Upload
lamnhan
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
University of Groningen
Low-intensity wheelchair training in inactive people with long-term spinal cord injuryvan der Scheer, Jan
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.
Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date:2015
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):van der Scheer, J. (2015). Low-intensity wheelchair training in inactive people with long-term spinal cordinjury [S.l.]: [S.n.]
CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Download date: 27-07-2018
https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/en/publications/lowintensity-wheelchair-training-in-inactive-people-with-longterm-spinal-cord-injury(a87932d1-145e-4cf5-b368-f303a11e3e9b).html
Chapter 4
Can a 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint be used to
Jan W. van der ScheerSonja de Groot
Riemer J.K. Vegter
Med Eng Phys 2014; 36: 432-438
4
Chapter 4
60
(PO) over a 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint test can be used to assess wheel-
-
based on stopwatch time (time and mean velocity over 15 m) and on PO (primary
-
r
2 p -1
2 p -r 2 p
It seems that outcomes based on stopwatch time over a 15 m-over-
-ed wheel can be implemented in rehabilitation practice and research settings when
Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity
61
14
-
6-8
-3
output outcomes over a Wingate-like sprint test in a wheelchair ergometer or roller --
Alternative tests
15-17 and as such has been implemented in rehabil-18 -
15
17
(r r 19 while others r 8
-
-20 In the
It is not yet known how PO is expressed in a 15 m-overground sprint and whether
Chapter 4
62
-
7 which resembles time needed to complete a 15 m-over-
-1
20 Able-bodied persons participated in this initial study on 15-m sprint outcomes
-25
on stopwatch time and PO over a 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint test can be used
ParticipantsN
Table 1. N
Characteristic Mean SD (range)
a
Fisoa
a Measured when hands were on top of the handrim.
Equipment
Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity
63
14
-
5 -
We used a custom-built stationary ergometer26 --
25 -mensions were adjusted so that it matched as closely as possible the wheelchair used
Protocol
with ergometer propulsion and learning to maintain the same relative velocity between
15-18
15
-
25 -
et al.27
Chapter 4
64
-
-1
-1
-1 or was unable to propel the wheel-
Data processing
28) and analyzed using 28
20
20
Statistics
p
r) and 2) were calculated between 15-m outcomes (time-15
p
Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity
65
14
29
-p
-
either time-15 m or P5-15m as the independent variable (step 1) and combined in step
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Time (s)
Unila
tera
l PO
(W)
PO (W)Push startPush stopPpeak-15m
P5 -15m
Pstart -15m
0 5 10 15 20 25 30-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Time (s)
Un
ilate
ral P
O (
W)
P5-WAnT
P30-WAnT
Figure 1.
last data point representing the start angle plus 15 m in radians.
-
-
-
263N.
Figure 2.
30s-wheelchair ergometer sprint and of the
over the 6 successive 5-s intervals of Win-
Chapter 4
66
All subjects (N-1
r and R2 that were calculated between 15-m sprint
r
2 p 2= p
between all outcomes (r p
Table 2.
N
PO outcome Unilateral PO (W) -1) -1)
38.1 14.0 1.8 0.3* 3.1 0.4*
46.3 17.0 1.0 0.2* 2.1 0.4*
228.0 71.6 N.A. 2.4 0.4
44.4 17.3 1.2 0.3 1.6 0.3
57.0 19.0 1.2 0.2* 1.5 0.3*Data in mean SD.
Table 3. -
N
P30-WAnT P5-WAnT
r R2 r R2
Time-15 m 0.38* 0.36*
MeanVelocity-15 ma 0.42* 0.39*
0.59** 0.56**
0.62** 0.61**
0.69** 0.61**
a Linear model without intercept
Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity
67
14
-
-
-1
-1
p
-1
p
2p
2p
2p
2p
0 1 2 3 4 5-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Unila
tera
l PO
(W)
Time (s)
0 1 2 3 4 5-1
0
1
2
3
Velo
city (
m/s)
Time (s)
15m sprintWAnT
15m sprintWAnT
Figure 4.
the interval of the highest successive 5-s
-gate-based 30s-wheelchair ergometer sprint
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 901.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
P5-WAnT (W)
Mean
Velo
city-
15m
(m/s)
Figure 3. Scatter plot of meanVelocity-15m N
line representing the linear model used to study the relationship between the outcomes over a data range than can be
15,16,19
Chapter 4
68
Table 4.
Time-15 m (s) P5-15m (W)
p R2 p R2
Step 1
Constant 120.36 24.01 7.84 7.59 0.316
15 m-outcome -10.50 3.29 0.005 0.38 0.96 0.19 0.61
Step 2
Constant 78.96 22.88 -7.01 14.95
15 m-outcome -11.53 2.64 0.001 0.88 0.20
0.70 0.21 0.005 0.63 0.26 0.22 0.265 0.63
Step 2
Constant 212.63 50.93 103.27 47.83
15 m-outcome -7.68 3.34 0.035 0.80 0.19 0.001a -1.06 0.53 0.061 0.50 -0.84 0.42 0.061 0.69
Step 2
Constant 104.77 23.63 17.04 11.13
15 m-outcome -7.50 3.43 0.044 0.81 0.23 0.002
-12.96 6.75 0.073 0.49 -6.97 6.24 0.278 0.64a Measured when hands were on top of the handrim. Abbreviations: 2
5-s intervals of 15 m sprint.
30 40 50 60 70-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Unilateral PO (W)
P5-1
5m -
P5-W
AnT
(W)
Figure 5. -
plotted indicating mean difference between the outcomes, while upper and lower lines indicate
Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity
69
14
over a 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint test can be used to assess wheelchair-spe-
-1 (table
-1
-
-
r
r
r
-sively starting to propel an inherently unstable wheelchair while this is not required in
-
-
in which
-
Chapter 4
70
-
-
same conclusion as based on the linear model tested in this study: stopwatch time over
r p -
-
during an interval with relatively low handrim velocities may stronger relate to
-1
r p
-
Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity
71
14
compared to P5-15m (also r
over Pstart-15m and Ppeak-15m since P5-15m is determined identically to the widely
25
a more homogeneous and well-accessible group compared to non-athletic wheelchair 25
-15
-
-
by time-15 m and P5-15m (both p
p
-ships between the tests in an able-bodied sample are similar in non-athletic wheel-
-8 and
27
We conclude that outcomes based on stopwatch time over a 15 m-overground sprint
-chair with an instrumented wheel can be implemented in rehabilitation practice and
-
Chapter 4
72
-
Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity
73
14
-
-
-
-
Chapter 4
74
-
-
Chapter 4 15 m-overground wheelchair sprint to assess anaerobic work capacity
75
14