34
Sarah and Hagar Page 1 of 34 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy ). Subscriber: University of Denver; date: 27 October 2015 University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship Online Shared Stories, Rival Tellings: Early Encounters of Jews, Christians, and Muslims Robert C. Gregg Print publication date: 2015 Print ISBN-13: 9780190231491 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: August 2015 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190231491.001.0001 Sarah and Hagar Jewish Portrayals Robert C. Gregg DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190231491.003.0007 Abstract and Keywords The story of Abraham’s two women and their sons is the basis for Israel’s self- understanding as God’s covenant people in the lineage from Isaac. Strife and competition between Sarah and Hagar, leading to the expulsion of Hagar and Ishmael to the wilderness, drew the attention of rabbinic exegetes, storytellers, and of mosaic artists in the Galilean city of Sepphoris. How were the attitudes and behaviors of the two women and their sons to be assessed? Voices in Genesis Rabbah debate causes of the infertility of Sarah and the easy pregnancy of Hagar, the character and attributes of both women, and also what kind of “play” by Ishmael caused Sarah to force Abraham to send the boy and his mother away. The chapter concludes with consideration of the damaged mosaic floor of the Sepphoris synagogue and the relation of its images to both Jewish and

University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ... · between Sarah and Hagar, leading to the expulsion of Hagar and Ishmael to the wilderness, drew the attention of rabbinic

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Sarah and Hagar

Page 1 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

UniversityPressScholarshipOnline

OxfordScholarshipOnline

SharedStories,RivalTellings:EarlyEncountersofJews,Christians,andMuslimsRobertC.Gregg

Printpublicationdate:2015PrintISBN-13:9780190231491PublishedtoOxfordScholarshipOnline:August2015DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190231491.001.0001

SarahandHagar

JewishPortrayals

RobertC.Gregg

DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190231491.003.0007

AbstractandKeywords

ThestoryofAbraham’stwowomenandtheirsonsisthebasisforIsrael’sself-understandingasGod’scovenantpeopleinthelineagefromIsaac.StrifeandcompetitionbetweenSarahandHagar,leadingtotheexpulsionofHagarandIshmaeltothewilderness,drewtheattentionofrabbinicexegetes,storytellers,andofmosaicartistsintheGalileancityofSepphoris.Howweretheattitudesandbehaviorsofthetwowomenandtheirsonstobeassessed?VoicesinGenesisRabbahdebatecausesoftheinfertilityofSarahandtheeasypregnancyofHagar,thecharacterandattributesofbothwomen,andalsowhatkindof“play”byIshmaelcausedSarahtoforceAbrahamtosendtheboyandhismotheraway.ThechapterconcludeswithconsiderationofthedamagedmosaicflooroftheSepphorissynagogueandtherelationofitsimagestobothJewishand

Sarah and Hagar

Page 2 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

Christianiconographyoftheera.

Keywords:heir,harshtreatment,wilderness,GenesisRabbah,Sepphorissynagogue

Figure4.1 AbrahamcastingoutHagarandIshmael.RembrandtvanRijn,1637.Etching:15.7cm×13.3cm.©TheMetropolitanMuseumofArt,NewYork.ArtResource,NY.

(p.121)

Inadrawingmadeafterthemid-1630sRembrandtfocusedonthefigureofHagarwhenshewassentbyAbrahamintothedesert.Thethemeofthetworivalwomenwasawidelydepictedsubject....YetonlyRembrandt’setchingTheExpulsionofHagarreallyshowsthecontrastbetweenthetriumphantSarah,gleefullypeepingthroughthedoorwaywithasatisfiedsmileonherface,andthedesolatefigureoftheweepingHagar.

AnatGilboa,ImagesoftheFeminineinRembrandt’sWork1

CommandedbyGodtoleavehisnativelandandtraveltothelandofCanaan,Abram(toberenamedAbraham),obeyed,andonceathisdestinationtheLordappearedtohimanddeclared“Iwillassignthislandtoyouroffspring”(Genesis12:7).Sometimelater,whenAbramwastoldbyGodthat“[his]rewardwouldbeverygreat,”heresponded,“OLordGod,whatcanyougivetome,seeingthatIamchildless,andtheoneincharge

Sarah and Hagar

Page 3 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

ofmyhouseholdisDammesekEliezer?”GodreassuredAbramthatEliezer,hissteward,wouldnotbehisheir.Nonewouldbebut“yourveryownissue”(15:1–4).

15:5Hetookhimoutsideandsaid,“Looktowardheavenandcountthestars,ifyouareabletocountthem.”Andheadded,“Soshallyouroffspringbe.”

6AndbecauseheputhistrustintheLord,Hereckonedittohismerit.

ThedeclarationinPsalm11:5that“theLordteststherighteous”oftenevokesthememoryofGod’scommandthatAbrahamofferhissonasaburntsacrifice,buttheversecouldstandovertheentirebiblicalhistoryofthepatriarch.ItcertainlyappliestothenarrativetellingofthebirthoftwosonstoAbraham,firstbySarah’smaidservant,Hagar,andthenbySarahherself.Thedramainvolvinghistwowomenandtheirsonsisoneofconflict,uponwhichhingesthecharacterofGod’sdifferentrelationshipswithAbraham’soffspring.

Inthischapter,afterreviewingtheHebrewBible’spresentationoftheevents,weturntoJewishinterpretationsofthestorybyrabbisandbyartists.Thecommunity’sscriptureinterpreterswillbeobservedworkingtoensurethatthissacredstorypresentstheoriginsofIsrael’scovenantrelationshipwithGodinthemostpowerfulwordsandimagespossible.WeshallalsobecomeawareoftheirawarenessofacounterinterpretationbyChristians.

(p.122) SarahandHagarinGenesis

16:1Sarai,Abram’swife,hadbornehimnochildren.ShehadanEgyptianmaidservantwhosenamewasHagar.2AndSaraisaidtoAbram,“Look,theLordhaskeptmefrombearing.Consortwithmymaid,perhapsIshallhaveasonthroughher.”AndAbramheededSarai’srequest.3SoSarai,Abram’swife,tookhermaid,HagartheEgyptian—afterAbramhaddweltinthelandofCanaantenyears—andgavehertoherhusbandAbramasconcubine.4HecohabitedwithHagarandsheconceived;andwhenshesawthatshehadconceived,hermistresswasloweredinheresteem.5AndSaraisaidtoAbram,“Thewrongdonemeisyourfault!Imyselfputmymaidinyourbosom;nowthatsheseesthatsheispregnant,Iamloweredinheresteem.TheLorddecidebetweenyouandme!”

6AbramsaidtoSarai,“Yourmaidisinyourhands.Dealwithherasyouthinkright.”ThenSaraitreatedherharshly,andsheranawayfromher.

7AnangeloftheLordfoundherbyaspringofwaterinthewilderness,thespringontheroadtoShur,8andsaid,“Hagar,slaveofSarai,wherehaveyoucomefromandwhereareyougoing?”Andshesaid,“IamrunningawayfrommymistressSarai.”

9AndtheangeloftheLordsaidtoher,“Gobacktoyourmistress,andsubmittoherharshtreatment.”10AndtheangeloftheLordsaidtoher,

Sarah and Hagar

Page 4 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

“Iwillgreatlyincreaseyouroffspring,Andtheyshallbetoomanytocount.”

11TheangeloftheLordsaidtoherfurther,

“Behold,youarewithchildAndshallbearason;YoushallcallhimIshmael,FortheLordhaspaidheedtoyoursuffering.12Heshallbeawildassofaman;Hishandagainsteveryone,Andeveryone’shandagainsthim;Heshalldwellalongsideofallhiskinsmen.”

13AndshecalledtheLordwhospoketoher,“YouareEl-Roi,”

bywhichshemeant,“HaveInotgoneonseeingafterHesawme!”

14ThereforethewellwascalledBeer-lahai-roi;itisbetweenKadeshandBered.—15HagarboreasontoAbram,andAbramgavethesonthatHagarborehimthenameIshmael.16Abramwaseighty-sixyearsoldwhenHagarboreIshmaeltoAbram.(p.123)

17:1WhenAbramwasninety-nineyearsold,theLordappearedtoAbramandsaidtohim,“IamElShaddai.WalkinMywaysandbeblameless.2IwillestablishmycovenantbetweenMeandyou,andIwillmakeyouexceedinglynumerous.”3Abrahamthrewhimselfonhisface;andGodspoketohimfurther,4“AsforMe,thisisMycovenantwithyou:Youshallbethefatherofamultitudeofnations.5AndyoushallnolongerbecalledAbram,butyournameshallbeAbraham,forImakeyouthefatherofamultitudeofnations.

6Iwillmakeyouexceedinglyfertile,andmakenationsofyou,andkingswillcomeforthfromyou.7IwillmaintainmycovenantbetweenMeandyou,andyouroffspringtocome,asaneverlastingcovenantthroughouttheages,tobeGodtoyouandyouroffspringtocome.8Iassignthelandyousojournintoyouandyouroffspringtocome,allthelandofCanaan,asaneverlastingholding.IwillbetheirGod.”...15AndGodsaidtoAbraham,“AsforyourwifeSarai,youshallnotcallherSarai,buthernameshallbeSarah.16Iwillblessher;indeedIwillgiveyouasonbyher.Iwillblesshersothatsheshallgiverisetonations;rulersofpeoplesshallissuefromher.”17Abrahamthrewhimselfonhisfaceandlaughed,ashesaidtohimself,“Canachildbeborntoamanahundredyearsold,orcanSarahbearachildatninety?”18AndAbrahamsaidtoGod,“OthatIshmaelmaylivebyYourfavor!”19Godsaid,“Nevertheless,Sarahyourwifewillbearyouason,andyoushallnamehimIsaac;andIwillmaintainmyconvenantwithhimasaneverlastingcovenantforhisoffspringtocome.20AsforIshmael,Ihaveheededyou.Iherebyblesshim.Iwillmakehimfertileandexceedinglynumerous.Heshallbethefather

Sarah and Hagar

Page 5 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

oftwelvechieftans,andIwillmakeofhimagreatnation.

21ButmycovenantIwillmaintainwithIsaac,whomSarahshallbeartoyouatthisseasonnextyear.”22AndwhenHewasdonespeakingwithhim,GodwasgonefromAbraham.

18:9They[thethreemenwhovisitedAbrahaminMamre]saidtohim,“WhereisyourwifeSarah?”Andhereplied,“There,inthetent.”10Thenonesaid,“Iwillreturntoyounextyear,andyourwifeSarahshallhaveason!”Sarahwaslisteningattheentranceofthetent,whichwasbehindhim.11NowAbrahamandSarahwereold,advancedinyears;Sarahhadstoppedhavingtheperiodsofwomen.12AndSarahlaughedtoherself,saying,“NowthatIamwithered,amItohaveenjoyment—withmyhusbandsoold?”

13ThentheLordsaidtoAbraham,“WhydidSarahlaugh,saying,‘ShallIintruthbearachild,oldasIam?’14IsanythingtoowondrousfortheLord?Ishallreturntoyouatthetimenextyear,andSarahshallhaveason.”15Sarahlied,saying,“Ididnotlaugh,”forshewasfrightened.ButHereplied,“Youdidlaugh.”

21.1TheLordtooknoteofSarahasHehadpromised,andtheLorddidforSarahasHehadspoken.2SarahconceivedandboreasontoAbrahaminhisold(p.124)age,atthesettimeofwhichGodhadspoken.3Abrahamgavehisnewbornson,whomSarahhadbornehim,thenameofIsaac.4AndwhenhissonIsaacwaseightdaysold,Abrahamcircumcisedhim,asGodhadcommandedhim.

5NowAbrahamwasahundredyearsoldwhenhissonIsaacwasborntohim.

6Sarahsaid,“Godhasbroughtmelaughter;everyonewhohearswilllaughwithme.”7Andsheadded,

“WhowouldhavesaidtoAbrahamThatSarahwouldsucklechildren!YetIhaveborneasoninhisoldage.”

8Thechildgrewupandwasweaned,andAbrahamheldagreatfeastonthedaythatIsaacwasweaned.

9SarahsawthesonwhomHagartheEgyptianhadbornetoAbrahamplaying.10ShesaidtoAbraham,“Castoutthatslave-womanandherson,forthesonofthatslaveshallnotshareintheinheritancewithmysonIsaac.”11ThematterdistressedAbrahamgreatly,foritconcernedasonofhis.12ButGodsaidtoAbraham,“Donotbedistressedovertheboyoryourslave;whateverSarahtellsyou,doasshesays,foritisthroughIsaacthatoffspringshallbecontinuedforyou.13Asforthesonoftheslave-woman,Iwillmakeanationofhim,too,forheisyourseed.”

