89
32501.042 05.01.42.0007 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET, SW ATLANTA, GEORGIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED I 4WD-FFB Commanding Officer Naval Air Station Pensacola 190 Radford Boulevard Pensacola, Florida 32508-5217 SUBJ: Record of Decision - Operable Unit 17 NAS Pensacola NPL Site Pensacola, Florida Dear Sir: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 has reviewed the above subject decision document and concurs with the selected remedy for the Remedial Action at Site 42. This remedy is supported by the previously completed Investigation and Baseline Risk Reports. The selected remedial alternative is no further action. This involves taking further remedial actima at the site and leaving the environmental media as they currently exist. This remedial action is protective of human health and the environment, complies with Federal and State requirements that are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate to the remedial action and is cost effective.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGION 4 …UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION . REGION 4 . ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER . 61 FORSYTH STREET, SW . ATLANTA, GEORGIA . CERTIFIED

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

32501 .042 0 5 . 0 1 . 4 2 . 0 0 0 7

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGION 4

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET, SW

ATLANTA, GEORGIA

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED

I

4WD-FFB

Commanding Officer Naval Air Station Pensacola 190 Radford Boulevard Pensacola, Florida 32508-5217

SUBJ: Record of Decision - Operable Unit 17 NAS Pensacola NPL Site Pensacola, Florida

Dear Sir:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 has reviewed the above subject decision document and concurs with the selected remedy for the Remedial Action at Site 42. This remedy is supported by the previously completed Investigation and Baseline Risk Reports.

The selected remedial alternative is no further action. This involves taking further remedial actima at the site and leaving the environmental media as they currently exist. This remedial action is protective of human health and the environment, complies with Federal and State requirements that are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate to the remedial action and is cost effective.

EPA appreciates the coordination efforts of Pensacola and the level of effort that was put forth in the documents leading to this decision. EPA looks forward to continuing the exemplary working relationship with NAS Pensacola and Southern Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command as we move toward final cleanup of the NPL site.

ly,\ , LRichard D. Green Director Waste Management Division

cc: Elsie Deput Assistant Secretary of the Navy Ron Joyner, NAS Pensacola Bill Hill, SOUTHDIV David Grabka, FDEP

Allison Abernathy,

FINAL OF DECISIONOPERABLE UNITSITE 42-PENSACOLA BAYNAS PENSACOLAPENSACOLA, FLORIDA

Contract Number:

Prepared for:

Comprehensive Lung-Term Environmental Action Navy

Naval Air StationFlorida

Prepared by:

Inc.5724 Trees DriveMemphis, Tennessee 38134(901) 372-7962

May 6, 1998

*

*

* *

-

*

* * *

- *

*

*

*

* -

* *

*

* - * *

*

* *

- *

* *

-

of Contents

+ +

+

aLIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

+

+ I ?DECLARATION OF THE OF DECISION

+ I+1 SITE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

1 3I2.0 SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES + + 3a 1 +2.1 General Site History

4 I a I + 32.2 Site-Specific History

3.0 HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION I . 8

+ I ? I r 94.0 SCOPE AND ROLE OF THE OPERABLE UNIT

10+ ISITE CHARACTERISTICS +

a + + I 105.1 and Extent of Contamination + 1 I 20. +5 . 2 Fate and Transport

+ + + 211 + I +6 SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS 226.1 Ecological Risk Assessment

6.1 1 Problem . + I + 23Preliminary

43Exposure Estimate . 1 ++1+4 Preliminary Risk Calculation

45I + I ++I+ +Uncertainties 1

46+4 + &I I a6 .I Ecological Risk 47a I + + a aConclusions +

47+ + t * + I+6.2 Human Health Exposure Assessment 51+ a6 2 Carcinogenicity and Effects 53+ITissue 531+ ++ . + # a IConclusions 55a. I6.3 Baseline Assessment Conclusions

+ + + 57+a+7.0 THE SELECTED REMEDY

a + a + 584 +8.0 STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS 58* + + a +I Protection of Human Health and the Environment

+8.2 of the 1 + +

. + + a a8.3 Cost-Effectiveness + + 60

608.4 Use of Permanent Solutions to the Maximum Extent PracticablePreference for Treatment as a Principal Element + I I 1 60

22+ +

43

* * *

* *

* *

*

-

*

* - *

*

* * *

* *

*

*

* * =

* *

-

*

9.0 DOCUMENTATION OF NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGES * + + 61

+ II I I I 4 a + I 6210.0 REFERENCES

List of

a I 2I + + I + +

6

2

65-

-

--1

2

1

1

Site Location Map 4 1 + + 4Figure Contaminant Sources and Ecologically Sensitive Areas

+ I a 4 + 11 + + IIFigure Nature and Extent Silver

n+

++ + +Nature and Extent of I + +Figure Nature and Extent (Lindane)

+ + I4Figure 6

6

-

-5

3 and Extent

+ 1 + + a I a I 4 a I

3233Nature and Extent Anthracene

I + + I 34gure Nature and Extent + a 4 + * + 35

Figure

6

66 -

--678

Nature and ExtentNature and Extent + + + a I + + a a 1

3736

+6-9 Nature and Extent 38I a +6-10 Nature and Extent Fluorene

+ + 39+ + + a6-11 Nature and Extent Phenanthrene a a I 4 I + I

a

406-12 and Extent

List of Tables

6Table 2-1 NAS Sites Related to Assessment Zones in Pensacola I 12+Table 5-1 Detected in Sediment +

15aTable 5-2 Detected Pesticides in Sediment 17a + + I + +Table 5-3 Detected in Sediment

a a + + I t 19Table 5 4 Detected inSediment 4 26

TableTable

66-

-32 Site 42 Concentrations Exceeding

a a aTable 6-1 Site 42 Inorganics Exceeding Benchmark 1

4131

+SVOC Concentrations Exceeding Screening CriteriaTable Justification for Human Exposure Pathways -

a + 48a I I+ I 3 &a +Site 426-5 Chemicals Detected in Crab

+

Tissue Samples (in

554 4+ +I1 + INAS Pensacola, Site 2

+ 1 I I +Table 6-6 Risk Projections for Based Tissue Ingestion I + + a 59ITable 8-1 and for Selected Remedy

B B

- - . 111

B

. . . 111

List of Appendices

Appendix A GlossaryAppendix Responsiveness Summary

-

of Abbreviations

The following list contains may of the abbreviations, acronyms, and symbols used in thisdocument. A glossary of technical terms i s in Appendix A.

BEHPBRA

CERCLA

E&E

FDEPFFA

HHRAHI

HRS

ILCRIWTP

MSL

NASNCPNPDESNPL

PAHPBS

Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements

Risk Assessment

ComprehensiveIntake

Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability ActChemical of ConcernChemical of Potential Concern

Ecology & Environment,Ecological Risk Assessment

Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionFederal Facilities Agreement

Human Health Risk AssessmentHazard IndexHazard QuotientHazard Ranking System

Intercoastal WaterwayIncremental Lifetime Excess Cancer RiskIndustrial Wastewater Treatment Plant

contaminant levelmilligram per kilogramMean Sea

Naval Air StationNational Contingency PlanNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemNational Priorities List

Unit

Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonBay System

(continued)

PCBPEL

PRAPPRG

RARAB

RCRA

ROD

SARA

ssvsvocSWMU

TALTCLTELTOCTRC

voc

Polychlorinated BiphenylProbable Effects Levelpart per billionpart per millionProposed Remedial Action PlanPreliminary Goal

Quality AssuranceQuality Control

Risk AssessmentRestoration Advisory Board

Resource Conservation and Recovery ActReferenceRemedial Investigation

Dose

Record of Decision

Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986Sediment Quality Assessment GuidelineSediment Screening ValueSemivolatile Organic CompoundSolid Waste Management Unit

Total hydrocarbonTarget Analyte ListTarget Compound ListThreshold Effect LevelTotal Organic CarbonTechnical Review Committee

Environmental Protection Agency

Volatile Organic Compound

Micrograms per kilogram

V

DECLARATION OF THE RECORD OF DECISION

Site Name and

Operable Unit 17Site 42 -Pensacola BayNaval Air Station PensacolaPensacola, Florida

Statement of Purpose

This decision document (Record of Decision), presents the selected remedial action for OperableUnit 17 (Site 42, Pensacola Bay) at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Pensacola, Florida, which was

accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, andAct of as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization

Act of 1986 (SARA), 42 9601 and the extent practicable, the NationalContingency Plan (NCP), Code of Regulations Part 300. This decision is based on theadministrative record fur Operable Unit 17 at the Naval Air Station Pensacola.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Florida Department of EnvironmentalProtection concur with the selected remedy.

Description of the Selected Remedy

This action is the first and action for the operable unit. The remedial investigation and thehuman health and ecological risk assessment conducted for Operable Unit 17 support aremedial alternative. The remedial investigation and risk assessment addressed all media at thesite, and therefore, no other actions will be considered fur Operable Unit

Declaration Statement

No remedial action i s necessary to ensure protection of human health and the Theselected remedy complies with and state requirements that are legally applicable or relevantand appropriate to the remedial action, and is cost-effective.

M Commanding DatePensacola

Record ofNAS Unit 17

recreation maintaining a fish and wildlife population.

SITE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

It includes theand southern borders of Naval Air Station (NAS) Escambia County.

Trout Point, east to NAS Pier 303, and terminating

at the mouth of Bayou Grande. Primarily situated in Escambia County, Pensacola Bay occupiesapproximately 52 square miles of surface area. Approximately miles of Pensacola

+

Bay

coastline border NAS Pensacola property (Figure The Florida Department of Environmental

NAS Pensacda surface elevation ranges from to approximately 40 feet above mean sea

prominent topographic feature at NAS Pensacola is a bluff paralleling the

and eastern shorelines. Between the bluff and the shoreline, a nearly level marine terrace

approximately feet above Gently rolling uplands reach of up to 40 feet

above landward of the bluff.

Surface soil at NAS Pensacola is primarily highly permeable sands limiting formation.

Several naturally occurring intermittent streams and numerous man-made drainage ditches flow

south into Pensacola Bay. The depth of Pensacola Bay the NAS Pensacda area i s 10 feet.

The depth to groundwater at NAS Pensacola ranges from less than 1foot to approximately 20 feet below land surface, depending upon land surface elevation and proximity to surface water bodies,

including Pensacola Bay. Groundwater i s not currently used as a potable water source at

NAS Pensacola. Potable water for NAS Pensacola is received from Station, approximately

4 miles Three NAS Pensacola supply wells on the facility are used for backup supplies only

during periods of demand. The zone in the supply is screened is protected from

surface contamination by a to thick, low-permeability clay layer. Groundwater

contamination has not been detected in this zone.

Z

W-I-

W

W

II 1

II

+

+I

I

)

. . .

. .

. . . . . .. .

. . .

'. .. . . . . . . .. ' . . .

.%

c

A

A . . .

...

. .

I '

. . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .

L

. . . . . .

4

4

c

_

I

'

'

'

I

..... .

A. . . . A

. . .

!

. . .

. . . . .

.

.... . . ... ..... . .

.... . . .. . A . . . .:'.. .. . .... .. . , . . . . ,'.' .... . . . .

.

.

I

4

U P

. . . . .

... . . . ..

0

.'

P

. . . . . .

.

... . . . . .

.. .

'

''-

-

' * '

:?

' 1 :

.:.

I

.

. .

. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . .

. . .

: , .. . . . . .

.

. . . .

.:

... . . . .. . . . .. .,

. . . .

. .:.. ,. . . .

. . .

. . . .

...

I

...

.:. . . . .

0

. . . . .

. .. ..

t

#

a

r -.

. .

. .

.. . .

... + . . .

I. . . . . . . . .

.

3

I

,

I

'

I '

. . . .

I

. . . ..

. . .

. . .. . . ,,

I:.I ............ . .

.

.

. .

4

'a

. . .

'

- ' ' '

' ".'_I.

. . -

'

'

'

'

I

. . . . . . .

.. I .

. . . . . ...

.

.. . . . . . .

. . . ... . .

.

...

I

I

7 ,. . . . . . . .

. . . . .. . . . . . . . .....

. . . .. . . . . .

. . . .

. . . . . . . .. . . .I '

.... . . . . . . .' . ...... .

. . .

.. . . .

. . . . . . . . . .

.. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ......

. . . . . . . .. .

0. . . . . . . . ..

.

. ..

,

..!

I -

C?

.

...

'

' '

'

I ,

- - -

' '

"

.. .

. . . . . . . . . . ,

I

. .... . . . . . . . ...... . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . .

. . .. . . . . . .

. . . , . . ,

,

I . . .. ... . .

. . . . . .

. . . .

. . . . . . . . ........... .... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .

.

. . . . . . . . -. . . . . .

II

I

. .I.

. .

. . . . . .

...

. .

I

E

d

. .

3

I

- -

' -

' '

'

' ' I

'

~ ~~

- -

I

F-

a

. .

. !.: . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . ., : .

. . . :. ..

A

.

. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .

I. ......

. . . . .....

. . . . .

A .

:.

. . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .I . I .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:. . ... . . .

. . .

A

LABEL NAME GROUNDWATER .

35

BAYOU A BAY, BAYOU (FROM STORM

BAYOUBAYOUBAYOU

G

BAYOUBAYOUBAYOU

METALS, (NO

PESTICIDES, METALS

11

METALS, PESTICIDES, METALSMETALS

PESTICIDES

(FROM STORM

f

AAI

W O E

METALS,

METALS

ff

13

1516

METALS

METALS,METALS, PESTICIDES,

If

(FROM STORM DRAINS)

BAYOUBAYOUBAYOU

I1824 PESTICIDES,25 PESTICIDES

A BAY (FROM STORM DRAINS)

PESTICIDES,

METALS, PESTICIDES,METALS PESTICIDES, PBS,METALS, PESTICIDES

BAYOU

METALS,

A BAY, BAYOUAA BAYOU

PESTICIDESMETALS, PESTICIDES

METALS, PESTICIDES, PENSACOLA

BAY

3221 4

BUILDING

35573220

SITE3644

649,18

TO 3255

SITE 27

20

2326

18

SLUDGEPIPELINEUNKNOWN

MULTIPLE GAL.

GAL:

OPENM 12

UNKNOWNUNKNOWNUNKNOWNUNKNOWN

WASTEWASTE FWELJP-5

DIESEL JET FUEL

USEDWASTEDIESEL,

FUEL

WASTEFUEL OIL

KEROSENEm

JET FUEL

WASTE OIL, WATERFUEL

JET

FUELFUELFUELFUEL

METHYLENE CHLORIDEPETROLEUM

HYDROCARBONSHYDROCARBONS

NONE

NONE

UNKNOWNUNKNOWN

UNKNOWNPETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS

UNKNOWN

NONE

PETROLEUMPETROLEUM

HYDROCARBONSHYDROCARBONS

HYDROCARBONS

IMPACT

METALSMETALS

METALS, RADIATION

(GW NOT

METALS,

INVESTIGATED)

BAYOUBAYOU F

A BAY

BAYOUBAYOU

f

.. . . . . . . .

....

IMPACTS TO PENSACOLA BAY FROMAT PENSACOLA INVESTIGATED BY

CONTAMINANTS METALS,

PESTICIDES,

i

. .

a

. .

A

I

1517

22232425262829

I 30344438

PETRO 979

977

956-1964719811979

1972- 11972-1979

FROM THE CRASH CREW TRAINING AREAFROM THE GOLF COURSE

FROM AT SITEFROM A RUPTURED TRANSFORMER

FUEL FROM A BREAKFUEL FROM A PIPELINE LEAK

OF FUEL FROM

FROM A AREAWASTE FROM REMOVAL

FROM CHEMICALTRANSFORMER FEU FROM A TRUCK LEAKEDSKIN BURNS FROM A IN80,000 GALLONS OF WASTESULFURICFUEL FROM THE BILGE

SOLVENT DETERGENTSTORED AT BUILDING 3380

FUEL FROM A PIPELINE

WASTE DUMPED INTO

-

-

- STORM0 -

-

-

-NATURE OF YEAR ISPILLS FROM ENVIRONMENTAL SITES

REFERENCES:

- SITE

A DRAINS)

A

NDE

ONREPORTS FROM

WORKS CENTER,

2. AND OTHER INFORMATION

SPILLS ON1983 AND HISTORICAL

SITE: SPECIFIC RI

by:

--

FROM THE GOLF COURSESTORED AT

AA PIPELINE

FROMA PIPELINE BREAK

M A MIXINGREMOVAL

AOM A SUBSTANCE IN

OF

GENT AT BUILDING

PLATING

EFERENCES:

INFORMATION BASED ON

WORKS

AND OTHER INFORMATION

FROM

ON

INFORMATION ON1983 AND HISTORICAL

COMPILED INSPECIFIC

TRAINING AREA 1955-PRESENT1963-1978ONGOING1967

1958-1977

196919811979

1972-

... . . .... . .

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

SITE

PETROLEUM SITE OR UNDERGROUNDSTORAGE TANK

WETLAND

SURFACE DRAINAGE DISCHARGE POINT,ON DRAINAGE BASIN

STORM WATER OUTFALL

SURFACE SPILL

SEDIMENT SAMPLE.

ESTUARINE AQUATIC BED

36

800

SCALE

0 800

FEET

. .

A

LEGEND

FIGURECONTAMINANT SOURCES AND

ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREAS

by:

Ck by:

Date: 02/02/98'

. Tr by: 0036-00138

1

DWG I I

sites, spill locations, and petroleum sites assessing the likely

of discharge into the bay. Pertinent information summarized in Table

Collard (1991) summarizes the environmental-biological history of the PBS documenting

published as well as previously unpublished data from numerous studies conducted the 1950s

to the present. which were conducted to identify biological trends and help

understand the current status of the PBS. have been performed with varying sampling methods,and analytical procedures They were presented the work plan tor Sites 40 and 42.

Collard’s trends (1) the data did not support distinct, discernible I

trends and (2) future investigations should not attempt to evaluate existing data for these trends +

because of database deficiencies

Pensacola Bay Studies

1984 Thompson & Testing-Sediment samples were collected along the

four edges of the basin for analysis of grain size, polychlorinated biphenyls

oil and grease, and total and volatile solids. were not detected and

concentrations were considered representative of natural conditions

1984 & Miller -Sediment samples were collected from storm sewer

approximately 300 feet offshore of the facility’s southeastern waterfront Trace

of arsenic were detected in samples, but the method used was

inappropriate for assessing the total contaminant burden to sediment

5

3

m

3 .

3

3

I

0

Record DecisionOperable 17

1982-1985 of Environmental Protection -Sediment samples

collected from Bay’s basin south of the waterfront, Big Lagoon,

and the mouth of Bayou Grande showed elevated concentrations of mercury and

of Nitrogen to total carbon (TOC) indicated

sediments in the turning basin at the mouth of

Bayou Grande

1986 Navy -Water and sediment samples collected from the turning basin were

analyzed for heavy metals during an environmental impact study. Results are

considered suspect because laboratory quality control

were not provided. According to the consultant’s report, chromium and zinc

concentrations were elevated

1991 - A Phase I Contamination Activities Investigation

conducted at Site 2, the waterfront sediment, to identify source areas and

contaminants of concern and to provide recommendations for the next phases of the

investigation. Results indicated metals volatile organic compounds total

recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Site 2 3) was investigated as a separate remedial investigation The

provided here because Site is within Site 42. At Site the

appeared related tu the historical discharge of untreated industrial

sources possibly contributing to the

contamination cited above are operations at the aircraft carrier berth and naval

shipping and private industrial facilities discharging effluent the bay.

