156
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES FOR THE THE L. A. CLARKE SUPERFUND SITE SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY, VIRGINIA Spotsylvania County, Virginia Wednesday, March 9, 1988 ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS,INC. . Stenotype Reporters 444 North Capitol Street Washington, D.C 20001 (202)347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646 flR5QQ03l

United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

TRANSCRIPTOF PROCEEDINGS

ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

PUBLIC MEETING

PROPOSED CLEANUP ALTERNATIVESFOR THE

THE L. A. CLARKE SUPERFUND SITE

SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Spotsylvania County, Virginia

Wednesday, March 9, 1988

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.. Stenotype Reporters444 North Capitol StreetWashington, D.C 20001

(202)347-3700Nationwide Coverage800-336-6646

flR5QQ03l

Page 2: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

PUBLIC MEETING

PROPOSED CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES

FOR THE

L. A. CLARKE SUPERFUND SITE

SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY, VIRGINIA

WEDNESDAY, MARCti 9, 1988...i

Lee Hill Community Center

Routes 2 & 17, Junction Route 608

Spotsylvania County, Virginia

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. . p -202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage " SOoflsfifcSaJ U 0 3 2

Page 3: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 .01 01

.rysimons 1.

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

PANEL PARTICIPANTS

RAY GERMANN, Public .Affairs. Special is t .

U.S. EPA - Region III '"... . -"._" - . . - "

841 Chestnut Street . . - - -

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107

DARIUS OSTRAUSKAS, Remedial Project Manager

U.S. E P A Region I I I ._... . . _ . . . " . . -

841 Chestnut Street,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ,19107 ._ .. .

KIMBALL PAYNE, County Administrator

Spotsylvania, County, Virginia

JONATHAN D. HORIN, Environmental Engineer Senior

Department of Waste Management

Commonwealth of Virginia . _

101 North.._14th Street "

Richmond, Virginia 23219 -/

JOHN V. ROLAND, Assistant Director of Operations

Office of Enforcement

State Water Control Board

P. 0, Box 11143

Richmond, Virginia 23230

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage „,"-._. SPQJ36-6646flR500033

Page 4: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

3

FREDERICK K. CUNNINGHAM, Water Control Engineer

Virginia Water Control Board _. . ; . . " . . ... ,._

2111 N. Hamilton Street • - - - :

Richmond, Virginia 23230-1143

GREG CLAYTON

Air Pollution Specialist

Nine Counties in Virginia

Air Pollution Control Board

K. C. DAS, Ph.D., Director

Administration and Special.-Programs

Department of Waste Management

1 0 1 North 14th Street • ; . - • -

Richmond, Virginia 23219 —- . . .. _.....__ .-_

HUGH COSNER, Supervisor . _ . " . [ " . . . _ "

Lee Hill District :

Spotsylvania, County, Virginia

* * * * *

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 80a-33&di§ 0 0 0 3 f

Page 5: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 0.1

.ry simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

4

P R O C E E D I N G S

. . . The Public Meeting to Present a Summary

of the RI/FS and the Proposed Remedy for the L. A. Clarke

Site convened, pursuant to notice, at 7:30 p.m., Ray

Germann, presiding . . .

MR. PAYNE: I would like to welcome everybody

here tonight.

I think we all know why we are here, but I

would like.to bv? way of a few opening remarks explain some

of the reasons behind this meeting.

This meeting is really designed to- serve two

purposes. Firs.t of all, the meeting is being held in

accordance with some of the regulatory requirements under

the Superfund Program to allow the Environmental

Protection Agency to. receive public comment on the

remedial investigation and feasibility study that has been

conducted at the L. A. Clarke site over the last several

years. . . . . . _

That is the main purpose of why we are here

tonight, and we want to concentrate on that first.

There is another purpose as well. The Board of

Supervisors of Spotsylvania County has requested that in

addition to us hearing about the Superfund progress on the

site, that a number of State agencies also be present so

that they can explain the ongoing day-to-day activities at

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 ; Nationwide Coverage 80C$if|§lf} Q fl S

Page 6: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

13

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

5

the site and also so that you can get a better

understanding of what the State agencies'.,.. role is in

relationship to the Superfund_program and in relationship

to the Environmental Protection agency.

We have individuals here from the State

Department of Waste Management, the State Water Control

7 ij Board and the State Air Pollution Control-Board.

I would like to introduce some of thoseiindividuals right now.

From the Virginia Department of Waste

Management we have Mr. K. C. Das .and Mr. John Horin.

If you would just-stand and raise your hands so

people will know who you are.

(Mr. Das and Mr. Horin stand in the audience,)

From the Virginia Air pollution Control Board,

Mr. Lew Baumann and Mr. Greg Clayton.

audience.)

(Mr. Baumann and Mr. Clayton stand in the

From the State Water Control Board we have Mr.

Gary Moore, Ms. Kathleen O'Connell, Mr. Cunningham and Ms.

Melanie Donohue.

(Ms. O'Connell, Ms. Donohue, Mr. Moore and Mr.

Cunningham stand.)

They are clustered up here in the front.

Also, I would like to-recognize Mr. Hugh

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage = 800-3

Page 7: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090.. 01 01.

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11-

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19.

20

21

22

23

24

25

6

Cosner, the Supervisor for the Lee High District who is

here tonight .in the _audience...._.

(Mr. Cosner stands.).

The meeting tonight wi.ll initially start and

initially be run by the representatives who are up here

from the Environmental Protection Agency. They do have

certain regulatory requirements that they have to meet.

That is why the meeting is being recorded.

Once do their presentation on the superfund

activities and explain what they have done there and

answer your questions, then we will be able to concentrate

on any questions that you might have from the people from

the State agencies.,..

At this -time let me introduce the two main

people from the Environmental Protection Agency, Mr.

Darius Ostrauskas from Region III in Philadelphia and Mr.

Ray Germann, who I believe you have seen before, those of

you who were here two years ago.

At this time I'm just going to turn this over

to Ray

Thank you.

MR. GERMANN: Thank you, Kirn.

Like Kirn said, the primary purpose that the EPA

is here tonight is to try to get comments on a proposed

•remedial cleanup remedy for the L. A. Clarke Superfund

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.D-H6>664fi

37202-347-3700.. . Nationwide Coverage fl DB<D-

Page 8: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

13

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

site.

7

I know that people have a lot of different

concerns, not necessarily related to this particular part

of the^project that we are involved in tonight, but we

want to_ spend some time on this because we are nearing a

point in this project where we are ready to make a

decision on what is going to. be the final cleanup option .

chosen for this particular portion of the cleanup at L. A

Clarke.

We are going to. explain it using these maps and

those fact sheets in a little bit of detail to try to give

you an idea of what we are considered doing, the studies

that we have done and what at this point we are looking

toward as a final cleanup option.i

Just to go over basically what has happened ini

the last couple of years, studies that we did over the

first year or year and a half of that process were

summarized in a document called a. Remedial Investigation.

What that is basically is a compilation of"all

the data that we have gathered up to that particular point

in time, and it includes sampling of groundwater, soil,

sediment and a whole variety of media, and it's put

together in a report which forms the basis for a final

decision on the cleanup.

Now this final decision is based on a document

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. « D q H fl fl R202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6fidK 0 U U U J Q

Page 9: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

called a feasibility study. This remedial investigation

and feasibility study is the primary document which

supports a cleanup by the EP_A ..under..the Superfund program.

So-we have finished .that remedial investigation

and feasibility study now and we have something called a

proposed plan, which is that document that most of you

should have in your hands there, and that summarizes

everything we have done over the last.two years and it

tells you. want .alternative looks "to this agency and to the

State Department of .Waste=. Management and the best cleanup

alternative for this site.

One of the functions of this meeting is to get

input on that tentative decision. The comments that do.

come up here tonight will be and are by law considered as

part of'the public record toward the decision on the final

cleanup.

So, like I say, it's .very important that we try

to get a little bit of focus on the meeting tonight, at

least initially, so that we can get some comments on that

study and this, part of the cleanup.

There is.going to be another aspect to the

Superfund process. It complicates things a little bit,

but the plan that we are talking about tonight deals

specifically with soil _onsite and sediment, what are

thought to be the sources of contamination.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC202O47-3700 ...".L..." ~__._N_ationwide Coverage

Page 10: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

3

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

9

So that we are going to direct our efforts

initially toward what we think are the sources of

contamination, remove the sources and that will be our

first step in removing the problem.

The next step, which is expected to begin thisi

summer, is an examination or a more in-depth examinationi

of groundwater, something that i: know a lot of you are

concerned about because you drink it, and the surroundingi

environment, areas such as Massaponax Creek, for example,

and ponds=in the general vicinity.

In such a second Darius is going to get up and

explain this particular part, this first part of the

Superfund cleanup process.

There are several other, as Kirn said, severali

other agencies involved in the regulation _of..,that

facility, and I'm just going to touch briefly on some of

their responsibilities.

Like I say, the EPA and the Department of Waste

Management are primarily at this time concerned with the

Superfund cleanup. That is primarily what we are involved

in, although we do have input in the other aspects of the

examination of the facility.

The State Water Control Board at this time is

quite active in their regulation of the facility. Some of

you might know that there is a public hearing within the

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. fl202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6546

Page 11: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

5

6

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10

next couple of weeks regarding permits issued to that

facility which enable them to discharge into local streams

and rivers, and that...is, like I say, one of the problems

that we are facing here.

That is not a completely different aspect of

the project, but one that is not included in this plan

that we are here to .discuss tonight, although we do have

people who can try to.answer to answer your questions

regarding"that if need..be.

The State Air Pollution Control Board, as you

know, was heavily involved, and still is, but was more

heavily involved in th is whole issue maybe a couple of

years ago, or as recently as a year or so ago when the

emissions from the plant were a lot more serious than I

think that they are today. That obviously is their

primary responsibility, regulating emissions from

processes that go on there.

The County of Spotsylvania also has been very

involved, especially in trying to minimize odors from the

facility, and they have a legal agreement with the

facility that is designed to control that odor problem.

Then all the agencies I mentioned and the

Governor's office of the State of Virginia have a concern

of trying to, while competently regulating the L. A.

Clarke facility,' keeping these gentlemen in business so

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 .._.. .... Nationwide Coverage

Page 12: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01 - 11

.rysimons 1 that they can continue to be a productive part of your

2 economy.

3 That is a goal that we are all striving towards

4 is both, having them in business and having them operate In

5 the way that is for the people who live around the

6 facility.

7 At this point I'm going to turn the., meet ing

8 over to Darius so that he can get into some of the details

9 specifically of what we are here at EPA an agency to talk

10 about tonight.

11 If you would .:just let him get through his

12 proposal, and then if you could ask any questions that you

13 might have on that.proposal and on the information that he

14 give you, we1!! try to answer them at that time.

15 i As soon as that period, of time is over, we'll

16 open the meeting up to any other questions regarding thati

17 facility that you may have. i18 Now we are going to try to as strictly as we

19 can adhere to that schedule. Obviously we are not going

20 to be ridiculous about the whole thing. If somebody

21 thinks of a question later that they didn't ask before,

22 please do so. But that's the way we are going to-__try to

23 handle it. - .-

24 So I'm going to turn it over to Darius now and

25 he is going to go through the proposed plan.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage

Page 13: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01.. 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12.

13

14.

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

12

Thank you.

(Mr.. Ostrauskas gives his presentation using

large diagrams as reference._material. )

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Generally I guess one way toj —,summarize what the Superfund program is all about, it is-

designed primarily to deal with. re_mediation of

contamination that has been caused.due.to the improper

handl ing of" hazardous was.te-.materials -

The Superfund is not .designed, for instance, to

regulate active facilities- that discharge, for instance,

processed.waste waters due to their active operations or

emit, air emissions from a facility due to active

operations.

The Superfund is generally designed to address

what we would generally consider abandoned waste

materials, waste materials that have been deposited in the

environment in a way that they are just not properly

contained and therefore potentially present a threat to

either human health or the environment.

So that is why with all these issues regarding

the active operation why Superfund really doesn't get

involved with that. Even though there might be some sort

of problem potentially associated with active operations,

that is just not the nature of the Superfund program to

deal =with that.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700, ..""'.. ..T . Nationwide Coverage 80Qi3

Page 14: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

13.

So what I will be talking about generally is

how we deal with really contamination that for all intentsi

and purposes has resulted from this facility's operations

since 1937, which is when the facility actually began

ooeration.

As you are probably aware, L, A. Clarke and

Son, "^corporated, is a wood treatment facility that has

used creosote since about 19-37. I'm sure you all are

familiar with the general location of the facility. Route

is 608-over here and what we have is Massaponax Creek

running towards Ruffins Pond, which I guess is two miles

or so downstream.

You've got residents living along 608 here and

also residents living up just north of the .facility here

on 609 and also south on 609 a little ways down the road.

I guess all the residents here are on private wells the

way I"understand it.

This area in here between the facility itself

and the creek is in fact what we consider to be a wetland

according to different species of, plants that occur there,

and actually even part of the site itself in this area is

what we consider a wetland meadow type area.

So this is the type of area that, for instance,

the EPA is interested in protecting because of its unique

character.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage ~ W- §6S64B n /") n i i

Page 15: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

14

In terms of the site itself ——

FROM THE FLOOR: " Would you go back over what

E.PA was referring to as the wetland area? Would you

restate that. I couldn't catch it.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, generally the wetlands ..

are .protected by ..the_ EPA in a certain manner —-

FROM THE FLOOR: Walt a minute. Generally they

are in a certain manner, would you elaborate, because I'm

listening now, and I didn' t.= really understand.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: What I'm saying is that if you

have a particular piece of land that has a certain type of

plant growing on it, that that will render that piece of

land a wetlands. In Federal law there are certain laws

that say that if a piece of land is called a wetland, then

you have to follow certain rules and regulations

regarding, for instance, building there or doing anything

there.

So that there are, for instance, different

Federal Executive Orders and things of that nature which

say, for instance, if you want to build a house here in

this wetland, you have to follow "certain requirements that

are spelled basically in the law.

That's why I mentioned this, that this area in

here is in fact this type of area because of the type of

plants that occur there.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700" " Nationwide Coverage 800-336 646 C n n H I C

Page 16: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

15

FROM THE FLOOR: Would. I thinking along the

right lines if something were damaging those p_lants other

than building a house that there might be..a Federal law

that might protect that, area, the water and the plantsjthat grow there?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes. ' Well, that is what we

are here about. " , ~ -- - —

FROM THE FLOOR: Thank you.

FROM THE FLOOR: I've got a question ——i

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I think, as Ray said, I can

answer questions, but I've got to go through, and maybe

after ——

MR. GERMANN: If you could keep a mental note

of your question.

FROM THE FLOOR: I've got.one question that I

think should be answered. I run a plant, and I amipersonally liable by the Federal Government by what I say

and what I do. How many of you up here are personally

liable by what you say and what you do?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I'm very liable.

FROM THE FLOOR: I'm personally liable by

Federal law by what I do. Now are you personally liable

by what you do?

MR. GERMANN: Well, the answer is we are all

personally liable. I mean we have all been threatened by

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 8

Page 17: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0-090 01 .01.

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

16

suits or are faced with suits ——

FROM THE FLOOR: By what you say tonight are

you personally liable or not?

MR. GERMANN: I don't understand yourj *question. ..We are going to have to go on with this thing

because I don't understand what you're asking.

FROM THE FLOOR: Okay. Thank you.

FROM THE FLOOR: You won't commit, in other

words, right? " ..

MR. GERMANN: I guess that's right. ..

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: At any rate, I mean I'm just

describing that this is a wetland area here. In terms of

the facility itself, the kinds of features that are

important are, for instance, you have the actual

processing facility located in this portion of the site.

Also, we have a lagoon here, for instance, which is

basically a pond that has been created in which waste

water is stored after use.

We've got-a couple of drainage ditches. We

have one drainage ditch running this way here, and we have

another drainage ditch running here, and also we have

another drainage ditch going through this part of the

site, and they are basically designed to discharge storm

water runoff from the facility.

If you have water, for instance, running down

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-3 - 64? U U 0 k 7

Page 18: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

00.90 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

17 .

this direction, it will eventually find its way into these

ditches, and also I guess during the years probably at

some point process water from the^ facility itself probably

made its way into these ditches.* •We have a soil pile here .that was created when

I guess~there was a spill of sorts around .the facility ati

one point and the State Water Control Board requested that

some of the contaminated soil be excavated, and that soil

has been put on a liner in this area in here. That isi

another feature of concern.

Also, we do have of course groundwater

underlying the facility, and what: you have is a situation

where there is a clay layer that, of instance, lies

approximately 12 feet below the process facility and,

depending on what part of the site you're on, it's at

16 j least several feet thick, if not more.

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

What you have then is two water bearing bodies

essentially of concern on the site. You have one that

sits on top of this clay layer, and then you have another

water bearing body which lies below this clay layer.

Over the years of course since the facility has

been operating since 1937, waste water that has been

generated during operations has been handled in several

different ways. We are not entirely aware of how waste

water was handled in early years of operation, but I would

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage '" " 8

Page 19: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19,

20

21

22.

23

24

25

18..

hazard to guess that, there is probably a chance that at

least some waste was actually going into these ditches

directly "at s_ome~ point in time.

.Also, of. cours'e", another matter that you're

probably aware of is the use of the dehydrator that was

causing the air problems, that was another manner in which

waste .water was handled-at one point.

At other times what we found through aerial

photographs was that there were a series of pits that we

have identified where-it appeared that waste water and/or

what, we call sludge, which is_.basically the contaminated

material that settles at the bottom of waste water, was

being apparently disposed of in several pits around the

site. As you can see, these are the locations that we

picked.up from the aerial photographs.

Also, this lagoon here was used for disposal of

waste water at one ..time as well. Occasionally the lagoon

apparently would overflow and there wa.s. apparently this so-

called -overflow lagoon area here where you did have, for

instance, waste water actually would run out of the lagoon

and sometimes cover this area in here.

Also, I guess spraying of waste water was

another manner in which the waste.water as disposed of.

Now in terms of the extent of contamination at

the site, I'm going to -- help me flip that over.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336- 4? 5 0 0 0 k 9

Page 20: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01 i 19

.rysimons 1 (New chart displayed.)

2 What "I. have put together here is sort of a

3 graphic representation. I've tried to summarize on this

4 map here what we have have found to be what I :calL here

5 the primary and secondary sources of contamination at.the

6 site. t

7 What we have is contaminated soil and sedimenti

8 materials that have resulted from the various practices

9 over the years of the facility's operation on this map

10 depicted in sort of a generalized manner.

11 This is put together primarily with information

12 from the RFS Study, the remedial Investigation part in

13 particular which was the so-called extent of contamination

14 study.

15 The sources of the contamination, soil andi

16 sediment contamination at the site are primarily the types

17 of practices I was talking about, and I'll get into that a

18 little bit more now.

19 First of all, may be I should discuss what are

20 we concerned about here exactly in terms of contaminants,

21 and what exactly is the problem here.

22 Well, really the material of concern here is

23 creosote itself. Creosote actually consists of a very

24 large group of compounds, many of which do have

25 significant toxicity, and if exposed to high

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. . _202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage ""= 800-336-6646 Anbu0050

Page 21: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

20

concentrations of these compounds over a long period of

time, it could potentially cause detrimental health

effects. :...-: : "• il~; T- - ~:: ~.--.-—.:~:=-.-~-

So that as a result, the creosote compounds arejwhat we are concerned about, and in particular there are

two groups of compounds within creosote. There is the so-

called polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon compounds, which

we call PNAs.. for short, and then the other types of

compounds that we are concerned about are called aromatic

compounds, but essentially the main contaminant we are

concerned about out of this so-called group of aromatic

compounds that occurs in creosote is benzene.

So that in terms of contaminants of concern,

what we are looking at are _these so-called PNAs and

benzene, and what this particular map here shows ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Is aromatics airborne?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Pardon me?

FROM THE FLOOR: Would aromatics be airborne?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Aromatics are, I don't know

how to best describe it, they are solvents. Like, for

instance, benzene is an organic solvent and it'sic ——

airborne?

