Upload
eugene-rogers
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
United States Patent and Trademark Office – www.uspto.gov
Strategic Handling of Applications for Rapid Examination
(SHARE)
United States Patent and Trademark Office
2
Background
2006 Cross filing Applications among IP5 Offices
3
Background
• The concept of SHARE arose out of the discussions among the Trilateral Offices.
• A 2004 study conducted by the Trilateral Offices showed, most notably, that for USPTO-JPO/JPO-USPTO cross-filings, USPTO produced first action results prior to JPO first action in about 90% of cases, whereas the JPO produced first action results prior to USPTO first action in only about 10% of cases.
• The study revealed that the timing of the availability of OFF search and examination results relative to OSF pendency is far from optimal, which posed a major obstacle to work-sharing.
• Given the high volume of JPO-USPTO filings, this disparity represented a significant loss to the USPTO in potential efficiency gains.
• Subsequent work has been undertaken to improve the situation.
4
• In SHARE, applications for which an office is the office of first filing (OFF) are prioritized in the examination queue.
• SHARE is expected to enhance the worksharing environment by increasing the volume of exploitable work product from the office of first filing (OFF).
Improving the Worksharing Environment: SHARE
5
SHARE BENEFITS
• Increase examination effectiveness
• Office of second filing can reuse OFF work product to the maximum extent practicable
– Decrease overall pendency
– Improve quality
– Reduce redundant work
6
Relationship with other Worksharing Mechanisms
• SHARE and PPH are complementary.
– Accelerate the examination in the office of first filing
– More OFF work product becomes available for PPH in the office of second filing (OSF)
7
POSSIBLE ISSUES
• Effect on non-prioritized applications, e.g.
– Patent Term Adjustment?
– De Facto Deferred Examination?
• Forum Shopping?
8
KIPO-USPTO SHARE Pilot
• KIPO-USPTO Pilot
– Initiated September 1, 2009
– 400 cases
– Selected in narrow technology (battery, fuel cells and semiconductors)
– Manual prioritization and notification of work product availability to the offices
9
Status of other offices
• The EPO’s PACE program sets internal deadlines for work product for EP direct filings.
• The JPO’s JP-FIRST started in April 2008.
• More information is available at http://www.epo.org/patents/law/legal-texts/html/guiapp1/e/ga_aii.htm. and www.jpo.go.jp
10
USPTO SHARE Strategy
Work groups have been created to develop a roadmap for 2010 implementation
• Policy/Legal
• Examination/Operations
• Information Technology
11
• Thank you.