Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MECHANICAL SYNTHESIS OF
MAGNESIUM ALLOYS FOR HYDROGEN
STORAGE
by
Luis Felipe Contreras Vásquez
A thesis submitted to
The University of Birmingham
For the degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
School of Metallurgy and Materials
College of Engineering and Physical Sciences
University of Birmingham
September 2017
University of Birmingham Research Archive
e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder.
SYNOPSIS
Synthesis, characterisation and hydrogen sorption properties of a variety of magnesium based
hydrides were investigated in this work. The structure of these composites was studied using
X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy.
The thermal stability and decomposition reactions of the Mg-based hydrides was studied using
differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), coupled with
a mass spectrometer (MS) to determine the gaseous products released during heating.
Compositional changes and reversibility were investigated in detail using in-situ XRD under
Ar and H2.
Mechanical milling of magnesium hydride (MgH2) under Ar and H2 resulted in a reduction of
the crystallite size from 207 nm for the as received to 18 nm for 10 h milled MgH2. For the first
time was reported the effect of Raman spectroscopy on milled MgH2 demonstrating that milled
samples were Raman active. Hydrogen desorption temperatures were decreased ~120 °C (DSC)
with increasing milling time (10 h), however, hydrogen capacity was decreased ~6.55 wt. %
(TGA).
Hydrogenation of Li-Mg alloy was investigated via reactive milling in 100 bar H2, after 1 h
milling Li-Mg phase was hydrogenated forming LiH and MgH2. Hydrogen desorption was
observed at 250 °C (DSC), releasing 0.19 wt. % (TGA). Although, the desorption temperature
was decreased, the amount of hydrogen released is insignificant and is hard to consider for on-
board applications.
Mechanical milling of sodium hydride (NaH) and magnesium hydride (MgH2) under Ar and H2
lead to the formation of sodium magnesium ternary hydride (NaMgH3). Thermal decomposition
occurred at ~ 325 °C with a mass change of 5 wt. %, associated with the evolution of hydrogen.
Hydrogen desorption occurred in two-step reactions. Rehydrogenation of the NaMgH3 hydride
was observed at 250 °C and 10 bar H2.
Mechanical milling of lithium hydride (LiH) substituted into NaMgH3 hydride resulted in the
formation of a quaternary LixNa1-xMgH3 hydride with molar compositions (x=0, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8).
Thermal decomposition started at 250 °C, releasing a total amount of 5 wt% of H2.
Decomposition reactions occurred in two and three steps. Furthermore, reversibility of the main
phase was achieved at 250 °C and 10 bar H2.
Milling calcium hydride (CaH2) and MgH2 lead to the formation of calcium magnesium (Ca-
Mg-H) ternary hydride. Hydrogen sorption characteristics showed a dehydrogenation
temperature of 325 °C (DSC) with a total amount of 2.24 wt.% H2 evolution up to 500 °C.
However, dehydrogenation of CaH2 was not completed even at 500 °C. Thermal decomposition
suggested two steps reactions. Reversibility was successfully achieved at 365 °C and 10 bar H2.
LiH and NaH were substituted into the Ca-Mg-H to form quaternary hydrides with composition
MxCa1-xMgH4. Hydrogen sorption properties showed desorption temperatures between 300 °C
and 385°C with a maximum of 3.5 wt.% H2 released. Thermal decomposition proceeded in
three-step reaction. Nonetheless, complete dehydrogenation was not achieved.
Overall, this investigation has demonstrated for a variety of Mg-based hydrides that reducing
crystallite size has a positive effect in the sorption properties, unfortunately, none of the
materials and composites investigated in this work meet the targets for light-duty vehicles set
out by the Department of Energy (DoE). However, other applications such as heat storage might
be of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First of all, I would like to thank Almighty GOD for the opportunity to be at this stage of my
life, successfully accomplishing one more goal, embarking into a new dream. Thank you for
the wisdom, perseverance, love and faith given through Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit to walk
firmly and not tumble. All the Glory Must be to The Lord.
Special thanks dedicated to you my beloved wife, for your patience, love, support, and
sacrifices. For leaving everything and everyone behind, to help me to accomplish this degree. I
can certainly say that without you by my side, I would not be able to be where I am now. Thank
you for giving me the best gift one can dream of, a beautiful angel that completely changed my
perception of what life is. I love you both, and I am grateful for the time, love and laughs shared
with me during these years. I am blessed to have you.
Thank you to my family for the love, support, and prayers. You encouraged me to keep going
forward no matter what, backed me up as a family and showed me the importance of having
GOD in my life.
Thank you to my supervisor Professor David Book for his guidance and support on every stage
of this work and for the opportunity to be part of the Hydrogen group at the University of
Birmingham.
Thank you to Dr. Reed, Mr. Simon Cannon, Dr. Joshua Vines, Dr. Luke Hughes, Dr. Sheng
Guo and all my fellows at hydrogen group, for their help and share knowledge of the equipment.
Thank you for all the food shared during our social hours.
