Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL
AAPPPPLLIICCAATTIIOONN OOFF NNOOVVEELL PPRROOCCEEDDUURREESS FFOORR TTHHEE PPRREEPPAARRAATTIIOONN OOFF GGAALLLLIIUUMM((IIIIII)) FFLLUUOORRIIDDEE WWIITTHH
SSPPEECCIIFFIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS
MASTER'S THESIS
Tine Oblak
Mentor: Asst. prof. Tomaž Skapin
Ljubljana, 2009
- 1 -
AA bb ss tt rr aa cc tt
Metal fluorides have interesting optical, electrical, magnetic, surface and
catalytic properties. Their use is still concentrated only on specific fields of
applications. Novel fluoride sol-gel and oxidative decomposition of fluorometalates
methods for the preparation of metal fluorides with extraordinary high surface areas
opens new possibilities for wider use of these materials. Focus of this thesis was on
the application of these two methods to the preparation of gallium(III) fluoride, GaF3,
with improved properties, high surface area, high Lewis acidity and as a result of
those higher catalytic activity. Pure GaF3 was not yet produced using these two
preparation approaches. Majority of the research performed so far was done on the
preparation and characterization of HS-AlF3 prepared via fluoride sol-gel, starting
from the commercially available low-cost aluminium isopropoxide. In the present
work, we evaluated the preparation of GaF3 via fluoride sol-gel against the basic
parameters, which were defined during the preparation of HS-AlF3. Most important
parameters of synthesis were temperature, concentration and ratio of reactants and
type of fluorinating agent. GaF3 synthesized by this route is amorphous material with
high Lewis acidity. It has also been found that such GaF3 catalyzes reaction of
dismutation of dichlorodifluoromethane, CCl2F2, although to a lesser extent than HS-
AlF3. GaF3 was also prepared via oxidative decomposition which is an alternative
inorganic route to metal fluorides. Material prepared in this way had higher purity but
lower surface area, was weakly crystalline and catalytically inactive. The final goal
was to characterize these two materials prepared via different methods and compare
them to well characterized HS-AlF3. All newly prepared materials were characterized
by determination of specific surface area (BET), elemental analysis, scanning
electron microscopy, photoacoustic IR spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction. In
addition, the materials were also characterized by two indirect methods,
determination of acidity by pyridine adsorption and measurement of catalytic activity
in test reaction of dismutation of dichlorodifluoromethane, CCl2F2. Further
optimization of the procedure for preparation of GaF3 will allow us to proceed with
research on this kind of materials and their possible applications.
Keywords: gallium fluoride, sol-gel, oxidative decomposition, catalysis, Lewis acidity
- 2 -
Statement I am the original author of this work. Date: 30. 6. 2009 Tine Oblak
- 3 -
TT aa bb ll ee oo ff CC oo nn tt ee nn tt ss:: I LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................- 5 - II LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................- 6 - III LIST OF SCHEMES........................................................................................- 6 - IV LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS AND SYMBOLS..........................- 7 - V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...............................................................................- 8 - VI PREGLED MAGISTRSKE NALOGE
(SUMMARY IN SLOVENIAN LANGUAGE).....................................................- 9 -
1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... - 14 -
2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND GOALS .......................................... - 17 -
2.1 INORGANIC METAL FLUORIDES.............................................................................................- 17 - INTRODUCTION TO INORGANIC METAL FLUORIDES.....................................................................- 17 - GALLIUM(III) FLUORIDE ........................................................................................................................- 19 - HIGH SURFACE METAL FLUORIDES ...................................................................................................- 21 -
2.2 PREPARATION TECHNIQUES TO OBTAIN HIGH SURFACE METAL FLUORIDES.....- 23 - INTRODUCTION TO SYNTHESIS STRATEGIES ..................................................................................- 23 - GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF SOL-GEL PREPARATION ..........................................................................- 23 - FLUORIDE SOL-GEL PREPARATION ....................................................................................................- 26 - COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CLASSICAL SOL-GEL PROCEDURE AND FLUORIDE SOL-GEL ROUTE.......................................................................................................................................- 28 - OXIDATIVE DECOMPOSITION OF HYDRAZINIUM FLUOROMETALATES ..................................- 29 -
2.3 EXAMPLE OF HS-AlF3 PREPARED WITH APPLICATION OF FLUORIDE SOL-GEL AND OXIDATIVE DECOMPOSITION PROCEDURES....................................................................................- 31 -
HS-AlF3 PREPARED VIA FLUORIDE SOL-GEL PROCEDURE............................................................- 31 - HS-AlF3 PREPARED VIA OXIDATIVE DECOMPOSITION ..................................................................- 34 -
2.4 SCOPE AND OUTLINE..................................................................................................................- 36 -
3 EXPERIMENTAL WORK.............................................................................. - 37 -
3.1 BASIC EQUIPMENT.......................................................................................................................- 37 - VACUUM SYSTEM ...................................................................................................................................- 37 - DRY BOX....................................................................................................................................................- 38 - REACTION VESSELS................................................................................................................................- 38 - REACTORS, OVENS AND AUTOCLAVES.............................................................................................- 39 - SCALES.......................................................................................................................................................- 39 - TEMPERATURE CONTROLLER AND MASS FLOW CONTROLLER.................................................- 40 -
3.2 PREPARATION OF GaF3 VIA FLUORIDE SOL-GEL..............................................................- 41 - INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................- 41 - PURIFICATION OF GALLIUM(III) ISOPROPOXIDE ............................................................................- 42 - PREPARATION OF GaF3 PRECURSOR...................................................................................................- 43 - POST-FLUORINATION OF GaF3 PRECURSOR......................................................................................- 45 - ADDITIONAL POST-FLUORINATION TESTS.......................................................................................- 47 -
- 4 -
3.3 PREPARATION OF GaF3 VIA OXIDATIVE DECOMPOSITION...........................................- 49 - INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................- 49 - PREPARATION PROCEDURE..................................................................................................................- 50 -
3.4 INSTRUMENTATION AND CHARACTERIZATION METHODS..........................................- 53 - PHOTOACOUSTIC INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY.................................................................................- 53 - ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS .........................................................................................................................- 54 - SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA......................................................................................................................- 54 - GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY......................................................................................................................- 55 - X-RAY POWDER DIFFRACTION ............................................................................................................- 55 - SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY.................................................................................................- 56 -
3.5 RESEARCH OF CATALYTIC AND ACIDIC PROPERTIES ...................................................- 57 - DETERMINATION OF CATALYTIC ACTIVITY....................................................................................- 57 - RESEARCH OF ACIDIC PROPERTIES....................................................................................................- 57 -
3.6 USED CHEMICALS ........................................................................................................................- 59 -
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION...................................................................... - 60 -
4.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................- 60 -
4.2 MATERIALS PREPARED VIA SOL-GEL...................................................................................- 61 - SUBLIMATION OF Ga(OiPr)3 ...................................................................................................................- 61 - CONCENTRATION OF SUBLIMATED Ga(OiPr)3 IN SOLVENT..........................................................- 61 - EFFECT OF Ga(OiPr)3 : HF RATIO...........................................................................................................- 62 - ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS OF PRECURSOR...........................................................................................- 63 - POST-FLUORINATION OF PRECURSOR WITH CCl2F2 AND aHF......................................................- 64 - COMPARISON OF PHOTOACOUSTIC IR SPECRA...............................................................................- 65 - RESULTS OF ADDITIONAL POST-FLUORINATION TESTS ..............................................................- 67 -
4.3 MATERIALS PREPARED VIA OXIDATIVE DECOMPOSITION..........................................- 70 - ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS AND SURFACE AREA.................................................................................- 70 - PHOTOACOUSTIC IR SPECRA................................................................................................................- 71 -
4.4 X-RAY POWDER DIFFRACTION ...............................................................................................- 72 -
4.5 DETERMINATION OF CATALYTIC ACTIVITY .....................................................................- 73 -
4.6 RESEARCH OF ACIDIC PROPERTIES......................................................................................- 74 -
4.7 SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY - SEM .......................................................................- 76 -
5 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................ - 77 -
6 REFERENCES.............................................................................................. - 81 -
- 5 -
LL ii ss tt oo ff FF ii gg uu rr ee ss:: Figure 1: 700 ml PCTFE reaction vessel for oxidative decomposition of N2H6AlF5 with F2 in aHF
medium (350 ml). ...................................................................................................................... - 34 - Figure 2: Vacuum system.................................................................................................................- 37 - Figure 3: FEP reaction vessels. Capacity of 30 mL (left) and 300 mL (right). ................................. - 38 - Figure 4: Flow reactor in an electric furnace. ...................................................................................- 39 - Figure 5: Nickel autoclave (up) and oval oven (down). ....................................................................- 39 - Figure 6: Digi-Sense Temperature controller. .................................................................................. - 40 - Figure 7: MKS mass flow controller.................................................................................................. - 40 - Figure 8: Sublimation of Ga(OiPr)3. Furnace (left) and Ice bath (below). ........................................ - 43 - Figure 9: Vessel with purified Ga(OiPr)3. ......................................................................................... - 43 - Figure 10: Condensation of solvent (isopropanol) into the reaction vessel on vacuum
system....................................................................................................................................... - 44 - Figure 11: Addition of aHF on vacuum system. FEP reaction vessel (1) and aHF in thin
vessel (2). ................................................................................................................................. - 45 - Figure 12: Wet gel (up) and dry gel (down) after pumping on vacuum system. .............................. - 45 - Figure 13: Precursor (dry gel)...........................................................................................................- 45 - Figure 14: Flow reactor in an electric furnace. .................................................................................- 46 - Figure 15: Addition of aHF to reaction vessels on the vacuum line. ................................................ - 50 - Figure 16: Reaction vessel with N2H6GaF5
.H2O in aHF. .................................................................. - 50 - Figure 17: Reaction between N2H6GaF5
.H2O and fluorine. .............................................................. - 51 - Figure 18: Mtec model 300 photoacoustic detector. ........................................................................ - 53 - Figure 19: Scattering of surface areas for materials obtained at different Ga(OiPr)3 : HF ratios..... - 63 - Figure 20: PAS spectra of Ga(OiPr)3 and other fluorinated materials.............................................. - 66 - Figure 21: PAS spectra of GaF3 post-fluorinated with CCl2F2 (down) and the same material
which was conditioned on 250°C (vacuum line) before post-fluorination (up). ........................ - 67 - Figure 22: PAS spectra of GaF3 post-fluorinated (16 hours) with CCl2F2 (down) and
aHF (up).................................................................................................................................... - 68 - Figure 23: Coke deposited on final material..................................................................................... - 69 - Figure 24: GaF3 after preparation.....................................................................................................- 70 - Figure 25: PAS spectra showing the presence of NH4
+ in GaF3, HS-AlF3 prepared by oxidative decomposition and NH4AlF4 (reference)................................................................................... - 71 -
Figure 26: PAS spectra of GaF3 post-fluorinated with CCl2F2. (1-after, 2-before) pyridine adsorption. GaF3 post-fluorinated with aHF. (3-after, 4-before) pyridine adsorption................ - 74 -
Figure 27: PAS spectra of GaF3 prepared via oxidative decomposition before (down) and after (up) pyridine adsorption. Inset (right) shows the difference spectrum. ............................ - 75 -
Figure 28: Comparison of PAS spectra between different HS metal fluorides after pyridine adsorption. ................................................................................................................................ - 75 -
Figure 29: SEM of precursor (140 m2/g). .........................................................................................- 76 - Figure 30: SEM of final material post-fluorinated with CCl2F2 (40 m2/g). .........................................- 76 - Figure 31: SEM of final material prepared via oxidative decomposition (19 m2/g). ......................... - 76 - Figure 32: Comparison of purities between GaF3 and AlF3 materials.............................................. - 78 - Figure 33: Comparison of surface areas between GaF3 and AlF3 materials. .................................. - 78 -
- 6 -
LL ii ss tt oo ff TT aa bb ll ee ss:: Table 1: Comparison of surface areas of precursors prepared from non-sublimed and sublimed
Ga(OiPr)3 at stoichiometric molar ratio of reactants. ................................................................ - 61 - Table 2: Comparison of surface areas of precursors prepared from different concentrations of
Ga(OiPr)3 in isopropanol at stoichiometric molar ratio of reactants.......................................... - 62 - Table 3: Effect of Ga(OiPr)3 : HF molar ratio on precursor surface properties................................. - 63 - Table 4: Surface area and elemental analysis of precursor and precursor additionally threaded
at 250°C in vacuum. ................................................................................................................. - 64 - Table 5: Elemental analysis and surface areas of materials post-fluorinated with CCl2F2. .............. - 64 - Table 6: Elemental analysis and surface areas of materials post-fluorinated with aHF. .................. - 65 - Table 7: Comparison of surface areas and elemental analysis of GaF3 post-fluorinated with
CCl2F2 and the same material which was conditioned on 250°C (vacuum line) before post-fluorination. ....................................................................................................................... - 67 -
Table 8: Comparison of surface areas and elemental analysis of GaF3 prepared with extended (16 hours) post-fluorination time (CCl2F2 and aHF). ................................................................ - 68 -
Table 9: Comparison of catalytic activity of materials in probe reaction of dismutation of CCl2F2 ... - 73 - Table 10: Comparison between GaF3 materials prepared via fluoride sol-gel and oxidative
decomposition (o.d.). ................................................................................................................ - 77 - Table 11: Comparison between HS-AlF3 materials prepared via fluoride sol-gel and oxidative
decomposition (o.d.). ................................................................................................................ - 78 - Table 12: Comparison between fluoride sol-gel and oxidative decomposition preparation method.- 80 -
LL ii ss tt oo ff SS cc hh ee mm ee ss:: Scheme 1: Overview of the sol-gel process and their main applications. ........................................ - 25 - Scheme 2: Metal fluoride preparation via non-aqueous fluoride sol–gel route. ............................... - 27 - Scheme 3: Metal fluoride preparation via oxidative decomposition of hydrazinium
fluorometalates in liquid aHF medium. ..................................................................................... - 30 - Scheme 4: (A) Al4(OiPr)12 (aluminium isopropoxide), (B) partially fluorinated, (C) Al(OR, F)6
intermediate, and (D) Al alkoxide fluoride (precursor)13 ........................................................... - 32 - Scheme 5: Structure of gallium(III) isopropoxide.............................................................................. - 42 - Scheme 6: Pyridine interaction with Brønsted acid sites (B). Pyridine coordinated to
Lewis (L) acid sites. .................................................................................................................. - 58 -
- 7 -
LL ii ss tt oo ff AA bb bb rr ee vv ii aa tt ii oo nn ss,, AA cc rr oo nn yy mm ss aa nn dd,, SS yy mm bb oo ll ss:: Å angstrom a.u. arbitrary unit BET Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area °C degree celsius FTIR fourier transformation infrared FEP tetrafluoroethylene-hexafluoropropylene GC gas chromatography HS high surface h hour IR-PAS infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy mg milligram μl microliter ml milliliter mm millimeter mol mole ppm part per million SEM scanning electron microscopy TA temperature (°C) of activation TEM transmission electron microscopy TPD temperature-programmed desorption XRD X-ray diffraction
LL ii ss tt oo ff CC hh ee mm ii cc aa ll ss:: AlF3 aluminium fluoride Al(OiPr)3 aluminium(III) isopropoxide ACF aluminium chloride fluoride aHF anhydrous hydrogen fluoride Ar argon CCl2FCClF2 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane CCl2F2 dichlorodifluoromethane (CH3)2CHOH 2-Propanol, anhydrous, 99.5+% C5H5N Pyridine (Py) CFC chlorofluorocarbons GaF3 gallium(III) fluoride Ga(OiPr)3 gallium(III) isopropoxide H2 hydrogen He helium HF hydrogen fluoride HFC hydrofluorocarbons iPrOH 2-propanol N2 nitrogen N2H6AlF5 hydrazinium(+2) fluoroaluminate(III) N2H6GaF5 hydrazinium(+2) fluorogallate(III) F2 fluorine SbF5 antimony pentafluoride
- 8 -
AA cc kk nn oo ww ll ee dd gg ee mm ee nn tt ss
I wish to express my deep gratitude to my mentor and advisor asst. prof.
Tomaž Skapin who introduced me into an interesting research theme. I also
appreciate his valuable time spent on deliberating and discussing this project with me
and for following the work closely.
I am very grateful to dr. Gašper Tavčar for much helpful discussion, ideas, and
advices throughout the study. He has shown me some of the grandeur and
enthusiasm involved in the quest to obtain good experimental results.
I would like to thank asst. prof. Maja Ponikvar–Svet and Mira Zupančič for
elemental analysis and for their precise interpretation of results.
