19
University of Groningen Low-intensity wheelchair training in inactive people with long-term spinal cord injury van der Scheer, Jan IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2015 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van der Scheer, J. (2015). Low-intensity wheelchair training in inactive people with long-term spinal cord injury [S.l.]: [S.n.] Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 27-07-2018

University of Groningen Low-intensity wheelchair training ... · Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record ... ZDV©WKH©½UVW©RI©WKH© ©LQWHUYDOV ... 3VWDUWõ P46.3 ±17.0

  • Upload
    lamnhan

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • University of Groningen

    Low-intensity wheelchair training in inactive people with long-term spinal cord injuryvan der Scheer, Jan

    IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.

    Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

    Publication date:2015

    Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

    Citation for published version (APA):van der Scheer, J. (2015). Low-intensity wheelchair training in inactive people with long-term spinal cordinjury [S.l.]: [S.n.]

    CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

    Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.

    Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

    Download date: 27-07-2018

    https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/en/publications/lowintensity-wheelchair-training-in-inactive-people-with-longterm-spinal-cord-injury(a87932d1-145e-4cf5-b368-f303a11e3e9b).html

  • Chapter 4

    Can a 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint be used to

    Jan W. van der ScheerSonja de Groot

    Riemer J.K. Vegter

    Med Eng Phys 2014; 36: 432-438

    4

  • Chapter 4

    60

    (PO) over a 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint test can be used to assess wheel-

    -

    based on stopwatch time (time and mean velocity over 15 m) and on PO (primary

    -

    r

    2 p -1

    2 p -r 2 p

    It seems that outcomes based on stopwatch time over a 15 m-over-

    -ed wheel can be implemented in rehabilitation practice and research settings when

  • Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity

    61

    14

    -

    6-8

    -3

    output outcomes over a Wingate-like sprint test in a wheelchair ergometer or roller --

    Alternative tests

    15-17 and as such has been implemented in rehabil-18 -

    15

    17

    (r r 19 while others r 8

    -

    -20 In the

    It is not yet known how PO is expressed in a 15 m-overground sprint and whether

  • Chapter 4

    62

    -

    7 which resembles time needed to complete a 15 m-over-

    -1

    20 Able-bodied persons participated in this initial study on 15-m sprint outcomes

    -25

    on stopwatch time and PO over a 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint test can be used

    ParticipantsN

    Table 1. N

    Characteristic Mean SD (range)

    a

    Fisoa

    a Measured when hands were on top of the handrim.

    Equipment

  • Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity

    63

    14

    -

    5 -

    We used a custom-built stationary ergometer26 --

    25 -mensions were adjusted so that it matched as closely as possible the wheelchair used

    Protocol

    with ergometer propulsion and learning to maintain the same relative velocity between

    15-18

    15

    -

    25 -

    et al.27

  • Chapter 4

    64

    -

    -1

    -1

    -1 or was unable to propel the wheel-

    Data processing

    28) and analyzed using 28

    20

    20

    Statistics

    p

    r) and 2) were calculated between 15-m outcomes (time-15

    p

  • Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity

    65

    14

    29

    -p

    -

    either time-15 m or P5-15m as the independent variable (step 1) and combined in step

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8-100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    Time (s)

    Unila

    tera

    l PO

    (W)

    PO (W)Push startPush stopPpeak-15m

    P5 -15m

    Pstart -15m

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30-100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    Time (s)

    Un

    ilate

    ral P

    O (

    W)

    P5-WAnT

    P30-WAnT

    Figure 1.

    last data point representing the start angle plus 15 m in radians.

    -

    -

    -

    263N.

    Figure 2.

    30s-wheelchair ergometer sprint and of the

    over the 6 successive 5-s intervals of Win-

  • Chapter 4

    66

    All subjects (N-1

    r and R2 that were calculated between 15-m sprint

    r

    2 p 2= p

    between all outcomes (r p

    Table 2.

