16
UNIVERSITY RESPONSES TO FORCED MARRIAGE AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN RENATE KLEIN & MARILYN FREEMAN LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY SRHE SEMINAR 8 MAY 2014

UNIVERSITY RESPONSES TO FORCED MARRIAGE AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

UNIVERSITY RESPONSES TO FORCED MARRIAGE AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN. RENATE KLEIN & MARILYN FREEMAN LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY SRHE SEMINAR 8 MAY 2014. Case Examples. Student is exploited by relatives on whose financial support she depends - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

UNIVERSITY RESPONSES TO FORCED MARRIAGE AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

RENATE KLEIN & MARILYN FREEMAN

LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY

SRHE SEMINAR 8 MAY 2014

CASE EXAMPLES

• Student is exploited by relatives on whose financial support she depends

• Student is physically abused by father of her child• Parents/family support student’s studies on

condition that she get married to man of family’s choice when studies completed

• Student has experienced abuse in childhood, and in multiple abusive relationships as adult

• Student is physically abused in context of FM

Freeman & Klein, 2012

WHY SHOULD UNIVERSITIES BOTHER?

Extent of problem

Disproportionate impact on female students

Legal duty to end discrimination

Improve access & participation

PREVALENCE

National Union of Students, 2010

PREVALENCE

Stenning et al., 2012

FORCED MARRIAGE UNIT CASE LOADS

2012 1485 cases

82% female, 18% male

71% 16-25 years old

2013 1302 cases

82% female, 18% male

73% 16-25 years old

www.gov.uk/forced-marriage

IMPACTSHEALTH SOCIAL ACADEMIC

•Depression•Eating disorders•Alcohol or drug use•Suicidal thoughts

•Scared of leaving house•Loss of confidence•Difficulty trusting other people

•Poor performance•Avoiding courses•Delay of progress•Disruption of studies

Feltes et al., 2012

DO UNIVERSITIES KNOW?

Stenning et al., 2012

REASONS FOR LOW FORMAL REPORTING

• Violation seen as “normal”

• Fear not to be believed

• Fear that authorities will ridicule or dismiss

• Fear that authorities will take inappropriate action

• Not wanting to upset friends/family

• Unwilling to bring charges against family

Klein, 2012

RED FLAGS IN ACADEMIA

Failing academically

• Failing a paper or exam• Sudden change in habits, not attending classes anymore

or attending too much• Absence from classes

Requesting leave from classes to go home for an “arranged” marriage

Family or relationship “problems”

Crisis point

HOW DO UNIVERSITIES RESPOND?

Research Methodology:

Semi-structured interviews• 24 staff at 9 different PSE institutions• 6 staff at 6 different NGOs• 5 police officers from 5 different PDs

Keyword searches on websites- 16 HE websites, 40 FE websites

Freeman & Klein, 2013

KEY FINDINGS• Response is up to individual staff members

Most highly motivated, well-meaning

Some well informed, specialist VAW training

Many without specialist VAW training

• No systematic, institutional response

• Problematic assumptions

About disclosure

About “generic” interventions

Freeman & Klein, 2013

PROBLEMATIC ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT DISCLOSURE

No disclosure means no problem?

Student will say things in a way staff member expects?

Distinction between arranged and forced marriage is clear?

Somebody else at university is first port of call?

Klein, 2012; Ullman, 2010

PROBLEMATIC ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT INTERVENTIONS

Talking to parents helps?

Generic counseling skills are sufficient?

One-stop complaint processes are helpful?

Non-specialist policies (e.g., anti-bullying) are sufficient?

COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE

Core responsibility for cultural transformation at institution

Specialist institutional policy with adequate staff training

Awareness campaign: campus culture and resources

• Statement and action against abuse-conducive contexts• Information about specialist resources• Opportunities for disclosure (being clear on confidentiality)• Supporting students’ informed decisions

Participation in multi-agency working

Periodical impact evaluation

PRESENTER CONTACT

[email protected]