7

Record of DecisionNAS Operable

Site 6,1998

3.0

history the community has been kept abreast of activities accordance with

CERCLA Sections and In January 1989, a Technical Review Committee

(TRC) was formed to review recommendations for and progress of the investigation and

remediation at NAS The TRC was made up of representatives of the Navy,

the local community. In addition, a mailing list of interested community

members and was established and maintained by the Pensacola Public Affairs

Office. In July 1995, a Restoration Advisory Board was established as a for communication between the community and The absorbed the TRC and

added members from the community and local organizations. Its members work together to

monitor progress of the investigation and to review remediation activities and recommendations

at NAS Pensacoh, RAB meetings are held regularly, advertised, and are open to the public.

the preferred alternative for OU 17 was presented in the Proposed

Remedial Action Plan (PRAP), also called the Proposed Plan. A copy was sent everyone on

the NAS mailing list. The notice of availability of the Proposed Plan and

was published the News Journal on December 12, 1997, followed by a public

comment period. from December 8, 1997 to January 22, 1998, to encourage public participation

in the remedy-selection process. The opportunity for a public meeting was provided during the

comment

8

of Decision17

Site

4.0 AND ROLE OF THE OPERABLE UNITaction identified this document is the "no action alternative. No action

proposed because it does not pose an excess risk to human health and the

environment. This remedy is the and final remedial action planned for

This i s the only Record of Decision (ROD) contemplated for OU Operable Unit which

consists of Site 42, i s one of 13 operable units within NAS Pensacola. The purpose

of each operable unit defined in the FY Site Management

1997) for NAS Pensacola, which is in the Administrative Record.

Separate investigations and assessments are being conducted for the other operable units at

NAS Pensacola in accordance with CERCLA. Therefore, this ROD applies only to

9

Record of DecisionOperable 17

42- Buy8

SITE

Nature and Extent of Contamination

Metals

upper bounds range of detected concentrations and average detected

approximately of coastline. The Phase sampling targeted the sediments and

areas of high identified during Phase I sampling. Phase I assessed areas of deposition and

erosion by mapping sediment types. TOC analysis was used to determine that the adsorptive

capacity of were low. Figure 5-1 depicts the sediment sampling locations. This section nature and extent of the analytes detected the Phase investigation.

concentrations. Frequency of detection is a ratio of detections to samples analyzed. The

range of nondetects describes the range of nondetects in the sampling set as a minimum and

The range of detected concentrations shows the and

concentrations detected. The average detected concentration is the arithmetic mean o f only the

detected concentrations concentrations were not included in this calculation to give

an accurate of what was detected.

AS shown in Table every metal the list was detected. The frequency of detection was

few as in 141and as much as in 141. Not surprisingly, the primary seawater constituents

calcium magnesium, potassium, and sodium were detected in every sample.

ar-.

-

NAS

3

FA-

. . -. -.a

. .

LEGEND 42RECORD OF DECISION

PENSACOLAPHASE

PHASE 5-1COAST GUARD FACILITY LOCATION PHASE IAND

SAMPLING STATIONS

*

GT

I

8

1

8 8

T

I

I

I

I

+

3

U

E

t I

3

II

1 I

0

0+

nC

U

3

3

V

E

EE +-

3

-

-

Record of DecisionNAS

Site 42- Bay

TableDetected Inorganics in

of Detectedof Detection Ranee of Concentrations Average Detected Concentration

14.8Silver 141

Sodium 3,735

(TI) 0.31 -

0 . 1 2 0.14 0.13 - 37.4 3.63

- 0.23 - 84.4

milligrams per kilogram

13

Record DecisionUnit 17

Site 42-6,

range of upper bounds range of detected concentrations

and average detected concentration. The frequency of detection was less than a third of the

number of

Semivolatile Organic CompoundsTwenty-three were detected in the 141 Site 42 samples. From Table 5-3, the frequency

of detection ranges one to 34 detections 141 samples.

Volatile Organic

were detected in the 141 samples collected at Site 42. Table displays the

frequency of detection, range of upper bounds, range of detected concentrations and

average detected concentration. The frequency of detections is less than 7% of the total number

of samples

No sediment quality screening values are available for VOCs in sediments. Areas of high TOC

and fine grained sediment such as Trout Point, barge fuel dock, concrete seawall and quay, and

industrial wastewater treatment plant (IWTP) show some or all of these VOCs just above the

detection limit

Conclusions

All sample at which contamination was detected were surrounded by locations at which

no contamination was found. Thus, the areal extent of contamination is easily discernible from

the sampling data. The analytical data identified metals, pesticides, and VOCs at

Site 42. Areas of greater contaminant detections compared to other areas sampled include the

*

- *

-

I

I

dI

I

I

I

I

I1

It

It

I

I

03

I I

+0

+

II

I

t

a

I

0

b-e

u

c

L

M

I

m

+

c E m

w

cc -

delta-BHe 6/141

ga rna BHC (Lindane) 291141

samma-Chlordane 1/141 •

Note: All res Its are in micrograms. per kilogram (ug/kg).

Table 5-2 Detected Pesticides in Sediment (pg/kg)

0.093 - 1.6

0.093 1 6

0093 1 6

16

0.11 -0.4

0,11-1,3

o 15 0 15 ~

Record of Decision NAS Pensacola Operable Unit 17

Site 42 Pensacola Bay May 6, 1998

0,2183

0.3721

o 15

Table 5-2 Detected Pesticides in Sediment (pg/kg)

Pesticide~=======d~~ of Dete~c~t @=======!!""""of Nondetects

delta-BHe 6/141 0.093 - 1.6

ga rna BHC (Lindane) 29/141 0.093 1 6

Record of Decision NAS Pensacola Operable Unit 17

Sire 42 - Pensacola Bay May 6, 199~ . ;

of i)etected Concentrations ::: ::::::=:=

Average Detected Concentration === =

0.11 - 0.4

0.11-l.3 0.3721

.. ~amma -Chlordan;:e =: ______________ 1:.:./~14:.1:...... __ _=====:::::::::::=0=09=3==1 =6====::::::::::====0:::::1:5 =0:1:5::: o 15

Note: All res I(s are in micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg).

16

I + E I

3

- -

*

*

8

1

1

ti

3

+ +

8 8

I

C I

I t

8

I

I

II

+

0

8 8

88

. +

+

II

I

I

-

3

- - - - --- -

-

4 -

Record Decision17

42- Bay6, 1998

5-3Detected in

Range of Detected Average DetectedConcentrations ration

phe 4,200.0

Phena rene 36. 170.0 410.0 97 375

24. - 39.0

Py ne 170.0 22 . - 2,300.0 2 15

I ) ph 350.

Phenol

18

- - I I

t I

1

T

E

I,

E

E

.-E

barge loading Coast Guard Station, concrete seawall and quay, and the IWTP.

Contamination in. these areas is related to the discharges from these facilities.

Record of DecisionOperable

6, 1998

5.2 Fate and Transport

Metals and were found in Site 42 sediments. The marine

environment encourages the assimilation of contaminants into sediment, which transported

by deposited, unaffected by currents, for long periods of time. The chemistry

o f seawater does not encourage to dissolve and, if they are dissolved, seawater

dilution prevents measuring their contribution to the sea,

The proximity of NAS to the bay suggests impact is occurring. Humans would

be exposed possibly by consumption of seafood, because the Bay seawater is not a source of

bathing potable water The ecological receptors affected by sediment contamination observed

will be sessile benthic such as oysters and barnacles, and mobile species

closely associated with the sediments such as crab, shrimp, and flounder. An edible crab tissue

study at Site 2 (within Site 42) did not detect any contaminants at a concentration causing a risk

to humans for consumption.

Record of DecisionNAS Operable Unit I 7

Site

6.0 OF SITE RISKS

During the baseline risk assessment evaluating excess human health risk and excess ecological risk were conducted to evaluate the actual or potential risks to human health the

environment resulting from the no-action scenario at Site 42. is incorporated into Section

of the report. The BRA represents an evaluation of the action alternative, because it

identified the present if no remedial action is taken. The assessment considers

media and exposure pathways that could result in an unacceptable levels of exposure now or in the

foreseeable future. Data collected and analyzed during the provided the basis for the risk

evaluation.

Since Site 42 a marine environment, the ecological risk assessment, which is a component of

the compared observed sediment concentrations to sediment screening values considered

be critical exposure levels for marine fauna. The approach used to assess human health is a

preliminary screening, evaluating exposure potential based Site 42 physical characteristics

BRA Objectives

Characterize the source media and determine the chemicals of potential concern

for Site 42 at NAS

Identify potential receptors and quantify potential exposures under current and future

Qualitatively quantitatively evaluate the adverse effects associated with the

21

6.1 Ecological Risk Assessment

The ecological assessment (ERA) is a key component of the BRA. It develops a qualitative

quantitative ecological appraisal of the actual or potential effects of Site 42. The

assessment considers environmental media and exposure pathways potentially resulting in

unacceptable concentrations of exposure to flora and fauna now or in the foreseeable future.

Record of DecisionNAS Unit

Site 42-

Formulation

This section uses basic information about the site setting, potential receptor species, and

assessment endpoints to assess the environmental threat present. This assessment uses a qualitative

weight-ofevidence approach to judge the validity of a pathway to a receptor. To describe

qualitative risk, the terms “low,” “medium,” and “high”are used. These are not quantitative

but are useful comparing one area or sample location to another.

Potential

Species with the highest potential fur contamination effects are sessile benthic macroinvertebrates

such as oysters and barnacles, and mobile species closely associated with the sediments such as crab, shrimp, and flounder.

Assessment Endpoints

The potential for negative effects tu benthic communities from contamination was the

The work

plan outlined phased approach tu assess ecological risks from site contamination. The phased

assessment endpoint selected for the screening-level assessment for the site

approach a preliminary screening assessment in which concentrations were compared to

benchmark effects levels. If the screening assessment had exhibited a high potential for effects,

the subsequent phases (acute toxicity tests, diversity tests or bioassays) would have been

conducted.

22

ofOperable Unit 17

Site 6,

Preliminary Characterization

characterize risk to receptors, contaminant concentrations have been compared to sediment

quality guidelines+ For assessment, the benchmark effects levels used to assess the potential

effects to benthic species are the Region IV Sediment Screening Values (SSVs) and the

FDEP Sediment Quality Assessment Guidelines (SQAGs)

ssvs SSVs are based on contaminant concentration associated with a low probability of unacceptable

risks to ecological receptors. The Office of Health Assessment has developed these for use at

Region hazardous waste sites. Because these numbers are based on conservative endpoints and

sensitive ecological effects SSVs represent a preliminary screening of site contaminant levels

determine further investigation is needed. Ecological screening values are not

SSVs are derived from statistical interpretation of effects databases obtained

the literature as publications from the State of Florida, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and a joint publication by Long et (1995). These values are

based observations of direct toxicity when available

SQAGs

The preliminary SQAGs developed by McDonald are guidelines for evaluating sediment

contamination coastal ecosystems. Defining the range of sediment contamination is a two-step

process. First, parameters are compared to the threshold effects level (TEL), the upper

of the range of sediment contaminant concentrations dominated by no effects data entries

a effects range). Within this range, sediment concentrations are nut considered to

represent a hazard tu aquatic organisms. Next, they are compared the probable effects level

(PEL), which the lower range of contaminant concentrations that are usually associated

with adverse biological effects. The SQAGs do not address the potential for of

persistent toxic chemicals and potential adverse effects on higher trophic levels of the food web.

23

Record DecisionOperable Unit 7

Site 42 - BayNovember 1998

Contaminant Results and Effect Characteristics

The following paragraphs discuss the contaminants detected in sediment collected from the

141 sample locations along approximately 10 of shoreline as described Section 5.0, Site

is major contaminant type:

metals, and Of the metals, only one detection of silver exceeded

the PEL. Of the organic constituents detected, one sample with DDT, two samples with lindane,

and one sample exceeded PEL.

Arsenic

Arsenic was frequently detected across Site 42 (98 detections in 141 samples). Only ten locations

exceeded the SS’V and SQAG-TEL of 7.24 (Table No concentrations exceeded the

SQAG-PEL. detected range for arsenic was 0.12 to 22.3 parts per million (ppm).

None of these metals exceeded the SQAG-PEL (See Table

The range of detected mercury was from 0.08 to 0.64 ppm. Only seven locations had mercuryabove the SQAG-TEL. small population suggests a low risk to ecological receptors. No

concentrations exceeded the FDEP SQAG PEL (see Table

Silver

Silver was only detected at locations; both exceeded the SQAG-TEL and SQAG-PEL. No

other detections of silver were found. The limited extent alone (see Figure 6-1) suggests a low

risk to ecological resources (See Table

24

VI

QL

U

LL

$ 2 rJ

* Q

er

--

I

0

CY a

w

b)

c9 z

n

0

W I

t;

J

-.

(}

o flHlt

042MZ733 042MZ734

042MZ901

042MZ902 \

\ ..,

\ \

\ 042MZ903

, , \ \ \.

042!IAZ904

042MZ90S

\ \

042MZ906

042 MZ801

042MZ802

042 M Z803

042MZ804 \

\

042MZ806 \

042MZ807 \ \ '.

\

\. \ \ \ ,

042MZ80

\ \,

:.'

• , , \

\, \

\

"

, . ~ . ,.

'.

\. \ ,

\

, ,

\

, \ ,

" ,

"

\. .., , \.

\ \. \

\ \

\, , \ ,

"

\,

\ \

\,

\

. . , . ""

\. I,

, .~ .. ~ 1

, , , \ , ,

\

\,

\.

042 M ZB09

042MZ810

042MZ811

"

042MZ821

\

iG. . " ,

" , "

"

,

\

, \

, ,

\

11\

• , , , , , , ,

\ I"

"

:; '., .' :1".'

..

... \ +, , . . . .. ,

.~ "

'i: ,. ,

' .. ' ,

1 ." .' .. ' " ... . . :~"

\ \.

, "

\\

\ " '

". ~' ~. \'.

,"1 :~

'. " " !.

,.,'.

, . .. \

," ,.

\

"

\

\ , \~

/1"\ ' ,

.. , , . • ; . . ,

Q42MZ816 '042MZ818

042MZ819

" " .. ' , ,

~ .. I : "" >'.' • I .'

~ ,'.:....~ : '.:.J

.,

' ... ',

.. , To -'. • • , .

" J ~.j ,'~., : , ~;,"J"" ,) '. " . ~::""i;_':"":':~

,'f\ 1\\ \

\ \ I \

, ,

, , , ,

'.

042MZ820 ,

\

'\

\ 042 MZ625 042MZ826

042 MZ823 042MZ913

042MZ827

, ,

." \,

\.

'\ , ,

\

'.

" :~ ,1 \ , . ,

, , ' ..

. i; , ~

"\

, ,

I , 1

f 1

., .

) -, .. ',

-. , .

,. .. "

". :'

• "

~.

" " " ,-' '

> '~ •• /.

,'.\ '

~.i ~ .' ;.,' ",

,.J.

~ \ " '.

: . I

. '

. \ ".: '\

': [,

, .

.r, 1 ., ,

, ,

. '

, .'

, ,

, , ' ; ~ .. . ~~ -

;.> ••

, "

., ,

\

r~ . ,., ,:

, ,-.. ~~ ;: , ' .. . ,I.:

.'

, . , .'

'. , , •• ... ~

" ~.\

, .

,. ,~

~ '" ., ..

'0;;" '; ,

, , , .

',;'

)\

'\ ", . ,

"' "

, .

I~ I • i

; .1

'.j. . - : .•

I', ... .\

, ..

.. i

• ..

11 /.

i 042MZ740 04ZMZB06

042MZ812

,

lew

SCALE

,

'. . , , '

'. .'

." ',r

"

, '

., ~ .

"

"

, . . " I. .'

"

, " ',- .

,

• "

,

, ,

• , \,

\ "

, . , '.

,

, .' .. ', -,.

-\~ . " '

\':: '. .. \

\

m

\ \

, I

,

.. , ,

042MZ732 " 042MZ735

042MZ736 042MZ737

042MZ738 __ ", Q4,?MZ739

-'" ....

/ 042MZ711

042MZ714 042M1718 042 MZ725

042MZ726

COAST GUARD FACILITY

BAYOU GRANDE

, \ \ \ ,

\

\ \ \. \

\

\ \

\ "

~.

\ , • I

\ , , ,

• ,

,

\ \ \

• "

1

\ \ \ •

..

\ .. ..

042MZ613

\ \ , 042MZ616

042M2B18

042M2620 1 • • \

\

,

\ '\

042 MZ704 042MZ707

042MZ710

\ .. .. 042MZ623 042MZ703

--- ,.

lew

PENSACOLA BAY

LEGE D

NONDETECT (139)

DETECTED (0)

EXCEEDS SEDIMEN QUALITY SCREENING CONCEN RATION

SCREENING LEVEL -- 0.733 ppm

(2)

-

~ \ ,

\.

\

"

\

,

\ \.

\ ,

~-

< mm ___ --

._-_ .

-E'--------

<

-.E'-:---

042 MZ602

042MZ503 042MZS04

04.2MZ505

042MZ506

042MZ50S

042MZ509

042Ml512

042MZ613

042MZ616 042MZS16

042MZ519

042MZ520

D42MZ522

042MZ525

042MZS27

Q4.2MLb30

042MZ531

042MZS33

042MZ634

042MZ537

042MZ539

042Ml541

042 MZ642

042MZ543

042 MZ544 \

, \

\, .. \ ..

\

, '. , ,

\ \ \ \

042M2601 D42Ml602

042MZ603 042MZ605

042MZ606

042MZ609

ro

PENSACOLA BAY

042MZ612

SITE 42 RECORD OF DECISION NAS PENSACOLA PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

FIGURE 6-1

NATURE AND SILVEI

XTENT

I

1 I-

F

2

I I

I

I

1

I

I I I

I

I

II

0+

++

I

+ a

NN

N

E

I

E

*

1

I

I +->

Is

’-

Record DecisionNAS

Site 42-

Dieldrin

Dieldrin exceeded i t s SQAG-TEL of 0.715 at only one location (see Table 6-2) and it did

not exceed the or the

DDT

Site 42, locations exceeded the SQAG-TEL of 1+ 19 (Table 6-2 and Figure

Lindane was detected above screening levels at of the locations in Site 42 (see Table 6-2

and Figure 6-3).

ecological receptors

was detected at 16 locations across the site. Of these, two exceeded the

and exceeded the (see Table The limited distribution suggests limited risk

c li Hydrocarbons

Most detected were a general term applied to a group of compounds with two or

more benzene rings. They in the environment as a result of the incomplete combustion of

constituents of petroleum and its derivatives. Oil spills and refinery effluents

are major sources of contamination. In addition, storm water from urban areas is

to contain The content in storm water suggests hydrocarbon fuels and

asphalts associated with roadways as the source. During the sampling of Site 42, field crews

observed “tar balls” in dredge samples from the

28

'

-

'

" -

' -

-

BAYOU

I

.

I

I

. .

04

U42 5

. - I. . I

I. '. .

I

I .

!

I . . .

I

I

. . I

I

' I

I.

I+ I -.I

. . .

I

: .

I I I .