14EarlynextmorningAbrahamtooksomebreadandaskinofwater,andgave

Sarah and Hagar

Page 6 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

themtoHagar.Heplacedthemoverhershoulder,togetherwiththechild,andsentheraway.AndshewanderedaboutinthewildernessofBeer-sheba.15Whenthewaterwasgonefromtheskin,sheleftthechildunderoneofthebushes,16andwentandsatdownatadistance,abowshotaway;forshethought,“Letmenotlookonasthechilddies.”Andsittingthusafar,sheburstintotears.

17Godheardthecryoftheboy,andanangelofGodcalledtoHagarfromheavenandsaidtoher,“Whattroublesyou,Hagar?Fearnot,forGodhasheededthecryoftheboywhereheis.

18Come,liftuptheboyandholdhimbythehand,forIwillmakeagreatnationofhim.”19ThenGodopenedhereyesandshesawawellofwater.Shewentandfilledtheskinwithwater,andlettheboydrink.20Godwaswiththeboyandhegrewup;hedweltinthewildernessandbecameabowman.21HelivedinthewildernessofParan;andhismothergotawifeforhimfromthelandofEgypt.

Questionsthatariseforusaswereadthesepassages—especiallythoseconcentratedonthechiefcharacters’motivationsandactions—wereunderdiscussionamongJewsfromthetimeoftheTorah’screationandcirculation.ReadersoftheHebrewunderstoodeasilytheetymological(p.125) senseofthenamesgiven:theconnectionofIsaacwithlaughter;ofIshmaelwithheedingorhearingofthechangefromAbramtoAbraham,withitsconnotationofhispaternityofmany;thesuggestionofseeingandbeingseeninHagar’snamingoftheLordasElRoi(withitsimplication:Iseeyou,andIamstillalive)andElShaddai,takentomean“GodAlmighty.”Morecomplexquestionsconcerningthestory,however,demandeddeeperexploration.

OmittedfromthepassagesabovearetwopartsofthestoryofAbraham,Sarah,andHagarthatareworthpausingover.Twicewhiletravelinginthelandsofpowerfulrulers,AbrahamfearsdeathbecauseofSarah’sbeauty—thathewillbekilledbythosewhoareattractedtoSarah,andwishtoobtainherforthemselves.Abrahamurgeshertolieaboutheridentity,callingherselfhissister.InGenesis12:10–20,theregentdesirousofSarahwasEgypt’sPharaoh,whosetakingofherintothepalacebenefitedAbraham(hegainedmanyanimals),butbroughtplaguesuponthePharaohandhishousehold“onaccountofSarai,thewifeofAbram”(12:17).Oncescolded,Abrahamwassentaway,withSarahand“allthathepossessed.”Thoughitisnotmentioned,arereaderstosupposethatitwasatthistimethatSarahcameintopossessionofHagar,herEgyptianmaidservant?

WhatoccurswhenAbrahamandSarahsojourninGerar(Genesis20)isanearreplayofwhatAbraham’slieearliercausedtohappen.KingAbimelechlearnsofSarah’spresenceinhisrealm,andacquiresher.Inadreamvisitation,GodcorrectsAbimelech’smisunderstandingofwhoSarahis,warningthekingthatsheisnothistopossessandenjoy.Sarah’shusband,Godinformstheking,isaprophetofsuchpowerthathecanmakesuccessfulintercessionforhim.Further,Abimelechwilldie,withallhishousehold,unlessherestoresSarahtoAbraham.WhenAbimelechberatesAbrahamforhisdeceptionconcerningSarah,Abrahamhasatwo-partrejoinder,orrationalization:

Sarah and Hagar

Page 7 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

Ithought,surelythereisnofearofGodinthisplace,andtheywillkillmebecauseofmywife.Andbesides,sheisintruthmysister,myfather’sdaughter,thoughnotmymother’s;andshebecamemywife(20:11–12).

Theking’spromptpeace-makingentailsthegiftofcattleandslavestoAbraham,followedbytherestorationofSarahtoherhusband.Anadditionalgiftorpaymentismade:athousandpiecesofsilverpaidtoAbraham—agestureAbimelechconstruesanddescribestoSarahasanexonerationandpublicvindicationofher.

(p.126) Inthefinaltwoverses(17–18)welearnhowdangerousthesituationhadbecomefortheroyalhouseofGerar:

AbrahamthenprayedtoGod,andGodhealedAbimelechandhiswifeandhisslavegirls,sothattheyborechildren;fortheLordhadclosedfasteverywombofthehouseholdofAbimelechbecauseofSarah,thewifeofAbraham.2

SincethislatterepisodefallsinAbraham’sstoryjustpriortothenoticeofSarah’spregnancy,laterinterpreters,therabbisinparticular,werepromptedtodiscusswhatmighthavetranspiredbetweenAbimelechandAbraham’s“sister”whileshewasintheking’scompany.Theeventimpinged,asweshallsee,uponimportantquestionsnotonlyofmorality,butalsoofgenetics—thatis,mattersofpaternityandmotherhood.

DrivingtheAbrahamnarrativeistheinsistentclaimthatGod’scovenantwithAbrahamand“hisoffspring”iswithandthroughIsaac.TheLord’sblessingofIshmaelandthosewhomhewillfatherisofadifferentorder.Nonetheless,chapter17’sconcludingversesreportAbraham’scovenant-prescribedcircumcisionofthirteen-year-oldIshmael,aswellashisowncircumcisionandthatoftheothermales(home-bornandpurchasedslaves)ofhishousehold.Ishmael,onaccountofhiscircumcision,anddespitethedistinctionGodmakesinvv.19–20,wouldseemtobeincludedinthecovenant,aparticipantinitsobligationsandbenefits,butthisdoesnotprovetobeso.

Genesis21:1–21is,fortheBible,theclimaxofthestoryofSarahandHagarandtheirrivalry.Strongemotions—heightsanddepthsofthecharacters’lives—areondisplay.Verses1–8celebratetheLord’sfulfillmentofthepromiseconcerningSarah.AgreatfeastmarksIsaac’sweaning,theendofhisinfancy.

Thedramathatfollowsinvv.9–21growsoutofSarah’sfearfulorhostileattitudetowardHagarandherson.Thetwo-mother,two-sonhouseholdhascometoacrisis.SarahisreportedtohaveseenHagar’ssonplaying(thetextdisclosesneitherthemannerofIshmael’splay,norwhetherhishalf-brotherIsaacmighthavebeeninvolved,asmanylaterinterpreterswillpresume),andapparentlywhatsheseesstirshertoastrongaction.Abraham,onherorders,sendsHagarandhersonawaythenextday,supplyingthemwithbreadandwater.

WanderinginthewildernessnearBeer-sheba,theirprovisionsrunoutandHagarforeseestheirdoom.AnangelapproachesHagaranddirectsheractions;Godthenopens

Sarah and Hagar

Page 8 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

Hagar’seyestothesightofwater,andsheandhersonaresaved.

(p.127) Fromthispointon,IshmaelandHagararevirtuallyabsentasactorsintheAbrahamsaga.Interestingly,Ishmaelsurfacesoncemoreinthestory,joininghishalf-brotherinburyingtheirfather(nearSarah)inthecaveofMacpelah(25:9).ThelistofIshmael’stwelvesonsandtheirregionofsettlementisprecededbyareferencetohismother,“HagartheEgyptian,”at25:12.ThatchapterbeginswithmentionofanotherofAbraham’swives,Keturah,whosesixsonsarenamed,asarethedescendantsofthefirsttwoofthese,JokshanandMidian(vv.1–4).ThelesserimportanceforAbrahamichistoryofthesesonsandofotherswhomhe“begat”byconcubinesisclearlyindicated:“AbrahamwilledallthatheownedtoIsaac”(v.5).HisothermaleoffspringweregivengiftsbyAbrahamandsent“awayfromhissonIsaaceastward,tothelandoftheEast”(v.6).Ishmael’sstatusisatoncesimilaranddifferent.HetoowasdistancedfromIsaac,yethereceivedfromGodtheblessingofnumerousoffspring,andofnationhood(16:20,21:13,18).

ItisnecessaryatthispointtovisitthenarrativefollowingtheexpulsionofHagarandIshmaelandtheirtrialinthewilderness.Genesis21:14–21resumesthemainstoryofAbraham’sdealingswithGodandhis“favored”offspringintellingoftheakedah—thebindingofIsaac.ThistestofAbraham—takingIsaac,whomheloves,toMoriahtoofferhimasasacrificetoGod—endsintheboy’s(andthefather’s)deliverancefromthisobligation,andarestatementandelaborationofGod’scovenantpromise:

22:15TheangeloftheLordcalledtoAbrahamasecondtimefromheaven,16andsaid,“BymyselfIswear,theLorddeclares:Becauseyouhavedonethisandhavenotwithheldyourson,yourfavoredone,17IwillbestowMyblessinguponyouandmakeyourdescendantsasnumerousasthestarsofheavenandthesandsontheseashore;andyourdescendantsshallseizethegatesoftheirfoes.18Allthenationsoftheearthshallblessthemselvesbyyourdescendants,becauseyouhaveobeyedmycommand.”

JonLevenson,inhisTheDeathandResurrectionoftheBelovedSon,eloquentlyspelledoutthesignificanceofthisdivinepledge,initsnowrevisedform:

ItconvertsthestandingpromiseofAbrahamofinnumerableprogenyintoaconsequenceofthenear-sacrificeofIsaac....Thisisatransformationofenormousimport.ItrenderstheveryexistenceofAbrahamicpeoplesdependent(p.128)upontheirancestor’sobediencetothefearsomedirectivetomakeofhisbelovedsonaburntofferingtohisGod.Theaqedah,inshort,hasbecomeafoundationalact,anditsconsequencesextendtoeverygenerationofthosewhosefatherisAbraham.Ourpeopleexistsandperdures,theIsraelitenarratorseemstobesaying,onlybecauseoftheincomparableactofobedienceandfaiththatthepatriarch-to-becarriedoutonanunnamedmountaininthelandofMoriah.Inlightoftheinterpretivemovethatthesecondangelicaddressevidences,itishardlyasourceofwondermentthat,atleastsincebiblicaltimes,JewishthinkershavecontinuallyponderedthetroublingstoryofthebindingofIsaac.Norisitsurprising

Sarah and Hagar

Page 9 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

thattheponderingisusuallymostintensewhentheexistenceofJewsisthreatened,andtheirsurvival,toallappearances,miraculous.3

Sarah’snamedoesnotappearinthestoryofthenear-sacrificeofIsaac,thoughlaterinterpreterswillfindaplaceforherintheevent’sretelling.Herdeathatage127inKiriath-arba(Hebron)isrecountedinchapter23,alongwithAbraham’spurchaseofaburialsite,thecaveofMachpelah.ThefortunesofIsaacandhissuccessorsarethesubjectofthecontinuingchaptersofGenesis,andsowereadinchapter24thecolorfulstoryofthemissionofAbraham’sservanttofindafittingwifeforIsaac—someonefromthepatriarch’shomeland,not“fromthedaughtersoftheCanaanites”(v.3).Thehappy(anddestined)resultoftheservant’ssearchisthebeautifulvirgin,Rebekah,whohailsfromthefamilyofAbraham’sbrother,Nahor.ThenextstageofthehistoryofAbraham’sseedhasahappybeginning:

IsaacthenbroughtherintothetentofhismotherSarah,andhetookRebekahashiswife.Isaaclovedher,andthusfoundcomfortafterhismother’sdeath(24:67).

Sarah,throughwhosesonthepeopleofthecovenantwillcomeintobeingandultimatelypossessthelandpromisedtothem,becomes,fromtheTanakh’s(andlater,Judaism’s)viewpoint,themateandpartnerofAbraham.Therealityofherprominenceinthetraditionsurfacesinreferencestothegraveofthe“fathers”andtheirwomenatMachpelah(inGenesis49:29–33,Jacob,dyinginEgypt,requeststhathiscorpsebetakentothelandofCanaanforburialinthecompanyofAbrahamandSarah,andofIsaacandRebekah,hisparents.)

Weshouldtakenote,here,oftheappearanceofIsaac’snameintherecurringformulawhichidentifiesthetriadofAbraham,Isaac,andJacob.4TheunfoldinghistoryofIsraelcannotberecordedwithoutallusionsbacktotheAbrahamicconvenant,and,simultaneouslytoIsaac,theguarantorofitspromiseandpower.

