Upload
jacob-patterson
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Up-to-Date Review
A Review of 2007 Breast Cancer Highlights
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhDAssistant Professor of Medicine
Dana Farber Cancer InstituteBreast Oncology centerHarvard Medical School
Boston, MA
Highlights
• New agents for refractory disease
– Ixabepilone
– Lapatinib
• Chemotherapy in node-positive disease?
– CALGB 9344
– Oncotype DX®
Ixabepilone: Epothilone B Analog
• A new class of antineoplastics: the epothilones
• Epothilones bind to microtubules resulting in polymerization and apoptosis
• Novel microtubule-stabilizing agent with tubulin-binding mode distinct from other agents
S.cellulosum Epothilone B Ixabepilone
Lee JJ, Swain SM. Semin Oncol. 2005;32(suppl 7):S22-S26Kamath K et al. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:12902-12907Mozzetti S et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:298-305.
Ixabepilone: Preclinical Activity
Days Post-Tumor Implant
Pat-21 Xenograft
Lee FY et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:1429-1437.
Control
Paclitaxel
Ixabepilone
1000
40 70 100 130 160
Med
ian
Tu
mo
r W
eig
ht
(mg
)
Paclitaxel Rx (36 mg/kg/inj)
Ixabepilone Rx (10 mg/kg/inj)
100
10
N = 8
Ixabepilone: Combination Preclinical Activity
(P=0.0001)
Days post-tumor implantGEO Human Colon Carcinoma
Me
dia
n t
um
or
we
igh
t (m
g)
Control IxabepiloneCapecitabine Combination
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
10 30 50
250 mg/kg (MTD)
10 mg/kg (MTD)
Capecitabine Synergy
Bevacizumab Synergy
Rx
20 40 601
10
100
1000
10000
Me
dia
n t
um
or
we
igh
t (m
g)
Control
Trastuzumab
Ixabepilone
Combined
Trastuzumab Synergy
Days Post-Tumor ImplantHER2 receptor positive KPL4
Human breast Carcinoma Xenografts
Data on file. Bristol Myers Squibb Company; Princeton, NJ
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
control
Ixabepilone, 6mg/kg
bevacizumab, 4mg/kg
Ixabepilone, 6mg/kg+
bevacizumab, 4mg/kg
Med
ian
tu
mo
r w
eig
ht
(mg
)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
controlpaclitaxel24mg/kg
bevacizumab 4mg/kg
paclitaxel 24mg/kg+
bevacizumab 4mg/kg
Med
ian
tu
mo
r w
eig
ht
(mg
)
