Upload
kareem-buckley
View
27
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Using IT to add value: Innovation versus Efficiency. Overview. Efficiency/Innovation dilemma Attempt to integrate numerous frameworks into something simple that makes sense Review Competitive Forces Model Extend Michael Porter’s Value Chain Value Shop and Value Network - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Using IT to add value: Innovation versus
Efficiency
Overview Efficiency/Innovation dilemma
Attempt to integrate numerous frameworks into something simple that makes sense
Review Competitive Forces Model Extend Michael Porter’s Value Chain
Value Shop and Value Network All use IT as the enabler to increase efficiency
IT also enables value add through innovation Innovation strategies How to implement those strategies
Porter’s Competitive Forces Model
How the Model is Used
The Players in each force are listed
An Analysis is made to relatethe determinants to each player listed
Devise a strategy todefend a company against the forces,
based on specific players and the determinants
Look for supportive information technologies
Response Strategies
Reduce Costs Cost leadership?
Product differentiation Enhance value of existing products Improve quality (Superior product)
Focused market niche
Additional Response Strategies Internal efficiency
Reduce “cycle time” Growth strategy Customer-oriented strategy External Alliances Innovation: new products, features, etc.
Strategy and the Internet (Porter) We need to “…see the internet for what it is: an
enabling technology…” (pg 64) The “…greatest impact [of the internet] has been to
enable the reconfiguration of existing industries that had been constrained by high costs for communicating, gathering information, or accomplishing transactions.” (pg 66)
“The great paradox of the Internet is that its [benefits] also make it more difficult for companies to capture those benefits as profits.” (pg 66)
Myths associated with the Internet First mover advantage through increased
switching costs and network effects In reality, switching costs lower For network effects to provide entry barrier, must
be based on proprietary technologies Partnering is a “win-win” strategy
Complements can have negative effect Microsoft standardized operating systems which
increased rivalry in PC industry Outsourcing can lead to homogeneous industry
with lowered entry barriers
Principles for Internet Strategy (Porter)
Strategic Positioning Start with the right goal: long term ROI. Deliver a unique value proposition. Develop a distinctive value chain configuration. Make trade-offs for robust strategy. Fit all elements of company to the strategy. Maintain continuity of direction
Value Configuration Analysis
Chain
Shop Network
Find Solve
Evaluate Execute
Choose
Improve Internal Efficiencies
Resolve Customer Problem Facilitate Customer
Relationships
Value Chain
Inbound Logistics
Operations
Outbound
Logistics
Marketing & Sales
After-sales
Service
Firm Infrastructure
Human Resources Management
Technology DevelopmentProcurement
Value created by transforming inputs into products
Value Chain Structure Critical Activities
Transform inputs into products Also identify activities that provide infrastructure
support Critical Linkages
Internal linkage: Information shared across activities within firm Tend to be sequential flows between activities
External linkage: Information shared across activities between different firms Extended value chain
Value Chain Analysis
Understand Industry Strategy Activities of the organization
Identify the activities and linkages that are critical Add value by focusing on those critical activities and
linkages Lower cost by increasing efficiency, scale or capacity
Competitive Forces Analysis
Value Chain Use
Directly applicable to manufacturing activities Mass vs customized
Less applicable when intangible products R&D
Value Shop
Problem Finding & Acquisition
Problem Solving
Control/ Evaluation
Execution
Choice
Firm InfrastructureHuman Resources ManagementTechnology DevelopmentProcurement
Value created by providing solutions, not services
Simon’s Problem Solving Model
InfrastructureSupport
Value Shop (cont’d) Rely on intensive information to solve a
customer problem Value creation based on:
Information asymmetry between firm and client Firm has information client needs