I wish to express my gratitude to all co-workers at Department of Inorganic
Chemistry and Technology at Jožef Stefan Institute for their assistance and moral
support during my research work. The discussions with them and their suggestions
were always very helpful.
I wish to extend my special thanks also to co-workers from other departments
that were involved in my work, especially to Sebastjan Glinšek who made all my SEM
measurements.
I also thank Slovenian agency for research and development, ARRS and
European Commission Project FUNFLUOS (6th F.W.) for the financial support.
And last, I would like to thank all my friends in the University of Nova Gorica
and my friends outside the University. Special thanks for my family for their support
and caring all the time.
- 9 -
PP rr ee gg ll ee dd MM aa gg ii ss tt rr ss kk ee NN aa ll oo gg ee
(SUMMARY IN SLOVENIAN LANGUAGE)
NOVI POSTOPKI PRIPRAVE GALIJEVEGA(III) FLUORIDA S SPECIFIČNIMI LASTNOSTMI
UVOD
Uporaba kovinskih fluoridov, kljub zanimivim optičnim, električnim, magnetnim,
površinskim in katalitskim lastnostim ni tako razširjena, kot je uporaba kovinskih oksidov. Glavni vzrok za to je pomanjkanje ustreznih sintetskih postopkov za pripravo kovinskih fluoridov z natančno definiranimi lastnostmi. Klasični postopki priprave kovinskih fluoridov navadno potekajo pri višjih temperaturah, pogosto pri povišanem tlaku, kot fluorirno sredstvo se najpogosteje uporabljata fluor ali vodikov fluorid. Produkti, dobljeni pri teh relativno ostrih reakcijskih pogojih, so delno ali popolno kristalizirani kovinski fluoridi. Klasični metodi priprave galijevega(III) fluorida sta razklop amonijevega heksafluorogalata, (NH4)3GaF6, v toku F2 pri 400 °C (673 K) ali reakcija med kovinskim galijem in plinastim HF pri 550 °C (823 K). V zadnjih letih je viden precejšen napredek pri iskanju alternativnih sinteznih poti za pripravo fluoridov s specifičnimi lastnostmi. Opaznejši dosežek na tem področju je razvoj dveh postopkov za direktno pripravo fluoridov (Poglavje 2.2). To sta fluoridni sol-gel postopek in oksidativen razpad hidrazinijevih fluorometalatov. Glavni namen magistrske naloge je bil uporaba teh dveh postopkov za pripravo GaF3 s specifičnimi lastnostmi, karakterizacija končnih produktov in primerjava novo pridobljenih materialov z dobro raziskanim aluminijevim(III) fluoridom z veliko površino, HS-AlF3. Pričakovane nove lastnosti so velika specifična površina, močna Lewisova kislost in kot posledica velika katalitska aktivnost. Čisti GaF3 še ni bil pripravljen po novih postopkih priprave, čeprav je Kemnitz s sodelavci že pripravil katalitsko aktiven MgF2 dopiran z GaF3 z veliko površino. Sam MgF2 pripravljen po fluoridnem sol-gel postopku ni katalitsko aktiven.
Priprava amorfnih kovinskih fluoridov z veliko površino po modificiranem fluoridnem sol-gel postopku poteka v dveh stopnjah (Shema 2, stran 27). V prvi stopnji raztopini kovinskega alkoksida v suhem alkoholu ali drugem brezvodnem organskem topilu dodamo stehiometrično količino brezvodnega vodikovega fluorida (aHF) pri sobni temperaturi ter dobimo moker fluoridni gel. S sušenjem mokrega fluoridnega gela dobimo amorfen prašnat produkt (prekurzor). Prekurzor poleg kovinskega fluorida, vsebuje še znatne količine organskih nečistot. Organske ostanke
- 10 -
odstranimo v drugi fazi sinteze z dodatnim fluoriranjem s plinastim fluorirnim sredstvom pri povišani temperaturi. Kot fluorirno sredstvo v tej fazi lahko uporabimo različne delno ali popolno halogenirane fluoro(kloro)ogljikovodike ali aHF. V primeru katalitsko neaktivnega prekurzorja na osnovi aluminijevega(III) fluorida, AlF3, s tako obdelavo dobimo katalitsko zelo aktiven amorfen AlF3 z veliko površino (HS-AlF3), zato to fazo pogosto označujejo kot aktivacijo. Zagotavljanje zadovoljive ponovljivosti postopka v fazi dodatnega fluoriranja prekurzorja (intermediata) je navadno težavno, zaradi narave reakcij, ki pri tem potekajo. To predstavlja glavno pomanjkljivost fluoridnega sol-gel postopka.
Zaradi omenjenih težav pri odstranjevanju organskega ostanka je bil razvit alternativni sintetski pristop, oksidativnega razpada hidrazinijevih fluorometalatov z elementarnim fluorom, ki prestavlja popolnoma novo anorgansko sintezno pot do kovinskih fluoridov s specifičnimi lastnostmi (Shema 3, stran 30). Postopek poteka tako, da v reakcijsko posodo najprej odtehtamo hidrazinijev fluorometalat ter nato dodamo tekoči brezvodni vodikov fluorid (aHF), ki se uporablja kot reakcijski medij. Na vakuumskem sistemu v posodo dodajamo točno določene količine elementarnega fluora. Reakcija je zelo eksotermna, zato je potrebno med reakcijo zagotoviti, dovolj intenzivno mešanje (mehansko mešalo), da preprečimo usedanje trdne faze in zagotovimo učinkovito odvajanje toplote. Pri popolnem oksidativnem razpadu anorganskih prekurzorjev nastane kovinski fluorid, kot edini trden produkt.
Večina raziskav na področju sinteze amorfnih kovinskih fluoridov z visoko površino je bila narejena na pripravi in karakterizaciji HS-AlF3, pripravljenem po fluoridnem sol-gel postopku (Poglavje 2.3). Mehanizme fluoridnih sol-gel procesov kot tudi optimizacijo priprave HS-AlF3 je intenzivno preučeval Kemnitz s sodelavci. HS-AlF3 je material z izredno visoko Lewisovo kislostjo, primerljivo s kislostjo antimonovega pentafluorida, SbF5. Zaradi tega HS-AlF3 katalizira nekatere reakcije halogeniranih ogljikovodikov, ki potekajo le v navzočnosti najmočnejših Lewisovih kislin.
V naših raziskavah smo se osredotočili na pripravo amorfnega GaF3, ki naj bi po podatkih iz literature imel visoko Lewisovo kislost. Material pripravljen po novih postopkih priprave naj bi imel izboljšane kislinske lastnosti, podobno kot HS-AlF3, ki ima višjo kislost kot AlF3, pripravljen z običajnimi postopki.
EKSPERIMENTALNI DEL
Pri pripravi GaF3 po fluoridnem sol-gel postopku (Poglavje 3) smo komercialni
galijev izopropoksid, Ga(OiPr)3, zaradi velike količine prisotnih nečistot prečistili s sublimacijo v dinamičnem vakuumu pri 136 °C (409 K). V reakcijsko posodo iz fluorirane plastike (FEP) smo dodali približno 1 g predhodno sublimiranega Ga(OiPr)3 in z dodatkom izopropanola pripravili približno 20 %(m/m) raztopino. V reakcijsko
- 11 -
posodo smo na vakuumskem sistemu dodali stehiometrično količino aHF. Moker gel smo evakuirali 16 ur in dobili suh gel (prekurzor). Prekurzor smo dodatno fluorirali oziroma aktivirali z mešanico dušika in CCl2F2 (280 °C) ali z aHF (120 °C). Organske komponente, ki so izhajale med fluoriranjem prekurzorja, smo zasledovali s plinskim kromatografom.
GaF3 smo pripravili tudi po postopku oksidativnega razpada (Poglavje 3). V reakcijsko posodo, kjer je bilo približno 1–5 g hidrazinijevega(II) akvapentafluorogalata (N2H6GaF5
.H2O), smo dodali tekoči brezvodni vodikov fluorid (aHF), ter nato na vakuumskem sistemu v reakcijsko posodo dodajali elementarni fluor v odmerjenih količinah. Po končani reakciji smo odčrpali topilo in preostale pline v reakcijski posodi ter dobili bel prašnat produkt.
Dobljene fluoride smo karakterizitali (Poglavje 4) z določitvijo specifične površine po metodi BET, elementno analizo, visokoločljivo elektronsko mikroskopijo, fotoakustično IR spektroskopijo in rentgensko praškovno analizo. Končne material smo karakterizirali tudi s posrednima metodama, določitvijo kislosti z adsorpcijo piridina in merjenjem katalitske aktivnosti v testni reakciji dismutacije difluorodiklorometana, CCl2F2. To reakcijo katalizirajo le srednje močne Lewisove kisline. Produkte dismutacije, CClF3, CCl3F in CCl4, smo kvantificirali s plinsko kromatografijo.
REZULTATI IN RAZPRAVA
Pri pripravi GaF3 po fluoridnem sol-gel postopku smo se opirali na osnovne
parametre sinteze, definirane pri pripravi HS-AlF3. Prvi poskusi so pokazali, da imajo materiali pripravljeni iz prečiščenega (sublimiranega) Ga(OiPr)3 bistveno večjo površino, kot tisti pripravljeni iz komercialnega Ga(OiPr)3. Drugi preučevan parameter je bila koncentracija Ga(OiPr)3 v topilu. Kot najbolj optimalno koncentracijo za pripravo gela smo izbrali 20 %(m/m) raztopino Ga(OiPr)3 v izopropanolu. Nadaljnji poskusi so bili namenjeni preučevanju vpliva razmerja reaktantov na površino prekurzorja. Za aluminijeve sisteme v literaturi navajajo kot optimalno razmerje, ki je enako stehiometričnemu, Al : HF = 1 : 3. Razmerja nad stehimetrijo so v primeru Al privedla do bistveno nižjih površin zaradi urejanja strukture. V nasprotju s temi rezultati so naši poskusi pokazali, da pri različnih razmerjih Ga(OiPr)3 : aHF = 1 : 2–10 dobimo približno enako površino prekurzorja od 135 do 195 m2/g. Galijevi sistemi so v primerjavi z aluminijevimi bolj stabilni, saj se amorfna struktura gela ohranja tudi pri visokih presežkih aHF. Amorfnost prekurzorja in končnega materiala smo dokazali z rentgensko praškovno analizo. Največjo površino (40 m2/g) je imel material, ki je bil dodatno fluoriran s CCl2F2. Iz elementne analize je razvidno, da smo tudi v najboljšem primeru pri tem materialu dobili razmerje Ga : F = 1 : 2,55 in čistoto 91,9 %(m/m) . Visok delež fluora v prekurzorju in materialu,
- 12 -
dodatno fluoriranem z aHF, lahko pripišemo prostemu HF, ki ostaja v materialu nezreagiran. Če prekurzor sušimo na 250 °C (523 K), vidimo, da se razmerje bistveno zniža.
V primeru bolje raziskanega HS-AlF3 ima prekurzor površino približno 400 m2/g, vsebuje okoli 30 %(m/m) organskega ostanka, molsko razmerje Al : F je 1 : 2. Končni material ima površino 200 m2/g in le 0,5 %(m/m) organskih nečistoč, z molskim razmerjem Al : F = 1 : 3. Iz tega je razvidno, da smo predvsem za naš končni material dobili precej slabše rezultate. Možno je, da dodatno fluoriranje prekurzorja ni poteklo do konca kljub temu, da s plinskim kromatografom izhajajočih organskih komponent nismo več zaznali. To potrjujejo tudi fotoakustični IR spektri produktov, dodatno fluoriranih s CCl2F2, v katerih so še opazni trakovi, ki jih lahko pripišemo preostalim izopropoksidnim skupinam. Poleg tega se na teh materialih nabira obloga ogljika, ki najverjetneje nastane pri reakciji prekurzorja s CCl2F2. V materialih, ki jih segrevamo do istih temperatur v toku dušika, karbonizacije ne opazimo. Pojav karbonizacije so opazili tudi pri dodatnem fluoriranju prekurzorja pri pripravi HS-AlF3, vendar v manjšem obsegu in pri ostrejših pogojih aktivacije. Prekurzor smo poskušali dodatno fluorirati tudi s plinastim aHF, ker smo se želeli izogniti izločanju ogljika. HF je bolj aktivno fluorirno sredstvo kot CCl2F2, zato je potrebno z njim delati pri milejših pogojih. Kljub temu je bila površina končnega materiala nižja, ostanek nečistot pa celo nekoliko večji kot pri dodatnem fluoriranju s CCl2F2. Karbonizacija v tem primeru ni potekala.
Postopek dodatnega fluoriranja smo poskušali izboljšati z nekaterimi dodatnimi postopki, kot so predhodna obdelava pred dodatnim fluoriranjem, podaljšan čas dodatnega fluoriranja, uporaba elementarnega fluora, kot fluorirnega sredsta ali dodatek kisika, k fluorirni mešanici, vendar nam kljub temu ni uspelo dobiti materialov z boljšimi lastnostmi.
Končni material, pripravljen po postopku oksidativnega razpada, je bil bistveno bolj čist (96,6 %(m/m)), z molskim razmerjem Ga : F = 1 : 3. Za razliko od materiala pripravljenega po fluoridnem sol-gel postopku je imel nižjo površino (19 m2/g) in je bil delno kristaliničen. Pri pripravi materiala je potrebno biti posebej pazljiv v začetni stopnji priprave. Elementaren fluor je potrebno dodajati v manjših odmerkih, da ne pride do pregretja in posledično poškodbe reakcijske posode. Med pripravo sta nam pregoreli kar dve posodi od petih.
Primerjava SEM slik prekurzorja in končnega materiala, pridobljenega po fluoridnem sol-gel postopku ter obdelanega s CCl2F2, prikazuje razliko v poroznosti in morfologiji obeh materialov. Prekurzor sestavljajo porozni aglomerati 30 nm kroglastih osnovnih delcev, kar se ujema z večjo površino tega materiala. Dodatno fluoriranje s CCl2F2 bistveno spremeni strukturo materiala. Opazna sta izguba izhodne strukture in poroznosti ter rast večjih zrn, kar vodi k znatnemu znižanju
- 13 -
površine. SEM slika materiala, pripravljenega po postopku oksidativnega razpada jasno prikazuje skupke 30–100 nm velikih kristalov.
Fotoakustični IR spektri adsorbiranega piridina v vseh končnih materialih kažejo prisotnost Lewisovih in Brønstedovih kislih centrov. Prevladujejo Lewisovi kisli centri relativno visoke jakosti. Brønstedovi kisli centri so najverjetneje posledica disociativne adsorpcije vode med manipulacijo vzorca.
Katalitski test dismutacije CCl2F2 smo opravili na različnih materialih: na GaF3 pripravljenim po fluoridnem sol-gel postopku in dodatno fluoriranim s CCl2F2 in aHF, na GaF3 pripravljenim s postopkom oksidativnega razpada, na komercialnem GaF3 ter slepi probi. Najbolj je bil katalitsko aktiven GaF3 pripravljen po fluoridnem sol-gel postopku in dodatno fluoriranim s CCl2F2. Konverzija CCl2F2 v produkte dismutacije je bila pri 300 °C (573 K) 0,8 %, pri 350 °C (623 K) pa 4 %. GaF3 pripravljen po postopku oksidativnega razpada ni bil katalitsko aktiven, ravno tako ni bil aktiven komercialen GaF3. Katalitska aktivnost HS-GaF3 je bila v primerjavi z HS-AlF3 nizka. Za HS-AlF3 je bila konverzija pri 300 °C (573 K) skoraj 96 %. Nižjo katalitsko aktivnost GaF3 lahko v prvi vrsti pripišemo nižji Lewisovi kislosti Ga3+ v primerjavi z Al3+. Dodaten faktor, ki lahko vpliva na nižjo katalitsko aktivnost, je visok delež relativno stabilnega organskega ostanka v naših vzorcih. Razpadni produkti tega ostanka lahko blokirajo aktivne kislinske centre, tako da se nanje fizično ali kemijsko vežejo.
ZAKLJUČEK
Nova postopka, fluoridni sol-gel in oksidatvni razpad hidrazinijevih fluorometalatov, sta bila uspešno uporabljena za pripravo GaF3 s specifičnimi lastnostmi. Materiali, pridobljeni po različnih metodah priprave, se med seboj nekoliko razlikujejo, povzetki rezultatov karakterizacije so v Tabeli 10 in 11 (Poglavje 5)
Bistvena razlika v pripravi GaF3 in HS-AlF3 po fluoridnem sol-gel postopku je v tem, da je v našem sistemu propoksid bistveno stabilnejši v prvem delu sinteze, saj na lastnosti prekurzorja ne vplivajo presežki aHF. To se odraža tudi v drugem delu sinteze, kjer dobimo GaF3 s skoraj 8 %(m/m) vsebnostjo nečistot in ne čistega produkta, kot v primeru HS-AlF3. Bistvena razlika med GaF3 in HS-AlF3, pripravljenim po postopku oksidativnega razpada, je v tem, da ima GaF3 bistveno manjšo površino ter, da ni katalitsko aktiven.
