i

United States Department of Agriculture

AgriculturalResearchService

ARS–169

July 2008

Evaluation of New Canal Point Sugarcane Clones

2006–2007 Harvest Season

ii

Abstract

Glaz, B., J.C. Comstock, S.J. Edmé, R.A. Gilbert, R.W. Davidson, and N.C. Glynn. 2008. Evaluation of New Canal Point Sugarcane Clones: 2006–2007 Harvest Season, ARS-169. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C., 36 pp.

Thirty-three replicated experiments were conducted on 13 farms (representing 5 organic and 4 sand soils) to evaluate 47 new Canal Point (CP) and 11 new Canal Point and Clewiston (CPCL) clones of sugarcane from the CP 02, CP 01, CP 00, CP 99, CPCL 99, CPCL 97, and CPCL 96 series. Experiments compared the cane and sugar yields of the new clones, complex hybrids of Saccharum spp., primarily with yields of CP 89-2143, and to a lesser extent with CP 72-2086 and CP 78-1628. All three were major sugarcane cultivars in Florida. Each clone was rated for its tolerance to diseases and cold temperatures. Based on results of these and previous years’ tests, three new clones—CP 00-1101, CP 00-1446, and CP 00-2180—were released for commercial production in Florida. The audience for this publication includes growers, geneticists and other researchers, extension agents, and individuals who are interested in sugarcane cultivar development.

Keywords: Brown rust, histosol, muck soil, orange rust, organic soil, Puccinia melanocephala, Saccharum spp., sugarcane cultivars, sugarcane smut, sugarcane yields, sugar yields, Ustilago scitaminea.

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by U.S. Department of Agriculture, the University of Florida, or the Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., over others not mentioned.

While supplies last, single copies of this publication can be obtained at no cost from Barry Glaz, USDA-ARS-SAA, U.S. Sugarcane Field Station, 12990 U.S. Highway 441 N, Canal Point, FL 33438; or by e-mail at Barry.Glaz@ars.usda.gov.

Copies of this publication may be purchased in various formats (microfiche, photocopy, CD, print on demand) from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (800) 553-6847, www.ntis.gov.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the assistance of Velton Banks, Matthew Paige, and Juan Tejeda of the Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., and B. Jay Cruz and Kenneth Peterkin of USDA-ARS in conducting the fieldwork described herein; and of Iwona Pajak of USDA-ARS for conducting laboratory work and data input for this report. The authors also express their appreciation to the growers who provided land, labor, cultivation, and other support for these experiments.

July 2008

iii

Contents

Test procedures ......................................................................................................................................... 3

Results and discussion ...............................................................................................................................6

Plant-cane crop, CP 02 series .................................................................................................................6

Plant-cane crop, CP 01 series .................................................................................................................7

First-ratoon crop, CP 01 series ...............................................................................................................7

First-ratoon crop, CP 00 series ...............................................................................................................7

Second-ratoon crop, CP 00 series ..........................................................................................................7

Second-ratoon crop, CP 99 series ..........................................................................................................8

Second-ratoon crop, sand soils, CPCL 96-97 series ..............................................................................8

Second-ratoon crop, muck soils, CPCL 96 series ..................................................................................8

Summary ....................................................................................................................................................8

References ..................................................................................................................................................9

Tables .......................................................................................................................................................12

iv

1

Evaluation of New Canal Point Sugarcane Clones

2006–2007 Harvest Season

B. Glaz, J.C. Comstock, S.J. Edmé, R.A. Gilbert, R.W. Davidson, and N.C. Glynn

Breeding and selection for clones that can be used for commercial production of sugarcane, complex hybrids of Saccharum spp., support the continued success of this crop in Florida. Though production of sugar per unit area is a principal selection characteristic, it is not the only factor on which sugarcane is evaluated. In addition, analyses are made on the concentration of sugar and on the fiber content of the cane. The economic value of each clone integrates its harvesting, transportation, and milling costs with its expected returns from sugar production. Deren et al. (1995) developed an economic index for clonal evaluation in Florida. Evaluation of clonal suitability also includes its reactions to endemic pathogens.

This report summarizes the cane production and sugar yields of the clones in the plant-cane, first-ratoon, and second-ratoon stage IV experiments sampled in Florida’s 2006–2007 sugarcane harvest season. This information is used to identify commercial cultivars in Florida and identify clones with useful characteristics for the Canal Point and other sugarcane breeding programs. The information is also used by representatives of other sugar industries to request Canal Point clones.

The time of year and the duration that a clone yields its highest amount of sugar per unit area is important because the Florida sugarcane harvest season extends from October to April. Because sugarcane is commercially grown in plant and

ratoon crops, clones are evaluated accordingly. Adaptability to mechanical harvesters is an important trait in Florida. All sugarcane sent to Florida mills and much of the sugarcane used for planting is mechanically harvested. Before a new clone is released, Florida growers judge its acceptability for mechanical operations.

Clones with desired agronomic characteristics also must be productive in the presence of harmful diseases, insects, and weeds. Some pathogens rapidly develop new, virulent races or strains. Because of these changes in pathogen populations, clonal resistance is not considered permanent. The selection team must try not to discard clones that have sufficient resistance or tolerance to pests, but it also must discard clones that are too susceptible to pests to be grown commercially.

The disease that has caused the most difficulty in Florida in selecting resistant sugarcane cultivars has been brown rust, caused by Puccinia melanocephala Syd & P. Syd. From 2000 to 2005, this program discarded 15 clones that were within 1 year of commercial release due to new infections of brown rust. During the summer of 2007, commercial sugarcane fields in Florida were infected with orange rust, caused by Puccinia kuehnii E.J. Butler. This program has had the most success in selecting resistant cultivars for sugarcane smut, caused by Ustilago scitaminea Syd & P. Syd. Other diseases we must contend with are leaf scald, caused by Xanthomonas albilineans (Ashby) Dow; sugarcane yellow leaf virus, a disease caused by a luteovirus (Lockhart et al. 1996); sugarcane mosaic strain E.; and ratoon stunting, caused by Leifsonia xyli subsp. xyli Evtsuhenko et al., which has probably been the most damaging, though the least visible, sugarcane disease in Florida. A program to improve resistance of CP clones to ratoon stunting is underway (Comstock et al. 2001).

Scientists at Canal Point also screen clones in their selection program for resistance to brown rust, orange rust, smut, leaf scald, sugarcane yellow leaf virus, mosaic, ratoon stunting, and eye spot caused by Bipolaris sacchari (E.J. Butler) Shoemaker.

Glaz is a research agronomist; Comstock is a research plant pathologist; Edmé is a research geneticist; and Glynn is a research biologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Sugarcane Field Station, Canal Point, FL. Gilbert is an associate professor in agronomy, Everglades Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Belle Glade, FL. Davidson is an agronomist, Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., Clewiston, FL.

2

Eye spot is not currently a commercial problem in Florida.

Sugarcane growers in Florida rely much more on tolerance to sugarcane diseases than on resistance. In the 2006 growing season, 8 cultivars comprised 92 percent of Florida’s sugarcane (Glaz 2007). Seven of these eight cultivars—CP 72-2086, CP 73-1547, CP 78-1628, CP 80-1743, CP 84-1198, CP 88-1762, and CP 89-2143—were at least moderately susceptible to one or more of the following sugarcane diseases: brown rust, orange rust, mosaic, leaf scald, smut, and ratoon stunting. Only CL 77-797 (1.3 percent of Florida’s sugarcane) was not susceptible to any of these diseases. Glaz et al. (1986) presented a formula and procedure to help growers distribute their available sugarcane cultivars while considering possible attacks of new pests.

Some growers minimize losses by planting stalks that do not contain the bacteria that cause ratoon stunting. This can be accomplished by planting with stalks that have been treated with hot-water therapy that kills the ratoon stunting bacteria or by using disease-free stalks derived from meristem tissue culture.

Damaging insects in Florida are the sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.); the sugarcane lace bug, Leptodictya tabida; the sugarcane wireworm, Melanotus communis; the sugarcane grub, Ligyrus subtropicus; and the West Indian cane weevil, Metamasius hemipterus (L.).

Winter freezes are common in the region of Florida where much of the sugarcane is produced. The severity and duration of a freeze and the tolerance of specific sugarcane cultivars are the major factors that determine how much damage occurs. The damage caused by such freezes ranges from no damage to death of the mature sugarcane plant. The rate of deterioration of juice quality after a freeze depends on the ambient air temperature: Warmer post-freeze temperatures result in more rapid deterioration of juice quality. Freezes also damage young sugarcane plants. Stalk populations may decline after severe freezes kill

aboveground parts of recently emerged plants. The most severe damage occurs when the growing point is frozen, which is more likely if the plant has emerged from the soil. Tai and Miller (1996) reported that resistance to a light freeze (‑1.7 oC to -2.8 oC) was not significantly correlated to fiber content, but resistance to a moderate freeze (-5.0 oC) was.

Each year at Canal Point, 50,000 to 100,000 seedlings are evaluated from crosses derived from a diverse germplasm collection. However, Deren (1995) suggested that the genetic base of U.S. sugarcane breeding programs was too narrow. About 85 percent of the cytoplasm in commercial sugarcane was Saccharum officinarum. This year, about half of the parental clones in our program originated from Canal Point, while the other half were developed by the United States Sugar Corporation (USSC) (CL clones). Additional parents originated from Louisiana or Texas breeding programs.

The USSC, based in Clewiston, Florida, recently discontinued its breeding program. Approximately the top 25 percent of clones in all selection stages from the USSC program were donated to the Canal Point program. Clones from the USSC program have traditionally been designated with a CL (Clewiston) prefix. Donated clones included in at least one CP evaluation trial will have a CPCL (Canal Point and Clewiston) designation and retain their USSC numbers.

The seedling stage planted in 2006 contained approximately 51,000 new clones that were planted from seeds. Once selected as seedlings, clones are vegetatively propagated. Because of this vegetative propagation, from this stage (seedling stage) on in the selection program, each plant (clone) is genetically identical to its precursor, assuming no mutations. The stage I trial selected from approximately 66,000 seedlings and planted in the winter of 2006 contained 10,722 new clones. Of these clones, 9,058 (84.5%) were CP clones and 1,664 (15.5%) were CPCL clones. The 1,807 clones in the stage II trial, planted in 2006, were selected from this stage I trial: 1,283 (71.0%) were

3

CP clones and 524 (29.0%) were CPCL clones. The 2006 plant-cane stage III trial had 135 new clones (28 CP clones and 107 CPCL clones) that were tested in replicated experiments on 4 grower farms. Each of the first three stages (seedling, stage I, and stage II) was evaluated for 1 year in the plant-cane crop at Canal Point. Selection is visual in the seedling phase. In stage 1, the first selection process is visual. The clones that are selected visually are then analyzed with a hand-punch Brix, and heavy emphasis is placed on Brix results. The primary selection criteria for stage II and all subsequent stages are sugar yield (in metric tons of sugar per hectare), theoretical recoverable sucrose, cane tonnage, and disease resistance.

The 135 stage III clones are evaluated for 2 years, in the plant-cane and first-ratoon crops, in commercial sugarcane fields at four locations—three with organic soils and one with a sand soil. The 13 to 14 most promising clones identified in stage III receive continued testing for 4 more years in the stage IV experiments where they are planted in successive years and evaluated in the plant-cane, first-ratoon, and second-ratoon crops. Clones that successfully complete these experimental phases undergo 2 to 4 years of evaluation and expansion by the Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., before commercial release. Some of the League’s evaluation occurs concurrently with the stage IV evaluations. The Canal Point selection program is summarized in appendix 1.

Clones with characteristics that may be valuable for sugarcane breeding programs are identified throughout the selection process. Even though the Canal Point program breeds and selects sugarcane in Florida, some CP clones have been productive commercial cultivars in Texas and outside of the United States. Sugarcane geneticists in other programs often request clones from Canal Point. From May 2006 to April 2007, clones or seeds from the Canal Point program were requested from and sent to Canada, the People’s Republic of China, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, and Panama.

Test Procedures

In 33 experiments, 58 new CP and CPCL clones were evaluated. Six clones of the CP 02 series and seven clones of the CPCL 99 series were evaluated at eight farms in the plant-cane crop. Thirteen clones of the CP 01 series were evaluated at two farms in the plant-cane crop and at seven farms in the first-ratoon crop. Fourteen clones of the CP 00 series were evaluated at one farm in the first-ratoon crop and at nine farms in the second-ratoon crop. Fourteen clones of the CP 99 series were evaluated at two farms in the second-ratoon crop. In four second-ratoon experiments, each of four new CPCL clones of the 97 and 96 series were evaluated at two farms.

CP 89-2143 was the primary reference cultivar. For experiments of new CP and CPCL clones on sand soils, CP 78-1628 was an important secondary reference cultivar. In 2006, CP 89-2143 was the most widely grown cultivar in Florida and CP 78-1628 the most widely grown cultivar on sand soils in Florida (Glaz 2007). CL 77-797 was also a secondary reference cultivar in two experiments that tested CPCL 96-2061. CP 72-2086 was sometimes used as a reference cultivar for KS/T. CP 72-2086 and CL 77-797 were the fifth and seventh most widely grown cultivars, respectively, in Florida in 2006 (Glaz 2007).

Agronomic practices, such as fertilization, pest and water control, and cultivation were conducted by the farmer or farm manager responsible for the field in which each experiment was planted.

Both second-ratoon experiments and the first-ratoon experiment of the CP 01 series planted at Okeelanta Corporation (Okeelanta) south of South Bay were conducted on Dania muck soil. Also, the second-ratoon experiment at Sugar Farms Cooperative North—Osceola Region S03 (Osceola) was conducted on Dania muck. As described by Rice et al. (2002), Dania muck is the shallowest of the histosols (organic soils) comprised primarily of decomposed sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense Crantz) in the Everglades Agricultural Area. The maximum depth to the

4

bedrock of Dania muck is 51 cm. The other organic soils similar to Dania muck are Lauderhill muck (51 to 91 cm depth to bedrock), Pahokee muck (91 to 130 cm to bedrock), and Terra Ceia muck (more than 130 cm to bedrock).

All experiments at A. Duda and Sons’, Inc. (Duda) southeast of Belle Glade, Knight Management, Inc. (Knight) southwest of 20-Mile Bend, Sugar Farms Cooperative North—SFI Region S05 (SFI) near 20-Mile Bend in Palm Beach County, and Wedgworth Farms, Inc. (Wedgworth) east of Belle Glade were conducted on Lauderhill muck. In addition, both plant-cane experiments at Okeelanta were conducted on Lauderhill muck.

The plant-cane experiment at Osceola was conducted on Pahokee muck. The second-ratoon experiment at United States Sugar Corporation—Ritta (Ritta) east of Clewiston was conducted on Terra Ceia muck.

