1
Hitotsubashi Review of Arts and Sciences 14 3 A translation of Luc Boltanski’s “Criticism and democracy: e cause of criticism” Daisuke KATAOKA In June 2012, the French sociologist Luc Boltanski won the first-ever “Petrarch Prize for the Essay” for his book Énigmes et complots Mysteries and Conspiracies2012. On this occa- sion, he gave the inaugural lecture at the 27th “Rencontres Pétrarque” in Montpellier, of which the present text is a Japanese translation. In this lecture, linked not only with his prize-winning book but also with his previous De la critique On Criticism2009, Boltanski begins by not- ing the crisis of contemporary capitalism and of democratic states, and then returns to the ques- tion of the historical tensions between democracy and liberalism. He notes that the ambiguity of modern institutions generates a necessary criticism in response. In order to maintain the future of democracy, Boltanski stresses the need to defend the principle of criticism.

URL...A translation of Luc Boltanski’s “Criticism and democracy: The cause of criticism” Daisuke KATAOKA In June 2012, the French sociologist Luc Boltanski won the first-ever

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Hitotsubashi Review of Arts and Sciences 14  3

    A translation of Luc Boltanski’s “Criticism and democracy : The cause of criticism”

    Daisuke KATAOKA

     In June 2012, the French sociologist Luc Boltanski won the first-ever “Petrarch Prize for the

    Essay” for his book Énigmes et complots [Mysteries and Conspiracies] (2012). On this occa-

    sion, he gave the inaugural lecture at the 27th “Rencontres Pétrarque” in Montpellier, of which

    the present text is a Japanese translation. In this lecture, linked not only with his prize-winning

    book but also with his previous De la critique [On Criticism] (2009), Boltanski begins by not-

    ing the crisis of contemporary capitalism and of democratic states, and then returns to the ques-

    tion of the historical tensions between democracy and liberalism. He notes that the ambiguity

    of modern institutions generates a necessary criticism in response. In order to maintain the

    future of democracy, Boltanski stresses the need to defend the principle of criticism.