(p.129) GenesisRabbahonSarahandHagarGenesisRabbah(GR),ananthologyofteachingscompiledinthelatefourthtoearlyfifthcenturiesCE,containsatreasuretroveofrabbis’ruminationsonthescripturalaccountofAbraham’stwowomen.SarahandHagarenjoytheirprominencebyvirtueofbeingmeanstoadivineend:theyarechildproducersintheserviceofGod’spromisesthatfromAbraham’sloinsnationswillcome,withfutureoffspringasnumerousasparticlesofdust,grainsofsand,starsintheheavens.5GenesisRabbahrevealsclearlytherabbis’familiarmethodsforuntanglingproblemsandforfillingingapsperceivedinthebiblicaltext:apassageunderconsiderationsuggestsanother,inwhoselightthefirstmaybeconsideredanew.Individualwordslikewisegainfreshconnotationsfromtheirappearanceselsewhereinscripture.Wehavealreadymetrabbis’regularemploymentofexamplesandparablesfromoutsidethescripturetoaddstrengthtotheirarguments.

Genesis16InGenesisRabbahXLVwefindasetofspeculationsaboutSarah’sbarrenness,andalsothepossibilityofAbraham’sinfertility.Reading“NowSaraiAbram’swifeborehimno

Sarah and Hagar

Page 10 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

children”inthelightofProverbs31:10(“Awomanofvalorwhocanfind,forherprice(mikrah)isfaraboverubies”),6andrecallinginEzekiel16:3theterm“origin”(mekuroth)connotatingpregnancy,alineofargumentreconstructsthereproductivehistoriesofAbraham’sbrothers.CalculatingthatHaran(Abraham’sbrother)fatheredhisfirstchildwhenhewassixyearsold,therabbisponderedhow,withthisprodigiousprocreativityatworkamonghismalekin,itwaspossiblethatAbrahamcouldnotbegetachild.TheinfertilitymusthavebeenSarah’s.ButthisinferenceischallengedbyRabbiJudah,whoremindshisfellowsagesthatthetextstatesthatSarahborenochildrentohim(Abraham),notrulingoutthepossibilitythatshemighthaveproducedchildrenwithadifferentmate.R.Nehemiahinsiststhatthetextcannotbeconstruedinthatway:Sarahwasherselfinfertile.TheversedrawscommentherebecauseGenesisRabbah’sformatisaverse-by-versemidrashonscripture,andGenesis16:1initsvocabularyallowsvariousinterpretiveoptions.Buttherearealsootherconcerns,lessgrammaticallyinspired,attachingtothistopic.Theymightbeputundertherubricofdivinepurpose,orprovidence.How,asktherabbis,doesGod’scommitmenttothecovenantmadewithAbrahamcometohingeonthepregnancyofalong-barrenwoman?Isit(p.130) thecasethatGod’smostimportantactions—likethepromiseoflandandnationhood—aremanifestthroughwondersandmiracles?Sarah’sconceivingofIsaacrequirescarefulattention,standingasitdoesincloserelationshiptothepregnancyofHagar,andthebiblicalrecordofAbraham’sotherwomenandtheirchildren.

Scripturalcross-referencingdoneinconnectionwiththeverse,“Andshehadahandmaid,anEgyptian”alsoledtodiverseopinions—namely,(1)thatHagarwasSarah’sproperty,andthuswasapersonwhomAbrahamwasobligedtosupport,butwasnotfreetosell;that(2)HagarwasthePharaoh’sdaughter,giventoSarahintheaftermathofthatruler’sattempttowedorbedtheonehebelievedtobeAbraham’ssister—anexplanationattributedtoR.Simeonb.Yohai;andthat(3)thenameHagarderivesfromtheHebrewwordagar,meaning“reward”(Genesis12:7).7

SimilarexegeticalstrategiesproduceavarietyofmeaningsattachingtoSarah’sdeclaration,“Look,theLordhaskeptmefrombearing,”andalsotoherremarkthatshetoomightbe“builtup”inAbraham’shavingason“through”Hagar.Sarahspeaksasshedoesbecausesheunderstandsthecauseofthings,anddoesnot(likemany,apparently,inthesocialworldoftherabbis)seekapregnancy-inducingamuletorcharm.Sarah’sbeingbuiltup,arabbiasserted,referredtosurvivalortorestorationtolife.Hisideawasconfirmed(orgenerated)byRachel’spleatoherhusbandJacobinGenesis30:1,“Givemechildren,orIshalldie.”Sarah,childless,isasgoodasdead,andherbuildingupdependsonherbecomingamother—ofhersurrogate’schild.

TherabbisruminateaboutHagar’squickconceptionofasontoAbraham—arguablyasaresultoftheir“firstintimacy.”8ToRabbiEleazar’sclaimthatthisneverhappens,arejoindermarshalsasevidencethepregnanciesofLot’sdaughters(Genesis19:36),whopresumablyhadsexwiththeirfatheronlyonce.RabbiTanhumaexplainsthatunusualcasewithunusualimagery:“Byaneffortofwillpowertheybroughtforththeirvirginity,andthusconceivedatthefirstactofintercourse.”9AcomparisonofHagar’sandSarah’s

Sarah and Hagar

Page 11 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

procreativecapabilities(andofthequalitiesoftheirrespectivesons)istheyieldofabotanicalmetaphorvolunteeredbyR.Haninab.Pazzi:“Thornsareneitherweedednorsown,yetoftheirownaccordtheygrowandspringup,whereashowmuchpainandtoilisrequiredbeforewheatcanbemadetogrow!”Thatis,Ishmaeliseasy,spontaneous,andworthless;Isaacistheproductof“labor,”is“worthyfruit,”andthusofgreatvalue.10

Therabbiscangiveexplanationsforthefactthatnotablewomenweresometimesbarren:Godlovedtoheartheirprayerfulrequests(SongofSongs2:14iscitedinsupport),ortheirinfertilitycausedthemtodependontheir(p.131) husbands’support,whentheirgreatbeautymighthavemadethemself-reliant,orthatbeingbarrentheymightpasstheirliveswithouttheburdensofhavingandraisingchildren.Theselinesofmalethinkingarecappedwithoneofferedbyatrioofrabbis:Thematriarchswereforalongtimebarren“sothattheirhusbandsmightderivepleasurefromthem,forwhenawomaniswithchildsheisdisfiguredandlacksgrace.ThusthewholeninetyyearsthatSarahdidnotbear[achild]shewaslikeabrideinhercanopy.”11

AverydifferentopinionandvaluationofSarah’sbarrennessisputonthelipsofHagarinapieceofnarrativemeanttoillustratehow,afterHagarbecamepregnant,“hermistresswasloweredinheresteem”(16:4b).ApassageinGenesisRabbahreports:

Ladiesusedtocometoinquirehow[Sarah]was,and[Sarah]wouldsaytothem,“Goandaskaboutthewelfareofthepoorwoman[Hagar].”Hagarwouldtellthem:“MymistressSaraiisnotinwardlywhatsheisoutwardly:sheappearstobearighteouswoman,butsheisnot.Forhadshebeenarighteouswoman,seehowmanyyearshavepassedwithoutherconceiving,whereasIconceivedinonenight!”SaidSarah:“ShallIpayheedtothiswomanandarguewithher!No;Iwillarguethematterwithhermaster!”12

Sarah’scomplainttoAbrahamaboutHagar’sdisrespectisintheformofcurse-likechallenge.Shewantsthewrongdonetohertofallonhim(16:5).Thetext,revealingasitdoesrancorbetweenhusbandandwife,producescontrastingcommentsbythesages.Ontheonehand,Sarahisunderstoodtohavemadeavalidcomplaint.HerclaimthatAbrahamshouldhimselfbearthewrongsufferedbyhergainscredencewhenitisrecalledthatAbrahamsaidtoGodin15:2(“seeingthatIshalldiechildless”).Ifhehadsaid“Wegochildless,”Sarahwouldnotbesufferinghumiliation,forachildwouldhavebeenborntothemboth.

Ontheotherhand,“thewrongdonetome”(hamasi)thatSarahspeaksofsuggeststheideathatshescratched(himmes,toscratch)Abraham,andthisobservationtriggersabriefcataloguingofbadcharacteristicsofwomeningeneral.Sarahistheexemplarofhalfofthese:

Therabbissaid:Womenaresaidtopossessfourtraits:theyaregreedy,eavesdroppers,slothful,andenvious.Greedy,asitsays,“Andshetookthefruitthereofanddideatit”(Genesis3:6);eavesdroppers:“AndSarahheardinthetent

Sarah and Hagar

Page 12 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

door”(Genesis18:10)[whenthevisitingangelpredictedthebirthofIsaacinthenextyear];slothful:“Makeready[quickly]threemeasuresoffinemeal”(Genesis18:6)[understoodtoimplythatSarahdidnoteagerlybestirherselftoprepare(p.132) themealfortheLord/theangelicvisitors];envious:“Rachelenviedhersister”(Genesis30:1).13

ThesharpexchangebetweenSarahandAbrahamthatgrowsoutofSarah’sresentmentofHagarrequires,therabbisthink,criticalassessment.Sarah’stoospeedymovetolitigation(“LettheLorddecidebetweenyouandme”)wasitselfblameworthy,andwonherthepunishmentofashortenedlife.Shewouldotherwisehavelivedaslongasherspouse.

Abraham’srefusaltotakeactionagainstHagar(“Yourmaidisinyourhands”)andthesubsequentharshtreatmentofherbySarahalsorequiredexplanation.SupportedbyaprohibitioninExodus21:8againstsellingaservantwithwhomonehasbecomedispleased,thepatriarch’slineofreasoningisthis:“afterwemadeheramistress[i.e.,gaveherthestatusofawife],shallwemakeherabondmaidagain?”14Finally,therearespeculationsaboutthekindofharshnessSarahvisiteduponHagar:shekeptHagarfromAbraham’sbed;“sheslappedherfacewithaslipper,”shemadeherdoslavetasksinconnectionwiththebaths.15

Hagar’sflightisclearlytheresultofSarah’smaltreatment,butwhethersheleavesAbraham’shouseholdinfear,indefiance,orinsorrowisnotindicatedinGenesis16:6,nortakenupbytheteachersofGR.Whatdoesdrawtheinterpreters’attentionisthefactthatHagaristhreetimesidentifiedinthetextnotasSarah’sequal(i.e.,aswifeormistressinherownright),butasmaidservant—byAbrahamwhenhespeakstoSarah(“yourmaid”),bytheangeloftheLordwhofindsHagaratthespringinthewilderness(“Hagar,slaveofSarai,wherehaveyoucomefrom?”),andinherownresponse(“IamrunningawayfrommymistressSarai”).ThepointbeingregisteredaboutHagar’splaceintheschemeofthingsisbluntlyandcomicallyput:“Sorunstheproverb:‘Ifonemantellsyouthatyouhaveanass’sears,donotbelievehim;iftwotellittoyou,orderahalter.’”16

WhenGod’sangeldiscoversHagarinflight,heurgeshertoreturntoSarah“andsubmittoherharshtreatment”(16:9),andwelearnlaterinthepassagethatHagarhasobeyedtheangeliccounsel.SheisbackinthehouseholdofAbrahamwhenshegivesbirthtoIshmael.

Ishmaelisnextinlineforscrutiny.Therabbis’discourseisevokedbyscripture’sreportthattheangeloftheLordsaidtoHagarthathe“willgreatlyincrease[her]offspring,”andthatshewillbearasontobenamedIshmael(Genesis10–11).RabbiIsaacnotesthatonlythreefiguresinthetraditionwerecalledbytheirnamesbeforebirth—Isaac,Solomon,andJosiah(inGenesis17:16,1Chronicles22:9,and1Kings13:2,resp.).Anunattributedopinionfollows:“SomeaddIshmaelamongthenations.”The(p.133) distinctionbeingmadepresumesthatalthoughIshmaelshareswithIsaac,Solomon,andJosiahtheapparenthonorofbeinggivenhisnamepriortohisbirthbytheLordortheLord’s

Sarah and Hagar

Page 13 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

angel,hedoesnotbelongintheircategory.Ishmael,sonofAbraham,iscountedanon-Jew—oneamongthenations.