FROM THE FLOOR: But are they prone to be

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Oh, yes. Aromatics, for

instance, benzene is a volatile compound that can go into

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 . .Nationwide Coverage 8QO-336jS6«5 ft ft n c

Page 22: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01 • 21--- -

^rysimons 1 the atmosphere.

2 FROM THE FLOOR: It immediately goes into the

3 atmosphere, right?

4 a ' MR. OSTRAUSKAS: It can, yes.

5 FROM THE FLOOR: Could, I ask one question,ii

6 please, before you go any further. When you mention PNAs,

7 how many different chemicals are you talking about in the

8 PNAs? Are you talking one or two or 25 or.more?

9 | MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Oh, no, you're talking about

10 literally probably over a hundred.

11 FROM THE FLOOR: So when you say PNAs, make

12 sure .you express it that is has different chemicals.

13 MR. OSTRAUSKAS: What you have, and creosote,

14 as I said, is made up of a very large number of thesei

15 different types of organic compounds. What we do is

16 essentially just look at the total -concentration of these

17 PNA compounds.

18 So what this map here shows is where the

19 highest concentrations of PNAs have been found to-be at

20 the site. Why don't I go through the areas that we have

21 mapped here.

22 FROM THE FLOOR: Do you have a list of-the PNAs

23 that have been found at the site?

24 MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, any wood treatment

25 facility that uses creosote, it's going to have the same_

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-:3 6§S§ 0 0 0 S ?

Page 23: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10-

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

22

group of PNAs found there.

FROM THE FLOOR: Is that just dioxin and

phenols and all this other stuff?

MR.- OSTRAUSKAS: No. Dioxin is not found ina . . .

creoso.te. Phenols are found in creosote. Phenols,

however, are not a PNA compound and they are not one of

the compounds that we are concerned about primarily. I'll

get into thai a little bi.t..—-

FROM THE FLOOR: I'm concerned because it was

found in ray well.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I'll get into that a little

bit later on, but right now I just want to make it clear,

that PNAs and benzene are the two most toxic compounds

that we're concerned about in this particular case.

FROM THE FLOOR: I was under the impression

that you all were concerned about any ill-causing, any

chemical that: would be that that would deal with a health

problem. I didn't think we were going to come here

tonight after many times and hear you people say I'm only

concerned about one, two or three chemicals. If it's a

health problem, I think you ought to be concerned about

it, and I hope that you are.

FROM THE FLOOR: All of them.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: We are concerned about them,

and maybe I'm —— ;

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 - - Nationwide Coverage 800-33 6 65 00053

Page 24: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

; 23FROM THE FLOOR: You're not bringing that as a

point, sir. You're trying to._f loat ...over the issue.

FROM THE FLOOR: You're trying to speak abovei

our heads is what .you're trying to do.cFROM THE FLOOR: You're trying to talk pyer ——

heads.

FROM THE FLOOR: You're trying to talk over our

MR. GERMANN: Now wait a second. What is it

exactly that you don't understand?

FROM THE FLOOR: I""think the man in the fronti

of the room ought to sit down and, let the people ask some

questions.

FROM THE FLOOR: You know, your chemicals.

you're speaking above our heads.

little ——

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, maybe I can explain___it a

FROM THE FLOOR: Was the chemicals of the 30's

and_creosote the same.as the chemicals in the 70's?

FROM THE FLOOR: Good point.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Pardon me?

FROM THE FLOOR: Are the same chemicals in the

1930's they used the same chemicals in the 1970's a n d _ _

80's?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: As far we know, the only

chemical that has ever been used for wood treatment at

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage

Page 25: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

24

this facility is creosote, and we have never——

FROM THE FLOOR: Yes, but has creosoie kept the

same chemicals ——

FROM THE..FLOOR: Is, it. comprised of the same

elements as it was in the 1930's.

FROM THE FLOOR: Was it the same in 1930 as it

is in 1980? ...... . ... .

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I mean essentially it's the

same — yes, creosote is a derivative-of coal tar and

different facilities, for instance, may use certain

creosote solutions that might differ slightly in terms of

content, but essentially they consist of the same types of

compounds.

Really, I would like to make it simpler. I

don't know what more to say other than these PNA ——

FROM THE FLOOR: PNA, I don't know what PNA

is. I've got no more idea ..what PNA is than ——

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, maybe the best way to

. look at it is creosote itself is a compound that we are

concerned about, and if you're exposed to creosote itself

over long periods of time -- for instance, if you have

drinking water that had a little bit of creosote dissolved

in it, that we would.be concerned about that because you

don't want to be drinking water that has a little bit of

creosote dissolved in it.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3.700 ~ Nationwide Coverage Soflsfi-S 0055

Page 26: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

Q090 01 01 I 25-,

^rysimons 1 So that is what this is all about. What we

2 want to do is prevent water —— , " ;

3 FROM THE FLOOR: Is creosote made of coal tar?

4 MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes, 'that's right. It's aa

5 coal tar derivative.

6 FROM THE FLOOR: "Is it, accumulated coal dust?

7 - MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Pardo^n me?i8 FROM THE FLOOR: Is that made out of coal dust?

9 -- MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Coal !tar is made from coal.i10 FROM THE FLOOR: Ain't that hazardous to your

11 lungs?

12 MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes. Well, it's related,

13 that's right.

14 FROM THE FLOOR: I'll |tell you;, something, Ii

15 worked for the mines for damn near 20 years, and that coali

16 is made of coal tar?

17 MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well,' what you do is you make

18 creosote from coal, and coal tar is the derivative, of coal

19 and creosote — you can't make a connection between coal,

20 for instance, and creosote.

21_ FROM THE FLOOR: It's a substance of coal,

22 right?

23 MR. OSTRAUSKAS: As I said, I don't think you

24 can make ——

25 MR. GERMANN: Listen, excuse me. I jus_t want

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC,202-347-3700 -Nationwide Coverage " 8

Page 27: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01.

.ry simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1.5

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 "

him to be able to get through his presentation. He'll

answer all the questions you have, I promise you.

FROM THE FLOOR: Well, we want to understand

what he's —- . ---.^,-~--^ - -j

MR. GERMANN: See, what's happening is.people

are losing their train of thought, and not understanding

the point he's trying to. make. So let him make his point

and then we'll answer your "questions.

All right?

(Disgruntlement expressed from the audience.)

Whatever will get us rolling again.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: The main thing is to just

understand that creosote is what we are concerned about

here, and I don't want to get too much into the chemistry

of creosote.

But generally the areas where you have the

highest creosote levels in the soil are marked in the

yellow here. For instance, these drainage ditches here

that over the years creosote has collected in -the sediment

and in the drainage ditch, and some of it has made its way

down into this wetlands here, for instance.

If you go maybe between one and five feet below

ground surface in this area you'll find high

concentrations of creosote in this area here.

In this area here where you had overflows of _..

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. A ft r - n202-347-3700 T Nationwide Coverage 800-flrf«6wU 0 0 5 7

Page 28: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

27

this lagoon, because the waste water from the plant, which

had creosote in it overflowed from the lagoon, you have

creosote in these soils here around this lagoon.

The soil pile which was dug up in an area where3 i

there was a spill of creosote, again, you've got creosote

in this soil in this pile here.

This area in here, what we've seen is that

there has been creosote just spilled on the surface here,

so that you have high creosote levels on the surface, andi

then also in the same area you'll have creosote levels

actually below ground sitting on this clay lawyer that is

about 12 feet below the ground.

FROM THE FLOOR: I would like to ——

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Please, sir, if you would just

let me keep going ——

FROM THE FLOOR: This is an interest point to

me though. When you dug that soil .up did you have a

document or any type of paperwork where that soil went to,

or does anybody know where that soil went to? •

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: We didn't dig it up. You

don't understand. What we do is we drill a hole .down ——

FROM THE FLOOR: You didn't dig it up. You

drilled a hole through it?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Sir, what we do is we drill a

hole down in the ground, and we didn't dig any ——

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-33

'" 00058

Page 29: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

••*»--s

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

28

FROM THE.FLOOR: Then say you. dig a hole, and

don't..say you dug it up.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: -We drilled a hole in the

ground 3and we found that there is. creosote underground

here on top of this clay layer that is about 12 feet below

the ground's.surface. " "

Also, we have this drainage ditch here also

where you have creosote, and then it deposited down in

this wetland here in the same manner as over here, and you

also have contamination below the ground surface here.

Then we did find a couple of these pits here

which were used ' for disposal of. creosote over the years.

What we found is because of-the handling of the

creosote, the fact that it wasn't properly contained, that

the aquifer, the water bearing unit that underlies this

site that sits on top of this clay layer is contaminated

with creosote, and that's what we are concerned about

primarily is we want to make sure that people do not, for

instance, drink water that has creosote in it.-

The whole purpose here now is for us to figure

out what we are going.to do with all this contaminated

soil so we can prevent it from getting into the

groundwater and into people's drinking water.

FROM THE FLOOR: We wouldn't want that going

into a cree.k and kill animals and things like that.

_ ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700.. Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646 flR500059l

Page 30: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.ry simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

29

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: That's one purpose. N.ow the

other thing I wanted to get into was that .we have this.

stream running by this site, and again you can see thati -"

the contamination here is relatively close to the creek.

So that what we also want to do is to protect this wetlandihere, and we want to protect the creek from receiving any

creosote from the facility.

Also we have this area in here, this pond

actually just to the west of the facility which also

apparently has some creosote in it, and we are concerned

about that as well.

FROM THE FLOOR: Are you talking about the pond

that's adjacent to 608?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes, that's right, 608.

FROM THE FLOOR: .Is that the one that they

found the fish with the cancerous! lesions that the

Wildlife, or the Fish and Game ——

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: That's right. There are fish

that were caught in that pond which apparently had the

types of lesions that would be associated with being

exposed to creosote. Apparently what they were doing is

they were feeding on the bottom of this pond and the

exposure of the gills and the mouth area of the sediment

caused basically cancerous lesions. So that what happens

is that is an example of what creosote can do at high

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Cbverage 800-

Page 31: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

00'90 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

30

concentrations.

FROM THE FLOOR: Sir, when you show that chart

to someone else, please code it., in a bright yellow. I

think that is,a primary contaminant area, too.jMR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, the reason these areas

here are —-and I call these containment sources. I

wanted to make to make a distinction ——

FROM THE FLOOR: That's on site and also

offsite, too. So you would want to color that in as a

problem area.

FROM THE FLOOR: What is that railroad track

running through that piece of paper you've got there?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Pardon me?

What is that railroad track running through

that piece of paper?

MR. OSTRAQSKAS: What, the railroad that goes

through — oh, over here you've talking about. 608 is

right here.

FROM THE FLOOR: So are you talking about some

of our ponds have been contaminated?

MR, OSTRAUSKAS: Well, I'm saying that this

pond right here had these fish in it that apparently had

been exposed to creosote, and therefore that is why they

had these problems.

I don.'t know what you all call this pond. All

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-3J6-6

Page 32: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01 : 31

^rysimons 1 I know is that it's the pond that is located just ——. .i

2 FROM THE FLOOR: Is"that the pond adjacent to

3 the traffic —— _. . . . . ;

4 m MR. OSTRAUSKAS: This.is 608 right-here, and

5 here is the site. So it's betwee.n 608 and the site. I

6 don't know what you call the pond, but it's between 608i

7 and —— |

8 FROM THE FLOOR: Is it south of Massappnax

9 Creek?

10 FROM THE FLOOR: No, the West VACO.

11 MR. OSTRAUSKAS: See, here's the creek down

12 here.- This is the creek down here and the pond is up

13 here. The pond is actually not connected to Massaponax

14 Creek at all. It's up here and it drains into Massaponax

15 Creek, but it's not actually connected with Massaponax' - - - - Li16 Creek. It's not on the Massaponax. Ruffins Ponds, forii

17 instance is downstream.

18 So, again, what we are concerned about here at

19 this point is the contaminated soils and sediments.

20 We also are concerned obviously with the

21 contaminated groundwater which we have already pointed out

22 exists below the site.

23 What we will be doing is this summer we will be

24 further looking into what we .need to do to actually clean

25 up the contaminated ground water, but in the meantime what

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Cd'verage 81 .„ , , ... „

0062

Page 33: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

32 -:-

we want to. do is to cut off these sources of contamination

that are creating the contaminated ground water in the

first" place. - . . - - . - •

So that want we do in this case then is, the so-

called feasibility study is designed to evaluate what are

our options to deal with this contaminated soil and

sediment.

That's what I would like to talk about right

now, is _what are the options that we have looked at and

talk a little bit about why we prefer particular

alternatives over the others.

First of all, I guess in terms of deciding

which alternative is the most appropriate in this case, we

used several different criteria.

First of all, the most important thing is

whatever we pick, we want to make sure that it is

protective of human health and the environment. We want

to make sure that whatever we do will hopefully help clean

up groundwater and will protect this stream that runs by

the site, Massaponax Creek.

Other considerations are whatever we select,

obviously it has to be implementable. It has to be

something that we can actually do. We can't come up with

something that is impossible.

FROM THE FLOOR: Can I ask a question?

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 ; Nationwide Coverage 800-33j-©4ff n ri _

Page 34: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

: 33 .

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Actually, sir, if you could. ^^k

wait —— . ^^

FROM THE FLOOR: The stream that comes by the

Massaponax goes into the Massaponax. Even if. you do clean

up the site, how long will it be. before we people can be

sure about it? : - -

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, that's a good point.

During these groundwater studies . that we're doing, we are

also going to be further studying all areas that on down

the site just to make sure. Right now we __dorv't think

there is a problem associated with any levels that beyond

the site in this direction.

,do some additional studies, do more sampling all through

here to find out what — as I said, just to confirm that

there isn't a problem.

Right now we have no information that -indicates

that there is any sort of health problem that would be m

associated with, for instance, fishing in this creek or

even hunting in this area or anything of that nature. The

problem ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Well, fishing, there is no

fish in there sir.

FROM THE FLOOR: I used to catch minnows in

that place about 15 years ago, and now there Is no fish at ^

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. = flR50006^202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646 _

S Or- -s

Page 35: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1 1011

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

all.

34

FROM THE FLOOR: I seined that creek 12 years

ago, and do you .know how many minnows we caught, zero.

It's from 608 to 609.j

MR. OSTRAUSKAS:. . That's what I'm saying, right

now we don't have any data which says that we need to dig

up like the contaminated sediment here.

What I am saying is that we ..are .going to

continue our studies on areas downflow of the site so that

we can evaluate the things that you're concerned about.

• FROM THE FLOOR: I can probably save you a lot

of trouble this way, if I could, please, and I don't mean

to interrupt, but I think the Water Control Board has

already run some tests all down through there, and I don't

think you woulcL have to _do any studies. If you could talk

with them, they could tell you want they found in there in

December. They can tell you want they saw on Christmas

Eve and what they say after Christmas Eve. They can te.ll

you what was in. there. I don't think you have to make any

studies.

I already talked to the Water Control Board

because the Water Control Board tells me that the

Superfund is in charge, and the Superfund tells me, you

just said earlier that you were.not involved in the

operations.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 , : Nationwide Caverage 80°-3fl'f?4§ Q 0 Q fi S

Page 36: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

35 .

MR. GERMANN: No, we are involved in anything

that involves that creek. i

FROM THE FLOOR: Well,'what has the Water

Control Board told you about that creek?

MR. GERMANN: Please, we are going to get into

this in just a second. We've got'everybody we need to get

that question answered. I just want to get through theI

project and then we are going to do.that.i

FROM THE FLOOR: Well, I just want-to say it's

going to cost the taxpayers hundreds of thousands ofidollars to do more damn testing

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, that is what I want to

get into now is the cleanup itself, and what are we going

to do in terms of the cleanup. We want to get away from

the testing now,i

Now again we want to clean up these soils and

sediments and what are our options in terms of: cleaning up

the soils and sediments?

Well, obviously we don't want to leave them

there because we have already discovered that, yes, there

are contaminants in the groundwater. So we can't leave

the contaminated soils there.

One alternative that we looked at was basically

digging up this contaminated soil and setting up these

tanks onsite and doing what we call a soil washing process

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 " : Nationwide Coverage ' 8

Page 37: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

00.90 01 01

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

36

where you literally wash _the so.il__w_i.th a solution which

removes the contaminants from the soil and then you place

the soil after you have washed the contaminants off of the

soil bapk in place after essentially you have cleaned the

soil-.

FROM THE FLOOR: Excuse me, sir, but we can

read. All this is i_n the book. Would you please go to

the step that the EPA recommends and the State of Virginia

has tentatively approved and tell us"~about that.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, sir, what I wanted to do

is at least — maybe you are aware of the other

alternatives, but I wanted to describe the other

alternatives for everybody else at the meeting just..so

people know that we considered them.

MR. GERMANN: It's not going to take a long

time, I promise.

time.

FROM THE FLOOR: It's taking a pretty long

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: So that this soil -washing then

is one alternative that we looked at.

Another alternative that we looked at is what

we call soil biodegradation where want you do essentially

is you dig up the contaminated soil again and you put it

in a certain area of the site, and we probably would put

it over here, and you essentially farm the soll in a way

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-3.47-3700 - Nationwide Coverage 800-3fl5 fe§ Q Q fl £ 7

Page 38: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

37

that bacteria that .naturally occur at this.site can. --

what they do is actually eat the contamination associatedi

with the soil.i

We would create the conditions necessary for

the bacteria to eat the contaminated soil, or "rather the

contamination associated with the soil.

Another alternative that we looked at was

simply containing all this material and buildingiessentially an underground wall at the facility on top of

this clay layer and just putting all the contaminated soil

in it and then covering it.

That we didn't really particularly like too

much because it's not really a permanent solution, that

you'll still have the contamination there and the

underground wall could potentially leak and break.

The other options we look at were just digging

up all the contaminated soil and .taking it to a landfill.

is another thing you could do.

Then the last thing would be to dig up all the

soil and take it to, an incinerator and burn it and that

would destroy all the contamination associated with the

soil.

FROM THE,FLOOR: I live right across the road

from here and we can't even drink our water because it's

contaminated. I'm not saying it's coming from there, but

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Cdveraee &<&$&-'&& L/ U n P

v W \,J

Page 39: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 0.1

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11-

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

38

there is a good chance it's coming from there.

We have to get spring water from the store .to

drink because we can't drink that is coming out of our

we 11. ,

MR. GERMANN: Which house are you in exactly?

FROM THE FLOOR: Right across the road from

th.is place, right here which is.about a mile and a quarter

from here.

MR. GERMANN: All.right. Have you got a box or

something on there?

question.

FROM THE .FLOOR: Excuse me?

MR. GERMANN: A box number?

FROM THE FLOOR: 4205 Tylerwood Trail.

Go ahead, Darius.

FROM THE FLOOR: Well, he didn't answer my

MR. GERMANN: He doesn't have an answer to your

question right. now_._ ___We are going to have to look into. it.

FROM THE FLOOR: But you've been looking into

it for a while now.

MR. GERMANN: I know, but it's going to be a

while longer. Let me put it this way. We haven't found

in contamination related to that site that it has forced

anybody to stop using their water.

FROM THE FLOOR: I mean we've had two or three

ACE~FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. A o c n n202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-333-SlM U U Q 6 9

Page 40: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

*rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

39

people come and check our well and they tell me our well

is contaminated.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I guess what it boils -down to

is we" don't have any information that indicates that

anybody's drinking water has been^affected by the site ini ...a way that they shouldn't drink the water.

IYour groundwater may be contaminated, but just

not from the site. I think that is probably what the case

la. All I can tell you is I think the contamination thatf~ " "— •- " ~-has been caused at this site, that we have found no

evidence that it has contaminated any drinking water welj-s

around the facility in a way that, they shouldn't drink the

water, and I don't think that yours has been contaminated

either. It just seems like it's too. far away.i

The contamination here, we're concerned about a!

relatively small a_rea. If you 're a mile away from the

site ——

FROM THE FLOOR: How far, what is the distance?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I think a mile is'just too

far.

FROM THE FLOOR: You think, but you dorr't know.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, that's what I'm saying.