I also would like to extend my thanks to the Government of Ecuador through the SENESCYT
for the grant awarded to study my postgraduate degree at the University of Birmingham.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Hydrogen as Energy vector ............................................................................................. 3
1.3 Hydrogen Storage ............................................................................................................ 8
1.3.1 Physical-based storage ................................................................................................. 13
1.3.1.1 Compressed Gas Hydrogen Storage ...................................................................... 13
1.3.2 Material-based Storage ................................................................................................ 15
1.3.2.1 Physisorption ......................................................................................................... 15
1.3.2.3 Complex Hydrides................................................................................................. 16
1.3.2.4 Metal hydrides ....................................................................................................... 17
1.4 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 21
2. Mg-BASED HYDRIDES ..................................................................................................... 24
2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 24
2.2 Mg/MgH2 Structures ........................................................................................................... 25
2.3 Hydrogen Storage Properties .............................................................................................. 27
2.3.1 Kinetics ........................................................................................................................ 27
2.3.1.1 Effect of Microstructural Modification ................................................................. 27
2.3.1.2 Catalysis and additives .......................................................................................... 28
2.3.2 Thermodynamic behaviour .......................................................................................... 30
2.3.3 Ternary Hydrides ......................................................................................................... 34
2.3.3.1 Na-Mg-H (Sodium Magnesium Hydride) ............................................................. 35
2.3.3.2 Ca-Mg-H (Calcium Magnesium Hydrides)........................................................... 37
2.3.3.3 Li-Mg-H (Lithium Magnesium Hydrides) ............................................................ 38
2.3.4 Destabilisation of ternary hydrides by light-weight metals substitution. .................... 40
2.3.4.1 Li substitution into Na-Mg-H hydride .................................................................. 40
2.3.4.2 Li and Na substitution into Ca-Mg-H hydrides ..................................................... 42
2.4 Magnesium-based hydrides applications. ........................................................................... 42
2.5 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 44
2.6 Aims and Objectives ........................................................................................................... 46
3. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS ........................................................................................... 48
3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 48
3.2 Starting Materials ............................................................................................................... 49
3.3 Synthesis of the material..................................................................................................... 49
3.3.1 Mechanical milling ...................................................................................................... 50
3.4 Structural Characterisation ................................................................................................. 52
3.4.1 X-ray Diffraction ......................................................................................................... 52
3.4.1.1 Powder X-ray diffraction ...................................................................................... 54
3.4.1.2 In-Situ X-ray diffraction........................................................................................ 55
3.4.1.3 X-ray diffraction data analysis .............................................................................. 56
3.4.2 Raman Spectroscopy .................................................................................................... 57
3.4.3 Microscopy .................................................................................................................. 59
3.5 Thermal Decomposition ..................................................................................................... 61
3.5.1 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) ................................................................... 61
3.5.2 Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) ........................................................................... 62
3.5.3 Mass Spectrometry ...................................................................................................... 64
4. MAGNESIUM HYDRIDE................................................................................................... 66
4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 66
4.2 Characterisation of as-received and milled MgH2 .............................................................. 67
4.3 Thermal Decomposition ..................................................................................................... 86
4.4 Analysis of Decomposition Products ................................................................................. 92
4.5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 95
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: LITHIUM MAGNESIUM ALLOY ............................... 98
5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 98
5.2 Structural characterisation of as received and as milled Li-Mg alloy (ribbon) .................. 99
5.3 Thermal decomposition .................................................................................................... 104
5.3.1 DSC-TGA measurements .......................................................................................... 104
5.3.2 In-Situ XRD ............................................................................................................... 108
5.3.2.1 Li-Mg Ribbon (as-received) ................................................................................ 108
5.3.2.2 Li-Mg 1h milled in 100 bar H2. ........................................................................... 110
5.4 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 114
6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: SODIUM MAGNESIUM HYDRIDE .......................... 117
6.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 117
6.2 Characterisation of as-received materials ......................................................................... 121
6.3 Characterisation of as-milled materials ............................................................................ 123
6.4 Thermal decomposition .................................................................................................... 129
6.5 Analysis of Products after Dehydrogenation .................................................................... 133
6.5.1 In-situ XRD of milled samples in Ar ......................................................................... 133
6.5.2 In-situ XRD of milled samples in 100 bar H2 ............................................................ 137
6.6 Reversibility. .................................................................................................................... 140
6.7 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 146
7. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: LixNa1-xMgH3 HYDRIDE SYSTEM ............................ 149
7.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 149
7.2 Sample Preparation ........................................................................................................... 150
7.3 Characterisation of milled material .................................................................................. 151
7.4 Measurement of hydrogen storage capacity of the LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8)
hydrides .................................................................................................................................. 155
7.4.1 Thermal analysis (DSC-TGA-MS) ............................................................................ 155
7.4.2 Analysis of Decomposition Products (in-situ XRD) ................................................. 159
7.5 Recombination ability ...................................................................................................... 177