    N

    PO outcome Unilateral PO (W) -1) -1)

    38.1 14.0 1.8 0.3* 3.1 0.4*

    46.3 17.0 1.0 0.2* 2.1 0.4*

    228.0 71.6 N.A. 2.4 0.4

    44.4 17.3 1.2 0.3 1.6 0.3

    57.0 19.0 1.2 0.2* 1.5 0.3*Data in mean SD.

    Table 3. -

    N

    P30-WAnT P5-WAnT

    r R2 r R2

    Time-15 m 0.38* 0.36*

    MeanVelocity-15 ma 0.42* 0.39*

    0.59** 0.56**

    0.62** 0.61**

    0.69** 0.61**

    a Linear model without intercept

  • Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity

    67

    14

    -

    -

    -1

    -1

    p

    -1

    p

    2p

    2p

    2p

    2p

    0 1 2 3 4 5-100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    Unila

    tera

    l PO

    (W)

    Time (s)

    0 1 2 3 4 5-1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    Velo

    city (

    m/s)

    Time (s)

    15m sprintWAnT

    15m sprintWAnT

    Figure 4.

    the interval of the highest successive 5-s

    -gate-based 30s-wheelchair ergometer sprint

    20 30 40 50 60 70 80 901.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    P5-WAnT (W)

    Mean

    Velo

    city-

    15m

    (m/s)

    Figure 3. Scatter plot of meanVelocity-15m N

    line representing the linear model used to study the relationship between the outcomes over a data range than can be

    15,16,19

  • Chapter 4

    68

    Table 4.

    Time-15 m (s) P5-15m (W)

    p R2 p R2

    Step 1

    Constant 120.36 24.01 7.84 7.59 0.316

    15 m-outcome -10.50 3.29 0.005 0.38 0.96 0.19 0.61

    Step 2

    Constant 78.96 22.88 -7.01 14.95

    15 m-outcome -11.53 2.64 0.001 0.88 0.20

    0.70 0.21 0.005 0.63 0.26 0.22 0.265 0.63

    Step 2

    Constant 212.63 50.93 103.27 47.83

    15 m-outcome -7.68 3.34 0.035 0.80 0.19 0.001a -1.06 0.53 0.061 0.50 -0.84 0.42 0.061 0.69

    Step 2

    Constant 104.77 23.63 17.04 11.13

    15 m-outcome -7.50 3.43 0.044 0.81 0.23 0.002

    -12.96 6.75 0.073 0.49 -6.97 6.24 0.278 0.64a Measured when hands were on top of the handrim. Abbreviations: 2

    5-s intervals of 15 m sprint.

    30 40 50 60 70-60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    Unilateral PO (W)

    P5-1

    5m -

    P5-W

    AnT

    (W)

    Figure 5. -

    plotted indicating mean difference between the outcomes, while upper and lower lines indicate

  • Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity

    69

    14

    over a 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint test can be used to assess wheelchair-spe-

    -1 (table

    -1

    -

    -

    r

    r

    r

    -sively starting to propel an inherently unstable wheelchair while this is not required in

    -

    -

    in which

    -

  • Chapter 4

    70

    -

    -

    same conclusion as based on the linear model tested in this study: stopwatch time over

    r p -

    -

    during an interval with relatively low handrim velocities may stronger relate to

    -1

    r p

    -

  • Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity

    71

    14

    compared to P5-15m (also r

    over Pstart-15m and Ppeak-15m since P5-15m is determined identically to the widely

    25

    a more homogeneous and well-accessible group compared to non-athletic wheelchair 25

    -15

    -

    -

    by time-15 m and P5-15m (both p

    p

    -ships between the tests in an able-bodied sample are similar in non-athletic wheel-

    -8 and

    27

    We conclude that outcomes based on stopwatch time over a 15 m-overground sprint

    -chair with an instrumented wheel can be implemented in rehabilitation practice and

    -

  • Chapter 4

    72

    -

  • Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity

    73

    14

    -

    -

    -

    -

  • Chapter 4

    74

    -

    -

  • Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity

    75

    14