Upload
lamdan
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Updates in
Endocrinology 2016
UCSF Medical Management of HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis
San Francisco December 10th, 2016
Elizabeth J. Murphy, MD, DPhil Professor of Clinical Medicine
University of California, San Francisco Chief, Division of Endocrinology San Francisco General Hospital
NO DISCLOSURES
2
Case47yohispanicMSM,HIV+onHAARTfor15years,htn.Pa?entcomplainsoffa?gueandjustoveralldecreasedenergy.FH:DM2infather,hipfractureinmotherHRB:+EtOH,marijuana,methuse,getsregularexerciseExam:5’9”,185lb,BMI27.3,BP120/80MEDS:Lisinopril10mgdailyWhatwouldwouldyouscreenfor?a) Diabetes/prediabetesb) Osteoporosis/bonelossc) Hypogonadismd) Nothing
Case47yohispanicMSM,HIV+onHAARTfor15years,htn.Pa?entcomplainsoffa?gueandjustoveralldecreasedenergy.FH:DM2infather,hipfractureinmotherHRB:+EtOH,marijuana,methuse,getsregularexerciseExam:5’9”,185lb,BMI27.3,BP120/80MEDS:Lisinopril10mgdailyWhatwouldwouldyouscreenfor?a) Diabetes/prediabetesb) Osteoporosis/bonelossc) Hypogonadismd) Nothing
DiabetesScreeningTool(NIH/CDC)
1
1
1
1
1
Prediabetes Risk Based on ADA/AHA Screening Tool
JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(12):1861-1863.
≥40yearsold >60yearsold
59% 81%
Economic Costs of Diabetes, 2012
American Diabetes Association website. Diabetes Care. 2013;
Total cost of diabetes $245 billion
excess medical expenditures $176 billion
to treat diabetes directly $27 billion
to treat diabetes-related chronic complications attributed to diabetes
$58 billion
excess medical costs $31 billion
reduced national productivity: $69 billion
2007 $174 Billion
Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes Among U.S. Adults
<4.5% Missing data 4.5%–5.9% 6.0%–7.4% 7.5%–8.9% ≥9.0%
CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics
1996
Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes Among U.S. Adults
<4.5% Missing data 4.5%–5.9% 6.0%–7.4% 7.5%–8.9% ≥9.0%
CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics
1999
Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes Among U.S. Adults
<4.5% Missing data 4.5%–5.9% 6.0%–7.4% 7.5%–8.9% ≥9.0%
CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics
2002
Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes Among U.S. Adults
<4.5% Missing data 4.5%–5.9% 6.0%–7.4% 7.5%–8.9% ≥9.0%
CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics
2005
Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes Among U.S. Adults
<4.5% Missing data 4.5%–5.9% 6.0%–7.4% 7.5%–8.9% ≥9.0%
CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics
2008
Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes Among U.S. Adults
<4.5% Missing data 4.5%–5.9% 6.0%–7.4% 7.5%–8.9% ≥9.0%
CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics
2010
Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes Among U.S. Adults
<4.5% Missing data 4.5%–5.9% 6.0%–7.4% 7.5%–8.9% ≥9.0%
CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics
2012 (note new methods)
Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes Among U.S. Adults
<4.5% Missing data 4.5%–5.9% 6.0%–7.4% 7.5%–8.9% ≥9.0%
CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics
2014
• Diabetesistheleadingcauseof:– Leadingcauseofblindness– LeadingcauseofESRD– Leadingcauseofnon-trauma?camputa?ons
• 29.1millionAmericans(9.3%)havediabetes• 86millionAmericans(27.5%)haveprediabetes• 25.9%ofAmericans>65havediabetes
DiabetesinAmerica-2012
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Men Women
Perc
ent
Total Non-Hispanic WhiteNon-Hispanic Black Hispanic
Narayan et al, JAMA, 2003
Estimated lifetime risk of developing diabetes for individuals born in the United States in 2000
1 in every 3 adults in the U.S. will have diabetes by 2050.
What is the only safe way to cure and treat DM2 long-term?
Don’t develop it in the first place.
Pre/DiabetesScreeningWhoisatRisk?
