Vesicles-shaped MOF-based mixed matrix membranes with
-
Upload
others
-
View
6
-
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Vesicles-shaped MOF-based mixed matrix membranes with intensified
interfacial affinity and CO2 transport freewayVesicles-shaped
MOF-based mixed matrix membranes with intensified inter facial
affinity and CO2 transport freeway
Rui Ding, Yan Dai, Wenji Zheng, Xiangcun Li, Xiaoming Yan, Yi Liu,
Xuehua Ruan, Shaojie Li, Xiaochen Yang, Kai Yang, Gaohong He
PII: S1385-8947(21)00404-6 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.128807 Reference: CEJ
128807
To appear in: Chemical Engineering Journal
Received Date: 30 October 2020 Revised Date: 18 January 2021
Accepted Date: 31 January 2021
Please cite this article as: R. Ding, Y. Dai, W. Zheng, X. Li, X.
Yan, Y. Liu, X. Ruan, S. Li, X. Yang, K. Yang, G. He,
Vesicles-shaped MOF-based mixed matrix membranes with intensified
interfacial affinity and CO2
transport freeway, Chemical Engineering Journal (2021), doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.128807
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements
after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and
metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the
definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional
copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its
final form, but we are providing this version to give early
visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production
process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content,
and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
© 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.
interfacial affinity and CO2 transport freeway
Rui Dinga, Yan Daia,c, Wenji Zhenga,b*, Xiangcun Lia, Xiaoming
Yanb, Yi Liua,
Xuehua Ruanb, Shaojie Lib, Xiaochen Yangb, Kai Yanga, Gaohong
Hea,b*
a State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, R&D Center of
Membrane Science and
Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of
Technology,
Dalian, 116023, P. R. China
b State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, School of Chemical
Engineering, Dalian
University of Technology, Panjin, 124221, P. R. China
c Liaoning Key Laboratory of Chemical Additive Synthesis and
Separation, Panjin
Institute of Industrial Technology, Dalian University of
Technology, Panjin 124221,
Liaoning, China
Corresponding author:
2
Abstract
The trade-off between gas permeability and selectivity represents a
huge
challenge for membrane separation. In this work, we design unique
polystyrene-
acrylate (PSA) modified hollow ZIF-8 (PHZ) nanospheres via a facile
hard template-
incomplete etching strategy as fillers for mixed matrix membranes
(MMMs). In the
vesicles shaped PHZ, the hollow core builds a low-resistance CO2
transport freeway,
leading to improved CO2 permeability. Meanwhile, the outside PSA
layer intensifies
the interface affinity between ZIF-8 and Pebax through molecular
chains
entanglements and hydrogen bonding, enhancing membrane selectivity.
Through
controlling the PSA etching process, both the hollow core with
tunable size and the
outside PSA layer with adjustable thickness are achieved. The 10
wt. % PHZ-2/Pebax
MMMs present the best performance with a CO2 permeability of 172.4
Barrer and
CO2/N2 selectivity of 87.9. The higher CO2/N2 selectivity proves
that the PSA layer
on the PHZ has better compatibility with Pebax. The higher CO2
permeability is
attributed to the low-resistance hollow core. The gas separation
performance of PHZ-
based MMMs not only well exceeded the 2008 Robeson upper-bond line
but also was
superior to those of other published MOF-based MMMs. The concept of
vesicle-
shaped PHZ paves a way to concurrently enhance both the gas
permeability and
selectivity of MMMs.
3
1. Introduction
The capture and storage of CO2, a major greenhouse gas as well as
an important
carbon resource, has been urgently required for environmental
protection and
sustainable development. As a new technology combining the
advantages of polymer
membrane and inorganic membrane, mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) have
been
widely developed for the CO2 capture and much more appealing
results have been
acquired over the past years. [1-3] Particularly, metal-organic
framework (MOF)-
based mixed matrix membranes have been demonstrated as a
prospective way to
capture CO2, and been expected to overcome Robeson’s upper bound
due to the
abundant micropores and organic linkers in MOFs. [4, 5] However,
poor interfacial
compatibility between MOFs and polymer matrix remains a critical
issue resulting in
CO2 separation performance far from the ideal situation. [6,
7]
Recently great efforts have been devoted to effective interface
engineering
between MOFs and polymer, such as filler geometry, [8, 9] in-situ
synthesis [10] and
surface modification. [11-13] Benefiting from operability and
universality, surface
modification strategy, including functional group modification,
hydrocarbyl chain
modification, and polymer modification, has been extensively
studied. In general,
functional groups, such as amino, carboxyl or hydroxyl, etc. are
used to modify MOFs
to improve the affinity between MOFs and polymer [14] or to
cross-link with the
matrix to eliminate interfacial defects. [15] Moreover, hydrocarbyl
chains including
alkyl and aromatic on MOFs could form hydrogen bonds or π-π
stacking with
polymer to improve interfacial compatibility. So far various
polymers, such as PI and
4
PEI, have been used to decorate MOFs to modify the interface.
Besides the
electrostatic and hydrogen bonding interaction between MOFs and
membrane matrix,
[16] unique segment interactions between the modified polymer and
membrane
matrix also enable to enhance the interface compatibility. [17]
However, in most
cases, the gas selectivity in most reported MMMs is greatly
improved at the expense
of reducing gas permeability. For further improving the
permeability, MOFs with
core-shell [18] and hollow structure [19] were introduced into MMMs
to provide low-
resistance transport pathway for gas molecules. Nevertheless, as
mentioned above, the
increase in permeability usually sacrifices some selectivity.
