Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Version 2.0 Page 1 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Quality Assurance Manual
Version 2.0 – April 2019
Version 2.0 Page 2 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
QAM Document Details
Authors Patrick Toye, Rebecca Walls
Version No 2.0
Date 9th April 2020
Document History
Date Revised By Summary of Amendments
11th Mar 2019 PT, CL, RW & PS Initial Draft for Re-Engagement
6th Dec 2019 PT, RW Updating QAM with some of the mandatory changes requested in the Panel Report
9th Mar 2020 PT Updating QAM with some of the mandatory changes requested in the Panel Report
30th Apr 2020 PT Updating QAM with some of the mandatory changes requested in the Panel Report
Version 2.0 Page 3 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Contents
Abbreviations – Used in this Document ........................................................................................... 11
Definitions / Glossary of Terms ......................................................................................................... 12
List of Figures .................................................................................................................................... 13
Quality Policy ................................................................................................................. 14
Policy Statement on Quality Assurance and Quality ........................................................ 15
Circulation List ................................................................................................................................... 16
Section 1 – Introduction ................................................................................................. 17
1.1 Company Profile .................................................................................................................... 17
1.2 The Cpl Institute Purpose ...................................................................................................... 17
1.3 The Cpl Institute Mission Statement..................................................................................... 18
1.4 Aim: ....................................................................................................................................... 18
1.4.1 The Cpl Institute’s Core Values are: .............................................................................. 18
1.4.2 Support Learners by: ..................................................................................................... 18
1.4.3 Ensure Learning Best Practice by: ................................................................................. 19
Section 2 – Governance and Management of Quality ...................................................... 20
2.1 Governance ........................................................................................................................... 21
2.1.1 Senior Management Team ............................................................................................ 22
2.1.2 The Cpl Institute Academic Council, Boards, Sub-Committees .................................... 23
2.1.3 Academic Council .......................................................................................................... 24
Boards & Sub-Committees ............................................................................................................ 26
2.1.4 Programme Board ......................................................................................................... 26
2.1.5 Examination Board ........................................................................................................ 27
2.1.6 Teaching, Learning and Assessment Committee .......................................................... 28
2.1.7 New Programme Development Committee ................................................................. 29
2.1.8 Appeals and Review Committee ................................................................................... 29
2.1.9 Admissions Committee ................................................................................................. 30
2.1.10 Quality Team ................................................................................................................. 31
2.1.11 Education and Training Governance ............................................................................. 33
2.1.12 Organisational Risk Management ................................................................................. 35
2.1.13 Business & Operational Risk ......................................................................................... 37
2.1.14 Identification of Risks .................................................................................................... 38
2.1.15 Garda Vetting Policy ...................................................................................................... 39
Version 2.0 Page 4 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.16 Safeguarding and Protection Policy .............................................................................. 50
2.1.17 The Dignity at Work Policy ............................................................................................ 56
2.1.18 Risk Analysis .................................................................................................................. 63
2.1.19 Management of Risks .................................................................................................... 64
2.1.20 Risk Matrix .................................................................................................................... 67
2.1.21 Internal Audits ............................................................................................................... 67
2.2 Management of Quality Assurance ...................................................................................... 69
2.2.1 The Cpl Institute Governance & Organisation Structure .............................................. 69
2.2.2 Management Responsibility ......................................................................................... 70
2.2.3 Quality Management Responsibility ............................................................................. 71
2.2.3 Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................. 72
2.2.3.1 Head of Operations .................................................................................................. 72
2.2.3.2 Training & Academic Affairs Manager ..................................................................... 72
2.2.3.3 QA & Compliance Manager ...................................................................................... 74
2.2.3.4 Marketing & eLearning Manager ............................................................................. 75
2.2.3.5 Quality Assurance Officer......................................................................................... 76
2.2.3.6 Training & Learning Co-ordinator ............................................................................ 76
2.2.3.7 Tutors ....................................................................................................................... 77
2.3.3.8 Learner Representative ............................................................................................ 79
2.2.3.9 External Quality Assurance Consultant .................................................................... 79
2.2.3.10 Internal Verifier ..................................................................................................... 80
2.3 Embedding a Quality Culture ................................................................................................ 81
2.3.1 Continuous Quality Improvement ................................................................................ 81
2.3.2 Quality Strategy............................................................................................................. 82
Section 3 - Documented Approach to Quality Assurance ................................................. 83
3.1 Documented Policies and Procedures .................................................................................. 83
3.1.1 Principles ....................................................................................................................... 83
3.1.2 Purpose of Quality Management System ..................................................................... 84
3.2 The Cpl Institute Quality System ........................................................................................... 84
3.3 Monitoring and Review ......................................................................................................... 84
3.4 Programmes of Education and Training ................................................................ 85
3.4.1 Programme Development, Approval and Validation .................................................... 85
3.4.2 Programme Approval Process Flow Chart .................................................................... 95
3.4.3 Programme Planning ..................................................................................................... 96
Version 2.0 Page 5 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
3.4.4 Programme Delivery ..................................................................................................... 97
3.5 Learner Admission, Progression and Recognition ................................................................ 99
3.5.1 Access, Transfer and Progression (ATP) Policy ............................................................. 99
3.5.2 Information for Learners Policy .................................................................................. 103
3.6 Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) .................................................................................... 104
3.6.1 Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy .................................................................. 104
3.7 Programme Monitoring and Review ................................................................................... 109
3.7.1 Internal and External Monitoring and Evaluation Policy ............................................ 109
3.7.2 Programme Review, Re-validation and Validation ..................................................... 111
Section 4 - Staff Recruitment, Management and Development ..................................... 117
4.1 Recruitment Procedure ....................................................................................................... 119
4.2 Organisational Communication .......................................................................................... 120
4.3 Staff Development .............................................................................................................. 121
4.3.1 Continuous Professional Development Diagram ........................................................ 123
4.4 Code of Conduct – Staff & Contractors ............................................................................... 124
4.5 Monitoring and Review ....................................................................................................... 124
Section 5 - Teaching and Learning ................................................................................. 125
5.1 Teaching and Learning Policy .............................................................................................. 125
5.2 Provider Ethos that Promotes Learning .............................................................................. 129
5.2.1 Facilitating Diversity .................................................................................................... 129
5.2.2 Learner Issues ............................................................................................................. 130
5.3 National and International Practice .................................................................................... 132
5.4 Learning Environments ....................................................................................................... 133
5.4.1 Learning Resources ..................................................................................................... 133
5.4.2 Selection of Premises .................................................................................................. 134
5.5 Monitoring and Review ....................................................................................................... 135
Section 6 - Assessment of Learners ............................................................................... 136
6.0 Effective Management of Assessments .............................................................................. 136
6.1 Assessment of Learning Achievements .............................................................................. 137
6.1.1 Assessment Information to Learners .......................................................................... 137
6.1.2 Coordinated Planning of Assessment ......................................................................... 138
6.1.3 Security of Assessment Processes .............................................................................. 139
6.1.4 Additional Support Needs for Learners ...................................................................... 140
6.1.5 Consistency of Marking ............................................................................................... 141
Version 2.0 Page 6 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
6.1.6 Cross Moderation ........................................................................................................ 142
6.1.7 Internal Verification .................................................................................................... 143
6.1.8 External Examiner / Authentication ............................................................................ 146
6.1.9 Appeals, Re-Checks and Reviews ................................................................................ 148
6.1.10 Approval of Assessment Results ................................................................................. 153
6.1.11 Academic Integrity ...................................................................................................... 155
6.1.12 Feedback to Learners .................................................................................................. 160
6.2 Monitoring and Review ....................................................................................................... 160
Section 7 - Supports for Learners .................................................................................. 161
7.1 Code of Practice for Learners with Disabilities ................................................................... 161
7.2 Disability Reasonable Accommodation Policy .................................................................... 166
7.3 Learners Support Policy ...................................................................................................... 170
7.4 Work Placement Support and Supervision Policy ............................................................... 172
Section 8 - Information and Data Management ............................................................. 180
8.0 Management of Information .............................................................................................. 180
8.1 Information Systems ........................................................................................................... 182
8.2 Learner Information System ............................................................................................... 184
8.3 Management Information Systems .................................................................................... 185
8.4 Further Planning.................................................................................................................. 185
8.4.1 Data Collection & Analysis .......................................................................................... 185
8.5 Completion Rates ................................................................................................................ 186
8.6 Document Maintenance and Retention ............................................................................. 186
8.6.1 Document Management ............................................................................................. 186
8.7 Data Protection and Freedom of Information .................................................................... 188
8.7.1 Obtaining and Processing Data ................................................................................... 190
8.7.2 Data Access Requests .................................................................................................. 191
8.7.3 Requests to Rectify, Erase, Restrict or objections to Processing ................................ 192
8.7.4 Data Sharing Requests ................................................................................................ 193
8.7.5 Confidentiality and Security ........................................................................................ 194
8.7.6 Data Cleansing ............................................................................................................. 196
8.7.7 Managing a Data Breach ............................................................................................. 197
8.7.8 Internal Audits ............................................................................................................. 199
8.7.9 Staff Training and Support .......................................................................................... 200
8.7.10 Data Retention & Disposal .......................................................................................... 201
Version 2.0 Page 7 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
8.7.11 Retention Schedule ..................................................................................................... 203
8.8 Monitoring and Review ....................................................................................................... 203
Section 9 - Public Information and Communication ....................................................... 204
9.1 Programme Information ..................................................................................................... 205
9.1.1 Communication with Learners .................................................................................... 206
9.1.2 Communication with Staff .......................................................................................... 206
9.1.3 Communication with other Stakeholders ................................................................... 206
9.2 Communication Policy ........................................................................................................ 207
9.3 Learner Information ............................................................................................................ 208
9.3.1 Protection for Enrolled Learners (PEL) ........................................................................ 208
9.4 Quality Assurance and Evaluation Reports ......................................................................... 208
9.5 Monitoring and Review ....................................................................................................... 209
Section 10 – Other Parties involved in Education and Training....................................... 210
10.1 Collaborative Provision and Agreements............................................................................ 210
10.1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 211
10.1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 213
10.1.3 Regulatory and Reference Documents ............................................................................. 213
10.1.4 Scope ................................................................................................................................. 213
10.1.5 Responsibility ..................................................................................................................... 214
10.1.6 Policy Intent and Purpose .................................................................................................. 214
10.1.7 Principles ............................................................................................................................ 215
10.1.8 Key Operating Principles .................................................................................................... 216
10.1.9 Overview of Collaborative Provision .................................................................................. 217
10.1.10 Establishment of Collaborative Provision ....................................................................... 219
10.1.11 Approval for Collaborative Arrangements ....................................................................... 222
10.1.12 Approval for Collaborative Arrangements ....................................................................... 224
10.1.13 Policies on Transnational, Collaborative Provision and Joint Awards ............................. 225
10.1.14 External Expertise, Examiners and Authenticators .......................................................... 225
10.2 External Agents involved in QA ........................................................................................... 226
10.3 Expert Panellists, Assessors and Authenticators ................................................................ 226
10.4 Monitoring & Review .......................................................................................................... 226
Section 11 - Self-Evaluation, Monitoring and Review ..................................................... 227
11.1 Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................................. 227
11.2 Provider Self Evaluation and Monitoring ............................................................................ 228
Version 2.0 Page 8 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
11.3 Internal Monitoring ............................................................................................................. 228
11.3.1 Internal Audits / Evaluations ....................................................................................... 230
11.4 Self- Evaluation, Improvement and Progress...................................................................... 232
11.4.1 Selection of External Evaluators & Consultants .......................................................... 234
11.4.2 Learner Involvement in Evaluation ............................................................................. 234
11.4.3 Management & Staff Involved in Self Evaluation ....................................................... 235
11.5 Provider Quality Assurance engages with External Quality Assurance .............................. 237
11.5.1 Quality Process Model ................................................................................................ 237
Appendix Section 1 - Application .................................................................................. 238
1.0a Application Letter for QQI Re-Engagement ........................................................................ 238
1.0b Completed Application for QQI Re-Engagement ................................................................ 238
1.1 Cpl Learning and Development TA The Cpl Institute .......................................................... 238
1.2 The Cpl Institute Org Chart ................................................................................................. 238
1.3 The Cpl Institute - Provider Agreement Template - v1.1 .................................................... 238
1.4 Cpl L&D Turnover Letter – March 2019 .............................................................................. 238
1.5 Cpl Learning and Development Ltd - Insurance Cert 2018-2019 ........................................ 238
1.6 CPL Learning Tax Clearance Cert ......................................................................................... 238
1.7 Statutory Declaration .......................................................................................................... 238
1.8 KPMG Letter of Support - L&D Ltd ...................................................................................... 238
1.9 TCI - Memorandum of Understanding ................................................................................ 238
Appendix Section 2 - Governance ................................................................................. 239
2.1 ISO 9001 2015 Certificate ................................................................................................... 239
2.2 Copy of Master List of Cpl Institute Courses ....................................................................... 239
2.4 Cpl Learning and Development PEL Arrangements ............................................................ 239
Appendix Section 3 - Management ............................................................................... 240
3.1 Cpl Institute Privacy Policy .................................................................................................. 240
3.2 Cpl Group Data Protection Policy ....................................................................................... 240
3.3 QQI Quality Process Model ................................................................................................. 240
3.10 Internal Key Dates - QQI Certification Periods Schedule - 2019 ......................................... 240
Appendix Section 4 – Programme Development & Delivery .......................................... 241
4.1 Tutor Handbook .................................................................................................................. 241
4.2 Tutor Contract for Services ................................................................................................. 241
4.5 Work Placement - Site Visit form ........................................................................................ 241
4.10 Tutors Evaluation Checklist ................................................................................................. 241
Version 2.0 Page 9 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
4.11 Tutor Competence Observation Sheet ............................................................................... 241
4.12 Programme Review Template ............................................................................................. 241
4.16 Tutor & Learner Issues ........................................................................................................ 241
4.17 Tutor Declaration ................................................................................................................ 241
Appendix Section 5 – Staff Recruitment & Development ............................................... 242
5.8 Further Education Policy ..................................................................................................... 242
5.10 End of Year Discussion Guide for Managers and Employees .............................................. 242
5.11 Equal Opportunities Policy .................................................................................................. 242
Appendix Section 6 – Health and Safety ........................................................................ 243
6.1 Training Facilities Checklist ................................................................................................. 243
6.2 Safety Statement................................................................................................................. 243
Appendix Section 7 – Assessment and Evaluation ......................................................... 244
7.1 Certificate Request & Daily Training Record ....................................................................... 244
7.2 Instructor Course Report .................................................................................................... 244
7.3 Training Evaluation Form .................................................................................................... 244
7.10 CPL Institute - External Authentication Report Template .................................................. 244
7.11a Internal Verification Report ............................................................................................ 244
7.11b Internal Verification Checklist ......................................................................................... 244
7.12 RAP Meeting Agenda .......................................................................................................... 244
7.15 Learner Request for Assessment Support Form ................................................................. 244
7.17 Learner Feedback Form ...................................................................................................... 244
7.18 Tutor Assessment Process .................................................................................................. 244
7.19 Tutor Guidelines for Marking .............................................................................................. 244
7.20 Letter - Final Statement of Results ..................................................................................... 244
7.21 Letter - Learner Appeal ....................................................................................................... 244
7.25 – Sample - QQI L6 Manual Handling Instruction Exam Paper ................................................. 244
7.26 – Sample - QQI L5 Safety and Health at Work Exam Paper .................................................... 244
7.27 – Sample - QQI L6 Training Needs ID and Design - Assignment Brief ..................................... 244
7.28 – Sample - QQI L5 Care Support Assignment Brief ................................................................. 244
Appendix Section 8 – Learner Access and Administration .............................................. 245
8.1 Learner Handbook .............................................................................................................. 245
8.2 In-Company Confirmation Template .................................................................................. 245
8.3 Public Confirmation Template ............................................................................................ 245
8.4 QQI Consent Form............................................................................................................... 245
Version 2.0 Page 10 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
8.5 Learner Contract Agreement .............................................................................................. 245
8.6 Pre-Course Questionnaire ................................................................................................... 245
8.7 Sample Pre-Entry to Programme - Interview Questions-Notes .......................................... 245
8.8 Sample Learner Registration Form - Healthcare Courses only ........................................... 245
8.15 Receipt of Submission from Learner ................................................................................... 245
8.20 Hardcopy - QQI L6 Train Deliver & Eval - Learner Handbook ............................................. 245
8.21 Hardcopy – QQI L5 Safety Representation - Learner Handbook ........................................ 245
8.22 Hardcopy – QQI L6 Manual Handling Instruction Learner Handbook ................................ 245
8.23 Hardcopy – QQI L5 Infection Prevention & Control Learner Handbook ............................. 245
8.24 Hardcopy - Workplace Competency Log ............................................................................. 245
Version 2.0 Page 11 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Abbreviations – Used in this Document
QQI QQI Quality and Qualifications Ireland MIMLO Minimum Intended Module Learning Outcomes FET Further Education and Training CAS Common Awards System NFQ National Framework of Qualifications PEL Protection of Enrolled Learners PAEC Programmes and Awards Executive Committee ATP Access, Transfer and Progression QA Quality Assurance GDPR General Data Protection Regulation PPSN Personal Public Service Number DOB Date of Birth QBS QQI Business System RFI Request for Information RPL Recognition of Prior Learning RPEL Recognition of Prior Experiential Learning RPCL Recognition of Prior Certified Learning CRO Companies Registration Office ETB Education and Training Board HSA Health and Safety Authority ICT Information and Communication Technology ITN Identification of Training Needs QMS Quality Management System SOLAS An tSeirbhis Oideachais Leanunaigh agus Scileanna HIQA Health Information and Quality Authority DOH Department of Health
Version 2.0 Page 12 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Definitions / Glossary of Terms
Award - A qualification conferred, granted or given by an awarding body and/or institution to record that a learner has acquired a particular standard of knowledge, know-how skill and/or competence. Awarding Body - An organisation that makes awards. Award Standards - Award standards describe the learning, in terms of knowledge, skill and/or competence that is to be acquired by learners before an award may be made. The awards standards describe the learning required to pass. Collaborative Provision - Two or more providers being involved by formal agreement in the provision of a programme or programmes and training leading to an award. Consortium Agreement - A formal and legally binding inter-institutional agreement concluded and signed by two or more partners in respect of providing, procuring or arranging programmes or other activities. It sets out the programme specific governing framework for the consortium's collaborative provision. The signing of a Collaborative Agreement is a pre-condition for collaborative provision. Due Diligence - Undertaking enquiries about a prospective collaborative arrangement to inform a decision on whether to proceed or not QQI - QQI was established on 6 November 2012 under the Qualifications and Quality Assurance (Education and Training) Act 2012. It was established as an integrated agency replacing four bodies that previously existed (HETAC, FETAC, NQAI and the IUQB) and assumed, inter alia, their awarding and quality assurance responsibilities. Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Prior learning that is given a value, by having it affirmed, acknowledged, assessed or certified. Transnational Provision - The provision of a programme of education, or part of a programme, in more than one country. It does not necessarily involve collaborative provision. Validation - The process by which an awarding body will satisfy itself that a learner may attain knowledge, know-how and skill, and/or competence, in taking a proposed programme, for the purpose of an award made by the awarding body.
Version 2.0 Page 13 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
List of Figures
Figure Description / Name Page No
2.1 TCI Management & Academic Structure 21
2.2 TCI Academic Council Boards and Sub-Committees 23
2.3 TCI Risk Matrix 67
2.4 TCI Governance & Org Structure 69
3.4 TCI New Programme Approval Process Flowchart 95
4.3 TCI CPD Diagram 123
11.5 TCI Quality Process Model 237
Version 2.0 Page 14 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Quality Policy The Cpl Institute hereinafter termed the company is engaged in the provision of training and
consultancy services in the areas of Professional Development, eLearning, Fleet Safety
Services, Healthcare & Childcare, Health & Safety, Soft Skills and Reactivation of the Long
Term Unemployed.
Our Vision
• To be the leading provider of the aforementioned training services in Ireland
• To provide the highest standards of training delivery and services to all of our customers
• To consistently provide products and services that meet the requirements of our customers
• To recognise the contribution of employees that will assist us to achieve our common goal
• To provide the necessary resources and training to enable the Quality System to operate effectively
• To strive for Continuous Quality Improvement in all we do
In order to achieve these Quality Principles, the Company has established a Quality Assurance
Programme which is intended to satisfy the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, QQI Quality
Assurance standards and others, where applicable.
Specific and measurable quality objectives are established and reviewed during the
management review process.
It is the Quality Policy of the Company to ensure that all requirements for quality are
recognised by all personnel and that effective, consistent control of these requirements is
achieved to enable client satisfaction.
Patrick Toye Conor Loughran
Training & Academic Affairs Manager Head of Operations
Version 2.0 Page 15 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Policy Statement on Quality Assurance and Quality
This Quality Policy statement outlines the Cpl Institute approach to the management of quality and standards. Our Training approach to quality complies with the provisions of the Qualifications and Quality Assurance Act 2012.
The Cpl Institute acknowledges that it is ultimately responsible for the academic standards of awards made in its name and for its learners’ quality of learning experiences. Our quality assurance policy has the following goals:
- Alignment to all or awarding bodies and all educational standards as laid down by validation requirements.
- Development of a quality assurance culture that is evident in all parts of the company
for the benefit of the learners, staff and all other stakeholders . - Ensuring The Cpl Institute’s programme design and development, quality assurance
and evaluation support a holistic and quality experience for each learner. - To make sure that appropriate and transparent governance and management
structures are in place to guarantee continuous progress in imposing and assisting
first-class quality assurance and development measures. - To put into effect and maintain procedures referring to the approval, tracking and
evaluation of all our educational programmes. - To take into consideration recommendations of unbiased, independent external peers
and organisations, in particularexternal examiners, professional, statutory and regulatory bodies and external assessors in internal and external reviews of academic, administrative and support units, and in subject matter-primarily based high-quality
reviews. - To accumulate quantitative and qualitative information and to conduct surveys to gain
evaluation from our key stakeholder groups including learners, employers and other
stakeholders, for quality improvement and policymaking. - To maintain programmes in good standing in relation to legislative obligations and to
make the organisation a centre of excellence for learners.
This Quality Assurance Policy will be reviewed on an on-going basis to ensure that it remains
appropriate, consistent and fit for purpose.
Version 2.0 Page 16 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Circulation List
The Quality Assurance Manual is issued on controlled circulation, under the responsibility of the QA & Compliance Manager who must ensure that amendments are circulated to, and obsolete copies are disposed of. The issued number of copies of the Quality Assurance Manual and procedures as follows.
Copy No. Holder
1. Head of Operations 2. Quality Team 3. Training & Academic Affairs Manager 4. QA & Compliance Manager (Master Copy)
Purpose of this Quality Assurance System
The purpose of the Quality Plan is to detail how the quality processes for the plan will be
implemented to ensure that all educational programmes are delivered fit-for-purpose. This
will be achieved by ensuring that all quality assurance processes are conducted in a quality
manner and that the development of quality criteria will assist in measurement.ie. quality
control.
Quality Management Plan Components
To achieve this, The Cpl Institute Quality Management system includes the following
components:
• Quality Assurance - to ensure quality project management processes.
• Quality Control - via the development of quality outputs; and
• Quality Improvement – review points to assess and improve quality where possible.
Quality Philosophy
The Quality Philosophy for The Cpl Institute Project involves:
• Standards and methodologies for project management quality assurance (QQI, PHECC, IOSH, City & Guilds Quality Assurance Guidelines).
• Working in partnership with stakeholders and utilising a consultative approach to ensure broad stakeholder support;
• Effective processes to support arrangements for good governance and accountability;
• Input from individuals with appropriate subject or technical expertise to ensure development of outputs that are fit for purpose.
Version 2.0 Page 17 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 1 – Introduction
1.1 Company Profile
- The Cpl Institute boasts multiple accreditation systems including the provision of over 60 QQI validated programmes, PHECC, IOSH & RTITB accreditation, NISO, RoSPA & RSA membership and holds ISO 9001 2015 quality assurance accreditation.
Your development as an individual or as an organisation is central to our offering:
- A comprehensive suite of professional development programmes from People management, and Continuous Improvement to Conflict Management designed to give you and your organisation a performance advantage
- A suite of Training and Development programme specific to the needs of the Healthcare Industry
- An unrivalled offering to assist in the development and management of industry/ organisations Health and Safety Management Systems, at training and consultation levels
- An extensive offering in E-Learning designed to enable compliance and competence development wherever you are and whenever you want to learn
- A personally tailored offering to suit organisation’s Corporate Fleet Risk profile and Fleet Management policy and development
1.2 The Cpl Institute Purpose
All of our programmes are designed to ensure that you have the option to achieve QQI, PHECC, IOSH & City & Guilds accreditation or complete internal organizational certification for upskilling and continuous professional development.
Our materials are designed in line with all awarding body validation requirements and ensure the effective delivery of all programmes to the certification level required.
We offer a tailored approach to your learner needs whereby the learner can review the learning outcomes we have defined and assist in the setting of additional new learning outcomes, to suit your specific needs. A subject matter expert will ensure that we deliver the programme applicable to the learner needs and mapped to all validated programmes.
Version 2.0 Page 18 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
1.3 The Cpl Institute Mission Statement
The Cpl Institute hereinafter termed the company is engaged in the provision of training and
consultancy services in the areas of Professional Development, eLearning, Fleet Safety
Services, Healthcare & Childcare, Health & Safety, Soft Skills and Reactivation of the Long
Term Unemployed.
We aim to increase productivity through relevant workplace-based learning & education and
increase your knowledge in areas that suit individual learner needs.
1.4 Aim:
We strive to provide learning endeavours that new learning programmes to individuals,
provide upskilling to current employees and support continual professional development of
individual learners.
1.4.1 The Cpl Institute’s Core Values are:
Respect: This encompasses integrity, fairness, listening, co-operation, responsiveness and perceptiveness.
Accountability: It is not just about your part of the job or task, it is about seeing the whole job through to the end – it is not done until it is all done.
Customer Focus: Excellence in everything we do for our clients and internal customers, including a commitment to innovation.
Effective Communication: Clarity in communication, openness and willingness to listen ensures a clear understanding of any request.
Empowerment: An entrepreneurial spirit and passion for the work we do which in turn supports and enables people to maximise their own individual potential.
1.4.2 Support Learners by:
1. Providing professional education environments and provide a rich range of services,
supports, resources and assessments to suit all learner requirements.
2. Delivering knowledge, skills and attitudinal objectives of all educational programmes
in a holistic and inclusive framework.
3. Assessing learners through fair and consistent assessment tools, where we can
provide evaluation for learner growth and skills improvement.
Version 2.0 Page 19 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
1.4.3 Ensure Learning Best Practice by:
1. Designing, developing and evaluating all educational programmes as laid down by
educational standards and/or validation requirements.
2. Providing a rich learning environment for all through the use of varied teaching
practices and resources
3. Liaising with key stakeholders and policymakers on all industry requirements and
utilise current trends/needs in the approach to devising learning content.
Version 2.0 Page 20 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 2 – Governance and Management of Quality
This quality manual will outline the key policies and procedures that are aligned to all
education and learning activities of The Cpl Institute, in our accredited (QQI, PHECC, IOSH,
City & Guilds) and non-accredited programmes.
Governance & Quality assurance within The Cpl Institute is essential to the successful design,
delivery and evaluation of all our programmes and measured consistently through our quality
assurance system.
The Cpl Institute ensures that we comply with all relevant regulations and Statutory
Instruments e.g. GDRP, HIQA, Safety Health & Welfare, Employment, Safeguarding and
Equality & Diversity legislation
Version 2.0 Page 21 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1 Governance
The Cpl Institute’s governance infrastructure has been established to ensure that it is
governed and managed effectively, with clear and appropriate lines of accountability for
each area of responsibility.
A governance structure (Figure 2.1 below and also see Figure 2.4) is in place to ensure that
there is adequate oversight of the financial and operational activities of the organisation
and that all legal, policy and ethical requirements are complied with.
Through the application of its governance structure, The Cpl Institute ensures that Quality
Assurance and standards of academic oversight are in place and that decisions regarding
admission, assessment and progression of any individual Learner are maintained completely
separate from those regarding financial and other commercial considerations.
The Governing Board supports the Head of Operations in ensuring that The Cpl Institute is
stable and in good financial standing, with a reasonable business case for sustainable
provision. In that context, the Head of Operations reports routinely to the Governing
Board in terms of financial and organisational sustainability. Likewise, the Head of
Operations and the Academic Council reports to the Governing Board on issues relating to
Academic Affairs, programme and staff performance and quality of programme delivery.
Figure 2.1 - TCI Management & Academic Structure
Version 2.0 Page 22 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.1 Senior Management Team
The Senior Management Team (SMT) is comprised of the Head of Operations, Training &
Academic Affairs Manager, QA & Compliance Manager and the Marketing and eLearning
Manager. This team brings together senior academic, compliance and commercial positions,
to help ensure that The Cpl Institute has a coordinated, clear and strategic direction.
The Senior Management Team is responsible for overseeing the day-to-day management and academic development of The Cpl Institute and also implementation
of the Strategic Plan and also serves to complement the work of the Academic Council Terms of Reference of the Senior Management Team
Responsibilities
• Develop and implement The Cpl Institute strategic plan
• Oversee the operational management of The Cpl Institute
• Consider and monitor human resources requirements
• Oversee marketing and brand awareness
• Manage resources to make sure that appropriate and effective facilities and services are available and scheduled to ensure the quality of delivery to Learners
• Manage access facilitation for Learners with disabilities
• Monitor progress against strategic goals
• Manage The Cpl Institute Risk
• Managing and deploying staff, including recruitment, performance management and development of staff.
Senior Management Team
• Head of Operations
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager
• QA & Compliance Manager
• Marketing and eLearning Manager Meetings Monthly meetings with informal meetings on an ongoing basis Reporting to Head of Operations reporting to Governing Board/manging Director
Version 2.0 Page 23 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.2 The Cpl Institute Academic Council, Boards, Sub-Committees
All boards and sub-committees in The Cpl Institute have prescribed memberships (including learner representation as appropriate), meeting schedules, and terms of reference concerning their responsibilities and remit. The Cpl Institute is committed to ensuring that the interrelationships between all boards, sub-committees and The Cpl Institute personnel are unambiguous. The sub-committee structure is subject to an annual review. Minutes are prepared for all boards and sub-committee meetings in The Cpl Institute and these minutes, which are retained on The Cpl Institute server in the appropriate board/committee folder, are available for inspection. The QA & Compliance Manager ensures they are filed and retained in accordance with The Cpl Institute’s Data Protection Policy. The Cpl Institute makes every effort to ensure gender balance in the composition of its sub-committees. The following para’s will outline all the different governance units (boards and sub-committees), their memberships and terms of reference and how they co-relate to each other in The Cpl Institute.
Figure 2.2 - TCI Academic Council Boards and Sub-Committees
Version 2.0 Page 24 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.3 Academic Council
The Academic Council of The Cpl Institute has overall responsibility for implementing the educational strategy as set by the Governing Board. It will manage and support the Academic Boards and sub-Committees of The Cpl Institute. Terms of reference:
General
• Governance of all Academic Matters
• Monitoring, review and ongoing improvement of all QA policies and procedures
• Approve policy amendments of The Cpl Institute pertaining to academic matters
• Appoint, review and monitor functioning of academic subcommittees
• Dissolution/modification of subcommittee(s) when and if required
• Finalise and ratify decisions relating to the work of subcommittees
• Consider appeals from any of the sub-committees, which have not been rectified at the level of that committee
• Appoint external members and approve appointments of internal members of Boards and sub-committees.
New Programmes
• To review and agree new programme proposals submitted by new programmes developments team
• Review Research in support of new programmes proposed
• Review and approve new programme submission documents prior to submission to QQI.
Assessment
• To review and decide on learner appeals relating to assessment outcomes (grades/marks)
• Review the application of penalties applied to assessment activities and approve policy and procedures for penalties
• To review and decide on learner complaints relating to assessment methodology and/or implementation
• Review the operation of Examination Boards and sign-off on minutes of same
• Review External Examiner Reports
• Approve appointments of External Examiners
• Monitor the implementation of QQI guidelines, policy and regulations pertaining to the assessment of learners.
Ongoing monitoring
• To review the findings and approve of changes generated by the ongoing monitoring procedures relating to academic matters, i.e., module content, readings, workshops, and assessment
• To make final decisions on matters referred to Council by Programme Board(s)
• Review the operation of Programme Boards and sign-off on minutes of same
• Approval of QA reports prior to publication
Periodic Evaluation
Version 2.0 Page 25 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• To monitor the recommendations and implementation of improvements made by all review processes relating to programmes and academic functioning of The Cpl Institute including (but not limited to):
- Re-validation (Programme Review) - Institutional Review - Strategic Review
• Ongoing review and enhancement of the procedures for periodic reviews.
Membership of the Academic Council
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager
• QA & Compliance Manager
• Training & Learning Co-Ordinator
• Tutor Representative X 2
• Learner Rep
• External Academics X 2
• External QA Consultant
• Educationalist
• Secretary (No Voting) Chairing of meetings Each Chairperson will hold the seat for a six month period which will include overseeing two meetings of the Academic Council. The Chair will rotate amongst the External Members and the Training & Academic Affairs Manager Frequency of meetings 4 times per year – (A minimum of two meetings per year is compulsory for all members). Incorporeal meetings are convened on occasion for specific matters requiring overview/ratification prior to the next meeting. Quorum for meetings 6 representatives; must include a minimum of two external members. Decision-making By vote. Each member will have an equal vote. Chair will have casting vote. Secretary will not vote. Breath of responsibility Accredited programmes run by The Cpl Institute. Meetings’ agenda Prepared and circulated in advance by Chair or Secretary on behalf of the Chair. Meetings’ minutes
Version 2.0 Page 26 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
The recording secretary will attend and produce minutes within 2 weeks of meeting.
Minutes will be stored electronically on The Cpl Institute server. Items of a confidential
nature (e.g. specific learner matters) may be recorded separately and stored securely.
Reporting arrangements The Academic Council will report into the Governing Board yearly with their annual report.
Boards & Sub-Committees
2.1.4 Programme Board
The Programme Board monitors and reviews all current programmes. Programme Board operates within the academic structure of The Cpl Institute. Terms of Reference:
• QA monitoring and evaluation of all aspects of programmes
• Monitor programme progression
• Monitor and recommend enhancements related to assessments
• Review and discuss results of ongoing evaluations of programmes
• Plan for and conduct the periodic review of programmes
• Action and monitor progress of Re-validation recommendations of programmes
• Produce and implement assessment strategies for programme, stages and modules of programme(s)
• Propose the appointment of external examiners
• Review reports of External Examiners and adapt recommendations
Membership of the Committee:
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager (Chair)
• QA & Compliance Manager
• Training & Learning Co-Ordinators
• Tutor
• Learner
Meetings: 2 meetings per year Reporting arrangements: Reporting to the Academic Council on Annual report. Recording procedures The Chair of the Programme Board is responsible for ensuring that minutes of all meetings are maintained and available to internal staff of The Cpl Institute and to the Academic Council. Minutes are forwarded to the Academic Council for approval.
Version 2.0 Page 27 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.5 Examination Board
Examination Boards are convened following an Internal Examiners Meeting where moderated results are considered. Matters to be discussed by the Examination Board includes:
• Determining if learners have been appropriately graded and classified
• Consideration of borderline cases
• Determination of eligibility for progression
• Recommendation for awards and classification
• External Examiners reports Terms of Reference:
• QA monitoring of assessment techniques, consistency of assessment and comparison of standards of programme(s) under consideration with national norms and best practice.
• Agree and ratify assessment results for all learners of programme, prior to forwarding to QQI.
• Review outcomes of external examiner moderation of programme.
• Consider learner appeals in relation to assessment results and procedures of programme and make recommendations to Academic Council.
• Consider learners for progression with missing credit, approve/decline progression as appropriate.
• Review of penalties applied to assessment activities of programme.
• Review/monitor statistics/trends regarding assessment results of programme. Membership of the Committee:
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager (Chair)
• QA & Compliance Manager
• Internal Verifier
• Training & Learning Co-Ordinator
• Tutor
• External Examiner/Authenticator Meetings As necessary – prior to submission for certification to QQI Reporting arrangements The Chair of the Examination Board will report on the activities of the Board to the Academic Council. Recording procedures The Chair of the Examination Board is responsible for ensuring that minutes of all meetings are maintained and available to internal staff of The Cpl Institute and to the Academic Council. Minutes are forwarded to the Academic Council for approval. Note: Minutes of all Examination Board meetings are strictly confidential and are stored on
the system securely.
Version 2.0 Page 28 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.6 Teaching, Learning and Assessment Committee
Terms of Reference
Learner Supports
• Consider applications from learners for additional supports
• Agree and monitor implementation of additional supports
• Development of policy and procedures for the provision of learner supports
• Ongoing review and enhancement of procedures for learner support.
• Review and enhance Learner handbook.
• Reasonable Accommodation
• Work Placement Support and Supervision
• Learner complaints
Teaching and Learning Systems
• Ongoing review and enhancement of teaching systems
• Ongoing review and enhancement of teaching and learning resources.
• Develop and enhance the teaching, learning and assessment strategy of The Cpl Institute
Staff Development
• Identification and promoting of staff training and development
Information storage
• Retention and deletion periods.
• GDPR policy compliance.
Assessment
• Revise and discuss assessment techniques utilised by The Cpl Institute programmes
• Review/monitor The Cpl Institute statistics/trends regarding assessment results
• Review and approve of learners sitting supplemental examinations
• Approval of policy on penalties to be applied to assessment activities
• Ensure compliance of The Cpl Institute assessment policy and procedures with QQI regulations
• Monitor the implementation of assessment strategies for The Cpl Institute programmes and modules
• Monitor the recording of penalties applied to assessment activities.
Garda Vetting
• This sub-committee of this committee will be the Garda Vetting Review Committee*
Membership of the Committee:
• QA & Compliance Manager (Chair)*
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager*
• Tutor
Version 2.0 Page 29 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Training & Learning Co-Ordinator*
• Learner
Meetings As required by the committee. Reporting arrangements: The Chair of the committee reports on the activities of the committee to the Academic Council. Recording procedures: The Chair of the committee is responsible for ensuring that minutes of all meetings are
maintained and available to internal staff of The Cpl Institute and to the Academic Council.
2.1.7 New Programme Development Committee
This Committee supports the specific development of new programmes once preliminary approval has been obtained. Terms of Reference
• Development of programme(s) as per process agreed under QA
• Development and submission of new programme proposals to Academic Council
• Ongoing review and enhancement of process for the development of new programmes.
Membership of the Committee:
• Programme Lead (Chair)
• Tutor
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager
• Associate or external programme developer
Meetings As required by the committee. Reporting arrangements The Chair of the committee reports on the activities of the committee to the Academic Council. Recording procedures The Chair of the committee is responsible for ensuring that minutes of all meetings are
maintained and available to internal staff of The Cpl Institute and to the Academic Council.
