20
Using PACT Data for National Accreditation Gladys L. Benerd School of Education University of the Pacific Presenters: Betsy Keithcart, Assessment Coordinator Claudia Schwartz, Director of Professional Practice

Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

  • Upload
    lola

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Using PACT Data for National Accreditation. Gladys L. Benerd School of Education University of the Pacific Presenters: Betsy Keithcart, Assessment Coordinator Claudia Schwartz, Director of Professional Practice. Who We Are as Teacher Educators:. Fully Accredited by CTC & NCATE 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Gladys L. Benerd School of EducationUniversity of the Pacific

Presenters:Betsy Keithcart, Assessment CoordinatorClaudia Schwartz, Director of Professional Practice

Page 2: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Who We Are as Teacher Educators:

• Fully Accredited by CTC & NCATE 2004– Four-Year Undergraduate– M.Ed. Program

• PACT 2005• Orange Cohort

– Joint Team Visit Spring 2011

Page 3: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Development of Proposal

• CTC / NCATE / PACT• Voluntary Pilot• Orange Cohorts• Proposal to CTC• Letter to NCATE• AACTE Conference

Page 4: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Session Question #1:

How are teacher education institutions incorporating PACT in NCATE's new transformation initiative?

Page 5: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Pacific’s Proposal: Continuous Improvement

• Coursework & fieldwork• Professional belief system• Multiple opportunities to:

– Observe– Understand– Demonstrate

• Reflective Habits of Mind

Page 6: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Guiding Concepts

Term I:Theory

Term II:Theory & Planning

Term III:Theory, Planning, &

Practice

Term IV:Synthesis &

Analysis

Page 7: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

BSE Assessment System

• Tier 1:– Coursework– PACT

• ESAs• CATs• Teaching Event

• Tier 2:– Key Transition Point Assessments

• Tier 3:– Other Considerations

Page 8: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Proficiencies

• Four-Point Rubric1 = Not Passing2 = Approaching Standard3 = Meets Standard Fully4 = Meets Standard with

Distinction

Page 9: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Research Focus

• Proficiency of Students• Students Not Meeting Proficiencies• Student Remediation• Programmatic Changes

Page 10: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Rationale

• Data Analysis• Program Improvement• Design Changes• Summative Assessments• Formative Assessments• Assessment System• Alternative Considerations

Page 11: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Research Questions

Overarching Research Question:

Are Benerd School of Education (BSE) students/candidates performing proficiently on key transition point assessments?

Page 12: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Research Sub-Questions

Research Sub-Question #1:If a student/candidate is not performing proficiently, what remediation is provided?

Research Sub-Question #2:If students are not performing proficiently, what programmatic revisions are implemented to foster student success?

Page 13: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

PACT Data Collection

Term I: Term II: Term III:

Term IV:

Multiple

Subject

ESA #1:Ethnography

ESA #2:Lesson Plan Narrative

ESA #3:Science Assessment

ESA #4:Integrated Lesson Plan

ESA #5:Assessment Case Study

Reflective Lesson Plan

Teaching Event

Single Subject

ESA #1:Ethnography

ESA #2:Unit Plan

ESA #3:Interactive Notebook

ESA #4:Assessment Case Study

Reflective Lesson Plan

Teaching Event

Page 14: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Data Analysis

• Quantitative Analysis– Aggregating Candidates’ Scores– Organizing / Disaggregating

• Qualitative Analysis– Work Sample Analysis– Constant Comparative Analysis

(Glaser & Strauss, 1967)• Other Forms of Analysis

– Understanding Candidate Learning– Impact of Instructional Strategies

Page 15: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Session Question #2:

In what ways are PACT data informing and/or supporting national accreditation?

Page 16: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Standards Addressed by the ProposedFocused Inquiry

• All CTC/NCATE Common Standards• NCATE Unit Standards (2006)• Specific Standards from Crosswalk:

– NCATE Unit Standard 1:Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Professional Dispositions

– NCATE Unit Standard 2:Assessment & Unit Evaluation

– NCATE Unit Standard 3:Field Experiences & Clinical Practice

– NCATE Unit Standard 4:Diversity

Page 17: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Benerd School of Education:Proposed

Process

• Programs• Continuous Improvement for

Continuing Accreditation • Time Line• References• Resources

Page 18: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

•Entry Assessments–Admissions–Credentials Office File –Evaluations (3)–TB / Background Check–Pass CBEST–Interviews (2)–Essay–Course Requirements–GPA (2.5+)

•In-Program Assessments–PACT Embedded Signature Assignments (ESAs) / Multiple Subject Content Area Tasks (CATs)*–Course Assignments–Feedback from Cooperating Teachers Course Grades–Professional Practice Interview

•Exit Assessments–PACT Teaching Event*–Surveys (Grad, CT, US)

•Follow-Up Assessments–Surveys (Alum & Employers)

* PACT Data

Page 19: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

BSE Assessment System Model

University&

BSEGoals

InitialPrograms

Goals/SLOs TeacherEducation

Advanced Programs

Goals/SLOsMA

Doctoral

DataCollection

Data AnalysisDecision Making

Continuous Improvement

Page 20: Using PACT Data for National Accreditation

Using PACT Data forNational Accreditation

University of the PacificBetsy Keithcart: [email protected] Schwartz: [email protected]