NegativeestimatesofIshmaelfillthesucceedingpassagesinGenesisRabbah,whichaddressphrasesbywhichtheangeldescribedhimtoHagarinGenesis16:11–12.TherabbisponderwhatitmeansthatIshmaelwillbea“wildassofaman.”R.Johanantakestheviewthatitsignifiesonlythathewillberaisedinthewild,ratherthanincivilization,whileReshLakishasserts,“Itmeansasavageamongmeninitsliteralsense,forwhereasallothersplunderwealth,heplunderslives.”17AndwhatsenseistobedrawnfromthepredictionthatIshmael’shandwouldbe“againsteveryone,andeveryone’shandagainsthim”(16:12)?Thekolbo(“againsthim”)ofthetextsuggestshisdoglike(kalboequalsdog)tasteforcarrion.18

ItisworthaskingwhatassociationsthenameIshmaelcarriesfortherabbisastheyconsiderthistextinGenesis.Theirmidrashimfromtheearlycenturiesofthecommonerainevitablylinktheangel’spronouncementthatIshmaelwouldbeaperpetualwarriorinconflictwith“everyone”toIsrael’spasthistory.TheprogenyofIshmaelhadlongsinceheldaplaceinthebiblicalrollofenemies.InPsalm83,aprayerforGodtospeakandactinatimewhen“foesassertthemselvesagainst[His]people”andthreatentoeradicateIsrael’snamefrommentionandmemory,theclanoftheIshmaelites,andalsooftheHagarites,areidentifiedalongwithsuchtraditionaladversariesastheEdomites,Ammonites,Amalekites,Philistines,andtheAssyrians.19

WemayseethisrepresentationofbellicoseIshmaelandhisoffspringalsoinPirkedeRabbiEliezer(PRE),acompilationofrabbinicteachingandloreeditedintheearlycenturiesaftertheriseofIslam.20Herewereadof“six(people)[who]werecalledbytheirnamesbeforetheywerecreated:Isaac,Ishmael,Moses,Solomon,Josiah,andKingMessiah.”21Ishmael’spresenceinthegroupisexplainedsimplybyreferringtoGenesis16:11,andgivingthemeaningofhisnameanewturn:

WhywashisnamecalledIshmael?Becauseinthefuture,theHolyOne,blessedbeHe,willhearkentothecryofthepeoplearisingfrom(theoppression)whichthechildrenofIshmaelwillbringaboutinthelandinthelast(days).22

Thehostileinversionisclever:Ishmael,theboycalledintoexistencebecauseGod“hearkened”tohisandhismother’smisery,isnowanoppressorwhosevictimsGodwillhearandheed.Elsewhereinthetext(p.134) RabbiIshmaelspeaksoffifteentravestiesthatthechildrenofIshmaelwillaccomplishinIsrael—inthefutureand“inthelatterdays.”Amongtheseterribleactionsaremeasuringsoftheland,desecrationofacemetery,falsehood’striumphovertruth,theremovalofstatutes“farfromIsrael,”thedestructionofwritings,thedespoilingofthetombsofthekingsofJudah,andthis:

Theywill…fenceinthebrokenwallsoftheTemple;andtheywillbuildabuildingintheHolyPlace;andtwobrotherswillariseoverthem,princesattheend.23

ThesepropheciesattributedtoRabbiIshmaelareofcourseretrospective,pointingas

Sarah and Hagar

Page 14 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

theydototheclaimingoftheTemplemountasharam(asacredplace)andthebuildinginthelateseventhcenturyofwhatcametobeknownal-Masjidaal-Aqsa(theal-Aqsamosque,ormoreliterally,“thefurthestmosque”fromMeccaandMedina),andtothesonsoftheAbbasidCaliphHarunal-Rashid,al-Aminandal-Mamun,whosequentiallyheldpowerfrom809to833CE.

Future-looking,however,isPRE’sexpressedmessianichopepositionedattheendofthelistofwoesbroughtupontheJewsbysonsofIshmael:

AndintheirdaystheBranch,theSonofDavid,willarise,asitissaid,“AndinthedaysofthosekingsshalltheGodofheavensetupakingdom,whichshallneverbedestroyed”(Daniel2:44).

ThischaracterizationofthesonsofIshmaelastheMuslimfoesofIsraelispartofatraceabledevelopment.HavingitsoriginsintheSarah-Hagarstory,theoppositionbetweenIsaacandIshmaelalreadyinlaterportionsofGenesisbecameastoryofdividedandhostilefamiliesandnations.Esau(likeIshmael,afirstbornsondeniedhisinheritance)tookoneofIshmael’sdaughters,Mahalath,asawife(Genesis28:6–9).TheIshmaeliteswhopurchasedJacob’sson,Joseph,andtookhimtoEgypt(Genesis37:25ff.)areportrayedasapeoplequiteotherthantheHebrews.Needlesstosay,athoroughlydifferentperceptionandvaluationofIshmaeltookshapeinMuslimtraditionandcommentary,aschapter6willdemonstrate.

ReturningtotheexegetesofGenesisRabbah,andtotheirconcernsintheirera,wefindthemponderingwhatoccursneartheconclusionofGenesis16,whenHagarcalledoutto“theLordwhospoketoher.”Therabbisconsideredthisunusualencounterandexchangerichinpossibilities.Again,thestandingofHagarwithGodisatissue—amatterseenspecificallyinrelationto,orincomparisonwith,thedivinefavorshonetoAbraham’sotherwife:(p.135)

R.Judahb.R.SimonandR.JohananinthenameofR.Eleazarb.R.Simeonsaid:TheHolyOne,blessedbeHe,nevercondescendedtoholdconversewithawomansavewiththatrighteouswoman[viz.Sarah],andthattoowasthroughaparticularcause(GRXLV.10).

ThecauseseemstohavebeenGod’sneedtoconfrontSarahaboutherlaughter,whereastheLordsimplyaddressedHagarbywayofanannouncementtoheraboutherfutureasamother.Butquestionspressthemselvesuponthecommentators:wasitGod,oranangel,whospoketoHagar?TheprevailingopinionisthatGodcommunicatedwithher“throughanangel,”thoughthegreatprivilegewhichcametoHagarviathedivinevisitoratthespringraisesanotherissue.Whatdidshemeaninsaying(16:13)“YouareaGodofseeing”?AccordingtoRabbiAibu,shemeant“Thouseestthesufferingsofthepersecuted.”

Thereis,however,moretobeconsideredinthelatterpartofverse13,whichcanbetranslated,“HaveIevenhere(halom)seenhimthatseethme?”24Averypositive

Sarah and Hagar

Page 15 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

estimateofHagarderivesfromnotingtheoccurrenceofthissameword,halom,in2Samuel7:18.UponhearingfromtheprophetNathanthatGodwillestablishhishouseandkingship,Davidresponds:“WhatamI,OLordGod,andwhatismyfamily,thatYouhavebroughtmethusfar[or:evenhere—halom]?”—thatis,toroyalstatus.25GenesisRabbahadvancedtheviewthatHagar’ssituationwaslikethatofDavid.Fromherwillissuerulers,astheangelpromised—theangelappearingtoher,notinthecompanyofhermistress,but“evennow”whenshe,arunaway,wasaloneatthespring.

Therabbis’interpretationsbothconfirmanddestabilizewhatmightseemtobeGenesis16’sobviouspresentationsofAbrahamandhistwowomen.NuancesattachtoSarahandherambitiousdesireforasonforAbraham,herangeratbeingdeprecated,heraggressivechallengestoAbrahamaboutwhichsonwillbehisheir,andherdesireforrevengeagainstHagar.Atthesametime,theinterpretersteaseoutreasonswhyHagargloatsinherpregnancy,demeansSarah,andattemptstofleeherdifficulties.BoldinherinterrogationoftheLord’sangel,whobringshergoodtidings,HagarneverthelessaccedestohisinjunctiontoreturntoherhouseholdandsubmittoSarah’scrueltreatmentofher.WenoticethatevenwhiledisparagingHagar,thecommentatorscreditherinteractionswithGod,andhonortheprivilegeswithwhichsheisblessed.Abraham,inthemidstoftherivalrybetweenthetwowomen,seemstodeflectSarah’schargeagainsthim,whileatthesametimetoleratinghermaltreatmentofHagar,whohasconceivedanddeliveredhisfirstborn.

(p.136) Genesis21:1–21WeturnnowtoGenesisRabbah’streatmentoftheearlierversesofchapter21,thosewhichprecedethefinalriftbetweenAbraham’stwowomen,andHagar’sbeingcastout.Atconsiderablelength,andwithanarrayofsupportingbiblicaltexts,therabbiscelebrateGod’sfaithfulnessinkeepinghispromiseconcerningSarah.ForGodtorememberortakenoteofthepledgeofthebirthofIsaactoherandtoAbraham,astherabbisreflectonthepassage,signifiesanumberofthings.Godaccomplisheswhathedecreeswhenthisisfortheworld’sgood(thoughhesometimespostponesorrelentsfromactionwhenhehaspromisedtobringevil—i.e.,judgment).Sarah’sconfidenceinthepromiseispraised.Nolongeronewholaughs,sheisimaginedexclaiming:“What!amItolosefaithinmyCreator!Heaven[forbid]!IwillnotlosefaithinmyCreator,‘ForIwillrejoiceintheLord,IwillexaltintheGodofmysalvation’”(Habbakuk3:18).26

Considerable(andamusing)interestcentersonthemeansbywhichthecapacitytoproduceachildcametoAbrahamandSarah.Therabbisspeakofyouthrestored,sexualpotencyreturnedtoAbraham,theLord’screationofanovaryforSarah,theonsetofhermenses,andtheprovisionofmilkforhernursingofIsaac.ConcernforSarah’svirtueisgreat,inorderthatitnotbesuspectedthatshewasimpregnatedbyAbimelech,fromwhosesexualaspirationsshehadonlyrecentlyescaped,withGod’shelp(Genesis20).Amoralclaimisadvanced.Sarah,havingemergedfromthehousesofthePharaohandAbimelechundefiled,deservedtoberememberedbyGodandmadeamothertoAbraham’sson.Thefactthatthetext(21:2)states“boretoAbraham”rulesoutsuspicion;“Thisteachesthatshedidnotstealseedfromelsewhere.”Furthermore,Isaac

Sarah and Hagar

Page 16 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

too,likehisfather,bore“asoninhisoldage.”TherabbisargueinseveralwaysthatSarah’spregnancywassufficientlylengthy“thatitmightnotbesaidthathe[Isaac]wasascionofAbimelech’shouse.”27

AstrikinglegendisinspiredbySarah’sversifiedexclamationinv.7:

WhowouldhavesaidtoAbraham

ThatSarahwouldsucklechildren!

YetIhaveborneasoninhisoldage.

Thecommentatorspauseandpuzzleover“children,”intheplural,andthensetabouttheirwork.AbrahamimportunesSarahtoputmodestyaside,andtobareherbreastssothathermiraculousflowofmilkcanbepubliclyobserved.Themilkisthenofferedtotheoffspringofmanynoble(p.137) ladieswhocome(whiledoubtingtheirworthiness)inorder“that[their]childrenmightbesuckledwiththemilkofthatrighteouswoman.”28Sarah’sdeclarationinGenesis21:6thatherGod-givenhappinesswillbeenjoyedbyallwhohearofit,becomesaprophecyfulfilledwhenmoremiraclesoccur.Thematriarch’sbeingrememberedbyGod—thatis,hergivingbirthtoIsaac—releasedtheseadditionalwonders:“manyotherbarrenwomenwererememberedwithher;manydeafgainedtheirhearing;manyblindhadtheireyesopened,manyinsanebecamesane.”29VerbalconnectionswithotherscripturesallowtherabbistoelaborateonthewaysthatGod’sfulfillmentofthepromiseofIsaac’sbirthtoSarahwas“agiftgrantedtotheworld.”30

ThecelebratorytoneofGR’streatmentofthebirthofIsaacandSarah’shappinessechoesGenesis21:1–8.Butimmediatelyafterthe“greatfeast”markingtheboy’sweaning,accordingtovv.10ff.,threateningcloudscomeoverthehouseholdofthepatriarch.31Thischangebeginswiththeprotectivemothersensingdanger(Genesis21:10–11):

SarahsawthesonwhomHagartheEgyptianhadbornetoAbrahamplaying.ShesaidtoAbraham,“Castoutthatslave-womanandherson,forthesonofthatslaveshallnotshareintheinheritancewithmysonIsaac.”

Whatwasthe“playing”ofIshmaelthatsoaggravatedSarah?RabbiAkiba’sinterpretationleadsoffaseriesofopinions.Theverbthatunderlies“playing,”or“makingsport”—tsahak—isthesamethatappearsinthestoryofJosephandPotiphar’swife.FailinginherattempttoseduceJoseph,shetellsPotipharthathis“Hebrewservant…cameintometomakesportofme”(Genesis39:17).Akibadeducesthat“thisteachesthatSarahsawIshmaelravishmaidens,seducemarriedwomen,anddishonorthem.”32RabbiIshmaelrecallstheuseoftheterm“sport”or“play”inExodus32:6,whichtellsoftheHebrews’actionsaroundthegoldencalfontheplainbelowSinai.Sarah,then,spiedIshmaelcommittingidolatry.Heisimaginedbuildingaltarsandtheresacrificinglocusts,theentertainmentofawicked,cruelyouth.No,othersargue;shesawaviolentact.RabbiEleazar(drawingontheappearanceof“sport”in2Samuel.2:14,whereabattleby

Sarah and Hagar

Page 17 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

swordanddaggerisdescribed),assertsthatIshmaelcommittedbloodshed.AwareofthenoticethatIshmaelbecameanarcher(Genesis21:20),R.LevirecallsimagesfromProverbs.22:18ff.inwhichthe“play”ofapersonwhodeceiveshisneighboriscomparedtothebehaviorof“amadmanwhocastsfirebrands,arrows,anddeath.”