Days post-tumor implantGEO Human Colon Carcinoma
Days post-tumor implantGEO Human Colon Carcinoma
Trastuzumab, 10 mg/kgIxabepilone 4 mg/kg
Trastuzumab, 10 mg/kg+
Ixabepilone, 4 mg/kg
Ixabepilone in MBC: Summary of Single-agent Phase II Trials
1. Roche H et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;23:3415-3420.
2. Denduluri N et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;23:3421-3427.
3. Low et al. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2726–2734
4. Thomas E et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;23:3399-3406
7783
5753
4257
22 12
35
26
3541
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
After Adjuvant Anthracycline1 (40 mg/m2 q3w)
Taxane Naïve MBC2
(6 mg/m2 daily X 5)
Taxane Pretreated MBC3
(6 mg/m2 daily X 5)Taxane Resistant MBC4
(40 mg/m2 q3w)
Per
cen
tag
e (%
)
SD
RR
N=65 N=23 N=37 N=49
Ixabepilone(40 mg/m2 IV over 3 hr d1 q3wk)
+Capecitabine
(2000 mg/m2/day PO 2 divided doses d1-d14 q3wk)
N = 375
Capecitabine(2500 mg/m2/day PO 2 divided doses
d1-d14 q3wk)N = 377
Metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer
RESISTANT to anthracyclines
and taxanesN = 752
Stratification •Visceral metastases•Prior chemotherapy for MBC
Study Design: International, Randomized, Open-label, Phase III Trial
•Anthracycline resistance•Study site
Resistance to Prior Therapy
Strict definition: patients whose tumors rapidly progressed in the adjuvant or metastatic setting after receiving both anthracyclines and taxanes
Setting Anthracycline Taxane
Metastatic ≤3 months of last dose ≤4 months of last dose
Neo/adjuvant ≤6 months of last dose ≤12 months of last dose
Any
Minimum cumulative dose
Doxorubicin: 240 mg/m2
Epirubicin: 360 mg/m2
Phase III Study 046: Key Baseline Patient Demographics
Characteristic
Patients, no. (%)
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine
(N=375)
Capecitabine
(N=377)
Median age (min-max) in years 53 (25-76) 52 (25-79)
Visceral disease (liver and/or lung) 316 (84) 315 (84)
No. of disease sites: < 2 sites ≥ 2 sites
43 (11)
332 (89)
36 (10)
341 (90)
ER-, PR-, HER2- 91 (24) 96 (26)
Prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy 282 (75) 285 (76)
No. of prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease
0
1
2
3
27 (7)
179 (48)
152 (41)
17 (5)
33 (9)
184 (49)
138 (37)
22 (6)
Anthracycline resistance 164 (44) 165 (44)
Taxane resistance
Neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting
Metastatic setting
PD as best response to prior taxanes
40 (11)
327 (87)
144 (38)
44 (12)
319 (85)
130 (35)
Vahdat L, et al. Proc ASCO. 2007;25:18s Abstract 1006; Data on file. Bristol Myers Squibb Company; Princeton, NJ; (ixabepilone) [package insert]. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Princeton, NJ; 2007.
Phase III Study 046: Progression-free SurvivalP
RO
PO
RT
ION
NO
T P
RO
GR
ES
SE
D
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
MONTHS
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32
Median 95% CI
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine 5.7 mo (4.8–6.7)
Capecitabine 4.1 mo (3.1–4.3)
HR: 0.69 (0.58–0.83)
P<0.0001
(ixabepilone) [package insert]. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Princeton, NJ; 2007.
Phase III Study 046:Non-hematologic Toxicities
Adverse Events
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine, % (N=369)
Capecitabine, % (N=368)
Total G3 G4 Total G3 G4
Non-Hematologic Toxicities
Peripheral sensory neuropathy a,b,c 65 20 <1 16 0 0
Hand-foot syndrome 64 18 0 63 17 0
Fatigue/asthenia 60 15 <1 29 4 <1
Diarrhea 44 6 0 39 8 0.5
Myalgia/arthralgia 39 8 0 5 <1 0
Stomatitis/mucositis 31 4 0.5 20 3 0
a Grade 3/4 Peripheral Neuropathy 23% (21% sensory and/or 5% motor)bMedian time to improvement of Grade 3/4 neuropathy is 6.0 weekscImprovement was defined as a return of symptoms to baseline levels or to grade 1
Vahdat L, et al. Proc ASCO. 2007;25:18s Abstract 1006
Data on file. Bristol Myers Squibb Company; Princeton, NJ; (ixabepilone) [package insert]. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Princeton, NJ; 2007.
Ixabepilone Grade 3/4 Neuropathy Rates in Breast Cancer
3
0
3
20
12
21
14
0
5
10
15
20
25
Prior Therapy Neoadjuvant Taxane Naïve MBC
Taxane Pretreated
MBC
Anthracycline Pretreated
MBC
Taxane Resistant
MBC
Anthracycline and Taxane
resistant MBC
Anthracycline, Taxane, and Capecitabine
resistant MBC
Treatment schedule
40 mg/m2 q3w x 4 cycles
6 mg/m2 daily x 5
6 mg/m2 daily x 5
40 mg/m2 q3w 40 mg/m2 q3w 40 mg/m2 q3w
+ capecitabine
40 mg/m2 q3w
Median # of cycles
4 8 4 6 3 5 4
Roche H et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;23:3415-3420; Denduluri N et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;23:3421-3427; Low et al. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2726–2734; Thomas E et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;23:3399-3406; Baselga J et al Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;94(Suppl 1):S31:abstr 305; Vahdat L, et al. Proc ASCO. 2007;25:18s Abstract 1006; Perez E, et
al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;23: 3407-3414.
