36
UTRAN Radio Resource Management Introduction Handover Control Soft/Softer Handover Inter Frequency Handover Power Control Closed Loop Power Control Open Loop Power Control Interference Management Load Control Call Admission Control Congestion Control Packet Data Transmission Packet Data Control Dynamic Scheduling BTS 1 BTS 3 BTS 2 UE

UTRAN Radio Resource Management · UTRAN Radio Resource Management Introduction Handover Control Soft/Softer Handover Inter Frequency Handover Power Control Closed Loop Power Control

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    25

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

UTRAN Radio Resource Management

IntroductionHandover Control

Soft/Softer HandoverInter Frequency Handover

Power ControlClosed Loop Power ControlOpen Loop Power Control

Interference Management

Load Control

Call Admission ControlCongestion Control

Packet Data Transmission

Packet Data ControlDynamic Scheduling

BTS 1

BTS 3

BTS 2UE

UMTS Networks 2Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

References

H. Holma, A. Toskala (Ed.), “WCDMA for UMTS”, Wiley, 5th edition, Wiley, 2010Walke, Althoff, Seidenberg: UMTS – Ein Kurs. J. Schlembach Fachverlag, 2002H. Kaaranen, et.al., “UMTS Networks: Architecture, Mobility and Services”,

Wiley, 2001. (see chapter 4)

A. Viterbi: “CDMA: Principles of Spread Spectrum Communications,” Addison Wesley, 1995.

J. Laiho, A. Wacker, T. Novosad (ed.): “Radio Network Planning and Optimisation for UMTS,“ Wiley, 2001

T. Ojanperä, R. Prasad, “Wideband CDMA for Third Generation Mobile Communication”, Artech House, 1998.

R. Prasad, W. Mohr, W. Konhäuser, “Third Generation Mobile Communications Systems”, Artech House, March 2000.

3GPP standards:

TS 25.214: “Physical Layer Procedures“ (esp. power control)TR 25.922: “Radio Resource Management Strategies“TR 25.942: “RF System Scenarios“

UMTS Networks 3Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Efficient use of limited radio resources (spectrum, power, code space)Minimizing interference Flexibility regarding services (Quality of Service, user behaviour)Simple algorithms requiring small signalling overhead onlyStability and overload protectionSelf adaptive in varying environmentsAllow interoperability in multi-vendor environments

Radio Resource Management algorithms control the efficient use of resources with respect to interdependent objectives:– cell coverage– cell capacity– quality of service

RRM – High-Level Requirements

UMTS Networks 4Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

RRM – Components

Radio Resource Management

MediumAccessControl

Packet DataControl

LoadControl

HandoverControl

PowerControl

Core Network/ other RNCs

Physical layer

typically in RNC

typically in NodeB

UMTS Networks 5Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Handover Control: Basics

General: mechanism of changing a cell or base station during a call or session

Handover in UMTS:UE may have active radio links to more than one Node BMobile-assisted & network-based handover in UMTS:

UE reports measurements to UTRAN if reporting criteria (which are set by the UTRAN) are metUTRAN then decides to dynamically add or delete radio links depending on the measurement results

Types of Handover:Soft/Softer Handover (dedicated channels)Hard Handover (shared channels)Inter Frequency (Hard) HandoverInter System Handover (e.g. UMTS-GSM)Cell selection/re-selection (inactive or idle)

All handover types require heavy support from the UMTS network infrastructure!

UMTS Networks 6Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Macro Diversity & Soft Handover (Wrap-Up)

Downlink: combining in the mobile station Uplink: combining in the base station and/or radio network controller

NodeB 1NodeB 2

UE

UMTS Networks 7Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Soft/ Softer Handover

In soft/softer handover the UE maintains active radio links to more than one Node BCombination of the signals from multiple active radio links is necessary

Soft HandoverThe mobile is connected to (at least) two cells belonging to different NodeBsIn uplink, the signals are combined in the RNC, e.g. by means of selection combining using CRC

Softer HandoverThe mobile is connected to two sectors within one NodeBMore efficient combining in the uplink is possible like maximum ratio combining (MRC) in the NodeB instead of RNC