Perhapsbecausehefindsthesevariedopinionstoospeculative,orbecausehehasreservationsaboutimputingsuchshamefulbehaviorstoasonof(p.138) thegreatpatriarchAbraham,RabbiSimeonb.Yohaitakesadifferenttack,readingvv.9–10together.“Playing”suggeststohimmockery—specifically,Ishmael’sattitudetowardthefestivecommotionsurroundingthebirthandchildhoodofhishalf-brother,“forwhenourfatherIsaacwasbornallrejoiced,whereuponIshmaelsaidtothem,‘Youarefools,forIamthefirstbornandIreceiveadoubleportion.’”33HereitisnotIshmael’swarlikecharacterthatarrestedSarah’sattention,butratherhisassertionofhisrightsofprimogeniture,expressedinaspiritofdisdainandgreed.Onthisreading,Sarah’sprotectivenessofhersonhastodowithIsaac’spatrimony—sheisforcefullyremindingherhusbandofthepromisemadeandnowfulfilledbyGod,andofAbraham’scommitmentstothecovenant.

WerecallthatSarah’sdemandthatthe“slavewomanandherson”bedismissedcausedAbrahamgreatpain,“foritconcernedasonofhis”(21:11).AsinglescripturaltextisbroughtforthinGRbywayofcomment:“Thusitiswritten,‘Andshuthiseyesfromlookinguponevil’”(Isaiah33:15).Thegistofthismidrashentailsacriticismofthepatriarch,who“shuthiseyesfromIshmael’sevilways,andwasreluctanttosendhimaway.”34Onewonders,however,ifanothermeaningmaybeintendedbythecitationofthetext—acommentmoresympathetictoAbraham.ThephraseinquestioninIsaiah33fallsinanumberofdescriptionsofarighteousperson“whospurnsprofitfromfraudulentdealings,wavesawayabribeinsteadofgraspingit,stopshisearsagainstlisteningtoinfamy,shutshiseyesagainstlookingatevil”(v.15).IsitpossiblethattherabbisacknowledgeAbraham’sdistress,imaginingthathemighthaveconsideredthebanningofhissonanunrighteousact,andthatforthisreasonheavertedhiseyes,andrecoiledfromit?

ThecontinuingnarrativeinGenesishasGodaddresswordstoAbrahamthatseem,whileupholdingSarah’sadmonitiontosendawaythethreateningmotherandson,consolatoryratherthanaccusatory.CertainlyGodreinforcesSarah’swish,tellingAbraham,“whateverSarahtellsyou,doasshesays,foritisthroughIsaacthatoffspringwillbecontinuedforyou”(v.12).Nonetheless,Goddoesreassurethepatriarchabouthisfirstson,saying“Iwillmakeanationofhim,too,forheisyourseed”(v.13).

ThebiblicalnarrativeoftheexpulsionofHagarandIshmaelpresentedpuzzlestothecommentatorsinGenesisRabbahthatmayormaynothaveheldforthemthekindofpathosseeninRembrandt’srendering.TheywonderedhowAbraham’sactionofplacingthewaterskinonHagar’sshoulderwastobeconstrued—positively,inthatheshowedgenerosityinprovidingherwithanabundanceofwater,ornegatively,showingHagartobeawater-bearingservant?Wasthefatherdiscouraginganyimpressionthattheboywithherwashisfreebornsonwithaclaimonhisinheritance?Why(p.139) didthe

Sarah and Hagar

Page 18 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

biblicaltextstatethatAbrahamputprovisionsforthejourney,plusthechild,onHagar’sshoulderashesentheraway?TherabbiswereconsciousoftheproblemofseeingIshmaelasayoungchild(theGRcommentsthathewastwenty-sevenyearsoldatthetime),35buttheirexplanationsaredifferentlyframed.IshmaelhadtobecarriedbecausehehadbeenmadeillbySarah,who“castanevileyeonhim,whereuponhewasseizedwithfeverishpains.”36WanderinginthewildernessnearBeer-Sheba,Ishmaelconsumedthewaterinthewayafeverishpersondrinks,andso,withnoneleft,wasonthevergeofdeath.

Anotherquestionarisesfromthestory.HavingputIshmaelunderabush,Hagarseparatedherselftothedistanceofabowshot,“forshethought,‘Letmenotlookonasthechilddies.’Andsittingthusafar,sheburstintotears”(21:16).Isherthoughtprayerful?Isitsomethingelse—anaccusation?TheHebrewwordforbowshotcallstomindasimilartermthatconnoteshurlingwords,or“onewhocriticizes”(ke-mateheth).So,itisproposed,hurlinghercomplaintsonhigh,Hagarspoke

asawomanwhoimpugnedGod’sjustice,saying,“YesterdayThoudidstpromiseme,‘Iwillgreatlymultiplythyseed,etc.’(Genesis16:10),andnowheisdyingofthirst!”37

Hagarisnotaloneinraisingquestionsofjustice.AccordingtoR.Simon,ministeringangelsaccostedGodandputtohimachallengestarklydifferentfromHagar’s.“Lordofallages,toamanwhoisdestinedtokillyourchildrenwiththirstwillyouprovideawell?”Theministeringangels,therabbissuppose,arepresumingthatapassageinIsaiah(21:13ff)tellsofatimewhenArabs,Ishmael’sdescendants,murderouslyignoredtheIsraelitesintheirdesperatepleaforwater.

WhatfollowsisastatementregardingthebasisuponwhichGodjudges,oractsonbehalfof,humanbeings.Abouttheperson(Ishmael)whomtheangelsforeknowwillsomedaybeinjurioustohischildren(ofthelineofIsaac),Godasks:“Whatishenow?”Theyanswer,“Righteous.”Goddeclaresthathejudgesthehumanasheorsheisinthepresent,“atthemoment,”notonthebasisofthatperson’sfuturecharacteranddeeds.Thehookonwhichthisargumenthangsisanelementinverse17,“whereheis,”whichistakentomean“asheisatpresent.”SoGodhearsthecryoftheboyandoneofhisangelscallstoHagarfromabove:

Whattroublesyou,Hagar?Fearnot,forGodhasheededthecryoftheboywhereheis.Come,liftuptheboyandholdhimbythehand,forIwillmakeagreatnationofhim(Genesis21.17b–18).

(p.140) ThetheologicalargumentaboutGod’swaysofjudgingseemsatfirsttostandatsomeremovefromtheagonizingofIshmaelandhismother,butofcourseasascenedepictingtheplightofthosewhoaresuffering,itnaturallyraisesquestionsaboutGod—hissilenceandhisinaction,orhispurposeandpowerinrelationtotheevent.Thenextverserevealsthemodeofdivinerescue.“Godopenedhereyesandshesawawellofwater.Shewentandfilledtheskinwithwater,andlettheboydrink”(v.19).Tworabbis

Sarah and Hagar

Page 19 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

commentthatallpeopleareblinduntilGodopenstheireyes.TheimplicationthattheproblemlaywithHagarisfollowedbytheobservationthatshelackedfaithevenafterhavingbeenenlightened—shefilledthewaterskinbecauseofdoubtaboutthewell,beinganxiousthatitmightvanishasquicklyasitappeared.38(WeshallseethatMusliminterpreterssimilarlycriticizedtheactionoftherescuedHagar,whowassaidtohaveattemptedtodam,andpreserve,thewatersofthespring.)

EventhoughthepreviouscommentaryonthisincidentregardedGod’sdecisiontointerveneandsaveIshmael“wherehe[was]”(i.e.,forwhathewasthen)asevidencethattheyouthwasapersonofrighteousnessandmerit,concludingremarksabouthisfuturelifetakeanegativeturn.ThetwoHebrewwordsfor“becameanarcher”(robehkashoth)pointtotwoothers(rabbah,kashiuth)suggestingthatIshmaelgrewincruelty.Thisnarrativesection’sfinalversetellingofHagar’sfindinganEgyptianwifeforherson(v.21)promptsR.Isaac,notwithoutprejudice,toremark,recallingGenesis16:1(“She[Sarah]hadanEgyptianmaidservant”),thatasticktossedintheairwillfallbacktoitspointoforigin.39

InthebiblicaldramaofAbraham’sfamily,thecast-outmotherandsonleavethestage,Hagarnottoappearagain,andIshmaelreturningonlytojoinIsaacinburyingtheirfather.GenesispursuesthestoryofAbrahamandSarahthroughtotheeventsoftheirdeathsandburialsinchs.23through25,andthenturnstothestoriesconcerningthepatriarch’s“seed”—Isaac,Jacob,Joseph.

RevealedonceagaininthesepagesofGenesisRabbahwasthetypicalmodeofrabbinicalscripturalanalysis—theproductionofmidrashthatexplored,ratherthanattemptedtoachieveconsensuson,theactionsofAbraham,Sarah,Hagar,andIsaacandIshmael—andtheirLord.Rather,holdingscriptureandallofitspartstobeGod-giventreasure,therabbiswereinsearchofitsrichprizes—itsmultiplelessonsandtruths.

Abraham’sFamilyinEarlyJewishArt:MosaicsintheSepphorisSynagogueThe1923discoveryofmultiplebiblicalscenesinathird-century“housesynagogue”inDuraEuropas(ontheEuphrates)fullydispelledthenotion(p.141) thatadherencetothecommandmentagainstidolatrypreventedJewsfromproducingfiguralart.40FurtherexcavationsinPalestinebroughttolightanumberofsplendidlydecoratedsynagogues,oneofwhichhasaroletoplayinoursearchforJewishartisticinterpretationsofAbraham’swomenandtheirsons.

WeshouldbeginbyacknowledgingthatnowhereinearlyJewishartdoesadepictionofHagarsurvive.DoweseeIshmael?Veryprobably,butacaseneedstobemadeforthis.Isaacdoesappear,andnotinfrequently,becauseofthepopularityofdepictionsoftheaqedatYitzhak,the“bindingofIsaac”atthetimehisfatherpreparedtosacrificehimtoGod.

Sarahistheonetobesearchedout,andsheisbelievedtobeshowninaportionofthemosaicflooruncoveredin1993byarchaeologistsZe’evWeissandEhudNetzer.41Asmallbutelegantlydecoratedsynagoguedatingfromthefifthcenturywasbuiltinthe

Sarah and Hagar

Page 20 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

lowerGalileancityofSepphoris.Inthaterathecity,whichhadlongbeenregardedasanimportantcenterforJewishlife,preservedmanyfeaturesofitshavingbeenatypicalGreco-Romanmunicipality.ItalsoshowedsignsofthegrowingstrengthofChristianity;severalchurches(constructeduponthefoundationsofwhathadbeenpagantemples)stoodnearthecardo,Sepphoris’smainstreet—closetothecity’sadministrativecenter.42Itishardtoknowtheextenttowhichpagansightsandsoundsmighthavecontinuedinthecityinthefifthtosixthcenturies,buttheproximityofJewish(aTalmudicreporttellsofeighteensynagogues)andChristianbuildingsinSepphorisallowsustopresumesomemeasureofsocialinteractionbetweenJewsandChristians.Abitlater,weshallexplorehowmuchtheyknewabouteachothers’beliefs,andinterpretationsofbiblicalnarratives.

Inasummarydescriptionoftheirdiscovery,WeissandNetzerwrote:

Themostsignificantremnantofthesynagogueisitsmosaicfloorwhichwasdesignedasasinglelongcarpetmeasuring16.0×6.6m[eters]….Thecarpetinthenaveisdividedinto7horizontalbandsofunequalheight,withazodiacinthecenter.Someofthebandshaveinternalsubdivisions.Thefloorismadeupof14panelscontainingavarietyofdecorations,someofwhichmaketheirfirstappearanceinJewisharthere.Dedicatoryinscriptions,mostlyinGreek,adornthepanelsbutbearnorelationshiptothescenesinthem.Allofthedepictionsthatcomprisethemainmosaiccarpetfaceinonedirection,perpendiculartothenave’slongitudinalaxis,thusemphasizingthebema,thefocusofreligiousactivityinthesynagogue.Althougheachpanelfeaturesadifferentscene,theyareallthematicallyconnected.43

Theproposalbytheexcavatorsthattheartprogramofthemosaiccarpetcenteredinthethemesof“promiseandredemption”generatedlively(p.142) scholarlydiscussion,withdiverseopinionsaboutwhatoverallsensecanbedrawnfromthemultiplepanels,whichdepictimagesofthearkandtwomenorahs,scenesoftemplesacrifices(thenameAaronappearingnexttoaneffacedfigurestandingatanaltar),alargeZodiacimagesimilartothosefoundinothersynagoguesoftheperiod),andtwosceneshavingtodowithAbraham.44

Bypassingherethediscussionofthemosaicfloorinitsentirety,wecloseinuponissuesofinterpretationpertainingtothelattermosaics,whichbeardirectlyonthischapter’stopic.Thefirstofthese(Figure4.2),largelydamaged,showedthehead-coveringandforeheadofawomanstandinginadoorway—Sarah,itsexcavatorsdetermined.