Nadaljnje raziskave na tem področju bodo omogočile boljše razumevanje mehanizma pri pripravi kovinskih fluoridov po fluoridnem sol-gel postopku in postopku oksidativnega razpada. Znanja, pridobljena pri pripravi GaF3 ter ostalih kovinskih fluoridov, bomo lahko uporabili za pripravo novih materialov. To bo lahko kasneje vodilo tudi v raziskave za njihovo uporabo na najrazličnejših področjih.
- 14 -
11 IINNTTRROODDUUCCTTIIOONN
Metal fluorides are not as widely used as metal oxides, although they often
exhibit properties superior to metal oxides. Metal fluorides have interesting optical,
magnetic, electrical and catalytic properties, making them useful in a broad range of
applications1-6.
Several preparation routes to solid metal fluorides have been developed and
are used today. Classical fluorination processes are prevalently performed at high
temperature and/or high pressure with fluorine, hydrogen fluoride or other fluorinating
agents. These relatively rigorous conditions favour the growth of larger particles and
formation of crystallized products. Fluoride products obtained by these procedures
are partly or fully crystallized materials with relatively low specific surface areas of
1–20 m2/g. Lack of adequate preparation procedures to obtain fluorides with higher
surface areas is one of the main reasons why metal fluorides are not as widely used
as oxides. In the last years an important progress in the preparation of solid metal
fluorides with high specific area was achieved. Two new chemical preparation
approaches were developed, (i) non-aqueous fluoride sol-gel procedure7 and (ii)
oxidative decomposition of fluorometalates8. The products of both procedures are
usually amorphous fluorides with high specific surface areas of 100–300 m2/g and
particle size in range of 5–20 nm. Amorphous structure, high surface and nano sized
particles are preserved in materials due to milder preparation conditions. Fluoride sol-
gel method is a type of classical sol-gel procedure. This is inexpensive and easy way
to produce high surface metal oxides which made them very popular for variety of
uses in the last few decades. Oxidative decomposition of fluorometalates using
elemental fluorine is a new inorganic technique for preparation of high surface metal
fluorides and can be used as alternative to the fluoride sol-gel method.
Most of the research of this two preparation techniques have been done under
project FUNFLUOS (6th Framework programme of the EU). A variety of metal
fluorides has been prepared during this project and research has also focused on
their properties and possible applications9-11. High surface materials are interesting
especially in the area of heterogeneous catalysis where the activity of the material
- 15 -
depends on its surface area and acidity. One of the most investigated metal fluoride
was HS-AlF3 which exhibits high surface area and an extremely strong Lewis acidity,
comparable with some of the strongest known Lewis acids such as SbF5 and
ACF12-14.
The main objective of this thesis was preparation of GaF3 with specific
properties by the application of two novel preparation techniques, fluoride sol-gel
procedure and oxidative decomposition of fluorometalate, hydrazinium(II)
aquapentafluorogallate(III) (N2H6GaF5.H2O)15. These properties are high surface
area, high Lewis acidity and as a result of those higher catalytic activity. GaF3 is
potential new high surface material with high Lewis acidity. Primar objective of the
work was to define the key parameters of the preparation and characterization of
newly prepared materials. The materials were characterized by determination of
specific surface area (BET), elemental analysis, scanning electron microscopy,
photoacoustic IR spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction. In addition, the
materials were also characterized by two indirect methods, determination of acidity
by pyridine adsorption14 and by measurement of catalytic activity in the test reaction
of CCl2F2 dismutation16. This reaction can be catalyzed by medium strong Lewis
acids.
Theoretical quantitative scale for Lewis acidity, published by Christe and
coworkers17 indicates that GaF3 could exhibit high Lewis acidity, slightly lower than
AlF3. Pure GaF3 was not yet produced using novel preparation techniques although
Kemnitz and coworkers18 studied mixed metal fluorides as doped Lewis acid
catalysts which also included a detailed investigation of the MgF2/GaF3 system.
Catalytically inactive MgF2 served as a host for an active metal trifluorides which
were used to adjust the Lewis acidity of the solid catalyst. In this case MF3 dopant
improves Lewis acidity due to generation of excess positive charge at the metal(III)
site which results in increased electron acceptor ability. MgF2/GaF3 doped system
was a high surface material (BET = 100 m2/g) which became more amorphous with
increasing dopant concentrations and achieved its maximum catalytic activity at a
concentration of about 20 wt.%. Due to good results from
Ga-doped system and other metal fluorides (HS-AlF3) prepared via novel preparation
methods, it was expected that our pure GaF3 would be amorphous, high surface and
catalytically active solid material with high Lewis acidity.
- 16 -
Majority of the research performed so far was done on the preparation and
characterization of HS-AlF3 starting from the commercially available low-cost
aluminium isopropoxide. Influence of many parameters has been studied in detail to
optimize this process12. Preparation of GaF3 was evaluated against the basic
parameters, defined during the preparation of HS-AlF3. Characterization results of
different steps of GaF3 preparation were compared with those obtained during HS-
AlF3 preparation.
New fluoride sol-gel method should give amorphous GaF3 with improved
acidic properties, prepared at much lower temperatures than with standard
preparation methods.
- 17 -
22 TTHHEEOORREETTIICCAALL BBAACCKKGGRROOUUNNDD
AANNDD GGOOAALLSS
22..11 IINNOORRGGAANNIICC MMEETTAALL FFLLUUOORRIIDDEESS
INTRODUCTION TO INORGANIC METAL FLUORIDES
The use of natural inorganic fluorides can be traced back to Greek and Roman
times when large crystals of fluorspar were used to make dishes, vases and other
ornaments. Nowadays main sources of fluorides as raw materials in industrial
production are: natural cryolite (AlF3·3NaF), fluorspar (CaF2) and fluorapatite
(CaF2·3Ca3(PO4)2). Besides metallurgical uses, the production of considerable
tonnages of inorganic fluorides for industrial use is relatively recent. The industrial
production of aluminium started in the late 19th century with the process of electrolytic
preparation of aluminium by reducing its oxide, which is dissolved in a bath of molten
cryolite. The production of hydrogen fluoride reached industrial stage in 1930 with
creation of two production units in U.S.A. and France. Rapid development of
chemical industry such as varied refrigerants, plastics, petrochemical industry,
aerosol propellants, surfactants, space industry, health service, electrical industries
and nuclear industry significally increased production of this acid from fluorspar.
Intensive research related to the development of nuclear energy for military and
peaceful purposes started in 1950s. It can be said that atomic era is era of fluorine as
the preparation of large amounts of uranium hexafluoride was necessary for isotopic
separation plants. This research has contributed to a better knowledge and
properties of numerous fluorides, leading to many advances and new applications.
Metal fluorides are known to have superior properties over metal oxides for
several applications. Many future developments can be predicted in certain fields of
use related to specific features such as for example optical (low refractive index),
- 18 -
electrical (high ionic conductivity), magnetic (high-spin configurations), catalysis
(super acidity) and other interesting applicable properties19. Their use is limited
especially due to the problems with processing. This new interest in fluorides justifies
research of new appropriate and low-cost synthetic techniques. In general, we have
to perform various types of fluorination procedures which may also involve high
pressure or high temperature reactions with fluorine, hydrogen fluoride or other
fluorinating agents such as chlorine trifluoride, sulfur tetrafluoride, arsenic fluoride,
ammonium difluoride, hydrazinium fluoride and others. Because of their strong
oxidizing power, fluorine and some other highly reactive derivates react
spontaneously with many compounds and give very exothermic reactions. Methods
such as decomposition of fluorides and hydrates or reducing process are also used
but are often done at high temperatures20.
There are three general reaction types to synthesize fluorides. First are gas-
solid reactions where, gaseous fluorine or other gaseous fluorinating agents react
with solid metals or metallic salts. F2 has very strong oxidizing power and this leads
in most cases to the fluoride with highest oxidation state for the metallic cation. Other
fluorinating agents give results similar to those obtained with F2. The reaction
conditions vary from ambient temperatures to more than 1000 °C. Second are liquid-
solid reactions (wet way) where chemical reactions are done in liquid medium, for
example in HF. Oxides, halides, carbonates and acetates can be used as starting
agents. Solid state reactions are third reaction type, where sample preparation
almost always requires dry boxes, gold or platinum tubes and inert atmospheres. A
perfect example of solid state reaction is preparation of K3Fe5F15, where
stoichiometric quantities of KF, FeF2 and FeF3 are mixed under dry argon, sealed in
gold tube and left in the oven at approximately 800 °C for 15 days3.
Described methods are quite demanding and require serious precautions or
procedures can be extremely dangerous at some points because of high
temperatures, high pressures and use of reactive or corrosive reagents. In addidtion
most of fluorides are moisture sensitive and some of them are highly corrosive. They
have to be handled in dry boxes in inert atmosphere and any direct human contact
has to be avoided.
- 19 -
GALLIUM(III) FLUORIDE
Since main focus of this thesis is gallium(III) fluoride it is important to mention
few basic properties, known standard preparation techniques, current known
applications and point out some possible future uses. Gallium(III) fluoride is a
chemical compound made from gallium, metal with exceptional liquid range (30 °C to
2000°C) and fluorine, most electronegative, highly reactive element. Gallium(III)
fluoride is white powder with molecular formula GaF3 and molecular mass of 126.718
g/mol. It has boiling point is around 1000 °C and it is almost insoluble in water.
Anhydrous gallium(III) fluoride can be prepared by three known methods21-23 and in
all three cases final product is partly or fully crystalline material.
First procedure is the thermal decomposition of ammonium hexafluorogallate,
(NH4)3GaF6 in a stream of F2 at 400 °C (reaction 1). Procedure is carried out in nickel
tube reactor. Extreme precaution is needed when working with fluorine at such high
temperatures. (NH4)3GaF6 is produced from Ga(OH)3 using HF and NH4F as
reagents.
Second procedure is reaction between metallic gallium in a stream of HF-gas
at 550°C (reaction 2). We must use nickel tube with a nickel boat. HF-gas can be
mixed with N2. Reaction is slow and may last few hours. GaF3 is formed on the
surface of Ga metal.
Third procedure consists of two steps. In first step GaF3·3H2O (trihydrate) is
obtained by dissolving gallium hydroxide, gallium oxide or gallium metal in 40 wt.%
hydrofluoric acid so as to leave small excess of acid. Evaporation to dryness at
100 °C at air gives GaF3·3H2O which is a white crystalline powder. Anhydrous GaF3
is obtained by drying the hydrate in vacuum at 200 °C and after that it has to be
additionally treated in a stream of F2.
The crystal structure of gallium(III) fluoride23 consists of layers of more or less
close packed fluoride ions with gallium ions occupying certain octahedral holes
- 20 -
between them. Each gallium atom has six fluorine neighbors at a distance of 1.89 Ǻ
(Sum of ionic radii = 1.95 Ǻ). Each fluorine atom has four neighbors in its own layer
at 2.69 Ǻ and four others in adjacent planes at 2.67 Ǻ. Each fluorine atom lies
equidistant from two gallium atoms but slightly displaced from the line joining them.
The Ga–F–Ga angle is 145° and the closest approach of gallium atoms to one
another is 3.61 Ǻ. The unit cell is a bimolecular rhombohedron with space group
symmetry R3c. The unit cell dimensions are: αR = 5.2 + 0.01 Ǻ; αR =57.5°. The
structure is similar to the structures of all trifluorides of the first transition series. GaF3
is isostructural with FeF3.
Gallium compounds have currently only one major application and this is as
materials for semiconductors24. More than 90 % of such devices are based on silicon,
because this element is more common and is much cheaper to produce. Silicon
however does not posses some the of most outstanding electronic properties as for
example GaAs (gallium arsenide) or other complex gallium containing compounds
that also exhibit semiconducting properties. GaAs devices have an advantage in
speed, better thermal stability and lower power consumption. The limiting factor for
the extensive use of GaAs is the fact that it does not have a passivating layer and,
therefore, devices containing GaAs can not be satisfactorily produced. GaF3 finds a
role in perfecting and improving this application. Some research using GaF3 as
suitable insulator that can be grown on GaAs layer has been done in the past25. The
problem was partially solved by providing a layer of indium gallium fluoride on the
surface of the gallium arsenide substrate. This resulted in semiconductor device with
improved insulating/passivating layer of indium gallium fluoride (InGaF), which is
produced by mixing together GaF3 with InF3 in specific ratio to get crystallographically
lattice matching layer on the surface of the GaAs substrate26.
Most of the research on GaF3 as a compound is focused in various optical
systems27, 28, which may find its applications in optical communication technologies.
Fluorides have several specific features such as small refractive index, wide
transmission wavelength range, etc. GaF3 and some other fluoride based glasses are
promising for applications which need wider IR transmission range and lower phonon
energy. For example GaF3 was used as compound for planar lightwave circuits which
have a valuable advantage (integrated in a very small area) compared to well known
silica-based glass optical fibers29.
- 21 -
HIGH SURFACE METAL FLUORIDES
Metal fluorides can be superior to metal oxides in several possible applications
but, due to the problems in processing, their use is limited. New preparation routes
are needed to open new fields of applications for metal fluorides. One of the most
promising and investigated route is non-aqueous fluoride sol-gel preparation which is
good alternative and low-cost method for preparation of metal fluorides with specific
properties. Metal fluorides prepared by sol – gel method, such as AlF3, MgF2 and
other complex metal fluorides, have extraordinary high surface areas up to 500 m2/g
with pores in the range of 10 – 40 Ǻ as a result of their morphological characteristics
and nanosized and mesoporous structures. If technologic borders regarding the
preparation of metal fluorides are overcome this may open a new fields for their
application.
Metal fluorides with strong Lewis acidity can be used as acid catalysts.
For example amorphous, HS-AlF3 with high Lewis acidity comparable to that of SbF56
and ACF30 is a potential candidate for several Lewis acid catalyzed reactions.
HS-AlF3 has under-coordinated surface Al sites that exhibit very strong acidity. It is
the first example for a direct sol-gel preparation of nano-metal fluorides resulting in
materials with exciting properties which differ remarkably from those exhibited by
classically prepared AlF3 phases. AlF3 is one of the most important catalysts for
halogen exchange and related reactions31, 32. This type of reactions involving
halofluorocarbons are of interest for the production of HFCs and for CFCs
transformations33. High catalytic activity of HS-AlF3 and other new metal fluorides can
be used in a wide range of reactions such as isomerisation of alkanes,
polymerization, carbonylation, Friedel-Crafts acylation and in general for the
preparation of new fluorinated organic compounds to be used in pharmaceutics. AlF3
may also be used as reactive coating on metal surfaces of micro-reactors to initiate
surface catalytic reactions. In some cases extraordinary strong sites in HS-AlF3 need
to be adjusted in reactivity to fit to the specific reactant molecule. Fine-tuning of a
catalyst system is achieved by doping metal fluoride matrices with the three-valent
metals18 such as FeIII, CrIII and GaIII. There are also other known fine-tuning
techniques like anion doping34 or applications of metal fluorides as supports35.
- 22 -
Metal fluorides exhibit very interesting optical properties as low refraction
indexes and very good UV transparency. For example MgF236 has lower refraction
index than SiO2 (n500 = 1.38) and may be used as anti-reflective coating in optical
systems. Fluoride sol-gel method is cheap, low temperature preparation technique
that can be used to produce metal fluoride coatings from diluted sol solutions of
known concentrations giving reproducible films of 15–50 nm thickness. Thin film
coating may serve in many known applications such as coating for: sensitive metal
surfaces, temperature-sensitive components like polymers, improvement of surface
properties of electronic parts, hydrophobicity and medical sterility. Most metal
fluorides obtained through sol-gel route are nano-sized and X-ray amorphous
powders. Cold pressed powders like MgF2, AlF3, Na3AlF6 and others give transparent
ceramic plates which may open an alternative route to transparent glassy metal
fluorides. Complex fluorometalates37 are accessible by fluoride sol-gel method at
room temperature. Their known optical, magnetic and ferroelectric properties are of
great interest. An unexplored field of fluoride sol-gel method is the functionalization of
nano-fluorides by leaving a defined number of OR-groups unconverted to use them
as chemical anchors to bind other compounds on it. This gives access to metal
fluoride inorganic or organic hybrid systems as it has been developed in the metal
oxide systems.
Based on these novel preparation strategies and new properties resulting from
them, metal fluorides could experience wider field of applications in the next future.