2.1.8 Appeals and Review Committee
The Appeals and Review committee review appeals of examination and assessment grades
or appeals against the decisions of other sub-committees. The Reviews and Appeals
Committee is the hearing and decision-making unit in the case of academic reviews and
appeals.
Version 2.0 Page 30 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Terms of Reference
• Consider appeals relating to Learner review of assessment, grade and award
• Determine the outcome of such appeals following the investigation process
• Where an appeal is accepted the Appeals and Review committee is required to determine the appropriate actions to be taken.
Membership of the Committee:
• External Academic Council Member (Chair)
• QA & Compliance Manager
• Tutor (none related to the Learner programme of study and wasn’t involved
previously)
• External Academic with experience of appeals
• Learner (may attend to address the committee)
Meetings: As required by the committee. Reporting arrangements: The Chair of the committee reports on the activities of the committee to the Academic Council. Recording procedures: The Chair of the committee is responsible for ensuring that minutes of all meetings are
maintained and available to internal staff
2.1.9 Admissions Committee
Considers all matters relating to admitting a learner. Terms of Reference:
• Review The Cpl Institute admissions, policies and procedures annually.
• Develop and monitor policy and procedures relating to Recognition of Prior Learning and transfers.
• Process applications.
• Conduct Open Days.
• Consider appeals from unsuccessful applicants.
• Review and consider trends in learner body population statistics.
• Ongoing monitoring and development of learner progression routes.
• Ensure detailed and accurate data regarding trends in learner admissions and registration is collected and maintained.
• Implement, monitor and review exemptions.
• Advises the Academic Council on matters related to the admission of full-time, part-time, short, professional, and other programme and transfer learners.
Membership of the Committee:
• QA & Compliance Manager (Chair)
Version 2.0 Page 31 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager
• Training & Learning Co-Ordinators
• Tutor
Meetings As required by the committee. Reporting arrangements: The Chair of the committee reports on the activities of the committee to the Academic Council. Recording procedures: The Chair of the committee is responsible for ensuring that minutes of all meetings are
maintained and available to internal staff of The Cpl Institute and to the Academic Council.
2.1.10 Quality Team
The Quality Team meets to ensure that The Cpl Institute quality assurance policies and procedures are effective, fit for purpose and working correctly. Also schedule and carry out internal audits.
Terms of Reference:
• Review The Cpl Institute’s full Quality System, Quality Assurance, policies and procedures annually.
• Process any changes to quality assurance documentation and to submit such changes to the Academic Council for adoption.
• Action issues that arise from quality assurance monitoring processes following annual report to the Academic Council meeting.
• Monitor the effectiveness of all quality assurance procedures through the various boards and committees of The Cpl Institute.
• Complete any functions delegated to it by the Academic Council or Senior Management
• Reports to Academic Council on all aspects of academic affairs and presents an annual report and recommendations to the Academic Council.
Membership of the Committee:
• QA & Compliance Manager (Chair)
• Marketing and eLearning Manager
• Head of Operations
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager
• Training & Learning Co-Ordinators
• Internal Verifiers
Meetings Monthly Meeting Reporting arrangements: The Chair of the committee reports on the activities of the committee to the Academic Council.
Version 2.0 Page 32 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Recording procedures: The Chair of the committee is responsible for ensuring that minutes of all meetings are
maintained and available to internal staff of The Cpl Institute and to the Academic Council.
Version 2.0 Page 33 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.11 Education and Training Governance
The Cpl Institute ensures the governance of all educational programmes through clear lines
of authority and staff training/progression. All activities are measured and monitored where
required, improvement processes are put in place.
RELAY – Performance Assessment & Management
On-going and annually, each resource is assessed in terms of their own training needs
analysis, thereby updating knowledge.
Using the above approach, The Cpl Institute conducts Performance Management which is
carried out on a continual basis.
RELAYSelf
AssessmentTL
Assessment
Consistent Scoring
Guidelines
Monthly One-One Meetings
Implement with TL & Training
Department
Internal Audits
Analyse Results
Develop Action Plan
Approach
o Major nonconformity o Minor nonconformity o Improvement opportunity o Observation o Recommendation
Result
Classification
Version 2.0 Page 34 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Each internal resource is continually assessed in terms of their ability to perform. This is a
central core competency for all resources. Our Training & Academic Affairs Manager is
charged with ensuring efficient management skills are deployed at all times. Gaps in skill
levels are addressed through the implementation of internal & external training, buddying
and mentoring programs.
The Cpl Institute’s credibility and professionalism in the provision of training services over the
past 28 years is testament to its competence and authority to successfully deliver the service
tendered. This is supported by QQI accreditation (amongst others) as a training provider. The
qualifications, experience, commitment to high standards of excellence and dedication of all
involved within The Cpl Institute is paramount in its success to date. Continuous monitoring
and auditing of our service provision and self-evaluation of our programmes support our
competence, expertise and authority in performing the services as per this tender.
The Cpl Institute evaluates all programmes by employing both learner and Tutor evaluation /
Evaluation forms. The Training & Academic Affairs Manager reviews evaluations/feedback in
consultation with Training and Learning Co- Ordinators and is proactive in responding to any
issues that may arise. Reports are communicated directly to the Training & Academic Affairs
Manager who initiates changes as required.
•New Starter
Go-Live
•Refresher Trainings
•Career Path Ladder
•Role Specific Training
•Certification
Development towards Management
•Team Lead / Management Development Plan
Promotion
Version 2.0 Page 35 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.12 Organisational Risk Management
Policy / Procedure Name Organisational Risk Management
Version No 1.0
Approval Governing Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
The Cpl Institute recognises that the nature of our activities and the educational
space in which we operate may expose us to risks which have the potential to impact
or harm our staff, learners, stakeholders, and success of our organisation.
It is our policy to adopt best practice in the identification, analysis, evaluation,
control, monitoring and review of risks to ensure that they are avoided, reduced,
shared or accepted.
To ensure this, we will:
- Embed full and effective consideration of risk within the planning and
management of new and existing activities across the organisation.
- Engage with all relevant stakeholders to determine and identify risks.
- Determine the level of risk for our organisation by considering the
likelihood and impact of identified
- Ensure that acceptable risk thresholds are clearly defined and
managed.
- Effectively manage risk throughout the organisation
- Maintain a risk register and control management plans.
- Monitor and review the risk register and enhance where required
Put contingency plans in place for areas of possible concern.
2.1.11.1 Purpose Construction of a risk management framework that ensures all levels of risk and
uncertainty are identified and managed.
All potential threat(s) to the delivery of our service will be appropriately managed, identified observed & resolved where concerns arise
2.1.11.2 Scope
The Cpl Institute business, overall operational activities including staff, accreditation
bodies and contractors involved in the delivery of educational activities.
2.1.11.3 Responsibility
• Head of Operations
Version 2.0 Page 36 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.11.4 Core Responsibilities include
- Delivery of learning & development at a consistent professional standard
- Identification & Determination of the levels of risk.
- Ensuring that the organisation has an effective risk management process
- Delegating authorities and responsibilities.
- Approving the completed Risk Management Policy, and associated guidance
documents.
Risk Assessment – H & S Consultants / Finance Officer
- Providing direction on the development of the risk criteria for analysing of
the impact of identified risk areas.
- Identifying, analysing and evaluating risks at multiple levels in the
organisation
- Advise Quality Team of all identified risks
- Monitor and review the risk register and control management plans.
- Reviewing processes in place within each risk to identify and assess the level
of risk involved.
Head of Operations / QA & Compliance Manager - Ensuring the development of the risk management policy and procedures
and the risk assessments and control measures plans through sub/ working
groups
- Development of a reporting system for all identified risks
- Oversee operational policies for risk management & reporting identified risk
situations.
- Developing a culture of Safety Awareness and wellbeing in both personal and
organisational respects
- Ensuring that the risk management policy and procedures are understood
and effectively communicated.
- Ensuring that all staff and contracted individuals are consulted in respect of
risk management issues aligned to their roles.
Training & Academic Team
- Advised of potential of risks
- Advised of their role in the management of risks relevant to their roles.
- Complying with all quality policies and procedures
- Reporting any concerns to management.
- Reporting risks to the health, safety and working environment for
themselves, learners or other individuals.
- Assist in the improvement learning environments to minimise risk.
Undertaking reporting procedures where required.
Version 2.0 Page 37 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Safety Statement & Risk Assessments Safety Policies Minutes of Meetings
2.1.13 Business & Operational Risk
Policy / Procedure Name Business & Operational Risk
Version No 1.0
Approval Governing Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
2.1.13.1 Purpose To provide clear guidance on the management of risk throughout all aspects of the organisation and clearly define all roles in these activities
2.1.13.2 Scope
The Cpl Institute business and overall operation
2.1.13.3 Responsibility
• Head of Operations
• Finance Officer
2.1.13.4 Keys Steps
The QA & Compliance Manager consults with Senior Management, and construction
of a subcommittee for Safety, Health & Welfare. A separate sub grouping with
external resource involved, will measure the risk scenarios for financial loss,
reputation and cessation of services.
This subgroup will consider the following:
- The sub-committee purpose and responsibilities
- Resources required
- The current safety polices in place and gap identification
- Internal & External requirements.
- The risk factors associated with training provision and all associated
activities.
Questions to help identify risk factors:
Version 2.0 Page 38 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Organisational responsibilities for safety & health
- What relevant legislation is applicable
- Individual roles and impacts of poor practice
- How do we achieve our aims/ objectives for risk management
- What impacts / considerations are there from external sources
- What are your contractual relationships and obligations to our
stakeholders?
The risk categories associated with the organisations strategic and operational activities. Common risk categories include: Governance, Human Resources, Reputation, Finance, Legal, Technology, Health and Safety, Compliance
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Safety Statement & Risk Assessments Safety Policies Minutes of Meetings
2.1.14 Identification of Risks
Policy / Procedure Name Business & Operational Risk
Version No 1.0
Approval Governing Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
2.1.14.1 Purpose Identification of risks and associated concerns
2.1.14.2 Scope The Cpl Institute business and organisational activities
2.1.14.3 Responsibility
• Head of Operations
• Finance Officer
2.1.14.4 Keys Steps Consideration of all risks is essential to the identification.
The following questions may assist in this process:
Version 2.0 Page 39 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- What are the perceived risk factors?
- What previous concerns arose?
- Was a change to our practice undertaken?
- What control measures are currently in place?
- What new possible control is there relation to each risk factor?
- What is the hazard to individuals?
- What legal obligations can this compromise?
- What factors are considered in the identification of potential risks.
Steps to Consider
- Recording each risk on to the risk matrix and the control measures under the
identified category.
- Mapping to a risk rating both prior to and preceding control measures and
assuring the compliance with these.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Safety Statement & Risk Assessments Risk Matrix Safety Policies Minutes of Meetings
2.1.15 Garda Vetting Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Business & Operational Risk
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version 2.1.15.1 Introduction
The National Vetting Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons) Acts 2012 to 2016 provide a statutory basis for the vetting of persons carrying out relevant work with children or vulnerable persons. The Act also creates offences and penalties for persons who fail to comply with its provisions.
The Act stipulates that a relevant organisation shall not permit any person to undertake relevant work or activities on behalf of the organisation, unless the organisation receives a vetting disclosure from the National Vetting Bureau in respect of that person.
Version 2.0 Page 40 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Therefore, The Cpl Institute as an organisation has to conduct Garda Vetting for any individual who may be carrying out relevant work and activity or training with children or vulnerable persons. Garda vetting cannot be applied for on a personal basis.
Furthermore, there is an obligation on any person who is employed and/or engaged
by or acts on behalf of The Cpl Institute to disclose any if they previously have been
convicted of a criminal offence(s), are convicted of a criminal offence or have
been/are indicted of a serious criminal offence.
2.1.15.2 Purpose
The Cpl Institute is committed the health, safety and wellbeing of its community. As
such, The Cpl Institute has a comprehensive suite of initiatives and policies in place
to enable The Cpl Institute to meet its obligations to provide a safe, inclusive and
diverse environment. One such policy is The Cpl Institute Garda Vetting Policy which
aims to fulfil The Cpl Institute’s commitment to its community and meet its legal
requirements under the National Vetting Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons)
Acts 2012 to 2016 (the Act). The Act provides a statutory basis for the vetting of
persons carrying out relevant work with children or vulnerable persons.
2.1.15.3 Definitions
Child/Children The term “child” or “children” shall be understood to mean any person under the age of 18 years.
Vulnerable Person The term “vulnerable person” shall be understood to mean a person, other than a child, who:
A. is suffering from a disorder of the mind, whether as a result of mental illness or dementia;
B. has an intellectual disability;
C. is suffering from a physical impairment, whether as a result of injury, illness or age; or
D. has a physical disability, which is of such a nature or degree-
• as to restrict the capacity of the person to guard himself or herself
against harm by another person; or
• that results in the person requiring assistance with the activities of daily
living including dressing, eating, walking, washing and bathing.
Relevant Work or Activities
Version 2.0 Page 41 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
“Relevant work” or “activities” shall be understood to mean any work or activity carried out by a person, a necessary and regular part of which consists mainly of the person having access to or contact with children or vulnerable persons. National Vetting Bureau Since the commencement of the National Vetting Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons) Acts 2012 to 2016 on 29th April 2016, the national vetting unit of An Garda Síochána (known before the Act as the Garda Central Vetting Unit) is now known as the National Vetting Bureau. The National Vetting Bureau is the single point of contact in An Garda Síochána to conduct Garda Vetting. Its primary objective is to provide an accurate and responsible vetting service which enhances the protection of children and vulnerable persons through enabling safer recruitment decisions. Garda Vetting Liaison Officer A Garda Vetting Liaison Officer is a person who is authorised within a Relevant Organisation for Garda Vetting to submit National Vetting Bureau Application Forms to the National Vetting Bureau on behalf of the Relevant Organisation and receive results and disclosures. The Garda Vetting Liaison Officer will provide the online application link to learners requiring Garda vetting and communicate with learners through the process. The Cpl Institute’s Garda Vetting Review Committee The Cpl Institute’s Garda Vetting Review Committee refers to the group tasked with assessing information received via a vetting disclosure and the suitability of the person to perform the role. The Cpl Institute’s Garda Vetting Review Committee will comprise the following persons:
• Garda Vetting Liaison Officer
• QA & Compliance Manager
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Vetting Disclosure A vetting disclosure shall be understood to include particulars of the criminal record (if any) relating to the person, and a statement of the specified information (if any) relating to the person or a statement that there is no criminal record or specified information, in relation to the person.
2.1.15.4 Scope
This policy applies to anyone who is employed and/or engaged by, or applying to be
employed and/or engaged, and/or acts on behalf of The Cpl Institute who will have
access to children and/or vulnerable adults in the programme of their
employment/engagement in a manner which is not merely incidental to the role of
that person. Individuals who are not directly employed by The Cpl Institute, but who
are employed by contractors (or sub-contractors) of The Cpl Institute and who will
have access to children and/or vulnerable adults in the course of their duties in a
manner which is not merely incidental to the role may also be required to undergo
Version 2.0 Page 42 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
the vetting/clearance process. All learners on healthcare work placements will be
Garda vetted.
2.1.15.5 Responsibility
Garda Vetting Liaison Officer 2.1.15.6 Principles
The Cpl Institute is committed to taking all reasonable and practicable steps to
ensure that only suitable candidates are appointed to positions which involve direct
contact with children and/or vulnerable adults which is not merely incidental in the
performance duties. The Cpl Institute undertakes that any vetting carried out as part
of its obligations under the aforementioned processes, and other statutory
obligations, will be done so in an atmosphere of mutual respect, trust and
transparency. On this basis, The Cpl Institute aims to apply best practices as set out
in the National Vetting Bureau, An Garda Síochána, Code of Practice - Garda Vetting
and ensure that Garda Vetting is conducted in accordance with the National Vetting
Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons) Acts 2012 and 2016. The Cpl Institute
reserves the right to take such steps as is reasonable to the circumstances should
persons identified in scope of this document fail to discharge their obligations under
the Act and/or if information is obtained through the vetting process which
necessitates same. Any such steps should be necessary, proportionate and
reasonable for the purposes of protecting children and/or vulnerable adults and/or
fulfilling The Cpl Institute’s statutory obligations. The Cpl Institute may also take any
interim steps as it deems appropriate to the circumstances in such instances. Any
such steps shall not influence the outcome of any investigation or infer wrongdoing
on any party.
2.1.15.7 Vetting and Foreign Police Clearance of Applicants The Cpl Institute relies on the National Vetting Bureau (NVB), in conjunction with
Foreign Police Authorities, to ensure, as far as is reasonably practicable, the
suitability of any person who is carrying out work or activity, a necessary and regular
part of which consists mainly of the person having access to, or contact with,
children and/or vulnerable persons.
It is noted that while the legislation only refers to Garda Vetting, it is The Cpl
Institute policy to seek Foreign Police Certificates (FPC) from applicants in relevant
cohorts who have lived and worked abroad as part of its vetting process.
The Vetting Application Form requires the person subject to the vetting to disclose
particulars of any criminal record. The administration of the vetting process will be
carried out under the direction of The Cpl Institute Garda Vetting Liaison Officer
Version 2.0 Page 43 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
and/or any other The Cpl Institute employee as may be assigned such responsibility
from time to time.
If the applicant has resided outside Ireland for a cumulative period of 24 months or
more over the age of 18, they must furnish a Foreign Police Certificate (FPC) from
the country or countries of residence. The Cpl Institute, however, reserves the right
to request FPC for a lesser period at its sole discretion.
The FPC should state that the applicant has no convictions recorded against them
while residing there or should disclose any convictions recorded against the
applicant during the term of residence.
The Cpl Institute may at its sole discretion also require that applicants provide an
enhanced disclosure by the completion of an affidavit or statutory declaration.
The Cpl Institute may, at its sole and absolute discretion, afford an employee or a
potential candidate a period of up to six months to obtain the appropriate Foreign
Police Certificate. This period may be extended only in the most exceptional of
circumstances.
Where every effort has been made, and a Foreign Police Certificate is unobtainable
in a particular jurisdiction then the QA & Compliance Manager on behalf of The Cpl
Institute, may, at their absolute discretion, agree to an alternative method by which
a candidate/employee can discharge this obligation.
Should any information required to be supplied by an employee, third party or
prospective employment candidate be false and/or not forthcoming then The Cpl
Institute shall be entitled to rescind any offer of employment or engagement and, in
the case of employees of The Cpl Institute shall immediately refer the matter
through the appropriate internal policy.
2.1.15.8 National Vetting Bureau and Foreign Police Certificate Procedure for
Applicants
The following sections outline the various stages that are involved in the vetting
process:
Stage 1: Identification of Vetting
The QA & Compliance Manager having consulted with The Cpl Institute Garda
Vetting Liaison Officer as they consider appropriate will identify the types of posts
that require vetting. This does not preclude the QA & Compliance Manager from
deciding that from time to time that additional positions will require vetting. Certain
roles/activities may be designated by The Cpl Institute and/or Garda Vetting Liaison
Version 2.0 Page 44 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
officer as automatically requiring vetting. A sample of the current list of these roles
and activities is contained in para 2.1.5.3.12.
No assessment shall be required to be undertaken in respect of such roles and/or
activities are a necessary and regular part of their role as vetting is likely to be a
precondition of participating in such activities. If, however, the QA & Compliance
Manager is of the view that certain roles in these areas do not require vetting, for
example, due to the application of an exemption under the Act, an assessment shall
be required to be undertaken before a decision that the position does not require
automatic vetting is made. This decision shall be recorded by the QA & Compliance
Manger and The Cpl Institute Garda Vetting Liaison Officer and subject to review if
the activities undertaken in the role change.
Stage 2: Advertisement
All posts identified as requiring vetting will generally state in either the job
description or accompanying documentation that the post will be subject to vetting.
The fact that the job description/advertisement does not contain such a statement
does not preclude The Cpl Institute from requiring that such a post be subject to
vetting/re-vetting.
Stage 3: The Offer / Contract
Following completion of the recruitment and selection process, the candidate(s)
deemed suitable for the appointment can be offered the position subject to them
satisfying the full requirements of the role including satisfactory vetting by the NVB.
This will be explicitly reflected in the offer letter and/or contract, which will be
accompanied by instructions on how to complete the Garda Vetting process. No
person required to undergo vetting shall be permitted by The Cpl Institute to engage
in work activities with children and/or vulnerable adults until such time as all parts of
the recruitment and selection process including vetting by the NVB has been fully
completed to the satisfaction of The Cpl Institute.
Whilst The Cpl Institute may, at its sole and absolute discretion afford an employee
or a potential candidate a period of up to six months to obtain the appropriate
Foreign Police Certificate, the contract will explicitly state that the offer and their
continued employment is subject to them successfully completing the Foreign Police
Certificate process within the stated period.
Stage 4: Confirmation of NVB/Foreign Police response by Liaison Officer
Where the information supplied by the NVB/Foreign Police is inconsistent with the
information supplied by the applicant and/or those vetted under para 2.1.5.3.10 of
Version 2.0 Page 45 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
this policy, The Cpl Institute Garda Vetting Liaison Officer will contact the applicant
to clarify whether:
a) The information supplied by the NVB/Foreign Police is correct; or
b) The employee/candidate does not agree that the information supplied by
the NVB /Foreign Police is correct, in which case The Cpl Institute Garda
Vetting Liaison Officer will request the NVB/Foreign Police to review their
information and confirm or review their initial response.
Where the vetting disclosure contains criminal records information or 'specified
information’, The Cpl Institute should as soon as practicable make available a copy of
the vetting disclosure to the applicant.
The Cpl Institute may also take any interim steps as it deems appropriate to the
circumstances. Any such steps shall not influence the outcome of any investigation
or infer wrongdoing on any party.
Stage 5: Assessment of Information
The Cpl Institute may take such action and/or invoke such internal policies as it
considers necessary and appropriate in respect of any vetting disclosure.
Where a vetting disclosure contains convictions, specified information or
information that is inconsistent with that provided by the applicant, then it shall be
considered in the first instance by The Cpl Institute Garda Vetting Liaison Officer and
the QA & Compliance Manager who will determine what, if any, action is
appropriate.
Where further assessment is deemed appropriate, this will be carried out by The Cpl
Institute’s Garda Vetting Review Committee.
The Cpl Institute’s Garda Vetting Review Committee will comprise the following
persons: The Compliance Manager, the Training & Academic Affairs Manager and
Garda Vetting Liaison Officer.
The role of The Cpl Institute Garda Vetting Review Committee will be able to assess
the information on the vetting disclosure and the suitability of the person who is the
subject of the disclosure to perform the role.
The Cpl Institute’s Garda Vetting Review Committee will gather facts and decide as
follows:
1. The appointment can proceed/the employee may continue in their role;
Version 2.0 Page 46 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2. There is a finding in relation to the suitability of a candidate in which case
The Cpl Institute’s Garda Vetting Review Committee will determine if the
appointment can proceed; or
3. In the case of retrospective vetting, re-vetting or a disclosure by any
person who is employed and/or engaged by or acts on behalf of The Cpl
Institute, facts gathered by The Cpl Institute’s Garda Vetting Review
Committee may be referred to the disciplinary policy or any other policy
appropriate to the circumstances.
In considering this assessment, The Cpl Institute’s Garda Vetting Review Committee
may, inter alia, consider the following criteria:
a. All the information disclosed to it by the NVB;
b. Previous employment history;
c. Educational qualifications;
d. Skills and competencies pertaining to the position sought/currently employed in;
e. Performance at interview or job assessment;
f. Satisfactory reference from acceptable referees in the opinion of The Cpl Institute;
g. The nature and seriousness of any conviction or offence which may be recorded in respect of the individual;
h. Mitigating factors, if any, in favour of the individual;
i. The self-disclosure of any such offence by the individual;
j. The age of the individual at the time any such offence was committed by the individual;
k. The length of time elapsed since any such offence was committed by the individual;
l. The conduct of the individual in the time elapsed since any such offence was committed;
m. Rehabilitative efforts undertaken by the individual in the time elapsed since any such offence was committed;
n. Recidivism rate, if any, of the individual in the time elapsed since any such offence was committed; and/or
o. Any other information relating to the commission of or involvement in the commission of an offence, or which would give rise or would be likely to give rise to a bona fide concern that the individual poses a risk to the safety of children and/or vulnerable adults.
Version 2.0 Page 47 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
This is not an exhaustive set of criteria. It is a general guideline to criteria The Cpl
Institute’s Garda Vetting Review Committee may consider and take into account
when assessing the suitability of an individual to undertake, or continue to
undertake, a role or engage in a work activity.
Stage 6 – Completion of the National Vetting Bureau / Foreign Police Procedure
Applicants, employees and/or any other person who is deemed to require vetting by
the NVB, or The Cpl Institute, and who has satisfactorily completed vetting (and all
other conditions of the appointment process) may be employed/engaged by The Cpl
Institute.
Applicants, employees and/or any other person who is required to provide a Foreign Police Certification may be employed/engaged by The Cpl Institute subject to them completing the process to the satisfaction of The Cpl Institute within six months of their commencement date.
2.1.15.9 Vetting and Foreign Police Certification of Existing Employees
Retrospective Vetting
The Cpl Institute is required to request employees and or third parties who are
already employed and/or engaged by The Cpl Institute in certain positions and/or
undertaking certain work activities to undergo vetting (including, for the avoidance
of doubt, the Foreign Police Certificate procedure).
Retrospective vetting will be carried out in accordance with this policy and all those
subject to these requirements will be informed that they will be required to undergo
vetting.
Re-Vetting
The Cpl Institute reserves the right to request any employee/third party to undergo
vetting/police clearance at any time in their employment/engagement but in any
event at appropriate intervals (currently every three years) or such shorter periods
as may be prescribed under the Act or as may be deemed appropriate by The Cpl
Institute.
The processes as outlined in para 2.1.5.3.5 will also apply to Re-vetting and
Retrospective Vetting of existing employees.
The Cpl Institute shall take such action and/or invoke such internal policies as it
considers necessary and appropriate in respect of any person’s failure or refusal to
engage in the vetting process and/or in respect of any vetting disclosure made.
2.1.15.10 Vetting Disclosure of Criminal Convictions
Version 2.0 Page 48 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
It is The Cpl Institute’s policy to ask any person who is carrying out work or activity, a
necessary and regular part of which consists mainly of the person having access to,
or contact with, children and/or vulnerable persons if they previously have been
convicted of a criminal offence(s).
Furthermore, there is an obligation on any person who is employed and/or engaged
by or acts on behalf of The Cpl Institute to disclose any if they previously have been
convicted of a criminal offence(s), are convicted of a criminal offence or have
been/are indicted of a serious criminal offence.
It will be a matter for The Cpl Institute’s Garda Vetting Review Committee to consider such disclosures on a case by case basis.
2.1.15.11 Posts which may require mandatory Garda Vetting/Foreign Police Clearance
If any person engaged by The Cpl Institute undertakes a role listed or is engaged in
the activities listed below as a necessary and regular part of their role then they may
be required to submit to Garda vetting and police clearance.
This is not an exhaustive list and may be added to, amended or varied by The Cpl
Institute from time to time and is subject always to any role and or activity being
identified as requiring vetting/clearance in accordance with para 2.1.5.3.2 of this
procedure.
Persons working in the areas below may not be automatically required to undergo
Garda Vetting and police clearance in circumstances where, for example, an
exemption to Garda Vetting applies under the Acts.
The QA & Compliance Manager in consultation with the Training & Academic Affairs
Manager will assess the work carried out on a case by case basis to determine if
Garda Vetting is required.
If the QA & Compliance Manager considers that an exemption may apply, they must
consult with the Garda Vetting Liaison Officer to clarify the position prior to allowing
an individual who has not completed the vetting process to undertake such
activities.
a. Office based staff
b. Contracted Trainers
c. All training involving children and/or vulnerable adults
d. Invigilators (when invigilating vulnerable adults or vulnerable adults may
be present)
Version 2.0 Page 49 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
e. Learners where it is a requirement of their programme to come in contact
with children/vulnerable adults
f. Where learners are vetted as a requirement for their programme, staff who
have similar access as the learners must then be vetted.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Garda Vetting Form Foreign Police Certification Safeguarding and Protection Policy National Vetting Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons) Acts 2012 to 2016
See section 2.1.5.4
Version 2.0 Page 50 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.16 Safeguarding and Protection Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Safeguarding and Protection Policy
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
2.1.16.1 Introduction
The Cpl Institute has a duty to protect children, young people and vulnerable adults
from any form of abuse. This duty applies to all management, staff, learners, tutors
and others contracted in by the company.
We at The Cpl Institute are committed to safeguarding the well-being of children and
vulnerable adults who are participating in training programmes or residents where
learners are completing a work placement. Our aim is to create a safe, creative and
enjoyable learning environment where all can engage and where their protection
and welfare is paramount. To this end, we adhere to the Children First Act 2015 and
all associated guidelines, as well as Safeguarding Vulnerable Persons at Risk of
Abuse: National Policy and Procedures, published by the Health Service Executive.
This document contains The Cpl Institute’s policy and guidelines for child and
vulnerable adult protection and promotes codes of behaviour so that everyone is
aware of the standards of behaviour of both children and adults. All staff, learners
and tutors are required to adhere to this code. All staff, learners and tutors at The
Cpl Institute will be made aware of the policy and procedure and child/vulnerable
adult protection will be covered in detail as part of the induction.
2.1.16.2 Purpose This Safeguarding and Protection Policy is intended to state the policies and
procedures agreed by The Cpl Institute in respect of safeguarding and the protection
of children and vulnerable adults.
2.1.16.3 Regulatory and Related Legislation
• Child Care Act 1991
• Children Act 2001
• Protection for Persons Reporting Child Abuse Act 1998
• National Vetting Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons) Acts 2012 – 2016
• Children First: National Guidance 2011
• Tusla’s Child Safeguarding: A Guide for Policy, Procedure and Practice
Version 2.0 Page 51 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.16.4 Scope
While the majority of persons studying, working and using the facilities of The Cpl
Institute are adults, it is acknowledged that there may be learners on programme
that are under the age of 18 or learners on certain programmes that interact with
children and / or vulnerable adults as part of their training.
Under the Child Care Act 1991, any person under 18 years of age is considered a
child and should be protected under Children First, the National Child Protection
guidelines. Categories of such persons include:
• Registered learners who are not yet 18 years of age;
• Children and vulnerable adults who interact with learners, staff and tutors on
work placement or during work placement visits.
2.1.16.5 Responsibility Training & Academic Affairs Manager (Designated Liaison Person – DLP)
2.1.16.6 Procedure The Cpl Institute has a duty to protect children, young people and vulnerable adults
from any form of abuse. This duty applies to all management, staff, learners, tutors
and others contracted in by the company.
The company does not tolerate the abuse of children or vulnerable adults in any
way, whether by intent, or as a result of neglect or ignorance. Such abuse is regarded
as a denial of people’s rights and liberty.
The public are protected, and their confidence maintained by ensuring that only
suitable candidates participate on academic programmes where they may have
access to children or vulnerable persons. On these programmes, all registered
learners will undergo Garda vetting and liaise with the Cpl Institute Garda Vetting
Liaison Officer.
The Cpl Institute will ensure that all management and staff who are involved in the
provision of designated programmes where they will come in contact with children
or vulnerable adults, will undergo Garda Vetting as is required by our current policy
and legislation.
The Cpl Institute will ensure that all staff will receive child protection awareness
instruction and a briefing on The Cpl Institute’s Safeguarding and Protection Policy.
The Cpl Institute has appointed a Garda Vetting Liaison Officer who will be
responsible for processing all Garda Vetting on behalf of The Cpl Institute.
Version 2.0 Page 52 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Learners are responsible for informing themselves of the requirements under this
policy and registration as a learner is considered confirmation of participation with
the policy.
The Cpl Institute undertakes to inform all learners of this policy during the learner induction.
2.1.16.7 Code of behaviour when working with children and vulnerable adults
When working with children and vulnerable adults it is essential that:
• Everyone is treated with respect and dignity.
• Contributions should be acknowledged by positive comments.
• Staff and learners should avoid spending excessive amounts of time alone with
children and vulnerable adults.
• While physical contact is a valid way of comforting, reassuring and showing
concern for children and vulnerable adults, it only takes place when it is
acceptable to the concerned party and should take place in areas where other
people are present.
• Good Practice includes valuing and respecting individuals, and the adult
modelling of appropriate conduct will always exclude bullying, shouting, racism,
sectarianism or sexism. Lack of respect may be shown in words, conduct, acts or
demeanour. It is recognised that harassment and bullying can seriously damage
working and social conditions, and it will not be tolerated during the course of
work, study or any other activity of The Cpl Institute.
• Staff or learners of The Cpl Institute should never physically punish or be in any
way verbally abusive to a child or vulnerable adult.
• Staff or learners of The Cpl Institute do not make suggestive or inappropriate
remarks to or about a child or vulnerable adult, even in fun as this could be
misinterpreted.
• Children and vulnerable adults are encouraged to report cases of bullying to a
staff member of their choice. Complaints must be brought to the attention of
The Cpl Institute senior management immediately.
• Children or vulnerable adults are not discouraged from making a disclosure of
abuse through fear of not being believed, and to listen to what they have to say.
If this gives rise to a child protection concern, it is important to follow the
procedure for reporting such concerns, and not to attempt to investigate the
concern oneself.
The Cpl Institute is aware that those who abuse children or vulnerable adults can be
of any age (even other children), gender, ethnic background or class, and it is
important not to allow personal preconceptions about people to prevent
appropriate action taking place.
Version 2.0 Page 53 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.16.8 Code of practice for learners and staff involved with work placements
Staff and learners likely to be undertaking direct work involving children or
vulnerable adults based in work placements associated with designated programmes
will be required to hold a current Garda Vetting report that indicates that the person
is acceptable for working with children and vulnerable adults.
Staff and learners on external work placement or other external work activity should
familiarise themselves, and comply with, the Child Protection and Safeguarding
policy and procedures in place at the work placement facility.
The Cpl Institute recognises that work placements will have their own specific Child
Protection and Safeguarding Policies and Procedures in place and acknowledges that
these will take precedence over The Cpl Institute’s own policies in relation to
activities undertaken on the work placement.
2.1.16.9 Recruitment and Selection of Learners All learners studying on designated programmes are required to submit to Garda
Vetting prior to commencing the programme. The report issued will be considered to
be valid for 3 years.
These learners are responsible for proactively notifying the Training & Academic
Affairs Manager of any change in their status, e.g. criminal convictions or charges
pending.
The Cpl Institute web site must clearly state that Garda Vetting will be a requirement
for designated programmes, and that should the prospective learner have a criminal
record that it may seriously jeopardize their chances of being able to secure a work
placement during the programme, or subsequent employment.
Garda Vetting Guidelines are issued to learners by The Cpl Institute’s Garda Vetting
Liaison Officer. In order to process Garda Vetting, learners have 3 steps to complete:
• Provide adequate ID (list provided in registration pack);
• Complete and return the Garda Vetting Invitation form at registration (issued
by Garda Vetting Liaison Officer);
• Complete the e-vetting requirements.
On submission of the Garda Vetting Invitation by the Garda Vetting Liaison Officer in
The Cpl Institute the National Vetting Bureau will forward a link to the email address
supplied by the learner on their Garda Vetting Invitation form, to enter the e-vetting
system to fill out a Vetting Application Form.
Version 2.0 Page 54 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Learners should look out for this e-mail arriving as they only have 30 days to
complete the application.
If a learner fails to submit a Vetting Application within the 30 days, they will have to
re-submit the ‘Garda Vetting Invitation Form’.
When learners have completed the application, they should print out the completion
page as they will need to produce this as proof of their e-vetting on-line completion.
Please note that Garda clearance only covers addresses in the Republic of Ireland
and Northern Ireland. If learners have resided in countries outside of the Republic of
Ireland / Northern Ireland for a period of 24 months or more, it will be mandatory
for them to furnish The Cpl Institute with a Police Clearance Certificate from those
countries stating that they have/have not any convictions recorded against them
while residing there.
Learners should ensure that they apply for this as soon as possible as it can take up
to 3 months to obtain. Learners will be refused placement without full satisfactory
clearance.
Regardless of whether the outcome was a custodial sentence or the application of
the probation act, convictions that may result in exclusion include (but are not
necessarily limited to) the following:
• Child related convictions;
• Violence, assault or grievous bodily harm;
• Drug related crime;
• Theft;
• Refusal to sign application and/or declaration form;
• Concealing information on one’s suitability for working with children;
• Refusal to consent to Garda clearance;
• Insufficient or inaccurate information regarding proof of identity.
Any learner has the right of appeal to the QA & Compliance Manager in the event of their dissatisfaction with the decision regarding the vetting process.
2.1.16.10 Recruitment and Selection of Staff
All applicants for posts at The Cpl Institute are required to declare any criminal
convictions, whether a custodial sentence was the outcome, or they were given the
benefit of the Probation Act, and/or of any charges pending.
Possessing a criminal record will not necessarily bar an applicant from working at the
company; the nature of a disclosed offence and its relevance to the post in question
will be considered.
Version 2.0 Page 55 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
However, convictions for offences relating to children and for violence or assault are
likely to be incompatible with working at the company.
The appointment of staff to work on designated programmes will be subject to
satisfactory clearance from Garda Vetting. The requirement to undergo vetting will
be set out in the job description.
In implementing this policy, The Cpl Institute will ensure that, in the first instance all
existing staff working on designated programmes will be subject to satisfactory
clearance from Garda Vetting.
All staff are responsible for notifying the company of any change in their status i.e.
charges leading to possible conviction.
The Cpl Institute commits itself to ensuring the following:
• All staff take part in an induction training process;
• All staff are fully cognisant and compliant with the Safeguarding and
Protection policies and procedures of The Cpl Institute;
• All staff are aware of the procedures for reporting allegations made against
staff members or others contracted in by The Cpl Institute;
All new staff are required to undergo a probationary period.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Garda Vetting Form Foreign Police Certification Garda Vetting Policy Children First Act 2015 Child Care Act 1991 National Vetting Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons) Acts 2012 to 2016
See Section 2.1.5.3
Version 2.0 Page 56 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.17 The Dignity at Work Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Dignity at Work Policy
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
2.1.17.1 Introduction
The Cpl Institute recognises the right of all employees to be treated with dignity and
respect and is committed to ensuring that all employees, tutors and learners are
provided with a safe working and learning environment which is free from all forms
of bullying, sexual harassment and harassment. Workplace bullying and harassment
adversely affect the quality of the learning environment by undermining employee
morale and can result in absenteeism, stress-related illnesses and higher turnover of
staff. Bullying and harassment can have a devastating effect on the health,
confidence, morale and performance of those subjected to it. Bullying and
harassment may also have a damaging impact on employees, tutors and learners not
directly subjected to inappropriate behaviour but who witness it or have knowledge
of it.