The three experiments at Eastgate Farms, Inc. (Eastgate) north of Belle Glade, and the second-ratoon experiment at United States Sugar Corporation—Bryant (Bryant) southeast of Canal Point were conducted on Torry muck. The three experiments at Hilliard Brothers of Florida, Ltd. (Hilliard) west of Clewiston were on Malabar sand. The three experiments at Lykes Brothers, Inc. (Lykes) near Moore Haven in Glades County were on Pompano fine sand. The second-ratoon experiment at United States Sugar Corporation—Benbow (Benbow) was on Margate/Oldsmar sand and the second-ratoon experiment at United States Sugar Corporation—Townsite (Townsite) were on Margate sand.

The CP 01 series plant-cane and the CP 99 series second-ratoon experiments at Okeelanta were planted on fields in successive sugarcane rotations. In this rotation in Florida, a new crop of sugarcane is planted within about 2 months of the previous sugarcane harvest. All other experiments were planted in fields that had not been cropped to sugarcane for approximately 1 year. In all experiments, clones were planted with

two lines of stalks per furrow in plots arranged in randomized-complete-block designs. All experiments of the CP clones had six replications. Second-ratoon experiments of CPCL clones had three replications.

Each plot of new CPCL clones in second-ratoon experiments had four rows, two border rows, and two inside rows used for yield determination. These rows were 10.7 m long and 3.0 m wide. The distance between rows was l.5 m, and 4.5-m alleys separated all four sides of all plots. There was no sugarcane planted at the front or back of these second-ratoon CPCL tests. In all other experiments of CP and CPCL clones, all plots had three rows, a border row, and two inside rows used for yield determination. These two rows were 10.7 m long and 3.0 m wide (0.0032 ha). The distance between rows was l.5 m, and 1.5-m alleys separated the front and back ends of the plots. The outside row of each plot was a border row and was usually planted with the same clones as the inside two rows. Experiments were two clones (6 rows) wide. An extra 1.5 m of sugarcane protected each row at the front and back of each test.

Samples of 10 stalks were cut from unburned cane from a middle row of each plot in each experiment between October 10, 2006, and February 1, 2007. In addition, preharvest samples were cut from two replications of all plant-cane experiments between October 11 and October 16, 2006. Once a stool of sugarcane was chosen for cutting, the next 10 stalks in the row were cut as the 10-stalk sample. The range of sample dates for each crop was as follows:

Plant-cane crop ...............November 11, 2006 to February 1, 2007

First-ratoon crop .............October 24, 2006 to January 25, 2007

Second-ratoon crop ........October 10, 2006 to December 19, 2006

After each stalk sample was transported to the Agricultural Research Service’s Sugarcane Field Station at Canal Point, FL, for weighing and

5

milling, crusher juice from the milled stalks was analyzed for Brix and pol, and theoretical recoverable yield of kg 96o sugar (in kg per metric ton of cane: KS/T) was determined as a measure of sugar content. The fiber percentage of each clone was also used to calculate theoretical recoverable yield (Legendre 1992). The values of theoretical recoverable yield determined by the Legendre (1992) method were multiplied by 0.86 to better predict recoverable yield in a Florida sugarcane mill. Brix and pol were usually estimated by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS); Brix and pol were measured for samples with unacceptable NIRS calibrations by refractometer and polarimeter, respectively.

Using 5-stalk samples collected from border rows, an average of 9 fiber samples were calculated for the CPCL clones in second-ratoon tests, and an average of 10, 14, 13, 11, and 10 fiber samples were calculated for the clones of the CP 99, CP 00, CP 01, CP 02, and CPCL 99 series, respectively. Leaves were stripped from these stalks, which were then cut into three approximately even sections (bottom, middle, and top stalk sections). Two randomly selected bottom, middle, and top sections were processed through a Jeffco1 cutter-grinder (Jeffries Brothers, Ltd., Brisbane Queensland, Australia). About 150 g of material (fresh bagasse) processed through the cutter-grinder were collected and weighed. The fresh bagasse was then placed in cloth bags, washed twice in a washing machine, and dried at 49 oC until its weight did not decline (about 1 week). The fiber percentage of a clone was calculated by dividing its dry bagasse weight by its fresh bagasse weight. Samples of a reference cultivar were processed on all dates that fiber samples of new clones were processed. All fiber percentages calculated on a given day were corrected to the historical fiber percentage of the reference cultivar.

Total millable stalks per plot were counted between June 13 and September 14, 2006. Cane yields (in metric tons per hectare: TC/H) were calculated by multiplying stalk weights by number of stalks. Theoretical yields of sugar (in

metric tons per hectare: TS/H) were calculated by multiplying TC/H by KS/T and dividing by 1,000.

To assess cold tolerance, stage IV was subjected to freezing temperatures in two field experiments established at the Hague Farm of the Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida, in Hague, near Gainesville, FL. Air temperatures usually go down to -2 to -4 oC at the testing site during winter months, which guarantees exposure of the clones to harsher freeze temperatures than normally found in south Florida. Clones of the CP 99 and 00 series, along with three reference cultivars (CP 78-1628, CP 70-1133, and CP 89-2143), were planted on February 22, 2005, as two randomized-complete-block experiments with four replications in single-row plots 1.5 m long and 2.4 m apart and with 2.4 m breaks between replications. Five stalk samples were cut for analyses of sucrose content on January 13, January 27, and March 15, 2006. Some clones were not sampled on all three dates because there were not sufficient stalks. Clones of the CP 01, CP 02, and CPCL 99 series were planted on March 16, 2006, using the same plot configurations and compared with the same three reference cultivars. Five stalks were sampled from each plot on January 13, February 6, and March 5, 2007. Cold-tolerance rankings for both experiments were based on temporal deterioration of juice quality in mature stalks after exposure to freezing temperatures.

Prior to their advancement to stage IV, CP clones were evaluated in separate tests by artificial inoculation for susceptibility to sugarcane smut, sugarcane mosaic virus, leaf scald, and ratoon stunting. CP clones were inoculated in stage II plots to determine eye spot susceptibility. Since being advanced to stage IV, separate artificial-inoculation tests were repeated on clones for smut, ratoon stunting, mosaic, and leaf scald. Each clone was also field rated for its emergence, early plant height, tillering, and shading, as well as for its reactions to natural infection by sugarcane smut, sugarcane rust, sugarcane mosaic virus, and leaf scald in stage IV.

6

Statistical analyses of the stage IV experiments were based on a mixed model using SAS software (SAS version 9.1, 2003; SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC) with clones as fixed effects and locations and replications as random effects. Least squares means were calculated for clones. Means of locations were estimated by empirical best linear unbiased predictors. Significant differences were sought at the 10 percent probability level. Differences among clones were tested by the least significant difference (LSD), which was used regardless of significance of F-ratios to protect against high type-II error rates (Glaz and Dean 1988). The mean square error of the clone × location interaction was the error term used to calculate this LSD. Clones that had significantly higher yields than the reference cultivar were also identified by individual t tests calculated by SAS. Values of LSD were also calculated to approximate significant differences among locations using the mean square error of replications within locations as the error term.

Results and Discussion

Table 1 lists the parentage, percentage of fiber, and reactions to smut, brown rust, orange rust, leaf scald, mosaic, and ratoon stunting for each clone included in these experiments. Tables 2–5 contain the results of the CP 02 and CPCL 99 plant-cane experiments, and tables 6–7 contain the results of the CP 01 plant-cane experiments. Tables 8–10 contain the results of the CP 01 first-ratoon experiments, and table 11 contains the results of the CP 00 first-ratoon experiment. Tables 12–14 contain the results of the CP 00 second-ratoon experiments, and table 15 contains the results of the CP 99 second-ratoon experiments. Tables 16–17 contain the results of CPCL second-ratoon experiments. Table 18 gives cold-tolerance ratings for clones of the CP 99, 00, 01, 02, and CPCL 99 series. Table 19 gives the dates that stalks were counted in each experiment.

Plant-Cane Crop, CP 02 Series

When averaged across all eight locations, four new clones—CPCL 99-1401, CP 02-1564,

CPCL 99-1777, and CPCL 99-2574—yielded significantly more TS/H (metric tons of sugar per hectare) and TC/H (metric tons of cane per hectare) than CP 89-2143 (tables 2 and 5). CPCL 99-1401 also had significantly higher harvest KS/T (theoretical recoverable yield of 96o sugar in kg per metric ton of cane) than CP 89-2143 (table 4). CPCL 99-1401 had significantly higher TS/H yields than all clones except CP 02-1564 and CPCL 99-1777 (table 5). CP 02-1564, CPCL 99-1777, and CP 89-2143 had similar preharvest KS/T yields (table 3), but each new clone had significantly less harvest KS/T than CP 89-2143 (table 4).

CPCL 99-4455 had significantly higher preharvest KS/T than all clones in this group (table 3). The harvest KS/T of CPCL 99-4455 was also high, although not significantly different from the harvest KS/T yields of CPCL 99-1401, CPCL 99-2574, CP 72-2086, and CP 89-2413 (table 4). The TC/H yield of CP 02-1143 was significantly higher than that of CP 89-2143 (table 2), and these two clones had similar yields of TS/H (table 5). However, both the harvest and preharvest yields of KS/T of CP 02-1143 were significantly lower than those of CP 89-2143 (tables 3–4).

Sugarcane in Florida is propagated by planting stem sections (referred to as seed cane) from which axillary buds emerge. The Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., has begun increasing seed cane of CPCL 99-1401, CPCL 99-2574, CPCL 99-4455, and CP 02-1143 (table 1). As seed cane of these clones is increased, more disease testing will be conducted. There is particular concern regarding the undetermined susceptibility of CPCL 99-1401 to brown rust and orange rust, and its susceptibility to leaf scald; the low level of susceptibility of CPCL 99-2574 to brown rust, orange rust, and leaf scald; the susceptibility of CPCL 99-4455 to smut and its low level of susceptibility to leaf scald; and the low level of susceptibility of CP 02-1143 to orange rust and leaf scald. Of these new clones that are undergoing seed cane increases, only CPCL 99-4455 is currently resistant to brown rust and orange rust. CP 89-2143 is considered a commercial cultivar in Florida with excellent

7

freeze tolerance because it sustains its juice quality well after exposure to moderate freezes. CPCL 99-2574 had excellent freeze tolerance (table 18). CPCL 99-1401 had mediocre freeze tolerance, CP 02-1401 had poor freeze tolerance, and the freeze tolerance of CPCL 99-4455 was not tested. The fiber contents of CPCL 99-1401, CPCL 99-2574, CPCL 99-4455, and CP 02-1564 were 10.67, 11.99, 10.37, and 9.70 percent, respectively (table 1). CP 02-1564 and CPCL 99-1777 were not increased due to concerns regarding their reactions to brown rust and orange rust.

Plant-Cane Crop, CP 01 Series

Last year’s report contained the results from eight locations of the CP 01 series plant-cane crop. This year, plant-cane results are available from two additional locations (tables 6–7). No new clone had significantly higher mean yields of TC/H, harvest KS/T, or TS/H, than CP 89-2143. Similarly, no new clone had significantly higher yields of TCH, harvest KS/T, or TS/H than CP 89-2143 at Eastgate. However, the TS/H yield of CP 89-2143 was significantly lower than the TS/H yields of nine new clones in the successive planting at Okeelanta. Therefore, the new clones at Okeelanta were also compared with CP 78-1628 and no new clone had a significantly higher yield of TS/H than CP 78-1628.

First-Ratoon Crop, CP 01 Series

When averaged across all seven farms, four new clones—CP 01-1372, CP 01-2390, CP 01-1338, and CP 01-1378—yielded significantly more TC/H and TS/H than CP 89-2143 (tables 8 and 10). The KS/T yields of CP 01-1372, CP 01-2390, CP 01-1378, and CP 89-2143 were similar (table 9). However, the KS/T of CP 01-1338 was significantly lower than that of CP 89-2143. CP 01-1372 had consistently high yields of TC/H, KS/T, and TS/H at all locations on both muck and sand soils and also had high yields as plant cane last year (Glaz et al. 2007a).

Last year and again this year, CP 01-1338 and CP 01-2390 have not been considered as potential

commercial cultivars. Along with its unacceptable yield of KS/T, CP 01-1338 was considered too susceptible to leaf scald (table 1) (Glaz et al. 2007a). CP 01-2390 was too susceptible to smut. Last year, CP 01-1378 was being increased for potential commercial use on Florida’s muck soils, but due to its severe susceptibility to brown rust, orange rust, leaf scald, and mosaic, it is no longer being considered as a commercial candidate. The Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., has initiated its second year of seed-cane increase of CP 01-1372 at all stage IV locations. The freeze tolerance of CP 01-1372 was excellent (table 19). Currently, CP 01-1372 has no major disease concerns, and it has a fiber content of 9.45 percent (table 1).

First-Ratoon Crop, CP 00 Series

Information for the first-ratoon crop of the CP 00 series was only collected at Eastgate this year (table 11). No new clone yielded significantly more TC/H, KS/T, or TS/H than CP 89-2143.

Second-Ratoon Crop, CP 00 Series

When averaged across all nine locations, CP 00-1630 yielded significantly more KS/T than CP 89-2143 (table 13). However, the TC/H and TS/H yields of CP 00-1630 were significantly lower than those of CP 89-2143 (tables 12 and 14). Three new clones—CP 00-1100, CP 00-1101, and CP 00-1748—had yields of TC/H and TS/H that were similar to those of CP 89-2143. However, CP 00-1100 was too susceptible to mosaic and CP 00-1748 was too susceptible to brown rust and mosaic for commercial production in Florida. CP 00-1101 and CP 00-1630 had high yields of KS/T, TC/H, and TS/H in the plant-cane (Glaz et al. 2007b) and first-ratoon crops (Glaz et al. 2007a). CP 00-1101 was released for commercial production in Florida in October 2007. CP 00-1101 had excellent freeze tolerance (table 18). CP 00-1101 was resistant to all major diseases and had a fiber content of 10.15 percent. CP 00-1630 was not released due to its low TC/H yields in the first-ratoon crop.

8

CP 00-1446 and CP 00-2180 were also released in October 2007 and recommended primarily for sand soils in Florida. Yields of CP 00-1446 were inconsistent at the three locations with sand soils. At Hilliard, CP 00-1446 and CP 78-1628 had similar yields of KS/T (table 13) and CP 00-1446 had significantly higher yields of TC/H and TS/H than CP 78-1628 (tables 12 and 14). CP 00-1446 and CP 78-1628 had similar yields of TC/H, KS/T, and TS/H at Townsite (tables 12–14). The TC/H yields of CP 00-1446 and CP 78-1628 were similar at Lykes, but CP 78-1628 had significantly higher yields of KS/T and TS/H than CP 00-1446 at Lykes. CP 00-2180 and CP 78-1628 had similar TC/H, KS/T, and TS/H yields at the three sand locations except that the KS/T of CP 00-2180 at Lykes was significantly lower than that of CP 78-1628. CP 00-1446 and CP 00-2180 had high yields of TC/H and TS/H in the plant-cane (Glaz et al. 2007b) and first-ratoon crops (Glaz et al. 2007a). The susceptibility of CP 00-1446 to smut, brown rust, and leaf scald was undetermined; and, it had low levels of susceptibility to orange rust and mosaic. CP 00-2180 had low levels of susceptibility to brown rust and leaf scald. CP 00-1446 and CP 00-2180 had poor freeze tolerance (table 18). CP 00-1446 and CP 00-2180 had fiber contents of 8.86 and 9.46 percent, respectively (table 1).

