable to the-Fort Totten, NY site . The New Jersey

Department of Environmental Protection guidance related to soil

clean-up levels-is included n Appendix G .

7 .0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7 .1 Introduction

The objective of this investigation was to provide a

preliminary investigation to determine the presence or absence of

chemical contamination which may have resulted from former DOD

activities at Fort Totten and to determine the potential for

contamination of local groundwater or surface water supplies . To

accomplish this objective 5 groundwater wells were installed, and

the following samples were collected from areas most suspect of

contamination : 5 groundwater samples, 10 soil samples, 4 wipe

samples, and 3 sediment samples .

New York State groundwater standards served as a basis for

comparison . In the absence of New York soil clean-upc t'-a'

regulations, New Jersey soil slean-up guidance levels were

compared to analyte concentrations found .

7 .2 Results

Volatile organic compounds were below detection limits for

soils and groundwater, semivolatile organic compounds were

measurable in some soil samples but well below NJ Clean-up

criteria . PCBs in all soil samples were below detection limits .

Although most total metal concentrations were below New York

State groundwater standards, chromium and lead concentrations in

MW-2 and MW-4 exceeded these . Mercury at 1200 ug/kg in (S-7) and

55

r-~

1500 ug/kg (Sed-3)~ exceeded NJ Cleanup criteria of 1000 ug/kg .

Petroleum hydrocarbons concentrations of 220,000 ug/kg,

280,000 ug/kg and 150,000 ug/kg in Sed-1, Sed-2 and Sed-3,

respectively exceeded NJ action levels . DDT, DDD, and DDE were

detected in all wipe samples collected in buildings #619 and

#624 .

7 .3 Conclusions

There is little evidence of volatile or semivolatileorganic compound contamination in groundwater, soils, orsediments .

No evidence was detected of PCB contamination in soilsnear former locations of electrical transformers .

Lead contamination in the groundwater of MW-2 and MW-4may be attributed to past DOD activities . Lead is acommon contaminant at former defense sites . However,chromium disposal has not been identified in availableliterature and may or may not be attributed to formerdefense activities . Mercury disposal onsite wasreported . Therefore, mercury contamination in soils andsediments may have resulted from past DOD activities .

Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in sedimentsexceeded NJ action levels . This contamination may beattributed to past DOD activities due to numerous oilspills at the site, that had occurred during DODoperations .

The presence of pesticide contamination inbuildings #619 and #624 is most probably due to past DODactivities . The storage of pesticides in thesebuildings had been reported in available information.

Although results of the EM survey presented in Section 4resulted in heavy interference from utility lines anddebris, it is unlikely that drums or ordnance are buriedonsite . This conclusion is based upon interviews withcoast guard personnel, interpretation of survey data andexisting drawings and available information regardingpast DOD activities onsite .

The east end of building #619 does not appear to containa sealed room .

56

7 .4 Recommendations

Since the Scope of Work for this evaluation was to"confirm or deny" the presence of environmentalcontamination, it is recommended that a Risk Assessmentat a minimum or an RI/FS at a maximum be performed sincecontamination does exist on this site . However, itshould be noted that the groundwater on this site is notused as drinking water nor does it flow towards adrinking water source . Groundwater on this sitedischarges into Long Island Sound which is actually theAtlantic Ocean . The primary threat of concern to theenvironment and human health on this site appears to bethe presence of mercury contamination in soil, marinesediments, and in the floor drainage system of building#615 .

57

8 .0 REFERENCE

Scope of Work for the Contamination Evaluation at EngineersSchool, Fort Totten, Queens New York, Project NumberC02NY00570'0, September 26, 1986 .

Law Environmental Services, Draft Report : "Defense EnvironmentalRestoration Program Inventory Report for Former Nike SiteHM-69 Homestead, Florida" . September 1985 .

Federal Drinking Water Standards of the Safe Drinking WaterAct . Vol 50 Federal Register, November 13, 1985, pg . 46936 .

Water Quality Regulations Surface Water and GroundwaterClassifications and Standards Section 703 .5, 11/30/84 and8/31/78 .

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Summary ofApproaches to Soil Cleanup Levels . January 1987 .

Code of Federal Register Sections 261 .31 & 261 .33 . July 1, 1985,pg . 266 and 374 .

McMaster, B .N ., Sosebee, J .B ., Fraser, W.G ., Govro, K .C ., Jones,C .F ., Grainger, S .A ., and Civatarese, K .A ., "HistoricalOverview of the Nike Missile System" . September 1983 .

Bruce, M .C ., Roux, R .G ., "Survey of the Former Nike Sites Locatedat North Smithfield, Foster and Coventry, Rhode Island" .June 1981 .

Barcelona, M .J . et . al ., "Practical Guide for GroundwaterSampling", Illinois State Water Survey, SWS Contract Report374, 1985, pp . 43-45 .

Freeze, R.A . and Cherry, J .A ., Groundwater , Englewood, Cliffs,N .J ., Prentice Hall, Inc . 1979 pp . 604 .

58

APPENDIX A

WELL LOGS AND FIELD DATA

59

. . .METCAS-f & -EIDY

" "GEOLOG IC LOG

aWGIKEV: " w SRI LL

Q

b

P~OTEtT: - .T" wA" SNEE T $O.r.w~ ,No,4. ' . f . F, .nary Z 33 Z Z " z Is'1cv -/ ~"A -a

L Ol~TIOA/ : COOf'Lr~N/!..

Fs ~', ,ye� - 33 '!'ewTt.4Cte*awl. . iuvJn rmr r /y), Z,r ~,p~ L Fm;r : 1~E7 O~ .w

20A-/cc kiG eOIE 75 I7r;/C.&r Z7/T: NFL ATI/t ;' : GI'~+~w~; v"/71 i' Cja'r+ "

~A~~ING ..t-17 IN Noc! ~L~"-' :t : Dz1,6s iNW F,460,~- : Tel or X-erx + lit i1~,,

" W\ C41x`

-01A. ALM&? t wr!-?ESC r. 7Tie

,'\

h

aLOsdss" ' 7e+ epor j i c II Al Trt.is:/TIL .4Tit#v ^W ti

i r~4

. s.s~Yra+.i . . . .- '

"r'' " -ir,r L AVZat3 ACC. ~ t .T~

".Jew-

S-1J'

` Z 4- /.G 8-/3 -/ rwwt/~ " t1,{~.nai.l&' Q.vfm- f Y. ,.' G

I ..t~ " Drl ~alt.,.n.s" l7 ~. sf"d, ttrw

L /"stt Lw !r

*~sr L s t ',~+ar /, e''A~...+wf.6-5-16 ~

L ("-7 3 /" 7.5 -SD -? Io..rw af/s. ~'!(r . S t~+w.~+ . r"' .r' J* Iya.. s O

-I, ....,.; r. A.w. . ...../,^f ~~-y+ ti j;:d FIJ ... .!r .G.j_

N jAor e P*&--, A . It

ef a a.6 c Ap orep,pp or'" .0-DA'Aprnlaco,rw . j, ly . A~ .0A.&A owlWA'J Row, wn s~

~ '.~ ~IO s~w..rti~ we./ 11~t M~w~rtf~ s. fI1j

kr0e: neve-,

/S-/ I. - 10-9-a- IS" I~.L 13+"..+,, ww+~f, fad f, /" Hot" . O

SS - I~..f! c~s,~/~n+dn,w~tfsl,~��r,rF~

-- 1 M 010, r" Iw ct1& S-17 13- , iwti , o $i 1-0/t,1M .1 4.., Jim se. "f of.". s0 6- - _ ~ black M"Oftq, i-- .

Ifi1-vros r Te;1 S: ci~J7tl7i.N Ne'~tS : avtiN~ No-S''STr srwrttlr7se:~

- ~. Low " res r o esa~ r , _ ' /1lLtl - --

METCAL.r d EiDYEN~fNs f ~ .

~~07Ef T: - .7 MO. .to/ic T Xir.4ive. / . : .Arm" A'O ' Z#., Z ?3 2. ~. ~ " _ MW-~

v? " ~ r, 1 SD/ .L /~OL "t 41v07.:M4 ;4

7tv "ay, 0r+.+fI . C ;1 ' v. . so..t~ w" s=T~G.r-Ar. /f, ~4v~..r! /.3 la .̀ hoArc~ ?v-st ",

N *O

I __ ..~rr~(jw"7rw

12's,171 /.7 -A-A-24 ?rIL Bio,,y~,,.rsl, ~I7+"/oOqL/l. /hlw .7 . O

G .3-2f! d r,~.r� ,~i rIL/ 4. An�d,(~Kt~I Q t ~~ p/r~ r0. ,+y ~~'fY

9 _wri lrt~, ~o'a++~stfi, ~ia+~~l~a~ p/w~f

,T Ie~~ KN~a I' yt/~pij~,f~

5.3 e.0-- fi~f~f~ p ~c .is w//"07.7

- Set: ~', T , .Vi f/.1 Rscw... . _ _ . dL -22 ' Le /.r.. 6rmf.r{ -

2S " t .: Pvc.22. &e Ow 3

7 6ex,~ " " go-of 3 37- 20

t poniI"d t .13 .,+b., ~t ~8 ' d'

i

1-~

=.pt-iws Ns" .

ME'rCAJt,.r EDDY" twCiNLC~ :

GEOLOGIC "DRILL 1..0G

~~OSECT: sas Mo. sNEE r ~r..~.~ wo.2332 t " "' f f1 /o~.iN e ~7W Z_

-LO!h 7-/DAi : Vt i - . .. Gr~I1[ /fir/

r

~Pi~ ~~wT1,4CS4~: ~/~ I/. rN.l7~c rsilr - ~yJ, it ~r r :d oil~i~ : ,0 7 1Ole. ~!f7S Lr~~~Er " ~c sm. v .^ ::"-r : . 6

IVo.&E- zr/tf : s.+ ""r-r~r r :!rr. .' .rJ,Lf+ " f~ `:// ' Gig id Il~SA -

.

Ram, eo.i /S' w/ow (,ro u�e( '44,-.,eib _c>> ,.r s/0& e e":.~~'IW4+'f : Dr1« "ws sAN/L : or ~.-seA f z~r " .;

~esi ~IlrsA) I

AA01'

~ ~r ~ ; ti1~ 7~`x ~ e.&r ~ v~ t.v-s/ritrr~sw V itk ew: i , . . a '

/y�de e 1 Iwr fa..IrONr y~ fl~r.,+~ /r

Andisfi+..~s InJh

s- eo,.,d'r. 4WW6/Ord 9APs!S -f /. 3'-S-f-I- Nlrlfr atrl F,#,; /1! d'A rpl+ .

_O

Ii .s Ar"Mj wo~tl" /o++r, t.IY .r/F1: or-ft

i.wt~/lam'Awl f&.AeJ 047'tor.

- ,cr,. .r A*fs ~...~.. 'sc 3 -7 /. eL . -9-It /r Ld6 4..&..+w~as; .wool, 'A " " s Oh

&y/ ~'.,/~x+c s s~/f Awes ..n r,.

--- .e "L .s Q.e�~/ *too$/ I6ese~l ~ (f .. s.... W/s ~ I

.ref. fv+.A~nr~G,R 4 ZS " Alm4m s p

'-

&O. er IN~J,IwoJ'" // `"sowww/s .//J Iwo'w ttI9-,,3 4aet J ow,%/, *O sg,~'-c . sa..d ~ .

a S_ AD.n Z oas.r, vos s . #"o I Sr, s" vMN.. s .AI'/r, AI?rt

e%t.~c~~ " / l6/" t~1 ~ ~/'l ~

~

Ad a swfttiaJ w>. a

- - aa. f~e~- - - ~ c~ ,r.~r .f" ~roJl ~.i- .,~. t ,o

Sworn t Tfl::S.' : "?I "s s'.~...~." ST r l"1,jr s..tl

h~7ict s.erv oo"orls aat:.v~ ~a.---k_ Apes . <r: r o -L er ii& X ~4

i

"lssive ~~ot, r /O~ !.t/es < ~o f~aass d~lw~ o=fi

!11 %&, o`

S

i

FTCA~. ~C ~~DY - _ '& E-OLOG I CEN6~NFFi5 '

i

r

~Ro7E~ r: -r Cc fr O~iC!^

~a ivo.Z 331

~.rsc r~r .~

I ra jt .wc. .nre .f ./176v- " I

. .V

J2

t 4t

SO/L koct^ k "N ;

a A, .L GL o.+, r/;Z Fj ilk

t ~~ y

Z Cj "LSL~'/97/J11/

r IN r

"~ C; . w~~t: c~ " IwqYts "fLT"

I

...n. r . . r ., r...~r*

''" ~- H~4 =o1 p~+d 1 f A /Q trJ L

-..~~rr` 0s E $-? ,7 64-10 M essns~r~r<cf, ~: us�p(~3r r,s ", sa..cl f>l.~f r~0~

' Ra.d " iw.E. o . b. .25

"Sef roe

el 2 PrtSc .~r .,It~ o/~%r t- ¢~, , .o 'G `VCt. PR.~"" 1 ~ 2/f .

Sod. 74.y " So/so oA(w ".+r )r/... #F0

sic12 -2S

p /* 'j48... l .n~1~r r .,/o-is,

/7p hbrow r

/0 Amp a

1

i

I

71-I

di "rww~ Jf " J~Ms7rf.~/1~!i s f>'s ov~c . Ywt r !'ri f O : i" 7 Ott i

srr/wi N. . ._,~

e~ .

.i

METCA&..f $ -EVDY GEOLOGIC "DRILL . , t-O G . " , . , . .

f

r=

PROJECT: _. ... E - f1 T Ayr.

~ba N~.

Z 3 3ZS~IEET

t or y~.~.wi No, -Hf -

obis s ~t/f -Pr?itl-!'~wT1 .ot toJC -, uvin err1C ."~.T. (r I / .". t Fair= (, 3 f', 7Z7~-ICt .? i6 r~1!f La-~cct~ >',~ " .," ; : 6 (, ¢ 7pvac: zr/ler .

1/ ':.+ ".:r:.tr:!~r. rte:;: :

-w4f .wroIv fsGv.. ». e~~~ "! /2. SG 6e~ /aa~ ~arvcsi+e~

~~ <~sA I

,

aw

Soli-are."s- AptwcW

fcrr1e

Ie.&rPEC.

~As

ivA DEL.fSS/T/Lr0TiIAI

nW Nk r

A.-:A:: .. .- :!s....v . . ...., .

l'LVi~-~ . . ~: :... .r6,

~""''7oOfeA /IAi. y /Jwv * 2A d Im", 7c. A"u6.y sr..t Arm6 -0 w.-ow

0, 1A IV

rse~IllI~.u ~ .O~n .r - Lt ;

4-IM

_ ~...r ....- . , /t . smc.~r do ,.,4.-.0 ~r...~ = r!ls+I~,.: 01I7iv i/atr tiwf~sr. I1s"~- l'!"t~

~~/~lr~rll ICI S0NI// .l Y :Iw+

-- ,4 A.o ~.w/L4

....R,w -y,.,.., . s. s ,te;. ..loose . 1

~f .s .T44

I1L '~-ILlty .... , ..+wr.:V, /oev ~ 1'" l4. 9P 'AIJ

ir love

zo At

~h r't j; y~I =rw+QoI

Srww~, Irf"sifl ~C OV'~ ~". ~fwl~ - 04...

54foo-ia l Tfrrl:-~~Y. r~ !'.~.A., sT r l~+s.lr1..« I

_~~ 1e orr lr~i O a Os iie ~t'

ti~r7Y saw Ivirrs : /

'111

aotiw! ~/o.

n1 10- 3 - - '

re1V

u~

'n,O.r,OpAtP-0.04SIC

I=EI

~"/+~fwrf

tiw10Na~Iyb/

a~N~I

.....N:,,�ryawYt,I

.90,4l�y""IFt̀;A;

-s/qw4d"~VAg.~29

,f.v9oa/a*47%7 ols4*1

p~.~.'o,h/èwnewore+oew

il.esI '~we9"s

7Ad,~e/si0'.,2~!Q/

oF`~.'

"/tired/Sns"'H

l~l~~"f!~'7!J,1f7ry~M~4"'71~~

ra~+r'YI'O.s

4AS

low t.Iw~y"f

e"m/lv/'i'1li~l

r.++t,rrsy~ry~++'~~`9Lt-:'Stf~s.eynN.ra.~/

-r

W-fl-L!-6fLYIIIN116t,

V'v+/rsIOVN0-","IVal-Lo-os-1615-JAI-51'a94

,oy.l/-i.ai:,-':oi.%(Q-J1'L71yJ11

770;17/Js~~~~ _V .tAJ.

.wr^#0,*w

.riww.r~J

,f!~'tON

£_i~Gt/

~1syl~M3~0-7-1-71:1.~~i~0-7o3lf~

METCALF EVDY' - - ENC~NtE~~

1

GEOLOGIC -DRILL l-OG

PX07ErT: JOa NI. S-Ve& T ~r,L~",vi No.~r..+e. E, - reflL~~ - 2 332 t wr _~- /196u-¢L OlAT/D.V : j'00;'~oiIVr7j, :

T~?it"L ~eWT2.4CT0~ ; ~R Iwfl. *VstrroJC-' B7Zlt-~tt i?~G L'ME 75 ?~t-~cttk .r/Otdr' .'r/m£ : "":i~LI?" :!~,r . I~..; ` . WA '9TI/t ~. - -'

elk . 6./ ' IS-7 fro/ C- ~.,..dC.~fSlw'6 ~t-J7 ,HSIl~c! -./ZCN"s' D?ictiw6 -0i or 7-oft 7~c ir " ,

~... .. (HsA ) j

lug?C 16 t

~' ~'TO .A.

? IALSeP.7r'owr 4 rd--" ac-asps

)) ~Jo A L 00 Ar T J h

..u .r . >. ....:',

00

v w ~?l! ~ k, si . , r

i.s ilitfir. fi h# 0"401.~ lw+w 1l f Jbrr OS, ~A. .+I~ .w'/ 'A' a.n j &l -l-s,+d Q/AC4 s4,+d f : Ow!

"!-?.l erv.s r, -+&r.-900o /croso" A ~w/s

?s- J t" -9-/2 " Q.w&M~ *We/..60 /*air ~', jr.~d . l,/� r :O

Ilaw, .+wm

L -J f //. V . O ,

Ir>r. &PdV.r( /hy ..s of sr...Q RAW, w.9 �,~- --- (/-! " 04 "r, ), S*~ s o'...// sluts ~7 : p " ~ 1;G .

c4�*l a',sc.l le ps.e+rs ,c4~ l... . ~ r"

7

0 4 /oar / a s-~ ~r-(. ro-ro.ts 6rw.w,, .~+~t~ /w +r, f. ss. " l~ ~"r~Or /~

Al,. . . o- _ R.s a fr+ .".S

/040-11.t &o�,,,,,.v/, /0069 , As,sw"Q, tip . # It,

- ,~! ~ sf~f~~ L'kt -

Pic

R#s.r t Q:~, " j ~, ~, ? " I V~' 5--0 S '/J j j0/j% OA..w .̂w "Il0 1 %! ~~, 1

*vw 6eom t t T s

_-E=!boa .- rem F O Pro,& 2-a W ^~a-

-. t

! I9// psPths H~~~a ~'i~ tar .r~I D row4s 4r ltr. .vy wroc,4mow trwc crs4pJ i6sr Ruw av P. . ... w+ .d or/,,f ,( !r i /L r 0 t d &..j A~lf ~Ot "ow 5 in r .b fL.lasMdd'~P'~'~j fe

' _ Ew~Ipit.E~s GEOLOG IC . "DRILL BOG .

~LoTECr: .Toa /vi. s~~E r ~Or,~ No.rw w fFr T e"", 233Z. Z or Z /yJ/U-

LOlI1*7OW : ~'00~'~I/N/7l~: ~rtw~wi ftl

Ienwew~f,:e~r.~ : vs i^' .

,//- = sIXrT/L,L ewrIAcrOk: R-r A *Vtfl heic ." G ~;-&7Z~-ict rO/G e0lC

/!0l0 ~ ~4."I "I ~ 7 " `l(iid d" L~ » . .

mil:/I1/6 ~C)7 MI Ne~tf ~ii.~~t.vf~~~ . Dr~~s.Ns i<o./L TiN as X-i/:t 1~~ i~ " ~ E t .J

_, . I .t/essr rNJA . '

i '.'k V- r SO /A. uoccx~ At I , '`t ` aPis'her

~,P ti ; h L /Wt. Art._ G i -2 ~s -3-~ 3

!3

f

4s 11.TI-4-

-7 /. C I- 4-lr.i0 , f

r.c

A

` is

~E?t!i7ri~.vAwD

tL~ISS/TiL~+TiIN

O -. .r 7wios/ . 50d} DR ammo--l-,~YG/a09, AM, t, ia..,.d 46,.r'+.A1

0, A

IS-d.t drwsa., n.ert, l~o "d,

/00

~Fh~r~ I~e~.n~, /i+~+rLe>.A~rl

,

!r- . s i /t " ~/a Atr~Ovs 07~r+/v t9- IS

www . &.& I-d:!

rot,,, go, f!

lz

Rao -r o. vm%

'Y" 6, 9, CR'araplovem :

a$elm,

ask

ll1

0props op. aw -C some~#.Pft-fioft

~t rr .SOWS/ f s 1

7 6-rrr+m, Alef, Aiwdt,r" sa4.rl, ?r. So P

is 7 -/& f Gp4b) , dof4, sff {lpA, /F ,1t

N.. ..R. .e . ." 0" . .i

//few s oRoof . mrqdK'

s

I S,4n0rtr TtrrISj + !a "vftlsieve NI'~CiXr. .r t'...o., IT ? mr./s.lr s-e! 1

III 1' s )kOet' !rt./ , O a 07I/L 't40se% e " p, ~t at 7' =w+ o vtd we/r

1~lrAIR

gored to 75 o., Ir.a k o Ie

Itavt/w!~ No. ~ '

Mw- IS

r1

t

.0i4p-ti~o"s~"~"y24+2_410+14'

1

M~Mo.19

1

f04//

s,t.7~~.~3.-

t-E

.v~�1'w"'yc"o!/,.",.

