Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

  • Upload
    uroosha

  • View
    223

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    1/30

    &

    Strategy ANALYSIS&Strategy ANALYSIS

    CHOICECHOICE

    UROOSHA NAEEM

    UROOSHA NAEEM

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    2/30

    Strategy FormulationStrategy Formulation

    FrameworkFramework

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    3/30

    Input StageInput Stage

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    4/30

    Matching StageMatching Stage

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    5/30

    Decision StageDecision Stage

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    6/30

    Stage 2: Matching StageStage 2: Matching Stage Matching Stage focuses upon feasible

    alternative strategies by aligning keyinternal and external factors.

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    7/30

    SWOT MatrixSWOT Matrix

    A SWOT Analysis is a strategicplanning tool used to evaluate theStrengths, weakness, Opportunities

    and Threats involved in a business.Four types of strategies: 1:SO Strategies

    2:WO Strategies 3:ST Strategies 4:WT Strategies

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    8/30

    SWOT Matrix DevelopingSWOT Matrix Developing

    StepsSteps1. Rank external opportunities2. Rank external threats3. Rank internal strength4. Rank internal weaknesses.5. Match internal strengths with external

    opportunities and mention the result in the SOStrategies cell.

    6. Match internal weaknesses with externalopportunities and mention the result in the WOStrategies cell..

    7. Match internal strengths with external threatsand mention the result in the ST Strategies cell.8. Match internal weaknesses with external threats

    and mention the result in the WT strategies cell.

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    9/30

    SWOT MatrixSWOT MatrixLeave Blank Strengths S

    List Strengths

    Weaknesses W

    List Weaknesses

    Opportunities O

    List Opportunities

    SOStrategies

    Use strengths to takeadvantage ofopportunities

    WOStrategies

    Overcoming weaknessesby taking advantage ofopportunities

    Threats T

    List Threats

    STStrategiesUse strengths to avoidthreats

    WTStrategiesMinimize weaknessesand avoid threats

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    10/30

    Space MatrixSpace Matrix Space Matrix explains that what is

    our strategic position and whatpossible action can be taken.

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    11/30

    Space FactorsSpace Factorsn te rn a l S tra te g ic P o sitio n xte rn a l S tra te g ic P o sitio n

    ( )in a n cia l S tre n g th F SRisk involved in business

    Return on investment

    LeverageLiquidityWorking capital conditionCash flow

    Debt to equity ratio

    ( )nvironmental Stability ESTechnological changesRate of inflation

    Demand variabilityPrice range of competing productsCompetitive pressurePrice elasticity of demand

    Political situationCompetitive pressure

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    12/30

    Space FactorsSpace Factorsnternal Strategic Position xternal Strategic Position

    ( )ompetitive Advantage CAMarket shareProduct life cycle

    Customer loyaltyCapacity, location & layout

    -Technological know how

    ( )ndustry Strength ISGrowth potentialProfit potential

    Financial stability,Productivity capacity utilization

    Ease of entry into marketResource utilization

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    13/30

    Space Matrix Preparation StepSpace Matrix Preparation Step1. Select a set of variables to relating to financial strength, competitive

    advantage, environmental stability, and industry strength.2. Assign a numerical value ranging from +1 (worst) to +6 (best) to

    each of the variables that make up the financial strength andindustry strength dimensions. Assign a numerical value ranging from-1 (best) to -6 (worst) to each of the variables that make up theenvironmental stability and competitive advantage dimensions.

    3. Compute an average score and dividing by the number of variables4. Plot the average scores in the SPACE Matrix.5. Add the two scores on the x-axis and plot the resultant point on X.

    Add the two scores on the y axis and plot the resultant point on Y.Plot the intersection of the new x y point.

    6. Draw a directional vector from the origin of the SPACE Matrixthrough the new intersection point. This vector reveals the type ofstrategies recommended for the organization: aggressive,competitive, defensive, or conservative.

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    14/30

    BCG MatrixBCG Matrix The BCG matrix is a well-known

    portfolio management tool used inproduct life cycle theory.

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    15/30

    BCG MatrixBCG Matrix

    Question marks Units with lowmarket share in a fast-growingindustry. Require large amounts of

    cash to grow their market share. Thecorporate goal must be to grow thebusiness. fall down into the dogscategory.

    Stars Units with a high market sharein a fast-growing industry. Stars arethe leaders in the business but stillneed a lot of support for promotion aplacement.

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    16/30

    BCG MatrixBCG Matrix

    Cash cows Units with high marketshare in a slow-growing industry.Because of the low growth,

    promotion and placementinvestments are low. Generate cashin excess of the amount of cash

    needed.Dogs Units with low market share in a

    slow-growing industry. Dogs shouldbe avoided and minimized.Expensive turn-around plans usually

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    17/30

    IE MatrixIE Matrix

    IE Matrix is strategic management toolused to analyze working conditionsand strategic position of a business.

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    18/30

    IE Matrix DevelopmentIE Matrix Development

    StepsSteps1. Based on two key dimensions IFE and EFE.2. Plot IFE total weighted scores on thex-axis and

    the EFE total weighted scores on the y axis3. On thex-axis of the IE Matrix, an IFE total

    weighted score of 1.0 to 1.99 represents a weakinternal position; a score of 2.0 to 2.99 isconsidered average; and a score of 3.0 to 4.0 isstrong.