Aiming at concurrently improving the gas permeability and
selectivity, based on
the goal of one-bullet-two-objects, herein we present a facile hard
template-
incomplete etching strategy to synthesize a special
polystyrene-acrylate (PSA)
modified hollow ZIF-8 (PHZ) in one step. This unique structure not
only intensifies
the interface affinity, but also provides a low-resistance CO2
transport channel. As
illustrated in Scheme S1, PSA is first used as a hard template to
allow ZIF-8 to grow
on its outer surface. Through controlling the PSA etching process,
hollow core with a
tunable size is obtained. Meanwhile, residual PSA molecules
penetrate through the
interval space among ZIF-8 nanoparticles and adhere to hollow ZIF-8
nanospheres to
form an outer PSA coating layer. With this method the thickness of
the coating layer
can be easily controlled by adjusting the PSA etching time. The gas
separation
mechanism of PHZ/MMM is shown in Scheme 1. With the help of
functional PSA
layer, the PHZ can be readily dispersed into polymer matrix (shown
in Scheme 1 left).
5
Different from the ZIF-8/Pebax MMM with interfacial defects (white
parts), PSA
molecular chains outside PHZ entangle with Pebax (red parts and
enlarged view) and
the hydrogen bonding between Pebax and PHZ is formed (imine groups
and carboxyl
groups, carbonyl groups and carboxyl groups, enlarged view). The
hydrogen bonding
can reinforce the interfacial compatibility between PHZ and Pebax,
resulting in less
interface defects and thus considerable improvements in
selectivity. In addition,
benefiting from the hollow structure, the effective gas mass
transfer distance (DE=a +
b + c) of PHZ based MMMs is shorter than the normal mass transfer
distance (DN) of
ZIF-8 based MMMs, resulting in higher gas permeability of PHZ-based
MMM. As a
result, the synergistic effect of PSA modification and hollow
structure leads to
simultaneous improvements in gas selectivity and
permeability.
DE: Effective gas mass transfer distance (DE =a + b + c) DN: Normal
gas mass transfer distance
Scheme 1 Schematic diagram of gas separation mechanism of PHZ-based
MMM (left) and
ZIF-8-based MMM (right).
2. Experimental
2.1 Materials
Commercial Pebax MH 1657 was used as the polymer for preparation
of
MMMs. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, C12H25SO4Na, 99%), potassium
persulfate
(KPS, K2S2O8, 99%), styrene (C8H8, 99.5%), acrylic acid (C3H4O2,
99.5%), methanol
(CH3OH, 99%), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3, 98%) and
N,N-dimethylformamide
(DMF, C3H7NO, 99%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent
Co., Ltd.
Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2•6H2O, 98%), 2-methylimidazole
(Hmim, C4H6N2,
98%) were purchased from Aladdin. All solvents and chemicals were
used without
further purification.
Nanosized PSA particles were synthesized via an emulsion
polymerization
method as published with some modification. [20] Typically, 100 mL
deionized water
was added into a three-necked flask and followed by addition of
24.8 mg sodium
dodecyl sulfate, 240 mg sodium bicarbonate and 100 mg potassium
persulfate. Then,
8 mL styrene and 2 mL acrylic acid were poured into the aqueous
solution. The
sample were kept stirring for 4 h at 80 °C under N2 atmosphere. The
obtained samples
were centrifuged and washed with ethanol and deionized water for
several times.
2.3 Synthesis of PSA modified hollow ZIF-8 nanospheres
Generally, 120 mg of zinc nitrate hexahydrate and 66.4 mg of
2-methylimidazole
were dissolved in 64 mL of methanol. Then, 176 mg PSA were added
into the
precursor solution with ultra-sonication for 5 min. The samples
were kept in an oil
7
bath at 70 °C for 30 min and subsequently centrifuged to collect
the PSA@ZIF-8
particles. Then the PSA@ZIF-8 samples were dissolved in 200 ml DMF
at 25 °C for a
controlled time to remove the PSA core incompletely, and the final
PHZ nanospheres
were collected by centrifugation at 9000 rpm for 10 min. Then the
obtained PHZ
nanoparticles were washed with ethanol and water several times and
dispersed in
ethanol. In this work, we prepared three kind of PHZ with different
PSA modification
by controlling the etching time (PHZ-1: 2 days, PHZ-2: 8 days and
PHZ-3: 16 days).
Meanwhile, unmodified ZIF-8 without the addition of PSA was
synthesized in the
same way for comparison.
2.4 Fabrication of MMMs
The MMMs were fabricated by solution casting. [21, 22] Firstly, the
Pebax MH
1657 solution (3.0 wt. %) was prepared as the common method. Then,
a certain
amount of PHZ were dispersed in the Pebax solution and sonicated to
remove the
bubbles of the casting solution. Then the PHZ/Pebax solution was
poured into petri
dishes and the membrane was obtained after drying the solution at
40 °C for 24 h. The
membranes were putted at the vacuum oven for 24 h to remove
residual solvents.
The PHZ loading is defined as subsequent equation:
PHZ loading (wt. %) = ×100%
+
In this work, the loading of PHZ in MMMs ranged from 0 to 15 wt.
%.
2.5 Characterization
The size and the morphology of PHZ and the dispersion of the filler
in MMMs
were characterized with Nova Nano SEM 450 scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) at
8
20 kV. The cross sections of MMMs were prepared under liquid N2.
Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) was used to characterize the hollow
structure of ZIF-8.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) data of all materials and films were
obtained from 5 to 40 °
at a scanning rate of 5 ° from an XRD-7000S X-ray diffractometer
(60 kV and 80
mA). Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were used to
characterize the surface
area of PHZ and measured at -196 °C using a porosity analyzer
(Autosorb-iQ-C,
Quantachrome Instruments). Thermo gravimetric analyses (TGA) were
performed
using a Mettler Toledo TGA/DSC1 system. Samples were heated in N2
flow from
30 °C to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
3. Results and discussion
3.1 Characterizations of PHZ nanospheres
XRD patterns of PSA@ZIF-8 and PHZ are shown in Fig. 1a and Fig. S1.