,.1.,..,oI.~1/~r»ff"od.~>'a~~

-r»"'w

ps"rN~p'r~Ow/+...9r.,s"+~,.g",j-.1-pi.6l"/i-o~Q'-tQS

i

'0t---- /Z-S�,�.tT:

.* axtip'/voi+r~ir/str7.%wr'sew.r't'A1!~1~i4 .jr+""a.1.0&a....w=NMl

Tl

t'/~J%iy'O77707"

~"f/Os' 7w Iavs.7s~,iv~~.~v

l

s~-2z~sz"1~~"1~"br.v'J/V.9/v/l6,.A7104C941'-~1»lOald

'~~.T

(T,.~~,.~:3NIIN3

?L~'F,S44e

a:

i

r.

`r

WATER CONTENT

LABORATORY NO. O

SAMPLE NO. VA F-I QS

DATE TESTED VU~C~r I7 ~~T_,

7-sL2n ,

ACCT. AE"R. i1 SL-t - f*_ it

ACCT. NO. L332

TESTED "Y W GHE~~ I

TEST NUMBER Pw116-S8 Mw-Z 5'7 Mu) 3 S'7 MUU y 5 HW 5-S 7TARE NUMBER 1, 1~!- I p IL w RA . WEIGHT OF WET SOIL+TARE 52 .-7 , qq4,O 67'2.S . WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL+TARE 2,7q 34 ,7a 397,2(e t g,C. WEIGHT OF WATER, Wws(A-S) (v 0 8 00 2-9 1z ; Z0. 9 00. WEIGHT OF TARE S/13 (J 1' 57193 i 30 SI yE . WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL, w,=(9-D1 Z l . 0 opco .l.szo Z99, ZO S".7F. WATER CONTENT, W= (C/E a 1001

lZY,9 'L 3 , f~) 1 4ye l 9, Lr , 821

r

TEST NUMBER

TARE NUMBER 1 1,S '.',

A. WEIGHT OF WET SOIL +TARE Z071,Z," . WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL+ TARE V/0 - (08C. WEIGHT OF WATER, w,- lA-dl 0

0. WEIG04T OF TARE

E. WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL, Ws " 1!-Dl I is 9,[F. WATER CONTENT, Ws IC/E a 1001 /&,t,

/eO7 liven ul;,-ucTEST NUMBER 3 $ 2 s07 M S S'1 ' S /~ltU I8 STARE NUMBER

A. WEIGHT OF WET SOIL+TARE

"" . WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL + TARE 16S.163 Q I ,0 S , 3S~ZZ

C. WEIGHT OF WATER, 1Afws (II- " )

0. WEIGHT OF TARE S1.66 3 1 -' I s I " y3 . 3 sb 42E. WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL, w, a is-01 77.0o Oy. `t 03t I B q. Oi WATER CONTENT, w s (CIE a 1001

TEST NUMBERTARE NUMBERA. WEIGHT OF WET SOIL+TARE

S. WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL + TARE

C. WEIGHT OF WATER, Ww"(A- ")

0. WEIGHT OF TARE ~.

E. WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL,w,at"-D1 , pF. WATER CONTENT, ws(C/E &100) 777

GRADATION

LA90RATORYN0

.016--GEOTUN

FIELDSAMPLE

NOS.UWows

;TUL,

1,1!591

DATETESTED

CURVES

ACCT .

A98R

. usc~-

FT,T~~L

ACCT.NO.'Z332

TESTED6Y

l-1tC1~LCC1"

1w0

17 "Af*19$W1Aw»

113"

,mw

too

dgoo'

too-

too'f00'

Nto"00'

tJ

!fee'

Cl

W2

=too'

foat

''

_

wL00sec'

000'1~

'ti

~,"OC

10.W

!

¢Qd

=0s0

.V

_

t0'

t?O

w.o'

fo'.o'

fo'40,00:

.o'

IDo

:aA-?

s09Of

Ôi

i.tJv

w>s,

~33

e~

~Oi

YN

J

.Ot

"~,a

s~

st

zi

`WS

t/t

1111

111HIM

1111

111

l!

lota

tj

1I~

1I

t~

~j

t°'

I°s

~I

I~"

fs�,t

A

t,

o.Coal~1

~/1^

Q

A00130A!

0!w nlsnA1133103d

swwzwOOWVJ44u

IF4ml

GRADATIONCURVES

sicsi

sDWeJtfW

LABORATORYN0.

0GC-01TCH

ACCT.ABBR-.

Vu6

FT.

7piTvi

FIELDSAMPLE

NOS.VARIOIu

ACCT.N0

.Z33Z

DATETESTED

ZV

.,~~g

TESTEDByW

"CH&C44

I

1~"

t)"a""1tlii~I

1w»

r~~

$Y

loo

too'too'

too'too'

HiNtoo,

"00'

'ce'

ti

"00

'i"00'

Nr

"o0

'i

ZQ

,r,Loo"o0',

"00'

1~;,

for.lo'

W_

III

I

rd

s°,~

=0.

w

~I

t0'i0'

'CO'

t0"o'

oot

I'.

ooto"t'

°'1'N

°ii

r~

~'Z

o"r

~3

".°t

~i

sI

ElG

fliA

V~

EtI

IH

JS

Nf

nd

E,~n~

NN~

tflNt

JIM

11

1111

1111

1111

1111

111

111

"ll1

N

Hil

l1

1111

1111

111

11111

111

1111

111

1'

."/ "

08A

'J`

II

wtW

Iiof

!s

06w

la

tog001

ONN

V!1

zj

Tf

WJ

l

! iS

AR

Y009

EK?33

l»"I)r~f

Otri~atr1rfo

rs.

"1

SIEVE ANALYSIB

O

d

s

Z

1

\y

aI

I Y

7

=1 4t 1.

LABORATORY N0. 018- _4OMC1! ACCT. AW. VXM - FT . 7a ?7ENMw t 8 Sa uz~='~ ACCT. NO. Z35 2

FIELD SAMPLE N0.

DATE TESTED %TU6 lisp) TESTED By W " clibc-c t} i

WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE }3S X22

WT. TARE 0 co .7` '

WT . TOTAL On SAMPLE '~q .30

WT. RETAINED #10 SIEVE % PLUS R10

11R . PASSING #10 SIEVE % MINUS 110

SIT PORTION PASSING x10 SIEVE (opprox. 115 wn ffmax .)

SIT. PASSING x10 SIEVE + TARE '

WT . TARE II

SIT . PASSING 110 SIEVE

WASH PORTION PASSING 1110 SIEVE

Wt. RETAINED 1200 SIEVE + TARE

SIT . TARE II

WT . RETAINED 11200 SIEVE

Wt. PASSING 1200 SIEVE

U.S.SIEVENO.

CUMULATIVEWEIGHTRETAINED

1~RETAINED

..

_. .

1 1/2"

tr

yrL

No. 4110.10

PAN 1

U.S.SIEVENO.

CUMULATIVEWEIGHT

RETAINED

% PASSING10% RETAINED

A

% TOTALSAMPLERETAINED

0

020

m

#60

$140

n00 ,~o y, 7-200WASHED

1 -200OTAL

"" %PLUS 410 MINUS 110 xA

- -BIEVE ANALYSIS

LABORATORY NO. 1 - gv OT C ACCT. ABM. uSC& T-T. TOTICAJ

FIELD SAMPLE NO. _w-2 -S? L2.r<

ACCT. NO. 2337.

DATE TESTED `~ y ?-t98- TESTED BY - W " C4HLrCCiji

i08 .91WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE

WT . TARE 11 1 p 31 -917'7 .00WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE

.r

0

z

sO

WT. RETAINED 910 SIEVE

WT . PASSING 1110 SIEVE

SPLIT PORTION PASSING 1110 SIEVE (OPProx. 116 WT niax .)

111T. PASSING 1110 SIEVE +TARE

SIT. TARE It

WT. PASSING #10 SIEVE

WASH PORTION PASSING "10 SIEVE

WT. RETAINED 11200 SIEVE + TARE

WT. TARE I1

WT. RETAINED "200 SIEVE

WT. PASSING 0200 SIEVE

U.S.SIEVENO.


%RETAINED

..

2..

1 v2..rShe.

1r

NO . 4110.10

"AN

%KUS A10

% MINUS $10

U.S. CUMULATIVE % PASSING % TOTALSIEVE WEIGHT 10% RETAINED SAMPLEN0. RETAINED RETAINED

A 0

920

"40 .

40 b.01 7.88200 t3 .s~e /?. e00

-WASHED . ., , . .'oTOTAL A-200 -- -9-% MAX 010 + % MINUS 1110 x A

&-_ * x A

=0"M 309

.ow

sz~v~ ArTAZYS=s

LABORATORY N0. y ' 1 , `c'}I ACCT . ABBR . 0sS - FT, To- 4

FIELD SAMPLE N0. tAW~ 3 S? ACCT . N0. 2332DATE TESTED V a ~9 y TESTED 6Y W " C"6CCV4 4

SIT . TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE `g 'y

TARE N I t., 81,940WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE 1

O

O1

z

s

r

s

WT. RETAINED 1110 SIEVE X PLUS 1110

Wt . PASSING 010 SIEVE !1 MINUS x10

SPLIT PORTION PASSING 010 SIEVE (@Wox. 115 pn fn""

WT. PASSING 11'10 SIEVE + TARE

SIT. TARE 1f

Wt. PASSING 010 SIEVE



WT. TARE x

Wt. RETAINED X200 SIEVE


U.S.SIEVEN0.


tiRETAINED

,.._. .1/2 . .

,-' ..wI~.

. . oNO. 10PAN

U.S . CUMULATIVE X PASSING % TOTALSIEVE WEIGHT 10% RETAINED SAMPLEN0. RETAINED RETAINED

A

.z0 1 e, l 7, y""0 13 -89 /0 " l

2Zs4 o Ib.LO y3. 3 3Z~o

s8.o l02 .5

oE°-2WTOTAL

" -% PLUS 1110 MINUS 1110 K A

8"_+ xA

L #A 300I . "m

6IEVE ANALYSIS

LABORATORY NO. d y GEOTSCH ACCT. ABOR. SE~ rr. 1D'fTZJ

FIELD SAMPLE NO. !"1t y Sy ` -~~ "ZI ACCT. NO . ~,~,~.,,

DATE TESTED "V . I `~g~ TESTED !Y W " oi6cco~

WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE 14 3 159

WT. TARE +1 5U , 69WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE ,

r

O

a

z

r

g

O

0

W

s

WT. RETAINED 910 SIEVE


SPLIT PORTION PASSING 1110 SIEVE (apProx. 116 W+ Max.)

WT. PASSING 010 SIEVE+TARE

WT. TARE R



WT . RETAINED 11200 SIEVE + TARE

WT. TARE 0

WT. RETAINED It200 SIEVE


U.S.SIEVEN0.

CUOALLATIVEWEIGHT

RETAINEDti

!RETAINED

1 1/Z""

r214->wNO. sNO. 10

PAN

" PLUS #10

ti MINUS 1110

U.S.SIEVENO.

CUMULATIVEWEIGHT

RETAINED

% PASSING10% RETAINED

A

% TOTALSAMPLERETAINED

9

o a"o ea.t 6" ~ooleo ,'7#140 .50 In .7y6200 (00. Z e0

-WASHED h~'TOTAL

" " % PLUS 910 + t MINUS "10 x A

xA

=t M 309

it. . &E3

SIEVE ANALYSI6

U.S.SIEVEN0.

CUMULATIVEWEIGHTRETAINED RETAINED

z. .

ryrarmsNO. 4 6 0

NO. 10 0.95 ~ "9PAN

" PLUS "10

X MINUS K10

U.S . CUMULATIVE 11, PASSING !I, TOTALSIEVE WEIGHT 10% RETAINED SAMPLEN0. RETAINED RETAINED

A

t 1 ~5 I ~- Z940 sno11140 "79,3-rm e*7.-200 4~WASHM-200T0OTZ-

0a % PLUS A10 +% MINUS 1110 x A

go_ _xA

01 G" GE~"i'E~CN ACCT . ABBA. "SC- ~. ~iT~ ~ULABORATORY N0.

FIELD SAMPLE NOAUJ E s'7 Zo , (sub) ACCT. NO.

DATE TESTED yy1~-~ . t18-*7 TESTED BY [~1 . CHECGH;

WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE S 3' (e

WT . TARE If I C So .yaWT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE I O

WT . RETAINED 010 SIEVE

WT . PASSING 910 SIEVE

SPLIT PORTION PASSING 1110 SIEVE (aWrox. 116 on max.)

WT . PASSING 1110 SIEVE + TAREs

WT. TARE If


WASM PORTION PASSING 1010 SIEVE _


SIT. TARE 11

`j WT. RETAINED 11200 SIEVE

Zb: WT. PASSING 11200 SIEVE

=C A 300

iEV. aw

- SIEVE ANALYFI6

WORATORY N0. _ GEOTr

14 ACCT . ABN. USCg " ` + "76T CA)

FIELD SAMPLE N0. '-'W S 62 _Zo , , ACCT. N0.

DATE TESTED `6`- #1 1181- TESTED Sr 4AJ -CM

WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE ISO 0 7

WT. TARE 9 s 1 . y3

WT. TOTAL DRY SAID 104 . (0(.*

O

W

s

WT. RETAINED #10 SIEVE % PLUS #10

WT. PASSING "10 SIEVE x MINUS #10

SPLIT PORTION PASSING 010 SIEVE (approx . 116 WT MR.)

WT. PASSING #10 SIEVE + TARE

SIT. TARE 11


WASM PORTION PASSING x10 SIEVE


WT. TARE II

51T. RETAINED #x200 SIEVE

SIT. PASSING #200 SIEVE

U.S .SIEVEN0.


1~RETAINED

1 1/2 . .

1"yr

NO. . 0 6No. 10 S,~.S 3 " SPAN

U.S . CUMULATIVE ti PASSING % TOTALSIEVE WEIGHT 109 RETAINED SAMPLEN0. RETAINED RETAINED

A

820 10, 19 9.77.

#Go 7-512. 2.4,139,11(o 331(0

4 1 . (o o 99-PAN:100WASKED-200OTAL12COD

5 - % PLUS "10 + !~ MINUS 010 x A

" n + XA

'"b1 300

/. i152

METCALF & EDDYGRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS-HYDROMETER METHOD

Project t1SCe - i,'TD Trw .fob No . 2332

Location of Project Q NS 1 Boring No. ~Sample No. `S

Description of Sots Depth of Sample 2'7 I

Tested By . UU CNfCU4-1 Date of Testing :TV T (, 9~$?

Hydrometer analysis 1~

Hydrometer no. 1S 2 G, of solids , . (goo

Dispersing agent 1V4P0g Amount _%1oWt. of soil. IN. 9Y, o

Zero cornction Meniscus oorrection L

O&

rowst

m.aingE1hpwdWw.wolf,

VW.do

AotudrHya .

AadingR,

Con.Mo.

madingO,

"1Row

CDRonly formenioewR

LAanTO*sa Y

Kroniebbsr wn

Za o Zc>

S t (do1 t 1. 0

I,~ 9q I 5c. Go ooze!2 55 SZ G la SL '7 .1 .07.511-5 1 sz '~ 0 1( 53 'zv 00233 50 1 41 M 91 1 7-11 10223.5 9? `{ SZ. 8 oi 6021

1 Mis 46 & +0201 I 31 36 . 03s, 0,S "o 1lZI 2a 25 29.4 " %I.S 40 1C3 2, 11 .'~ 7.3 ,1 z36 itA

'1 1 11 10 Z0 3.0 10056'l Is,S t.S ly~~ !o "S 13. .003

IR, JR,ow - nro corr"ion * C, % &W . IVOW, O-Rr

"11 y,*

9Z23y1y

99

ftv =0

METCALF 3 EDDYGRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS-HYDROMETER METHOD

Project USCE - r-1' t 1b 71t`1l) ,fob No. 2332.

Location of Project Q~~'Ns N~ Boring No. w sample No.

Description of Soil Depth of Sample 2Z

Tested By -W, Date o1 Testing VL"1 Y 11S!2

Hydrometer analysis

LooHydrometer no. ISZ " ' G, of solids " 2I ~"' a s

Dispersing agent N dLPO Amount ~~ Wt. of soil, W,

Zero correction Meniscus correction

w

-77.00

ata

Timed

reading

Etapwdtime.min

Amp.,4C

ActualMyd .

readingA,

Cot.Ho.

readingA,

%Finer

Con.only for

niaeusR

LUornTWO65

,~V t

KUomibba64 . mm

2 ~3 Zo #0137,s s3 Sa X1.9 ?-'1 .05z'

I yZ 4 G3.(* y3 0)42 ,0y14I~5 3-7 3y i 3 o,1 'o3s,2 31 2S 34, 32. list .0323 ZS 22 29 .te ~ X2.0 .oZ~

Zo 1~ 12 .1 zi 12 . 02412 74 to 1 %4 4-7 1 01S740 3 o 1s (a .00W

1% . A�,� . see awreexion . c, %liner a $VOW. D"KfUft

a

Y

z

flaft= 41M . 1M %,V\ "3 ISLO

METCALF & EDDY

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS-HYDROMETER METHOD

,� 1

Hydrometer no . ISZ H G. of solids " Z' `~ a 1#00

(0,9Diprsing agent Ay2I

Amount Wt. of soil, W, 13

Zero oorrection Meniscus correction

Project 11 SCS - RTi Mt .̀~1 ,Job No. Z332

Location of Project 0u&1S _ A1 "Y" Boring No. ,J -7 Sample No.

Description d Soil Depth of Sampleoz 0 .:z2

Tested By Date of Testing ~W L

Hydrometer anaysis

aTurwof

readingElapsedtime.fn

Temp .,cc

ActualI".

readingA.

CWT.Mo.

readingA.

%wW

Car.only kxmeniscus

R

LfteTable`s r

Khornbbl.6r . m+

/1 2119 0 W 037

I S-) S 3 . 5'8 t~,8 LOW-91.5 YSS S't.S 7.7 "o31 c

2 1 401 4k. 33,L So of 160?"7141 zi f 49 19 A 102:51

1 41 38 27, 1 1 914 1802.1 1$ .S 33 0 LI al 54 107 .01S

cS. t' t1. 0010~5 1 .S .S Io~~ IS .S 13.2 ~ooG-

Z (e " t. 13 1 .2 ~Ooy~W ,002

corhetjon G.1~, . 11�� . wrv % tar " 1VSW. D-^"0

2ar

a


k PO)41

Pew usCE - ?-To 3P TTIA2 ,roe No. Z33ZLxation of Projsd QVNS_ /VT- Boring No. Sample No. s

DescGiption of Soil Depth of Sample

Tested By w ` t1i4t CC %4- Date of Testing 'TV r-Hydrometer ana":

Hydrometer no. ~SZ- 17 (a, o1 solid=s 2~ ~r a

° 9~2 90Oispsrsing agent ~ Amount ~ Wt. asoil, w,

Zero Correction 3 Meniscus corncxion -

rut

Unaof

A"ng

EWPwdWN.wain

m0..10C

ActualHyd .

Aadinglk

ComMO.

tsadingl1,

%Finer

INO .corr.ony for

iA

L6w+1A~5 -

~Y t

KfmI"s" t wn

2~ $3 0 20 ' . 0I

.2S 3 1 33 3S30- Z. 2q I S1 II~Z ~oG~1P2? 2 ZVI$ Z.g, 11 .$ ~0 7

2 Z3 2o LI " Zy 1Z.y ,Zo 1'? 1f .3 21 12 ti .o'L

9 17.5 ±L& 1Sl(o l$ 13.25 00 14C9 1s 12, 12,J t(. %4jI poll(

31 I 11 ~I .a lS t3$ ,0815 to 7 7.5 11 I4 "S 10051,

9 4.q 10 1 .

I

0 60tr*

_ METCALF & EDDY

1~ Cl0)

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS-HYDROMETER METHOD

Project U-4C6- FT. Ivrmd Job No. Z 332 .

Location of Project dT49 AL W S N~Boring No. KW S Sample No. S07

Description of Soil Depth of Sample 2-0 1 VAAq%)

vLAI 19$T?Tasted By Date of 7estin

Hydrometer analysis

Hydrometer no. IS?- N G, of solids a " 1 . OO

Dispersing agent Va fy3 Amount 4( yo wt. of soil, W,

Zerq correction Meniscus correction

ate

Timest

r"ding

EI4pedtimM .ruin

Amp. .6C

IIMuWMo.

madinpA,

COT"Yd .

madingR,

%Fwwr

corr.ony forniWusA

Lfrom7"6.5 t

KI~om~bl~64 . MM

/~ ~o ~zs Lo V7 UPS- 7.1 "Z. ,013 . 81y 11 to . it 138 - .M2

i lz,s 9.S 9.2 15.5^ ly~< <0v11 .0 8 '7 "S It ,3 #0y2

2. 10 .5 10S' ?. 3 11-S' %414 .03 C3 10 -) ('S It ~S "o

1~ r4 S 10 t4~~ .0249.5 8-S 5>y' S1'S . t "01121 .s 8 s y, s 9 ,6 10 /1111 . ~. 2 .9 7 IS,2 ,00L6z 5 2 t5'3 00

/t,. P1,00 - mm oort.Gion . c, p ,1L w +dw -

glow

~"K~

ZH 1~ ~~~

10~ . 18

0

3

1i3


Project VSCE - Er ?b 7THN ,Job No . 23 32

Location of Project qV~NS. ii-Y. Boring No. NUJSSample No. S7

ZOO 'Description of Soil Depth of Sample

Tested By W I CNtCCt Date of Testing 1V!4 (v 11 87

Hydrometer analysis Cq)1 " oOHydrometer no. 'SZ 14 G, of solids " 2" (Qg -a m

' Dispersing agent r+e' PDt Amount y% Wt. of aoil, W, OY. ~.