7.5.1 In-situ XRD ................................................................................................................ 177
7.6 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 193
8. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: CALCIUM MAGNESIUM HYDRIDE ....................... 198
8.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 198
8.2 Structural characterisation of milled material .................................................................. 201
8.2.1 Thermal decomposition ............................................................................................. 203
8.2.2 Analysis of Decomposition Products ......................................................................... 208
8.2.3 Rehydrogenation Ability ............................................................................................ 218
8.3 Novel quaternary hydrides (MxCa1-xMgH4), (M=Li, Na) ................................................ 221
8.3.1 Quaternary Hydride (LixCa1-xMgH4) ......................................................................... 221
8.3.1.1 Structural characterisation of as milled material ................................................. 221
8.3.1.2 Thermal decomposition ....................................................................................... 224
8.3.1.3 In-situ XRD ......................................................................................................... 226
8.3.2 Quaternary Hydride (NaxCa1-xMgH4) ........................................................................ 235
8.3.2.1 Structural characterisation of as milled material ................................................. 235
8.3.2.2 Thermal decomposition ....................................................................................... 242
8.3.2.3 In-situ XRD ......................................................................................................... 245
8.4 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 253
8.4.1 Ca-Mg-H ternary hydride .......................................................................................... 253
8.4.2 LixCa1-xMgH4 (x=0.2) ................................................................................................ 254
8.4.3 NaxCa1-xMgH4 (x=0.2) ............................................................................................. 255
9. GENERAL DISCUSION ................................................................................................... 257
10. CONCLUSIONS & FUTURE WORK ............................................................................ 267
10.1 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 267
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Comparison of specific energy (energy per mass or gravimetric density) and energy
density (energy per volume or volumetric density) for several fuels. (Schlapbach and Züttel,
2001) ...................................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 1.2 Schematic function mechanism of a PEMFC(Britannica, 2007) .............................. 7
Figure 1.3 Volumetric against gravimetric energy storage densities of different energy carriers.
Hydrogen shows very low volumetric density, but a very high gravimetric energy density
(Züttel et al., 2010) ................................................................................................................ 8
Figure 1.4 Relative volumes required to store 4 kg of hydrogen based on a 400 km driving range
using different techniques (Hanwha, 2013) ........................................................................... 9
Figure 1.5 Potential storage systems that can meet the targets for on-board light duty
vehicles((DOE), 2012b) ....................................................................................................... 11
Figure 1.6 Volumetric and Gravimetric densities of a series of investigated materials for
hydrogen storage. Modified from (Züttel, 2003). Red – metal hydrides. Purple – complex
hydrides. Green – carbon based hydrides (Züttel, 2003). Red dashed circle – materials target
............................................................................................................................................. 13
Figure 1.7 Schematic diagram of possible hydrogen bonding states in hydrogen storage
materials. (Orimo et al., 2007) ............................................................................................. 17
Figure 1.8 Pressure composition isotherm plot of LaNi5 (left), van’t Hoff plot (right) (Züttel,
2003, Guo, 2015). ................................................................................................................ 19
Figure 2.1 Schematic structural illustration of catalyst layer covered on Mg particle.
Reproduced from (Cui et al., 2013) ..................................................................................... 29
Figure 2.2 Temperature-Programmed Desorption (TPD) profiles for the ball-milled MgH2 in
Ar at a heating rate of 5 ᵒC/min, fully hydrogenated BM-R sample and BM sample.
Reproduced from (Cui et al., 2013). .................................................................................... 30
Figure 2.3 Theoretically achievable reversible storage capacities and reaction enthalpies of
selected hydrides. LaNi5H6 and FeTiH2 are taken as examples for conventional room
temperature hydrides. Reproduced from (Dornheim, 2011) ............................................... 31
Figure 2.4 Modification of the thermodynamic properties of M-H by altering the stability of the
hydrogenated or dehydrogenated state. Reproduced from (Dornheim, 2011). ................... 32
file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357971file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357971file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357971file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357972file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357973file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357973file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357973file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357974file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357974file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357976file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357976file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357976file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357976file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357978file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357978file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357986file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357986file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357987file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357987file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357987file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357988file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357988file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357988
Figure 2.5 (a) the unit-cell parameter, (b) cell volume, and (c) tilting angle for Na1-xLixMgH3
as a function of the amount of Li at the A position of the perovskite. Reproduced from
(Martínez-Coronado et al., 2012) ........................................................................................ 41
Figure 2.6 Schematic of MgH2 heat store in a pressure container. Reproduced from (Kilner et
al., 2012) .............................................................................................................................. 43
Figure 2.7 McPhy modular standard cartridge based on Mg hydrides discs. Reproduced from
(Jehan and Fruchart, 2013) .................................................................................................. 44
Figure 3.1 Experimental techniques used in the project ........................................................... 48
Figure 3.2 Schematic a) Retsch Planetary Ball Mill PM400, b) Hardened steel milling pot 250
ml, c) Hardened steel high-pressure milling pot 220 ml. (swagelok ball valve, max pressure
150 bar) ................................................................................................................................ 50
Figure 3.3 Bragg's Law reflection. Two beams with identical wavelength and phase approach a
crystalline solid and are scattered off two different atoms within it. The lower beam traverses
an extra length of 2dsinθ. Constructive interference occurs when this length is equal to an
integer multiple of the wavelength of the radiation. Dots on X-rays represent constructive
interference (Britannica, 1999). ........................................................................................... 53
Figure 3.4 Bruker D8 advanced XRD with a 9-position multi-changer sample stage, reproduced
(Hughes, 2016) ..................................................................................................................... 54
Figure 3.5 Schematic Bruker D8 advanced XRD with an Anton Paar XRK900 reactor chamber.
