26

UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible

FM2801

Page 2: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 3: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 4: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 5: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 6: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 7: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 8: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 9: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 10: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 11: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 12: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 13: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 14: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 15: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 16: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 17: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 18: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 19: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 20: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 21: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 22: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 23: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 24: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 25: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible
Page 26: UTIG contribution 42...km/s. The offset range for this stacking was short enough (about ±50 m) so that attenuation of arrivals of phase velocities different from 6 km/s was negligible