Zero correction Meniscus correction

A oe

Timeof

reading

Elapsedwn.,min

Tamp. .cc

ActualNo.

readingA,

Coat.NO.

readingA,

%Finer

clef.way1w

nlicusA

LftmVia.6-S t

Kfrom~b1.e"4 . mm

Z I 08 0 2.0 .ot 7

.S 4(.0o s?

, .S s sy s-11G 58 log edl.o2 5S 61 Mo SL l " 1 I SozS

.~ ~r r s ~.3 y2 y,y .ot8~5 3:.S 335 S2.n VS 10,6 .o/0,

1 31 2.5 U.S 3% th l 0067123 22,0 27 11 "

158 20 . I -7 Itt LI IZ '1 ,06 -3la43 1~~~ .5 l. o IS~s 13 .7 ~o~Z

1t " A,o�w- arro a«+8001 + C' w tin~r " ItJ~M+'. o"'

3'I y1~~

2D

3

APPENDIX H

MONITORING WELL COMPLETION DIAGRAMS

60

GROUND WATER INSTALLATION PRa£cT : ~~N

yew NowE

. - wiLNO.2$ 3~ /w-Is d ~r+ .

DRILLING CONTRACTOR :- COORDINATES :/o I<rr 0 A h Q "f~_

BE ( .UN : t sle7 SUPERVISOR : ~~ "Z ~r ir k WELLSITE : WATER LEVEL DEPTMIELEVFill ISHEO (f/*t7 DRILLER : f. BvCI~fOr /'f' 6,-1-- 6e*, .q re

- DEPTH IN ELEV . INREFERENCE !00)NT & ELEVATION:. . 0'~- J rt oewpo& j~

TOP Of SURF ACE CASING : Z. Z 63 ~ 5'~

~~tlI!6 ~RRe~ TOP OF RISER CASING :

GROUND SURFACE (~ I " SGENERALIZED '~ R i r K ,¢ " 1 I

I

0

GEOLOGIC LOG R R SURFACE GAPING : TV~E : s 4It t ~

R R

R i

i R

t t

t R

R R

t R BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASINGR

t R

R

t

R R

BACKFILL : TYPE:Tyor:eov~.St - B'

i t /k'.~ l~s+ ~1sr ~N ~r+k.rs

R R tiDIA. " j

t RISER CASING : TYPE : PvCR R

R RtR R

TOP of SEAL

ANNULAR SEAL,: TYPE :f~~ rlss 6.s t liefa A~ ~/ 1

"' BOTTOM OF SEAL

" TOP OF SCREEN '

FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE :

SCREEN : DIA . : 2 " TYKE : PVL

OPENING V11DTH . O/ TYPE : d/0

;i BOTTOM OF SCREEN

METHOD DRILLED : G A" #519ftNOTTOM OF MOLE

411E'lM00 EVELOPED : MOLE DIAMETER

J COMMENTS :

TO DEVELOPED

4 Aoulj

.b 16s .1

43.5

0 (L41 .5

zz- 139-111

4?z ' 12.9-15

MrItrM i Eaoy

GROUND WATER INSTALLATION PRaECT : _ Jos No . WELL No.v w~ ~ F_ FI l Ilr .~ 'S~Z uJ

DRILLING CONTRACTOR : COORDINATES :" R n ~vleflv"rc

BEGUN : 61+11e7 SUPERVISOR, : 01 .Z,+bf I wELLSITE : WATER LEVEL DEPTM/ELEv .FINISHED C o E DRILLER : ~r, "g.t kAA, 4.'1a, " recw

DEPTH IN ELEV.INREFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION'Z - S "r S's ~Er~

y

11

TOP OF SURFACE CASING : -12 .3 b oi l,oei i ~"~

>T j" 3,~ 4 ~ TOP OF RISER CASING : 2 . O S8 .9GROUND SURFACE

GENERALIZED P =R

RR

r DIA. : do wGEOLOGIC LOG ~ R SURFACE CASING : TYPE : S

1 R

I aR R

a R

R =

a 1

Ra

Ri BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING ,7i 56 ,

R R

a aR R

aR .

"ACKFILL : TYPE: rmolf""~I r4r 4..+ A.. 6/r/0 k,v ...,

a a

` ` DIA . : P "a RISER CASING : TYPE : Pvc

R

a

R yg .9a a TOP of SEAL p

ANNULAR SEAL:IIYf"!1

TYPE :

/,*Iwlb-", ~II/7

' 40BOTTOM OF SEAL

., 4q 4 .9TOP OF :GREEN

~i -- '".' FILTER MATERIAL : TYPE:

7LIqj

- SCREEN : DIA. : Z w TYPE: Pvt

OPENING VADTM : .*I TYPE :" : sio><:r ¢-

BOTTOM OF SCREEN

METHOD DRILLEDr

BOTTOM OF SUMP

- 33 `1`y~ ~, , hlsA"

s .BOTTOM OF MOLE

MEir100 DEVELOPED : HOLE DIAMETER

' q' _~ .COMMENTS :,

TlMr- DEVELOPED

T ~t ocr rs WstroM! tow

GROUND WATER INSTALLATION UIECT ; JOB NU .7-'#7 Zr Z3ep;pL NO .P,.c,e" c ' 3,

DRILLING CONTRACTOR . COOROINATES :R pq a6rpqdL( IE(,UN &6 SUPERVISOR : 4W, Z 0 00 6 AVI SITE ; WATER LEVEL DEPTH/ELEV

F110SHE0 . DRILLER : doz. sz- 4fl"-, ec,DEPTm IN ELEV . IN

REFERENCE POINT& ELEVATION :3- r " "S'iAwlpash

TOP OF SURFACE CASING :MIS

. " . OF RISER CASING : P ~TOP1.22 . v 67. 1

«77ew+ Pat? ,,, GROUND SURFACEGENERALIZED

kt

t tGEOLOGIC LOG ~ o SURFACE CASING : TYPEt

a aa s 'a a

't 1

2' 9 Sa a BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING- t a

a aa t

fACKFILL : //J ~.J! TYPE : /~fII~~ Ti~rt I

s a _ . . .- a t

CIA . : 2a RISER CASING: TYPE : XIVC

a a

a a 4'TOP OF SEAL /,s p

ANNULAR SEAL : TYPE: Bvr~J/~. bre ~/ R./Qth 3~e

yp~ rBOTTOM OF SEAL

~g .o' 3g " 1TOPOfICREEN:f

-

~~FILTER MATERIAL: TYRE. 4/10

F/.w1r"A

SCREEN: OIA . : Z T11"E: Ave-

. OPENING MDTN: 0 / TYPE :SI&OPENING

:: _ ~~.

L

ta .c, Z8~ ~1 :~' BOTTOM OF WREEN

METHOD DRILLED :" Il. Ivv//o.d -farmG %

i;_" .; ;"

"~ " "

OF IUMPBOTTOM OF SUMPBOTTOM

27, '

`N"tI~

.BOTTOM OF~ BOTTOM OF MOLE' ~ v

ME1NOD DEVELOPED : HOLE DIAMETER

. J- "4 " , COMMENTS :

TIMC DEVELOPED

.

61ft oarvl Meual1 t E.oOy

GROUND WATER INSTALLATION r~PROJECT : JOB NO. `TWEB era .M F7 To~m 2 .972- &w -4L

DRILLING CONTRACTOR : COORDINATES :j?. R /.+ lee ir. .f #""a

SEWN . L/G107 SUPERVISOR : _07 . 2 LL SITE : WATER LEVEL DIEPTH/ELEV .

FIJoSMED 6/6 87 DRILLER : ,T. 8-chip r S. 7 ~l~o.a.> brow.' ;I

REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATIONDEPTH IN I ELEV . IN

T

GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC LOG

'

TOP of Rwod s.ir/- TOP Of RISER CASING :

ORDUNDSURFACEc

DIA. :' TYPE

t t

l

a

i

a aa a

a aaa st

aa t

a

a "ACKPILL : TYPE:a a A&. 'o" s

" aq/, 00.,*wa r,~a.all rt a . j ÒIA . :o

RISER CASING: TYPE : /rGa aa a

t aTO. OF SEAL

ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE :

BOTTOM OF SEAL

'TOP OF ICREEN

=V"" FILTER MATERIAL : TWE :: . o OAF .A-Z%s Ay + 301f`

I~M~I~"f.

SCREEN:SCREEN: DIA.: j TYPE : O

~. OPENING IIADTM : ~ T11~E :

BOTTOM OF SCREEN;z

LOTTaw of *A MAD" ." . "METHOD DRILLED :

id. BOTTOM OF HOLEI2

MEIN00 DEVELOPED : HOLE DIAMETERr

/ml COMMENTS : -IreI< ow tc~" -"ffr ootae...~

TOAi DEVELOPED : " '

4 Aottri

1-1 .1511 .92

.15

-7-15

6.15

1,15

0.15

I'p 9% OS

Meta

GROUND WATER INSTALLATION PROJECT : Joe NO .� E ft ~orl~e.. 233Z WELLNO .

Btu-6DRILLING CONTRACTOR :

RRCOORDINATES :

" 1-n it lefiafIerrs."EGUN &/f/IT SUPERVISOR : /Y1 . Z1-p LCl WELL SITE : WATER LEVEL DEPTH/ELEVFIIoSMED G1a111 DRILLER : f'._ aV~ kbr *~ " LiIw

DEPTH IN ELEV.IN

REFERENCE POINT & E LEVATION:

PJ~j TOP OF SURFACE CASING : 2 _ ^-~

~ `' I ITOP OF RISER CASING :TOP OF RISER CASING : :~C

earwv Av Oe'~ GROUND SURFACE 12S-0GENERALIZED

R r k a a iGEOLOGIC LOG 1 s SURFACE CASING : PIPE ; ! l

a at t

t a 't a

a at a

'a a: a BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING

a aa a

a a

t "ACKFILL : TYPE :a a p 1%f..q b,T.a a

DIA. : Zt 111SER CASING : TYPE : PVCa aa a

aa a ~~0it ,oTOP OF SEAL

SEAL : TYPE :k"' Qw"16.. it.~ 1q .0

~ BOTTOM OF SEAL

'12 . 0

TOP OF SCREEN

FILTER MATERIAL : TYPE :

- SCREEN : DIA . . T' Tm ; Pv

. a OPENING MDTM:, 0 1 TM .5to#

' . .t3 1~

;i BOTTOM OF SCREEN

METHOD DRILLED : '''" . " BOTTOM OF tuMPj . " , z 5.BOTTOM OF HOLE

ME1NOD DEVELOPED : MOLE DIAMETER

S01 I~/~ COMMENTS :

TIME DEVELOPED : [ `! 1

~frt l~ l~~IAetult t EOOy

APPENDIX C

WELL SURVEY DATA

61

z.332. FT. 1-0 TT Ajuse a

Dtsc Z. S. zt 19 "~9 I .S-7 r

:' `' " r S iTr r S. I I'7.-7B -7. 3L 12 .4'7.' ~u spin V. . 1 d t 13 .21 U. GI - ,32 13 .4V

. . . :; P R t _ TP z + 5.4 1-7"91 - yS2 12 .1 ~pjW.y.

1192 ~` l

. A_ I r- -S"1Z 11 . 81 t " R~t~rIMA 4 .o IS .i.o -3.o2. 14-S7

disc

~' 3 L = D~ 7T '! 4 12 .41 28 .80 "2 .2(, 116 3

.. -

<f: : .~ :'' 3. 5= = 17,73 MLLw~ TP -11 .35' 38 .5-0 -1 " a5 Z7 " IS VI-s. . . . . . :,r

: .: 7" 2-

ow4y0 -It-4 Z') . 0l

'yet t~G5-

07 Ta 21T. 0

RE.rucw . s 19 .89 s3 . l6y - VIC 33.'75', . .

. .4 r 1 TP~V B " bl "3 0-4 q 53.20. 3 V J ~0.2,L G1 .

ter t~orcW-2

1~3~ -0 .33 LI, o4

1 .~ ~S~ b .9 - .I -'' ' 1t0 . 2 -,r. 70 S9. r3 Mw-3

'AIP

`

- 7 , S u~3__13. 41. 4v D T. P. g a. 3 ,21 -1~3y 43.5"1 W"_°TC't

-3.38 ~3,yo ,+r eve' I II I I `s'. ~ I GI.S Icwo

asiq

, PPig

14~va

+41

Ash3

00

4v

03wl-

Ll

16-...

........

r(q0tL

am,a

'OWN

.4.,cp

APPENDIX D

R.AI ANALYTICAL DATA

62

Field Identification : 2333-301 Fort Totten Well 91 Matrix : WaterT,aboratory Number : 10,465-3

DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration

Silver, recoverable (mg?L) 7/30/87 6010/1 <0 .01Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87 7060/1 <0 .01Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 .0 .2Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .005Chromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 0 .031Mercury, recoverable (mg/L) 7/28/87 7470/1 (0 .0005Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 8/11/87 6010/1 0 .0072Selenium, recoverable (mg/L) 8/14/87 7740/1 (0 .01

" Field Identification : 2332-302 Fort Totten Well 62 Matrix : WaterLaboratory Number : 10,465-6


Silver, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .01Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87 7060/1 - 0.016Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 0.23Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .005

r .̂hromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 0.097arcury, recoverable (mg/L) 7/28/87 7470/1 (0 .0005

Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 8/11/87 6010/1 0.030Selenium, recoverable (mg/L) 8/14/87 7740/1 (0 .01

Field Identification : 2332-303 Fort Totten Well 63 Matrix : WaterLaboratory Number : 10,465-9


Silver, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .01''Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87 7060/1 (0 .01Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 <0 .1Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .005Chromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 0 .032

'Mercury, recoverable (mg/L) 7/28/87 7470/1 (0 .0005Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 8/11/87 6010/1 0 .0069Selenium, recoverable (mg/L) 8/14/87 7740/1 (0 .01

Field Identification : 2332-304 Fort Totten Well i4Laboratory Number : 10,465-12

DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference

Silver, recoverable (mgr/1)Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L)Barium, recoverable (mg/L)Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L)Chromium, recoverable (mg/L)Mercury, recoverable (mg/L)Lead, recoverable (mg/L)Selenium, recoverable (mg/L)

7/30/87 6010/18/12/87 7060/17/30/87 6010/17/30/87 6010/17/30/87 6010/17/28/87 7470/18/11/87 6010/18/14/87 7740/1

Field Identification : 2332-306 Fort Totten Well #6Laboratory Number : 10,465-15


Silver, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87 7060/1Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1Chromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/11ercury, recoverable (mg/L) 7/28/87 7470/1Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 8/11/87 6010/1Selenium, recoverable (mg/L) 8/14/87 7740/1

Field Identification : 2332-308 Well Samp HlkLaboratory Number : 10,465-18


Silver, recoverable (mg/L)Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L)Barium, recoverable (mg/L)Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L)Chromium, recoverable (mg/L)Mercury, recoverable (mg/L)Lead, recoverable (mg/L)Selenium, recoverable (mg/L)

Matrix : Water

Concentration

<0 .01<0 .010 .15

<0 .0050 .072

<0 .00050 .33

<0 .01

Matrix : Water

Concentration

<0 .010 .0180 .19

<0 .0050 .071

(0 .00050 .016

(0 .01

Matrix : Water

Concentration

7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .018/12/87 7060/1 (0 .017/30/87 6010/1 <0 .17/30/87 6010/1 (0 .0057/30/87 6010/1 (0 .017/28/87 7470/1 (0 .00058/11/87 6010/1 (0 .0058/14/87 7740/1 (0 .01

Field Identification : 2332-305 Fort Totten Well 85Laboratory Number : 10, "65-22

DateParameter Analyzed

Silver, recoverable (ma/L) 7/30/87Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87Cadmium, recoverable (mQ/L) 7/30/87Chromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87Mercury, recoverable (mQ/L) 7/28/87Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 8/11/87Selenium, recoverable (mQ/L) 8/1"/87

References : 1) EPA SW 846, 2nd Edition

ethod/Reference

6010/17060/16010/16010/16010/17.70/16010/177.0/1

Matrix : Water

oncentration

<0 .01<0 .01<0 .1(0 .005(0 .025(0 .0005(0 .005(0 .01

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE

Lab Number : 10429 Site : Fort Totten

WS 378 CONC . 12 (DOUBLE CONC .)

True Value Found % Recovery Method

Silver 0 .092 0 .038 41 7760

Arsenic 0 .124 0 .123 99 7060

Barium 0 .924 0 .841 91 7080

Cadmium 0 .0148 0 .012 81 7130

Chromium 0 .134 0 .131 98 7190

Mercury 0 .016 0 .017 107 7470

Lead 0 .126 0 .117 93 7420

Selenium 0 .0186 0 .0161 87 7740

Resource Analysts, Incorporated

CALIBRATION VERIFICATIO14

tLab Number : 10429 Site : Fort Totten

Units : mq/L

HETIALS

True Value Found %R Met hod

Arsenic 0 .050 0 .048 96 7060

Barium 20 .0 20 .0 100 7080

Cadmium 0 .50 0 .492 98 7130

Chromium 1 .0 0 .985 98 .5 7190

Lead 10 .0 10 .0 100 7420

Mercury 0 .0050 0 .00515 103 7470

Selenium 0 .050 0 .049 99 7740

Silver 1 .0 0 .998 99 .8 7760

1) Control Limits : Mercury and T in 80-120 ; Other Metals 90-1102) Indicate Analytical Method Used : P-ICP ; A-Flame AA ; F-Furnace AA

CALIBRATION VERIFICAT ION SOURCES

Dilution of Commercial AA Standard unless otherwise specified .


s

' QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

MERCURY

1. Blank DataResults

Blank Number _ (ua/a)

HQB 68 <0 .05

2 . AccuracyTotal

Original ConcentrationConcentration Spike Level Found %

Sample Field I .D . (uQ/Q) (uo/a) (ual0) Recovery

10429-27 2332-328 0 .207 1 .0 1 .23 102

3. Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Relative" Sample Field I .D . (ua/o) (uQ/Q) (ua/0) Ranoe

10429-27 2332-328 0 .209 0 .204 0 .207 2 .4

SILVER

, . 1 . Blank DataResults

Blank Number (uQ/Q)

MB 366 <0 .5

2 . AccuracyTotal

Original ConcentrationConcentration Spike Level Found

Sample Field I .D . Spa/a) (ua/o) (ua/a) Recovery

10429-3 2332-320 <1 7 .2 7 .0 9710429-21 2332-326 <1 6 .0 5 .8 97

r

3 . Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . (ua/o) ' . (uQ/sr) (uo/o) an e

10429-3 '2332-320 <1 <1 <1 NC10429-21 2332-326 <1 <1 <1 NC


' . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2 . Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

3 . Precision

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2 . Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-316

3 . PrecisionF

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332 326

- ARSENIC

-Results(uo/Q)

c1

OriginalConcentration Spike Level

(uc/Q) (ua/a)

19 7 .220 6 .0

Replicate 1(ua/a)

2021

Replicate 2(uQ/Q)

1819

BARIUM

Results(ua/a)

<10

TotalConcentration

Found(uc/Q) Recovery

22 .5 4922 .8 47

Average Relative(uQ/c) Range

19 10 .520 10

TotalOriginal Concentration

Concentration Spike Level Found %(ua/a) (ua/a) (use/4) Recovery

94 724 757 915 602 617 102

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Relative(ua/a) (ua/Q) (ua/a) Range

93 95 94 258 56 57 3 .5


BARIUM

r

1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2 . Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

3 . Precision

CADMIUM

Results_ (uc/Q)

<0 .5


Concentration Spike Level Found(uQ/O) (uQ/Q) (uQ/Q) Recovery

0 .72 72 71 98(0 .6 60 .2 55 90

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Averagesample Field I .D . (uc/Q) WO/0) (ug/a)

10429-3 2332-320 0 .69 0 .74 0 .7210429-21 2332-326 <0 .6 <0 .6 c0 .6

CHROMIUM

- 1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2 . Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

3 . Precision

Results(uQ/Q)

(l

RelativeRange

6 .9NC


Concentration Spike Level Found %(ua/Q) (ua/Q) (ugla) Recovery

39 725 796 10427 602 640 102

r Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . (uQ/Q) (u0/al (ua/a)

10429-3 2332-320 38 39 3910429-21 2332-326 26 27 27

RelativeRange

2 .63 .7


BARIUM

1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 367

2 . Accuracy

- Resultsm L

<0 .1


Concentration Spike Level FoundSample Field I .D . m L m L m L Recovery

10465-3 2332-301 0 .2 5 .0 4 .94 95

3 . Prec ision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Relative. Sample Field I .D . m L m L m L Range

10465-3 2332-301 0 .1 0 .2 0 .2 50

CHROMIUM

1 . Blank DataResults

Blank Number m L

MB 367 <0 .01

2 . Accuracy" Total


Sampl e Field I .D . (ma/L) m L (ma/L) Recovery

10465-3 2332-301 0 .031 5.0 5.4 107

3 . Precision

" Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . (mc/L) m L m L ap e

10465-3 2332-301 0.032 0 .029 0 .031 9 .7


a

1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 367

2 . Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10465-3 2332-301

3 . Precision

Resultsm L

<0 .1

LEAD


Concentration Spike Level Found(ma/LL m L m L

<0 .1 5 .0 4 .97

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . m L m /L m L

10465-3 2332-301 0.1 <0 .1 <0 .1

NC - not calculable due to results below detection limit .