It can
be seen that all samples exhibit a diffraction peak at 19.4°, which
originates from the
PSA polymer. [23] This result indicates the presence of residual
PSA in all PHZ
samples. It is obvious that PHZ-2 shows the same diffraction peaks
with ZIF-8,
confirming that ZIF-8 is synthesized successfully in PHZ-2 and
retains the
crystallinity. [24-26] The same conclusion can be drawn from PHZ-3
(Fig. S1).
However, no diffraction peak for ZIF-8 is observed in PHZ-1 (Fig.
S1), which can be
attributed to the fact that specific diffraction peaks of ZIF-8 are
masked by PSA
residuals with slight etching of PHZ-1.
FTIR spectra of ZIF-8, PSA, PSA@ZIF-8 and PHZ-2 are recorded in
Fig. 1b. It
is noted that PSA, PSA@ZIF-8 and PHZ-2 show different FTIR spectra
with ZIF-8
9
due to the existence of PSA. Particularly, -CH stretching vibration
peaks on the
benzene ring appear in 3025, 3059 and 3082 cm-1; the new peak at
3400 cm-1 is
derived from the -OH; the other peak at 1720 cm-1 represents the
stretching vibration
peak of C=O. Besides, there is no peak in 1639 cm-1, revealing that
acrylic acid is
polymerized with styrene and -COOH is introduced into PSA
successfully. [22, 27] It
is worth noting that the vibration peak of Zn-N at 420 cm-1 appears
in PHZ-2 and
PHZ-3, but not in PHZ-1 and PSA@ZIF-8 (Fig. 1b and Fig. S2), which
is similar to
the XRD result. It is probably that the Zn-N peak in PHZ-1 and
PSA@ZIF-8 is
masked by the PSA.
Fig. 1. XRD patterns (a), and FTIR (b) of PSA, PSA@ZIF-8 and PHZ-2
nanospheres.
The thermal analysis curve of PHZ conducted under N2 atmosphere is
shown in
Fig. S3. Obviously, the small mass remaining (related to ZnO) of
all PHZ samples
reveals a lot of PSA existing in all PHZ samples. And all samples
exhibit quite similar
TGA curves with only one major weight loss. In contrast, the
decomposition
temperature of PHZ is higher than that of PSA, benefiting from the
higher
decomposition temperature of ZIF-8 (500-600 °C) [28, 29] on the
surface of PSA.
10
Meanwhile, the decomposition temperature of PHZ slightly increases
from 420 °C
(PHZ-1) to 430 °C (PHZ-3) accompanying with concurrent increase of
residual
weight which is attributed to the decrease of PSA and increase of
ZIF-8 in PHZ with
increasing the etching time. Anyway, the above results prove that
the PSA content in
PHZ can be controlled through the etching time.
The size, morphology and hollow structure of PSA and PHZ-2 are
characterized
by SEM and TEM (shown in Fig. 2). To confirm the PSA etching
process and the
formed PHZ structure further, SEM, TEM images and EDS mappings of
all PHZ
samples are shown in Fig. S4. Fig. 2a implies that spherical PSA
nanospheres have
uniform sizes of about 100 nm with smooth surface. After ZIF-8
growth, the PSA
surface becomes rough and the size increases to 110 nm (shown in
Fig. 2b), indicating
the successful coating of ZIF-8 shell on the surface of PSA. As
shown in Fig. 2c and
Fig. S4a-c, compared with PSA@ZIF-8, all PHZ samples exhibit smooth
surface, and
ZIF-8 nanoparticles on PSA nanospheres surface disappear due to the
etching in
DMF. Meanwhile, the size of all PHZ samples becomes larger than
that of PSA@ZIF-
8. Increasing the etching time leads to increase of the size of PHZ
from 114 nm to 132
nm (Fig. S4a-c). Therefore, it is reasonable to conjecture the PSA
dissolution process
as following. DMF transports through both the intervals among ZIF-8
nanoparticles
and the micropores of ZIF-8 into the PSA core, resulting in the PSA
core swell and
dissolved in DMF, then the dissolved PSA molecules penetrate
through the intervals
among ZIF-8 nanoparticles into the DMF solvent. The gradually
increased hollow
size of PHZ with etching time from the TEM results in Fig. S4 also
verified this.
11
During the PSA molecules transport back into the DMF solvent, due
to the interaction
between the -COOH of PSA and the Zn2+ of ZIF-8, PSA molecules are
adsorbed on
the ZIF-8 surface, and they are more difficult to swell and
dissolve again into DMF
solvent. Consequently, hollow ZIF-8 nanosphere with PSA coating
layer is formed.
Fig. 2. SEM, TEM and EDS images of PSA (a, d), PSA@ZIF-8 (b, e) and
PHZ-2 (c, f).
As shown in Fig. 2f and Fig. S4d-f, the hollow structure of PHZ is
well
presented. The PHZ size is enlarged in comparison with PSA@ZIF-8,
and the size
shows an increase with increasing the etching time, which is
consistent with SEM
results. It is clearly seen that all PHZ samples show the same
morphology and vesicle
shape and the hollow size can be adjusted from 42 nm (PHZ-1) to 91
nm (PHZ-3) by
controlling the etching time (Fig. S4d-f and Table S1). Specially,
the hollow size of
PHZ-3 is close to that of PSA, revealing that PHZ-3 is almost
completely etched.
Insets in Fig. 2d-f and Fig. S4d-f are EDS elemental mappings (Zn
and O) of
12
PSA@ZIF-8 and PHZ. The Zn element (green) confirms the existence of
ZIF-8, and
the O element (red) belongs to the PSA (-COOH). The inset in Fig.
