US Holiday Retail Analysis 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 US Holiday Retail Analysis 2010

    1/2

    1 ICROSSING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

    KEY FINDINGS

    + Traffic is up: Traffic to retail sites from paid search is currently up 29% over the same period in

    2009. Traffic increased by 44% in 2009 over 2008.

    + Conversion rates are back up: Conversion rates have fluctuated this period from 7.26% in 2008,

    6.67% in 2009 and 7.61% in 2010.

    + Those who buy online are ordering more: Average order volume has been rising slowly but steadily

    from $140.66 in 2008 to $147.43 in 2009 and $155.53 in 2010.

    + Marketers are getting more bang for their buck: The return on ad spend for core paid search

    branded keywords on exact match rose 12.3% on average over the past two years.+ Cost Per Click (CPC) for branded keywords is decreasing: CPCs are down -34% from 2008-2009

    and -29% from 2009-2010 for exact match brand keywords. Please note that the figures are not

    reflective of CPCs for non-brand keywords.

    Written by:

    Reid Spice, VP Search Media Insights

    EARLY HOLIDAY SEASON ONLINE BUYING RESULTS OPTIMISTICTraffic Up/People Buying More at Start of 2010 Season

    In an analysis of paid search data for some of iCrossings largest retail clients, it is clear that the 2010

    holiday season will be much stronger than 2009, but is still recovering in a difficult economy.

    Average order volume

    $140.66

    $147.43$155.53

    2008 2009 2010

  • 7/29/2019 US Holiday Retail Analysis 2010

    2/2

    EARLY HOLIDAY SEASON RESULTS OPTIMISTIC

    2 ICROSSING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

    DECEMBER 20

    STAY CONNECTED

    Find out more at www.icrossing.com

    Call us toll-free at 866.620.3780

    Follow us at twitter.com/icrossing

    Become a fan at facebook.com/icrossing

    iCrossing reviewed the trafc, CPCs, average order value and conversion rates for the core, exact match branded keyword

    for several clients (typically the trademarked name of the retailer) in Google for the period of November 20 through

    December 2, 2010. We then compared the data to the same periods for 2008 and 2009. The study purposely used a singleexact match keyword in Google to ensure a consistent, sterile environment for the analysis (eliminating the potential noise

    of changes in matching algorithm, negatives, client spend/targets, Yahoo/Bing alliance, etc.).

    METHODOLOGY

    Though this data does not necessarily provide any indicators about overall economic health trends, it does clearly indicate

    that 2010 will be a much stronger holiday season than 2009.

    The strong increases in trafc may simply be a result of the ongoing shift from brick and mortar to the convenience of

    online holiday shopping, a trend that does not necessarily indicate incremental revenue growth for all advertisers. However,

    the fact that the trafc increases are consistent across all brands, including those without physical locations, indicates that

    retailers are continuing to enjoy some incremental market growth and improved economic health. Decreasing brand CPCs

    are offsetting some of the costs incurred with the increased trafc, contributing to a stronger return on ad spend.

    The year-over-year increases in average order value are encouraging in the context of a stagnant economy, indicating that

    these gains cannot simply be attributed to ination.

    Finally, it is interesting to note that, following mid-2009 changes to Googles trademark policy (that many predicted would

    lead to an increase in CPCs), Google brand CPCs have actually decreased for all but one retail client in our study. With CPCs

    falling almost universally during a time when trademark policies became more relaxed, one might assume that Google has

    been making some changes to their pricing algorithm for keywords that appear to be trademark terms. Googles Sitelinks

    program has certainly contributed to the decrease in exact match brand CPCs since its introduction in 2009.

    We will revisit our analysis at the end of the holiday season to see if retailers did indeed have a happy holiday or found

    another lump of coal in their stockings.

    WHAT IT MEANS