I I

I

. I

I

!_ I I

I . . +------ 541I' I.I

I

I

I I

I

I

I

L

I

I

_-I

I

-! .

I

. .

.. . . . . , .

Y

.-04 12 I

.... .

LEGEND

DETECTEDEXCEEDS SEDIMENT QUALITYSCREENING CONCENTRATION ( 3 ) NATURE AND EXTENT

SCREENING LEVEL =

. -

FACLITY

, I

) ,

I

I I 1

I ,

I I

• ,

.•. ~ ;~,

... I ...... ~ - ... ,_ . ... ~~--~.

042MZ733

042 MZ734

04ZMZ901.

042MZ902

042MZ903

'. " . , " "

" ,

",

• -042MZ904

042MZ905 " ", -', '. ._1, ,

'. • , '.

'. 042MZ906 "

\ \.

\, '-

" '. , "

.

\

\ , , \ \', i

04ZMZe01\ \, \, \, \ "," I "', .... ~_. -\-:--___ ',_. _____ ."--_~ ,I

'\" .,. \';~ .. ':, "i'::- -,' :--\.:: .. ;,""' -,,'-\ \. ._ ~',L;_ -•. 1' -'. ':, \''"'' \ _.'.

" "\- .. '_ • '.~ ~ I

042MZ802 .. , 042MZ803

042MZ804 , "\ \ \\ ' :: '\ \' ,"

\ "\', \' , , -\ " ' , . ~ ,"

'" '\"-.. l,.-" '~" " \ "' .' . ~ . "'.. \ .. ':',--.i__ \. ''------.- _) \. ,- '"

'.\ \\~t ~I.,: \:~ ",:'.:. \.:~:;~~: ,i.:,.(\::.: _ \ .-'~ " ,. '" ~', '.-.', \ .. "', .,' , . -. " ~,

~'" '. ., ;t .. ' , \ .. ." . \

042MZS06 -,. , •

042MZ807 \ \, ... ,

'. '.

\ \ ,

,: .' ,- : .. \ .. ,

'. '. \/'

',",.'. : .~,' .... ,', ' ~'., .

'l \. '\

:::,

'.'

1 , ,

. . ' .. ,. , ".V

' .. , \ , , . y '. " , '. .. ,'. '. , ,

'.' , '" \ .

~ .. ::.., '" 'v , ." , . , .

I. '~. 1 '.\' ,

" : .. ~ 0:.-', .~, ~. , ~ , ': , l "\

, ,

i

" ,

,

,

., ' , I

, ',' , . , , .\ :"i

042MZB09 -" I, , '

"

042MZS10

042MZ811 ,

,

\

, I I " " , , , , , ,

'. 'I \

"

~ \'

'~.

.. ".

"

\ , "

\

i -

, \

.,

,

"

\ \

"

.. ': \ .,

'-

, I. " , '

, ,

\ '

.. ,

. ,

-

, , ..

\

,

, ,

I

,

". . \; . , I

" ..

1', •

, .' "

, ,

· \ , , '.' I

.. il { '. , , 1 .'.' , ,

I •• ,.

c· '. " , '.

,

, •

, .. .. , ,

..

" .... :

'.-

.'. --

,

\ , ,

, ,

'-

.' .' .

~ .. , '. , .

- ,o4iMZ716 "

..•. £l42MZ1,17 '",: ':.' :,,'. ~ -. '.: 'II.: ~ .'y';'. :.: '

'0"4 :lMZ'7 19 ... ". ,.,~ .. , .:,- "'~,,'

042M'Z72Q-,. '. '

.. , .'

': , .:. y,:. .

. . , ... '\ , ! -,

'"1 '. -' 042M27:1;1 , ' , , , , , , " , , ",./.1 15

".

, .- ... \ ",'. \ ;

.... \ ' \ . , -· \ .' ~ ,

\ I ... __ .

\ ,

042 MZ8 14- ,\,..' ..: ':, ~ ", 1.\

~ , 11 ': ~', 'J .j , \ \- 1. , __ ,~, .

-

'U:lElW,'JNs _ MIr.'T "/' \ i '-7

" . 042MZB15

, I . '. , -- /. ---.' -, '- ' \ • •.••• I 'If \. : 1,. .,

I ,.';.. " " .JJ "J ., '.1; .... '0:; . "

. . '" , . ~ -' '/' , , '-., .I ',. .' ':' ','.~ ,~ . ~ 1 ,'.' ........... ;. " '" ~ .~~. ;.- ..... -"'~,,~ .'.:J: ,~.:)) ·~d:~.\ "";":~...... ~-:\. ~.~ ..... ',. 042MZ817 ~ __________ ~ >~______ '0:; '" -"J'" -- "'--L-~f ---.;~~

~/ \ -. ~ ~, '. ~~ \ ,',

042MZB21_ TROUT /' 1\ ,,'1,'- '. ft,,'; KV.,. ,,', --- ___ POlNf . ,/ , / i. \, ~1, I .~\ '. \.' L ....

-------.--------- ' ./. '/' :'\'" -...

,. ,'. I·· , ; ,

'-

~. -.

"

... -. ,

,­--~':j ,/ -- - fo

,

'.

"

"~, ,

-,

... \ ,

04:2 MZB22 _ ~.'>§ '''"-- 042MZB16 I, \. I , \. .... _', , i

-~ ~~-:i£-- '0::-' 042MZS1S ' \ : " "',' 042MZ732 042MZS24~ __ 4 "I: 042MZ819 I " i , ' "." 04"MZ735

" ::> I '\ :' 042MZ740 """ 042""'MZ736 042 Mza25 /> "~ 042MZ820 I 042MZBoe " " 042MZ737

.' I ,

042MZ826 i>' 042MZB12' 042MZ738

042MZS27 042MZ823 042 Mze13~2MZ739 .,--

SCALE .-~~~-;~~

Of~ 5000

, --

lew

~.'-

. ,- -

"

042M2614

.. ,.,.-'

.. --

\

, • '.

, , , ,

"

.. -

"

, , ,

... ,,: , - ' ... ' , '. "

"

,'~

I ,

i ,

I \

.. :, , '. ,\

-. .', ..

, I

I. , I

, ". i

.'

" , ". ' . ;

, , : ,

I I

,

I I

,

" ,

FACILITY

,

,

"

BAYOU GRANDE

,

, .-

, ,

, I

, , , , , " I

-, ,

, , , ", .. , '. '." ~:

,>: 'l • .. -. . '

, , , , , "

,

I I

" I' _

, , ,

, ,

, , ",

" , , , \

., , ...

, \

\

, , , ,

, ,

"

• , , , , I , , , ,

, -... ' .

, , , , , , , ,

, , , , , , " , , , ,

, ,

- -, , . ,

,

" "

,

. ,-, . ',,'

, ,

, , ,

"

,

, -" ':

'.

"

..• :,

. , :

,

, , -

• ct , .

"

'-

"

'-" ...

"

\

042MZ704 " 042MZ707

'-

"

" '.-. _. , ,

'~, . ' ., -,-. • " ! , . ,

,

" \

.. ,-

-

,

:':

.. ,:

,

, -,

' . .' , , -

.' .... ::

,

.:. 'r'

" ' .

.. ',~' . ".' ,

• "'::~'1.....;.,' . : '. " .""'"""! .-~--:..: , •

, ' .

"

\ -,

h \,

'.

.. ' . ,

'.

\

,~ \.

\ , \. \

, \ '.

" \ , "

\ \ \

' . \ \

-... "

'.

, "

,

"

",

\. , . •

, "

"

,

"

'-,

-

,

,

, "

, "

,.

, .

, "

-\ ,

'. '. 042MZ613 '-• , \

.. '. "

" \ ,

'. "

\. '.., 042MZB16 \ \ , , 042MZ61B

042MZ620 042MZ623

042MZ703 - ,.-~~.

.... .., ',.'

, ", ,

, ,

, ,

• ,

- ~~ •• I

042MZ710 lew

PENSACOLA BAY

NONDETECT (112)

DETECTED (17)

EXCEEDS SEDIMENT QUALITY SCREENING CONCENTRATION

SCREENING LEVEL - 0.32 ppb

(12)

"

,

'. • , ,

"

...

<'-------------

042 MZ602

042 MZ 503 042MZ504

042MZ505

042MZS06

~------.- 042MZ50S

042MZS09

\.

,

,

, ,

'.

<'---------

<E,-----------

,,<E--~--- .. -

'E --

"" -- ----~

~------- --

042M2S12

042MZ613

042MZEi15 042.MZ516

042MZ519

042MZ520

042MZ522

042 MZ52:5

042MZ527

042MZ630

042MZ531

042 MZ533

04-2MZ634

042MZ537

042MZ539

042MZ541

042MZ542

, 042 MZ543

'. 042MZ644

\ -.

'. '. ,

\

042MZ601 042MZ602

042MZ603

. "

042MZ605 042M260a

PENSACOLA BAY

042MZ609

042MZ612

SITE 42 RECORD OF DECISION NAS PENSACOLA PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

FIGURE 6-3

NATURE AND EXTENT GAMMA-BHe (LINDANE)

, ii

I I

.•. ~ ;~,

... I ...... ~ - ... ,_ . ... ~~--' ~.

• I

) ,

I

I

I 1

I

I I

01961

042MZ733

042 MZ734

042MZ901,

042MZ902

042MZ903 042MZ904 '

\ "

. " -, '. \ ",

-042MZ905 ' ,~I-

, , , , '.

\

....

"\ \. \. , ,

... \, \ ",

" ...

, r . ,

\

". \ , - . \ ,

'. '. '. 042MZ906\ , \ \

• • 042MZe01 .. \ " '

... '\ ... \ \ -,\ fl .,.:-- \:.::- --:::- -.\:,:"",,""~''-:-,..-','. '\ \",-,._ \ i,' ',"" '.' _. ,- \ .

... \" -:' -".' '. ~:,~. "(

"""'-.. '\'~" --' ,'-\, -\; \ '\' , . , ~. " , "", . , '\ ",

,-. \ .... .\.,!" " ,.-~ . \ \ \ l "I, • -,.. - -•. " 1, _ '-

.. :--...~..........,. -..\. ----.....~ 'i,.. ., l"

042MZB02 \ , 042MZ803

\ 042MZ804 ,

, . t " - : '.. .,: >, -', . - i .' ',', , - ~' , _ . \ ~" '~;;,,_\::.: ';:".'\"-.:;~,:: -' '.:: ..... :.: _' 'c'.'_ '~::' '- ',"

'-_ , ',- ._- \" .' '.- ,1- ~ ,. \. \ "- ~ . \". -, '" . \. '- '-':_- \ '.

"':"', \.- ~.~~: \-~,,- -,' .';,: , !."'. ";,.- ~--. ., . " . . . . ' -

042MZS06 '. , -' '.

.~

.:' . , ~,',

\. -'

042MZ807 .. '. ', .. , ...•. \,' - .,

~'-'- ", - ,-, .-, I : \. '\

, -" "..

\ . , , '. , \/-.

042MZBOEli'

V,

"

. '. . '.', - , ~.' ::. " . '" ".\'- .. ' \" ," ". . :' .: " '

~ ',' - " "

~ :\.'. \ - \'. '.1

~ ,J - ',:,~' ',' \:.-'\ •• ~, _. .. '. -' ,'.­. , , ~, ,

. . .-' \.. , '- " ;

, , -': , . ,

, '- . ~ .: ~ .: - -,"

\'. .. I

, , "

. " -"': . -'----- ..... -

-' ....

-,' .

<,' .-- , . '. '.".,-. .

-.' " "

.' .- , - :. -' .

o4iMZ716 .'

I , ; 'c.' , , , L • ! .

. _\ ;'i

. \ :. , -\ '.-

042MZB09 -" I,

·····M2MZ117 ,

042MZS10

042MZ811

\

, , ':

, , , , , . ,

, 1 \

042 MZ8 14-

042MZB15

, ., \.,

~' .

- '. ".

. "

\

,

, . \

, . , . " .

, \

..

, I. " , ..

1 .' \ , . 1

. \ ' "

, " .

, ,

\

.. "

, . ,

1'-•

: "

, ,

,

, •

, ' , , • •

. O~-iM~-~_~9 ,-,". ",' - .:- - "-,

»42!lit'l'72Q-., '- . ,', -

.' .

iJ42P.t~1~1 04-'2:M~7 ,3'2 'b4~'Mri':~ ·042M-Z1.~4 _

. . , ,

. \ .. , • •

i '1 ,~', ., 1

• I , 1

~ ','

I -, I -...', ._ " , I ....

> "- " , . . . . , ',' ,

\ , ,

-, , -:. y,:

. -' .... .. -- -, . '. -\\ " ,

, . .,. -, '.- 042f,<1Z7:(1 , ' , \

, .- , .. \ .- --", ;

-.. \ ' \'

. -./.'~ '-' -, , - , '. ' " -' L ' , L ... .. , .. :'.

, . ,- . ' "- :.\ '~(\L ,,', ~'. ,

\

\ . <'1:lEfI.}f.'1Ns' .. _ f'(Hr,"( '-' /' \" ,- '/'"

" . '\ ' " ': '; I: '}. ,) " '. 'I - , _." '-'.. -- /.--"- :..::...;.., -, - ; '. . ~. '.: .' "-.. . ••••.. I 'J]" ,\i • :;, .'. '. I . , _.' , .. ' .. . - ,~./I"'I . ,; •.

, - ,- :'1 " ~, :. -" ~ . -;- - \ -. - ~ 1 '-- -' \ /.'. ' .. -f '. ; _

'-

'0::' -.

"'- "\' -, .---Jo-- .. ";' ~ ..:J"- ;""1 ':" .\ ..,-n. F-" /' > - - .,' 042MZ817 '". ~-,,---- ""1 - '<.l-"-::.d< .. ~":-;~ -0';;'~-~ ~

---.---------. ______ ~ ,/--------- ~ 'v ~·;:::f ~ ~ ~ '" ,.

042MZB21 "-, ,\ l\',

':~ ',- ' '.

If, \,

'~ 042MZB16.,

'I. //1 ,

.. "" .. ". '" \ ", 'c

~ .. . '. .' \" "' ~ \ '" -". ,

,

I

"

'0;'. ---, 042Mze1S , ,

! 042MZ819 042MZ732

", "

.. 042 [ViZ 825 ----"f;;..

" 042MZ826 />

042MZB27

.. ,

!

042MZ920

042MZ823

SCALE ~

5000

, \

042MZ813

, .. 042MZ740

042MZ8013 042MZ812

-,- -

lew

~,.-

, , , \.' 04.2MZ735

" 042MZ736 \. 042MZ737

042MZ738 _, .... r

~2MZ739

!.-

. ,

. ,

; .. - ,

'-'. , -':j /

fg'"

..... 'j-,:"". ','-.'-_ I'. ,

-,

, ' .. "

... -.,.... .,.-

• • . . :., - L-' ,

, . . , ,., , . ,~ , ,.,. ,~ . ,,-. '- ..

"". j . '.' .-' . -'- ' " \ .

, ... " ' - ~.,,' , ,- ""1. .. _. , ':, '

. , -. " .

, . , . ' ,,:, -,

, . , ' ... '

"

.' , .. . \. \.. , \ , , '

I , , I " !

1 ,

-!, '

,.:. "" ' ' .. ~ '1 , , . :"

- :.; i - ,

" .' '

< ' " '. .. :. . .

, . ", .~' " ::' _\ ' , , '- r -.=--. .,

BAYOU GRANDE

-,

-"," .

.,.:,

.,' -- ", -

" .

,,' - .' .-

. , , ., .. . . - . . ."

, '" , , - . '.- : ~ -:. -' ... , '. - "",-' .~:; - ...... ,. "--"'" -, :.,

.J, . '--

- .~" . '. ,- .,-. . ,

,- '- ',., -,'

1'-, ' ' .'. !,' _' ' '~', 'L • " • . :' .. ,-'\. ..... ;.,'~ " , .

, " ' , '-, \ ,-',., -, ',' -'. ...,

-, .. ", I, ' - ,:_ . . .' " " ',",'

· -""-- ,-

, -' - ' -,

" , _ . ,'i- •

. , "

.. ' - , , " , _\

~- - - -

" ~ . ' , ",

,. .. '- ".

.'

, '.,

, "

, .

, .

". ,-

. '

. :: '.- . .

· -, " .,' . ..

C", :" , _

, .,--

• !-

. . , · , , .

.,

- .

,

'. . "

· .,:- .. . ~ :

. " -

',' .

••

• '-,-

, . ;

- , ..

" , , . - --. .; - , '- -: ' ,

.. , !

,,-

.. .. ..

, ,

,- - , ,- - , , - ,. -

, ,,-,

" "', , " .'

, .i

, , .. ,

I I

, ,

I

"

,

042MZ711 042MZ714

FACILITY

,.

.'

. - ,

, , , , , , , , "

" ,

, , - " ,". •• " '. ':, .

, ,

" , ,

,

,

->!'" -"

'. . -

, , ,

--- '. .-.. , . .-

. ' ," .. '

, , , ,

... ",

'-

I.

, , , '.

,. ,­

, .,' ,

, , , ,

· ", ,I., .

· . -,. . ,. -" . '. .'" --. ,

"

" , ,"V \ '\ \

\ '. \ \.

\. -

"

\ \

\

. ':.' , ,

. \. " ,

'.

\

\ \. ,

,

"

.. •

,

,~

, ,

'. \

\

\ .' ,

'.

, '-

....

- ." ",

, .. , .. ,

"

, '\

, , , ... \ \ ,

\ , \ , ,

" , "

\

, , ,

, ,

'.

" ,

" , , , , , , , , , , , ,

\ ,

042MZ704 042MZ707

042MZ710

'.

.. "

\. \

'.

.., ,

\ \.

, ..

\

\

..

\ "

..,

,

...

042MZG13 042MZ616

042MZ618

042MZ620 042MZ623

042MZ703 - ,--_ .. - .., ',,' -

lew

PENSACOLA BAY

NONDETECT (112)

DETECTED (17)

EXCEEDS SEDIMENT QUALITY SCREENING CONCENTRATION

SCREENING LEVEL = 0.32 ppb

(12)

'.

' .

, ..

Q42MZ602

042 MZ 503 042MZ504

<'-----------042MZ505

042MZS06

~------ 042MZ50S

042MZ509

\.

' .

~--.------- " ----

042Ml512

042MZ613

'.

<E-----.

<E;'------ ---

-='<'-------~----

'c --

-'

"" -"<::--------~-

042MZ616 042MZ516

042MZ619

042Ml520

042MZ522

042 MZ52:5

041MZS17

042MZ630

042MZS31

042 MZ533

042MZ634

042MZ537

042MZ539

042MZ541

042MZ642

.. 042 MZ543

042MZ644

'.

'.

\ '.

...