    4. On they-axis, an EFE total weighted score of 1.0to 1.99 is considered low; a score of 2.0 to 2.99 is

    medium; and a score of 3.0 to 4.0 is high.5. IE Matrix divided into three major regions. Grow and build Cells I, II, or IV Hold and maintain Cells III, V, or VII Harvest or divest Cells VI, VIII, or IX

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    19/30

    Grand Strategy MatrixGrand Strategy Matrix Grand strategy matrix it is popular

    tool for formulating alternativestrategies. It is based on two major

    dimensions

    1. Market growth

    2. Competitive position

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    20/30

    20

    u a d ra n t I V.1 Concentric diversification

    .2 Horizontal diversification

    .3

    Conglomeratediversification

    .4 Joint ventures

    u a dr an t I I I.1 Retrenchment

    .2 Concentric diversification

    .3

    Horizontal diversification

    .4 Conglomeratediversification

    .5 Liquidation

    u a d r an t I.1 Market development

    .2 Market penetration

    .3 Product development

    .4 Forward integration

    .5 Backward integration

    .6 Horizontal integration

    .7 Concentric diversification

    u a dr a n t I I.1 Market development

    .2 Market penetration

    .3 Product development

    .4 Horizontal integration

    .5 Divestiture

    .6 Liquidation

    APID MARKET GROWTH

    LOW MARKET GROWTH

    EAK OMPETITIVEPOSITIONSTRONG OMPETITIVEPOSITION

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    21/30

    Grand Strategy MatrixGrand Strategy Matrix

    Qurdant-1 Matrix are in an excellentstrategic position. These firms mustfocus on current market.Take risks

    aggressively when necessary.Quadrant II need to evaluate their

    present approach to the

    marketplace. Rapid market growthrequires intensive strategy.

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    22/30

    Grand Strategy MatrixGrand Strategy Matrix Quadrant III The firms fall in this

    quadrant compete in slow-growthindustries and have weak competitive

    positions. These firms must make somedrastic changes quickly to avoidpossible liquidation.

    Quadrant IV have a strong competitive

    position but are in a slow-growthindustry. It have the strength to launchdiversified programs into morepromising growth areas.

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    23/30

    -trategy Formulation Framework

    :tage 3he DecisionStage

    uantitativeStrategiclanning Matrix( )SPM

    Technique designed to determine therelative attractiveness of feasible

    alternative actions

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    24/30

    QSMP Matrix Developing StepsQSMP Matrix Developing Steps

    1.Make a list of the firms key externalopportunities/threats and internalstrengths/weaknesses in the left column

    2.Assign weights to each key external and

    internal factor3. Examine the Stage 2 (matching)

    matrices, and identify alternativestrategies that the organization should

    consider implementing4. Determine the Attractiveness Scores(A.S)

    5. Compare the Total AttractivenessScores

    6. Compute the Sum Total Attractiveness

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    25/30

    25

    QSPM : information from IFEQSPM : information from IFEand EFEand EFE

    e y In te rn al Facto rsM a n a g e m e n t

    M a rke tin g

    /Fin a n ce A cco u n tin g

    /Pro d u ctio n O p e ra tio n s

    R esearch a nd

    D ev elop m en t

    C o m p u te r In fo rm a tio n

    System s . .u m to ta l A S

    Strategy 3Strategy

    2

    Strategy

    1

    W e ig h tey Ex tern al Facto rsE c o n o m y

    / /Po litica l Le g a l G o v e rn m e nta l

    / /S o cia l C u ltu ra l D e m o g ra p

    /h ic E n viro n m e n ta l

    Te ch n o lo g ica l

    C om p e titiv e

    trategic Alternatives

    : =AS 1 to 4 and blank if factor does not effect strategy TAS Weight x AS

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    26/30

    Q S P M

    . &1 Requires intuitive judgments educatedassumptions

    .2 Only as good as the prerequisite inputs

    Limitations

    Advantages.1 Sets of strategies considered

    simultaneously or sequentially. &2 Integration of pertinent external

    internal factors in the decision makingprocess

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    27/30

    Cultural Aspects Of StrategyCultural Aspects Of StrategyChoiceChoice

    All organization have a culture.Culture include the set of shared values,

    believes, attitudes, customs, norms,

    personalities that describe a firm.Success often rests upon the supportthat strategies receive from a firmsculture.

    Strategies that require fewer culturalchanges may be more attractivebecause

    Extensive can take time and effect.

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    28/30

    Politics of Strategy ChoicePolitics of Strategy Choice

    All organization are political .Following tactics use by politician can

    aid strategists. 1.equifinality 2.satisfy 3.generalization

    4.focusnon higher-order issues 5.provide political access onimportant

    issues

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    29/30

    Corporate Governance IssuesCorporate Governance Issues

    . o more than 2 directors current or former companyexecutives. o directors do business with the company. , ,udit compensation and nominating committees madeup f outside directors. %ach director attends at lest 75 of all meetings. udit committee meets at least four times a year. EO is not also the Chairperson of the Board

    . hareholders have considerable power and informationo &hoose replace directors. tock options are considered a corporate expense. o interlocking directorships

    usiness Week s principles of good governance

  • 8/9/2019 Uroosha Strategy Analysis & Choice

    30/30

    THE ENDTHE END