48
UNIVAC decision support model A uni versal framework for evaluating vac cine policy options in low- and middle-income countries

UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

UNIVAC decision support model

A universal framework for evaluating vaccine policy options in low- and middle-income countries

Page 2: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Key questions

1. How do you access, navigate and run UNIVAC?

2. How are the UNIVAC inputs used to generate outputs?

Page 3: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Key questions

1. How do you access, navigate and run UNIVAC?

2. How are the UNIVAC inputs used to generate outputs?

Page 4: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Key questions

1. How do you access, navigate and run UNIVAC?

2. How are the UNIVAC inputs used to generate outputs?

Page 5: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Main output (outcome measure)

1. Cost-utility ratio Cost per DALY averted

Page 6: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

What is a DALY?

6

Page 7: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• Should we choose option 1 or 2?

– Option 1 (HPV vaccine) – prevents 250 deaths

– Option 2 (PCV vaccine) – prevents 200 deaths

,7

Page 8: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• Should we choose option 1 or 2?

– Option 1 (HPV vaccine) – prevents 250 deaths

– Option 2 (PCV vaccine) – prevents 200 deaths

• Choosing option 1 might not be fair

– Cervical cancer deaths mostly occur in adults

– Pneumococcal deaths mostly occur in children

,8

Page 9: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• Should we choose option 1 or 2?

– Option 1 (HPV vaccine) – prevents 250 deaths

– Option 2 (PCV vaccine) – prevents 200 deaths

• Choosing option 1 might not be fair

– Cervical cancer deaths mostly occur in adults

– Pneumococcal deaths mostly occur in children

• It would be fairer to compare the number of prevented YLLs (Years of Life Lost)?

– Option 1 (HPV vaccine) – prevents 12,500 YLLs

– Option 2 (PCV vaccine) – prevents 20,000 YLLs

,9

Page 10: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• Should we choose option 1 or 2?

– Option 1 (HPV vaccine) – prevents 250 deaths

– Option 2 (PCV vaccine) – prevents 200 deaths

• Choosing option 1 might not be fair

– Cervical cancer deaths mostly occur in adults

– Pneumococcal deaths mostly occur in children

• It would be fairer to compare the number of prevented YLLs (Years of Life Lost)?

– Option 1 (HPV vaccine) – prevents 12,500 YLLs

– Option 2 (PCV vaccine) – prevents 20,000 YLLs

,1020,000 YLLs prevented is the same as 20,000 Years of Life gained

Page 11: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

…but this still isn’t a fair comparison

11

Page 12: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• …because it doesn’t take into account prevented YLDs (Years of Life lost due to living with the Disease)

• YLDs take into account:

– The number of disease cases

– Years lived with the disease eg. 0.5 years

– % of diseased time lost eg. 35% (disability weight)

• It would be fairer to use DALYs (YLLs + YLDs)

– Option 1 (HPV vaccine) – prevents 22,000 DALYs

– Option 2 (PCV vaccine) – prevents 28,000 DALYs

,12

Page 13: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• …because it doesn’t take into account prevented YLDs (Years of Life lost due to living with the Disease)

• YLDs take into account:

– The number of disease cases

– Years lived with the disease eg. 0.5 years

– % of diseased time lost eg. 35% (disability weight)

• It would be fairer to use DALYs (YLLs + YLDs)

– Option 1 (HPV vaccine) – prevents 22,000 DALYs

– Option 2 (PCV vaccine) – prevents 28,000 DALYs

,1328,000 DALYs prevented is the same as 28,000 QALYs gained

Page 14: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Outputs of UNIVAC

1. Cost-utility ratio Cost per DALY averted

2. Vaccine costs Incremental vaccine costs

3. Healthcare costs Healthcare costs averted

4. Disease events Cases, visits, hosps., deaths, DALYs

5. Adverse events Cases, visits, hosps., deaths, DALYs

6. Benefit-risk ratio e.g. Deaths averted per death caused

Page 15: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Without vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort?

• Start by using United Nations Population Division (UNPOP) projections of the number of individuals that will be alive in each single year of age (and single calendar year) as the birth cohort ages…

Page 16: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

16

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARS

Page 17: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

17

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 1000 950 920 910 900 895 890 885 880 875 870 865 860 855 850 845 840 835

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSPopulation, no vaccine

0 1 2 3 4

Years of age

5 6 7 8 9 etc……………………….......