Gra
de
3/4
Neu
rop
ath
y R
ates
(%
)
Phase III Study 046:Hematologic Toxicities
Adverse Events
Ixabepilone + Capecitabine, % (N=369)
Capecitabine, % (N=368)
Total G3 G4 Total G3 G4
Hematologic Toxicities
Neutropenia 79 32 36 31 9 2
Febrile Neutropenia 5 4 1 1 0.5 0.5
Leukopenia 90 41 16 36 5 1
Anemia 84 8 2 6 4 1
Thrombocytopenia 44 5 3 6 2 2
Vahdat L, et al. Proc ASCO. 2007;25:18s Abstract 1006; Data on file. Bristol Myers Squibb Company; Princeton, NJ; (ixabepilone) [package insert]. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Princeton, NJ; 2007.
Highlights
• New agents for refractory disease
– Ixabepilone
– Lapatinib
• Chemotherapy in node-positive disease?
– CALGB 9344
– Oncotype DX®
Burstein, H. J. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1652-1654
Interactions Between Trastuzumab and Tumor Cells
Lapatinib Targets HER2
Konecny et al, Cancer Res 2006; 66(3): 1630-9)
Phase I Results Summary
• Steady-state achieved in 6-7 days in cancer patients (Studies EGF10003 and EGF10004)1,2
• Serum concentrations were 90% of the in vitro IC503
• Dose proportionality at steady state (500 – 1600 mg/day)1
– Tmax = 3 – 6 hours post-dose
– Cmax = 1.02 – 2.13 g/mL
– AUC = 13.9 – 29.4 g/mL-h
• Effective half-life = 24 hours, once-daily dosing should be possible1,2
1. Burris HA et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23(23):5305-5313.
2. Burris HA et al. Oncologist. 2004;(9 suppl 3):10-15.
3. Kim TE, Murren JR. Drugs. 2003;6:886-893.
Phase I Results Summary
• Clinical activity observed in heavily pretreated patients in EGF10003 (43 patients)1
– 1 CR in head and neck cancer
– 1 minor response
– Stable disease for up to 13 months in remainder
• Clinical activity observed in heavily pretreated patients in EGF100042
– 4 PR in trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer
– Prolonged SD in 10 patients
• Well tolerated: most common AEs were rash, diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue1,2
1. Burris HA et al. Oncologist. 2004;(9 suppl 3):10-15.
2. Burris HA et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23(23):5305-5313.
EGF20002/EGF20008: Designs
EGF20002 EGF20008
Location North America Global
Planned Accrual 80200
A = 120, B = 80
Status Completed Completed
Treatment 1500 mg QD* 1500 mg QD
Tumor HER2 Status
3+ or FISH A: 3+ or FISH
B: negative
Prior Therapy
Trastuzumab Yes Yes: cohort A
Chemo 1-2 Prior A, T, & C
*first 13 patients treated at 1250 mg QD
Phase II Trial of Lapatinib for Brain Metastases in Patients with HER2-positive
Breast Cancer
NU Lin, LA Carey, MC Liu, J Younger, SE Come, M Ewend, E Bullitt, A van den Abbeele, JT Yap, G Harris, X Li, R Gelman, A Crawford, E Kasparian, HJ Burstein, D
Kirsch, F Hochberg, EP Winer
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Georgetown University
Best CNS Response (RECIST)(N=39)
Complete Response (CR) 0Partial Response (PR) 1 (2.5%)
Baseline Week 8
Taxane +Trastuzumab
Disease Progression
MD Anderson, 2001 SWOG, 2003
Caveat:trastuzumab t1/2
1-4 weeks
Test of Principle: Should Trastuzumab be Continued
After Disease Progression?
Vinorelbine
Vinorelbine +Trastuzumab
Study Design
• Progressive, HER2+ MBC or LABC
• Previously treated with anthracycline, taxane and trastuzumab*
• No prior capecitabine
Lapatinib 1250 mg po qd continuously +
Capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/d po days 1-14 q 3 wk
Capecitabine 2500 mg/m2/d po days 1-14 q 3 wk
Patients on treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity, then followed for survival
Stratification:• Disease sites• Stage of disease
RANDOMIZE
*Trastuzumab must have been administered for metastatic disease
N=528
Geyer CE et al. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2733-2743
Independent Radiology Review Investigator Reported Outcomes
Progression-free Survival
Geyer CE et al. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2733-2743
Overall Survival
Geyer CE et al. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2733-2743
Efficacy End Points in the Intention-to-Treat Population
Geyer CE et al. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2733-2743
Adverse Events
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2007
• German collaborative group study (Gunter von Minckwitz)
RANDOMIZED
Capecitabine
Capecitabine +
Trastuzumab
Trastuzumab-treated patients
Higher response rate and longer TTP resulted with ongoing anti-HER2 therapy
with trastuzumab
Highlights
• New agents for refractory disease
– Ixabepilone
– Lapatinib
• Chemotherapy in node-positive disease?