SELENIUM

1 . blank DataResults

Blank Number ma/L)

MB 367 (0 .01

2 . Accuracy

Recovery

99

RelativeRange

NC


Concentration Spike Level Found %Sample Field I .D . ma/L) (ma/L) (,mo/L) Recovery

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 0.05 0 .0111 22

r3 . Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativefSample Field I .D. (ma/L) (ma/j!) m L Ranoe

10465-3 2332-301 M01 X0 .01 <0 .01 NC



Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 367

2 . Accuracy

SILVER

-Resultsm L

<0 .02

Totaloriginal Concentration

Concentration Spike Level FoundSample Field I .D . m L m L m L Recovery

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 0 .05 0 .053 106

. 3 . Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2Sample Field I .D . (ma/L) m L

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 <0 .01

CADMIUM


Blank Number m L

MB 367 (0 .005

2 . Accuracy

Averagem L

<0 .01

RelativeRance

NC


Concentration Spike Level Found %Sample Field I .D . (ma/L) m L m L Recovery

10465-3 2332-301 (0 .005 0 .5 0 .477 94

3 . Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2Sam2le Field I .D . (mQ/L) m L

10465-3 2332-301 (0 .005 (0 .005

Averagem L

(0 .005

NC - Not calculable due to result below detection limit.

RelativeRange

NC


.

1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2 . Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

3 . Precision

SELENIUM

Results(uc/4)

<1


Concentration Spike Level Found %Sua/cr) (ua/a) ,(uC/Q) Recovery

(l 7 .2 4 .1 57<l 6 .0 2 .6 43

' Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . (uQ/Q) (ua/2) (uQ/Q) Rance

10429-3 2332-320 c1 cl <1 NC10429-21 2332-326 <1 c1 c1 NC

NC - Not calculable due to result below detection limit .

LEAD

1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2. Accuracy

Sampl e Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

3 . Precision

Results(,ua/a )

<1


Concentration Spike Level Found %(use/a) (uQ/9) (ua/a) Recovery

40 724 684 8945 602 578 89

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . (ua/a) (ua/o) (ua/o)

10429-3 2332-320 40 40 4010429-21 2332-326 47 43 45

RelativeRance

08 .9


ARSENIC


Blank Number m L

MB 367 <0 .01

2 . AccuracyTotal


Sample Field I .D . m L m L m /L Recovery

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .1 0 .05 0 .0427 85

i3 . Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . m L m L m L Rance

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 <0 .01 <0 .01 NC

NC - Not calculable due to result below detection -limit .

MERCURY

1 . Blank Data' Results

Blank Number m L

MB 367 (0 .0005

2 . Accuracy \Total


Sample Field I .D . (ma/L} m L m L Recovery

10465-3 2332-301 (0.0005 0 .01 0 .00755 76

' 3 . Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSa_m219 Field I .D . m L m L m L Ranae

10465-3 2332-301 (0 .0005 (0 .0005 (0 .0005 NC

NC - Not calculated due to result below detection limit .


Lab Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :Matrix :

STD 50 PPB (run as a sample)C38418/3/87Soil

VOLATILE ORGANICS CONC . OF CONC . % DETECTIONSTANDARD FOUND RECOVERY LIMIT(ug/g) (ug/g) (ug/g)

CHLOROMETHANE 6 .2 * 0 .0 1 .0VINYL CHLORIDE 6 .2 * 0 .0 1 .0CHLOROETHANE 6 .2 6 .8 109 .7 0 .5BROMOMETHANE 6 .2 * 0 .0 0 .5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 6 .2 3 .7 59 .7 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 6 .2 5 .8 93 .5 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHANE 6 .2 5 .5 88 .7 0 .51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE 6 .2 5 .9 95 .2 0 .5CHLOROFORM 6 .2 5 .6 90 .3 0 .51,2-DICHLOROETHANE 6 .2 6 .0 96 .8 0 .51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 6 .2 5 .6 90 .3 0 .5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 6 .2 5 .7 91 .9 0 .5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 6 .2 6 .1 98 .4 0 .51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 6 .2 6 .1 98 .4 0 .51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE 4 .8 6 .2 129 .2 0 .5TRICHLOROETHYLENE 6 .2 6 .2 100 .0 0 .5BENZENE 6 .2 6 .1 98 .4 0 .51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE 7 .8 6 .1 78 .2 0 .51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 6 .2 6 .7 108 .1 0 .52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER 6 .2 6 .2 100 .0 0 .5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 6 .2 6 .5 104 .8 0 .5BROMOFORM 6 .2 6 .5 104 .8 0 .5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 6 .2 6 .4 103 .2 0 .51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 6 .2 6 .6 106 .5 0 .5TOLUENE 6 .2 6 .6 106 .5 0 .5CHLOROBE14ZENE 6 .2 6 .1 98 .4 0 .5ETHYLBENZENE 6 .2 5 .9 95 .2 0 .5

ACETONE 6 .2 5 .7 91 .9 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE 6 .2 5 .9 95 .2 0 .5THF 6 .2 6 .2 100 .0 2 .5MEK 6 .2 6 .6 106 .5 2 .5VINYL ACETATE 6 .2 5 .6 90 .3 1 .0MIBK 6 .2 5 .6 90 .3 2 .52-HEXANONE 6 .2 6 .0 96 .8 2 .5STYRENE 6 .2 6 .1 98 .4 0 .5XYLENES 17 .0 16 .0 94 .1 0 .5

r

* The retention times have changed and Chloromethane elutedbefore scan start delay began. Vinylchloride and Bromomethane's

. baseline detection is poor due to new column bleed .

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION

METHOD 8240Resource Analysts, Incorporated

Lab Number : WPO17C1 HALOSample Designation : - C3823Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : Water

0

VOLATILE ORGANICS TRUE colic . DETECTIONVALUE FOUND LIMIT RECOVERY(ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L)

CHLOROMETHATIE BDL BDL 10VINYL CHLORIDE BDL BDL 10CHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 5BROMOMETHANE BDL BDL 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 98 .0 65 .9 5 671,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL BDL 5CHLOROFORM 60 .4 39 .3 5 651,2-DICHLOROETHANE 90 .2 85 .0 5 941,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 73 .8 25 .4 5 34CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 92 .7 22 .8 5 24BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 84 .5 77 .7 5 921,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE 55 .1 22 .3 5 40BENZENE BDL BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL BDL 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL BDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 71 .7 89 .0 5 124BROMOFORM 97 .8 122 5 125TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 48 .0 19 .0 5 391,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 5TOLUE14E BDL BDL 5CHLOROBENZENE 79 .1 55 .6 5 70ETHYLBENZENE BDL BDL 5

ACETONE BDL BDL 25CARBOt1 DISULFIDE BDL BDL 5THF BDL BDL 25MEK BDL BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL BDL 10MIBK BDL BDL 252-HEXANONE BDL BDL 25STYRENE BDL BDL 5XYLENES BDL BDL 5

SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERY

d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENE

RECOVERYM

100106102

ACCEPTANCE LIMITS

70 - 12181 - 11774 - 121


METHOD 8240 Resource Analysts, Incorporated

Lab Number : BlankSample Designation : - C3816Date Analyzed : 8/3/874atrix : Water

VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT_(ug/L) (ug/L)

CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10VI14YL CHLORIDE BDL 10CHLOROETHANE BDL 5BROMOMETHANE BDL 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 3 51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5CHLOROFORM BDL 51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 5CARB014 TETRACHLORIDE BDL 5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5BENZENE BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 5BROMOFORM BDL 5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 5TOLUENE 1 .6 5CHLOROBENZENE BDL 5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 5

ACETONE BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 5THF BDL 25MEK BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL 10MIBK BDL 252-HEY.ANONE BDL 25STYRENE BDL 5XYLENES BDL 5



RECOVERYM9094

102

ACCEPTANCE LIMITS

76 - 11488 - 11086 - 115

BDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION

METHOD 8240 Resource Analysts, incorporated

Lab NumberSample Designation :Date Analyzed :Matrix :

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHAN EVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENE,ETHYLBENZENE

MeOH Blank 7/29C38398/3/87Solid

CONCENTRATION(ug/g)BDLBDLBDLBDL1 .4BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL1 .0BDLBDL

DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g)

11

0 .51

0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5

ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5

SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS

($)d4-DICHLOROETHANE 83 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 98 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 96 74 - 121

BDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION IncorporatedResource AnalystsMETHOD 8240 ,

Lab Number : 10,429-1Sample Designation : -- 2332-320 Fort Totten Soil #1Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : Solid

VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g) (ug/g)

CHLOROMETHANE BDL 1VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 1CHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5BROMOMETHANE BDL 1METHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5_1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5CHLOROFORM BDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5

' 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 0 .5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 0 .51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 0 .5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5BENZENE BDL 0 .51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 0 .51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL _ 0 .52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 0 .5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 0 .5BROMOFORM BDL 0 .5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5TOLUENE BDL 0 .5CHLOROBENZENE BDL 0 .5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 0 .5




RECOVERY

90111102

ACCEPTANCE LIMITSM

70 - 12181 - 11774 - 121



Laboratory Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :Matrix :

COMPOUND

ACID/BASE/NEUTRAL MATRIX SPIRE RECOVERY

10,429-22332-320 Fort Totten Soil "18/12/87Solid

1,4-DICHLOROBENZENSACENAPTHENE2,4-DINITROTOLUENEN-NITROSO-DI-N PROPYLAMINE

' PYRENEPHENOL2-CHLOROPHENOL'-CL-3-METHYLPHENOL-NITROPHENOL

PENTACHLOROPHENOL

SAMPLE CONC .CONC . SPIRE ADDED(uQ/Q) (uQ/0)

0 3 .30 3 .30 3 .20 3 .50 3 .50 6 .80 9 .50 6 .7 -0 6 .70 6 .5

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : SPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION

METHOD 3550/8270

CONC . %SPIRE FOUND RECOVERY

(ufl/Q)

0 .3 9 .0902 60 .60

2 .4 752 .3 65 .711 .8 51 .423 .1 45 .583 .4 35 .788 .4 125 .31 .7 254 .3 66


t

Lab Number :Sample Designation :'gate Analyzed :atrix :

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARB014 TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEZ-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENE,,ETHYLBENZENE

10,429-42332-321 Fort Totten Soil #28/3/87Solid

CONCENTRATION(ug/g)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL


11

0 .51

0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5

ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1I4IBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5


Wd4-DICHLOROETHANE 90 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 101 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 101 74 - 121


METHOD $240 Resource Analysts, Incorporated

ACIJIASE ;NE'JT Al. E1-RAC''?- .

111w! It ve .. . Ci 'c : :tur~ LO^tQ(t : ~ .7~

CONCENTiA?ION DETECTION L : "" :itug/ ;) fu4/ ;?

r :N-Nr.1nGS .: D I . .E .M yrLkM" N C BD_, 0 . 0~%mENOL SDL 0 .3P :s (2-CHLOROETHYL ETr=5) SOL 0 .3.-C"LOROFHENOL BDL 0 .3. .3-)IC4L0RC6EN?ENE °_DL

i . .-V :Ch:GR~E:N :C!i : BDL D .3

4{LFHENV^L BDL 0.3

OF F NE D-,2-S :TisC~~:A :. BDL C 32 .o-D :ME'!+r;~cEr'_ BDL G,3E :K:rI~ ACID 61.1 .Ls I :-CHLORE'HOXYI "_1 ;W:: EDL C' .3_ .c-')ICH;CRC=HENG: BD . III:,2,6-Ti :CHLGF05EN ;ENE SOLNA?HTMA!EN! SOL 0 .3t-CHl2RGANILI'!E BD! .3fE~ACyL~zOB:'1A :IERE BD: 0 .3s-CHLOr.0-3-"ETHYLF~°!!G' : SOL ^.3

BDL C.,8D. 0.11

: .G .S-?tICM .GRC`-HEN :- BU 0.3, .i . :-TFICH;OROFwE-NG: SOL

. L-:I'_u "'sSkAi:d'nA::RE BJL 0.1

' :-'J1 i AJAN:! INE BOl t

+ ;NA?!"~YLENE BDL r .3

!-N:TA'ANIIINE °DLACENA=r'HENE SOL 0 .3_ .6-D :N:TRC?"ENCL SOL 1c-NiT'r.OPhEN : ; BD : IDIBENZOFURAN BDL 0 .3

'.t-NNITRGTOLUENE SOL 0 .3JIETMYLPHTHALATE BDL 0.3l-CHLOROPMENYL-PHENYLETHER SDL 0 .3fLUORENE BDL 0.3

~ .c-D1Ni?ir0 . .-M :T!!YLFHENC : °_~ :N-N?1RO~ ::DIFHENY;AM :YE 111 BDL C . :i-E'GM~PHEh1L-PHENYLETMER 9D! " .3HE XACH!OR02EN;ESE °0L _ .'?:NTACH!0KFHEN :! E~LFHENANT~IENE SOL . . .ANJ'HRA'ENE P,., G .'

I:!-N-e'JTYL-'-`HA ;ATE !DL C .r.FL!I(,R3ANT1 :NE 2 CBEN-DENE ?~! .PYRENE 1 .' G . .'_.'YL2EN:YLFHT~A.AT' :D : . . .. .J-DICF.iEKN:

C, AN 7.6 AC -. NE 1 .3Crzr~EKE:15' .-ET`'fLF .EXY.iFXTFA,ATE:'I-!:-OCTYLPtITHA:ATE BDLEEyP:70RAN'HENEKN::Ìk!FLUDFANTrEhE BD : c . :3cc :̀ :0 31 PYRE NEIDEN011 . ..3- : .d .?riENE C .6 e . .'DISEY10ia .h1ANTHRACENE EJL 0 . :SE .N :DIS,r, .i)FEFYLENE

5 ;'RRGSATE SIAK-DA=JS RECOVERYA:COVE;Y A, :EFTAS ;-

!1~ ;1~:-F:-'r!tEi Icdt-?4ENC;yl?ROBEy :ENE-d5 S := 1'

,_ 9TEEFHERYL-d:C :5 33

S3L = BE :CU DETECTION LIMITFIETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW !66 . 2ND EDITION

METHOD 3550/527


e

'Lab Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :Jatrix :

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEL-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENE --ETHYLBENZENE

10,429-72332-322 Fort Totten Soil #38/3/87Solid

CONCENTRATION(uq/q)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL

'.'BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL

DETECTION LIMIT(uq/q)

11

0 .51

0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5



d4-DICHLOROETHANE 66 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 90 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 76 74 - 121


. " . : :~r Nua :a " . .- .6 :4--

. .c' : . Dt : :vs ". : .rl :

. .J : : : eiDreBse'_ '. :3 .̂ec'- : C ba5 :_ .

C ")NCENTRA7IJh DETECTION LIMITlupls' t~?%s!

i Nk09JD141ETH%V :"E ?DL 0 . :

~H :N ;: BDL C " 3

E :s I2-:HL0n0ETH! : ET~EE' BDLBDL 0 .3

. ;-DICHlORO°E!l:EtiE~ . " ?DL 0.3-?^L

--'FQYI ALCO4 .̂L :D : 0 . .

20L

(H:uk I :)°.- ..- BDL C' .3

> N-' :A-?k:'Y 2D L C " 3

S. . LS . . E(I~ C . J

"`!'jA':E BD_ 0 .3

1 D.I(ML'A EK~_ BD : c .31 . .4-TRICM: "JkH :k.:' : -D= ^ " =

{ NA'M'MUNE BU'- J'3

A-CHLORCAN ::INE EDl 0 .3

iiEYACMAROBO'ADIEN : BDL e .3

-c,LeF0-3-r.EirY :FMEN' :"

CDL 0.3

2- .I .14IYL#41AFni'PIALENE BDL D.3MEXA;MLDRDCYC;OFENTA :?!N : BDLi . . ._ . . .5-'3ICML^F0rr!tNOL BD_ 1

2-L :OP.C'NA?~T~AL BC: G " 3

:-w:TRDANIL1NE 3DL;wTmAX--

'

ED 0 .!

Er;A=MTFtL :NEA : NL 0 .-

EN : `, r" ?'-N :T~)Ay : :IVE EDL 1ACE~A~ . .',r! :~E BDL 0.3

4-??~u°cE'~~l 6D16 1

EN :r.FUiAN EDL C' .3

.; ;:'HYLfmTHALAT? BDL 0.3

4- :H( ;+kOFH'_NY:-FMENY :E'MER 9D : 0 .3

FLINRENE BDL 0 .3

IU :i~ IU : .

c RC,-_-r.'6'4YLFrENU :N-NITRCS0DI 6_9YLA" :+:E I" ;D,. C .,

A-ORC`GEHEt+°l-'~ENYIETHER E!I: r' °

7

FEBTACML'. . .4EN :'_FHENAWTME :`:E E~-AN 7.IFA ;E E BD : . . .DI -,i-'UTY;FwT~A:A'_ DL - "'FLJOFCAS'tENE Tra:~ - " .E_"ZIDDENE E O'- -rYRCN :

t � Y : :N :

iC~17A1ÌÎJ0

H% Y. F

I EN:Ci3.c!AN'Mn.ACESE^nN:{'is,h,i'FEkYLEK ED : - " -

;CRkG`v4TE STAN ::AK_ REC01'E ;'RECOVERY a(CE='ati : . _ :" :

i41

17

-1

. " -- . .'Trice' Cen�: :s roroDable oresence Delou 1 :3 ;ea cet!c ;i^r.

6D : = EEL0u DETECTIA L :~111:r1!~~G REFERENCE : EPA 56" '-4t, ND ENT :0N

PETH00 :5 :-C1182'C


r

r,

i

Lab Number :Sai:ple Designation :Date Analyzed :.atrix :

VOLATILE ORGANICS

10,429-10_ 2332-323 Fort Totten Soil #4

8/3/87Solid

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE



11

0 .51

0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5

ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MER BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBR BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5


Wd4-DICHLOROETHANE 100 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 105 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 103 74 - 121

BDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITIO14


' ACI :'13A5EINEJTAA: EX'Fk'4e_ ,~"fC~ALDS

-= ;o-r N~ccE- . I 10 . G :9-11ie Desiqr-tic, . 2332-323 Fc-t Tot-.!r Sc :l 34

:!E Eztr : : ;E~ . 7i3[~4~a:E An,ali :ed : 8!3(2?�� -I : Jri i

eiorezset cr, = ~-Y !1'. . de ;r+t : C) basiS .

CONCENTRATIDN DETEC:ION LI :C:"' COn,_s'RaTIGti D_TEC' . ;ti

ti-A :TaC' .̀ :'SI"E?MYLA~ ;r~E EDt .VV

' -:W~_is 12-CM! OROETHYL ETHEi I SOL 0. 3 ti-A'.:nL~D~ =fiENY! A"ICE ! 1 ! !DL G. :

.-CH~3RiF h_10L BD! 9 .3 s-~F'D1:0=h?f1~L-FM ;NYLETHER BGl C .3° .3-OICMLOROBENIZENE SOL 0 .3 Ifa,;;KL'~r.VE_tN2 :NE BCL C .,.4-DICHLOROSENZEN: BDL 0.3 'F?f'0LDfUPHEKU: BD_ 1'ENZYL ALCOHOL ?DL 0 .3 ilHr'A'Rl'fi BD_ ~ . ?' .-D :CHLCRJE:N:EK: 8:! 0 .3 .A~iTtt;-..Arr;= fD'. C' .?-ME "YLFhENO! IDL C' .3 '1J~"~; .T°h.-.A :AT[ °D!r r .';s " 2-CF:UR:ISG~+~GErI ~ :THE ; B% C' .3 i~,JR;tAb?4V~E BDL _ .3

SD: 0 .3 ?-EN2IDfNf ED . 21aC~_UnC?ThAh : SOL 0 .3 TlfRENE BD : D . :

o-N :7 =^SC'C'--N-FPO°Y'_A~ :' : !DL : .3 2l,7R311Cf_~H?HALATE fCl C' . :;;TP.1F:QEN: BU : G .3 _ , ., -I.~ ±+�DT'c ;+E :~I171NE BD : C .":GFFC=O',: 9J' D . ;, I1acr-~RA:ENE BDL C . :

FnEN :_ ED! C' .3 -~Y:ikE - E..D! G . .'-"!ME THYLFtt;\^! EDL 0 .3 ?._ . ~-~"-'~'~t?EzY :iFMiH ' AT- ',6 C

:Ek1 :C :C A;IC BDL BD : . .3: : 12-CiLORE!M~zY? !!E-'!'A4~ BDL 0 .3 . .211ka) :11'FlV0AANTHtNE.E- ICH:OR('-MExu: SDL 0 .3 5=t'D ~kli_utIiAN'HEN: 6D ;. C .?

! .- .C-inI,HL CRR01ENZ SOL 0 .3 tiL,'2YiE4? 'DL . .'I -:A°~'HA:EN: SD . C' .3 C . .~=YP :" : f:~! - .?

.-CH:OROANILINE °DL +LTU!~ .'.!AN'M ;A E4E eDL C .',EXAMOFO?J''ADIEN : BD. - .3 tL'_.̀~i..t . .IFfRI_Eh : Sk - .3-C~LCR-5- ;-,9E'HY_P=Ey _ SOL D.3-r:T,iYAAPhTHALENE BDDL D., ~itwV.:ATT STAKIARC : FECOV'ERY,EIA :n_OROCY ;LOPEtiTADHNE SOL C' .3 REC^V'ERY ACCE ;'ANC;?.~ .^-?= :CJ%MENC' BD: ..3 It) !1. . . .5-?RICMLOROPHENOL SOL 1 a-11.-'Mf'i1L1.-C~!(~% :NA~4?cAl°-k : SOL L.3 4:-HEM 0 1- -_-NANI :INE SOL 1 1~( : rF` EN2 NE-~5 63 33 - :1 .

rY!FhtiALAiE R'.~; 0 .3 -~T'F'!&'NYL 52 63 - Ilc.:NA_S!FYLESE M. D .3 7-A-fiOrOfAN"_ 5y :C - 12I

TRO?OLVEN: BD! 0 .3 'r .T'".~f$'A`Y;-;lt ?E 3: - 1~!:-~ :T?Oa4IlIyE ?DL 14CENAF~JHENE SOL o.3: .4-DINITROPMEV : SOL 1 ' -acx' zitno!ts orcbeclt oresenct below listed detectior !iii' .44117?0?HENIL SOL 1::If?N,OFURAI 8DL 0 .3".,4-[1INITROTOLUENE BDL 0 .3*,*arHYLP4THALATE SOL 0 .3 ?11L =$f-OY DETECTION LIMIT

!t! ORCPMENY :-PHENY:E'~ :F SOL 0 .3 *-1-~Z RffRENCE : EPA 5v '-ab . 2K EDITIOk-LUORENE SOL 0 .3 METHOD !j$U !2' j


a

Lab Number : _ -Sample Designation :-Date Analyzed :Matrix :

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,'3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER7IBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE

10,429-132332-324 Fort8/3/87Solid


Totten Soil #5


11

0 .51

0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5



Md4-DICHLOROETHANE 98 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 107 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 105 74 - 121



Fcr : :''ter, Soil :_

. ;- Af.31Y:tc : 9 3 ;a-

CONCENTRATION DETEiTICN LIMIT(UiiO~ ;Us~~i

h-N1IS05DDDImETi1TLA~: .4E ED : C . .~ ~ :N~ : eol 0 .3

'i : ; .-CHLOFOET~Y . ETHER ; !DL 0.3.-CH:~hPr.ENO ; BD ; U .3. :-DICHIOROBE`C .̀SE ?DL ~.3. .~-,''.tH_OAGZE!wZEh? 5DL 0.3

A. :OM:' : E)L : . :

E ^"6

VV "

B! . f . 3

_c' : . . A:ID :i .

