167
UNIVERSITY OF GUAYAQUIL FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, LETTERS AND EDUCATION SCIENCES SCHOOL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS EDUCATIONAL PROJECT IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR OBTAINING THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS DEGREE TOPIC: INFLUENCE OF THE USE OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TO IMPROVE READING COMPREHENSION ACCOMPLISHMENT PROPOSAL: DESIGN OF A CRITICAL THINKING SKILL BOOKLET FOR THE STRENGTHENING OF THE READING COMPREHENSION IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE AUTHORS: GARCÍA TENEMPAGUAY LOURDES VERÓNICA VILLÓN MEZA ODALY DEL ROCÍO ADVISOR Msc. Heidi Marriott Toledo GUAYAQUIL ECUADOR 2018

UNIVERSITY OF GUAYAQUIL FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, …repositorio.ug.edu.ec/bitstream/redug/38135/1/Garcia - Villon.pdf · insufficient reading comprehension of the English language in

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • UNIVERSITY OF GUAYAQUIL

    FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, LETTERS AND EDUCATION SCIENCES

    SCHOOL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS

    EDUCATIONAL PROJECT

    IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR OBTAINING THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS DEGREE

    TOPIC:

    INFLUENCE OF THE USE OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TO

    IMPROVE READING COMPREHENSION ACCOMPLISHMENT

    PROPOSAL:

    DESIGN OF A CRITICAL THINKING SKILL BOOKLET FOR THE

    STRENGTHENING OF THE READING COMPREHENSION IN THE

    ENGLISH LANGUAGE

    AUTHORS:

    GARCÍA TENEMPAGUAY LOURDES VERÓNICA

    VILLÓN MEZA ODALY DEL ROCÍO

    ADVISOR

    Msc. Heidi Marriott Toledo

    GUAYAQUIL – ECUADOR

    2018

  • ii

    UNIVERSITY OF GUAYAQUIL

    FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, LETTERS AND EDUCATION SCIENCES

    SCHOOL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS

    BOARD OF DIRECTORS

    _________________________ ________________________

    MSc. Silvia Moy-Sang Castro MSc. Wilson Romero Dávila

    DEAN SUB- DEAN

    __________________________ _________________________

    MSc. Alfonso Sánchez Ávila Ab. Sebastián Cadena Alvarado

    DIRECTOR OF THE CAREER GENERAL SECRETARY

  • iii

    FACULTAD FILOSOFÍA, LETRAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN ESCUELA DE LENGUAS Y LINGÜÍSTICA

    UNIDAD DE TITULACIÓN

    Guayaquil, 29 de Junio del 2018

    MSc. ALFONSO SANCHÉZ ÁVILA DIRECTOR (A) DE CARRERA FACULTAD FILOSOFÍA, LETRAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN UNIVERSIDAD DE GUAYAQUIL Ciudad.-

    De mis consideraciones:

    Envío a Ud. el Informe correspondiente a la tutoría realizada al Trabajo de TITULACIÓN INFLUENCE OF THE USE OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILL TO IMPROVE THE READING COMPREHENSION ACCOMPLISHMENT. DESIGN OF A CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS BOOKLET FOR THE STRENGTHENING OF READING COMPREHENSION IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE de los estudiantes GARCÍA TENEMPAGUAY LOURDES VERÓNICA-VILLÓN MEZA ODALY DEL ROCÍO, indicando han cumplido con todos los parámetros establecidos en la normativa vigente:

    El trabajo es el resultado de una investigación.

    El estudiante demuestra conocimiento profesional integral.

    El trabajo presenta una propuesta en el área de conocimiento.

    El nivel de argumentación es coherente con el campo de conocimiento.

    Adicionalmente, se adjunta el certificado de porcentaje de similitud y la valoración del trabajo de titulación con la respectiva calificación.

    Dando por concluida esta tutoría de trabajo de titulación, CERTIFICO, para los fines pertinentes, que los estudiantes están aptos para continuar con el proceso de revisión final.

    Atentamente,

  • iv

  • v

    UNIVERSITY OF GUAYAQUIL

    FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, LETTERS AND EDUCATION SCIENCES

    SCHOOL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS

    PROJECT

    TOPIC: INFLUENCE OF THE USE OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TO

    IMPROVE READING COMPREHENSION ACCOMPLISHMENT.

    PROPOSAL: DESIGN OF A CRITICAL THINKING SKILL BOOKLET FOR

    THE STRENGTHENING OF THE READING COMPREHENSION IN THE

    ENGLISH LANGUAGE.

    APPROVED

    ……………………………

    Tribunal No 1

    …..…………………… ….………………………

    Tribunal No 2 Tribunal No 3

    Lourdes Verónica García Tenempaguay Odaly del Rocío Villón Meza

    C.I. 0924973274 C.I.0923237424

  • vi

    EL TRIBUNAL EXAMINADOR OTORGA AL PRESENTE TRABAJO

    LA CALIFICACIÓN DE: ______________

    EQUIVALENTE A: ______________

    TRIBUNAL

    ______________ _____________

    ______________

  • vii

    DEDICATION

    All this effort is dedicated to God for allowing me to continue with my

    studies, which with great effort and dedication I have been able to

    successfully complete.

    This work was also dedicated to my husband Jefferson Vélez Zambrano,

    for his continuous support. To my mother because her sound advice,

    values, motivation, and blessings have helped me succeed in my studies.

    Finally, to the teachers who marked each stage of my university path, and

    who helped me overcome difficulties and doubts presented in the

    preparation of my thesis.

    Villón Meza Odaly del Rocío

    I am proud to dedicate this project to my main guide, God, for giving me a

    life full of health, love and faith, for guiding my steps and for always

    staying on the right path. To my family that was an important pillar for me.

    And above all to my beloved children Paulette and Yoel.

    García Tenempaguay Lourdes Verónica

  • viii

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    I would like to thank First of all God who created the universe. To my

    mother, for giving me the necessary strength in the difficult moments of my

    life.

    I am also grateful to my thesis supervisor MSc. Heidi Marriott Toledo, for

    giving me the opportunity to draw on her scientific knowledge and ability,

    and for her patience in guiding me throughout the development of the

    thesis.

    Villón Meza Odaly del Rocío

    I would like to thank my MSc thesis consultant. Heidi Marriot, who was a

    great support for me. Your patience and effort makes me perseverant.

    Thanks to her experience, motivation and kindness.

    I also thank all the teachers who made my learning process possible over

    time, which made my knowledge grow.

    García Tenempaguay Lourdes Verónica

  • ix

    GENERAL INDEX

    PRELIMINARY PAGES

    COVER PAGE .............................................................................................i

    BOARD OF DIRECTORS ...........................................................................ii

    DOCUMENTS……………………………………………….…………...…......iii

    LETTER OF APPROVAL............................................................................iv

    INTELLECTUAL POPERTY RIGHTS..........................................................v

    TRIBUNAL’S GRADE .............................................................................. vi

    DEDICATION.............................................................................................vii

    ACKNOWLEDGENT.................................................................................viii

    GENERAL INDEX......................................................................................ix

    CHAPTERS…………………………………………………….…….…...........x

    INDEX OF TABLES ................................................................................xiii

    INDEX OF GRAPHIC..............................................................................xiv

    REPOSITORIO NACIONAL EN CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA..................xvi

    NATIONAL REPOSITORY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.................xvii

    RESUMEN............................................................................................ xviii

    ABSTRACT............................................................................................ xix

    INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................1

    CHAPTER I

    THE PROBLEM

    CONTEXT OF THE RESEARCH............................................................. 3

    RESEARCH PROBLEM ..........................................................................3

    CONFLICT SITUATION........................................................................... 3

  • x

    SCIENTIFIC FACT .................................................................................. 4

    CAUSES................................................................................................... 5

    PROBLEM FORMULATION..................................................................... 5

    OBJECTIVES OF THE INVESTIGATION................................................ 6

    GENERAL OBJECTIVE........................................................................... 6

    SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES..........................................................................6

    RESEARCH QUESTION..........................................................................6

    JUSTIFICATION.......................................................................................6

    CHAPTER II

    THEORETICAL FRAME

    BACKGROUND.........................................................................................9

    THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................9

    PEDAGOGICAL FOUNDATION............................................................. 25

    DIDACTIC FOUNDATION……………………………………….……....….29

    PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ........................................................32

    SOCIOLOGICAL FOUNDATION.............................................................33

    LEGAL FOUNDATION ...........................................................................35

    CHAPTER III

    METHODOLOGY, PROCESS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF THE

    RESULTS

    METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN ............................................................. 38