• Historyofgesta?onaldiabetes• Familyhistoryofdiabetes• Age• Overweightandobese• Sedentary• Highriskethnicgroup• Impairedglucosemetabolism
Prediabetes
• Fas?ngglucose100or110-125mg/dl
• A1C5.7-6.4%
• 2hglucosepost75OGTT140-199mg/dl
LaboratoryScreeningRecommenda?ons• CDCDiabetesPreven?onProgram
– Posi?veonhighriskonscreeningtoolsAND• BMI≥24kg/m2or≥22kg/m2inAsian-AmericansOR• HistoryofGDM
• ADA– Everyoneoverage45– Adultswhoareoverweightorobese(BMI≥25kg/m2or≥23kg/m2inAsian-Americans)
• USPSTF– Age40-75withBMI≥25kg/m2
USPSTFRecommenda?ons• NoethnicityappropriateBMIcut-offs• Doesn’tallowforscreeningof<40• Resultsinsignificantunder-detec?on• Sensi?vity45.0%1• Specificity71.9%1
1O’BrienMJ,LeeJY,CarnethonMR,AckermannRT,VargasMC,etal.(2016)Detec?ngDysglycemiaUsingthe2015UnitedStatesPreven?veServicesTaskForceScreeningCriteria:ACohortAnalysisofCommunityHealthCenterPa?ents.PLoSMed13(7):e1002074.
%DysglycemicPa?entsCapturedbyUSPSTFScreeningGuideline
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
White AfricanAmerican LaSnoO’BrienMJ,LeeJY,CarnethonMR,AckermannRT,VargasMC,etal.(2016)Detec?ngDysglycemiaUsingthe2015UnitedStatesPreven?veServicesTaskForceScreeningCriteria:ACohortAnalysisofCommunityHealthCenterPa?ents.PLoSMed13(7):e1002074.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002074
Conclusions–WhotoScreen?• USPSTFrecommenda?onsshouldbeaminimumbar
• Dependsinpartonyourpopula?on,useAsianspecificBMIcut-off
• Aswithscreeningforgesta?onaldiabetes,perhapseasiesttoscreenwidely
DataforDiabetesPreven?on
• StudiesofLifestyleInterven?on– USDiabetesPreven?onProgram– DaQingIGTandDiabetesStudy– FinishDiabetesPreven?onStudy
• Results– Lifestyleinterven?onpreventsdiabetes– Associatedwithweightloss
USDiabetesPreven?onProgram• Randomizedhighriskpa?entsto
– melormin– extensive,individuallifestyleinterven?on
• 150minutesofmoderate-intensityphysicalac?vityperweek
• Lifestylegroup– 7%weightlossatoneyear– 4%weightlossat4years
NEJM 346:393, 2002; Lancet 374:1677, 2009.
DiabetesPreven?onProgram
TheFutureofType2DiabetesCare
DPPTransla?onalStudies• Focusonmorecostefficientdelivery
– Groupeduca?on• Focusedonweightloss
– Allachieveearlyweightloss– Longtermdurabilityofweightlossnotasclear
Reduc?oninDiabetesbyWeightLossDiabetesPreven-onProgram
NEJM346:393,2002.
DPPTransla?onalStudies• Focusonmorecostefficientdelivery• Focusedonweightloss
– Allachieveearlyweightloss– Longtermdurabilityofweightlossnotasclear
• Don’tyethavediabetespreven?ondatafortransla?onalprograms
• Otherpoten?albenefits– Lipids– HTN– Depression
DiabetesPrevenSonPrograms• Inperson,groupcoaching
– YMCA(DEPLOY,RAPID…)– WeightWatchersforprediabetes– Manyothers(MontanaDHHS,Kaiser)
• Digital,humancoaching– OmadaHealth-Prevent®– CanaryHealth-VirtualLifestyleManagementTM
• Digital,fully-automatedcoaching– TurnaroundHealth-Alive-PDTM
CDCDPPCerSficaSonRequirements• CDC-approvedcurriculumpromo?ng5-7%weightlossandincreasedphysicalac?vity(DiabetesPreventProgramGroupLifestyleBalanceCurriculumTM)
• alifestylecoach• apeersupportgroupofprogrampar?cipants• Submitannualdataonweightloss,ac?vity,classpar?cipa?on
• Enroll>50%ofpa?entsbasedonlabtests
HowtoFindaProgram
hqps://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/preven?on/index.html
OnDigitalDPP
hqps://www.omadahealth.com/
WhotoRefer• CDCDPP:prediabetesandBMI≥24or≥22forAsianAmericansor
historyofGDM• ADA:Prediabetes
– “Follow-upcounselingandmaintenanceprogramsshouldbeofferedforlong-termsuccessinpreven-ngdiabetesandsuchprogramsshouldbecoveredbythird-partypayers”
– EvidencelevelB• USPSTF:Prediabetes
– “intensivebehavioralcounselinginterven-onstopromoteahealthfuldietandphysicalac-vity”
– EvidencelevelB– Similarrecommenda?onforCVDriskfactorsandoverweight/obese
Coverage• 30+privateplanscover• MontanaMedicaid• CDC/MedicaidPilotProjects
– Maryland– Oregon
• StateEmployeecoverage
StateEmployeeHealthCoverage
Coverage• 30+privateplanscover• MontanaMedicaid• CDC/MedicaidPilotProjects
– Maryland– Oregon
• StateEmployeecoverage• March2016,CMSannouncedplanstocover
– PilotprogramwithYMCAsaved$2650perpersonenrolled
MedicareDiabetesPrevenSonProgram(MDPP)• January1,2018• MedicarePartBenrollees• BMIofatleast25kg/m2(or23kg/m2Asian)ANDoneof– FPG110-125mg/dL– OGTTof140-199mg/dL– HbA1cbetween5.7%and6.4%.
