Upload
rhoda-burke
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Validating the Needfor Systemic Change
Leaders of LearnersMarch 27-28, 2013
Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013)
Level III (Advanced)
STAAR Performance Standards
Final Level II (2016 and beyond)
Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015)
1575 52%
1637 65%
1700 75%
1783 87%
Scale Score
Percent CorrectGrade 8 Reading
Level II (Satisfactory)Sufficiently prepared
for the next grade level or course
Level III (Advanced)Well prepared
for the next grade level or course
Level I (Unsatisfactory)Inadequately prepared
for the next grade level or course
Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013)
Level III (Advanced)
STAAR Performance Standards
Final Level II (2016 and beyond)
Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015)
3500 37%
3750 50%
4000 63%
4333 78%
Scale Score
Percent CorrectAlgebra I
Level II (Satisfactory)Sufficiently prepared
for the next grade level or course
Level III (Advanced)Well prepared
for the next grade level or course
Level I (Unsatisfactory)Inadequately prepared
for the next grade level or course
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 1230
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
State Assessment Performance - Reading(source: AEIS)
BISD
State
Year
Pe
rce
nt
Me
t S
tan
da
rd
STAAR
TAKSTAAS
All tests, grades3 – 8 and Reading 1 at Level II Final
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 1230
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
State Assessment Performance - Mathematics(source: AEIS)
BISD
State
Year
Pe
rce
nt
Me
t S
tan
da
rd
STAAR
TAKSTAAS
All tests, grades3 – 8 and Algebra 1 at Level II Final
Africa
n American
Hispanic
White
American In
dianAsia
n
Pacific I
slander
Two or More Race
s
Econ Disa
dvLE
P
At-Risk
BL/ESL
CTE GT
Special E
d0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Student Demographics and Program Participation2011-12
BISDHEB ISD
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
BISD HEB ISD0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000 2362921540
2011-12 Enrollment
Source: 2011-12 AEIS
Students/teacher Yrs Experience Yrs w District0
5
10
15
20
25
Teacher Profile
BISDHEB ISD
Teacher Salary (x10) Tot Expend / Student Instruction / Student$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
Instruction-Related Expenditure
BISDHEB ISD
Source: 2011-12 AEIS
Grad Rate RHSP/DAP Adv Course College Ready 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
85.3
70.9
26.8
53
85.980.1
30.3
52
96.3
82.8
30.1
65
College Readiness Measures
BISDStateHEB ISD
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Source: 2011-12 AEIS
4- or 5-Year Grad Rate RHSP/DAP Index 4 - Part 1 Overall
District Name Total Pts Max Pts Total Pts Max Pts Total Pts Max Pts Score
Denton 669.7 700 628.9 700 1298.6 1400 93Grapevine-Colleyville 817.8 900 603.8 700 1421.6 1600 89Hurst-Euless-Bedford 668.5 700 666.1 800 1334.6 1500 89Eagle Mountain-Saginaw 800.1 900 562.7 700 1362.8 1600 85Grand Prairie 627.9 700 560.1 700 1188.0 1400 85Keller 827.0 900 523.3 700 1350.3 1600 84Northwest 579.8 700 505.3 600 1085.1 1300 83Pflugerville 763.9 900 568.4 700 1332.3 1600 83Irving 510.7 600 464.1 600 974.8 1200 81Mansfield 875.5 1000 589.7 800 1465.2 1800 81Arlington 733.0 900 540.4 700 1273.4 1600 80Carrollton-Farmers Branch 609.2 700 511.8 700 1121.0 1400 80Fort Worth 519.6 700 668.9 800 1188.5 1500 79Birdville 804.7 1000 562.1 800 1366.8 1800 76
Source: Moak Casey, based on 2012 AEIS
Projected 2013 District Performance, Accountability Index 4
3 4 5 6 7 850
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
78 7780
7881
83
76 77 7775 76
80
8486 86
8885
90
2012 STAAR Performance - Reading (English)Phase-in Level II Satisfactory
BISD TX HEB
Grade Level
Perc
ent M
et S
tand
ard
3 4 5 6 7 850
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
71
62
76
81
73
79
68 68
77 77
71
7678 78
8789
85
89
2012 STAAR Performance - Math (English)Phase-in Level II Satisfactory
BISD TX HEB
Grade Level
Perc
ent M
et S
tand
ard
4 7 5 8 850
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
70
7476
71
63
71 71
76
70
59
8179
8688
79
2012 STAAR Performance (English)Phase-in Level II Satisfactory
BISD TX HEB
Perc
ent M
et S
tand
ard
Writing Science Social Studies
Reading 1 Writing 1 Algebra 1 Biology W Geog50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
75
60
87
91
85
68
55
83
87
8182
68
95 9694
2012 STAAR EOC PerformancePhase-in Level II Satisfactory
BISD TX HEB
Subject
Perc
ent M
et S
tand
ard
# tests below
minimum
# tests met minimum but not passing
0 1 2 3 4 Total
0 127 33 6 1 1671 90 44 12 5 1512 30 21 4 1 563 22 18 4 444 9 11 205 6 6
Total 157 221 53 12 1 444 students
2015 Cohort EOC Retesting (Number of students remaining after December testing)
277 students must take one or more tests
Failing scores on one or more tests
Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013)
Level III (Advanced)
STAAR Performance StandardsPhase-in
Final Level II (2016 and beyond)
Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015)
3500 37%
3750 50%
4000 63%
4333 78%
Scale Score
Percent CorrectAlgebra I
Continuous improvement timelineFeb 2003 BISD enters ESC XI Continuous Improvement
Consortium with Weatherford and Burleson ISDsJul 2003 Jim Shipley CI overview training for principalsMar 2004 BISD Board OrientationApr 2004 Board approves new goals/objectives, Graduate ProfileApr 2004 HEB and Decatur join consortiumJun 2004 District Department Team trainingJun 2004 Campus Leadership Team training (Level I)Oct 2004 Teacher/Student Partnership TrainingNov 2004 Campus Leadership Training (Level II)Jan 2005 Campus and Department Systems Checks
Eng III
Eng II
Eng I
8th
7th
6th
5th
4th
2nd
1st
Kinder
Phase 1
2012 & 2013Phase 2
2014 & 2015Final
2016 & beyond
Level II Phase-in
20162015
20142013
3rd
How will we ensure that our current 6th graders are well prepared for success at the next level?
How do we determine whether our kindergarten through grade 2 students are well prepared for success at the next level?
Vertical/longitudinal thinking
SSI in 2016
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 22001200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
f(x) = − 1.89602323808488 x + 4128.10731371742R² = 0.046541261557702
STAAR Reading / ISIP Correlation
2012 STAAR Reading Grade 5
ISIP
Per
form
ance
Feb
ruar
y 20
13
Tier 2: 1959383 of 592 = 65%
Level 2 (final): 1582Unsatisfactory408 of 592 = 69%
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 All U.S.0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
5542 42
50 45 43 4356 58
47
75
21
2515
23 28 27 25
24 20
23
202433
4228 27 30 32
20 2230
5
BISD ISIP Performance by Tiers - January 2013
tier 3
tier 2
tier 1
Grade Level
1
2
3
1
2
3
Recommended ISIP Grades K-8January 2013
75%
20%
5%
47%
23%
30%
EOC
The moral imperativeEnsure that all students are well prepared for success at the next level of learning
This can only be accomplished by changing the learning system