042MZ601 042MZ602

042MZ603

042MZ605 042MZ606

PENSACOLA BAY

042MZ609

042MZB12

SITE 42 RECORD OF DECISION NAS PENSACOLA PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

FIGURE 6-3

NATURE AND EXTENT GAMMA-BHe (LINDANE)

, ii

I I

LEGEND

COAST GUARD

~- I . ,, - . . -

Record of DecisionOperable Unit 17

Bay

4

Table 6-2Site 42 Concentrations Exceeding Benchmark

SQAG SQAGration ssv PEL

15 3.3 1.19 4.77 5.01.3

2

1254 15 26.0 3315 1.1

Dieldrin 19 0.78 3.3 0.715 4.3 1.1

1.3 3.3 0.32 0.99 3.8 (Lindane) 0.4 1.3

2.70.85 2.70.48 1.51.2 3.8

0.52 1.60.46 1.4

0.41 1.30.4 1.2

0.47 1

Notes: Region 4 Sediment Screening Valuessv

SQAG Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Sediment Quality Assessment GuidelineEffectsTEL

PEL Effects Level1 Represents effects level for total

Hazard Quotient; Level.

at of the locations sampled within Site 42, but they only exceeded the

total SSV and TEL of 1,684 at two of these. exceeded its

screening level at I of the 141 sampling All other individual compounds exceeded

their respective screening concentrations at fewer locations + Concentrations for locations where

screening concentrations were exceeded are listed in 6-3 and depicted in Figures

6-12.

31

3

I

I

rn m

I

1

[

-

1

il

1.:

i

i, I: I'

i.

In

< L . i.

1

i i !

! ;

i i

i

i > $ 1 J

I

ii I

1.:

1

I.:

MZ82

0 f& 5wo FACILITY

SITE QF DECISION

PENSACOLA PENSACQLAr FLORIDA

d)

ppb

FIGURE

I J

042MZ733 042MZ734 ""

042MZ901 "

042MZ902

042MZ903 042MZ904

042MZ905

, \

'"

\

"

"'" '"

'" , '"

, '"

, ,

,

\, \

, ,

• , ,

." ,

-' . " , 042MZ906 ""'"

042 MZS01 ",

\ , ", , •

\ \ " I' \ \ ", ""'t;":""";: •• ~- • '. T-;""-'----

042MZS02 '-

04-2MZS03 , ,

042MZ804

\ ... , ..

\,

-" '. , . \ ,

'I __

.~ \ \,

c -'-. - .• ..;·'--4\--.1

042MZ8Q6 \

\

.. '. ,

\

""

'.

.. , '

. ":.', . ""

I \ ' -

, .

\ _. . ~ ".,' ' . . . l :1'::': r ,:-: \".:': -I 1-

" ' , ,

, ... ,-::\ "l. ,,'''\ : .:,' .

';0-"-

. -'.~ .

,

"\" ". , , "I' " - ~ -' - ," ,"'

, , ..

l.- I , '" - \:

- ',.: . . , , '

\, -. , ;/: :. '1,' - .,'

, '

, ",

\ " ' .. - · . ,,' , '." - , ,.

, ' ,,, .~', .,'

042Mze07 \ ", '

.', . , , , , . . - .~-.' V·

\\ 'I 042MZ80~," .",'

042 MZOO9

042MZ310

\-.\'- . .,~ '.. , ' ,

-' ., , , , ,

,

.' ,. ~ •• I ....

~ -, ~ - " '. " , 'I' :-, "" ,," . \

Ii 'r " I: . .. ,-: i ,'-'"' ,

.. , .; , , '. \. ;, 'I -\'. ~ ~:

-,/:" ~ "':- - .--

. ':'. \.;. -' ,. ',; ~~-:... ~!. _ .. ', , ,. -

";

, ' , . , , .. '-/

, l·-, ' , 1 ' . ; -: "

, l ,-, ' · ,~, '"

,

"

"~I ; \ '

:; r ~'. , ,

, ' ~--.

I' "" '\ ,,"

""

" ,

-

'"

, ,

,-. '

,

v , ,

•• . ;: .

'\ .:. ' I, ''' .. ",'" .;:, ' ,,""

'"

042MZS11

'.

, "

\ \ , ,

, , ,

, , "" ,

-"

, "I , ,

"

, , , " \

\

\ I

\.1 'l

, ,

,

i ,

, .

" ,

042MZB140 • " ' 042MZ815,..... '" I

042MZ917 _________ ..... ~ ~ ----s../~

042MZ821 TROUT // ~-__ POINT /"- A

':' I

"

. ~'.:, , ,

042MZ822 -~- / ~-- ~

042MZ824 ---;-.x. 2, 042MZS16 !

• 'C:::, ... ~ 042MZ818 '~

042 MZB2S --,6-042M Z826 _-,L'~

, .. , ""

,

"

"1'\ '042MZ819

042MZS20

'"

. - .: ..

, , , ,

,,' ,,\

, , ,

"

.... ",

,"

, ...

042MZ823 042MZ913

MZ82

, ,

-, , .. .. ',. ~ _.-, , ,'. , '

I

, ,

. . i - ',\ -

" ~ " , , ,

",.

\

I'

"

, , '

,

\ '

,

" , , '

., ., , ,

-, ,; ..

"

'. '- .'­. -,'

, , , , . ' ....

--, ' -,

!

\ , ,

\ ,

, , ,

,

- -, - .',

, i

"

, ..

..

. '" ., -I

-' -,

042MZ740 042MZS06

042MlB12

- .-.

lew

".'.

... "

, ,

, ,

,,\

--

. '.. ;, ,," ,

, 042\\1iJ1~ . ,.: . " -. "

, , .• -,.' -, '

"" ,

,

"" ,

---. " '. , . - . ":-. , ...

, ,

, '

, ... , '

,

, , ~ I

'! ,

'. I - , " '

.~ --~

~ .!",~ , ,

'"

-. -',',

, '

!

'"

'-'- .-

" r ' ..

-....

,,/

',' 042MZ732 , ..... 042MZ736 \' 042MZ736

" ' 042MZ737 , 042MZ738 .042MZ739 ",-"

"

"

, " , , ,,'

, ,

, , '

, ,

,

' •..

,," .", , , ". '. .,' . , ,,"

.... '-' -, '

, , , ; , -.j" .

- ,- , . , ,,"

, " .. , ,

..

, 'r"

" ',~-, ".

.. \ -

, .. , , .;

, '"

,,'

,'J' '

• ,.- :' "1.

'-- \ .. .,' , , " , .

c, •• , ' , ._

,.- : ,,,

-. .': . -. " . , . .. .. , ,-.. ~ .. ' ;.,

.... ,," \ .. 'r-'···· .'l'" _, • _1 r,~' f,.:,;',· : "".~~.

-,_. , "-s; .. ';.. -: ...... - ..L --~~ -~,-., :.-/' ~

, :

BAYOU GRANDE

, ,

, ,

· ,"

, ,;

.', ~ "

.. "

.. ' -

, '.-

, . , '

~ I.. , '" . -,: ;; .' .... " -" ' -,,'

~'. . ".'

, :', ~ .. , ., ..

': ' '"

'. , ,. ,;

, '

'" , ,,' ., . :-

:. - .-..

, ,

," , ,,-, . -. ' . -~ ; , .'-,,' , " ,

.. .. ", , , -, '

,.. ..,

, '

· ' .~ . " , , " ' ,--

, ,

, : , . • •• . ,. _ \ 'l

.. ' .. ' : , ,"

, , , , , , ,

... , , "

,,' · I, • " ".~;,..

_ .. ;.. '. ' .. - ,

, ~-

"" ' .-~,; '- -._- .. :

" "'_,

.. I'·

"

,," .'; \,

.' I -,

1 F ~ .It;-

i I ,

'" .. '" ,

",

",

, , , ,

!

, , ,

I

, ,

I

.~ -., \,

''-, " \'" \, 042MZ711 '\'" ...... ,\\ ,\",\, 'I 042MZ714

"\ ',,', ',042M27!8 \', "\, ................ ", '\', \ 042MZ725

" 042MZ726 ",' 042MZ728

042MZ729 "-, 042MZ730

042MZ731

\ \ , , , ,

, , I

, \

\

"

, ,

, ,

\

\ , , , \

, , ,

\ , \ ,

, , ,

, , , "

,

\ , \

\ , , , , , ,

, ,

, "

, \ " , , , , \ , , ,

, \

, \ ,

, " ,

, , '" I ,

"

\

, , , ,

" "

,

"',

" "

" '"

042MZ704 042M2707

042MZ7100

""

\ , "

\ "

:. -

, ""

.-, . . ~' -"" , ~'.

-,. .

, '" _ ... _oj', . ~,--. .

-, , .. '

"'"

...

'.i "

[':;-.

...

", ,

\

"

\.

\ , , ,

,

,

...

"

,

-; . .-

",. -.'

",--

'" ,

. :,.: ~; , . , ,,"

.'r

.-, -, , . , ,

"," -

'" '; .

.. ' ",'

, '

'" \ ,

\

'" .. , , , ,

'.

, ,

" ,

'" ,

",

" ,

",

'"

'" , : -,. .

- .. ~' ,,"

, . ',. ,

, ,"~

,

, ,

" , ,

- .~

'"

,,' .. . . " .:,,:: . L . , . - ,.;~:. --;: ~~\ ~ ':\. _~ ,·_d,f .. _., .. --... -~.:::.: ...

" '

, ,

\

,

\

\ \

\

" , , '"

,

, ,

\. ,

,

, ,

\

"

\. , , ,

, \,

\,

\,

, ,

.. \ "\ 042MZ613

\. ...

", \ ' 042MZ616

,'- ' .

'"

, \

, " 042M261a \

\

"

042MZ520 042MZB:13

042MZ703

, , ...

, .. -- -.-. ~ ., , "

lew

PENSACOLA BAY

DETECTED (0)

• FACILITY

ppb

.. "

, ,

"

- '

<E:--- .,'----

~:-----

-E'---.,:::,~---'----

""=-------E:--------

/ --~--

<=----

?-----~-~

042 MZ502

042 MZ503 042MZ504

042MZ505

042MZ506

042 MZ50e

042 MZ5D9

042 MZ512

042MZ613

042MlEi16 042MZ516

042MZEi19

042MZ520

042MZ522

042MZ525

042MZ527

042MZ530

042MZ531

042 MZ533

042 MZ634

042MZ537

042 MZ539

042MZ541

042M2542

1\-0. \

\.

\.

,

\. 042MZ543

042MZ644

" ,

,

, ,

,

...

'" , \

,

\ ",

\

"" ,

'" \

, , , \.

042MZ601 042MZ602

042MZ603 042MZ605

042MZ606

042MZ609

042MZ612

~. ,- ."

SITE

PENSACOLA BAY

OF DECISION PENSACOLA

PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

FIGURE

I , l

I J

042MZ733

042MZ734 " 042MZ901,

042MZ902

042MZ903 042MZ904

042MZ905 "

... , ,

", , " \

\ ...

\. \

, ,

\ \ "

... --" -

" 042 MZ906\

042 MZS01 \ -'. "

\ , \ \, '\ ", I' " "

"'T'"":" .~--- . j:-. ~-'<--'

, ...

042MZS02 '-

042MZB03 '- " \

042MZ804 '.

, ,

"

.. , \ ,

"

, . \,"

, '

. . ~ -, ,

_ , _. 1 r,: -;": ., I.

" , " \ .: ~ ..

- " .. , ':,.'". ,

,

'. \ " \ 1 • ' - • " •• '

~ - -_ - .. ..,'---'<\~ -. ..t " (~ -~ ". ~ :. ,

'.\: --\

042 MZS()6 ,

, ,

,

" \

.. '.-" '~', -" '\ :,' . ":,', . , '

,. ::\"l. \

, -:'" . - ,. " , , "

,' .. " , "L

. ,.' : l, . I' ': ...

, , . ' .; I ._. ;-

\

, '

'. .~', .,'

042Mze07 \ , \ " '

' .. - · .. ,' , " - , ,.

,

-.. " . \ ~ 'y .

\\ '

'I 042MZ80~,".'. ','

, , , '

• ' I. >:

',,', , ' ' - '\ . , .:

.' ; , , '

"

" \

, '

, '. -, '- -

. - , . ., '. ' . , ' , , ' , , " , ,

. - . ..:' 1,\ ; y

" ."

"

'1-.,.,'

,

--'. ,

"

-- "

.,' .

"

, ,

,-. '

" . "

"

. ' .. ~ ;

., " , .' -" '

, . . " , '

, '

,;~. '. ,.-

'.:. ;.,' ;,.' " .' :' ..

.... "

,

. , " ,

_ .. -'.

, '

, . , ,., ...

, .. ,

."

, ,

..... :

" . ,

-~" -

- .' ,

, '

<. " -

, , " . " - .~

, :~,. ." 'j. ,-;'

.. "

';~- -' -:';-.. ..,.: ;":-: .', :'~ '.. ,1 . .. . .- ' .

-- \ ,.:' ~\ . ; , . ~ • .'i: ....

'1\' ',- ;', ,'I' '

" <.,. . ":-'-':' ", '.-' "\':'

" .

BAYOU GRANDE

, ',', : , ' , ., .

': ' "

'. · ": . "

',.-' .. - "",

. " .. ' .. "

,,'

. ,"

.'- . . ' ~:- " , ' .

" . '.' " '

" ' , , : • • • ••

, .,. - \ '~

", , ,

, ',-

,

,,; -

, ~ " ,

-, " '

.' : ..

, , . , . '"

,

"

\.\L .. '\'" 042 MZOO9

, , I' " '\ .- , , '. ~ '­.. '(_. , , . . .. -

" .'I . .'- :. ..: ' .•

t-' - \:- .• ~.- --..;:' \ .'. , ,

" - " ," '...-_' 0.:. ,... ".; .--

','

042MZ310 "

042MZ811

"

"

\ \ , ,

" ,

,. . .' .. , ,

\ , ' .. "'. •

I ' ; .. ' .. , ",' , , , , ,

, , " ,

\ 'I. \ : ,

, , " \

\

\

, ,

..

I,

.. ,

,

"

'~"I , ,

. _ • l , ' , 1 '

"

, ~'.

" ,,' , " ' · . ~, " , ,-

, . - :.-

"

1 .-:::.~\. _. , ..

" ~.. ~ -'. , , ,', o ' ,

, , ,

, '

. , . . I

- ',I -

" 1 " ,

, \

\'

"

, ,

,

,e ,

: "

I, ,

'\ .:. '

, ' , " ., , ,

, , .

'<.. 0.'·

" , , '

" .;'.

..

, ,

r , , -, ;' .

. , \

.-, •

,

"

,

, ,

" , ,

-,

, "

_ ··-r

"

"

: -~~

, , .

, ,

• L '. . , . -,-

, ,Y--,~. , .. p

'-' -'.'_. " .. , ; . ~-~)._/

, ,

' .. , " , , .. "

I ',' .: :.' "1.

·1:, .: \ .. . "\J . " , ,

-"i.

, ,

C,., _ ., ,-.. - : ,"

': - '. : .

. " ' " .. ~: .. , ' " ' , ' .. ' ~ . ,< ;j.~.'~

.. ,'" \ . t-'· .• -' . .- ~ ',t-c',-c - ... . , .. -.~- .:, -~ ~ '- ,,,, .. ,. ~

-'- . -s;:. - ...... - ..... --~ ~.~------..;.. ~~ -... > /~

," 'i I, 'I .,

I

I ___ I

'; .\ .. '. '. -,'. .1 , . fo

042 MZ914

• ,

'\ I 'j

,

\ ,

\, . , '~.

o

","

, . , , , ,

'\ \

, , ,

, , '\

, , -, .,

I''; • , ....

:. . , ' '-.- .-

, ' - " - -'.

, .. '.',' ,': .. :~~lk~4..,Vj , _ .'\ _ ' ...... ,.,. \(: ~ -', \' .,_ _ . ,7" r .• .' ~ .. ""+.. ,- '., . " ,

/

" I

042MZ815,..... '\ I · : . , \ '

. , t ..;.------ ~ , L' , ,.,', ~'4'i ,,\J " ",,';, (' " , " '; ,,"

042MZ817 ~__ ..... ~ ~ -~/~

042MZ821 TROUT //

042MZ822 ------_ POINT// _~__ ~,;§" 042Mze16 "

04:2 MZ824 --:~'- . 0::. '042MZ818 -~,/ I' ' / > . ii' 042MZS19

042 MZB2S -z> "o', 04 042M 2826 _+/'~ ... 2MZS20

A ':' I

" ,

\

042MZ923 042Mza13

MZ82

5000

;'.: . ,~ , ., _'.. . '" ~ , I: .' .. -::_, : :~ ','::-'.'--~ .d'~ ... :~ . -> ,/ , it'" , ;'::::) ..-A~";;: ,'- c.>"

~~'r~'" -. Q,-, ... -.~~./'

I i

"

• "

" r "_ "

I , ' , '

~'-" '. , 042MZ732

042MZ735 , 042MZ740

042MZ80a 042MlS12

lew

~ .-.

\, ,,042MZ736 " " 042MZ737 , 042MZ738 .042MZ739-·-

., \,

• " , , " ,

,

" " \

", , ,

" , \, \. ",

\

, , , ,

!

I , , , ,

I

,- ., ....', '~ '.~ \'

.... " ....,,, \', \ ", 042.MZ711

"", \.....,\. \ " 042MZ714 "-~ " '. \ \ "-. ''', " ' \ 0421VPl:7!8

"", "-. "-....~ ", "" \ 042M2725 " . ". 042MZ726 "',"" 042M2728

" .... , " ' 042Mzn9 ..... 042MZ730

042MZ731

FACILITY

, '

, ,

\ , , , , ,

, \

. - ' ;-; .. :.

\ , ,

,"

-.. -

\

, " , ,

, ,

,

"

\ ,

\

\ \ , , ,

,

\

\ • , , , , , ,

. ' , ,

, ,

, , , I ,

" ,

,

:.~,: ',. - - , " '

"

" ,

, ,

,

" , ,

. , " .. ~,\ .- -

I'·

, ~ , .-, , :

"

\ "

'\ \ , , , , ,

"

\ , "

, • ,

, , , \ , , ,

, , \

, ,

042MZ704

042M2707

042MZ71(J

DETECTED

,

"

,

, '

:,'i"

,

,

." ..

-".

. -.'

"

, .:.",

,'.'

.~' -:',

' .. ., .

, , ,

.-j', . . ~.-.. '

, , " ..

, ,

" .. ; : ..

... -• .

, " '

, ,

. ." , -, .. -

.-:r ,

~,o , -, "

': ." -- ;.",.

, -, '

': .

"

, . " , , , , ,

" ,-

._ : ~ - ' .. ~ , - ,I· .. .

~4:: .. - >.,,~:,;~. :~ .' . .

.• ' J _ .:,,::: L .•. "

\ "

",

'.

['::-.

... ,

"

\

,

\ , \

,

, ,

, ,

~---...::. .J

• ~;: :~:~J-l~»J..-: ._ .. '

" '

"

\ '.

"

" "

" ,

• , ,

,

\

, , '.

, "

,

, , "

" •

,

\ .. '~ \

\, \

\ \ \ \

\ , \

, \ "

\

\ .. \, \ \ 042MZ613 "-

" '- \. \ . 042MZ616

\ 042MZS1a Q4:!M2620

042MZ623 042MZ703

, '\. \

" , , , ,

\ '.

, ' , .. -- ._._" .-

"

, .

lew

PENSACOLA BAY

(0)

ppb

"

"

, •

- ,

\1\: \

, ,

, , '. , \ ,

\

.,

"

rc. \

\.

o.E=--- ''''''-- -- ,

<

~.:::'-~--'-~~~

<c-~-

<,--------.' --~--

"',:-~-.-,---

<=---~-

-'-

--

042 MZ502

042 MZ503 042MZ504

042MZ505

o42MZ506

042 MZ509

042 MZ5D9

042 MZ512

042MZ613

042MZl'i16 042MZ516

042M2619

042MZ520

D42MZ522

042MZ525

042MZ527

042MZ530

042MZ531

042 MZ533

042 MZ634

042MZ537

042 MZSS9

042MZ!i41

042M2542.