MedicareDiabetesPrevenSonProgram(MDPP)• January1,2018• MedicarePartBenrollees• BMIofatleast25kg/m2(or23kg/m2Asian)ANDoneof– FPG110-125mg/dL– OGTTof140-199mg/dL– HbA1cbetween5.7%and6.4%.
OtherMethodsofDiabetesPrevenSon
• Melormin– Mosteffec?veinage<60withBMI>35orgesta?onaldiabetes
– Costsavingover10years– 18%reduc?onindiabetesover15years– Lifestyleinterven?onismoreeffec?ve
• Othermedica?ons?• Bariatricsurgery
44
Case47yohispanicMSM,HIV+onHAARTfor15years,htn.Pa?entcomplainsoffa?gueandjustoveralldecreasedenergy.FH:DM2infather,hipfractureinmotherHRB:+EtOH,marijuana,regularexerciseExam:5’9”,185lb,BMI27.3,BP120/80MEDS:Lisinopril10mgdailyWhatwouldwouldyouscreenfor?a) Diabetes/prediabetesb) Osteoporosis/bonelossc) Hypogonadismd) Nothing
Case47yohispanicMSM,HIV+onHAARTfor15years,htn.Pa?entcomplainsoffa?gueandjustoveralldecreasedenergy.FH:DM2infather,hipfractureinmotherHRB:+EtOH,marijuana,methuse,getsregularexerciseExam:5’9”,185lb,BMI27.3,BP120/80
HehasaDXAT-scorespineof-2.3,femoralneckof-2.2.
Whatwouldyoudo? a) Encouragemodifica?onofriskfactorsandop?mize
vitaminDandcalciumintakeb) a+bisphosphonatec) Don’thaveenoughinforma?ond) a+testosteronee) a+denosamab(Prolia)
Case47yohispanicMSM,HIV+onHAARTfor15years,htn.Pa?entcomplainsoffa?gueandjustoveralldecreasedenergy.FH:DM2infather,hipfractureinmotherHRB:+EtOH,marijuana,methuse,getsregularexerciseExam:5’9”,185lb,BMI27.3,BP120/80
HehasaDXAT-scorespineof-2.3,femoralneckof-2.2.
Whatwouldyoudo? a) Encouragemodifica?onofriskfactorsandop?mize
vitaminDandcalciumintakeb) a+bisphosphonatec) Don’thaveenoughinformaSond) a+testosteronee) a+denosamab(Prolia)
BMD• Proxy for fracture • Best fracture data is in older folks • Doesn’t always correlate with bone strength
BMDandFracturebyAge
Huietal.JClinInvest1988;81:1804-9
BMD
• Z-score– ComparedtoBMDofsameage
– Usedforkids,premenopausalwomen,men<50
• T-score – United States - compared to
a sex and ethnicity concordant 30 year old
– WHO – compared to 30 yowf – Used for post-menopausal
women and men > 50 y
• Proxy for fracture • Best fracture data is in older folks • Doesn’t always correlate with bone strength
WHODefiniSonsLowBMD
Status T-score Osteopenia between −1.0 and −2.5 Osteoporosis ≤−2.5 Severe osteoporosis ≤−2.5 + fragility fracture
Status Z-score Low BMD ≤ - 2.0
BMDinHIV
• Decreased• HIVposi?vepa?entshaveincreasedriskfactorsforlowBMD
• IntrinsictoHIV?• Doesthattranslateintoincreasedfractures?
