Upload
hector-andrews
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
V Konferencja EwaluacyjnaV Konferencja EwaluacyjnaWarszawa, 23.10.2009Warszawa, 23.10.2009
Peter van der KnaapPeter van der Knaap
Ewaluacja w procesie Ewaluacja w procesie budżetowania zadaniowego budżetowania zadaniowego
– doświadczenia holenderskie– doświadczenia holenderskie
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 2
Evaluations for a cost-effective and responsive government
Experiences from The Netherlands
Peter van der Knaap, PhD.
Director, Netherlands Court of Audit
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 3
Outline
1. Introduction: performance based budgeting and evaluation in The Netherlands
2. Regulations and management
3. Results and challenges
4. Outlook: next steps
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 4
• 16,5 million inh.
• decentralised unitary state
• State expenditure 272 billion Euro (income: 240)
• top 10 TI index
• christian-social democratic coalition
• old ties with Poland
Holland
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 5
I. Performance based budgetting in The Netherlands
1999: ‘From policy budgetting to policy accountability’
Objectives and indicators plus evaluation Initiative: Parliament!
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 6
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 7
Structure of Budgets and Annual Accounts
To be answered by Governments’s budget:
What do we want to achieve?
What will we do to achieve it?
What will be the costs?
To be answered by Annual Report:
Did we achieve what we wanted to achieve?
Did we do what we promised to do?
Did it cost what we estimated?
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 8
Scores for “Accountability Day”
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 9
Minister
Agencies
ParliamentNCA
MADMAD
AuditorAuditor Auditor
ICICICIC ICIC
ICICIC IC
II. The formal audit and evaluation system
- ministers = responsible
- 5 year (6, 7…)
- ‘adding up’ evaluations:
objectives
↑
instruments
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 10
Levels of evaluationPolicy audits Ministries /
Ministry of Finance
General policy objectives
(line items)
Policy evaluations Ministries (Evaluation / Audit department)
Operational policy objectives
(line item subdivisions)
Evaluation of policy instruments
Ministries
(policy units / agencies)
Policy instruments
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 11
Evaluation quality: requirements and management
Standards and guidelines: process transparancy and checks
Professionalism and education (State Finance Academy)
Exchange / Pool / Central Audit Directorate Evaluation of evaluation quality Peer reviews (NCA)
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 12
Results?
☺Political debate, cabinet priorities, media attention☺Focus in monitoring systems, ex ante and ex post
evaluation
! Bureaucracy, data dumping and perception of “audit tower”
! Negative effects: tunnel vision, rigidity, strategies! No real adding-up evaluations! Questions concerning quality
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 13
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 14
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 15
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 16
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 17
Results?
☺Political debate, cabinet priorities, media attention☺Focus in monitoring systems, ex ante and ex post
evaluation
! Bureaucracy, data dumping and perception of “audit tower”
! Negative effects: tunnel vision, rigidity, strategies! No real adding-up evaluations! Questions concerning quality
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 18
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 19
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 20
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 21
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 22
Next steps:
Quality: indepence and transparancy Reporting Keeping it managable: adding up and sizing
down! Responsivenes: citizen centered evaluations “Accountable for learning”
V Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 2009 23