2d shows the large
amount of O elements existing in PSA, while lots of Zn elements
(green) are observed
in the inset in Fig. 2e, indicating the coating of ZIF-8 on PSA.
Meanwhile, scattered
O element (red) also appears through the whole sphere, which may be
caused by the
certain depth of EDX irradiation. On the contrary, it is observed
that one distinct layer
of red O element spreads the outside surface for the three kinds of
PHZ samples (the
inset in Fig. S4d-f), indicating that PSA template molecules begin
to dissolve from the
core center, penetrate outside through the interval space among
ZIF-8 nanoparticles,
and finally adhere on the surface of ZIF-8 to form a PSA coating
layer. [30, 31]
The etching process is further confirmed by etching photographs
(Fig. S5). It
illustrates that pure PSA dissolves rapidly in DMF (<1 s) and
the solution becomes
clear. However, for PSA@ZIF-8 nanospheres, the etching becomes
slower and the
solution becomes cloudy, indicating that the coating ZIF-8 blocks
and slows PSA
molecules dissolving in DMF. The PSA substrate retained by the
incomplete etching
provides an anchoring effect on the dissolved PSA segments,
meanwhile, Zn2+ in ZIF-
8 also interacts with the carboxyl group in the PSA segments,
inducing adherents of
some dissolved PSA segments on the surface of ZIF-8. Besides,
thickness of the
coating PSA layer (Table S1) increases from 3.1 nm (PHZ-1) to 11.9
nm (PHZ-3)
with the increase of the etching time, demonstrating that more PSA
molecules are
adsorbed on ZIF-8 surface.
The pore structure of PHZ and ZIF-8 are characterized by nitrogen
adsorption-
13
desorption isotherms (shown in Fig. S6). ZIF-8 shows type I
isotherm curve,
indicating the microporous nature of ZIF-8. [32] For the PHZ-1 and
PHZ-2, there are
no obvious adsorption in low relative pressure (< 0.1), which is
due to ZIF-8 channel
blocking by residual PSA. With the increase of the etching time,
PHZ-3 shows a
higher adsorption than PHZ-1 and PHZ-2 at the low relative
pressure, owing to the
reduced PSA content and regenerated pores in PHZ-3 caused by
long-time etching.
3.2 PHZ/Pebax MMMs
To explore the potential of PHZ nanospheres in CO2 separation,
PHZ/Pebax-
based MMMs are further prepared. Two peaks of Zn (2p) in XPS
spectrum (Fig. S7)
confirm the successful incorporation of PHZ into the Pebax matrix.
Moreover, from
the surface (Fig. S8) and cross-section SEM images (Fig. 3) and the
inserted EDS
pattern of PHZ-2/Pebax MMMs, the PHZ-2 nanospheres distribute
uniformly in the
Pebax matrix, and no obvious interface defects are observed,
confirming that defect-
free MMMs have been successfully prepared. The cross-section image
in Fig. 3d
illustrates that significant particle agglomeration appears in MMMs
with 15 wt. %
PHZ-2 loading. However, there is still no visible interface defect
in the PHZ-2/Pebax
MMMs, revealing excellent compatibility between the PHZ and
polymer.
14
Fig. 3. Cross-section SEM images and EDS results of different
concentrations PHZ-2-based
MMMs: (a): 0%; (b): 5%; (c): 10%; (d): 15%.
2.3 Gas permeability properties
Fig. 4 represents the CO2 permeability and CO2/N2 selectivity of
MMMs with
different fillers at 10 wt. % loading (Fig. 4a) and PHZ-2/Pebax
MMMs with different
PHZ-2 loading (Fig. 4b). As shown in Fig. 4a, it is observed that
PHZ-2/Pebax
MMMs exhibit both higher CO2 permeability and CO2/N2 selectivity.
The CO2
permeability of all kinds of MMMs are higher than that of pure
Pebax membrane,
which is attributed to the fact that incorporated fillers destroy
the packing of polymer
segments and therefore, improve the free volume. The CO2/N2
selectivity of PHZ-
based MMMs are higher than that of ZIF-8 and PSA@ZIF-8 (without
PSA
modification)-based MMMs, confirming that the PSA segment outside
PHZ provides
a better compatibility with Pebax due to entanglements and hydrogen
bonding
between PSA and Pebax molecular chains. [17, 33, 34] Meanwhile,
PHZ-2/Pebax
MMMs also show higher CO2 permeability than ZIF-8 and PSA@ZIF-8
based
15
MMMs. The increased permeability mainly originates from the hollow
structure,
which effectively reduces the gas transfer resistance. [35] As
shown in Fig. S9, the
CO2 permeability of PHZ-based MMMs increases from 123.5 Barrer
(PHZ-1) to
188.4 Barrer (PHZ-3), further demonstrating that the increase of
hollow size leads to
further reduction in the gas transportation resistance. PHZ-3/Pebax
MMMs show a
drop in CO2/N2 selectivity compared with PHZ-2 and PHZ-1. The
reason is probably
that the thicker PSA layer on ZIF-8 surface makes PHZ-3 similar
with PSA, thus
PHZ-3 based MMM shows the similar separation performance with that
of
PSA/Pebax MMMs (Fig. 4a). Obviously, the gas separation performance
of PHZ-
based MMMs can be effectively tuned via controlling PSA layer and
hollow size.
As shown in Fig. 4b, it is obvious that the CO2 permeability and
CO2/N2
selectivity of PHZ-2/Pebax MMMs are higher than those of pure Pebax
membrane.
The CO2 permeability of PHZ-2/Pebax MMMs increases with the
increase of PHZ-2
loading, owing to improved free volume and low gas transfer
resistance caused by the
hollow structure of PHZ-2. As for the CO2/N2 selectivity, in the
case that the PHZ-2
loading is 10 wt. %, the selectivity reaches the highest value of
87.9, which is 80%
higher than that of pure Pebax membrane. Further increasing the
PHZ-2 loading to 15
wt. %, however, leads to easy formation of non-selective defects
between the
interface and agglomeration of the fillers, resulting in decreased
CO2/N2 selectivity.