Second-Ratoon Crop, CP 99 Series

Two new clones—CP 99-1893 and CP 99-1894—had significantly higher mean TC/H and TS/H yields than CP 89-2143, combined across both locations, in the successively planted experiment at Okeelanta and the experiment on Torry muck at Eastgate (table 15). Both new clones and CP 89-2143 had similar KS/T yields. However, both genotypes were not considered for commercial release in Florida due to concerns regarding susceptibility to leaf scald and brown rust. Both clones had high yields as plant-cane (Glaz et al. 2005), first-ratoon (Glaz et al. 2007b), and second-ratoon crops (Glaz et al. 2007a).

Second-Ratoon Crop, Sand Soils, CPCL 96–97 Series

No new CPCL clone on the sand soils at Benbow and Townsite had a significantly higher mean yield of KS/T or TS/H than CP 89-2143 (table 16). However, the Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., is increasing seed cane of two clones from this group—CPCL 97-2730 and CPCL 96-0860—for potential release at locations with sand soils (table 1). The mean TC/H yield of CPCL 97-2730 was higher than that of CP 89-2143, otherwise both of these clones had mean KS/T, TC/H, and TS/H yields similar to those of CP 89-2143. CPCL 96-0860 is susceptible to brown rust and orange rust, and CPCL 97-2730 had a low level of susceptibility to leaf scald. The fiber contents of CPCL 96-0860 and CPCL 97-2730 were 11.48 and 9.52 percent, respectively.

Second-Ratoon Crop, Muck Soils, CPCL 96 Series

CPCL 96-2061 and CP 89-2143 had similar yields of TC/H and TS/H across both locations with muck soils (table 17). However, the mean KS/T of CP 89-2143 was significantly higher than that of CPCL 96-2061. Seed cane of CPCL 96-2061 is being increased at locations with muck soils for potential release (table 1). Currently, CPCL 96-2061 has no major disease concerns, and it has a fiber content of 10.33 percent.

Summary

The CP 02 and CPCL 99 series were tested for the first time this year at eight locations in stage IV. CPCL 99-1401 and CPCL 99-2574 had high KS/T, TC/H, and TS/H yields. CPCL 99-4455 had high preharvest and harvest KS/T yields and CP 02-1143 had high yields of TC/H. Seed cane of these four new clones is being expanded by the Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., for potential commercial release in Florida. CP 02-1564 and CPCL 99-1777 had high yields of TC/H and TS/H, but seed cane of these clones is not being expanded due to disease concerns.

9

The CP 01 series was tested at two locations in the plant-cane crop and eight locations in the first-ratoon crop this year and at eight locations in the plant-cane crop last year. CP 01-1372 had high TS/H, TC/H, and harvest KS/T yields and seed cane of CP 01-1372 is being expanded by the Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., for potential commercial release in Florida. CP 01-2390, CP 01-1338, and CP 01-1378 also had high TC/H and TS/H yields, but seed cane of these new clones is not being expanded due to disease concerns.

The CP 00 series was tested at one location in the first-ratoon crop and nine locations in the second-ratoon crop this year, at two locations in the plant-cane crop and nine locations in the first-ratoon crop last year, and at nine locations in the plant-cane crop 2 years ago. Based on results reported here and the previous two reports of this series, CP 00-1101 was released and recommended for all soils on which sugarcane is grown in Florida, and CP 00-1446 and CP 00-2180 were released and recommended for sand soils in Florida. High-yielding clones not released due to disease concerns were CP 00-1100, CP 00-1748, and CP 00-1751.

Stage IV testing of the CP 99 series was completed this year with two second-ratoon experiments. Previous testing of these clones included 2 years and 11 locations as plant cane, 2 years and 9 locations as first ratoon, and 8 locations as second ratoon last year. No new clones were released from this group. CP 99-1893 and CP 99-1894 had high plant-cane, first-ratoon, and second-ratoon yields but were not released due to disease concerns.

CPCL clones were tested at four locations in the second-ratoon crop this year, at five locations in the first-ratoon crop last year, and at five locations in the plant-cane crop 2 years ago. Seed cane of CPCL 96-0860 and CPCL 97-2730 is being increased by the Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., for potential commercial release and use on sand soils in Florida. Seed cane of CPCL 96-2061 is being expanded for potential release and use on muck soils in Florida.

References

Comstock, J.C., J.M. Shine, Jr., P.Y.P. Tai, and J.D. Miller. 2001. Breeding for ratoon stunting disease resistance: Is it both possible and effective? In International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists: Proceedings of the XXIV Congress, vol. 2, September 17–21, 2001, pp. 471–476. Brisbane, Australia.

Deren, C.W. 1995. Genetic base of U.S. mainland sugarcane. Crop Science 35:1195–1199.

Deren, C.W., J. Alvarez, and B. Glaz. 1995. Use of economic criteria for selecting clones in a sugarcane breeding program. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 21:2, March 5–14, 1992, pp. 437–447. Bangkok, Thailand.

Glaz, B. 2007. Sugarcane variety census: Florida 2006. Sugar Journal 70(4):11–15, 18–21.

Glaz, B., J. Alvarez, and J.D. Miller. 1986. Analysis of cultivar-use options with sugarcane as influenced by threats of new pests. Agronomy Journal 78:503–506.

Glaz, B., J.C. Comstock, et al. 2005. Evaluation of new Canal Point sugarcane clones: 2003–2004 harvest season. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ARS-161.

Glaz, B., R.W. Davidson, et al. 2007a. Evaluation of new Canal Point sugarcane clones: 2005–2006 harvest season. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ARS-167.

Glaz, B., S.B. Milligan, et al. 2007b. Evaluation of new Canal Point sugarcane clones: 2004–2005 harvest season. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ARS-166.

Glaz, B., and J.L. Dean. 1988. Statistical error rates and their implications in sugarcane clone trials. Agronomy Journal 80:560–562.

10

Legendre, B.L. 1992. The core/press method for predicting the sugar yield from cane for use in cane payment. Sugar Journal 54(9):2–7.

Lockhart, B.E.L., M.J. Irey, and J.C. Comstock. 1996. Sugarcane bacilliform virus, sugarcane mild mosaic virus and sugarcane yellow leaf syndrome. In B.J. Croft, C.M. Piggin, E.S. Wallis, and D.M. Hogarth, eds., Sugarcane Germplasm Conservation and Exchange, pp. 108–112. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia, Proceedings No. 67.

Rice, R.W., R.A. Gilbert, and S.H. Daroub. 2002. Application of the soil taxonomy key to the organic soils of the Everglades Agricultural Area. Agronomy Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, SS‑AGR‑246. Available online at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/AG151 (May 2002, verified Sept. 9, 2002).

Tai, P.Y.P., and J.D. Miller. 1996. Selection for frost resistance in sugarcane. Sugar Cane 1996(3):13–18.

11

Tables

Notes (tables 2–17):

Clonal yields approximated by least squares (1. p = 0.10) within and across locations.

Location yields approximated by empirical linear unbiased predictors.2.

LSD3. = least significant difference.

CV4. = coefficient of variation.

Tab

le 1

. P

are

nta

ge, fi

ber

co

nte

nt,

in

cre

ase s

tatu

s, an

d r

ati

ng

s o

f su

scep

tib

ilit

y t

o s

mu

t, b

row

n r

ust,

ora

ng

e r

ust,

leaf

scald

, m

osaic

, an

d

RS

D f

or

CL

77

-07

97

, C

P 7

2-2

08

6, C

P 7

8-1

62

8,

CP

89

-21

43

, a

nd

80

new

su

ga

rca

ne

clo

nes

R

ati

ng∗

Pa

ren

tag

e

Inc

rea

se

P

erc

en

t

R

us

t L

ea

f

Ra

too

n

Clo

ne

Fem

ale

M

ale

s

tatu

sH

fib

er

Sm

ut

Bro

wn

O

ran

ge

s

ca

ld

Mo

sa

ic

stu

nti

ngI

C

L 7

7-0

79

7

CL 6

1-6

20

M

ix 7

5B

' C

om

me

rcia

l

11

.34

R

R

-

R

R

---

CP

72-2

086

CP

62-3

74

C

P 6

3-5

88

Co

mm

erc

ial

8

.97

R

R

L

R

S

R

C

P 7

8-1

628

CP

65-0

357 C

P 6

8-1

026

Co

mm

erc

ial

1

0.3

9

S

S

-

L

R

R

CP

89-2

143

CP

81-1

254

C

P 7

2-2

086

Co

mm

erc

ial

9

.85

R

R

R

L

L

L

C

P 9

9-1

534

C

P 8

9-2

377

C

P 8

9-1

75

6

No

ne

9.3

1

R

U

-

L

L

L

CP

99-1

540

CP

90-1

535

95 P

16'

No

ne

11

.28

L

S

-

R

L

R

CP

99-1

541

CP

90-1

535 95 P

16'

No

ne

8.5

8

R

R

-

R

R

R

CP

99-1

542

CP

90-1

535

95 P

16'

No

ne

11

.54

R

R

-

L

L

L

CP

99

-16

86

C

P 8

5-1

382

C

P 7

0-1

13

3

No

ne

10

.25

L

L

-

L

R

R

CP

99

-18

65

C

P 9

1-1

795

C

P 9

0-1

15

1

No

ne

9.3

7

L

L

-

L

R

R

CP

99

-18

89

C

P 8

7-1

475

C

P 7

2-1

21

0

No

ne

12

.75

S

S

-

L

R

L

CP

99

-18

93

C

P 8

7-1

475

C

P 7

2-1

21

0

No

ne

9.9

4

R

L

-

L

R

S

CP

99

-18

94

C

P 8

7-1

475

C

P 7

2-1

21

0

No

ne

11

.14

R

L

-

S

R

L

CP

99

-18

96

C

P 9

0-1

204

C

P 9

0-1

43

6

No

ne

10

.56

R

L

-

R

L

S

CP

99

-19

44

L

CP

86-4

54

U

nkn

ow

n

No

ne

10

.43

S

S

-

L

L

R

CP

99

-20

84

C

P 9

3-1

634

C

P 8

4-1

19

8

No

ne

10

.88

R

L

-

L

S

R

CP

99

-20

99

C

P 8

9-2

377

C

P 8

4-1

19

8

No

ne

10

.01

L

S

-

L

L

R

CP

99

-30

27

U

nkn

ow

n

U

nkn

ow

n

No

ne

11

.07

R

S

-

R

R

S

CP

00-1

074

CP

89-2

143 98 P

07'

No

ne

9.6

2

R

L

-

R

S

L

CP

00

-11

00

C

P 8

9-2

143

U

nkno

wn

N

one

8.5

4

R

R

R

R

S

R

C

P 0

0-1

101

C

P 8

9-2

143

C

P 8

9-2

14

3

Co

mm

erc

ial

1

0.1

5

R

R

R

R

R

R

C

P 0

0-1

252

C

P 9

0-1

424

C

P 9

2-1

167

N

one

9.7

6

R

S

-

U

R

R

CP

00

-13

01

C

P 7

5-1

632

C

P 8

9-2

14

3

No

ne

10

.74

R

S

R

U

U

S

C

P 0

0-1

302

C

P 7

5-1

632

C

P 8

9-2

14

3

No

ne

10

.52

R

L

-

L

R

R

CP

00

-14

46

C

P 9

3-1

607

C

P 9

1-1

15

0

Co

mm

erc

ial

8

.86

U

U

L

U

L

R

C

P 0

0-1

527

C

P 8

0-1

827

C

P 9

2-1

32

0

No

ne

8.9

6

R

L

-

R

S

S

CP

00

-16

30

C

P 9

2-1

167

C

P 9

2-1

32

0

No

ne

10

.19

R

L

R

U

U

S

C

P 0

0-1

748

C

P 8

1-1

238

C

P 8

9-1

50

9

No

ne

9.7

3

R

S

-

R

S

R

CP

00

-17

51

C

P 8

1-1

238

C

P 8

9-1

50

9

No

ne

8.9

2

R

S

-

L

L

R

CP

00

-21

64

U

S 9

5-1

063

U

S 9

5-1

12

7

No

ne

9.2

9

R

L

-

R

L

R

CP

00

-21

80

H

oC

P 9

1-5

52 H

oC

P 9

1-5

52

C

om

me

rcia

l

9.4

6

R

L

R

L

R

R

C

P 0

0-2

188

C

P 9

0-1

549

U

nkno

wn

N

one

8

.68

R

L

-

R

R

R

12

Tab

le 1

.—co

nti

nu

ed

. P

are

nta

ge, fi

ber

co

nte

nt,

in

cre

ase s

tatu

s, a

nd

rati

ng

s o

f su

scep

tib

ilit

y t

o s

mu

t, b

row

n r

ust,

ora

ng

e r

ust,

leaf

scald

, m

os

aic

, a

nd

RS

D f

or

CL

77

-07

97

, C

P 7

2-2

08

6, C

P 7

8-1

62

8, C

P 8

9-2

14

3, a

nd

80

new

su

ga

rca

ne

clo

nes

Ra

tin

g∗

P

are

nta

ge

Inc

rea

se

P

erc

en

t

R

us

t L

ea

f

Ra

too

n

Clo

ne

Fem

ale

M

ale

s

tatu

sH

fib

er

Sm

ut

Bro

wn

Ora

ng

e

sc

ald

M

os

aic

s

tun

tin

gI

C

P 0

1-1

178

C

P 8

4-1

198

C

P 8

2-1

17

2

No

ne

9

.97

R

U

R

L

L

R

C

P 0

1-1

338

C

P 9

4-1

200

C

P 8

9-2

14

3

No

ne

9

.00

R

L

-

S

L

R

CP

01

-13

72

C

P 9

4-1

200

C

P 8

9-2

14

3

All

9.4

5

L

R

R

L

L

R

CP

01-1

378

CP

94-1

200

C

P 8

9-2

143

None

10.4

8

R

S

S

S

S

S

CP

01-1

391

CP

81-1

384

C

P 9

4-1

528

None

8.6

2

R

R

- S

S

R

C

P 0

1-1

564

C

P 9

3-1

634

C

P 8

9-2

143

N

one

1

0.6

4

R

R

- L

U

R

C

P 0

1-1

957

CP

88-1

762 U

nknow

n

None

12.4

7

R

R

- S

R

S

C

P 0

1-2

056

C

P 8

9-2

143

U

nkn

ow

n

No

ne

1

0.5

5

L

R

- R

S

R

C

P 0

1-2

390

C

P 9

5-3

218

C

P 9

4-1

52

8

No

ne

9

.77

S

L

-

L

R

S

CP

01

-24

59

U

S 9

5-1

023

C

P 8

5-1

30

8

No

ne

1

1.3

2

L

L

R

S

S

L

CP

02-1

143

CP

93-1

382

C

P 9

2-1

666

All

10.8

0

R

R

L

L

S

R

CP

02-1

458

CP

85-1

382 C

P 8

0-1

743

None

11

.90

R

S

S

L

R

R

C

P 0

2-1

554

CP

92-1

561 C

P 9

4-2

059

None

12

.13

R

L

L

R

L

R

C

P 0

2-1

564

CP

94-1

528 C

P 7

2-2

086

None

9.7

0

R

L

L

L

L

S

CP

02-2

015

CP

85-1

491

C

P 8

0-1

743

None

11

.84

R

L

L

L

L

U

C

P 0

2-2

281

CP

94-1

200

C

P 9

2-1

167

None

11

.93

R

R

R

L

S

R

C

PC

L 9

6-0

860

CL

75-0

85

3

CL

78

-160

0

Sa

nd

11

.48

R

S

S

S

R

-

CP

CL

96

-20

61

C

L 8

3-3

576

Mix

91V

' M

uck

10

.33

R

R

R

R

R

-

CP

CL

97

-03

93

C

L 8

9-4

29

4

US

87

-100

6

No

ne

11

.99

L

L

R

R

S

-

CP

CL

97

-27

30

C

L 7

5-0

85

3

CL

88

-473

0

Sa

nd

9.5

2

R

R

R

L

R

- C

PC

L 9

9-1

225

C

L 8

7-2

60

8

CP

80

-174

3

No

ne

1

1.5

2

S

S

S

R

R

L

CP

CL

99

-14

01

C

L 7

4-0

25

9

CP

81

-123

8

All

10

.67

R

U

U

S

R

R

C

PC

L 9

9-1

777

C

L 8

3-3

58

6

CL

84

-423

4

No

ne

11

.05

R

S

S

R

R

R

C

PC

L 9

9-2

103

C

L 8

6-4

04

7

CL

84

-315

2

No

ne

11.9

9

S

S

S

R

S

S

CP

CL

99

-22

06

C

L 8

7-1

63

0

CP

80

-174

3

No

ne

9.6

6

R

S

S

S

R

S

CP

CL

99

-25

74

C

L 8

3-3

43

1

Mix

98

C

All

11

.99

R

L

L

L

R

R

C

PC

L 9

9-4

455

CL 9

0-4

64

3

CP

84-1

198

All

10.3

7

S

R

R

L

R

S

∗ R

= r

esis

tan

t en

ou

gh

fo

r co

mm

erc

ial p

rod

uctio

n;