The Dignity at Work policy covers sexual harassment and harassment as outlawed by
the Employment Equality Acts 1998 to 2008 and workplace bullying and reflects how
The Cpl Institute in dealing with complaints of bullying and harassment.
2.1.17.2 Purpose
The purpose of The Cpl Institute’s Dignity at Work policy is to honour employees,
tutors and learners’ right to a safe working and learning environment where each
individual is respected. The Cpl Institute is committed to providing a working and
learning environment, which is free from all forms of bullying, sexual harassment
and harassment of any kind. All employees, tutors and learners are expected to
comply with this policy and The Cpl Institute will take appropriate measures to
ensure that any bullying and/or harassment does not occur.
Appropriate disciplinary action will be taken against any employee, tutor and learner
who violates this policy.
Version 2.0 Page 57 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.17.3 Regulatory and Related Legislation
• Employment Equality Acts 1998 to 2008
• The Health and Safety Authority’s Code of Practice for Employers and Employees
on the Prevention and Resolution of Bullying at Work
• The Labour Relations Commission’s (LRC) Code of Practice Detailing Procedures
for Addressing Bullying in the Workplace • The Equality Authority’s Code of Practice on Sexual Harassment and Harassment
at Work
2.1.17.4 Scope This policy applies to all employees, tutors and learners including those who job-
share, work part-time and/or are on temporary and fixed term contracts.
It applies to forms of bullying, sexual harassment and harassment not only by fellow
employees but also by a learner, tutor, customer or other business contacts to which
an employee, tutor or learner might reasonably expect to come into contact within
the course of their employment, in the learning environment or during a work
placement.
The Dignity at Work policy applies to employees both in the workplace and at work
associated events such as meetings, conferences and work-related social events,
whether on the premises or off site.
2.1.17.5 Responsibility Head of Operations
Support Contact Person A support contact person is an employee of The Cpl Institute who has volunteered and received training to provide support and information on the Dignity at Work policy to colleagues who may feel they are experiencing bullying, harassment and or sexual harassment.
2.1.17.6 Policy
Definition of Bullying
Bullying at work has been defined as “repeated inappropriate behaviour, direct or
indirect, whether verbal, physical or otherwise, conducted by one or more persons
against another or others, at the place of work and/or in the course of employment
that could reasonably be regarded as undermining the individual’s right to dignity at
work”.
Version 2.0 Page 58 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
An isolated incident of the behaviour described in the definition may be an affront to
dignity at work, but as a once off incident, is not considered to be bullying.
Examples of bullying behaviour may include:
• Personal insults and name-calling;
• Persistent unjustified criticism and sarcasm;
• Shouting at staff in public and/or private;
• Sneering;
• Unfair delegation of duties and responsibilities;
• Setting impossible deadlines;
• Unnecessary work interference;
• Aggression;
• Not giving credit for work contribution;
• Continuously refusing reasonable requests without good reason;
• Intimidation and threats in general.
Definition of Harassment
Harassment is any form of unwanted conduct, related to an individual’s gender, civil
or family status, sexual orientation, religion, age, disability, race or membership of
the travelling community which has the purpose or effect of violating a person’s
dignity and creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive
environment for the person.
The unwanted conduct may consist of acts, requests, spoken words, gestures, or the
production, display or circulation of written words, pictures or other material.
Definition of Sexual Harassment
Sexual harassment is any form of verbal, non-verbal or physical conduct of a sexual
nature which has the purpose or effect of violating a person’s dignity and creating an
intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for the person.
The unwanted conduct may consist of acts, requests, spoken words, gestures, or the
production, display or circulation of written words, pictures or other material.
Examples of sexual harassment include:
• Sexual gestures;
• Displaying sexually suggestive objectives, pictures, calendars;
• Sending suggestive and pornographic correspondence, including e-mails or
text messages;
• Unwelcome sexual comments and jokes;
• Unwelcome physical conduct, such as pinching, unnecessary touching, etc.
The examples stated in this policy are not an exhaustive list and The Cpl Institute reserves the right to take action against these and other inappropriate behaviours.
Version 2.0 Page 59 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.17.7 Procedure
Should an employee, tutor or learner experience unwanted conduct, he or she is
encouraged to raise the issue so that it can be resolved speedily. Informal and formal
procedures are in place to deal with the issue of bullying/harassment at work. Any
investigation will be completed as quickly as possible and The Cpl Institute will take
all reasonable measures to ensure that the complaining employee, tutor or learner
will not be victimised or suffer any other adverse treatment as a result of making a
complaint.
The Cpl Institute may decide to access external assistance at any time during this
process.
Informal Procedure
It is often preferable for all concerned that complaints of bullying or harassment are
dealt with informally whenever possible, as often the perpetrator may not be aware
that their behaviour is causing such offence to others. This is likely to produce
solutions that are speedy, effective and minimise embarrassment and the risk of
breaching confidentiality.
Thus, in the first instance, an employee, tutor or learner who believes that they are
the subject of bullying and/or harassment should ask the person responsible to stop
the offensive behaviour.
• Raise the issue informally with the person who is creating the problem,
pointing out that their conduct is unwelcome, offensive or interfering with
work.
• If an employee, tutor or learner finds it difficult to approach the alleged
perpetrator directly, they should seek help and advice on a confidential basis
from their manager or anyone else that they feel comfortable talking to. Any
disclosures will be treated in strictest confidence.
• Having consulted with an appropriate person, the employee, tutor or learner
may request the assistance of the manager or senior person in raising the
issue with the alleged perpetrator(s). In this situation, the approach of the
manager or senior person should be by way of a confidential non-
confrontational discussion with a view to resolving the issue in an informal
low-key manner.
• An appropriate course of action at this stage, for example, could be exploring
a mediated solution.
An employee, tutor or learner may decide, for whatever reason, to bypass the
informal procedure. It is recognised that it may not always be practical to use the
informal procedure; particularly where the bullying or harassment is serious, or
Version 2.0 Page 60 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
where the people involved are at different levels in The Cpl Institute or an external
facility. In such instances the employee, tutor or learner should use the formal
mechanism set out below.
Formal Procedure
If the informal procedure is not appropriate, or if the issue has not been successfully
resolved, the following procedure should be followed:
• An employee, tutor or learner must contact their manager either verbally or
in writing outlining the nature of the complaint.
• The complaint will be subject to an initial informal examination by a
designated Manager, who can be considered impartial, with a view to
determining an appropriate course of action. At this stage, an appropriate
course of action could be exploring a mediated solution or otherwise
resolving the complaint informally. Should these approaches be deemed
inappropriate or inconclusive, a formal investigation of the complaint will
take place to determine the facts and the credibility or otherwise of the
allegation(s).
• If a formal investigation is deemed appropriate, the employee, tutor or
learner will be requested to outline the complaint in a written statement and
provide it to the designated manager.
• Senior Manager will appoint an impartial investigator to investigate the
complaint.
• The investigation will include interviews with both the employee, tutor or
learner and the alleged perpetrator. Another employee, tutor or learner may
accompany both sides during the interview process.
• In the interests of natural justice, the alleged bully or harasser will be notified
in writing of the nature of the complaint, given a copy of the allegation,
informed of his or her right to representation and will be given every
opportunity to rebut the detailed allegations made. A copy of the employee,
tutor or learner’s written statement may be given to them. A record in the
form of a written statement of reply may be taken.
• Whilst it is desirable to maintain utmost confidentiality, once an investigation
of an issue begins, it may be necessary to interview other employees, tutors
or learners. If this occurs, the importance of confidentiality will be stressed to
them. Any statements taken from witnesses will be circulated to the person
making the complaint and the alleged bully/harasser.
• A record of all relevant discussions which take place during the course of the
investigation will be maintained by the appointed investigator. Both parties
will be given the opportunity to comment on these and the witness
statements before any conclusion is reached in the investigation.
Version 2.0 Page 61 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• The appointed investigator will outline their conclusions, and the reasons for
reaching their conclusions, in a written report. Both parties and senior
management will be given copies of the written report.
• Both parties will be given the opportunity to comment on the findings in the
written report before any action is decided upon by senior management.
Action Post Investigation
Where a complaint is upheld the disciplinary policy will be implemented. Should a
case of bullying or harassment be proven, The Cpl Institute will take the appropriate
disciplinary action which will be in line with The Cpl Institute’s Disciplinary Policy.
Such an action can include a warning, transfer, demotion or other appropriate action
up to and including dismissal or termination of contract.
Records of any warnings for bullying and/or harassment will remain in the employee,
tutor or learner’s file and will be used in determining disciplinary action to be taken
if any further offences of the same or similar nature occur in the future.
Observation of Bullying or Harassment
If bullying or harassment is observed to be taking place, it should be brought to the
attention of the employee, tutor or learner’s manager or if this is not appropriate,
any member of the senior management team.
Bullying or Harassment by Non-Employee
If an employee, tutor or learner believes that a non-employee with whom they have
come into contact in the course of their work or training has bullied or harassed
them, the employee, tutor or learner should adopt the procedures outlined above.
Where a formal complaint is made against a non-employee, efforts will be made to
ensure that the individual is dealt with through the procedures outlined here. If the
complaint is upheld, The Cpl Institute will take steps to prevent the situation arising
in the future, which may involve terminating the services of that person or the
organisation they represent.
Malicious Complaints
Sometimes complaints concerning bullying and harassment may themselves be false
and/or maliciously motivated. If The Cpl Institute finds this to be the case,
disciplinary action up to and including dismissal may be imposed or a termination of
a contract.
Confidentiality
All individuals involved in the procedures referred to above will be required to
maintain confidentiality at all times.
Appeal Procedure
Version 2.0 Page 62 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Employee, tutors or learners have the right to appeal against the outcome of the
investigation. An employee, tutor or learner may exercise there right of appeal.
Employees, tutors or learners will be advised who will be appointed in the business
to hear their appeal. All appeals should be made in writing within five days from the
date on which the decision to impose disciplinary action is communicated to the
employee, tutor or learner. Employees, tutors or learners will be required to set out
the grounds for their appeal in writing.
The appeal will be heard as soon as it is practical, normally within five working days.
In some circumstances, due to details of the appeal and availability of the
appropriate persons, this timeframe may be unreasonable. In these instances, a
revised time frame will be communicated directly to the employee, tutor or learner.
Where appropriate, the appeal may be heard by a member of senior management or
by the Operations Director. At the appeal meeting the employee, tutor or learner
will be given the opportunity to explain the basis of their appeal. The Cpl Institute
appointed representative will be entitled to ask further questions and seek
clarification. At the conclusion of the appeal process, the decision will be delivered
to the employee, tutor or learner in writing. This is the final step in the internal
process and the decision made by the designated member of senior management or
Operations Director is final.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Version 2.0 Page 63 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.18 Risk Analysis
Policy / Procedure Name Risk Analysis
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
2.1.18.1 Purpose Identification of all possible risks and the evaluation of control measures on organisational activities.
2.1.18.2 Scope
The Cpl Institute business and organisational activities
2.1.18.3 Responsibility H & S Consultants - Risk assessors
2.1.18.4 Key Steps
Using the 5x5 rating scale, analyse the risks in terms of likelihood and impact using
the following steps:
1. Score the Likelihood Consider the likelihood that each risk may occur. Record the level under the column
heading – (Likelihood “L”) on the risk assessment
Likelihood Criteria
The following applies when considering the likelihood of the event taking place:
- Remote – exceptional circumstances.
- Unlikely – Rare probably of occurring.
- Possible – Might or could occur at some time.
- Likely – Occur in most circumstances.
- Highly Likely –Expected to occur in most circumstances.
2. Score the Possible Impact
Consider the possible impact that each risk may have. Record the level under the
column heading – (Impact “I”) on the risk assessment
Impact Criteria
The following applies when considering the event taking place:
Version 2.0 Page 64 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Insignificant – Low level impact with negligible consequences
- Minor – The consequences could threaten the role at hand, requires
observation to minimise impact.
- Moderate – A significant/medium potential of causing harm or difficulties
- Major – High potential to cause significant occupational health, safety and
welfare incident(s), financial loss or reputation damage.
- Extreme – Extreme potential to cause very serious occupational health,
safety and welfare incident(s) and organisational damage
3. Calculate the Risk Level
Use the 5x5 risk matrix to determine the overall risk level of each risk. Record the
outcomes and scores and link to required control measures. Core Stages
- Discuss the actions to be taken to mitigate against each risk and record
on the risk assessments.
- Review and amend as required but no less than yearly
Prioritise highest rated risks concerns, and identification of new control measures
required to mitigate these.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Risk Assessments Quality reviews Minutes of Meetings
2.1.19 Management of Risks
Policy / Procedure Name Management of Risks
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
2.1.19.1 Purpose Identification of control measures and work practice enhancements
2.1.19.2 Scope
The Cpl Institute business and organisational activities
Version 2.0 Page 65 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.19.3 Responsibility
• Quality Team
• H & S Consultants - Risk assessors
2.1.19.4 Keys Steps
Consider one of the following four options to manage a risk: 1) Avoid the risk 2) Reduce the risk 3) Share the risk 4) Accept the risk
1. Avoid the Risk
Avoiding a risk is considered when the consequence of a risk is too high to accept
and cannot be easily reduced or shared. Avoiding risk may involve:
- Not undertaking the activity that would create the risk
- Removing the source of the risk
- Termination of the activity from quality & financial perspectives
2. Reduce the Risk
The following may reduce or control the likelihood of an event occurring:
- Policies and Procedures
- Internal and External Audits
- Contractual Conditions
- Preventive Measures
- Continuous Quality Improvement Activities
- Adherence to Quality Standards
- Staff Training
- Support and Supervision
3. Share the Risk
The following should be considered for sharing risk:
- Using a third party to complete a specialist or difficult activity (Second
Provider agreements)
- Using Insurance (Check that the insurer and insurance policies are suitable
and will cover specific risks)
- Limiting liability by using waivers and disclaimers
4. Accept the Risk
The acceptable net risk threshold is described as follows:
Version 2.0 Page 66 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Not undertaking any activities that would have an extreme impact on the
organisation, unless the likelihood of occurrence is considered to be at the
lowest level and after all control measures have been taken.
- We will not undertake any activities that would have a major impact on the
organisation where it is seen that risks are highly likely to occur.
- All activities sitting in the minor/ moderate risk group will be concerned only
when we can address all risks with control procedures.
Questions to assess risk management options:
- How adequate are our current ways of managing this risk?
- Is more than one option necessary to reduce the risk to an acceptable level?
- Does the option reduce the risk but also reduce our opportunities?
- How do the costs weigh up against its benefits?
- Can the resources required be provided to minimise the risk
- Has the risk been reduced to an acceptable level?
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Risk Assessments Quality reviews Minutes of Meetings
Version 2.0 Page 67 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.1.20 Risk Matrix
Risk Matrix – Acceptable “Net Risk” after mitigating action has been taken.
Likelihood Remote Unlikely Possible Likely Highly Likely
Impact Score 1 2 3 4 5
Extreme 5
Major 4
Moderate 3
Minor 2
Insignificant 1
Legend
Acceptable
Marginal - Activities considered marginal can only be undertaken after
detailed scrutiny and with the approval of QA Team. Marginal activities
include:
- Extreme: Considered unlikely.
- Major: Considered possible or likely.
- Moderate: Highly likely.
Unacceptable
Figure 2.3 - TCI Risk Matrix
2.1.21 Internal Audits
The purpose of this procedure is to cover the conduct of internal quality audits of the
Quality Management System in all areas of The Cpl Institute’s activities to ensure that
the Quality Management System is reviewed on a regular basis to check its continuing
suitability and effectiveness and continuous quality improvement.
The QA & Compliance Manager will establish an Internal Audit Schedule covering all
elements of the Quality Management System, inclusive of all staff and contract
activities.
Frequency of auditing will be mapped to internal and external systems (ISO), with
prioritisation of procedures for auditing taken account of:
- Previous audit findings/importance of the process to the business/internal
non-conformances raised
Version 2.0 Page 68 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Audits will mainly be carried out by the Quality Team, under the guidance of
the QA & Compliance Manager.
- The Quality Team will also consist of trained auditors who carry out audits in
areas other than those for which they are directly responsible.
- Prior to an audit, the Auditor shall check any areas of outstanding action from
any previous audit and add these to the check sheet.
- The audit shall be conducted against the agreed check sheet or copy of the
procedure and the audit findings recorded on the check sheet.
- Deficiencies and corrective actions required, together with target dates for implementation, shall be recorded on the Internal Audit Report form.
- Internal Audit report forms are maintained by the QA & Compliance Manager and all issues /corrective actions are notified to relevant personnel.
- Progress on the implementation of agreed corrective actions shall be monitored by the QA & Compliance Manager at regular intervals.
- The audit non-conformances spreadsheet will be located on the TMA system for tracking /close out of items raised by the auditors in a timely fashion.
- Where actions are not completed the Audit Report form shall be forwarded to the Senior Management for discussion and appropriate action.
On completion of all actions, the report shall be filed as part of the Quality Records and for evaluation as part of the Senior Management Review of the Quality Management System.
Version 2.0 Page 69 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.2 Management of Quality Assurance
2.2.1 The Cpl Institute Governance & Organisation Structure
Figure 2.4 - TCI Governance & Org Structure
Version 2.0 Page 70 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.2.2 Management Responsibility
Policy / Procedure Name Management Responsibility
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose Outline management roles in the monitoring of quality assurance and
implementation of all policies/ procedures.
Responsibility QA & Compliance Manager
Key Steps Development of a robust comprehensive assurance system which
reflects the day to day activities of the organisation.
- Establish performance measures to determine the
effectiveness of policies and procedures.
- Ensure ongoing monitoring of performance measures.
- Schedule and carry out regular management and staff
meetings.
- Carry out regularly scheduled observations, monitoring
and audits of all systems.
- Quality team to lead self-evaluation & corrective
actions
- External Quality reviews inclusive of ISO 9001:2015
audits
Documentation Internal & External Reports, Document Control Matrix, Quality
Improvement Plans, Internal KPI’s
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Document Control Quality Improvement Plans
Version 2.0 Page 71 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.2.3 Quality Management Responsibility
Policy / Procedure Name Quality Management Responsibility
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Version: Date
Approved:
Purpose Outline the role of management and team members with
responsibility for quality management implementation, review and
monitoring.
Responsibility QA & Compliance Manager
Key Steps QA & Compliance Manager will have overall responsibility for the
Quality Assurance Systems and the monitoring of all Groups &
Councils.
Key responsibilities includes:
- Ensuring that processes for quality assurance are
established, implemented and maintained.
- Overseeing internal and external audits.
- Engaging with external consultants/ evaluators.
- Identification of need for improvements and
implementation of new procedures.
- Accreditation body communication on all Quality
matters
Documentation Role Descriptions, Internal Audit Reports, External Audit Reports,
Minutes of Meetings, Records of Correspondence (emails etc.)
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
ISO Audits Reports PHECC Quality Reviews IOSH QA Reviews
Version 2.0 Page 72 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.2.3 Roles and Responsibilities
2.2.3.1 Head of Operations
Purpose Overall responsibility for commercial activities and legal compliance of the The Cpl Institute. Responsibilities:
• Responsible for the direction, guidance and management of The Cpl Institute Management team and Revenue Streams, including Staff Development, Healthcare & PHECC, Fleet Safety Services and Training & Quality Teams.
• Ensuring the organisation generates the volume and quality of commercially appropriate business deals to ensure the growth and profitability of the organisation.
• Ensure appropriate brand exposure while ensuring value for money.
• Management of FTE head counts within the organisation.
• Management of profitability of the organisation.
• Ensure the resources in use within the organisation are appropriate to ensure effective business operations and requesting additional resources with appropriate business case where required
• Appropriate assessment and mitigation of risks to the organisation in the operations of the business.
• Appropriate reporting of business operations, risks and opportunities as they occur.
• Ensuring the development of the risk management policy and procedures and the risk assessments and control measures are in place.
• Oversee operational policies for risk management & reporting identified risk situations.
• Attends Senior Management Team Meetings, but does not sit on the Academic Council. May sit on the Quality Team.
• Maintaining confidentiality and adherence to data protection policies and guidelines.
• Responsible for the daily operation, effectiveness and continuous
• Improvement of the overall The Cpl Institute.
• Develop and maintain key strategic academic and industry related Partnerships.
• Responsible for The Dignity at Work Policy
2.2.3.2 Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Purpose The Training and Academic Affairs Manager has over responsibility for The Cpl Institute academic leadership, programme’s teaching and academic standards. Responsibilities:
Version 2.0 Page 73 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Manage self-evaluation and the ongoing monitoring of programmes and
associated services.
• overall responsibility for managing the programme development process
and providing the resources to develop the programme.
• The management of policy, planning and implementation of training
programmes developed by The Cpl Institute.
• Assist with management of accreditation, registration and the certification
processes, maintaining appropriate records.
• Overseeing the collection of data for evaluation, analysis and reporting
purposes.
• Producing an annual self-evaluation report for the organisation, acting as
the liaison for external reviews.
• Maintain and update a Quality Improvement Plan
• Meet lead module tutors for the programme once per year.
• has overall responsibility for ensuring the assessment process is adequately
resourced, including the allocation of an internal verifier.
• Appoint ad-hoc appointees and other board/committee members.
• Ensure that all programme related documents and material are up to date
• Develop assessment briefs and marking schemes in conjunction with
module tutors.
• Manage initial stages of Assessment Recheck and Review procedures.
• Manage the assessment processes to ensure the integrity of all academic
decisions regarding admission and progression.
• Act as the main point of contact with QQI, accrediting bodies and education
partners.
• Maintaining confidentiality and adherence to data protection policies and
guidelines.
• Manage Learner academic related complaints and process
• Maintain current regulations, programme files and links with QQI,
accrediting bodies and education partners.
• Ensure that learning materials and methods are consistent to the
programme aims and outcomes.
• Ensure that procedures for assessment and moderation are implemented
and security and integrity upheld.
• Ensuring that suitably qualified personnel are in place to carry out education
and training activities, inclusive of both administration and tutoring.
• Ensuring that personnel are adequately prepared and supported for their
role, whilst being allowed sufficient time to undertake their roles effectively.
Version 2.0 Page 74 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Ensuring that personnel involved in training, assessment and internal
quality assurance co-ordination have access to and regularly participate in
activities designed to promote continuous quality improvement.
• Designated Liaison Person – (DLP) - Safeguarding and Protection Policy
• Responsible for Work Placement Support and Supervision Policy.
• Responsible for Access, Transfer and Progression Policy
• Responsible for Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)
• Attend Academic Council Meetings, Programme Board, and Examination
Board meetings and other sub-committees each year. Also act as chair on a
few of the board and other sub-committees.
2.2.3.3 QA & Compliance Manager
Purpose Manage the development and implementing of all Quality Assurance procedures and academic quality standards and ensure full compliance in The Cpl Institute. Responsibilities:
• Ensuring that administration, assessment, data collection, and internal
quality assurance procedures are implemented correctly and consistently.
• Ensuring there are current and appropriate QA policies and procedures are
in place and implemented.
• Ensuring that general correspondence from awarding bodies is
disseminated to all relevant staff.
• Assist with the development and co-ordination of the appropriate recording
systems, documentation, policies and procedures for quality assurance and
ensuring that staff and associated stakeholders are familiar with these
systems.
• Safeguarding the integrity and currency of programme validation and
awards, including compliance with the terms and conditions of programme
approval and the requirements and regulations of accrediting bodies for
ongoing provision of delivery.
• Manage oversight of academic quality and standards, academic records and
examinations.
• Maintain records, reports and audit trails.
• Maintaining confidentiality and adherence to data protection policies and
guidelines.
• Liaise with agencies to facilitate external programme validation from
accrediting bodies.
• Audit reports on programmes and Learner evaluations.
• Please the audit schedule and carry out internal audits .
• Ensure that inputs and reports are made available to appropriate
committees.
Version 2.0 Page 75 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Ensure that approved programme evaluation and review processes are
carried out.
• Work with the teaching faculty in devising and reviewing programme
Schedules.
• has responsibility for informing the Academic Council of programme
developments, organising approval, and arranging the validation process
with QQI.
• Prepare a range of reports crucial to Quality Assurance processes including
monitoring reports, annual programme reports and external moderation
reports.
• Ensure academic staff are aware of, and adhere to the policies, guidelines
and regulations.
• Is responsible for the implementation of the appeals policy.
• is responsible for the implementation of this Academic Integrity policy.
• Assist with Learner complaints process where requested.
• Attend Board and other sub-committees each year and also act as chair on
a few of the board and other sub-committees.
2.2.3.4 Marketing & eLearning Manager
Purpose To drive all market events and manage the implementation of The Cpl Institute online offering. Also act as the Data Protection Officer for The Cpl Institute. Responsibilities:
• Design, develop and deliver the formatted lectures and presentations (tutor-led, online) to support academic staff and Leaners in the effective use of digital technologies to enhance teaching and learning.
• Update all online content
• Manage all Marketing and social media events.
• Design, develop and integrate high quality online learning materials, suitable for assessment methods and a range of delivery approaches, in collaboration with academic staff.
• Manage, maintain and update the website content.
• Maintaining confidentiality and monitor adherence to data protection polices and guidelines.
• Review data protection polices and guidelines and advise Senior of any requested changes.
• Act as a subject matter expert in the area of technology enhanced learning and instructional design.
• Consult and collaborate with Training and Academic Affairs Manager on projects related to the design and development of online programme materials and resources.
Version 2.0 Page 76 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Communicate frequently and effectively with various project collaborators to ensure that goals are met and objectives are being fulfilled.
• Work with the IT Manager and be main point of all for IT issues in The Cpl Institute.
• Cultivate an environment that encourages creative and independent use of instructional technology throughout The Cpl Institute.
2.2.3.5 Quality Assurance Officer
Purpose To develop and ensure implementation of Quality Assurance procedures Responsibilities
• Manage and implement Quality Assurance systems and procedures designed to enhance and monitor the effectiveness of all The Cpl Institute programmes.
• Work closely with the QA & Compliance Manager, Training and Academic Affairs Manager and all staff in The Cpl Institute implementing and rolling out all Quality Assurance requirements in The Cpl Institute.
• Contribute to programme development specifically in relation to the teaching and learning strategy.
• Carry out internal audits.
• Maintaining confidentiality and adherence to data protection policies and guidelines.
• Evaluate the effectiveness of the Quality Assurance policies and procedures within The Cpl Institute.
• Prepare reports as required by Boards and Sub-committees.
• Attend Academic Council or Sub-Committees when requested.
• Asist in Managing where required, the Learner complaints procedure
2.2.3.6 Training & Learning Co-ordinator
Purpose Has specific responsibility for implementing Quality Assurance procedures
and to oversee the teaching and learning strategy of The Cpl Institute.
Maintaining a strong support link between The Cpl Institute and its Learners.
Responsibilities
• Liaising with learners, Tutors and associated stakeholders on a regular basis.
• The preparation of training materials before programme commence.
• Guiding learners through the registration process, ensuring that all required
documentation is in place.
• Contribute to programme development specifically in relation to the
teaching and learning strategy.
• Provide support to tutors in all aspects of planning and programme delivery.
Version 2.0 Page 77 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Contribute to The Cpl Institute strategy, policies and procedures and
approach to teaching, learning and assessment for all programmes.
• Work in conjunction with the QA & Compliance Manager and Quality
Assurance Officer with respect to Teaching & Learning policy requirements.
• Oversee reasonable accommodation policy and report on same.
• Manage where required Learner complaints procedure.
• Report to the module tutor any Learner queries.
• Act as Internal verifier for examination board
• Co-ordinate and approve venues in accordance with training specifications.
• Act as a primary point of contact for current and prospective Learners.
• Provide Learner support as appropriate.
• Provide academic results, letter and transcripts to learners
• Responsible for and co-ordinating assessment re-checks
• Manage training material requirements and logistics associated with same.
• The revision, maintenance and updating of all filing systems and folders on
server.
• Attending and responding to all initial enquiries in a prompt manner.
• Maintaining and updating all information resources. E.g. TMA
• The ordering of equipment and training materials.
• Managing face to face, email and telephone enquiries.
• Maintaining confidentiality and adherence to data protection policies and
guidelines.
• Following up on payments and the tracking of invoices. E.g. TMA
• Setting up and coordinating meetings and events.
• Assisting in any other administrative duties, as directed by the Training &
Academic Affairs Manager.
• Oversee all administrative tasks in relation to QBS, Learner documentation,
IV, Examination Boards.
• Sit on relevant boards and sub-committees when requested.
2.2.3.7 Tutors
Purpose Delivering programme content, coaching, tutoring and assessing Learners on all The Cpl Institute programmes in accordance with stated learning outcomes for individual modules and the overall programme outcomes. Responsibilities
• Welcoming learners to the programme and advise them of the context of
learning.
• Informing learners of the programme outline, delivery & assessment.
Version 2.0 Page 78 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Act as the first point of contact for the Learner with an issue relating to the
programme of study and its components.
• Encouraging learners to provide feedback throughout the programme.
• Maintaining a register of attendance.
• Ensuring contact details are correct, for administration purposes.
• The preparation of assessment briefs and marking schemes and provide
learners with details of these.
• Providing learners with notice of deadlines for the return of assignments
and assessment deadlines.
• Adhere to all assessments policies and procedures
• Reports on programme delivery, assessment and moderation matters
• Providing learners with feedback and guidance on their draft assignments.
• The marking of assessments in accordance with marking schemes.
• Ensuring that assessments are adapted, where required and reasonable, to
ensure that learners with support needs are accommodated.
• Provide constructive feedback to Learners on assessed work within a
specified time.
• Act ethically and professionally.
• Act as assessor for practical based assessments or written classroom
• Administration of all module/programme return paperwork
• Participate in continued professional development programme.
• Maintaining confidentiality and adherence to data protection policies and
guidelines.
• Sit on relevant boards and sub-committees when requested
The role of the tutor also includes:
- Ensuring all assessment material is checked and complete before submission
to the Training & Learning Coordinator
- The completion and return of the Tutor report form(s) to the training
coordinator, highlighting any issues, problems or challenges and make
recommendations that will enhance the delivery of quality training.
- Advising the Training & Learning Coordinator of any accidents or incidents
which may occur while completing the relevant paperwork allocated for that
purpose.
- Advising the Training & Learning Coordinator of any learner who may be
experiencing difficulties so that remedial action or relevant supports can be
put in place.
- Advising the training coordinator of any early leavers so that the Training &
Learning Coordinator can follow up with the learner to ascertain the reasoning
and attempt to facilitate the return of the learner.
Version 2.0 Page 79 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Acknowledgment of the receipt of documents and other relevant information.
- If examinations are part of a programme, the Tutor should refer to and follow
the guidelines on how to conduct an examination.
- To maintain records of any additional supports given to a learner and return
these records with the learner portfolio.
- To store all learner details and portfolios confidentially and securely until such
time as they are ready for submission.
2.3.3.8 Learner Representative
Purpose The purpose of the Learner representative is to inform and provide a Learner’s perspective to the relevant Academic Council, Boards or any sub-committees. The Learner representative is ideally a current senior Learner which has completed a few modules with The Cpl Institute. The same expectation of confidentiality applies to the Learner representative as it does to all attending members of committees. Responsibilities Attend the Academic Council meetings Provide Learner feedback and perspective to the relevant Council/Board • Attend Programme Board meetings
• Attend Examination Board meetings o Attendance at the Examination Board may be confined to
those sections where the Learner representative does not have a conflict of interest within the item of discussion such as results sheet which include the attending Learner representative results.
• Maintaining confidentiality and adherence to data protection policies and
guidelines.
2.2.3.9 External Quality Assurance Consultant
Purpose The External Consultant is a member of the self-evaluation panel and also will
sit on relevant boards and sub-committees when requested.
Responsibilities
• The design of an evaluation process compatible with the organisation’s
activities.
• Carrying out an annual evaluation of the quality assurance system.
• Conducting on-site observations and consultations with Tutors and staff.
• Reviewing data collection, analysis, and recording processes and
recommend areas for development.
• The preparation and submission of final evaluation reports in consultation
with the Training & Academic Affairs Manager and the QA & Compliance
Manager.
Version 2.0 Page 80 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Attending at least one meeting to outline the evaluation process.
Timeframe to be confirmed in line with Organisational needs or review
requirements.
• Sit on relevant boards and sub-committees when requested.
• Communicating regularly with the Training & Academic Affairs Manager
concerning the evaluation process.
• Maintaining confidentiality and adherence to data protection policies and
guidelines.
2.2.3.10 Internal Verifier
Purpose The Internal Verifier (IV) checks assessments, marks/grades, calculations and
confirms all in keeping with our QA Procedures. Also will complete an IV Report
as part of the process.
Responsibilities
• Adherence to assessment procedures.
• Learner evidence matches the assessment specifications of the award.
• Appropriate assessment methods are used for testing of all learning outcomes.
• Documentation was issued to learners i.e. assessment briefs, learner declarations.
• Documentation was used to record learner results and was completed effectively.
• Evidence is available for all learners, results are recorded, and feedback has been provided on grading.
• Percentage marks and grades awarded are consistent with grading band.
• Provisional results are available.
• Results are recorded/available for all learners submitted for provisional results.
• Note any irregularities on IV report and take corrective action.
• Liaise with Examination Board and Training & Academic Affairs Manager on any issues arising from the IV process.
• Complete an IV report and file, copy available for Examination Board.
• Maintaining confidentiality and adherence to data protection policies and guidelines.
• Will sit on Examination Board Committee and other boards and sub-committees when requested.
This list is not exhaustive and may be updated or amended by Senior management Team
when the need arises in order to comply with legislation or further requirements associated
with quality assurance guidelines.
Version 2.0 Page 81 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
2.3 Embedding a Quality Culture
2.3.1 Continuous Quality Improvement
Policy / Procedure Name Continuous Quality Improvement
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
The Cpl Institute is committed to the continuous improvement of all its courses/
programmes and all services. We recognise our responsibilities to provide a quality
service to meet the needs of all our stakeholders.
In order to achieve this, we will:
- Comply with all legal and statutory requirements and awarding body
guidelines.
- Establish and follow a comprehensive Quality Assurance System
- Monitor and review Quality to ensure its relevance and effectiveness
- Identifying areas for improvement and enact change
- Communicate the importance of quality throughout the organisation and
provide guidance and supports where required.
- Provide training to ensure we can operate our quality policies and
procedures for best practice.
- Recruit and develop staff so as they have the skills required to provide the
highest quality service.
Purpose
To oversee our quality throughout the organisation and provide monitoring and supports
where required
Scope
All activities associated with education and training, to include all staff, tutors and
evaluators.
Responsibility
Version 2.0 Page 82 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
The Cpl Institute quality team committee have overall responsibility for ensuring the
relevance, resourcing, implementation and compliance with the quality policy.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
QQI Quality Process Model Appendix 3.3
2.3.2 Quality Strategy
Key stages in quality analysis and improvement planning
Collect, analyse and utilise feedback from learners for evaluation purposes
Collect, analyse and utilise feedback from tutors for programme evaluation and needs requirements
Collect, analyse and utilise feedback from industry to ensure that learning outcomes are meeting industry requirements
Collect and analyse information on learner participation, success rates and progression, non-completion rates for learner benchmarking
Monitor and review tutor performance by way of observations, feedback and CPD
Review all learning resources as required and enhance access to online systems
Conduct quality reviews of policies and procedures in line with organisational needs and accreditation bodies
Internal verification and external authentication
External audits, including ISO and Educational Standards
Self-evaluation and quality improvement planning
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Trainers Evaluation Checklist Trainer Competence Observation Sheet Programme Review Template Tutor & Learner Issues Tutor Declaration Instructor Course Report Training Evaluation Form External Authentication Report Template Internal Verification Report Internal Verification Checklist Learner Feedback Form
Appendix 4.10 Appendix 4.11 Appendix 4.12 Appendix 4.16 Appendix 4.17 Appendix 7.2 Appendix 7.3 Appendix 7.10 Appendix 7.11a Appendix 7.11b Appendix 7.17
Version 2.0 Page 83 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 3 - Documented Approach to Quality Assurance
3.1 Documented Policies and Procedures
The Cpl Institute is a learner centred organisation which recognises the importance of quality
and continuous quality improvement through all our areas of practice
Our delivery of high-quality learning programmes is achieved through participation from all
stakeholders in quality monitoring and improvement process.
We have developed policies and procedures for each area identified by awarding bodies, such
as:
- Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI)
- Pre-Hospital emergency Council (PHECC)
- City and Guilds (C&G)
The Academic and Senior management of the organisation have defined, documented and
approved a quality management system that:
- Is appropriate to the needs of the organisation and of learners.
- Includes a commitment to the continual quality improvement and maintaining
high standards
- Provides a detailed description of all processes & procedures associated with
educational activities
- Provides a framework for reviewing quality objectives.
- Communicated quality systems across all levels of the organisation.
- Monitored and reviewed for continued suitability and application.
3.1.1 Principles
All Tutors will be appropriately qualified and have relevant industry experience.
- Our entire team will be available to provide support to learners.
- We will seek to listen to all stakeholders and act on Evaluation.
- We are committed to honesty, openness and transparency.
That Quality Assurance is implemented throughout the organisation, and is systematically
monitored and reviewed on an annual basis, being updated where necessary, or due to
changes in Educational Standards
Version 2.0 Page 84 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
3.1.2 Purpose of Quality Management System
To provide staff, learners, tutors and contractors with a comprehensive quality system that
guides the day to day activities associated of educational activities within our learning
environment.
3.2 The Cpl Institute Quality System
The Cpl Institute has a documented Quality Assurance System and we are committed to
providing our learners with training programmes of the highest quality that comply with all
legal, statutory and awarding body requirements.
3.3 Monitoring and Review
The Training & Academic Affairs Manager and the QA & Compliance Manager will provide
ongoing monitoring of quality and assist in the assurance of all elements of the organisation
in its educational activities. Learner Evaluation forms and Tutor Reports will be analysed after
each module/programme.
Internal audits will be conducted and reviewed at Senior Management, QA Team and
Academic Council meetings.
Recommendations for changes to any procedures through the evaluation processes will be
reviewed at the QA Team and Academic Council meetings.
Any changes required will be reported to QA Team for approval.
External evaluation of Quality by an external authenticator will be conducted on regular basis
and all reports reviewed and communicated to all core staff.
The QA Team will provide oversight of all documentation associated with Quality system and
ensure sufficient resources are available for its effective implementation, review and auditing.
Version 2.0 Page 85 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
3.4 Programmes of Education and Training
3.4.1 Programme Development, Approval and Validation
Policy / Procedure Name Programme Development, Approval and Validation
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
3.4.1.1 Introduction
The Cpl Institute is committed to best practice in the design and approval / validation of programmes, and to meet the objectives and intended learning outcomes. Ensuring we are aligned to awarding body guidelines and in line with The Cpl Institute’s mission and vision. This policy will inform the designing and approving of programmes constructed to
ensure that the learning outcomes required for a specified award have been addressed
and mapped to specific industry requirements.