    TYPES OF INVESTIGATION ............................................................... 38

    OPERATIONALIZATION OF THE VARIABLES CHART...................... 39

    POPULATION....................................................................................... 40

    SAMPLE................................................................................................ 40

    INVESTIGATION METHODS................................................................ 41

  • xi

    TECHNIQUES AND RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS................................ 42

    TECHNIQUES OF THE INVESTIGATION............................................. 42

    INSTRUMENTS OF THE INVESTIGATION........................................... 43

    ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULT OF THE

    INSTRUMENTS OF INVESTIGATION................................................... 44

    ANALYSIS OF THE OBSERVATION RESULT .....................................44

    ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF THE SURVEY TO THE STUDENT... .... 45

    ANALYSIS OF RESULT OF THE TEACHER INTERVIEW ...................61

    CHI SQUARE TEST ..............................................................................62

    CHAPTER IV

    THE PROPOSAL

    JUSTIFICATION.....................................................................................64

    OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................65

    GENERAL OBJECTIVE......................................................................... 65

    SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES....................................................................... 65

    THEORETICAL ASPECTS.................................................................... 54

    EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ………………………….…......…..65

    PEDAGOGICAL FOUNDATION………………………………………...…65

    FEASIBILITY OF ITS APPLICATION ....................................................66

    FINANCIAL.............................................................................................66

    LEGAL........................................................................................ ............66

    HUMAN RESOURCES...........................................................................66

    POLICIES...............................................................................................66

    DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL……………………………………66

    THE PROPOSAL

    COVER PAGE......................................................................................69

    GENERAL INDEX OF THE PROPOSAL ……………..………........…..70

  • xii

    INTRODUCTION OF THE PROPOSAL……………………….………....72

    CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................127

    RECOMENDACIONES……………………………………………….…...127

    REFERENCES ....................................................................................128

    BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................129

    ANNEXES

    ANNEX 1……………………………………………………..……..….…..130

    ANNEX 2 ………………………………………………………....…..……136

    ANNEX 3…………………………………………………………….…..….139

    ANNEX4………………………………………………………..….....….…143

  • xiii

    INDEX OF TABLES

    TABLE 1: OPERATIONALIZATION OF THE VARIABLES………..……..39

    TABLE 2: POPULATION & SAMPLE…………………….……….…………40

    TABLE 3. ANALYSIS OF THE OBSERVATION RESULT………………..44

    TABLE 4: ITEM 1. READING ACTIVITIS……………………………….…..45

    TABLE 5: ITEM 2. ENJOYING READING………………………………….46

    TABLE 6: ITEM 3. GROUP WORK………………………………….……...47

    TABLE 7: ITEM 4. MODELING EXAMPLES……………………………...48

    TABLE 8: ITEM 5. CHALLEGING EXERCISES…………………..………49

    TABLE 9: ITEM 6. READING…………………………………………….…50

    TABLE 10: ITEM 7. READING TOPICS…………………………….…...…51

    TABLE 11: ITEM 8. GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS……………………..….....52

    TABLE 12: ITEM 9. WARM–UP READING ACTIVITIES………..……....53

    TABLE 13 : ITEM 10. READING MOTIVATION…………………..…….…54

    TABLE 14: ITEM 11. THINKING DEEPLY…………………………..…….55

    TABLE 15: ITEM 12. ENGLISH INSTRUCTIONS……………………..…56

    TABLE 16: ITEM 13. READING INSTRUCTIONS……………………….57

    TABLE 17: ITEM 14. READING STRATEGIES……………………...….58

    TABLE 18: ITEM15. PARTICIPATION IN CLASS……………….……...59

    TABLE 19: ITEM 16. SURVEY…………………………………………....60

    TABLE 20: ITEM 17. CHIP SQUARE RESULT……………………...….62

  • xiv

    INDEX OF GRAPHIC

    GRAPHIC 1: ITEM 1 READING CTIVITIES….……………………….…..45

    GRAPHIC 2: ITEM 2 ENJOYING ACTIVITIES…………………..…….….46

    GRAPHIC 3: ITEM 3 GROUP WORK……………………...……………...47

    GRAPHIC 4: ITEM 4 MODELING EXAMPLES………………...….......…48

    GRAPHIC 5: ITEM 5 CHALLENGING EXERCISES…………….....….…49

    GRAPHIC 6: ITEM 6 READING……………………………. ..…. ……... ..50

    GRAPHIC 7: ITEM 7 READING TOPICS ……………………………….…51

    GRAPHIC 8: ITEM 8 GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS……..……………….…..52

    GRAPHIC 9: ITEM 9 WARM-UP READING ACTIVITIES……….………53

    GRAPHIC 1O: ITEM 10 READING ACTIVITIES…………….….………..54

    GRAPHIC 11: ITEM 11THINKING DEEPLY……………….………….…55

    GRAPHIC 12: ITEM 12 ENGLISH INSTRUCTIONS……….……………56

    GRAPHIC 13: ITEM 13 READING INSTRUCTIONS…….……….……..57

    GRAPHIC 14: ITEM 14 READING STRATEGIES…….………………….58

    GRAPHIC 15: ITEM 15 PARTICIPATION IN CLASS………………….…59

    GRAPHIC 16: ITEM 16 CHIP SQUARE RESULT………………………..62

  • xv

    FACULTAD FILOSOFÍA, LETRAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN

    ESCUELA DE LENGUAS Y LINGÜÍSTICA

    UNIDAD DE TITULACIÓN

    LICENCIA GRATUITA INTRANSFERIBLE Y NO EXCLUSIVA PARA EL

    USO NO COMERCIAL DE LA OBRA CON FINES NO ACADÉMICOS

    Yo, García Tenempaguay Lourdes Verónica con C.I. No. 0924973274 y

    Villón Meza Odaly Del Rocío con C.I. No. 0923237424, certifico que los

    contenidos desarrollados en este trabajo de titulación, cuyo título es:

    “ Influence of the use of critical thinking skill to improve the reading

    comprehension accomplishment. Design of a critical thinking skills booklet

    for the strengthening of reading comprehension in the English language ”

    son de nuestra absoluta propiedad y responsabilidad Y SEGÚN EL Art.

    114 del CÓDIGO ORGÁNICO DE LA ECONOMÍA SOCIAL DE LOS

    CONOCIMIENTOS, CREATIVIDAD E INNOVACIÓN*, autorizo el uso de

    una licencia gratuita intransferible y no exclusiva para el uso no comercial

    de la presente obra con fines no académicos, en favor de la Universidad

    de Guayaquil, para que haga uso del mismo, como fuera pertinente

    García Tenempaguay Lourdes Verónica Villón Meza Odaly Del Rocío

    C.I. No. 0924973274 C.I No. 0923237424

    C.I. No. 0924973274-C.I No. 0923237424

    *CÓDIGO ORGÁNICO DE LA ECONOMÍA SOCIAL DE LOS CONOCIMIENTOS, CREATIVIDAD E INNOVACIÓN (Registro

    Oficial n. 899 - Dic./2016) Artículo 114.- De los titulares de derechos de obras creadas en las instituciones de

    educación superior y centros educativos.- En el caso de las obras creadas en centros educativos, universidades,

    escuelas politécnicas, institutos superiores técnicos, tecnológicos, pedagógicos, de artes y los conservatorios

    superiores, e institutos públicos de investigación como resultado de su actividad académica o de investigación

    tales como trabajos de titulación, proyectos de investigación o innovación, artículos académicos, u otros

    análogos, sin perjuicio de que pueda existir relación de dependencia, la titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales

    corresponderá a los autores. Sin embargo, el establecimiento tendrá una licencia gratuita, intransferible y no

    exclusiva para el uso no comercial de la obra con fines académicos.

  • xvi

    FACULTAD FILOSOFÍA, LETRAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN

    ESCUELA DE LENGUAS Y LINGÜÍSTICA

    UNIDAD DE TITULACIÓN

    REPOSITORIO NACIONAL EN CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA

    FICHA DE REGISTRO DE TESIS/TRABAJO DE GRADUACIÓN

    TÍTULO Y SUBTÍTULO: Influence of the use of critical thinking skill to improve the reading comprehension accomplishment. Design of a critical thinking skills booklet for the strengthening of reading comprehension in the English Language.