PENSACOLA BAY

,

'.

, ,

"

, •

, ,

\ ,

.. \

, "

"

\

, \

"

, ,

"

"

", ,

'.

042MZ543

042MZ644

"

\. \ 042M2'601

042MZ602 042M2B03

042MZ605 042MZ60a

042Mze09

042MZ6t2

."

SITE OF DECISION

PENSACOLA PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

FIGURE

I , l

i

i

I

1t

I:

tiI

I

II

I .

I

I

itI

! I

!

II1

I

I

II I

I

I!I! 042 7I II

! I

I

t

I

i

LEGEND 42I

RECORD I

I. NONDETECT (137) NAS

6-5SCALE EXCEEDS SEDIMENT QUALITY

COAST GUARD SCREENING CONCENTRATION (4) NATURE AND EXTENTANTHRACENE

SCREENING LEVEL = 46.9

z

4

LLI

n

m

G

n

1-

Q

Q

cz

II

(~ .-;..........:: '

....:::3""" "\ \-..:J,,\ .... -.i,~ 'Z"-..-::..-

,

, ! •

! I

"

"

BAYOU GRANDE 042MZ6Q4

042MZS07 \ 042MZ60B '" "

042MZ610 '. \, 042MZG11 \ ",!,~. 042MZS01 >

042MZ614 \ , ." .!,-~,., 042MZS07 r,~; .= ~_ .. ,_. __ \ 042MZ615 . ),<,'>'(;,,-";~,.~\;,'" c,_ 042MZ510 ~~-----;,;,'

042MZ901 \ \ ".)~",':.)<, c(, c',>,',<,'\:ccc;c, .' 042MZ." c"c" I~ 042M Z'O, \ \ q 2M"'""c.". '<; c ',; _'. ,,", . ";" '''<' " ~,,' ,(\ c'":'_<' .'

042MZ903 \. \. \ {' "--",~~~MZ.~t,.i2\'-,"i.'\ ~':"":""'_":!.:':" '" // '_',\".<d':: .,:-:\ ~~';,.~: . > .' 04:2MZ '. ,.,,. , . .." ' "'," \ /-'. . ,. ~ / '. .. '.'."

042MZ904 ,\. \\~ ______ ,~ /--... ,:. ' .• ' .. , : 6-?2:':-'<","~',",:,"',<: . '.' ',:'.';' ~,/!' ~Y.,',',;- :,.;i",~,~.; ;< ',::.f,'··',·;>·,· :,7~ " ' ' • . .. ,~'_ ,. , .•. '" "r· """.. ..' .. -'"""' 042MZ905 ,\ \ \ \ \, /< i:.. "'. .;,. . . ·i:. '.: '.' ,04:2M;;q-~t· ~"'::"'-' """;".,.,,.'.:: . i >.:_ ... ,.' ,; ".~,-,.-, "'.. ,"" ',,':"'" '-" 'f "'"., "'-'." .~ '.,.'.- ...• ;.'- //" ··.i"'· "'.:':'" . ~~ 4 (JniNr-

.. \ , ,'- ",.'.',. . """."''-. .' "~"""", .!, .. ',,' ~ .... ", ... " ... ,\ p,' ..... ' J .,..... . ".~. .' '.... ".'"," ---f-i' \ \ \" \ \ \ \ rt/ .. .... '." ,':' ': i""""=;e%;j:";'·.~;"'~~ "c'i"';:!." (,,';1 '(~' ': ,{;Y",' :::' .~\ c" ... ~ ,), ,', .,.;~, >r;"i" ,'o .... ,J'&',zl-,fJ:" ~ {;;:-:T':" 'I' \ \ "'" I,,' ." 'i",,/ ,. ":-' '~'?M2;'7:Oa:"'':,'';:';~' :':;~: "·i"·, /;;' :c." .;,.' '- \";" ,>~;;" "" ,'j;> .,,>,';:;,'",. ~;: .:" ,:"' .. ,),> ~. ,:; ,: .. :.:,,:, ~ ~ ~'.: .:.:'

042 MZ90SI, I, \. \. \ \ \ ," .,'_,: • -':':'-':." _. --';- -,,'- :,.:.-o.·:"~""·"''''27Q''8'' :.,;., .,.,'.;''''i.'. ~'>:" ':;"'~""'~;'.~',.".:': )'.,": '~'-' ··'··.:i.-",·:.'·'\··"";:':"""'" ""-"">"':,';"''-'''''' '. ":"',, ·:<,V..:,,"; ':":',"-"'.' .. ',0'::" ":''''':'''' .:\. ~ ... ,\ " "'.' .. ". ~""YJ ..•. ".".: ;i . . ". '.. ':'. ' .. S',,· ', . ." " "\' .. ' '(;" .:,;",".' .. " .'.' " ..... ,. '? ,,' .' '." '.i' . .:"""";'. ',;". .' ·.".\.-,,·,..· ... .-2M.-I~' ~.-' .~-.... -;:;.~.-. ....::;;:::-

· \ \ '\' '.',., ..... '" . ''''' .. .-._.".,."'.,.",,,.,.,.,,"""',.,," ,',' ",., ... " '." -,' '." -', •. ",J., .. '.""v<+ '. ! .. \~,,-,~,-, · ,..' .,,'. "".'" _"','" .. "-,,,,'." .. ', ' .. ., ",,'.'." ,. ",.'.' .. ,.,,,., . ," .. ' .,' .,..."., ." , "c" " .. ," ,'. '.' .• " . . ".' ''''',.'' ,

042MZ801 .. -, \ \.... '\ ','" .,.'" .. ,'.' "04."2rnz)a~'''i'''',,'''·'·: --"',i' '..I .• ;c' S·" . ,-., '.~,i,:, .; .. , »'''''<'' ,.,,:;., ""' .. ",.,'.; ." .. ,'.' ,,,.,.;, ... ,., ... >'.. ';C' .,...., .... '."" ·"'1.04ZMZ<:.t"-'" ,;",;.,;-<,=¥ ': ... \ \ \ \ " '. ' .. ''.'.'' ._, .. ,:.,>." .... , ,,-,',:." """", .. ':' .~,',.,.:.:'.: ..... '.".,:'.;;.'.,.:.li;.,." .. \:' ,"'j ,. ,.,"''''''''.i'.:''._. ''''.. .":"'''''.'. '.",,"iftlc;, M ~··"f.";~k··" ,~":'1. •• : •• <,,::,~ •. , .. ~-,

. ..' \, i'.',''-'')' -' ,"." Q42L<i---'C1l'l'"''''-',;·''''' ,,"' .. '.' " .. ",' .. , ",."':':"','1'"'" '.,",. "",;";.,;.",.,~.::',,.,"('. """.' .. '~',,' ., .... ,' .. ,,',', ... ::.',.,.,' .. ,<;"..;.'.' .... ".'." .. .-.':~ .. ,'. , .. ",;<,,-,,,,,.,.,2 ~~IJ ~:",."':'. ·".-,'·1 042 M ZS02 \ \.. \ i, ;/,. .;:.' ',' .:., "".: ,,' ", ( ":.i" o• ~~:~ . "'", \> .:.~.: !:"~.':"" ": ',> ),..;\~:' ... :,;"".:,-,.,. \'.,. '., . -., " ::;",:: :"':" '.;-:'''.:,~':" . .'- ,,,':::: . ,';' 'i,',',,' '.",Y ... " .,"',...:< ' .. ':, " ~:. " .. "., ,.,-.:(,;~;( " ,:,~ .~:-- i>~'.:<,";,~

042:MZ803 \ \\ \ \\ \~\\. " ,;, c " .. ,:", c"'c .c 'c;9',,,!P,13",' ',;,.,' .. :, ,',,), "V.>:' ',' Cit:;"',. ~;c."~; ,:/.«"i). "Y'lfi. \.,"" ;". ,c·." .. ··, ,,/" C fi< c 'c c .. " .. b4~;i:!'6'~':''''''C:<;; \ ',. • •. " ..... .-. "," '. ;, .. ,-" '"., .", •••.• " .' .. 'CO .,.,,- :.",'.,." <' .. ", 0," ..• ' :.' .. ","", ".' ••• '''. .,,', ., __ .~ .• ,.,,,,.,,'.' ""',,,,,,·l ",." 'oc· .. ·".·,',,· .,: ... ,I~. ",!-"" .,,"-'.·i_'.~··~"

042MZ804 \ .\ \ \\'.\ \",,~, ·1- \.,. . ,\.:,',. '~\,- ." ,,,,,: p:4;~J,,;rt'o:'.1Ji:;;;,<,'.;';'\:"·";.'{:,,:\";~"';'.~~:"'::'~<:.:";",;":<{,,:"c:,:,~,;::·· ',,:': )i""';'o\:<::,"':',,~,.,'::";·" "',.'.: ",' .. ,,:",. ,·,::'··;.:-'r.,;"'''''''I'·: ,\"'~·I'~';./''-:c:~.~. ,', ""'\ .,.' ., .. ". ,., .,' ""'.' , ..• \ ''''''''','' ,'.'" .- .. ".- ... , ," ",,-' '." ."-c"'· ,- .. , I ... , ' .. ". '," "Q4-2MZ528-'''' .. , .

\ ' ,I, \ \ \ 'I',,>, ,\. ,)" . " ' c.' "'" ,', .. n c,. ,'/"c S ,),ft ~, .;" >,': ,,, ,>, ".:X:' >, ~r i ' 3:c') ,'., ,':c: ',:e,,: ". '.': ,'; "", ii. i:"/"<' ,.:;: //.:,,:,,: c''l! .,,-'.' "\''''"~\

042MZ733

<--------------------:;s <~--

-E-----

~---------------

<E=----~~

<-----~---------------

---.----.-~--~---<E":'---------

./~---~-~

<E":----

<E'-------

<E:-~-

/ ,-------

042MZ807 '-- V " .. '-"';\" "'\""';""'. ' .. , . .-,.:,.,..',-"."\,'. '... .' "', .. ",:,' .< ' ... ~ ""'., ,. .': .'" '~" " "'C'" •.. ' ,,-- ;',"> \\ : .. ' ';,.\I"'::".~<::~.'-' .'~'",;.\,;'!'<\" ,\:,:,~\ ,.' .C", .. ~,.,~·.' ,~":, ', .. ~.'. ,.... '." ., · ... L"···,:: "'. ;:'.'" ', ... :,,:'~:,",;,'."' .. "\':'- .:~' ... ,""~.: -..-,",.-:' " .. --• \ .. ,,,,-"'. i·,'''''''''' .. " ""':'J" .. '.' .,,'. ',' '."" ... .. , ... ' .' ... ,." ,., .".'" •

\ \, •. :'e'(i :.~; :~;:\ ,:\\:,~~:\,.: ~,{:.;,.\.>{:~~<. ·e.: :'i ";,:."<,:.::',, ,;<:,":".: ':"'~ .::.>t"· .',' .,.c'

042 Jj,',... ,. ~. ,,- ... ',' '. ;., .,,, ' .. -' I... . ','.".".', ""' 04:iMZ7]6'."'" '" '. , .. ".,.,

" .... .', '.,

• - I'

'" .. !~., "

'. .';. ~d'.,"

<E'---------

~ .. -,---. ',. ::.' '.'!:,:'< .. ' .,

<--

042MZ502

042 MZ503 042MZS04

042MZ505

042MZS06

042 MZSOS

042 MZ509

042MZ512

042Ml613

042MZ616 042MZ516

042Ml619

042MZ520

042MZ522

042fv1Z525

042002527

04-2MZ630

042MZ531

042MZ533

04-2MZ534

PENSACOL BAY

M zeo B(\" ,;. " '. :':>, ;.1;"'. "1' 'I .',.~ .. \' '. '. 'I; .. \ '. ,,: . ;i"., _. ,,'. ' :' ',.:",' '\ ,;" ."",,, •.. ,., ., i'·.' . .". "\,--J,,.,._ .,., ,1"" ... ' c.lj ..... ,\., '>- •• - I' •. ' ,." •. '- ' ... ',.',., ~\.'. ",

O42:"'Z \,',~: .:\. ~,.,;' /--[;'-.. i.,.-~~ ::):",.' .:';., ,--~:'-", ... !:".'-'.\~ "\' .. : ;::'.'H'~." ,'./ :,:::;': , ...... '~ . ' ... ', .~':-',:, {, IVI 809 \~' ':,; ~" ;'.."'~~. ;.,. ':-":'.' "',.:.-'\',. \'. ,; , . l!.. .~,' '. .'. .'.', ....... ,.' ,.-'-"'. " .. ~ . .",;"" ',.·1."" ' ,-,..., '.' .,,', "C" " . y..\ ,:,' '. \" '1 ';'. " • .' ..;', ' ".'" .'.t, '.;, ::\.;, .,"\ " ". e' ,," ,,' ' ",,':' ... : :.: ' .. i" ;.'; •. ) . : ... ,': ': ", ",,; ." .''/ '~-: ·:·;t· ... .. ',,': ;-i,' :';":';, :·t:,· .i,,:' ,::,:: ~ \'''; .'/ '.','c' .J.: ,. "'-', ... ' ,,,: .. '. - ,J , .. " ''','.'' ", , .. " ". ",.

042MZ810 \' '."'-' \',.",": .... ", ... ".' :.', l,,·'· ... '. 'i""'\"; ". '''''"~MZ7l:r ',,'':.,,'', .. : .. ' J"' '.,' .':.: :'l"""''''''''''''''':''~''';'''''''':''''':''';'''';''''~','''-'.' ... ;",~:.:.",.:.~.",.';''''';'' ,':~':<..:.>' :·.·}I<:'·'- .'i ({ .".' ,', .. :'c. "i.·--'·'·" -""'--042~ <'-----------<E":-'---------......., .-------'-----~

042MZ1537

042MZ539

042MZ541

"" , , •

\ , \ ,

.\ V.',,"," .... '" ."',.,,., ... ,'""','" "i. . ". "~, " ..-: :'. ",""., :",",',",,',." 'J', "\'.'0"';'"' :;...,:, .... "',,~,y,,1~. __ :.t~'.,~~"·i'·.~·'.:I/_f .. ,':. ':.-~;i·,·:~·'~,.~·:'·)~·J··;"I./" .. "","-'f.!,f4'Z,5:4i~~,:·-.;-.,-· ::~" "E- . ~ __________ ____

.. ,., ' ,,'.-. ' •. '", ... ' '"',''''' ," '- ,,' .••.. , . .o,' .... "-'.,,.','., ... ' .. " ...... __ ' ...•. ~ """" ... "-.. "" .. ,.,-,, •... '." '.'. ·.c .. ·" .... ·. \ ~'" ',\ .. '.i'''. '\ .. '-. : .. ,.""" ," .'.' ,.,.', .~, ",\. V' ......... ,...... ... ., ',. , .. ' ,,'>:' ',," , .. ,,,."',. "'C""'·'1'·· ":1· '~.,'. " ~. '." ·.'~',r.:~.\\' ",~., "-.<;;.;:~:" ____ -...."'="tr---L"-~:'.'-'.;;JI,'.,/.'~.'~~t·-"-··i .... ...:.\:'::~,",";.,'; ~~",: .c'."· f,;;_.-L,.·,,:"';:··i·';'-, .","., .... ~', ..• '" ""', .,.,., .' .',' ,,'" .,' ... ' ,'<, . ,,,,,,, , .. ," .... ,,",.,~." .. - .. ' .. " .... ".,. "'.;,'p.r-'--'" ~ ''--'.'''''''. '''--.. .... ''' ... ,\ ...... ', .. " ,.o'. '{',e .. '"

\"'c .'\ '.'-/. ' : ":,,, ".'.' .L ," t.,' ',~\ ~'~, '~:';" '.> \:,,~ ... ,: . \ .- 'I,"'l '~L\~'" .. ;';"'A -1i~'~"'~;i&1' .., " ". ,. ~...:' ,,'>. *-~ ,c,;,;;'="'- , ", '." ." .--.::!,''',. ,',f.;,'''''; ,e ,1"·, .".:\I~:,~".;.., '."~.~iiY • '. ----j.~' '"lr-'~~," .. \. ';~ "'. ~l·'·ui;,.\I~~'~.>--' ~ ~ "G2 \ \ "'",: . :.:,'.~':~" " '< .. f, .,;\-:" . • i ''';:~''' .. .'' \:-.. '-:.\'~ . >,' ~,: ~:'" .. ' ; ,;~.~ ___ ,,~"t:~ .... '~ "';':"": .. ::,.-''' ~", ,:. :,","' . .::...... . ., .,:",,\.,':::.~, ~,'j:~: ',,--.' • '-i:J"- __ ~ .. ~-< ". :.~;J~~~'~~' '.:.'~.---- \'-.... \~ '. .\' ."J.' '>;',-" ,,' .. ,.· .. 'c L '.'\' ,., ,.., ",.>1",,,.,-',,,,,,,,, ,.'c,", ". '.; ""., , 'V y ---- -. ' •.... ,. .".,

,. . "":.'. ;'ie.' i;."" . '. "I,' ,~""]fi""',,,, .... "·"~··" ,., ...', .,."""y 'S: tp.. I\:-- '0-:- ~ • "

, \

., ,', .'::. '.' "i,'.'· \ '. '''',,' '. ~'.'\. " • " .\ \ " ,

'. \

\, \ " , -::. .' ; . .. \ '_,. 't I .... ' ... 3; , \

\. .:",,_ .~.::; ,,,.;, .",.,',\.} ".' '\'~~\""'I, ,:.'\:",,'/{';':. ~".:.'\ ... 1 .... ,:':~04.2MZ 2'- .',~.:.~~.~:~,;il.'..:" ..... ,.-'.-:' •. ,/" c, , I ,~', .'~.". .'.~,.'.~c{ :'. :';:.'.\ ", .. ,.)...~.~'I"-' ~'" .. \ ::'. ", .• ,.".",.,- .. :--""~4,-,, .... ';~'~ .' :'-::---iio<':;f 1\\ j I \ \

I "",',' ,'" " .... '"." .,r"'\"'~h r"·' ,~ ,.: .. :-." .. ",~.'" '--'·'·'·'''''''!·'·7· I' 'I' \ .. '.'. . . .' . _.... '._ ~... I' I • " c· .,' y' ". ' 'c oJoU..' ,~ I \ ,. '. \ .\,)c ". ,.\-.; , .• ' _'. ".~':"' •• "'_ , ..• :' .""';,' ... :.' .. ..;'.'-,',:,'--" ."J •. \: .. ,'.... I ' \ . , " '- \ \ " \\ .'. , . .. " ,'. , .. '.' . - .,.' ",.. . ".' I ' \',..