To achieve this, we will ensure that:
- Learning activities are designed to allow learners to draw on their
previous education or life experiences.
- Programmes are developed and reviewed in consultation with the
relevant Senior Management Team, Academic Council, stakeholders and
professional bodies.
- Processes comply with awarding body guidelines.
- Programmes provide clear pathways to other programmes.
- Where one programme is a pathway to another, programmes are
designed to ensure that learners can make a successful transition.
- We provide learners with a work learning experiences (work placements),
where applicable.
3.4.1.2 Purpose
The purpose of these procedures and guidelines is to ensure the proposed programme:
• Is consistent with The Cpl Institute’s strategic planning and contributes to achieving The Cpl Institute’s aims and objectives.
• Is a valuable educational experience to learners.
• Is formally approved and validated prior to delivery.
• Is developed to meet the requirements of the awarding body QQI
Version 2.0 Page 86 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Has access, transfer and progression arrangements that meet the awarding body criteria for approval.
• Is subject to continuous monitoring and an annual review.
• Is subject to revalidation in advance of the expiry on the certificate of validation. (This is normally every five years).
3.4.1.3 Regulatory and Reference Documents
• Statutory Quality Assurance Guidelines - developed by QQI for Independent/Private Providers coming to QQI on a Voluntary Basis – QQI 2016.
• Policy and Criteria for Making Awards – QQI, 2014.
• Policies and Criteria for the Validation of Programmes of Education and Training –
QQI 2017.
• Statutory Quality Assurance Guidelines developed by QQI for use by all Providers
– QQI April 2016.
3.4.1.4 Scope
This policy applies to all QQI programmes developed by The Cpl Institute which are part
of The Cpl Institute’s strategy, employers, the business community, learners, faculty,
various stakeholders, skill shortages and professional bodies.
Programmes of Education and Training are classified as:
1. Quality and Qualifications Ireland Awards (QQI). The processes and responsibilities are detailed in New programme development and approval process.
2. The Cpl Institute’s short programmes 3. Collaborative Programmes with Third Parties
Prior to submitting a programme to QQI for validation, an approval process shall be undertaken, by the Senior Management, to ensure The Cpl Institute resources are properly employed in developing programmes with a sound rationale and all submission documents are approved by the Academic Council. Please note that Programmes do not commence until a Certificate of Approval has been obtained from QQI and the programme is approved for delivery by The Cpl Institute Governing Board.
3.4.1.5 Responsibility
The responsibilities and approvals are briefly described below and also in Fig. 3.1
Programme Approval process flowchart. (see section 3.4.2)
• The Training & Academic Affairs Manager has overall responsibility for managing
the programme development process and providing the resources to develop the
programme.
Version 2.0 Page 87 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• The QA & Compliance Manager has responsibility for informing the Academic Council of programme developments, organising approval, and arranging the validation process with QQI.
• The Training & Academic Affairs Manager has responsibility for appointing a programme team lead and programme team to develop a submission.
• The Programme Lead has responsibility in conjunction with the programme development team for completing the proposed programme document.
• The Academic Council approval is required at stage 2 and stage 4.
• Senior Management Team approval is required at Stage 1 and Stage 2.
• Governing Board approval is required at Stage 5. Revisions to this section, policy and/or procedures are subject to the approval of the Academic Council.
3.4.1.6 Development of Programmes for Validation by QQI
QQI has published several policies and procedures relevant to programme development and validation. In addition to the procedures in this section the development of new programmes must be carried out in a manner consistent with these QQI policies and procedures. This section needs to be read in conjunction with QQI’s Core Policies for the Validation by QQI of Programmes of Education and Training (2017).
3.4.1.7 Stages of New programme Development and Approval New programme development and approval is a five-stage process as outline in Fig. 3.1 Programme Approval process flowchart. (see section 3.4.2)
• Stage 1 - Preliminary approval to proceed with proposed development of the programme.
• Stage 2 - Internal Development of the proposal.
• Stage 3 - Development of the programme submission to QQI.
• Stage 4 - Evaluation of the programme by an independent panel.
• Stage 5 - Authorisation to offer the programme. QQI awards include major awards, minor awards, special purpose and supplemental awards. The process below describes the procedures relating to the development and validation for major awards. The approval process for minor awards, special purpose and supplemental awards are the same as that for major awards, but the detail provided in submissions will not necessarily be the same. Programmes submitted for minor awards, special purpose and supplemental awards must meet the validation criteria for the awards.
Stage 1 - Preliminary Approval for Development of a New Programme The Training & Academic Affairs Manager is responsible for programme development and ensuring the Programme Development Team is adequately resourced to develop the programme. Sufficient time should be allocated for the programme approval process to allow for development, validation, marketing. New programme proposals may originate from a variety of sources, both internal and external and for a variety of reasons or based on industry needs. Proposals should be developed with reference to the
Version 2.0 Page 88 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
QAM and any other external requirements. The initial outline of the programme is presented to the Senior Management Team. Approval The Senior Management Team considers the proposal and approval can be granted based on the following:
1. The proposed programme is aligned with The Cpl Institute’s strategy. 2. There is evidence of learner demand for the programme. 3. There is support for the introduction of the programme (such as from
industry/employers, legislation demands or regulatory bodies). 4. There is good rationale for providing the programme. 5. The programme meets a national skills shortage or training needs.
Stage 2 - Development of the Proposal Where Stage 1 approval is obtained the Training & Academic Affairs Manager appoints a Programme Lead who establishes a Programme Development Team who will consult with stakeholders and prepare a Programme Proposal including an estimate of the Proposed Programme Resource Requirements. The Programme Lead is responsible for ensuring that the proposal shall address the following:
• Programme Details including the Award standard.
• Rationale for the Programme including any unique features.
• Alignment with The Cpl Institute’s strategic plan.
• An overview of the potential market with a competitor analysis.
• Potential demand for the programme nationally.
• Proposed arrangements for access, transfer and progression.
• Programme aims and objectives, proposed draft Minimum Intended Programme Learning Outcomes.
• Outline of structure and content. It is important to note that the validation process is an evidence-based process. All stakeholder feedback must be evidenced through business meeting minutes, surveys, meetings with learners, minutes of consultation with regulatory bodies, etc.
Approval The proposal document is submitted to the Senior Management Team for feedback and approval. The Senior Management Team is responsible for evaluating the financial and resource implications of the programme and its alignment with the strategic plan. The proposal together with the Senior Management Team approval is submitted to the Academic Council. Academic Council will approve the establishment of a Programme Development Team. The Academic Council is responsible for evaluating the academic merit of the programme and assesses the proposal against the QQI Core Validation Criteria. If a programme is based on a collaborative agreement the QA & Compliance Manager shall ensure that a due diligence report is completed and presented to Senior Management Team. Following approval by the Senior Management Team
Version 2.0 Page 89 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
the report is submitted to the Academic Council. The Governing Board is informed of all collaborative agreements and the due diligence reports are provided. The Training & Academic Affairs Manager is responsible for academic due diligence and the Finance Officer for financial and legal due diligence.
Stage 3 - Development of the Programme Submission to QQI Once the Academic Council approves the development of the programme, the Programme Development Lead and the Programme Development Team develop the programme content in line with the approved proposal, stakeholder feedback and industry expertise and informed by QQI Core Validation Criteria. The Programme Development Lead organises the meetings of the Programme Development Team and ensures appropriate meetings are held with stakeholders to complete the required QQI Programme Validation together with supporting documentation for the submission to QQI. The Training & Academic Affairs Manager ensures that the programme submission takes each of the 12 criterion statements in turn and explains how the programme meets the criteria. This submission should also address the sub-criterion statements where applicable. The validation may be refused by QQI if any one of the applicable criteria or sub-criteria are not demonstrated to be satisfied. An important exercise carried out by the Development Team is mapping the MIPLOs against the award standards and with comparable programmes. The programme is developed to the point that it is ready to be offered to learners. Programme Documentation Programme documentation includes all information required to demonstrate that the programme addresses all applicable validation criteria. The headings and subheadings of the QQI General Programme Validation Manual template for Presenting an Application for Validation (Check QQI website). The team will evaluate the programme against the core validation criteria which are stated. The QQI template to be completed is detailed and requires explicit information and responses to be provided with supporting documentation where relevant. Please note generalised, non-programme specific, vague, ambiguous, contradictory or evasive responses to the criteria are unacceptable and may result in the refusal of validation if they appear in the provider’s evaluation report, and the rejection by QQI of an independent evaluation report. The completed template together with the evidence supported documentation and proposed programme schedule is submitted to the QA & Compliance Manager.
Evaluation of the Programme by an Internal Independent Panel The QA & Compliance Manager establishes an internal review of the proposal on behalf of the Academic Council. The composition of the internal independent review panel shall be determined by the QA & Compliance Manager and will have external (independent) representation.
Version 2.0 Page 90 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
The internal independent review panel prepares an evaluation of the relevant programme against the applicable validation policies and criteria. The Senior Management Team will be provided with a copy of the report and will be informed by the Academic Council if there are changes to the initial resource requirements for the delivery of the proposed programme. The Programme Lead will take account of recommendations made by the internal independent review panel prior to submitting programme documentation and internal evaluation report to the Academic Council for approval before submitting to QQI for validation.
Stage 4 - Evaluation of the programme by an Independent Panel appointed by QQI On approval of the Proposed Programme Submission the completed programme template, supporting documentation and proposed programme schedules are submitted by the QA & Compliance Manager to QQI together with the appropriate validation fee. The QA & Compliance is responsible for complying with QQI’s submission requirements, liaising with them regarding proposed dates for a site visit if required, agreeing with QQI the composition of the Independent Evaluators on the Validation Panel and making arrangements for the validation meeting. This should be undertaken in consultation with the Senior Management Team, Programme Development Lead and training staff. The Training & Academic Affairs Manager, in consultation with the Programme Development Lead, is responsible for making all necessary arrangements relating to the team proposing the new programme. Submission to QQI For submission to QQI, the following applies: The Cpl Institute must be eligible to apply for programme validation based on the criteria laid out in section 3 of the Policies and Criteria for the Validation of Programmes of Education and Training – QQI 2017: a) Established procedures for QA under section 28 of the Act. b) Established procedures for access, transfer and progression. c) Comply with all arrangements for the protection of enrolled learners. The QA & Compliance Manager submits the following for all validations: 1. Completed submission template and supporting documentation 2. A self-evaluation of the relevant programme against the applicable validation policies and criteria. 3. The applicable fee. Independent evaluators will undertake site visits as part of the evaluation. They may interview the provider’s senior management team, the programme personnel and other relevant stakeholders including any relevant learners. The evaluation group may provide informal feedback to the provider at the conclusion of a site visit. Any such feedback will not be comprehensive and will be given without prejudice to the final independent evaluation report. The validation panel makes a recommendation to QQI. There are three possible outcomes:
Version 2.0 Page 91 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
I. Satisfactory. It recommends that QQI can be satisfied that an enrolled learner of that provider who completes that programme will acquire, and where appropriate, be able to demonstrate, the necessary knowledge, skill or competence to justify an award of QQI being offered in respect of that programme. II. Satisfactory subject to proposed special conditions. Specified with timescale for compliance for each condition and these may include proposed pre-validation conditions i.e. proposed (minor) things to be done to a programme that almost fully meets the validation criteria before QQI makes a determination. III. Not satisfactory. After QQI has received the independent evaluation report, it will make this available to The Cpl Institute. The Cpl Institute will be invited to: a) Comment on the factual accuracy of the independent evaluation report. b) Respond to the overall findings (e.g. whether they are accepted by the provider). c) Submit any modified documentation and plans addressing any pre-validation conditions proposed in the independent evaluation report. Where a validation determined by QQI involves special conditions and recommendations, The Cpl Institute will have an opportunity to comment on factual accuracy of the report. Once agreed the Academic Council will consider and respond to the report and submit:
• Plans for addressing any pre-validation conditions and/or recommendations.
• Modified programme documentation. Differential validation involves QQI validation of a programme that is based on, or a modification or extension of, a QQI validated programme. The QQI validation of the original programme can inform the QQI validation of the derived programme and this can simplify the QQI validation process for the derived programme.
Stage 5 - Authorisation to Offer the Programme On completion of the validation process a Certificate of Validation is issued by QQI. The QA & Compliance Manager is responsible for maintaining the record of the Certificate of Validation, the submission documentation, and reports of the Validation Panel. The programme is subject to statutory conditions of validation as prescribed in section 9 of the Policies and Criteria for the Validation of Programmes of Education and Training – QQI 2017 and for a specified duration as published in the Certificate of Validation. The programme is subject to ongoing monitoring and periodic review. The independent evaluation report, the validation determination by QQI, and the Certificate of Validation, are substantive products of the validation process. The QA & Compliance Manager is responsible for the following:
Version 2.0 Page 92 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Notifying the Governing Board, Academic Council and the Senior Management Team of the outcome of the validation and providing them with the findings of the Panel.
• Publication of programme details, the independent evaluation report, the validation determination by QQI and the Certificate of Validation as well the applicable PEL will be published.
The relevant reports will also be published on the QQI website. The Governing Board will authorise the running of the programme subject to the resource availability in The Cpl Institute. A Checklist and Notification of New Programmes template is filled out to communicate correct programme information to all stakeholders.
3.4.1.8 Changes that can be made to a Validated Programme As stated in section 8 of QQI’s Policies and Criteria for the Validation of Programmes of Education and Training, 2017: A validated programme is not a static entity, frozen in time. It is expected that the provider will make necessary enhancements and adaptions to programmes from year to year. However, there are limits to what may be changed before a modified programme must be submitted to QQI for validation as a new programme. These limits depend on the scope of the provider’s QA procedures as approved by QQI. Where an extensive (i.e. very substantial) change to a programme is one that effectively results in a new programme, then it must be validated as such. Any change must be consistent with the applicable award standard(s) against which the programme was validated. The interpretation of what does and does not constitute an ‘extensive change’ is a matter to be informed by expert judgement. Examples of ‘extensive changes’ would be:
• Undermining anything that was essential to support the original validation decision.
• Elimination of any core intended programme learning outcomes.
• A change in the pre-requisite learning requirements for a given programme. The Training & Academic Affairs Manager and QA & Compliance Manager will consult on proposed changes to programmes and a record is kept by the QA & Compliance Manager of any changes that are agreed. The QA & Compliance Manager will consult with QQI in case of any doubt about whether or not validation would extend to a modified programme. The QA & Compliance Manager will inform the Academic Council of any and all changes to programmes.
3.4.1.9 Revalidation QQI programmes are always validated conditionally.
• All validation determinations are subject to a ‘duration of enrolment’ condition, this is typically five years.
Version 2.0 Page 93 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• The duration of enrolment is variable and defined as the interval during which learners may be enrolled on the validated programme.
• Revalidation is validation by QQI of a programme that has emerged or evolved from a programme that had been previously validated by QQI. This can occur if the original programme may have reached a point where, for example, it needs to be substantially modified or updated such that the end result is a new programme.
• Revalidation is also required for any programme that is to continue to enrol learners following expiry of the duration of enrolment.
3.4.1.10 The Cpl Institute Short/Minor Programmes The approval process for The Cpl Institute short programmes follows a similar development and approval process as described above in section “Stages of New programme Development and Approval”. The Cpl Institute’s short programmes are mainly programmes of education or training that companies propose that The Cpl Institute deliver and may be based on a specific company purpose or regulatory requirement. Stage 1 - Preliminary Authorisation When a programme is proposed it is reviewed by the Senior Management Team in the first instance. The Senior Management Team considers the merits of an outline proposal, authorisation to proceed with the initial programme development is granted based on the following:
• That the programme is consistent with The Cpl Institute strategic planning and contributes to achieving The Cpl Institute aims and objectives.
• That the programme offers a valuable education or training experience to learners and for a specific purpose.
• Resource requirements.
• Fee. Stage 2 - Internal Development of the Proposal Where preliminary authorisation is approved a Programme Development Lead is appointed to develop a detailed programme proposal. The proposal is submitted to the Senior Management Team and includes:
• Programme Details - title, short description, duration, etc.
• Rationale for the Programme including any unique features.
• Alignment with The Cpl Institute’s strategic plan.
• Programme aims, objectives, and intended learning outcomes.
• Outline of structure and content.
• Assessment strategy.
• Profile of target participant. The Senior Management Team considers the proposal on the basis of the documentation above and the financial arrangements of the proposal, and if it satisfied with the merit of the proposal then approval is granted to proceed with the development of the
Version 2.0 Page 94 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
programme. The final proposal, excluding financial information, is submitted to the Academic Council for approval. Stage 3 - Development of the Material The programme material comprises:
• Learner Handbook
• Marketing Material
• Programme Document including all material for delivery and supplementary material.
In some cases, stage 2 and 3 may be combined. Stage 4 - Evaluation of Programme by Company and Financial Arrangements Where the final programme submission is agreed by both The Cpl Institute and the proposing company, if relevant, a formal agreement is signed and the Senior Management Team will authorise delivery of the programme. The Academic Council and Governing Board are notified of authorisation to provide the programme.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Checklist and Notification of New Programme form
Version 2.0 Page 95 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
3.4.2 Programme Approval Process Flow Chart
Figure 3.4 - TCI New Programme Approval Process
Version 2.0 Page 96 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
3.4.3 Programme Planning
Policy / Procedure Name Programme Planning
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
Purpose This procedure describes the scheduling of programmes, including
timing, resources and resources required. Planning and running of
programmes is so important and based on many contributing factors
and must be well planned in advance, so specific items like resources,
facilities must be available and permission sought from Senior
Management Team
Responsibility Training & Learning Coordinators
Key Steps The Training Coordinators:-
- Will seek permission from Senior Management team
before scheduling a programme.
- Will provide a schedule of programmes to be advertised
on the website and assist with other promotional
tools/material.
- will book and confirm all Tutors and venues
- prepare all programme resources, supporting materials,
equipment, learner induction pack/presentation,
Evaluation forms, etc. are all prepared and checked by
another training coordinator.
The Tutor:-
- is responsible for double checking that all the required
resources are in place before the programme starts.
- All venues/facilities must meet the organisations
selection criteria and be approved prior to selection.
Documentation Calendar of Events, Website, Resource Checklist, Facilities Checklist,
All programme documentation and Material.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Instructor Course Report Training Evaluation Form Training Facilities Checklist
Appendix 7.2 Appendix 7.3 Appendix 6.1
Version 2.0 Page 97 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
3.4.4 Programme Delivery
Policy / Procedure Name Programme Delivery
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
Purpose To ensure that all programmes are delivered in a consistent manner so
that learners can maximise their learning experience while also
allowing for enhanced delivery by Tutors.
Responsibility Tutors
Key Steps At the beginning of each programme the Tutor delivers a
comprehensive learner induction to include:
- An introduction to the organisation and the
programme.
- Health & Safety induction and learner welfare
arrangements
- Learner workbook is given to learners to include hand-
outs, notes and support material.
The Tutor(s) are encouraged to make use of a variety of delivery styles
Tutors must:
- Advise Learners with identified support needs that they will be accommodated, as necessary and inform Training Co-ordinators.
- Ensure all relevant course documentation is distributed
to learners and completed e.g. daily sign in sheets,
Evaluation forms etc.
- All relevant documentation is returned to the Training
Co-ordinator.
- Be responsible for ensuring all assessment activities are
carried out according internal procedures and
validation.
Version 2.0 Page 98 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Documentation Learner Induction Checklist, Tutor Declaration, Course Material,
Reasonable Accommodation Form, Sign in Sheets, Evaluation Forms.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Learner Handbook Tutor Declaration Learner Induction Checklist Course Booklets Daily Training Record Training Evaluation Form
Appendix 8.1 Appendix 4.17 Appendix 7.1 Appendix 7.3
Version 2.0 Page 99 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
3.5 Learner Admission, Progression and Recognition
The Cpl Institute aim to provide a quality further education service that is accessible to all and
allows for the acquisition and development of skills and knowledge at all levels. It is the policy
of The Cpl Institute, as far as practical, to admit all applicants who fulfil minimum academic
requirements for it programmes.
The Cpl Institute provide accurate and up to date information on the programmes and
services offered by The Cpl Institute and routes for transfer between programmes within the
company or to another company having received recognition for knowledge, skill and
competence acquired, as well as progression to other programmes at a similar or higher level
than the preceding programme.
All applicants who seek additional supports or who has reasonable accommodation requests
as a result of a disability or medical condition will be catered for as per section 7 (Support for
learners).
All information is published on The Cpl Institute website and in The Cpl Institute brochure and
is provided in hardcopy /electronic copy to applicants on request
3.5.1 Access, Transfer and Progression (ATP) Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Access, Transfer and Progression
Version No 1.0
Approval Admissions Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
3.5.1.1 Introduction
It is the policy of the Cpl Institute to ensure that learners can avail of fair and
transparent access, transfer and progression in our programmes.
This will be achieved by:
- Providing potential learners with sufficient information about each
programme.
- Developing clear entry criteria.
- Providing learners with accurate content on the programme.
Version 2.0 Page 100 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Identifying transfer and progression opportunities.
- Ensuring learners are aware of the transfer and progression options available
to them.
- Ensuring that entry requirements are transparent, fair and consistent.
- Providing learner supports for equality & diversity of learners.
3.5.1.2 Purpose The purpose of this policy is to outline The Cpl Institute’s overarching framework for admission, transfer and progression procedures. This policy supports the enrolment of suitably qualified learners and the creation of a
diverse learners. This policy promotes lifelong learning and facilitates learner
mobility.
3.5.1.3 Regulatory and Related Legislation
• QQI Policy Restatement - Policy and Criteria for Access, Transfer and Progression in Relation to Learners for Providers of Further and Higher Education and Training (NQAI, 2003, Restated 2015)
• Qualifications and Quality Assurance (Education and Training) Act 2012
• Core Statutory Quality Assurance Guidelines (2016), QQI.
3.5.1.4 Scope This policy applies to all programmes offered and delivered in The Cpl Institute
It applies to programmes and standalone modules/minor awards that carry
academic credit.
The procedures for admission, transfer and progression for programmes delivered collaboratively with other providers are specified in the relevant collaborative agreement.
3.5.1.5 Responsibility The Training and Academic Affairs Manager is responsible for this policy and
ensuring all programme information is communicated to the Training & Learning Co-
ordinators, who is responsible for providing information to all learners. The Training
and Academic Affairs Manager has ultimate responsibility for this policy, effective
development, implementation and reviewing with the admissions committee.
3.5.1.6 Policy / Procedure
Principles
Version 2.0 Page 101 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
All programmes at The Cpl Institute are aligned to the appropriate level of the
National Framework of Qualifications (NFQ).
Procedures for admission, transfer and progression are in line with the national
legislation and support The Cpl Institute’s strategic plans.
The Cpl Institute is committed to non-discrimination, diversity in its learner body,
and the protection of the dignity of the learner at all stages in the learner lifecycle
from application to graduation for major award.
The Cpl Institute is committed to the highest academic standards in its academic programmes.
Admission
The Cpl Institute welcomes and supports applications from all appropriately qualified
learners irrespective of social, cultural and educational backgrounds.
The Cpl Institute recognises formal, informal and non-formal prior learning as
relevant for admission to programmes. (See Section 3.6 on RPL)
Applicants are admitted on the basis of their individual merits, abilities and aptitudes
and the extent to which they can make a meaningful contribution to the programme
of study.
Applications for programmes are processed fairly and impartially, and in a consistent
and transparent manner.
The Cpl Institute recognises that it is not in the interest of an applicant to be
admitted into a programme of study on which s/he is unlikely to be successful
because of lack of English language competency or lack of necessary skillset. If
English is not the applicants first language, then he/she may be required to submit
evidence of English proficiency.
Learners on programmes with work placements will be subject to Garda vetting
under the provisions of the National Vetting Bureau. This may limit an admission.
For some programmes, an interviewing process is carried out for suitability of
learners.
- to check if any extra or additional support or reasonable accommodation
requests is required for learners. (See Section 7 – Support for Learners).
- To check the best possible fit between the learner and the programme is
found and to ensure that The Cpl Institute can adequately and appropriately
provide supports to ensure that all leaners have equal opportunity to succeed
on their programme of choice.
Version 2.0 Page 102 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- To check on applicant’s proficiency of the English language.
Entry to or progression on programmes can be achieved by RPL and each individual
will be assessed on an individual basis through the RPL policy. (See Section 3.6 on
RPL)
The Admissions Committee is responsible for overseeing the annual review and fair
application of the admissions and ensure that appropriate record keeping is
maintained for applicants.
Transfer
Procedures are in place to consider and, where appropriate, to approve requests
from learners to transfer out of one programme into another.
Learners may apply, through their tutor, for permission to transfer to another
programme. Transfer applications, which must be made in writing, should be
submitted to the Training and Academic Affairs Manager, who will process the
application.
While every effort will be made to allow adequately qualified learners to change
programme, it will not be possible to permit a transfer into a programme which
already has a full complement of learners.
Learners who are being considered for a transfer to another programme, should
register for and attend the programme to which they were admitted. In no case may
learners register for a programme until their application to transfer has been
formally approved by the Training and Academic Affairs Manager.
Progression
Learners who wish to progress onto additional programmes should contact the
Training and Academic Affairs Manager.
The Training and Academic Affairs Manager will provide them with information in
relation to their progression, including where these programmes are available and
what entry criteria is required. Some of these programmes will be provided by other
Further Education Training providers or Higher Education Training providers.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Company Brochure Company Website
Version 2.0 Page 103 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 3.6 - RPL Section 7 – Supports for Learners
3.5.2 Information for Learners Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Information for Learners Policy
Version No 1.0
Approval Admissions Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
3.5.2.1 Introduction The Cpl Institute policy on communication with learners is to ensure that we
promote regular and effective information for all to assess our programmes of
learning.
3.5.2.2 Purpose To ensure that current and prospective learners have sufficient information about
programme access, transfer and progression and for the participation in
programmes.
3.5.2.3 Regulatory and Related Legislation
N/A 3.5.2.4 Scope
While the majority of persons studying, working and using the facilities of The Cpl
Institute are adults, it is acknowledged that there may be learners on programmes
that
3.5.2.5 Responsibility Training and Academic Affairs Manager
3.5.2.6 Policy / Procedure Essential information required for learners includes:
- Programme information, clearly outlining entry requirements and
arrangements, transfer, progression, learner resources, Awarding body,
Version 2.0 Page 104 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Programme level, Programme content, outline of assessment and learner
supports available etc. are published on our website.
- Programme brochures and promotional material.
- Relevant and accurate information in on the website.
- Social networking sites
- Oral communication, electronic communication, one to one meeting with
prospective/current learners.
- Informative learner induction.
- Learners will be supplied with a handbook (if applicable), programme outline,
and all other resources as required.
- Open Nights and Information Evenings
- Protection of Enrolled Learners (PEL).
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Learner Handbook Tutor Declaration Learner Induction Checklist Course Booklets Company Brochure Company website
Appendix 8.1 Appendix 4.17
3.6 Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)
3.6.1 Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Recognition of Prior Learning
Version No 1.0
Approval Admissions Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
3.6.1.1 Introduction and Statement
The Cpl Institute aims to provide a quality further education training service that is
accessible to all and allows for the acquisition and development of skills and
knowledge at all levels. Learners’ needs are accommodated, and The Cpl Institute
assist them to gain entry to a programme of education and training, to be granted
Version 2.0 Page 105 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
credit or exemptions and / or receive a QQI award by recognising the knowledge,
skills and competencies they already have acquired.
The Cpl Institute actively promotes the principles of lifelong learning, including the
recognition of learning wherever and whenever it is achieved; in this regard, it is
committed to enabling more inclusive approaches for mature and lifelong learners at
different stages of their personal and professional lives, who wish to undertake their
studies on a full or part-time basis.
This policy ensures that The Cpl Institute is correctly implementing and properly
managing the process for learners who wish to apply for Recognition of Prior
Learning (RPL) and gain access into/or exemptions in a programme.
3.6.1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this procedure is to acknowledge prior learning received at another
provider or from another awarding body which will mean that the learner may
receive recognition of skills and knowledge already acquired and/or certified or prior
learning or experiential (non-certified), which can then go towards certification for the
programme of study which is leading to a Major, Minor or Special Purpose award.
The learner will complete an application for recognition of prior learning for
consideration.
3.6.1.2 Regulatory and Reference Document(s)
• Principles and Operational Guidelines for the Recognition of Prior Learning in
Further and Higher Education and Training (2015)
• Access, Transfer & Progression (ATP)
3.6.1.3 Scope
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) is a system whereby learning acquired through
certified programmes and/or through experience can be acknowledged as a basis for
entry onto formal programmes of study, and/or for gaining exemptions from parts of
a programme of study. The Cpl Institute offers Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL),
the prior learning can be Certified or Experiential (non-certified). This policy applies
to all learners seeking to use prior learning.
Recognition of Prior Certified Learning (RPCL)
Prior Certified Learning is where an applicant has already been awarded a
qualification for a formal programme or module taken with another provider or
Version 2.0 Page 106 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
training organisation. This prior learning can be recognised on the National
Framework of Qualifications and may entitle the applicant to:
▪ Admission to a programme or course of study.
▪ Exemptions from some components of a programme.
▪ Exemptions from some components of a programme which duplicate the
learning an individual has already acquired.
▪ Credits towards a qualification.
Where prior certificated learning is the basis for RPL, the learner is required to
provide the relevant syllabus and a transcript of results and Certificate.
The Cpl Institute reserves the right to seek supporting evidence from the training
provider/education institution referred to, in the application and where appropriate
seek other supporting reference documentation from an employer or referee.
Only when The Cpl Institute is completely satisfied that the learner meets the criteria, that
an exemption will be granted. Exemptions may be granted at any stage of a programme.
Recognition of Prior Experiential Learning (RPEL)
This involves the awarding of credit for learning from experience. In this case, the
candidate must demonstrate that the learning outcomes have been achieved by
producing a portfolio of evidence to support the claim for access, exemption or
credit (in some instances the Training and Academic Affairs Manager or the assessor
may decide to use an alternative method of assessment, e.g. project/assignment or
examination). Supporting documentation and authentication of evidence of work-related
experience may be required from an employer.
As a general principle, credit is given for learning, not for experience per se. The
portfolio of evidence must be written in such a way that the matching of the
knowledge, skills and competencies of the module learning outcomes to the prior
learning and is clearly demonstrated. As part of the assessment the learner may be
interviewed by an appointed tutor/assessor. Learners can receive support with
developing their portfolio from the Training & Learning Co-ordinators.
3.6.1.4 Responsibility
The Training and Academic Affairs Manager is responsible for this policy and
ensuring all information is communicated to the Training & Learning Co-ordinators,
who is responsible for providing information on RPL to all learners.
Version 2.0 Page 107 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
The Training and Academic Affairs Manager has ultimate responsibility for this
policy, effective development, implementation and reviewing with the admissions
committee.
3.6.1.5 Policy / Procedure
If applying for RPL on any programme with The Cpl Institute, an RPL application must
be completed online. Also, one of the Training & Learning Co-ordinators will conduct
a short telephone interview, discussing their experience to date both professionally
and academically to determine their eligibility for RPL and may seek other
information or supporting documentation.
This online form will be sent to the relevant Training & Learning Co-ordinators who
will pass onto the Training and Academic Affairs Manager, who will approve or
contact the learner to further clarification on the details provided.
When applying online, The Cpl Institute website shows clearly the requirement for
RPL and a place on the programme is not guaranteed until their RPL application has
been reviewed and evaluated. The learner will be contacted within 24 hours of
completing their RPL form online to further discuss their eligibility.
If the Training and Academic Affairs Manager assesses the learner as having the
experience required to join an RPL programme, the learner is sent a copy of the
learning outcomes to be reviewed and informed of the timetable to attend as part of
the programme. If the Training and Academic Affairs Manager is unsure it will be
brought to the admissions committee and the learner informed of this by the
Training & Learning Co-ordinator. The learner’s exemption may be granted or
refused and learner informed.
If approved, learners are encouraged to engage in self-directed learning in the
intervening days between training days. To enable this, learners are provided with
learner handbooks covering each module in detail, complete with end of unit
assessments which learners are encouraged to complete to confirm their self-
directed learning.
If an applicant is entitled to an exemption and completely satisfied The Cpl Institute
that the applicant meets the stated criteria that an exemption will be granted.
Exemptions may be granted against any stage of a programme.
Where the module that is being exempted counts towards the overall result for an
award an exemption will result in the recommendation of an award, except in the
case of the previous learning having an equivalent mark/grade attached, which can
be verified through an official transcript of results from The Cpl Institute itself or
Version 2.0 Page 108 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
another provider. In this instance the learner will be eligible to carry the grade
previously achieved, and to count this towards their new award.
The learner will also have the option to decline the offer of exemption and carry out
the regular requirements of the module(s) and be awarded a grade based on their
achievement in the module, which will be put forward for the award. The credit
value of exemptions awarded will not be greater than the credit value of the
previous accredited learning.
Previous accredited learning to be considered for exemption purposes must be at the same or higher level than the module(s) for which the exemption is being sought.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Company Brochure Application for RPL Learner Portfolio Records of Correspondence Admissions Report for Admissions Committee/Academic Council
Version 2.0 Page 109 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
3.7 Programme Monitoring and Review
The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that programmes are reviewed at regular intervals to ensure their continued relevance and to improve delivery and content where appropriate, as part of our continuous improvement ethos. Staff and learners are encouraged to contribute feedback and suggestions to the programmes and services they are involved with. The Training & Learning Co-ordinators will review learner and tutor evaluation on a regular
basis and note suggestions in the Quality Improvement log.
The Training and Academic Affairs Manager along with the Programme Board committee is responsible for ensuring the ongoing monitoring and periodic programme reviews takes place.
3.7.1 Internal and External Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Internal and External Monitoring and Evaluation
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
3.7.1.1 Introduction
The Cpl Institute facilitates and promotes the continuous monitoring of programmes
through various methods and seeks feedback on all aspects of the programme from
internal and external sources. Feedback is reviewed and recommendations are
considered as part of continuous improvements.
3.7.1.2 Purpose To ensure the continued relevance of all programme content and delivery, ensuring that that recommendations for improvements are gathered and implemented accordingly.
3.7.1.3 Regulatory and Related Legislation
• Policy and Criteria for Making Awards – QQI 2017
• Policies and Criteria for the Validation of Programmes of Education and Training
– QQI 2017
• Policy and Criteria for Making Awards – QQI 2017
3.7.1.4 Scope
Version 2.0 Page 110 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
While the majority of persons studying, working and using the facilities of The Cpl
Institute are adults, it is acknowledged that there may be learners on programmes
that
3.7.1.5 Responsibility Programme Board
3.7.1.6 Policy / Procedure
Internal Monitoring and Evaluation
Evaluation and Review will consist of but not limited to:
• Learner Evaluation forms reviewed and summarised after each
module/programme.
• Tutor reports reviewed and summarised after each module/programme.
• Tutor workshops/briefings are held to review programmes and associated
assessments and results brought to the Academic Council.
• End of programme review reports – including content and structure, learner
achievements, disciplinary procedures, safety concerns, communication with
learners
• The Training and Academic Affairs Manager will carry out periodic
module/programme reviews
• An annual programme review will be carried out by programme review team
/ academic council and Learners may be asked to participate in a programme
survey.
• Feedback from the Teaching Learning, Exam and Assessments committee
External Monitoring and Evaluation
Evaluation and Review will consist of :
• Being monitored by QQI
o Programme quality and attainment of awards standards
o Internal/ External quality procedures (re-validation)
o Quality indicators – Annual completion rates
• External Audits
• External Authenticator
• Arrangement for the protection of learners
The QA & Compliance Manager will notify QQI the awarding body of any minor
changes and will go through a validation process if major changes are required to the
programme, before offering the modified programme to learners.
Version 2.0 Page 111 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Programme Review Template Tutor Course Reports Training Evaluation Form EA Reports RAP Meetings Results Summary Sheet Company Brochure Quality Improvement Log
Appendix 4.12 Appendix 7.2 Appendix 7.3
3.7.2 Programme Review, Re-validation and Validation
Policy / Procedure Name Programme Review, Re-Validation and Validation
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
3.7.2.1 Introduction Programme review is a provider owned process and relies on QA approved by QQI.
Re-validation/Validation is a process owned by QQI and carried out on its behalf in
part by an independent expert panel, which makes a recommendation for approval
or otherwise to QQI’s through the completion of an Independent Evaluation Report.
Ultimately, programme approval depends on an application for re-
validation/validation meeting all the Criteria and Sub-Criteria of QQI’s Validation
policy must be met.
3.7.2.2 Purpose To ensure that all programmes are reviewed at regular intervals and programmes with extensive changes required, are to be re-validated. That a programme board is established for each programme.
3.7.1.3 Regulatory and Related Legislation
• Statutory Quality Assurance Guidelines - developed by QQI for Independent/Private Providers coming to QQI on a Voluntary Basis – QQI 2016.
• Policy and Criteria for Making Awards – QQI 2017
Version 2.0 Page 112 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Policies and Criteria for the Validation of Programmes of Education and Training – QQI 2017
3.7.1.4 Scope All The Cpl Institute programmes up for review at regular intervals or up for re-
validation.
3.7.1.5 Responsibility Programme Board
3.7.1.6 Policy / Procedure Please note that stages 3, 4 & 5 in the New Programme Development and Approval
(see section 3.4.1.7 and Fig. 3.1 Programme Approval process flowchart see section
3.4.2) are common to both the re-validation of existing programmes and the
validation of new programmes.
Stages 1 and 2 below are unique to Programme Review.
Programme Review
Programme Review is the formal evaluation of QQI accredited programmes and
related services, carried out at regular intervals for related programmes. This review
process has an internal and an external evaluation phase.
The specific objectives of a programme review are to:
• ensure that the programme remains appropriate, and to create a supportive
and effective learning environment.
• ensure that the programme achieves the objectives set for it and responds to
the needs of learners and the changing needs of society.
• review the learner workload.
• review learner progression and completion rates review the effectiveness of
procedures for the assessment of learners.
• inform updates of the programme content; delivery modes; teaching and
learning methods; learning supports and resources; and information provided
to learners.
• update third party, industry or other stakeholders relevant to the
programme(s).
• review quality assurance arrangements that are specific to that programme.
Stage 1: Programme Review - Self-Evaluation Step 1: Formation of the Programme Review team
Version 2.0 Page 113 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
A programme Review Team is formed under the co-ordination and
management of the relevant Programme Board.
Step 2: Planning of the process to include collation of 5-year QA summary report The programme review team will conduct a review of the Quality Assurance
data collected for the programme(s) during the 5-year period being
addressed by the review.
Step 3: Stakeholder Consultation Consultation with relevant stakeholders will be conducted to gather feedback
and opinions on the successes of the programme(s) and recommendations
for future developments. Relevant stakeholders will be defined by the
Programme Review Team and the focus of the programme review itself.
Step 4: Agreement in writing of Terms of Reference The progamme Review Team will define the Terms of Reference for the
programme review and agree these with QQI.