............................................................................................................................................. 55
Figure 3.6 Rayleigh and Raman scattering energy diagram. S0, S1, S2 are electronic energy
levels, with higher energy vibrational levels. The dashed lines represent virtual states. .... 57
Figure 3.7 (a) Laser source, (b) Renishaw inVia Raman Microscope, (c) Instec HCS621 sample
cell. Blue line: incident beam, green line: scattered beam, yellow line: remaining beam after
removal of the Rayleigh scattering. Reproduced from (Reed, 2010) .................................. 59
Figure 3.8 Schematic of scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Atteberry, 2009) .................. 60
Figure 3.9 Left: Schematic of heat flux DSC cell, Right: high pressure DSC system (Netzsch
DSC 204 HP) with input gas. Reproduced from(Guo, 2015). ............................................. 62
Figure 3.10 Schematic simplified internal view of a Netzsch TG 209 analyser. Reproduced from
(Guo, 2015) .......................................................................................................................... 63
Figure 3.11 Schematic of a Hidden Analytical HAL IV Mass spectrometer ........................... 65
Figure 4.1 XRD patterns of the as-received and 2, 5 and 10h milled MgH2 in Ar. ................. 69
file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357991file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502357991file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358029file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358029file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358029file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358030file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358030file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358030file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358030file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358030file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358032file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358032file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358035file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358036file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358036file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358062
Figure 4.2 Rietveld refinement profile for the as-received MgH2, blue line shows the observed
data, the calculated data is represented by the red line and the difference is plotted underneath
shown by the grey line. Values before 20 (2θ°) did not show any representative peaks and
therefore are neglected. Goodness of fit 1.958. ................................................................... 70
Figure 4.3 Rietveld refinement profile for the 2h milled MgH2 in Ar, blue line shows the
observed data, the calculated data is represented by the red line and the difference is plotted
underneath shown by the grey line. Values before 20 (2θ°) did not show any representative
peaks and therefore are neglected. Goodness of fit 1.862 ................................................... 71
Figure 4.4 Rietveld refinement profile for the 5h milled MgH2 in Ar, blue line shows the
observed data, the calculated data is represented by the red line and the difference is plotted
underneath shown by the grey line. Values before 20 (2θ°) did not show any representative
peaks and therefore are neglected. Goodness of fit 1.396 ................................................... 72
Figure 4.5 Rietveld refinement profile for the 10h milled MgH2 in Ar, blue line shows the
observed data, the calculated data is represented by the red line and the difference is plotted
underneath shown by the grey line. Values before 20 (2θ°) did not show any representative
peaks and therefore are neglected. Goodness of fit 1.751 ................................................... 73
Figure 4.6 XRD reflections of as-received and 2, 5 and 10h milled MgH2 in 100 bar H2. ...... 75
Figure 4.7 Rietveld refinement profile for the 2h milled MgH2 in 100 bar H2, blue line shows
the observed data, the calculated data is represented by the red line and the difference is
plotted underneath shown by the grey line. Diffractions before 20 (2θ°) did not show any
representative peaks and therefore are neglected. Goodness of fit 1.579. ........................... 76
Figure 4.8 Rietveld refinement profile for the 5h milled MgH2 in 100 bar H2, blue line shows
the observed data, the calculated data is represented by the red line and the difference is
plotted underneath shown by the grey line. Diffractions before 20 (2θ°) did not show any
representative peaks and therefore are neglected. Goodness of fit 1.622. ........................... 77
Figure 4.9 Rietveld refinement profile of the 10h milled MgH2 in 100 bar H2, blue line shows
the observed data, the calculated data is represented by the red line and the difference is
plotted underneath shown by the grey line. Diffractions before 20 (2θ°) did not show any
representative peaks and therefore are neglected. Goodness of fit 1.556 ............................ 78
Figure 4.10 Lattice parameters and cell volumes of the 2, 5, 10 h MgH2 milled in Ar a) Mg, b)
γ-MgH2 and c) α-MgH2 plotted in function of the milling time. Where error bars are not
shown, they are smaller than data symbols. Solid lines are a guide for the eye. ................. 81
file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358063file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358063file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358063file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358063file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358064file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358064file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358064file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358064file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358065file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358065file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358065file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358065file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358066file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358066file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358066file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358066file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358067file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358068file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358068file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358068file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358068file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358069file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358069file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358069file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358069file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358070file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358070file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358070file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358070file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358071file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358071file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358071
Figure 4.11 Lattice parameters and cell volumes of the 2, 5, 10 h MgH2 milled in 100 bar H2 a)
Mg, b) γ-MgH2 and c) α-MgH2 plotted in function of the milling time. Where error bars are
not shown, they are smaller than data symbols. Solid lines are a guide for the eye. ........... 82
Figure 4.12 Estimated crystallite size vs milling time for MgH2 samples milled under Ar and
100 bar H2 for 2, 5 and 10 h. ................................................................................................ 83
Figure 4 13 Raman spectrum of as-received MgH2 using the 633 nm excitation laser.