0.7

~4-CMLOFOANI,'.NE 8D : C .3~;?1.aCr.:JRM:'.A : :EK: ED_G-Cel,0SC'-3-?ET rYLFr.EN" . 5D : . .3

-:XACK.0RLCY :,0FEu~ASE e4 . .3

~.:vcu :f in : .F: . .'i% aJl

C NA P i~ A . E N' ;

raCEC'aFPTeYLE.NE 2 : . . :

: TRROWL INE

'.-DIN!TROPHENOL BDL

I-NZOFURAN BD: 0 .3:.C-JiNITRQTr'L ;:Et~ BD: C .3DIETMY :P :'!?HA :ATE 8Dl 0 . :-CHLOROPHENYL-°'^lENYLETHE= BulUORENE BDL

N! T i CA%' : N ;H ~ L F H E N 0'.

,V-N!T1R0$CID1FHENY'-AM1NE ~1! DL C' .

6 )L

PWACHLI'POFHEN"-'~ENASIHFENE ED,AKIHFACEhE

%'-!UTY F~T'!A'X- DL

F'-!.! 0F A h 4EN 5ceE E N

E

F Z E E Z 1 1 NE

ATE

; 'v ;S ;NAN VL

e E%Cr*

A ~'7 4 RAC E N EE F E .: L NE

0t P'~; N

. .ENV .

Trs:e* len--:et vow!e oresence bel .-w lis:ed 0! :!C :~or

S.-I-

-z FE L OW CIE '.ECT 1ON LIM 1M; HFUENCE : EPA 5w !Lt, NJ WTICN

METHOD 355;;%~ :7 ::


t

r

Lab NumberSa .-ple DeEignation :Date Analyzed :atrix :

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,I-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE?-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE

10,429-16_ 2332-325 Fort

8/3/87Solid

CONCENTRATION(uq/g)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL

Totten Soil #6

DETECTION LIMIT(ug/A)

11

0 .51

0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5




BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT ,METHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION ' Resource Analysts, IncorporatedMETHOD 82 40

AC :? ;2A!EiNEU'RA ; E%T ; .CTAF_ :

-! :5 port Totter, S0 :1 3t

713Cii7

:/!/-;7-$0i

-1

"._ . . . :5 tnrt : :` : Cr -- :rv i :f': ~`0~!e: C1 DD: : : .

r,= :S :'.!t COQ' :er' .

CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMITNCO !u9/q1

` 4-W :TnC :J7I".ETHYLA". :SE BDL 0.1SDL r.3

:5 I : ;=LORD°'rfL F rIE : SDL 0.3-SDL

r :Cc!OEC?E ",_'Et _ BDL 0 .3

BBD .

r, `

E :F; :~ : : a! ;r ?D t

E .s i2-CFLUR :T':jXY, mE~-~'i_ G.J : : .3

1 .2 .i-TRICH :'.FC'BEN:aI !DL i .3NA :' H.:1A!EK_ BDL G.3

L-;NLROANI:IyE EDL

,2-''.TXYLhA%yThA:Et : E D'- 0 .31

;AA;hl^R:CfC:0FA; . aE SDL C' .3

-75.JONA:. .CAL :", :_ aL.! (' .t

-1'.'5(14 : :14: ED! IDDL

0.1

AC:NA=H'1YLENE SDL C .3I NIIW .,~'r1~~11 N:-DL . . Di~L J.0

3-!iIinJA~IIINE EDL 1

AC :NAFKNENE B:L 0.32 . .-DIN1TR0FHEN^L BDL 1

4411A~'PhEkk SD*- 14D:?ENZCFURAN BDL 0 .3'' . r-SIN:TRCTGL,ICNc E~ : 0 .3::'4YLFHTHALATE BDL O .J

4-CHLOirtuFdKYL-?6EN! :!7e.EF BD : 0 .3

f :QCRENE BD: 0.3

s-4:TRUNILINEd .S-)INIIRU- :-CIE''~r!FhENOI OJ_

Y-V;'Sy~'Jqr :uEarÀrTyE i, i E!'- r, . :

r:-~RCnJ~aEKY :-Pf1:1~LcrHc'.. :',' .

HE xAC~:CFOE:S:ESEFEATACHLC'RUPHEN~'_ Big!P~ENaNTHR=sE "! . . :A' RA E f,

iEA:9Iig . ."i . .l~ .

'! .

Y .jRJBEy :CV : r' LI 35 ' . . .

_-F :-eI~-EkY : J_ 43 - ; . .C : . ,

I RrY~N,.-VIG VY J.

'Tract' deroè!orobatle orese-ce below liste: de'ec ; ::f . *. *~'. ' .

BDL = BELOW DETECTIN LIMITCIE?H0 : REFEFENCE : EPA 51.' Ut . AD EDITION

METHOC 35501 ; :70

Resource Analysts, incorporated

Lab Number : 10,429-19Sample Designation : -- 2332-326 Fort Totter. Soil #7r)ate Analyzed : 8/3/87.4atrix : _ Solid

t

s

r

VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g) (ug/g)

CHLOROMETHANE BDL 1VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 1CHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5BROMOMETHANE BDL 1METHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5CHLOROFORM BDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 0 .5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 0 .51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 0 .5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5BENZENE BDL 0 .51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 0 .51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 0 .5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 0 .5BROMOFORM BDL 0 .5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5TOLUENE BDL 0 .5CHLOROBENZENE ' BDL 0 .5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 0 .5



($)d4-DICHLOROETHANE 88 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 100 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 100 74 - 121

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts IncorporatedMETHOD 8240 ,

AC ;75A :EINE,'RA! ECF.A;~A:--

o : :- .tort hur. .!r : A, : .129- .I531;:f Dtsign :'.ICn : ' or : % 16 It r, So : 1, 4.7.) . :e Ei:re:teC : 7/301:7;ate Ans :YZe: : 7!3:12"%Z%x : 5~ :1

t1Dr : : : .̀ : Cr. . o"r 1 . :t owes : :I OaS . . .CGG:t' : : :0!

CONCENTRATION DETECTj0N LIMIT(v-,/ ;l f :p/s1

rr_n(_ 3:: - ,

.EDL

:E SDLZE'N :Y . A:CCH!: . BD! C .?

SD: ~' .

ti:xA:1;;^kD!'~A~ :.r

~ :'R:'?En:'.k~ 6DL 0 . :01

A= T rALEN .' SD: C' . :L . r.

L.xa ;F ;GF~ :CY!LGF,r:'A;'.E!~ : BDL D. :_ .4 .6-7FCF5?m!kC . BDL U .3

_-CH' MNAPPOITMA:EN : BJ! C .32-N; TRDANILINE BDL

ACENA?HTSYLENE BDL D.Z: .t-JINITECTOLUENE BD . U.3:-NIT,-:0A.N%!M! IDLACEKAF~I1;ENE BD! C.31 . wD:NITFCF4EN :~ : BDL IR-4'ITR0Fi=NC' : Bal ID1 :EK:ONFAN BJ : C.3

t-C-?4EN .̀' : . ET-.. BD : C' .3% :L'CREt.E ? : 0.3

l :r ;!

4 .6- 'KI7FC- l-HYLFh:NO,

a~!FENTAC!'.:4RO ;HEk"t, E~ :PKENANTHRENE ED: . .ANT~RACER : E- _ . :

D .'-y-?UTYL'`''Â.AT: :DL . . :FLUO~0ANTh=NE.EN;ICENE ?CL _

ANT NE

N:0 2

HENZQ a n AN'iRAC!VE

;0'-.RC"WE ''ANJAFi', FECOVE ;Y

.-. .-FxE

k :TnOEV:E":- : :.-°:Fr:ENYL

!EF:rhENY ;-d:4

:CQVF` - .-

~ETd:REFERENCE : EPA , . :4, . 2ND EDIT :~.krETND 3 :~ ":; :?74

, :


Lab Number : 10,429-22Sample Designation : 2332-327 Fort Totten Soil #8Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : _ Solid

r

t'

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBRO140METHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1 , 1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENE-ETHYLBENZENE

CONCENTRATION.(ug/g)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBD"'BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL


11

0 .51

0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5

ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE DDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5


Irk) Md4-DICHLOROETHANE 88 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE (94) 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 101 74 - 121

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts, IncorporatedMETHOD 8240

ACID/SASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

oratory Number : 10,129-23 _se8cle Designation : 2332-327 Fort Totten Soil 88Date Extracted : 7/30/87Date Analyzed : 7131/87Matrix: Solid

Results eipressed on a dry (103 degrees C) basis.Moisture content : 21%

CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMITREP 1 . REP 2 (u9/9)(u9/9) (u9/9)

N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE SOL SOL 0.8PHENOL SOL SOL 0.3Sis (2-CMLOROETHYL ETHER) SOL SOL 0.32-CHIOROPNENOL SOL 1DL 0.31,3-DICHIOROBENZENE SOL SOL 0.31,4-DICHLOROBENIENE SOL BDL 0.3BENZYI ALCOHOL SOL SOL 0.31,2-DICHLOROBENZENE SOL SOL 0 .32-flETHYLPHENOL SOL SOL 0 .3Bis (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER SOL BDL 0.34-METHYLPHENOL SOL SOL 0.3HEXACHLOROETHANE SOL SOL 0.3I!-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE SOL SOL 0.311TROBENZENE SOL SOL 0.3OPHORONE SOL BDL 0.3

2-NITROPMENOL SOL BDL 0.32,l-DIMETHYLPHENOI SOL SOL 0.3BENZOIC ACID SOL BDL 1$is (2-CHLORETHOXY) METHANE SOL SOL 0.32,4-DICHLOROPMENOL 6DL SOL 0.31,2,1-TRICHLOROBENZENE SOL SOL 0.3NAPHTHALENE SOL SOL 0.3i-CHLOROANILINE SOL SOL 0.3HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE SOL BOL 0.34-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL BDL SOL 0.32-METMYLNAPHTMALENE SOL SOL 0.3MEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE SOL SOL 0 .32,1,6-TRICHLOROPMENOL SOL SOL 0.32,4,$-TRICMLOROPMENOL SOL SOL 12-CHLORONAPHTMALENE SOL SOL 0.32-NITROANILINE SOL SOL 1OIMETHYLPHTMALATE SOL SOL 0.3ACENAPMTHYLENE SOL SOL 0.32,6-DINITROTOLUENE BOL SOL 0.33-NITROANILIRE SOL ODL 1ACENAPHTHENE SOL SOL 0 .32,l-DINITROPMENOL SOL SOL 14-NITROPHENOL SOL SOL 1DISENZOFURAA SOL SOL 0.3,l-DINITROTOLUENE SOL SOL 0.3

AETHYLPHTMALATE SOL SOL 0.3c-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHER SOL SOL 0.3FLUORENE SOL SOL 0.3

CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIREP 1 REP 2 WOO)NOW (u9/9)

l-NITROANILINE SOL SOL 1l,6-DINITRO-2-METHYLPHENOL BDL BLD 1N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE (1) SOL BDL 0.31,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZOBENZENE) SOL SOL 0 .3l-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHER SOL SOL 0 .3HEXACHLOROSENZENE SOL SOL 0 .3PENTACKOROPHENOL BDL BDL 1PHENANTHRENE SOL Trace 0 .3ANTMRACENE BDL 1.0 0 .3DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE SOL SOL 0.3FLUOROANTHENE co .-6 1 .9 0.3BENZIDENE SOL SOLPYRENE 7Trece- 1 .2 0.3BUTYLBENZYLPHTKALATE SOL SOL 0 .33,3'-DICHLOROSENZIDINE SOL SOL 0 .7SENZO(e)ANTHRACENE ' BD-L . 0 .6 0 .3CHRYSENE 601

'0 .5 0 .3

Bis(2-ETHYLMEXYL)PHTMALATE O1 0.6 0 .3DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE

_SOL BDL 0 .3

BENZO(b)FLUORANTHENE ~Dl . 0.9 0.3SENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE BDL SOL 0.3BEN10(o)PYRENE

~SOL 0.5 0.3

IDENO(1,2,3-c,d)PYRENE , BDL SOL 0.3DISENZO(s,h)ANTHRACENE -BDL SOL 0.3SENZO(9,h,i)PERYLENE ,SDL BDL 0 .3

SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMI'

(=1 (t)2-FL-PHENOL 9 11 21 - 100d6-PHENOL 20 26 10 - 96

NITROBENZENE-d5 1 5 23 - 1202-FL-BIPHENYL It 1t 30 - 115TRIBROMOPHENOL 24 16 10 - 123

TERPHENYL-414 12 18 18 - 137

'Trace' denotes probable Presence below listed detection limit .

SOL s BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 146, 2ND EDITION

METHOD 3550/8270


Lab Nurber : - 10,429-25Sample Designation : _ 2332-328 Fort Totten Soil #9Date Analyzed : 8/3/874atrix : Solid

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE

f CHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZEIJE .ETHYLBENZENE



11

0 .51

0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5

ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARB014 DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBR BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5


($) Wd4-DICHLOROETHANE 92 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 105 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZE14E 103 74 - 121

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts IncorporatedMETHOD 8240 ,

ACI3qAiEINE'jTRA : EXTRACiAE__ CFAN :C CC11'CUNG1

.DOr.torr N�ctE : : 1: .4:?-io~a®o~d Dr:9rat :cr : 233:-3.? Fcr : Totter, Soil !40.'! Ett--tec : 7/30/°_7Date Analyzed : 7/3 :1°.7M :;'rl~ Solid-

7-

IF

CO"'' :NTRAT :,'N DET: .-I"y LI!7T

? :s ' :-(rll('qÎ ;n :, . :`__-yE: 3~! G .3

ec'L4-h?'iC :^C :-N-FiiO :Y!A~r .- eC,~ C .3N'.'F,? :N:ENE SD'.

-NITa:~CNf.= Bn . J .3

'~A7~ 'ALEt : EDL C .3rF"AN : .I~'E 6ul

-, :IkC"Ln~nE':iAC :EA: VL+-(r:,CF0-:-r?TFY:F':N_

Tnl :hA=r'1A,a_ BOL 0 .3aEX1,Nl.ROCYCI^FENTAJ : :~+E EDL C, .3

ODL.,4,5-Tk :CMLOkO'~E~O'_ SDL '

1-WHANILINE 2'.LD:METHY;PNIMALA'E BD: 0.3AC :%APMTMYIENE 3G: 0.3: .o-"AI'ROTCLUE% : SOL 0.3'-tiI'aOAN ;LINE IDL 1ACENAPH1r.E&E BDL 0 .3

-n :Tc(+FMEftCIL UL 1r.,' :aZ:=l'RAN BDL C .3. .4-D NI RV L".11 .-N!

BD: c .3.vL

TFC: :I : :yE

~c\av'FE_ ~ . ._ : .

RAN'=EVE `_JL . . .ca:Z'F:UO;AN'r:NE

EN 7--,i .h e!.T6RACENE

i PE :'- LEENE

VAW:A? :' ;, FFE :0V?FY~,~ k('':AT :RErOVEFY A:CEF-AN-:E : :" :

NITROBENZENE-dz e '-' : - --

"T?IBR!MOFhENOL 1 :.

:a! : eE . ;u M EC ICN LI"ITfs :TMC: FEF_REN EPA SW ?t! . 2N0 EDT'ION

'E?MCC 355~1 : :~ :


aboratory Number : _ 10,429-28Sample Designation : 2332-330 Fort Totten Soil "i1Date analyzed : 8/18/87Matrix : Solid

PCB'S CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMITREP 1 REP 2 (uQ/9)(u9/0) (uq/0)

r PCB-1242 BDL BDL 0 .08PCB-1254 BDL BDL 0 .16PCB-1221 BDL BDL 0 .08PCB-1232 BDL BDL 0 .08PCB-1248 BDL BDL 0 .08PCB-1260 BDL BDL 0 .16PCB-1016 BDL BDL 0 .08


METHODS 3540 AND 8080

t


Laboratory Number :Sample Designation :Date.Analyzed :Matrix :

PCB'S

PCB-1242PCB-1254PCB-1221PCB-1232PCB-1248

- PCB-1260PCB-1016

10,429-29- 232-331 Fort Totten Soil #12

8/01/87Solid

CONCENTRATION(uQ/Q)

BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL



DETECTION LIMIT(u9/Q)

0 .080 .160 .080 .080 .080 .160 .08


Lab Number : 10,429-31Sample Designation : - 2332-333 Ft Soil Sam Blk #1Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : Water

r

VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTIO14 LIMIT(uq/L) (ug/L)

CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 10CHLOROETHANE BDL 5BROMOMETHANE BDL 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 31 51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51 , 1-DICHLOROETHAII£ BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5CHLOROFORM BDL 51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5BENZENE BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 5BROMOFORM BDL 5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 5TOLUENE 5 5CHLOROBENZENE BDL 5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 5

ACET014E BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 5THF BDL 25MEK BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL 10MIBK BDL 252-HEXANONE BDL 25STYRENE BDL 5XYLENES BDL 5



RECOVERY

8410093

ACCEPTANCE LIMITS

76 - 11488 - 11086 - 115



ACIDIBA: :ISEcT ;A. i)7- _ : . . :~3 : . . �:: .

23 :?-3'T r : .a"tr 4 :

~01 I "N DF :

G-3F :kYY: .-X.R E: . : .:DL

:Ek~E .% :-

eEN:Y : ALLOH,'L --r ? . .-O :CHI'CA'If!N '.E ED : :C AsTHRr.:EN: B: : . .

Cry

' a-~ETHYLFHENOL BDL IC EENZ :DE'~= ED : l~' .

..-y :'6'?BCD:-N-f- ."cr:R! :+JE An : :. f_!='I,2Y : :.?? ED~_ . .7 7

. :c`F :k : !DL E --'DL

' _-" :-Pif::ÈNL E0: 1'. E : " r- ~-.~YY~1=~T~A:A' : S? ,

'I Ar.~ L --

: .c-. :C :Orti:=~tEx . !r.'=:A;'-i:A d:' : . .

TN: BD . 1:^ I :'ENC.!.:~.s7!:. .x~-'YRLt : - 3( : .-.-C;i;OACANILINS SD. 11' " :?E : '? :T!4AN?4FACENE ?Dl : :H:XAF.L0RC31'AEN : 8t': ' ` BE '.::~t . . . ._ FFFY:;K:

L~L

2-"?"rYLNAPHTHA ::R : BD! -7.`. 5'J ;i?C'iw* : "OJIlG:JAf ." : ~E C0 .

l~ExAC 0A0F.YCLC.'- :N?A~. :NE C'Jl 1T REC I;EF,

. .A . .-Tf.IChLURL'FLLN% Er.L : :-

JR :JNAFnT~§A ; BE, ID c' ~FENo.c-N :?rt ;'RNII:NE IDL 5L Y;Trt :;E=l: 11E~'~~ . :!' is

A:!%'A'h'HY_3NE. . R'?TF.r.'TCL~Jfk : BD: .r: TF-=s .̀i'r .-~:1-" :-.SqAN ::1flE !DL

A ; ;NA~~THEN°_ 8~ : !C!6Cf'EY:' ; BDl 30

c-N:TV?HENS: BDLBDL

DINI'F;'7:1 :5 :. . .- BC := :='i! ._cu- .A'-A'E !Dl :r. cD'_ _ =V-IL t~EC'I0N LI! :TC'C.". :^RC?~ENY: i~CN\' .c'~r; BDL ::t MET=[.'": RATE : (C CFR FART :3 ." . FRIDAY . ^:T('' . . . . . " .-FL%R:NE :DL .; : 'ETH; 6: ;


r'

Lab NurberSample Designation :ate Analyzed :

Aatrix :

VOLATILE ORGAIIICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHFIIIEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1 , 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1 ,1-DICHLOROETHAP:E1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZE14EETHYLBENZENE

DETECTION LIMIT(ug/L)

101055555555555555555

55555

5

ACETONE BDL 2 5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 5THF BDL 25MEK BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL 10MIBK BDL 252-HEXANONE BDL 25STYRENE BDL 5XYLENES BDL 5


d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBE14ZENE

CONCENTRATIO14(ug/L)BDLBDLBDLBDL

12BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL

6BDLBDL

RECOVERYM

8610094

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846,

METHOD 8240

I

10,429-34`- 2332-335 Ft Soil Trav Blk #1

8/3/87- Water

2ND EDITION

ACCEPTANCE LIMITS

76 - 11488 - 11086 - 115


MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY

Laboratory Nur:ber : 10, 4_29-34Sample Designation. : 2332-335 Ft Soil Trv B1k #1Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : Solid

COMPOUND

REPLICATE 1ug/g IN ug/g ug/g %REC-SAMPLE SPIRE FOUND OVERY

1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 0 54 62 115TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0 67 70 104BENZENE 0 52 57 110TOLUENE 6 54 61 102CHLOROBENZENE 0 58 65 112

METHOD REFERE14CE : EPA SW 846, 214D EDITIO14 METHOD 8240


A.NE: . "7RA- -xTEA"a=--

P. ;K

CNC :N'RA' :C'ti DE'ECTIJN

iDl C' .2 .-N.TF"I ?D .