Meanwhile, Table S2 presents gas diffusion and solubility
coefficients of PHZ-
2/Pebax MMMs obtained by time delay method. It is observed that
diffusion
coefficients of CO2 and N2 increase with the increase of PHZ-2
loading due to the
16
hollow structure of PHZ. Moreover, the DCO2/DN2 increases while the
loading of PHZ-
2 reaches to 10 wt. %; simultaneously, compared with the DCO2/DN2,
the SCO2/SN2
shows a slower increase, revealing that the increased selectivity
mainly depends on
the diffusion selectivity, which should originate from the superior
compatibility
between PHZ-2 and Pebax as well as the retarded non-selective
diffusion. The long-
time stability of the obtained MMMs for CO2/N2 separation is shown
in Fig. S10,
both the CO2 permeability and CO2/N2 selectivity keep almost
unchanged, indicating
the fine long-term stability of the PHZ based MMMs.
Fig. 4. CO2 permeability and CO2/N2 selectivity of MMMs with
different fillers at 10 wt. %
loading (a) and PHZ-2/Pebax MMMs with different filler loadings
(b).
The comparison of CO2/N2 separation performances of PHZ-2/Pebax
MMMs
under different pressures (1bar, 5bar and 9bar) with other reported
MOF-based and
Pebax-based MMMs are presented in Robeson upper bond in 2008 (shown
in Fig. 5)
and listed in Table S3. [36] It is observed that, compared with the
MOF-based and
Pebax-based MMMs, the 10 wt. % PHZ-2/Pebax-based MMMs at 1 bar
possess both
acceptable CO2 permeability (172.4 Barrer) and CO2/N2 selectivity
(87.9) and well
17
exceeds the 2008 Robeson upper bound. Meanwhile, with the increase
of the feed
pressure, the CO2 separation performance of PHZ-2/Pebax MMMs
steadily increases.
[9, 17, 37-70]
Fig. 5. CO2/N2 separation performances of 10 wt. % PHZ-2/Pebax MMMs
under different
pressure in Robeson upper bound.
4. Conclusion
In our study, PSA modified hollow ZIF-8 nanospheres are synthesized
via a hard
template-incomplete etching strategy. The hollow structure can
reduce the gas mass
transfer resistance so that the gas permeability is improved. In
addition, there exist
residual PSA segments on the surface of PHZ during formation of the
hollow
structure, which combines PHZ with Pebax tightly and therefore,
enhances the
compatibility between PHZ and Pebax. At 10 wt. % PHZ-2 loading, the
permeability
of MMMs reaches 172.4 Barrer, which is 118.5% and 16% higher than
that of pure
18
Pebax membrane and ZIF-8/Pebax MMMs, respectively. Meanwhile, the
selectivity
of 10 wt. % PHZ-2/Pebax MMMs increases to 87.9, which is 80% and
118.7% higher
than that of pure Pebax membrane and ZIF-8/Pebax MMMs,
respectively. The
superior gas separation performance of PHZ based MMMs not only well
exceeds
other published MOF-based MMMs but also is far beyond the 2008
Robeson upper
bond. The present study presents a new strategy to synthesize
hollow MOF
nanoparticles with surface modified PSA in one step and therefore,
to concurrently
improve the gas permeability and selectivity.
Declaration of Competing Interest
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (21978035,
21506028, 21706023, 21978033), the Fundamental Research Funds for
the Central
Universities (DUT18RC(3)071) and the China Postdoctoral Science
Foundation
(2018M631167).
References
[1] A.E. Amooghin, S. Mashhadikhan, H. Sanaeepur, A. Moghadassi, T.
Matsuura, S. Ramakrishna, Substantial breakthroughs on function-led
design of advanced materials used in mixed matrix membranes (MMMs):
A new horizon for efficient CO2 separation, Prog. Mater. Sci. 102
(2019) 222- 295. [2] X. Guo, Z. Qiao, D. Liu, C. Zhong,
Mixed-matrix membranes for CO2 separation: role of the third
component, J. Mater. Chem. A 7 (2019) 24738-24759. [3] Z. Wang, S.
Zhang, Y. Chen, Z. Zhang, S. Ma, Covalent organic frameworks for
separation applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 (2020) 708-735.
19
[4] M. Kalaj, K.C. Bentz, S. Ayala Jr, J.M. Palomba, K.S. Barcus,
Y. Katayama, S.M. Cohen, MOF- polymer hybrid materials: From simple
composites to tailored architectures, Chem. Rev. 120 (2020)
8267-8302. [5] Q. Qian, P.A. Asinger, M.J. Lee, G. Han, K. Mizrahi
Rodriguez, S. Lin, F.M. Benedetti, A.X. Wu, W.S. Chi, Z.P. Smith,
MOF-based membranes for gas separations, Chem. Rev. 120 (2020)
8161-8266. [6] N. Prasetya, N.F. Himma, P.D. Sutrisna, I.G. Wenten,
B.P. Ladewig, A review on emerging organic-containing microporous
material membranes for carbon capture and separation, Chem. Eng. J.
(2019) 123575. [7] S. Park, K.Y. Cho, H.-K. Jeong, Polyimide/ZIF-7
mixed-matrix membranes: understanding the in situ confined
formation of the ZIF-7 phases inside a polymer and their effects on
gas separations, J. Mater. Chem. A 8 (2020) 11210-11217. [8] T.H.