Step 5: Review of data and development of Provider’s Programme Review Report The Programme Review Team will convene meetings as necessary to review
the data gathered through steps 2 and 3, and critically evaluate the
programme.
The Programme Review Team will develop recommendations for
developments and improvements to the programme as a result of this review
and analysis. Details of actions taken and results of each step of the internal
phase, as well as the recommendations generated, will be presented in a
Provider’s Programme Review Report.
Stage 2: External Independent Review Stage 2 of the Programme Review is carried out by an Independent Review
Panel which is required to make an impartial judgement on the continued
maintenance of the overall standard of the programme and on its
acceptability for the award in question, when compared with similar
programmes elsewhere in Ireland. The Independent Review Panel is agreed
with QQI at the time of the agreement of Terms of Reference, at which time
it may also be requested (and agreed in writing) that the same Panel
members are designated as Independent Evaluators for the Revalidation
Phase (Phase 3-below).
Step 1: Site Visit of the Independent Review Panel
The Independent Review Panel is comprised of external peers familiar with
current practice and developments in the programme area.
Panel members are selected with the aim of forming a balanced panel which
has:
Version 2.0 Page 114 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• an understanding of the relevant sector;
• experience of working in the sector;
• knowledge and expertise in relation to teaching and assessment;
• expertise in relation to national and international trends relevant to
the programme;
• an acceptable gender balance of at least 40% of either gender
Each of the panel members will be supplied with the Provider’s Programme
Review Report and any necessary supporting documentation well in advance
of the panel visit. In order to complete its work, the review panel visits The
Cpl Institute to review the relevant documentation including the programme
review report, discuss the programme with the Programme Review Team,
learners of the programme(s) and review the facilities available for
conducting the programme(s).
The Chair of the programme review team is responsible for agreeing the
agenda for the panel visit with the Secretary of the panel, ensuring all
relevant personnel are available to meet with the panel as required and that
all relevant documentation is available. On completion of the site visit, the
Review Panel and Programme Review Team meet and the Chairperson of the
Panel provides verbal feedback to the Programme Review Team. Issues are
discussed and clarifications are provided. The Panel and Review Team discuss
recommendations in relation to developing and improving the programme(s).
Step 2: Production of an Independent Programme Review Report
Following the panel visit the Secretary is responsible for producing a written
panel report, which gives the panel’s response to the self-evaluation
conducted by The Cpl Institute and their recommendations for developments
and improvements to the programme. It should also include a
recommendation, positive, negative or conditional, in respect of the
continuing validation of the programme(s), which are the subject of the
review. The report should specify the duration of revalidation recommended,
but not in excess of five years.
Step 3: Response to the Independent Programme Review Report
The Programme Review Team will have the opportunity to review the report
before it is finalised, in order to check for factual accuracy. At this stage, the
review team should also prepare a formal response to the Panel’s report and
an implementation plan in respect of any recommendations made by the
Panel. This response and plan becomes part of the Provider’s Evaluation
Report.
Version 2.0 Page 115 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Step 4: Response of the Independent Panel)
Following The Cpl Institute’s response to the Panel at step 3 above, the Panel
may make a final response.
Stage 3: Validation/Revalidation - Submission to QQI for revalidation of programme Stage 3 here for re-validation is the similar to stage 3 & 4 of New Programme
Development and Approval (see section 3.4.1.7) and the validation of new
programmes.
The Provider’s Evaluation Report, will be forwarded to QQI for Independent
Evaluation, as part of the revalidation process. This will be accompanied by a
formal request for revalidation and:
• Documents demonstrating prerequisites to apply have been established
• The proposed terms of reference for the Independent Evaluation Report, if these have not been agreed earlier at Phase 1, Step 4.
The QA & Compliance is responsible for submitting the completed validation
documentation to QQI. In the case of all applications for validation, the application will
be submitted on the current QQI Template, with QQI appointing the panel.
QQI may get back with further queries or recommendations in the Independent
Evaluation report before it is submitted.
Stage 4: Adoption and Implementation of Recommendations
Stage 4 here for re-validation is the similar to stage 5 of New Programme
Development and Approval (see section 3.4.1.7) and the validation of new
programmes.
This the final stage of in the Programme Review, Validation and Re-validation
processes. The Provider’s Evaluation Report and Independent Evaluation Report are
circulated to the Academic Council and the relevant Programme Board. The
recommendations of the report are formally approved and adopted at the Academic
Council meeting. Following this the recommendations are taken up by the relevant
Programme Board, which will plan for and monitor their implementation.
The Cpl Institute will receive a copy of the Independent Evaluation Report for fact
checking before it is submitted to the Programmes and Awards Executive Committee
for approval or declining of re-validation or validation.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Programme Review Template Tutor Course Reports Training Evaluation Form EA Reports
Appendix 4.12 Appendix 7.2 Appendix 7.3
Version 2.0 Page 116 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
RAP Meetings Results Summary Sheet Company Brochure Quality Improvement Log Provider Evaluation Report Independent Evaluation Report
Version 2.0 Page 117 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 4 - Staff Recruitment, Management and Development
Policy / Procedure Name Staff Recruitment
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
The Cpl Institute recognise that the recruitment, selection and retention of staff is one of the most important roles for our Senior Management Team and is critical to the development and success of our business. It is important to invest time and effort in sourcing the right person for a position. The Cpl Institute will use professional recruiters to assist in resourcing professional and experienced staff and associates nationwide. The Cpl Institute mission is:
- To sustain a working environment that attracts, develops and retains committed employees, who share in the company’s goals, objectives and ongoing achievements.
- To take all reasonable steps to ensure that the Company achieves the best
possible appointment to any post.
- To take all reasonable steps to ensure that all candidates receive, and are seen to receive, fair and equitable treatment.
- To take all reasonable steps to ensure the application of consistent practice
throughout all areas of the company’s policies and procedures, with particular emphasis on those applicable to recruitment, selection and retention of suitable employees.
- To take all reasonable steps to ensure that the Company meets all of its
Statutory, industry accreditation and moral responsibilities / requirements.
- To take all reasonable steps to ensure that the policies and procedures are executed in the most cost-efficient manner.
Purpose
The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that The Cpl Institute has a recruitment system that is transparent and fair in order to appoint the best candidate to a position and in
Version 2.0 Page 118 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
keeping with the employment equality legislation. The need to recruit staff and associates is based on identifying the human resource needs as per turnover and increasing portfolio of programmes offered and services delivered. Clearly defined role descriptions are in place for all levels, which are used in the selection process, and there are detailed recruitment criteria and recruitment processes laid down which is in keeping with employment equality legislation.
Scope
This policy applies to the recruitment and development of all staff associated with
education and training activities.
Responsibility
The Senior Management Team is responsible for evaluating the need for the role against
planned activities and for providing support and development opportunities.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Job Specifications
Version 2.0 Page 119 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
4.1 Recruitment Procedure
Policy / Procedure Name Recruitment Procedure
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that all new The Cpl
Institute staff receive a comprehensive recruitment process which is
co-ordinated, by the Training & Academic Affairs Manager and QA &
Compliance Manager.
Responsibility Training & Academic Affairs Manager and QA & Compliance Manager
Key Steps Once a recruitment need has been identified and approved, the
following will apply:
- Management meeting held to agree the job and tutor
specification.
- Advertise the position online, in print media and/or
utilise a recruitment agency, if required.
- Applicants are invited to send their applications to
administration
- Once the deadline for applications has passed,
administration will compile all applications and make
them available to the interview panel.
- The recruitment panel will screen against the set
criteria, i.e. job and person specification. The most
suitable candidates are selected for interview
- Communication with selected new tutors/ staff
- Issued a contract of services accompanied by any other
relevant documentation.
Documentation Job Description, Advertisements, Interview notes, Scoring sheets,
Interview Schedule, Correspondence (emails, letters etc.),
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Job Description Advertisements Interview Notes
Version 2.0 Page 120 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
4.2 Organisational Communication
Policy / Procedure Name Organisation Communication
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
It is The Cpl Institute policy to promote and ensure regular and effective communication at all levels of the organisation. The Cpl Institute believes that communication must be two way and inclusive of diversity. The Cpl Institute are committed to providing accurate information and guidance about our programmes and services and to seek constructive feedback from our learners and all stakeholders where possible to ensure continuous improvement and develop programmes and services which reflect best practice. Communication is delivered indirectly via website, newsletter, telephone and email and directly face-to-face.
Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to describe how staff communicate with learners from initial contact, through the duration of the programme up until certification through verbal, para verbal and written communication. The Cpl Institute considers that good communication with learners will foster an improved learning experience for learners thereby empowering learners to achieve their goals.
Responsibility QA & Compliance Manager
Key Steps - Common communication channels include meetings,
email, phone, website, social media, notice boards etc.
- Induction – Including mission, aims and objectives of
The Cpl Institute, Quality induction
- Staff/Personnel meetings – formal and informal.
- Updates from the awarding body.
- They will be encouraged to provide Evaluation on any
issues which may arise during programme activities.
- Programme review meetings, including:
- Review of Learner Evaluation forms.
- Review of Tutor reports.
Version 2.0 Page 121 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Review of any other stakeholder Evaluation.
Documentation Induction Checklist, Emails, Learner Evaluation Forms, Tutor Course
Reports, Awarding Body Correspondence.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Internal Emails Meeting Minutes Awarding Body Updates
4.3 Staff Development
Policy / Procedure Name Staff Development
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that a documented system is in place to identify the training, development and support needs of staff. The Head of Operations is responsible for the development and implementation of training programmes for all staff. The identification of individual training needs is carried out as part of the performance management and appraisal process.
Responsibility Teaching, Learning & Assessment Committee
Key Steps The Cpl Institute operates a systematic approach to staff development
underpinned by the systematic monitoring and evaluation of
education and training activities.
The procedure is intended to be open and interactive between
management and staff by encouraging regular and meaningful
communication.
- Induction
- Informal discussion and Evaluation - The Head of
Operations and staff member(s) will meet informally for
discussion and Evaluation.
Version 2.0 Page 122 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
They will:
- Discuss the progress in achieving the annual work and
development goals set in the current plan.
- Discuss any support(s) required by the staff member to
meet the specified targets.
- Where relevant, discuss and note updated goals to
reflect any changes to organisational objectives.
- Following the discussion(s), any changes will be noted
in the performance plan, including the reason for the
agreed changes, and formalised during the next review
meeting.
- Observation (Tutors)
- The Training & Academic Affairs Manager carries out
one in class observation of experienced Tutors during
the year and more if required.
- For new Tutors, The Training & Academic Affairs
Manager will carry out an observation during the first
solo delivery of a module/ programme. A further two
observations will be carried out during the first 12
months.
- If there are obvious areas for improvement, The Tutor
will be asked to address them with immediate effect
and will receive the appropriate support in order to do
so.
- Where required, and/or requested, additional training
and/or continuous professional development
opportunities are made available.
- Head of Operations carries out reviews and appraisa in
line with end of year performance and achievements.
Documentation Induction Checklist, Record of Meetings, Employment Contract,
Observation Form, Annual Performance Appraisal, Learner Evaluation
Forms.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Induction Checklist Further Education Policy End of Year Discussion Guide for Managers and Employees Learning & Development Policy
Appendix 5.8 Appendix 5.9
Version 2.0 Page 123 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
4.3.1 Continuous Professional Development Diagram
Figure 4.3 – CPD Diagram
Version 2.0 Page 124 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
4.4 Code of Conduct – Staff & Contractors
Policy / Procedure Name Code of Conduct for Staff & Contractors
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
This code of conduct applies to all staff carrying out activities on behalf of The Cpl Institute
and it is the responsibility of all to familiarise themselves with it.
This code should be read in conjunction with the disciplinary procedures, health and safety
procedures and the contract of employment.
At all times, all are expected to:
- Treat learners and all staff with courtesy and respect.
- Comply with reasonable requirements as laid down in role description.
- Familiarise and adhere to all policies and procedures.
- Carry out their duties with integrity, care and diligence.
- Promote and protect the good reputation of The Cpl Institute.
- Preserve the confidentiality of all information and maintain the riles of GDRP
- Not act in a way which is discriminatory towards individuals or groups and
observe the nine ground/reasons of discrimination: gender, disability, age,
religion, family status, race, civil status, sexual orientation or membership of
the travelling community.
- Take reasonable steps to ensure the health, safety and welfare of all
- Dress in a way which is appropriate to their position and duties.
- Refrain from using offensive language.
- Not attend work or carry out duties whilst under the influence of alcohol,
illegal drugs or other substances which prevent them from doing so
competently.
4.5 Monitoring and Review
The Head of Operations and the Training & Academic Affairs Manager will be responsible for
the day to day monitoring of staff and Tutor performance. Review of contractor’s forms part
of the continuous monitoring of the quality assurance process.
The Head of Operations and the Training & Academic Affairs Manager with the support of
other staff members and are responsible for ensuring all Tutors and administrative staff are
recruited and trained to the highest level.
Version 2.0 Page 125 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 5 - Teaching and Learning The Cpl Institute aims to provide a quality further education training service that is accessible
to all and allows for the acquisition and development of skills and knowledge at all levels.
Flexibility and accessibility are key characteristics of any strategy devised to provide learning
opportunities for adults. The Cpl Institute provide accurate and up to date information on all
programmes of learning, provides effective access routes for learners and for progression to
other programmes in the field of practice.
5.1 Teaching and Learning Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Teaching and Learning Policy
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Introduction
The Cpl Institute is committed to delivering programmes with a comprehensive support
system that facilitates effective learning and enables learners to reach their maximum
potential while achieving the best possible results. The Cpl Institute promotes a learning
model that ensures flexibility for adults learners and recognises that managing learning
can be difficult while juggling further education and other commitments in life. Learners
are supported through effective timely supports and effective access routes for leaners
between programmes or for progression to other programmes in their field of practice.
Purpose
To promote flexible learning, active communication with learners and work towards
excellence in teaching and all learner activities in the further education training sector.
Regulatory
• Core Statutory Quality Assurance Guidelines (2016)
• Qualification and Quality Assurance (Education and Training) Act 2012
• Sector Specific Independent/Private Statutory Quality Assurance Guidelines (2016), QQI
Scope
This policy applies to all programmes, further education programmes and training
activities
Version 2.0 Page 126 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Responsibilities
The Training and Academic Affairs Manager is responsible for providing the resources to
ensure a quality teaching and learning environment for tutors and learners.
The Training and Academic Affairs Manager is responsible for the day to day resourcing
of education and training activities.
Tutors are responsible for creating an environment for learners to maximise their
potential.
Policy & Learning Strategy
The Cpl Institute is committed to providing a learning environment that enables learners
to reach their maximum potential while achieving the best possible assessment results.
This policy outlines our approach to teaching and learning and continuous role in
achieving high quality teaching and learning practices.
We will achieve this by:
- Ensuring teaching and learning activity is professional, positive, engaging.
- Ensuring learners fully understand the learning outcomes as laid out in
their programme.
- Assisting learners to develop their knowledge skills, & attitudes through
positive learning experiences.
- Approaching teaching and learning actively to motivate and engage with
learners.
- Utilising technologies and other resources available to enhance the
learning experience.
- Encouraging Tutors to be reflective, assess their own performance and
development needs.
The Learner will learn through the following key strategies:
Learning Materials
The Cpl Institute provides high quality module booklets, handouts, presentations and
other learning materials that are regularly updated. The materials are structured to cater
to the needs of adult learners, through the provision of separate sections that support
each learning outcome.
Directed Study & Learning
The Cpl Institute tutors encourages directed study & learning through a focus on the
learning outcomes which are in the module booklets or learning material. The learners
have to complete some self-directed learning activities and in turn, are covering the
learning outcomes.
Version 2.0 Page 127 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Workshops
Group workshops are encouraged (for each module) to provide learners with the
opportunity to collaborate with other learners and develop their understanding and
appreciation of the learning outcomes associated with the module and the setting up of
study groups. These opportunities for group learning also provide an excellent
opportunity for learners to social network, make contacts, and discuss all aspects of the
programmes or discuss issues with their peers. Some of this is done through online
media or after programme hours.
Practical and Skills Assignments
A key component of the assessment of the learner’s learning is their application of that
learning to their place of work. This process is assessed using a variety of media,
including written reflection, participation in group discussions and the completion of
learning activities which a lot of the time are of a practical nature and reflecting their
own workplace.
Learners are supported through the following key supports:
Tutorials
If required, Learners have access to a tutor to support them with their studies. Tutorial
supports are provided through a variety of media including, e-mail, telephone and face-
to-face. Any or all of the following areas may be discussed during tutorials:
• Revision of study topics.
• Local study groups.
• Assignment preparation, guidance and feedback.
• Additional issues that may arise relevant to the learning process e.g. Module
Material.
Feedback (Formative and Summative)
The Cpl Institute provides numerous opportunities for learners to obtain feedback on
their learning and understanding as they progress through each module. These
opportunities include online learning activities, peer and tutor feedback through online
discussion forums and tutorials. Following each module assessment, the learner is
furnished with detailed written feedback, which clearly outlines the learner’s
performance against the key learning outcomes of that module. Learners can expect to
receive this feedback via e-mail approximately 6 weeks after they have submitted their
assessment.
Daily Support
Version 2.0 Page 128 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
The Cpl Institute provides immediate office hour support and out of office support to
Learners on matters related to any academic aspect of the programme, assignment
submission or IT issues, etc..
Workplace or Work Placement Support
While on work placement, support is provided by work placement facility and the learner’s
manager/supervisor in site in association with The Cpl Institute. The work placement
manager/supervisor is responsible for providing the learner with appropriate activities to
enable them to achieve their intended learning outcomes, practical competencies within their
current workplace environment and supporting the learner’s professional development
See Work Placement and Supervision Policy.
The Partnership Approach and Three-Way Collaboration
The Cpl Institute considers participation on its programme as a partnership between the
learner, their employer and The Cpl Institute. Through this collaborative approach the
employer allows time for attendance at programmes, study time, to attend study
groups, examinations and agrees the learner may undertake work-based assignments as
part of their regular duties or a work placement and with financial support being
provided to the learner by the employer.
The learner makes a commitment to complete programme assessments, attend the
Programme/workshops, undertake personal study and directed study in their own time,
engage with peers and tutors outside of hours, engage with supervision and fulfil their
financial obligation to pay programme fees.
The Cpl Institute provides module booklets, handouts, presentations and other learning
materials, can assign a Tutor if required to a learner, provides other support and co-
ordinates the assessment and certification of programmes.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Instructor Course Report Programme Review Template
Appendix 7.2 Appendix 4.12
Version 2.0 Page 129 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
5.2 Provider Ethos that Promotes Learning
5.2.1 Facilitating Diversity
Policy / Procedure Name Facilitating Diversity
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that arrangements are in place to facilitate the diversity of learners.
Responsibility Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Key Steps The following steps will be undertaken:
- Email sent to learners prior to commencing their
programme requesting information on any additional
support needs.
- Application form to have section for learners to request
additional support.
- Learner interviews will be used to ascertain support
needs. These will be managed and/or facilitated where
possible to allow learners to participate fully on
programmes.
- Programme content/delivery/assessment adapted to
facilitate those with support needs.
- Provide Learner inductions, One to One meeting,
Assessment feedback.
- Learners with support needs identified during delivery
and continuous assessment will be afforded as much
individual attention and encouragement as possible
within the constraints of programme delivery.
Documentation Application/Registration Form, Induction Checklist
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
InCompany Confirmation Template Appendix 8.2
Version 2.0 Page 130 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Public Confirmation Template Appendix 8.3
5.2.2 Learner Issues
Policy / Procedure Name Learner Issues
Version No 1.0
Approval Teaching Learning and Assessment Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Version: Date
Approved:
Purpose To provide learners with effective advice on how to make a complaint
Responsibility Training and Academic Affairs Manager
Key Steps Complaints can be made verbally or in writing and to any staff
member.
Stage 1 – Informal
A complaint can be made informally to any member of staff, who will
discuss the complaint with the learner and attempt to resolve.
Learners will be notified of the required time to investigate or remedy
the issue. The staff member receiving the complaint will attempt to
resolve the complaint immediately
Details should be recorded on the course/module report.
Stage 2 – Formal Complaint
If a complaint cannot be resolved informally or if the learner feels that
an informal complaint will not address the issue, then the complaint
should:
- Be submitted in writing within 5 working days of initial
contact or the issue arising to the course/programme
Training & Learning coordinator.
- It should provide a detailed account of the issue.
Version 2.0 Page 131 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- The course/programme Training & Learning coordinator
will contact the learner within 5 working days to
acknowledge receipt of the complaint and outline the
course of action to be taken.
- Training and Academic Affairs Manager will undertake
an investigation of the complaint.
- The investigation may take different forms depending
on the nature of the complaint. This process is
completed within 10 days of receipt
- When the investigation is complete the learner will be
notified of the outcome in writing.
- Where the learner is not satisfied with the outcome,
they can make a request for a final review to be carried
out.
- The request for a review must be submitted in writing
to the Appeals and Review Committee within 10
working day of the outcome.
- Appeals and Review Committee will be appointed to
carry out the review. The decision from this review will
be final.
Documentation Records of Correspondence, Complaints Form/Email
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Tutor & Learner Issues Complaints Log
Appendix 4.16
Version 2.0 Page 132 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
5.3 National and International Practice
The Cpl Institute offers Further Education Training programmes in line with the National
Framework of Qualifications. In relation to Further Education Training programmes
reference is made to IQAVET, as the Irish national reference point for EQAVET (European
Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training). Therefore, from a policy and
framework perspective all programmes offered by the Cpl Institute aim to maintain and
develop national and international guidance to encourage the development of new
approaches and enhance the status of The Cpl Institute.
To enhance our educational provision and keep up to date with national and international
standards of practice:
- Engage with awarding bodies.
- Maintain membership of representative bodies and organisations.
- Provide staff members with opportunities to engage with peers.
- Engage in a variety of knowledge sharing activities with industry stakeholders
- Attend seminar/ briefings on best practice
- Maintain CPD for all staff and align to new practices
Learners where English is not their first language are admitted to The Cpl Institute
programmes and given support if there is a language barrier. The Recognition of Prior
Learning (RPL) in relation to international qualifications is referenced against the NARIC
service offered by QQI and other QQI publications which demonstrate international systems
equivalency in relation to the NFQ.
Given the nature of programmes offered by The Cpl Institute, continual reference with
regards to programme and systems updates is made to publications and learning material.
Learning Material is updated with reference to material published by from the HSE, DOH,
HIQA (Health Information and Quality Authority), other relevant regulators (e.g. Health and
Safety Authority, Data Protection Commissioners,) as well as to QQI policy and guideline
updates.
Version 2.0 Page 133 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
5.4 Learning Environments
5.4.1 Learning Resources
Policy / Procedure Name Learner Resources
Version No 1.0
Approval Teaching Learning and Assessment Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To confirm that all necessary resources are in place and identify new
resources where required
Responsibility Training and Academic Affairs Manager / Training & Learning Co-
Ordinators
Key Steps Assess facilities/resources needed for each module/ programme.
- Ensure that learner evaluation is used to identify gaps
- Identify list of key resources for each programme at
design stage.
- Budget allocated for necessary resources.
- Programme material review at standard and academic
meetings
- Provision of back up equipment for all Tutors.
- Maintenance contracts are put in place for all internal
and external equipment
Documentation Resource Checklist, Supplier Contracts, Budget Request Form, Record
of Meetings, Learner Evaluation Forms, Tutor Report
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Tutor & Learner Issues Training Facilities Checklist Instructor Course Report Training Evaluation Form
Appendix 4.16 Appendix 6.1 Appendix 7.2 Appendix 7.3
Version 2.0 Page 134 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
5.4.2 Selection of Premises
Policy / Procedure Name Selection of Premises
Version No 1.0
Approval Teaching Learning and Assessment Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure the premises and facilities are accessible and maintained.
Responsibility Training and Academic Affairs Manager / Training & Learning Co-
Ordinators
Key Steps For our own premises, a maintenance review is carried out regularly.
Safety statement and risk assessments have been developed.
- A health and safety check is carried out on the premises
for each programme, including own premises and
external venues.
- Premises selection criteria will reflect module/
programme requirements and the access needs of
potential learners.
- Where premises are rented, a copy of the premise’s
safety statement and risk assessment will be requested
and reviewed.
- All programmes delivered will contain information on
facilities, housekeeping and safe access and egress
including fire assembly points.
- External premises will be reviewed to ensure suitability,
including a review of learner Evaluation.
Documentation Safety Statement, Risk Assessments, Premises Selection Checklist,
Health and Safety Checklist
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Training Facilities Checklist Health & Safety Checklist for Risk Safety Statement Risk Assessments
Appendix 6.1
Version 2.0 Page 135 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
5.5 Monitoring and Review
It is the responsibility of the Training & Learning Co-ordinator and individual Tutors to
ensure they have sufficient and appropriate resources in place to deliver their programmes
effectively. Any deficiencies should immediately be brought to the attention of the Training
& Learning Co-ordinator. It is the responsibility of the Training & Learning Co-ordinator to
monitor all materials to ensure they are both up to date and fit for purpose.
The status of all resources, complaints and issues relating to education and training will be
discussed, with actions identified at regularly scheduled quality meetings. In addition to the
ongoing monitoring activities outlined, the Training and Academic Affairs Manager will be
responsible for reviewing all relevant evaluation and reporting to the Quality Team. An
annual review of all teaching and learning activities and resources will take place.
Version 2.0 Page 136 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 6 - Assessment of Learners Supporting Documents
• QQI (2013) Assessment and Standards (Revised)
• QQI (2013) Quality Assuring Assessment Guidelines for Providers
• QQI Policy Restatement - Policy and Criteria for Access, Transfer and Progression in Relation to Learners for Providers of Further and Higher Education and Training- NQAI 2003, Restated 2015
6.0 Effective Management of Assessments
Policy / Procedure Name Effective Management of Assessments
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
It is the policy of The Cpl Institute that all learners should receive fair, transparent and
consistent assessment and in line with awarding body guidelines.
Learners will be made aware of the methods of assessment and their responsibilities for
achieving and demonstrating the required knowledge and skills in advance of any
assessment event taking place.
The circumstances of each learner will be taken into consideration and our procedure
will detail guidelines for approaches and acceptable facilitation for those with additional
support needs.
We are committed to all aspects of the assessment process and will ensure that it is:
- Understood by Staff and Learners.
- Valid for the purpose of awarding body requirements.
- Fair to learners, in terms of both access and process.
- Internally verified to ensure the process is fair and consistent.
- Externally authenticated to ensure it is consistent with national standards.
- Consistent with awarding body assessment policy and guidelines.
- Evidence of assessment will be maintained to allow verification and
validation of the assessment process .
Purpose
Version 2.0 Page 137 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
To ensure quality assurance and effective management of the conduct of assessment
practices.
Scope
This policy applies to all assessment activities carried out by The Cpl Institute.
Responsibility
The Programme Board Committee are responsible for ensuring assessment practices are
fit for purpose and in line with awarding body guidelines.
The Training & Academic Affairs Manager has overall responsibility for ensuring the
assessment process is adequately resourced, including the allocation of an internal
verifier and the appointment of an external examiner/authenticator.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Internal Verification Report External Authentication Report Template Trainer Assessment Process Trainer Guidelines for Marking Internal Key Dates - QQI Certification Periods Schedule
Appendix 7.11a Appendix 7.10 Appendix 7.18 Appendix 7.19 Appendix 3.10
6.1 Assessment of Learning Achievements
6.1.1 Assessment Information to Learners
Policy / Procedure Name Assessment Information to Learners
Version No 1.0
Approval Programme Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure learners have access to information for them to successfully
participate in the assessment process.
Responsibility Training & Learning Coordinators, Tutor(s)
Key Steps Pre-Module/Programme information outlines assessment details.
- Provision of assessment information is appropriate,
Version 2.0 Page 138 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Learner handbook/information pack distributed to all
learners.
- Assessment brief distributed to all Learner induction.
- Group briefing prior to each assessment activity and
during the delivery of each programme.
Documentation Assessment Brief, Learner Handbook, Induction Checklist, Course
Outline, Promotional Material
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Learner Handbook Assessment Briefs
Appendix 8.1 Appendix 7.11a
6.1.2 Coordinated Planning of Assessment
Policy / Procedure Name Co-ordinated Planning of Assessments
Version No 1.0
Approval Programme Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure that assessment is planned in advance of commencing
programme and scheduled to facilitate learners abilities and in line
with knowledge attainments.
Responsibility Training & Learning Coordinators, Tutor(s)
Key Steps Training & Learning Coordinators consider and plan for assessment to
include:-
- Plan and coordinate assessment, in line with
requirements.
- Review of learner application(s) to determine additional
support needs for assessment activities and make
necessary adjustment.
- Dates scheduled to provide an even spread of
assessment throughout the course
Version 2.0 Page 139 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Documentation Record of Meetings, Assessment Schedule and Plan, Application
Forms,
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
6.1.3 Security of Assessment Processes
Policy / Procedure Name Security of Assessments
Version No 1.0
Approval Programme Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure the security and integrity of assessment materials, the
assessment process, learner’s evidence and submission requirements.
Responsibility Training & Academic Affairs Manager / Training & Learning
Coordinators
Key Steps Secure storage area allocated for all assessment materials
- Assessment master copies are controlled via secure
username and password access and stored on
computer network or portable computers.
- Hard copies stored behind lock and key in a secure
location with designated access.
- Relevant Tutors supervise exams, retaining and
verifying an exam attendance sheet and ensure the
exam material is signed by both themselves and a
learner.
- Learner assessment material is sent by registered post
or is hand delivered by The Tutor to The Training
coordinator. Where appropriate, assessment material
may be sent electronically.
- Learners are required to confirm authorship by signing
declaration stating that the work submitted has been
created by themselves.
Version 2.0 Page 140 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Random observation of assessment activities may be
carried out by the Training & Academic Affairs
Manager.
- Results of assessments are maintained electronically
and backed up onto removable media for storage and
retained securely, as per retention schedule.
Documentation Daily Sign in Sheets, Attendance Register, Learner Declaration,
Examination Material Receipt.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Daily Training Record Assessment & Exam Papers Learner Declaration
Appendix 7.1
6.1.4 Additional Support Needs for Learners
Policy / Procedure Name Additional Support Needs for Learners
Version No 1.0
Approval Teaching, Learning and Assessment Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To provide learners with additional support needs where required so
that they can achieve assessment of the standards being assessed.
Also see Section 7 – Supports for Learners
Responsibility Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Key Steps - Learners identify to staff any additional support needs
when applying for a programme.
- Individual meetings with learners to assess additional
support needs and agree appropriate
accommodation(s).
- Tutors will have the authority to adjust assessment
methods to accommodate learners’ needs if they are
informed of needs during programme delivery, as
agreed with Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Version 2.0 Page 141 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- These can include enlargement of print, facilitating the
use of a scribe or reader, practical assistance, rest
periods, provision of adaptive equipment and software
if available.
- All staff are trained in the provision of adaptations and
accommodations during assessment to ensure the
integrity of the assessment process.
Documentation Reasonable Accommodation Form, Application Form.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Learner Request for Assessment Support Form Section 7 – Supports for Learners
Appendix 7.15 Section 7
6.1.5 Consistency of Marking
Policy / Procedure Name Consistency of Marking
Version No 1.0
Approval Programme Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure all assessments are marked in a fair and consistent way
among all assessors
Responsibility Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Key Steps - Tutor Induction to include training in assessment
methods and marking.
- Assessment guidelines documented in line with
programme requirements, including sample answers,
marking schemes and guidelines.
- Cross-moderation will be organised where appropriate
- Random observation of Tutors by Training & Academic
Affairs Manager during assessment events
- Internal verification and external authentication
processes looking at results
- Review of learner Evaluation forms.
Version 2.0 Page 142 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Documentation Induction Checklist, Record of Meetings, Cross Moderation Log,
Internal Verification Report, External Authentication Report, Learner
Evaluation Forms.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Internal Verification Report External Authentication Report Template Trainer Assessment Process Trainer Guidelines for Marking
Appendix 7.11a Appendix 7.10 Appendix 7.18 Appendix 7.19
6.1.6 Cross Moderation
Policy / Procedure Name Cross Moderation
Version No 1.0
Approval Programme Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose This procedure is to ensure that consistent level of instruction and
assessment across all levels of education within the organisation.
Responsibility Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Key Steps When scheduling assessment and certification periods, cross-
moderators will be identified by the Training & Academic Affairs
Manager.
- Where there are multiple programmes in any
certification period, the Tutor of one programmes may
serve as the cross-moderator for a programme
delivered by another
- Cross moderated markings should be clearly identified
by using a different colour to the original markings, this
can be aligned to current practice of red for marking,
green for IV and blue for EA.
- Any changes should be recorded on the cross-
moderation log, which will be made available for
internal verification and external authentication (Tutors
must be available to speak to the EA if necessary).
Version 2.0 Page 143 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Method & Sampling – The method of the cross-moderation will be
determined by the Training & Academic Affairs Manager.
One of the following mechanisms may be used:
- All distinctions and fails will be second-marked.
- All borderline marks will be second-marked.
- A random sample of papers from each module/
programme (25% + 1) will be second marked.
Notes:
In instances where there is only one module for certification, all
learner results will be cross moderated.
For any new Tutors, the first module/programme will be fully
moderated (all learners).
Documentation Cross Moderation Log
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
6.1.7 Internal Verification
Policy / Procedure Name Internal Verification
Version No 1.0
Approval Programme Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure The Cpl Institute is awarding fair & consistent marks to all of
our learners and check all calculations.
Responsibility Internal Verifier(s)
Key Steps All assessment periods have an Internal Verifier (IV) appointed, and
these IV are internal staffing
- IV training provided for all relevant staff.
- Ensure that the IV is given sufficient time to complete IV
related activities effectively.
Version 2.0 Page 144 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Sampling Strategy
- Samples will be taken from every learner group. An
appropriate sampling strategy is defined for each
certification period and will:
- Be representative of all awards and all assessment
techniques.
- Be sufficient in size enabling sound judgments to be
made about the fairness and consistency of assessment
decisions.
- Cover the full range of attainment in terms of grades
achieved.
- Include a random selection of evidence for each
grade/band.
- Identify evidence which is borderline between grades
e.g. learners who have not or learners who have only
just achieved within the grading band.
- Ensure new assessor decisions are sampled at least
once during the assessment cycle.
The IV will check the selected sample to ensure:
- Marks have been calculated in line with guidelines.
- Marks are transferred correctly from learner evidence
to marking sheet.
- Percentage marks and grades allocated are consistent
with grading bands.
The following will be appropriate for internal verification for each
certification period and as laid out by relevant awarding body
guidance documents:
- A minimum of 12 portfolios included in the sample for
each award.
- If there are 12 or less portfolios for an award, all
portfolios will be internally verified.
- If there are more than 12 portfolios for an award, the
sample will normally be greater than 20% and will not
be less than 13 assessment portfolios, as per the
following table:
Number of assessment portfolios
for certification
Number of assessment
portfolios to be included
Version 2.0 Page 145 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
0 – 12 All
13 – 50 13
51 – 100 25
101 – 200 40
Assessment portfolios selected by the IV must include the following in
the sample to determine the cut-off points between the grades:
The highest unsuccessful
The lowest pass
The highest pass
The lowest merit
The highest merit
The lowest distinction
The remaining number of portfolios will be randomly chosen, across all
grade bands, until the sample quota is reached. All Tutors will be
sampled over a defined period. Sampling from new Tutors will be
100% of learners who present for certification from their first
programmes.
The IV Report
- Having completed the IV process, the Internal Verifier
completes the IV Report confirming the outcome of the
process.
- The report will be retained and made available to the
External Authenticator and results approval panel.
- It captures evidence that the internal verification
process has taken place, acknowledges strengths, any
gaps identified and highlighting areas for improvement.
Documentation IV Checklist, IV Report
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Internal Verification Report Internal Key Dates - QQI Certification Periods Schedule
Appendix 7.11a Appendix 3.10
Version 2.0 Page 146 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
6.1.8 External Examiner / Authentication
Policy / Procedure Name External Examiner / Authentication
Version No 1.0
Approval Examination Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure that there is independent, confirmation of fair and
consistent assessment of learners which is in accordance with
awarding body specifications
Responsibility Training & Academic Affairs Manager/ External Examiner
Key Steps A suitably qualified External Examiner/ Authenticator (EA) is selected.
Selection Criteria
- Broad technical/subject matter expertise within the
appropriate award area/field of learning.
- Have the required knowledge and expertise to confirm
that policies and procedures in relation to awards and
assessment are being implemented.
- Experience of carrying out assessment or similar
relevant work within the industry/field.
- Have administrative and IT skills e.g. report writing.
- Be in a position to operate within the code of practice
and/or guidelines issued by the awarding body.
- Be independent of our organisation.
- Carry out their role as EA with integrity and
professionalism.
External authentication will take place in line with the assessment and
certification schedules.
Preparation for External Authentication – The following should be
agreed and/or made available in advance of the EA:
- Date, time and venue.
- Sampling strategy.
Version 2.0 Page 147 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Paperwork to be completed and the time allocated to
this.
- The date by which the EA report will be completed.
- Evaluation to appropriate personnel.
- Availability to the Results Approval Panel.
Documents to be made Available:
- Assessment briefs.
- Examination papers.
- Marking schemes.
- Outline solutions.
- Assessment plan(s).
- Learner assessment evidence.
- Learner assessment results (recorded on a provisional
results sheet).
- Component specification.
- Internal Verification Report(s).
- EA will be carried out in line with the organisations
sampling strategy
Complete the Examiner’s Report
This report is available to the results approval panel and provides
evidence that the external authentication process has taken place.
It comments on the outcomes of results moderation against national
standards, acknowledges strengths, any gaps identified and highlights
areas for improvement.
Documentation EA Checklist, EA Report
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
External Authentication Report Template Internal Verification Report Internal Key Dates - QQI Certification Periods Schedule - 2019 Learner Portfolios
Appendix 7.10 Appendix 7.11a Appendix 3.10
Version 2.0 Page 148 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
6.1.9 Appeals, Re-Checks and Reviews
Policy / Procedure Name Appeals, Re-checks and Reviews
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
6.1.9.1 Introduction
Following the issuing of grades/results and feedback to learners, The Cpl Institute
fully understands that learners may have issues with the assessment outcome or
require assistance in understanding their assessment outcome. Where a learner has
concerns, they are encouraged to lodge an appeal or seek a re-check/review.
The Assessment Appeals, Re-Check & Review Policy outlines the circumstances
under which learners may submit appeals/re-checks or reviews and the procedures
that will be followed. Decisions that can be appealed include assessment results for
all modules.
Definitions An appeal is where a learner formally requests that a decision or judgement of a lower authority is referred to a higher authority for alteration or reconsideration of the decision. Re-check means the administrative operation of checking (again) the recording and combination of component scores for a module and/or stage.