Note:In uplink no additional signal is transmitted, while in downlink each new link causes interference to other users, therefore:

Uplink: HO general increase performanceDownlink: Trade-off

UMTS Networks 8Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Soft and Softer Handover in Practice

UMTS Networks 9Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Soft Handover Control

• Measurement quantity, e.g. EC/I0 on CPICH

• Relative thresholds add & drop for adding & dropping

• Preservation time Tlink to avoid “ping-pong” effects

• Event triggered measurement reporting to decrease signalling load

MeasurementQuantity

Link to 1 Link to 1 & 2 Link to 2 time

CPICH 1

CPICH 2

drop

NodeB 1 NodeB 2

add Tlink

UE

soft handoverarea

UMTS Networks 10Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Soft Handover – Simulation Results

Soft handover significantly improves the performance, but …

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

5 15 25 35 45 55

Offered Traffic [Erlang per site]

Out

age

Pro

babi

lity

(Blo

ckin

g an

d D

ropp

ing)

1 linkmax 2 SHO linksmax 4 SHO linksmax 6 SHO links

UMTS Networks 11Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Soft Handover – Simulation Results II

… the overhead due to simultaneous connections becomes higher!

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

1 2 4 6

Max. Active Set Size

Mea

n N

umbe

r of A

ctiv

e Li

nks

UMTS Networks 12Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Handover f1 f2 always needed between layers

Hierarchical cell structure (HCS)

Macro Micro Macro

f1

f2

f1

Handover f1 f2 needed sometimes at hot spot

Hot-spot

f1

f2f1 f1

Hot spot

Inter-Frequency Handover

Hard handoverInter-frequency measurements of target cell needed in both scenariosMobile-assisted handover (MAHO)

slotted (compressed) mode for inter-frequency measurements to find suitable target cellalso supports GSM system measurements

Database assisted handover (DAHO)no measurements performed on other frequencies or systemsuse cell mapping information stored in data base to identify the target cell

UMTS Networks 13Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Power Control: Basics

Controls the setting of the transmit power in order to:Keep the QoS within the required limits, e.g. data rate, delay and BERMinimise interference, i.e. the overall power consumption

Power control handles:Path Loss (Near-Far-Problem), Shadowing (Log-Normal-Fading) and Fast Fading (Rayleigh-, Ricean-Fading) Environment (delay spread, UE speed, …) which implies different performance of the de-interleaver and decoder

Uplink: per mobileDownlink: per physical channel

Three types of power control:Inner loop power controlOuter loop power control (SIR-target adjustment)Open loop power control (power allocation)

Downlink power overload control to protect amplifierGain Clipping (GC)Aggregated Overload Control (AOC)

UMTS Networks 14Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Near-Far Problem:• Spreading sequences are not orthogonal

(multi-user interference)• Near mobile dominate• Signal to interference ratio is lower for far

mobiles and performance degrades

The problem can be resolved through dynamic power control to equalize all received power levels

AND/OR

By means of joint multi-user detection

Near-Far Problem – Power Control

NodeB

UE 1

UE 2

UMTS Networks 15Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Closed Loop Power Control

Closed loop power control is used on channels, which are established in both directions, such as DCHThere are two parts

Inner Loop Power Control (ILPC): receiver generates up/ down commands to incrementally adjust the senders transmit powerOuter Loop Power Control (OLPC): readjusts the target settings of the ILPC to cope with different fading performance

NodeB

UE

control command: Up/DownExample: Uplink Closed Loop Power Control

Inner Loop(1500 Hz)

SIR > SIRtarget ?