Bae, J.S. Lee, W. Qiu, W.J. Koros, C.W. Jones, S. Nair, A high
performance gas separation membrane containing submicrometer-sized
metal-organic framework crystals, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 122
(2010) 10059-10062. [9] L. Ge, W. Zhou, V. Rudolph, Z. Zhu, Mixed
matrix membranes incorporated with size-reduced Cu- BTC for
improved gas separation, J. Mater. Chem. A 1 (2013) 6350-6358. [10]
B. Seoane, V. Sebastián, C. Téllez, J. Coronas, Crystallization in
THF: the possibility of one-pot synthesis of mixed matrix membranes
containing MOF MIL-68 (Al), CrystEngComm 15 (2013) 9483- 9490. [11]
S.N. Wijenayake, N.P. Panapitiya, S.H. Versteeg, C.N. Nguyen, S.
Goel, K.J. Balkus Jr, I.H. Musselman, J.P. Ferraris, Surface
cross-linking of ZIF-8/polyimide mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for
gas separation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013) 6991-7001. [12] M.
Askari, T.-S. Chung, Natural gas purification and olefin/paraffin
separation using thermal cross-linkable co-polyimide/ZIF-8 mixed
matrix membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 444 (2013) 173-183. [13] R. Lin,
B.V. Hernandez, L. Ge, Z. Zhu, Metal organic framework based mixed
matrix membranes: an overview on filler/polymer interfaces, J.
Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 293-312. [14] T. Rodenas, M. van Dalen, E.
García Pérez, P. Serra Crespo, B. Zornoza, F. Kapteijn, J. Gascon,
Visualizing MOF mixed matrix membranes at the nanoscale: towards
structure-performance relationships in CO2/CH4 separation over
NH2-MIL53(Al)@PI, Adv. Funct. Mater. 24 (2014) 249-256. [15] N.
Tien-Binh, H. Vinh-Thang, X.Y. Chen, D. Rodrigue, S. Kaliaguine,
Crosslinked MOF-polymer to enhance gas separation of mixed matrix
membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 520 (2016) 941-950. [16] Q. Xin, J.
Ouyang, T. Liu, Z. Li, Z. Li, Y. Liu, S. Wang, H. Wu, Z. Jiang, X.
Cao, Enhanced interfacial interaction and CO2 separation
performance of mixed matrix membrane by incorporating
polyethylenimine-decorated metal-organic frameworks, ACS Appl.
Mater. Inter. 7 (2015) 1065-1077. [17] H. Wang, S. He, X. Qin, C.
Li, T. Li, Interfacial engineering in metal-organic framework-based
mixed matrix membranes using covalently grafted polyimide brushes,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 17203-17210. [18] S. Sorribas, B.
Zornoza, C. Téllez, J. Coronas, Mixed matrix membranes comprising
silica-(ZIF-8) core-shell spheres with ordered meso-microporosity
for natural-and bio-gas upgrading, J. Membr. Sci. 452 (2014)
184-192. [19] S. Hwang, W.S. Chi, S.J. Lee, S.H. Im, J.H. Kim, J.
Kim, Hollow ZIF-8 nanoparticles improve the permeability of mixed
matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 gas separation, J. Membr. Sci. 480
(2015) 11- 19.
20
[20] H.J. Lee, W. Cho, M. Oh, Advanced fabrication of metal-organic
frameworks: template-directed formation of polystyrene@ZIF-8
core-shell and hollow ZIF-8 microspheres, Chem. Commun. 48 (2012)
221-223. [21] W. Zheng, R. Ding, K. Yang, Y. Dai, X. Yan, G. He,
ZIF-8 nanoparticles with tunable size for enhanced CO2 capture of
Pebax based MMMs, Sep. Purif. Technol. 214 (2019) 111-119. [22] K.
Yang, Y. Dai, W. Zheng, X. Ruan, H. Li, G. He, ZIFs-modified GO
plates for enhanced CO2 separation performance of ethyl cellulose
based mixed matrix membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol. 214 (2019)
87-94. [23] H. Veisi, S.A. Mirshokraie, H. Ahmadian, Synthesis of
biaryls using palladium nanoparticles immobilized on
metformine-functionalized polystyrene resin as a reusable and
efficient nanocatalyst, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 108 (2018) 419-425.
[24] Q. Hou, Y. Wu, S. Zhou, Y. Wei, J. Caro, H. Wang, Ultra-tuning
of the aperture size in stiffened ZIF-8_Cm frameworks with mixed
linker strategy for enhanced CO2/CH4 separation, Angew. Chem. Int.
Edit. 58 (2019) 327-331. [25] D.J. Babu, G. He, J. Hao, M.T.
Vahdat, P.A. Schouwink, M. Mensi, K.V. Agrawal, Restricting lattice
flexibility in polycrystalline metal organic framework membranes
for carbon capture, Adv. Mater. 31 (2019) 1900855. [26] Z. Wu, L.
Wang, S. Chen, X. Zhu, Q. Deng, J. Wang, Z. Zeng, S. Deng, Facile
and low- temperature strategy to prepare hollow ZIF-8/CNT
polyhedrons as high-performance lithium-sulfur cathodes, Chem. Eng.
J. 404 (2021) 126579. [27] S. Mallakpour, A. Nezamzadeh Ezhieh,
Preparation of polystyrene/MWCNT-Valine composites: Investigation
of optical, morphological, thermal, and electrical conductivity
properties, Polym. Advan. Technol. 29 (2018) 1182-1190. [28] Y.
Pan, Y. Liu, G. Zeng, L. Zhao, Z. Lai, Rapid synthesis of zeolitic
imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) nanocrystals in an aqueous system,
Chem. Commun. 47 (2011) 2071-2073. [29] U.P. Tran, K.K. Le, N.T.
Phan, Expanding applications of metal-organic frameworks: zeolite
imidazolate framework ZIF-8 as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst
for the knoevenagel reaction, ACS Catal. 1 (2011) 120-127. [30] X.