Reproduced from (Reed and Book, 2011) ........................................................................... 84
Figure 4.14 Raman spectrum of the 2h milled MgH2 in Ar using the 633 nm excitation laser.
............................................................................................................................................. 85
Figure 4.15 Raman spectrum of the 2, 5 and 10h milled MgH2 in 100 bar H2 using the 633 nm
excitation laser. .................................................................................................................... 85
Figure 4.16 (a) DSC, (b) TGA measurements of as-received and 2, 5 and 10h mechanically
milled MgH2 in Ar. All measurements were performed at a heating rate of 2 °C/min under
flowing 3 bar Ar at 100 ml/min (DSC) and at 1 bar Ar flowing at 40 ml/min (TGA).
Temperatures before 250 °C do not show any representative peaks and thus, DSC and TGA
curves are plotted from 250 up to 415 °C. ........................................................................... 88
Figure 4.17 (a) DSC, (b) TGA measurements of as-received and 2, 5 and 10h mechanically
milled MgH2 in 100 bar H2. All measurements were performed at a heating rate of 2 °C/min
under flowing 3 bar Ar at 100 ml/min (DSC) and at 1 bar Ar flowing at 40 ml/min (TGA).
Temperatures before 250 °C do not show any representative peaks and thus, DSC and TGA
curves are plotted from 250 °C to 415 °C where the reactions were completed. ................ 90
Figure 4.18 Hydrogen desorption temperatures (onset, peak, final) vs milling time of
mechanically milled MgH2 under Ar for 2, 5 and 10 h. ...................................................... 91
Figure 4.19 Hydrogen desorption temperatures (onset, peak, final) vs milling time of
mechanically milled MgH2 under 100 bar H2 for 2, 5 and 10 h. .......................................... 92
Figure 4.20 In-situ XRD diffractions of the 2h milled MgH2 in Ar, heated at 2 °C/min under 3
bar He flowing at 100 ml/min. Reflections below 25 (2θ°) were not considered as no
representative diffractions were detected. ........................................................................... 94
Figure 5.1 Li-Mg alloy (ribbon) acquired from Ilika plc with approximate scale bar. .......... 100
Figure 5.2 Lithium Magnesium Alloy phase diagram (Nayeb-Hashemi et al., 1984) ........... 100
Figure 5.3 XRD pattern of as-received Li-Mg ribbon, and after ball milling for 1 h. ........... 102
Figure 5.4 Rietveld refinement of as-received Li-Mg ribbon, values before 25 were not
considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions were detected. (Observed data
file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358072file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358072file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358072file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358073file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358073file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358074file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358074file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358075file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358075file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358076file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358076file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358077file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358077file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358077file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358077file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358077file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358078file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358078file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358078file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358078file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358078file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358079file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358079file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358080file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358080file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358119file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358122file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358122
is shown by blue lines, calculated data is represented by the red lines and the difference is
plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 2.013 ................................................................... 102
Figure 5.5 Rietveld refinement of 1 h milled in 100 bar H2 Li-Mg ribbon, values before 25
were not considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions were detected.
(Observed data is shown by blue lines, calculated data is represented by the red lines and the
difference is plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 2.137 .............................................. 103
Figure 5.6 DSC measurements of the as received and 1h milled (100 bar H2) Li-Mg alloy (a)
under 3 bar Ar at 100ml/min and 2 °C/min heating rate, (b) under 3 bar H2 flowing at 100
ml/min and a heating rate of 2 °C/min ............................................................................... 106
Figure 5.7 TGA of the 1h milled (100 bar H2) Li-Mg sample heated under 3 bar Ar flowing at
40 ml/min, heating rate 2 °C/min....................................................................................... 107
Figure 5.8 In-Situ XRD of as-received Li-Mg ribbon heated and cooled in 3 bar He flowing
at100ml/min. No reflections were detected below 25 °C, hence are not shown. .............. 109
Figure 5.9 In-Situ XRD diffraction patterns for Li-Mg sample heated and cooled down under 3
bar H2 flowing at 100ml/min. No reflections were detected below 25 °C, therefore, are not
presented. ........................................................................................................................... 110
Figure 5.10 In-Situ XRD diffraction patterns for 1h milled (100 bar H2) Li-Mg sample heated
and cooled down under 3 bar H2 flowing at 100ml/min. No reflections were detected below
25 °C, hence, are not presented. ......................................................................................... 112
Figure 5.11 Lattice parameters a, c of the Mg phase in the 1h milled Li-Mg alloy milled in 100
bar H2. Solid lines are a guide for the eye. ........................................................................ 113
Figure 5.12 Unit cell volumes plotted against temperature for the Li-Mg, LiH, Mg and MgH2
phases in the Li-Mg alloy milled for 1h in 100 bar H2. Solid lines are a guide for the eye.