Review means the re-consideration of the assessment decision, either by the original assessor or by other competent persons or a committee. Learners are required to state the grounds for the requested review. The grounds for review will normally be that the learner suspects that the assessment was erroneous in some respect. A complaint is an expression of a concern that a particular assessment procedure is unfair or inconsistent or not fit-for purpose.
6.1.9.2 Purpose The Cpl Institute recognises that, from time to time learners may feel that they have
grounds to appeal the results or request a re-check of their assessments.
This policy sets out the principles, circumstances, grounds and possible outcomes of
an appeal by a Learner against a decision made by The Cpl Institute.
Version 2.0 Page 149 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Learners with concerns about the outcome of an assessment should contact the
relevant Training & Learning Co-ordinator as soon as possible.
6.1.9.3 Regulatory and Related Legislation
• QQI (2013) Assessment and Standards (Revised)
• QQI (2013) Quality Assuring Assessment Guidelines for Providers
6.1.9.4 Scope This policy applies to all learners wishing to appeal decision made by The Cpl
Institute. Learners may appeal assessment results as a result of procedural
irregularity in the conduct of the assessment process or the learner feels that they
were not assessed fairly. Learners may appeal to The Cpl Institute for their work to
be re-checked and/or reviewed. Any request for a review must be in writing/emailed
to the Training & Learning Co-ordinator.
Dissatisfaction or disappointment with the result of an assessment is not a ground
for an assessment appeal.
6.1.9.5 Responsibility The Academic Council is ultimately responsible for the reviews and appeal policy.
The QA & Compliance Manager is responsible for the implementation of the appeals
policy and reports to the Academic Council. The Training & Learning Co-ordinators are
responsible for re-checks. The Training & Academic Affairs Manager who is responsible
for managing Stage 1 & 2 and the QA & Compliance Manager manages stage 3.
Certain formal committees of The Cpl Institute have formal deliberative, decision-
making powers delegated to them by the Academic Council. The Reviews and
Appeals Committee is the hearing and decision-making unit in the case of academic
reviews and appeals.
6.1.9.6 Policy / Procedure The Cpl Institute understands that there are instances where Learners may wish to
question the assessment grade and or feedback they receive on their assessment.
The Cpl Institute is committed to ensuring the assessment procedures are reliable,
valid, accurate and fair and therefore implements appropriate procedures to
facilitate Learners to seek to appeal, re-check or review of an assessment decision. The
following procedures for learner to appeal, request re-check or a review.
Request for a Recheck a) A Learner wishing to have the marks awarded for a particular module (or
modules) re-considered should seek a recheck (or rechecks) of the relevant
Version 2.0 Page 150 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
module(s) after all assessments are corrected and internally verified. A recheck is
a re-examination of the marks awarded for a module, or part of a module, to
ensure that there have been no arithmetical or clerical errors and that all the
marks to which the Learner is entitled have been included in the final total.
b) The Learner must contact the tutor or relevant Training & Learning Co-ordinator
in writing no later than 10 working days after the examination results have been
released to the learner or booked by person. Requests received after that date
will not be considered. The Learner should supply any details that he/she
believes will help expedite the recheck.
c) Requests for rechecks must be accompanied by the appropriate €20 fee which
shall be set in respect of each module for which such a request is made. In the
event of a recheck resulting in an amended mark the fee will be refunded.
d) All rechecks will be completed within ten days of being received.
e) The recheck will be conducted by the appropriate module Tutor.
f) The Training & Learning Co-ordinator will inform the Learner in writing or
electronically of the outcome of the recheck.
Request for a Review - Stage 1 a) A review is a request to reconsider the grade awarded to a Learner in an
assessment for specific reasons.
b) The grounds for a review are one or more of the following:
• The examination regulations of The Cpl Institute have not been properly
Implemented.
• The regulations do not adequately cover the candidate’s case.
• Compassionate circumstances exist which may not have been considered
by the Tutor. Normally, such compassionate circumstances
must be notified in writing to the Training & Learning Co-ordinator or the
Training & Academic Affairs Manager when they occur.
d) The Cpl Institute will seek to complete all reviews within twenty-eight (28) days
where review requests have been received in writing by the Training & Learning
Co-ordinator or Training & Academic Affairs Manager not later than 10 working
days after the examination results have been released to the learner or booked
by person.
e) Only a written request for a review made in writing signed by the person/learner
concerned will be considered.
f) A request for a review must state the grounds upon which the review is sought,
and the candidate must supply evidence in support of his/her request.
g) Prior to any formal review the Learner will be invited by the Training & Academic
Affairs Manager to view their original assessment script, marking scheme and
Version 2.0 Page 151 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
marks awarded. This viewing will be scheduled to coincide with either the next
face to face workshop attended by the Learner, or an appointed Learner visit to
The Cpl Institute.
h) The assessment sighting of all related work shall be managed by the Training &
Academic Affairs Manager and following this the Learner may decide to
• withdraw the review request or
• proceed with the request for a review conducted by the Teaching,
Learning & Assessments Committee.
i) Should the Learner request a formal review through the Teaching, Learning &
Assessments Committee, the processing of the review will be carried out having
due regard to the schedule of meetings of the committees.
i) A €20 fee for a review shall be set, which in the event of a successful review, will
be refunded.
k) Following receipt of the review fee and written request from the Learner the
Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee will formally convene.
Request for a Review - Stage 2 Procedure to Request a Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee – Stage 2.
a) Where the Learner requests a Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee
review the Training & Academic Affairs Manager shall contact the Teaching,
Learning & Assessments Committee in the event of a Learner wishing to pursue
the review.
b) The Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee shall then consider the
evidence presented to it and decide the outcome of the review.
c) The following are members of the Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee:
• QA & Compliance Manager (Chair)
• Tutor (none related to the Learner programme of study)
• Teaching and Learning Co-Ordinator
• Internal Verifier
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager
• The Learner concerned may choose to address the Teaching, Learning &
Assessments Committee on the circumstances of the review. In the event of
the Learner seeking this opportunity a person of his/her choice may
accompany the Learner to the meeting.
d) In carrying out a review, the Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee may
consult with such persons, as it deems appropriate. The Teaching, Learning &
Assessments Committee may require that a review of the marking of an
assessment be undertaken by another tutor, where feasible, or by an external
tutor or by external authenticator.
Version 2.0 Page 152 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
e) All decisions of the committee will be by majority vote. In the event of a tie, the
Chairperson will have a casting vote.
f) The Learner will be informed by the Training & Academic Affairs Manager, in
writing by registered post or electronically, of the outcome of the review.
g) A Learner dissatisfied with the outcome of a review may appeal the decision of
the Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee.
h) The Training & Academic Affairs Manager shall notify the Learner’s Tutor of the
outcome of the review.
i) Where appropriate, as in if the Learner has accepted the decision of the
Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee, the QA & Compliance manager
shall notify QQI of the outcome of the review.
Request for an Appeal - Stage 3 Procedure, if the learner requests to appeal the review at stage 2.
a) Grounds for Appeal: The Learner can appeal the outcome of the review on the
grounds that the review did not properly address his/her case. The introduction
of new material that could have been included in the submission for the review
shall not be a valid ground for appeal.
b) A request for an appeal following the decision of the Teaching, Learning &
Assessments Committee decision must be received by the QA & Compliance
Manager not later than the date specified in the letter notifying the candidate of
the decision of the Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee.
c) Only a written request for an appeal made in writing signed by the learner
concerned will be considered
d) A request for an appeal must state the grounds upon which the appeal is sought.
e) The learner must supply evidence in support of his/her request.
f) The Appeals and Review Committee will be responsible for determining the
outcome of the appeal.
g) Membership of Appeals and Review Committee. The following will be selected
as members of the Appeals and Review Committee:
• External Academic Council Member (Chair)
• Head of Operations
• Tutor (none related to the Learner programme of study and wasn’t involved
previously)
• External Academic with experience of appeals
• The Learner concerned may choose to address the Committee on the
circumstances of the appeal. In the event of the Learner seeking this
opportunity a person of his/her choice may accompany the Learner.
Version 2.0 Page 153 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Procedures of the Appeals and Review Committee Procedure, if the learner requests to appeal the Teaching, Learning & Assessments
Committee’s decision.
The Appeals and Review Committee:
a) Shall consider the report of the Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee
and Training & Academic Affairs Manager.
b) Will seek (through the Chairperson) such information or advice as it considers
necessary and in such manner as it considers appropriate.
c) Shall, having considered the circumstances, decide the outcome of the appeal.
d) May, through the QA & Compliance Manager, seek the advice of such external
professionals considered necessary to ensure a proper and fair procedure.
d) Shall make their collective decision by majority vote. In the event of a tie, the
Chairperson shall have a casting vote.
e) Shall inform the learner in writing, by registered post or electronically, of the
outcome by the QA & Compliance Manager. All decisions of the appeal
committee are final subject to any legal rights of the Learner. The Training &
Academic Affairs Manager shall notify the Learner’s Tutors of the outcome of the
appeal.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Assessment Paperwork Learner Feedback Instructor Report Meeting Minutes
6.1.10 Approval of Assessment Results
Policy / Procedure Name Approval of Assessment Results
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure that assessment results are reviewed and signed-off by the
organisation prior to submission for certification by the awarding
body.
Version 2.0 Page 154 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Responsibility Examination Board
Key Steps An examination board is scheduled for each assessment period.
An examination board is convened to approve results, the following
documentation should be reviewed:
- Agenda for Examination Board meeting
- Provisional results for consideration.
- Internal Verification Report.
- External Examiner/Authentication Report.
- Tutor/Assessors Report.
- Grade Changes.
- Corrective Actions.
- Appeals Processed.
- AOB.
A completed report will be retained for auditing and monitoring
purposes.
It forms evidence that the authentication process has taken place. It
acknowledges strengths, any gaps identified and highlights areas for
improvement in the authentication process.
The examination board report will include:
- Panel membership.
- Agenda for meeting.
- Proposals to the meeting.
- Minutes of meeting.
- Proposals recorded in the minutes may include
decisions:
- To adapt the recommendation of the IV report.
- To adapt the recommendations of the EA report.
- To approve results before the meeting (provisional now
approved).
- Request for certification.
- To issue results to learners
Documentation Record of Meetings, Final Approved Results, Results Summary Sheet
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
RAP Meeting Agenda RAP Meeting Minutes External Authentication Report Template
Appendix 7.12 Appendix 7.10
Version 2.0 Page 155 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
6.1.11 Academic Integrity
Policy / Procedure Name Academic Integrity
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
6.1.11.1 Introduction
The Cpl Institute is committed to building a culture which values and supports good
and honest academic conduct. The Cpl Institute will not tolerate acts of assignment
falsification, misrepresentation, or deception. The policy applies where an individual
is engaging in academic work and accepts responsibility for upholding academic and
ethical standards.
Definitions Academic Integrity
This refers to the process of completing academic work independently, honestly and
in an appropriate academic style using good referencing and acknowledging all
sources.
Achieving good academic practices involves a Learner:
• Engaging with and using research from their discipline.
• Demonstrating an understanding of the thinking, writing, and practices in
the discipline.
• Independently evaluating theoretical and practical dimensions of a
particular discipline and putting it into to your own words.
• Originating new ideas.
Academic Malpractice This refers to any action or practice that undermines the fairness of an assessment.
The action may be deliberate or accidental. The following actions are considered to
constitute academic malpractice however, these actions and practices are not
exhaustive:
• Avoiding or attempting to avoid assessment regulations.
• Falsification of data: making up results and recording or reporting them
Version 2.0 Page 156 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Forgery of data: manipulating research, materials, equipment, or
processes or changing or omitting data or results such that the work is
not accurately represented in the research.
• Unauthorised collusion: aiding, attempting to aid, obtaining aid from or
attempting to obtain aid from another Learner or any other person to
contribute to an assessment task (except where required for group
assessment tasks) or any form of cheating
• Plagiarism is copying another person's ideas, words or writing and
pretending that they are one's own work or passing it off as your own
work failing to use academic referencing conventions.
• Self-plagiarism is the use of one's own previous work in another context
without citing that it was used previously.
6.1.11.2 Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to establish standards for the ethical conduct of
academic work, to establish parameters for the detection and investigation of
instances of academic malpractice, and to set penalties for those found to have
engaged in academic malpractice.
6.1.11.3 Regulatory and Related Legislation
• QQI Assessment and Standards (Revised 2013)
• QQI Quality Assuring Assessment Guidelines for Providers (Revised 2013)
• QQI Core Statutory Quality Assurance Guidelines (2016
6.1.11.4 Scope This policy applies to all Learners completing programmes with The Cpl Institute.
6.1.11.5 Responsibility The QA & Compliance Manager is responsible for the implementation of this policy
on behalf of the Academic Council. Further, all The Cpl Institute staff and Learners
are responsible for upholding the principles of this policy. The Cpl Institute staff are
responsible for reporting suspected malpractice to the QA & Compliance Manager or
the Training & Academic Affairs Manager.
6.1.11.6 Policy / Procedure This policy applies to all learners and where a learner is engaging in academic work,
they must accept responsibility for upholding academic and ethical standards.
The Cpl Institute is always committed to building a culture which values and supports
good and honest academic practices and conduct.
Version 2.0 Page 157 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Procedures for Minimising Academic Malpractice The procedures that are in place for minimising Academic Malpractice include:
• Ensuring that all Learners are aware of the Academic Integrity Policy of The
Cpl Institute
• Educating Learners about what constitutes academic integrity. As part of the
induction process, Learners will receive info on academic integrity.
• The content of this will set out the expectations of both Learner and Tutors
and will clarify the expectations of both Learner and Tutor.
• Assessments will change occasionally for each module and/or will be rotated
on some modules.
• Where assessments are being carried out at practical classes or
demonstration of skills, these assessments will be recorded and reviewed by
tutors, internally and by external authenticators to ensure consistency of
marking. Each learner will identify themselves on the videos.
• Software may be used to ensure that written assignments do not display
evidence of plagiarism.
Procedure for Investigating Academic Malpractice Where a Tutor suspects Assessment Malpractice, the Training & Academic Affairs
Manager should be informed immediately, and the following steps completed:
• All material related to the alleged malpractice should be made available to
the Training & Academic Affairs Manager. A report should be prepared by the
Training & Academic Affairs Manager taking into consideration the extent of
the evidence of the alleged malpractice.
• If the outcome of this investigation is that there is no case to answer, then
the case is closed, and no formal records are maintained.
• If the Training & Academic Affairs Manager is of the opinion that there is a
case to answer, then a meeting of the Teaching, Learning & Assessments
Committee is arranged. The purpose of this meeting is to determine whether
the allegation is upheld and if so, what the appropriate penalty is to be. If the
outcome of this meeting is that the allegation is not upheld, then the case is
closed, and no formal records are maintained.
• The Learner is invited to attend this meeting in person and is given the
opportunity to be accompanied by a colleague of choice, if they wish. They
may be questioned about the situation and assessment content.
• A record of the meeting is maintained and reported to the Academic Council
only where the case has been upheld by the Teaching, Learning &
Assessments Committee.
Version 2.0 Page 158 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• The Learner is notified in writing of the outcome including the penalty, if
applicable, within 5 working days of the Teaching, Learning & Assessments
Committee meeting.
• The Learner has the right to appeal the Teaching, Learning & Assessments
Committee decision and should do so within five working days of receiving
the Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee outcome notice.
Membership of the Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee The following are members of the Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee:
• QA & Compliance Manager (Chair)
• Tutor (none related to the Learner programme of study)
• Teaching and Learning Co-Ordinator
• Internal Verifier
• Training & Academic Affairs Manager
• The Learner concerned may choose to address the Committee on the
circumstances of the review. In the event of the Learner seeking this, they are
given the opportunity of a person of his/her choice may accompany the
Learner to the meeting.
Guidelines for Establishing Penalties for Assessment Malpractice A judgement is made on the required penalty for a plagiarism offence based on the
following criteria:
a) History of the Learner and whether the particular case is a first, second etc.
time offence.
b) Amount of plagiarism involved (the percentage of the document
plagarised).
c) Level of Award and Credit weighting.
d) Value of the Assessment/Assignment.
Right of Appeal The Learner has a right to appeal the decision of the Teaching, Learning &
Assessments Committee and this must be made within 5 working days of receiving
outcome correspondence from The Cpl Institute. The policy and procedures for
appeals, re-check and reviews are then implemented. The decision of the Appeals
and Review Committee is final in this matter. The Learner is then notified of the
decision within 10 working days of the appeal being lodged.
The following will be selected as members of the Appeals and Review Committee:
• External Academic Council Member (Chair)
Version 2.0 Page 159 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Head of Operations
• Tutor (none related to the Learner programme of study and wasn’t involved
previously)
• External Academic with experience of appeals
• The Learner concerned may choose to address the Committee on the
circumstances of the appeal. In the event of the Learner seeking this
opportunity a person of his/her choice may accompany the Learner.
Procedures of the Appeals and Review Committee Procedure, of the learner requests to appeal the Teaching, Learning & Assessments
Committee’s decision.
The Appeals and Review Committee:
a) Shall consider the report of the Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee
and Training & Academic Affairs Manager.
b) Will seek (through the Chairperson) such information or advice as it considers
necessary and in such manner as it considers appropriate.
c) Shall invite the Learner to address it on the circumstances of the appeal. In the
event of the Learner accepting this opportunity a person of his/her choice may
accompany the Learner.
d) Shall, having considered the circumstances, decide the outcome of the appeal.
e) Shall through the QA & Compliance Manager, seek the advice of such external
professionals considered necessary to ensure a proper and fair procedure.
f) Decisions of the Appeals and Review Committee shall be by majority vote. In the
event of a tie, the Chairperson shall have a casting vote.
g) The learner will be informed in writing, by registered post or electronically, of
the outcome by the QA & Compliance Manager. All decisions of the Appeals and
Review Committee are final subject to any legal rights of the Learner. The QA &
Compliance Manager shall notify the Training & Academic Affairs Manager.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Assessment Paperwork Learner Feedback Instructor Report Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee Meeting Minutes Appeals and Review Committee Meeting Minutes
Version 2.0 Page 160 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
6.1.12 Feedback to Learners
Policy / Procedure Name Feedback to Learners
Version No 1.0
Approval Teaching, Learning and Assessment Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure Tutors provides effective feedback to learners
Responsibility Tutor(s)
Key Steps - During the programme the Tutor will organise feedback
sessions where learners will receive timely and
constructive
- Evaluation on summative assessment.
- A summative Evaluation sheet is developed for learners
and completed by their Tutor.
- Records of learner Evaluation are retained.
Documentation Record of Meetings, Assessment Evaluation Form
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Learner Feedback Form Instructor Reports
Appendix 7.17
6.2 Monitoring and Review
Evaluation comments are gathered at the end of each module/programme from Learners
and Tutors. Questions are designed to gather information and insight into the effectiveness
of the assessment process.
This information is feedback to the Teaching, Learning & Assessments Committee and used
to modify and improve the effectiveness of future assessment activities in keeping with the
validated programme.
Version 2.0 Page 161 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 7 - Supports for Learners
7.1 Code of Practice for Learners with Disabilities
Policy / Procedure Name Code of Practice for Leaners with Disabilities
Version No 1.0
Approval Teaching Learning and Assessment Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
7.1.1 Introduction
The Cpl Institute is committed to ensuring that learners with disabilities have as
complete and equitable access to all aspects of programmes as can reasonably be
provided.
The Cpl Institute has adopted a Disability Policy, which is applicable to all learners
with disabilities. This is in accordance with the Disability Act 2005, the Equal Status
Acts 2000 (as amended).
Learners with disabilities are encouraged to speak to either their tutor or the
Training & Learning Co-ordinators to seek supports where their disability could affect
their ability to participate fully in all aspects of the programme. Also given the
opportunity to complete a “Reasonable Accommodation Request Form”.
This policy and code of practice have been aligned with a national policy called
‘Inclusive Learning and the Provision of Reasonable Accommodations to learners
with Disabilities in Further Education’, agreed by the Disability Advisors Working
Network (DAWN), in developing standardised teaching, learning, and assessment
procedures for learners with disabilities in Further Education in Ireland.
7.1.2 Purpose of the Code of Practice
This code of practice provides a framework for documenting the company’s reasonable accommodation provision for learners with disabilities and will be reviewed regularly, based on feedback from learners, members of staff, and other stakeholders.
7.1.3 Reasonable Accommodation – Definitions and Application
For the purpose of this Code of Practice and all The Cpl Institute policies relating to
learners with disabilities, a Reasonable Accommodation is any action that helps to
Version 2.0 Page 162 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
alleviate a substantial disadvantage due to a disability and/or a significant ongoing
illness.
As per The Equal Status Act 2000: “Discrimination includes a refusal or failure by the
provider of a service to do all that is reasonable to accommodate the needs of a
person with a disability by providing special treatment or facilities, if without such
special treatment or facilities it would be impossible or unduly difficult for the
person to avail himself or herself of the service.” Reasonable Accommodations are
defined as standard or non-standard Reasonable Accommodations.
A standard Reasonable Accommodation is defined as an amendment to the learner’s
teaching, learning and assessment which enables them to participate fully in their
education. A non-standard Reasonable Accommodation occurs when the company
recognises that tutors may need to consider providing alternative non-standard
teaching learning and assessment methods where standard Reasonable
Accommodations are not sufficient to meet the needs of the learner.
The application of a Reasonable Accommodation will result from consideration of
the circumstances of the individual learner and will involve the learner in discussion
of possible routes of action. What is ‘reasonable’ for The Cpl Institute will vary
according to a range of factors and will depend on the circumstances of the
individual case.
Factors influencing the determination of what is reasonable will include: the
effectiveness of taking particular steps in enabling the learner to overcome the
relevant disadvantage; whether the steps would significantly compromise the
academic standards or professional practices associated with the programme of
study; health and safety issues; the effect on other learners; and the financial and
other cost to The Cpl Institute.
7.1.4 Reasonable Accommodations in assessment
The company has responsibilities under the Equal Status Act, to ensure that learners with disabilities are not disadvantaged for reasons relating to their disability in its methods of assessment. Adjustments to assessment for a learner with a disability may take one of two general forms:
• Modifying the circumstances under which the existing assessment is taken
• Providing an alternative/equivalent form of assessment.
In only a very small number of cases the effects of the learner's disability are such
that an alternative form of assessment is required.
7.1.5 The Cpl Institute Policy on Confidentiality for Learners with Disabilities
Version 2.0 Page 163 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
The Cpl Institute encourages learners with disabilities to disclose information on
their disability to the Training & Learning Co-ordinators before they apply to The Cpl
Institute or at any point during their studies.
Such disclosure is encouraged so that The Cpl Institute can work with the learner to
ensure that reasonable accommodations are identified and facilitated in conjunction
with the learner. Learner will be asked to complete a “Reasonable Accommodation
Request Form”.
An electronic record of the learner’s contact with the Training & Learning Co-
ordinators is held securely in accordance with the Data Protection Act (2003 and
2018), and information provided to the Training & Learning Co-ordinators is
regarded as ‘sensitive personal data’.
Any documentation or information presented in disclosing a disability is held by the
Training & Learning Co-ordinators, and specific medical or other documentation will
not be disclosed to any third party except where necessary to provide Reasonable
Accommodations.
Where a learner requests, and is granted any form of Reasonable Accommodation,
such as extra time in exams, or permission to record lectures/tutorials, the Training
& Learning Co-ordinators will, in consultation with the learner, disclose relevant
information to the individuals responsible for providing or facilitating learners in
accessing such accommodations. In such instances, only information relevant to the
particular situation will be disclosed.
Where tutors contact the Training & Learning Co-ordinators for advice regarding individual learners, the Training & Learning Co-ordinators will be informed that it is necessary to obtain the permission of the learner in writing, before the individual case is discussed. The completed “Reasonable Accommodation Request Form” will be consulted.
7.1.6 Reasonable Accommodation Decision Making Process
7.1.6.1 Needs Assessment
Based on appropriate evidence of a disability and information obtained from the learner on the impact of their disability and their academic programme requirements, the Training & Learning Co-ordinators will identify supports designed to meet the learner’s disability support needs. The completed “Reasonable Accommodation Request Form” will be consulted.
The following areas are addressed:-
• Nature of disability or condition, to include: impact on education, severity,
hospital admissions etc.
Version 2.0 Page 164 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Treatment: any medication they are taking, outpatient appointments, such as
physiotherapy;
• Previous support: arrangements made at secondary school or with other
Further Education Training Providers, if any;
• Current difficulties: difficulties the learner anticipates that they have or may
have with their programme requirements;
• Access to equipment and IT facilities;
• Appropriate academic and disability support. These might include, for
example, accessible class venues, in-course support and examination support
arrangements.
7.1.6.2 Review of Support
Learners receiving Reasonable Accommodation will be contacted twice-yearly to review their support requirements. This process provides learners with an opportunity to review and provide feedback on the quality of support received during the year. It also allows learners to discuss their needs for further programmes and to request changes to their support provision where additional support is required or support is no longer necessary. Learners can contact the Training & Learning Co-ordinators for a review of their support at any time during the academic year if the impact of their disability changes or they do not feel the Reasonable Accommodations in place adequately address their needs.
7.1.6.3 Communication of Reasonable Accommodations to Staff
Following the Needs Assessment by the Training & Learning Co-ordinators and the submission of appropriate evidence of a disability by the learner, a report is disseminated to the learner’s programme tutor.
This information should be disseminated in line with the Data Protection Act (2003
and 2018), and The Cpl Institutes data protection policies. Further information on
dealing with personal and sensitive data can be obtained from The Cpl Institute’s
Data Protection Officer.
7.1.6.4 Confidentiality
Information about disability is classed as sensitive personal data and will be
processed by The Cpl Institute in accordance with the Data Protection Act (2003 and
2018), and The Cpl Institute’s Data Protection Policy. The company cannot pass on
personal or sensitive information without the learner’s written permission. When
the learner registers with the Training & Learning Co-ordinators, they are asked to
sign a ‘Consent to disclose form’ allowing the Training & Learning Co-ordinators to
forward on any relevant information regarding their disability and/or support needs.
This allows the Training & Learning Co-ordinators to forward the report to the
relevant tutor. General background details of the learner’s specific disability will be
included in the report.
Version 2.0 Page 165 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
A learner is not obliged to reveal detailed information to the tutor about their
disability. In some instances, it may be useful for the tutor to know, but in many
cases, it may not be relevant to the Reasonable Accommodation support.
A discussion about disability disclosure usually takes place between the Training &
Learning Co-ordinators and the learner, with the learner deciding what information
may be passed on during the completion of the Needs Assessment. The completed
“Reasonable Accommodation Request Form” will be consulted.
7.1.6.5 Dissemination of the report & ensuring Implementation of Reasonable Accommodations
Reasonable Accommodations and reports are available on the learner’s record.
Tutors must ensure they have a system in place to capture the Reasonable
Accommodations specified on the learner record. It is the responsibility of each tutor
to have an effective dissemination and implementation system in place to allow for
information on Reasonable Accommodations to be circulated to all relevant staff e.g.
those organising examinations and timetabling if required.
Version 2.0 Page 166 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
7.2 Disability Reasonable Accommodation Policy Policy / Procedure Name Disability Reasonable Accommodation Policy
Version No 1.0
Approval Teaching Learning and Assessment Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
7.2.1 Introduction
The Cpl Institute is committed to ensuring that learners with disabilities have access to all programmes and this Disability Policy will outline the support mechanism and how a learner can disclose their disability and the completion of a “Reasonable Accommodation Request Form”.
7.2.2 Purpose
The purpose of this policy and the associated Code of Practice (above in 7.1), is to
provide a framework for the provision of Reasonable Accommodations for learners
with disabilities studying with The Cpl Institute.
The policy defines standard and non-standard Reasonable Accommodations
available to learners with disabilities. The policy explains how Reasonable
Accommodations are granted and communicated to all relevant stakeholders.
The policy demonstrates The Cpl Institute’s compliance with relevant national legislation and policies.
7.2.3 Scope
This policy applies to all learners with disabilities studying at The Cpl Institute
The most common forms of standard Reasonable Accommodations agreed in this
policy are outlined in the Code of Practice, (see section 7.1).
A procedure for requesting a non-standard Reasonable Accommodation is outlined
in the Code of Practice.
This policy applies across The Cpl Institute and includes learners, staff and any other
persons providing goods and/or services associated with the functions of the
company. All of these are responsible for ensuring that they adhere to the relevant
sections of this policy.
7.2.4 Principles
The Cpl Institute will strive to create an environment where learners are comfortable
in disclosing a disability and are provided with opportunities to do so at various
stages throughout their time at The Cpl Institute. The Cpl Institute endorses the
principles of inclusive teaching, learning, and assessment.
Version 2.0 Page 167 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
The Cpl Institute will strive to ensure that its courses and programmes are as
inclusive and as accessible as possible.
Learners with disabilities will have access to appropriate academic Reasonable
Accommodations in accordance with the individual’s certified disability.
The learner and the staff are key partners in the development and provision of
Reasonable Accommodations, which enable the learner’s participation in all
teaching, learning, and assessment.
7.2.5 Definitions
Disability: The legal definition of disability stipulated in the Employment Equality Act 1998 and Equal Status Acts (2000) as amended, is as follows:
1. “the total or partial absence of a person’s bodily or mental functions, including the absence of a part of a person’s body,
2. the presence in the body of organisms causing or likely to cause, chronic disease or illness,
3. the malfunction, malformation or disfigurement of a part of a person’s body,
4. a condition or malfunction which results in a person learning differently from a person without the condition or malfunction, or
5. a condition, illness or disease which affects a person’s thought processes, perception of reality, emotions or judgement or which results in disturbed behaviour.
And shall be taken to include a disability which exists at present, or which previously
existed but no longer exists, or which may exist in the future, or which is imputed to
a person.” A disability is significant, long term and/or enduring in nature, lasting
longer than a year.
Reasonable Accommodation: A Reasonable Accommodation is any action that helps to alleviate a substantial disadvantage due to a disability and/or a significant ongoing illness. As per The Equal Status Act 2000: “Discrimination includes a refusal or failure by the
provider of a service to do all that is reasonable to accommodate the needs of a
person with a disability by providing special treatment or facilities, if without such
special treatment or facilities it would be impossible or unduly difficult for the
person to avail himself or herself of the service.”
Version 2.0 Page 168 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Factors influencing the determination of what is reasonable will include: the
effectiveness of taking particular steps in enabling the learner to overcome the
relevant disadvantage; whether the steps would significantly compromise the
academic standards or professional practices associated with the programme of
study; health and safety issues; the effect on other learners; and the financial and
other cost to The Cpl Institute.
For the purpose of this policy, Reasonable Accommodations are defined as standard
or non-standard Reasonable Accommodations.
A standard Reasonable Accommodation is defined as an amendment to the learner’s
teaching, learning and assessment which enables them to participate fully in their
education.
A non-standard Reasonable Accommodation occurs when the company recognises
that programmes may need to consider providing alternative non-standard teaching,
learning, and assessment methods where standard Reasonable Accommodations are
not sufficient to meet the needs of the learner.
7.2.6 Policy Statement
The Cpl Institute welcomes applications from prospective learners with disabilities
and is committed to making Reasonable Accommodations to enable learners to fully
participate in programmes.
Learners with disabilities are encouraged to disclose their disability to the Training &
Learning Co-ordinator.
Training & Learning Co-ordinators are facilitators in the process of advising and/or
providing Reasonable Accommodations and, as such, are viewed as experts in the
area of Reasonable Accommodations and as a resource to learners and tutors in the
identification and implementation of Reasonable Accommodations in teaching,
learning, and assessment.
Reasonable Accommodations are determined on a case-by-case basis through a
Needs Assessment. This is carried out by a suitably qualified staff member in The Cpl
Institute. A Needs Assessment considers the nature of the disability, programme
requirements, and individual differences.
Standard Reasonable Accommodations (see definition above) identified through the
Needs Assessment process, carried out by a suitably qualified staff member, are
communicated to the relevant tutors. The Reasonable Accommodation in question
Version 2.0 Page 169 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
will be put in place, unless a specific rationale is provided by the tutor for not
implementing it. (see Reasonable Accommodation Request Form).
All Reasonable Accommodations not covered in are considered as non-standard
requests. The Training Co-ordinator will engage with the Training Academic Affairs
Manager to determine if the accommodation being requested can be implemented
and/or if it constitutes a ‘Reasonable Accommodation’.
If there is agreement, then the Reasonable Accommodation will be recommended to
the tutor, for consideration and approval.
If the Training & Learning Co-ordinator and the Training Academic Affairs Manager do
not reach an agreement as to the requested non-standard Reasonable
Accommodation, firstly, efforts should be made to assess whether an alternative,
effective, and reasonable form of accommodation can be made for the learner in
question.
In the event of an agreement on an alternative, effective and reasonable form of
accommodation not being reached, the matter will be referred to the QA &
Compliance Manager, who will adjudicate as to what, if any, accommodation should
be made for the learner in question. The decision of the QA & Compliance Manager
will be final, binding on all parties, and will be communicated to all relevant parties
including the learner, the relevant tutor and Training & Learning Co-ordinator.
All Cpl Institute staff should maintain appropriate confidentiality (as per Data
Protection legislation and The Cpl Institute policies) of records and communication
concerning learners with disabilities, except where the disclosure is authorised by
the learner as indicated in the completed Reasonable Accommodation Request
Form.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number Training Facilities Checklist
Reasonable Accommodation Request Form Learner Request for Assessment Support Form Records of Correspondence
Appendix 6.1 Appendix 7.16 Appendix 7.15
Version 2.0 Page 170 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
7.3 Learners Support Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Learners Support Policy
Version No 1.0
Approval Teaching Learning and Assessment Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
7.3.1 Introduction
The Cpl Institute is committed to providing learners with adequate support and
resources to maximise their learning potential.
• Monitoring and review of resources to ensure they are fit for purpose and readily
accessible.
• Ensure learners are fully informed of the supports and resources available to
them.
• Provide sufficient pre-entry information on the content, assessment and
demands of each programme to enable potential learners to make an informed
choice about their participation on a programme.
• Providing information on the range of supports available and how to access
those supports.
• Providing prospective learners with the opportunity to disclose any support
needs on application or at any time during their programme.
• Providing learners with the opportunity to highlight any concerns they may have
during their programme.
• Ensuring learners have access to Tutor and administrative support throughout
their programme.
• Providing reasonable accommodation to ensure that learner needs are met at
every stage of their programme.
• Support the learners in obtaining work placements
7.3.2 Purpose
To provide a workable learning environment, support for all learners and ensure that
any additional learner support needs are available to all learners so as they can
access to all our programmes.
7.3.3 Scope
This policy applies to all learners.
7.3.4 Responsibilities
Version 2.0 Page 171 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
The Training & Learning Co-ordinators are responsible for ensuring all resources are
in place. The Academic Council are responsible for ensuring that all supports, and
resources are considered at the design stage and implemented into practice.
Final approval will lie with the Training Academic Affairs Manager.
The Training Academic Affairs Manager will be responsible for extra resources &
monitoring the progress of learners through their programme ensuring resources are
made available to provide additional support if required.
Tutors are responsible for monitoring learners during their programme and providing
additional support where required and discuss any concerns with the Training
Academic Affairs Manager.
7.3.5 Policy
All learners are advised to disclose any support needs they may have when they
register. Those identified with support needs are then contacted by email or phone
to make the necessary arrangements.
Learners who encounter difficulties during their programme are advised to inform
their Tutor or the programme Training coordinator immediately.
The following supports will be available to learners:
• Venues assessed to ensure the location is accessible to all individuals and that
appropriate facilities are in place.
• Physical modifications to the training and assessment location e.g. seating
arrangements etc., if necessary.
• Learning materials provided in an accessible format, where possible.
• Additional time allocated to complete assessments, where warranted.
• Alternative assessment formats.
Support from a reader and/or scribe to complete assessments or examinations.
7.3.6 Monitoring and Review of Learners Support
The Training & Learning Co-ordinators will monitor applications and report any
requests for additional supports to the Training Academic Affairs Manager.
The Training Academic Affairs Manager will liaise with the relevant Tutor during
programmes or with work placement manager/supervisor to discuss learner needs
and any supports they may require.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Training Facilities Checklist Reasonable Accommodation Request Form
Appendix 6.1 Appendix 7.16
Version 2.0 Page 172 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Learner Request for Assessment Support Form Request for Extension From - Online Records of Correspondence Website Promotional Material
Appendix 7.15
7.4 Work Placement Support and Supervision Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Work Placement Support and Supervision Policy
Version No 1.0
Approval Teaching Learning and Assessment Committee
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
7.4.1 Introduction
A work placement gives learners the opportunity to transfer the theoretical elements
relevant to their programme, to their work area while being supervised by a relevant
professional in the workplace or a healthcare facility. Our healthcare programmes require a
work placement to be completed as part of the work experience module. The Cpl Institute
will assist learners in obtaining placements suitable to their needs and abilities. Whilst
undertaking your work placement it is important to learn some valuable information
relating to the work placement facility and some common standards which exist in the
healthcare industry.
7.4.2 Purpose
This policy has been developed to provide support, quality assurance, accountability and
development mechanism for The Cpl Institute learners, mainly healthcare learners
completing their Healthcare Support programme. Healthcare support programme aims to
teach theories of practical skills and develop these practical skills with the aim of
incorporating both theoretical and practice strands on professional programmes.
Supervision in the workplace forms an integral part of the work experience module and all
learners must engage in a work placement to gain the practical experience. As such, the role
of the supervisor in the workplace is a highly valued one. The aim of the policy is to set a
framework of clear and transparent processes for the learner, work placement
manager/supervisor and the roles and responsibilities for all 3 parties involved. (The Cp
Institute, Learner and work placement manager/supervisor).
Version 2.0 Page 173 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
7.4.3 Regulatory Insurance and Legal Requirements
The Policy is intended to have regard to The Cpl Institute legal obligations in the context of
work placement including the common law duty of care and
• Safety Health & Welfare at Work Act 2005,
• General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
• Equal Status Act 2000 – 2008
• Employment Equality Act 1998-2005
• Organisation of Working Time Act 1997
• National Vetting Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons) Acts 2012 to 2016
7.4.4 Scope
This Policy applies to all learners attending and being managed/supervised during a work
placement.
7.4.5 Roles and Responsibilities
This Policy sets out the responsibilities of The Cpl Institute’s staff and others involved in the
work placement with clear identification of roles and responsibilities will ensure a successful
work placement experience.
7.4.5.1 Training and Academic Affairs Manager
The Training Academic Affairs Manager responsibilities include:
• Ensuring that this Policy is reviewed, updated as appropriate.
• Ensuring that appropriate procedures are in place to support this Policy.
• Ensuring that any breaches of the Policy are properly dealt with.
• Will conduct intermittent work placement visits to the various facilities and meet
with the work placement manager/supervisor.
7.4.5.2 QA & Compliance Manager
The QA & Compliance Manager is responsible for ensuring the Policy is implemented and to
:-
• Ensure their The Cpl Institute’s staff attend targeted training and briefing sessions as
required.