    AUTOR(ES) (apellidos/nombres):

    García Tenempaguay Lourdes Verónica - Villón Meza Odaly Del Rocío

    REVISOR(ES)/TUTOR(ES) (apellidos/nombres):

    MSc. Heidi Marriott Toledo

    INSTITUCIÓN: Universidad De Guayaquil

    UNIDAD/FACULTAD: Facultad de Filosofía, Letras y Ciencias de la Educación

    MAESTRÍA/ESPECIALIDAD: Lenguas y Lingüística

    GRADO OBTENIDO: Licenciatura en Ciencias de la Educación, mención en Lengua Inglesa y Lingüística

    FECHA DE PUBLICACIÓN: No. DE PÁGINAS: DE CLASIFICACIÓN

    ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS: Lengua Inglesa

    PALABRAS CLAVES/ KEYWORDS:

    Reading, reading comprehension, thinking skills, reading strategies.

    RESUMEN/ABSTRACT : This document is the result of an investigation at the Francisco Huerta Rendon high school related to the insufficient reading comprehension of the English language in the 8th grade students of General Basic Education. This research work was carried out to determine the influence of critical thinking skills in the development of reading comprehension. Since reading is a metacognitive process, there is a strong link with thinking skills. This research work has been carried out through theoretical, empirical and statistical methods following a mixed, qualitative and quantitative methodological approach and the application of different data collection instruments; as, an observation guide, surveys and interviews and after a thorough analysis.

    ADJUNTO PDF: SI NO

    CONTACTO CON AUTOR/ES: Teléfono: 0989904863 0987155141

    E-mail: [email protected] [email protected]

    CONTACTO CON LA INSTITUCIÓN:

    Nombre: : Secretaría de la Escuela de Lenguas y Lingüística

    Teléfono: (04)2294888 Ext. 123

    E-mail: [email protected]

    x

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • xvii

    FACULTAD FILOSOFÍA, LETRAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN

    ESCUELA DE LENGUAS Y LINGÜÍSTICA

    UNIDAD DE TITULACIÓN

    REPOSITORIO NACIONAL EN CIENCIA Y

    TECNOLOGÍA

    FICHA DE REGISTRO DE TESIS/TRABAJO DE GRADUACIÓN

    TÍTULO Y SUBTÍTULO: Influencia del uso de la capacidad de pensamiento crítico para mejorar el logro de la comprensión lectora. Diseño de un folleto de habilidades de pensamiento crítico para el fortalecimiento de la comprensión lectora en el idioma inglés.

    AUTOR(ES) (apellidos/nombres):

    García Tenempaguay Lourdes Verónica- Villón Meza Odaly Del Rocío

    REVISOR(ES)/TUTOR(ES) (apellidos/nombres):

    MSc. Heidi Marriott Toledo

    INSTITUCIÓN: Universidad De Guayaquil

    UNIDAD/FACULTAD: Facultad de Filosofía, Letras y Ciencias de la Educación

    MAESTRÍA/ESPECIALIDAD: Lenguas y Lingüística

    GRADO OBTENIDO: Licenciatura en Ciencias de la Educación, mención en Lengua Inglesa y Lingüística

    FECHA DE PUBLICACIÓN: No. DE PÁGINAS: DE CLASIFICACIÓN

    ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS: Lengua Inglesa

    PALABRAS CLAVES/ KEYWORDS:

    Lectura, comprensión de lectura, habilidades de pensamiento, estrategias de lectura.

    RESUMEN/ABSTRACT : Este documento es el resultado de una investigación en la escuela secundaria Francisco Huerta Rendón relacionada con la insuficiente comprensión lectora del idioma inglés en los estudiantes de 8 ° grado de Educación Básica General. Este trabajo de investigación se llevó a cabo para determinar la influencia de las habilidades de pensamiento crítico en el desarrollo de la comprensión lectora. Dado que la lectura es un proceso metacognitivo, existe un fuerte vínculo con las habilidades de pensamiento. Este trabajo de investigación se ha llevado a cabo a través de métodos teóricos, empíricos y estadísticos siguiendo un enfoque metodológico mixto, cualitativo y cuantitativo y la aplicación de diferentes instrumentos de recopilación de datos; como, una guía de observación, encuestas y entrevistas y después de un análisis exhaustivo.

    ADJUNTO PDF: SI NO

    CONTACTO CON AUTOR/ES:

    Teléfono:0989904863, 0987155141

    E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

    CONTACTO CON LA INSTITUCIÓN:

    Nombre: : Secretaría de la Escuela de Lenguas y Lingüística

    Teléfono: (04)2294888 Ext. 123

    E-mail: [email protected]

    x

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • xviii

    FACULTAD FILOSOFÍA, LETRAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN ESCUELA DE LENGUAS Y LINGÜÍSTICA

    UNIDAD DE TITULACIÓN

    "Influencia del uso de la capacidad de pensamiento crítico para mejorar el logro

    de la comprensión lectora. Diseño de un folleto de habilidades de pensamiento

    crítico para el fortalecimiento de la comprensión lectora en el idioma inglés".

    Autor: García Tenempaguay Lourdes

    Villón Meza Odaly Del Rocío

    Tutor: : MSc. Heidi Marriott Toledo

    Resumen

    Este documento es el resultado de una investigación en la escuela secundaria

    Francisco Huerta Rendón relacionada con la insuficiente comprensión lectora del

    idioma inglés en los estudiantes de 8 ° grado de Educación Básica General. Este

    trabajo de investigación se llevó a cabo para determinar la influencia de las

    habilidades de pensamiento crítico en el desarrollo de la comprensión lectora.

    Dado que la lectura es un proceso metacognitivo, existe un fuerte vínculo con las

    habilidades de pensamiento. Este trabajo de investigación se ha llevado a cabo a

    través de métodos teóricos, empíricos y estadísticos siguiendo un enfoque

    metodológico mixto, cualitativo y cuantitativo y la aplicación de diferentes

    instrumentos de recopilación de datos; como, una guía de observación,

    encuestas y entrevistas y después de un análisis exhaustivo.

    Palabras claves: Lectura, comprensión de lectura, habilidades de

    pensamiento, estrategias de lectura.

  • xix

    FACULTAD FILOSOFÍA, LETRAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN ESCUELA DE LENGUAS Y LINGÜÍSTICA

    UNIDAD DE TITULACIÓN

    “Influence of the use of critical thinking skill to improve the

    reading comprehension accomplishment. Design of a critical

    thinking skills booklet for the strengthening of reading

    comprehension in the English language”

    Autor: García Tenempaguay Lourdes

    Villón Meza Odaly Del Rocío

    Tutor: MSc. Heidi Marriott Toledo

    Abstract

    This document is the result of an investigation at the Francisco Huerta

    Rendon high school related to the insufficient reading comprehension of

    the English language in the 8th grade students of General Basic

    Education. This research work was carried out to determine the influence

    of critical thinking skills in the development of reading comprehension.

    Since reading is a metacognitive process, there is a strong link with

    thinking skills. This research work has been carried out through

    theoretical, empirical and statistical methods following a mixed, qualitative

    and quantitative methodological approach and the application of different

    data collection instruments; as, an observation guide, surveys and

    interviews and after a thorough analysis.

    Keyword: Reading, reading comprehension, thinking skills, reading

    strategies

  • 1

    INTRODUCTION

    Reading process and improve the skills of critical thinking as inference,

    interpretation and reading is a vital component in each of the educational

    spaces and requires adequate reflection for its execution. The present

    research work seeks the design, constructions and subsequent

    elaboration of reading comprehension workshops as an innovative tool

    and facilitator of the critical reading process.

    It has as population the students of Eighth grade of General Basic

    Education at Francisco Huerta Rendón High School, located in Guayaquil-

    Ecuador, in this population it is evident the need to strengthen the

    evaluation through critical reading of short stories and that what is done in

    the classroom can transcend beyond the classroom, since the students

    recognize that the reading process is fundamental in all the ambits

    CHAPTER I - THE PROBLEM: Describes the problem in context, scientific

    facts and principal causes, objectives and questions of this research.

    CHAPTER II - THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: which consists of

    background information study, that is, relevant topics similar to the

    research topic that is being carried out, consists of theoretical bases that

    are based on the application of thinking skills, the process of teaching -

    learning with their respective definitions, they are shown also the

    foundations of the present investigative work, which are: philosophical,

    pedagogical, psychological, sociological, etc. In addition, the contextual

    frame and the legal basis, the same that mentions the main laws in which

    this project is based on.

    CHAPTER III - ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS: The

    discussion of results; that is the methodology of the research, this chapter

    includes the types of research, population and shows, the

  • 2

    operationalization of the study variables, used in the investigative process,

    describes the research methods, the techniques and instruments.

