42
UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN

EARTHQUAKES

Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia,

USA 

Page 2: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

BACKGROUND

Page 3: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO HORIZONTAL GROUND SHAKING

EARTHQUAKESEARTHQUAKES

SOIL AMPLIFICATION

PERMANENT DISPLACEMENT (SURFACE FAULTING & GROUND

FAILURE)

IRREGULARITIES IN ELEVATION AND PLAN

TSUNAMI WAVE RUNUP

LACK OF DETAILING AND POOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

LACK OF ATTENTION TO NON-STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

CAUSES OF DAMAGE

CAUSES OF DAMAGE

CASE HISTORIESCASE HISTORIES

Page 4: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

BUILDING ELEVATIONS

• FACT: Unnecessary FACT: Unnecessary horizontal and vertical horizontal and vertical changes in symmetry, mass, changes in symmetry, mass, and stiffness will increase a and stiffness will increase a building’s vulnerability to building’s vulnerability to strong ground shakingstrong ground shaking. .

Page 5: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

FACT: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS ARE LIKELY TO BE MORE

VULNERABLE IN AN EARTHQUAKE

Page 6: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

A CHURCH: REYKJAVEK, ICELAND

Page 7: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

ATLANTIS HOTEL: DUBAI, UAE

Page 8: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

EMP MUSEUM: SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (USA)

Page 9: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

A LIBRARY: KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI (USA)

Page 10: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

A HOTEL: PYONGYANG, NORTH KOREA

Page 11: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

“THE GHERKIN,” AN OFFICE BUILDING: LONDON

Page 12: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

SKY CITY (2,749 FEET--NOT YET FINISHED) : CHANGSHA, CHINA

Page 13: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

REGULARITY IN A BUILDING’S ELEVATION REDUCES ITS

VULNERABILITY TO STRONG GROUND SHAKING

Page 14: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

1-21-2

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

None, if attention given to foundation and non-structural elements. Rocking may crack foundation and structure. X-Cracks around windows.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

BoxBox

Page 15: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

DAMAGED HOUSE:CHINA

Page 16: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

ASYMMETRY AND LATERAL CHANGES: CHINA

Page 17: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

11

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

None, if attention given to foundation and non structural elements. Rocking may crack foundation.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

PyramidPyramid

Page 18: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

4 - 64 - 6

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Top heavy, asymmetrical structure may fail at foundation due to rocking and overturning.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

Inverted PyramidInverted Pyramid

Page 19: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

5 - 65 - 6

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Asymmetry and horizontal transition in mass, stiffness and damping may cause failure where lower and upper structures join.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

““L”- Shaped L”- Shaped BuildingBuilding

Page 20: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

3 - 53 - 5

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Vertical transition and asymmetry may cause failure where lower part is attached to tower.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

Inverted “T”Inverted “T”

Page 21: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

2 - 32 - 3

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Vertical transition in mass, stiffness, and damping may cause failure at foundation and transition points at each floor.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

Multiple SetbacksMultiple Setbacks

Page 22: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

4 - 54 - 5

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Top heavy asymmetrical structure may fail at transition point and foundation due to rocking and overturning.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

OverhangOverhang

Page 23: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

6 - 76 - 7

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Horizontal and vertical transitions in mass and stiffness may cause failure on soft side of first floor; rocking and overturning.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

Partial “Soft” StoryPartial “Soft” Story

Page 24: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

8 - 108 - 10

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Vertical transitions in mass and stiffness may cause failure on transition points between first and second floors.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

““Soft” First FloorSoft” First Floor

Page 25: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

THE TYPICAL SOFT-STOREY BUILDING IN TURKEY

THE TYPICAL SOFT-STOREY BUILDING IN TURKEY

Page 26: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

9 - 109 - 10

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Horizontal and vertical transitions in mass and stiffness may cause failure at transition points and possible overturning.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

Combination of Combination of “Soft” Story and “Soft” Story and

OverhangOverhang

Page 27: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

1010

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Horizontal transition in stiffness of soft story columns may cause failure of columns at foundation and/or contact points with structure.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

Building on Building on Sloping GroundSloping Ground

Page 28: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

SOFT STORY BUILDING ON

SLOPING GROUND: CHINA TRIGGERED LANDSLIDES

Page 29: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

8 - 98 - 9

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Horizontal and vertical transition in stiffness and cause failure of individual members.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

Theaters and Theaters and Assembly HallsAssembly Halls

Page 30: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

9 - 109 - 10

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL FAILURE

Horizontal and vertical transition in mass and stiffness may cause failure columns.

BUILDING ELEVATION

BUILDING ELEVATION

Sports StadiumsSports Stadiums

Page 31: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

SIMPLICITY IN A BUILDING’S FLOOR PLAN REDUCES ITS

VULNERABILITY TO STRONG GROUND SHAKING

Page 32: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

BUILDING FLOOR PLANS

• FACTFACT: CHANGING FLOOR PLANS FROM SIMPLE TO COMPLEX AND FROM SYMMETRICAL TO ASYMMETRICAL WILL INCREASE A BUILDING’S VULNERABILITY TO GROUND SHAKING.

Page 33: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

11

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

None, if symmetrical layout maintained.

FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN

BoxBox

Page 34: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

2 - 42 - 4

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

Differences in length and width will cause differences in strength, differential movement, and possible overturning.

FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN

RectangleRectangle

Page 35: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

2 - 42 - 4

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

Asymmetry will cause torsion and enhance damage at corners.

FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN

Street CornerStreet Corner

Page 36: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

5 - 105 - 10

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

Asymmetry will enhance damage at corner regions.

FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN

““U” - ShapeU” - Shape

Page 37: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

44

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

Open space in center reduces resistance and enhance damage at corner regions.

FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN

Courtyard in CornerCourtyard in Corner

Page 38: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

88

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

Asymmetry will cause torsion and enhance damage at intersection and corners.

FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN

““L” - ShapeL” - Shape

Page 39: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

TORSION: CHINA

Page 40: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

5 - 75 - 7

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

Directional variation in stiffness will enhance damage at intersecting corner.

FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN

““H” - ShapeH” - Shape

Page 41: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

8 - 108 - 10

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

Asymmetry and directional variation in stiffness will enhance torsion and damage at intersecting.

FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN

Complex Floor PlanComplex Floor Plan

Page 42: UNUSUAL BUILDINGS AND VULNERABILITY IN EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

RELATIVE VULERABILITY

[1 (Best) to 10 (Worst)]

5- 95- 9

ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS

Asymmetry and irregularities will cause torsion and enhance damage along boundaries and at corners.

FLOOR PLANFLOOR PLAN

Curved PlanCurved Plan