Page 18: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• Start by using United Nations Population Division (UNPOP) projections of the number of individuals that will be alive in each single year of age (and single calendar year) as the birth cohort ages…

• Multiply by age-specific rates of disease per 100,000 per year to estimate numbers of disease events…

Without vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort?

Page 19: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

19

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

0 1 2 3 4

Years of age

5 6 7 8 9 etc……………………….......

Page 20: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

20

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

0 1 2 3 4

Years of age

For simplicity, this

example focuses on

disease in under-fives

Page 21: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

21

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

0 1 2 3 4

Years of age

Page 22: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• Start by using United Nations Population Division (UNPOP) projections of the number of individuals that will be alive in each single year of age (and single calendar year) as the birth cohort ages…

• Multiply by age-specific rates of disease per 100,000 per year to estimate numbers of disease events…

• If you want to account for changes in inputs over time (e.g. demography, mortality rates, coverage, price) then repeat for up to 30 birth cohorts…

Without vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort?

Page 23: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

23

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

0 1 2 3 4

Years of age

Page 24: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

24

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014 50 40 20 10 5

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

Page 25: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

25

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014 50 40 20 10 5

2015 50 40 20 10 5

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

Page 26: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

26

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014 50 40 20 10 5

2015 50 40 20 10 5

2016 50 40 20 10 5

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

Page 27: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

27

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014 50 40 20 10 5

2015 50 40 20 10 5

2016 50 40 20 10 5

2017 50 40 20 10 5

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

Page 28: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

28

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014 50 40 20 10 5

2015 50 40 20 10 5

2016 50 40 20 10 5

2017 50 40 20 10 5

2018 50 40 20 10 5

2019 50 40 20 10 5

2020 50 40 20 10 5

2021 50 40 20 10 5

2022 50 40 20 10 5

2023 50 40 20 10 5

2024 50 40 20 10 5

2025 50 40 20 10 5

2026 50 40 20 10 5

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

Page 29: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

29

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014 50 40 20 10 5

2015 50 40 20 10 5

2016 50 40 20 10 5

2017 50 40 20 10 5

2018 50 40 20 10 5

2019 50 40 20 10 5

2020 50 40 20 10 5

2021 50 40 20 10 5

2022 50 40 20 10 5

2023 50 40 20 10 5

2024 50 40 20 10 5

2025 50 40 20 10 5

2026 50 40 20 10 5

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

S

Also useful if you want to report

results by ‘calendar year’

Page 30: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• Start by using United Nations Population Division (UNPOP) projections of the number of individuals that will be alive in each single year of age (and single calendar year) as the birth cohort ages…

• Multiply by age-specific rates of disease per 100,000 per year to estimate numbers of disease events…

• If you want to account for changes in inputs over time (e.g. demography, mortality rates, coverage, price) then repeat for up to 30 birth cohorts…

• Repeat for each disease type and outcome…

Without vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort?

Page 31: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Disease

type 1

VisitsCases Hosps. Deaths

Page 32: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Disease

type 1

Disease

type 2

VisitsCases Hosps. Deaths

Page 33: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

VisitsCases Hosps. Deaths

Disease

type 1

Disease

type 2

Disease

type 3

…up to

10 types

Page 34: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Any RVGE

VisitsCases Hosps. Deaths

Example: Rotavirus configuration 1

Page 35: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Any RVGE

VisitsCases Hosps. Deaths

Example: Rotavirus configuration 2

Page 36: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Any GE

VisitsCases Hosps. Deaths

Example: Rotavirus configuration 3

Page 37: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Non-severe

RVGE

Severe

RVGE

VisitsCases Hosps. Deaths

Example: Rotavirus configuration 4

Page 38: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Non-severe

RVGE

Severe

RVGE

Intussusception

VisitsCases Hosps. Deaths

Example: Rotavirus configuration 5

• The background rate of severe adverse

events can also be included if required.

• Users can then enter the relative risk of

vaccination compared to this background

rate to estimate vaccine-related events.