    CHAPTER IV - THE PROPOSAL: Offers the proposal, its justification, the

    objectives and the practicable application as well as its description and

    conclusions.

  • 3

    CHAPTER I

    THE PROBLEM

    This research work aims to solve the problem in reading

    comprehension development found in students of Eighth grade of General

    Basic Education (BGE) at Francisco Huerta Rendón high school. This is a

    mid-level educational institution created in May of 1971; attached to the

    Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Guayaquil.

    Conflict situation

    During the initial observations performed during five English

    teaching practice periods with students of Eighth grade of BGE at

    Francisco Huerta Rendón High School, the researchers noticed that most

    of the students were getting low grades in reading comprehension class

    activities and lessons.

    After having revised, the materials and the strategies used by the

    English teacher, as concrete evidence; authors have realized that the

    origin of this problematic might be related to:

    Students not following instructions; they have difficulty at reading

    instructions, despite the teacher explanations and modeling. As a

    result, they make many mistakes.

    Students usually fail at doing exercises that require deeper level of

    reasoning or abstract thinking like in comparing, describing, inferring,

    justifying, or giving opinions.

    Students were not able, most of the time, to accomplish some

    exercises such as answering questions, and other tasks that involve

    the use of higher order thinking skills like in analysis, synthesis and

    evaluation into the reading process.

  • 4

    Additionally, authors have realized, during this research work, that

    the students were not used to apply strategies for reading comprehension;

    in fact they are not trained. It was also observed that many of the reading

    activities performed did not follow the appropriate curricular

    recommendations for the development of this receptive skill.

    Furthermore, it was evident that teachers did not put the necessary

    emphasis in the development and improvement of reading comprehension

    skills in general. On the other hand, the students did not receive

    appropriate feedback when performing activities.

    Therefore, the authors conclude that the conflict situation needs to

    be addressed to restore a correct situation. Hence, it is urgent the

    implementation of exercises and strategies to develop and strengthen the

    critical thinking skills at the learners in order to improve their reading

    comprehension in the English language.

    Scientific fact

    When asking comprehension questions, the students frequently

    answer repeating the same words as in the readings. In consequence,

    they did not make any type of reasoning processing that allowed further

    understanding.

    In addition to this, the students got confused to find the main and

    the secondary ideas. They have difficulty at summarizing events and

    drawing conclusions.

    Overall, the authors noticed an insufficient level of reading

    comprehension accomplishment in students of Eighth grade of BGE at

    Francisco Huerta Rendón high school.

  • 5

    Causes

    After a conscientious analysis, authors conclude that the principal

    causes of this problematic situation are the following:

    Absence of an updated methodology for teaching reading

    comprehension.

    Scarcity of critical thinking exercises.

    Inadequate types of reading activities.

    Uninteresting reading topics for learners.

    Problem formulation

    What is the influence of the use of critical thinking skills to improve

    reading comprehension accomplishment in students of Eighth Grade of

    Basic General Education at Francisco Huerta Rendón High School located

    at Guayaquil-Ecuador, school year 2016-2017?

  • 6

    Research objectives

    General Objective

    To analyze the influence of the use of critical thinking skills to improve

    the reading comprehension accomplishment through a literature review, field

    study, and statistical analysis; in order to design a critical thinking skills booklet

    for the strengthening of reading comprehension in the English language.

    Specific Objectives

    To determine the relevance of critical thinking skills in the reading process

    through a literature review, field study, and statistical analysis.

    To categorize reading comprehension accomplishment through a literature

    review, field study, and statistical analysis.

    To assess the aspects that should be considered for the design of a critical

    thinking skills booklet for the strengthening of reading skills through the

    application of a literature review, field study, and statistical analysis.

    Research questions

    1. What are the skills needed to strengthen reading comprehension?

    2. What is involved in the critical thinking?

    3. What is the relation between reading comprehension and critical thinking

    skills?

    4. What are the common critical thinking exercises?

    5. What are the barriers to implement thinking skills into the reading process?

    6. What are the approaches that enhance the critical thinking?

    Justification

    This research work is convenient because it will be helpful to determine

    the actual causes the students usually have low grades and poor performance

    to do reading comprehension activities and to evaluate the effectiveness of

    including critical thinking skills into the reading process.

  • 7

    This is also relevant because the direct beneficiaries will be the students

    of Eighth grade of BGE at Francisco Huerta Rendón high school who will be

    able to overcome their actual reading comprehension difficulties. Furthermore,

    the investigation is valuable to prevent future scholar problems in English

    language or other subjects.

    Moreover, this research work is according to the policies and objectives

    set by the Ecuadorian Constitution, in the section 5, and the Plan toda la Vida in

    the objective 4.

    Our research is also supported by the National Curriculum Guidelines for

    the teaching of English as a foreign language that is based on the Common

    European Framework of Reference for languages. Our country has decided to

    modify the parameters according with our reality in the General Basic

    Education. Therefore, the A-1.1 level for the Eighth grade corresponded to

    Basic Users.

    Finally, this research work will help to upgrade the students’ English

    reading proficiency simultaneously with thinking abilities. At the end, students

    will become in better readers and better thinkers.

  • 8

    CHAPTER II

    THEORETICAL FRAME

    Background

    According to Paul & Elder (2006) the human ‘thinking is biased and

    distorted’, partial, or prejudiced and they conclude that the quality of our lives is

    highly related to the quality of our thoughts. Therefore, human beings should

    cultivate high quality in their thoughts. For this reason, teachers should

    encourage students to develop their thinking skills during classes.

    Likewise, reading comprehension is a mental and metacognitive process.

    According to the researchers’ experience, the common difficulties in successful

    reading comprehension are due to the scarcity of training in higher order

    thinking skills. They also consider critical thinking gathers a series of skills and

    sub skills that can and must be developed along the educational system as,

    critical thinkers are rational problem solvers.

    Many authors support that thinking skills must be developed in learners

    even in the lower levels, and particularly in the teaching-learning of the reading

    process. Consequently, the authors have focused this research in the students

    of Eighth grade of General Basic Education (BGE) at Francisco Huerta Rendón

    high school to enhance their reading comprehension.

    With this work, the authors aim to provide an overview of a wide range of

    studies related to the variables and the proposal theme, and some useful

    background information and recommendation to validate the need for the

    implementation of this proposal. For example, Echeverria (2011), in a study

    performed in a high school in Colombia identified that students responded

    better to the development thinking skills when they practiced reading strategies

    and considered that the strategies and interactive reading activities allowed

    them to improve the reading comprehension.

  • 9

    Additionally, in an article by McNulty Ferri (2009) from Universidad de

    Antioqua, about the development of critical thinking through reading

    comprehension in intermediate level noticed that students responded better to

    the development of the reading comprehension when critical thinking activities

    were incorporated.

    After a process of revising of all the available and updated literature,

    promoting the development of critical thinking to improve reading

    comprehension is an approach that fits the necessities of students of Francisco

    Huerta Rendón high school to attain the language learning reading objectives,

    especially enhancing reading comprehension for their level.

    Theoretical – Conceptual Framework

    Didactic Foundation

    Thinking in the Educational context

    Thinking is a purposeful, organized, cognitive process that the mind uses

    to make sense of the world. Thinking is at the core of human life and human

    problems. Therefore, thinking must be at the core of the curriculum. For this

    reasons the authors consider pertinent to implement the proposal developing

    thinking skills at the students of eight grade of BGE at Francisco Huerta Rendón

    high school.

    Types of thinking

    The main are critical thinking and creative thinking. Additionally the

    elements of thought are:

    Purpose

    Question at issue

    Information

    Interpretation and inference

    Concepts

    Assumptions

    Implications and consequences

    Point of view

  • 10

    Thinking skills

    As Einstein asserted “Education is not the learning of facts, but the

    training of the mind to think.” Consequently, the thinking determines what we

    learn, how we learn, the effort we expend, what is true or false, and how deep

    or superficial is the learning.

    Furthermore, the thinking skills are divided into Low Order Thinking Skills

    LOTS and High Order Thinking Skills HOTS.

    Higher order thinking skills include critical, logical, reflective,

    metacognitive, and creative thinking. They are activated when

    individuals encounter unfamiliar problems, uncertainties, questions, or

    dilemmas. Successful applications of the skills result in explanations,

    decisions, performances, and products that are valid within the context of

    available knowledge and experience and that promote continued growth

    in these and other intellectual skills.

    After this research, authors consider that even in the lowest level of

    language knowledge teachers need to start the training using higher order

    thinking skills.

    Critical thinking

    It is a self-directed process by which human beings take deliberate steps

    to think at the highest level of quality.