Y .

,- -CNL,~fi00 :',~~ :r- BD! C .3 :Cr'IF~EAr:W : ( : .ti-N : Tn 2 :! . . .

ESC . 3D! v .3 c EiC, ,'FF :k': . '-MEkER B :-. .3 " DICr:OE^? :+~:Er: :D : . .3 I'EXAC~L 106EN :t_NE KIL

BDL ^ .3 °E N!ACt~ OK:°MEtiC' . E.? :

:y :'': A!CGHO'. 6C! 0 . 3 %~ENA!:'. ~cc.yE :7L.: . . i1 :0% OE E BD! - .3 ANL EN: B^ : C .3

EN'4! BDL . .= : :-'~-:UTY!%N : .-.A :A' . ?, .- . .'

n!.`' NI : % :u! ' : :S : AN :A*,*A y6- .a' : . . . . "

.NA=-''T~A_ . .:-nt- . .,_ . .' :~.

. :?E~ :cFUiaS V! . .3UEK: 9DC ~.3

ID! : .3 :7 : - 1E:% DE-!.TION LI~:ED! F;FE%EN : . . .'A 5W :6- . :k'.' E:IT"N

BDL



PCB'

PCB-1242PCB-1254PCB-1221PCB-1232PCB-1248PCB-1260PCB-1016

i

B-Pled.Blank

- 8/13/87Solid

CONCENTRATION(uQ/0)

BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL



r

DETECTION LIMIT(uW/Q)

0.080 .160 .080 .080 .080 .160 .08


SOIL MATRIX SPIRE

Date : 8/13/87 Sample Number : S-P102(10,429-28 PCB Solid)

PCB SMO CONC . SPIRE SAMPLE CONC .SAMPLE NO . ADDED (uQ/Q) RESULTS MS . REC.

(u4/fl) (uQ/a)

PCB 1254 1 .3 .47 .60 48


RESOURCE ANALYSTS, INC .-LABORATORY CONTROL SPIRE

LAB NUMBER 10429 DATE 8/12/87 SAMPLE DESIGNATION WP780

COMPOUND TRUE VALUE ACCEPTANCE ACTUALGUIDELINES RECOVERY

Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) ether

"

55 12 .0 - 84 .8 40

Bis (2-Chlororthyl) ether 20 4 .3 - 29 .1 9

.33is (2-chloroethoxy) methane 35 8 .4 - 41 .6 50

4-chlorophenyi-phenylether 40 5 .2 - 64 .4 23

4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 75 3 .3 - 129 48


SOIL-MATRIX SPIKE - - .-

DATE SAMPLE NUMBER - / O o~ ( 10, y a of -a$~PCs 5~(- t v

pCa SMOSAMPLE N0 .

CONC. SPIKEADDED (ug/ q)

SAMPLERESULTu

CONC .ITS . . REC.

-4q U6 Ì1I


RESOURCE ANALYSTS, INC .LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE

LAB NUMBER S~(O3 DATE SAMPLE DESIGNATION l D ~I~~J -~`~Cr3 Scat I D

COMPOUND TRUE VALUE ACCEPTANCE ACTUALGUIDELINES RECOVERY

coL1~~ la5y . . . I$ / . .off- .a'~. ..l~

r


._i-brary used : SY : ACIDS -lata file name : SY : %)L731H1

,section time : 31-JUL-87 0_8 :52 :58Iments :ACID/SURR 50 STD. A '(.I t7S

Dilution factor : 1 .00

, ibrary entries as follows :Cp~~NJinJG

Standards :1S 1#4-DICHLORODENZENE-D42S NAPHTHALENE-DS3S ACENAPHTHENE-D10 V -3 1 - S--7-4S PHENANTHRENE D105S CHRYSENE D12

Targets :1T PHENOL2T 2-CHLOROPHENOL3T 2-METHYLPHENOL4T 4-METHYLPHENOL5T 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL6T 2-NITROPHENOL7T BENZOIC ACID8T 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL9T 4-CHLORD-3-METHYLPHENOL

10T 2 .4.6-TR I CHLOROPHENOL11T 2 .4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL12T 2.4-DINITROPHENOL.3T 4-NITROPHENOL14T 4.6-DINITRO-2-METHYLPHENOL15T PENTACHLOROPHENOL

No . Time Scan Tmass/Smass Tarea/Sarea Ref Fit Conc Units

1S 8.10 285 STD 1 .00 40.0 UG/L2S 11 .10 534 STD 0.76 40.0 UG/L3S 15.58 906 STD 1 .00 40.0 UG/L4S 19.35 1219 STD 0.85 40.0 UG/L5S 26.32 1796 STD 0.74 40.0 UG/L1T 7.55 240 94. / 152. 42652. / 18539. 1 0.93 50.9 UG/L2T 7.72 254 128 . / 152 . 31483. / 18539. 1 0.96 48.4 UG/L3T 8.62 345 108. / 152. 28389. / 18539. 1 1.00 47.4 UG/L4T 9.18 375 107 . / 132 . 36655. / 18539. 1 1.00 48.2 UG/L

1 5T 10.42 478 107. / 136 . 28926. / 70413. 2 1.00 31 .1 UG/L6T 10.23 463 139. / 136. 11342 . / 70413. 2 1.00 38.9 UG /L7T 11 .05 530 122. / 136 . 11588. / 70413. 2 0.94 43.4 UG/L8T 10.82 511 63. / 136 . 13623 . / 70413. 2 0.67 48.2 UG/L9T 12.67 664 107. / 136 . 20061 . / 70413. 2 1 .00 37.2 UG/L10T 13.70 750 198 . / 164 . 10099. / 28946. 3 1.00 43 .2 UG/L11T 13.82 759 198. / 164 . 10263 . / 28946. 3 0.93 44.9 UG/L12T 15 .90 933 184 . / 164 . 559 . / 28946. 3 0.77 6 .8 UG/L13T 16 .10 899 65 . / 164 . 3341 . / 28946. 3 0.00 18.0 UG /L44T 17.28 1047 198 . / 188 . 1861 . / 41381 . 4 0.63 20.0 UG /LIT 19.10 1198 266 . / 188. 3533. / 41381 . 4 0.77 26.8 UG/L


39T 25.05 1692 149. / -240 . 26836. / 52368 . 5 0 .96 34 .6 UG/L . .40T 26.30 1795 228. / 240 . 31931 . / 52368. 5 0.96 33.0 UG/L41T 26.40 1804 228. / 240. 72047. / 52368. 5 0.93 53.0 UG/L?T 26.60 1821 149. / 240 . 43427. / 32368. 5 0.96 44.5 UG/L

,3T 28 .18 2068 149 . / 264. 47261 . / 20734 . 6 0.85 31 .0 UG/L44T 29. 03 2068 252 . / 264. 66526. / 20734 . 6 0.00 107.6 UG/L45T 29.25 2068 252. / 264. 66526. / 20734. 6 1 .00 100.4 UG/L46T 30.02 2068 232.-1_ 264. 21749. / 20734. 6 0.00 36.3 UG/L47T 34.35 2068 276 . / 264. 8305. / 20734. 6 0.00 26.5 UG/L48T 34 .48 2068 278. / 264. 4732. / 20734. 6 0.00 16.0 UG/L49T 35.47 2068 276. / 264. 6350. / 20734. 6 0.28 28.1 UG/LSOT 26.28 1745 252. / 240. 3446. / 52368. 5 0.00 17.2 UG/L51T 23.00 1472 184. / 188. 104. / 96320. 4 0.00 1 . 1 UG /L

'GOq.t%/g47. .

Co-v -n Piv j or G~titQ+~-f~.oJ

b- 3- a--


MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY

Laboratory Number : 10,429-1Sample Designation : 2332-320 Fort Totten Soil #1Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : Soil

COMPOUND

1,1-DICHLOROETHENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENETOLUENECHLOROBE14ZENE

ug/g IN ug/gSAMPLE SPIKE

0 70 80 70 70 7

REPLICATE 1ug/g %REC-FOUND OVERY

8 12310 1198 1228 1219 131

REPLICATE 2ug/g % REC-FOUIJD OVERY

8 11210 1158 1158 1249 124

RELATIVRANGE

93525

METHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION METHOD 8240


AC1~18ASE/NEUTRAL EXTRA~!A!' : OE~-ANIC

;r_ ;orr Nur: :,e^ : 10.G2~-2;3 .D :e Desivnr ior. : 2332-3 :0 Fort Totten Soil 1 :

Cue!! Ar:b :YZed : °l~~C)

~ : . . :s : :+G1 :~-r

. . . . .:'.'. . iYDre : :t : on a .'Y i'.Z deirees CI h.515 .

'i : :SI'~ff 16Cnten: : := .i+

CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT C :NTZA? : .n :E-?;- ;-r;1j9" ;'~ !1!3/9) ~u;/y`

-n1T,'-� SO)InET!;YlAM1yE BDL 0 .1 E-NITRGANI;1NE BD,F=:FC! 3! ) .3 i . .-UINITF : .-n.?~Y:PH:NUL ?U'.Y :s !i-CH.0RC'ETHY. ETHEi! SOL 0 .3 !11 ?9!2-CK0RRCF01ER :- : BD! 0 .3 t-EFOMuFNW L-P~EKILETHER dU : . . .: .3-DI:P.L0RC°,ESZEN : BD : 0 .3 XEXACH'-0iHENIZENE 2G . . .,

:CHLORC!E:-°:~E BD! : .~ FENTA'H:Cpo%'n:hl' : 8. :A!CCH ."I ZDL C' . : fk:kAY'FF~N_° F:! _ . :

CH,0KCEh:Eh: BD : 0 .3 WXAACEN=

.-"E'dv:fHEtiO : BDL U .3 :-N-!LIT YLFN'rA,AT : ?J :c :s ~ :-C4F,L,1 FF. YI c1 H , BDl 10 .3 FLU ;:At"HENE RU : . .3d-ME'MYLFHENG! BD: 0 .3 SENMENE EDL 2H;iAC-:C,n;:TONE BDL 0.3 FFYF,1 :NT6'SC,I-N-?k:=(LA SDL 0 .3 °-J'Y';BENZYL;M' ALATE _)L ~.'til-R,~E :n1EN: BD : C.? 3 .3CH!)kOB:NZ7D!NE BD : . . .'50P~ORCNE 3DL C . : ?EN;CItiA%7i1.RACEIIE BD : C . .'

t,'ITFC:HEN0L SDL 0 .3 CHR,SENE Bt- ~ - .2,l-DIMETHY ;PHENO: SOL 0 .3 L :3!2-ETHYLHEXY :'FMTHALATE 0 .7 . . :BENZ :C ACID BDL I DI-N-OCTYLPH?HALATE BDL : .3Bis (2-CHLORETHOXYi METHANE SOL 0 .3 BENZO(b1FLUORANTHENE 1% C.!2 .C-DICKOPOPMENOL SOL 0.3 9EhZ0(k)FLU0FANTMENE B:! C.31 .2,4-TRICHLOR09ENZENE SOL 0 .3 BENZU(aiPYRENE BDL 0.3NAPHTHALENE SOL 0 .3 IDEN0l1 .2 .3-CA )PYRENE BDL 0.3c-CHLOROANILINE BDL 0 .3 DISENZ0(e.h)AN1hRACENE BD! C.3MEXACHLORUB,'TA,'IENE SOL 0 .3 BENZ0(q .r. .i)FERYLEN: BD: 10 .3c-CHLCk0-3-METFY;FHEN^! SOL 0 .3_-r:TyYItiAP~?HA:Eh: BD : 0 .3 SUFROCATE S1Ak :~ARGS RECOVER'c_xACHLOROCYCLOP;NTAC:a: SOL C' .3 RECCVEFY ACCEFTAN ; : ~ . .

i .6 .5-TUCHL0A0FHENOL !DL 1 ?-'L-;HENCLi-CM;^c, :NA-HTnA!ENE BDL 0 .3 d:-P+ :NO; :3 1C - 9~_-S7TF'AN'L1NE. 3DL 1 N7TR^~EV :ENE-C : 1-. 35 - . .+:.'." : ;MY! Pi;1r+A ATE BDL 0 .3 .-F : "PMEA?! 2c 0 - . . .A:?NA ;H:4YLESE BDL l .3 Tt?2~0 .".r,-.ucy,: 3~ : . .

- . .-u?K :?f070-CE'E SOL 0 .3 . .r.%H :NY. : :e 61.-N'7ROANa1NE ILL 1ACENAP=?MENE 8% D . :?,4-DIN:TROPHENOL SOLi-hl!k:'?HENO. SOL 1MENZOFURAN BDL 0 .3^ .G-DIA:TF':1G!UEkE BD: 0 .3-1 :ETMY.PHTHA!ATE BDL 0 .3 E~.! - Hlcu CETEC'I00N LIM!T.-CHLCR0FHENYL-FHW::THEF BDL J .3 flE!HOU REFERENCE . E;A SW 2ND Er.1T?L'kFLUCRENE E.l 0.3 4ETHOD ;550 :?:? ;'


ield Identification : 2332-341 FT Sediment #1 Matrix : Solid-boratory Number : 10,430-2

Date.arameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration

ilver, recoverable (uq/p)-- 7/29/87 6010/1 <1rsenic, recoverable (ug/g) 8/12/87 7060/1 4 .9Barium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <10âdmium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <0 .5hromium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 13

mercury, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 7471/1 0 .27Lead, recoverable (u9/9) 7/29/87 6010/1 210lelenium, recoverable (ug/g) 8/14/87 7740/1 <1

r"ield Identification : 2332-342 FT Sediment "2 Matrix : Solid,aboratory Number : 10,`30-5

Datelarameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration

Silver, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <1irsenic, recoverable (ug/g) 8/12/87 7060/1 5.03arium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 18Cadmium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1- <0 .5,Chromium, recoverable.(uq/p) 7/29/87 6010/1 19

"ercury, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 7.71/1 0 .20:ad, recoverable (ug/g) 7/19/87 6010/1 225

Selenium, recoverable (uq/Q) 8/14/87 7740/1 <1

Field Identification : 2332-343 FT Sediment #3 Matrix : Soliduaboratory Number : 10,- "30-8

\ DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration

Silver, recoverable (up/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <1Arsenic, recoverable (ug/g) 8/12/87 7060/1 2 .8Barium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <10Cadmium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <0 .5Chromium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 12-Mercury, recoverable (ug/Q) 7/29/87 7.71/1 0 .15Lead, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 270Selenium, recoverable (ug/g) 8/14/87 77 .0/1 <1


Field Identification : 2332-344 FT Sediment 64 Matrix : SolidLaboratory Number : 10,430-11

Date,rameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration

Silver, recoverable (uQ/0) 7/29/87 6010/1 <2Arsenic, recoverable (uq/Q) 8/12/87 7060/1 4 .6Barium, recoverable (u0/Q) 7/29/87 6010/1 27Cadmium, recoverable (ug/Q) 7/29/87 6010/1 <0 .6Chromium, recoverable (uq/9) 7/29/87 6010/1 14Mercury, recoverable (uQ/Q) 7/29/87 7471/1 0 .28Lead, recoverable WOO 7/29/87 6010/1 190Selenium, recoverable WOO 8/14/87 7740/1 <1

Field Identification : 2332-346 FT Sod Samp Blk Matrix : WaterLaboratory Number : 10,430-13


Silver, recoverable (mg/L) 7/29/87 6010/1 <0 .01Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87 7060/1 <0 .01

. Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/29/87 6010/1 <0 .1Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/29/87 6010/1 (0 .005Chromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/29/87 6010/1_ (0 .01Mercury, recoverable .(mg/L) 7/29/87 7470/1 (0 .0005Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 7/29/87 7421/1 (0 .005elenium, recoverable (mg/L) 8/14/87 7740/1 (0 .01

References : 1) EPA SW 846, 2nd Edition


CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Number : 10430 - Site : Fort TottenUnits : mg/L

METALS :

r

True Value Found %R Method

Arsenic 0 .050 0 .048 96 7060

Barium 20 .0 20 .0 100 7080

Cadmium 0 .50 0 .492 98 7130

Chromium 1 .0 0 .985 98 .5 7190

Lead 10 .0 10 .0 100 7420

Mercury 0 .0050 0 .00515 103 7470

Selenium 0 .050 0 .009 99 77 .0

Silver 1 .0 0 .998 99 .8 7760

1) Control Limits : Mercury and Tin 80-120 ; Other Metals 90-1102) Indicate Analytical Method Used : P-ICP ; A-Flame AA ; F-Furnace AA

CALIBRATION VERIFICATION SOURCES

Dilution of Commercial Ah Standard unless otherwise specified .


QUALITY ASSURANCE/~~UAL17

- - MERCURY

1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

`HgB 68

2 . Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10430-8 2332-343

3. Precision

Results- (ua/a)

c0 .05


(uo/a) WO/0)

0.15 0 .99

f Replicate 1 Replicate 2Sample Field I .D . (ua/a) WO/0)

10430-8 2332-343 0 .14 0 .16

SILVER

. . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2 . Accuracy

Sam

1 10429-310429-21

3 . Prec

Sam

10429-310429-21

Field I .D .

2332-3202332-316

ision

Field I .D .

2332-3202332-326

Results,duo/a)

<0 .5

TotalConcentration

FoundWO/0)

1 .18

AverageWO/0)

0.15


Concentration Spike Level Found(ua/a) (ua/a) (ua/a)

<1 7.2 7 .0ti 6.0 5 .8

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average(ua/a) (ua/c) (ua/a)

<1 <1 c1<1 <l c1

kRecovery

104

kRelative

Rance

13

Recovery

9797

RelativeRange

NCNC


1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2 . Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

3 . Precision

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2 . Accuracy

Sampl e Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

3 . Precision

Sample Field I.D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332 326

ARSENIC

Results(ua/a)


Concentration Spike Level Found(ua/o) WO/0) (ua/o)

19 7 .2 22 .520 6 .0 22 .8

Recovery

4947

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Relative(ua/a) (ua/a) (ua/a) Rance

20 18 19 10 .521 19 20 10

BARIUM

Results(ua/a)

c10


Concentration Spike Level Found(ua/a) (ua/a) (uala) Recovery

94 724 757 915 602 617 102

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Relative(ua/a) (ua/a) (ua/a) an e

93 95 94 258 56 57 3.5


Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2. Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

3 . Precision

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

1. Blank Data

Blank NumberI

MB 366

Z. Accuracy

Sam Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

3. Precision

Sam Yield I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

CADMIUM

Results_ (ua/a)

<0 .5

Originalconcentration Spike Level

(use/o) (ua/a)

0 .72 72(0 .6 60 .2

Replicate 1Wala)

0 .69<0 .6

Replicate 2(ug o)

0 .74<0 .6

CHROMIUM

Results(ua/a)

<1


(ua/a) (ua/o)

39 72527 602

Replicate 1(ua/a)

3826

Replicate 2(ua/a)

3927

TotalConcentration

Found % .(uo/G) Recovery

71 9855 90

Average Relative(uo/a) _ Ranae

0 .72 6 .9<0 .6 NC

TotalConcentration

Found(ua/a)

796640

Recovery

104102

Average(up/a)

3927

RelativeBanco

2 .63 .7


ARIVM

Blank DataResults

Blank Number - m L

MB 367 <0 .1

2 . AccuracyTotal


sample Field I .D . (m°/L) (ma/L) m L Recovery

10465-3 2332-301 0 .2 5.0 4 .94 95

3 . Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . m L m L m L Ranoe

10465-3 2332-301 0 .1 0 .2 0.2 50

CHROMIUM

Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 367

Z. Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10465-3 1332-301

3 . Precision

Sam Field I .D .

' 10465-3 2332-301

Results(mo/L)

<0 .01


Concentration Spike Level roundm L (ma/L) Sma/L) Recovery

0 .031 5 .0 5.4 107

Replicate 1 Replicate 2(mss/L) (ma/L)

0 .032 0 .029

Average(ma/L)

0.031

Relativean e

9 .7


CAL


Blank Number ` m L

MB 367 - <0 .1

2 . Àccuracy_

.Total


Sample Field I .D . m L m L m L Recovery

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .1 5 .0 4 .97 99

T3 . Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . m L (ma/L) m L Rance

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .1 <0 .1 <0 .1 NC


SELENIUM


Blank Number m L -

MB 367 <0 .012. Accuracy


Concentration Spike Level FoundSample frield"I .D . (Mo/L) (ma/L-) (mQ/L) Recovery

10465-3 1332-301 <0 .01 0 .05 - 0 .0111 22

3 . Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I.D . (mo/L) (mo/L) (ma/L) an e

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 <0 .01 <0 .01 NC

NC a not calculable due to results below detection limit .


SILVER

Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 367

2 . Accuracy

-Resultsm L

<0 .02


Concentration Spike Level Found %Sample Field I .D . m L m L m L Recovery

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 0 .05 0 .053 106

3 . Precision

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . m L m L m L Range

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 <0 .01 <0 .01 NC

CADMIUM

1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

NB 367

2 . Accuracy

. Sample Field I .D .

10465-3 2332-301

3. Precision

Resultsm L

(0 .005


Concentration Spike Level Foundm L (ma/L) (ma/L) Recovery

(0 .005 0 .5 0 .477 94

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . (ma/L) (ma/L) m L

10465-3 2332-301 (0 .005 (0 .005 (0 .005

NC - Not calculable due to result below detection limit .