Where error bars are not shown, they are smaller than data symbols ............................... 113
Figure 5.13 Unit cell parameter and volume plotted against temperature for the LiH phase in
the Li-Mg alloy milled for 1h in 100 bar H2. Solid lines are a guide for the eye. Where error
bars are not shown, they are smaller than data symbols .................................................... 114
Figure 6.1 NaMgH3 unit cell, light grey, red, and gold spheres represent H, Mg and Na
respectively (left); Structure of NaMgH3 as a polyhedral representation viewed along the
[010] direction (right). ....................................................................................................... 118
Figure 6.2 Calculated pressure-temperature equilibrium diagram for NaMgH3 in comparison
with experimental data from the literature (Abdessameud et al., 2014). ........................... 121
file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358122file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358122file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358123file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358123file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358123file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358123file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358124file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358124file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358124file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358125file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358125file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358127file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358127file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358127file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358128file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358128file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358128file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358129file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358129file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358130file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358130file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358130
Figure 6.4 XRD patterns for the as-received NaH (top) and MgH2 (bottom) ........................ 122
Figure 6.3 DSC-TGA-MS of the as-received (left) NaH and (right) MgH2 heated at 2 °C/min in
3 bar Ar flowing at 100 ml/min (DSC), and 1 bar Ar flowing at 40 ml/min (TGA). MS shows
the hydrogen evolution of the as-received materials. ........................................................ 122
Figure 6.5 RT-XRD patterns of NaH and MgH2 mechanical milled for 2, 5 and15h in Ar
showing NaMgH3 phase. .................................................................................................... 124
Figure 6.6 RT-XRD patterns of NaH and MgH2 mechanical milled for 2, 5 and15h in 100 bar
H2 showing NaMgH3 phase formation. ............................................................................. 125
Figure 6.7 TOPAS refinement of NaH+MgH2 milled for 5h in Ar. 2 theta (°) values before 25
were not considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions were detected.
(Observed data is shown by blue lines, calculated data is represented by the red lines and the
difference is plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 1.214 .............................................. 126
Figure 6.8 Lattice parameters a (black line), b (blue line) c (green line) and cell volume (red
line) of the NaMgH3 phases obtained from NaH+MgH2 samples that had been milled in Ar
for 2, 5 and 15h. Where error bars are not shown, they are smaller than data points. ....... 127
Figure 6.9 Lattice parameters a (black line), b (blue line) c (green line) and cell volume (red
line) of the NaMgH3 phases obtained from NaH+MgH2 samples that had been milled in 100
bar H2 for 2 and 5h. Where error bars are not shown, they are smaller than data points. . 128
Figure 6.10 (a) DSC, (b) TGA and (c) MS measurements of NaH+MgH2 which had been milled
in Ar for 2, 5, and 15h. All measurements were carried out at a heating rate of 2 °C/min
under 3 bar flowing Ar at 100 ml/min (DSC), and 1 bar Ar flowing at 40 ml/min (TGA).
Temperatures lower than 250 °C did not show any peaks, hence are not plotted. ............ 131
Figure 6.11 (a) DSC, (b) TGA and (c) MS measurements of NaH+MgH2 which had been milled
in 100 bar H2 for 2 and 5h. All measurements were carried out at a heating rate of 2 °C/min
under 3 bar flowing Ar at 100 ml/min (DSC), and 1 bar Ar flowing at 40 ml/min (TGA).
Temperatures lower than 250 °C did not show any peaks, hence are not plotted. ............ 132
Figure 6.12 In-situ XRD of NaH+ MgH2 milled for 5h in Ar heated from 30 to 400 °C at 2 °C
in 3bar He flowing at 100 ml/min ...................................................................................... 135
Figure 6.13 RT XRD of the decomposed milled NaH+MgH2 for 5h in Ar after In-Situ XRD
........................................................................................................................................... 136
Figure 6.14 Retvield refinement of the decomposed milled NaH+MgH2 for 5h in Ar after In-
Situ XRD. Red line shows the calculated data. Blue line shows the data received from the
cif file. Grey line shows the difference between the observed and calculated data. Goodness
of fit = 1.212 ...................................................................................................................... 136
file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360097file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360097file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360097file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360098file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360098file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360099file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360099file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360100file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360100file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360100file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360100file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360101file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360101file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360101file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360102file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360102file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360102file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360103file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360103file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360103file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360103file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360105file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360105
Figure 6.15 In-Situ XRD of NaH+MgH2 milled for 5h in 100 bar H2 heated from 30 to 400 °C
at 2 °C in 3bar He flowing at 100 ml/min.......................................................................... 138
Figure 6.16 Surface plot from in-situ XRD of 5h milled NaMgH3 heated under He (100 ml/min,
~3 bar) between 30 – 450 C. A brighter colour corresponds to a higher diffraction intensity.