    “Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and

    skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or

    evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation,

    experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief

    and action” (Scriven & Paul).

  • 11

    Critical thinking skills

    The types of critical thinking skills are reasoning, evaluating, problem

    solving, decision-making, and analyzing.

    Critical Thinking activities

    Recognizing

    Recalling

    Distinguishing

    Visualizing

    Sequencing

    Predicting

    Inferring

    Evaluating

    Analyzing

    Synthesizing

    Drawing conclusions

    Classifying

    Critical thinking in EFL

    There are multiple reasons for helping EFL learners improve their critical

    thinking. First, they become better readers and critics of what they read

    in English. Second, critical thinking can improve learners’ writing and

    speaking abilities when they have to give their opinions and arguments in

    the foreign language. Third, being a critical thinker is an advantage to be

    successful, not only in academic contexts, but also when solving real life

    tasks. Fourth, learning a foreign language implies using language within

    communicative contexts in which learners can think critically in order to

    achieve communicative goals. Otherwise, language could be seen as a

    useless code to be learnt by force. Pineda (2003) states, “combining the

    learning of a language with critical thinking may result in a more

    meaningful learning experience” (p. 44).

  • 12

    Pithers and Soden (2000) affirm that students are expected to learn not

    only the specific contents of a discipline, but also, “to develop ‘generic’

    abilities which can be deployed flexibly in a wide range of work and life

    context” (p. 238).

    Critical thinkers

    They can do the following:

    Distinguish between fact and opinion

    Ask questions; make detailed observations; uncover assumptions and define

    their terms; and

    Make assertions based on sound logic and solid evidence

    Focus on the most relevant information

    Ask the right questions

    Separate facts from opinions and assumptions

    Make sound decisions

    Set priorities

    Learn quickly

    Apply what they learn to new situations

    Benefits of critical thinking

    It is important to develop critical thinking to students as follows:

    1. Personal and Public Life:

    The critical thinking avoid falling for scams and making foolish decisions from

    ignorance and help make better decision from verified information.

    It also gives free one from unexamined assumptions, dogmas, and prejudices

    and people can be better-informed citizens and voters.

  • 13

    2. The Workplace:

    The critical thinking help people to be better problem-solver and principally to be

    better analyze information and draw appropriate conclusions.

    It helps us to communicate a position logically and making good decisions

    (based on data, not feelings).

    Barriers to Critical Thinking

    Among the most relevant they are: lack of relevant background

    information, poor reading skills, prejudice, superstition, resistance to change,

    rationalization, stereotyping, wishful thinking, egocentrism, mindless

    conformism, narrow-mindedness, and closed-mindedness.

    Critical thinking in reading comprehension

    Four language domains: In relation to the theme, researchers advise that all

    four domains should be activated, incorporated, and integrated during a lesson

    as follow:

    Reading, writing, listening, and speaking are naturally interrelated and

    integrated. We read when we write, and we listen when we speak to

    each other.

    Practice in any one of the four domains we result in improvement in

    the other three.

    By the time young children begin kindergarten at the age of five, they

    have generally become grammatically competent in their primary

    language. Thus, the holistic development of the four language

    domains makes more sense cognitively than developing them in

    isolation of each other, particularly because they are not acquired

    independently of each other.

    Connecting abstract and concrete concepts is best accomplished

    when students can incorporate and use all four language domains to

    practice and apply the new learning (Carrillo, 2011, p. 103).

  • 14

    Teachers need to provide many opportunities for students to engage in

    the four domains in order to develop the critical thinking in students.

    Fifth domain: Thinking: Critical thinking within the process of acquiring a

    foreign language has a very important role as follow:

    Many of us mistakenly believe that beginning-level ELLs have such

    limited English skills that deep critical thinking cannot be required of them

    or accessed. This is an erroneous notion, with the result that ELLs,

    particularly those in the preproduction and early production levels, are

    not being adequately challenged. This lack of rigorous instructional

    expectations may lead to high levels of disengagement.

    There is another surprising connection between critical thinking and two

    of the other domains in language: reading and writing. Because reading

    and writing are constructive processes and the outcome of both

    processes is to construct meaning, both are considered highly cognitive

    in nature. Due to the high levels of cognition involved in constructing

    meaning, research has shown that students become better critical

    thinkers when reading and writing are taught together (Carrillo, 2011, p.

    106).

    Reading

    Reading is an active process in which we get meaning from looking at

    written symbols. However, it is also a receptive language domain because we

    receive information that communicate something to us; although reading

    requires active processing skills in order for comprehension to take place.

    This process requires that learners integrate word recognition,

    comprehension, fluency, and motivation to make meaning. Sometimes reading

    skills involve minimal processing like in invitations, ads or menus but sometimes

    it involves higher levels of comprehension like in novels, science textbooks, or

    fiction books.

  • 15

    Authors consider that students need to learn:

    Phonemic awareness, alphabetical principle, decoding, word study, and

    sight vocabulary to foster word recognition.

    Background knowledge, oral and print vocabularies, how the language

    works, various kinds of texts, various purposes for reading, and strategies

    for constructing meaning to develop comprehension.

    Accuracy, rate, phrasing and expression, and automatic comprehension

    skills to work out fluency.

    To explore their interests, read for various purposes; be exposed to different

    genres to maintain the motivation to read.

    In the reading process, learners decode symbols to construct meaning; in

    other words, they do reading comprehension. Reading is also a way of

    language acquisition and communication; there is a real interaction between the

    reader and the text. This process needs rigorous practice and development. In

    brief, critical analysis and creativity are required in the reading process.

    Authors conclude that the reading ability is not learned only by natural

    exposure like in speaking skills. Learners need to be trained using a wide range

    of strategies and techniques; all of them according with the pre-establish aims

    following the appropriate pedagogical approach and taking into account the

    level and age of students.

    Teachers have the great task to immerse learners in the wonderful world

    of reading, and whatever effort is valuable when motivating students is the goal.

    They need to support students in different ways; providing glossaries,

    scaffolding, modeling, with direct instruction and always relating the topic with

    students’ experiences to do the learning experience more meaningful.

  • 16

    Reading Models

    Bottom-up model

    In the reading context, bottom-up is decoding of meaning by the reader

    encoded by the writer.

    Top-down model

    It is the inference of meaning on the basis of activating prior semantic,

    pragmatic, syntactic and discourse knowledge.

    It is necessary that students are able to use top-down or global

    strategies, as well as bottom-up processes.

    Reading Stages

    Most of researchers suggest the following stages in the reading process:

    Pre-reading activities;

    Reading for gist and detail;

    Focusing on linguistic structures and forms;

    Rebuilding selected language forms to express personal views.

    Pre-reading activities: Students must be prepared before being exposed to

    written texts by predicting the content, applying world knowledge and word

    associations with the help of headlines, titles, subtitles, visual aids and

    pictures.

    Reading for gist and detail: Once students have been familiarized with

    linguistic items and structures with the content of the text, it is necessary to

    make students to get an overall understanding of the text. Teachers can

    promote students to do closer examinations of the text by questioning in a

    graded and structured manner; from closer to open questions in order to

    increase students’ participation.

  • 17

    Focusing on linguistic structures and forms: After have reviewed the text for

    meaning we can use it to draw particular attention to key language and

    particular structure of the reading. Some activities pupils could do are gap-filling

    exercises focusing on grammar, substituting some lexical items, jigsaw

    readings, reconstruction of passages, and summarizing.

    Rebuilding: Trainers always should use follow-up activities developing

    speaking and writing skills assuming that students are familiar with the text.

    Students can be asked to talk or write about his or her favorite character,

    continue the story or produce an alternative one.

    These kinds of activities are preferable to be personal and individual and

    teachers always need to offer some modeling or reference material especially in

    written activities.

    Reading for pleasure

    According to Krashen (2013) and research evidence the benefits of ‘free

    voluntary reading’ by foreign language learners are the more positive effects on

    reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition than in intensive reading.

    Obviously, teachers need to enable students to discover the pleasure of reading

    in a foreign language.

    Teachers can upgrade the obstacles when planning extended reading

    considering the following:

    Avoiding material too simple or too difficult. It must be a balance.

    Providing selecting material that learners will find interesting and pertinent.

    Edited readers for young language learners.

    Emphasizing cultural awareness.

  • 18

    RED Model

    They are useful keys to critical thinking:

    Recognize assumptions

    Evaluate arguments

    Draw conclusions

    The text

    Reading text: Texts can be from a paragraph to a page or more in length and

    they are usually used for intensive reading. Intensive means that the text is

    studied in detail; by contrast in extensive the text is read or heard for pleasure

    or for information.