" 1 :0". ~ ",\,~.~ ',," \1,1:;: .~'~'.':::"~,~~':\\' •. ~ ,.,:,:,."",,:.'.:;t.. , " \ \ \ \ \ \ \ '-.~ '''.., '~" \ . " " . ,. .. '." , .', ". I, ' .~ J • ,.' I' .,,' \ \ , ,.' . ".,.,., ..... ,'" ... :.,""'., ."., . ".' ' ,\, " ' \, ' ',.:, ;,. '::,: ,', r" Ie ;.:\".~ \:,t.".: " \ltl~P~7 '"-" \\ \ / '\" \ \. \. \\ \ \. "'. ~ "'" \ \ \

"', \ ' ::',,' 'i:' 'i" ;;:",1' .,.:,\Y\j: \" li\" \-.',' ':',., "",\):/., /,1 ~ \ II II \\ \\ \, \\ \"\ \ \\ \\.... ---, '" ", "'-., '''" '\\ · .., '- , -' .' .. ' •. ,- "." ',', " ',,,". ..... ,,",.', ."" " '\ " ........ "- ' \ ,. .. . .•.. --.- •. ,-,.~ "'"' \ ,! \ \ ' , . . ,. ' ,\

, ,

"'-""-,

\ ". \, ,

\ ..

--- 042MZ642

042 MZ543 ... 042MZ644

, . ••• iL ' •

, : ' .. ' 042 MZ814

TROUT 042MZ-S21 -_ POINT

----------042 M Z82 Z __ ____ -'~. ::>"' 042MZ824 ____________

042MZ825 042MZB26

,

--fo /'--

i'r. , \

'. ',. \. '" 'I·· t, '" J • • " • \0 l~"".·.\;."' ... "~·':,l.( :-,~:,.'~', ,. , ~

-""", '. l. . . ,\" ',",. ' '.' ",' ,-,-, ','. ". C" ~ "', ~" ", .... " \" \ i \ \ ..<. ;-4-.>* :,- ::o.~-~ ~ "', ' .... ', I 1\, \ \ \. \ \ \ "'- '" \ 042:MZ602 ~ • _ ",V Q ... ~ ---, " ", '.' \, \'\ \' "--"" '-'. _ _ 1\ ',,' , ", \., \.. \ '\ \ \ \, \ \ 042M Z613 '"

1', !i\ \ ,,1\ ~\ \, .1 "-.'---..-., "'-" ~," \\ \ I 042M04Z27MZ7ii .\ \ \ \\\ \ \ 042l1li2616 "" ",,', 042MZ605 \ \ Ai" '," '. ---, '-, ,,"... \ \ ,14 \ \ "\ \ " '"

0"",,, 04''''01. • \ ! ,I i;' ,\\" \ ""',, " '. \ 04'''Z71. " \ ': ' \ 042"Z61. "'., " '0... 042MZ8T8, \ ..' ,,", \. \ '--., ... , ~ " ,04"MZ725 \' I \ \ 042MZ620 ...

Ij\' , I ""'\\ " '" \ \ \, " 042MZ819 \ \" I j ,,"'o '''', ,,\ 042MZ732 '--..-. '-----, "" ---.... 042MZ726\', \ 042MZ623

042MZSOS

042MZ60e

042MZ612

042MZ820 i \ / 042MZ740 I \ ',''o 042MZ735 '--..-. ~ ~ C42MZ728 \' 042MZ704 042 MZ703 I \ 042MZ80S', '" "', 042MZ736 ~ " 042MZ72:S '042MZ707 - --.' - -'-

.-. , ~

lew ~

042MZ812 \ \ 042MZ737 ... 042M2130 ' 042 MZ813 \ 042MZ73$ -. --" .. 042MZ731 042MZ710

982MZ739 ... --' J;..r:"'"

042MZ823

042MZ827 ....... . '

lew

SCALE

-'

~ .~ COAST GUARD FACI ITY

, ,..;

PENSACOLA BAY

LEGEND

NONDETECT (123)

DETECTED (9)

EXCEEDS SEDIMENT QUAL LTY SCREENING CONCENTRAT ON

SCREENING LEVEL = 74.8 ppb

(9)

SITE 42 RECORD OF DECISION NAS PENSACOLA PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

FIGURE 6-6

NATURE AND EXTENT BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE

/;--r;.-re4/f>";so.:~j, I mcw~ / rmmianl

! I

"

f

OflMlt

042MZS11

042MZ'821

042MZ822 ___

, "

-~,----

042MZ924 --r~

042MZ825 042MZ826

~ />

042MZ827

SCALE

, , ,

\

042MZ733 042MZ734

042MZ901 \,

\

'. , 042MZ902 I,

\ \ '. 042MZ903 " "

042 MZ904

042MZ905

\

\, , 042 MZ906,

"

042MZ801

, , "

\.

\ \

\

\

\

, "

5000

, ,

, "

.. ' -

lew

COAST GUARD FACI ITY

BAYOU GRANDE

lew

PENSACOLA BAY

LEGEND

NONDETECT (123)

DETECTED (9)

EXCEEDS SEDIMENT QUAL LTY SCREENING CONCENTRAT ON

SCREENING LEVEL 74.8 ppb --(9)

. ~~.

042MZ502

< <E-----

042 MZ503 042MZS04

042MZ505

042MZ506

042 MZ500

042 MZ509

<'------- 042MZ512

042Ml613

" »

< <-----<E-----

<E'----­

<---<---

042MZ616 042MZ51S

042MZ619

042MZ520

042MZ522

042MZ525

042MZ630

042Ml531

042MZ533

042MZ534

042MZ537

042MZ539

042MZ541

042MZ642

042 MZ543

042MZ644

SITE 42

PENSACOL BAY

RECORD OF DECISION NAS PENSACOLA PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

FIGURE 6-6

NATURE AND EXTENT BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE

e

e

-

I

V

I

I

3

W

2

W

I

I I

1

1I

'-TI

I

I

V

I

I

a

*

I-

o

or

. -

ow

I

m -

ho

Q 4

c CI

rn x c3 c? v

) m

U

m

m

m

v) rn

r

0

c

rn

z

c

1

r-

z

m

rn

0

r

P z

U

x --I rn

rn

B)

0

r

tl

1

i~ ,~

..J~,"-­-'1"'--.. \x.:Y. ,..-~'

042MZ733 042MZ734

042MZ901 \

\

, , , \ ' \ ".

\

\ ,

\ .,. ,.',

BAYOU GRANDE ---, ~ "

042 MZ6Q4 042MZ607

042MZSOB 042MZ610

042MZ611

" " " , ,

:;s, ""',---~~-

042MZS01 :7: ",. _,:0

042MZ507 '< ,

042 MZG14 042MZ6t5

. " ': 042MZ510 ~---------1,_>' "y.~':'~ " ~, 042MZ511 ~ L.: '-':: " ....... .. ... J,-·c ,"I ," ~...... r'~,~ " ,_. . . ,c '. , '\ '

.... ·'·.:,L ~;~'-"'- ... ,.- "'{ ',.<-.. '.'.~"., ,.,",,;: ~'i\ ,. <~ ":!, ' ~ ,,'-' ,", - "" . , ", - " i ............ :,:, ?:~::;,:~~:.;:,;,i\'~;;';"':,:',, " ~ ~/~;;"',':\':. ':, ~:> \. , :-fli;;~

,;;,'.' > ":>":',.:.;>;}:'(t! ,}', ;'=~.;:. ':i',,'}~ ,/'J; :: ,.".::;,~,".'~ 0 ,~ 4'i.~~E '<<':0'-------------------

-• ....

./ ~

<~~--~

"'" \,

042MZ902

042MZ903 04211112904 ,

042MZ905\ \

\ .. \,

': \ \

\ \ \

/<,'~ _. -;,:V~·-:"C ~,...-;: ~ .. ---::----t: ,. ,. .. .. .. :,. ,. , .. ,-

.. - : .. , ..... -.,-,.--~~-/ !.",~~-:: .,-; . ,.,~' -: .... J -"1' '-"f-":'- - -"c· ,-.,,\ .. ~. A .~ .. ', '.:',;" ',. 4."Z51 :.~~.::':."'~ )'. -\.:~-:~:-'-:-'-. _"c',;; ...... ' "'~_\, .. ,~,~,.~-",\~ /~'-'·"-,-.i~'o:·':"\,'<,'··-."~.. ,,' ., .. ;, .,.,-"~.~"." :.~ .' ... ,.: .... " oJtn.lZ".E:4ri .. ;:-"'~ I •• ~~~;.:.,~--> .. ~ <

" :, "-;.,,,/., -.';~: ,'. ,~: " '~..~'" ",,:, . ','" - .,::, .">",, ""'. :,c", < ".'. ""'f. ",,~''', ~~"';- <: ';''',.}\ "."""',~ '< 'J" "'.";'- ;(,." ~ '''''''''',3' ',,' ", ',' ,- " "'" "" ., "" ",' ,"":, '",'" "j, ~'.",:~", '>"" '-""">''''''\

"!;}i' _' ~,:}: :'S:~~ ,c' :(;'/;:">~~,><~;\ :i::::~::,· ".\"",-~t,;:·,.'" ": •. ' ::. _:,: .:::" ",:,' .. :i:,' 'j::':':: ':,::; .. ~(; ;, }~~:~i~;;,J;i~B';.~' -E

"

, . . ' , \

" , -• \ .. ..

\ \ \ '. \ \ \ \

\,

\ \ ,

\

\ , \

r"\. j,-:.~' ,~'.",' I,' " I ' ;,., < , ,

l :; ,. ",

" , ,

\ ,,\ \. \

" \ .. \ \ ,

042MZ906 \ \ \ \ 1\ \ \ , \ \ '.

042M2801 \ 'I., \ \, ,) ._.\ \ \\ '

, '

, '

I,·, . ,\ . ,.

\" \ L'" .,.. " ""'\ ' ".,) , ~ \ ..~ -\:,,, 'C.,. _. ,.

042MZ802 \ \ \, \\ ,Y' \!", \\{~':;'.' '\ ',0'

042M28()3 \ \. \, \ ,,~.<\ "C;, ,:~> ";, I'!' ," .; \ \ __ \ t .'

\ .. \ '.. ~ ... \ .. \ nA "~Al7"nil. \. "\ \, \ \, '.. '... .:/ ':,' , .. " .................. ,--_...... \ I, \ '\ " \....,. 10 ,;'l". ..••. ,-

'\ ' ..... ~ 'I..~ ~,'~~I:~~ : , \ \ "" '. \ '\', ' c,',","', ;,' \ \ .~.........".,.:-.,.-~-~ . '!.. , ::,' \ .• ,~.I, .~'. '.'

\ \ \.'~; .~';~ ',.' .\:; ... -,(.," i. ~~ ~ ;:;':y, .. \-~ ... '.' ,) ,

"

\ I. : . I

,"' 042MZ806

042MZ907\ \ ,

'. '.\' ;,:,.'.'",\ .:. ·'-1· .. , \:.;

, / ~. .Z~>': '.~-; '\. ':r~ .. ,.' ""\' , '\:':';:':.:.(~: '~";:":'; \ ',. ·c\·: , .~ .. '. I~,,~ ".,,' ...• :\-"

"

, . " ,- . . ,~

.~ :'. \ •• ~ _~. \ r ~ ", .1>,:-. .\ .. ..,;::_ 'h~. , \._ ".~ ... ~., \ ,·\T.:.l'':.~·· "li', 1;;.-;;

'''i.'.'' .)~ ~_ :', 1·'\. -h' .. ~. ;\~ ,.' :.:;,. d , " I.' ." " " "

.(. ' .. ; .. ' ,:. "\ '~"'".- "'-~ ~. :'I . ,.~.\. ~~ .\,. ~.~" •. ' ' .. \, ',~ .. ", \''': ,.' ~'.. " ~ .. :~. \' .'

.'.,', ··i;.'1". ,-.'," ,'~~'. ;::~'.' '. I, ·_'_"1'" I,\: ,I· ,,! ..... '. :.. {,' ...•. ".

\ .. " , ... .1;. ; "

042Mzeo"j,: ,. , \\., ,.~ ,

, " '·c", "',,'," ',., '" ,,,,' -:. .,,'., .. ,',.' •.• _" ." I,' \ '~l·" _,.

. ,>._\:,. ~ .. ':., .>~:. "~fJ~ .~'., ,.; .. ~.:\: .:,\. Q42MZlt09 Y", t '" "

042MZ810

042MZ811 \

'I, " ,

" "

, ,

"

\

"

" \ ,

'\

" •

",

,

• ,

\ , \

\ . : ... '

\ " \ , , .

\ c~ , \ .... ' ,~ ,.. .

. ' \' , , \\

,

,

\

'.'J' ,\ ,. . i' ·

, .

'Co

" , \;

"'''' •

\

\ ' " l··,· ~ :. I ~ ._ '\.. .~ ~,. ?t· ':' \.,; "_:. .

, '. ~'- \ ..., '. • • • .' '1 " , ... ' ' .. ' " ,

, .... -. ,

\ ,\",. ,,' . " . \ \ . ~ , l' . , '.. ,,; 'I: \ '.:;. '.(;-'

,. . '. '. , . 0.:·

."' : ~. "

" :': ; . '\ , ,

' , " ... ' .;> "'.' ,. . '.,

: ::. II.

\'\" '\"" , ,

, '. •

. '

." ' .... ,

,

.'.' ,

" ,,'

:;, ~".

'. ,~ .. , , "

· . ' : (,

" , -' ... ' : .. ' .' ., .. "., '

'.

\'

I.'·

." . .. ' .J .' " "

, , " "

, ;. :'

\'

"

..

,

, ,

, "

", .' • ,'1

:, ,.,' ",,, ',. " . ,'.', . ,."" , ., " >'" ",,,,,1 - ',"" "_' ,"'" 0',42M~~" ,',,"' '.

'.';,,'.:'.. "'::h,; "::~,~,:.\::>',;::><:..:,i~ ;:,';:::';:~'::(,:,·,: .. }:<~~::','c:"c'·:;.:t),:: :r:,' ,', :',~<', ,,+:'::.. "~~~~~~~i>,~~,f;~;~:;,>.,~~; , ,',,'.".' "'"'' ','" ''''''~ .,,,' J c ":',.'-',--"",,, ",-'. "," ""-'~" '·i'· ',', "'" ,>"',",, ',,',.P ',-'"<"k'-'" ""~'."~ ".,

;.. ,',' .. ',. '.' .'\', ~ ,:-~,

;:,

". " "

"

, "

.-.. , .. ,.' i'.· . .".. ; .... ~ ~ .. ~ ':: .:.: .I,J., ':, ~ ': '\ .~~." .:.'"'t' --"'.,' ,':. C~.; .. ~.1 '.:) .... :::,1. '''::''~{,i':' ,'. . .... ~ .. c- ,.' '.: ~. . '.' ~ •• ;.'. :." .• ". ;',' .' /NAS ~NS44"(:;'Q~ .;:, ':: .. -'.'r . ,;, . l;;' ~,' ,...... .,.-',1-" .~ ?

.. ' ",

"

"

" "

,., .•• ,~~ • ," ...... -. " •••. ".-' ....... , •. ,._-" .' .~ ... ,. , .... ,'- • 1 . " , .... I ., ',"' ·:.t'ft·· I"1.g'\''''' \',... '. ,'. -r ",.",,,.,,.,:, ''',,', '""',',.!,,, "oo,,'_~" ," " ~\" .. '. ,,"',""", ","""""J'\' " '", '0_ ~ -'''''>i'''''''~'9''

" ...• ,:'~' ",; ,,:, >:;J,,: .~\:~.i;;~;;;',i:~ji; ;~;";';'";ii?'; ~;'1(;>r9"'~F .' :' .. : C\;?;.}j~{~{J

./

"" <E~--~

< ~~--~

--""" <:.-.----

-<E::'-----

"'"

-<EO

-< <E

< 1)1;~M~!i!=( , ", "\) "'; ",' :'" "0:'",<:',:) 9,' ',<"': :'>,'., ''':'S:',::'' h .. ;, ,'" oo'i "~'I - "'. " --c," '~:, ,~' ,,: •. , , " .: " .' ",,, '\",",' ." .(t4·.;.,.iH;f.~:r.: '", " '.";-'~:','\~~';}<;(' ;':~" ,-", \," .' ,j:' "",>' ,"":',>;." " ':',',;" ;';ii"::' :',:_/ ;J/6~-' ., .... ",~~\ ~ ,,~lf- ='.'f;:« ", "\ "" -:'<".' '.'" ... ' ," ,> ',_ .' "" "", ","" "'.,~' '. "" .. ,,,',, ",4.2M«.,S ... ""~,,, .. '''-. .. Ar.'4·";"~·""''''''''':'''' • . "" """:' """ ""1,,,""',::' " ',' .. "'·'·"c.~.:c';;' «,' "",« ;"'"'''''' ',' - ",'" ";:. "~I"~ !'C', 'c'.:";):,:,,

V .... ''''~~ ... 'U,' ,.,"" ", ' '," '" ", x',C," "'~"" .:" " ',.,/,"t :0" ,Y":',,,,:,' i e',,;':.,:,._', "';',.' '; .,",/."'. ' : ",,', ' .. '>"~:"'?"'" v

-<E- _~.~_~

, ,'i' ,'::'" " , ., " " '" ,",,""", ", ""'"'(''''>''' ", ': :.', :, " T"'k"'N>"::;:'<~,'~4' 2~:'''''''':\;''.''''''''',,"'i..;''''; ',:".'", '"' :ii.;;-';"'iiiI';'j) ,. __ .. 1 .,:.~. ,,-~'j ',,' .'. ~ .. ~. '" ,.' ,.': ~;:. ~'~.',1 ),~:~.~ ":~\.'>"".~_ >::~;,~, '<' .. ' .,~.,.~ .. ;-" .. ':.~ r1},-;~&; j' •. ~.";"p-' .• -- - ~.~~~._~ ...... : ~ :.~~~ ',. '.. . r J~~ ,;"",::::"

~- , ., ,-... , .. ( .'; ..... ~.. ·1 ,~.,.,l'.,' .'.". ,.. '-' '.~'.1 !'- .. d. ,o{..,. :. • ,,'.:t.'.n .,. , ... i.,. ,. ,j.,: =','.· .. ~·,i ';.!:,::<-., '.' !.,""!" •. _ .. !'':=f'; .. ~..::... ., t-.~._, .l,I, .. ,c_ •• J, }~~, '."/'. "'0: .:. _J ':;";_"".":":. , •• ".'-~~:~,-. ..... , , .... , "" " ~,.--I.... . '_" • , ..... ~ i" ,,\·~J:.i~~ 'I'i-:r'" " -- - "","-2.,~ :"::';',~. ~ "\

c , , .

: ~ ': " ',,: > . : .. i. .. . '. "

'O'42MVZl' " ,

'R ~

042MZ602

042MZ503 042MZ504

042MZ505

042MZS06

042M2508

042MZ509

042MZ512

042MZ613

042MZ616 042MZ516

042MZ519

042MZS20

042MZ522

042MZ525

042MZ527

04211112530

042MZ531

042MZ533

042MZ634

042MZ537

042MZ539

042MZ541

042MZ642

PENSACOLA BAY

"

• , \

, , , \

, , \

. ~, ~ \;: ~ '\. q . . -: '

\ , \\: ~\\ \ ~ \ \ \\ \ " "

@:2M;t1:2~' ',> \;" ',;':'1 ~';.:;~ .. ·_A-'~.:I'-.f'-"-·'\.' ~ '~." ~ .. ;. '.<' ,~"c>'~'!'" ,,,,,,: " '",' '",~

, .... 11\ , ,~ 042 MZ543 · t ,

" ,

'.

,

042MZ814

042MZB16

\ "

\ , \ , I \)

\ , \

, , ,

" ' , ' \i ,

" "

'. ~.