Triant,Brown,Hang,Grinspoon;TheJournalofClinicalEndocrinology&Metabolism2008,93,3499-3504.
FracturePrevalenceinHIVInfectedPaSents
Female Male
ARTMakesitWorse
• DecreaseinBMDof2-6%infirsttwoyearsoftreatment
• Stabilizesover?me• BoostedPIseemworse• Tenofivirisworse
Tenofivir• Tenofivirdisoproxilfumarte(TDF)
– DecreasesBMDinhipandspine– Increasedfractures– Likelymediatedbychangesinrenalphosphatehandling(canhavefrankFanconiSyndrome)
ChangeinBMDTAFv.TDF
Saxetal,TheLancet(2015)385:2606–2615.
L-Spine Hip
---------E/C/F/TAF----------E/C/F/TDF
Tenofivir• Tenofivirdisoproxilfumarte(TDF)
– DecreasesBMDinhipandspine– Increasedfractures– Likelymediatedbychangesinrenalphosphatehandling(canhavefrankFanconiSyndrome)
• Tenofiviralafenamidefumarate(TAF)– SlightlybeqerBMD– Slightlybeqerkidneys– Slightlyworselipids– Muchworsewallet
BMDprePrEP• InSanFranciscoPrEPstudy
– 9.5%withlowBMD(ZScore<-2)atbaseline
• DecreasedriskoflowBMD– MVI,calcium,orVitaminDuse(OR0.26)
• IncreasedriskoflowBMD– Amphetamineuse(OR5.86)– Inhalantuse(OR4.57)
Liuetal,PLoSOne,2011,6:e23688.
BMDlosswithPrEP
Mulliganetal,ClinicalInfec?ousDiseases,2015,61:572-580
Case52yohispanicMSM,HIV+onHAARTfor15years,htn.Pa?entcomplainsoffa?gueandjustoveralldecreasedenergy.FH:DM2infather,hipfractureinmotherHRB:+EtOH,marijuana,methuse,getsregularexerciseExam:5’9”,185lb,BMI27.3,BP120/80
HehasaDXAT-scorespineof-2.3,femoralneckof-2.2.
AgertreaSngmodifiableriskfactorswhatwouldyoudo?
ModifiableOsteoporosisRF• Diet
– VitaminDdeficiency– Inadequatecalciumintake
• PhysicalInac?vity• Smoking,Alcohol,otherrecrea?onaldruguse• Lowweight
VitaminD• Decreasedlevelswithefavirenz• Endocrinesocietysaysscreenhighriskfolks• EuropeanAIDSClinicalSocietysaysscreenHIV+at
diagnsois• Brownetal,20151–Checkinpa?entshistoryof
lowBMDand/orfracture.Considercheckingif– Darkskin– Dietarydeficiency– Avoidanceofsunexposure– Obese– CKD– Rxwithefavirenz– Malabsopr?on
CHECK EVERYONE!
TreatmentGoal>30forhighrisk>20isokayforpreven?on
1Brownetal,Recommenda?onsforEvalua?onandManagementofBoneDiseaseinHIV,2015,ClinicalInfec-onsDiseases,60:1242.
Case52yohispanicMSM,HIV+onHAARTfor15years,htn.Pa?entcomplainsoffa?gueandjustoveralldecreasedenergy.FH:DM2infather,hipfractureinmotherHRB:+EtOH,marijuana,methuse,getsregularexerciseExam:5’9”,185lb,BMI27.3,BP120/80
HehasaDXAT-scorespineof-2.3,femoralneckof-2.2.
AgertreaSngmodifiableriskfactorswhatwouldyoudo?