Firm has standardized information acquisition process
Cyclical, iterative solution process Many standardized solutions
Can be resolved by non-experts Need experts to recognize unique cases
Find Solve
Evaluate Execute
Choose
Value Shop (cont’d)
Key driver is value, not cost “Value” depends on quality of professionals assigned
to client projects Learning across projects is critical linkage
Need for “knowledge base” Examples
Medical profession Law Consulting
Find Solve
Evaluate Execute
Choose
Value Network
Network promotion and contract management Invite and select
customers tojoin network
Initialize, manage andterminate contracts
Firm InfrastructureHuman Resources ManagementTechnology DevelopmentProcurement
Value derived from service of linking customers
Service provisioning Establish,
maintain andterminate links
Billing forvalue received
Infrastructure operation Maintain and
run physical and information network
Mediating technology facilitates exchange relationships
Value Network (cont’d)
Value derived from scale and capacity Each additional customer adds value Value of new service dependent on who else
adopts it Examples:
Telephone The first cell phone had no value
Insurance, HMO Board base of clients share risk
Value Configuration Examples
Compaq: mass production
Cisco: solves problems
Amazon: shared information
Find Solve
Evaluate Execute
Choose
Do not confuse efficiency with innovation “Price compression is killing innovation”
Michael Capellas, Compaq Computer CEO, Business Week (Sep 24, 2001), pg 102
“Don’t mistake reinventing the wheel for innovation”
Related to Goldman Sachs $100 million investment in Webvan – current value $0 Allan Sloan, “Dumb Deals 101”, Newsweek (Sep 10, 2001)
pg 41
Types of Innovation(Christensen & Overdorf) Sustaining Innovation
Respond to evolutionary market changes Make a product or service perform better
Disruptive Innovation Dealing with disruptive market changes Create an entirely new market
Innovation as Value Proposition Three components of value proposition
Value Shop (VS) Value Chain (VC) Value Network (VN)
Total Value Proposition (TVP) is the product ∆TVP = ∆VS * ∆VC * ∆VN
Innovation depends on new business model VS or VN or multiple factors are foci
Efficiency is incomplete innovation VC is the focus
Value Added Strategies
Value Shop Value Chain Value Network
Innovation Create truly new benefits
Develop new process as support
Enhance customernavigation
Efficiency Standardize Products & Services
Reengineer(TQM, Fast cycle time)
Automate Interface
Value Configuration Strategies
Compaq: mass production
Cisco: solves problems
Amazon: shared
information
Find Solve
Evaluate Execute
Choose
Value Configuration Strategies
Compaq: mass production
Cisco: solves problems
Amazon: shared
information
Find Solve
Evaluate Execute
Choose
Dell: mass customization
Napster: music distribution
Sun: Javaenablesinternet
EBay: auctionnetwork
How to innovate?
Focused on strategies Combination of value configuration strategies
needed to enable innovation How can a manager facilitate implementation
of these strategies? Hope to provide some insight by end of course
Where does IT fit into this?
Use IT as a ready lever for efficiency improvement By improving products and services By improving operations By improving the customer interfaces
Use IT as a lever to aid innovation By making new benefits possible By developing new processes By creating new customer networks
Use IT to create new business model Extended Value Chain Value Shop Value Network
Value Added Strategies
VC
VS VN
References
Chan K.W. and Mauborgne R. “Value Innovation: The Strategic Logic of High Growth”, Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1997, pp 103-112.
Christensen, C.M. and Overdorf. M. “Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change”, Harvard Business Review, Mar-Apr 2000, pp 67-76.
Gobeli, D.H. & Rudelius, W. “Managing Innovation: Lessons from the Cardiac-Pacing Industry”, Sloan Management Review, 26:4 (Summer 1985), pp. 29 – 33
Hansen, M.T. and von Oetinger, B. “Introducing T-Shaped Managers: Knowledge Management’s Next Generation”, Harvard Business Review, Mar 2001, pp 107-116.
Stabell, C.B. and Fjeldstad, O.D. “Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage: on Chains, Shops, and Networks”. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1998), pp 413-437.