• Have regular reviews to ensure the adherence to the policy, procedures and ensure
documentation is updated as appropriate.
7.4.5.3 Learners
The Learner is responsible for:
• Attending any briefing sessions provided by The Cpl Institute.
Version 2.0 Page 174 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Attending any induction sessions provided by the Work placement facility.
• Advising The Cpl Institute of any issues that may affect their ability to engage in work
placement manager/supervisor.
• Adhering to the all work placement facility policies and procedures.
• Contacting The Cpl Institute tutor at agreed intervals or the Training and Academic
Affairs Manager.
• Ensuring the competency log is fully completed and signed off by the work
placement manager/supervisor.
7.4.5.4 Work Placement facility
The work placement facility, in association with The Cpl Institute, is responsible for
providing the learner with appropriate activities to enable them to achieve their intended
learning outcomes and competencies within their current workplace environment.
7.4.6 Policy Statement
A positive learner experience while in the work placement will serve the healthcare
profession well as it will identify compliance with statutory and professional ethical
guidelines, ensure learners work within their scope and meet regulatory requirements. This
work placement and experience gained will prepare the learner for future employment. It is
envisaged that the learner’s engagement with the work placement will ensure clarity of
roles and responsibilities and create structured opportunities to discuss work, review
practical experience, progress and plan for any future development as the learner continues
to relate theory to practical skills throughout the programme.
7.4.6.1 Key work placement relationships
The key to success in learner work placement lies in the management of the relationships.
There are
three key relationships involved in the work placement:
1. The Cpl Institute and Learner
2. The Cpl Institute and Work placement
3. Learner and Work placement / manager/supervisor
Each of above has an obligation to nurture and develop these relationships to ensure each
Learner has a successful work placement.
7.4.6.2 Monitoring and Communication during the work placement
During the learner work placement, there will be ongoing communication between Training
and Academic Affairs Manager, programme tutor, the work placement manager/supervisor
and the learner. The work placement will be monitored by the Training and Academic Affairs
Version 2.0 Page 175 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Manager to ensure the learner is achieving their learning objectives, competency log is
being completed and to address any concerns or issues.
7.4.6.3 Feedback and Debrief Post-Supervision
After completion of the work placement, learners will be required to provide feedback to
their tutor and the Training and Academic Affairs Manager on their work placement. In light
of the feedback, a review of the work placement process and experience may be carried
out.
7.4.6.4 Documentation / Recording
Documentation and recording of information must be completed throughout the entire
learner work placement.
This includes but is not limited to:
• Agreement with the work placement facility and includes insurance.
• Key programme learning outcomes and competencies signed off in the competency
log by work placement manager/supervisor.
• Any communications during the learner work placement.
• Post work placement review.
Please not that Data protection legislation will be considered and complied with during the
whole learner work placement.
7.4.6.5 The role of the Work placement manager/supervisor
The work placement manager/supervisor’s role involves the following:
• Establishment of mutually agreed learning goals as per competency log which the
learner will work towards during work placement.
• Helping learner to enhance or develop observation, communication and relationship
skills as essential requirements for effective healthcare environment.
• The development of an open, trusting and confidential relationship with the learner,
where opportunities for learning and professional development are maximised.
• Setting aside a regular time for feedback on the learner’s progress or discuss any
issues
that arise.
• The completion of the competency log. Learners should be involved in this process
and should be aware of the contents of the completed log before it is returned to
The Cpl Institute.
7.4.6.6 Appointing a work placement manager or supervisor
Version 2.0 Page 176 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
All work placement managers or supervisors will be qualified, experienced and a senior
member of staff in the work placement facility. The manager or supervisor should be able to
work daily with the learner in order to arrive at a valid and comprehensive
assessment/evaluation of the learner’s abilities. While it is hoped that the manager or
supervisor will be in a position to supervise the learner for the entire duration of the work
placement, should unforeseen absences occur, it is essential that an alternative manager or
supervisor can be put in place and the learner advised, and agreed with the Training and
Academic Affairs Manager.
7.4.6.7 Support for Supervisors
To support the work placement managers or supervisors in their important work The Cpl
Institute can offer training for managers or supervisors. The Cpl Institute will also email all
related information on the work placement so as the managers or supervisors are fully
advised of support mechanisms. The work placement manager or supervisor and learners
can contact the Training and Academic Affairs Manager at any point during the work
placement, to discuss any issues which are impacting on the work placement or if the work
placement is not going according to plan.
7.4.6.8 The Role of The Cpl Institute tutor
Through regular classroom sessions and tutorials before the work placement commences,
the programme tutor will assist and guide learners in the preparation for their work
placement and discuss the programme learning objectives to be achieved during the work
placement.
7.4.6.9 The Role of the Learner
The work placement is important so as the learner and develop the necessary practical and
social skills and adapt to the healthcare environment to become:
• A caring, reliable, responsible and observant healthcare worker.
• A person using both initiative and an awareness of the needs and rights of various
clients in the facility.
• A skilled person in forming relationships and communicating with healthcare
residents.
• A person that can work constructively with colleagues and team members.
• A person to maintain confidentiality which reflects a sound approachable
personality.
• A person that can prioritise and maintain the safety of both client users and those
involved in their care.
Version 2.0 Page 177 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
7.4.6.10 What should the Learner wear
The work placement manager/supervisor will advise you in advance, what to wear or they
may provide you with a uniform (conforming with Health and Safety requirements). It is
important to note that you must wear appropriate clothing as requested by your work
placement manager/supervisor.
7.4.6.11 Behaviour during Work Placement
While you are in attendance of work placement, your behaviour must be professional at all times. Remember that you are there to learn and gain valuable experience in the work place. Therefore adhere to all facility local rules and regulations and
• Act professionally at all times as residents relations could be present.
• Adhere to the timetable and the scheduled breaks.
• Ensure you are not standing idle, always look for something to do.
• Do not be on your phone or standing around chatting to other colleagues.
• Be honest – if you don’t know how to do something, just ask.
• If you damage equipment tell your work placement manager/supervisor straight away.
• Do that extra bit, go that extra mile and it will pay off and achieve a good reference.
7.4.6.12 Personal Hygiene
As you may be moving around and performing tasks that put you under pressure, you may become extremely warm and you must maintain good personal hygiene. You must ensure that your uniform or work clothing is clean before entering work each day and you may need spare clothing. Encourage you to shower/Wash daily prior to entering work and make sure your footwear is clean.
7.4.6.13 Mobile phones in work placement
Most employers do not allow the use of the mobile phones during work hours. Please adhere to local rules and regulations regarding mobile phones in your work placement. If your mobile phone is meant to be in your locker, then ensure that your mobile phone is stored away in a secure locker or location. Most work placements will offer you a locker to store away personal belongings during your working day/shift. Place your mobile phone, personal belongings and any other valuables in this locker. Bring the key with you and keep it safe on you. If you do need to take a telephone call during your break, be respectful to others and go to a quiet location in the canteen or outside to make or take the call. 7.4.6.14 Laptops/iPads in the Work Placement Facility
For security reasons it is recommended that you do not bring a laptop/iPad into the work
placement facility.
Version 2.0 Page 178 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
7.4.6.15 Social media sites
Whilst the use of Facebook and other social media sites during work hours is not acceptable, either is speaking about your work placement manager/supervisor or colleagues on them in such an open forum. Be careful of what you post and say on these websites and take care of disclosing any confidential information or data. Do not post negatively about work placement manager/supervisor or colleagues as your friends could be their friends or you may want a job with that facility again at a future date.
7.4.6.16 Working Time
The Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 sets out the statutory minimum entitlement for employees/learners during their work placement. All learners are entitled to have breaks while they are work. All learners are entitled to rest periods as defined in the Organisation and Working Time Act 1997. 7.4.6.17 If Difficulties Arise
Throughout the course of the programme it is possible that issues may arise for some
learners
and/or managers/supervisors which could impact on the work placement.
Such issues could include:
• Learner taking maternity leave.
• Learner goes on extended sick leave.
• Learner takes up a new work placement in a different facility.
• Disciplinary process in relation to the Learner.
• Manager/Supervisor leaving their current role.
• Manager/Supervisor going on maternity leave or other extended leave (parental
leave/sick leave etc.) and is no longer in a position to manage/supervise the learner.
• Manager/Supervisor unhappy with the learner’s performance or participation in
Work placement.
• Learner unhappy with the work placement Manager/Supervisor.
In any of these instances the manager/supervisor and/or the learner should contact the
Training and Academic Affairs Manager to discuss the issue and agree a plan of action to
resolve the issue.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Company Insurance Competency Log Booklet Emails / Records of Correspondence Work Placement – Site Visit Form Tutor & Learner Issues
Appendix 4.5 Appendix 4.16
Version 2.0 Page 179 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Learner Handbook Garda Vetting Policy Safeguarding and Protection Policy
Appendix 8.1 See Section 2.1.5.3 See Section 2.1.5.4
Version 2.0 Page 180 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 8 - Information and Data Management
8.0 Management of Information
Policy / Procedure Name Management of Information
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Information is a core asset of The Cpl Institute.
It is a key resource required to meet our business objectives and expectations of all
stakeholders. We are committed to creating, managing and retaining secure records and
providing access to same for continuous quality improvement.
This is underpinned by the following principles:
- Management of information effectively
- Information resources are secured by the organisation and not to be
stored on individual systems.
- Responsibility for managing information assets is clearly identified.
- Staff will be able to access information for the effective performance of
their role and there will be the opportunity for the free flow of information,
as appropriate.
- Protection of personal information, which cannot be shared for legal
reasons, e.g. in relation to privacy, security or due to commercial
sensitivity.
- Produce accurate information
- Information will be timely, relevant and consistent.
- Information will be managed and will comply with relevant legislation.
- Manage information in accordance with policies, standards and
procedures
Purpose
To provide a framework for managing information which will enable the organisation to:
Version 2.0 Page 181 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Deliver quality services by having timely access to meaningful and appropriate
information, be open and transparent, comply with all legislation and protect both
company and personal information.
Scope
This policy applies to all staff, contractors, representatives working on behalf of the
organisation who have access to records in all formats, whether paper, electronic or
audio-visual.
It includes emails produced or received in the conduct of business which are part of the
organisational record.
Responsibility
The Senior Management Team are responsible for direction that policies and procedures
are in place for the safe management of information.
All staff, contractors, consultants and agents are responsible for documenting their
actions and decisions accurately in the organisations records and for managing
information in accordance with procedures and related policies.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Version 2.0 Page 182 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
8.1 Information Systems
Quality System Area Performance Measure/ Documentation Review Actions Required
Responsible Person
Governance and Management Quality reviews & improvement tasks
Priority tasks open
Risk issues Identified
Risk analysis review
Documented Approach to Quality Assurance
Policies and procedures review/ amendments
Programmes of Learning and Staff training Number of registered learners
Course completion rates
Inhouse/ validated programmes
Recruitment, Management and Continuous Professional Development
Tutor evaluations
Staff CPD/ Induction/Training
Tutor recertifications.
Tutor retention
Teaching and Learning Provider evaluation rating
Programme evaluations
Complaints and areas for improvement highlighted
Assessment & Certification of Learners Grade Analysis against national averages
Number Certified (in all areas)
Learner submission gaps
2nd Marking /Appeals /Notifications to awarding bodies
Non submission for assessment
Learner Supports Learner supports available
Supports needs achieving certification
Information and Data Management Number of data breaches
Learner and Tutor files -arising issues
Learner assessment portfolios – non completion
Version 2.0 Page 183 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
GDPR non compliance
Information and Communication Completed internal and external quality reports
Public information- no arising issues
Provider agreements/Partnerships Sub-contracting arrangements in place
Provider agreements, success/ identified gaps.
Self-Evaluation, Monitoring and Review Monitoring and Evaluation activities
Quality improvements plans
Quality improvement tasks open
Version 2.0 Page 184 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
8.2 Learner Information System
Policy / Procedure Name Learner Information System
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To track performance and generate reports on learner registration,
completion and course provision.
Responsibility Training & Learning Coordinators
Key Steps Check the system to ascertain if the learner is already registered,
- Each learner is assigned a unique number when they
enrol on a programme for the first time.
This number is to be inputted into the system with their personal
information, to include:
- Name, Address, Contact Details, Gender, Date of Birth,
PPS Number, Emergency Contact Person, Prior
Learning, Additional Support Needs.
Information collected during and after each module is to be inputted
into the system to include:
- Attendance Additional Support Provided, Progression,
Non-Completion, Assessment Results, Certification.
Documentation Learner records
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Version 2.0 Page 185 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
8.3 Management Information Systems
Policy / Procedure Name Management Information System
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
The Cpl Institute have a customised electronic management information system (TMA) which is accessible to all management and administration staff. The system provides:
- A data repository and reporting function for all organisational activity. - Database to include learner details, certification details per learner,
assessment details, application and completion rates per module etc. The system is monitored through:
- External evaluation – An external IT support company provide support and maintenance of the system.
- Identified improvements and necessary updates are carried out in a timely manner.
- The system is backed up daily and is updated on a regular basis. - Use the centrally based filing system for electronic and paper files.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
8.4 Further Planning
8.4.1 Data Collection & Analysis
Policy / Procedure Name Data Collection & Analysis
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Version 2.0 Page 186 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Purpose To ensure up to date, accurate and reliable data is available at all
times for direct provision and supports to all learners
Responsibility QA & Compliance Manager
Key Steps The QA & Compliance Manager will carry out an analysis of data to
ensure secure security of data.
- Reports will be presented at regularly scheduled staff
meetings.
- Regularly scheduled programme review meetings, ref.
completion rates, grade analysis, learner satisfaction
rates, enrolment rates target groups (learner profile
details, per module/programme).
Documentation Minutes of Meetings, Data Reports
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
8.5 Completion Rates
In order to assure all our stakeholders that the organisations learning delivery, assessment
and evaluation meets best practice, The Cpl Institute will undertake both data collection and
measurement of all completion rates of programmes. These will be tracked using our TMA
system and provided for review at both Academic Council and Admissions Committee.
We will endeavour to consistently measure our grading and identify any areas of concern in
either the delivery of a programme or the assessment tools aligned to it. Industry standards
and results will be used as a tool for bench marking within the organisation and all identified
areas for improvement will be acted upon.
Our auditing processes will assist in these measurements and pre validation of any new
programme, we will look to national published grades to set the level of learner activity and
results.
8.6 Document Maintenance and Retention
8.6.1 Document Management
Policy / Procedure Name Document Management
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Version 2.0 Page 187 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that we can trace, record
and retrieve the involvement of learners in all activities of the delivery
of our programme to learners. These records will be maintained
securely until such times as they will be destroyed. The accuracy of the
records will be assured as much as is reasonably practicable
Responsibility Training & Learning Co-Ordinators
Key Steps Records must be managed through their lifecycle: from creation,
through storage and use, to disposal.
Creation and Maintenance - Information users will:
- Create, keep and manage records which document the
organisation’s principal activities.
- Maintain records the organisation requires for business,
regulatory, legal and accountability purposes.
- Create records with meaningful titles so that they can
be retrieved quickly and efficiently.
- Create and maintain records in accordance with the
procedures for version and document control.
- Make sure records are authentic, reliable, have integrity
and remain usable.
- Ensure appropriate backup arrangements are in place
for electronic records (including restoration of backups
and disaster recovery if electronic records are
damaged).
- Storage - To maximise efficiency, reduce costs, enable
sharing and minimise risks, information users will:
- Not store information permanently on removable
media (e.g. memory sticks, external hard drives etc.).
- Using Information - In order to balance the
organisations commitment to openness and
transparency and a desire to store our information with
Version 2.0 Page 188 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
our responsibility for privacy and sensitivity
requirements, information users will:
- Ensure all records are subject to appropriate security
measures.
- Document decisions regarding access so that they are
consistent and can be explained and referred to.
Documentation Learner Records, Staff Records, External Audit Report, Internal Audit
Reports
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Internal Audit Reports
8.7 Data Protection and Freedom of Information
Policy / Procedure Name Data Collection & Analysis
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
The Cpl Institute is committed to the protection of the rights and privacy of individuals and organisations whose data is held by the organisation. This commitment is underpinned by full compliance with the statutory measures that ensure these rights, namely the Data Protection Act 1988, the Data Protection (Amendment) Act 2003 and the General Data Protection Regulation 2016. To meet our responsibilities under the legislation and in accordance with the data protection principles, we will:
- Obtain and process information fairly. - Keep it only for one or more specified, explicit and lawful purposes. - Use and disclose data only in ways compatible with these purposes. - Take appropriate measures to keep data safe and secure. - Keep it accurate, complete and up-to-date. - Ensure it is adequate, relevant and not excessive. - Retain for no longer than is necessary for the purpose or purposes in was
collected. - Provide data to data subjects upon request.
Version 2.0 Page 189 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Purpose To outline the rules on data protection and the legal conditions that must be satisfied in relation to the collecting, obtaining, handling, processing, storage, transportation and destruction of personal data. To protect The Cpl Institute from the consequences of a breach of its responsibilities.
Scope All staff, contractors and tutors handling data for or on behalf of The Cpl Institute who have access to data in all formats i.e. paper, electronic, audio-visual etc.
Responsibility - Ensuring resources are in place to meet the requirements of this policy. - Ensuring the policy and procedures are adequate, up-to-date, in line with
legislative requirements and systematically reviewed. - Designating a Data Protection Officer (DPO).
Training & Academic Affairs Manger - Assisting the Senior Management Team to develop, review and approve
the policy and procedures. - Ensuring the organisation is fully compliant with legislation in its day to day
activities. - Ensuring only authorised personnel engage in activities associated with
providing the service. - Monitoring the implementation of this policy and associated procedures. - Dealing with concerns arising out of the implementation of this policy.
Staff - Complying with the requirements of the policy and associated procedures. - Creating and maintaining full and accurate records of all activities. - Handling data with care and respect so as not to compromise their
integrity. - Preventing unauthorised access. - Bring any observations or concerns that may require updates to the policy
and procedures to the attention of the Training Manager. Data Protection Officer (DPO)
- Monitor compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation. - Collect information to identify processing activities. - Analyse and check the compliance of processing activities. - Inform, advise and issue recommendations. - Provide support, assistance and training.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
QQI Consent Form Appendix 8.4
Version 2.0 Page 190 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
8.7.1 Obtaining and Processing Data
Policy / Procedure Name Obtaining and Processing data
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure that all data is obtained and processed in a transparent and effective manner.
Responsibility All Staff
Key Steps Information may only be collected for the provision of education and training activities and associated services. Information will be collected to:
- Provide services including, but not limited to, training and consultancy.
- Provide personnel, payroll and pension administration services.
- Update databases. The data subject must be made aware of the following prior to processing their data:
- Reason for collecting the data. - How it will be used. - Legal basis for processing the data. - Disclosure to third parties. - Retention period. - Contact details for the DPO.
Learners rights: - Right to be informed. - Right of access. - Right to rectification. - Right to erasure. - Right to restrict processing. - Right to data portability. - Right to object. - Rights around automated decision making and profiling. - Right to withdraw consent at any time. - Right to make a complaint.
Personal data should only be processed for the specific purpose(s) notified to the data subject(s) and for which it was gathered in the first place:
Version 2.0 Page 191 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- If it is requested to be used for any other purpose, consent must be obtained from the data subject(s)
- Data should only be disclosed for the original purpose it was obtained.
- Data should not be disclosed to third parties without the explicit consent of the data subject.
- Verbal consent may be obtained for the disclosure of non-sensitive data.
- Written consent must be obtained for the disclosure of sensitive data.
- Sensitive personal data may be disclosed without the express written consent of the data subject in the following circumstances:
- Where it is required by law. - Where it is required for legal advice or legal proceedings,
and the person making the disclosure is a party or a witness.
- Where it is required for the purposes of preventing, detecting or investigating offences, apprehending or prosecuting offenders, or assessing moneys due to the state.
- Where it is required urgently to prevent injury or damage to health, or serious loss of or damage to property.
Documentation IT System, Personnel Files, Retention Schedule, Disposal Log, Emails, Written Correspondence
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
QQI Consent Form Appendix 8.4
8.7.2 Data Access Requests
Policy / Procedure Name Data Requests
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To allow an individual access to their personal data
Version 2.0 Page 192 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Responsibility Data Protection Officer (DPO)
Key Steps Once a data request is received, the following applies: - Inform the individual that the request must be submitted
in writing to the DPO using the organisation’s access request form (form issued by email upon request).
- Once the written request is received the DPO will verify the identity of the individual using reasonable means – e.g. request a copy of recent photo I.D.
- Once verified, the DPO will process the request or assign a person who will process it.
- The DPO will track/record results to ensure compliance (In the event of a dispute, an audit trail must be available to demonstrate compliance).
- Processing the request should be complete within one month of receiving the request in writing.
- This time period can be extended to two months where requests are complex or numerous.
- Inform the individual of the extended time period. - Send the data electronically to the individual in the
agreed time, unless the individual requests that it be sent manually.
Documentation Access Request Form, Tracking Log, Emails, Written Correspondence
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Access Request Form Emails
8.7.3 Requests to Rectify, Erase, Restrict or objections to Processing
Policy / Procedure Name Requests to Rectify, Erase, Restrict or Object to Processing
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure that individual requests are dealt with in a timely and effective manner.
Responsibility Data Protection Officer (DPO)
Key Steps Once a request is received the following applies: - Inform the individual that the request must be submitted
in writing to the DPO.
Version 2.0 Page 193 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Once the written request is received, the DPO will verify the identity of the individual using reasonable means – e.g. a copy of a recent photo I.D.
- Once verified, the DPO will process the request or assign a person to it.
- The DPO will track/record results to ensure compliance (In the event of a dispute a trail must be available to demonstrate compliance).
- Processing the request should be complete within one month of receiving the request in writing.
- This time period can be extended to two months where requests are complex or numerous.
- Inform the individual of the extended time period. - Notify the individual of the results of their request within
the agreed timeframe.
Documentation Emails, Written Correspondence
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Access Request Form Emails
8.7.4 Data Sharing Requests
Policy / Procedure Name Data Sharing Requests
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Version: Date Approved:
Purpose To ensure that individual requests are dealt with in a timely and effective manner.
Responsibility Data Protection Officer (DPO)
Key Steps Handling a Request Once a data portability request is received, the following applies:
- Inform the individual that the request must be submitted in writing to the DPO using the organisation’s data request form, detailing all data requested (form issued by email upon request).
Once the written request is received, the DPO will:
Version 2.0 Page 194 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Verify or delegate a person who will verify the identity of the individual using reasonable means – e.g. a copy of a recent photo I.D.
- Once verified, the DPO will process the request or delegate someone to process it.
Processing a Request - Gather all data requested in whatever format it is in. - Save all data in PDF format. - Send the data to the data subject for review and agree
upon it. - Once agreed, send the data in PDF format to the other
controller identified by the data subject and request a receipt.
- Processing the request should be complete within one month of receiving the request in writing.
- This time period can be extended to two months where requests are complex or numerous.
- If the time period is to be extended, inform the individual.
- The DPO will track/record results to ensure compliance. - In the event of a dispute, an audit trail must be available
to demonstrate compliance. - The person responsible must send notification to the
data subject of the results of their request within the agreed timeframe.
Documentation Data Request Form, Tracking Log, Emails, Phone Calls, Written Correspondence.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Data Request Form Emails
8.7.5 Confidentiality and Security
Policy / Procedure Name Confidentiality and Security
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Version 2.0 Page 195 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Purpose To ensure that information is managed in a consistent, secure and confidential manner.
Responsibility Data Protection Officer (DPO), All Staff
Key Steps Standards of security include the following: - Access to the IT system is limited to authorised
personnel only, each of which will have individual passwords for secure access.
- Access to IT servers is restricted, in a secure location and available to a limited number of approved Staff.
- Access to any staff personal data is restricted to authorised personnel for legitimate purposes only.
- Access to computer systems is password protected with other factors of authentication as appropriate to the sensitivity of the data.
- Non-disclosure of personal security passwords to any other individual including other personnel is encouraged.
- Information on computer screens and manual files to be kept out of sight from unauthorised individuals.
- Back-up procedures in operation for information held on computer servers, including off-site back-up.
- Computers are protected by anti-virus software. - Computers have automatic screen savers should the user
fail to log out. - Personal manual data is to be held securely in locked
cabinets, locked rooms, or rooms with limited access. - Staff are provided with data protection information and
training relevant to their role.
Documentation Training Records, Computer Audit Trail, Log in Details.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Version 2.0 Page 196 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
8.7.6 Data Cleansing
Policy / Procedure Name Data Cleansing
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure accurate, up to date data is available to the organisation and that it is in line with data protection legislation and guidelines.
Responsibility Data Protection Officer (DPO)
Key Steps In order to ensure clean data all fields must be complete at time of initial entry on any systems. Quality checks are carried out quarterly on a random selection of:
- Learner Records - Log any issues identified. - Contact all organisations annually to verify and update
information. Maintain the database:
- Assign responsibility for systematic cleansing. - Update policies and procedures. - Seek external expertise, if required. - Keep staff informed and upskilled. - Carry out random spot checks. - Discuss issues with relevant staff members. - Ensure consistency of data entry among all staff. - All policies and procedures are reviewed annually, as per
the document control matrix. - Staff records are updated annually, or sooner if required,
in line with performance reviews. - Information on the website and/or social media is
reviewed and updated weekly. - All data is reviewed annually for relevance and updated
or disposed of as required.
Documentation Quality Reports, Quality Improvement Plan, Record of Meetings, Document Control Matrix
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Version 2.0 Page 197 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
8.7.7 Managing a Data Breach
Policy / Procedure Name Managing a Data Breach
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure a standardised management approach is implemented in the event of a data breach.
Responsibility Data Protection Officer (DPO)
Key Steps A data breach may happen for a number of reasons, including: - Loss or theft of equipment on which data is stored. - Inappropriate access controls allowing unauthorised use. - Equipment failure. - Human error e.g. the sending of an email to the wrong
address. - Unforeseen circumstances, such as a flood or fire. - Computer hacking. - Access where information is obtained by deception.
Should a breach occur it is to be manged in the following way: - Details of the incident should be recorded, including. - A description of the incident. - The date and time of the incident. - The date and time it was detected. - Who reported the incident and to whom it was
reported? - The type of data involved and how sensitive it is. - The number of individuals affected by the breach. - Was the data encrypted? - Details of any IT systems involved. - Notification of the breach - Internal Notification
A data breach must be reported without delay to the DPO and the Senior Management Team, with the incident details.
- The DPO will immediately convene a meeting of relevant people to deal with the incident.
- The group will assess the incident details and the risks involved, including:
- What type of data is involved? - How sensitive is the data involved?
Version 2.0 Page 198 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- How many individuals’ personal data are affected by the breach?
- Were there protections in place e.g. encryption? - What are the potential adverse consequences for
individuals and how serious or substantial are they likely to be?
- How likely is it that adverse consequences will materialise?
External Notification
- It is best practice to inform the office of the data commissioner immediately for advice on how best to deal with the aftermath of a data breach.
- The DPO will be responsible for contacting the office of the data commissioner.
- The Senior Management Team, in consultation with the office of the data commissioner, will decide if it is appropriate to inform the persons whose data has been breached (Not every incident will warrant notification).
- When notifying individuals, Senior Management will consider the most appropriate medium for doing so. It will bear in mind the security of the medium for notification and the urgency of the situation.
- Specific and clear advice will be given to individuals on the steps they can take to protect themselves and, what the organisation is willing to do to assist them.
- The DPO will be the contact person for further or ongoing information.
- The Senior Management Team will also consider notifying third parties, such as An Garda Síochána who can assist in reducing the adverse consequences to the data subject(s).
- Other statutory agencies will be informed, as required. Evaluation and Response
- Subsequent to any breach, a review of the incident will be made by Senior Management. The purpose of this review will be to:
- Ensure that the steps taken during the incident were appropriate.
- Describe and record the measures being taken to prevent any repetition of the incident.
- Identify areas that may be in need of improvement. - Document any recommended changes to policy and/or
procedures which are to be implemented as soon as possible thereafter.
Documentation Record of Meetings, Emails, Quality Improvement Plan
Version 2.0 Page 199 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
8.7.8 Internal Audits
Policy / Procedure Name Internal Audits
Version No 1.0
Approval Quality Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure systems in place are operating in accordance with the data protection acts and regulations and to identify any risks or possible non-compliance.
Responsibility Data Protection Officer (DPO)
Key Steps Internal audits will be carried out annually by the DPO, who will: - Complete the audit schedule
The schedule specifies the areas and/or processes to be audited, the audit criteria and scope of the audit.
- Areas specified in the schedule are audited against relevant documentation and standards (audit criteria).
- Internal audits are carried out across selected activities annually, with greater frequency, if required.
- The frequency of audits can be adjusted depending on the results of previous audits, Evaluation, new procedures or the importance of an identified issue.
The audits are carried out by: - Reviewing manual and electronic procedures and
compliance. - Consultation with relevant Staff. - Reviewing previous audit reports and improvement
plans. - A summary internal audit report is completed by the
Data Protection Off outlining any strengths and areas for improvement.
- Where an issue is discovered it is recorded and any Issues will be prioritised for completion.
- The issue and corrective action should be agreed between the auditor and the person tasked with completing the corrective action.
Version 2.0 Page 200 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Where no issues are found, a record is retained to signify that an audit has been carried out, i.e. an audit report must still be completed.
- Corrective actions are checked at the end of each month by the Data Protection Officer to verify completion.
- Reports are provided to the next quality team meeting for review.
- Internal audit reports are to be maintained for a period of three years.
Documentation Audit reports, Quality Improvement plan, Corrective Action Log
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Internal Audit Reports Correction Log
8.7.9 Staff Training and Support
Policy / Procedure Name Internal Audits
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To ensure that staff have the necessary knowledge and skills to carry out their activities
Responsibility Data Protection Officer (DPO)
Key Steps Training and supports will include - Initial data protection information will be provided at
induction. - All new staff members will receive training on the IT
system. - The Data Protection Officer will provide periodic updates
and awareness training as required. - Upskilling workshops will be held annually. - Manuals will be reviewed and updated annually or
sooner if required. - Updates will be communicated to stakeholders
electronically. - The IT lead will provide ongoing advice and support.
Documentation Training Attendance Sheets, Login Details, Induction Checklist, Staff CPD Records
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Version 2.0 Page 201 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Daily Training Record
Appendix 7.1
8.7.10 Data Retention & Disposal
Policy / Procedure Name Internal Audits
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose To provide guidance to staff in meeting their obligation in relation to the retention and disposal of data.
Responsibility Data Protection Officer (DPO)
Key Steps Management will: - Ensure all Staff are made aware of the records retention
schedule so that they know which records the organisation has decided to keep and their personal responsibility to follow the retention schedules.
Information users will: - Review records in accordance with the retention
schedule when they are no longer required for on-going business or specific legal or regulatory purposes.
- Review records at the end of their retention period and arrange for secure destruction, transfer to storage or given a further review date - Documentation of the disposal or transfer of records will be completed and retained.
- Manage electronic records in accordance with the retention schedule. It is recommended that an intended disposal or review date is captured when creating electronic records.
All data created and/or received by staff in the course of their duties are retained for as long as they are required to meet legal, administrative, financial and operational requirements. The final disposal, either through transfer to archives or destruction, is carried out according to the retention schedules. Retention periods depend on different criteria, including compliance with legislation and best practice.
Version 2.0 Page 202 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
The retention periods are the minimum time that records should be kept and are calculated from the end of the calendar month, following the last entry on the record. A records retention schedule will apply to a series of records and will indicate when eligible records must be destroyed or deleted, as well as when permanent records are to be archived. In conjunction with the retention periods included in this policy, the following principles should also be observed:
- Be conservative and avoid inordinate degrees of risk. - Consider the consensus of knowledgeable/experienced
people. - Retain a record if it is likely to be needed in the future,
and if the potential consequences of not having it would be substantial and are foreseeable at the time.
- Apply common sense. - Disposal of records must be authorised by a senior
manager or the Data Protection Officer. - Where hard copy records are to be destroyed after the
retention period has expired, they should be destroyed using a shredder, or where there is a large amount of records to be destroyed, a professional contractor with expertise in this field should be employed on a confidential basis with the intention that such contractor will oversee the process and issue a certificate of destruction.
- A record in the form of a register is to be maintained of all records destroyed, providing verifiable authorised proof of destruction.
- The register should be kept in perpetuity and should provide details of all records destroyed, including identifying the name of the person to whom the record relates.
- The register should be signed and dated by the person who authorised the destruction of the records. This register should be held in a secure location.
- Electronic records should be disposed of as per the retention schedule.
- Third parties who have received records should be notified and requested to dispose of those records according to the retention schedule.
Documentation Retention Schedule, Disposal Log, Staff CPD Records, Emails
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Version 2.0 Page 203 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
8.7.11 Retention Schedule
This is a list of common types of information showing how they should be classed and the
retention period.
Information Type Retention Period Disposal
Staff & Tutor Documentation
Personal Details
Professional Details (CV, Contract of Employment etc.)
CPD Records
Learner Documentation
Learner Records (Such as contact information: phone address, etc)
Module/Programme Details
Assessment Details
Module/Programme Documentation
Programme Content
Programme Information
Programme Material (Hard Copy and Soft Copy)
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
8.8 Monitoring and Review
The Data Protection Officer will be responsible for monitoring compliance by carrying out
random audits during the year and a scheduled audit annually. The procedures will be
reviewed annually by the Data Protection Officer, Senior Management Team and the
Academic Council
Any issues will be raised at regularly scheduled staff meetings and actioned as required.
The policy will be reviewed by the Quality Team every periodically or should a need to amend
after a raised concern or clarification.
Version 2.0 Page 204 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 9 - Public Information and Communication
Policy / Procedure Name Communication with All Stakeholders
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
The purpose of this procedure is to describe how The Cpl Institute communicates with all stakeholders through verbal, para verbal and written communication. The Cpl Institute considers that good communication with stakeholders will allow us to meet the learning and training needs of the stakeholders and ensure best practice. To achieve this, we will:
- Have a clear vision and mission that enables all to understand and engage
with our education and training aims and objectives.
- Provide and be provided with appropriate information to enable us to
deliver a quality service to all stakeholders.
- Ensure policies and procedures are clearly communicated.
- Disseminate information to inform decision making, practice and
encourage a communication stream for continuous quality improvement.
Purpose
To provide information on programmes of education and training and quality assurance
policies, procedures and reports.
Scope
This policy applies to all education and training activities as well as both internal and
external communications.
Responsibility
The QA & Compliance Manager are responsible for ensuring that policies and procedures
are in place for all education and training activities. Responsibility will be delegated as
appropriate.
Version 2.0 Page 205 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
All Sub-Committees are responsible for:
- Promoting a culture of open and honest communication.
- Ensuring all Stakeholders are kept updated on relevant activities.
- Ensuring that information is made available to all stakeholders in a timely
manner, via the appropriate channels.
- Maintaining two-way communication and listening to Evaluation and
comments from all Stakeholders.
- Monitoring the effectiveness of the policies and procedures.
Staff are responsible for:
- Ensuring good individual communication practice.
- Being informed and having the knowledge to be effective in their role.
- Taking responsibility for communicating with stakeholders.
- Using open two-way communications to keep colleagues and
stakeholders informed.
- Continually measuring and evaluating communication procedures.
Learners are responsible for:
- Being aware of and actively using communication channels and processes
that are designed to enhance and support their experience.
- Responding to communications from representatives in a timely manner.
- Actively engaging with formal and informal Evaluation processes that
provide an insight into how services and infrastructure for learners might
be enhanced.
- Taking an active role in opportunities provided for learner representation,
if applicable.
- Informing staff at the earliest opportunity of any concerns or issues that
may be affecting their ability to learn.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
9.1 Programme Information
Policy / Procedure Name Programme Information
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Version 2.0 Page 206 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
It is The Cpl Institute policy to promote and ensure regular and effective communication at
all levels of the organisation. The Cpl Institute believes that communication must be two way
and inclusive of diversity.
The Cpl Institute are committed to providing accurate information and guidance about our
programmes and services and to seek constructive Evaluation from our learners and all
stakeholders where possible, to ensure the continuous improvement and development of our
programmes and services, which reflect best practice.
Communication is delivered indirectly via our website, newsletter, by telephone, email and
directly face-to-face.
9.1.1 Communication with Learners
The purpose of this procedure is to describe how staff communicate with learners from initial
contact, through the duration of the programme up until certification, via verbal, para verbal
and written means of communication.
The Cpl Institute believes good communication with learners will foster an improved learning
experience for learners, thereby empowering learners to achieve their goals.
9.1.2 Communication with Staff
The purpose of this procedure is to describe how information is communicated to, from and
between staff, via verbal, para verbal and written means of communication. The Cpl Institute
believes that good communication with staff is a key component to a positive, healthy work
and learning environment.
9.1.3 Communication with other Stakeholders
The purpose of this procedure is to describe how The Cpl Institute communicates with all
stakeholders, via verbal, para verbal and written means of communication. The Cpl Institute
considers that good communication with stakeholders will allow us to meet the learning and
training needs of the stakeholders and ensure best practice.
Purpose To ensure that programme information is made available to learners
and that it provides enough information to make an informed choice
about participation on a programme.
Responsibility Marketing Manager, Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Key Steps Sources of Information
- Website
Version 2.0 Page 207 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Social Media
- Promotional Material/Exhibitions
- Local Media
- Emails
Information to be Provided
- Programme Title
- Award Type
- Awarding Body
- National Framework of Qualifications Level (if
applicable)
- Entry Criteria
- Module Outline/Content
- Transfer and Progression Opportunities (if applicable)
- Assessment Details
- Details on Protection for Enrolled Learners (if
applicable)
The following will be made available:
- Quality Assurance Policies and Procedures
- Awarding Body Reports and Evaluations
- Learner Award Information (Assessment statistics)
Documentation Promotional Material, Website, Centre Activity Report
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
9.2 Communication Policy
Policy / Procedure Name Communication Policy
Version No 1.0
Approval Senior Management Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Version 2.0 Page 208 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Purpose To ensure that information is provided to and collected, analysed,
acted upon and used to inform improvements to training activities.
Responsibility Senior Management Team, Academic Council
Key Steps Communication Methods
- Website.
- Internal reporting.
- Replying to requests for information in a timely
manner.
- Attendance at meetings and events.
- Participation in external review.
- Submission of documentation.
- Annual Reports.
- Collecting Evaluation
- Stakeholder needs assessment.
- Scheduled emails to and from associated stakeholders.
- Attendance at local events (Networking Opportunities).
Documentation Record of Meetings, Internal and External Reports, Survey Results,
Quality Review Report, Annual Report, Needs Assessment Report
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Meeting Minutes Audit Reports
9.3 Learner Information
The Cpl Institute has a learner handbook and is made available to all learners attending
validated courses/programmes. This handbook will be reviewed by the Teaching, Learning
and Assessments Committee on an annual basis.