- 23 -
22..22 PPRREEPPAARRAATTIIOONN TTEECCHHNNIIQQUUEESS TTOO OOBBTTAAIINN HHIIGGHH SSUURRFFAACCEE MMEETTAALL FFLLUUOORRIIDDEESS
INTRODUCTION TO SYNTHESIS STRATEGIES
Several chemical and physical methods have been developed and used to
prepare high surface and/or nano-sized metal fluorides7. Some common physical
methods are condensation from a suitable vapor phase (e.g. PbF2)38, laser deposition
(e.g. NaF)39, molecular-beam epitaxy for coatings (e.g. LaF3)40, and mechanical
milling, which was also used to prepare nanostructured GaF3 powder41. Chemical
methods have been also intensively researched and developed, especially non-
aqueous fluoride sol-gel method7 and oxidative decomposition of fluorometalates8, 42.
These two methods will be reviewed in more details since the focus of this thesis is
preparation and characterization of GaF3 by the application of these two methods.
Also two other synthetic routes were widely investigated, but were not used to
prepare GaF3. The first is post-fluorination of metal oxide prepared via sol-gel route43
and the second is formation of thermal decomposition of metal trifluoroacetates44.
GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF SOL-GEL PREPARATION
The sol-gel process is a wet-chemical technique used for preparation of
versatile materials at lower temperatures. Typical materials prepared with classical
sol-gel are pure or multicomponent metal oxides or related hybrid inorganic-organic
materials. The technique is cheap and can be used to prepare diverse materials such
as light aerogles or tough dense ceramics. It also allows a fine control of the
product’s chemical composition and it can yield very pure materials.
The method is based on the hydrolysis and condensation reactions. Most
typical precursors are metal alkoxides, M(OR)x. The first step of reactions is
- 24 -
hydrolysis (reaction 3)45, the nucleophilic substitution of the alkoxides groups (OR) by
hydroxyl groups (OH).
Hydrolysis:
Second step is condensation reaction which leads to the formation of the
extended 3D network (gel) by the formation of M-O-M links or M-O(H)-M link with the
evolution of water or alcohol. The gel state is described as a viscoelastic material
composed of interpenetrating solid and liquid phases. Main condensation reactions
are alcoxolation/oxolation (reactions 4 and 5) and olation (reactions 6 and 7).
Examples of condensation reactions45:
Alcoxolation:
Oxolation:
Olation:
Solution or stable suspension of colloidal particles (sol) produces porous 3D
continuous solid networks entrapping a continuous liquid phase (wet gel). Next step
is removal of the solvent. In the case of evaporation, xerogel (dried gel) is obtained.
When the removal of the solvent is done by supercritical extraction aerogels are
obtained. Aerogels are very porous gels having high surface area which were dried
so that the pore and network structure of the wet gel are maintained. It is also
possible to use wet gel directly and deposit it on a substrate to form a film (dip or spin
coating) or threat it (heating) to produce ceramic fibers, glasses, etc.45 (Scheme 1).
- 25 -
Sol-gel transition could be explained in few steps. At the beginning sol
particles aggregate to give the gel network and small oligomeric species are formed,
bearing OH groups on the surface (nucleation seed). This process continues with the
agglomeration of the particles to larger polymeric structures and increase of the
viscosity which leads to formation of a continuous network, elastic gel (gel point). In
some cases we also use gel ageing which leads to further stabilization of the
inorganic network by further condensation of the remaining precursor (monomer).
One of the results of gel ageing is shrinkage of the gel (syneresis).
Scheme 1: Overview of the sol-gel process and their main applications45.
There are many parameters affecting the sol-gel process and the properties of
the final products. The most important are nature and concentration of the
precursors, reactant ratio (M(OR)x : H2O), effect of pH on hydrolysis and
condensation, reaction temperature, nature of the solvent, drying conditions and
presence of stabilizers/additives.
To summarize all advantages of sol-gel process we can say that it is versatile
process which allows fine modulation of the final features of the materials by a careful
- 26 -
tuning of different experimental parameters. It gives good control of the sample
morphology, chemical composition, homogeneity, porosity, crosslinking density and
special functionalities. As mentioned before it is possible to prepare materials in a
wide variety of forms: ultra-fine powders, fibers, solids, xerogels, aerogels, thin films
and bulk materials at relatively low or even ambient temperatures. This synthetic
route is an important direction for the preparation of a wide range of novel materials
with applications especially in the areas of photonics and chemical sensors, catalysis,
ceramics, coatings and glasses. Ambient processing conditions also enable
encapsulation of numerous organic, organometallic and biological molecules within
these sol-gel derived inorganic matrices and vice versa.
There are also some draw backs of sol-gel process like availability of
appropriate alkoxides, high cost of some raw precursors (alkoxides), high shrinkage
during gelation, dynamic nature of the process involved and difficulties in fine tuning
some of the preparation parameters.
FLUORIDE SOL-GEL PREPARATION
The non-aqueous fluoride sol-gel preparation of inorganic metal fluorides is a
relatively new method. Most of the efforts in past have been made to study sol-gel
processes for the preparation of inorganic oxides for various applications. Since
fluorides have potential importance in similar or even new applications as oxides
there is an interest in developing new synthetic routes for the preparation of fluorides.
The foundation and first basic research for non-aqueous sol-gel preparation route
was done by Kemnitz and co-workers9. Modification of conventional sol-gel
preparation was developed with the aim to prepare amorphous metal fluorides.
Fluoride sol-gel is a two step preparation (Scheme 2) of amorphous highly
distorted metal fluorides with unusually high surface area caused by a mesoporous
morphology and surface texture10.
- 27 -
Metal alkoxide+
Water free solvent
Anhydrous HF+
Organic solvent
Mixing
Wet fluoride gel Dry fluoride gel
Removal ofsolvent
Metal fluoride
Additionalfluorination/activation
Step 1
Step 2
Scheme 2: Metal fluoride preparation via non-aqueous fluoride sol–gel route9.
In first step metal alkoxide is dissolved in water free alcohol or other
non-aqueous solvent. Calculated amount of aHF in organic solvent is added to the
mixture under stirring at ambient temperature. A wet gel forms immediately and could
be either used directly for coatings or dried to yield solid metal fluorides. The sol-gel
fluorination reaction results in complex development of a polymer-like network of a
gel. Depending on the type of metal and on concentrations used a wet gel of metal
fluoride and alcohol is formed. After removing all volatile material under vacuum a dry
gel (xerogel) is formed which is also referred as precursor. It is amorphous solid with
the content of some organic material. Because of organic part present in material
second step of post-fluorination is needed to yield final product, pure amorphous high
surface metal fluoride. Precursor (dry gel) is usually treated with a fluorinating agent,
such as fluorocarbon compounds (e.g. CCl2F2) or gaseous HF. This process is also
named activation because after such treatment the catalytically inactive dry Al–F-gel
becomes catalytically active. Not all fluorocarbon compounds are good enough for
post-fluorination, because some of them cause extensive coke formation on the
fluoride material. HF can be used only at rather low temperatures because of its
higher fluorinating activity which can affect the final properties of material such as
surface area or Lewis acidity.
Original fluoride sol-gel procedure from Kemnitz was later modified at
Department of Inorganic Chemistry and Technology, "Jožef Stefan" Institut.
Reactions were carried out in FEP (HF resistant plastic) and all operations were
- 28 -
performed in a closed vacuum system avoiding any contact with ambient air.
Advantages of improved method are that aHF can be dosed more accurately, pure
aHF without organic solvent can be added and it is safer due to limited exposure to
HF. Both methods yield materials with comparable properties.
Main disadvantage of both fluoride sol-gel procedures is their low
reproducibility in the second step of fluorination due to the nature of heterogeneous
reactions involved.
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CLASSICAL SOL-GEL PROCEDURE AND FLUORIDE SOL-GEL ROUTE
Novel fluoride sol-gel method has few parallels with classical sol-gel method
because it follows similar principles. In classical sol-gel, reaction is started by adding
exact amount of water to metal alkoxide which result in hydrolysis reaction followed
by condensation and finally ends in formation of gel. Actually this means that OH
groups, which appear in first step of reaction (hydrolysis) react with OR and OH
groups in second step of reaction (condensation) which leads to formation of oxide
gel. All structure of the gel is made from metal – oxygen bonds, –M–O–M–. The main
difference between fluoride and classical sol-gel method is in the use aHF instead of
water. Addition of aHF to solution of metal alkoxide starts a nucleophilic substitution
of OR groups by fluoride ion and may be considered as fluorolysis. This step
resembles to a great extent the hydrolysis step in classical sol-gel reaction for metal
oxide preparation. Fluoride ion is not able to continue reaction as condensation
known in classical sol-gel, so coordinative covalent bond (dative bond) is formed with
second metal atom which helps to stabilize the gel. Besides similarities in the first
step of the process mechanism of fluoride sol-gel is therefore quite different from the
classical sol-gel process. Comparison between two synthesis mechanisms of
classical (reaction 8) and fluoride (reaction 9) sol-gel is shown below12.
- 29 -
OXIDATIVE DECOMPOSITION OF HYDRAZINIUM FLUOROMETALATES
Oxidative decomposition of hydrazinium fluorometalates with elemental
fluorine is novel inorganic one-step route to high surface area metal fluorides8, 42, 46.
The preparation is based on milder synthetic procedures which result in amorphous
and nano-structurized final materials. Metal fluoride is the only solid product after
oxidative decomposition of hydrazinium fluorometalates. This method was developed
as inorganic alternative to fluoride sol-gel preparation because of its known problems
with removal of organic residue in the second step of preparation. Oxidative
decomposition was first used for the preparation of aluminum and chromium
fluorides, two of the catalytically most relevant fluorides.
Preparation procedure of materials was studied under heterogeneous
(gas-solid) conditions and in liquid aHF medium. Results showed that material
prepared in liquid aHF medium yielded amorphous materials with surface areas up to
300 m2/g (Scheme 3).
- 30 -
Scheme 3: Metal fluoride preparation via oxidative decomposition of hydrazinium fluorometalates in
liquid aHF medium.
- 31 -
22..33 EEXXAAMMPPLLEE OOFF HHSS--AAllFF33 PPRREEPPAARREEDD WWIITTHH AAPPPPLLIICCAATTIIOONN OOFF FFLLUUOORRIIDDEE SSOOLL--GGEELL AANNDD OOXXIIDDAATTIIVVEE DDEECCOOMMPPOOSSIITTIIOONN PPRROOCCEEDDUURREESS
HS-AlF3 PREPARED VIA FLUORIDE SOL-GEL PROCEDURE7, 12
The majority of the research was performed on the preparation and
characterization of HS-AlF3 starting from aluminium isopropoxide. HS-AlF3 is
amorphous material with very high Lewis acidity. It was prepared as described in
Scheme 2 by non-aqueous fluoride sol-gel route. Slightly modified process was
applied for the preparation of gallium fluoride gels. Fluoride sol-gel procedure is
therefore exemplified by the preparation and characterization of HS-AlF3.
Al(OiPr)3 was dissolved in dry iPrOH (aprox. 100 g/L) at room temperature.
Stoichiometric amount of aHF also dissolved in dry iPrOH was added to the mixture
within a few minutes during continuous stirring. The stable transparent gel (wet gel)
was formed in within some minutes. The overall reaction of aluminium alkoxide with
HF can be formulated as shown in reaction 10:
The precursor had specific surface area 450 m2/g. Post-fluorination of dry
Al-F-gel was carried out in a flow reactor consisting of a Ni tube (5 mm i.d.) located
vertically in an electric furnace. Dry gel (1–2 g) was placed on a silver wool plug in
the centre of the reactor. Precursor was treated with a fluorinating agent (CCl2F2)
diluted by N2 at 300 °C. The goal was to remove the organic component by replacing
it fully by fluorine. The gases from the exhaust of reactor were analyzed by on-line
GC. With CCl2F2 as fluorinating agent the progress of activation was followed up by
monitoring the dismutation of the reactant and the decrease of other organic residue
compounds concentrations. When dismutation reached about 98 % the activation
process was complete. The final product had a ratio of fluorine to aluminum of 3 : 1
- 32 -
and the carbon content was less than 0.5 wt.%. HS-AlF3 had a specific surface area
of about 200–300 m2/g.
The research to fully understand the mechanism of the sol and gel formation
of direct fluoride sol-gel method is still in progress, but to some extent mechanism
has already been clarified13. A proton goes to the leaving OR group during the
fluorination reaction. Following step is the protonation of the alkoxy groups, an
alcohol splits off and Al–F bonds form. As the number of Al–F bonds increases, they
bridge with each other and form a network. Different steps of sol-gel process and
formation of random network with successive replacement of oxygen atoms by
fluorine in bridging bonds are shown in Scheme 4.
Scheme 4: (A) Al4(OiPr)12 (aluminium isopropoxide), (B) partially fluorinated, (C) Al(OR, F)6
intermediate, and (D) Al alkoxide fluoride (precursor)13
The influence of many parameters on the HS-AlF3 preparation has been
studied in detail aiming optimization of the process. It was found, that concentration
of metal alkoxide has no important effect on the properties of the final metal fluoride.
Al3+: HF ratio had distinct effect on the properties of final material. Over-
stoichiometric excess of HF than Al3+ : HF equal to 1 : 3 resulted in decrease of
surface area and in formation of partly crystalline AlF3. Under-stoichiometric amounts
- 33 -
of HF could be balanced by the second fluorination step. The most ideal was
stoichiometric amount of Al3+ : HF = 1 : 3 because less post-fluorination is needed. A
dry gel of aluminium fluoride (precursor) contains always substantial amounts of
alcohol and/or alkoxide groups mounting up to an analytical organic content of
30 wt.%. In going from AlF3 to MgF247 and to NaF48 the organic content of the dry gel
goes down to less than 1 wt.%. This shows that the Lewis acidity of the metal cation
in its fluoridic environment is responsible for the degree of solvent binding. At the
same time the organic constituents are covering and blocking preferably the
strongest Lewis acid sites. The removal of organic constituents from aluminium
fluoride dry gel, with aim to prepare extremely highly Lewis acidic HS-AlF3 is done in
a flow of a gaseous fluorinating agent. Simple heating of the dry gel in an inert gas
was not successful. This process is named activation because the catalytically
inactive dry gel of aluminium fluoride becomes active catalyst. Fluorocarbon
compounds and HF have been tested as fluorinating agents. CCl2F2 have been
successfully employed, whereas CHClF2 and gaseous HF were less effective.
CHClF2 caused extensive coke formation because of lower stability due to its
hydrogen content and gaseous HF can be only used at rather low temperatures (120
°C) because of its higher fluorinating capability. HS-AlF3/HF material prepared this
way had lower Lewis acidic characteristics.
Measurements of catalytic activity which depends specifically on the action of
Lewis acidic catalysts have been done. Dismutation reaction of CCl2F2 can be only
catalyzed by medium strong Lewis acids. Conversion reached 96 % using HS-AlF3
as catalysts at 300 °C. HS-AlF3 proved as a successful catalyst also in the
isomerization reaction of CCl2FCF2Cl which can be only catalyzed by very strong
Lewis acids. Photoacoustic IR spectroscopy was used for indirect determination of
Lewis acidity by pyridine adsorption test. Results of these tests show the presence of
almost exclusively Lewis acid sites with relatively high strength.
The development of HS-AlF3 having high surface area and high Lewis acidity
may be considered as a breakthrough in metal fluoride preparation.
- 34 -
HS-AlF3 PREPARED VIA OXIDATIVE DECOMPOSITION8, 46
Preparation of HS-AlF3 was the first studied procedure. Starting material for
preparation was hydrazinium(II) fluoroaluminate, N2H6AlF5. Complete decomposition
of N2H6AlF5 with elemental fluorine should yield pure AlF3 (reaction 11). The reaction
was done under heterogeneous (gas-solid) conditions and in liquid anhydrous
hydrogen fluoride (aHF) medium.
Initial experiments showed that oxidative decomposition under heterogeneous
conditions (gas-solid) is not suitable for preparation of metal fluorides with high
surface areas. Material is over-heated due to intense heterogeneous exothermic
reaction. This leads to partly crystallized materials with low surface area.
On the contrary liquid aHF proved as
excellent reaction medium for this kind of
reactions. Final material prepared under
gas-solid conditions yielded partly crystallized
AlF3 with surface areas of 25 m2/g, while
material prepared in liquid aHF medium
yielded amorphous material with surface
areas of 200–300 m2/g. Continuous stirring is
needed during reaction to prevent subsiding
of the solid phase and to ensure efficient
conveying off the heat. Scale-up of the
oxidative decomposition of N2H6AlF5 with F2 in
aHF medium is possible. The scaled-up
preparation could be safely reproducible
(Figure 1), which allowed preparation of
batches with product capacity of up to 10 g.