Zhang, B. Xiao, J. Chen, M. Guo, Q. Yang, Adjusting the acid
strength of hybrid solid acids in confined nanospace, Top. Catal.
59 (2016) 1748-1756. [31] F. Teng, G. Xie, L. Zhang, X. Ma, Hollow
mesoporous organic polymeric nanospheres (HMOPNs) -supported
carbene rovis catalyst: mesopore and morphology dependent catalytic
performances in asymmetric organocascade, ChemCatChem 10 (2018)
4586-4593. [32] B. Ren, Y. Chen, Y. Li, W. Li, S. Gao, H. Li, R.
Cao, Rational design of metallic anti-corrosion coatings based on
zinc gluconate@ZIF-8, Chem. Eng. J. 384 (2020) 123389. [33] G.S.
Martins, I.M. Pereira, R.L. Oréfice, Toughening brittle polymers
with shape memory polymers, Polymer 135 (2018) 30-38. [34] J. Xu,
C. Wu, Y. Qiu, X. Tang, D. Zeng, Novel elastically stretchable
metal-organic framework laden hydrogel with pearl-net
microstructure and freezing resistance through post-synthetic
polymerization, Macromol. Rapid. Comm. 41 (2020) 1900573. [35] R.
Thür, N. Van Velthoven, S. Slootmaekers, J. Didden, R. Verbeke, S.
Smolders, M. Dickmann, W. Egger, D. De Vos, I.F. Vankelecom,
Bipyridine-based UiO-67 as novel filler in mixed-matrix membranes
for CO2-selective gas separation, J. Membr. Sci. 576 (2019)
78-87.
21
[36] L.M. Robeson, The upper bound revisited, J. Membr. Sci. 320
(2008) 390-400. [37] W.S. Chi, S.J. Kim, S.J. Lee, Y.S. Bae, J.H.
Kim, Enhanced performance of mixed matrix membranes through a graft
copolymer directed interface and interaction tuning approach,
ChemSusChem 8 (2015) 650-658. [38] Z. Wang, D. Wang, S. Zhang, L.
Hu, J. Jin, Interfacial design of mixed matrix membranes for
improved gas separation performance, Adv. Mater. 28 (2016)
3399-3405. [39] T. Li, Y. Pan, K.-V. Peinemann, Z. Lai, Carbon
dioxide selective mixed matrix composite membrane containing ZIF-7
nano-fillers, J. Membr. Sci. 425 (2013) 235-242. [40] M. Jia, X.-F.
Zhang, Y. Feng, Y. Zhou, J. Yao, In-situ growing ZIF-8 on cellulose
nanofibers to form gas separation membrane for CO2 separation, J.
Membr. Sci. 595 (2020) 117579. [41] L. Ma, F. Svec, Y. Lv, T. Tan,
In situ bottom-up growth of metal-organic frameworks in a
crosslinked poly (ethylene oxide) layer with ultrahigh loading and
superior uniform distribution, J. Mater. Chem. A 7 (2019)
20293-20301. [42] Y. Ying, Y. Cheng, S.B. Peh, G. Liu, B.B. Shah,
L. Zhai, D. Zhao, Plasticization resistance- enhanced CO2
separation at elevated pressures by mixed matrix membranes
containing flexible metal- organic framework fillers, J. Membr.
Sci. 582 (2019) 103-110. [43] J. Shen, G. Liu, K. Huang, W. Jin,
K.R. Lee, N. Xu, Membranes with fast and selective gas- transport
channels of laminar graphene oxide for efficient CO2 capture,
Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 54 (2015) 578-582. [44] A. Sabetghadam, B.
Seoane, D. Keskin, N. Duim, T. Rodenas, S. Shahid, S. Sorribas,
C.L. Guillouzer, G. Clet, C. Tellez, Metal organic framework
crystals in mixed-matrix membranes: impact of the filler morphology
on the gas separation performance, Adv. Funct. Mater. 26 (2016)
3154-3163. [45] J. Deng, Z. Dai, J. Hou, L. Deng, Morphologically
tunable MOF nanosheets in mixed matrix membranes for CO2
separation, Chem. Mater. 32 (2020) 4174-4184. [46] J. Yuan, H. Zhu,
J. Sun, Y. Mao, G. Liu, W. Jin, Novel ZIF-300 mixed-matrix
membranes for efficient CO2 capture, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 9
(2017) 38575-38583. [47] H. Molavi, A. Shojaei, Mixed-matrix
composite membranes based on UiO-66-derived MOFs for CO2
separation, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 11 (2019) 9448-9461. [48] K.
Xie, Q. Fu, J. Kim, H. Lu, Y. He, Q. Zhao, J. Scofield, P.A.
Webley, G.G. Qiao, Increasing both selectivity and permeability of
mixed-matrix membranes: Sealing the external surface of porous MOF
nanoparticles, J. Membr. Sci. 535 (2017) 350-356. [49] N. Prasetya,
B.P. Ladewig, New Azo-DMOF-1 MOF as a photoresponsive low-energy
CO2 adsorbent and its exceptional CO2/N2 separation performance in
mixed matrix membranes, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 10 (2018)
34291-34301. [50] H. Lee, S.C. Park, J.S. Roh, G.H. Moon, J.E.
Shin, Y.S. Kang, H.B. Park, Metal-organic frameworks grown on a
porous planar template with an exceptionally high surface area:
promising nanofiller platforms for CO2 separation, J. Mater. Chem.
A 5 (2017) 22500-22505. [51] C. Satheeshkumar, H.J. Yu, H. Park, M.