RelativeRanee

NC


l . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2 . Accuracy

Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-320- 10429-21 2332-326

3 . Precision

SELENIUM

`Results(uc/o)

c1


(ua/a) WO/0)

<1 7 .2(l 6 .0

TotalConcentration

FoundWO/0) Recovery

4 .1 572 .6 43

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . (uQ/o) (ua/a) (uo/a )

10429-3 2332-320 c1 <1 <110429-21 2332-326 <1 <1 c1

NC - Not calculable due to result below detection limit.

LEAD

1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 366

2 . Accuracy

I

t Sample Field I .D .

10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326

3 . Precision

Results(ua/0,

<1


(ua/a) (uo/Q)

40 71445 602

RelativeRange

NCNC

TotalConcentration

Found %(ua/o) Recovery

684 89578 89

Replicate 1 Replicate Z AverageSam field I .D . (uo/a) (ua/a) (ua/a)

10429-3 2332-320 40 40 4010429-21 2332-326 47 43 45

RelativeRance

08 .9


1 . Blank Data

Blank Number

MB 367

2 . Accuracy

Sam 1e Field I .D .

10465-3 2332-301if ''

3 . Precision

ARSENIC

Results-_ m L

<0 .01


Concentration Spike Level Found %m L m L m L Recovery

<0 .1 0 .05 0 .0427 85

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . m L m L m L

10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 <0 .01 <0 .01

NC = Not calculable due to result below detection limit .

' MERCURY


Blank Number (ma/L)

j MB 367 0.0005

2. Accuracy

Samflle Field I .D .

10465-3 2332-301

3 . Precision


Concentration Spike Level Found(mo/L) (ma/L) (ma/L)

<0 .0005 0 .01 0 .00755

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSam l Field I .D . ,(ma/L) (ma/L) (ma/L)

10465-3 2332-301 (0 .0005 0.0005 (0.0005

NC - Not calculated due to result below detection limit.

RelativeRange

NC

Recovery

76

Relativean e

NC


QC DATA FOR PESTICIDES

1 . Laboratory Control Sample

-_ AcceptanceTrue Value Found Recovery Limits

I . (uQ/Q) SWO/0)

S-P105 Lindane 0 .2 0 .12 61 56 - 123Heptachlor 0 .2 0 .096 48 40 - 131Aldrin 0 .2 0 .11 57 40 - 120Dieldrin 0 .5 0 .27 54 52 - 126Endrin 0 .5 0.26 51 56 - 121DDT 0 .5 0 .14 27 32 - 127

2 . Blank

Blank Number

D 107No compounds detected .

3 . Mid-Range Calibration - Check

(True)Calibration Calibrati on

Standard Value Value %Compound 8-5-87 8-6-87 Recovery

(uq/mL) (uq/mL)

Lindane 0.025 0.020 79Heptachlor .050 .Aldrin 050 .0.1 82Heptachlor spoxide .050 .041 82Endosultan 1 .10 .075 75Dieldrin .050 .040 80Endosultan 2 .050 .038 76Endrin Aldehyde .125 .089 71

I DDT .10 .028 (100)Methoxychlor .50 .19 38

alpha BBC .025 .023 92beta BBC .050 .043 86delta BBC .050 .044 88aldrin .050 .041 82DDE .050 .041 82endrin .050 .041 82DDD .10 .081 81endosultan sulfate .10 .080 80endrin ketone .10 .073 73


d . Precision

Wipes were unable to ba-subsampled for precision assesment .

Accuracy

Wipes were unable to be subsampled for accuracy assesment .

11


' QC DATA FOR PETROLEUM HYDROCARBOIV5

1. Laboratory Control SampleTrue Value

I . (ma/L)

5-15 5 .04SD-13 5 .04

Foundm L

5 .05 .4

Recovery

99107

2. Mid Range Calibration Check Sample

True Value Found(mo/L) m L

50 53

3 . Blank

Blank Number Results

261 c60 uQ/Q260 (1 mq/L

4 . Precision

Recovery(%L-

106

Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . WO/0) ,qua/°) (uQ/a)

.0439-9 2332-343 190 150 170

t5 . Accuracy

RelativeRan e

24


Concentration Spike Level Found %Sampl e Field I .D . (uc/a) (ua/a) (ua/a) Recovery

10430-3 2332-341 220 320 710 15610430-11 2332-344 280 630 660 60

J


Analysis : Petroleum Hydrocarbons (uq/Q) Matrix : SolidMethod/Reference : 503B,D,VStandard Methods, 16th Edition"ate Analyzed : August 4, 1987

Field Identification Lab . No . Concentration

2332-341 FT Sediment #1 ` 10,430-3 2202332-342 FT Sediment #2 10,430-6 2802332-343 FT Sediment #3 10,438-9 1502332-344 FT Sediment #4 10,430-11 280 .

Analysis : Petroleum Hydrocarbons (uq/Q) Matrix : WaterMethod/Reference : 503B,D,E/Standard Methods, 16th EditionDate Analyzed : August 4, 1987

rField Identification Lab . No . Concentration

2332-346 FT Sod Sam Blk 10,430-14 c1 .0

k It


y

f

Lab Number : _-Sample Designation :-Date Analyzed :Matrix :

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCNLOROMETHJINEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE '1,1, Z , 2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE

10, "30-12332-3.1 FT Sediment "18/04/87Solid

CONCENTRATION(uQ/0)BDLDDLDDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLDDLBDLBDLBDLBDL

DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/Q)

11

0 .51

0.50.50.50.50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5

ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 1 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2. 5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0.5


d"-DICHLOROETHRNEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENE

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 946,

METHOD 8240

RECOVERY

e78981

2ND EDITION

ACCEPTANCE LIMITS

70 - 12181 - 1177" - 121


Lab Number : -Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :latrix :

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE2,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE

. CHLOROFORM1, 2-DICHLOROETHIUJE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE

10,430-d2332-3`2 FT Sediment 828/04/87Solid

CONCENTRATION(uQ/0)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLDDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL

DETECTION LIMIT(up/Q)

11

0 .51

0.50 .50.50 .50.50 .50.50 .50 .50 .50 .50.50 .50.50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50.50.50 .50 .5

' ACETONE BDL 2 .5,CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MER BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 1 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5


(R) (BId4-DICHLOROETHANE S" 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 84 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 83 7" - 111

DDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 8.6, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts, Incorporated

METHOD 82.0

f

Lab Number : - 10,430-7Sample Designation : 2332-343 PT Sediment 93Date Analyzed : 8/04/87tatrix : Solid

VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uq/Q) (up/0)

CHLOROMETHANE BDL 1VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 1CHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5BROMOMETHANE BDL 1METHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5CHLOROFORM DDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5-1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE DDL 0 .5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 0 .5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 0.51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DDL 0 .51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE DDL 0 .5TRICHLOROETHYLENE DDL 0 .5BENZENE BDL 0 .51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 0 .51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE DDL 0.5'-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER DDL - 0 .5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE DDL 0 .5BROMOFORM DDL 0 .5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE DDL 0 .51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE DDL 0 .5TOLUENE DDL 0 .5CHLOROBENZENE BDL . 0 .5ETHYLBENZENE 5DL 0.5

ACETONE DDL 1 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF DDL 2 .5MER DDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE DDL 1MIBK DDL 2 .52-HEXANONE DDL 2 .5STYRENE DDL 0 .5XYLENES SDL 0 .5



RECOVERY

869060

ACCEPTANCE LIMITS

70 - 12181 - 11774 - 121

BDL w BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION

METHOD 8240Resource Analysts, Incorporated

Lab Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :tatrix :

10,430-102332-344 FT Sediment 848/04/87Solid

VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uW/0) (u0/9)

CHLOROMETHANE DDL 1VINYL CHLORIDE DDL 1CHLOROETHANE DDL 0 .5BROMOMETHANE DDL 1METHYLENE CHLORIDE DDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE DDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHANE DDL 0 .51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE DDL 0 .5CHLOROFORM DDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROETHANE 9DL 0 .5-1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE DDL 0 .5BROMODICHLOROMETBANE DDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DDL 0 .51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE DDL 0 .5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5BENZENE DDL 0 .51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE DDL 0 .51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE DDL 0 .52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER DDL 0 .5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE DDL 0 .5BROMOFORM DDL 0 .5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE DDL 0 .51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHARE NDL 0 .5TOLUENE RDL 0 .5CHLOROBENZENE DDL 0 .5ETHYLBENZBNE sDL 0 .5

ACETONE DDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE SDL 0 .5THF DDL 2 .5MER DDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE DDL 1MIBR DDL 2.52-HEXANONE DDL 2.5STYRENE SDL 0.5XYLENES DDL 0 .5



RECOVERY(" )

989078

ACCEPTANCE LIMITSM

70 - 12181 - 11774 - 121

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts, Incorporated

METHOD 8240

Lab Number : - 10,430-12Sample Designation : _ 2332-346 FT Sod Sam BlkDate Analyzed : 8/04/87Matrix : Water

i

f

VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT'- (uQ/L) (uQ/L)

CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10VINYL CHLORIDE ' BDL 10CHLOROETHANE BDL 5BROMOMETHANE BDL 5NETHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5CHLOROFORM BDL 51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5BENZENE BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL

_5

3ROMOFORM BDL 5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 5TOLUENE BDL 5CHLOROBENZENE BDL 5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 5

ACETONE BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 5THF BDL 25MER BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL 10MIBR BDL 25Z-HEXANONE BDL 25STYRENE BDL 5XYLENES BDL 5


d4-DICHLOROETHANE 90 76 - 11"d8-TOLUENE 100 88 - 110BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 83 86 - 115

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW $46, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts, Incorporated

METHOD 8240

Lab Number :Sample Designation:Date Analyzed :Matrix :

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEZ-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZZNE

CONCENTRATIONREP. 1 REP. 2(uU/L) (up/L)DDL BDLDDL BDLDDL BDLBDL DDLBDL DDLBDL BDLBDL BDLDDL BDLDDL BDLBDL BDLDDL BDLDDL DDLBDL DDLBDL BDLBDL BDLBDL BDLDDL BDLBDL DDLDDL BDLBDL BDLBDL DDLBDL BDLBDL BDLDDL DDLBDL BDLDDL DDLDDL DDL

DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/L)10105 _555555555555555555555555

ACETONE DDL BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE 8DL DDL 5TRY DDL DDL 25MER BDL DDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL DDL 10MIBR DDL DDL 252-HEXANONE DDL DDL 25STYRENE DDL BDL 5XYLENES SDL DDL 5

SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYREP . 1 REP . 2

d4-DICHLOROETHANE 92 92d8-TOLUENE 96 94BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 85 83

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : ZPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION

KSTHOD 8240

10,430-152332-348 FT Sod Trav Blk8/04/87Water

ACCEPTANCE LIMITS

70 - 12181 - 11774 - 121


Laboratory Number :Sample Designation :,)ate Analyzed :Matrix :

PESTICIDES

ALDRINALPHA-BHC

-- BETA-BHCGAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANE4 , 4 ' -DDT4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDDIELDRINENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRINENDRIN ALDEHYDEHEPTACHLORHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDETOXAPHENEENDRIN KETONEMETHOXYCHLOR

' 10,430-162332-350 Fort Totten Wipe "18/07/87Solid

CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/wipe) (ufl/Wipe)

BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .05

4 .2 0 .011 .1 0 .01

0 .69 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 10BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .05

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CFR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984

METHOD 608

" Pesticide identification is tentative .needed for positive identification .

GC confirmation is



PESTICIDES

ALDRINALPHA-BHCBETA-BHCGAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANE4,4'-DDT4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDDIELDRINENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN II

i ENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRINENDRIN ALDEHYDEHEPTACHLOR3EPTACHLOR EPOXIDETOXAPHENEENDRIN KETONEMETHOXYCHLOR

10,430-172332-351 Fort Totten Wipe #28/07/87Solid

CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uq/wipe) (ufl/Wipe)


1 .7 0.010 .29 0 .010 .42 0.01

BDL 0.01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 10BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .05

BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CYR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984

METHOD 608

ti " Pesticide identification is tentative . GC confirmation is

needed for positive identification .


Laboratory Number :°ample Designation :ite Analyzed :

matrix :

PESTICIDES

ALDRINALPHA-BHC

_ BETA-BHCGAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANE4,4'-DDT4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDDIELDRINENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRINENDRIN ALDEHYDEHEPTACHLORHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE''OXAPHENEIDRIN KETONE

METHOXYCHLORi

-- 10,430-182332-352 Fort Totten Wipe "3

_ 8/07/87Solid

CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/wipe) (uq/wipe)


3 .2 0 .010.05 0 .010 .53 0 .01

BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL _ 10BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .05

' BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CFR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984

METHOD 608

" Pesticide identification is tentative . OC confirmation isneeded for positive identification .


".aboratory Number : 10,430-19ample Designation: 2332-353 Fort Totten Wipe 6a

Date Analyzed : 8/07/87Matrix : Solid

PESTICIDES CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uq/wipe) (up/wipe)

ALDRIN BDL 0 .005ALPHA-BHC BDL 0 .005

` BETA-BHC BDL 0 .005GAMMA-BHC BDL 0 .005DELTA-BHC BDL 0 .005CHLORDANE BDL 0 .054,41-DDT 4 .1 0 .014,4'-DDE 0 .2 0 .014,4'-DDD 0 .8 0 .01DIELDRIN BDL 0 .01ENDOSULFAN I BDL 0 .005ENDOSULFAN II BDL 0 .01

' ENDOSULFAN SULFATE BDL 0 .01' ENDRIN BDL 0 .01

ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BDL 0 .01HEPTACHLOR BDL 0 .005HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE BDL 0 .005ÒXAPHENE BDL 10ENDRIN KETONE BDL 0 .01

F METHOXYCHLOR BDL 0 .05

BDL s BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : "0 CFR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984

METHOD 608

Pesticide identification is tentative .needed for positive identification .

GC confirmation is


Laboratory Number :sample Designation :ate Analyzed :

Matrix :

PESTICIDES

ALDRINALPHA-BHCBETA-BHC

r GAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANE4,4'-DDT

r14,4'-DDS4,4'-DDDDIELDRIN

' ENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRIN

' ENDRIN ALDEHYDEHEPTACHLORHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE'"OXAPHENEHDRIN KETONE

METHOXYCHLOR

-- 10,430-202332-354 Fort Totten Wipe 65

_ 8/07/87Solid

CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uq/wipe) (uQ/wipe)


2 .3 0 .01.72 0 .01.60 0.01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0.01BDL 0.01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 10BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .05

' BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CFR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984

METHOD 608

Pesticide identification is tentative . GC confirmation isneeded for positive identification .


Laboratory Number :ample Designation :

date Analyzed :Matrix :

PESTICIDES

ALDRINALPHA-BHC

j BETA-BHCGAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANE4,4'-DDTd,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDDIELDRINENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRINENDRIN ALDEHYDEHEPTACHLORHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDEOXAPHENE

ENDRIN KETONEI- METHOXYCHLOR

10,430-112332-356 PT Wipe Sam . Blk8/07/87Solid

REP 1 REP ZCONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/wipe) (uQ/wipe)

BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .05BDL BDL 0 .01BDL BDL 0.01BDL BDL 0.01BDL BDL 0 .01BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0.01BDL BDL 0.01BDL BDL 0 .01BDL BDL 0 .01BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 10BDL BDL 0 .01BDL BDL 0 .05

BDL " BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CYR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984

METHOD 608


Lab Number : Laboratory Control Sample.Sample Designation :- C3823Date Analyzed : 8/03/87Matrix : Water

VOLATILE ORGANICS TRUE CONC . DETECTION %VALUE FOUND LIMIT RECOVERY(uQ/L) (uQ/L) (uQ/L)

CHLOROMETHANE BDL DDL 10VINYL CHLORIDE BDL BDL ' 10CHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 5 .BROMOMETHANE BDL BDL 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 98 .0 65 .9 5 671,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL BDL 5CHLOROFORM 60 .4 39 .3 5 651,2-DICHLOROETHANE 90 .2 85 .0 5 941,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 73 .8 25 .4 5 34CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 92 .7 22 .8 5 24BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 84 .5 77 .7 5 923,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE 55 .1 22 .3 5 40BENZENE BDL BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL BDL 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL DDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 71 .7 89 .0 5 124BROMOFORM 97 .8 122 5 125TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 48 .0 19 .0 5 39

1 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 5TOLUENE BDL BDL 5CHLOROBENZENE 79 .1 55 .6 5 70ETHYLBENZENE BDL BDL 5

ACETONE BDL BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE BDL BDL 5THF BDL BDL 25MER BDL BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL BDL 10MIBK DDL BDL 252-HEXANONE BDL 8DL 25STYRENE DDL BDL 5XYLENES DDL BDL 5


d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENZ

RECOVERY

100106102

ACCEPTANCE LIMITS

76 - 11488 - 11086 - 115

BDL " BELOW DETECTION LIMIT ---METHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW $46, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts, Incorporated

METHOD 8240

Lab Number : - Calibration VerificationSample Designation : C3849Date Analyzed : - 8/04/87Matrix : Water

VOLATILE ORGANICS CONC . OF CONC . % DETECTIONSTANDARD FOUND RECOVERY LIMIT(u9/L) (uQ/L) (uq/L)

CHLOROMETHANE 50 24 48 10VINYL CHLORIDE 50 29 58 10CHLOROETHANE 50 25 50 5BROMOMETHANE 50 24 48 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 50 53 106 51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 50 50 100 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE 50 57 114 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE 50 46 92 5CHLOROFORM 50 42 84 51,2-DICHLOROETHANE 50 40 8D 51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 50 34 68 5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 50 32 64 5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 50 42 84 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 50 54 108 51,3-traps-DICHLOROPROPSNE 38 40 105 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE 50 37 74 5BENZENE 50 49- 98 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE 62 53 85 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 50 56 112 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER 50 31 62 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 50 40 80 5BROMOFORM 50 45 90 5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 50 34 68 51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 50 57 114 5TOLUENE 50 52 104 5CHLOROBENZENE 50 42 84 5ETHYLBENZENE 50 46 92 5

ACETONE 50 43 86 25CARBON DISULFIDE 'SO 33 66 5THF 50 76 152 25MER 50 72 144 25VINYL ACETATE 50 58 116 10MIBK 50 72 144 252-HEXANONE 50 71 142 25STYRENE 50 46 92 5XYLENBS 134 130 97 5

BDL " BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION

METHOD 8240


Lab Number : BlankSample Designation :- -Date Analyzed : 8/04/87Matrix : - Water

VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/L) (ug/L)

CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10VINYL CHLORIDE > BDL 10CHLOROETHANE BDL 5BROMOMETHANE BDL 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 13 51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5CHLOROFORM BDL 51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5BENZENE BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPSNE BDL 52,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 5Z-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 5BROMOFORM BDL 5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 5TOLUENE BDL 5CHLOROBENZENE BDL 5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 5

ACETONE BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 5THF BDL 25MER BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL 10MIBR BDL 252-HEXANONE BDL 25STYRENE BDL 53CYLENES BDL 5


«) «)d4-DICHLOROETHANE 90 76 - 114d8-TOLUENE 101 88 - 110BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 87 86 - 115

BDL s BELOW DETECTION LIMIT ------ - ---METHOD REFERENCE : EPA 3W 846 . 2ND ZDITION

IncorporatedResource AnalystsMETHOD 8240 ,

i~-

Lab Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed : --Matrix :

VOLATILE ORGANICS

CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1, 2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1, 2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-traps-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE

Blank 100 MEC38478/04/87Solid

CONCENTRATION(uq/Q)BDLBDLBDLBDL1 .7BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLDDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL.7

BDLBDL

DETECTION LIMIT(up/Q)

11

0 .51

0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50.50.50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5

ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 . 5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBR BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5

SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITSW M


BDL " BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION


MATUX SPACE DUPLICATE RECOVERY

Laboratory Number : 10,430-10Sample Designation : 2332-344 FT Sediment 94Date Analyzed : 8/04/87Matrix : Water

REPLICATE 1 REPLICATE 2 RELATIV .ug/L IN ug/L ug/L ,%REC- ug/L % REC- RANGE

COMPOUND SAMPLE SPIRE FOUND OVERY FOUND OVERY %

1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 0 50 70 140 77 154 10I TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0 52 78 150 89 171 13

BENZENE 0 48 60 125 69 144 14TOLUENE 9 48 63 113 72 131 13CHLOROHENZENE 0 53 70 132 81 153 15

METHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITIONMETHOD 8240


.

MATFaX SPIRE DUPLICATE RECOVERY

Laboratory Number : 10,430-12 __ .Sample Designation : 2332=346 FT Sed Sam BlkDate Analysed : 8/04/87Matrix : Water

REPLICATE 1 REPLICATE 2 RELATIVIuQ/L IN uQ/L uQ/L %REC- uQ/L % REC- RANGE

COMPOUND SAMPLE SPACE FOUND OVERY FOUND OVERY

1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 0 50 79 158 82 164 4TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0 52 89 171 87 167 2BENZENE 0 48 67 140 66 138 2TOLUENE 0 48 69 144 67 140 3CHLOROBENZENE 0 53 79 149 77 145 3

METHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITIONMETHOD 8240


Laboratory Number :Sample Designation :ate Analyzed :

_jatrix :

PESTICIDES

ALDRINALPHA-BHCBETA-BHCGAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANEa,4'-DDT4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDDIELDRINENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRINENDRIN ALDBHYDEHEPTACHLORHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDETOXAPHENE'NDRIN KETONEAETHOXYCHLOR

B-M107Blank8/10/87Solid

CONCENTRATION(uQ/wipe)

BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL

DETECTION LIMIT' (up/wipe)

0 .0050 .0050.0050 .0050 .0050 .050 .010 .010 .010 .01

0 .0050 .010 .010 .010 .01

0 .0050 .005

100 .010 .05

BDL s BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CFR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984

METHOD 608

' " Pesticide identification is tentative . GC confirmation isneeded for positive identification .