We have additional studies that we have to keep doing on

the groundwater, and that's why we're talking about right

now the contamination sources.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. =202-347-3700. Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646

Page 41: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

40

So now, finally, what I want to do is just ...talk

about the preferred alternative.

(New Chart.)

FROM THE FLOOR: Have you gone down to the

underground, water yet?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, that's what I'm talking

about, the groundwater ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Not the well water, but the

underground water, you know, the second layer of water.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: We sampled the groundwater

that is underneath this clay layer. So we've sampled that

water underneath the site and it's clean. We have found

no contamination in the ground that lies underneath this

clay layer at_. the site. ..... .. ._.. ..

FROM THE FLOOR: Are you saying that the

aquifer _unde.rrieath__the site is completely clear of any

contamination?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: No, no. I'm saying that the

aquifer that sits on top of the clay layer is

contaminated.

FROM THE FLOOR: And the aquifer underneath the

clay it's clean?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Underneath the clay layer, the

samples that we have taken from there have come up clean,

that's right.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. S R 5 0 0 0 7 I202-347-3700 ........ -- - Nationwide Coverage .800-336-6646

Page 42: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

00.90 01 01

*rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

41

FROM THE FLOOR: What do you mean by clean, how

many parts per million?

nothing.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: There is. no contamination.

FROM THE FLOOR: -No arsenic?H

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: None. No arsenic, no.

FROM THE FLOOR: No arsenic and no .lead?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: No lead and no creosote,

FROM THE FLOOR: Could you tell me what the

difference is in the first and second aquifers are.

please?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes. There is about 12 feet

under the site of clay layer~andf depending on where you

are on the site, the clay layer gets thicker as you move

up, but what you have is water sitting on top of this clay

layer that is under the site, and that is the first!

aquifer that is closest to the surface.

Then underneath this clay layer is another

aquifer, and that is what I was calling the deeper

aquifer, and it is this deeper aquifer that we have not

found any contamination in and we believe, that is because

this clay layer is preventing the contamination from

getting to this deeper aquifer.

FROM THE FLOOR: Do you have test data

available?

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage ._.. 800-334 R § fl fl fi 7 O

Page 43: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

009.0 01 01

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15..

16

17

18

19

20

21.

22

23

24

25

1 42

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes.

MR. GERMANN: He's winding down now ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Can you answer me one question

now. I'm a stup id country boy and I don't have a bi g

college degree/ okay, so IVm dumb. That's what a lot-of

people think. The person that goes in and breaks that

first clay aquifer, will that water from that first

aquifer go Into the second aquifer?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes, If you ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Then how are you going to stop

that from contaminating people's wells ——

MR* OSTRAUSKAS: What-I'm saying is if you —

for .instance, when we put wells in this site and when down

to the -.r—

FROM THE FLOOR: If you broke that first

aquifer, you as. the SPA could have contaminated the second

aquifer.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: That's right. If you don't do

it properly ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Your tests could have broke

the second aquifer and contaminated it.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, that's possible. For

instance —-—

FROM THE FLOOR: I'm just asking.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: What I'm saying is that what

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 ' Nationwide Coverage 800fl3fi 1r) ft ft 7 o

Page 44: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.ry simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

43

we do is we drill the wells in a -7 :.- that we dp not do

that. I'm not a geologist or anycning —-; _ -_

FROM THE FLOOR: . That's what I-rm asking you.i

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I--don't really know exactlyihow it's done. All I know is if we had a geologist here

they could tell you, but essentially what" they do is they

just drill the well in a way that.they prevent that from

happening and you're just.going to take my word for it.

FROM THE FLOOR: I -believe you. ' I really do.

(Laughter.)

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Now I just want to talk a

little bit about the alternative that we have selected in

this particular case. This contamination that is

underneath the plant area, what .we would do is. basically

put this cleaning solution down into the ground with wellsi

and then pull that solution back up with another set of

wells, and the contamination would come up to the surface

basically through these what we call recovery wells.

We have wells that we Inject the solution, and

then we have other wells where we recover, the solution.

Then this water that comes to the surface, we separate out

the contaminants from the solution, treat that solution

and take the contaminants aware from the site.

Then we keep doing this over and over until the

contamination is all recovered underneath the plant.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 .. . . Nationwide Coverage 800;336ft<ft5 0 0 0 7 k

Page 45: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01. 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

44

Now the rest of the site, what we would do is

dig up all the soils and sediments, including the

sediments from the West VACO Pond, or the pond that is

Io.cate4 on the p'roperty "that West VACO leased and put all

these sediments-in this so-called land farm area on the

eastern part of "the site and we would create the

conditions needed for these bacteria to eat the

contaminants that are associated with the soil.

So;.this is the alternative that we are

proposing, and by no means have, we selected this

alternative. This alternative, the main reason for this

meeting is for you to think about it and any kind of

comments that you have regarding the alternative, the EPA

and the State Department of Waste Management have agreed _

on at this point to provide us with those comments.

We like this alternative because it destroys

the creosote that we are concerned about. It's something

that we know is successful, especially with this land farm

area. These bacterial we know actually eat this stuff.

It has been done at other facilities just like this around

the country, and we know that it works.

FROM THE FLOOR: Is this the plan that you used

at the Hollywood, Maryland creosote site?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes. The difference there

though — well, the problem is that this type of land farm

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 ,=i._. ....... .Nationwide Coverage 8

Page 46: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

arysiraons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

45

operation, probably the most important thing is

maintenance, that you have to maintain the operation

properly. If you don't continually pay attention to it,

which is what we would do, it's just going to -fall apart

and it's not going to work.

FROM THE FLOOR: How do you maintain it, sir?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, what you do.-is this

operation would take place over a several-year period. Wei

would have people assigned —•- .

FROM THE FLOOR: Let me ask you, who would

maintain it?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: If the EPA does it, we will

maintain it, or if the so-called responsible parties ...

choose to do the cleanup, then they will ——

party be?

FROM THE FLOOR: Who would that responsible

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Former property owners and

things like that. What I'm saying -- hold on a second —

if for whatever reason they can't do it exactly the way we

think it should be done, we'll just do it. That's like

the whole point of Superfund is that if somebody else

won't do it, we'll do it.

FROM THE FLOOR: May I ask one question. If it

works well when you farm"it, how come in a biologically

very rich area which is -in a settlement bottom with much

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. A - - -202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage " 800>336-ft# t> 0 0 0 7 6

Page 47: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

imons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1.0

11

12

13

14

15

16"

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

46

moisture, how come naturally it. doesn't break this

creosote down1? That's a very rich biological area.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: What you need, the No. 1 thing

is oxygen, that if you are "below the surface of the ground

and you don.1 1 ..get^ enough. ox_ygen,__ basically it needs air.

It's just like, for -instance, you've got a farm and you

have to till the land to give it air for the crops to

grow, and the .same way here. _ You'.ve got to continually,

you know, literally farm the soil. You have to plow it,

and then what you have to do is_you have to add

nutrients. You -have to add manure or something to provide

food -—

waste in.

FROM THE FLOOR: So you want to bring a sewage

MR.. OSTRAUSKAS: No. What you've got to do is

you've got to provide food for these bugs, you know. What

I'm saying is when the bugs don't have the food -——

FROM THE FLOOR: Farmers today are going to no

till farming.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Pardon me?

FROM THE FLOOR: The agriculture area is going

to no till farming today. They're not doing much tilling.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I know. I'm saying in this

kind of farming ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Are you saying that your

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 ' -'- Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646 ~ u / /

Page 48: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

rysimons

3 !

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

47

people are going _tp start t.illing?_

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Take my word for it, in thisi

case you need to do the tilling and you need to add the

nutrients, you know, if it's manure or whatever, and

you've got to add this stuff to-it. You've just got to - ..inurture these bacteria. |

FROM THE FLOOR: I like the question that thei

woman in front asked, this was the same system that was

recommended and implemented in Hollywood,rwhich is a

subsidiary of this operation here and from your comments I

take it that it didn't work there! for some reason. You _

said,' yes, but we have to do this. So it didn't work

there, right? _ : .

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: No. What I'm saying is thati

operation was not properly maintaine_d.

16 ;; FROM THE FLOOR: So it did not work there.

right?

say is ——

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: It did not work there.

-FROM THE FLOOR: You all fell down on the job,

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: It's wasn't EPA. All I can

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

MR. GERMANN: Hold on.

FROM THE FLOOR: Wait 'a minute now. Let's._let

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Cbverage 8oA&&£) 0 0 7 8

Page 49: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090.. 01 01

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19-

20

21

22

23

24

25

48

the guy talk.

MR. GERMANN: Yes, please. . -

FROM THE-'FLOOR: Yes, that's what I say.

FROM THE FLOOR: Did it work in Hollywood?

FROM THE FLOOR: How did this thing happen in

the fdrst place? . . . . . .

FROM THE FLOOR: If you all had done your job,

it wouldn't have happened in the first place.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: All I'm saying is if you

maintain this facility properly that it will work.

FROM THE FLOOR: "Did it work in Hollywood?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I already told you it didn't

work right, but EPA was not involved in maintaining that

operation.

FROM THE FLOOR: Was Curtis involved in

Hollywood? Yes or no?

Hollywbo'd?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Sir, I don't know.

FROM THE FLOOR: Who" owned the operation in

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

FROM THE FLOOR: In Hollywood did it work?

No. Who was involved in Hollywood? Was Curtis involved

in Hollywood?

MR. GERMANN: Excuse me, sir. There are people

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. -202-347-3700 " Natlonwfde'Coverage " 800-336-&*? 5 0 0 0 7 Q

Page 50: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

imons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

49

who want to hear what he has to say.

FROM THE FLOOR: It didn't work, did it?

MR. GERMANN: Let him say what he has to say.i

Go ahead.j

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: So what we have here now is we

are in the public comment period and everybody is free to

express their comments regarding the plan that we have

proposed. If you don't like the plan, just say so.i

And also if you would li_ke to submit your

comments in writing to us, you can do that _as .well.

Also, the State is in agreement with the plan,

and I don't whether the Department of Waste Management

might want to say a thing or two about the plan.

MR. GERMANN: All right, the Department of

Waste Management is going, to make a .few comments and then

we're going to take your questions I promise.ii

FROM THE FLOOR: Let's| hear what these other

people have to say, too,

MR. GERMANN: We're going to do that, but we're

just going to have them answer questions rather than make

a presentation.

Go ahead, John.

MR. HORIN: I'm Jon Horin. I'm the Project

Officer for this site from the Department of Waste

Management.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, I202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage

Page 51: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

50

I have been working with Darius for the last

few" months on reviewing the. different versions of the

RI/FS document, and probably more importantly working with

him on noosing this preferred alternative.

The State agrees with EPA on all of the major

aspects of their preferred alternative, and we are

especially convinced that the land farming is going to be

a very implementable method at this site which will

address all of -the health concerns in a cost effective

manner, and that the problems of implementing this

proposed option will be overcome by closely monitoring the

project as it proceeds through to completion.

The Department is in a good unique position of

working with EPA closely and. providing comments and

working tow_ard_ a position where we can concur with EPA on

these types of projects, but we are also a lot closer to

the constituency here at the State and we are available

completely for all your input.

You are more than welcome to just keep coming

to us until you are satisfied that all your concerns have

been addressed.

FROM THE FLOOR: What do you call close

monitoring, once a year?

MR* GERMANN: Are you asking about the

monitoring of the cleanup?

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. .202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage SOO-ftfle&Q Q Q Q j

Page 52: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

51

FROM THE FLOOR: Yes.

MR. GERMANN: The first thing you have toi

understand about the cleanup is that it is.not necessarily

going £o be implemented by the EPA. When we make a final

decision on what the cleanup is going to consist of, then

we are going to give those that we consider potentiallyi"responsible for the problem the opportunity to ——

FROM THE FLOOR: The opportunity for them to

do their own thing, in other words.i

MR. GERMANN: No, the opportunity to implement

the cleanup. If they do, they will be monitored closely_i

by the EPA, and that means having somebody there onsite

all the time.

If we do it, obviously we will.be doing the

work and monitoring ourselves, but an important

distinction is we are not saying!here tonight that this

work is necessarily going to be done by this agency. That

is a possibility, but it certainly at this point is not a

certainty.

We are required by law to give these

potentially responsible parties the opportunity to

undertake the cleanup and do that here just like we dp at

any other site.

FROM THE FLOOR: How can you call them

responsible parties when they have ruined the land

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. .202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336 ? 5 0 Q Q £ 9

Page 53: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 .01 01

.rysimons. 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

, 8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

52

already?

MR. GERMANN: Excuse me?

FROM THE -FLOOR: How can you call them

responsible .parties?.. ~j

MR. GERMANN: Because, we think they are

potentially responsible for"that situation. Like I say,

we are not trying tq point fingers at ..anybody in

particular. We are.just trying to find out who are those

individuals that may be connected with the cleanup, and we

want to.work with them to try to get the area cleaned up.

FROM THE FLOOR: What are you going to do to

keep it cleaned up once you get.it cleaned up?

MR. GERMANN: Basically what we are going to

try to do is address the source of contamination first.

The way we_look at it, the beginning of the problem is the

site and the source of contamination, and that is

obviously have a tendency to spread to other areas. So we

want to remove that source before we get on to the other

areas.

The second part of that phase hasn't begun yet,

but the first,.part we believe is about to begin. ,

Yes, sir.

FROM THE FLOOR: Let me ask you a question.

I'm pretty much in favor, and I think it's a good way to

go, to clean up.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS202-347-3700 . '. Nationwide Coverage ^ **

Page 54: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

*rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

24

25

53

MR. GERMANN: Good.

FROM THE FLOOR: But I want to-know, you all

are going to dig wells and., you're; gpj.ng to flush this

stuff put, am I correct, that itVs going to be. flushed out

and sucked out from this hole.

property.

the plant.

MR. GERMANN: In one particular portion of the

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Just 'that area right around

FROM THE FLOOR: What going to.keep it from

pushing it down?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Pardon me?

FROM THE FLOOR: What'.s going to keep it from

pushing it down and doing more contamination?i

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Remember that clay layer I was

talking about?i

FROM THE FLOOR: Yes, sir.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: We believe, and of course

before we do this on a full scale, we'll test'it out, but

we believe that this clay layer will prevent what we

inject into the ground from going downward. It will get

down to the clay layer, and then rather than keep going

down, we'll just be able to suck it right back up because

it can't get down through this clay layer.

But what we'll -do is before we — we believe.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC,202-347-3.700 ^ Nationwide Coverage __ _

Page 55: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

54

right now we believe that it will work, but of course

before we actually do it we'll test it to make sure that

i t does.

FROM THE FLOOR: Can I ask you one thing before

you do that. I'm probably, looking around, one of the

closest residents living to. L. A. Clarke. Before you do

this I would like to have my well tested again by an

independent, and when you finish your tests I would like

to have it tested, and if my well is more contaminated,

are you going to be responsible?

to do -—

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, as I mentioned, we plan

FROM THE FLOOR: Are you going to be

responsible for what you all do? If my well has got one

part per billion phenol in it now, and you can't test more

than one part per billion, so they tell me, okay. Well,

they tell me I have less than one part per billion, but

say you do your cleanup, I want my well tested by an

independent, not by you and not by the State, but by an

independent firm.

MR. GERMANN: That's a problem.

FROM THE FLOOR: It's no problem. It can be

done and I've got the money to do it. Don't tell me it's

a problem. It's no problem. Okay.

MR. GERMANN: All right.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 -Nationwide Coverage 8

Page 56: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

55

FROM THE FLOOR: Then when you finish doing

your cleanup and my well has got 10 parts.per billion, who

is going to be responsible? If that water you try toi

clean Qut and those chemicals go down into the aquifer and

contaminates my well, who is going to be responsible?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well,' that's what all..thei

monitoring that Ray was referring' to is all about. What!

we will have is groundwater monitoring right on the site,

let alone ——ii

FROM THE FLOOR: I'm not worried about the

site, I'm worried about my house, my well and my kids.

man.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I understand that ——

MR. GERMANN: Let me just say this. We are

trying to do everything ——i

FROM THE FLOOR: What I'm trying to say is weiiget this runaround all the time. I'm not trying to give

you a hard time. You're trying to do your job and that's

right. I'm not trying to give you a hard time, but we

want some answers. We want some definite, concrete

answers and not and's or but's. I want some definite

concrete answers, that's all.

MR. GERMANN: I know, and in a lot of cases

it's just not possible for us to.give you guarantees, and

I'm afraid that's just the way it is. We're doing the

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. ": ft D q fi n n Q c202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-3 - 5 "JJ U O 6

Page 57: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

,ry simons

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19.

20

21

22

23

24

25

56

best that we know how, and one of the ——

FROM THE FLOOR: I believe you.

MR. GERMANN: One of the things we're doing is

implementing this cleanup-and trying to make sure that

your well does stay clean.

I or nobody else "from EPA or any of these ;~

agencies here present tonight I don't think can give you a

guarantee tha_t's. going to say this is going to be the

final solution"and you don't have to worry any more.

FROM THE FLOOR: If you start cleaning up and

I've got 15 parts per billion, and I've got a letter from

your outfit th.at says I've got less than 1 part per

billion. I've talked to five different companies that

says you ca.n.'t test less than one part per billion.

MR. GERMANN: I think they were saying less

than one part per billion saying that they didn't see it.

FROM THE FLOOR: Well, what happens if I've got

a letter than says I've got less than one part per billion

of phenols in my well_, and you do your cleanup, you flush

this soil, and it's tested again and I've got 15 parts per

billion. Who is going to be responsible for that?

MR. GERMANN: I don't know.

Also, you have to keep in ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Well, let me ask you, before

you go into this -phase where you start going off the deep

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 .: Nationwide Coverage 800-336-vwo

Page 58: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

11

0090 01 01

.try simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

' 57

end and doing things that you don't know who is going to ^^^

be responsible for, think about the people in the area . .

that might be affected by. it. ;

MR. GERMANN: That's what we're trying to do,

and you have to keep in mind that we don't have any solid

connection between the phenol that has been found aroundi

the site, you know, upgrading, it, or downgrading i_t and all

over, connected directly to that site. In fact, we don't -

believe that it's necessarily the source., of the phenol.

The thing that you have to keep in mind is that -

we're going to do-.everything we can to clean up that site.

but there may be other sources involved that we're not

addressing, and that's a fact. ; .L _ =-..._- - R

FROM THE FLOOR: I think you've got another

site that should tested.

MR. GERMANN: Well, we can look into that.

FROM THE FLOOR: And I can tell you where it's

at.

MR. GERMANN: Then we will.

FROM THE FLOOR: Would you say the question and

answer period started?

(Laughter. )

Why don't we take a three to five-minute break

and let's cool our emotions a little bit.. and come back.

Do you have a problem with that? ^^^

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide £ovefa~ge L Pffitfpffifl D O Q

Page 59: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090- 01 0-1

irysimons 1.

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

5

MR. GERMANN: No, I don't.

Does anybody want to take, .a three to five-

minute break?

(Simultaneous questions and conversations --

not repprtable.)

FROM THE FLOOR: I've waited two and a half .

years to get some answers, and I don't want to wait five

more minutes. I want some answers now.

MR. GERMANN: Okay, Mrs. Collier, your next.

FROM THE FLOOR: Will someone recommend that we

take a three to five-minute break.

.MR. GERMANN: I'm sorry. The majority rules.

FROM THE FLOOR: You've been in charge of

everything else. Tell them.

MR. GERMANN: I'm sorry, I'm not going to tell

you to take a break. If you want to leave we will still

be here when you get back. How's that.

(At this point in the public hearing members of

the. audience got up and headed for the doors for a

recess.)

We will wait a second until the room clears and

then we'll continue.

(A voluntarily recess was taken.)

MR. PAYNE: I think we've had our three

minutes, and if we can kind of gather together again.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6 6 g Q Q ft Q Q

Page 60: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

rysimons 1

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

'. 59

I would like to remind all of you of something

that is mentioned on the fact sheet, and that is that _the

entire administrative record, the remedial investigation

and the feasibility study on this site are in the County

Administrator's Office at the Courthouse. It's a record

about this think — (Indicating) '— -and if you care to

know all the names and all the results and all the

information of where the test wells were dug, it's all in

there. So you are all free and Welcome to come to the

County Administrator's Office to look at that record.