L =

lo

w le

ve

ls o

f d

ise

ase

su

sce

ptib

ility

; S

= t

oo

su

sce

ptib

le f

or

pro

du

ctio

n;

U =

un

de

term

ine

d s

usce

ptib

ility

(a

va

ilab

le d

ata

no

t

s

uff

icie

nt

to d

ete

rmin

e t

he

le

ve

l o

f su

sce

ptib

ility

).

H C

om

me

rcia

l =

Re

lea

se

d f

or

co

mm

erc

ial p

rod

uctio

n;

No

ne

= N

ot

co

nsid

ere

d a

s p

ote

ntia

l re

lea

se

ca

nd

ida

te;

Oth

erw

ise

, in

cre

asin

g a

cre

ag

e o

f se

ed

ca

ne

at

all

loca

tio

ns,

loca

tio

ns

w

ith

sa

nd

so

ils o

nly

, o

r lo

ca

tio

ns w

ith

mu

ck s

oils

on

ly.

I R

SD

ca

n b

e c

on

tro

lled

by u

sin

g h

ea

t-tr

ea

ted

or

tissu

e-c

ultu

red

ve

ge

tative

pla

ntin

g m

ate

ria

l.

' M

ix 7

5b

an

d 9

5 P

8 r

efe

r to

po

lycro

sse

s.

In M

ix 7

5b

, fe

ma

le p

are

nt

(CL

61

-62

0)

exp

ose

d t

o p

olle

n f

rom

ma

ny c

lon

es,

an

d in

95

P 1

6 C

P 9

0-1

53

5 e

xp

ose

d t

o p

olle

n f

rom

ma

ny

c

lon

es in

19

95

cro

ssin

g s

ea

so

n; th

ere

fore

, m

ale

pa

ren

ts o

f C

L 7

7-0

79

7 a

nd

CP

99

-15

40

un

kn

ow

n.

Sim

ilar

exp

lan

atio

ns f

or

CP

99

-15

41,

CP

99-1

542,

CP

00-1

07

4,

CP

CL 9

6-

2

06

1 a

nd

CP

CL

99

-25

74

.

13

T

ab

le 2

. Y

ield

s o

f can

e in

metr

ic t

on

s p

er

hecta

re (

TC

/H)

fro

m p

lan

t can

e o

n L

au

derh

ill m

uck, P

ah

okee m

uck, M

ala

bar

san

d, an

d P

om

pan

o

fin

e s

an

d

Me

an

yie

ld b

y s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm, a

nd

sam

pli

ng

da

te

Po

mp

an

o

P

ah

ok

ee

M

ala

ba

r fi

ne

L

au

derh

ill m

uck

m

uck

san

d

san

d

E

sti

ma

ted

Kn

igh

t W

ed

gw

ort

h

Okeela

nta

S

FI

Du

da

Osceo

la

Hilliard

L

ykes

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

1

/9/0

7

1/1

1/0

7

1/1

7/0

7

1/1

8/0

7

1/2

4/0

7

1/8

/07

1

/22/0

7

12/1

2/0

6

all f

arm

s

CP

CL

99

-14

01

1

60

.64

1

84

.35

1

79

.44

2

35

.78

1

93

.93

1

90

.90

1

62

.34

2

01

.78

1

88

.74

* C

P 0

2-1

564

1

80

.68

2

15

.19

1

74

.93

2

12

.92

1

87

.03

2

01

.11

1

48

.53

1

68

.81

1

85

.82

* C

PC

L 9

9-1

777

1

63

.34

2

05

.78

1

80

.19

1

97

.66

2

07

.27

1

95

.84

1

37

.36

1

67

.19

1

81

.76

* C

P 0

2-2

015

1

55

.35

2

23

.26

2

01

.85

2

03

.10

2

08

.56

1

77

.74

1

47

.36

1

36

.81

1

81

.74

* C

P 0

2-1

143

1

32

.97

1

92

.20

1

71

.22

2

27

.26

2

07

.80

1

97

.84

1

13

.26

1

75

.03

1

77

.64

* C

PC

L 9

9-1

225

1

48

.67

1

97

.75

1

71

.94

2

10

.30

2

17

.31

1

61

.18

1

39

.84

1

53

.17

1

75

.26

* C

PC

L 9

9-2

574

1

38

.63

2

02

.59

1

67

.67

2

32

.67

1

98

.94

1

73

.97

1

24

.28

1

54

.07

1

74

.58

* C

PC

L 9

9-2

103

1

58

.29

1

93

.14

1

77

.42

2

01

.48

1

81

.87

1

90

.08

7

2.0

3

17

2.8

5

16

8.1

6

CP

78

-16

28

--

----

---

----

----

- 1

40

.18

--

----

--

17

0.1

7

18

1.0

9

15

2.7

8

16

0.4

0

16

6.2

0

CP

02

-15

54

1

42

.86

1

84

.42

1

62

.25

2

07

.23

1

58

.75

1

59

.86

1

46

.63

1

58

.28

1

65

.04

C

PC

L 9

9-2

206

1

32

.51

1

78

.39

1

62

.71

1

89

.63

1

64

.52

1

77

.65

1

34

.78

1

58

.07

1

62

.44

C

P 8

9-2

143

--

----

---

----

----

- 1

50

.28

1

75

.14

--

----

--

18

0.6

6

12

3.3

2

16

1.1

8

15

9.5

3

CP

02

-14

58

1

02

.81

1

88

.24

1

69

.76

2

03

.62

1

65

.48

1

52

.95

8

8.1

1

16

1.0

7

15

4.4

9

CP

02

-22

81

1

20

.40

1

54

.76

1

61

.16

1

88

.04

1

51

.90

1

70

.06

1

09

.43

1

65

.64

1

53

.04

C

P 7

2-2

086

1

32

.55

1

37

.02

1

59

.71

1

77

.77

1

87

.95

1

20

.48

--

----

--

15

2.0

8

14

6.7

1

CP

CL

99

-44

55

1

18

.87

1

68

.18

1

31

.83

1

69

.38

1

59

.55

1

51

.39

1

31

.80

1

32

.29

1

45

.50

Me

an

1

42

.04

1

87

.52

1

66

.41

2

02

.13

1

84

.07

1

73

.93

1

28

.79

1

61

.17

1

67

.92

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

2

9.5

5

24

.39

1

8.6

1

19

.32

2

5.2

2

27

.53

2

4.7

3

21

.73

13

.41

C

V (

%)

1

7.4

4

13

.50

1

1.6

2

9.9

3

14

.23

1

6.4

6

19

.58

1

4.0

2

1

4.3

6

* S

ign

ific

an

tly g

rea

ter

tha

n C

P 8

9-2

14

3 a

t p

= 0

.10

ba

se

d o

n t

te

st.

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f ca

ne

yie

ld =

13

.51

TC

/H a

t p

= 0

.10

.

14

Ta

ble

3. P

reh

arv

es

t yie

lds

of

theo

reti

ca

l re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o

su

gar

in k

g p

er

metr

ic t

on

of

can

e (

KS

/T)

fro

m p

lan

t can

e o

n L

au

derh

ill m

uck,

Pah

okee m

uck, M

ala

bar

san

d, an

d P

om

pan

o f

ine s

an

d

Me

an

yie

ld b

y s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm, a

nd

sam

pli

ng

da

te

Po

mp

an

o

P

ah

ok

ee

M

ala

ba

r fi

ne

L

au

derh

ill m

uck

m

uck

san

d

san

d

E

sti

ma

ted

Kn

igh

t W

ed

gw

ort

h

Okeela

nta

S

FI

Du

da

Osceo

la

Hilliard

L

ykes

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

1

/9/0

7

1/1

1/0

7

1/1

7/0

7

1/1

8/0

7

1/8

/07

1/2

2/0

7

12/1

2/0

6

all f

arm

s

CP

CL

99

-44

55

1

25

.8

11

8.0

1

21

.9

11

9.6

1

15

.4

11

4.6

1

31

.4

13

4.0

1

21

.0*

CP

89

-21

43

--

----

- --

----

- 1

09

.3

11

3.5

--

----

9

3.3

1

40

.4

12

1.6

1

11

.9

CP

72

-20

86

1

13

.7

11

0.4

1

00

.6

10

7.8

8

7.8

8

9.1

--

----

- 1

19

.0

10

8.4

C

PC

L 9

9-1

777

1

12

.8

10

3.0

9

5.4

1

16

.0

87

.2

88

.9

14

0.4

1

13

.6

10

7.4

C

PC

L 9

9-2

103

1

06

.4

81

.3

10

6.0

1

13

.9

98

.5

93

.9

13

9.4

1

08

.0

10

6.2

C

PC

L 9

9-2

574

9

8.3

9

5.4

1

00

.9

10

7.3

8

9.9

9

2.2

1

41

.2

11

5.9

1

06

.1

CP

02

-15

64

1

12

.6

95

.6

93

.8

10

8.9

9

1.4

8

4.1

1

37

.6

11

9.6

1

05

.6

CP

CL

99

-12

25

1

12

.8

94

.4

90

.6

10

5.1

8

9.4

8

4.1

1

38

.5

10

3.2

1

03

.0

CP

02

-22

81

1

00

.1

91

.1

94

.1

11

1.6

9

6.1

9

1.5

1

25

.1

11

6.1

1

02

.7

CP

02

-14

58

1

14

.3

90

.7

98

.7

10

4.6

8

4.7

8

1.1

1

31

.2

11

3.6

1

02

.2

CP

CL

99

-14

01

1

18

.2

82

.8

81

.4

96

.0

80

.4

86

.2

14

6.4

1

17

.9

10

2.0

C

PC

L 9

9-2

206

1

12

.9

94

.3

93

.3

10

0.2

8

5.2

7

5.6

1

32

.9

11

6.9

1

01

.5

CP

02

-15

54

1

00

.2

95

.9

89

.5

93

.3

83

.3

96

.7

13

3.8

1

13

.0

10

0.9

C

P 7

8-1

628

--

----

- --

----

- 9

2.5

--

----

- 8

7.3

8

2.7

1

36

.4

10

2.6

1

00

.7

CP

02

-11

43

1

03

.8

11

0.4

9

2.1

1

06

.7

79

.4

79

.1

12

9.2

1

02

.6

10

0.3

C

P 0

2-2

015

1

06

.2

87

.8

95

.3

94

.6

87

.1

78

.0

12

6.7

1

13

.0

98

.7

Me

an

1

09

.9

96

.5

97

.2

10

6.6

8

9.5

8

8.2

1

35

.4

11

4.4

1

04

.9

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

12

.5

12

.5

17

.2

15

.4

11

.1

13

.3

12

.2

11

.0

8.2

C

V (

%)

6.4

7

.3

10

.1

8.1

7.0

8.6

5.4

5.5

7.0

*

Sig

nific

an

tly g

rea

ter

tha

n C

P 8

9-2

14

3 a

t p

= 0

.10

ba

se

d o

n t

te

st.

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f su

ga

r yie

ld =

4.2

KS

/T a

t p

= 0

.10

.