Sarah and Hagar

Page 21 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

Figure4.2 SarahdepictedinamosaicpaneloftheSepphorissynagogue.FifthtosixthcenturyCE.CourtesyofProf.ZeevWeiss,TheSepphorisExcavations,TheHebrewUniversityofJerusalem.

Figure4.3isadrawinginwhichWeissreconstructedwhatthismosaicshowedandsuggested.

Figure4.3 Drawing,courtesyofProf.ZeevWeiss,TheSepphorisExcavations,TheHebrewUniversityofJerusalem.

(p.143) Weissdescribedthesceneinthisway:

Onlysmallfragmentsoftheoriginalpanelarepreserved.Onefigure,standinginarectangularstructure,canbeseenontheleftofthepanel.Tracesoftwootherfigurescanbeidentifiedbesideit.Oneisstandingtotherightoftherectangularstructure,andtheotherisdepictedinarecliningpositionfarthertotherightandbelowthepreviousone.Tracesofaclothwithafringedhem,whichprobablycoveredatablethatstoodinthepicture’sforeground,arevisiblebelowtherecliningfigure.Althoughthissceneispoorlypreserved,analysisofitsremainsin

Sarah and Hagar

Page 22 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

lightofacloseparallelinthepresbyteryinSt.Vitale,Ravenna(mid-sixthcenturyCE),makesitpossibletoreconstructwhatwasoncedepictedhere.Thethreeangelsreclinedintheforegroundofthepanelnexttoalowtable.Abraham,theirhost,islocatedtotheirleft,andbehindhim,Sarahstandsinthetentlisteningtohisconversationwithhisguests.ThepresentationofthestoryoftheBindingofIsaacasadirectcontinuationofthesceneoftheangels’visittoAbrahamisalsofoundinRavenna(iftheidentificationsuggestedhereisaccepted).InJewishart,thisthememakesitsfirstappearanceintheSepphorissynagogue.45

(p.144) Themosaic(Figure4.4)onthenorthwallofthechurchofSanVitaletowhichWeissreferspostdatestheSepphorissynagoguebyapproximatelyacentury(SanVitalewasconstructedintheperiod528–547),butitdoesprovidethesimilarconfigurationoftheSarahimagethatgaveWeissandNetzerexternalsupportforidentificationofthismosaic’ssubject.Thetwobiblicalstoriesinthemosaicpavementinitiallyvisibletothoseenteringthesynagogue—first,theangels’visitationtoAbrahamandSarahatMamreandsecond,thedepictionofthenear-sacrificeofIsaac—appearintheSanVitalewallmosaicalignedonahorizontalplane,andappear,notsurprisinglyinthisChristiancontext,beneathacrossheldaloftbyangels.

Figure4.4 Abrahamwelcomesstrangers,preparestosacrificeIsaac.Mid-sixthcenturyCE.MosaicinSanVitale,Ravenna.©ArtHistoryImages.

InthechurchdecorationbothpartsofthesinglemosaicscenestandnotonlyaspictorialAbrahamichistorybutalsoassymbolsunderstoodtoprefiguretheannunciationofthebirthofJesusandhissacrificialdeath.AsiftoholdthetwoimagestogetherandmakemanifesttheirconnectedmeaningforChristians,theangelsatthecenterhaveinfrontofthemastheysitatthetablewhat,inthissetting,canonlybeeucharisticbread.46

IntheSepphorissynagogue,thetwosceneswillofcourseonlyconveyJewishmeanings,butinthesocial-religiouscontextofPalestine’s—andSepphoris’—fifthandsixthcenturies,itwouldbesurprisingiftheirpresentationswerenotcognizantof,andresistantto,Christianizedappropriationsofthesetwoimportantscripturalstories.WewanttoweighhowtheakedahsceneintheSepphorismosaic(Figure4.5)reveals—orgivesstrongintimationsof—theideasandperspectiveofitsartists.

Sarah and Hagar

Page 23 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

Figure4.5 Abraham’sattendantsandtheaqedah.AfloorpanelintheSepphorissynagogue.CourtesyofProf.ZeevWeiss,TheSepphorisExcavations,TheHebrewUniversityofJerusalem.

Again,adrawingbyWeiss(Figure4.6)clarifieswhatcanbeseeninthedamagedmosaic.

Figure4.6 Drawing,courtesyofZeevWeiss,TheSepphorisExcavations,TheHebrewUniversityofJerusalem.

Weissdescribesthetwopanelsonthisbandofthemosaicfloor:

ThetwoyouthswhomAbrahamhasleft,togetherwithanass,atthefootofthemountain,aredepictedintheleftpanel.Theass,whichhasacoloredpack-saddleonitsback,standsintheforegroundofthescene;behindhimisoneoftheyouthswhoisextendingonehandforwardandholdingaspearintheother.Thesecondyouthisseatedontheleftbeneathatreeandgripsthereinsoftheassinonehand.Thecontinuationofthestoryinthepanelontherighthasbeenlargelydestroyed.Onitsleftsideonecandiscernasparselybranchedtreetowhicharamistetheredbymeansofareddishcord;onlytheheadoftheramremainsintact.Belowit,twopairsofshoesremovedbyAbrahamandIsaacastheyapproachedthesiteofthesacrificearevisible,adetailabsentinotherdepictionsofthisepisode.Inanothersurvivingpartofthemosaicinthecenterofthepanel,onecanpossiblyidentifythebladeofaknife,andtoitsrightthe(p.145) (p.146)remainsofacloak.InthelightofthenumerousparallelsinByzantineart,itappearsthatAbrahamwasdepictedintheforegroundoftheoriginalpanel,hisbodybeingfarlargerthantheotherfiguresbesidehim.Inhisraisedrighthandheheldtheknife,whilehis

Sarah and Hagar

Page 24 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

otherhandgrabbedIsaac,perhapsonlybyhisforelock.Isaac,probablyportrayedonasmallerscale,appearednexttoAbraham,(p.147) ontheright,besideanaltarthatwaslocatedonthepanel’srightside.Theramontheleftsideofthepanelcompletestheportrayalofthebiblicalnarrative.47

ThecontentandarrangementconformtoanothermosaicdepictionoftheaqedatYitzhakfoundinthesixth-centuryBethAlphasynagogue(Figure4.7).

Figure4.7 AqedahscenefromtheBethAlphasynagogue.SixthcenturyCE.PhotocourtesyoftheCenterforJewishArtattheHebrewUniversityofJerusalem.

DistinctiveherearethetituliinHebrew,whichread(fromtheright):“Isaac,”“Abraham,”“Donotraise[yourhand]”(theangeloftheLord’swordsfromheaventoAbrahaminGenesis22:12),andthedeclarativestatement,“Hereistheram”(22:13).

IntheSepphorismosaic’saqedahscene(andalsoinBethAlpha’s)theramistiedtothetreeorbush,ratherthancaughtinitbyitshorns(asGenesis22:13relates).Themotifoftheramtetheredwitharopeisregardedasapieceof“artisticmidrash”meanttoclarifyandexpandwhattheram’sappearanceinGenesis22:13signifies:tiedupandawaitingthisevent,theram’spresencewasprovidential,notaccidental.48ThetetheredanimaltobesacrificedinIsaac’ssteadwasinthematickeepingwiththisandotherartists’interpretiveadditionsfocusedondivineoversightoftheevent—namely,thehandofGodshownatopthepaintingoftheaqedahinDuraEuropas’ssynagogue,representingthevoicefromheaven(batqol),orthehandpicturedinconjunctionwiththedivinecommandgiveninletters,observableabovetheramintheBethAlphaimage.49

(p.148) Significanceattachestoanotherdetailconcerningtheropethattetherstheram.Theartistsknewtherabbinicteachingwhich,expandinguponthedescriptionofthescapegoatsacrificedonYomKippur(Leviticus16:10),heldthattheropewascrimson—itssymbolismfoundinIsaiah1:18—“Beyoursinslikecrimson,theycanturnsnowwhite.”Bythismotif,therecouldbeputinplaceathoroughlyJewishcommentaryonwhattheramwasandsignified.TheanimalavailabletoAbrahamwasthebearerandremoverofIsrael’ssins.PassagesinboththeMishnahandtheBabylonianTalmudrefertothecrimsonthreadtiedbetweentheram’shorns—theformertextnotingthattheotherendofthewoolenropewasattachedtoarockasthescapegoatwaspushedover

Sarah and Hagar

Page 25 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

theprecipice.50

RabbinicdiscoursespertainingtotheaqedahspendconsiderabletimeonIsaac’sattitude(willingorquestioning)aboutwhatistobefallhim;bycontrasttheartistsdonotportrayIsaacasanadult,withtheresultthatgreaterinterestandcentralitybelongstothefigureoftheram.51Forexample,GenesisRabbah’sextensivecommentaryonthe“bindingofIsaac”oftentakesintoconsiderationthoughtsandemotionsofIsaacandAbrahamastheyspeaktoeachother,orofAbrahamwhenhe“pickeduptheknifetoslayhisson”(Genesis22:10).Theangels,incloseattendance,areimaginedasweepingatthesight.52

Further,apassageinGRdisclosessharpconsciousnessofIsrael’shistoricalsituation,andtheplaceoftheaqedahinJudaism’srituallife.TheramspiedbyAbrahamahar(“behindhim”)isgivenatemporaltwist,sothatR.Judancansay,“Afterallthathappened[i.e.,ourredemptionfromslaveryinEgypt,thegiftoftheTorah,etc.],Israelstillfall[s]intotheclutchesofsinand[inconsequence]become[s]thevictimofpersecution;yet[Israel]willbeultimatelyredeemedbytheram’shorn,asitsays,‘AndtheLordGodwillblowthehorn,etc.’”(Zechariah9:14).53R.Haninab.R.Isaacadds,“ThroughouttheyearIsrael[is]insin’sclutchesandledawayby[her]troubles,butonNewYeartheyshalltaketheshofarandblowonit,andeventuallytheywillberedeemedbytheram’shorn.”54RabbiHanina’sremarkletsusknowthatthestoryofthebindingofIsaacwasreadatRoshHashana,eventhoughithadearlierbeenassociatedwithPassover.55ChristianpreachingatEaster,whichtransformedtheboundIsaacintoChristcrucified,wouldhavebeenoneofthemotivationsformovingthereadingoftheaqedahtoanotherfeastintheJewishcalendar.Asnotedearlier,Melito,asecond-centurybishopinthecityofSardis,had,withstrongpolemicalforce,taughthiscongregationatEasterwhatthe“sacrificeofIsaac”signifiedforhimandhisfellow-believers.

Thesynagoguemosaicemphasizedtheanimal’sroleinthedramanotonlybyputtingthescapegoat’sredleashonhim,butalsobydepictingin(p.149) theupperregistersthemenoroth-surroundingark,Aaron’spriesthood,andthecentralimportanceofsacrificialanimals,includingbirds,intheculticlifeoftheTemple.TheritualconsciousnessofJewswasbeingevokedinthisimagery,andtherelationoftheserealitiestotheramthattookIsaac’splaceastheofferingatMoriahwasobvious.

IntheTanhumaYelammedenu,acollectionofexegesesmanyofwhichstemfromthefifththroughseventhcenturies,wefindavariationontheinterpretationsalreadymet:

Aramcaughtinthethicketbyhishorns.TheHolyOne,blessedbeHe,saidtoAbraham:“letthemblowupontheram’shorntoMe,andIwillsavethemandredeemthemfromtheirsins.”ThisiswhatDavidmeantwhenhesang:Myshieldandmyhornofsalvation,myhightower(Psalm18:3).56

Andofcourseourmosaicpanelisartinaplaceofworship,notinabook.Theliturgicalhearingandseeingoftheaqedahrecalledandconfirmedthecongregation’ssenseofidentityasGod’sbeloved—tested,protected,andredeemed.