Also, there is a public comment-period, a

period for written comments. The addresses are on the

fact slieet and they will receive .written comments on the

plan up until or through March 22nd.

MR. GERMANN: I'm grateful for" that break

anyway. I hoped that worked out that way for everybody.

We didn't by any means mean to cut you off, and

I know we did, but it wasn't intentional to cut you off.

during the presentation. I want; to have some kind of

cohesiveness to it so people can try to understand what we

are trying to do there,

With that we'll entertain any questions you

have. Try to limit your quest.ions first to the plan, and

then we will go on to other matters.

Anybody?

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-*3<$ 0 Q Q 9 fl

Page 61: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

1.3

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

60

Ye s, sir.

FROM THE FLOOR: I've got a lot of things on my

mind, and i:.don't know where to begin but. No. 1, about

two wefks I-^went over to the Spotsylvania Courthouse when

I got the notification from Mr. Payne that your.study was

on display and we could go over and study it.

And low and behold I. get over there and I find

seven three-inch volumes that I am supposed to look at

before I come here tonight to be prepared to speak

intelligently about this subject.

Now there is no way that I could read it, that

my supervisor could read it and Mr. Payne could read it

and digest the technical matter that is in that in 13 days

before we come over here, and I don't think that's playing

quite.fair. ... .. ..... .._...___ . __ . .... . _..—_

MR. GERMANN: One of the things we are trying

to do is summarize — well, most of information, not all

of it, but most of the information that is part of the

decision-making process in that huge administrative record

is summarized in this pamphlet here. I mean obviously all

the answers aren't there, but it's summarizes, it hits the

high points and summarizes for you what it is we are going

to do, and that is what we have done here tonight.

Basically we have given you — I mean we

obviously haven't gone into every sampling point, but we

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 . ' _ Nationwide Coverage

Page 62: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

have given you a summation of what is in that record here

tonight, and that is really what we are here to try to get

comments on.

If there is something that you wanted more*

iinformation on about the plan, then now is the time to .ask

it. If there is something we didn't explain properly,i[then this is the time for us to —•- . .

FROM THE FLOOR: That is very difficult 'to doi

when you haven't had the time to read it. See, we're

working people. We have to work for a living, and if we

don't get off work until 4:30 in the afternoon, and the

courthouse shuts off shortly thereafter. But even if you

took two weeks of leave time, there is no way that you

could go in and digest that to ask you the__intelligent

questions that you would like to have.

MR. GERMANN: Well, let me put it this way, I

understand and that is a perfectly legitimate point.

FROM THE FLOOR: Now we've got that, out of the

way and let's move on to the next thing. We've agreed to

that one long enough.

Listening to your presentation a few moments

ago, you said that the deep aquifer was clean, that there

was no problems there, it was just the upper stratum.

I've got your executive summary right here, and let me

read to you. It says "Total PNA concentrations in the

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. ftOCnnAQo202-347-37QQ. . Nationwide Coverage SOoH P u V 9 2

Page 63: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysiraons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

• 62

deep aquifer do not ..exceed-risk based cleanup levels."

Now that tells me when I. read -it that there is some

contamination in that deep aquifer.

MR. GERMANN: Then that is an error in oura

terminology. That is what clean means to us. It does not

mean that there is absolutely no compounds in the deep

aquifer.

FROM THE FLOOR: The next thing I have a

problem with in listening to what was said is when I went

to school I thought,-! understood physics pretty well, but

you're telling me all this contamination is confined in

the aquifer underneath the site.

Now I always thought that if I poured a

dissimilar liquid into another one it was going to

disperse, that it was going to move, and you're telling me

all this contamination is confined underneath the site.

Is-~that what you're telling me?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: What we are saying is we

installed a number of monitoring wells on the site that go

down into the_ deep aquifer and we did not find any

contamination in the deep aquifer. .

FROM THE FLOOR: We're off the subject of the

deep aquifer. I shifted and I'm sorry if you didn't

follow that. We acknowledge that your paper here says

there was some.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS,202-347-3700 _ Nationwide Coverage

Page 64: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

i 63i

But you said earlier that the contamination

2 that is in the aquifer is confined under the site, and my

understanding of physics is that it is not going to be

stationary. It's going to intersperse and the aquifer isi

under a moving stream and that .that material is offsite.

Sir, I think that is misstatement.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Firstly, you will recall that

we to^ntioned that we are going to; be continuing our

studies on the groundwater, and a lot of the questions

you're bring up now we're still trying to answert

ourselves. We need to actually install more wells.

FROM THE FLOOR: I understand that.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: So that I would like to be.

able to answer your questions, and what we want to do is

we will in fact be installing more wells to get a better

handle on the groundwater situation at the site.

But what we want to do is at least try and

start to clean up the site. We want to get moving, and

that's the purpose of this. We want to start -cleaning up

the site and in the meantime we will further investigate

th© groundwater situation.

The main thing is to start the cleanup. We

don't want to keep delaying things forever and ever and

ever. We want to start the cleanup, and rather than notistart the cleanup and continuing groundwater

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 1

Page 65: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 .01 01

.ry simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

64

investigations as an excuse not to start to cleaning up

the site, we want to start the cleanup and do the

groun_dwater investigations at the same time.

So I just want to emphasize that we share your

concern about the groundwater and we are going to continue

our work on protecting the groundwater as well as cleaning

up these sources, but the main thing is to start the clean

up process. That is the main thing we want to do, just

start cleaning up the site.

FROM THE FLOOR: I want to ask you a question.

You say that the place is contaminated, right?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: The soils are contaminated.

FROM THE FLOOR: What about the workers that

work there, what about them breathing that stuff all day?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: That is one of the reasons we

want to clean up the site.

FROM THE FLOOR: I want to know, is it

hazardous to their health now or what?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, if the contaminated

soils remain there ——

FROM THE FLOOR: I mean you say the

contaminated soil is there now, right?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes.

FROM THE FLOOR: In other words, it's

contaminated the mean that's working there, right?

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC202-347-3700 - Nationwide Coverage

Page 66: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

65

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, there are certainly even

within the State of Virginia, and again in the beginning

of the program what I tried to describe is the purpose ofi

our program. I know you would like us to address a lot of.» \ • -different problems here, but we can't, for instance,

address ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Are you trying to tell me thatithere isn't contamination in there for the people that are

working there?

MR. GERMANN: I think what he's saying is there

may be, and that is one of the reasons ——

FROM THE FLOOR: There may be! :

FROM THE FLOOR: When you start moving all that

dirt it's going to be worse,

FROM THE FLOOR: I've !been working there for 10

years, and I've been sick for eight years. Now is there

contamination for the people who work there?

MR. GERMANN: We don't know, sir. What I'm

saying is we don't know for sure. EPA does not have MDs

on staff. We clean up sites. We can't do health

assessments. That's just the way it is. However, say you

have a doctor who has some reason to believe that you're

conditions are associated with your work at the site. We

can get him ——

FROM THE FLOOR: I'm asking is it contaminated

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage SOO-33jlJ6«fi[r H n n Q r

Page 67: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11.

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

66

or is it- not?

MR. GERMANNi I don' ^..understand the question.

FROM THE FLOOR: I want you to give me a

straight answer. Is it .contaminated or is it not?j —

MR. GERMANN: What.do you mean when you say

contaminated? - . . . . . _ .

FROM THE FLOOR: The fumes we breathe, is it

contaminated?

MR. GERMANN: Possibly.

FROM THE FLOOR: Possibly?

MR. GERMANN: Yes.

Yes, sir.

FROM THE FLOOR: Could we do one thing. We've

got,four people sitting at the table, and the third one,

Mr. Payne, I^'know he's not responsible for anything ——

(Laughter.)

——but the three of you, EPA is responsible for

what, cleanup, and you're responsible for what, and what's

this other guy responsible for because we're giving the

poor guy with the tie and the_suit.a hard time, and I

think he's just stated that he's only responsible for what

has happened after the fact, not what is happening now,

and I think we should address our questions to the person

that is responsible for the "future of the cleanup and not

.him who is responsible for what has already happened.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-33&66tfq 0 A D Q *7

Page 68: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

. ry simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

67

You know, what are your realms of

responsibility as three public servants talking to us

tonight? Give us your realms of responsibility and then I

think we can address our questions to each individual to-

get an answer instead of hitting the guy with the coat and

tie all the time.i :

(Laughter.)

He is only responsible for after the fact.

MR. GERMANN: Okay. Well, I'll give it a

shot. Myself and Darius both work for the Environmental

Protection Agency. _

FROM THE FLOOR: Yourself and who?

MR. GERMANN: Darius Ostrauskas, the little guyiwith the suit and tie. '.

(Laughter.)

FROM THE FLOOR: I asked a question before, is

it contaminated for us to breathe while we work there?

MR. GERMANN: It could be. Like I said —_see

what I'm trying _to explain ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Why don't you all give us a

straight answer.

MR. GERMANN: I don't have one for you.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: See, what I was getting at

earlier is there are other agencies involved in regulating

what is going out there right now. __ What we are trying to

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage

Page 69: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

.rysimons 1.

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12.

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

68

do is just tell you about — we can't do everything. Just

like you have a job. that you do, we-have our job. Our job

is to deal with the contamination in the soil that has

happened over the years and clean it up.

If you're talk.ing about what is going on at the

plant right now in terms of workers .and in terms of how

they are handling their waste water ——

FROM THE FLOOR: I see all you guys running

around down there. You got white suits on, masks on,

gloves on, rubber boots up to your ass on —

(Laughter.) .

I want to ask you a question. Is it

contaminated?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well obviously. Those people

that are wearing those suits are .digging up, in many cases

digging up contaminated material and you have to be

protected.

FROM THE FLOOR: When you go and dig up all

this dirt now, is that plant going.to be closed down when

you're going to move all J:hi.s dirt pr_is the plant still-

going to be open while these people got to work?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: That's a question that is

really not in our hands, the Environmental Protection

Agency's.hands whether this facility continues operating.

As you're all aware, there is going to be a

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-3~36-66 o H n n

Page 70: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

69-

hearing before the State Water Control Board within I

guess the next month or so which is going, to discuss

whether this facility will keep operating.

Again, that's not something that we're.involved

with. We would like to be able to answer questions, but

we're not the people to answer that question.

FROM THE FLOOR: What will happen to the water

on the land farm area? You said.you're going to draw that

water off, right, as it comes up, right?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes, right.

FROM THE FLOOR: All right, that filthy water_,

where are you going to put that?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, we are going to- treat

that water and get the contamination out of the water and

then take it offsite.

to?

FROM THE FLOOR: Where are you going to take it

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, you can do several

things with it. You can either treat it or you have to

dispose of it or you incinerate it. There are not too

many options. I mean if we have to, we can take it all

the way across the country if we had to. that's a

possibility, but more likely there are other things we

would like to do like, for instance, to treat the water

with these bugs, the bacteria I was talking about that can

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. .202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage " " 800-35S-6&& 0 Q / Q Q

Page 71: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

70

actually eat this contamination as like one example of

what we would do with the stuff that comes up out of the

ground.

MR. GERMANN: Let's get this gentleman over

here, the one that proposed the break.

FROM THE FLOOR: Go ahead.

MR. GERMANN: All right, we're going to go on

to .somebody else.

Yes, ma'am, right here.

FROM THE FLOOR: First of all, I would like to

know in every short, simple terms why did you start this

study with those little plants out there that you're

talking about.in the wetlands that they are complaining

about their conditions? Why did you start looking at this

place?

And second of all, what are you going to do

with these little things that are going to eat this stuff?

MR. GERMANN: Okay. No. 1, we got involved

because there was information that indicated that there

was contamination on the soil at the site and possibly in

the groundwater, and by contamination basically we mean

creosote.

So there was some sampling data that was done

way back, you know, in the early 80fs or so that indicate

there may be a problem there, and through a long process

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage I ft i

Page 72: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

! 71

of prioritizing the site this eventually became one of'rthe

sites that the EPA came to view as fairly serious and was

placed on this national priorities list. ~

So that is how we got to the point we are.

I'm going to let Darius answer _the question

about the bugs, if you don't.mind.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: The bugs, again these bugsi

actually eat creosote. So the idea is to create the

conditions necessary for the bugs to be happy and be

working as well as they can. Right now those bugs are

actually out there even right now, but what you need to doj

is create the conditions that they need to work really

well.

As I mentioned before, the way you do that is

through some of these farming techniques where you

actually expose air to the bugs. The bugs need air to

operate. So you actually plow up the soil", the

contaminated material, get the bugs exposed to the air,i

and also you add nutrients, things like manure or some

fertilizer or something so that again it makes the bugs

work better. So that is the theory behind the bacteria or

the bugs that we're talking about.

it, right?

FROM THE FLOOR: You said the bug comes to eat

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-33&$l§ Q Q j Q O

Page 73: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

00:90. 01 01

rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

' 72

FROM THE FLOOR: That's like a rat that comes

to Decon. They become .immune to it. They are going to

eat it and it don't do no effect to them.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: -I mean nobody is going to be

eating these bugs.

FROM THE FLOOR: I mean you said the bugs are

going to be eating that ._creosote, right?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes.

FROM THE FLOOR: And they become immune to it

so it don't hurt them and so the bugs keep on eating it.

So what?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, what they do is they

destroy the creosote. In .the process of eating it, they

destroy it. . ._ .

FROM THE FLOOR: How?

FROM THE FLOOR: We're not dumb enough not to

know that bacteria break down compounds ——

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, he's asking, and I'm

just saying ——

FROM THE FLOOR: So they just keep on eating

it? So you have a creosote eating bug.

(Laughter.)

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I know it sounds crazy, but

that 's ——

FROM THE FLOOR: It is crazy.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. a p q n n I h .202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-OT * 0 U U I U 0

Page 74: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

21

22

23

24

25

'73

(Laughter.

crazv.

MR. GERMANN: Hey, as long as it works it's not

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: It works, believe me. We have

studies that show it works.

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)i

MR. GERMANN: Okay, this woman over here near

the door with the white sweater has a question.

FROM THE FLOOR: It's not a question. I was

just thinking you might want to clarify for him on

groundwater. I think a lot of people have a misconception

as to what groundwater is. I. think he thinks it's a

stream, when it in fact groundwater moves very slowly and

could address why there is contamination only on this

site.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes. Groundwater is water

that you can't see that's on the ground. For instance, if

you have a well that your well is going down into ground

water and the water that comes up out of your well is

groundwater and it's underground in this site, it varies

from about maybe 15 feet underground to a couple of feet

underground where it starts.

So if you dug a hole in the ground, you would

start finding water maybe around five feet from the ground

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage

Page 75: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

74

surface, for instance, and that is groundwater.

MR. GERMANN: It's water that flows through the

dirt that is already there. It's not a cavern or anything

like that in the soil.^

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes.

MR. GERMANN: .And say you dig a hole in a place

that has a shallow groundwater table, you dig a hole and a

little while later the hole will fill up.

FROM THE FLOOR: But it does come from rain,

and when that rain falls on the earth it travels over the

contaminants and one of the laws we have in our county is

that we grout all wells, and if we didn't grout it then .we

would get the contaminants in there.

However, the water does still go deeper in the

ground and then it comes in through the cavities of the

well terne. So rain water is the same thing as ground

water, and if it flows over L. A. Clarke ties or its

contaminated soil and it turns down to a stream, that's

groundwater. I guess what happens is the sun-draws it up

out of the ocean and then it brings it over here in little

clouds and drops it on us.

(Laughter.)

And if it drops it on us, we would get

contaminants from the contaminated soil, and we might get

some bugs, too.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-jftG6C6n rj ,

Page 76: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01 75-

jrysimons 1 (Laughter.)

2 MR. GERMANN: .Yes, sir.

3 FROM THE FLOOR: He didn't ask his question.i

4 , MR. GERMANN: "I don't'think he' had-one. I

5 think he was just trying straighten me out.

6 j FROM THE FLOOR: I like your map. Your map has

7 a very good top view, but you don't have a side view. I

8 think the ground level is approximately 97 feet in that

9 area. The RF&P railroad dug out all the clay, sand and

10 gravel in that area when they built the embankment on the

11 other side of 609.

12 When you start flushing those wells, if you

13 don't have any way to contain that, your water is going to

14 j go to the sides.

15 i MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Exactly.i i

16 , FROM THE FLOOR: - What ,are you going to flushi '

17 those wells with, what chemicals.

18 MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, first of all, the

19 containment that you're referring to is in fact very

20 important. What we do is before going out there and

21 starting just putting in 15 wells all at the same time and

22 just start pumping them in and out, you start out with

23 maybe one well in one location and one in another location

24 and do a very small-scale test just to see if it really

25 works. We believe that it will work, but you have to

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage _ 800- j ftr

Page 77: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

76

start one step at a time.

As I said, first, you just sink two wells in,

try it out and if it doesn't work for whatever reason, and

I mean^right now we think it will work because of the

conditions there that we think it's right for this kind of

system. But if it _doesn't work, we will be the first ones

to acknowledge that and we'll try something else. But the

main thing is we will go one step at a time and make sure

it's done right.

FROM THE FLOOR: What are you flushing with?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Again, that's something we __.

don't know right now. We have to do some studies to

figure out what the best solution is to do the flushing

with.

If this particular plan is approved, and if you

all agree with it and the State continues to agree with it

and the EPA also -continues to agree with it, that one of

the first steps that will be taken is to actually start

doing some studies to figure out what the exact solution

will be. Right now, though, we don't know what that

solution is. We have to do the tests first.

FROM THE FLOOR: Now let's go from here to

Hollywood, Maryland^ I talked to you_back in January and

we talked about the Hollywood, Maryland site for a while

and I asked you about dioxins. You told me that when you

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC*202-347-3700 . Nationwide Coverage 8

Page 78: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

• 77

cleaned the pond up there that you found dioxins on the

bottom of that lagoon. .__ ._ _._... ;

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: That's right, in Hollywood,

Maryland, but not here though.

FROM THE FLOOR: "I agree, and I have no problem

with that. But they are both wood treating plants, wood

preserving plants. Why would you find dioxins up there

and not down here when we were used by the same person?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: The reason is that the plant

in Hollywood, Maryland used both creosote and another-

compound called pentachlorophenol. Pentachlorophenol

contains dioxin. This facility here has never used

pentachlorophenol. We collected .like well over 200

samples at this site everywhere, at "all sorts of different

locations and never found pentachlorophenol. We never

found dioxin in the samples we took for dioxin. There

simply is no dioxin out there from our sample results, and

there is no pentachlorophenol either.

FROM THE FLOOR: But you did the same tests up

there that you did here and you didn't find it up there

until you drained the lagoon*, right? __

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I don't know the exact tests '

that were done. All I'm saying is that ---._

FROM THE FLOOR: I'm asking you that.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Sir, we have taken over 200

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage " -800-3

Page 79: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

78

samples at .this site and we have never found

pentachlorophenol.

FROM THE FLOOR: But you did the same type of

tests, up there and you didn't find it until you drained

the lagoon; is that not right? Just say yes or no.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I don't know. Sir, I wasn't

involved in the Hollywood, Maryland site and I don't know

the real details.

FROM THE FLOOR: I-thought you were the Project

Manager up there.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: No.

there?

tonight.

FROM THE FLOOR: Who is the Project Manager up

MR. GERMANN: I'm afraid he is not here

FROM THE FLOOR: Excuse me?

MR. GERMANN: He is not here tonight, and I

can't recall the name.

There was a question in the back. Yes, ma'am.

FROM THE FLOOR: I don't know very much about

this, but I have three concerns, and one of them is the

water, the water that we drink every day. I want to know

how does-this affect the nearby wells that are close to

this plant?

Then, secondly, I want to know about the odor.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 . Nationwide Coverage

Page 80: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01 79...

irysimons 1 Are we going to deal with the real bad odor with this

2 testing and so forth? \

3 And, thirdly, I want to^know have you checkedi

4 the nearby wells because I want to know whether my well^ ii5 has been contaminated or not.

ii6 I also want to know what effect does creosote

7 have on humans.