Outer Loop( 100Hz)

target adjustmentBLERtarget

RNC

UMTS Networks 16Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Impact of Power Control

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

pow

er/

fadi

ng [

dB]

time [sec]

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

E b/N

0[d

B]

speed = 3 km/h

Example: UMTS Closed Loop Power Control in the slow fading channel

UMTS Networks 17Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Power Control Performance

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

7.5

0 20 40 60 80 100 120Velocity [km/h]

Requ

ired

UL

SIR

[dB]

PedAVehA

SIR requirement strongly depends on the environment (due to different fast fading conditions – Jakes models)

outer loop power control needed to adapt SIR

UMTS Networks 18Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Open Loop Power Control

Open loop power control is used on channels that cannot apply closed loop power control, e.g. RACH, FACHThe transmitter power is determined on the basis of a path loss estimate from the received power measure of the opposite directionTo avoid excessive interference, probes with incremental power steps until a response is obtained: “power ramping”

NodeB

UE

Open Loop Power Control on RACH

UMTS Networks 19Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

CDMA Overload

• CDMA systems tend to become unstable– More traffic increases the

interference– More interference requires

higher power– More power increases the

interference …

• Methods are required to limit the system load– Restrict the access to the

system– Overcome overload

situations

UMTS Networks 20Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Interference in CDMA Networks

Frequency reuse factor is oneCDMA is subject to high multiple access interferenceSoft capacity: CDMA capacity (e.g. number of users) determined by the interference is softHandling of interference is the main challenge in designing CDMA networks

Interference Problem

Inter-Symbolinterferenz (ISI) Delayed components from the same user signal interfere due to multipath propagation

Multiple Acces Interference – MAI Different user signals interfere dependent on the access scheme

Intra-Cell Interference Interference caused by the users belonging to same cell

Inter-Cell Interferenz Interference caused by the users belonging to neighbor cells.

UMTS Networks 21Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Cell Breathing

CDMA systems: cell size depends on the actual loadingAdditional traffic will cause more interferenceIf the interference becomes too strong, users at the cell edge can no more communicate with the basestation

CDMA interference managementRestriction of the users access necessaryCell breathing makes network planning difficult

Example: cell brething with increasing traffic

UMTS Networks 22Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Cell Breathing (contd.)

coverage low load

coverage medium load

coverage high load

Coverage depending on load: load causes interference, which reduces the area where a SIR sufficient for communication can be provided

yellow area: connection may drop or blocked

UMTS Networks 23Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Coverage vs. Capacity

Capacity depends on:QoS of the users (data rate, error performance (bit-error-rate))User behaviour (activity)Interference (out of cell)Number of carriers/ sectors

Coverage (service area) depends on:Interference (intra- & inter-cell) + noisePathloss (propagation conditions)QoS of the users (data rate, error performance (bit-error-rate))

Thus, trade-off between capacity and coverage

UMTS Networks 24Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Coverage vs. Capacity

Downlink limits capacity while uplink limits coverageDownlink depends more on the load (users share total transmit BS power)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Downlink

Uplink

Erlangs (2% GOS)

Max

imum

cel

l rad

ius

(km

)

13kbps circuit switched service capacity versus maximum cell radius

UMTS Networks 25Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Example of Coverage and Best Server Map

Application: RF engineering (cell layout)Legend: violet indicates high signal level, yellow indicates low level

cove

rage

map

Application: HO decisionLegend: color indicates cell with best CPICH in area

best

ser

ver

map

UMTS Networks 26Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Load Control: Basics

Main objective:Avoid overload situations by controlling system loadMonitor and controls radio resources of users

Call Admission Control (CAC)Admit or deny new users, new radio access bearers or new radio linksAvoid overload situations, e.g. by means of blocking the requestDecisions are based on interference and resource measurements

Congestion Control (ConC)Monitor, detect and handle overload situations with the already connected usersBring the system back to a stable state, e.g. by means of dropping an existing call

UMTS Networks 27Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Resource Consumption

• Service/BLER-dependent resource consumption

• Uplink example:– Service I: Voice

Rb = 12.2kbps, Eb/Nt = 5dBI = 0.99%

– Service II: DataRb = 144kbps, Eb/Nt = 3.1dB

II = 7.11%

• In downlink there is additional dependency on the location of the user– Cell center low

consumption– Cell edge high

consumption

UMTS Networks 28Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Admission/ Congestion Control