a) Treatwithabisphonateb) CalculateaFRAXtodecideabouttreatmentc) GoreadaboutFRAXd) Treatwithtestosterone
FRAX
WhentoTreatPost-MenopausalWomen,Men>50• T-score<-2.5%(osteoporosis)• T-scorebetween-1and2.5AND
• ≥20%riskofmajorosteoporosisfracturefromFRAX• ≥3%riskofhipfracturefromFRAX
• HistoryofhiporvertebralfracturePre-MenopausalWomen,Men<50• Safetyandefficacydatamuchlessclear• Canconsidertreatmentforseverediseasebutaggressivelycontrolsecondarycausesfirst
EvaluateforTreatableSecondaryCauses
• SwitchtononPIornonTDFbasedtherapy
• ThingstoCheck– 25OHVitaminD– TSH(hyperthyroid)– AMTestosteroneormenstrualhistory
– Calcium,Albumin,Phos,Crea?nine(hyperpara)
– Frac?onalexcre?onofphosphate
• Thingstoconsiderbasedonclinicalsezng– Cushing’ssyndrome– Mul?plemyeloma
FRAX
Case52yohispanicMSM,HIV+onHAARTfor15years,htn.Pa?entcomplainsoffa?gueandjustoveralldecreasedenergy.FH:DM2infather,hipfractureinmotherHRB:+EtOH,marijuana,methuse,getsregularexerciseExam:5’9”,185lb,BMI27.3,BP120/80HehasaDXAT-scorespineof-2.3,femoralneckof-2.2.FRAX10yrriskofhipfractureof4.9%.AgeragerevaluaSngforandtreaSngmodifiableriskfactorsandsecondarycauseswhatwouldyoutreatwith?
a) abisphonateb) terapera?de(rPTH/forteo)c) testosteroned) denosamab(Prolia)
OsteoporosisTreatmentOpSons
• BoneResporpSon– Bisphosphonates
• IncreaseBMDinHIV• NoFracturedata• Osteonecrosis(increasedrisk?)
– Estrogens• OCP/HRT• Raloxifene(SERM)
– Denosumab(RANKLmonoclonalAb)
• Don’tuseinHIV
• BoneFormaSon– Teraperi?de(rPTH;Forteo)– Testosterone– Abalopara-de(rPTHrp)– Romosozumab(Scleros-nmonoclonalAb)
BoneHealthinHIV
• EVERYONE– Focusonmodifiableriskfactors– Adequatecalcium/D/weightbearingexercise
• <40?• Men40-49andpremenopausalwomen≥40
– CancalculateFRAXwithoutBMD– DXAifsignificantrisk
• Men≥50andpost-menopausalwomen– DXA
Case
38yom,HIV+,(VLUD)bodybuildernotedtohavesevereerythrocytosis(19.8/60).Whatshouldbeyournexttest?a) Bonemarrowbiopsyb) Ferri?nc) Testosteroned) TSHandFreeT4
Case
38yom,HIV+,(VLUD)bodybuildernotedtohavesevereerythrocytosis(19.8/60).Whatshouldbeyournexttest?a) Bonemarrowbxb) Ferri?nc) Testosteroned) TSHandFreeT4
12!
TSHandT4normalbuthighT3
60
46.3
Hct
60
46.3
Hct
Abuse….isassociatedwithserioussafetyrisksaffec?ngtheheart,brain,liver,mentalhealth,andendocrinesystem.Reportedseriousadverseoutcomesincludeheartaqack,heartfailure,stroke,depression,hos?lity,aggression,livertoxicity,andmaleinfer?lity.Individualsabusinghighdosesoftestosteronehavealsoreportedwithdrawalsymptoms,suchasdepression,fa?gue,irritability,lossofappe?te,decreasedlibido,andinsomnia.
BACKGROUND:Prescrip?ontestosteroneproductsareFDA-approvedashormonereplacementtherapyformenwhohavelowtestosteroneduetocertainmedicalcondi?ons.Examplesofthesecondi?onsincludefailureofthetes?clestoproducetestosteronebecauseofgene?cproblems,ordamagetothetes?clesfromchemotherapyorinfec?on.
ImportantTestosteronePrinciples
1. Testosteroneassaysarenotverygood.
77
TestosteroneAssays• Knowthetypeandqualityofassayyouareusing• Mostassaysoftotaltestosteronewillallowforthediagnosisof
classichypogonadism– Obtainonamorningsample– Considerrepea?ngatleastonce– Normalrangeshouldbecloseto300-1000(basedonyoungmen)
• Mostassaysarenotverypreciseorreproducibleinthe200-300range
• LCMSMSisthebestassayoftotaltestosteronebutisexpensive• FreeTestosteroneisbestmeasuredasacalculatedvaluewith
highqualitytestosteroneandSHBGassaysthoughcalcula?onshavenotbeenspecificallydeterminedforHIV
• HIVcanincreaseSHBGandfalselyelevatetotaltestosterone(considerfreetestosterone)
TotalTestosteroneAssays
DirectassaybyRIA,ELISA,CLIA
Easy,inexpensive,fast,automated.