8 I also want to know whether this plant, L. A.t '

9 ; Clarke, whether they have been charged with certa.in

10 violations, and the next question I have is who is goingI

11 to pay for all this? Are the taxpayers going to be paying

12 for this or is the Government going to pay for it? Where

13 is the money going to come from.

14 MR. GERMANN: There are a bunch of questions in

15 • there and I'm not sure I remember them all. f'11—start by

16 : saying that we have sampled the residential wells in thei

17 immediate vicinity of the site and so far we haven't been

18 able to make a connection between the site and any levels

19 in wells that were above EPA drinking water criteria.

20 So in the opinion of the EPA we have not seen a

21 detrimental effect to the residents from drinking water

22 surrounding that site due to the L. A. Clarke site.

23 Now when we finish this study, like I said

24 before," and we haven't yet figured out who is .going to pay

25 for all this. The SPA is there no put up the money if

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage ~ %<ty-f***x*Ti' n i

Page 81: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 .0.1

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

80

necessary. However, we prefer not to do that if we can

find potentially responsible parties who are interested in

funding that work.

Now there is an incentive for them to becomej

interested because if we spend our money up front ——

FROM THE FLOOR: You're talking about the U.S.

Government?

MR. GERMANN: The U.S. Government spends the

money up front, and we are mandated by law after we spend

that money to try to seek out those individuals that we

believe to be responsible for the problem and to try to

recoup the money.

So we are going to try to work with those that

we believe J o— be potentially responsible so that they can

fund that cleanup action. The term that we use is

potentially responsible parties. We don't point to -

somebody and s.ay you, you're responsible and you, you're

responsible. Under the law as long as somebody is

potentially responsible for that problem, they can be

brought into this cleanup process.

FROM THE FLOOR: So how long has L. A. Clarke

operated this site?

MR. GERMANN: The operating itself has been

going on for decades.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC202-347-3700 .. Nationwide Coverage 800"3S"ft4*l H H / I I

Page 82: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01 81

^rysimons 1 FROM THE FLOOR: But the Curtis.people bought

2 that operation, and you can tell,me that they didn't havei

3 that checked out. If you go put!and buy a house or ai

4 piece of property, don't you have it thoroughly

5 investigated before you buy that ;place? They bought it so

6 they are responsible for it. That's all I'm saying.

7 FROM THE FLOOR: Ray, I heard that_-RF&P

8 railroad is going to be. responsible for it in conjunction

9 with L. A. Clarke.

10 MR. GERMANN: Pardon me?

11 FROM THE FLOOR: That RF&P railroad was going

12 to be a responsible party to the cleanup. RF&P railroad

13 once owned L. A. Clarke, and L. A. Clarke treats all the

14 ties for RF&P railroad. Am I correct?

15 RF&P railroad, 22 percent of that is owned by

16 the State of Virginia. So who the hell a"re we fighting?

17 MR. GERMANN: I believe that the railroad is a

18 potentially responsible party.

19 FROM THE FLOOR: Ray, you made a statement to

20 this lady about some well water that has been tested and

21 nothing is wrong with it. I've got a letter from your

22 office, the United States Environmental Protection Agency4

23 of June 27th, 1986.

24 (The gentleman brings the letter forward as he

25 is speaking and places the letter before Mr. Germann.)

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 8 f O

Page 83: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 ,01 01.

.trysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12-

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

• 82

I wish you would read very slowly and very

plainly that paragraph.

MR. GERMANN: I know exactly what you're

talking about.

FROM THE FLOOR: Read it.

FROM THE FLOOR: Read it out loud.

FROM THE FLOOR: I want you to read it.

MR. GERMANN: I-'m not going to read this

paragraph.

VOICES. FROM THE FLOOR: Read it. Go on.

MR. GERMANN: Okay. What it says is

"Specifically the concentration of cadmium reported in

your well was 12 _to 15 micrograms per liter, and the

actual concentration may actually be 20 to 60 percent

higher."

FROM THE FLOOR: Go ahead.

MR. GERMANN: "While the MCL — which means

maximum contaminant level — of 10 micrograms per liter

contains a considerable margin of safety, it is

conceivable that those who consume such waters over an

extended period of time could experience some degree of

adverse health effects."

FROM THE FLOOR: That's your letter you all

wrote to us. So don't get up here and tell these people

that there is nothing out there.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646

Page 84: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

jtrysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

83

MR. GERMANN: I didn't say there was nothing

out there, sir. If you would have listened to-what I said

carefully you would have heard me say we haven't had any

reason to believe that any contamination related to thata ;

site is impacting people's wells. We did .not say there

was no contamination in the County of Spotsylvania.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Let me discuss the cadmium

just a little bit and address your concern. Out of the

hundreds of samples that we took at this site, we did not

detect elevated levels of cadmium. The cadmium is not a

contaminant that is associated with the L. A. Clarke site.

with?

FROM THE FLOOR: What could it be associated

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: First of all, cadmium occurs

naturally in rock and in the environment, and it could_

just be dissolving from sand or rock.,underground and it

gets into the water that way. It's natural possibly, or

it might be coming from the pipes in yoirr system, there

might be cadmium in the metal in your pipes, and we were

concerned about this.

Even though we have nothing at all that would

indicate that this cadmium that-was found in these wells

comes from this site, we still brought it to the attention

of the County Health Department. We notified the County

Health Department and discussed the issue with them. We

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, IlMC202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage ~ 8QQ-3§6ff>4B rt Q . .

Page 85: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 0.1 _01

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

84

wrote individual -letters to all those who had these

slightly elevated cadmium levels,, detected in their wells,

and because it is .not- connected to the site, we cannot do

anything' about..it in terms of this particular project, butathe County Health Department has been referred the

situation. Since it's not connected to the site, it's

difficult for us to do something .about it.

What I suggest is .if you are concerned about

those levels, which from what I understand are not

necessarily a problem, then I would contact your County

Health Department and ask their recommendation as to what

you might be.able _tp do .about it. There is nothing we can

do about it in this situation because it doesn't have

anything to do with L. A. Clarke.

FROM THE FLOOR: Let me ask you one other

question. With all the contamination in the area, how far-

say west of L. A. Clarke have you checked for

contamination? From 608 over. Have you gone as far as

Route 1?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, we have checked, let's

see, in terms of scale, it's off this map here. We have

checked up in here and what we have is there are other

parts of the Superfund program that can investigate other

sites.

Because .we are finding some contamination, for

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage a *.' 800-336-6646

Page 86: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

^ry simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

85

instance, we found phenols in General Products' well, the

company General Products. So we figured well, maybe we

should check out General Products and maybe they are

somehow causing a problem.A

So, for instance, the State of Virginia

Department of Waste Management within the last" couple of

months I believe has done an investigation of general

products to see whether they might be a problem.

Certainly if you think there might be other

contaminant sources of concern in the area, we would be

only too happy to check them out for you in cooperation

with the Virginia Department of Waste Management.

Just be aware that it's not as if — just

because in this particular case here, this meeting, that

we are not, for instance, concerned — it's not that we

are not concerned about contamination, possible

contamination in other areas, but that type of problem, if

it is indeed a problem, can be addressed through other

programs within EPA and within the State.

FROM THE FLOOR: Could I go off scale with one

more thing while it's still on my mind. Earlier you said,

and I don't mean to be bouncing back and forth, and I

would appreciate your view of this, you said that the

first water aquifer was about 12 feet? iiiMR. OSTRAUSKAS: Yes, at least under the plant

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 1

Page 87: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

'11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25_

86

it's about 12 feet below the ground.

FROM THE FLOOR: I had a report that was done

by EPA about two years ago that says is was around 25

feet.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, what happens is if you

go up here, for instance, it goes down to 25 feet. See,

as you go._ down closer and closer in this direction, it

comes closer and closer to the surface.

FROM THE FLOOR: Once you get down by the creek

what would you think?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, once you get down to the

creek, the groundwater almost comes right to the surface

here.

FROM THE FLOOR: I'm just on the other side of

the creek and my well is, like I say, 25 feet deep from

the bottom to the top. You were saying 12 feet, and when

I talked with Ray and I got a report, and I've got it at

the house and I can go get it if you would like to see it,

but you've probably already seen it, that said that the

first water aquifer was about 25 feet and the second one

went from 40 to 45 feet.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Like, it I said, it depends -

FROM THE FLOOR: I-just didn't understand where

you got your 12._feet from and that was kind of puzzling my

mind a little bit.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 "^- = -Nationwide Coverage

Page 88: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

• 37

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: It just depends on where you

are. If you're up here it's 2S. an;d here it's 12 and here

it might be 6. It just depends on the location.

FROM THE FLOOR: May I say something. I really

don't understand why you did not want to read the

paragraph in the letter that was written to me.

MR. GERMANN: Why? I mean I know what was in

the paragraph.

FROM THE FLOOR: Okay. But from I understand,

there were six wells found in the vicinity, and I think

people should know what this can do to you over.a period

of time. I think I spoke with you on the phone. I'm

Linda Self, and I've spoken to this gentleman sometime

back and I expressed my concern about this.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, as I said, we were

concerned as well, and that is why we notified the County

Health Department, and that is we notified yourself and

the other residents.

FROM THE FLOOR: It may not be affecting us

now, but what it is going to do to our children?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I agree with you. Again, we

notified the County Health Department and they are really

the people that can help you out.

FROM THE FLOOR: Excuse me, Linda. I called

the County Health Department five years ago, and then when

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 8t£r*fJ»iur? n i i

' '8

Page 89: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

2.5

88

he talked to me I had to go to the Water Control Board and

EPA. I disagree with you on that. I called four or five

year ago on that.

FROM THE FLOOR: Don't you think people shoulda

be aware of what can happen?

FROM THE FLOOR: The Health Department doesn't

give a __damn unless you're involved in it.

FROM THE FLOOR: I would like to,clarify one

thing. It's not the County Health Department. It's the

State Health Department that has an office in Spotsylvania

County. You all keep saying County Health Department. We

have, no jurisdictional authority. It's out of our

jurisdiction. It's the State of Virginia Health

Department controlled by the State Legislature and by the

Governor of the State of Virginia. He rents an office

from the Spotsylvania. They rent and pay rent.

FROM THE FLOOR: I can tell you people one

thing, all of you, the State, the Federal EPA, the Air

Pollution Control Board, if you all had turned this over

to Spotsylvania County, they would have had the damn thing

cleared up five years ago. They wouldn't have farted

around that you all have.

(Laughter.)

(Applause.)

FROM THE FLOOR: Let me tell you all

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3300 :" .Nationwide Coverage fl I

/9

Page 90: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

89

something. I think EPA has done an excellent job tonight

snowing us because they brought us here to ..comment on

alternative four whether we like it or don't like it.

FROM THE FLOOR: And that's the only one

they've shown us.

FROM THE FLOOR: That's right. And if we don't

come out against alternative four, they're going to push

it down our throat because alternative four, if you williiremember when I asked did it work in Hollywood, the guy

wouldn't answer me.

But I'll tell you what. If we don't say we

don't want want alternative four, we're going to get it.

Alternative four does not work, it will not work and he

won't say it.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Actually it's alternative that

we have selected.

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable,)

MR. GERMANN: I just want to say one thing. We

wouldn't have bothered to come out and set up the meeting

if we weren't going to listen to what you had to say.

FROM THE FLOOR: Why didn't you show us a

diagram of the other two?

MR. GERMANN: Well, I mean, at that point we

were ——

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 _.. Nationwide C0verage 80*feJ?-&4) 0 j 20

Page 91: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

6

7

3

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

90j . ,

FROM THE FLOOR: In others words, you've made

up your mind and you're going to do what you want to,

right?

MR. GERMANN: No, that's not true.

Is there something else you want us to go into

more detail on?

FROM THE FLOOR: Ray, one more thing and then

I'm going to shut up. I've gotten more response out of

the people at the Water Control Board than anybody out of

the whole four or five years, because they did listen to

us and they did come down and they worked with us and they

didn't mind talking to us. Any time I called anybody,

they had time to talk to me and explain it to me. Those

people there were fantastic, and I appreciate that.

FROM THE FLOOR: I appreciate your saying that.

FROM THE FLOOR: I didn't mean to throw you off

with what I said before, because these people have been a

big help to us.

MR. GERMANN: Yes, ma'am.

FROM THE FLOOR: Would you support a Federal

grant to run a waterline to the community?

MR. GERMANN: All I can say is that at this

particular point in-time that is not something that we see

as a necessary alternative.

Like I. say, just specifically related to the

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 '~~ .Nationwide Coverage SOO-3.36-

Page 92: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

Arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

contamination at the site, we think that we can clean that

up and take it out of that area before it becomes_a

problem to residents drinking the groundwater.

Like I say, I'm not saying there is noa

contamination in this country. What I'm saying is weI

haven't seen any evidence of contamination from the siteiiiwhich is having a detrimental effect on the residents'

drinking the groundwater.i

FROM THE FLOOR: How about offsite?

MR. GERMANN: Offsite. That's what I mean, all

the residential wells that are offsite.

Yes, sir.

MR. WONDREE:' I would like to speak against the

plan if I may.

MR. GERMANN: No problem.

MR. WONDREE: My first name is Lou, L-o-u, and

my last name is Wondree, W-o-n-d-r-e-e. I" live at the

corner of the Route 609 and Route 17 bypass.

Did you ever get the feeling that an elephant

is a mouse designed to government specifications?

(Laughter.)

You can surely see it here.

In more ways than one, I'm probably the largest

landowner, or one of the largest landowners in the area.

I have a letter that I would like to deliver to.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6 6 5 0 0 I 22

Page 93: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15-

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

• 92

the Environmental Protection Agency, and I would like to ...

read this letter to you tonight.

I'll be ..very brief.

Primarily what I want to do is propose anj

alternate plan that will cos_t .a whole lot less than what .

they have spent so far.

I understand from their own recommendations

they are planning to_spend $23 million on a hunch it seems

like.

Dear Sir: I have had the opportunity to review

the Executive Summary of the Proposed Plan pertaining to

the cleanup alternative of the L.A. Clarke site and I

would like to offer an opinion, proposal and some

additional--information.

In review of the summary, it is obvious that no

one has considered-the socio-economic impact of. the area.

Being one of the largest land owners in the immediate

area, I feel qualified to address this issue. It is also

obvious that there is a more cost effective way of dealing

with this problem that would provide a residual value

after the problem is solved.

I would like to propose an alternatives to the

plan that they have proposed to us tonight.

Step 1. Form an advisory panel to review and

give input and to help develop the alternatives — not

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC202-347-3700 " ~ .Nationwide Coverage 800-336-jJpfe C n O

Page 94: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

iry simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9 ,

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

i

93 .

some people from out of the area who have no knowledge of ^^^

1

what our problems to force an answer down our throat. the ^^^

panel should consist of our county representatives,

adjacent landowners, EPA reps., state reps., and an L.A.

Clarke representative .

Step 2. The source of pollution (i.e., L.A.

Clarke) should be shut down and eliminated forthwith.

(Applause. )

Thank you.

Step 3. A policy of containment at minimum of

the current levels of pollution should be instituted

immediately. No further studies and no $10 million more

in studies. Contain it now. ^^^

(Applause. )

FROM THE FLOOR: I agree with__that.

MR. WONDREE: By the EPA's own study, the way

to do it is to dig a 13 foot deep perimeter ditch around

the property, line this ditch with a leachate barrier made

of plastic, which we use in landfills quite often. It has

already been tested and it works. Then on top of "this put --

a 10 foot cap of clay or other impervious material.

Step 4. A program to monitor all existing

wells and water resources in the area for a minimum period

of five years.

I myself have over 20 wells and water sites on ^jt

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-uAO H H n 1 o i

Page 95: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

, 20

21

22

23

24

25

94

my property. All of my property is within a half a mile

of this site. Not one of my wells or my water resources

have been checked or tested by the EPA during this

exhaustive study.

Step 5. Then after the cap is put on it,

construct a recreational facility on the site to provide

soccer fields, ball fields or whatever. This has been

done before and it was done in Virginia Beach, a placed

called ~~Mount "Trashmore. It's a beautiful park. It's a

big mountain, but it's got a cap on it and it's a big

park.

Step 6. Provide county water and sewer to all

property owners within a three-quarter mile radius of the

plant.

Don't tell me it can't be done, because was

done right in Sylvania Heights byr a HUD grant 10 years

ago

By utilizing this concept much from the funding

could come from areas such as HUD grants, recreational

monies, et cetera.

If we were to follow their proposal of land

farming, soil flushing, soil biodegradation and magic

creatures that eat the creosote, after the project is

completed the source of pollution will still exist, and

then we have not addressed the needs of the area and we

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800

Page 96: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

! 95

still have a piece of land that is a liability rather than

an asset.

My plan offers an alternative. Look at the end

of the project. Adjacent land values will.be greater, thes

county will have a recreational facility in an area where

it is badly needed and the source of the problem will bei

eliminated, and I assure you the cost will be far less

than $23 million.i

I am under the opinion that the authors of the

proposal that you have seen tonight are simply looking at

solving a problem on the short-term basis. It would be a

tragic waste, of money to spend $23 million and have little

or no residual value for the money spent. By following my

"program, the cost would be substantially less and the

resulting impact would be beneficial.

I want to finish by saying that : it's a tragedy

that with the vast land-holdings I have in this area and

with over 20 wells and water sources, to my knowledge, not

one has been tested or not one of the tenants who occupy

my land have been approached.

I urge you in the strongest way not to spend

$23 million without considering the feelings and the

thoughts of the landowners in the area. In most cases

their investments are represented here.

For anybody that is interested, I have a

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Cbverage 126

Page 97: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01 -

• a ry simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11—

12

^ 13.

^ 14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21-

22T

23

24

^^ 25- .

96

synopsis .of the six-step plan that will be up here for

i

your perusal. ;

Thank you.i

MR. GERMANN: Thank you.

(Applause. )

Yes, Ms. Collier, finally.

MS. COLLIER: I'm very skeptical of your

presentation tonight. There is a lot of I believe 's, I

think 's, I guess, hopefully, probably, it's possible. I'm

very skeptical as to what you're saying is going to

reality.

What type of time period are you talking

about. You promised us, all of us here that we were going

to_ have a follow-up meeting in six months from our past

mee-ting, which was o.ver two years ago. Are you talking

about one year, two years or five years for our cleanup,

and then you don't even know that the steps that you're

going to take.are going to clean it up.

I want to personally ask. representatives from

the Air Pollution Control Board what have you done in the

last year regarding resolving the. odor from L. A. Clarke?

FROM THE FLOOR: We're still getting the odor.

MS. COLLIER: We still have odors.

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC -202-347-3700 .. . Nationwide Coverage - 800-336-6646 | :." ;'; ' ."'"

hffl 1*V P""» A -.AH50QJ27• *• /

Page 98: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

_97 - .

FROM THE FLOOR: Come on, let's get an answer. ^^

, CLAYTON: For those of you that don't know, ^Br

my name is Greg Clayton. I am the Air Pollution Control

Specialist for nine counties in Virginia, one of which isa

Spotsylvania.

As a result of a number of complaints over the

last three years or so, we have worked with L. A. Clarice'

and they have made changes in their process that we feelii

has reduced, not eliminated, but reduced significantly the

emissions that were causing the odor problem.

I am not about to deny that there was an odor

problem. I agreed with the people that said there was.

VOICES FROM THE FLOOR: There is. ^^

FROM THE FLOOR: And it started back this week. ^^

MR. CLAYTON: The first complain that I have

received ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Do you have business cards

that you can hand out to us so we can call you?

(Laughter. )

Give us all one.

MR. CLAYTON: I'll give you my phone number. I

don't have enough cards to hand out.

But in the last year I have received —

approximately in the last year I've only received one

complaint, and that came on February the 29th at 9:30 p.m. ^j^wACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC

202-347-3700 " . Nationwide Coverage " 800-336-6646

-.

'

SR500I28

Page 99: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14.

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

98

from Ms. Collier.

Again, they_have instituted some major changes

in their process, and some of those changes have only

occurred within the last — well, it was supposed to have^

been completed .by January 1st, and it was completed by

February 1st. _. . .