The white dashed lines show the phase transition temperature and are given as a guide for
the eye. ............................................................................................................................... 139
Figure 6.17 In-Situ XRD of the decomposed NaH+MgH2 sample milled for 5h (Ar) in 3 bar
He. Heated from RT to 400 °C in 10 bar H2 flowing at 100 ml/min. Blue dashed lines show
the re- hydrogenation of the NaMgH3 phase. ..................................................................... 142
Figure 6.18 Ex-situ XRD of the re-hydrogenated NaH+MgH2 that has been milled for 5h in Ar.
........................................................................................................................................... 143
Figure 6.19 TOPAS refinement of the re-hydrogenated NaH+MgH2 milled for 5h (Ar). 2 theta
() values before 25 were not considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions
were detected. (Observed data is shown by blue line; calculated data is represented by the
red line and the difference is plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 1.321 ..................... 144
Figure 6.20 Surface plot from in-situ XRD of rehydrogenated NaMgH3 heated under H2 (100
ml/min, ~10 bar) between 30 – 450 C. A brighter colour corresponds to a higher diffraction
intensity. The white dashed lines show the phase transition temperature and are given as a
guide for the eye. ............................................................................................................... 145
Figure 7.1 XRD patterns of 5h ball milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8) hydride system.
Main NaMgH3 peak zoomed in for the different Li x substitutions. ................................. 152
Figure 7.2 Unit cell parameters (top) and Cell Volume parameters (bottom) of LixNa1-xMgH3
hydride system in function of Li substituted into the system. This work (left) vs literature
(right)11. Where error bars are not shown, they are smaller than the data symbols. .......... 154
Figure 7.3 (a) DSC, (b) TGA and (c) MS curves of nominal composition LixNa1-xMgH3 hydride
system (x=0, 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8). All measurements were performed at a heating rate of 2
C/min from 30 to 400 C in flowing 3 bar Ar at a rate of (100 ml/min) (DSC) and 1 bar Ar
flowing 40 ml/min (TGA). Data below 200 C are not plotted as no exo/endothermic
reactions were detected. ..................................................................................................... 158
Figure 7.4 In-situ XRD of 5h ball milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0) showing the decomposition
reactions of the sample under 3 bar flowing He atmosphere. Measurements were taken from
file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360108file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360108file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360109file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360109file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360109file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360109file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360110file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360110file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360110file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360111file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360111file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360112file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360112file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360112file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360112file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360113file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360113file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360113file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502360113file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358203file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358203file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358204file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358204file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358204file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358205file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358205file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358205file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358205file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358205file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358206file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358206
30C to 400C at a rate of 2C/min. values before 28 were not considered as no
representative diffractions were detected. ......................................................................... 160
Figure 7.5 RT XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0) after dehydrogenation under 3 bar
He flowing at 100 ml/min. 2 theta () values before 25 were not considered as no
representative diffractions were detected. ......................................................................... 161
Figure 7.6 TOPAS refinement of LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0), 2 theta () values before 25 were not
considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions were detected. (Observed data
is shown by blue line, calculated data is represented by the red lines and the difference is
plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 1.212 ................................................................... 162
Figure 7.7 In-situ XRD of 5h ball milled Li0.2Na0.8MgH3 showing the decomposition reactions
of the sample under 3 bar flowing He atmosphere. Measurements were taken from 30C to
400C at a rate of 2C/min. values before 28 were not considered as no representative
diffractions were detected. ................................................................................................. 164
Figure 7.8 RT XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.2) after dehydrogenation under 3 bar
He flowing at 100 ml/min. 2 theta () values before 25 were not considered as no
representative diffractions were detected. ......................................................................... 165
Figure 7.9 TOPAS refinement of LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.2), 2 theta () values before 25 were not
considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions were detected. (Observed data
is shown by blue line, calculated data is represented by the red lines and the difference is
plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 1.677 ................................................................... 166
Figure 7.10 Surface plot from in-situ XRD of LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.2) heated under He (100
ml/min, ~3 bar) between 30 – 450 C. A brighter colour corresponds to a higher diffraction
intensity. The white dashed lines show the phase transition temperature and are given as a
guide for the eye. ............................................................................................................... 167
Figure 7.11 In-situ XRD of 5h ball milled Li0.5Na0.5MgH3 showing the decomposition reactions
of the sample under 3 bar flowing He atmosphere. Measurements were taken from 30C to
400C at a rate of 2C/min. values before 28 were not considered as no representative
diffractions were detected. ................................................................................................. 169
Figure 7.12 RT XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.5) after dehydrogenation under 3
bar He flowing at 100 ml/min. 2 theta () values before 25 were not considered as no
representative diffractions were detected. ......................................................................... 170
Figure 7.13 TOPAS refinement of LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.5), 2 theta () values before 25 were not
considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions were detected. (Observed data
file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358206file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358206file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358207file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358207file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358207file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358208file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358208file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358208file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358208file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358209file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358209file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358209file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358209file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358210file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358210file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358210file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358211file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358211file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358211file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358211file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358212file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358212file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358212file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358212file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358213file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358213file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358213file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358213file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358214file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358214file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358214file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358215file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358215
is shown by blue line, calculated data is represented by the red lines and the difference is
plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 1.529 ................................................................... 171
Figure 7.14 Surface plot from in-situ XRD of LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.5) heated under He (100
ml/min, ~3 bar) between 30 – 450 C. A brighter colour corresponds to a higher diffraction
intensity. The white dashed lines show the phase transition temperature and are given as a
guide for the eye. ............................................................................................................... 172
Figure 7.15 In-Situ XRD of 5h ball milled Li0.8Na0.2MgH3 showing the decomposition reactions
of the sample under 3 bar flowing He atmosphere. Measurements were taken from 30C to
400C at a rate of 2C/min. values before 28 were not considered as no representative
diffractions were detected. ................................................................................................. 174
Figure 7.16 RT XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.8) after dehydrogenation under 3
bar He flowing at 100 ml/min. 2 theta () values before 25 were not considered as no
representative diffractions were detected. ......................................................................... 175
Figure 7.17 Surface plot from in-situ XRD of LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.8) heated under He (100
ml/min, ~3 bar) between 30 – 450 C. A brighter colour corresponds to a higher diffraction
intensity. The white dashed lines show the phase transition temperature and are given as a
guide for the eye. ............................................................................................................... 176
Figure 7.18 In-situ XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0) rehydrogenated sample under
10 bar H2 flowing at (100 ml/min) after decomposition. Data was collected isothermally in
50 °C intervals. Dashed (black line) indicates the patterns where rehydrogenation is detected.