Sarah and Hagar

Page 26 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

OnlyintheSepphorissynagogue’saqedahiconographyisfoundthefeatureoftwopairsofupturnedshoes,shedbythesmallerIsaacandbyhisfather.WeissnotesthatinGenesisRabbah56.2onemeetsthetraditionthatcloudsand“theShekhinah(DivinePresence)…dweltintheplacechosenforIsaac’ssacrifice.”57OnerecallsGod’scommandinExodus3:5thatMosesremovehissandalsatMt.Horeb,sinceitis“holyground.”AplaceofGod’spowerfulpresenceandspeechrequiresthosewhoascendittoproceedwithfeetunshod.58InthisdetailofthepairsofshoesresidestheclaimthatthismountaininMoriah,likeHoreb,isa“mountainofGod”andthattheaqedahranksinimportancewiththegivingoftheLawatSinai.ButtheimageoftheshoesleftoffattheplaceofthebindingofIsaacmaybeunderstoodtosignifymorethanproperrespectforhallowedspace.OveragainstChristianinterpretationsofthebindingofIsaacinChristologicalterms,theshoessay:thiseventofGod’spardontookplaceinourholyplace,andwasrevealedtoourancestors.

StudyingtheSepphorisaqedahsceneinthelightofChristianusesoftheimage,arthistorianHerbertKesslersuggestedthatanotherdetail—abarelynoticedomissionfromtheJewishimagery—canalsobethoughttoservethecauseofadistinctiveJewishclaimadversusChristianorum.Genesis21:6’sreportthat“AbrahamtookthewoodfortheburntofferingandputitonhissonIsaac”failstoappearintheSepphorisaqedahimage,andinotherJewishrepresentationsofthescene.ChristianexegetesandtheologiansasearlyasthesecondcenturyassertedthatthisbiblicaldetailheldthecluethatIsaac’ssacrificeanticipatedandpointedtoJesus’sbearinghis(p.150) owncrosstotheplaceofhisdeath,andChristianartistsdidshowIsaacwiththewoodinhisarms.59Kessler’sstudyofminiaturepaintingsofthesceneintheChristiantopographymanuscripts(datingfromtheelevenththroughthetwelfthcenturies,but“surelycopiedfroma6th-or7thc.Syrianmodelandhence…ratherclosetotheSepphorismosaicinplaceandtimeoforigin”)promptedhimtospeculate:

TheubiquitousnessofthedepictionofIsaacbearingthewoodinEarlyChristianart,andhenceofthetypologicalinterpretation,mayhaveinducedthemosaicist[attheSepphorissynagogue]toomitit.60

InhisBoundbytheBibleEdwardKessler,ahistorianofJewish-Christianrelations,pursuedconcernsakintothoseofHerbertKesslerbysearchingforevidenceof“exegeticalencounters”betweenJewsandChristianswhointerpretedthesacrificeofIsaac.61Earlyinhisstudyheremarkedaboutrabbis’responses“toChristianclaimsaboutownershipofScripture,”andquotedapassagefromtheTanhuma:

WhentheHolyOne,BlessedbeHe,saidtoMoses“write”(Ex.34:27),MoseswantedtowritetheMishnahaswell.HowevertheHolyOne,BlessedbeHe,foresawthatultimatelythenationsoftheworldwouldtranslatetheTorahintoGreekandwouldclaim,“WeareIsrael.”62

Kesslerobservedthatthechurchfathers,whilenotabandoningthenarrative’sstronginterestinAbraham’sfaithfulnesstoGod’scommand,gaveconcentratedattentiontoIsaacastheprototypeofJesus.Kesslerarguesthattherabbisknewandusedconcepts

Sarah and Hagar

Page 27 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

fromthisChristiantrajectoryofideas,turningthemtotheirownpurposes.ExaminingapieceofcommentaryinGenesisRabbah56.3whichlikensAbraham’splacingofthewoodonIsaacto“amanwhocarrieshiscrossonhisshoulder”—aphrasewhichwas“undoubtedlydeliberate”—Kesslernotedthatthis“isasneartoanexplicitreferencetoChristianityasweshallfindinrabbinicinterpretations”ofthistimeperiod.63Hecontinued:

RatherthanassociatingIsaacwithdeathandmartyrdom,the[rabbis’]purposewastoemphasizeIsaac’swillingnesstogiveuphislifeandsuffertorture.ThisiswhytherabbisdeliberatelyfailedtoassociateIsaacwithsuchmartyrsasAkiva….ItisIsaac’swillingnesstogiveuphislifethatprovidesthebasisforthoseinterpretations[i.e.,thosethatspokeofhisfearoftheknife]andappearstobearesponsetotheChristianteachingthatChristwaswillingtogiveuphislifeforIsrael.Therabbisarguedthatthereexistednumerousbiblicalfigures,(p.151)suchasIsaacattheAkedah,whowerewillingtogiveuptheirlivesonbehalfofIsrael.TheseexamplesshowedthatnospecialsignificanceshouldbegiventothewillingnessofChristtogiveuphislife.Inthewordsoftherabbis,‘youfindeverywherethatthepatriarchsandtheprophetsofferedtheirlivesonbehalfofIsrael.’Inotherwords,thesacrificeofJesuswasnotauniqueevent.IsaacwasusedtocounterChristologicalclaimsofuniqueness.64

WecannotleaveunexaminedtheSepphorismosaic’srepresentationoftheotherhalfofthebandshowingtheaqedah.Abraham’sservantsmayberegardedasbiblicallyrequired,butthemosaicportrayalofthemisprovocative.Thetwomenareturnedtowardeachother,withthelarger,spear-bearingmanontherightspeakingandgesturingintheother’sdirection.Istheviewerofthispanelthatadjoinsthesacrificialscenemeanttorecognizethesetwoattendants,andtohavesomeideaofwhatistranspiringbetweenthem?Familiar,presumably,wereaqedahtraditionsliketheonefoundinPirkedeRabbiEliezer31,whichgivesthenamesofthosewhoaccompaniedAbrahamandIsaactotheplaceofsacrifice:Eliezer,theservant,andIshmael,thepatriarch’sotherson.Howdidthesetwo,toldtostaybehindwiththeass,occupythemselvesduringthetimeAbrahamandIsaacwenttothemountaintopto“worship”(asAbrahamsays)?

ContentionarosebetweenEliezerandIshmael.IshmaelsaidtoEliezer:NowthatAbrahamwillofferIsaachissonforaburntoffering,kindleduponthealtar,Iamhisfirst-bornson,Iwillinherit(thepossessions)ofAbraham.Eliezerrepliedtohim,saying:Hehasalreadydrivenyououtlikeawomandivorcedfromherhusband,andhehassentyouawaytothewilderness,butIamhisservant,servinghimbydayandbynight,andIshallbetheheirofAbraham.TheHolySpiritansweredthem,sayingtothem:Neitherthisonenorthatoneshallinherit.65

TheexchangeresonateswithoneofthefundamentalthemesandplotlinesofGenesis:inheritancerightsandcompetitionbetweensonsforthese.Ishmaelseeshisopportunitytolayclaimtotherightsofafirstbornson,whileEliezer,afterlikeningIshmael’sstatustothatofarejectedwife,baseshisownclaimuponalifeofdevotedservice.Thetwomen

Sarah and Hagar

Page 28 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

personifyvaluesworthyofcomparisonandjudgmentinthisrabbinictale,butinitstellingtheSpiritofGodsummarilyendsthedebate.ThedenialofbothmenandtheirclaimsbytheSpirit“points”thelistenertothewonderthatistranspiringonthemountain.Asimilarredirectionoftheeyemusthavehappenedtoviewersofthemosaic.Butwepauseoverthebestpreservedpartofband6becauseheretheartists,nodoubtawareofsomeformofthemidrashwehaveinPRE,haveIshmaelre-enteringthe(p.152) Abrahamicstory(backfromthewildernessofParanwherehewasleftinGenesis21:20–21),armedwithaspear,ratherthanthebowwhichGodpredictshewillmaster.

Ishmael’spresenceinthesceneunderlines,withanonbiblicalimage,thisscripturenarrative’schieftheme:itistoAbraham’ssonborntoSarah(nottoHagar’sson)thatGod’scovenantapplies.Thepatriarchhasdemonstratedhisfaithfulness,atwhichpointtheangeloftheLordreiterates(andasJonLevensonemphasized,transforms)theblessing:“Becauseyouhavedonethisandnotwithheldyourson,yourfavoredone,Iwill…makeyourdescendantsasthestarsofheavenandthesandsontheseashore;andyourdescendantsshallseizethegatesoftheirfoes.Allthenationsoftheearthshallblessthemselvesbyyourdescendants,becauseyouhaveobeyedMycommand”(Genesis22:16–18).

WeconcludeourconsiderationofAbraham’sfamilyinthefiguralartofSepphorisbyturningoncemoretoSarah.ThoughtheartistsdidnotplaceSarahanywhereinthebandofthesynagoguemosaicdepictingofthebindingofIsaac,shewouldhavebeenimaginedbehindthatscenebythosewhoseeyesfellonthetwopanelstheymetastheyenteredthebuilding.AmainreasonforthiswasthatinGenesistheaccountofAbraham’snear-sacrificeofIsaacinchapter22isfollowedonlyafewverseslaterbythereportofthematriarch’sdeath.Weknowthatinsomesynagoguesthetwostories,theaqedahandthedeathofSarah,constitutedasingleTorahportiontobereadtothecongregation.66

Thejuxtapositionofthe“bindingofIsaac”andSarah’sdemisepromptedspeculationthattherewasacause-effectrelationbetweenthetwohappenings.ApassageinPirkedeRabbiEliezertellsofavisittoSarahbySammael/Satan,whoknowsof,andisfrustratedby,Abraham’sfidelitytoGodatthealtarhehaspreparedforIsaaconthemountain.DuringthetimewhenAbrahamandhissonareatthemountaininMoriah,SammaelfalselyinformsSarahthatIsaachasbeenslainandgiventoGodasaburntofferingbyherhusband.Sarahweeps,thenwailsaloudwiththreelongandthreeshortcrieslikethoseoftheshofar,anddies.67Itisthestuffoftragedy—adangerousdeceiver,workingofftothesideofdrama’smainaction,turnstothewomanwhohadoncelaughedinincredulity,andbringshertotearsofagonyandtoherdeath,evenwhiletheGodofAbrahamisrescuingherson,theirson,atcenter-stage.SympathyforSarah,evenamongthosewhotakethemoralpointabouthervulnerabilities,musthavebroughtanimageofhertomind.

ThelatterpartofthischapterhasbeenanexplorationofhowJewishmosaicartistsatSepphorischosetorepresentAbraham,Sarah,andIsaacandIshmaelbothsimilarlyanddifferentlyfromthosedescriptionswepossessinliterarytexts.Sharplyevidentintheworkoftheartistsofthe(p.153) SepphorissynagogueareindicationsthattheJewsknewthemselvestobedebatingascripturalstoryheldincommonwiththeirrivals.

Sarah and Hagar

Page 29 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

HerbertKessler’scommentsabouttheimportanceofthesynagogueanditsartilluminetheinteractionsbetweenreligiouscommunitiesthatarethisstudy’sprincipalinterest.

WhatthisnewdiscoverytellsusabouttherelationshipofJewishtoChristianartduringlateantiquity,then,isappropriatelycomplex.ItsupportsthehypothesisthatChristiansmaywellhavebasedsomeoftheirimageryonJewishmodels;butitremindsus,aswell,thattheydidsoonlywithinthepolemicsofwhoaretheChosenPeople.Moreover,itsuggeststhattheJews,inturn,deployedthesharedpictorialrepertorytostakeouttheirownclaims,particularlytheirfaiththattheircovenantwithGodhadnotbeenabrogatedbutwould,indeed,berenewed.AndwhileJewsmaywellhavetakentheleadindeployingRomanartisticformstotheirownreligiouspurposes,bythe5thc.theyseemtobefollowingtheChristians,oratleast,tobeindialoguewiththem.ThefacelessHelios[intheZodiac],theomissionofIsaaccarryingfaggots,andeventhespectacularrepresentationofAaronconsecratingtheTabernaclemightwellberesponses,notinitiatives,inadebateoverwhowasthetrueheirtoGod’sgrace,adebateconducted,inpartatleast,throughpictures.Seenfromthisperspective,viewedthroughthelensofChristianart,theSepphorismosaicappearsevenmoreclearlyanduniquelyJewish.”68

InhowmanywaysandwithwhatintendedgoalsdidearlyChristianinterpretersexplorethescripturalstoryofAbraham’stwowomenandtheirsons?Wehavealreadyhadglimpsesoftheirviewpointandtactics,butthenextchaptertreatsmorefullythemannerinwhichchurches’teachersandartistspressedtheassertionthatthestory’smeaningbecameclearonlywithandsubsequenttotheappearanceofJesusasGod’sannointedone—andSon.Twoimportantfactorswereoperativeinthechurches’appropriationofAbraham’snarrative.First,itwasAbraham,Sarah,andIsaac,andthecovenantofGodmadeavailablethroughthemandtheirposteritythatChristianslaidclaimto—notAbraham’sotherfamily.Second,originatingasasectwithinJudaism,believersthatJesuswasGod’spromisedmessiahassertedthattheyhadbecomeGod’sfavoredpeople,andobviouslyfoundthemselvesimmediately(andalsopermanently)indebate,conflict,andcontroversywiththeirparentreligion.Inthenextchapterweshallbecomeacquaintedwiththechurches’determinedeffortstoChristianizeAbraham,Sarah,andIsaac.

