Upload
virgil-davis
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Value Added and Distance Travelled and the Learner Achievement Tracker
Yvonne FullwoodNew Measures of SuccessLSC, National Office
Context of the New Measures
• Fair, valid and ‘fit for purpose’ measures
• Four partners: LSC, DfES, ALI, OFSTED
• ‘Basket’ of measures to contextualise performance
• Application across the sector
• No additional bureaucratic burden
New Measures of Success
1. Qualification success rate (QSR)
2. Value Added and Distance Travelled measures (VA/DT)
3. Recognising and recording progress and achievement (RARPA)
4. Learner satisfaction
• Learner destinations
• Provider responsiveness to employers
• Value for money (VFM)
• Staff measures
Purpose of VA and DT for 16-19 learners
Improvement and inspection:• LSC: Value Added and Distance Travelled data for 16-19 learners• Learner Achievement Tracker (LAT)• Provider Gateway
DfES accountability:
• VA for 16 – 19 Learners included in the School and College Achievement Tables pilot
Overview (1)
• Measures the progression in qualifications of 16-19 learners based on their prior attainment
ie, how well do learners do post-16 based on their achievement at Key Stage 4?
• Cover the majority of larger, approved qualifications taken by 16-19 learners, including vocational and ungraded qualifications
Overview (2)
• VA for 16-19 learners will measure achievement in Level 3 graded qualifications, for example:
•GCE A and AS level•AVCE•BTEC National Diploma
• DT for 16-19 learners will include other approved Qualifications at levels 1,2 and 3 for example:
•NVQ •Foundation and Intermediate GNVQ•GCSE•BTEC First
Learner AchievementTracker (LAT)
• Produces reports for use by teachers, managers, inspectors and LSC
• Accessible via the Provider Gateway
• Uses most robust statistical methods available and includes full national sample
• Builds on proprietary systems currently available
• Software and data free of charge to all LSC-funded providers and LAs
VA and DT data
• Data used to calculate the VA and DT for 16 – 19 learners is gathered directly from the the awarding bodies
• Additional data from the ILR is required to calculate DT for 16 – 19 learners
• Providers will not be involved in collecting data for the measure
• Providers will be involved in checking the accuracy of the VA data
Issues for further exploration
• Learners with missing or no prior attainment
• Context variables
• Customising the LAT
• Treatment of AS levels in the VA measure
• Treatment of fails in the VA measure
• Use of success rate for DT
LAT piloting arrangements
January 2006 Updated Quality Improvement Packs availableJanuary 2006 Pilot LAT will be available via the Provider
Gateway. This will contain Work-Based Learning Distance Travelled (DT) data and un-amended Value Added (VA) data for schools and colleges
March 2006 DT data for colleges and amended VA data for schools and colleges.
January 2006
to April 2006
Short term evaluation.
November 2006 The LAT software released for reflection and quality improvement purposes. Ofsted continues to pilot the LAT.
More information
• http://www.lsc.gov.uk/nms• Measuring Success Newsletter• The Quality Improvement Pack• Implementing New Measures of Success• Local LSC
The Learner Achievement Tracker (LAT) Reports
LAT Output reports
Type of LAT report What the report shows
Summary Charts Overview of performance across different
qualifications and across different subjects
within a given qualification type compared to
the national average
National comparison
graph
Performance in a given qualification/subject
compared to the national average across
the full range of prior attainment
National chances charts
Chances of a learner with a given prior
attainment achieving a particular outcome
Summary Chart for all Qualifications
A Level Summary Chart
National Comparison Graph: A Level D&T Product Design
National Comparison Graph: A Level D&T Product Design
A Level Mathematics
National Comparison Graph: A Level Maths
A Level Psychology
National Comparison Graph: A Level Psychology
A Level D&T Product Design Chances Chart (40-46)
34%
A Level D&T Product Design Chances Chart (40-46)
A Level Mathematics Chances Chart (40-46)
A Level Psychology Chances Chart (40- 46)
Output type: Distance Travelled national comparisonchart (fails included)Organisation: fictional organisationQualification type: NVQ level 2Subject/ Subject group: Engineering, Technology andManufacturingProvider sample size: 40National sample size: 4,267Data source: 16-19 learners completing in 1900/1901
Prior attainment of learners, banded(Average QCA points at GCSE/ GCSE equivalent (40=C))
22-28 28-34 34-40 40-46 46-52 52-58
DT
sc
ore
(%
)
25% 23% 23% 19% 20% 22%
Overall DT score across allprior attainment: 22%
We are 95% confident thatthis score lies betweenand
6%36%
DT score = the percentage differencein the chances of success in thisorganisation, compared to anationally average organisation,taking prior attainment into account.
0%= national average
0%
-100%
100%
50%
-50%
25%
75%
-25%
-75%
Key
Performance is significantlyabove or below the nationalaverage, taking priorattainment into account
Performance is similar to thenational average, takingprior attainment intoaccount.
95% confidence intervals
Number inbold
DT score for band of priorattainment
The number of learners isfewer than five, so nojudgement can be made.
*
Example of a Distance Travelled National Comparison Graph
Further Information
• The Quality Improvement Pack contains detailed information about the interpretation and application of each type of LAT reports
• www.lsc.gov.uk/nms