Figure 1: 700 ml PCTFE reaction vessel for oxidative decomposition of N2H6AlF5 with F2 in aHF medium (350 ml).
Elemental analysis showed that HS-AlF3 contain approximately 95 wt.% of
AlF3 and other residues which could not be quantified due to the nature of the
- 35 -
samples. IR and XPS spectra proved that the residue consist of nitrogen and oxygen
compounds. Oxygen compounds, most likely H3O+ and OH–, originate from the
residual water in the starting material, N2H6AlF5. Nitrogen compounds, mostly NH4+
appear due to incomplete decomposition. Research of catalytic activity showed that it
is directly connected to the amount of NH4+ in the material. Amounts higher than
0,5 wt.% of NH4+ resulted in materials with no catalytic activity in selected probe
reactions43, isomerization of CClF2CCl2F and dismutation of CCl2F2. Amount of NH4+
in HS-AlF3 can be reduced by decanting the liquid aHF phase, additional extraction of
HS-AlF3 with liquid aHF or treatment with gaseous fluorinating agent such as CCl2F2.
It results in catalytically active material with unchanged high surface area. Catalytic
activity of HS-AlF3 prepared with oxidative decomposition is comparable to HS-AlF3
prepared with fluoride sol-gel process.
- 36 -
22..44 SSCCOOPPEE AANNDD OOUUTTLLIINNEE
Primary purpose of this thesis was preparation of GaF3, with improved specific properties by the application of:
Fluoride sol-gel procedure using metal alkoxide, gallium(III) isopropoxide, as
starting material.
Oxidative decomposition of fluorometalate, hydrazinium(II)
aquapentafluorogallate(III), N2H6GaF5·H2O.
The focus of preparation was to define the key parameters of the synthesis such
as concentration of reactants, type of solvent, type of fluorinating agent, etc.
All materials were characterized by:
Determination of specific surface area (BET method),
Elemental analysis (Ga : F molar ratio, residues)
Scanning electron microscopy (morphology)
Photoacoustic IR spectroscopy (comparison of materials in different stages of
preparation)
Gas chromatography (identifying the organic reaction products from catalytic
experiments)
X-ray powder diffraction, (amorphous?)
In addition the materials were also characterized by two indirect methods:
Determination of acidity by pyridine adsorption14
Measurement of catalytic activity in test reaction of CCl2F2 dismutation16.
.
- 37 -
33 EEXXPPEERRIIMMEENNTTAALL WWOORRKK
33..11 BBAASSIICC EEQQUUIIPPMMEENNTT::
VACUUM SYSTEM
Most of reactants used to synthesize our materials and also final products are very
reactive and toxic. Exposure to ambient air is most problematic and results in quick
reaction with water that ruins our materials in matter of minutes. Reactions were
carried out in closed vacuum system (Figure 2) to prevent degradation of our
reactants and products.
Figure 2: Vacuum system
This vacuum system is a modified version of vacuum system, developed at Jožef
Stefan Institute at Department of Inorganic Chemistry and Technology49. System is
- 38 -
made from nickel, glass and plastic pipes and appropriate valves connected to oil
rotational and mercury diffusion vacuum pump. Working vacuum from 10–1 to 10–3 Pa
is achieved using mercury diffusion pump and the vacuum of 1 Pa needed for
diffusion pump operation is achieved by oil rotational pump.
DRY BOX
The manipulation of all non-volatile solids is accomplished in dry argon
atmosphere within a dry-box (M. Braun, Germany). The residual water in the
atmosphere within the dry-box should never exceed 2 ppm.
REACTION VESSELS
HF resistant plastic has to be used for
reaction vessel instead of glass, which
reacts with HF. All reactions are carried out
in FEP (tetrafluoroethylene-
hexafluoropropylene; Polytetra, Germany)
reaction vessels (Figure 3). FEP has similar
properties like PTFE (Teflon) but is more
suitable for reactions since it is transparent
and vessels allow visual monitoring of the
processes.
Figure 3: FEP reaction vessels. Capacity of
30 mL (left) and 300 mL (right).
- 39 -
REACTORS, OVENS AND AUTOCLAVES
Flow reactor consisting of a Ni tube (5 mm i.d.) located vertically in an electric
furnace (Figure 4) was used for post-fluorination of precursors and for selected probe
reactions. Nickel autoclave was used together with oval oven to dry precursors and
final materials (Figure 5). The whole system was additionally connected to a vacuum
system and heated up to 250 °C.
Figure 4: Flow reactor in an electric furnace.
Figure 5: Nickel autoclave (up) and oval oven (down).
SCALES
Scale with accuracy of +0,1 mg (Mettler 0 – 1000 g) was used for accurate
weighting of reactants and final materials in closed reaction vessels. Scale with
accuracy of +1 mg (Tehtnica 100M-300C, Železniki) was used for apprpximate
weighting of reactants and final materials in dry box.
- 40 -
TEMPERATURE CONTROLLER AND MASS FLOW CONTROLLER
Programable temperature controller (Digi-Sense R/S) was used to control the
temperature program in electric furnace (flow reactor) during post-fluorination,
catalysis test and pyridine adsorption test (Figure 6).
Mass flow controller MKS (PR 4000 - console, 179B - measuring module) was
used to accurately measure and control the mass flow of gases into flow reactor
(Figure 7).
Figure 6: Digi-Sense Temperature controller.
Figure 7: MKS mass flow controller.
- 41 -
33..22 PPRREEPPAARRAATTIIOONN OOFF GGaaFF33 VVIIAA FFLLUUOORRIIDDEE SSOOLL--GGEELL::
INTRODUCTION
The preparation of GaF3 is affected by several parameters. Our focus was to
determine the key parameters of preparation; temperature, purity of alkoxide
precursor, concentration of reactants and type of fluorinating agent. Since majority of
properties of our material depends on its surface, measurements of specific surface
area according to the BET method were performed preferentially on all newly
prepared precursors and final materials. Elemental analysis has been done on final
materials after fluorination and some precursors to compare Ga : F ratios and to
quantify residues in prepared materials. FT-IR spectroscopy with photoacoustic
detection was used to obtain IR spectra of precursors and final materials. This
method was used to compare our materials in different stages of preparation. These
measurements were performed before other characterization steps described in
chapter 6.
Non-aqueous sol-gel fluoride preparation route for GaF3 was investigated on
the modified equipment as described in the previous chapter with HS-AlF3
preparation and characterization. Preparation of GaF3 can be divided in three main
steps:
1. Purification of gallium(III) isopropoxide
2. Preparation of GaF3 precursor (dry gel)
3. Post-fluorination of GaF3 precursor to yield the final material
- 42 -
PURIFICATION OF GALLIUM(III) ISOPROPOXIDE
Starting material was a
commercially available Ga(OiPr)3
(gallium(III) isopropoxide – Alfa
Aesar). We succeeded to prepare
single crystal for crystal structure
determination by leaving small
amount of Ga(OiPr)3 in glass tube for
two months in dry box. Crystal
structure of Ga(OiPr)3 was
determined. As expected, it is
isostructural with aluminium(III)
isopropoxide, and crystallizes in
monoclinic P 21/c space group with a
= 10.3(1) b = 20.9(2), c = 23.6(4) and
β = 95.1(1).
Scheme 5: Structure of gallium(III) isopropoxide
The basic building block is tetramer where four gallium atoms are connected
through two oxygen bridging atoms from isopropoxide groups. The central gallium
atom is octahedrally surrounded by six oxygen atoms. Other three gallium atoms are
surrounded by 4 oxygen atoms from isopropoxide groups in tetrahedral arrangement
(Scheme 5).
- 43 -
Dissolution of the commercial
Ga(OiPr)3 in isopropanol was incomplete.
Obtained solutions were opaque indicating
the presence of insoluble impurities. The
impurities probably originate from the
hydrolysis of Ga(OiPr)3 since original
package is not closed tight enough. This
was the reason that Ga(OiPr)3 was
additionally purified by sublimation50.
Sublimation system for commercial
Ga(OiPr)3 was constructed from two oval
glass vessel. First vessel was used to hold
commercial Ga(OiPr)3 in furnace and the
second one was immersed in ice bath to
collect the purified product (Figure 8).
Sublimation was performed at 140 °C
under dynamic vacuum for 12 hours. Pure
Ga(OiPr)3 is transparent honey like
material (Figure 9), and the yield of the
purified Ga(OiPr)3 was 50 – 70 %.
Residue was a white-yelow solid, probably
oxide from hydrolysis of Ga(OiPr)3.
Figure 8: Sublimation of Ga(OiPr)3. Furnace (left) and Ice bath (below).
Figure 9: Vessel with purified Ga(OiPr)3.
Its composition was not defined. With the purified Ga(OiPr)3 clear solutions
with up to 30 wt.% of alkoxide in isopropanol could be prepared.
PREPARATION OF GaF3 PRECURSOR
Next step was preparation of precursor (dry Ga-F-gel), an amorphous solid,
which still contains some remaining alkoxide groups and solvent. Closed vacuum
system was used for all operations to avoid any contact with ambient air. The overall
reaction of gallium alkoxide with HF can be formulated as shown in reaction 12:
- 44 -
Pure Ga(OiPr)3 (1 g) was added in reaction vessel from HF resistant plastic
(fluoropolymers) mounted with teflon valve in metallic frame. Reaction vessel
(immersed in liquid nitrogen) and flask with dry isopropanol (with molecular sieves
Ǻ3) were connected to a vacuum line. Dry isopropanol was condensed into the
reaction vessel and approximately 20 wt.% solution of the alkoxide was prepared
(Figure 10).
Figure 10: Condensation of solvent (isopropanol) into the reaction vessel on vacuum system.
Reaction vessel was heated to ambient temperature and content was stirred
for approximately 15 minutes till all Ga(OiPr)3 dissolved.
- 45 -
Anhydrous HF was
added to the mixture within a
few minutes during
continuous stirring at
ambient temperature. aHF as
a gaseous reactant was
added with high accuracy
using vacuum system
(Figure 11). A stable
transparent viscous gel (wet
gel) was formed immediately
after the addition of the aHF
(Figure 12).
Figure 11: Addition of aHF on vacuum system. FEP reaction vessel (1) and aHF in thin vessel (2).
Figure 12: Wet gel (up) and dry gel (down) after pumping on vacuum system.
Reaction vessel was again connected
to vacuum system after the synthesis,
followed by removal of the solvent yielding a
dry red sugar like (Figure 13) Ga-F-gel
(xerogel). This material was precursor for
our final material GaF3.
Figure 13: Precursor (dry gel).
POST-FLUORINATION OF GaF3 PRECURSOR
Precursor needs additional fluorination in order to obtain the final material,
amorphous GaF3 (reaction 13). Influence of fluorinating agents CCl2F2 and gaseous
aHF on properties of final material was studied on precursor prepared from the
stoichiometric ratio of reactants in 20 wt.% solution of Ga(OiPr)3 in isopropanol.
- 46 -
Post-fluorination of precursor was carried out in a
flow reactor consisting of a Ni tube (5 mm i.d.) located
vertically in an electric furnace (Figure 14). Precursor
(approximately 1 g) was placed on a silver wool plug
which was fixed in the centre of the reactor.
Two fluorinating agents were predominately
tested at different temperatures:
CCl2F2 (CCl2F2 : N2 = 1 : 1 vol.)
Temperatures from 200°C to 300°C
Gaseous aHF (HF : N2 = 1 : 20 vol.)
Temperatures from 120°C to 200°C
Diluent N2 was added to fluorinating agents as a
carrier gas and to moderate the fluorinating activity. All
gases were introduced into reactor via teflon tubes.
Figure 14: Flow reactor in an electric furnace.
With CCl2F2 as a fluorinating agent the progress of post-fluorination was
followed up by monitoring the exhaust from the reactor. Exhaust gases were
analyzed on-line by GC. The flow of gaseous CCl2F2 and the diluent N2 entering
reactor were measured by mass-flow meters. The process of post-fluorination with
CCl2F2 is finished when we do not detect any residue organic compounds like
isopropanol on our chromatogram (Approximately 4 - 6 hours). Clear indication that
activation is finished is also the appearance of dismutation products of CCl2F2 which
appear when material has its active sites free.
- 47 -
Gaseous aHF was also used as fluorinating agent and since its fluorinating
activity is higher than that of fluorocarbon compounds post-fluorination was done at
lower temperatures. Progress of post-fluorination with aHF was not followed and
analyzed by GC due to the nature of the fluorination agent. Fluorinating time was set
to 4 hours, according to the result observed by the fluorination of HS-AlF3 with aHF51.
ADDITIONAL POST-FLUORINATION TESTS
As already mentioned before, main disadvantage of fluoride sol-gel procedure
is to assure satisfactory reproducibility involved in this process of precursor
fluorination due to the nature of the reactions. Two main problems were residues still
present in final material and coke formation during post-fluorination. This is why some
additional tests with the goal to improve the post-fluorination step were done.
1. Test: Conditioning of precursor before post-fluorination
The goal of this test was to remove majority of the residual organic
compounds from precursors before post-fluorination with CCl2F2. In this way the
chances of coke formation during post-fluorination would be minimized. Precursor
was heated at 250 °C and connected to vacuum for 8 hours before post-fluorination.
It was expected that in this way solvent (isopropanol) and other organic compounds
formed during the synthesis would be removed from the dry gel.
2. Test: Extended post-fluorination time
The goal of this test was to fluorinate the material at longer times. This could
affect the material by improving its purity by reducing the amount of the organic
residue. Precursor was post-fluorinated with aHF and CCl2F2. The post-fluorination
took 16 hours instead of only 4 to 6 hours as used in previous tests. The expected
drawback of this procedure was lower surface area and as a result of this also lower
catalytic activity.
- 48 -
3. Test: Using elemental fluorine as fluorinating agent
Elemental fluorine was also tested as fluorinating agent. Dambouret and
coworkers52 reported successful low-temperature fluorination of AlF3 precursor with
gaseous F2. Post-fluorinated material was catalytically active HS-AlF3 with surface
area SBET = 330 m2/g. According to these results, GaF3 precursor was post-
fluorinated at room temperature with a mixture of fluorine and argon (Ar : F2 = 1 : 1)
under static conditions in a nickel autoclave.
4. Test: Addition of oxygen to fluorinating mixture
The problem occurring during post-fluorination was formation of coke on material.
Deactivation of the catalyst due to coke formation is a well known industrial
problem53. Coke deposition on the catalyst surface significantly deteriorates its
catalytic activity. Coked catalysts are usually regenerated by combustion in a stream
of diluted oxygen or air. Upon combustion, coke is converted to CO2 and H2O but in
the absence of oxygen, CO may also be formed. Combustion of coke is exothermic
and this may accelerate phase changes or sintering in catalysts. To avoid these
effects the gas stream contains small amounts of oxygen (2–5 %) and the
concentration of oxygen is only gradually increased in order to complete coke
burnoff. The same amount of oxygen was added to our fluorinating mixture. The bulk
of coke is removed by oxidation at temperatures higher than 450 °C. These high
temperatures can significantly affect our materials so we tried this procedure at
300 °C.
- 49 -
33..33 PPRREEPPAARRAATTIIOONN OOFF GGaaFF33 VVIIAA OOXXIIDDAATTIIVVEE DDEECCOOMMPPOOSSIITTIIOONN::
INTRODUCTION
GaF3 was prepared by oxidative decomposition of hydrazinium(II)
aquapentafluorogallate(III), N2H6GaF5.H2O, with elemental fluorine. Full
decomposition should yield pure GaF3 (reaction 14) as the only solid product.
Reaction was carried out in liquid anhydrous hydrogen fluoride (aHF) medium by
similar procedure as HS-AlF3 described in Chapter 2.3.
Extreme caution is needed during preparation of GaF3 due to exothermal nature of
the reaction. Slow stirring was used in order to avoid overheating and possible
deposition of unreacted particles of the starting material on the walls of reaction
vessel out of the solvent.
- 50 -
PREPARATION PROCEDURE
N2H6GaF5.H2O (3–5 g) was weighted in FEP reaction vessel (30 mL) with a
magnetic stir bar. Anhydrous HF (aHF) was added as a solvent (at least 3 cm above
N2H6GaF5.H2O) on the vacuum line by condensation. Starting material was not
soluble in aHF (Figure 15 and Figure 16).
Figure 15: Addition of aHF to reaction vessels on the vacuum line.
Figure 16: Reaction vessel with
N2H6GaF5.H2O in aHF.
Next step was addition of fluorine in small portions, 130 kPa of fluorine in
reaction vessel. Fluorine was added to reaction vessel at -196 °C and then the
reaction mixture was carefully stirred at room temperature (Figure 17). Large quantity
of solvent (aHF) was needed to increase the warmth capacity of the reaction mixture.