Basic algorithm• Admission control is triggered

when load thr_CAC– New users are blocked– Existing users are not

affected as long as load < thr_ConC

• Congestion Control is triggered when load thr_ConC– Reduce consumption of one

or several users– Simple action: drop the user– Repeat until load <

thr_ConC

UMTS Networks 29Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

5 15 25 35 45 55

Offered Traffic [Erlang per s ite ]

Blo

ckin

g Pr

obab

ility

thr_CAC = 50%thr_CAC = 75%thr_CAC = 90%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

5 15 25 35 45 55

Offered Traffic [Erlang per s ite]

Dro

ppin

g Pr

obab

ility

thr_CAC = 50%thr_CAC = 75%thr_CAC = 90%

Tradeoff between blocking and droppingExample: 64k per user, urban

Call Admission Control: Simulation Results I

UMTS Networks 30Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

5 15 25 35 45 55

Offered Traffic [Erlang per site]

Cell

Load

ing

thr_CAC = 50%thr_CAC = 75%thr_CAC = 90%

Cell load depending on CAC thresholdExample: 64k per user, urban

Call Admission Control: Simulation Results II

UMTS Networks 31Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Packet Data Control: Channel Switching

Flexibility of packet servicesAsymmetrical data ratesVery low to very high data ratesControl information/user information

Efficient transmission making good use of CDMA characteristicsDedicated channel (DCH)

Minimise transmission power by closed-loop power controlIndependence between uplink and downlink capacity

Common channelRandom access in the uplink (RACH)Dynamic scheduling in the downlink (FACH)

Adaptive channel usage depending on traffic characteristicsInfrequent or short packets Common channel (Cell_FACH)Frequent or large packets Dedicated channel (Cell_DCH)No packet transmission UE “stand by” modus (URA_PCH)

UMTS Networks 32Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

CELL_DCH CELL_FACH CELL_DCH

Page Download Time Reading Time

DCH Active Time“Chatty Applications”

Channel Switching – Example

Example: Web serviceChatty apps.: keep alive message, stock tickers, etc.(e.g. 100 bytes every 15 sec)Second stage: when no activity in CELL_FACH then switch to URA_PCH

UMTS Networks 33Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Power Control:– Balances user received quality (BLER, SIR)– Users at cell center get less share of BTS

transmit power assigned than at cell edge– Occurrence of power overload

Rate Adaptation:– Transmit power ~ data rate– Users at cell edge get lower data rate assigned

than at cell center– Reduces also power overload

On DCH combination of power control and rate adaptation

– Rate assignment at begin of a transmission based on load and user location

– Rate adaptation when ongoing transmission according to power consumption and overload

– Based on RRC-signaling (time horizon: 100msec … 10sec)

NodeB

UE 1

UE 2low data rate

area

high data ratearea

Power Control vs. Rate Adaptation

UMTS Networks 34Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Rate Adaptation Performance

Rate adaptation significantly improves the RRM performance on DCH.

UMTS_urban, 50 kByte

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

200 300 400 500 600

Cell Throughput [kBit/sec]

Out

age

Prob

abili

ty

384k64kadaptive

UMTS_urban, 50 kByte

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

200 300 400 500 600

Cell Throughput [kBit/sec]M

ean

Del

ay [s

ec]

384k64kadaptive

UMTS Networks 35Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Dynamic Scheduling

• “Statistical multiplexing” of data packets from different data flows on one shared medium, e.g. on DSCH or HSDPA

• Scheduling with time-horizon of 2msec … 1sec

• Optimised usage of radio resources

• Exploitation of the short-term variations on the radio channels (opportunistic scheduling)

• Can provide certain degree of QoS

NodeB

Sample Flow

Flow #1

Flow #3

UE 3

UE 2

UE 1

Flow #2

UMTS Networks 36Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Jens Mueckenheim Nov. 2011

Summary/ Outlook

Basic RRM algorithms presented here:Handover ControlPower ControlLoad ControlPacket Data Control

RRM procedures not discussed here:Spreading code managementRRM for TDD mode: time-slot management

Related issue: RF engineering

With HSPA scope of resource allocation has been changed esp. for packet dataDynamic scheduling in NodeB to quickly (re)allocate radio resourcesDistribution of RRM between NodeB and RNC