24
Nicolas Rallo Chief, Safety and Air Navigation Oversight Audit Section USOAP CMA: Objectives and Activities in Evolution

USOAP CMA: O bjectives and Activities in Evolution · 3 main USOAP CMA Activities audit CMA : On-site, to conduct a systematic and objective assessment of D6WDWH¶V safety oversight

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Nicolas Rallo Chief, Safety and Air Navigation Oversight Audit

Section

USOAP CMA: Objectives and Activities in Evolution

Some acronyms

• USOAP : Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme of ICAO (launched in 1999).

• CMA : Continuous Monitoring Approach (launched in 2013).

• CE: Critical Element of a State’s Safety Oversight System.

• EI: Effective Implementation.

• SSC: Significant Safety Concern (finding with immediate risk for safety).

• OLF: Online Framework.

We carry out audits, validation activities and other continuous

monitoring activities to determine the safety oversight capabilities

of States, by:

• Assessing State’s effective implementation of the 8 critical

elements (CEs) in 8 audit areas: LEG, ORG, PEL, OPS, AIR,

AIG, ANS and AGA, using a set of “Protocol Questions” (PQs) for

each audit area; and

• Verifying the status of States’ implementation of SARPs and

associated material.

What does ICAO do under the USOAP CMA?

• To validate States’ progress through various on-site

and off-site activities; and

• To continue assessing the effectiveness and

sustainability of States’ safety oversight systems

through audits.

What for?

The 8 Critical Elements

The USOAP CMA Components

3 main USOAP CMA Activities

• CMA audit : On-site, to conduct a systematic and objective assessment of a State’s safety oversight system. Can be a full scope or limited scope audit.

• ICVM : On-site, to collect and assess evidence of a State’s effective correction of previously identified findings. Collected evidence is reviewed and validated at ICAO HQ.

• Off-site validation activity: to assess a State’s effective corrective actions addressing previously identified findings related to PQs not requiring an on-site activity.

USOAP CMA Activities

Jan 2013 - Dec 2015

Activities: Jan 2013 - Dec 2015

USOAP CMA Activity 2013 2014 2015

USOAP CMA Audits 8 5 10

ICAO Coordinated Validation Missions (ICVMs) 20 15 18

Off-site Validation Activities 1 15 21

Seminar/Workshops 7 12 10

Total 36 47 59

10

11

12

USOAP CMA Activities

2016 to date

USOAP CMA Activity 2014 2015 2016*

USOAP CMA Audits 5 10 6

ICAO Coordinated Validation Missions (ICVMs) 15 18 11

Off-site Validation Activities 15 21 16

Seminar/workshops 12 10 7

Total 47 59 40

2016 activities to date

Some of the new

developments…

• MIRs can be sent by ICAO to a State at any moment, especially when there

are indication of concerns regarding the State’s safety oversight capabilities.

• Require timely reply by the State to 1 or more of PQs, and the submission

of the necessary evidence.

• Can lead to a finding, or even an SSC.

• Enable concerns to be documented and addressed, without waiting for a

CMA audit.

Mandatory Information Requests

• “Best Practice”: document, tool or mechanism developed by a State to support safety

oversight functions, which ICAO identifies of sufficient quality or/and practicality to

potentially benefit other States.

• ICAO teams performing USOAP CMA on-site or off-site activities may now identify

“Best Practices” related to any CE in any audit area.

• With the State’s agreement, Best Practices – once identified – are shared with other

States through the SPACE-Exchange Discussion Forum Solution Center on iSTARs

SPACE 3.0.

Identification of Best Practices

• “New PQs on safety management” issued in 2014. Used for voluntary, confidential

assessments of SSP implementation at States’ request.

• In July 2017, amended SSP-related PQs will be published, to reflect Amendment 1 to

Annex 19, 4th edition of the Safety Management Manual (SMM) and lessons learned.

• Selected States will be approached for performing audits including the amended

SSP-related PQs in 2018 and 2019 on a voluntary but non-confidential basis.

• As of 2020, ICAO will perform audits using the amended SSP-related PQs on the

States meeting the criteria to be established by ICAO, in line with the Global Aviation

Safety Plan (GASP).

Audit of SSP implementation

Questions?

I su ary…

• USOAP CMA is becoming more and more dynamic.

• 2 main objectives: validating progress & checking sustainability.

• An increasing number of activities, of many new types, conducted following a risk based prioritization

• States need to provide updated information on the Online Framework (OLF).

ICAO and States

we are partners

If more questions:

[email protected]

Nicolas Rallo Chief, Safety and Air Navigation Oversight Audit

Section

USOAP CMA:

Objectives and Activities in Evolution

THANK YOU