Kim, J.S. Lee, M. Seo, Thiol-ene photopolymerization of
vinyl-functionalized metal-organic frameworks towards mixed-matrix
membranes, J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 21961-21968. [52] B. Ghalei,
K. Sakurai, Y. Kinoshita, K. Wakimoto, A.P. Isfahani, Q. Song, K.
Doitomi, S. Furukawa, H. Hirao, H. Kusuda, Enhanced selectivity in
mixed matrix membranes for CO2 capture through efficient dispersion
of amine-functionalized MOF nanoparticles, Nat. Energy 2 (2017)
17086.
22
[53] S. Feng, M. Bu, J. Pang, W. Fan, L. Fan, H. Zhao, G. Yang, H.
Guo, G. Kong, H. Sun, Hydrothermal stable ZIF-67 nanosheets via
morphology regulation strategy to construct mixed-matrix membrane
for gas separation, J. Membr. Sci. 593 (2020) 117404. [54] I. Luz,
L. Toy, F. Rabie, M. Lail, M. Soukri, Synthesis of soluble metal
organic framework composites for mixed matrix membranes, ACS Appl.
Mater. Inter. 11 (2019) 15638-15645. [55] G. Dong, J. Hou, J. Wang,
Y. Zhang, V. Chen, J. Liu, Enhanced CO2/N2 separation by porous
reduced graphene oxide/Pebax mixed matrix membranes, J. Membr. Sci.
520 (2016) 860-868. [56] K. Duan, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Liu,
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) functionalized mixed matrix
membrane for effective CO2/N2 separation, J. Membr. Sci. 572 (2019)
588-595. [57] G. Huang, A.P. Isfahani, A. Muchtar, K. Sakurai, B.B.
Shrestha, D. Qin, D. Yamaguchi, E. Sivaniah, B. Ghalei, Pebax/ionic
liquid modified graphene oxide mixed matrix membranes for enhanced
CO2 capture, J. Membr. Sci. 565 (2018) 370-379. [58] H. Sanaeepur,
R. Ahmadi, A.E. Amooghin, D. Ghanbari, A novel ternary mixed matrix
membrane containing glycerol-modified poly
(ether-block-amide)(Pebax 1657)/copper nanoparticles for CO2
separation, J. Membr. Sci. 573 (2019) 234-246. [59] N.U. Kim, B.J.
Park, M.S. Park, J.T. Park, J.H. Kim, Semi-interpenetrating polymer
network membranes based on a self-crosslinkable comb copolymer for
CO2 capture, Chem. Eng. J. 360 (2019) 1468-1476. [60] J.H. Lee,
C.H. Park, J.P. Jung, J.-H. Kim, J.H. Kim, Dual-phase all-polymeric
membranes with graft copolymer filler for CO2 capture, Chem. Eng.
J. 334 (2018) 939-947. [61] F. Shi, J. Sun, J. Wang, M. Liu, Z.
Yan, B. Zhu, Y. Li, X. Cao, MXene versus graphene oxide:
Investigation on the effects of 2D nanosheets in mixed matrix
membranes for CO2 separation, J. Membr. Sci. (2020) 118850. [62] X.
Wang, X. Ding, H. Zhao, J. Fu, Q. Xin, Y. Zhang, Pebax-based mixed
matrix membranes containing hollow polypyrrole nanospheres with
mesoporous shells for enhanced gas permeation performance, J.
Membr. Sci. 602 (2020) 117968. [63] K. Yang, Y. Dai, X. Ruan, W.
Zheng, X. Yang, R. Ding, G. He, Stretched ZIF-8@GO flake-like
fillers via pre-Zn(II)-doping strategy to enhance CO2 permeation in
mixed matrix membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 601 (2020) 117934. [64] W.
Guan, X. Yang, C. Dong, X. Yan, W. Zheng, Y. Xi, X. Ruan, Y. Dai,
G. He, Prestructured MXene fillers with uniform channels to enhance
CO2 selective permeation in mixed matrix membranes, J. Appl. Polym.
Sci. 138 (2020) 49895. [65] X. Li, S. Yu, K. Li, C. Ma, J. Zhang,
H. Li, X. Chang, L. Zhu, Q. Xue, Enhanced gas separation
performance of Pebax mixed matrix membranes by incorporating ZIF-8
in situ inserted by multiwalled carbon nanotubes, Sep. Purif.
Technol. (2020) 117080. [66] A. Nadeali, S. Kalantari, M.
Yarmohammadi, M. Omidkhah, A. Ebadi Amooghin, M. Zamani Pedram, CO2
separation properties of a ternary mixed-matrix membrane using
ultraselective synthesized macrocyclic organic compounds, ACS
Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8 (2020) 12775-12787. [67] A.A. Shamsabadi, F.
Seidi, E. Salehi, M. Nozari, A. Rahimpour, M. Soroush, Efficient
CO2- removal using novel mixed-matrix membranes with modified TiO2
nanoparticles, J. Mater. Chem. A 5 (2017) 4011-4025. [68] Y. Zhang,
H. Wang, S. Zhou, J. Wang, X. He, J. Liu, Y. Zhang, Biomimetic
material functionalized mixed matrix membranes for enhanced carbon
dioxide capture, J. Mater. Chem. A 6
23
(2018) 15585-15592. [69] W. Zhu, Y. Qin, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, R. Guo,
X. Li, Incorporating the magnetic alignment of GO composites into
Pebax matrix for gas separation, J. Energy. Chem. 31 (2019)
1-10.
[70] Y.-C. Liu, C.-Y. Chen, G.-S. Lin, C.-H. Chen, K.C.-W. Wu,
C.-H. Lin, K.-L. Tung,
Characterization and molecular simulation of Pebax-1657-based mixed
matrix membranes
incorporating MoS2 nanosheets for carbon dioxide capture
enhancement, J. Membr. Sci. 582 (2019)
358-366.
1. PSA modified hollow ZIF-8 were designed by a hard
template-incomplete etching strategy.