15

Tab

le 4

. Y

ield

s o

f th

eo

reti

cal re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o s

ug

ar

in k

g p

er

metr

ic t

on

of

can

e (

KS

/T)

fro

m p

lan

t can

e o

n L

au

derh

ill m

uck, P

ah

okee m

uck,

Mala

bar

san

d, an

d P

om

pan

o f

ine s

an

d

Me

an

yie

ld b

y s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm, a

nd

sam

pli

ng

da

te

Po

mp

an

o

P

ah

ok

ee

M

ala

ba

r fi

ne

L

au

derh

ill m

uck

m

uck

san

d

san

d

E

sti

ma

ted

Kn

igh

t W

ed

gw

ort

h

Okeela

nta

S

FI

Du

da

Osceo

la

Hilliard

L

ykes

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

1

/9/0

7

1/1

1/0

7

1/1

7/0

7

1/1

8/0

7

1/2

4/0

7

1/8

/07

1

/22/0

7

12/1

2/0

6

all f

arm

s

CP

CL

99

-14

01

1

23

.6

12

7.0

1

25

.8

12

6.4

1

24

.4

12

1.3

1

46

.4

13

4.8

1

28

.5*

CP

CL

99

-25

74

1

20

.5

12

4.7

1

31

.0

12

4.7

1

27

.3

11

8.4

1

41

.2

13

4.5

1

27

.7

CP

CL

99

-44

55

1

19

.4

12

6.1

1

29

.9

12

4.3

1

28

.6

12

3.5

1

31

.4

13

5.9

1

27

.4

CP

72

-20

86

1

19

.3P

1

20

.6

13

2.6

1

23

.0

12

8.8

1

21

.0

----

---

13

0.4

1

26

.9

CP

89

-21

43

--

----

- --

----

-

13

0.3

1

17

.3

----

---

1

19

.6

14

0.4

1

33

.9

12

5.8

C

PC

L 9

9-2

103

1

17

.7

12

1.4

1

30

.3

11

9.1

1

25

.5

11

4.7

1

39

.4

13

3.6

1

25

.2

CP

CL

99

-17

77

1

18

.3

12

0.7

1

26

.6

11

8.8

1

21

.6

11

4.7

1

40

.4

13

4.8

1

24

.4

CP

78

-16

28

--

----

- --

----

-

12

5.3

--

----

- 1

25

.4

11

5.6

1

36

.4

12

7.4

1

22

.7

CP

02

-15

64

1

13

.1

11

9.1

1

22

.7

11

2.7

1

20

.9

11

3.7

1

37

.6

13

7.1

1

22

.1

CP

CL

99

-12

25

1

07

.1

12

1.0

1

27

.0

12

1.2

1

20

.1

11

1.1

1

38

.5

12

9.1

1

22

.0

CP

CL

99

-22

06

1

08

.4

11

6.6

1

26

.7

11

7.6

1

21

.6

11

4.8

1

32

.9

12

7.9

1

20

.9

CP

02

-11

43

1

11

.8

11

5.4

1

24

.1

11

8.5

1

19

.9

11

1.8

1

29

.2

12

9.1

1

20

.0

CP

02

-14

58

1

10

.1

11

5.9

1

19

.4

11

7.8

1

19

.7

10

7.1

1

31

.2

12

2.7

1

18

.0

CP

02

-15

54

1

09

.1

11

0.3

1

21

.9

11

0.4

1

16

.8

11

1.6

1

33

.8

12

7.2

1

17

.6

CP

02

-22

81

1

03

.9

11

3.2

1

17

.5

11

2.4

1

21

.2

11

6.6

1

25

.1

12

7.6

1

17

.3

CP

02

-20

15

1

08

.4

10

6.4

1

16

.8

10

8.7

1

11

.2

10

4.0

1

26

.7

11

8.0

1

12

.4

Me

an

1

13

.6

11

8.5

1

25

.5

11

8.2

1

22

.2

11

5.0

1

35

.4

13

0.2

1

22

.4

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

5.3

5

.1

4.5

4

.6

4.5

5

.1

7.1

3

.5

2.4

C

V (

%)

3.9

4

.5

3.7

4

.1

3.8

4.6

5.4

2.8

4.2

*

Sig

nific

an

tly g

rea

ter

tha

n C

P 8

9-2

14

3 a

t p

= 0

.10

ba

se

d o

n t

te

st.

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f su

ga

r yie

ld =

2.5

2 K

S/T

at

p =

0.1

0.

16

Tab

le 5

. Y

ield

s o

f th

eo

reti

cal re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o s

ug

ar

in m

etr

ic t

on

s p

er

hecta

re (

TS

/H)

fro

m p

lan

t can

e o

n L

au

derh

ill m

uck, P

ah

okee

mu

ck, M

ala

ba

r san

d, an

d P

om

pan

o f

ine s

an

d

M

ea

n y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm, a

nd

sam

pli

ng

da

te

Po

mp

an

o

P

ah

ok

ee

M

ala

ba

r fi

ne

L

au

derh

ill m

uck

m

uck

san

d

san

d

E

sti

ma

ted

Kn

igh

t W

ed

gw

ort

h

Okeela

nta

S

FI

Du

da

Osceo

la

Hilliard

L

ykes

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

1

/9/0

7

1/1

1/0

7

1/1

7/0

7

1/1

8/0

7

1/2

4/0

7

1/8

/07

1

/22/0

7

12/1

2/0

6

all f

arm

s

CP

CL

99

-14

01

1

9.8

31

2

3.3

87

2

2.7

79

2

9.8

03

2

3.9

67

2

3.2

41

2

3.7

74

2

7.2

43

2

4.2

62

* C

P 0

2-1

564

2

0.4

59

2

5.5

72

2

1.5

80

2

4.0

63

2

2.6

21

2

2.9

35

2

0.4

48

2

3.1

87

2

2.5

83

* C

PC

L 9

9-1

777

1

9.4

17

2

4.8

25

2

2.8

11

2

3.5

25

2

5.1

89

2

2.6

10

1

9.2

30

2

2.5

51

2

2.5

14

* C

PC

L 9

9-2

574

1

6.6

13

2

5.3

10

2

2.0

14

2

9.3

27

2

5.3

30

2

0.6

87

1

7.4

77

2

0.7

12

2

2.2

19

* C

PC

L 9

9-1

225

1

6.0

92

2

4.2

05

2

1.8

62

2

5.4

59

2

6.1

15

1

7.9

30

1

9.3

45

1

9.7

74

2

1.3

94

C

P 0

2-1

143

1

4.9

17

2

2.1

82

2

1.2

12

2

6.9

15

2

4.9

06

2

2.0

95

1

4.6

38

2

2.6

37

2

1.2

44

C

PC

L 9

9-2

103

1

8.6

11

2

3.4

01

2

3.1

19

2

3.9

87

2

2.5

78

2

1.7

09

9

.93

3

23

.12

2

20

.78

5

CP

78

-16

28

--

----

--

----

----

1

7.5

60

--

----

--

22

.11

2

21

.07

6

20

.82

3

20

.40

2

20

.53

0

CP

02

-20

15

1

6.8

90

2

3.7

60

2

3.5

80

2

2.0

26

2

3.9

66

1

8.5

05

1

8.6

88

1

6.1

64

2

0.4

30

C

P 8

9-2

143

--

----

--

----

----

1

9.5

57

2

0.5

58

--

----

--

21

.64

8

17

.32

3

21

.65

0

19

.98

1

CP

CL

99

-22

06

1

4.3

82

2

0.8

10

2

0.9

87

2

2.2

78

2

0.0

13

2

0.4

58

1

7.9

26

2

0.2

97

1

9.6

67

C

P 0

2-1

554

1

5.6

08

2

0.2

33

1

9.7

91

2

2.8

61

1

8.5

05

1

7.8

34

1

9.6

09

2

0.1

62

1

9.3

31

C

P 7

2-2

086

1

4.6

82

1

6.6

09

2

1.1

56

2

1.9

77

2

4.2

24

1

4.5

10

--

----

--

19

.77

1

18

.55

2

CP

CL

99

-44

55

1

4.1

76

2

1.1

42

1

7.1

05

2

1.0

61

2

0.2

48

1

8.6

67

1

7.2

95

1

7.9

85

1

8.4

93

C

P 0

2-1

458

1

1.3

52

2

1.7

66

2

0.2

80

2

3.9

91

1

9.8

07

1

6.3

91

1

1.6

40

1

9.6

48

1

8.1

69

C

P 0

2-2

281

1

2.5

23

1

7.5

21

1

8.9

25

2

1.1

24

1

8.4

32

1

9.8

80

1

4.7

23

2

1.1

81

1

8.0

94

Me

an

1

6.1

11

2

2.1

95

2

0.8

95

2

3.9

30

2

2.5

34

2

0.0

11

1

7.5

25

2

1.0

30

2

0.5

16

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

3.5

54

3

.03

4

2.5

68

2

.43

2

3.3

08

3

.37

2

3.3

21

3

.01

3

1.7

57

C

V (

%)

18

.47

7

14

.18

8

12

.77

7

10

.55

7

15

.23

2

17

.52

3

19

.68

8

14

.89

3

15

.23

2

* S

ign

ific

an

tly g

rea

ter

tha

n C

P 8

9-2

14

3 a

t p

= 0

.10

ba

se

d o

n t

te

st.

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f su

ga

r yie

ld =

1.6

75

TS

/H a

t p

= 0

.10

.

17

Ta

ble

6. Y

ield

s o

f p

reh

arv

es

t a

nd

ha

rve

st

the

ore

tic

al re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o s

ug

ar

in k

g p

er

metr

ic t

on

of

ca

ne (

KS

/T)

fro

m p

lan

t can

e o

n

Lau

derh

ill m

uck a

nd

To

rry m

uck

P

reh

arv

es

t yie

ld b

y s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm,

H

arv

es

t yie

ld b

y s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm,

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

L

au

derh

ill

T

orr

y

Lau

derh

ill

T

orr

y

m

uck

m

uck

m

uck

m

uck

O

ke

ela

nta

Ea

stg

ate

Me

an

yie

ld,

O

ke

ela

nta

Ea

stg

ate

Me

an

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

1/2

9/0

7

2/1

/07

b

oth

farm

sH

1/2

9/0

7

2/1

/07

b

oth

farm

sH

C

P 0

1-1

321

8

9.2

1

09

.8

99

.5

13

4.1

1

24

.3

12

9.1

C

P 8

9-2

143

1

01

.4

10

8.1

1

04

.7

13

6.4

1

21

.5

12

8.8

C

P 0

1-1

205

1

07

.2

11

0.4

1

08

.8

12

9.8

1

26

.0

12

8.0

C

P 7

2-2

086

9

9.4

1

11

.3

10

5.4

1

31

.6

12

3.7

1

27

.6

CP

01

-11

78

1

08

.7

10

7.5

1

08

.1

13

0.4

1

24

.3

12

7.4

C

P 0

1-1

391

8

6.7

1

09

.3

98

.0

13

4.5

1

18

.0

12

6.0

C

P 0

1-1

378

8

9.5

1

08

.0

99

.7

13

3.2

1

19

.0

12

5.5

C

P 0

1-1

338

8

0.6

8

8.6

8

4.6

1

27

.6

12

3.0

1

25

.3

CP

01

-23

90

9

8.2

9

7.5

9

7.8

1

28

.2

12

2.4

1

25

.3

CP

01

-11

81

1

08

.7

11

9.8

1

14

.3

12

4.3

1

22

.6

12

3.6

C

P 0

1-2

056

9

0.3

9

6.9

9

3.6

1

24

.5

12

2.5

1

23

.6

CP

78

-16

28

9

3.4

1

10

.1

10

1.8

1

25

.3

11

8.6

1

22

.0

CP

01

-13

72

1

03

.9

11

0.6

1

07

.3

12

4.1

1

18

.2

12

1.2

C

P 0

1-2

459

9

3.3

1

01

.2

97

.2

12

0.2

1

17

.2

11

8.8

C

P 0

1-1

957

8

1.7

9

5.1

8

8.4

1

23

.7

11

0.4

1

16

.9

CP

01

-15

64

8

4.2

1

04

.8

94

.5

11

9.1

1

14

.6

11

6.7

M

ea

n

94

.8

10

5.6

1

00

.2

12

7.9

1

20

.4

12

4.1

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

10

.9

8.6

1

1.8

5

.0

5.4

1

4.1

C

V (

%)

6.5

4

.6

5.6

3

.7

4.6

4

.2

H

LS

D f

or

loca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f p

reh

arv

est

su

ga

r yie

ld =

2.6

KS

/T a

nd

of

ha

rve

st

yie

ld =

1.5

KS

/T a

t p

= 0

.10

.

18

Tab

le 7

. Y

ield

s o

f can

e a

nd

of

theo

reti

cal re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o s

ug

ar

in m

etr

ic t

on

s p

er

he

cta

re (

TC

/H a

nd

TS

/H)

fro

m p

lan

t c

an

e o

n D

an

ia

mu

ck a

nd

To

rry m

uck

C

an

e y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm,

S

ug

ar

yie

ld b

y s

oil t

yp

e,

farm

,

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

L

au

derh

ill

T

orr

y

Lau

derh

ill

T

orr

y

m

uck

m

uck

m

uck

m

uck

O

ke

ela

nta

Ea

stg

ate

Me

an

yie

ld,

O

ke

ela

nta

Ea

stg

ate

Me

an

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

1/2

9/0

7

2/1

/07

b

oth

farm

sH

1/2

9/0

7

2/1

/07

b

oth

farm

sH

C

P 0

1-1

178

1

22

.51

3

39

.15

2

33

.21

1

6.0

23

4

2.3

56

2

9.4

32

C

P 0

1-1

391

1

21

.93

3

42

.92

2

33

.37

1

6.4

08

4

0.4

82

2

8.5

29

C

P 0

1-1

321

1

28

.16

3

08

.77

2

18

.36

1

7.1

57

3

8.2

67

2

7.7

11

C

P 0

1-2

459

1

24

.07

3

37

.53

2

31

.55

1

4.9

38

3

9.7

31

2

7.4

39

C

P 0

1-1

378

1

30

.94

3

11

.98

2

21

.73

1

7.4

71

3

7.0

14

2

7.1

10

C

P 0

1-1

372

1

32

.75

3

18

.48

2

25

.65

1

6.4

98

3

7.6

79

2

7.0

94

C

P 0

1-1

564

1

36

.41

3

38

.56

2

37

.40

1

6.1

63

3

7.6

15

2

6.8

62

C

P 7

8-1

628

1

22

.61

3

24

.84

2

24

.18

1

5.3

63

3

7.9

24

2

6.6

62

C

P 0

1-1

205

9

9.1

7

31

4.6

0

20

7.6

8

12

.84

2

39

.51

6

26

.33

8

CP

01

-13

38

1

43

.40

2

75

.88

2

08

.31

1

8.2

73

3

3.9

15

2

5.9

36

C

P 0

1-2

390

1

45

.25

2

68

.55

2

05

.33

1

8.4

24

3

2.7

54

2

5.3

93

C

P 0

1-1

957

1

20

.88

3

19

.08

2

20

.33

1

4.8

72

3

5.3

19

2

5.0

76

C

P 8

9-2

143

92.1

6

307.0

2

20

0.3

7

12

.57

2

37

.25

7

25

.01

6

CP

01

-20

56

1

27

.10

2

63

.33

1

93

.98

1

5.8

56

3

2.0

54

2

3.8

13

C

P 7

2-2

086

8

2.8

1

29

4.3

8

18

9.3

0

10

.86

3

36

.41

8

23

.76

7

CP

80

-17

43

9

1.2

7

---

----

- 1

83

.03

1

2.1

08

--

----

--

22

.67

7

CP

01

-11

81

8

8.6

0

23

1.3

8

15

8.9

2

11

.02

2

28

.29

5

19

.54

7

M

ea

n

11

8.2

4

30

6.0

3

21

1.3

4

15

.10

9

36

.66

2

25

.78

8

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

19

.52

5

1.6

8

40

.78

2

.44

0

6.4

02

4

.72

1

CV

(%

) 1

5.6

1

17

.56

1

9.9

5

15

.27

3

18

.14

3

20

.05

0

H

LS

D f

or

loca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f ca

ne

yie

ld =

16

.12

TC

/H a

nd

of

su

ga

r yie

ld =

2.5

20

TS

/H a

t p

= 0

.10

. 19

Tab

le 8

. Y

ield

s o

f can

e in

metr

ic t

on

s p

er

hecta

re (

TC

/H)