I'm not going to try and^stand here and tell

you that there is no odor. I think my feeling is that as

long as .there,_is the creosote operation there there is

going to be an odor.

The Air Pollution Control Board does not say

that there can be no emissions into the atmosphere. They

say that there can be no emissions above some certain

level, and it depends on the type of pollutant you're

talking about as to what those levels are.

The Air Pollution Control Board did do air

quality monitoring in the vicinity around L. A. Clarke.

Spotsylvania County hired a consultant that also did air

quality monitoring in the .vicinity.

Our monitoring, and according to the report

that I saw from the consultant that the county hired,

there were no levels of any pollutant that were

significant levels.

Now I'm not saying you didn't smell it.

FROM THE FLOOR: And I.'m saying it burnt my

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC202-347-37QO. . Nationwide Coverage flS j «TTTW

129

Page 100: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

skin.

law.

99

FROM THE FLOOR: How about an offensive odor

MR. CLAYTON: There is a regulation.on the

books that says that no person shall cause, suffer, allow

or permit odors that are objectionable to persons of

normal sensitivity.

law.

FROM THE FLOOR: There is an offensive odor

MR. CLAYTON: Yes. There is an odor regulation

of the Air Pollution Control Board.

you?

FROM THE FLOOR: You can't test for odors, can

MR. CLAYTON: No, you can't. You can test for

chemicals, but you can't test for odors, and we did test.

for the chemicals, for some of the chemicals that-we know

are constituents of creosote and we did not find those in

the ambient air.

FROM THE FLOOR: Where did you test the air?

MR. CLAYTON: Where?

FROM THE FLOOR: Yes. . _____ _ _._

MR. CLAYTON: We tested it at various

residences around the plant. We tested the Greenfield

subdivision, we tested there. We tested ©specially at one

site located on 609, We have tested down at

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Cdverage ^ 800-336-6646

fl/.5QO/30

Page 101: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 01 01

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

100

Fredericksburg Rod and G.un Club a couple of times. We had

the monitors mounted on a trailer so that we could move

them from site to site, and it was, to- be very honest, a

little bit of a guessing game in that we had to try ands

predict based on weather forecasts and things of that

nature, where the winds were going to carry any emissions

that night.

Some nights, you know, I was lucky. I got it

set up and the next morning T compared where it was with

the wind charts that we had and it was located directly

downwind. Other nights I wasn't quite so lucky.

And during that sampling period, and the

sampling period that we did, I don't recall exact dates,

but it was late summer or early fall of 19-86. We did not

test last year, but '86 was when we got most of our

complaints on it.

During those sampling periods we tested at

various -times during the day, and most frequently at

night. That's when most of our complaint were coming.

and during those sampling periods I also went out and

drove around the area trying to smell it.

I know a lot of,people are saying that the

people you're seeing up here talking to you tonight don't

really care because they don't leave here. That's not

true.' I do live here and I do care, and where I lived at

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 8 I 1J J j

Page 102: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

4009 01 01

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

the time I smelled L. A. Clarke.

101

during those sampling periods I would go

out and try and figure out, you know, whether to me there

was an odor present, and again most of the nights _I could*find an odor. I had no problem.

That's why we tried to come up with some

alternatives — well, our agency doesn't typically suggest

alternatives to the source. We tell them you've got a

problem and do something about it, and that is what we did

in L. &. Clarke.

FROM THE FLOOR: You don't fine if. .there are

any violations of air quality? Do you give fines on it?

MR. CLAYTON: Yes.

FROM THE FLOOR: Has L. A. Clarke ever been

issued a fine or a citation?

MR, CLAYTON: They have never been penalized,

or fined if you will by the Air Pollution Control Board.

They have been issued notices of violation.

FROM THE FLOOR: But those violation notices

did not resolve in them taking any corrective actions?

MR. CLAYTON: Yes, they have made changes in

their process.

FROM THE FLOOR: But it has not eliminated the

odor problem.

MR. CLAYTON: It has not eliminated. It has

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-3 36-

Page 103: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

. 102

significantly reduceid, and I'm not going to tell you that

there is any process change that will eliminate that short

of 'shutting the plant down because that is probably the

only way that you will el_imina_te 100 percent of theirj . . .emissions into the air.

Again, the Air Pollution Control Board

regulations for the most part do not — our regulations.

don't say that there.can be absolutely no emissions. It

says there can be no_ emissions above, some certain' level.

Again, it. depends on the type of pollutant as to what that

le ve 1 is.

And the question was raised earlier are the

workers at risk. They may well be as, as they said. Our

regulations are not designed to protect workers. That is

another, agency within both the Federal and State

Governments.

We have regulations that are designed to

protect the health and safety and welfare of the general

public. We are trying to protect ambient air,, which is

the air that the general public might reasonably be

exposed to.

FROM THE FLOOR: I have a question for you.

When that odor is strong, is it a health hazard? Now I'm

talking not.recently, but back somewhat. I work shift

work and I come home at 1 o'clock in the morning. I get

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 - -_ Nationwide Coverage 800-336-664$ f{ g Q Q I

Page 104: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02 ; 103

..rysimons 1 out of my truck and you can feel your skin crawl Like andi !" ' '

2 the pungent odor from the creosote will be real strong. I

3 live down in Greenfield. Now I want to know is it healthy

4 for you to breathe that stuff? I^ve got two small-a '

5 children, and I don't want them hurt by this stuff.

6 MR. CLAYTON: I know you've heard this a lot

7 tonight, but I can't give you a definitive, answer, and I

8 don't mean to be a smart^aleck and I'm sure that none of

9 the gentlemen up here mean to but, unfortunately, we are

10 not dealing with a topic that there are clear-cut answers

11 too on everything.

12 All I can tell you concerning when those odors

13 were strong and it burnt your skin and it irritated your

14 eyes and your nose and it kept you from sleeping at night,

15 I have no intention of arguing those points with you,

16 because I tend to agree that that'probably did occur.

17 The only thing I can tell'you is that from all

18 of the studies that I've seen, our sampling technique and

19 our analysis technique is not so precise, that you can

20 detect very, very minute levels.

21 We feel that the detection levels for the

22 chemicals we were looking at were well below the point

23 where it would have some significant impact on your

24 health, not irritation maybe, and not the nuisance part of

25 it, but some serious impact on your health.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Cdverage 800-336-66* D g Q Q I OK

Page 105: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 -02

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

104

We did not find detectable levels of those

chemicals. Somebody said something about a snow job. I'm

not — honestly I am not trying to do that. I am trying

to -give you as specific an answer as I can but,3

unfortunately, there is no, at least I don't have a

specific answer. I'm not a toxicologist.

FROM THE FLOOR: In the springtime of the year,

you know, you would like to be able to open your windows

and not run the air conditioner.

MR. CLAYTON: I ag~ree".

the re.

FROM THE FLOOR: And you can't do that down

MR. CLAYTON: On certain nights, you're right.

I have no problem with that.

FROM THE FLOOR: Are they still boiling any of

their creosote?

MR. CLAYTON: They are not. The last time I

was there, and that was on February the 12th, they are

not.

FROM THE FLOOR: See how often you visit.

MR. CLAYTON: Well, wait. You know, I cover

nine counties. Am I supposed to spend 24 hours a day at

L. A. Clarke?

FROM THE FLOOR: You could spend one day a

month.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800- 36

' "135

Page 106: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

3

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

105

MR. CLAYTON: February the 12th was less than a

month ago.

FROM THE FLOOR: I mean one hour one month.

MR. CLAYTON: I'm sorry, I shouldn't have^

reacted in that manner, but I—have got a large area and

I've got a lot of sources.

I was there on February the 12th, and at that

time the — well, and even before that time -- they arei

not boiling water to dispose .of it.

FROM THE FLOOR: They can do it at night.

MR. CLAYTON: They have several steps in their

process and this is a result of a consent agreement that

they have with us and a consent agreement they have with

the county. They are processing the water and trying to

separate the creosote that comes out in that water so that

they can reuse the creosote, and the water is being

disposed of in some other manner. It's being used in

their boiler, £or instance, but they are not boiling water

off to dispose of it like they were in 1986 when the odors

w@re a whole lot worse than they appear to be right now.

Yes, ma'am.

FROM THE FLOOR: I want to know is there

anyone here from the Health Department?

MR. GERMANN: I think that is the one agency we

don't have.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-

tf.500136

Page 107: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090: 02 0-2-

rysmons

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10.

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

2-1-

22

23

24

25

106

MR. CLAYTON: I don't think anybody from the

State Health Department is here.

Ye s, sir.

FROM THE FLOOR: You said that they are using3 -

the water in their boilers. In their process I imagine

they have safeties and things like this. Why couldn't

creating the same type of environment as blowing it off,

maybe not ..in.the. same degree, but there is still, you

know, there is still creosote in their feedwater.

MR. CLAYTON: Well, the way, and I'm not the

one, you know, I don't claim to be an expert on water

either because I'm not. But the process waste waters that

they were putting into the dehydrators, and at one time as

a result of some legal action on behalf of the Water Board

they saw fit to take their water out of their lagoon and

put it into their pressure treatment vessels and boil it

off there, and that is when things really hit the fan.

That is when you all really got socked with the

odor because they were boiling off tremendous amounts of

water in a very short period of time, and they

contaminants, the creosote and some of the constituents of

creosote that boil .off at a relatively low temperature

were being emitted into the air at some considerably

higher levels- than they were when they were just using the

dehydrator.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646

3R500I37

Page 108: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

3

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

107

Again, now they have done away with the

dehydrator, they have done away with some other things,

.they have installed a new vacuum system so that they are

able to collect more of these volatile constituents ofacreosote that evaporate very easily. They are condensed

and they are ejected into that air from the vacuum system

which is injected into the boiler along with the fuel-oil

that they are burning. So that those are burned and

things of that nature.

So there have been some significant changes,

and it's my opinion and the opinion of I think the Air

Pollution Control Board that those changes have resulted

in an improvement. - Again, they have not eliminated the

creosote odor a hundred percent.

FROM THE FLOOR: Is there technology available

now to eliminate the odors completely?

MR. CLAYTON: To the best of my knowledge, no,

there is not. As long as that plant is there and they are

using the creosoting process where they draw a vacuum and

all the steps involved in the creosoting of railroad ties

and other wood products, I don't think there will ever be

a creosote process like that that has no odor whatsoever

associated with it.

FROM THE FLOOR: How about if you put a

building over the complete plant and purified the air

ACE.-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-33-fc6fjJ6c: n n j Q Q

Page 109: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

108

before it came out of it?

MR. CLAYTON: I "guess"if you had the right kind

of purification system or.incineration or something,

maybe. 3 I think-that the cost of that would be prohibitive

if the. company was to keep operating. Even for a brand

new source that is going in our regulations in that case

say the source must use the best available control

technology. And we are not talking about a brand new

source. We're talking about a source that is essentially

50 years old. _ „ ...

But even best available control technology,

that terminology .in_relation to air pollution control

addresses such things as economics. If the cost of that

control equipment or that control technology is so great

for the benefits in terms of reduction of pollutants, a

new source might not even be required to do something like

that.

Again, we have no evidence that the residents

of the area are being exposed to levels that are going to

have an adverse health, you know, impact on your health.

Again, I'm not here to-address whether it's a

nuisance or not. That's something totally different, but

our evidence suggests that the residents of Spotsylvania

County and the City of Fredericksburg and the rest of the

area around here are not being e*xposed to levels that are

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC j? R 5 fi jj I Q202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage ~" 800-336-66 6 ' " •?

Page 110: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

109

going to have an adverse impact on your health and

welfare.

FROM THE FLOOR: On a short-term basis, but you

don't £now about the long term.

MR. CLAYTON: Our regulations, you know, we try

and hopefully our regulations are.designed to protect your

health and safety, not just on the short term, but on the

long term as well.

The Federal Government and the State Air

Pollution Control Board both, right now we are trying to

get more information, not just from L. A. Clarke, but from

all sources on pollutants that have not been specifically

addressed in the past, because obviously we are becoming

more and more aware that there are a lot of other things

that we haven't really regulated .in the past that maybe

need to be regulated.

So I can't tell you that there is with 100

percent certainty that there is no impact or there will" be

no impact, but again based on the evidence that we have

today and the knowledge that we have today there is no

impact on your health. But I can't give you a guarantee.

Unfortunately, that just doesn't work that way. I wish I

could, but I can't. -

I'm sorry to take so long.

Mk. GERMANN: No problem.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage i

Page 111: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

Arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

110

FROM THE FLOOR:. The land farm technology of

plowing and replowing this contaminated soil, how is that

going to contribute to the .odor? You may not be able to

field this, but that is going to cause some odor, isn't

it?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: During any kind of cleanup

activities at the site we will be doing air monitoring,

and we know what States' rules and regulations are

regarding odors. We have a copy of all those rules, and

we will follow those" rules and we'll have all the air

monitoring set up, and when.we are exceeding the levels -

that are allowed, we will -just shut down until we correct

the problem and continue once the problem has been

corrected.

MR. CLAYTON: There may be some odor associated

because you are taking soil that is contaminated with

creosote and you're going to be stirring it up.

My feeling is, and this is not necessarily a

technical, you know, a real technical explanation, but my

feeling is that it's not going to contribute significantly

to the odor because right now if .you go to the site there

is 'Creosote on the ground and you're stirring it up, and

you would hopefully be eliminating that creosote. You are

certainly not adding to it by this, you know, if this soil

biodegradation and soil farming thing is adopted.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC,202-347-3700 ~ Nationwide Coverage 80(ft$®i{/ Q I It I

Page 112: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

simons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

111

FROM THE FLOOR: What are the names of the

bugs? Do you just call them bugs, or bacteria. Do you

know the technical name?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Specific names I'm not aware

of, but they do vary from site to site. For instance, at

L. A. Clarke there is a certain particular group of

bacteria that are present there. At another site youi

might have different bacteria in the same family.

FROM THE FLOOR: So you're going to nurture the

existing bacteria basically. You not going to bring in a

foreign culture that's going to be a unique health

problem, but you're going to simply nurture the existing

bacteria.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: We believe that the bacteria

that are out already, if we nurture them and provide them

the right conditions that they can do the job.

FROM THE FLOOR: I think the bottom line from

talking to the citizens in the entire area and here

tonight, the people want to know, you know, you say you've

got to run more tests and more studies, they want you to

be able to tell them some estimate of when you're going to

finish your studies and your tests. We have the Water

Control Board here now and they play a certain part in

that issue also.

We want to know when are you _a_ll going to set a

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. fl p C A fl M o202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage SOcftiS. ^ U I 4 2

Page 113: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

*rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

112

deadline that you will give us some facts and figures on

what you're going to do. Xt has been several years now

and people feel :like they are being pushed around and

shoved 'around and they are worried about their children

and their future, and you just can't keep on and on.

They don't want a Love Canal. They don't want

the issue to be carried on and on and on. They want you

to._give them some kind of reasonable time that you're

going to .give ..them.an., answejr q£. vjhat the problem is and

what methods are you going to use immediately to clear up

the problem, and the Water Control Board can't walk away-

with clean hands.

MR. GERMANN: We're talking about a multi-year

project. I mean there is no doubt.about that. The

problem is that when you are dealing with this kind of

technology, which we really think is.going to work here

and we think it's the best, or at this point it looks to.

us to be the best alternative, and even if we were to

choose something else, for example, we don't ——

it.

up there

FROM THE FLOOR: I thought we had a choice in

MR. GERMANN: You do. That's what I'm saying.

FROM THE FLOOR: You ain't got but one choice

MR. GERMANN: Well, I thought we explained what

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. ft p C n n202-347-3700.. . Nationwide Coverage 800-3%%5 U 0 / {j. 3

Page 114: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

113

the alternatives were. Like I say, if you have more in-

depth questions, we will answer them.

But, anyway, a lot of this depends quite

honestly how things go during the design o.f" the cleanup.

We don't know exactly in these particular — see, even

though this process has been done elsewhere, it has never

been ~^ne under these specific conditions. So what we

have to do is find out how long this type of cleanup takes

under these specific conditions.

I think we are talking about on the order of,

just this phase of the cleanup, we are talking in the

general vicinity of five years to: complete it with the

land farming and everything. It could be _lpnger and it

could be less, but we're talking in that general time

frame.

FROM THE FLOOR: All right, that's the cleanup

is five years. Now give_me the dates you think that you.

can have all your studies in for this specific area that

you addressed tonight, you know, for just that specific

area. Give us a date when you are going to have your

studies finished.

MR. GERMANN: We are supposed to start the

second phase of this cleanup process sometime in the

summer and we are — can you guys, is it a year or year

and a half?

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. fl p202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 80&I«-«48 0 f L L

Page 115: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

114

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Essentially we will begin the

design of how we are going to do this this summer and

hopefully if it goes well, we are talking about maybe a

year arid then, like Ray said, it could take up to five

years to do. it. It has taken at least several years in

other cases. It's not a fast process, you know, because

the bacteria don't work quickly, but we think that this

method will destroy the contamination and that it's the

best alternative we believe in this case.

MR. GERMANN: What it boils down to is we are

talking about the general vicinity of five years to

implement this particular part of the cleanup. We are

talking about a two-step cleanup process.

The second phase, we plan to begin this

summer. That will take approximately a year, in that

general vicinity. At that time we will have another

situation just like we are in right now, and at that time

we should be able to give you with some kind of confidence

our estimate of the end point of the cleanup process.

So today we are just not prepared to do it. We

can tell you how long this part of the cleanup is going to

take, but we haven't done all the studies necessary to

tell you"how long the rest of it is going to take, and

that doesn't1 answer your question.

FROM THE FLOOR: Do you have the funds for this

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. $ ft 5 0 fi *202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-oo4t> ~ '

Page 116: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

*rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

115

cleanup?

funds.

MR. GERMANN: Yesr we 'do.

FROM THE FLOOR:. You do have the funds?

MR. GERMANN: If necessary, we do have the

FROM THE FLOOR: It is, necessary.

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

MR. GERMANN: Excuse me. What I mean is --

like I-said before, the project is going to be funded ——

(Disgruntlement expressed from the audience.)-

This is very important so I wish you would

listen. The project is going to be funded. It's just a

question of who it is going to funded by. If it is

necessary for the Federal Government to put up that money,

we will. However, we prefer not !to use the taxpayers'

money to do that. We prefer to bring in potentially

responsible parties to help us with that. If that can't

be worked out, the project will be funded through the

Government.

FROM THE FLOOR: Have RF&P railroad and L. A.

Clarke agreed to pay anything on this cleanup?

MR. GERMANN: I don't believe that there is

anything in writing to that effect.

FROM THE FLOOR: How much money have you spent

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. _ _202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage SOO-lWtfc&Q Q j 46

Page 117: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

009.0 02 .J3.2

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

116

to date on the studies and developing the program?.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: I would say it's somewhere in

the million dollar range, rsome"thing like that.

FROM THE FLOOR: And we're looking at another

five years. .With my program you can do it immediately.

MR. GERMANN: Well, "like I said, I don't doubt

that for a minute. It's just a question of what we and

everybody here think is the best idea and not just

necessarily the cheapest and the quickest.

FROM THE FLOOR: Let's go back to Hollywood,

Maryland, and I didn't get arty clear-cut answers on a

compatible operation with the same company owning it and

EPA being involved. Has it worked in Hollywood or has it

not worked in Hollywood? ...

MR. GERMANN: The reason you haven't gotten an

answer is because none of us up here worked at Hollywood,

Maryland

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: We just don't know. The

project person ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Don't you think you ought to:

try find out with the same problem?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, we will look into it,

sir. We just can't answer. We don't know happened.

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. d R5 0 0 I |f 7202-347-3700 - - -Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646

Page 118: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02 : 117

*rysimons 1 FROM THE FLOOR: Does it work or doesn't it

2 work ?

3 MR. GERMANN: We think it's going to work here.

4 * (Simultaneous questions and conversations —

5 not reportable.)

6 FROM THE FLOOR: It doesn't work in Hollywood,

7 does it? It didn't work in Hollywood, did it?i

8 MR. GERMANN: I don't know.

9 (Simultaneous questions and conversations —

10 not reportable.)