Notes:

(1.)AnatGilboa,ImagesoftheFeminineinRembrandt’sWork,30–31.

(2.)Wenoticetheecho,orreplay,ofthethemein12:17:“ButtheLordafflictedPharaohandhishousewithgreatplaguesbecauseofSarai,Abram’swife,”causingthePharaohtosummonAbrahamandaskhimwhyhehasdeceived(andpunished)him.

(3.)JonD.Levenson,TheDeathandResurrectionoftheBelovedSon,173–174.

(4.)See,forexample,1Chronicles29:18andExodus33:1,whereGodspeaksofthelandhe“sworetoAbraham,Isaac,andJacob”;alsoLeviticus26:42,andJeremiah33:26.

(5.)H.FreedmanandM.Simon,eds.,MidrashRabbah:Genesis,volumes1–2.

Sarah and Hagar

Page 30 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

(6.)Reflectingonthechild-bearingofthematriarchs—SarahandRebekah,notably—wereadapassagefromtheJerusalemTalmudinH.FreedmanandM.Simon,MidrashRabbah,vol.1,p.378,n.1:“Y.T.:Righteouswomen,asinthecaseofSarah,findpregnancymoredifficultofattainmentthanrubies.”

(7.)Inthisinstance,andintheoneinvolvingAbimelech,therulersgavetheirdaughterstoSarah.Thereasoning:“Betterletmydaughterbeahandmaidinthishouse[i.e.,thehouseofwomanofSarah’scharacterandGod-protectedpower]thanamistressinanotherhouse.”SeeFreedman,Simon,MidrashRabbah:Genesis,GRXLV.1,380.

(8.)GRXLV.4,381.

(9.)Ibid.Freedman,at381,n.6,givestheliteraltranslationof“byaneffortofwillpower”as“theymasteredthemselves.”

(10.)GRXLV.4,381.

(11.)GRXLV.4,382.

(12.)Ibid.

(13.)GRXLV.5,383.Explanatoryadditionsinbracketsaremyown.

(14.)GRXLV.6,384.

(15.)GRXLV.6,384.

(16.)GRXLV.7,385.

(17.)GRXLV.9,386.

(18.)Aninterpretationof16:12(NRSV:“Andheshallliveatoddswithallhiskin”)tendsinthesamedirection,likeningIshmaeltoanenemyofIsraelwho“fell”(suggestedinplaceof“dwell”onthebasisoftheaccountofIshmael’sdeathinGenesis25:17)beforeanattemptto“stretchouthishandagainsttheTemple”(GRXLV.9).ButwhichenemyofIsraelisinview—Nabatea,andtheirking,Aretes?ThearmiesofRome?SeeFreedman,Simon,MidrashRabbah:Genesis,387,n.1.

(19.)See1Chronicles5:19:“theywenttowarwiththeHagarites,”andalso1Chronicles5:10,5:20.

(20.)GeraldFriedlander,PirkedeRabbiEliezer.Kugel,Traditions,933,writesofthework:“ItsallusionstoIslamiccultureandtoArabruleoverthelandofIsraelcertainlysuggestthatthisworkwasputintoitsfinalformaftertheArabconquest—accordingtosome,aslateastheeighthorninthcenturyCE.Atthesametime,thetextpreservesmanyancienttraditions,includingquiteafewknownonlyfromthebiblicalApocryphaandPseudepigrapha.”

Sarah and Hagar

Page 31 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

(21.)PRE32,231.

(22.)Ibid.

(23.)PRE30,221–221.

(24.)GRXLV.10,387.

(25.)Ibid.

(26.)GRLII.3,462–463.

(27.)GRLIII.6,466.

(28.)GRLIII.9,468.

(29.)GRLIII.8,467.

(30.)Ibid.

(31.)AtGRLII.10,468–69,weseetherabbiselaboratinguponthegreatfeastincolorfulterms.Theconquestelementisstronglyprojected.Ogisthere,dresseddownby“theGreatOneoftheworld”forhisimpudenceincallingIsaacscrawny.GodproceedstowarnhimthathewillseemyriadsofIsaac’sdescendants,andbedoneinbythem.ReferenceismadetoNumbers21:34:“AndtheLordsaiduntoMoses:Fearhimnot;forIhavedeliveredhimintothyhand.”Thecelebratorymealwasominous.Thirty-one(ormore)ofthekingsslainbyJoshuawereallthere.Thepassage’smessageisclear:thefatesofIsrael’s(later)foesweresealedalreadyinthedaysofthefirstpatriarch.

(32.)GRLIII.11,470.

(33.)Ibid.

(34.)GRLIII.12,471,n.1.

(35.)GRLIII.13,472.IshmaelwasbornfourteenyearsbeforeIsaac.SeeGenesis16:14and21:5.

(36.)GRLIII.13,472.

(37.)GRLIII.13,473.

(38.)GRLIII.14,474.

(39.)GRLIII.15,474.

(40.)Manytomeshavebeendevotedtothetopic,butseethebriefessay,“RepresentationalArt,”366–371.RachelHachlili’s“SynagoguesintheLandofIsrael,”113,quotes“anAramaicparaphraseinTargumPseudo-JonathanofLeviticus26:1,which

Sarah and Hagar

Page 32 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

modifiestheBible’ssternprohibitionagainstmakingandbowingdownto‘carvedstone’:

...norshallyouplaceafiguredstoneinyourlandtobowdownuponit.Butapavementfiguredwithimagesandlikenessesyoumaymakeonthefloorofyoursynagogue[s].Anddonotbowdown[idolatrously]toit,forIamtheLordyourGod.

(41.)Ze’evWeissandEhudNetzer,PromiseandRedemption.SeealsoZe’evWeiss,TheSepphorisSynagogue,360pages+211illustrations.

(42.)SeeSethSchwartz,ImperialismandJewishSociety,142–145,[203]–206.ChristianbuildingsinSepphorisaredescribedinZe’evWeissandEhudNetzer,“SepphorisintheByzantinePeriod,”81–89.Theauthorscomment(85):“Theproximityofprivateandpublicbuildings,bothontheacropolisandinlowerSepphorisisrathersurprising,asthisphenomenonhasnotbeenencounteredelsewhereinPalestine.InbothRomanandByzantineSepphorislargeandornatemansionswerebuiltclosetosimplehomes,afeaturenotedthroughoutthecity.Moreover,aclearandrigiddivisionintoneighborhoodsaccordingtosocial,religious,oreconomicstatuscannotbediscerned.”

(43.)ThequotationisfromZe’evWeiss,“TheSepphorisSynagogueMosaicandtheRoleofTalmudicLiteratureinItsIconographicalStudy,”20–21.

(44.)EssaysinLevineandWeiss,eds.,FromDuratoSepphoris,engageinvariouswaystheinterpretationadvancedbyWeissandNetzerinPromiseandRedemption.Achallengingcritiqueandre-evaluationappearsinSchartz,Imperialism,248–259.

(45.)Ze’evWeiss,“TheSepphorisSynagogueMosaic,”3–24.

(46.)RobinM.Jensen,FacetoFace,120:“Theequalityofthethree[visitors]andtheirfunctionassymbolsofthethreedistinctpersons[ofGod]withonesharednaturemaybeintentionallyexpressedbythecomposition.Here,however,theiconographyalsopointstotheimportanceoftheeucharisticofferingmadedirectlybelow,atthealtarinthecenterofthepresbyterium.”

(47.)Weiss,“TheSepphorisSynagogueMosaic,”23.

(48.)SeeEdwardKessler,“ArtLeadingtheStory,”67–68.

(49.)ThehandofGodfirstappearsinJewishartinjustthisscenepaintednexttotheDuraEuropossynagogue’sTorahshrine,thoughinthatinstance,theram’shorns,entangledinatree,holdhiminplace;thereisnoropetether.

(50.)MishnahYoma5.6.2–6,andTalmudYoma39a,b.

(51.)Seetheprovocativetreatmentofthisquestionoftheramtiedto,ratherthancaughtupinthetree’sbranches,inKessler,“ArtLeadingtheStory,”73–81,esp.78–81.Kessler’sconcludingsentencesarethese:“Artistsalsoexpandedtheroleoftheram.The

Sarah and Hagar

Page 33 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

ramintheBiblicalstoryisonthemountaininthelandofMoriahbychanceandplaysaminorroleinRabbinicliterature,whereasinartisticmidrashtheramisquitedifferentthroughitssignificantsizeandprominentplacement.”

(52.)GRLVI.5,495.

(53.)GRLVI.9,498.

(54.)GRLVI.9,499.

(55.)SeeLevenson,DeathandResurrection,[173]–199.

(56.)ThetranslationisfromSamuelA.Berman,MidrashTanhuma-Yelammedenu,148–149.Forthehistoryofthetext,seeMarcBregman,TheTanhuma-YelammedenuLiterature.

(57.)LevineandWeiss,FromDuratoSepphoris,27.

(58.)SeeJosephYahalom,“TheSepphorisSynagogueMosaicandItsStory,”84,forhiscommentsabout“barefootworshipandthesanctuary.”

(59.)SeeClementofAlexandria,TheInstructor(Paedagogus)1.5.23,andOrigen,GenesisHomilyVIII.6.Origen,whileinterpretingthemesfromHebrews5–10forhisthird-centurycongregation,proclaimed:“ThatIsaachimselfcarriesonhimself‘thewoodfortheholocaust’isafigurebecauseChristalso‘himselfcarriedhisowncross,’[cf.John19:17]andyettocarry‘thewoodfortheholocaust’isthedutyofapriest.Hehimself,therefore,becomesbothvictimandpriest.”ThetranslationisfromRonaldE.Heine,Origen,140–41.

(60.)HebertKessler,“TheSepphorisMosaicandChristianArt,”66,70.Kessleradds(70):“thetextaccompanyingtheminiaturesdepictingthesacrificeofIsaacinthemanuscriptsoftheChristiantopographyprovidesatypologicalreadingoftheHebrewBible;IsaaccarryingthefirewoodonhisshouldersonthewaytohissacrificialdeathistakenasatypeofJesuscarryingthecrosstoGolgotha,‘AbrahamleadinghissontosacrificeononeofthemountainssymbolizesthemysteryofthepassionandresurrectionofChrist’.Anysuchinterpretationis,ofcourse,precludedinasynagoguefloormosaic.”

(61.)EdwardKessler,BoundbytheBible.

(62.)EdwardKessler,BoundbytheBible,29.

(63.)Ibid.,113.

(64.)Ibid.,115,116.ItisbecauseofattentiontothequestionofIsaac’swillingnessthatrabbinicaltexts(unlikeJewishartisticrepresentations)pointtohismaturity(thirty-sevenyearsofage,twiceinGR).Kessler,110–113,proposesthatthisemphasisservesasacounteragainstsomeChristianarguments(likethatofMelitoofSardis)thatIsaac,as

Sarah and Hagar

Page 34 of 34

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofDenver; date: 27 October 2015

antetype,waspreparatoryand“young”inrelationtoChristcrucified,whoactualizedwhatIsaachadonlytypified.Thiscompetitiveinterplaybetweeninterpretationsis,Kesslerinsists,anothercaseof“exegeticalencounter”betweenJewishandChristianinterpretersofGenesis22:1–19.

(65.)PRE31,224,trans.slightlyaltered.JosephYahalom,“TheSepphorisSynagogueMosaicanditsstory,”inLevineandWeiss,eds.,FromDuratoSepphoris,87,callsattentiontothisexchangebetweenEliezerandIshmaelinitsseveralversionsinPirked’RabbiEliezerandinthelaterMidrashHagadolandMidrashVaYosha,andoffershisowncommentaryonthetwoastheyappearintheSepphorismosaic:“Thepictureinthemosaic…whichshowsEliezerholding,orwaving,theropethatistiedtotheass,seemstosupporthisclaimtoAbraham’spossessions.(Hewas,inotherwords,aloyalservant.)Ontheotherhand,Ishmael’sspear,theweaponofwarusedinthedesert,indicatesaclearthreattothefaithfulservant.”

(66.)SeeAvigdorShinan,“SynagoguesintheLandofIsrael,”130–152.

(67.)PRE32,233–234.

(68.)Kessler,“TheSepphorisMosaicandChristianArt,”72.