    A text is a piece of writing and speech which we use for learning

    language. It can be study as a complete and autonomous unit: the reader

    or listener can therefore understanding without necessarily knowing the

    context, even if it was originally an extract from a book, a conversation,

    etc. It is coherent, so it has a beginning, a middle and an end which

    make a clear sequence of thoughts and events (Ur, 2012, p. 28).

    Texts are generally aimed to improve language learning, comprehension

    of content, and discourse analysis.

    Language learning

    Vocabulary. The main goal of intensive study of a text is vocabulary expansion

    and review. In addition students need to comprehend all the words by explained

    them and doing vocabulary-focused activities.

    Grammar. The second goal is to study morphology and syntax because a text

    provides different grammatical structures. Teachers need to select language

    items.

  • 19

    Comprehension of content

    General gist. Firstly, language learners have to understand the general idea or

    the purpose of different kinds of texts.

    Detailed understanding. Secondly, learners need to comprehend different

    parts of the text. Trainers should explain new words and concepts.

    Reading between the lines. Learners will infer meanings that are not explicit in

    the text; for instance the characters’ personality and motives or the approach

    and prejudice of the writer.

    Critical analysis. This means to judge a text according to reliance,

    consistency, relevance, logic or about ideas and opinions.

    Discourse analysis

    It is an overall discussion of a text; not only isolated linguistic items. It

    takes place after students have understood the total content. It is related to

    style, function, structure, genre, and meaning.

    Types of texts

    The principal types of texts are descriptive, informative, instructive, and

    persuasive.

    Approaches to reading

    There are several approaches for the developing of reading

    comprehension.

    Intensive reading (IR)

    Extensive reading (ER)

    KWL: Know, Want to know, Learned

    SQ3R: Survey, Question, Read, Recall and Review

    ETR: Experience-Text-Relate

    QAR: Question-Answer-Response

  • 20

    DR-TA: Directed Reading and Thinking Activities

    Reciprocal Teaching

    Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR)

    Direct Explanation

    Questioning the Author

    Transactional Strategies Instruction (TSI)

    Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI)

    Intensive reading (IR)

    There are three approaches to teach intensive reading:

    Grammar translation

    Comprehension questions and language analysis

    Comprehension work and strategies

    In this research work, the authors have focused in the comprehension

    work and strategies. Authors consider this is the most appropriate approach to

    foster critical thinking.

    Extensive reading (ER)

    In the EFL context ER is an approach whose main objective is to get

    students reading in the English language and enjoy it; in order to enhance

    fluency rather than accuracy; and any language learning is incidental. ER

    responds to several classroom needs such as it is a manner of extending

    contact with English outside the classroom.

    ER states that learners learn to read by reading. First they see the

    language previous learnt in another context communicating things. Secondly, as

    students choose the books that they want to read as well as the time to do read,

    it is a personalized learning experience and make students autonomous. Then

    students will be able to develop their writing skills because of reading

    extensively. Finally, ER can be a pleasurable activity with great value in

    education field.

  • 21

    ER expands the reading comfort zone of students and according to

    Bamford and Day it consists of some principles:

    1. The reading material is easy.

    2. A variety of reading material on a wide range of topics must be available.

    3. Students choose what they want to read.

    4. The teacher is a role model.

    Extensive vs. Intensive Reading

    IR focuses on reading to learn rather than in learning to read; and put

    especial emphasis in strategies and techniques to attain language or content

    goals.

    A lot of in-class reading work has traditionally been ‘reading for detail’ –or

    ‘intensive reading’ i.e. reading texts closely and carefully with the

    intention of gaining an understanding of as much detail as possible.

    Often this is so that the student can answer comprehension questions.

    This is typically a stop/ start kind of reading, involving go back over small

    pieces of the same text a number of times to find out more and more

    about it, making sure that the words have been correctly interpreted

    (Scrivener, 2011, p. 264).

    ER increases the students reading speed. There are a large amount of

    report of ER research, which states that learners improve in several areas such

    as vocabulary knowledge, writing skills, positive motivation, speaking

    proficiency, listening proficiency and grammar.

    In everyday life, we tend to do much more extensive reading, ie fluent,

    faster reading, often of longer texts, for pleasure, entertainment and

    general understanding, but without such careful attention to the details.

    When we don’t understand words or small sections, we usually just keep

    going, maybe only coming back when there has been a major breakdown

    in our understanding (Scrivener, 2011, p. 264)

  • 22

    Strategies for reading

    Because of reading is an essential skill to obtain English reading

    proficiency, teachers must ensure that students develop and achieve effective

    comprehension skills and it becomes a fundamental priority, regardless of level.

    Teachers can use research and data as the basis for professional

    decisions. Harris (1997) states some reading strategies:

    Recognizing the type of text: poem, newspaper article, brochure.

    Examining pictures, the title, etc. for clues.

    Going for gist, skipping inessential words.

    Using punctuation or clues; question marks, capital letters, etc.

    Using knowledge of the world to make sensible guesses.

    Substituting English words.

    Analyzing unknown words, breaking a word/phrase down and

    associating parts of it with familiar words.

    Saying the text out loud and identifying ‘chunk boundaries’; how a

    sentence breaks down and which part of it to work on at one time.

    Identifying the grammatical categories of words (p.7).

    Useful reading activities

    It is fundamental to use authentic material like newspaper articles,

    brochures, ads, etc; that is to say some material done for native people.

    One test for useful reading (or listening work) might be to check how far

    tasks reflect real-life uses of the same text. If a text is used in class in

    ways that are reasonably similar to real life, it is likely that the task will be

    effective (Scrivener, 2011, p. 266)

  • 23

    Reading Comprehension

    After further research, the authors conclude that comprehension is the

    key to accessing content. Teachers should provide comprehensible input like

    choosing topics that learners can relate to their background experience;

    teachers should create a low-anxiety environment, and encourage pupils to

    respond as frequent as possible in the target language. Furthermore using

    these strategies trainers will help English learners at all levels to make

    connections, visualize, infer, and predict when reading.

    Researchers have concluded that exist six important elements that must

    be present to reading comprehension; they are background knowledge, word

    recognition, and the language of comprehension, text structure, comprehension

    strategies, attention and motivation.

    Comprehension Strategies

    Background knowledge

    It is a well-known fact that motivation has an important place in

    education; teachers can increase the learners’ motivation to read a text

    activating their prior knowledge about the topic. Useful strategies are making

    connections and List-Group-Label, but these require direct instruction and need

    to be modeled many times before students can apply this strategy fluently.

    Making connections to Background Knowledge: It is a priority to include

    topics that English learners have had experience with. When using this strategy

    at elementary level teachers must ask students to remind similar events in their

    own lives.

    Teachers can provide scaffolding like this:

    - This story makes me think about….

    - I remember when…

    - This part of the story reminds me of…

  • 24

    List-Group-Label to Background Knowledge: It consists on brainstorming as

    a manner of activating prior knowledge. This strategy is highly effective in

    activating all four domains of language as well as thinking.

    Motivation and attention

    For most of the students, reading becomes a boring activity because of

    the lack of reading purpose and scarcity of monitoring learners for

    comprehension. We can use questioning and concept mapping strategies to

    foster a purpose for reading and engage learners.

    Teaching Questioning: This is not a natural skill so learners need explicit

    direction. In order to establish a purpose for reading it is advisable that teachers

    provide effective direct instructions so that students generate questions. This is

    the key for successful outcomes.

    This strategy will help students to construct questions, then they apply it

    during their own reading after have practice it several times. Teachers can

    scaffold students creating a chart like this:

    - Our questions before we read the book

    - Our questions while we read the book

    - Our questions after we read the book

    Reading Comprehension Strategies

    The most useful are predicting, questioning, and summarizing. In relation

    to this Grabe (2004) recommends to follow this individual text comprehension

    strategies:

    Prior knowledge activation;

    Mental imagery;

    Graphic organizers;

    Text structure awareness;

    Comprehension monitoring;

    Question answering;

  • 25

    Question generating;

    Mnemonic support practice;

    Summarization (p.51).

    He also recommends the promotion of strategic reader, rather than to

    teach individual reading strategies. In this proposal, authors have integrated all

    of these strategies in each lesson.

    Authors consider important to assess learners in the following areas to

    provide diagnostic information in order to identify frequent reading problems:

    reading vocabulary words, passage comprehension, accuracy, and fluency.