9.3.1 Protection for Enrolled Learners (PEL)
The Cpl Institute has learner protection in place for all learners who enrol on validated
programmes in accordance with the Qualifications and Quality Assurance (Education and
Training) Act 2012. The arrangements are in the form of insurance which will provide learners
with refunds should the organisation cease to trade.
See appendix 2.4 – The Cpl Institute PEL Arrangements
9.4 Quality Assurance and Evaluation Reports
The Cpl Institute will publish the following on its website.
Version 2.0 Page 209 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Awarding Body Reports on request
- Quality Assurance Policies and Procedures - accessible by learners
- Summary Reports from Internal Self-Evaluation on request
- External Evaluation Reports available on request
9.5 Monitoring and Review
The QA & Compliance Manager and the Marketing Manager will monitor published
information to ensure it is up to date, accurate and relevant.
The Academic Council are responsible for ensuring appropriate PEL arrangements are in
place.
A review of PEL arrangements will be included on the agenda for Academic Council.
The Head of Operations will inform the Training & Academic Affairs Manager of any applicable
changes.
PEL arrangements will also be reviewed annually to ensure compliance with all regulations.
Version 2.0 Page 210 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 10 – Other Parties involved in Education and Training
10.1 Collaborative Provision and Agreements
Policy / Procedure Name Collaborative Provision and Agreements
Version No 1.0
Approval Governing Board
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Version 2.0 Page 211 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.1.1 Introduction
The Cpl Institute staff have been involved in education and training for over 20 years and
have quality assurance policies and procedures in place across a range of awarding
bodies. All collaborative arrangements or other relationships with awarding bodies, both
in Ireland and the UK, offered through The Cpl Institute are organised with reputable
bodies and are subject to appropriate internal and external QA procedures.
This section details the policy and procedures which should be followed for the
development, approval and ongoing quality management of programmes operated in
collaboration with other organisations or providers nationally.
The Cpl Institute is a Further Education Training provider and its awards are validated by
QQI. The Cpl Institute’s Governing Board has overall responsibility for correct
governance of all parts of the organisation and The Cpl Institute’s Academic Council
(comprising of internal, external academics & learners) oversees academic governance
on behalf of the Governing board.
The Cpl Institute is interested in collaborative provision because it has the potential to
enrich provision to the advantage of learners, in a way that The Cpl Institute could not
achieve on its own. Collaborative programme provision is strategic in nature and builds
on The Cpl Institute’s mission and a shared vision and ethos with similar providers. The
Cpl Institute is committed to the provision of quality education and positive learner
experience within an increasingly diversified learner population. It sees collaborative
provision as one element of a strategic approach to supporting greater learner
diversification and thus more holistic learner experience with Further Education Training
providers.
The Cpl Institute is committed to collaborative arrangements which are characterised by
support and respect. It will only engage in Collaborative arrangements where it is
assured that each of the partner providers will and can play a significant and equitable
part in each facet of the development and delivery of collaborative programmes.
The Cpl Institute sees collaborative provision as a means of drawing on the industry
experience and expertise of partner providers for the ultimate benefit of learners and
therefore is also committed to ensuring that any prospective partner providers is in good
academic and financial standing. It is also necessary to ensure that prospective providers
are competent and sufficiently well-resourced to fulfil its obligations, as well as being
legally entitled to enter into an agreement. Collaboration will only be used where it is in
the mutual interests of partner provider and the overall learner experience.
This policy draws on QQI Policy for Collaborative Programme, Transnational Programmes
and Joint Awards (2012), but The Cpl Institute will only be involved in the Further
Version 2.0 Page 212 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Education Training sector at present. It specifically focuses on collaborative provision in
the context of taught programmes where there is a single Awarding body – in this instance
Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI). QQI defines Collaborative Provision as follows:
“There may be collaboration in the development of the programme, in the academic
monitoring of the programme, in the teaching, in the assessment, etc. or a combination
of any of these” (QQI, 2012:5).
QQI also stipulates that “A provider is responsible for any activities conducted in its name
and this responsibility extends to activities conducted by consortia involving the provider.
Accordingly, a provider’s Academic Council should establish the overarching strategy for
collaborative provision; approve potential collaborator providers and should be involved
in the establishment of any collaborative arrangements and the associated agreements”.
The Cpl Institute Governing Body and Senior Management will approve the overarching
strategy for collaborative provision; approve potential collaborative providers; any
collaborative arrangements as well as associated agreements. Academic Council within
The Cpl Institute will ensure adherence to academic standards and governance of
programmes.
Version 2.0 Page 213 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.1.2 Purpose
This policy document specifies the quality assurance procedures of The Cpl Institute for
collaborative provision and agreements in relation to programmes awarded by QQI at
level 5 and level 6 on the NFQ.
10.1.3 Regulatory and Reference Documents
QQI Policy for Collaborative Programme, Transnational Programmes and Joint Awards
(2012),
10.1.4 Scope
The Cpl Institute’s collaborative provision will be limited to the development and delivery
of taught level 5 and level 6 programmes of the National Framework of Qualifications in
the Further Education Training sector. In this instance, collaboration will be established
between:
(a) The Cpl Institute
(b) Private Homecare
The two named providers may collaborate on programmes leading to QQI awards at Level
5 and level 6 on the NFQ. Should future opportunities to expand collaborative provision
arise, this policy will be subject to revision and approval of The Cpl Institute Senior
Management, Academic Council and QQI.
Within the context and scope specified above this policy sets out the guiding principles,
and framework of responsibilities, structures and processes for The Cpl Institute for:
• the establishment, approval and governance of the partnership for collaborative
provision.
• the development of collaborative provision programmes, the validation or re-
validation of collaborative provision programmes and awards, and the processes
associated with the authorisation to proceed.
• the on-going management of collaborative provision programmes, including
delivery, assessment, monitoring, revalidation, evaluation and response, and the
provision of information to learners and for the general public.
In a collaborative arrangement, where The Cpl Institute is the lead partner/primary
provider for Quality Assurance, all policies and procedures relating to the programmes
contained in this document will equally apply to the delivery of the programmes offered.
Version 2.0 Page 214 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.1.5 Responsibility
• Academic Council should establish the overarching strategy for collaborative
provision; approve potential collaborator providers and involved in associated
agreements.
• The Cpl Institute Governing Body and Senior Management will approve the
overarching strategy for collaborative provision.
• The Academic Council will ensure adherence to academic standards and
governance of programmes.
• The Joint Programme Team, reporting to the Academic Council of The Cpl
Institute will have responsibility for the proper running of the programme
• Training and Academic Affairs Manager is responsible for Due Diligence and Risk
Assessment exercise
10.1.6 Policy Intent and Purpose
Essentially the policy will inform collaborative engagement in an ethos of quality provision,
ensure the quality of programme provision with partner providers and safeguard the
reputation of The Cpl Institute and partners by having explicit standards which will
safeguard against possible recklessness or negligence.
The overall intent and purpose of the policy is to:
(a) ensure clarity, transparency and consistency with regards to collaborative
provision.
(b) inform stakeholders about The Cpl Institute’s procedures for assuring the
standards and quality of collaborative provision.
(c) act as a guide and support for The Cpl Institute Faculty and staff.
(d) Set out clearly for both The Cpl Institute staff and potential collaboration
partners the required compliance and quality assurance processes.
(e) inform prospective partners of The Cpl Institute standards and requirements
in developing collaborative agreements and subsequently managing
collaborative provision.
(f) Ensure that all procedures deliver a consistent learning experience to those
learners on the collaborative programmes and with those delivered by The
Cpl Institute.
(g) Ensure compliance with QQI standards, policies and procedures on quality
assurance.
(e) Ensure the mechanisms for the operation of the consortium are clearly
considered, detailed and specified.
Version 2.0 Page 215 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.1.7 Principles
The Cpl Institute have used the guiding principles for collaborative provision as promoted
by the Irish Higher Education sector, although working in the Further Education sector,
which require that providers:
(a) are cognisant of the strategic and policy contexts for collaborative provision.
(b) have primary responsibility for the management, quality assurance and delivery
of programmes of in further education in the sector.
(c) ensure that learners enrolled on collaborative programmes receive an equivalent
learning experience to other learners.
(d) give due consideration to the academic support of learners, including to learner
representation on appropriate committees.
(e) develop approval and quality assurance processes for collaborative programmes,
which involve the conduct of appropriate due diligence, ongoing monitoring and
checks.
(f) recognise the need to have formal written agreements for all collaborative
arrangements.
The Cpl Institute will ensure adherence to these principles and the details of how this will
be achieved will be specified in the Collaborative Agreement (CA) and the programme
documentation. In all such developments The Cpl Institute will operate within the policy
contexts as specified by the appropriate bodies including QQI and any other relevant
regulatory parties.
In the Collaborative Agreement and the programme validation documentation, The Cpl
Institute will clearly outline its ownership and responsibility with regard to QA processes
and procedures and the delivery of an excellent learning experience to learners.
Appropriate governance arrangements will apply relating to the operation of the
consortium itself, the running of the programmes, teaching and learning, assessment,
learner representation, feedback and QA monitoring. Overall day to day governance will
be the responsibility of Training and Academic Affairs manager assisted by QA &
Compliance Manager and Academic Council. Regular reports on the collaboration, its
operation, progress and QA monitoring will be discussed at all Academic Council
meetings.
The Joint Programme Team, reporting to the Academic Council of The Cpl Institute will
have responsibility for the proper running of the programme and for ensuring
standardisation of programme content, the learner experience and assessment across all
venues where the programmes are delivered.
Version 2.0 Page 216 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.1.8 Key Operating Principles
The Cpl Institute is committed to collaborative provision where each provider Partner
plays a significant mutually agreed and equitable part in each aspect of the development
and/or delivery of the programmes. This may be evidenced through:
• Alternating meetings between sites or hosting MS Teams / Zoom meetings
• Sharing responsibilities for key roles such as the Chair of Joint Programme Teams.
• Recognition of each Partner in all promotions and media communications in
relation to its provision, in an honest, fair and accurate manner.
Quality assurance processes employed in respect of potential partners in collaborative
provision will be the quality assurance processes operated by The Cpl Institute for all
programmes delivered and this will ensure consistency.
Version 2.0 Page 217 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.1.9 Overview of Collaborative Provision
Collaborative provision for the purpose of this policy refers to the engagement of the
providers named above being involved by means of formal agreement in the
development, provision and monitoring of a programmes in the Further Education
Training sector leading to a Level 5 or 6 award with QQI. In that regard, this document
refers to all aspects of collaborative provision, encompassing all stages in the
development of a collaborative programme up to and including validation by QQI as well
as its subsequent delivery and academic monitoring. The collaborative arrangements for
other aspects of such collaborative agreements including learner recruitment and
selection and registration, provision of physical facilities, provision of support services,
programme delivery, monitoring and assessment are also addressed.
Within the context of the scope of this particular policy it is envisaged that there are a
number of distinct phases (albeit interconnected) as follows. Some of these stages are
presented below and some of the steps will run concurrently;
Stage 1: Collaborative Consortium Preparatory Phase
• Identification of potential new programme.
• Identification of, and preliminary research on, prospective partners for a
Consortium.
• Approval from the Governing Board of The Cpl Institute and Academic Council
to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding.
• Establishment and signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between
providers.
• Undertaking mutually agreed processes of Due Diligence and Risk Assessment.
• Establishment and signing of a detailed Consortium Agreement.
Stage 2: Programme Proposal & Development Phase
• Programme Development (including the establishment of a New Programme.
• Development Committee (as per The Cpl Institute QA procedures) and carrying
out market research.
• Programme validation or re-validation.
• Planning of programme delivery.
Stage 3: Programme Delivery & Monitoring Phase
• Delivery methods.
• Assessment.
• Monitoring.
Version 2.0 Page 218 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Periodic review.
• Evaluation and response.
• Provision of information for learners and for the general public.
Stage 4: On-going Management of Collaborative Aspects
• Content Delivery.
• Assessment.
• Monitoring.
• Revalidation.
• Evaluation and Response.
• Provision of information for learner and for the general public .
Version 2.0 Page 219 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.1.10 Establishment of Collaborative Provision
All collaborative arrangements will be negotiated, agreed and managed through the Training and Academic Affairs in consultation with the Academic Council. The Training and Academic Affairs may delegate functions within the process as appropriate.
The distinguishing feature of a collaborative programme is that it is jointly developed
between two providers - in this case the two providers (named above). New ideas for the
development of collaborative provision emerge from many sources, including
engagements with the relevant sectors or identifying new contexts for the delivery of
existing popular modules/content. Whatever the source any new idea for collaborative
provision is subject to this policy and the procedures specified. Members of staff are free
to bring ideas on possible collaborations to the attention of Senior Management Team
for consideration.
When a possible new idea (collaboration) is identified proposers are required to submit
an outline of the programme prior to the development of a full submission. This is
submitted to the Training and Academic Affairs for initial evaluation, prior to
consideration by the Senior Management. If the Training and Academic Affairs is of the
view that the proposal requires additional information, he will work with proposer to
secure this prior to submission of the initial proposal to the Senior Management Team.
On receipt of the proposal from the Training and Academic Affairs Manager an
evaluation by relevant members of the Senior Management Team (lead by Head of
Operations), of the proposal itself and potential collaborative providers takes place.
The evaluation criteria include the proposal’s alignment with The Cpl Institute’s strategic
vision, resource availability and quality assurance demands. If agreed by Senior
Management Team the proposal will be brought to The Cpl Institute’s Governing Board
by the Head of Operations for agreement to continue with further exploration of the
initiative. When agreed with the Governing Board a Memorandum of Understanding
(MoU) (intent to proceed) can be signed with the providers identified as possible
partners/ providers in the consortium. This will include detail on the following:
1) The parties involved;
2) Initial aims of the collaboration;
3) Work to be undertaken by the parties individually and collaboratively;
4) Timelines for the completion of tasks;
Training and Academic Affairs Manager appoints a programme lead who prepares a
formal proposal and resource requirements.
Version 2.0 Page 220 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
The signing of the Memorandum of Understanding authorises The Cpl Institute to
proceed to the next step - Due Diligence and Risk Assessment processes.
A Due Diligence and Risk Assessment exercise will be undertaken by The Cpl Institute
prior to entering into a Consortium Agreement for collaborative provision. Due Diligence
and Risk Assessment is the responsibility of the Training and Academic Affairs Manager
who will undertake due diligence with the identified partner provider, in addition to
facilitating due diligence examination of The Cpl Institute by the potential partner
provider as part of their engagement with The Cpl Institute. The Cpl Institute will enter
into a legally binding non-disclosure agreement with its prospective partner provider
covering any private information shared and/or acquired during this process. This
agreement may be signed at the same time as the Memorandum of Understanding.
The Training and Academic Affairs Manager will co-ordinate the Due Diligence and Risk
Assessment exercises, assisted by a dedicated Review Committee which s/he will Chair,
whose composition will vary with the nature, scope, scale and strategic significance of
the proposed collaboration, and to avoid any potential conflict of interest. The
Committee may co-opt additional members if it deems this necessary.
The Programme Review Committee will formulate a comprehensive, informed, true and
fair view of prospective partners, and in particular, of their capacity and ability to deliver
on commitments under the proposed collaboration. It may seek advice from The Cpl
Institute Financial Controller, its legal advisers, the proposer of the initial idea and
her/his team, and any other relevant sources.
As a result of a Due Diligence and Risk Assessment exercise the following may be
required:
• The exchange of Self-Evaluation Reports between The Cpl Institute and prospective
collaborative partner provider.
• A site visit by the Programme Review Committee.
• A robust evaluation of the academic, legal and financial standing of prospective
partners by the Programme Review Committee.
• An identification of critical risk factors by the Programme Review Committee, and
an assessment of potential exposure and related liability on the part of The Cpl
Institute.
The Self-Evaluation Report will normally be expected to contain the following
information:
• Profile and range of activities, including existing partnerships/collaborations.
• Governance, strategy, structure, culture.
Version 2.0 Page 221 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Regulatory environment and quality assurance, including outcomes of recent
external reviews.
• Learner services, supports and environment.
• Staffing profile.
• Financial performance, position and prospects.
The Due Diligence and Risk Assessment exercise may include a site visit by members of
The Cpl Institute’s Progamme Review Committee. The Programme Review Committee
will prepare its final report and recommendation for submission to the Academic Council
and Senior Management Team.
The Academic Council and Senior Management Team will consider the proposal
separately. Either entity can request additional information which will be supplied by the
Review Committee, but if both parties are satisfied and provide formal sign-off the
initiative can proceed.
Formal sign off by the Academic Council and Senior Management Team gives the go
ahead for the signing of a formal Collaborative Agreement and the Programme
Development and Validation can commence.
It will be the responsibility of the Training and Academic Affairs Manager to keep the
Academic Council informed of developments in respect of collaborative provision. It will
fall within the domain of that committee to ensure that The Cpl Institute’s quality
assurance processes are observed accordingly throughout the entire process.
Head of Operations as part of sign-off will be required to present regular updates to the
Governing Board.
Version 2.0 Page 222 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.1.11 Approval for Collaborative Arrangements
The formal Consortium Agreement will address the following matters:
• The members of the consortium and their role including specification on lead role.
• Day to day management of the consortium and the programme development
process.
• Programme design and validation.
• On-going monitoring of programme.
• Periodic review of programme
• Programme teaching and assessment strategies including modalities of
assessment, rechecks, reviews and appeals.
• Financial arrangements.
• Governance arrangements for the consortium.
• Mechanisms for appeal or complaint by learners or staff.
• Mechanisms to resolve any differences between consortium members.
• Staff recruitment and development.
• Numbers projections and recruitment.
• Marketing and media management.
• Liaison with QQI and any other relevant bodies (regulatory or government
departments).
The Consortium Agreement should also provide for a review process, which will
generally occur within five years of its signature. The Cpl Institute will draw on its
existing quality assurance processes to inform this process.
The Consortium Agreement will have Protection of Enrolled Learners policies and
procedures in place, showing how it can fulfil its obligations to learners, so that in the
event that the collaborative programme cannot be continued, alternative arrangements
are in place so that without undue delay, learners already registered on that programme
are enabled to transfer to a similar programme and gain a qualification equivalent to the
one that the first programmes had been leading towards.
The Consortium Agreement will reflect the principles outlined above, particularly
reflecting The Cpl Institute’s commitment in respect of learner welfare.
Prospective learners should be advised of the parties to the Collaborative Agreement
and other relevant details including:
• The awarding body.
• Programme validation status and associated information.
Version 2.0 Page 223 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
• Award type, name and its placement on the National Framework of
Qualifications.
• Admission requirements.
• Access information, including Recognition of Prior Learning processes.
• Recognition by regulatory, statutory and any professional bodies as appropriate.
• Programme structure and intended learning outcomes.
• Teaching and assessment strategy.
• Delivery mode.
The Head of Operations is the only person authorised by the Governing Board to sign off
the Consortium Agreement.
QQI validation of the collaborative programme is conditional on the commencement of
the Consortium Agreement.
Version 2.0 Page 224 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.1.12 Approval for Collaborative Arrangements
In proposing collaborative arrangements The Cpl Institute implements an approval
process to mitigate any reputational risk to The Cpl Institute, the sector and /or the
national qualifications system associated with particular prospective providers and
awarding bodies.
All collaborations regarding the delivery of academic programmes must be approved by
the Academic Council and Senior Management Team. In reaching its decision, the Senior
Management Team and Academic Council will be advised by Programme Review
Committee.
Collaborative arrangements will vary in nature from delivery of programmes developed
in partnership with an awarding body, to a study centre arrangement. All applications for
approval must be arranged to cover the following key headings:-
1. Legal, reputation and compliance requirements
2. Resource, governance and structural requirements
3. Programme development and provision requirements
The due diligence exercised must take account of the overall suite of education and
training provision offered by the proposed provider. The Training and Academic Affairs
Manager is responsible for academic due diligence. The Head of Operations is
responsible for undertaking financial and legal due diligence. All due diligence reports
and associated paperwork are submitted to the Academic Council with the final proposal
for approval.
Where a collaborative arrangement is agreed procedures must be put in place to
monitor and review the effectiveness of those arrangements. Any review agreed with a
collaborating provider, must be periodic, two-way and there should be a facility to
schedule a review where there is a doubt or concern regarding the quality of the
arrangement. The QA & Compliance Manager is responsible for maintaining all formal
agreements and QA arrangements and agreeing a schedule of review.
Version 2.0 Page 225 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.1.13 Policies on Transnational, Collaborative Provision and Joint
Awards
The Cpl Institute does not currently offer any formal collaborative, transnational
programmes, or joint awards validated or awarded by QQI. However, The Cpl Institute is
informed by these polices when considering collaborative provision.
If The Cpl Institute is to make a strategic decision to pursue such a development, it will
necessitate a change of scope to any agreed procedures. To facilitate this change, The
Cpl Institute will submit to QQI, a supplementary document to describe the QA
processes.
Currently the delivery of transnational programmes is not part of the Cpl Institute
Strategy.
10.1.14 External Expertise, Examiners and Authenticators
The Cpl Institute has occasion to engage external, independent, experts from time to time
to provide external expertise in both an academic and an industry focused point of view.
It will ensure that The Cpl Institute vision, mission and goals and strategic actions are
independently informed.
These include:
• Membership of Committees or sub-committees
o The Academic Council
o Senior Management Team
o Programme Development Team
o Sub-Committees
• Advisory
o Educationalist (Act in the capacity of Academic External Adviser)
o Business Strategy (To provide a real-world context)
• Expert Panels
o Programme Reviews
o Internal Review
• External Examiners
o External Authenticator
When selecting and proposing external experts, independence and appropriate expertise
must be reviewed, ethical considerations and conflict of interest actual or perceived must
be considered.
Related Documents
Memorandum of Understanding
Collaborative Agreement
Version 2.0 Page 226 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
10.2 External Agents involved in QA
The Cpl Institute operates a Quality Assurance Programme which is intended to satisfy the
requirements of ISO 9001:2015, QQI Quality Assurance standards and others, where
applicable. External Quality reviews inclusive of ISO 9001:2015 audits are carried out twice
yearly. Internal audits are carried out across each operational area at least once a year but
may be carried out at a greater frequency depending on areas under change or process
improvement.
The QA & Compliance Manager is responsible for ensuring that audits are carried out,
following a planned audit schedule and that the findings are made known to the Senior
management, Quality Team. A summary internal audit report is completed by the auditor
outlining any strengths and gaps for improvement.
10.3 Expert Panellists, Assessors and Authenticators
The purpose of this procedure is to provide independent authoritative confirmation of fair and consistent assessment of learners in accordance with national standards. To establish the credibility of the provider’s assessment processes and ensure that assessment results have been marked in a valid and reliable way and are compliant with the requirement for the award. This procedure is to ensure that when third parties are employed by The Cpl Institute to deliver auditing and evaluation processes on our behalf, that the assessors are fully briefed and understand their role and responsibilities in assessing requirements of the role and confirm their compliance with The Cpl Institute standards of evaluation as laid down by all awarding bodies.
10.4 Monitoring & Review
The Senior Management Team are responsible for ensuring the adequate resources are in
place to maintain standards across all awarding bodies. Responsibility is delegated to the
relevant committees who will monitor and review activities.
The Training & Academic Affairs manager will be responsible for the monitoring of day to
day activities with responsibility delegated as appropriate.
Version 2.0 Page 227 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Section 11 - Self-Evaluation, Monitoring and Review
11.1 Monitoring and Evaluation
Policy / Procedure Name Monitoring and Evaluation
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
The Cpl Institute is committed to the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of its
programmes and services:
- Assessing the effectiveness of our policies and procedures in achieving a
consistent and high-quality
- Ensuring we are meeting the requirements of our learners, external
contractors, awarding bodies and staff.
- Identifying opportunities for improvements.
- Internal monitoring and self-evaluation will involve learners and other
various stakeholders involved in our services
- Engagement of external evaluators to contribute to the process of self-
evaluation to allow for objective and independent evaluation.
External evaluations will be carried out by individuals who are:
- Competent in the activity of self-evaluation.
- Independent of organisation or process under evaluation
- Professional and robust in their approach.
Evaluations will be scheduled and carried out annually and at an appropriate frequency.
The results of self-evaluation including quality improvement plans will be published and
submitted to the relevant awarding body.
Purpose
To provide the framework organisational monitoring and self-evaluation which meets
the requirements for our quality management systems.
Version 2.0 Page 228 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Both good and bad practice will be identified to facilitate change in practice and adopt a
culture of continuous quality improvement.
Scope:
This policy applies to all activities associated with education and training
Responsibility:
The QA & Compliance Manager will have responsibility for reviewing self-evaluation
reports and approving the quality improvement plan. The Training & Academic Affairs
Manager will be responsible for the ongoing monitoring and review of all programmes
and associated services.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Quality Improvement Plan
11.2 Provider Self Evaluation and Monitoring
The Cpl Institute carries out a range of monitoring and review activities of its organisational
activities, resulting in the continuous quality improvement of its education and training
programmes.
The quality improvement plan is continuously updated and monitored by the QA &
Compliance Manager, Training & Academic Affairs Manager and the Academic Council.
11.3 Internal Monitoring
Policy / Procedure Name Internal Monitoring
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose Identification of the methodologies for conducting internal monitoring
of programmes and services within the organisation
Responsibility The Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Version 2.0 Page 229 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Key Steps Internal monitoring plays a key role in making meaningful and
beneficial improvements to our education and training provision
- Ongoing reviews of programme content, teaching
practices and assessment of learning achievements are
carried out by the Training & Academic Affairs Manager
through informal discussion with Tutors and learners.
Any relevant observations or comments are recorded
and presented to the Programme Review Team.
- Regular Meetings – Staff will meet formally/ informally
to discuss ongoing practice and arising issues when
required.
- All staff participate in an annual cycle of prospective
and retrospective appraisal activities – Performance
management which will assist them to identify their
own development goals and any needs for
improvement in performance.
- Training standards are evaluated, and any changes to
programmes documented and communicated to all
relevant staff
- Programme Evaluation will assist in measurement of
performance and identify areas for development.
- Learner opinion and evaluation at mid-point and
summation of progrmme through informal
conversation, formal meetings and evaluation forms
etc.
- Staff are encouraged to provide feedback on policies
and procedures, and any other area of practice where it
observed that changes could be made.
- Programme Reviews at the end of each programme will
be discussed between Training & Learning Coordinator
and the relevant Tutor.
- Internal Audits – The QA & Compliance Manager will
plan and schedule audits with the Quality Team and
carry out a range of internal audits on different aspects
of activities throughout the year.
Documentation Record of Meetings, Internal and External Audit Reports, Learner
Evaluation Forms, Tutor Reports, Annual Survey.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Version 2.0 Page 230 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Instructor Course Report Training Evaluation Form Programme Review Template Internal Audits
Appendix 7.2 Appendix 7.3 Appendix 4.12
11.3.1 Internal Audits / Evaluations
Policy / Procedure Name Internal Audits / Evaluations
Version No 1.0
Approval Quality Team
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial version
Purpose Outline of the process for internal quality evaluations/audits and the
impact on all programmes and services.
Responsibility QA & Compliance Manager
Key Steps Internal audits are carried out across each operational area at least once
a year but may be carried out at a greater frequency depending on
requirements and our ISO auditing processes.
- Frequency of audits can be adjusted depending on
reports and possible gaps identified. Where gaps are
noted in the audit, improvement plans will be
constructed and circulated to the relevant staff.
- The internal audit schedule specifies the areas and or
processes to be audited, the auditor, the audit criteria
and scope of the audit. Areas specified in the schedule
are audited against relevant documentation and
standards (audit criteria).
All Evaluation tools will be utilised during audits, these will include but
not limited to:
- Learner evaluation forms and other communications.
- Tutor evaluations
Version 2.0 Page 231 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- End of programme reports
- Programme reviews
- IV/ EA/RAP reports
- Previous audit results.
- Improvement plans
- Awarding body criteria and correspondence
A set date for completion of the process with be agreed with the QA &
Compliance Manager and the Quality Team who will ensure that all
those involved in the audit are independent of the area/process being
audited.
Where a gap or issue is identified it will be noted on the corrective
action/ non-conformance logs. Information gathered will include:
- Details of the gap/ issue,
- All queries around the gap including the programme it
occurred in,
- The associated quality procedure for guidance on
effective practice,
- All corrective actions and improvements
- Denote a person responsible for the corrective action.
- Communication with Head of Operations and QA &
Compliance Manager where appropriate.
- A completion date is assigned to the corrective action
and the person responsible signs the report to indicate
acceptance of the corrective action.
A summary internal audit report is completed by the internal auditor
outlining any strengths and gaps for improvement.
- Copies of internal audit reports together with any
checklists or notes used by the auditor during the audit
will be uploaded to our quality folder and used for
reference in next audits.
- Where no issues are found in a particular area, a record is
retained to signify that an audit has been carried out, i.e.
an audit report must still be completed.
- Internal audit reports are to be maintained for a period
of three years.
Version 2.0 Page 232 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Records Audit Schedule, Audit Reports, Corrective Action Log, Quality
Improvement Plan
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
11.4 Self- Evaluation, Improvement and Progress
Policy / Procedure Name Self-Evaluation, Improvement and Progress
Version No 1.0
Approval Academic Council
Date of Approval TBC
Effective Date TBC
Amendments to Policy Initial version
Amendments to Policy Date Comments
9th Mar 2020 Initial Version
Purpose To review, evaluate and report on all learning and training activities
and the effectiveness of our quality management system.
Responsibility QA & Compliance Manager, Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Key Steps Scope and Frequency
- Self-evaluation of all programmes will take place
annually, or as directed by the awarding body.
- The frequency of evaluation may also take into account
any changes in legislation or educational standards
reviews
- An evaluation may be carried out on an individual
programme, should a concern or identified gap arise.
- There may be a combined evaluation of all programmes
by our external auditing systems
Gathering Data, Planning and Reports.
- Accumulation of data from multiple evaluation
resources including monitoring processes
- Engaging with all stakeholders for feedback and
suggestions.
- Learner interactions and gradings.
- Review of evaluation tools and recommendations.
Version 2.0 Page 233 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Aligning recommendations for programme
improvement.
- Ensuring that programmes are relevant to learner
needs and mapped to industry requirements.
Internal Evaluations require that we:
- Plan and Prepare
- Complete Self-Evaluation Checklist
- Document all Evidence
- Complete Self-Evaluation Reviews
- Prioritise Areas of concern
- Identify recommendations for improvement
- Complete Improvement Plans
- Finalise all reports
- Implement Action plans
The Training & Academic Affairs Manager will have responsibility for
appointing staff for self-evaluation purposes.
Ensuring the process is completed and all results circulated to relevant
staff.
Self-evaluation process and core responsibilities include:
- Effective Planning and Preparation
- Setting appropriate schedules and timelines.
- Communicating processes to panel members
- Construction of self-evaluation checklist.
- Gather all other relevant evidence for review.
- Collate all information from the panel
- Ensure that the self-evaluation report is complete and
signed off.
- Ensure that the Improvement Plan is complete
Documentation for completion
- Self-Evaluation Report.
- Quality Improvement Plan.
- Completed self-evaluation checklist.
- Quality Policy/ Procedures updates
Version 2.0 Page 234 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Formal communication of new actions to all relevant
Staff, Sub-Committees, Academic Council.
Documentation Self-evaluation report, Quality Improvement Plan, update Quality
Policies/ Procedures.
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Quality Improvement Plan
11.4.1 Selection of External Evaluators & Consultants
Purpose Outline the process for appointment of External Evaluators /
Consultants to our panels and ensure that they hold professional
standards/ expertise in evaluation procedures, methodologies and
evaluation tools. To provide guidance on the development and
enhancement of the company’s education and learning activities.
Responsibility Training & Academic Affairs Manager
Key Steps - Create roles and responsibilities
- Retain list of professional qualifications and relevant
experiences of evaluators of various programmes.
- Assign role dependent on the descriptor and most
suitable candidate.
Evaluator Criteria:
- Not involved with programme delivery.
- Relevant subject expertise, external to the organisation.
- Broad understanding of the awarding body criteria.
- Experienced in training and development processes.
- Experienced in quality assurance systems.
Documentation Stored on TMA inclusive of all relevant evaluator details &
qualifications
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
11.4.2 Learner Involvement in Evaluation
Purpose Collection of feedback information from learners, review, evaluation
and to inform improvements in all aspects of educational activities.
Version 2.0 Page 235 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Responsibility Training & Learning Co Ordinators
Key Steps When appropriate the following evaluation tools may be considered:
- Learner Representatives.
- Representation on Sub-Committees
- Focus groups/ Evaluation Sessions
- Informal Conversations (Individual and Group).
- Questionnaires/on line Surveys.
- Tutor Evaluation & Feedback Forms.
- Mid- programme /Summative Evaluation forms will be
utilised to gather information on the value and quality
of each programme of learning.
- Communication streams will be in place for learners to
make recommendations or highlight areas of concern
on their personal experiences
- Learner Evaluation forms will be reviewed following
each programme.
- Sub-Committees meetings will discuss and analyse
evaluations, identifying &informing areas for
improvement.
- Improvements identified will be included in the quality
improvement plan.
Documentation Emails, Mid-Programme Evaluation Form, Summative Evaluation Form,
Minutes of Meetings, Tutor Course Reports
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Mid-Programme Evaluation Form Instructor Course Report
Appendix 7.2
11.4.3 Management & Staff Involved in Self Evaluation
Purpose To identify the roles / responsibilities of all management and staff
(including contract) involved in the self-evaluation process, reporting,
& improvement procedures.
Responsibility QA & Compliance Manager
Key Steps - Quality Team to lead the self-evaluation process and
report to QA & Compliance Manager.
Version 2.0 Page 236 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
- Advise Sub-Committees of any processes required and
report on programmes issues, changes or
enhancements
- Liaise with an external evaluator e.g. ISO Auditor,
Quality Consultant for feedback and improvement plans
- To ensure for the provision of meetings for Staff,
Tutor(s) & Quality team
- To provide access to Evaluation, Learner & Tutor
feedback and client reviews
- Identify all gaps, identify possible actions, and
improvement plans, report back to Quality team
- Review of Internal verification, External Authentication
reports to assist in guidance to tutors, assessors and for
feedback on best practice.
- Review of External Authentication reports to increase
quality of design and delivery and map against national
industry standards.
Documentation Minutes of Meetings, Tutor Reports, IV Report, EA Report
Related Documents Reference Number/ Appendices Number
Instructor Course Report External Authentication Report Template Internal Verification Report
Appendix 7.2 Appendix 7.10 Appendix 7.11a
Version 2.0 Page 237 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
11.5 Provider Quality Assurance engages with External Quality Assurance
The Cpl Institute is ISO 9001 certified and is independently assessed and audited by SGS twice
yearly. Our Quality Management Function is an essential component of The Cpl Institute’s
delivery of training and is the key driver in identifying and improving the level of service
provided to our clients. We maintain clear and rigorous performance and quality standards
that encourage continuous improvement and service excellence. Our QA & Compliance
Manager is responsible for maintaining and promoting Operational Service Excellence.
See Appendix 2.1 for the ISO 9001:2015 Certificate.
Our continuous improvement process is outlined below:
11.5.1 Quality Process Model
Figure 11.5 – TCI Quality Process Model
Version 2.0 Page 238 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Appendix Section 1 - Application
1.0a Application Letter for QQI Re-Engagement
1.0b Completed Application for QQI Re-Engagement
1.1 Cpl Learning and Development TA The Cpl Institute
1.2 The Cpl Institute Org Chart
1.3 The Cpl Institute - Provider Agreement Template - v1.1
1.4 Cpl L&D Turnover Letter – March 2019
1.5 Cpl Learning and Development Ltd - Insurance Cert 2018-2019
1.6 CPL Learning Tax Clearance Cert
1.7 Statutory Declaration
1.8 KPMG Letter of Support - L&D Ltd
1.9 TCI - Memorandum of Understanding
Version 2.0 Page 239 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Appendix Section 2 - Governance
2.1 ISO 9001 2015 Certificate
2.2 Copy of Master List of Cpl Institute Courses
2.4 Cpl Learning and Development PEL Arrangements
Version 2.0 Page 240 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Appendix Section 3 - Management
3.1 Cpl Institute Privacy Policy
3.2 Cpl Group Data Protection Policy
3.3 QQI Quality Process Model
3.10 Internal Key Dates - QQI Certification Periods Schedule - 2019
Version 2.0 Page 241 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Appendix Section 4 – Programme Development & Delivery
4.1 Tutor Handbook
4.2 Tutor Contract for Services
4.5 Work Placement - Site Visit form
4.10 Tutors Evaluation Checklist
4.11 Tutor Competence Observation Sheet
4.12 Programme Review Template
4.16 Tutor & Learner Issues
4.17 Tutor Declaration
Version 2.0 Page 242 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Appendix Section 5 – Staff Recruitment & Development
5.8 Further Education Policy
5.10 End of Year Discussion Guide for Managers and Employees
5.11 Equal Opportunities Policy
Version 2.0 Page 243 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Appendix Section 6 – Health and Safety
6.1 Training Facilities Checklist
6.2 Safety Statement
Version 2.0 Page 244 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Appendix Section 7 – Assessment and Evaluation
7.1 Certificate Request & Daily Training Record
7.2 Instructor Course Report
7.3 Training Evaluation Form
7.10 CPL Institute - External Authentication Report Template
7.11a Internal Verification Report
7.11b Internal Verification Checklist
7.12 RAP Meeting Agenda
7.15 Learner Request for Assessment Support Form
7.17 Learner Feedback Form
7.18 Tutor Assessment Process
7.19 Tutor Guidelines for Marking
7.20 Letter - Final Statement of Results
7.21 Letter - Learner Appeal
7.25 – Sample - QQI L6 Manual Handling Instruction Exam Paper
7.26 – Sample - QQI L5 Safety and Health at Work Exam Paper
7.27 – Sample - QQI L6 Training Needs ID and Design - Assignment Brief
7.28 – Sample - QQI L5 Care Support Assignment Brief
Version 2.0 Page 245 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019
Appendix Section 8 – Learner Access and Administration
8.1 Learner Handbook
8.2 In-Company Confirmation Template
8.3 Public Confirmation Template
8.4 QQI Consent Form
8.5 Learner Contract Agreement
8.6 Pre-Course Questionnaire
8.7 Sample Pre-Entry to Programme - Interview Questions-Notes
8.8 Sample Learner Registration Form - Healthcare Courses only
8.15 Receipt of Submission from Learner
8.20 Hardcopy - QQI L6 Train Deliver & Eval - Learner Handbook
8.21 Hardcopy – QQI L5 Safety Representation - Learner Handbook
8.22 Hardcopy – QQI L6 Manual Handling Instruction Learner Handbook
8.23 Hardcopy – QQI L5 Infection Prevention & Control Learner Handbook
8.24 Hardcopy - Workplace Competency Log
Version 2.0 Page 246 of 246 © The Cpl Institute 2019