11 MR. GERMANN: In the back.

12 * FROM THE FLOOR: Is the plant still running?

13 MR. GERMANN: The Hollywood plant, I don't

14 know.

15 - FROM THE FLOOR: It's an abandoned site, isn't

16 it? • ' -

17 MR. GERMANN: I don't know. I'm just not

18 involved in that project.

19 Can I ge=t this gentleman in the back.

20 FROM THE FLOOR: I had a question on your other

21 alternatives, except for No. 1 which is no action. What

22 are the estimated time parameters for this kind of job

23 from the time it would start to the time when the risk

24 would be diminished?

25 MR. GERMANN:" Do you mean how long would each

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage _ _8pO-33*6frtt- rj ri . , Q

Page 119: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

118

alternative take?

FROM THE FLOOR: Right.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, generally I guess with

the soil washing alternative we estimated three years from

the time you actually start the cleanup ——

FROM THE FLOOR: That's No. 3?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: That's No. 2. No. 3, which is

the one that EPA and the State are recommending and that

we are proposing to you tonight would take five years we

estimate, and then No. 4, just the land farming, the soil

biodegradation alone we estimate would take three.years, -

and the containment and offsite disposal options and

offsite incineration I think those would be in the two

year range

FROM THE FLOOR: Do you have an estimate as to

how much volume, you're looking at?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: We've estimated, our

preliminary estimate is about 100,000 cubic yards.

FROM THE FLOOR: How often does the EPA, the

Water Control Board and Air Pollution, how often do you

all meet together to talk about the Superfund site? For

the last two years how often have all of you met to

discuss your findings and all? ...

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, our primary

communication is with the Department of Waste Management

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. ,» DCnn , , n202-347-37.00 Nationwide Coverage 80ofl»6oJD U I H 9

Page 120: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

009_0 02 02

rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

119

and I.Vve been talking with John probably every other day

for the last half year about the site.

FROM THE FLOOR: Have you talked with the Water

Control Board?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, maybe John can speak for

how the State operates, but our primary contact with the

Department of Waste Management. They are our sister

agency, so to .speak, and just to coordinate things I work

primarily with._John, and then John works with the other

State agencies. That is just generally how we like to

work together. .

meetings?

FROM THE FLOOR: Did you ever have any

MR. HORIN: We have had a meeting where these

agencies were provided a draft 'copy of the RI/FS and they

provided comments, and those comments were incorporated

into the final version of the RI/FS.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: For instance, when I mentioned

with the air monitoring, that was specifically a request

of the Air Control Board that we have such and such

regulations that you would have to adhere to in doing the

cleanup action, for instance. That's an example.

FROM THE FLOOR: What procedures have you met

in notifying the Board of Supervisors about this?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: We keep the county posted in

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. m^cn202-347-3700 --"- --Nationwide Coverage 8<xRM&MJ Q J 5 0

Page 121: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

Arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

120

terms of sending them a copy of the draft RFS, the final

RFS, just generally keeping Kirn Payne, the County

Administrator updated on what we are doing. That is

really Jthe way we have been working with the county.

FROM THE FLOOR: Would,you agree with that.

Kirn?

MR. PAYNE: Yes, sir. That's right.

FROM THE FLOOR: That ain't what the papers

said, and that ain't what the Board of Supervisors been

saying

FROM THE FLOOR: I have two questions I would-

like to ask and you might be able to answer — one of them

I know you can answer but one of them I don't think you

can.

The first one you probably can answer maybe.

How many times has L. A. Clarke been sited for

violations? Can you tell me that?

MR, GERMANN: I don't know.

FROM THE FLOOR: You can't answer, right, but I

have one you can answer. How many times have they been

fined for violations?

MR. GERMANN: I don't know.

FROM THE FLOOR: Zero.

FROM THE FLOOR: Why not?

FROM THE FLOOR: Yes, why not? That's one

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.- —202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage sfl-R Q I C |

Page 122: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

jrysimons 1

2

3.

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

121

answer I would like to know. Why haven't they been f.ined.

MR. PAYNE: We have some representatives from

State Water Control Board here, and it might be a good

opportunity for them to tell you what has been going on

there.

tonight.

FROM THE FLOOR: Yes. They ain't said nothing

MR. GERMANN: The Water Control Board has been

working very hard on this project in a kind of different

way than we have been, but they do have a lot to say and

we are going to let them do it right now.

MR. ROLAND: My name is John Roland, and I'm

the Director of Enforcement on the Water Board.

I don't want to want to mix some of our public

participation in the process with this, but we are having

a Board meeting in March where we have an action pending

against L. A. Clarke. It is a public meeting and ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Speak up. We can't hear you.

MR. ROLAND: It's a fact-finding type meeting.

It's a public hearing essentially to go over some problems

we have been having with the company.

FROM THE FLOOR: Were you part of this pumping

of the West VACO Pond? Several weeks ago or maybe a month

they pumped off so many gallons of water out of that pond

to keep it from overflowing. Would you mind telling us

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. a D C - n.- c n202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage SOO-SsAiW I 5 2

Page 123: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

*rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

122.

where that water went to? Do you have a document saying

that it went out of State or it went somewhere else in

Spotsylvania County or did you pump it on the ground and

who was there to monitor the pumping?

MR. ROLAND: Okay. Let me back up a little

bit. I think this gentleman ——

FROM THE FLOOR: I would like to hear the

answer to the question,

MR. ROLAND: I will I promise.

This gentleman here called in with some

complaints I believe about conditions in the creek several

months ago. We sent some people out and looked into the

area and did a full investigation.

One of the things we found was this waste

lagoon which — (Mr. Roland is indicating on the chart.)

FROM THE FLOOR: With the lines through it.

MR. ROLAND: Right here I guess.

FROM THE FLOOR: No, up.

MR. ROLAND: Up here.

It had a free board of two inches, which is not

much. We have a court order that is still.in effect that

we had filed, what ——

FROM THE FLOOR: In '83.

MR, ROLAND: —— in '83 that required a 17-inch

free board. When we found out about that we sent the

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, i202-347-3700 _. Nationwide Coverage fP3-W44

Page 124: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02..02

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

2.4

25

123

Curtis's a letter giving them 24-hours to reduce .the free

board, which they did, and I.think it's down now to 20

inches roughly.

FROM THE.FLOOR: How often do you check it?

FROM THE FLOOR: Where did they pump it to?

MR. ROLAND: They pumped it over into their

process tanks, and that's where it is.

FROM THE FLOOR: If it still in the process

tanks?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: No.

FROM THE FLOOR: Where is it?

MR. ROLAND: This is Greg Cunningham. He is

one of our engineers. He has been up there a number of

times and he can probably answer all those questions.

MR. CUNNINGHAM: We initially went out and as a

result of that we did inspections and saw there was a

problem with the lagoon. .We came back and told them they

had to lower the level. Basically we just told them that

they had to dispose of it- in an approved legal method.

What they chose to do initially was to take

their water and just hold it at their facility in a number

of tanks, including their processing cylinder, and they

also had a number of -tanks that they used for biological

treatment. Initially that's what they did.

FROM THE FLOOR: Are we talking about the same

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. z D q n A I R202-347-3700 :,. Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646 H " U ° w

Page 125: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02 124

^rysimons 1 pond that you're going to_pump down 20-some inches and put

2 in a tank on L. A. Clarke's site? Which size tank? Just

3 give me a guess, guesstimate? How big would that tank be?

4 J MR. CUNNINGHAM: I can tell you. We actually

5 calculated what he needed, the volume he needed to lower

6 five versus how much volume he had on site, and he had

7 enough volume on site to hold what was required.

8 FROM THE FLOOR: How many gallons?

9 MR. CUNNINGHAM: I can tell you in a second.

10 FROM THE FLOOR: How much did he dump on the

11 ground?

12 MR. ROLAND: To our knowledge, he did not dump

13 on the ground.

14 MR. CLAYTON: What he did with that water ——

15 FROM THE FLOOR: How many gallons did he pump

16 out?

17 MR. CUNNINGHAM: 150,000 gallons got removed

18 from the tank and it got put into: cylinders ——

19 FROM THE FLOOR: Wait a minute, we're talking

20 about the pond, removed from the pond.

21 MR. CUNNINGHAM: From the pond and it got put

22 into tanks and cylinders, existing tanks and cylinders on

23 site.

24 FROM THE FLOOR: He don't have that kind of

25 capacity on site.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, . n202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage *D«36iM6l 55

Page 126: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02:

.rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1-0

1.1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

125

MR. CUNNINGHAM: Yes, he does, and we

documented ——

FROM THE FLOOR: How many tanks does he have

have and what is the capacity?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: I don't have it. in front of me

now.

FROM THE FLOOR: Well, he is in violation of a

court order, and how come he ——

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —•

not reportable.)

MR. CUNNINGHAM: He has a small cylinder of .

20,000 gallons, a holding tank of 17,000 gallons, he has

two biological tanks of _44,000 gallons, he has two basins

of 20,000 gallons ——

FROM THE FLOOR: What kind of basins?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: ——,for the sludge drawing ——

FROM THE FLOOR: That's not a tank. It's a

swing basin.

MR. CUNNINGHAM: There are two open air

concrete structures probably, oh, four feet high and

probably — okay 2 by 21 by 3 by 7 and a half feet high.

FROM THE FLOOR: You would have 71,000 if

everything was empty.

FROM THE FLOOR: Have they been inspected for

their ability to contain this water? Do they have cracks

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC..202-347-3700 - - - Nationwide Coverage

Page 127: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02 126

irysimons 1 in the ——

2 MR. CUNNINGHAM: What they did with the water

3 after they held it was basically use it as boiler feed and

4 ran their boilers continuously for approximately I think a

5 three-week period, and that's now he got rid of the water.

6 (Simultaneous questions and conversations —

7 not reportable.)

8 (The reporter indicated to Mr. Germann the

9 difficulty of hearing due to .the distance of the speaker

10 across the room and the multiple questions_and

11 conversations simultaneous taking place while Mr.

12 Cunningham was attempting to answer questions.)

13 MR. GERMANN: Fred, could you just come up

14 front with us here. We are trying to keep at .least a

15 decent record and we're having trouble doing it.

16 MR, CUNNINGHAM: I'm sorry.

17 - FROM THE FLOOR: Since the Water Control Board

18 is on the floor how, it would be appear to be that if you

19 had a court order and you had violated the court order,

20 and I understand what happens if you violate a court order

21 in this county, you go to a certain place.

22 (Simultaneous questions and conversations —

23 not reportable.)

24 MR. CUNNINGHAM: From a technical basis in

25 terms of what he did with the water, it was feasible. I'm

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC-S rjCnp • r202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage " SoWJBfl-wAU I 5 7

Page 128: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02. 02

rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

127

not saying what he did was right or we approved of what he

did.

tanks.

FROM THE-FLOOR: Is-it still there in those

MR. CUNNINGHAM: No.

FROM THE FLOOR: Where is it? He done boiled

it off in the air, right?

approval?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: He boiled it off.

FROM THE FLOOR: Did that meet with your

MR. CUNNINGHAM: No, and that's why ——

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

That's why ——

FROM THE FLOOR: You don't want to take action

against him.

him ——

MR. CUNNINGHAM: That's why we sent a letter to

FROM THE FLOOR: You're scared of him.

MR. CUNNINGHAM: —— we sent a letter to ——

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

FROM THE FLOOR: You're scared of him because

the Senators and all of _thera have stock in the railroad

and on telephone poles and ——

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS,202047-3700 .._ Nationwide Coverage

Page 129: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

128

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

MR. ROLAND: Give me five seconds, and I think

I can satisfy you. We are taking two of the strongest

actions, probably the two strongest actions we can take as

a Water Control Board.i

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

Just a minute. We referred the violation of

the court order to the Attorney General's Office. That is

a serious matter and something is. going to happen there..

FROM THE FLOOR: When did you refer it to the

Attorney General?

problem.

March?

MR. ROLAND: Virtually right after we found the

FROM THE FLOOR: Was it in February, was it in

MR. CUNNINGHAM: Approximately three weeks —

three or four weeks ago.

FROM THE FLOOR: Have you heard anything back

from the Attorney General's Office about it?

MR. ROLAND: They have asked us for some

additional information, and I think we're probably ready

You ought to call their office ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Who is our point of contact?

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. . R c n n202-347-37X Nationwide Coverage SOoft&flMJ 0/59

Page 130: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

129

MR. ROLAND: John Butcher. You ought to call

him and ask him when he's going to.proceed.

The second item :——

FROM THE FLOOR: Do you have a number?

MR. ROLAND: 786-4073 ——

FROM THE FLOOR: I can't hear you.

MR. CUNNINGHAM: 786 ——

FROM THE FLOOR: 804?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: Yes, area 'code 804.

MR. ROLAND: 786-4073. The other action is

we've got some problems with the operation. We have not- '

gotten the information we needed —-

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

FROM THE FLOOR: Does Mr. Payne have a copy of

the court order?

MR. PAYNE: I might — the '83 order. I think

I probably have that.

MR. ROLAND: We have problems with the process

and we are not sure what's happening with that water, and

we have a hearing at our next Board meeting to possibly

revoke the permit, which means'they cannot continue to

ope ra te

Now those are about the two most serious things

we can do right now.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 .. . _. Nationwide Coverage 8 0 - 4 ft I C fl

Page 131: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02 130

.irysimons 1 FROM THE FLOOR: Why don't you contact the

2 judge that issued the order? ![

3 (Simultaneous questions and conversations —. - - I

4 not reportable.)

5 MR. ROLAND: That's for the Attorney General'si

6 office. I don't direct the Attorney General's office. We

7 have given them the information and I assume ——

8 (Simultaneous questions and conversations — i

9 not reportable.)

10 (The reporter again indicated to Mr. Germann

11 that due to many people trying to speak at once and - .....i

12 conversations taking place throughout the room it was !

13 difficult to hear.)

14 MR. ROLAND: If you all would like to come to

15 the March Board meeting you're welcome to. That's what

16 it's for.

17 FROM THE FLOOR: What is the date and the

18 location of the meeting, sir?

19 MR. ROLAND: Excuse me. The Water Board

20 meeting is Assembly Room D, the General Assembly

21 Building. It's at Ninth and Broad essentially. It starts

22 at 9 o'clock in the morning. I think court is in the

23 middle of the agenda. So it would probably be like 10 at

24 least.

25 FROM THE FLOOR: The 28th?

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646

Page 132: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02-02

arysimons 1

2

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

131 -

MR. ROLAND: The 28th of March, and there will

be a full discussion of the concerns we have about the

operation there. .

speak?

speak?

paper?

FROM THE FLOOR: Will the public be able to

MR. ROLAND: Excuse me?

FROM THE FLOOR: Will the public be able to

MR. ROLAND: Yes.

FROM THE FLOOR: Do you have a notice in the

FROM THE FLOOR: Yes.

FROM THE FLOOR: How about radio announcements?

FROM THE FLOOR: Yes.

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

FROM THE FLOOR: I had a question about the

lagoons. Are the lagoons that are around that site part of.

the present process?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: No.

FROM THE FLOOR: So basically this water

accumulation is just from rain water?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: Rain water, yes. You have a

net accumulation.

FROM THE FLOOR: I want to ask you. Take

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 . Nationwide Coverage

Page 133: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

OQ90 02 02

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

132

tonight and it's raining, and he done did some ties and

stuff today, and that stuff is dripping right on the

ground right tonight, right?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: We have told him and we have

sent him a letter in terms of his facility, that he is iniviolation of his permit for operating his facility right

now because he does not have approved plans and

specifications.

FROM THE FLOOR: Then why not shut him down?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: That's why we are having the

hearing to consider that in March.

FROM THE FLOOR: Is that one of your

disapprovals, that he doesn't use pans? Now another plant

around here is not a creosote plant, they use a salt base,

but they use drip pans, what you 'call drop pans. Why

doesn't the State make him use drip pans?

I mean if it's going to take all of $21 million

to clean it all up, it's not going to take long to where

it's back to where it is if you don't use drip pans or

something.

MR. CUNNINGHAM: We have problems with the

existing facility as it is right now. He needs to

install drip pans. We discussed that with him and told

him that he was in violation of his permit right now

because he does not have approved plans.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. $ ft 5 Q 0 I202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646 ,

Page 134: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12-

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

133

FROM THE FLOOR: What -does law say about being

in violation? I mean how many days does a person go

without being shut down? What is the procedure? Does

this person get a hearing?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: That is exactly what we are in

the process of doing right now.

him down?

FROM THE FLOOR: Are you requesting to close

MR. ROLAND: Actually this is the first time

that we have done this particular thing, which is to take

somebody's permit away from them. There is a process for

that as described in our regulations. The first step in

that process is what we are doing on March 28th, which is

to hold a public hearing.

L. A. Clarke has rights, too, under this thing.

We have asked them for some information and there are some

things happening now between now and the Board meeting.

So I can't tell you right now exactly how it's going to

go

FROM THE FLOOR: In other words, you've said to

them though that they need to correct certain things, and

if they don't do it then you have ——

them down?

FROM THE FLOOR: What can citizens do to close

MR, CUNNINGHAM: Yes.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. 4 ft 5 Q Q / fi fe202-347-3700 _ - Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646 ° "

Page 135: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

- 134

FROM THE FLOOR: But you warned them.

MR. CUNNINGHAM: Yes,

FROM THE FLOOR: During all your investigations

are you people aware that the West VACO Pond is owned by

. RF&P railroad? iMR. CUNNINGHAM: Yes.

FROM THE FLOOR: Have you all contacted, these

people and said, this is your property and you do

something to stop these people? This property, L. A.

Clarke, are aware that it's owned by RF&P railroad?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: Yes, but the permit to

discharge is issued to L. A. Clarke, and that's ——

FROM THE FLOORS If I own a piece of property

and I go over there and dump uranium all over it, you're

going to come to me because I own that damn piece of

property

MR. CUNNINGHAM: We know that.

FROM THE FLOOR: Then how come you're not

pushing RF&P railroad?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: In terms of the permit for the

existing —~

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

FROM THE FLOOR: I'm not talking about

permits. I'm talking about ownership If I own a piece of

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-3 -

65

Page 136: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

• 135-

property and if I go over.there and put a bunch of crap

all over my property, if I go over there and put 19,000

automobiles tires and set them on file, you all are going

to put^my butt in jail. So how come you're not putting

pressure on RF&P railroad. They own where the Vest VACO

Pond is where there is a lot of contamination, and I can

prove it to you from the county record in the courthouse.

I've already researched it.\

FROM THE FLOOR: Why has the Water Control

Board, since you have had .information related to this

project that dates back as. far as 1973, why have you all

been -so slow and dragging our feet in doing things?

MR. ROLAND: I wouldn't say we've been slow and

dragging our feet. We've taken this into court four

times.

FROM THE FLOOR: Ten or 15 years and you don't

call that dragging your _feet?

MR. ROLAND: Well, these guys can attest to the

fact that we've got sites like this all over the place

that have been there for years and it takes a long time to

get them straight.

The big problem out there is the contamination

at the site. Our main concern right now is the operation

that is going. on__and is _it contributing to the problem.

FROM THE FLOOR: Why do you mean is it

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. ,202-347-3700 -. . .. Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646 fl R 5 0 0 I 66

Page 137: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

^rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

136

contributing? It's in violation of a court order.

MR. ROLAND: We've got actions under way no

those things.

FROM THE FLOOR: And that was in 1983, right?

MR. ROLAND: The first court order was '82, and

it was filed for contention in '85. There was basically a

violation similar to what we're seeing now in '85. It was

brought to the judge, and the judge ordered I believe the

company to take the actions that were needed to correct

the problem.

FROM THE FLOOR: You don't have the power to -

close them down; is that what you're saying?

MR. ROLAND: Excuse me?

FROM THE FLOOR: You do not have the authority

or the power to close these people down?

MR. ROLAND: Not without going through a

certain process, which is what we're doing.

FROM THE FLOOR: Why don't you start

processing?

long?

VOICES FROM THE FLOOR: We are.

FROM THE FLOOR: Well, why is it taking so damn

FROM THE FLOOR: Now the meeting that you're

having in Richmond, if a group of citizens were there and

we did some protesting, do you think we would get some

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. 3 R 5 0 f] I £ 70 ' Nationwide Coverage 800-336-664 U ' & /202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage

Page 138: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

6

7

3

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

action?