"

'i. "'-. '-..... f:

042MZ817 '-" >\,:L ----- ::.::" " -~~

, "

, -;1 .\

"-

\

, "

, ,

,

, ,

'I: . I ,

.• '0\.

" '\:" " , ". 1'.'\ ::"\, ;J\...-:,

.:, ;( . .. , , ;', " ' "2~"~'~ ':. ~": ",'",' ,"

.'''42MZ124 ., ... "' .... '!., ,-" · , ",..

.,.'~ ~ :'.,'., :: .. ~.,;",;, .. ,:,::":,,.', .""'-.';< .. S""~~ / \ /\" ' ' .. , ... ' . ·r.·)L· • ,"" . , .'

:- ." .... ' : \" ~,... ~ ~'>.: .':;~.'."' .. ;'.:'.:, -.• ' .• , .\. , '.. . I .•• "

:~::~::;\ \.;\', ..

, .'., ' ' ' • tl42f\4Z' 727' , ,.,' . \·.1 . ,_. ,..,. -. ." . .~' , ' , '. -. .. \ ... '. . . . ' , .' . " . . -.... '.~. - .. : \ / ~ 1\

, \.\ \" , .

I~ \ I

\ :' ';: ,,:: .. :~ ;:", \"~ .\,\ .', ,". ': ':";r ":,! ". .' .. ' ',' ',' " \ ", .",:"\ < ,.",511!lliJlA.\!S.' , ,' .. ' '," ,·.C,':,. \ "', ..... "" .... ",'

~ '\,

\"; '" "" \ , ,

i . .~ ~r' '. .. ....' .1~'.·rq+',C-_,.

! I

., , "'I , , ,

'.. ". ~\ ~ '........ • ""-.. '" \, 'I

, '.' " 1

I

, ... '-.., """ ~ '" '-, , "\ 'I ' .... \1 ~-_.:..:.J.i.., .. '\.' '~'-\.' ... '-"'''.:n .... ,',!~-- .......' ' \ \.' ... " ..... , ", "\ \

I

, 1

/ I , ,

,

,

/ ,

" , I

'"-:J, ..... • •• i..-...l ..... l....·':, . y' , ..... :. . , ...... '.- ..... I~ ... ~ ...... ---,.;. .".: ...... ~ ~ .... '-.\ ~

';;"', \"t-. , ~ ~

-...... -..., " ..... \ \ . ~\ ','....... '- '"-,, \\ \ 042M:2711

,'1\' '0.:;- . \ I"~ ' A 'K'-'..,

I~ ",,".' \

'I: ........ "" ......" .......... '- "" \., \. \ 042MZ714 '\ " ......... ' '\." 042MZ718

042MZ9Z1 TROUT Y ______ POINT / / /j

042MZ822 ~ _____ / J/ /1

~ ,

_ __________.. ,~= ,;!;-.., 042Mze16 " "I' ... 1\'" \. ".

j / I, '\~"" \ " '-..... ......... ..... , .......... , \' 042MZ725

042MZ924 .~, . /06 !\~, 042MZ819 7$ . . 042MZ819

'. , , "

042MZ925 ,i> rc..

042MZ926''-,;· , \

042MZ827

SCALE

042MZ820

042MZ823

5000

\

, , ,

042 MZ813

, i

I i

042 MZ1'40 042MZ806

042MZ812

lew

\ \ '.,.". .. .. ""',' 042M 2732 , "' '.. '

\'" '.,.'\ 042M2735 "', 042MZ736 '\ 042MZ737

042MZ738 0iJ2MZ739---'

~~ ~/

' ......... "" '-. " 042 MZ728 ......, ''-, "" 04 lMZ728

... , '. 042Mzn9 042 MZ730

042 MZ731

, >

"

COAST GUARD FACILITY

\ \ \ , \ , \

,

\ , , \

\ , \

, \ \, \ '\

\

, , " ., I \

" \.

" , , \ \

\ , l , ,

,

" c \ \ , \ "

042 MZ644

\ \ \ ," \ \ ' ,"" \ \ \" \ \ \, ......., ", \ \ \

\ \

1\ '\ \ \\ \ "-....,............ ,"" \\ \ \ \ -..., \ \ '\ \ ~ ~~" " ~ \ '..

"\ \ \ '\ \ ... \ ~ "'-.. '.,'"" \ \ \ ",", \\, \ I ' I

\ \ \, \ \ \ \ ".., ''', "-..,."" '. \ 042M Z602 \ '\ \ \, \ \ \ ·''.c'' "" ''.'' ',,-- 042MZ603 " \ '\ \ \ \ 042MZ613 '., '" ~ 042MZ605 \ \, \ \ \ 042M2616 "-...., "''. 042MZ60S \ \ \ \ 042M2B18 ~ , 042MZ609 " \ \ 042MZ620

, '.. , \ \

042MZ704

042MZ62:3 042MZ703 .- -'~'~~ ...

042Mze12

.- - ~-.

042MZ707

{)42MZ710 lew

NONDET

LEGEND

CT

(0)

(138)

PENSACOLA BAY

( 3)

SCREENING L V L = 21.2 ppb

SITE 42 RECORD OF DECISION NAS PENSACOLA PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

NAT

IGURE 6~10

RE AND EXTENT FLUORENE

,,~~, "~~:l'-'-" i~ff;"""';' I~.';""" ~, , ...... '.~.I"_;~J.,.., '.I .J!.""..II'1""":I ... -"I'IIJ"'v.;;''''IJ

f

01001

042MZ733 042MZ734

\

\ ,

'.

"

, ,

042MZ814

042MZB16

\" \ \ '

\ I \1

\ \ ... ,

\... ',' , ' \) , ,

I , "'-.. ~ t.

'. ~.

.... , . 3\ .\ 042M2817 -~, "'~' ----....... ~

~/ 042MZB21 -_______. r:8JJJ; // "i~

~ / !

042MZ822 _ ~ ~ 042Mze16 ---/ "K,---"'042MZ818

042MZ924 -~_~ /1 '042MZS19

042MZ92S -~& , . 11;,. 042MZ820 ,

042MZ926 /y '\

, , , , , , ,

,

, \

-, .

.,

\ .,

--.

042M2823 042M2913

042MZ827

SCALE

5000

, •

042MZ740 042MZ806

042MZ812

lew

\ \

" , '.

" '- ,",_ 041M 2132 \, '" '\ 04211AZ735 ,-, 042MZ736

"\ 042MZ737 042M2738

042MZ739"-' •

, , i , , , \ ,

"

'\

\ ,

\ I

, ,

/ I , , ,

I 042MZ711

042MZ714

COAST GUARD FACILITY

BAYOU GRANDE

, \

\ \ , , ,

I, I

\ , " , ,

"

\ \ 042MZ704 042MZ707

042MZ710

' •.

042MZ62:3 042MZ703

~ .... -'-'~~ .- ...

lew

PENSACOLA BAY

NONDET

LEGEND

CT

(0)

(138)

SCREENING L v L=

( 3)

21.2ppb

<

<

<

< <-----<

<'-.-----

042MZ602

042M2503 042MZ504

042M2505

042MZS06

042MZ508

042MZ509

042MZ512

042MZ613

042MZ616 042MZ516

042MZ619

042MZS20

042MZ522

042MZ525

042MZ527

042MZ530

042M2531

042MZ533

042MZ634

042MZ537

042MZ539

042MZ541

042MZ642

042 MZ543

042 MZ644

PENSACOLA BAY

042MZ612

SITE 42 RECORD OF DECISION NAS PENSACOLA PENSACOLA, FLORIDA

NAT

IGURE 6-10

RE AND EXTENT FLUORENE

m

m

m m

a

C n

I

-e

W

I

W

I

4

I-CY

W

WX

I

-

e

FIGURE 6-12

1

I

i

i

. -

14

. . . .

- I

SITE 42LEGEND RECORD OFPENSACOLA

PENSACOLA,DETECTED 5)EXCEEDS SEDIMENTSCREENING CONCENTRATION NATURE

PYRENEAND EXTENTCOAST FACILITY

SCREENING LEVEL =

13

- - -

Record Decision

42-

Table 6-3Exceeding Screening Criteria

SQAG SQAGContaminant tration ssv PEL

Acenaphthy

Anthr

Chrysene

Fluor

28 330 5 128

92

330 46.9 245

130

330 74.8 69395

1 8589

16 330 88.8 763140330140

330120520240

330 1494130220140

8 150

19 1201207302 10210

4.8

2.8 1.1

1.7

1.21.1

1.624.0

1.213.7

12.4

1.51.14.82.223.1

1.71.21.9

1

6.5

1.923

41

Record DecisionOperable

Site

Table 6-3Concentrations Exceeding Screening Criteria

SQAG SQAGConcentration ssv PEL

I31 330 2.246

63 3

Naphthalene 41 330 34.6 391 1.2

1.198 4.7

95 3

200 330 153 1393 1.3

1680 4.4190 1.2230 1.5

2,300

1 ,684 16,770 1.96.7

b 182 182 2647 6.018 7 .7

Notes: Region 4 Sediment Valuessv Department of Protection - Sediment Assessment GuidelineSQAG

EffectsTEL Probable Effects LevelPEL Hazard Quotient; Level

42

*

Operable Unit 17Site 42-

Phthalate Esters

(BEHP) exceeded the SSV and TEL of 182 at two locations (see

6-3). source for this organic constituent was identified for either location.

Because of the frequent use in pumps and plastics the laboratory, BEHP is considered

a contaminant However these concentrations were not rejected during data

validation for

Organic: Compounds

sediment screening values are present for VOCs Detected concentrations are presented

Section limited distribution and low values detected suggest a limited risk to ecological

receptors. are extremely mobile. At the concentrations observed, the would be

solutes in seawater or the sediment interstitial, fluids

Preliminary Exposure Estimate

The use of screening values for comparison of observed contaminant concentrations necessitates

an assumption benthic associated fauna will use the area surrounding a sample location

exclusively for feeding and other life requisites. Also, this screening approach assumes that 100%

of the contaminant concentration found will be bioavailable to those benthic organisms found at

at the location. By applying both of these assumptions in the screening assessment, a very

conservative estimate of a chemical's potential effects is made.

6.1.4 Preliminary Risk Calculation

the estimate (100 of contaminant concentration) for benthic infauna

associated with the sample location, and by applying the must conservative effects benchmark, a

hazard quotient can be determined for each sampling location (see Tables 6-1 through 6-3). The

hazard quotient method compares the estimated exposure concentrations to the measured or

43

4

Record Decision

Site 42 - BayNovember

predicted threshold value for effect. Equation 1presents the calculation method with explanation

of the variables

Sediment ConcentrationEquation 1 Hazard Quotient (HQ) SQAG Threshold Effect Level

An HQ of more 1 is interpreted as a level at which there is a potential for adverse ecological

effects. An HQ of less than 1does not indicate a lack of risk, but should be interpreted based on

For Site 42, were determined only for those contaminants exceeding the SQAG-TEL. Thus,

all quotients for the locations presented exceed 1and those locations not presented in the table

will be below The following paragraphs discuss exceedances and spatial relevance, along with

an interpretation of the number of exceedances relative to the size.

Metals

for arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, and mercury were less than 5 (see

Table Anthropogenic input of metals into sediments near NAS Pensacola has occurred, but

specific sources of these metals are difficult to The limited distribution of exceedances

and the low HQ values suggest a risk to ecological receptors.

Of the two screening level exceedances for silver, one had a HQ of 20.2. The limited extent

suggests a low to ecological resources

Pesticidest

For the three pesticides and one PCB detections listed in Table 6-2, all were 5 or less, and

most were less than Only 15 of the 141 locations sampled had concentrations

+ 44

Record Decision

6, 1998

above screening values and no spatial pattern was evident. Based on the limited distribution and

Results for 10 compounds were compared to screening values and values for total

Except two locations, the for all compounds did not exceed 3. For these same two locations were the only ones with concentrations above the screening value of

1,684 suggests the Coast Guard Station and the barge fueling pier are sources The barge fueling pier will be investigated under the auspices the

Florida program. Both facilities are permanent; expected operations will continue in the future. These concentrations suggest moderate risk to ecological receptors these areas.

The fur two locations exceeding the screening value were 6 and 7.7. With only two of

141 locations elevated concentrations it is predicted risk to ecological receptors is

1imited

6. Uncertainties

All sampling programs may produce unavoidable variations tu the design. Below are uncertainties

related to field conditions, laboratory procedures, other circumstances are likely to have

influenced the and risk assessment.

Analytical matrix interferences due tu excess organic in sediment Sampling in

the grass Trout Point required sampling roots and other benthic organisms with

the sample +

- -

*

Record of DecisionOperable

Bay

lack criteria or screening values for some chemicals increases the uncertainty for

screening level assessments.

The quotient approach lacks the consideration for natural metal concentrations, and

sediment grain-size and TOC effects as they relate to calculated using

guidance are typically more conservative than field exposure scenarios indicate

at Site 2, Sediments in Bay, no distinguishable

changes assemblages were distinguishable below an HQ of 10.0.

The nature of a marine ecosystem provides natural variability not considered +receptor scenarios

Risk Summary

Sediment chemistry results show concentrations for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead

mercury, and are above Only one sample of silver exceeded a PEL. Hazardquotients calculated for these metals did not show any significant potential risk to receptors. The

limited detections and distribution suggest a limited risk to ecological receptors

appear to the most significant organic contaminants found at. the site. at Site 42

area are to past practices, but recent oil spills and asphalt road may have also

contributed to sediment loads. Samples taken near the barge loading dock and the Coast Guard

Station represent all the for exceeding the This suggests that sediments

near these sample locations are of moderate risk to ecological receptors. Both of these facilities

are permanent it is expected that operations will in the future. The barge loading

dock be investigated under the auspices of the Florida petroleum Pesticides,

and phthalate esters were detected in a limited number of samples and did not exceed a PEL. The

46

3

Record DecisionNAS Operable

Bay

limited distribution and detections suggest a low risk to ecological receptors; therefore, additional

phases o f were not performed.

Conclusions

Apparent anthropogenic effects on sediment quality at Site 42 was detected during the

Contaminant classes included pesticides and and phthalates. Although

calculated quotients within each class of contaminants exceeded unity (suggesting a

potential risk), the calculated were generally low (less than arid the areal distribution of

the contaminant was generally limited. These factors combine to suggest the detected

contamination presents a low risk to ecological resources at Site 42.

One noted to is the PAH contamination at the barge fueling pier. This

contamination be addressed under the auspices of Florida's petroleum program.

6.2 Exposure Assessment

This assessment examines the potential for excess human exposure to the contaminants detected

at Site 42.

Current Use

NAS Pensacola Site 42, near the industrial portion of the base, is currently limited to boating

activities. Human contact with site media will occur only due to activities associated with the

Rescue Training School (short duration swimming), and a public beach at Beach, west of

the Coast Guard Station. Otherwise, swimming is not authorized anywhere else within Site 42.

Exposure

Exposure to at Site 42 appears be limited. Rescue Training activities involve training

students in the for a single class. This exposure i s to the surface water only and does nut

47

Record of

constitute a route and thus no surface water samples were: collected during the RI. Contact with near the developed portion of the base is by security, sediment depth,

and reduced of sediment to skin. Table lists the scenarios for exposure

routes . Beach samples had lower concentrations of than samples from other

areas, due to the strong surf and tidal currents in this area of Site 42.

3

Except for the activities of the rescue school and Beach, is not

allowed at Site 42. The site is monitored by the Navy and Coast Guard. The Navy

the seawall and quay, while the U.S. Coast Guard monitors boating traffic near the ICW.

frequent human exposure to site sediments is not possible. Occasional trespassing

possible, although trespassers would likely be arrested. Prudent individuals also would not risk

the physical hazards associated in the swift currents of the shipping channel.

Sediment

In addition to the security patrolling Site 42 and the surrounding area, other issues limit human

exposure to Site media. Many samples were during the that would be deeper than

could reach without diving equipment. If direct exposure were possible, sediment

near the shipping channel would be expected to contain chemicals of concern. However, direct,

frequent exposure to sediment is unrealistic because sediment is submerged year round. In

would wash off of skin rather than adsorbing, as is assumed for soil exposure.

sediment i s submerged year round

48

-

-

-

of Decision

6, 1998

TableSummary Justification fur Eliminating Human Exposure Pathways -Site 42

NAS PensacolaPensacola, Florida

Medium and Pathway Selectedfor Evaluation for Selection or Exclusion

Site 42 soil. NoAir - of No concentrations were reported in sedimentgaseous contaminants exceeding their correspondingbased concentrations .

soil

43 ,

submerged year-round. Consequentlyassessing sediment exposure as if it weresoil would riot be appropriate. This exposure pathway was eliminated inaccordance USEPA Region

chemicals entrained in

Supplemental Guidance to RAGS 3,Exposure

Groundwater is the aquitard inNOGroundwater - Ingestionof contaminants during

or general use Pensacola

Groundwater is below the inGroundwater - Inhalation N O Pensacolaof volatilized groundwater

contaminants

Swimming is allowed only at Mustin Beach.Surface water was considered to apossible source o f contaminants.Consequently, this medium was

Surface water - Ingestionof contaminants during

1swimming

analyzed.

Swimming is allowed only at Mustin Beach.Surface water was not considered to be a

NoSurface water - Inhalationof volatilized groundwater

possible source of contarninants.Consequently, this medium was

Site 42 contains no soil.Soil - Incidental ingestion No

Site 42 no soil.- contact

Swimming i s allowed only at Mustin Beach.Site 42 sediment is submerged year-round.Consequently, assessing sediment exposureas if i t were soil would not be appropriate.This exposure pathway was in

- Incidental N O 1

accordance with USEPA RegionGuidance to RAGS 3,

Exposed

Current and FutureSite Users

t

49

- -

- -

- -

Record of DecisionUnit 17

Site 42- Bay

TableSummary Justification for Eliminating Human Exposure Pathways-Site 42

NAS PensacolaPensacola, Florida

Potentially Exposed Medium and Exposure Pathway SelectedPopulation for Evaluation Reason for Selection or Exclusion

Sediment -Dermal Swimming is Beach.Site 42 sediment is submerged year-round.

assessing sediment exposureas if it were soil would not be appropriate.

exposure pathway waswith

Supplemental Guidance RAGS Bulletin 3,Assessment

Wild game or domestic No Fishing and crabbing do occur in area. t

animals - Ingestion of A study conducted at Site (OU 13)tissue impacted by media concluded that there was no excess riskcontamination from consuming edible crab tissue.

Fruits and vegetables- N O Site 42 contains soil. Aquaculture isIngestion o f plant tissues a proposed use and would be grown in expected to be a concern at this site, relative

direct pathways considered,addition, activities would beprohibited in the ICW the CoastGuard.

Surface Water

Surface water samples taken for Site 2 (OU 13) indicate trace amounts of and the

usual metals associated with seawater- Only two compounds exceeded the federal or state criteria

in surface water. Silver exceeded the criteria in 18 of the 21 samples. the detections

may be the result of the natural salinity. The other chemical 10 ppb) was

detected and exceeded its criteria of 6.5 ppb in only one o f the samples, indicating it is not

widespread, Exposure to surface water would be limited to swimming trespassers, due to the

stringent security enforced by the Navy and Coast Guard. Pensacola Bay seawater i s not

potable because of the natural salinity

50

-

Record of DecisionOperable Unit

Site 42- Bay . . .. . . . .