APPENDIX E

QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLE RESULTS

63

TABLE F.1 - FIELD 01»LICATE ANALYSIS

AGUEGUS SAMPLES 2332-302 233;-306 (x) (Z)w/L tig/L

Volatile Organies NO NO -- <30

Extractable organic*

8102-sthylWyl)phthslste 120,000 95,000 20 <30

Total Petals

Silver ss A, <10 <10 0 <30Arsenic as As 16 1a 12 <30Barium as b 230 190 19 <30Cdbium p Cd <S <S 0 <30Chromium se Cr 97 71 31 <30Mercury M 110 <.S <.S 0 <30Lead as Pb <30 16 61 <30Selenium as Se <10 <10 0 <30

S-3 S-3SOIL SAMPLES Field Duplicate Relative GAir

2332-322 2332-328 of ffefenee ObJKtiveug/kf ug/k' (X) (x)

Volatile Organies LID ND -- <30

Extractable Organies

§is(2-ettqrlhwl)phtb@tste 1,500 1,100 30 <30

TALE F.1 - FIELD DtfICATE ANAlrsis continued

SOIL SAMPLESs-3

2332-322

Total Itetate u0/ke

$1 War as AS 1,100Arsenic as As 15,000Ilariuw as Be 76,000Cedoium as Cd 530Chromium as Cr 32,000Mercury as 11, 420teed as Pb 80,000Selenium as se 41,000

fed-3SEDIMENT SAMPLES

2332-341u0/k9

s-3Field Duplicate Relative CAPP

ObjectiveM

23327A28 DifferenceM

uo/k#*

<2,000 5816,000 6100,000 27

4800 4142,000 27

450 790,000 1241,000 0

sed-3Field Duplicate Relative2332-344 Difference

us/its tx)

volatile Organics RD IA

Total Metals

silver 41,000 42,000 67Arsenic 4,900 4,600 6Sarium 410,000 27,000 92Cadmium 4500 <M 18Chromium 13,000 14,000 7Mercury 270 280 4lead 210,000 190,000 1sselenium 41,000 41,000 0

RD a Not Detected, ail volatile organics compounds were below detection limits" dry wt basisRotative X difference Range X 100

Mess

<30

<30430430<3 .430430

0APVObjective

cx~

00

030430<0430430430430<30

TABLE F.2 - LAOORATORT SAMPLE PIKES

a-1SOIL SAMPLE Simple 2332-320

Replicate 1 Replicate 2uo/kr uuke W/k0' Z uY/ke % Relative OAPV

CORmurd In Sample Spike Found Recovery Found Recovery % Difference Objective(X)

1,1 Dichloroethene 0 7,000 0,000 122 8,000 112 9 <30Trichlorethylene 0 0,000 10,000 119 10,000 115 3 <30semem 0 7,000 0,000 122 0,000 115 S <30Toluene 0 7,000 8.000 121 8,000 124 2 <30Chloreben:ens 0 7,000 9,000 131 9,000 124 S <30

*dry wt basisXRecovery " Amount found - amount in saxple x 100

amount spiked

Relative Percent Dlfference a Range X 100man

AGWON SAMPLE

UVI. U511 .Calpou+d In !ample Spike

1,1 01chlorosthene 0 S4Trichloretkylene 0 67Ouuens 0 52Toluene 0 S"Chlorobentane 0 so

Mw-1sample 2332-301

Replicate 1 Replicate 2us/l. % u0/l % Relative OAPPFound Recoaenr Found Recovery X Difference Objective

(X)60 126 SS 102 21 <3067 100 S9 80 13 <30se 112 S3 102 9 <30S4 100 40 09 12 <3061 105 S6 97 9 00

TABLE F.2-LA"ORATORT SAMPLE SPIKES continued

AQUEOUS SAMPLES

Total Metals

SilverArsenicBar iuscadmiumChromiumMercuryLeadSelenium

SOIL SAMPLES

Total Metals

silverArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadSelenium

Total 1letsls

siloArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadSelenium

IRI-1Sample 2332-301

Original Spike TotalConcentration level i Concentration %

us/L ug/L Found ug/L Recovery

se Aq -CIO so 53 106as As 'C10 SO 42.7 e5e. me 200 5,000 4,940 95as cd <5 500 477 94as Cr 31 9,000 5,400 107ss Rg <0.9 10 7.6 76as Pb <1OO 9,000 4,970 99ss Se <10 50 11 .1 22

a-1Sample 2332-320

Original Spike TotalConcentration Level Concentration

W/kg" uq/kg" Found ug/kg" Recovery

me Ag 41,000 7,200 7,000 97se As 09,000 7,200 22,500 49es se 94,000 724,000 757,000 91e. Cd 720 72,000 71,000 96as. Cr 39,000 M,000 7%,000 104se Pb 40,000 724,000 "4,000 e9,s Se 0,000 7,200 4,100 57

S-7Sample 2332-326

Original Spike TotalConcentration Level Concentration 11

uq/kg" ug/kg" Found ug/kg* Recovery

se Ag 41,000 6,000 5,800 97ss As 20,000 6,000 22,800 .7u so 5,000 602,000 617,000 102ss Cd 4600 60,200 55,000 90.. Cr 27,000 602,000 640,000 102an /b 45,000 602,000 576,000 89" Se 41,000 6,000 2,600 43

OAVPObjective

(X)

70-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-130

GAOPObjective

tX)

70-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-130

OAVVObjective

(X)

70-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-130

TALE F .2 - LABORATORY SAMPLE SPIKES continued

SEDIWRT SAMPLESSaxple 2332-341

Original Spike Total LAPPConcentration Level Concentration x Objective

ug/ke ug/ke Found ug/ke Recovery (x)

Petrole w Rpdroesrbon~ 220,000 320,000 710,000 156 70-130

Sed-iField DuplicateSexple 2332-344

Original Spike Total apPPConcentration Level Concentration x Objective

ug/ke ug/ke Found ug/k0" Recovery (X)

Patroleun Rydrociiboro 250,000 630,000 660,000 60 70-130

Sad-3Wple 2332-343

Original Spike Total LAPPConcentration Level Concentration x Objective

ug/ke uo/k9" Found ug/k9" Recovery (x)Total Rotate

rr .. x, ISO 9" 1,180 104 70-130

x Recovery " amount foul-woant In ample a 100mount spiked

" dry wt . basis

TABLE F .3 - LABORATORY REPLICATES

Mw-1AGUEM SAMPLES ; Sample 2332-301

Relative OAPVRaplleste 1 Replicate 2 Mean Difference Objectives

Total metals u0/L uD/L ug/L (X) (X)

Silver as 114 <10 <10 <10 0 <30Arsenic as As <10 <10 <10 0 <30Barium as Be 100 200 200 50 <30CaahitiR as w -ts 4s <9 0 "30Chromium as Cr 32 29 31 9.7 <30Ilereurr as of <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0 <30lead as Pb 4100 4100 4100 0 430Selenium as Se 410 410 410 0 <30

S01L SAMPLES$-1

Simple 2332-320

Relative owRqlleate t Raplleete 2 NM Difference Objectives

Total Natele Ul/ke uo/kg* uo/ke (x) (x)

:111rer as 11e 41,000 .1,000 41,000 0 430Arsenic as As 20,000 18.000 19,000 10.5 430$arius as as 93,000 95,000 94,000 2 430Cadmus h Cd 690 740 720 6.9 430chromium as Cr 38,000 39,000 39,000 3 430Lead as Pb 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 430Selenium " se 41,000 41,000 41,000 0 <30

TAKE f .3 - LABORATORY REKICATES continued

$-7Sample 2332-326

/ Relative CAPPReplicate 1 Replicate 2 Mean Difference Objectives

Total NotNs WASP us/k4' ug/ke (%) (X)

Silver as 11@ 0,000 11,000 0,000 0 <30Arsenic as As 21,000 19,000 20,000 10 <30Barium as me Sa,000 56,000 57,000 3 .5 <30Ceamium .s Ce 460 4600 4600 0 <30Chromium as Cr 26,000 27,000 27,000 3 .7 430lead as Pb 47,000 43,000 45,000 8 .9 <30Selenium as Se 41,000 41,000 41,000 0 430

s-eSample 2332-325

Relative CAPPReplicate 1 Replieste 2 Neon Difference Objectives

Total Metals ug/k9' u0/k0' u0/k0' (X) (X)

percarp os OR 209 204 207 2.4 430

SEDIRFRT SAIKEISed-3

11wple 2332-343

Relative OAPPkept ieet@ 1 Replicate 2 Neon Difference Objectives

Total Notsls uR/ke uo/ky* tq/ke (X)

Mercury u 119 140 160 150 13 430

Petroleum Rydroesrbo~s 190,000 150,000 170,000 24 <30

" Dry wt . basis

TABLE F .4 - SURR0611TE STANDARD RECOVERIES--Volatile Compound,

Sample Description Sample so.

1111-1 2332-301mw-2 2332-302MY-2 Field Duplicate 2332-306MY-3 2332-303MY-4 2332-304114-5 2332-305 Lob Rep 111w-S 2332-305 Lob Rep 2Yell Sample Ilk 2332-308Well Travel Rlk 2332-360Lob Control 00027Lob Control 00012$-1 2332-320S-2 2332-321S-3 2332-322S-3 Field Duplicate 2332-328S-4 2332-3231-3 2332-324S-6 2332-325S-7 2332-326:-e 2332-327sell Sexqle Ilk . 2332-333loll Travel Ilk 2332-335Sad-1 2332-341SW-1 Field OW leete 2332-344Sed-2 2332-342Sad-3 2332-343Sed Saple Ilk 2332-346Sad Train Ilk 2332-348 Lob Rap 1Sad Travel Ilk 2332-348 Lob Rep 2Lob Control C3d23

D(4)-1-2-Diehloroethane 08-Totue~+e "romofluorobenzene% Recovery Control Range % Recovery Control Range % Recovery Control Range

8. 76-114 79 SO-110 87 86-11590 76-114 81 88-110 ' 85 86-1158d 76-114 81 88-110 ' 85 86-115106 76-114 111 88-110 . 85 86-115105 76-114 81 88-110 . 85 86-11596 70-121 81 81-117 85 74-12190 70-121 77 81-117 " 81 74-121100 76-114 79 88-110 . 83 86-11594 76-114 79 88-110 . 87 86-11583 76-114 77 88-110 * 81 86-11596 76-114 79 88-110 * 83 86-11590 70-121 111 81-117 102 74-12190 70-121 101 81-117 101 74-12166 70-121 90 81-117 76 74-12192 70-121 105 81-117 103 74-121100 70-121 105 81-117 103 74-12196 70-121 107 81-117 105 74-12190 70-121 101 81-117 100 74-1218d 70-121 100 81-117 100 74-1218S 70-121 94 81-117 101 74-12184 76-114 100 88-110 93 86-11586 76-114 100 88-110 94 86-115a7 70-121 89 81-117 81 74-12196 70-121 90 81-117 7d 74-12184 70-121 84 81-117 83 74-12186 70-121 90 81-117 8o 74-12190 76-114 100 se-110 83 86-11592 70-121 96 61-117 85 74-12192 70-121 94 81-117 83 74-121100 76-114 106 88-110 102 86-115

x Reeoverp a Amount found X 100, it la assumed that analyte in ample is negligibleAmount 1n spike

% Recovery outside Control Range

"3

""V~~."YYN+^r

"YNNr

'-s

"r

ww s

-~n

~~a~a~

~n~n

L

1{

a

rr

++

"Z

:~a~=~~s~8aa~~=

a=s~s~

Oi"Vr1"iSr"vt~LLSvV=~7L

w3

rri

rrrr~rrrrrrirrrr

ftt

YYYOOYIAYYYIAYY

VYYYIYYYY

71srrrrirrrrrrrrrrr

?S~liwiwPLL~111~11iPP~~

S" K "

O~XrL"

YYI-r~PO"VVw--"LO

A

eeseee

eieeeeeeeeeoeee~

'

1rfA

1/1/4

1/1~w4WYyVWV

YIV

1/V

1/Y

+ "

r

1 1 i 1

Zr`"NV

.~VO"YVrr

.~P~-N-

O

1/~/

1A~~V

1/f/V

1IY

1~1Y

IVV

1AYYW

YIYI

~

iiir=i

rrrYY"rrrrr

rrr

rrrrrrr

iVVr

APPENDIX F

NEW JERSEY SOIL CLEANUP APPROACHES

64

rr Attachment 6

Cleanup Approaches used by 1JDEP

t'

Yew Jersey Department of tovironseatal Protection66

Summary of Approaches to =oil Cleanup Levels

(_) Discussion of !heretical Approaches .

IJDtp has investigated many theoretical approaches to elta"lishiajcleanup objectives for cootanioated soil including cleanup tobackground, cleanup to the analytical detection limits and Cleanup toa risk asses meet derived somber .

_ (A) Cleanup to taettroued bas been considered for a hraber of eoapooods .Development of a cleanup objective based on background requires anextensive environmental data base . This approach eat only be appliedto corpoueds which are normally found in mature . If it is applied toauthropoteeiic compounds the cleanup level could become "sero" whichequates to the current limit of detection of the analytical method innap . A cleanup objective based on background is determined by therange of concentrations observed on a specific site or based onliterature values . This approach bas been applied to inorganiccompounds . for petroleum hydrocarbons, as "industrial" background isgeneralised as 100 ppo .

` (1) Cleanup levels based or analytical detection limit$ Gave bees coo-iidered . in reality, the cleanup objective becomes the limit ofdetection of the analytical method, thus the cleanup objective becomesson-detectable '(cleanup to pristine conditions) . This approach isundesirable by itself because the limit of detection of analyticalmethods is a oovia$ target . Current treads in environmentalanalytical chemistry indicate that detection limits will continue todecrease to levels that are below those of environmental or publichealth concern . This approach is further complicated by the fact thatis Sony instances the method detection limit is influenced by thestore of the matrix sad the presesce of other interfering compounds .

Developing a cleanup objective based oa method detection limits eatonly be applied to aethropotesic compounds . ,If applied to compoundswhich occur ostnsally, the cleanup objective could be w11 below thelevels mormally found in the pewiromcat.

(C) fist assessment Sethodolo dtas lees used to establish elesanpobjectives* The 69e of~st assesasent is COMM to standard and/orcriteria aettiaj. The Water Treliainarp ttoteetive Concentration1{aits and Recommended ttasinus Contaminant Levels ate based se riskassessment methodologies which estimate tee risks from eareieosens sadooacarcieodeas Is drinking water. in the ease of carcinogens, it isassumed that so threshold exists below which cancer does Got develop.thus$ exposure to any. dose regardless of for aoall$ sesa1ts is acancer risk . For soacarcinosens, *a the other band, a thresholdexists below which so response is observed . Thus a "aafe" doseexists . !he susbera developed for risk based standards/criteria range

from sub parts per billions (carcinogens) to busdreds of parts perSillioo (son-careisogess) .

It gust 1e noted that the use of the risk asseenwst approach requiresthat an exposure pathway be defined in terms of the frequeecp andduration of exposure and that a suitable toxicology database nists

j' for the chemical -of concern . to the absence of either of these$ therisk assessment approach cannot 1e applied correctly. tibere there isuncertainty retarding the route or extent of espoaere, the riskassessment will reflect these uncertainties .

to Several, eooservati a worst case exposure sceneries are seed isdeveloping risk based standards or criteria. Qsfortusatelp, real lifeexposures say 1e quite different than those used to develop. the riskbased %umber. Thus a risk based *umber may 0avtrprottct" theindividuals being exposed . ?his can 1e avoided 1y developing

,, situation specific risk based cleanup criteria or by developing arange of exposure seeviarios which can be selectively applied tospecific situations . The cost conservative approach (and the leasttime consusin=) is to use reasonable worst case exposure sceearies toprotect the most sensitive individual likely to be exposed .

( (D) Chemical class clesnup ob jectives have bees set for classes ofI' compounds . Cleanup objectives white have been established for a class

of compounds are seed as a surrogate or action level to iodinate if acloser look at the individual ebesicals comprising the residue iswarranted .

(11) Ap_plication of Cleanus Approaches to WJDLT Trearass .

soil cleanup levels have "to developed based on anticipated background orrisk assessment . to pseral$ the Departseet attempts to establish a soilcleanup level that :

" protects human health from direct contact" protects groundwater from degradation due to leatbisg" protects surface water (is situations when oisraties of

contaminated soil to surface water to a possibility).

?be 'pepartueet bas also established surrogate or alarm levels for classesof compounds . These surrogates are usually conservatively set to sere asas indicator or "red flag" to /Mist the seed for further attesties . This

L approach allow staff sot trained is toxicology to detersise erbee theassistance of a toxicologist /enviroaSestal ebesist to seeded. to general,surrogate levels are lot cleanup susbers, but they could be is certainsituations .

` ("). Inorganic compounds '" Cleanup levels for setais bows bees establishedbased on expected background eoscentratioss to few Jersey soils . Thecleanup objectives are generally to 1 to 3 times laetprosed depeedissso the range of concentration observed sew toxicity. Table 1summarises Vow Jersey background, United States baek=rovsd sod soilcleanup objectives . Some of the cleanup objectives were proposed by

OW

tCU, tpplicints and have been accepted by the Department is gmelmups . The cleanup objectives applied at a specific site strap bedifferent that those listed to Table 1 depending on site specificfactors . These esceptions normally allow higher levels to cousin onsite . These situations include (1) if information exists to indicatethe soil background essite is different that values listed is thetable, (2) eootesinatioe from other sources is suspected (especiallylead on a site -star highways), (3) a contamination problem is areawide and (4) encapsulation is included as part of the cleanup plan .

(t) Or cnie eoatamlea- - Cleanup levels for individual organic toepouedsawe been developed based on s at assesmot methodologies . A worst

ease soil intestine model is good to calculate as acceptable soilcontaminant level (ASCL) to protect individuals fro* direct contactand a simple transport to groundwater model is used to calculate toASCL to protect groundwater quality . The ASCL9 ate then compared to

( analytical method detection limits to determine ii the calculatedconcentration can be measured accurately . If the risk based criterionis below the method detection limit, the method detection limitbecomes the cleanup objective.

[AsThis latter approach bas been used by the New Jersey Division of Ja=ardous-site Mitigation (DVSM) to develop an acceptable soil eestssisest level for

L LCSs based on direct contact . (Transport to groundwater was consideredissisoificaot since Me bind strongly to soils .) A ti"t assessmentutilising a pica and inhalation of soil scenario indicated that iedividaalscould !e esposed to soils contaminated with 274 ppb of Ms withoutexceeding a ore-in-a-million lifetime gauger risk doe to this esposure.The limit of detection of Me to soil using current analytical methods is2.3 pps. In reality S Dye or above can be detected with confidence. Thus

i_ the acceptable soil contaminant level (based en analytical methods) Is Sppe. In situations where the potential its children to ame is contact

/ with soils is treat (if., parts, schooipatds, residential areas) S ppe istot adequate to protect health and a cleanup objective of 1 pps sboaid beconsidered, to spite of the inherent eeee:taisty with retard to

- wantitation.

This risk approach bas bees embodied is a doeuftest ntitled Calculation ofCleanup Levels for Costasisated coils, recently prepared by WIN . Tee

s approach outlined is the document is composed of tyro steps (A) selection of, ebevieals of centers sod (1) eoculatiee of acceptable soil contaminant

levels to protect isdividaals frem direct sostaet avid to protectgroundwater and surface water quality . The approach has bees wood to tootand ealeaiate acceptable soil contaminant towels for 21 eoupooeds uriebinclude Mme chlorinated soieests, oosebloriested soivests, Dhesols,plpcplicaroustle bpdrocat"oes, and phthalates . This approach vasdeveloped is-boese and bas sot gone tbtonsb as external poor review. ORINis. finalising a request for proposal to 'hire a consultant to review .critique and sefiso the approach developed "y DW.

46

' (C) Purr tte or action levels have been developed for volatile organic$,&s# neutral estractables and petroleum hydrocarbons as shown below .

volatile organic# 1 rpmlate Neutrals 10 ppePetroleum Sydrocarboos 100 rpm

r' (n) Cbeaical Class Cleanup Objectives have beet set for petroleumhydrocarbons 'at 100 ppe . This vas assumed to be "industrialbackground".) The actual soil cleanup euober will vary depending onthe chemical constituents present in the petroleum residue . S.evelsgreater than 100 ppm may be acceptable it the residue is comprisedmainly of toluene or syleoes while a 1" .e1 lose that 100 rpm say bewarranted it the residue is comprised mostly of benzene and/or thecarcinogenic polyouclear aromatic hydrocarbons.

i

i

"iL

r

ADLt 1

t Itetsl ".1. 0.f . Cleanup Tile aboveL feckiroos"a tecktroosd . Objective "ack=rowad

arsenic ".A.u1~

1.1 - 16 .7G c (~

~~ 20 "ps ".4.%f, ;.r . ., I . to- f ~ ~~ 1

fCadmium 1.0-4.0 0.01 - 1.0pp. 2 "a

Chro.in. 5.0 -48 1- 1.500 100 pp. 2Copper 0.5 - $3.6 2 - 200 170Cyanide ".A. 0.0l, lit ".".

Load 1 .0 - 160 2 - 200 1150 - 1000! 1-2

J, mercury " .A . 0.01 - 4.6 1 ".".

"iekel 11.1 - 66 .5 6 - $50 100 t

:eloei~ 0.01 - 4k 0.01 - 5.0 4 1

silver P." . 0.01 - S S "." .

'' site , 4.5 - 169 10 - 3000 250 2

a. Data` isoe steppes Totb or "arrlr motto, Cook Colleges Itutsers" Ooiveraity .,

-4001 U

4%

C ~If. Agricultural aoile is ".J.

suggested "p a consultant sa as zC&A sane.

."i61thr

IL

} .

Documents

United States Army Corps of Engineers · RECEIVED 1988 M COEKCCHST SUPERFUND BRANCH CONTAMINATION EVALUATION AT THE U.S. COAST GUARD STATION (FORMER ENGINEERS SCHOOL) FORT TOTTEN