    It is highly necessary to build a reading profile of students; that can be

    used to develop English language proficiency. In this research work researchers

    are going to include an assessment sheet in the end of each unit.

    Pedagogical Foundation

    Readers of research have to take into account that Foreign Language

    (FL) learning and teaching are very complex fields influenced by a lot of factors

    and variables. Therefore, all of these factors play an important role on the

    learning field.

    This research work is supported for uncountable researches like

    Lightbown (2003) who argued that “ESL research is an important source of

    ideas and ‘can help shape teachers’ expectations of themselves and their

    students, and provide valuable clues to effective pedagogical practice” (p.10).

    Consequently, authors have gathered all the updated studies related to

    reading comprehension strategies as well as the link with the development of

    the High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). At last, they have exposed the methods

    and strategies that fit better in the accomplishment of the proposal.

  • 26

    Theories of second language acquisition

    The principal theories are the following:

    Intuitive acquisition. (Krashen, 1982) We learn another language the same

    way as we learnt our first: intuitive acquisition through lots of exposure to the

    language in authentic communicative situations.

    Habit-formation. (Skinner, 1957) Language is a set of habits: we mimic,

    memorize, and drill the patterns of the language until we learn to produce

    the correct forms automatically.

    Cognitive process. (Chomsky, 1957) Language involves the understanding

    of underlying rules: if we master these rules, we will be able to apply them in

    different contexts.

    Skill learning. (Johnson, 1996) Language is a skill. We learn it in school just

    as we learn other skills: someone explains rules or words to us; we

    understand and practice them until we master them and use them fluently

    and skillfully.

    The authors interpret that it exists a contrast among these four theories.

    Intuitive acquisition and Habit formation theories are implicit teaching; in

    consequence, they claim that students do not need to be taught grammatical

    rules since the language learning is subconscious. On the contrary, Cognitive

    process and Skill learning are explicit teaching theories; because of this, they

    argue that pupils need to understand how the language works consciously.

    Learning strategies

    Learners have to be aware of the specific techniques they can use to

    improve their performance in English language learning; as it was stated by

    Chamot (2005) learning strategies are defined as ‘procedures that facilitate a

    learning task’ (p.112).

  • 27

    Additionally, learning strategies are very important because they allow

    learners to gain insights into the metacognitive, social and affective processes

    involved in language learning; in other words learning strategy instruction can

    help students to be better language learners.

    There are four main classes of learning strategies:

    Cognitive strategies, involving the manipulation or transformation of the

    learning materials/input (e.g. repetition, summarizing, using images);

    Metacognitive strategies, involving high order strategies aimed at

    analyzing, monitoring, evaluating, planning and organizing one’s own

    learning process;

    Social strategies, involving interpersonal behaviors aimed at increasing

    the amount of L2 communication and practice the learner undertakes

    (e.g. initiating interaction with native speakers, cooperating with peers);

    Affective strategies, involving taking control of the emotional (affective)

    conditions and experiences that shape one’s subjective involvement in

    learning (Skehan, 2003, p. 608).

    In order to develop an appropriate level of communicative competence in

    FL, teachers need to recall that the learning process involves wide range of

    aspects and strategies that must be integrated; if learners are human beings

    with different personalities and many necessities.

    Furthermore, some researchers have summarized the characteristics of

    strategies:

    1. They are active

    2. They are conscious

    3. They are chosen by the learner

    4. They are purposeful

    5. They are used by the learner to control or regulate their own learning

    6. They are about learning the language

  • 28

    Therefore knowing the importance of using strategies in EFL learning-

    teaching most of the theorists advise that strategy instruction should be explicit

    and teachers always must remind learners the wide range of available

    strategies; apart from this, trainers have to provide many opportunities to

    practice them.

    Sheltered instruction: They are strategies used in content areas and can be

    used in EFL too. ESL instruction should focus on four skills areas as follow:

    1. The function of language. The purpose of language is communication,

    which encompasses social conversation, asking questions, and

    communicating ideas.

    2. The form of language. Forms refer to the structure of English

    language, such as its grammar, sentence structure, and syntax. The

    form of the language represents its building blocks.

    3. Fluency. Fluency refers to the ease with which we speak a particular

    language. It takes an ample amount of time dedicating to learning

    English in order to become fluent. Although ESL usually focuses on

    speaking, fluency can also refer to reading.

    4. Vocabulary. In order to become proficient, ELLs must develop a

    broad and varied vocabulary. Research shows that they should be

    taught the key vocabulary associated with a topic, referred to as brick

    words, prior to a lesson in order to assist them in their language

    development (Carrillo, 2011, p. 120).

    Students should be taught the vocabulary words they will encounter in

    the lessons in order to build background knowledge and associate this to their

    experiences to provide comprehensible input during the lesson.

  • 29

    Pedagogical Foundation

    Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)

    Hymes (1971) carried out the idea that grammatical knowledge is not

    sufficient to know a language. At the same time, learners also need to develop

    linguistic, sociolinguistic, and strategic competence; therefore, he proposed his

    theory of ‘communicative competence’.

    CLT states that the purpose of language is to communicate and we learn

    best through natural acquisition. Pupils are exposed to language and

    communication skills in order to use the target language effectively. In this

    approach, fluency is estimate over accuracy and it is more learned-centered.

    Some methodologies based on this approach are Task Based Instruction and

    CLIL.

    Content-Based Instruction

    The main goal of this approach is to teach English language and

    academic content simultaneously. That is to say, trainers use the content to

    teach language goals.

    Content-area learning succeeds when students have transitioned from

    learning to read to reading to learn. The principal challenges using this

    approach are:

    An increase in the amount of content-specific vocabulary

    Complex sentence instruction and syntax

    Difficulty reading and understanding informational texts

    Difficulty understanding what the teacher says

    Use of higher-level thinking skills in reading and writing (Carrillo,

    2011, p. 124).

  • 30

    Task-based Learning and Teaching (TBLT): It is based on CLT approach. In

    this TBLT pedagogical approach, the tasks are aimed to allow students to solve

    problems and negotiate meaning achieving an objective in order to

    communicate.

    First we need to differentiate a task from an exercise. While exercises

    are concerned with semantics (meaning of words and phrases); tasks are

    associated with pragmatic meaning (the use of language in context).

    Ellis (2003) claims the critical characteristics of a task:

    A task is a work plan.

    A task involves a primary focus on meaning and will incorporate some

    forms of ‘gap’ in information that has to be filled.

    A task will reflect real world processes of language use. Task

    therefore suggests the need for some form of authenticity.

    A task may involve any of the four language skills. This can be both in

    writing and speaking, and reading and listening, although often the

    literature on tasks is concerned purely with productive skills and

    spoken outcome in particular.

    A task engages cognitive processes. e.g. selecting, reasoning,

    classifying information.

    A task has a clearly defined communicative outcome (p.9-10).

    According to Norris (2011) when using tasks we will have the following

    advantages:

    Involves ‘real’ communication;

    Respects learners’ interests and is learned-centered;

    Attends to learners’ interlanguage development;

    Is motivating with relevance to applications outside the classroom;

    Offers real outcomes (with tangible success criteria - you get what

    you ask for outside the classroom);

  • 31

    Allows for trial and error in the classroom (p.580).

    The main components of a task-based lesson are:

    Pre-task phase: In this first step is very important to motivate learners to carry

    out the task; either reducing the linguistics demands by brainstorming or

    predicting language they might need to use. In this phase, the trainer needs to

    provide some essential input and modeling the task outcome.

    During task phase: The teachers must to take a lot pedagogical decisions

    about the materials, time, complexity, accuracy or fluency focus, and students

    support in this stage.

    Post-task phase: Ellis (2003) suggests three categories of adequate tasks:

    “repeat performance; reflecting on the task; and focusing on forms”.

    In relation to this, Norris (2011) argued:

    It should be clear that much more goes on in the task-based classroom

    than simply turning learners loose on tasks (or vice versa). Teachers play

    an essential role throughout the task lesson cycle, motivating,

    schematizing, scaffolding, monitoring, intervening, and so on (p.585).

    TBL gives enough tools to develop critical thinking in a coherent and

    useful form; thus, students are going to work with activities that motivate their

    own leaning in the use of English and solve problems of daily life. Teachers and

    researchers can become critical thinkers through TBL approach on their

    classroom behavior, methodologies, materials, activities, and they can also

    improve their weaknesses and increase their strengths on their professional

    practices.

