Upload
moya
View
28
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Update on Proxy Statement Disclosures and Strategies for 2011 Annual Stockholder Meetings. March 17, 2011 Presented by: Christine Daly, Partner at Holme Roberts & Owen LLP Jennifer D’Alessandro, Senior Counsel at Holme Roberts & Owen LLP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
#1521776 v1 den 1
Update on Proxy Statement Disclosures and Strategies
for2011 Annual Stockholder
MeetingsMarch 17, 2011
Presented by:
Christine Daly, Partner at Holme Roberts & Owen LLPJennifer D’Alessandro, Senior Counsel at Holme Roberts & Owen LLPEdgar J. Lewandowski, Senior Associate at Holme Roberts & Owen LLP
#1521776 v1 den 2
Director Qualifications
Since February 2010, Item 401(e) of Regulation S-K has required disclosure of the qualifications of each director and nominee, including the particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that: qualify that person to serve on your company’s board at the time of that particular filing in light of the company’s then-current
business and structure
#1521776 v1 den 3
Director Qualifications
Frequent SEC comments regarding this disclosure, often related to the following areas: aggregated disclosure regarding the board as a whole
or groups of directors generic references to “business experience, skills, or
knowledge” directors in board classes not currently up for election directors nominated or elected by specific
stockholders or classes of stock not simply why the person was chosen as a director in
the first place, but why he or she should be one now
#1521776 v1 den 4
Compensation Committee Independence Dodd-Frank requires SEC to adopt rules
regarding independence of compensation committee members and compensation consultants / other advisors Committee member independence rules are expected
to relate to additional affiliations of directors (similar to enhanced standards for audit committee members)
Consultant independence is not required, but process for evaluating and disclosing independence of consultants is required
#1521776 v1 den 5
Compensation Committee Independence Committee must consider matters to be
specified by SEC including disclosure of: Other services provided by the advisor Fees paid to the advisor as a percentage of the
advisor’s revenue Policies and procedures used by committee designed
to prevent conflicts of interest Business and personal relationships between the
advisor and committee members Advisor’s ownership of company stock
Rules will apply equally to compensation consultants, attorneys and other advisors
#1521776 v1 den 6
Compensation Committee Independence Current SEC timetable:
Proposed rules: March 2011 Final rules: April – July 2011
Action Items: Begin considering importance of consultants and their
independence Review current compensation committee member
independence in light of strict audit-committee-style requirements
Review and revise compensation committee charter to comply with final rules (when available)
Controlled companies are exempt
#1521776 v1 den 7
Board Diversity Since February 2010, public companies must disclose
whether the nominating committee considers diversity in identifying board nominees Not required to consider diversity, just whether it is considered,
and if so, how – which leads to an odd disclosure if not considered
If there is a policy, how it is implemented, as well as how the nominating committee (or the board) assesses its effectiveness
“Diversity” not defined by rules - each company must disclose how it defines diversity Experience Expertise Background Gender / Ethnic Origin
#1521776 v1 den 8
Board Diversity In a September 2010 speech, SEC Commissioner
Aguilar indicated his disappointment with most disclosures to date in response to this rule and suggested improvements: Disclose actual diversity on board (number of women,
minorities, etc.) Describe concrete steps taken by the board to increase
its diversity adopt policy of interviewing women/minority candidates
for each board vacancy disclose number of interviews conducted with diverse
candidates instruct search firms to seek out diverse candidates
#1521776 v1 den 9
Proxy Disclosure of Risk Oversight
www.CartoonStock.com
#1521776 v1 den 10
New Disclosures Rules in Practice New proxy disclosures have been in places
since February 28, 2010: Disclosure of compensation policies and
practices as they relate to the company’s risk management practices (Item 402(s) of Regulation S-K)
Disclosure of the board’s role in risk oversight of the company, such as how the board administers its oversight function, and the effect this has on the board’s leadership structure (Item 407(h) of Regulation S-K)
#1521776 v1 den 11
New Disclosures Rules in Practice Deloitte Study of 398 of the S&P 500 (Jan. ‘11):
58% of disclosures note that the audit committee is primarily responsible for risk
53% of disclosures note that compensation committee is responsible for overseeing compensation-related risks
34% discussed how risk oversight/management aligns with strategy
19% noted a management-level risk management committee, but only 4% have board-level risk committee
#1521776 v1 den 12
Best Practice Recommendations
www.CartoonStock.com
#1521776 v1 den 13
Best Practice Recommendations Evaluate Role of Board Committees Consider Forming a Risk Committee
Dodd-Frank §165(h) requires some financial service companies to form them
Approximately 4-6% of companies have them (ArcelorMittal, Genzyme, La-Z-Boy, Duke Energy and others)
A new best practice? Evaluate Lines of Communication and
Information Flow Are “risk dashboards” enough?
#1521776 v1 den 14
Best Practice Recommendations Examine Board Composition and Director
Education Programs Dodd-Frank will require some financial companies to
have a risk management expert on the board Site visits? Review analyst reports?
Consult Recognized Sources of Guidance for Risk Governance NACD and COSO reports
#1521776 v1 den 15
Executive Compensation Say-on-Pay and Say-on-Golden Parachutes
Final Rule – January 25, 2011
Smaller reporting companies – delayed effective date until January 21, 2013
Includes SEC “model” resolution for SOP
CD&A mandatory disclosure re consideration of SOP results
Form 8-K disclosure of frequency of SOP decision
#1521776 v1 den 16
Executive Compensation Dodd-Frank planned guidance
Comp Committee Independence – Mar 2011
Clawback policy – Aug-Dec 2011
Pay for performance – Aug-Dec 2011
Internal pay equity – Aug-Dec 2011
Hedging policy – Aug-Dec 2011
Chair and CEO positions – None planned
#1521776 v1 den 17
Executive Compensation Compliance Disclosure Interpretations (CDIs)
How and when to report modifications to awards
How to report awards payable in cash or stock
How to report awards declined or not accepted
Performance award disclosures
SOP, frequency and golden parachutes
#1521776 v1 den 18
Executive Compensation SEC Comments
Performance goals
Peer groups and benchmarking
How amounts were determined
Compensation risk assessment process
The “Why” of compensation
#1521776 v1 den 19
Executive Compensation Disclosure “best practices:”
Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A)
Pay for performance
Selection of peer groups and benchmarking
Compensation risk assessment
Plain English – simple and clear disclosures
Check it one more time – do the math
#1521776 v1 den 2020
Conclusion – Q&A
www.CartoonStock.com