fro

m f

irst-

rato

on

can

e o

n D

an

ia m

uck, L

au

derh

ill m

uck, M

ala

bar

san

d, a

nd

P

om

pan

o f

ine

san

d

M

ea

n y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm, a

nd

sam

pli

ng

da

te

Po

mp

an

o

D

an

ia m

uc

k

Lau

derh

ill m

uck

M

ala

bar

san

d

fi

ne

san

d

M

ea

n

O

ke

ela

nta

S

FI

Kn

igh

t D

ud

a

We

dg

wo

rth

H

illiard

Lykes

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

10

/26

/06

1

0/1

9/0

6

1

0/2

6/0

6

1

2/1

4/0

6

1

2/2

6/0

6

12/2

8/0

6

12/2

4/0

6

all f

arm

s

CP

01

-13

72

1

66

.26

22

4.7

8

15

4.5

8

22

2.4

1

20

8.4

6

1

57

.43

1

26

.98

1

80

.13

*

CP

01

-23

90

1

36

.32

20

3.7

7

16

2.9

2

20

6.4

8

19

1.7

7

1

62

.87

1

22

.08

1

69

.46

*

CP

01

-13

38

1

62

.16

23

9.5

5

88

.21

2

14

.61

1

91

.38

----

----

112.3

9

165.4

3*

CP

01

-13

78

1

41

.84

16

9.7

0

19

6.9

4

21

6.3

4

20

0.1

5

1

19

.66

1

14

.78

1

65

.24

*

CP

01

-19

57

1

47

.57

19

5.6

0

15

7.9

1

21

4.5

0

19

8.5

0

1

24

.13

5

2.8

3

15

6.3

4*

CP

78

-16

28

1

25

.45

----

----

----

---

2

01

.68

--

----

--

1

49

.22

9

6.6

0

15

2.8

6*

CP

01

-15

64

1

66

.54

16

6.3

3

12

6.7

0

18

7.4

9

19

9.2

3

1

35

.58

8

6.4

0

15

2.5

9*

CP

01

-20

56

1

43

.78

15

2.3

8

16

5.1

7

17

9.6

2

16

3.5

3

1

10

.90

7

2.6

8

14

1.1

5

CP

01

-24

59

1

38

.00

15

2.3

3

13

3.0

1

16

2.2

2

14

9.9

4

1

15

.73

9

7.1

8

13

5.6

7

CP

01

-13

21

1

18

.69

15

5.7

3

11

0.1

1

16

1.9

3

17

6.4

0

1

18

.18

9

6.5

0

13

3.9

4

CP

01

-13

91

1

21

.52

15

2.2

8

10

3.8

6

13

8.9

8

19

7.4

6

1

09

.46

8

8.4

3

13

0.4

5

CP

89

-21

43

1

04

.34

16

0.9

3

----

---

1

62

.38

--

----

--

1

20

.85

8

6.5

6

13

0.2

0

CP

01

-11

78

9

7.5

7

1

23

.80

8

9.8

6

12

8.5

0

14

8.6

6

1

22

.37

1

04

.47

1

16

.60

CP

01

-12

05

1

06

.39

12

7.6

7

93

.54

1

47

.00

1

38

.04

10

4.0

4

86

.16

1

14

.41

CP

72

-20

86

1

11

.04

11

9.7

2

92

.12

1

36

.16

1

48

.14

----

----

-

88.1

9

112.9

1

CP

01

-11

81

1

04

.45

11

5.3

0

87

.44

1

40

.33

1

21

.04

99

.04

9

6.2

9

10

8.4

2

Me

an

1

30

.75

16

3.9

9

12

5.8

8

17

6.2

9

17

3.7

6

1

24

.96

9

5.5

3

14

1.6

1

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

20

.83

26

.94

2

1.6

6

27

.84

2

4.6

6

1

8.2

3

19

.27

1

7.2

6

CV

(%

) 1

6.5

5

1

7.0

7

17

.85

1

6.4

2

14

.71

15

.09

2

0.9

6

17

.01

*

Sig

nific

an

tly g

rea

ter

tha

n C

P 8

9-2

14

3 a

t p

= 0

.10

ba

se

d o

n t

te

st.

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f ca

ne

yie

ld =

14

.26

TC

/H a

t p

= 0

.10

.

20

Tab

le 9

. Y

ield

s o

f th

eo

reti

cal re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o

su

gar

in k

g p

er

metr

ic t

on

of

can

e (

KS

/T)

fro

m f

irst-

rato

on

can

e o

n D

an

ia m

uck, L

au

derh

ill

mu

ck, M

ala

ba

r san

d, an

d P

om

pan

o f

ine s

an

d

Me

an

yie

ld b

y s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm, a

nd

sam

pli

ng

da

te

P

om

pan

o

Da

nia

mu

ck

Lau

derh

ill m

uck

M

ala

bar

san

d

fi

ne

san

d

M

ea

n

O

ke

ela

nta

S

FI

Kn

igh

t D

ud

a

We

dg

wo

rth

H

illiard

Lykes

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

10

/26

/06

1

0/1

9/0

6

1

0/2

6/0

6

1

2/1

4/0

6

1

2/2

6/0

6

12/2

8/0

6

12/2

4/0

6

all f

arm

s

CP

01

-11

81

1

23

.0

1

21

.8

10

3.4

1

14

.1

12

7.5

13

8.2

1

26

.6

12

2.0

CP

01

-11

78

1

17

.6

1

10

.7

10

6.3

1

19

.6

12

7.1

14

3.6

1

19

.1

12

0.6

CP

01

-13

72

1

15

.1

1

21

.2

11

0.4

1

13

.8

12

4.4

13

8.4

1

20

.4

12

0.5

CP

01

-12

05

1

14

.3

1

18

.3

10

6.1

1

06

.6

13

2.6

13

3.5

1

22

.8

11

9.5

CP

01

-13

78

1

13

.5

1

13

.5

11

8.3

1

10

.7

12

3.7

13

2.3

1

16

.6

11

8.2

CP

89

-21

43

1

13

.6

1

09

.1

--

----

- 1

14

.3

--

----

14

0.2

1

13

.7

11

7.1

CP

72

-20

86

1

13

.4

1

11

.1

10

0.5

1

18

.3

12

6.8

---

----

1

03

.4

11

5.7

CP

01

-23

90

1

11

.4

1

13

.7

10

2.4

1

11

.4

12

2.5

13

4.8

1

10

.1

11

5.2

CP

01

-24

59

1

15

.1

1

06

.4

10

0.6

1

09

.5

12

3.8

13

7.3

1

07

.4

11

4.3

CP

01

-13

21

1

15

.4

1

21

.7

77

.1

11

5.5

1

18

.1

1

38

.6

11

2.4

1

14

.1

CP

01

-20

56

1

06

.0

1

06

.8

98

.8

10

4.5

1

24

.0

1

33

.6

11

0.7

1

12

.1

CP

01

-15

64

1

10

.2

1

02

.7

93

.4

10

3.7

1

23

.8

1

31

.8

11

6.6

1

11

.8

CP

78

-16

28

1

10

.3

-

----

---

---

----

1

09

.0

--

----

12

6.2

1

07

.3

11

0.8

CP

01

-13

91

9

9.6

10

7.1

1

00

.8

10

1.5

1

22

.6

1

33

.4

10

8.6

1

10

.1

CP

01

-13

38

9

7.3

95

.6

94

.2

11

4.8

1

14

.0

---

----

9

9.3

1

05

.9

CP

01

-19

57

9

2.6

91

.5

86

.3

10

8.8

1

17

.8

1

31

.4

86

.3

10

1.7

Me

an

1

10

.5

1

10

.1

99

.9

11

1.0

1

23

.5

1

35

.2

11

1.3

1

14

.3

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

8.1

10

.0

7.5

7

.0

6.9

9.9

6.8

5.1

CV

(%

) 7

.6

9.4

7.8

6.6

5.8

7.6

6.3

7.4

H

LS

D f

or

loca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f su

ga

r yie

ld =

2.3

KS

/T a

t p

= 0

.10

.

21

Tab

le 1

0. Y

ield

s o

f th

eo

reti

cal re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o s

ug

ar

in m

etr

ic t

on

s p

er

hecta

re (

TS

/H)

fro

m f

irst-

rato

on

can

e o

n D

an

ia m

uck, L

au

derh

ill

mu

ck, M

ala

ba

r san

d, an

d P

om

pan

o f

ine s

an

d

M

ea

n y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm, a

nd

sam

pli

ng

da

te

P

om

pan

o

Ma

lab

ar

fin

e

D

an

ia m

uc

k

Lau

derh

ill m

uck

sa

nd

sa

nd

M

ea

n

O

ke

ela

nta

S

FI

Kn

igh

t D

ud

a

We

dg

wo

rth

H

illiard

Lykes

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

10

/26

/06

1

0/1

9/0

6

1

0/2

6/0

6

1

2/1

4/0

6

1

2/2

6/0

6

12/2

8/0

6

12/2

4/0

6

all f

arm

s

CP

01

-13

72

1

6.3

06

2

7.2

21

1

7.2

12

2

5.2

87

2

6.0

28

21

.70

9

15

.25

9

21

.28

9*

CP

01-2

390

12.8

19

2

3.2

38

16.7

90

2

2.9

05

2

3.3

57

21

.98

5

13

.43

0

19

.21

8*

CP

01-1

378

13.7

32

1

9.3

58

23.3

04

2

3.8

30

2

4.6

97

15

.86

7

13

.40

2

19

.09

8*

CP

01

-13

38

1

3.1

26

2

2.9

85

8

.27

7

24

.58

2

21

.82

2

--

----

---

11

.12

0

17

.14

0*

CP

78

-16

28

1

1.9

32

-

----

----

-

----

----

2

1.9

79

-

----

----

19

.17

3

10

.40

4

16

.92

3

CP

01-1

564

15.1

07

1

7.5

49

11.9

58

1

9.4

36

2

4.6

09

17

.84

8

10

.13

9

16

.67

2

CP

01-1

957

11.6

61

1

7.9

83

13.5

28

2

3.2

65

2

3.5

43

16

.76

8

4.5

78

1

5.9

27

C

P 0

1-1

321

13.7

35

1

8.9

67

8.4

55

1

8.5

82

2

0.9

77

16

.15

3

10

.83

0

15

.38

5

CP

01-2

056

12.6

37

1

6.3

22

16.1

90

1

8.8

92

2

0.2

93

14

.82

3

8.0

34

1

5.3

13

C

P 0

1-2

459

13.2

27

1

6.2

19

13.6

13

1

7.7

78

1

8.6

28

15

.86

4

10

.40

0

15

.12

8

CP

89

-21

43

1

0.4

54

1

7.5

77

-

----

----

1

8.6

29

--

----

---

1

6.8

69

9

.87

3

15

.10

7

CP

01-1

391

10.3

61

1

6.4

28

10.5

76

1

4.3

64

2

4.2

03

14

.47

9

9.4

59

1

4.2

98

C

P 0

1-1

178

11.5

78

1

3.9

72

9.6

28

1

5.4

71

1

8.9

44

17

.65

5

11

.88

1

14

.18

7

CP

01-1

205

11.7

61

1

5.2

48

10.0

01

1

5.7

94

1

8.3

14

13

.63

5

10

.60

9

13

.69

2

CP

01-1

181

12.8

76

1

4.0

96

9.1

06

1

6.0

32

1

5.4

24

13

.63

2

12

.16

2

13

.25

3

CP

72

-20

86

1

0.2

71

1

3.3

03

9

.34

0

16

.10

1

18

.78

4

---

----

- 9

.13

5

12

.93

9

Me

an

1

2.5

99

1

8.0

31

1

2.7

13

1

9.5

58

2

1.4

02

16

.89

0

10

.67

0

15

.97

3

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

3.4

92

3.7

50

2

.43

2

3.2

81

3

.33

5

2

.93

1

2.2

67

2

.03

5

CV

(%

) 2

8.8

29

2

1.6

10

1

9.8

44

1

7.4

43

1

6.1

57

17

.94

3

22

.07

1

20

.34

8

* S

ign

ific

an

tly g

rea

ter

tha

n C

P 8

9-2

14

3 a

t p

= 0

.10

ba

se

d o

n t

te

st.

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f su

ga

r yie

ld =

2.5

82

TC

/H a

t p

= 0

.10

.

22

Ta

ble

11

. Y

ield

s o

f c

an

e in

me

tric

to

ns

pe

r h

ecta

re (

TC

/H)

an

d o

f th

eo

reti

ca

l 96º

reco

ve

rab

le s

ug

ar

in k

g p

er

metr

ic t

on

(K

S/T

) an

d in

m

etr

ic t

on

s p

er

hecta

re (

TS

/H)

fro

m f

irst-

rato

on

can

e o

n T

orr

y m

uck

Me

an

yie

ld

C

an

e

Su

ga

r S

ug

ar

(TC

/H)

(KS

/T)

(TS

/H)

E

as

tgate

E

as

tgate

E

as

tgate

C

lon

e

1/2

5/0

7

1/2

5/0

7

1/2

5/0

7

CP

89

-21

43

2

29

.70

1

33

.6

30

.66

0

CP

00

-14

46

2

35

.03

1

29

.5

30

.42

6

CP

00

-17

51

2

11

.20

1

38

.8

29

.31

3

CP

00

-11

01

2

26

.72

1

28

.9

29

.19

8

CP

00

-10

74

2

15

.29

1

31

.8

28

.39

9

CP

00

-11

00

2

06

.08

1

35

.9

27

.98

2

CP

72

-20

86

2

07

.28

1

32

.6

27

.49

5

CP

00

-17

48

2

05

.06

1

33

.6

27

.35

9

CP

00

-21

80

2

09

.36

1

29

.8

27

.06

9

CP

00

-13

01

1

96

.71

1

32

.4

26

.23

2

CP

00

-12

52

1

98

.36

1

28

.2

25

.41

6

CP

00

-13

02

2

09

.72

1

19

.7

25

.04

7

CP

00

-21

88

1

89

.35

1

22

.5

23

.17

7

CP

00

-21

64

1

49

.49

1

36

.3

20

.35

7

CP

00

-15

27

1

40

.95

1

36

.6

19

.32

6

Me

an

2

02

.02

1

31

.3

26

.49

7

LS

D (

p =

0.1

) 2

7.2

2

3.5

3

.52

8

CV

(%

) 1

4.0

0

2.7

1

3.8

25

23

Tab

le 1

2. Y

ield

s o

f can

e in

metr

ic t

on

s p

er

hecta

re (

TC

/H)