  • 32

    Content and Language Integrating Learning (CLIL)

    CLIL focuses on the use of English for the teaching of other school

    subjects or specific content. As with task-based instruction, the

    assumption is that learners will absorb the language best through using it

    purposefully, and through understanding and creating meaningful texts

    (Ur, 2012, p. 8).

    Models of Content-Based Instruction

    Content-Driven: Trainers have to work with content-area teachers

    cooperatively to identify the grammar, vocabulary and text structure that

    learners will encounter in the textbooks. In that way teachers construct

    background; as a result, learners are aware of specific knowledge and they will

    succeed in the content instruction.

    Content-Based: In this model teachers teach the foreign language in

    combination with the content according to learners’ level. In order to this model

    to be effective trainers have to establish language aims as well as content

    objectives.

    Psychological Foundation

    It is particularly difficult to increase motivation in young learners; but we

    can use and adapt some research outcomes to influence in learners’ motivation

    as follow:

    1. By taking every opportunity to show them how important it is for them to

    know English.

    2. By fostering their self-image as successful language learners.

    3. By ensuring that classroom activities are interesting.

    It is fundamental the motivation when we pretend to enhance the reading

    comprehension at students.

  • 33

    Developmental stages

    According to Piaget, there are four stages in the cognitive development

    of children. In this theory the first stage is sensorimotor, and it goes from 0 to 2

    years old; the second stage is pre-operational and starts at 2 and ends at 7

    years; the third is concrete operations and goes from 7 to 11; and formal

    operations start at 11 to the adult stage.

    In this research work the students of Eighth grade of GBE are in the

    beginning of formal operations stage. That is to say, they are developing their

    abstract thinking.

    Abstract thinking is less superficial than concrete thinking and involved

    the use of higher order thinking skills. This is a manner of thinking in which

    concentration is on conceptualization or generalization of things. An abstract

    thinker can view a particular phenomenon from an angle that others might not

    be able to view.

    Sociological Foundation

    Nowadays, teaching culture is necessary because the changes in our

    society. Learners need to be aware of different ways of thinking; as well as

    customs, rites and manners. It is very important to construct better citizens that

    respect other ways of thinking.

    Significant changes to society in recent decades as a result of

    globalization, internationalization and migration have considerably

    changed the linguistic and cultural make-up of many parts of the world, in

    particular in urban areas, as well as the need of cultural knowledge,

    understanding and skills. The increasing diversity of languages spoken,

    and the related cultural practices being in evidence in many societies,

    captured frequently through labels such as ‘multiculturalism’ and

    ‘multilingualism’, requires of us as FL teachers to review, and possibly

    revise, our perspectives on the role of culture in the language curriculum

    (Pachler, Evans, Redondo, & Fisher, 2014, p. 277).

    http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-conceptual-and-vs-perceptual/http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-stereotype-and-vs-generalization/

  • 34

    It is very important to construct better citizens that respect other ways of

    thinking and this apprenticeship can be developed in the classrooms too.

    Teaching culture. - The Council of Europe published in 2006 a document

    called Plurilingual Education in Europe (p. 6). This document aim to promote:

    Mutual understanding: The opportunity to learn other languages is an

    essential condition for intercultural communication and acceptance of

    cultural differences.

    Democratic citizenship: Participation in democratic and social

    processes in multilingual societies is facilitated by the plurilingual

    competence of individuals.

    Social cohesion: Equality of opportunity for personal development,

    education, employment, mobility, access to information and cultural

    enrichment depends on access to language learning throughout life.

    Perry and Southwell (2011) mentioned that ‘intercultural competence’ is a

    must in a globalized and multicultural world. And they defined as ‘the ability to

    effectively and appropriately interact in an intercultural situation or context’

    (p.453).

    Porto (2013) states the dimensions of culture knowledge, skills and

    attitudes:

    Savoir être (for instance, attitudes of curiosity and inquisitiveness);

    Saviors (knowledge of different aspects of life in a certain society,

    such as work, education, traditions, etc.);

    Savoirs comprendre (involving the skill of interpreting and related

    those saviors);

    Savoir apprendre/savoir faire (involving the skill of discoveryand

    interaction);

    Savoir s’engager (involving critical cultural awareness) (p.4).

  • 35

    Contextual Framework

    This research work is being developed at Francisco Huerta Rendón

    high school, which is a public high school located at Guayaquil city, Tarqui

    parish, Ciudadela Universitaria, Av. Las Aguas and Av. Juan Tanca Marengo; it

    currently has more than 1,900 of students, which has technological

    infrastructure, in accordance with her current rector Jacqueline Calero de Mora.

    There are 82 students per classroom and 4 English teachers.

    Finally, authors could notice that the majority of the students come from

    low and middle level families in the areas surrounding the institution, the

    classes take place in small classrooms where there is overcrowding of students,

    there are resources such as libraries where there are materials such as reading

    texts that they can use .

    The problem in reading comprehension development was found in

    students of Eighth grade of General Basic Education (BGE). Here, students do

    not have adequate resources to work, the authors noted that the readings are

    not appropriate to promote critical thinking engagement. The teachers only use

    the material given by the ministry; furthermore, there is no additional material

    that complements the reading part.

    Legal Framework

    The Art. 26 of the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, in the section

    five declare that:

    Education is a right of people throughout their lives and an unavoidable

    and mandatory duty of the state. It constitutes a priority area for public

    policymaking and public investment, the guarantee of equality and social

    inclusion and the conditions for the good way of living. People, families

    and society have the right and responsibility to participate in education.

    (Asamblea Nacional Constituyente, 2011)

  • 36

    According to the previous National plan of good living in the Objective 4:

    Strengthening the capacities and potentialities of citizens. Thus, the authors

    take out the following statements:

    4.4.j. Creating and strengthening infrastructure, equipment and

    technologies which, together with the human resources trained, promote the

    development of creative, cognitive abilities and innovation throughout

    education, at all levels, as well as 4.4.l to promote secular education, based on

    the centrality of critical thinking, logical reasoning and creativity, in all

    educational levels, adapting the mechanisms of evaluation for this purpose

    likewise, 4.4.n. to design and implement tools and instruments which allow the

    cognitive-holistic development in student population likewise, 4.4.d. to promote

    quality bilingual intercultural education for children, adolescents and young

    adults belonging to various communities, peoples and nationalities in all levels

    and modalities and finally, 4.8.i to promote the learning of a foreign language

    under the parameters of international accreditation, from early education to the

    top level.

    Moreover, the authors have gathered the pertinent statements that

    support this research work from the Curricular Guidelines for Eighth grade of

    GBE. According to this, the Eighth grade of GBE starts in level A.1.1, as English

    subject was not a compulsory subject in the past school year. Therefore, most

    students are not familiarized with the foreign language.

    In addition to this, these guidelines align with the CEFR level A.1 that

    corresponds to a Basic User which has been divided into A.1.1 and A.1.2 to

    approach them to the Ecuadorian reality in other words to make sublevels.

    “The CEFR is not a curriculum; instead it is intended to provide ‘a

    common basis for the elaboration of language syllabi, textbooks,

    curriculum guidelines, examinations, etc.” (Council of Europe, 2001,p.1).

  • 37

    According to the curricular guidelines students from Eighth grade of

    General Basic Education should read expository and transactional text

    such us: nonfiction texts as descriptions and biographies.

    In this teaching it is also important that teacher to provide the activities

    for the development critical thinking skill, they will help in enriching the

    development of skills.

    Students should be able to start processes of development the abstract

    thinking, critical thinking is important to development of thinking skills.

  • 38

    CHAPTER III

    METHODOLOGY, PROCESS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSION OF RESULTS

    In this section, the authors present an overview of the research

    methodology that has been used to investigate the approaches and the

    strategies that are being implemented to develop the critical thinking into the

    reading comprehension process of students of Eighth grade of GBE at

    Francisco Huerta Rendón high school. It contains an account of the procedures

    used for this study, including research design, selection and description of the

    population, the techniques and instruments used for data collection, data

    analysis and trustworthiness criteria for the study.

    Methodological Design

    In the elaboration of the present work the authors will follow the scientific

    approach. Indeed this educational research will also include empirical and

    statistical methods. Therefore, this is a mixed method approach research.

    Certainly, there are two main types of researches: qualitative and

    quantitative therefore the authors have chosen the mixed methods approach as

    the quantitative research and the theoretical review and content analysis in the

    qualitative research will provide a better view of the problem and its possible

    solution.

    Types of Research

    This research will implement different types of research as follow:

    Descriptive: It is descriptive because describe the situation and the problem in

    the institution.

    Explorative: It explores many aspects concerned with the conflict situation and

    the manner to overcome it.