Fishing and CrabbingFishing and crabbing are allowed and can be observed daily in Site The most likely

exposure for contaminants to humans is via fishing and crabbing. During the Site 2 RI,edible

crab tissue was collected in Site 42 and Site The study concluded there is no excess

from the consumption of edible crab tissue. The results of that study are summarized in

Section 6 2 + 2 ,

Future Land Use lands are owned by the State of Florida. Future land use at NAS

Site 42 to boating, and exposure will be limited by the physical factors discussed

above

Carcinogenicity and

USEPA established a classification system for rating the potential carcinogenicity of

contaminants based on the weight of scientific evidence The cancer classes are

described below Cancer weight-of-evidence class (human carcinogens) means that human

toxicological data have shown a proven correlation between exposure and the onset of cancer (in

varying + The 1 classification indicates that human exposure studies have

implicated the compound as a probable carcinogen. class indicates a

possible human carcinogen, a description based on positive laboratory animal data (fur

carcinogenicity) in the absence of human data. Weight-of-evidence class identifies possible

human and indicates a compound not classifiable with respect to it

The USEPA has established slope factors for carcinogeniccarcinogenic potential

compounds as a "plausible upper-bound of the probability of a response (cancer) per

intake of a over a lifetime."

51

Record of DecisionNAS Unit

42- Buy6, 1998

In addition to potential carcinogenic effects most substances can produce systemic toxic

responses at doses greater than experimentally derived threshold levels. For these substances,

USEPA has derived Reference Dose values. A chronic as “anestimate (with

uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of magnitude or greater) of a daily exposure level for the

population, including sensitive subpopulations, that is likely to be without an appreciable

effects during a lifetime. These toxicological values are used risk formulae

to assess the upper-bound level of cancer risk and hazard associated with exposure to

a given contamination concentrations

For carcinogens, the potential risk posed by a chemical is computed by multiplying the chronic

daily intake as by the (in reciprocal The hazard quotient (for

is computed by dividing the by the The has set standard limits

(or points of departure) for carcinogens and noncarcinogens to evaluate whether significant risk

is posed by a (or combination of chemicals). For carcinogens, the point-ofdeparture

range is with a generally excepted range of to risk values correlate

with 1 in and 1 in million excess cancer incidence resulting from exposure to

For other toxic effects are generally considered possible if the hazard quotient

(or sum of hazard quotients for a pathway - that is, the hazard index) exceeds unity (a value of

Although both risk and noncancer hazard are generally additive (within each target

group) only if the target organ i s to multiple chemicals, a most

estimate of each may be obtained by summing the individual risks or hazards regardless of target

organ. This BRA has taken the universal summation approach for each class of toxicant.

52

-

Record Decision17

42-Pernucola Bay

6.2.2 Tissue Pathway

During the Site 2 edible crab tissue was collected in Site 42 and Site 2. That data is

summarized in Table 6-5. Exposure to this tissue was evaluated under one scenario: current and

site fisherman ingesting shellfish 20 for days per

Table 6-6 presents the calculated risk and hazard for the tissue exposure pathways. As shown in

the below, an ILCR of 3x106 (rounded) was identified for possible carcinogens detected

Hazard indices of and 0.2 were calculated for child and adult exposure to Site

tissues, respectively. The primary contributor ILCR was heptachlor epoxide, and the primary

contributor to was copper. No chemicals of concern were identified for this exposure

pathway. Because the ILCR for heptachlor epoxide exceeded it is important to note that

the calculations were based on the maximum concentration detected in Site 2 blue crab tissues.

An ILCR based on the arithmetic average tissue reported for heptachlor epoxide

(0.00092 would not exceed the most stringent and FDEP threshold

6.2.3 Concl

The human health exposure assessment for Site 42 indicates that a complete health risk

assessment was required for the site due to a general lack of completed exposure pathways.

Without complete exposure pathway, no risk to human health can be associated with the

ion

The one exception tu the lack of complete pathways is the ingestion of edible crab tissues collected

from the Bay+ no specific investigation of this pathway was included in the Site 42

an exhaustive performed for Site 2 included data from crab collected from Site 2 . The

results of that evaluation indicate no unacceptable risk is associated with the ingestion of crab

tissue from Bay

53

- -

__

8

8

+

U . I

V

I C

I I

+-

w#-'I3

I

>.

a

* *

3

0

-

Record of DecisionOperable 17

Site 42 - Bay6, 1998

TableRisk Projections for Based on Tissue Ingestion

NAS -Site 2Pensacola,

Potential Future Use

Silver 0.005 NA 0.1 0.05 NA

A

NA 0.24 NA NA

0.34 0.01

0.1 0.05Heptachlor epoxide 1 3

Hazard Indices

Sum ILCR

ILCRusedused

NA0.037 NA

Hazard quotientILCR Incremental lifetime excess cancer riskLWA Lifetime weighted averagechild exposure assumptionsadult exposure assumptions

Noncarcinogen-based exposure assumptionsCarcinogen-based exposure assumptionsSlope

In the only complete human exposure pathway identified at Site 2 was the ingestion of

crab No unacceptable risks were associated with this potential exposure and other

completed pathways were identified at the site. Therefore, Site 2 in not considered to present an

unacceptable risk to human

Baseline Assessment Conclusions

Risk management decisions for NAS Pensacola Site 42 based preliminary human health risk

assumptions are not warranted for sediment because of a lack of complete exposure

The only pathway to humans is through the consumption of seafood collected from

Site A study completed for Site 2 concluded that there i s excess risk from consumption o f

55

Record of DecisionOperable Unit 17

42 6, 1998

edible crab tissue. Site 2 consists of the near-shore sediments in an area where untreated industrial

wastewater had previously been discharged within Site 42. As such, it is considered to have a

much higher potential for unacceptable risk than Site 42 in general and it is appropriate to utilize

risk from Site 2 in addressing Site 42.

42 ecological risk was assessed by comparing which showed adverse effects the Site 2

environment another operable unit in Pensacola Bay, that was investigated separately from

Site 42. The Site 42 environment i s similar and comparable to the Site 2 area. Site 42 were

lower than those that showed adverse effects at Site 2, except for the area around the barge loading

dock. The constituents of concern at the barge loading dock are which are likely from

petroleum products unloaded at the dock. This contamination be further investigated under

Florida's petroleum program.

56

Record of Decision

42 -May 6, 1998

7.0 SELECTED

Based upon consideration of the requirements of CERCLA, the NCP, the human health

associated with Site 42, and public and state comments, the Navy has selected the “No

alternative as the! preferred remedial action alternative for this site. Based on the results of the

Remedial no remedial action is necessary to control residual risks associated with

the site. to human health are minimal due to a lack of completed exposure pathways to the

contamination. only completed pathway identified was exposure to edible crab tissue. No

unacceptable is associated with this pathway + Similarly, no unacceptable ecological risk is

associated with the contamination detected at Site 42 Ecological hazard quotients are generally

low and areas of potential ecological risk are sparsely distributed.

As described in the preceding sections, this determination is based on both current and reasonable

exposure scenarios under ban swimming the

area). An area of contamination at the barge loading pier will be separately addressed under

Florida’s petroleum program.

The selected alternative will attain all federal and state is cost-effective, and uses

permanent solutions to the extent practicable.

Based on the available at this time, the remedy represents the best balance among the

criteria used to evaluate remedies. The remedy is believed to be protective of human health and

the environment, will attain will be cost-effective, and will use permanent solutions and

alternative treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the extent

practicable

57

employing treatment that and significantly reduces the volume, toxicity or mobility

Record of Decision

8.0 STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS

Section 121 42 9621

6, 1998

the Navy must select remedies that are protective

of human and the comply (unless a statutory waiver i s justified),

cost-effective.,and use solutions and technologies or resource

technologies to the maximum extent practicable In addition, CERCLA prefers remedies

of hazardous wastes as i t s principal element. The following sections discuss how the selected

remedy at Site 42 meets these statutory requirements.

8.1 of Health and the

The selected protects human health and the Based on current and reasonable

maximum exposure scenarios, no unacceptable human health ecological risks are

associated with existing conditions at Site 42.

of the

to CERCLA Section the remedial action for Site 42 must comply with federal

and state laws that are either applicable or relevant and appropriate to the

of the App icable requirements are those standards criteria, or limitations

promulgated under federal state law that specifically address a hazardous substance, a 4

contaminant, action, location, or other circumstance at a site. Relevant and

appropriate are those that, while not legally applicable still address problems or

situations to those encountered that their use is well-suited to the

particular site. Additional criteria to be considered are advisories and

guidance that are: not legally binding. but provide pertinent guidance which should be considered

in tlhe necessary level of cleanup to protect health or the

58

-

Record DecisionOperable Unit

42 Bay6,

M are considered in three distinct categories, although there is often overlap

among the three:

with solid and hazardous waste facility siting criteria. No location-specific or TBCs were

are identified for the selected remedy

Action-specific are or requirements or limitations on actions

taken with respect to hazardous wastes. These requirements are triggered by the particular

remedial activities that are selected to accomplish a remedy. Since there are usually several

for any remedial site, various requirements can be No

ARARs or TBCs were identified for the selected remedy.

Chemical-specific: are specific numerical quantity restrictions on individual chemicals in

of chemical-specific the Maximum Levels specified under the Safe Drinking Water Act. there axe numerous

of concern

Chemical-specific ARARs and TBCs for the selected remedy are presented in Table

Tableand TBCs for Selected Remedy

Appl able Class IIE Waters designation (applicable Bay)

TBC Guidance RAGS: Region 4 - Screening Values (SedimentRegion Atlanta, GA, November 1995.

'

TBC the Assessment Quality in Coastal Waters, FDEP Office ofWater Policy, Tallahassee, FL,

are restrictions placed on the concentration of hazardous substances or

the conduct of activities solely on the basis of location. Examples of

+

for remedial site various numerical quantity can be ARARs

59

Record of DecisionNAS Operable

Site 42 -

The selected remedy complies with and identified Table There are no

action- or location-specific ARARs with which the

8.3

The “No Action” alternative is cost effective

8.4 Use of Permanent to the Maximum Extent Practicable

The Navy, USEPA and Florida concurrence, has determined that the selected remedy

represents the extent to which solutions and treatment technologies can be

used in a cost-effective manner for of Site 42 at NAS The Navy, with

USEPA and Florida concurrence, has determined that this selected remedy provides the best

balance of in terms of long-term effectiveness and permanence; reduction in toxicity,

or through treatment; short-term effectiveness; ; and

cost while also considering the statutory preference for treatment as a principal element and

consideration of’state and community acceptance The selected remedy provides for long-term

effectiveness permanence; is easily implemented; reduces toxicity mobility or volume; and

is

8.5 Preference for Treatment as a Principal

The selected does utilize treatment as a principal element of the remedial action. In

instance, the!data generated during the indicate further action is necessary to reduce The statutorycontamination to acceptable risk-based concentrations in a

preference for remedies that employ treatment as a principal element does not require treatment

under these circumstances

Record of Decision

6, 1998

9.0 OF NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

The proposed released on December 8, 1997 identified the no-action alternative

The no-action alternative presented in the proposed plan the

as the no-action alternative described in ROD, No comments were received the public +

61

Record of Decision

10.0 REFERENCES

Collard, Water Improvement and Management Pensacoh

System, Biological Current Northwest Florida Water Management

District + Water Resources Special Report 91-3

& (1996)+ Remedial Investigation Site 2, Pensacoh,

Memphis Tennessee.

(1997). FinalRemedial Investigation Site 38, NAS Pensacoh,

Pensacoh, Florida. : Memphis

Long, Smith, and F.D. Calder. (1995). Incidence of Adverse

Effects Within Ranges of Chemical Concentrations in Marine and Estuarine

Sediments Environmental Management

(1993). Development of Approach to the Assessment of Sediment

in Coastal Waters.

Southern Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command. (1997). FY 1998 Site Management

Plan the Installation Restoration Program for the Air

Florida

Region Bulletins, Ecological Risk Assessment, Environmental Protection

Agency, Region IV, Atlanta, GA.

WP5 I ROD\ A

62

Appendix A

Glossary

glossary defines used in this record of decision describing CERCLA activities. The

definitions apply specifically to this record of decision and may have meanings when used

in different circumstances

RECORD: A file which contains all used by the lead agency

to make its decision in selecting a response action under CERCLA. This file i s to be available for a copy is to be established at or near the site, usually at one of the information

repositories Also a duplicate i s in a central location, such as a regional or state office.

AQUIFER: An underground formation of materials such as sand, gravel that can store

groundwater wells and springs. Most aquifers used the United States are within

a thousand feet of the earth's surface.

BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT: A study conducted as a supplement to a remedial

investigation to determine the nature and extent of contamination at a site and the risks

posed to public health the environment

CARCINOGEN: A substance that can cause cancer.

CLEANUP: Actions taken to deal with a release or threatened release of hazardous substances

that could affect public health the environment + The "cleanup" is often used broadly

to describe various response actions or phases of remedial responses such as Remedial

Study

COMMENT A time during which the public can review and comment on various

documents and actions taken, either by the Department of Defense installation or For

example, a comment period is provided when USEPA proposes to add sites to the National

Priorities List.

COMMUNITY RELATIONS: and subsequently Naval Air Station

program to inform and involve the public in the Superfund process and respond to community

concerns

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION,

LIABILITY A federal passed 1980 and modified 1986 by the

Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). The act created a special tax that goes

into a trust fund, commonly known as "Superfund," to investigate and clean up abandoned or

uncontrolled hanardous waste sites

Under the program the can either:

Pay for site cleanup when parties responsible for the contamination cannot be located

are unable to perform the work.

Take legal action force parties responsible for site contamination to clean up the site

pay back the federal government for the cost of the cleanup.

DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION ACCOUNT (DERA): An account

established by to fund hazardous waste site cleanups, building demolition, and

hazardous waste minimization. The account was established under S A R A .

STANDARDS: Standards for quality of water that are set by both

the USEPA and the FDEP.

EXPLANATION OF DIFFERENCES: After adoption of final remedial action plan, if any

remedial or enforcement action is taken, or if any settlement or consent decree is entered into, and

if the settlement or decree differs significantly from the final plan, the lead agency is required to

publish an explanation of any significant differences and why they were made.

FEASIBILITY STUDY: See Remedial Study.

Water beneath the earth's surface that pores between materials such as

sand, soil, or gravel. aquifers, groundwater occurs quantities sufficient for use as drinking

water, irrigation, and other purposes

HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM A scoring system used to evaluate potential relative

and the environment from releases or threatened releases of hazardous

substances, and states use the HRS to calculate a site score, from 0 to based on the

actual or potential release of hazardous substances from a site through air, surface water, or

groundwater to affect people. This score is the primary factor used to decide if a hazardous site should be placed on the

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES: Any material that poses a threat to public health the

environment Typical hazardous substances are materials that are corrosive, ignitable,

explosive, or chemically reactive.

INFORMATION REPOSITORY: A file containing information, technical reports, and

reference documents regarding a Superfund site. Information repositories for Naval Air Station

are located at the John Pace Library, University of West Florida; and the

NAS Library, Building 633 Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida.

MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL: National standards for acceptable concentrations of

contaminants in drinking water These standards are legally enforceable standards set by the

USEPA under Safe Drinking Water Act.

MONITORING WELLS: drilled at specific locations on off a hazardous waste site

where groundwater can be sampled at selected depths and studied to assess the groundwater flow

direction and the: types and amounts of contaminants present,

NATIONAL LIST The of the most serious uncontrolled abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial response using money

Ranking System. is required to update the NPL at least once a year.

PARTS PER BILLION PER MILLION (ppm): Units commonly used to express

low concentrations of contaminants. For example, 1 ounce of trichloroethylene in a ppm; I ounce of trichloroethylene in a billion ounces of water is If

one drop of trichloroethylene i s in a competition-size the water will contain

about ppb o f trichloroethylene.

GOALS: concentrations that are provided by the

USEPA and the FDEP and used to assess the site for comparison before remedial goals are set

during the baseline risk assessment +

PROPOSED A public participation requirement of SARA in which the lead agency

public the preferred cleanup strategy, and the rationale for the preference,

reviews the alternatives presented in the detailed analysis of the remedial

study, and presents any waivers to clean up standards of Section that may be proposed.

This may be prepared either as a fact sheet or as a separate document. In either case, it must

actively solicit public review and comment all alternatives under agency consideration.

RECORD OF DECISION (ROD): A public document that explains which cleanup

generated during remedial study and consideration of public comments

and community

REMEDIAL ACTION The actual construction implementation phase that follows the

remedial design and the selected cleanup alternative at a site on the

studies usually performed at the same time, and together referred to as the They are

intended to: (1) gather the data necessary to determine the type and extent of contamination at a

site; (2 ) establish criteria for cleaning up the site; (3) identify and screen cleanup

alternatives for remedial action; and (4) analyze in detail the technology and costs of the

alternatives in

RESPONSE: A long-term action that stops or substantially reduces a release

threatened release of hazardous substances that is serious, but dose not pose an immediate threat

to public health the environment.

REMOVAL ACTION: An immediate action performed to address a release or threatened release

of substances.

RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT A federal law that

established a regulatory system to track hazardous substances the of generation to

disposal. The law requires safe and secure procedures to be used in treating, transporting,

and disposing of hazardous substances+RCRA is designed to prevent new, uncontrolled hazardous

waste sites.

RESPONSE ACTION: As defined by Section of CERCLA, a response action means

remove or remedial action, including enforcement activities related thereto +

SUMMARY: A summary of oral and written public received

by the lead agency during a comment period on key documents, and the response to these

comments prepared by the lead agency. The responsiveness summary is a key part of the ROD,

highlighting community for USEPA

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS: Secondary drinking water regulations are set by the USEPA and the FDEP. These guidelines are not designed to protect public health;

instead they are intended to protect "public welfare' by providing guidelines regarding the taste,

odor, color, and other aesthetic aspects of drinking water which do no present a health risk.

past hazardous waste disposal sites and current releases or threats of releases of non-petroleum

products Superfund is often divided into removal, remedial and enforcement components

enacted October 17, to reauthorize the funding provisions, and amend the authorities

and requirements of CERCLA and associated laws. Section of S A R A requires that all federal

comply with, t h i s act the same manner and the same extent as any

non-governmental entity

WATER: Bodies of water are such as rivers, lakes, and

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND: An organic compound that

evaporates (volatilizes) readily at temperature

Appendix B Responsiveness Summary

Overview

At the time of the public period, the Navy had selected a preferred remedy to

was in coordination with the and the FDEP. The NAS Pensacola

Restoration Advisory Board, a group of volunteers, reviewed the details of

the selected remedy and raised no fundamental objections to its selection.

The sections below describe the background of involvement on the project and

received during the public comment period.

Background of Community Involvement

the site's the community has been kept abreast of site activities through press

releases to the newspaper and television stations reporting site activities

available to the public in the administrative record at information

repositories maintained at the NAS Pensacola Library and the John Pace Library of the

University of West Florida.

In December 1997, newspaper announcements were placed to the public comment period

(December 1997 through 22, present the for a public meeting, and

included a short synopsis of the proposed These advertisements ran in the

on 12, In conjunction with these newspaper announcements, addresses

on the Site 42 mailing were sent the proposed plan.

were

SUllmlary of COIllltlents Received During the Public Comment Period

were

SUllmlary of COIllltlents Received During the Public Comment Period

were No comments received during the public comment period,