Page 39: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Non-severe

RVGE

Severe

RVGE

Intussusception

VisitsCases Hosps. Deaths

Example: Rotavirus configuration 5

Page 40: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• Start by specifying the period of vaccination…

With vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort?

Page 41: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

41

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014 50 40 20 10 5

2015 50 40 20 10 5

2016 50 40 20 10 5

2017 50 40 20 10 5

2018 50 40 20 10 5

2019 50 40 20 10 5

2020 50 40 20 10 5

2021 50 40 20 10 5

2022 50 40 20 10 5

2023 50 40 20 10 5

2024 50 40 20 10 5

2025 50 40 20 10 5

2026 50 40 20 10 5

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

Vaccinate

infants born

2017-2026…

Page 42: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• Start by specifying the period of vaccination…

• Multiply age-specific disease events by:

1 – [ (% covered by only 1 dose x efficacy of dose 1)

+ (% covered by only 2 doses x efficacy of dose 2)

+ (% covered by only 3 doses x efficacy of dose 3)

….etc. ]

With vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort?

Page 43: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

• Start by specifying the period of vaccination…

• Multiply age-specific disease events by:

1 – [ (% covered by only 1 dose x efficacy of dose 1)

+ (% covered by only 2 doses x efficacy of dose 2)

+ (% covered by only 3 doses x efficacy of dose 3)

….etc. ]

This calculation is applied by year of age 5-99 years and

by week of age <5 years. UNIVAC therefore asks for

additional inputs <5yrs:• Age distribution of disease by week of age <5yrs;

• Vaccine coverage/timeliness by week of age <5yrs;

• Vaccine efficacy by time in weeks since dose given.

With vaccination, how many disease events can we expect over the lifetime of a birth cohort?

Page 44: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

44

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014 50 40 20 10 5

2015 50 40 20 10 5

2016 50 40 20 10 5

2017 50 40 20 10 5

2018 50 40 20 10 5

2019 50 40 20 10 5

2020 50 40 20 10 5

2021 50 40 20 10 5

2022 50 40 20 10 5

2023 50 40 20 10 5

2024 50 40 20 10 5

2025 50 40 20 10 5

2026 50 40 20 10 5

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, no vaccine

Vaccinate

infants born

2017-2026…

Page 45: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

45

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

2013 50 40 20 10 5

2014 50 40 20 10 5

2015 50 40 20 10 5

2016 50 40 20 10 5

2017 5 4 2 1 1

2018 5 4 2 1 1

2019 5 4 2 1 1

2020 5 4 2 1 1

2021 5 4 2 1 1

2022 5 4 2 1 1

2023 5 4 2 1 1

2024 5 4 2 1 1

2025 5 4 2 1 1

2026 5 4 2 1 1

BIR

TH

CO

HO

RT

SCALENDAR YEARSDeaths, routine vaccine

Vaccinate

infants born

2017-2026…

…and apply

age-specific

direct impact

Page 46: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

e.g. ~50000 ‘future deaths’ prevented if all

children born 2017-2026 are tracked over their

lifetimes

COMPARATOR

50760 deaths

without vaccine

NEW OPTION

590 deaths

with vaccine

Page 47: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

Advantages• Accessibility – developed in

Excel so familiar to most users;

• Transparency – can be easily explained to national teams and decision makers;

• Simplicity – uses a minimal set of inputs and steps;

• Flexibility – can be quickly adapted to evaluate new options in a timely way;

• Comparability – allows for more standardised comparisons between vaccine policy options;

Drawback• Static – unlike dynamic models,

UNIVAC does NOT track the number of susceptible, infectious and immune individuals over time, so cannot directly simulate herd (and other indirect) effects.

• However, in mitigation (!), calibration of dynamic models:

– can be a lengthy/complex process;

– may not provide estimates defensible by MoH if based on poor quality data;

– may not be necessary if plausible ‘what-if’ scenarios can demonstrate that inclusion of indirect effects would not change the recommendation/decision.

UNIVAC advantages and drawbacks

Page 48: UNIVAC decision support model - paho.org

If you want to know more…

▪ The Provac Toolkit

https://www.paho.org/provac-toolkit/

▪ Partners