This was necessary because the reaction is strongly exothermic. Liquid aHF has two
main functions: it serves as a dispersing medium for the solid reactant and dissipates
the heat released during the exothermic decomposition.
- 51 -
After each F2 addition the course of
reaction was monitored by cooling the
reaction vessel to liquid nitrogen
temperature again and by measuring the
pressure inside the vessel. When the
pressure was different from that of elemental
fluorine at -196 °C, the reaction was still not
completed. After the measurement of the
pressure, gasses were pumped out at
-196 °C and new portion of F2 was added.
Later F2 was added in larger quantities, but
no larger than 660 kPa. Reaction vessel was
left stirring for two days before new fluorine
addition. Approximately 30 % excess of F2
was added according to the stoichiometric
ratio. After the reaction was completed, the
remaining gasses and aHF were pumped
out at room temperature. Example of
preparation is shown on next page.
Figure 17: Reaction between N2H6GaF5
.H2O and fluorine.
Preparation has been done in five different reaction vessels. Preparation in
two batches was not successful since reaction vessel burned through due to
overheating.
The weight of the final product was higher than stoichiometrically calculated
value due to residual HF being present in the material. Product was dried for 20
hours at 250 °C on the vacuum line in a nickel autoclave and later stored in dry-box.
- 52 -
Example of preparation:
Stating material (N2H6GaF5·H2O) = 3.67 g
Addition of fluorine:
Theoretical = 5100 kPa (F2 at 25°C) Practical (30 % excess) = 7200 kPa (F2 at 25°C)
Addition number Amount added T = 25 °C (298 K)
Cumulative Pressure of residual gasses*
1. addition 130 kPa 130 kPa /
2. addition 130 kPa 260 kPa /
3. addition 130 kPa 390 kPa /
4. addition 660 kPa 1050 kPa 66 kPa
5. addition 660 kPa 1710 kPa 80 kPa
6. addition 660 kPa 2370 kPa 66 kPa
7. addition 660 kPa 3030 kPa 66 kPa
8. addition 660 kPa 3690 kPa 60 kPa
9. addition 660 kPa 4350 kPa 60 kPa
10. addition 660 kPa 5010 kPa 50 kPa
11. addition 660 kPa 5670 kPa 43 kPa
12. addition 730 kPa 6400 kPa 33 kPa
13. addition 800 kPa 7200 kPa 33 kPa
* Residue gases were measured in reaction vessel at -196 °C (77 K). Vapor pressure of fluorine at -196 °C (77 K) is 33 KPa.
- 53 -
33..44 IINNSSTTRRUUMMEENNTTAATTIIOONN AANNDD CCHHAARRAACCTTEERRIIZZAATTIIOONN MMEETTHHOODDSS::
PHOTOACOUSTIC INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY
Photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS)54 is unique
as a sampling technique, because it does not require
that the sample be transmitting, has low sensitivity to
surface condition, and can probe over a range of
selectable sampling depths from several micrometers
to more than 100 μm. PAS has these capabilities
because it directly measures infrared (IR) absorption
by sensing absorption-induced heating of the sample
within an experimentally controllable sampling depth
below the sample’s surface. Heat generated within
this depth transfers to the surrounding gas at the
sample surface, producing a thermal-expansion-driven
pressurization in the gas, known as the PAS signal,
which is detected by a microphone.
Figure 18: Mtec model 300 photoacoustic detector.
PAS signal generation is initiated when the FT-IR beam, which oscillates in
intensity, is absorbed by the sample resulting in the absorption-induced heating in the
sample and oscillation of the sample temperature.
FT-IR Perkin-Elmer Spectrum GX with MTEC model 300 photoacoustic
detector (Figure 18) was used to analyze our samples. Approximately 50 mg of
sample was put into sample holder and inserted into MTEC detector. All process was
monitored and operated via Perkin-Elmer “Spectrum” software. IR spectra were used
as reference to follow our materials in different step of preparation, to compare newly
prepared materials with old ones and to detect adsorbed pyridine in final materials
with goal of determination of the type of acid sites on the surface of our materials.
- 54 -
ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS
The purpose of elemental analysis is to determine the amounts of individual
components in a certain compound. It is important that chemical analysis is
accomplished with highly accurate and precise analytical methods that assure a total
error below 1 %.
Since synthesized compounds are moisture sensitive and rapidly hydrolyse in
the presence of moist air all work is carried out in a dry-box. After weighing the
sample (synthesis product) into an airtight Teflon container, the container is cooled
with liquid nitrogen to moderate the reaction during the subsequent hydrolysis in
strong alkaline solution. Different weights of samples are used for the determination
of total fluorine, gallium and in some samples also total chlorine.
The individual samples are evaporated to dryness on a sand bath and then fused
with NaKCO3. The melt is transferred into a volumetric flask, dissolved by addition of
sulphuric acid in the case of fluoride, with HNO3 in the case of determination of
chloride and with HCl in the case of determination of gallium. The amount of fluoride
is determined by direct potentiometry using fluoride ion selective electrode, the
amount of chloride by precipitation titration with Hg(NO3)2 and the amount of gallium
with complexometric titration with EDTA.
All elemental analyses were performed in the analytical laboratory of the
Department of Inorganic Chemistry and Technology, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana.
SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA
The sample was degassed in vacuum at 250 °C for 10 h before the
measurements to remove the physically adsorbed water, HF and propanol from the
pores. The specific surface areas were determined by N2 adsorption at liquid N2
temperature, according to the BET method55. Method is based on the physical
adsorption of gas molecules on a solid surface and serves as the basis for an
important analysis technique for the measurement of the specific surface area of a
material.
- 55 -
Samples (100 mg) were measured with Micromeritics Flowsorb 2300 by
determining the quantity of a gas that adsorbs as a single layer of molecules
(monolayer) on a sample. The area of the sample is thus directly calculated from the
number of adsorbed molecules. Mixture of 30 volume % of nitrogen in helium was
used for the formation of a monolayer of adsorbed nitrogen at atmospheric pressure
and at temperature of liquid nitrogen.
.
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
For identifying the reaction products from catalytic experiments, a Perkin
Elmer 8700 gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector (FID) was used.
Products were separated with a 3 m x 2.1 mm nickel column, filled with
4,8 % Fomblin YR 1200 perfluoropolyether fluid (Montefluos) on 60/80 mesh
Carbopack B (Supleco)56 with He as carrier gas. Heating program was applied. The
initial column temperature was 50 °C and remained constant for 1 min followed by an
increase of the temperature (10 °C/min) to 150 °C, which was held at this
temperature for 10 min. The retention times for the organic products, CClF3, CCl2F2,
CCl3F, and CCl4 were determined as 2.2, 5.1, 9.5, and 15.0 min, respectively.
X-RAY POWDER DIFFRACTION
X–Ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of all the samples were obtained
using Seiffert ID-3000 diffractometer with CuKα (λ = 1.5418 Ǻ) radiation (Ni filter).
Debye-Scherrer camera 114 mm was used. Samples were placed into the quartz
capillaries with inner diameter of 0.3 mm and were filled in dry-box sealed with
halocarbon grease and later melted in flame of oxygen and hydrogen. Lines (d-
values) on the films were visually checked. Only information that was needed from
this method was if our samples were amorphous or not.
- 56 -
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
Morphology of precursors and final materials were compared on SEM pictures
made with field emission scanning electron microscope FE-SEM SUPRA 35 VP (Carl
Zeiss). The powder samples were mounted on double-sided adhesive carbon tape in
dry-box and then inserted to sample holder in SEM.
- 57 -
33..55 RREESSEEAARRCCHH OOFF CCAATTAALLYYTTIICC AANNDD AACCIIDDIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS::
Final materials would be best characterized by determination of Lewis acid
strength, but unfortunately, no universal criteria exist to determine its strength like the
pKa value for Brønsted acids. The Lewis acidity of the solids is a property of the
surface and not of the bulk. Several indirect characterization methods have been
developed. We used two of theses methods to characterize Lewis acidity in our
materials, measurement of catalytic activity in test reaction of dismutation of
dichlorodifluoromethane, CCl2F216, and determination of acidity by pyridine
adsorption14.
DETERMINATION OF CATALYTIC ACTIVITY
Measurement of catalytic activity which depends specifically on the strength of
Lewis acid sites was used to determine catalytic activity of our final materials. This is
reaction of dismutation of CCl2F2 (reaction 15)16 that can be only catalyzed by
medium strong Lewis acids. Reaction is monitored by gas chromatography where we
follow the ratio between CCl2F2 and its dismutation products.
RESEARCH OF ACIDIC PROPERTIES
Method for indirect determination of the type of acid sites on the surface of our
materials and strength of Lewis acidity is the adsorption of a probe basic molecule,
for example pyridine14. Pyridine bonds selectively to different acid sites and acts as a
- 58 -
probe for the identification of Lewis or Brønsted acid sites. The lone-pair electron of
the nitrogen atom of pyridine can either bind coordinately to Lewis acid sites or
interact with acidic OH groups to form pyridinium cations and is adsorbed via
hydrogen bonds (Brønsted acid sites).
Scheme 6: Pyridine interaction with Brønsted acid sites (B). Pyridine coordinated to Lewis (L) acid
sites.
Photoacoustic IR spectra of adsorbed pyridine in final material confirm the
presence of strong Lewis acidic centers. Interaction of pyridine via nitrogen lone-pair
electrons, with aprotic (Lewis) and protonic (Brønsted) acid sites can be detected by
monitoring the ring vibration modes 8a, 8b, 19a and 19b, following the nomenclature
introduced by Wilson57. Wavenumbers of specific bands are characteristic for acidic
materials with adsorbed pyridine14, 58. For GaF3 Bands at approximately 1456 cm–1
(ν19b), 1579 cm–1 (ν8b) and 1641 cm–1 (ν8a) are typical vibrations of pyridine
coordinated to strong Lewis centres. Band at 1491 cm–1 (ν19a) is typical for both
Lewis and Brønsted acidic centres. Band at 1620 cm–1 (ν8a) is typical vibration of
pyridine coordinately bonded to weaker Lewis acid site. Band at approximately 1545
cm–1 (ν19b) is caused by adsorbed pyridinium ions and is typical for Brønsted acidic
centres. They may arise from very small amount of water that is taken up by the solid
during the transfer into the measuring cell. However, the catalytic activity is not
influenced significantly by such small amounts of water. Difference in the strength of
Lewis acidity is determined by the shift of bands because of the change in vibrations
in pyridine bonded to Lewis acid sites. It is always good to compare spectra from
other similar Lewis acids.
- 59 -
33..66 UUSSEEDD CCHHEEMMIICCAALLSS::
Solids: Ga(OiPr)3 Gallium(III) isopropoxide, mixture of oligomers, 99 % Alfa Aesar
GaF3 Gallium(III) fluoride, powder, anhydrous, 99,99+%, Alfa Aesar
Liquids: (CH3)2CHOH 2-Propanol, anhydrous, 99.5+% Merck
C5H5N Pyridine (Py) Merck
HF Hydrofluoric acid 40 % Merck
Gases: N2 Nitrogen (5.0) Messer
Ar Argon (5.0) Messer
He Helium (5.0) Messer
Air Synthetic air (CH free) Messer
H2 Hydrogen (5.0) Messer
CCl2F2 Dichlorodifluoromethane Solvay Fluor
F2 Fluorine Solvay Fluor
aHF Anhydrous hydrogenfluoride Merck
- 60 -
44 RREESSUULLTTSS AANNDD DDIISSCCUUSSSSIIOONN
44..11 IINNTTRROODDUUCCTTIIOONN::
Measurements of specific surface area, elemental analysis and comparisons
of photoacoustic spectra have been done from materials prepared via sol-gel
procedure and oxidative decomposition. Main goal of characterization was to
determinate the Lewis acidity and catalytic behavior in a selected test reaction.
The most interesting properties of this metal fluoride which were in the focus of
this work were for catalytic applications. Catalytic activity test was done in reaction of
dismutation of dichlorodifluoromethane, CCl2F216 and determination of acidity test
was done by pyridine adsorption14. FT-IR spectrometer with photoacoustic detector
was used to detect pyridine bonded to final materials in the test of determination of
Lewis acidity.
Two more techniques were used to additionally characterize our materials.
X-ray powder diffraction was done on standard Debye-Scherrer camera to prove
amorphous or crystalline structure of our materials. Field emission scanning electron
microscope (FE-SEM) was used to determine the morphology (particle size) of
precursors and final materials.
- 61 -
44..22 MMAATTEERRIIAALLSS PPRREEPPAARREEDD VVIIAA SSOOLL--GGEELL::
SUBLIMATION OF Ga(OiPr)3
Comparison of surface areas of precursor made from sublimated or non-
sublimated Ga(OiPr)3 was done. Stoichiometric amount of aHF and approximately
15 wt.% solution of Ga(OiPr)3 in isopropanol was used for this experiment. It showed
(Table 1) that precursor prepared from sublimated Ga(OiPr)3 had significantly higher
surface areas (130 – 160 m2/g) than precursors prepared from non-sublimated
Ga(OiPr)3, which did not have surface areas higher than 60 m2/g. Impurities in
commercial Ga(OiPr)3 are most probably products of hydrolysis which are not formed
under controlled conditions. These particles are larger than those formed during the
sol-gel procedure. Presence of impurities with larger particles and consequently
lower surface areas can explain lower surface areas of precursors prepared with
non-sublimated Ga(OiPr)3.
Table 1: Comparison of surface areas of precursors prepared from non-sublimed and sublimed Ga(OiPr)3 at stoichiometric molar ratio of reactants. Non-sublimated Sublimated Sample number: 1n 2n 3n 1s 2s 3s Surface area, SBET (m2/g) 25 60 40 130 160 140
CONCENTRATION OF SUBLIMATED Ga(OiPr)3 IN SOLVENT
Next parameter investigated was the concentration of Ga(OiPr)3 in
isopropanol. It is known from previous research on HS-AlF3 that concentration of
metal alkoxide should have no decisive effect on the properties of the final metal
fluoride12.
- 62 -
Stoichiometric amount of aHF was used in the molar ratio Ga(OiPr)3 : aHF =
1 : 3. Results show that compact gel are formed at concentrations of Ga(OiPr)3
higher than 12 wt.%. At lower concentrations only viscous liquids are formed. With
concentrations from 12–30 wt.%, precursors with a random distribution of surface
areas from 144 to 160 m2/g were obtained. In all cases reaction between Ga(OiPr)3
and aHF occurs instantaneously. There were no differences in gel formation time
between the four samples that formed gels. All gels formed immediately. Precursors
prepared from viscous liquid with concentration below 12 wt.% did not exceed
surface area of 80 m2/g. Sample with 10 wt.% solution of Ga(OiPr)3 in isopropanol
was left for three days, but no changes were observed, viscous liquid did not change
to gel. 20 wt.% solution of Ga(OiPr)3 in isopropanol was chosen as optimal
concentration. Results are shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Comparison of surface areas of precursors prepared from different concentrations of Ga(OiPr)3 in isopropanol at stoichiometric molar ratio of reactants. Sample number: 15 27,5 310 412,5 515 620 730 Concentration of Ga(OiPr)3 in isopropanol [wt.%]
5 7,5 10 12,5 15 20 30
Surface area, SBET [m2/g] 40 75 80 155 140 160 145 Form Viscous liquid Compact gel
EFFECT OF Ga(OiPr)3 : HF RATIO
For aluminum system it is known that optimal ratio between Al-isopropoxide
and HF is very close to the stoichiometric amount, Al(OiPr)3 : HF = 1 : 3. Higher
molar ratios lead to a significant decrease of surface area. Our results show that in
gallium systems molar ratios above stoichiometry did not have significant effect on
surface area. 20 wt.% solution of Ga(OiPr)3 in isopropanol was used at molar ratios
of Ga(OiPr)3 : HF = 1 : 2–10. Precursor had random surface areas from 135 to 195
m2/g (Table 3, Figure 19). It appears that gallium precursor is much more stable than
aluminum one and amorphous structure of the gel is not destroyed even at very high
concentrations of aHF. Stoichiometric amount of aHF was chosen as optimal
- 63 -
concentration for further experiments, since there was no need for excess of aHF in
this step.
Table 3: Effect of Ga(OiPr)3 : HF molar ratio on precursor surface properties. Sample number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
HF / Ga(OiPr)3 Ratio: 1,99 2,21 2,78 2,86 2,88 2,95 3,00 3,28 3,78 4,09 4,53 10,86
Surface area, SBET (m2/g) 136 177 161 144 157 160 140 171 176 135 195 151
Figure 19: Scattering of surface areas for materials obtained at different Ga(OiPr)3 : HF ratios.
ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS OF PRECURSOR
Elemental analysis (Table 4) shows Ga : F ratio and amount of organic residue
in our precursor. Precursor was additionally threaded at 250 °C in vacuum, since
there are still some volatile compounds present. The reason for high ratio of fluorine
in precursor is most probably due to the presence of non-reacted HF residue in our
material. Results from additionally treated precursor give a clearer picture of its
composition. Analyzed precursor has a ratio of Ga : F = 1 : 2 and results of elemental
analysis indicate that there is still 23,6 % of organic residue in the precursor.
- 64 -
Table 4: Surface area and elemental analysis of precursor and precursor additionally threaded at 250°C in vacuum. Sample: Precursor Precursor (250°C) Elemental analysis:
Ga : F = 1 : 3,0 Ga + F = 55,8 wt. %
Ga : F = 1 : 2,0 Ga + F = 76,4 wt. %
Surface area, SBET (m2/g)
/ 140
POST-FLUORINATION OF PRECURSOR WITH CCl2F2 AND aHF
Precursor fluorinated with CCl2F2 was treated at temperatures from 200 °C to
300°C (Table 5). Most optimal post-fluorinating temperature was 280 °C which is also
in agreement with literature51. Results on other metal fluorides have shown that
fluorination at higher temperatures result in excessive decrease of surface area while
at lower temperatures fluorination is not effective. The main problem observed during
fluorination was the formation of coke on our final materials9. Materials were
bright–red and powdery, except the one prepared at 300 °C which was dark black.
Material prepared at 280 °C is most suitable candidate for catalytic test reaction due
to its high surface area and relatively high purity compared to other materials.
Table 5: Elemental analysis and surface areas of materials post-fluorinated with CCl2F2. Sample number:
Temperature [°C]:
Elemental analysis:
Surface area, SBET (m2/g):
C1 200 Ga : F = 1 : 2,24 Ga + F = 84,5 wt. % /
C2 250 Ga : F = 1 : 2,35 Ga + F = 86,3 wt. % /
C3 280 Ga : F = 1 : 2,55 Ga + F = 91,9 wt. % 40
C4 300* Ga : F = 1 : 2,35 Ga + F = 87,6 wt. % 21
* For the material post-fluorinated at 300 °C an extensive coke formation was observed.
The post-fluorinating reaction with aHF was done at lower temperatures from
120 °C to 200 °C (Table 6) with the aim to preserve the highly disordered structure
and high surface area of the materials. Advantage of aHF use is that, unlike
- 65 -
fluorocarbons, HF can not form coke. Experiments of preparation of other high
surface metal fluorides36 showed that fluorination starts at 120 °C and that
concentrations higher than HF : N2 = 1 : 20 lead to high decrease of surface area in
final material.
Table 6: Elemental analysis and surface areas of materials post-fluorinated with aHF. Sample number:
Temperature [°C]:
Elemental analysis:
Surface area, SBET (m2/g):
H1 120 Ga : F = 1 : 2,86 Ga + F = 89,0 wt.% 24
H2 160 Ga : F = 1 : 2,88 Ga + F = 89,7 wt.% 17
H3 200 Ga : F = 1 : 2,90 Ga + F = 90,3 wt.% 9
Materials prepared at 120 °C and 160 °C were bright-red powdery materials,
except the one prepared at 200°C which was dark brown. Although material prepared
at 200 °C has the highest Ga : F molar ratio and is most pure, its surface area is
significantly lower than materials prepared at 120 °C and 160 °C. Material prepared
at 120 °C is most suitable candidate for catalytic tests due to its high surface area.
Commercial GaF3 is a white crystalline powder with Ga : F = 1 : 3 ratio and
surface area of only 3 m2/g, which is significantly lower than our materials. Most of
our final materials were bright-red powdery materials and not white. This might be
due to high content of residues in final materials.
GaF3 post-fluorinated with CCl2F2 has the highest surface area (Table 5 –
sample C3). Material contains 8,1 wt.% of organic residues which is the lowest value
obtained for the fluoride sol-gel method. A small amount of chlorine has also been
detected in this material. Elemental analysis also shows that the final material post-
fluorinated with aHF has the highest Ga : F molar ratio but has much lower surface
area than material post-fluorinated with CCl2F2.
COMPARISON OF PHOTOACOUSTIC IR SPECRA
IR spectroscopy was used to characterize our materials in different
preparation step and to compare newly prepared materials with old ones. Figure 20
- 66 -
shows photoacoustic IR spectra of starting material, Ga(OiPr)3 and other fluorinated
materials in different preparation steps.
Broad bands from 3300
to 3700 cm-1, which are seen in
precursor and other fluorinated
materials, are from solvating
isopropanol (OH stretching). It
could be also attributed to
adsorption of water, which
bonds to our material during
manipulation due to high Lewis
acidity. CH3 and CH absorption
bands at 2800 to 3000 cm-1 are
characteristic for the alkoxide.
Figure 20: PAS spectra of Ga(OiPr)3 and other fluorinated materials.
Spectra contain many peaks in the area below 1500 cm-1 but these are harder
to assign to specific vibration. C–C frame absorptions of the organic constituents are
scattered in this area. Bands from 950 to 1300 cm-1 are usually from C-O vibrations.
Valence vibrations from 350 to 800 cm-1 are indicative of the metal-oxygen and
metal-fluorine bonds59.
Spectra (Figure 20) show that our final materials still contain some residues
after activation. Spectrum of GaF3 activated with CCl2F2 indicates the presence of the
starting material, Ga(OiPr)3, or precursor, GaFx(OiPr)3-x. GaF3 activated with aHF
shows only traces of the residual propoxide, so organic residues can not be
confirmed as the main residue in this final material. Residues in final materials are
also confirmed with elemental analyses which indicate approximately 10 wt.% of
residues in both of our final materials. It appears from IR spectra that residues in
GaF3 activated with HF are not organic. With available methods we were not able to
unequivocally indentify the residues present.
- 67 -
RESULTS OF ADDITIONAL POST-FLUORINATION TESTS
Results from 1. Test: Conditioning of precursor before post-fluorination
Spectra (Figure 21)
show comparison between
conditioned precursor on
250 °C (vaccum line) before
post-fluorination with CCl2F2
and non-conditioned.
Conditioning resulted in final
material without CH3 and CH
absorption bands at 2800 to
3000 cm-1 that are
characteristic for the
alkoxide. This means that
we do not have starting
material present in GaF3.
Figure 21: PAS spectra of GaF3 post-fluorinated with CCl2F2 (down) and the same material which was conditioned on 250°C (vacuum line) before post-fluorination (up).
On the contrary elemental analysis (Table 7) showed that purity of final
material was not improved and that residues are still present. We did not characterize
residues in conditioned material but spectra indicate that these residues should not
be organic. Table 7: Comparison of surface areas and elemental analysis of GaF3 post-fluorinated with CCl2F2 and the same material which was conditioned on 250°C (vacuum line) before post-fluorination. Sample: GaF3 (CCl2F2) GaF3 (CCl2F2) Cond.250°C Elemental analysis:
Ga : F : Cl = 1 : 2,55 : 0,12 Ga + F + Cl = 91,9 wt.%
Ga : F = 1 : 2,40 : 0,17 Ga + F+ Cl = 90,3 wt.%
Surface area, SBET (m2/g) 40 29
- 68 -
The goal of this test to purify the final material was not achieved. Although in
the newly prepared material alkoxide could not be detected the material had lower
Ga : F molar ratio, lower surface area and approximately the same residues.
Results from 2. Test: Extended post-fluorination time
Extended post-
fluorination time (16 hours) did
not significantly improve the
properties of final materials.
Some changes that were noted
are: bands characteristic for the
alkoxide were not visible
(Figure 22), Ga : F molar ratio
was improved in case of aHF
post-fluorination, purity of final
materials remained almost the
same with around 10 % of
residues.
Figure 22: PAS spectra of GaF3 post-fluorinated (16 hours) with CCl2F2 (down) and aHF (up).
As expected surface areas of both materials were affected (Table 8) and are
lower than from materials prepared at 4 – 6 hours.
Table 8: Comparison of surface areas and elemental analysis of GaF3 prepared with extended (16 hours) post-fluorination time (CCl2F2 and aHF). Sample: GaF3 (CCl2F2) – 16 hours GaF3 (aHF) – 16 hours Elemental analysis:
Ga : F : Cl = 1 : 2,45 : 0,16 Ga + F + Cl = 91,2 wt.%
Ga : F = 1 : 3,00 Ga + F = 91,8 wt.%
Surface area, SBET (m2/g) 22 19
- 69 -
Results from 3. Test: Using elemental fluorine as fluorinating agent
Fluorine is a very strong oxidizing/fluorinating agent so extreme caution is
needed during direct fluorination of this kind of metal fluoride precursors. Although
there were some reports52 of successful usage of elemental fluorine in such
fluorinationt, our experiment showed that fluorine is not adequate for post-treatment
of precursor due to its too high reactivity. Experimental fluorination with F2 resulted in
immediate ignition of the precursor.
Results from 4. Test: Addition of oxygen to fluorinating mixture
Adding oxygen to fluorinating
mixture did not have desired effect.
Instead of removal of coke we got a
reverse effect. Coke deposited even
more to our material than before (Figure
23). The main reason for this might be
because we were not able to expose our
material to such high temperatures as in
classical catalyst regeneration
procedures (for oxides) which start at
around 450 °C and up. Heating of our
materials to this high temperature would
significantly affect its properties (surface
area) and accelerate phase changes or
sintering.
Figure 23: Coke deposited on final material.
- 70 -
44..33 MMAATTEERRIIAALLSS PPRREEPPAARREEDD VVIIAA OOXXIIDDAATTIIVVEE DDEECCOOMMPPOOSSIITTIIOONN::
ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS AND SURFACE AREA
Final material, GaF3 was additionally threaded at 250 °C in vacuum before
analysis since there are still some volatile compounds present, mainly HF.
Theoretical [%] Found [%] Ga 55,0 53,4 Ft
- 45,0 43,2 NH4
+ 0 0,6
Molar ratio: Ga : F = 1 : 3,00 Ga + F = 100,0 wt.%
Ga : F = 1 : 2,97 Ga + F = 96,6 wt.%
GaF3 prepared via oxidative
decomposition method is relatively pure
and the Ga : F ratio indicates the
formation of GaF3. Elemental analysis
showed that final material contains
0,6 wt.% of NH4+. X-ray powder
diffraction showed that compound which
contain NH4+ is (NH4)3GaF6. The final
material is a white powdery material
(Figure 24) and has a relatively low
surface area of 19 m2/g.
Figure 24: GaF3 after preparation.
- 71 -
PHOTOACOUSTIC IR SPECRA
The presence of NH4+ was proved by comparison with previous results done
on Al compounds. NH4+ vibrations can clearly be seen on comparison spectra. It is
known from literature46 that NH4+ is present in HS-AlF3 prepared via oxidative
decomposition. NH4AlF4 which is a possible side product in the preparation of HS-
AlF3 is shown as a reference with evident vibration band of NH4+ at approximately
1450 cm-1 (Figure 25).
Previous research
on HS-AlF3 preparation
showed that NH4+
presence in high surface
materials has significant
effect on catalytic activity
in selected probe
reactions. Test of catalytic
activity of GaF3 and
possible influence of NH4+
on it is described in
chapter 6. Figure 25: PAS spectra showing the presence of NH4
+ in GaF3, HS-AlF3 prepared by oxidative decomposition and NH4AlF4 (reference).
- 72 -
44..44 XX--RRAAYY PPOOWWDDEERR DDIIFFFFRRAACCTTIIOONN::
X-Ray powder diffraction was done on materials prepared via fluoride sol-gel
(precursor and final materials) and final material prepared via oxidative
decomposition.
Results of materials prepared via fluoride sol-gel:
• Precursor (amorphous)
• GaF3 – post-fluorinated with CCl2F2 (amorphous)
• GaF3 – post-fluorinated with aHF (amorphous)
Results of material prepared via oxidative decomposition:
• GaF3 (weakly crystalline)
Results of X-ray powder diffraction indicate small quantities of (NH4)3GaF6
present in final material prepared via oxidative decomposition.
- 73 -
44..55 DDEETTEERRMMIINNAATTIIOONN OOFF CCAATTAALLYYTTIICC AACCTTIIVVIITTYY::
Catalytic activity test of CCl2F2 dismutation was done on final materials
prepared via fluoride sol-gel and post-fluorinated with either CCl2F2 or HF, final
material prepared via oxidative decomposition, commercial crystalline GaF3 and
blank. Table 9 shows all results of catalytic activity of tested materials. Besides
temperatures shown in Table 9 catalytic tests have also been done at 200 °C and
250 °C but none of the samples converted CCl2F2 to its dismutation products at these
temperatures.
Table 9: Comparison of catalytic activity of materials in probe reaction of dismutation of CCl2F2
Dismutation of CCl2F2 [%] Temperature [°C] GaF3
(CCl2F2) GaF3 (aHF)
GaF3 (ox. decom.)
GaF3 (commercial)
Blank
300 0,8 0 0 0 0 350 4 0,4 0 0 0
Catalytic activity of GaF3 in this test reaction was very low. Maximal
conversion of CCl2F2 to its dismutation products was only 0,8 % at 300 °C and 4 % at
350 °C using material prepared via fluoride sol-gel and activated with CCl2F2. For
example conversion of CCl2F2 using HS-AlF3 was 96 % at 300 °C. Reason for lower
catalytic activity of GaF3 could be lower Lewis acidity of Ga3+ compared to Al3+ 8.
Additional factors that may have an influence on low catalytic activity are lower
surface area and high amounts of relatively stable organic residues in our final
materials prepared via the fluoride sol-gel process. Organic residues and their
decomposed products may physically or chemically block the active acid sites.
Catalytic inactivity of GaF3 prepared via oxidative decomposition is most
probably connected to the presence of NH4+ in material (0,6 wt.%). Previous research
on HS-AlF3 obtained by oxidative decomposition showed that amounts higher than
0,5 wt.% resulted in materials with no catalytic activity in selected probe reactions46.
- 74 -
44..66 RREESSEEAARRCCHH OOFF AACCIIDDIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS::
Photoacoustic IR spectra
(Figure 26, spectra 1 and 3) show
presence of Lewis and Brønsted
acid sites on materials prepared via
fluoride sol-gel process. Lewis acid
sites with relatively high strength
are prevalent. Brønsted acid sites
are probably the result of
dissociative adsorption of water.
Both materials post-fluorinated with
CCl2F2 and aHF have similar acidic
properties. Peaks indicating
pyridine bonding to Lewis and
Brønsted acid sites are located at
same positions. Intensity of peaks is
lower in material post-fluorinated
with aHF due to higher amounts of
adsorbed water in this material
(lower temperature during
preparation) and lower surface
area. Detailed descriptions of peak
positions are in chapter 3.
Figure 26: PAS spectra of GaF3 post-fluorinated with CCl2F2. (1-after, 2-before) pyridine adsorption. GaF3 post-fluorinated with aHF. (3-after, 4-before) pyridine adsorption.
Comparison of spectra (Figure 27) of pyridine adsorption test show that GaF3
prepared via oxidative decomposition has the same peak positions than materials
prepared via fluoride sol-gel method. Peaks are not that clear due to interferences
from other peaks in that area specific for material prepared via oxidative
decomposition. Peaks from starting material (N2H6GaF5.H2O), NH4
+ vibrations and
adsorbed water are present in that area. Refined spectra obtained by using the
- 75 -
spectra difference function clearly indicate the presence of peaks characteristic of
Lewis acid sites with relatively high strength.
Figure 27: PAS spectra of GaF3 prepared via oxidative decomposition before (down) and after (up) pyridine adsorption. Inset (right) shows the difference spectrum.
Comparison of spectra (Figure 28) of different HS metal fluorides after pyridine
adsorption shows that GaF3 has very similar peak positions than HS-AlF3. There are
small differences but in general we can confirm that GaF3 has lower Lewis acidity as
HS-AlF3. Direct quantification is not possible due to method limitations.
Peak intensity depends on
sample type, its color and its
surface area while peak positions
depend on the type of acid centers
and acidity strength. For example
HS-MgF3 has much weaker Lewis
acidity than HS-AlF3 and
comparison of these two spectra
clearly shows that all peaks
responsible for bonding to Lewis
sites are shifted to lower
wavelengths.
Figure 28: Comparison of PAS spectra between different HS metal fluorides after pyridine adsorption.
- 76 -
44..77 SSCCAANNNNIINNGG EELLEECCTTRROONN MMIICCRROOSSCCOOPPYY -- SSEEMM::
Morphology comparison of
precursor and GaF3 post-fluorinated with
CCl2F2 has been made with electron
microscopy. Images were made with field
emission scanning electron microscope.