fro

m s

eco

nd

-rato

on

can

e o

n D

an

ia m

uck, L

au

derh

ill m

uck, M

ala

bar

san

d,

Marg

ate

san

d, an

d P

om

pan

o f

ine s

an

d

Me

an

yie

ld b

y s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm, a

nd

sam

pli

ng

da

te

P

om

pan

o

Mala

bar

Marg

ate

fi

ne

Dan

ia m

uck

Lau

derh

ill m

uck

san

d

san

d

san

d

W

ed

g-

T

ow

n-

E

sti

ma

ted

O

keela

nta

O

sceo

la

Kn

igh

t S

FI

Du

da

wo

rth

H

illiard

sit

e

Lykes

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

1

0/2

0/0

6

10

/23

/06

1

0/1

3/0

6

10/1

8/0

6

10/2

5/0

6

11/6

/06

10/1

0/0

6

11/1

6/0

6

10/1

6/0

6

all f

arm

s

C

P 0

0-1

100

1

00

.03

1

18

.48

9

9.9

7

83

.77

1

38

.14

1

13

.51

4

2.7

5

12

6.1

4

92

.53

1

01

.13

C

P 8

9-2

143

1

16

.37

9

5.4

6

---

----

1

05

.05

1

35

.38

-

----

--

----

---

94

.06

--

----

- 9

9.5

3

CP

00

-17

48

9

9.8

7

10

6.5

6

86

.78

6

8.7

3

14

8.8

2

11

0.1

7

57

.16

1

19

.72

7

7.3

1

96

.71

C

P 0

0-1

302

1

00

.90

1

03

.67

1

05

.71

7

1.7

9

17

7.3

3

76

.20

3

8.0

3

91

.05

7

8.7

1

93

.91

C

P 0

0-1

101

1

00

.42

9

3.1

7

12

3.6

3

79

.57

1

33

.32

9

5.7

1

37

.35

8

5.5

2

78

.95

9

2.2

6

CP

00

-14

46

1

06

.52

1

00

.48

8

8.5

2

83

.14

1

23

.23

8

0.5

8

47

.46

1

06

.14

8

8.6

0

91

.33

C

P 7

8-1

628

---

---

----

---

---

----

--

----

--

-

----

--

---

----

2

6.9

4

94

.53

1

01

.98

8

8.1

4

CP

00

-15

27

1

00

.00

9

6.4

8

62

.81

6

4.6

5

16

0.5

1

72

.77

5

4.3

3

87

.73

6

9.6

3

85

.59

C

P 0

0-2

180

7

3.7

8

80

.26

9

3.4

9

61

.95

1

55

.84

7

1.9

7

30

.48

9

5.0

2

96

.63

8

4.1

4

CP

00

-16

30

7

8.5

5

99

.95

9

1.4

2

67

.21

1

20

.61

8

2.6

6

24

.54

7

9.8

3

81

.02

8

0.7

7

CP

00

-10

74

1

03

.35

9

0.9

3

77

.55

5

1.8

2

10

7.9

5

56

.65

4

2.2

0

75

.25

8

2.3

8

76

.63

C

P 0

0-1

751

8

8.7

1

75

.94

5

9.2

2

54

.24

1

15

.06

6

9.4

7

24

.80

1

06

.54

6

9.0

0

72

.85

C

P 0

0-1

252

8

7.3

5

79

.02

8

0.9

0

49

.61

1

01

.04

6

4.1

2

24

.68

3

7.2

6

70

.53

6

7.0

0

CP

00

-13

01

6

4.7

5

87

.15

6

1.4

6

85

.32

9

0.1

4

66

.99

2

4.0

7

55

.01

5

6.8

8

66

.18

C

P 7

2-2

086

7

4.6

4

----

---

68

.56

4

6.4

7

-

----

--

57

.66

--

----

- 6

8.2

3

62

.07

6

4.0

1

CP

00

-21

88

7

2.0

9

48

.96

3

8.6

3

46

.57

6

4.1

4

60

.20

3

7.8

1

10

0.9

5

61

.88

5

7.9

5

CP

00

-21

64

4

1.4

8

57

.76

1

6.3

9

42

.78

7

5.9

1

38

.75

9

.74

3

0.4

8

40

.62

3

9.7

0

M

ea

n

88

.05

8

8.9

5

77

.00

6

6.4

2

12

3.1

6

74

.49

3

4.8

2

85

.50

7

5.5

4

79

.87

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

19

.85

1

9.1

4

17

.13

2

2.3

6

27

.49

1

4.4

9

16

.53

2

2.8

6

12

.60

1

0.9

6

CV

(%

) 2

3.4

5

22

.36

2

3.1

1

35

.01

2

3.1

9

20

.20

4

9.3

2

19

.37

1

7.3

3

24

.84

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f ca

ne

yie

ld =

13

.75

TC

/H a

t p

= 0

.10

.

24

Tab

le 1

3. Y

ield

s o

f th

eo

reti

cal re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o s

ug

ar

in k

g p

er

metr

ic t

on

of

can

e (

KS

/T)

fro

m s

eco

nd

-rato

on

can

e o

n D

an

ia m

uck, L

au

derh

ill m

uck,

Mala

bar

san

d, M

arg

ate

sa

nd

, an

d P

om

pan

o f

ine s

an

d

Me

an

yie

ld b

y s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm, a

nd

sam

pli

ng

da

te

P

om

pan

o

M

ala

bar

Marg

ate

fin

e

Da

nia

mu

ck

Lau

derh

ill m

uck

sa

nd

s

an

d

sa

nd

Es

tim

ate

d

O

keela

nta

O

sceo

la

Kn

igh

t S

FI

Du

da

Wed

gw

ort

hH

illiard

T

ow

nsit

e

Lykes

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

1

0/2

0/0

6

10

/23

/06

1

0/1

3/0

6

10

/18

/06

1

0/2

5/0

6

11

/6/0

6

10

/10

/06

1

1/1

6/0

6

10/1

6/0

6

all f

arm

s

C

P 0

0-1

630

1

07

.6

11

8.9

1

06

.1

11

6.1

1

08

.8

11

5.7

1

25

.8

13

6.9

1

19

.9

11

7.1

* C

P 0

0-1

748

1

09

.6

10

4.3

9

7.6

1

10

.5

10

6.6

1

13

.5

12

9.5

1

39

.6

11

4.6

1

13

.7

CP

00

-21

88

1

06

.2

11

1.0

1

04

.3

10

7.9

1

01

.9

11

2.6

1

26

.9

13

3.6

1

16

.3

11

3.3

C

P 8

9-2

143

1

00

.7

10

6.3

-

----

--

11

9.0

1

12

.6

--

----

--

---

----

- 1

29

.0

---

----

1

13

.3

CP

00

-11

01

1

07

.1

11

3.7

1

01

.5

11

5.7

1

01

.5

12

0.7

1

17

.5

12

8.9

1

12

.2

11

3.2

C

P 0

0-1

751

1

09

.0

10

8.1

1

00

.0

11

2.0

1

05

.9

11

6.6

1

22

.0

13

0.6

1

11

.7

11

2.8

C

P 0

0-1

074

1

04

.5

11

0.5

9

7.5

1

05

.8

99

.9

11

1.9

1

26

.5

13

2.7

1

12

.0

11

1.1

C

P 0

0-1

100

1

02

.5

10

6.5

9

8.9

1

04

.9

10

5.7

1

21

.4

11

0.4

1

35

.5

10

9.2

1

10

.2

CP

00

-12

52

1

05

.9

10

9.3

9

8.1

1

08

.0

10

1.1

1

15

.6

11

5.2

1

16

.7

11

0.5

1

09

.2

CP

00

-21

64

1

11

.3

10

4.4

9

5.1

1

03

.0

97

.8

11

2.0

1

23

.1

12

8.0

1

09

.1

10

9.2

C

P 0

0-1

527

1

16

.4

10

5.3

9

5.2

9

5.9

1

05

.9

11

0.8

1

24

.4

12

3.8

1

03

.5

10

9.1

C

P 0

0-1

301

1

13

.4

10

8.3

9

4.8

1

12

.5

95

.8

11

2.7

1

17

.0

12

1.2

9

8.4

1

08

.3

CP

00

-21

80

1

09

.3

10

3.2

9

1.6

1

08

.0

98

.2

11

4.5

1

09

.5

12

1.0

9

8.7

1

06

.1

CP

72

-20

86

1

09

.0

---

----

- 9

3.3

1

01

.6

--

----

--

11

0.4

---

----

- 1

18

.0

10

3.3

1

05

.9

CP

78

-16

28

---

----

---

----

- -

----

--

--

----

--

--

----

--

--

----

--

11

5.0

1

20

.4

10

5.1

1

05

.3

CP

00

-13

02

1

01

.5

10

3.2

9

2.1

1

00

.7

80

.2

10

5.5

1

12

.8

12

0.4

1

02

.6

10

2.0

C

P 0

0-1

446

1

11

.0

10

0.7

8

0.5

9

9.0

9

1.5

1

02

.7

11

7.6

1

15

.9

93

.9

10

1.6

M

ea

n

10

7.8

1

07

.6

96

.4

10

7.5

1

00

.9

11

3.1

1

19

.5

12

6.6

1

07

.6

10

9.5

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

8.1

5.6

6.2

9.2

8.4

6.5

7.9

7.7

6.3

3.7

C

V (

%)

7.8

5

.4

6.7

8

.9

8.6

6

.0

6.8

4

.4

6.1

7

.0

*

Sig

nific

an

tly g

rea

ter

tha

n C

P 8

9-2

14

3 a

t p

= 0

.10

ba

se

d o

n t

te

st.

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f su

ga

r yie

ld =

2.9

KS

/T a

t p

= 0

.10

.

25

Tab

le 1

4. Y

ield

s o

f th

eo

reti

cal re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6º

su

ga

r in

metr

ic t

on

s p

er

hecta

re (

TS

/H)

fro

m s

eco

nd

-rato

on

ca

ne o

n D

an

ia m

uck,

Lau

derh

ill m

uck,

Mala

bar

san

d, M

arg

ate

sa

nd

, an

d P

om

pan

o f

ine s

an

d

Me

an

yie

ld b

y s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm, a

nd

sam

pli

ng

da

te

P

om

pan

o

M

ala

bar

Marg

ate

fi

ne

Da

nia

mu

ck

Lau

derh

ill m

uck

sa

nd

s

an

d

sa

nd

Es

tim

ate

d

O

keela

nta

O

sceo

la

Kn

igh

t S

FI

Du

da

Wed

gw

ort

hH

illiard

T

ow

nsit

e

Lykes

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

1

0/2

0/0

6

10

/23

/06

1

0/1

3/0

6

10

/18

/06

1

0/2

5/0

6

11

/6/0

6

10

/10

/06

11/1

6/0

6

10/1

6/0

6

all f

arm

s

C

P 8

9-2

143

1

1.7

50

1

0.1

86

---

--

12

.57

8

15

.23

1

--

---

-

----

1

2.1

51

--

---

11

.27

0

CP

00

-11

00

1

0.2

67

1

2.6

32

1

0.0

65

8

.86

6

14

.73

2

13

.78

0

4.7

36

1

7.0

70

1

0.0

41

1

1.2

33

C

P 0

0-1

748

1

0.8

70

1

1.1

07

8

.50

9

7.6

45

1

5.9

00

1

2.5

27

7

.38

5

16

.69

6

8.8

56

1

0.9

36

C

P 0

0-1

101

1

0.9

26

1

0.6

31

1

2.5

59

9

.37

9

13

.49

6

11

.56

5

4.4

54

1

1.0

47

8

.84

4

10

.34

7

CP

00

-16

30

8

.38

2

11

.82

2

9.7

37

7

.90

8

13

.23

6

9.5

10

3

.15

7

10

.95

1

9.7

41

9

.37

8

CP

00

-15

27

1

1.5

22

1

0.1

76

6

.12

2

6.4

31

1

6.9

66

8

.16

2

6.7

22

1

0.7

41

7

.18

9

9.3

55

C

P 0

0-1

302

1

0.4

93

1

0.7

08

9

.73

1

7.3

79

1

4.3

89

8

.01

5

4.2

51

1

1.0

65

8

.04

3

9.3

37

C

P 7

8-1

628

-

----

-

-

----

---

--

--

---

-

----

--

---

3.1

43

1

1.3

81

1

0.6

78

9

.27

2

CP

00

-14

46

1

1.8

86

1

0.0

81

7

.20

8

8.4

30

1

1.2

64

8

.30

3

5.6

79

1

2.3

02

8

.35

6

9.2

45

C

P 0

0-2

180

7

.98

5

8.3

00

8

.69

9

6.8

97

1

5.4

16

8

.27

3

3.4

11

1

1.5

66

9

.47

4

8.8

56

C

P 0

0-1

074

1

0.7

88

1

0.0

41

7

.53

7

5.4

68

1

0.7

51

6

.33

1

5.3

36

1

0.0

31

9

.14

0

8.3

79

C

P 0

0-1

751

9

.74

2

8.1

94

6

.00

8

6.1

66

1

2.1

56

8

.12

9

3.0

29

1

3.9

14

7

.70

3

8.2

21

C

P 0

0-1

252

9

.24

9

8.6

18

7

.97

4

5.3

58

1

0.2

50

7

.38

4

2.9

13

4

.30

6

7.7

74

7

.21

9

CP

00

-13

01

7

.49

9

9.5

23

5

.81

6

9.8

03

8

.61

0

7.6

66

2

.85

6

6.7

18

5

.60

0

7.1

79

C

P 7

2-2

086

8

.11

7

-

----

6

.49

3

4.7

99

-

----

6

.41

2

----

- 8

.08

7

6.3

81

6

.71

6

CP

00

-21

88

7

.68

6

5.4

86

4

.10

2

5.0

20

6

.56

6

6.8

71

4

.79

8

13

.44

1

7.1

24

6

.63

9

CP

00

-21

64

4

.61

0

6.0

30

1

.56

2

4.6

32

7

.35

7

4.3

12

1

.21

5

3.8

93

4

.41

5

4.2

81

M

ea

n

9.4

86

9

.56

9

7.4

75

7

.29

7

12

.42

1

8.4

83

4

.20

6

10

.90

4

8.0

85

8

.69

8

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

2.4

00

2

.16

1

1.7

96

2

.60

2

3.0

80

1

.83

8

2.0

68

3

.12

1

1.3

56

1

.26

2

CV

(%

) 2

6.3

08

2

3.4

67

2

4.9

65

3

7.0

83

2

5.7

62

2

2.5

12

5

1.0

77

2

0.7

34

1

7.4

29

2

6.6

45

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f su

ga

r yie

ld =

1.5

41

TS

/H a

t p

= 0

.10

.