........................................................................................................................................... 178
Figure 7.19 RT XRD of the 5 h mi lled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0) after re-hydrogenation in 10 bar
H2 flowing at 100 ml/min. 2 theta () values before 25 were not considered as no
representative diffractions were detected. ......................................................................... 179
Figure 7.20 TOPAS refinement of LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0), 2 theta () values before 25 were not
considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions were detected. (Observed data
is shown by blue line, calculated data is represented by the red lines and the difference is
plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 1.468 ................................................................... 180
Figure 7.21 In-situ XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.2) rehydrogenated sample under
10 bar H2 flowing at (100 ml/min) after decomposition. Data was collected isothermally in
50 C intervals. Dashed (black line) indicates the patterns where rehydrogenation is detected.
........................................................................................................................................... 182
file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358215file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358215file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358216file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358216file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358216file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358216file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358217file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358217file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358217file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358217file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358218file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358218file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358218file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358219file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358219file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358219file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358219file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358220file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358220file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358220file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358220file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358221file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358221file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358221file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358222file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358222file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358222file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%201193539%20VIVA%20Corrections%2022%20Dec%202017.docx%23_Toc502358222
Figure 7.22 RT XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.2) after re-hydrogenation in 10 bar
H2 flowing at 100 ml/min. 2 theta () values before 25 were not considered as no
representative diffractions were detected. ......................................................................... 183
Figure 7.23 TOPAS refinement of LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.2), 2 theta () values before 25 were not
considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions were detected. (Observed data
is shown by blue line, calculated data is represented by the red lines and the difference is
plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 1.523 ................................................................... 184
Figure 7.24 In-situ XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.5) rehydrogenated sample under
10 bar H2 flowing at (100 ml/min) after decomposition. Data was collected isothermally in
50 C intervals. Dashed (black line) indicates the patterns where rehydrogenation is detected.
........................................................................................................................................... 186
Figure 7.25 RT XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.5) after re-hydrogenation in 10 bar
H2 flowing at 100 ml/min. 2 theta () values before 25 were not considered as no
representative diffractions were detected. ......................................................................... 187
Figure 7.26 TOPAS refinement of LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.5), 2 theta () values before 25 were not
considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions were detected. (Observed data
is shown by blue line, calculated data is represented by the red lines and the difference is
plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 1.523 ................................................................... 188
Figure 7.27 In-situ XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.8) rehydrogenated sample under
10 bar H2 flowing at (100 ml/min) after decomposition. Data was collected isothermally in
50 C intervals. Dashed (black line) indicates the patterns where rehydrogenation is detected.
........................................................................................................................................... 190
Figure 7.28 RT XRD of the 5 h milled LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.8) after re-hydrogenation in 10 bar
H2 flowing at 100 ml/min. 2 theta () values before 25 were not considered as no
representative diffractions were detected. ......................................................................... 191
Figure 7.29 TOPAS refinement of LixNa1-xMgH3 (x=0.8), 2 theta () values before 25 were not
considered for the refinement as no representative diffractions were detected. (Observed data
is shown by blue line, calculated data is represented by the red lines and the difference is
plotted below in grey). Goodness of fit 1.294 ................................................................... 192
Figure 8.1 a) Schematic unit cells of CaH2 and the ternary phases b) Ca19Mg8D54 and c)
Ca4Mg3D14. (Green, grey and blue spheres represent Ca, H and Mg, respectively.) ...... 200
file:///C:/Users/lfcv_/Desktop/Thesis%20toprint/Corrections/PhD%20Thesis%20LFCV%20119