Upload
ashraflotfey
View
123
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
applied file for using Eviews to construct ARDL
Citation preview
Using Eviews to construct an ARDL Bound Test
1. These criteria are suggested for author to select the optimum lag in the ARDL modeling, namely
1. Akaike Information Criterion 2. Schwarz Bayesian Criterion 3. General to specific model
For Example: Our regression model RPCC = f(RGDPC, UN, WAGE, TAX, LL)
(See the file poverty and fd) and the selected optimum lag length is (1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)
ARDL Model Equation (1):
itr
i
tit
q
i
tit
p
i
t UNRGDPCRPCCconstRPCC0
,3
0
,2
1
,1
ttit
v
i
tit
u
i
tit
s
i
t DUMLLTAXWAGE
,70
,6
0
,5
0
,4
where
RPCC = real Consumption Per capita
Const = constant
RGDPC = real GDP Per capita
UN = unemployment
WAGE = Wages
TAX = Individual Tax
LL = Liquid Liability
DUM = 1 for crisis and 0 for otherwise; the crisis is refer to the Malaysian
oil crisis at 1973, 1974, 1980 and 1981; commodities crisis at 1985 to 1986;
and 1997/98 for Asian financial Crisis.
p, q, r, s, u, v = optimum lag length uses in model
t = residual
Such based on the AIC or SBC criteria, the selected lag length for this model (p, q,
r, s, u, v) is (1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0). This can use Microfit or Rats programming code to
obtain the optimum lag base on such listed criteria.
2. After selected lag length, using Eviews to estimate the Long-run OLS. The Eviews output is showed as following:
Dependent Variable: RPCC
Method: Least Squares
Date: 06/28/09 Time: 21:23
Sample (adjusted): 1971 2004
Included observations: 34 after adjustments Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C 1.380580 1.142938 1.207922 0.2384
RPCC(-1) 0.688508 0.175616 3.920539 0.0006
RGDPC 0.981537 0.179936 5.454926 0.0000
RGDPC(-1) -0.866497 0.237380 -3.650252 0.0012
UN 0.010227 0.036818 0.277762 0.7835
WAGE -0.019567 0.047700 -0.410202 0.6852
TAX 0.071253 0.047672 1.494647 0.1475
LL -0.095664 0.036619 -2.612439 0.0150
DUM 0.015761 0.016593 0.949891 0.3513 R-squared 0.992724 Mean dependent var 7.949910
Adjusted R-squared 0.990396 S.D. dependent var 0.307982
S.E. of regression 0.030182 Akaike info criterion -3.941225
Sum squared resid 0.022774 Schwarz criterion -3.537189
Log likelihood 76.00083 Hannan-Quinn criter. -3.803437
F-statistic 426.3952 Durbin-Watson stat 1.789455
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
3. After the estimate ARDL model, we have using the Wald Test to compute the long run elasticities and it standard error.
According to Pesaran et al. (2001) the Long run elasticities should compute as
follow:
p
i
t
q
i
t
RGDPCforesElasticiti
,1
,2
1
__
= Sum of the independent coefficients (RGDPC)
1 Sum of the dependent coefficients
The coefficient for the
variables in the Eviews
output is shows as:
c(1)
c(2)
c(3)
c(4)
c(5)
c(6)
c(7)
c(8)
c(9)
4. Go to View Coefficient Test Wald Test
Eviews Output:
Wald Test:
Equation: Untitled Test Statistic Value df Probability F-statistic 0.507750 (1, 25) 0.4827
Chi-square 0.507750 1 0.4761
Null Hypothesis Summary: Normalized Restriction (= 0) Value Std. Err. (C(3) + C(4)) / (1 - C(2)) 0.369318 0.518293
Delta method computed using analytic derivatives.
For others variables elasticities are showed as: constant (4.4322), RGDPC (0.36932), UN
(0.032831), WAGE (-0.062815), TAX (0.22875), LL (-0.30712), DUM (0.050599).
Type in the code:
(c(3)+c(4))/(1-c(2))=0
In the Wald Test
windows
The value of elasticities
is shows as 0.369318.
The standard error is
0.518293. However, the
t-statistic need compute
by the user, where t-stat
= coefficient / std. Err.
The probability 0.4827
also represent as p-
value for the computed
elasticities.
5. After computed the all long-run elasticities, we need proceed into short-run Error correction Model.
a. Firstly, compute the values of Error Correction Term (ECT). Based on the knowledge the ECT is represent as a long-run steady point for the model or
more statistically the ECT is a residual from long-run cointegration model.
Long-run Cointegration Model (Equation 2):
tp
i
t
s
i
t
tp
i
t
r
i
t
tp
i
t
q
i
t
p
i
t
t WAGEUNRGDPCconst
RPCC
1
,1
0
,4
1
,1
0
,3
1
,1
0
,2
,1 1111
tp
i
t
tp
i
t
v
i
t
tp
i
t
u
i
t
ECTDUMLLTAX
1
,1
7
1
,1
0
,6
1
,1
0
,5
111
(2)
After some mathematical adjustment, the Error correction term equation is shows
as:
tp
i
t
s
i
t
tp
i
t
r
i
t
tp
i
t
q
i
t
t WAGEUNRGDPCRPCCECT
1
,1
0
,4
1
,1
0
,3
1
,1
0
,2
111
tp
i
t
v
i
t
tp
i
t
u
i
t
LLTAX
1
,1
0
,6
1
,1
0
,5
11
(3)
Therefore, based on the previous example model and using the calculated
elasticities, the Long-run Cointegrated Model is shows as following:
RPCC = 4.4322 + 0.36932 RGDPC + 0.032831 UN 0.062815 WAGE +
0.22875 TAX 0.30712 LL + 0.050599 DUM
Hence, the ECT equation shows as:
ECT = RPCC 0.36932*RGDPC 0.032831*UN + 0.062815*WAGE
0.22875*TAX + 0.30712*LL
So, generate this ECT equation in the Eviews before the Short-run dynamic model.
b. Type in the ECT equation on the upper blank box of Eviews and then Enter.