26

Ta

ble

15

. Y

ield

s o

f c

an

e in

me

tric

to

ns

pe

r h

ecta

re (

TC

/H)

an

d t

he

ore

tic

al re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o s

ug

ar

in k

g p

er

metr

ic t

on

(K

S/T

) an

d m

etr

ic t

on

s p

er

he

cta

re (

TS

/H)

fro

m s

ec

on

d-r

ato

on

can

e o

n D

an

ia m

uc

k a

nd

To

rry m

uc

k

M

ea

n c

an

e y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm,

Mean

KS

/T y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e,

farm

,

M

ean

TS

/H y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e,

farm

,

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

Da

nia

To

rry

Da

nia

To

rry

D

an

ia

T

orr

y

m

uck

m

uck

mu

ck

m

uck

m

uck

m

uck

O

ke

ela

nta

E

as

tgate

M

ea

n y

ield

,

Ok

ee

lan

ta

E

as

tgate

M

ea

n y

ield

,

Ok

ee

lan

ta

E

as

tgate

M

ea

n y

ield

, C

lon

e

10/2

4/0

6

12/1

9/0

6

bo

th f

arm

s

10/2

4/0

6

12/1

9/0

6

bo

th f

arm

s

10/2

4/0

6

12/1

9/0

6

bo

th f

arm

s

CP

99

-18

93

9

9.0

2

18

5.8

5

14

2.4

3*

1

02

.5

1

19

.1

11

0.8

10

.19

1

2

2.2

06

1

6.1

98

* C

P 9

9-1

894

1

04

.60

1

76

.32

1

40

.46

*

10

6.1

11

6.1

1

11

.1

1

1.1

26

20

.50

5

15

.81

6*

CP

99

-18

96

8

6.7

7

22

2.7

6

15

4.7

7*

9

5.5

10

1.5

9

8.5

8.4

32

22

.60

1

15

.51

7

CP

99

-18

89

9

0.0

5

19

2.7

3

14

1.3

9*

9

1.7

10

7.0

9

9.4

8.2

76

20

.62

5

14

.45

0

CP

99

-19

44

7

0.5

8

17

3.0

2

12

1.8

0

1

07

.8

1

16

.3

11

2.0

7.6

45

20

.17

1

13

.90

8

CP

89

-21

43

5

5.6

9

16

9.7

3

11

2.7

1

1

05

.3

1

24

.2

11

4.8

5.9

65

21

.06

3

13

.51

4

CP

99

-18

65

7

1.2

9

15

8.1

0

11

4.6

9

1

01

.8

1

20

.3

11

1.1

7.2

20

19

.03

4

13

.12

7

CP

99

-15

41

5

5.0

6

16

5.8

1

11

0.4

4

1

12

.1

1

19

.3

11

5.7

6.2

50

19

.81

4

13

.03

2

CP

72

-20

86

5

4.4

9

15

9.9

7

10

7.5

0

1

03

.6

1

24

.2

11

3.8

5.7

15

19

.90

7

12

.78

8

CP

99

-16

86

5

5.5

8

16

2.0

1

10

9.1

3

1

00

.5

1

16

.9

10

8.6

5.5

92

18

.92

3

12

.27

8

CP

99

-20

99

4

1.4

2

17

2.4

4

10

6.9

3

1

04

.6

1

13

.1

10

8.8

4.1

81

19

.51

0

11

.84

6

CP

99

-15

40

5

0.0

3

16

5.0

7

10

7.5

5

1

01

.7

1

08

.3

10

5.0

5.0

47

17

.93

5

11

.49

1

CP

99

-20

84

5

4.2

0

15

0.8

7

10

2.5

3

9

7.8

11

6.5

1

07

.1

5

.35

8

1

7.5

28

1

1.4

43

C

P 9

9-1

534

4

6.2

5

14

4.5

8

95

.42

10

3.5

11

6.6

1

10

.1

4

.71

3

1

6.8

62

1

0.7

88

C

P 9

9-3

027

5

1.7

4

12

8.6

8

90

.21

10

3.7

11

1.2

1

07

.4

5

.40

8

1

4.2

73

9

.84

1

CP

99

-15

42

2

8.6

2

13

4.7

6

81

.69

10

2.2

11

1.4

1

06

.8

2

.93

5

1

5.0

25

8

.98

0

Me

an

6

3.4

6

16

6.4

2

11

4.9

8

1

02

.5

1

15

.1

10

8.8

6.5

03

19

.12

4

12

.81

3

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

16

.68

2

9.4

7

21

.51

6.1

3.6

6

.4

1

.65

0

3

.47

1

2.1

85

C

V (

%)

27

.34

1

8.4

1

21

.57

6.2

3.3

4

.8

2

6.3

91

18

.86

9

21

.95

2

* S

ign

ific

an

tly g

rea

ter

tha

n C

P 8

9-2

14

3 a

t p

= 0

.10

ba

se

d o

n t

te

st.

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f ca

ne

yie

ld =

19

.19

TC

/H,

an

d o

f su

ga

r yie

ld =

1.3

KS

/T a

nd

2.0

49

TS

/H a

t p

= 0

.10

.

27

Ta

ble

16

. Y

ield

s o

f c

an

e in

me

tric

to

ns

pe

r h

ecta

re (

TC

/H)

an

d t

he

ore

tic

al re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o s

ug

ar

in k

g p

er

metr

ic t

on

(K

S/T

) an

d in

metr

ic t

on

s p

er

he

cta

re (

TS

/H)

fro

m s

ec

on

d-r

ato

on

can

e o

n M

arg

ate

/Old

sh

am

sa

nd

an

d M

arg

ate

sa

nd

M

ea

n c

an

e y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm,

Mean

KS

/T y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e,

farm

,

M

ean

TS

/H y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e,

farm

,

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

M

arg

ate

/

Marg

ate

/

Marg

ate

/

O

ldsh

am

Marg

ate

O

ldsh

am

Marg

ate

Old

sh

am

M

arg

ate

san

d

s

an

d

san

d

san

d

san

d

sa

nd

B

en

bo

w

To

wn

sit

e

Mean

yie

ld,

B

en

bo

w

T

ow

nsit

e

Mean

yie

ld,

Ben

bo

w

T

ow

nsit

e

Mean

yie

ld,

Clo

ne

10/2

4/0

6

12/1

9/0

6

bo

th f

arm

s

1

0/2

4/0

6

1

2/1

9/0

6

bo

th f

arm

s

10/2

4/0

6

12/1

9/0

6

bo

th f

arm

s

CP

CL

97

-27

30

1

16

.09

1

04

.92

1

10

.51

*

12

4.1

7

1

25

.46

1

24

.74

14

.41

1

1

3.3

31

1

3.8

70

C

P 8

9-2

143

9

3.5

6

94

.23

9

3.9

0

1

20

.92

12

8.8

8

12

4.9

0

1

1.3

80

12

.17

0

11

.77

5

CP

CL

96

-08

60

1

04

.35

1

03

.88

1

04

.12

11

1.8

6

1

12

.85

1

12

.35

11

.53

1

1

1.7

43

1

1.6

37

C

PC

L 9

7-0

393

1

06

.28

9

8.9

3

10

2.6

0

1

15

.05

10

7.5

2

11

1.2

9

1

2.2

41

10

.65

8

11

.45

0

CP

78

-16

28

9

8.6

8

93

.20

9

5.9

4

1

11

.31

12

0.3

5

11

5.8

3

1

0.9

83

11

.22

1

11

.10

2

Me

an

1

03

.79

9

9.0

3

10

1.4

1

1

16

.66

11

9.0

1

11

7.8

2

1

2.1

09

11

.82

5

11

.96

7

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

21

.96

3

2.1

7

16

.03

7.7

6

9

.59

1

1.1

4

2

.46

6

4

.24

1

2.1

13

C

V (

%)

13

.93

2

1.0

0

15

.84

4.5

0

5

.38

4

.93

13

.41

4

2

3.9

64

1

7.6

82

*

Sig

nific

an

tly g

rea

ter

tha

n C

P 8

9-2

14

3 a

t p

= 0

.10

ba

se

d o

n t

te

st.

† L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f ca

ne

yie

ld =

18

.22

TC

/H,

an

d o

f su

ga

r yie

ld =

3.8

KS

/T a

nd

2.1

30

TS

/H a

t p

= 0

.10

.

28

Ta

ble

17

. Y

ield

s o

f c

an

e in

me

tric

to

ns

pe

r h

ecta

re (

TC

/H)

an

d t

he

ore

tic

al re

co

ve

rab

le 9

6o s

ug

ar

in k

g p

er

metr

ic t

on

(K

S/T

) an

d m

etr

ic t

on

s p

er

he

cta

re (

TS

/H)

fro

m s

ec

on

d-r

ato

on

can

e o

n T

orr

y m

uc

k a

nd

Terr

a C

eia

mu

ck

M

ea

n c

an

e y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e, fa

rm,

Mean

KS

/T y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e,

farm

,

M

ean

TS

/H y

ield

by s

oil

typ

e,

farm

,

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

an

d s

am

plin

g d

ate

T

err

a

Te

rra

T

err

a

T

orr

y

Ceia

To

rry

C

eia

To

rry

C

eia

mu

ck

m

uck

mu

ck

m

uck

mu

ck

m

uck

Bry

an

t R

itta

M

ea

n y

ield

,

Bry

an

t

Rit

ta

Me

an

yie

ld,

B

rya

nt

R

itta

M

ea

n y

ield

,

Clo

ne

11/1

6/0

6

12/1

9/0

6

bo

th f

arm

s

1

1/1

6/0

6

1

1/1

6/0

6

bo

th f

arm

s

1

1/1

6/0

6

1

1/1

6/0

6

bo

th f

arm

s

CP

89

-21

43

1

24

.28

9

9.7

6

11

2.3

5

1

23

.7

1

15

.0

11

9.4

15

.39

7

1

1.4

27

1

3.4

71

C

L 7

7-0

79

7

12

7.9

3

73

.64

1

00

.79

11

6.4

99

.2

10

7.8

14

.76

3

7

.41

5

11

.08

9

CP

CL

96

-20

61

1

15

.23

9

0.3

1

10

2.7

7

1

08

.9

1

00

.6

10

4.7

12

.50

8

9

.15

6

10

.83

2

CP

72

-20

86

-

----

---

--

----

-

--

----

--

-

----

--

1

10

.4

11

5.4

---

----

--

--

----

--

---

----

-

Me

an

1

22

.48

8

7.9

0

10

5.3

0

1

16

.3

1

06

.3

11

1.8

14

.22

3

9

.33

3

11

.79

8

LS

D (

p =

0.1

)†

30

.93

3

5.7

6

40

.45

12

.8

1

1.2

8

.0

2

.48

0

4

.31

9

5.1

00

C

V (

%)

10

.59

2

4.7

3

17

.38

6.3

6.8

6

.9

1

0.0

19

29

.16

4

19

.37

7

H L

SD

fo

r lo

ca

tio

n m

ea

ns o

f ca

ne

yie

ld =

22

.04

TC

/H,

an

d o

f su

ga

r yie

ld =

9.5

KS

/T a

nd

2.2

95

TS

/H a

t p

= 0

.10

.

29

Ta

ble

18

. R

an

kin

gs

of

clo

ne

s a

nd

perc

en

t ra

tin

g o

f C

P 8

9-2

143

, b

y s

eri

es,

of

dam

ag

e t

o ju

ice q

uality

by f

reezin

g t

em

pera

ture

s

C

P 9

9 s

eri

es

C

P 0

0 s

eri

es

C

P 0

1 s

eri

es

C

P 0

2 a

nd

CP

CL

99 s

eri

es

Clo

ne

Ra

nk

% o

f C

P

8

9-2

14

3

Clo

ne

Ra

nk

%

of

CP

8

9-2

14

3

Clo

ne

Ra

nk

% o

f C

P

89

-21

43

Clo

ne

Ra

nk

% o

f C

P

89

-21

43

C

P 7

2-2

086

12

8

8.0

CP

72

-20

86

12

8

8.0

CP

72

-20

86

12

9

2.6

CP

72

-20

86

14

9

2.6

C

P 8

9-2

143

1

10

0.0

CP

89

-21

43

3

10

0.0

CP

78

-16

28

1

10

4.1

CP

78

-16

28

1

10

4.1

C

P 9

9-1

534

16

8

3.9

CP

00

-10

74

15

8

5.4

CP

89

-21

43

4

10

0.0

CP

89

-21

43

5

10

0.0

C

P 9

9-1

540

7

91

.5

C

P 0

0-1

100

10

9

3.7

CP

01

-11

78

7

98

.7

C

P 0

2-1

143

13

9

2.7

C

P 9

9-1

541

5

93

.3

C

P 0

0-1

101

2

10

2.1

CP

01

-11

81

14

9

0.3

CP

02

-14

58

7

98

.2

CP

99

-15

42

6

91

.9

C

P 0

0-1

252

4

99

.6

C

P 0

1-1

205

6

99

.3

C

P 0

2-1

554

4

10

0.3

C

P 9

9-1

686

14

8

7.7

CP

00

-13

01

1

10

2.3

CP

01

-13

21

11

9

2.7

CP

02

-15

64

6

99

.6

CP

99

-18

65

2

96

.3

C

P 0

0-1

302

13

8

5.9

CP

01

-13

38

15

8

7.3

CP

02

-15

82

15

8

9.5

C

P 9

9-1

889

9

90

.2

C

P 0

0-1

446

11

8

8.7

CP

01

-13

72

3

10

0.3

CP

02

-17

36

9

95

.8

CP

99

-18

93

8

91

.4

C

P 0

0-1

527

7

94

.7

C

P 0

1-1

378

10

9

6.1

CP

02

-20

15

12

9

3.2

C

P 9

9-1

894

3

96

.1

C

P 0

0-1

630

6

97

.0

C

P 0

1-1

391

16

8

1.9

CP

02

-22

81

17

8

4.1

C

P 9

9-1

896

13

8

7.8

CP

00

-17

48

5

98

.8

C

P 0

1-1

564

9

98

.3

C

PC

L 9

9-1

225

10

9

5.4

C

P 9

9-1

944

10

8

9.6

CP

00

-17

51

9

94

.0

C

P 0

1-1

957

13

9

1.0

CP

CL

99

-14

01

8

97

.3

CP

99

-20

84

4

93

.7

C

P 0

0-2

164

14

8

5.6

CP

01

-20

56

2

10

0.9

CP

CL

99

-17

77

16

8

8.7

C

P 9

9-2

099

15

8

4.3

CP

00

-21

80

16

8

1.3

CP

01

-23

90

5

99

.9

C

PC

L 9

9-2

103

2

10

2.3

C

P 9

9-3

027

11

8

8.1

CP

00

-21

88

8

94

.5

C

P 0

1-2

459

8

98

.7

C

PC

L 9

9-2

206

11

9

3.6

--

----

-

----

---

--

----

-

CP

CL

99

-25

74

3

10

1.0

30

Ta

ble

19

. D

ate

s o

f s

talk

co

un

ts o

f 1

0 p

lan

t c

an

e, 8

fir

st-

rato

on

, a

nd

15

se

co

nd

-rato

on

exp

eri

me

nts

Cro

p

Lo

cati

on

Pla

nt

ca

ne

Fir

st

rato

on

Se

co

nd

rato

on

Be

nb

ow

---

---

0

9/1

4/0

6

Bry

an

t

---

---

0

9/1

4/0

6

Du

da

07

/11

/06

07

/26

/06

08

/11

/06

E

astg

ate

06

/13

/06

--

-

08

/10

/06

H

illia

rd

07/2

0/0

6

08/0

8/0

6

09/1

2/0

6

Knig

ht

07/1

6/0

6

08/0

3/0

6

09/0

8/0

6

Lykes

0

7/1

9/0

6

0

8/0

9/0

6

09

/11

/06

O

kee

lan

ta

0

7/1

3/0

6

0

8/0

2/0

6

0

9/0

6/0

6

Okee

lan

ta (

su

ccessiv

e)

0

7/1

4/0

6

0

8/0

4/0

6

0

9/0

7/0

6

Osce

ola

07

/06

/06

--

-

08

/23

/06

R

itta

---

---

0

9/1

4/0

6

To

wnsite

(C

P)

--

-

--

-

09

/13

/06

T

ow

nsite

(C

PC

L)

--

-

--

-

09

/14

/06

S

FI

07/2

5/0

6

08/0

1/0

6

09/0

7/0

6

We

dg

wo

rth

06

/21

/06

08

/02

/06

08

/24

/06

31