– CALGB 9344
– Oncotype DX®
Adjuvant Treatment for a 2 x 2 Marker Model of Breast Cancer
ER + ER -
HER2+
trastuzumab
chemo
endocrine
trastuzumab
chemo
HER2 - endocrine
± chemochemo
In the Beginning, There Was ACAnd Then There Was CALGB 9344
CALGB 9344
A dose Sequential T
DFS
OS
De Laurentiis, M. et al. J Clin Oncol; 26:44-53 2008
Meta-analysis of Disease-free Survival (DFS)
De Laurentiis, M. et al. J Clin Oncol; 26:44-53 2008
Meta-analysis of Disease-free Survival (DFS) According To Estrogen Receptor (ER) Status
De Laurentiis, M. et al. J Clin Oncol; 26:44-53 2008
Meta-analysis of Disease-free Survival (DFS) According to HER-2 Status
De Laurentiis, M. et al. J Clin Oncol; 26:44-53 2008
Pooled DFS (A) and OS (B) Curves for Studies Included in the Meta-analysis
Hayes D et al. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1496-1506
Disease-free Survival Among Patients Treated with or without Paclitaxel According to Estrogen-Receptor
Status and HER2 Expression
Sorlie, et al. PNAS 2001
ER neg ER pos
HER2+Basaloid
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
E R E xpression (re la tive to re f genes; log2)
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
HE
R2
Exp
ress
ion
(re
lativ
e to
re
f ge
nes;
log2
) HER2+
ER+HER2-(luminal?)
Triple Neg*
*>94% of these cases are PR-;rarely strongly PR+
• First Cohort - n = 10,618
Oncotype DX® Results:Distribution of Quantitative ER and HER2
Current Recommendations for Chemotherapy for ER+ Breast Cancer• NIH Consensus Conference 2000
– LN+
– LN – if T > 1 cm
• NCCN 2006
– LN+
– LN – if T > 1cm
– Consider for LN – if 0.6 to 1.0 cm
• St. Gallen 2005 (endocrine responsive)
– LN + (> 4 LN if HER2 negative, any if HER2+)
– Consider for LN – if: T > 2 cm, or grade 2-3, or LVI+, or HER2+, or age < 35 years
Candidate Gene SelectionFrom ~40,000 genes
*Sources include: 1) Sotiriou et al., Breast Cancer Res Treat 4:R3, 20022) Scherf et al., Nat Genetics 24:236-44, 20003) Lamendola et al., Cancer Res 63:2200-5, 20034) Chang et al., Lancet 362:362-9, 20035) Staunton et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:10787-92, 2001
Cancer Literature
Microarray
Data*
Gen
omic
Dat
abas
e
s
384 cancer-related genes*
Molecu
lar
Biology
PROLIFERATIONKi-67
STK15Survivin
Cyclin B1MYBL2
ESTROGENERPR
Bcl2SCUBE2
INVASIONStromolysin 3Cathepsin L2HER2
GRB7HER2
BAG1
GSTM1
REFERENCEBeta-actinGAPDHRPLPO
GUSTFRC
CD68
• Best RT-PCR performance and most robust predictions
16 Cancer and 5 Reference Genes
Genomic Health-NSABP B-14 Prospective Clinical Validation Study
• Objective
– Validate Recurrence Score as predictor of distant recurrence in N-, ER+, Tamoxifen-treated patients
• Design
– Pre-specified 21 gene assay, algorithm, endpoints, analysis plan
– Blinded laboratory analysis of three 10 micron tumor block sections
Randomized
Registered
Placebo--Not Eligible
Tamoxifen--Eligible
Tamoxifen--Eligible
B-14
10 year DRFS = 85%
DRFS - All 668 Patients
B14-Results
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Years
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
DR
FS
Oncotype DX®
Validation Study B-14
Paik et al. NEJM 2004;351:2817
Low Risk (RS<18)N
171142
0 2 4 6 8 14 16
Years
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DR
FS
PlaceboTamoxifen
1210
Int Risk (RS 18-30)N8569
0 2 4 6 8 14 16
Years
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DR
FS
PlaceboTamoxifen
1210
High Risk (RS≥31)N9979
0 2 4 6 8 14 16