6. After generated the ECT series, now we have go to Quick Estimate Equation
choose the method TSLS.
Type in this equation on the top
blank box:
ECT = RPCC 0.36932*RGDPC
0.032831*UN + 0.062815*WAGE
0.22875*TAX + 0.30712*LL
Furthermore, press the Enter and
the ECT will shows in the workfile
windows.
7. Now the Eviews shows you two boxes, one is for Equation specification and other
one is for instrument list.
a. The Equation Specification is refer to the Short-run dynamic model, which is:
itq
i
tit
p
i
ttt RGDPCRPCCECTconstRPCC1
0
,2
1
1
,11
itu
i
tit
s
i
tit
r
i
t TAXWAGEUN1
0
,5
1
0
,4
1
0
,3
ttit
v
i
t DUMLL
,71
0
,6
For our Example:
The Equation Specification code is follows:
D(RPCC) C ECT(-1) D(RGDPC) D(UN) D(WAGE)
D(TAX) D(LL) DUM
b. The instrument list refers to the endogenous for ECT models. For our Example,
the Eviews code to represent the exogenous variables for our ECT model is:
C RPCC(-1) RGDPC RGDPC(-1) UN WAGE TAX
LL
Type in this equation on the
Equation Specification box:
D(RPCC) C ECT(-1)
D(RGDPC) D(UN) D(WAGE)
D(TAX) D(LL) DUM
Furthermore, type in the
instrument list:
C RPCC(-1) RGDPC
RGDPC(-1) UN WAGE TAX
LL
After that click Options and tick that Heteroskedasticity consistent coefficient
covariance and Newey-West and then click ok.
8. After that you should get the Short-run dynamic results as follows:
Dependent Variable: D(RPCC)
Method: Two-Stage Least Squares
Date: 06/29/09 Time: 10:19
Sample (adjusted): 1971 2004
Included observations: 34 after adjustments
Newey-West HAC Standard Errors & Covariance (lag truncation=3)
Instrument list: C RPCC(-1) RGDPC RGDPC(-1) UN WAGE TAX LL Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C 1.380587 1.160771 1.189371 0.2450
ECT(-1) -0.311494 0.259603 -1.199883 0.2410
D(RGDPC) 0.981566 0.410089 2.393546 0.0242
D(UN) 0.010237 0.146174 0.070031 0.9447
D(WAGE) -0.019561 0.058823 -0.332532 0.7422
D(TAX) 0.071255 0.046388 1.536072 0.1366
D(LL) -0.095667 0.049627 -1.927704 0.0649
DUM 0.015762 0.018952 0.831679 0.4132 R-squared 0.768700 Mean dependent var 0.031574
Adjusted R-squared 0.706427 S.D. dependent var 0.054622
S.E. of regression 0.029595 Sum squared resid 0.022773
F-statistic 12.34394 Durbin-Watson stat 1.789467
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000001 Second-Stage SSR 0.022774
Click on Options and
tick the box of
Heteroskedasticity
consistent coefficient
covariance and Newey-
West.
And then click ok.
As compared to the Microfit Output:
Error Correction Representation for the Selected ARDL Model
ARDL(1,1,0,0,0,0) selected based on Schwarz Bayesian Criterion
*******************************************************************************
Dependent variable is dRPCC
34 observations used for estimation from 1971 to 2004
*******************************************************************************
Regressor Coefficient Standard Error T-Ratio[Prob]
dRGDPC .98154 .17994 5.4549[.000]
dUN .010227 .036818 .27776[.783]
dWAGE -.019567 .047700 -.41020[.685]
dTAX .071253 .047672 1.4946[.147]
dLL -.095664 .036619 -2.6124[.015]
dINPT 1.3806 1.1429 1.2079[.238]
dDUM .015761 .016593 .94989[.351]
ecm(-1) -.31149 .17562 -1.7737[.088]
*******************************************************************************
List of additional temporary variables created:
dRPCC = RPCC-RPCC(-1)
dRGDPC = RGDPC-RGDPC(-1)
dUN = UN-UN(-1)
dWAGE = WAGE-WAGE(-1)
dTAX = TAX-TAX(-1)
dLL = LL-LL(-1)
dINPT = INPT-INPT(-1)
dDUM = DUM-DUM(-1)
ecm = RPCC -.36932*RGDPC -.032831*UN + .062815*WAGE -.22875*TAX + .30
712*LL -4.4322*INPT -.050599*DUM
*******************************************************************************
R-Squared .76870 R-Bar-Squared .69468
S.E. of Regression .030182 F-stat. F( 7, 26) 11.8689[.000]
Mean of Dependent Variable .031574 S.D. of Dependent Variable .054622
Residual Sum of Squares .022774 Equation Log-likelihood 76.0008
Akaike Info. Criterion 67.0008 Schwarz Bayesian Criterion 60.1322
DW-statistic 1.7895
*******************************************************************************
R-Squared and R-Bar-Squared measures refer to the dependent variable
dRPCC and in cases where the error correction model is highly
restricted, these measures could become negative.