137

MR. ROLAND: You've got a seven-person citizen

board that is going to listen to all the evidence from

both slides. I mean there are two sides to this issue and

the company does have certain rights, too, and they are

allowed to ——

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable,)

FROM THE FLOOR: After this hearing, what is

the next step after the hearing? Who makes the decision?

MR. ROLAND: The board will make a

determination as to whether it's appropriate — it's sort

of a fact-finding . thing to- see .—— -

FROM THE FLOOR: Can we get the names and

addresses of all these board members and we can send them

letters -and let them know we are against this.

FROM THE FLOOR: You made a statement that is

real interesting to me. You made a statement that you've

got problems like this all over the State of Virginia.

MR. ROLAND: We have a lot of sites that ——

FROM THE FLOOR: And you've been playing around

with them for 10 years, and Chuck and Jerry haven't been

doing their job.

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that

there are a lot of places ..that before a lot of the laws ——

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. 3 f?5 H H I £ O202-347-3700 - "Nationwide Coverage 800-336-&645 <~* U f O O

Page 139: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

138

FROM THE FLOOR: If you're playing around with

all of the problems this long before you get to a public

hearing, and you know you've got to have a public hearing

bef ore Jyou can do anything, then Lord help the citizens of

the State of Virginia.

their job.

lives ——

FROM THE FLOOR: The Government ain't doing

FROM THE FLOOR: You're dealing with people's

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —•

not reportable.)

MR. ROLAND: When I first stood up I explained

that there were two public processes going on here, and I

think we are mixing the two again.

FROM THE FLOOR: I know what your process is.

MR. ROLAND: These fellows are doing one and

we're doing —— '

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

FROM THE FLOOR: Getting back to the amount of

water they pump into their tanks, you're saying that they

took: that water, put it in their tanks, put it in their

boilers and boiled it off into the atmosphere?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: Basically that's where it ends

up going.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-

Page 140: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02-02

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11.

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

about it?

139t

FROM THE FLOOR: Well, what are you going to do

MR. CUNNINGHAM: That's what they are trying to

address as far as this.

FROM THE FLOOR: You're going to flush the

water into that creek. There is no way you can help but

flush it into that creek.

MR. GERMANN: Everything that these gentlemen

have been saying for the past half hour is leading up to

the point that they have got to go through a certain

process just like we do to get .to .an .end point, and it .

might take a., long time. It takes us a long time, I know

that, and I'm sure it does them, too, but I think that

they are nearing the end of that process.

Like I say, there is an opportunity now, just

like at this meeting, and there is going to be an

opportunity on March 28th where you can make some of your

comments.

FROM THE FLOOR: Do you know the little creek

I'm talking about, right by the side of the old abandoned

railroad.

MR. GERMANN: On which side?

FROM THE FLOOR: Between 208 and 209 there is

an abandoned railroad, it transpires in one end and the

creosote goes in the other. That creek running down

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. - p- rt .202-347-3700 - Nationwide Coverage SOoA&MgU U f /O

Page 141: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

.irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

2S

140.

through there and it only stands that deep —

(Indicating). All right, when you flush on top, you're

five foot deep down in that creek. That's where you're

going to flush all your water.

MR. GERMANN: Like I said, that is .something

that is being addressed. That is being addressed now and

it's going to be taken care of before we even start our

cleanup process. I mean that is-something that is goingi

to be taken care of beforehand one way or the other,

because what you're saying is absolutely correct. It just

wouldn't work.

FROM THE FLOOR: But you know the creek I'm

talking about?

MR. GERMANN: Yes, I do.

MR. CUNNINGHAM: I would like to get back just

to respond to your question in terms of what they arei

doing with the boiler feed. We told them that they have

not submitted to us plans in terms of what they are doingi

and in terms of their operation because they are in

violation of their permit. We are not approving of

anything they are doing.

FROM THE FLOOR: I understand that.

MR. CUNNINGHAM: In addition to that, in their

original application that was submitted to us, it showed

only fresh water' being used as boiler feed.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC--=DCn202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage &£\W(Q<Q \ "] \

Page 142: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

jrysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7\

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

141

Does, that help clarify it?

FROM THE FLOOR: Basically they are taking

water that has run across the site into the retainment

pond, pump it into, a tank and then send it into a boiler

and boiling it off ,as steam to the atmosphere.

MR. CUNNINGHAM: The water that they are using,

according to the company, is not exactly the same in terms

of strength, but essentially they are boiling off a type

of product in the water, and in that respect I don't have

any disagreement with you.

FROM THE FLOOR: I want to know, these

different agencies, I know they have a check-off list of

their operations that they do on a daily basis. Do you

all ever do surprise visits and go right through and see

the check-offs, that they actually are doing what they are

supposed to do on a daily basis or a weekly basis

regarding the operations?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: The first inspection I

conducted over there was unannounced, and I believe

Melany's was unannounced.

FROM THE FLOOR: How many do you do a year?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: Since January ——

FROM THE FLOOR: January of this year?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: —— January of this year we

have been having one of our people go down there on a

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. S R S fl fl I 7 ?202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6636** v) U U I 1C

Page 143: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

142.

weekly basis.

FROM THE FLOOR: How about last year?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: Previous to .that I'm not sure,

very couple of months, along those lines.

FROM THE FLOOR: How did you all let it get so

bad? Somebody wasn't doing their job or somebody was

holding out a hand. Am I right?

MR. CUNNINGHAM: I think you have to realize

that this site started back in, what, 1930, and a lot ofithe problem, a lot of the groundwater problem that you see

there — like was said, groundwater doesn't move real

fast.

(Simultaneous questions and conversations _.—

not reportable.)

MR. CUNNINGHAM: Groundwater doesn't move realifast, and for it to be getting contamination down in thisIIare and coming to the surface, you've had contamination

for a long time.

FROM THE FLOOR.: I've been down there to load

my truck, and I just to go- down and get some stuff, and I

would walk in stuff that deep right there in front of the

office.

MR. GERMANN: I don't think we disagree with

the fact that there is an ongoing problem there. What we

are saying is that it's not something that just happened

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS,202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage "

Page 144: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

.irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

143

within the last 5 or 10 or even 15 .years

FROM THE FLOOR: But why has everybody closed

their eyes to all of t.his for so long?.

MR. GERMANN: Well, I mean I think the fact

that we're here even though we've taken a long time to get

here shows that we are not closing our eyes at least.

Yes, sir.

FROM THE FLOOR: Can EPA or the Water Control

Board do anything, right away about_that, to put a barrier

up or something to keep this from coming into the creek

and polluting the Massaponax Creek and the Rappahannock .

River?

(At this point in the proceedings people were

leaving due to the lateness of the hour and holding

private conversations so that hearing was extremely

difficult.)

MR. GERMANN: I'm sorry, can you just rephrase

the first part of your question?

FROM THE FLOOR: The sludge is coming out of

the bank on the Massaponax Creek and getting into the

creek. Are you all or the Water Control Board, are you

going to do anything right_now to put a barrier up to stop

this coming into the creek which is polluting the creek,

the Rappahannock River and the Chesapeake Bay?

MR. GERMANN: What we are going to do as far as

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 . Nationwide Coverage WOCcS-S4© / J L

Page 145: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02 144

irysimons 1 the creek is concerned is there is a discharge point •—

2 the answer to your question is we are not addressing thei

3 whole bank at this time, although we are going, to look at

4 it.

5 But there is one main discharge point where the

6 creosote levels have been shown to be particularly high at

7 one of the ends .f the ditches that leads to the creek.

8 ~o we are going co do some excavation, or we are planning

9 to do some excavation now to remove that particularly high

10 area of contamination.

11 Now I know that there are lesser levels at

12 different points along the creek. So what we are going to

13 do is — at this point we don't have a good enough handle

14 on that to just go out and start digging tomorrow. Only

15 in this one area do we have a good enough handle. So we

16 are going to start, like I say, within the next couple of

17 months doing some more sampling in that area and then try

18 to find out whether or not we have to, for example, dredge

19 the creek or whatever. I mean that's a bit radical, but

20 that's something that will be considered.

21 FROM THE FLOOR: For right now can put straw or

22 anything like that to soak up the stuff to keep it from

23 coming ——

24 MR. GERMANN: Where particularly are you

25 talking about?

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. . p -202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage " 80D-J36*35W 0/75

Page 146: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

*rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

145

FROM THE FLOOR: You know, where the abandoned

railroad is. There is abandoned railroad there between

608 and 609, an abandoned railroad. If you look on the

right-hand side there is an old big bridge, and it's right

behind there. There used to be an old road that ran back

on the other side of the creek, but that's sort of growed

up now.

map

map

FROM THE FLOOR: Why don't you show him on the

(Citizens proceed with Mr. Ostrauskas to the

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Do you know where it is on the

map, or is it even on the map.

FROM THE FLOOR: I don't know. You know the

land better than I. He has probably done walked all over

the re.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Is the the office building on

L. A. Clarke and there is ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Where is the landfill at?

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Where here is 608 right here,

and here is the creek going under 608. So it comes down

here and you see — we don't have the whole creek here.

See, this is 608 ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Up here next to the process

plant. There is a creek that runs right there, and the

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. /i p r r202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336 *10 0 0 / 7 6

Page 147: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

.irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19-

20

21

22

23

24

25

146

old railroad tracks ——

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: You're talking about up here.

This is it.

FROM THE FLOOR: Yes.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: Well, we are planning on

digging all that up. We are going to clean all that up as

part of the plan,

FROM THE FLOOR: When you pump water down

there, if you don't do something first, you're going to

run it all down in the ocean.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: We are going to dig that up. .

It's going to be dug up and the contaminated water is

going to be ——

FROM THE FLOOR: You can go down there any day

you want to and see ——

MR. GERMANN: Excuse me just for a second. Is

there anybody else out in the audience out here that has a

particular question because otherwise we are just going to

devote some time over here to the map?

Is there anybody else here who has a question?

FROM THE FLOOR: I would like to make one

comment. You guys obviously have done affair job, the

Water Control Board and the EPA. Will you do us one

favor. You're sent here by your boss. The man that can

make authority, I would like to see him down here.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. _202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage ' " 800-3M-&6) U 0 I 77

Page 148: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

jrysimons 1.

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

147

FROM THE FLOOR: You .guys are peons. You can't

answer our questions and you can't make decisions. We're

paying you .all for nothing. You come out and you say,

okay, tittle people, we'll answer your questions. We

can't do anything for you.. Now you all go away.

MR. GERMANN: That is completely wrong.

FROM THE FLOOR: I think what we should do as

an audience is get up and walk out because we can do as

much walking out as you can do here all night long.

MR. GERMANN: That is completely wrong.

FROM THE FLOOR: I think it's the best protest

that people can do.

FROM THE FLOOR: -There are a lot of I don't

know's .and maybe and ——

MR. GERMANN: Well, you're getting the truth

from us. "That's all I can say. We're doing the best we

can

FROM THE FLOOR: We're gotten absolutely

nothing from you. You can't make a decision. I can't tell

us anything and we can't get any results. We may do this,

we might do_._this, we'll do it five years from now.

MR. GERMANN: What we really need are some

comments on how to do it, not how not to do it.

FROM THE FLOOR: -What-problem have you solved

tonight?

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 ' Nationwide Coverage SOO-SSefleR 500 1 78

Page 149: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

ji rysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

148

MR. GERMANN: I obviously haven't solved the

problem you're talking about, but I hope that we have been

able to answer some questions.

FROM THE FLOOR: The problem you came here to

talk about, have you solved that?

MR. GERMANN: We haven't solved anything yet.

FROM THE FLOOR: That's right. There is no

argument about that,

FROM THE FLOOR: Then you can't do anything.

(Simultaneous questions and conversations —

not reportable.)

MR. GERMANN: Just a second.

Yes.

FROM THE FLOOR: I think at this point we need

to organize a citizens group to either file a lawsuit or

have a protest. We need to make some plans as to what we

can do to stop this plant. So what we would like to have

is the names and addresses of all those present here

tonight.

FROM THE FLOOR: That's a good idea.

FROM THE FLOOR: Is it possible that we can get

everybody's name that was here tonight, their names and

addresses, and we need to organize, and the names of the

representatives from all the agencies here.

The next time we have a meeting we would really

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTE202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage

Page 150: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

.irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

149

like to, and maybe we could even call the Health

Department in and let them tell us what effect this is

having on us. . ~ : • _ - -

MR. GERMANN: Certainly I can give you our

attendance sheet. I don't know if people put down their

addresses.

FROM THE FLOOR: I would like to deal with a

man that can answer our questions.

MR. GERMANN; That's your opinion, sir.

FROM THE FLOOR: Okay, you will give us a copy?

MR. GERMANN: f Yes, sure. I'll tell you want. _

Can you make sure that you give_.me your ad.dress so I can

know who to -send it to before the meeting is over.

FROM THE FLOOR: See, it he can't even give it

to you now, see.

FROM THE FLOOR: He doesn't have a Xerox

machine right here. .__

FROM THE FLOOR: -What type of a follow-up are

we going to have to this meeting?

MR. GERMANN: What type of follow-up would you

like exactly?

I mean this is what would normally happen. We

would within the next 30 days or so sign this record of

decision, which would be a cleanup decision that we would

start an action on.

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC.202-347-3700 :. ~:. Nationwide Coverage 800-336-11*500180

Page 151: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02 150

jirysimons 1 The next time that we would probably have a

2 meeting would be just when we begin the second phase of

3 this study to tell you what we're going to do then.j

4 Like I say, if you want us to come out and

5 explain the record of decision once we make the decision,

6 we'll do it. Like I said, please tell us that.

7 At the last meeting I was here I handed out,

8 and I know we could have had more meetings in the

9 meantime, but I handed out about ,a zillion business cards,

10 and I don't think I got a call in the last year and a

11 half. I can't go out to everybody and try .to answer their

12 questions. We'll have meetings, as many of them as you

13 want, but you've got to tell us that you want more

14 information if you're not getting, what you need.

15 We will make ourselves available as often as it

16 takes.

17 FROM THE FLOOR: So who makes the decision as

18 to what plan you're going to follow?

19 MR. GERMANN: Our Regional Administrator, but

20 he doesn't just sit there and make a decision off the top

21 of his head. I mean he looks what what we have put

22 together and looks at the response and the summary which

23 summarizes all the comments you've made, and he111 look at

24 all the written comments that come in between now and

25 March 22nd before he makes the decision, and then he'll

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. 4 R5 0 0 ! 8 !202-347-3700 Nationwide Cpverage 800-336-6646 ~

Page 152: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

151

make a decision.

FROM THE FLOOR: What is his name?

MR. GERMANN: His name is James M. Seif,

S-e-i-f, and he can be reached at the same address that

Darius and I have on that proposed plan.

Then those comments, say you send a letter to

him before the comment period closes, he will give it to

us and we will incorporate it in part of the plan, but he

will see it obviously since it's addressed to him,

FROM THE FLOOR; Is it true that ——

Collier?

MR. GERMANN: Just a second. Are you done, Ms.

FROM THE FLOOR: -The minutes from this meeting,

are they open for us to obtain copies of them?

MR. GERMANN: Sure, yes.

FROM THE FLOOR: Who do we address for that?

MR. GERMANN: I'll tell you what. What I'm

going to do w_ith all the information, unless anybody says

differently, is put it in the administrative record, which

is in the County Building, and there should be a guide in

there that tells you where to find each and every

document.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: There is an index in the front

of the record. So when you look at it, and it's obviously

a lot of information, but just look in the index and that

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. fi O q n fl J O OI""* I 1 W W t/ I t \ /

202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800,336-6646 u c

Page 153: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

152

will help you make sense out of it

MR. GERMANN: So when the decision i-s made you

will each get a notification in the mail. I can tell you

that.

FROM THE FLOOR: Will the citizens have any

input other than this meeting into the decision?

MR. GERMANN: Sure.

MR. OSTRAUSKAS: You can submit comments in

writing. I mean we're not going .to be back here again

until the 22nd to meet with you, but you can write to us

at the address that you've got in the plan here, and any-

written comments will be considered.

MR. GERMANN: If there is anything that you

think of that maybe you didn't say during this meeting or

maybe you feel like you weren't heard during the meeting,

and I know there were certain times when that happened ——

FROM THE FLOOR: Has the EPA considered closing

this plant down completely?

MR. GERMANN: We can't do that.

FROM THE FLOOR: If they are in violation, why

can't you do that?

MR. GERMANN: Well, that's something that is a

little bit difficult to follow, I know it is for me, but

the process that the State Water Control Board is going

through right now could hypothetically eventually result

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. flRSOO j 83202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646

Page 154: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

153

in a condition that would.make it impossible for L. A.

Clarke to operate.

FROM THE FLOOR:- Excuse me, I heard someone ask

you earlier about who had closed the plant down in

Maryland, I'm not sure, but I think I read somewhere that

the State of Maryland did. -

MR. GERMANN: It could be.

Anybody else?

FROM THE FLOOR: This meeting with the Control

Board in Richmond, does the State have the authority to

close this place down?

MR. ROLAND: Well, after due process. There is

a process.

FROM THE FLOOR: Ultimately.

MR. ROLAND: Yes, ultimately.

FROM THE FLOOR: I know you have to have a

hearing and a notice and so forth. So after this hearing

on March the 28th, then what is the next step after that?

MR. ROLAND: We get a Board decision on that,

the Citizens Board, and then the company has certain

rights based on how that decision turned out. They could

ask for a formal hearing at that point, which would be

quasi-judicial. It's an administrative action, but it's

very formal. Then if there is a loss there and the

decision is to revoke, then they can go forward with the

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. n ( Q (202-347-3700 _ _ Nationwide Coverage S o & & t t » U 4

Page 155: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 02 02

arysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

154

process ——

FROM THE FLOOR: So that might really take a

lot of years to do.

MR. ROLAND: No, not year, but months probably.

FROM THE FLOOR: How about the violation of the

court order?

MR. ROLAND: That is with the Attorney

General's office, and I can't speak for them as to where

they are going with that.

MR. GERMANN: We have a question over here,

this gentleman.

FROM THE FLOOR: I would like to direct a

question to you. On this hearing that you're going to

have in Richmond, what is going to be your__position that

you're going to take to represent to the Board?

MR. ROLAND: At this point in time we have

asked for information from the company and it has not yet

been forthcoming. It will be evaluated, whatever they

give us, between now and the Board meeting.

FROM THE FLOOR: Do we have any representatives

from L. A. Clarke here tonight?

(No response from anyone in the audience.)

FROM THE FLOOR: Have there been amendments

made to this EPA report that we have since it was issued?

Does Spotsylvania have any amendments on this? Since I

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. fl R 5 u 0 f 8 202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646 J

Page 156: United States Environmental Protection Agency · 2020. 5. 11. · TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PUBLIC MEETING PROPOSED

0090 .-02 02

'.irysimons 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

155

got _this, haye_you issued any amendments to change it?

MR. PAYNE: Which report is that?

FROM THE FLOOR: This Executive Summary. Have

you received amendments or has EPA send_amendments to you?

MR. PAYNE: No, sir. We received the Executive

Summary plus the seven volume set, and that is all we have

received in the last three or four weeks.

FROM THE FLOOR: Could you tell me whether or

not there have been amendments to this?

MR. PAYNE: The Executive Summary is what

Darius was reading from. There have been no changes to _

that, have there?

MR. GERMANN: No, I don't believe so.

FROM THE FLOOR: So it has not been amended?

MR. GERMANN: No,

Anything else?

I do appreciate everybody hanging in for this

amount of time. I hope we at least answered some

questions. Like I say, if you think of something that you

want to say that you didn't say tonight, please give me a

call. My number is on that fact sheet.

Thank you for coming.

. . . The Public Meeting on the Summary of the

RI/FS and the Proposed Remedy for the L. A. Clarke Site

concluded at 10:40 p.m. . . .

ACE-FEDERAL REPORTERS, INC. -A R 5 0 Q 1 8 6202-347-3700 Nationwide Coverage 800-336-6646