Precursor is composed of 30 nm
particles (Figure 29) which is also in
agreement with higher surface area of
this material. Additional post-fluorination
of precursor leads to significant changes
of morphology. Sintering and growth of
larger particles is observed (Figure 30).
These processes result in decrease of
surface area.
SEM image of GaF3 prepared via
oxidative decomposition has also been
made (Figure 31) for comparison with
material prepared via fluoride sol-gel.
Clear difference can be seen between
these two materials. Material prepared
with fluoride sol-gel has amorphous
porous structure while material prepared
with oxidative decomposition has clear
crystalline structure composed of small
30 – 100 nm crystallites. Crystalline
nature of this material has also been
proved with X-ray powder diffraction.
Figure 29: SEM of precursor (140 m2/g).
Figure 30: SEM of final material post-fluorinated with CCl2F2 (40 m2/g).
Figure 31: SEM of final material prepared via oxidative decomposition (19 m2/g).
- 77 -
55 CCOONNCCLLUUSSIIOONNSS
Novel preparation methods, fluoride sol-gel and oxidative decomposition of
fluorometalates, have been successfully applied for preparation of GaF3. General
data and comparison between GaF3 and AlF3 materials are summarized in Table 10
and Table 11. Additional graphical comparison of purity (wt %) and surface areas
(m2/g) between these materials can be seen in Figure 32 and Figure 33.
Main difference between GaF3 and HS-AlF3 prepared via fluoride sol-gel
procedure is in the stability of isopropoxide in the first step of the preparation.
Ga(OiPr)3 is significantly more stable since high excess of HF does not have impact
on the properties of precursor. This is also reflected in second step of the preparation
where the purest prepared final material post-fluorinated with CCl2F2 still contains
8,1 wt.% of residues. This is much higher than in HS-AlF3 which has only
0,5 wt.% of residues in final material (Table 11). It is evident from the Table 10 that
our final material has under stoichiometric Ga : F ratio, impurities (residues) and
much lower surface area than HS-AlF3. All these factors and considering the fact that
GaF3 theoretically exhibits lower Lewis acidity than AlF3 might be the main reason for
lower catalytic activity of GaF3. Table 10: Comparison between GaF3 materials prepared via fluoride sol-gel and oxidative decomposition (o.d.).
GaF3 (Precursor)
GaF3 (aHF)
GaF3 (CCl2F2)
GaF3 (o.d.)
Surface area, SBET (m2/g) 140 24 40 19
Elemental analysis (ratio)
Ga : F = 1 : 2,00
Ga : F = 1 : 2,86
Ga : F = 1 : 2,55
Ga : F = 1 : 2,97
Residue (wt. %) 23,6 11,0 8,1 3,4 Catalytic activity (CCl2F2 dismutation) / YESI YESII NO
ICatalytic activity is very low (0,4 %). IICatalytic activity is low (4 %).
- 78 -
Table 11: Comparison between HS-AlF3 materials prepared via fluoride sol-gel and oxidative decomposition (o.d.).
HS-AlF3 (sol-gel)12, 51 HS-AlF3 (o.d.)60 Precursor Final material Final material Surface area, SBET (m2/g) 400 200 210
Elemental analysis (ratio): Al : F = 1 : 2 Al : F = 1 : 3 Al : F = 1 : 3
Residues (wt. %) 30 0,5 5 Catalytic activity (CCl2FCF2Cl isomerization) / YESI YESII ICatalytic activity is very high (~ 98 %). IICatalytic activity depends on the amount of NH4
+ in material. Amounts higher than 0,5 % (wt.%) resulted in materials with no catalytic activity.
. Figure 32: Comparison of purities between GaF3 and AlF3 materials.
Figure 33: Comparison of surface areas between GaF3 and AlF3 materials.
It was expected that GaF3 prepared via fluoride sol-gel would have higher
surface area and catalytic activity due to results from MgF2/GaF3 doped system
prepared by Kemnitz and coworkers. Practical experiments showed that our GaF3
has much lower surface area and lower catalytic activity than other potential metal
fluoride catalysts (HS-AlF3, MgF2/GaF3) prepared via the fluoride sol-gel route.
- 79 -
It is possible that post-fluorination of precursor was not finished entirely in
spite of the fact that volatile organic components were not detected with gas
chromatography any more. Even at elongated post-fluorination times final materials
still contained almost the same amounts of residue. Another problematic effect is
coke formation during post-fluorination of precursor with CCl2F2. For example no
coke formation was detected on materials which are just heated to the same
temperatures in the flow of nitrogen. The formation of coke was also noticed during
HS-AlF3 preparation but at much lower extent and at harder activation conditions.
Considering reproducibility, preparation of GaF3 was most problematic in the
post-fluorination step due to the nature of these reactions. Few additional tests were
done to improve this step but no significant improvements could be obtained.
Elemental fluorine was tested as fluorination agent, but the test was not successful
resulting in the ignition of the sample. Additional tests were abandoned due to
excessive risk. Proces of post-fluorination was also modified with addition of oxygen
to the existing fluorinating agent (CCl2F2). Mixture but did not result in any
improvement in the temperature range used and coke removal could not be
achieved.
GaF3 prepared via oxidative decomposition of hydrazinium(II)
aquapentafluorogallate(III), N2H6GaF5.H2O, with elemental fluorine was also
successful. Material was very pure (96.6 wt.%) compared to other GaF3 and AlF3
materials but had significantly lower surface area than HS-AlF3 prepared with the
same method. Low surface area, crystalline structure and the fact that it contained
some NH4+ (0,6 wt.%) might be the main reasons that it was not catalytically active.
Despite the fact that material was successfully prepared extreme caution is needed
during preparation due to the very exothermic nature of the reaction.
Materials from both preparation methods have their advantages and
disadvantages. Table 12 shows some of major differences between these two
methods.
- 80 -
Table 12: Comparison between fluoride sol-gel and oxidative decomposition preparation method.
Fluoride sol-gel Oxidative decomposition Two step preparation procedure, more parameters affect the preparation than in the case with oxidative decomposition. Caution is needed during preparation due to highly corrosive and toxic aHF.
One step preparation with highly reactive elemental fluorine. Extreme caution is needed, but in general it is simple procedure.
Most problematic is second step of preparation due to problems with reproducibility.
Most problematic is beginning of preparation due to highly exothermal reaction.
All advantages of sol-gel (different forms) could be used (thin films, ceramics, powders, etc...).
Produces only powdery materials.
Could be used for industrial or laboratory use. It has similar application options as classical sol-gel.
Industrial use could be problematic due to very exothermal nature of reaction. It is more suitable for smaller quantities on laboratory scale (~10g ).
Produces amorphous materials. Produces weakly crystalline or crystalline materials.
Further development on this area will enable even better understanding of the
preparation mechanisms of metal fluorides with fluoride sol-gel and oxidative
decomposition procedures. The present thesis developed an alternative route
towards GaF3 preparation with specific properties, which is the basic for possible
technical applications of this new kind of material. Knowledge gathered during GaF3
preparation and other metal fluorides could be used to prepare new materials with
improved properties.
- 81 -
66 RREEFFEERREENNCCEESS
BB yy OO rr dd ee rr 1. R. B. King, Encyclopaedia of Inorganic Chemistry, Volume 3, John Wiley and Sons,
USA, 1999, pp 1207 - 1223
2. G. C. Righini, S. Pelli, Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology 8, 1997, 991-997
3. R. Blinc, G. Tavčar, B. Žemva, D. Hanžel, P. Cevc, C. Filipič, A. Levstik, Z. Jagličić, Z. Trontelj, N. Dalal, V. Ramachandran, S. Nellutla and J. F. Scott, Journal of Applied Physics 103, 2008, 074114
4. S. Fujihara, M. Tada, T. Kimura, Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology 19, 2000, 311–314
5. Z. Mazej, A. Tressaud, R.E. Riman, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 110, 2001, 139 - 143
6. H. Quan, H. Yang, M. Tamura, A. Sekiya, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 125, 2004, 1169–1172
7. S. Rüdiger, U. Groß, E. Kemnitz, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 128, 2007, 353 - 368
8. T. Skapin, A. Jesih, Z. Mazej, G. Tavčar, B. Žemva, 18th European Symposium on Fluorine Chemistry, Prague, 30th July – 4th August 2006
9. E. Kemnitz, U. Groß, S. Rüdiger, C. S. Shekar, Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 42, 2003, 4251 - 4254
10. J. K. Murthy, U. Groß, S. Rüdiger, E. Kemnitz, J. M. Winfield, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 179, 2006, 739 - 746
11. M. Nickkho-Amiry, G. Eltanany, S. Wuttke, S. Rüdiger, E. Kemnitz, J. M. Winfield, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 129, 2008, 366-375
12. S. Rüdiger, G. Eltanany, U. Groß, E. Kemnitz, Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology 41, 2007, 299 - 311
13. S. K. Rüdiger, U. Groß, M. Feist, H. A. Prescott, S. C. Shekar, S. I. Troyanov, E. Kemnitz, Journal of Materials Chemistry 15, 2005, 588 - 597
14. A. Hess, E. Kemnitz, Journal of Catalysis 149, 1994, 449 - 457
15. A. Meden, J. Šiftar, L. Golič, Acta Crystallographica Section C 52 – 3, 1996, 493-496
- 82 -
16. A. Hammoudeha, S. S. Mahmouda, S. Gharaibeh, Applied Catalysis A: General 243,
2003, 147 - 154
17. K. O. Christe, D. A. Dixon, D. McLemore, W. W. Wilson, J. A. Sheehy, J. A. Boatz, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 101, 2000, 151 - 153
18. J. K. Murthy, U. Groß, S. Rüdiger, E. Ünveren, E. Kemnitz, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 125, 2004, 937 - 949
19. D.T. Meshri, Industrial Applications of Inorganic Fluorides; Editors: T. Nakajima, B. Žemva, A. Tressaud, Advanced Inorganic Fluorides: Synthesis, characterization and Applications, Elsevier, Netherlands, 2000, Pages: 661 - 682
20. P. Hagenmuller, Inorganic Solid Fluorides: Chemistry and Physics, Academic Press, France, 1985, Chapter: Preparative Methods, Pages: 18 - 67
21. G. Brauer, Handbuch der Praparativen Anorganischen Chemie, FEV, Stuttgart, 1975, Erster Band, pp 239 - 240
22. J.C. Bailar jr., H.J. Emeleus, Sir R. Nyholm, A.F. Trotman-Dickenson, Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry, Pergamon Press, England, 1973, Chapter: 12, Pages: 1065 and 1082
23. F.M. Brewer, G. Garton, D.M. L. Goodgame, Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry 9, 1959, 56 - 64
24. A.J. Downs, Chemistry of Aluminium, Gallium, Indium and Thalium, Blackie Academic & Professional, UK, 1993, Chapter: 2, Pages: 105 - 106
25. P.R. Varekamp, W. C. Simpson, D. K. Shuh, T. D. Durbin, V. Chakarian, J. A. Yarmoff, Physical Review B Vol. 50 – 19, 1994, 14267 - 14276
26. J. K. Abrokwah, D. L Thompson, Z. Wang, United States Patent 5539248, Semiconductor device with improved insulating/passivating layer of indium gallium fluoride (InGaF)
27. G. Zhang, B. Friot, M. Poulain, Journal of Non-crystalline Solids 213 & 214, 1997, 6 - 10
28. R. S. Rowe, G. Rosman, C. G. Byrne, J. Javornitczky, P. J. Newman, D. R. MacFarlane, Journal of Non-crystalline Solids 184, 1995, 244 - 248
29. S. Takahashi, M. Shojiya, Y. Kawamoto, A. Konishi, Thin Solid Films 429, 2003, 28–33
30. T. Krahl, E. Kemnitz, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 127, 2006, 663 - 678
31. A. Sekya, H. Quan, M. Tamura, R. Gao, J. Murata, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 112, 2001, 145 - 148
- 83 -
32. H. Quan, M. Tamura, T. Takagi, A. Sekya, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 99, 1999,
167 - 170
33. C. G. Krespan, D. A. Dixon, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 77, 1996, 117 - 126
34. H. A. Prescott, Z. Lia, E. Kemnitz, J. Deutsch, H. Lieske, Journal of Materials Chemistry 15, 2005, 4616 - 4628
35. K. Scheurell, E. Kemnitz, Journal of Materials Chemistry 15, 2005, 4845 - 4853
36. H. Krüger, E. Kemnitz, A. Hertwig, U. Beck, Thin Solid Films 516, 2008, 4175 - 4177
37. U. Groß, S. Rüdiger, E. Kemnitz, Solid State Sciences 20, 2007, 1 - 5
38. P. Thangadurai, S. Ramasamy, P.T. Manoharan, The European Physical Journal B 37, 2004, 425–432
39. M. M. Kidibaev, B. K. Dzholdoshov, T. S. Koroleva, A. I. Slesarev, B. V. Shulgin, V. Y. Ivanov, A. N. Tcherepanov, C. Pedrini, K. Lebbou, Physica Status Solidi (C) No. 3, 2007, 1028– 1031
40. G. G. Condorelli, S. Gennaro, I. L. Fragalà, Chemical Vapour Deposition 7 No. 4, 2001, 151 - 156
41. H. Guerault, J.M. Greneche, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 12, 2000, 4791 - 4798
42. T. Skapin, G. Tavčar, A. Benčan, Z. Mazej, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 2009, doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2009.06.015
43. H. Bozorgzadeh, E. Kemnitz, M. Nickkho-Amiry, T. Skapin, J.M. Winfield, Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 110, 2001, 181 - 189
44. S. Fujihara, Recent Research and Development in Material Sience 3, 2002, 619 - 631
45. C. J. Brinker, G.W. Scherer, Sol-Gel Science: The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing, Academic Press, 1990, USA; Chapter 1 - 2, Page 1 - 45
46. T. Skapin, G. Tavčar, Z. Mazej, B. Žemva, Slovenski kemijski dnevi 2008, Maribor, 25. and 26. September 2008
47. J. K. Murthy, U. Groß, S. Rüdiger, E. Kemnitz, J. M. Winfield, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 179, 2006, 739 - 746
48. M. Ahrens, G. Scholz, M. Feist, E. Kemnitz, Solid State Science 8, 2006, 798 - 806
49. B. Frlec, Laboratorijski vakuumski sistemi za delo s hlapnimi fluoridi, IV. Jug. vakuumski kongres, Bled, 10–11. X 1968
50. R. C. Mehrotra, R. L. Mehrotra, Current Science 33, 1964, 241 - 242
51. G. Eltanany, Sol-Gel Synthesis and Properties of Nanoscopic Aluminum Fluoride, Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany, 2007
- 84 -
52. D. Dambournet, G. Eltanamy, A. Vimont, J.C. Lavalley, J.M. Goupil, A. Demourgues,
E. Durand, J. Majimel, S. Rudiger, E. Kemnitz, J.M. Winfield, A. Tressaud, Chemistry: A European Journal 14, 2008, 6205 - 6212
53. J. Scherzer, A. J. Gruia, Hydrocracking Science and Technology, CRC Press, 1996, Chapter: Catalyst Regeneration, pp. 123 - 125
54. D.W. Vidrine, `Photoacoustic Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy of Solids and Liquids' in “Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, Volume 3, Academic Press, New York, Chapter 4, 1982, pp. 125-148
55. S. Brunauer, P. H. Emmett, E. Teller, Journal of American Chemical Society 60, 1938, 309 - 319
56. J.L. Glajch, W. G. Schindel, LC-GC 4, 1986, 574 - 581
57. E. B. Wilson, Jr., Physical Review 45, 1934, 706 - 714
58. A. Vimont, J.C. Lavalley, A. Sahibed-dine, C. Otero Areán, M. Rodrigez Delgado, M. Daturi, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108, 2005, 9656 - 9664
59. G. Socrates, Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies, Table and Charts, Third Edition, John Wiley and Sons, UK, 2001, Chapter 2, 6, pp 53, 94
60. A. Jesih, A. Makarowicz, Z. Mazej, M. Nickkho-Amiry, N. Weiher, S. L.M. Schroeder, T. Skapin, J. M. Winfield, B. Žemva, Unpublished results: Aluminium(III) fluoride originating from thermal decomposition of hydrazinium fluoroaluminate(III) under oxidative conditions: syntheses, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and some catalytic reactions
PARTS OF THIS THESIS HAVE BEEN PRESENTED ON SCIENTIFIC MEETING:
Tine Oblak, Gašper Tavčar in Tomaž Skapin, Preparation and characterization of gallium(III) fluoride with specific properties, Slovenski kemijski dnevi 2008, Maribor, 25. and 26. September 2008