Years
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
DR
FS
PlaceboTamoxifen
1210
Benefit from Tamoxifen in the NSABP B14by Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score
Chemotherapy Response and Oncotype DX®
Design
Objective: Determine the magnitude of the chemotherapy benefit as a function of 21 gene Recurrence Score assay
Randomized
Tam + MF
Tam + CMF
Tam
NSABP Study B-20
B-20 Results
• Tam vs Tam + Chemo – All
All Patients N Events
Tam + Chemo 424 33
Tam 227 31
P = 0.02
0 2 4 6 8 10 12Years
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
DR
FS
RS < 18 “low”
RS 18-30 “int”
RS > 30 “high”0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Years
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0D
RF
S
High Risk Patients (RS 31) Tam + Chemo Tam
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Years
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
DR
FS
Int Risk (RS 18 - 30) Tam + Chemo Tam
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Years
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
DR
FS
Low Risk Patients (RS < 18) Tam + Chemo Tam
Phase III SWOG 8814 (TBCI 0100) Postmenopausal, N+, ER+
N = 1477
tam x 5 yrs CAF x 6, then tam
CAF x 6, with concurrent tam
Albain, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005
(N = 361)(N= 550) (N = 566)
RANDOMIZE
Superior Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS) over 10 Years
0.0
00
.25
0.5
00
.75
1.0
0
Dis
ea
se
-fre
e s
urv
iva
l
0 2 4 6 8 10
Years since registration
Tamoxifen (N=148, 63 events)CAF-T (N=219, 74 events)
Stratified log-rank P-value = 0.054 at 10 years (adjusted for nodal status)
Disease-Free Survival
Outcomes in RS Subset Mirror Those Reported in Main Trial: Superiority of CAF-T
SWOG 8814/TBCI 0100 21-Gene Recurrence Score is Prognostic for DFS and
OS in Tamoxifen Arm
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
Ove
rall
Su
rviv
al
0 2 4 6 8 10
Years since registration
Low RS <18 (N=55)Intermediate RS 18-30 (N=46)
High RS ≥31 (N=47)
Stratified log-rank P = 0.003 at 10 years
(tamoxifen alone)Overall Survival by Risk Group
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
Dis
ease
-fre
e su
rviv
al
0 2 4 6 8 10
Years since registration
Low RS <18 (N=55)Intermediate RS 18-30 (N=46)
High RS ≥31 (N=47)
Stratified log-rank P = 0.017 at 10 years
(tamoxifen alone)Disease-Free Survival by Risk Group
10-yr: 60%, 49%, 43% 10-yr: 77%, 68%, 51%
No benefit to CAF over time if low RS
Strong benefit if high RS
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
Dis
ease
-fre
e su
rviv
al
0 2 4 6 8 10
Years since registration
Tamoxifen (N=55, 15 events)CAF-T (N=91, 26 events)
Stratified log-rank P = 0.97 at 10 years
Low risk (RS < 18)
Disease-Free Survival by Treatment0
.00
0.2
50
.50
0.7
51
.00
Dis
ease
-fre
e su
rviv
al
0 2 4 6 8 10
Years since registration
Tamoxifen (N=47, 26 events)CAF-T (N=71, 28 events)
Stratified log-rank P = 0.033 at 10 years
High risk (RS ≥31)
Disease-Free Survival by Treatment
0.0
00
.25
0.5
00
.75
1.0
0
Dis
ease
-fre
e su
rviv
al
0 2 4 6 8 10
Years since registration
Tamoxifen (N=46, 22 events)CAF-T (N=57, 20 events)
Stratified log-rank P = 0.48 at 10 years
Intermediate risk (RS 18-30)
Disease-Free Survival by Treatment
Summary
• New treatment options available for refractory breast cancer
– Ixabepilone
– Lapatinib
• Ongoing refinement for:
– Patients who need chemotherapy
– Which types of chemotherapy