Canoveres?mateT,notstandardized,notgreat<300
GCMSMSorLCMSMS Accuratewhenproperlyvalidated.
Expensive,hasnotbeenwellstandardized,slow
RIAa{erextrac?on/chromatography
Goodreferencesranges. Difficult,laborintensive,slow,expensive.
FreeTestosteroneAssays
DirectRIA Easy,inexpensive Doesn’tworkwell.Don’teveruse.
EquilibriumDialysis(physicalsepara?on)
Accurate,sensi?ve,reproducible
Expensive,technicallydifficult
FreeAndrogenIndex(TT/SHBG)
Easy DependentonaccuracyofTT/SHBGassay
CalculatedFreeT(severalmethods)
Easy DependentonaccuracyofTT/SHBGassayandcalcula?ons
BioT(precip?a?on) Easy Lotsofinaccuracies.
TotalTestosterone8:30am,singlesample,samereferencelab
ImportantTestosteronePrinciples
1. Testosteroneassaysarenotverygood.2. Testosteronelevelsdecline1-2%peryearas
menage3. Trea?ngtheunderlyingchroniccondi?on
typicallycorrectsthelowtestosterone4. Directtoconsumeradver?singandmarke?ng
tophysicianshassignificantlyincreasedtheuseoftestosterone
5. DataonCVrisksaremixed.82
TrendsinAndrogenPrescribingintheUS2001-2011
83
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Year%M
en>40Given
And
rogenRe
placem
entT
herapy
Baillargeonetal,JAMAInternalMedicine(2013)173:1465.
Over2billioninAnnualSales
What’sNew?TheTestosteroneTrials
• 7doubleblinded,place-controlledmul?centertrials
• Sexualfunc?on,Physicalfunc?on,Vitalitytrials• AverageTestosterone<275ng/dl• Excluded:
– Highriskoractuallyhavingprostatecancer– HighCVrisk(MI/CVAwithin3months,unstableangina,classIII/IVCHF,SBP>160,DBP>100,severedepression
Snyderetal.,EffectsofTestosteroneTreatmentinOlderMen,NEJM,Feb2016,374:611,
• Oneyearoftestosteronetreatmentinprimarilynon-hispanic,whitemen>65
• Testosteroneconcentra?onsincreasedfrom250toapproximately500withtreatment
Results• Increasesinsexualac?vity,desireanderec?lefunc?on
• Effectonerec?ledysfunc?onwaslessthantypicallyseenwithphosphodiesteraseinhibitors
• Nobenefitwasseenwithwalkingabilityorvitalityprimaryoutcomes
• Largeplaceboeffect• Notdesignedtoassesssafety
Snyderetal.,EffectsofTestosteroneTreatmentinOlderMen,NEJM,Feb2016,374:611,
Conclusions• Neverstarttestosteronetherapyinsomeonewho
hasnothadalowtestosteronelevel.• Forpa?entsstartedforreasonsotherthanaclear
pituitaryortes?cularproblem(e.g.andropause)discusspoten?alrisks.
• Forpa?entsalreadyonandrogens,monitorforsafetyanddecreaseasable,againdiscussingrisks.
• Somepa?entsmightfeelbeqerontestosterone,wejustdon’tknowtherisk/benefitdataatall.
• RememberlessonslearnedfromHRTinwomenandGHtherapy.
Case47yohispanicMSM,HIV+onHAARTfor15years,htn.Pa?entcomplainsoffa?gueandjustoveralldecreasedenergy.FH:DM2infather,hipfractureinmotherHRB:+EtOH,marijuana,regularexerciseExam:5’9”,185lb,BMI27.3,BP120/80MEDS:Lisinopril10mgdaily1)Considerdiabetesriskandmodifyingthatrisk.2)Improvemodifiableosteoporosisriskfactors.3)Avoidcheckingtestosteroneintheabsenceofandrogenspecificsymptoms.
UsefulWebSites• 2pageguideforinclinicprediabetesscreeningandac?onworkflow– hqp://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/preven?on/pdf/point-of-care-prediabetes-iden?fica?on-algorithm_tag508.pdf
• DiabetesScreeningTool– hqps://doihaveprediabetes.org/pdf/Prediabetes_PrintableRiskTest(English).pdf
• CDCDiabetesPreven?oninforma?on– hqps://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/preven?on/index.html