Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
VGI Use-Case ScoringCalifornia Interagency VGI Working Group
Dr. Karim Farhat
All rights reserved to the author.
Feb 7, 2020
1
Analyze and understand the parties’ collective scoring of
benefits, costs and implementability for VGI use-cases
Group scoring01
Develop specific scoring thresholds, as agreed-upon criteria to
help define a list of favorable use-cases for PUC Question A
“Value now” thresholds02
Compare and consider reconciling Individual scoring with
Group scoring, to help answer PUC Question A
Individual scoring03
Objectives
Recommended answers to PUC Question A
Recommendations04
2All rights reserved to the author.
Executive Summary
3All rights reserved to the author.
• Scoring data may be used to address both PUC questions A and B.
• It’s important to account for all three scoring metrics (benefit, cost, and implementability) to answer PUC Question A. Benefits and costs help inform the “can provide value” aspect, while costs and implementability help inform the “now” aspect. We propose two “value now” thresholds for that purpose: PRIME-Strict & PRIME-Flex.
• PRIME-Strict: The use-case is considered favorable if the average of all parties’ scoring deemed it so
• PRIME-Flex: The use-case is considered favorable if at least one party scoring deemed it so
• Not every use-case that got fully scored should be deemed “favorable”. Some parties scored use-cases to explicitly show they are “unfavorable”.
• Scoring of LDV use-cases shows clear trends, where some are favorable across all metrics and others are unfavorable across all metrics. The majority of scored MHDV use-cases are deemed favorable.
• Recommended answer to PUC Question A – Part 1: What use-cases can provide value now?
• LDV: All use-cases that pass the PRIME-Flex threshold; total of 91 use-cases
• MHDV: All use-cases that pass the PRIME-Flex threshold; total of 43 use-cases
• Additional use-cases for special considerations
• LDV: Residential SFH, MUD, & Workplace / V2G / Customer & System Backup Resiliency
• MHDV: School Bus / V1G and V2G / Customer Bill Management, System RA, Day-Ahead Energy
• Recommended Answer to PUC Question A – Part 2: How to capture this value?
• Capturing the value must consider, and is already engraved in, the very definition of the use-case, specifically in dimensions 4 “Approach” and dimension 5 “Resource Alignment”
Scoring data may be used to address PUC questions A and B
229Fully scored
3Partially scored
12Not scored
97Fully scored
79Partially scored
29Not scored
LDV244
use-cases
MHDV205*use-cases
PUC
Question B
PUC
Question A
* NOTE: For MHV, the number of use-cases accounts for several technology variations of the same use-case. Without
distinguishing technology variations, the number of unique use-cases is 109.
4All rights reserved to the author.
LDV Use-cases
5All rights reserved to the author.
Group average scores show healthy scatter across VGI use-cases
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Ave
rage
Be
ne
fit
Average Cost
Imp = Low (1-2.5) Imp = Neutral (2.6-3.5) Imp = High (3.6-5)
• Every “bubble” represents a fully
scored use-case; total of 229
• Benefit score: vertical axis
• Cost score: horizontal axis
• Implementability score: color of the
bubble, falling into 1 of 3 categories
• Red = Low implementability, score [1-2.5]
• Yellow = Neutral implementability, score [2.5-3.5]
• Green = High implementability, score [3.6-5]
6All rights reserved to the author.
Data Insights
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Ave
rage
Be
ne
fit
Average Cost
Imp = Low (1-2.5) Imp = Neutral (2.6-3.5) Imp = High (3.6-5)
1. Clear trends: Some use-cases are
favorable across all metrics, and some
are unfavorable across all metrics
• Favorable: Use-cases with high benefits and
low costs also tend to have high
implementability scores
• Unfavorable: Use-cases with low benefits and
high costs also tend to have low
implementability scores
2. Not every use-case that got scored is
“favorable”. Some parties scored use-
cases to explicitly show they are
“unfavorable”
3. Less precision, confidence, and/or
certainty in cost estimates compared to
benefit estimates
• High concentration of use-cases with average
cost score = 37All rights reserved to the author.
Non-trivial divergence in the parties’ individual scores across VGI use-cases
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Ave
rage
Be
ne
fit
Average Cost
Imp = Low (1-2.5) / Div=[0-1] Imp = Neutral (2.6-3.5) / Div=[0-1] Imp = High (3.6-5) / Div=[0-1]
Imp = Low (1-2.5) / Div=[2] Imp = Neutral (2.6-3.5) / Div=[2] Imp = High (3.6-5) / Div=[2]
Imp = Low (1-2.5) / Div=[3-4] Imp = Neutral (2.6-3.5) / Div=[3-4] Imp = High (3.6-5) / Div=[3-4]
Divergence in benefit/cost scoring
• The size of bubble is indicative of the
min-max range in benefit/cost scoring
• The larger the bubble, the larger the
divergence in scores that the parties
assigned to benefit/cost
Divergence in implementability
• The color of the bubble border is
indicative of the min-max range in
implementability scoring
• No border = divergence [0-1]
• Blue border = divergence [2]
• Black border = divergence [3-4]
8All rights reserved to the author.
“Value now” thresholds
Benefit
score
threshold
Imp
score
threshold
Based on group scoring,
what use-cases meet the
“value now” threshold, and
what use-cases don’t?
“Value now”
threshold
Cost
score
threshold
• PUC Question 1 requires identifying what use-cases “can provide value now”
• can provide value → Focus on benefits and costs
• now → Focus on cost and implementability
• Define “Value now” threshold, that: (1) combines thresholds across the three scoring metrics ‘benefits’, ‘costs’,
and ‘implementability’, and (2) accounts for the divergence in parties’ scores
• Use-cases can then be categorized based on the “value now” threshold
9All rights reserved to the author.
“Value now” thresholds• PUC Question 1 requires identifying what use-cases “can provide value now”
• can provide value → Focus on benefits and costs
• now → Focus on cost and implementability
• Define “Value now” threshold, that: (1) combines thresholds across the three scoring metrics ‘benefits’, ‘costs’,
and ‘implementability’, and (2) accounts for the divergence in parties’ scores
• Use-cases can then be categorized based on the “value now” threshold
Alignment with other proposed methods and approaches
✓ SDG&E: Let’s be inclusive not exclusive
✓ Honda: Let’s make use of all scoring metrics
✓ Ford & Nissan: Let’s try to group the use-cases
10All rights reserved to the author.
“Value now” thresholds can help recognize favorable use-cases on all three scoring metrics
• Two illustrative “value now” thresholds are
applied to group scoring results:
• PRIME-Strict “value now” threshold: The
use-case is considered favorable if the
average of parties scoring deemed it so
• Average Benefit: score ≥ 5
• Average Cost: score ≤ 2
• Average Implementability: score ≥ 4
• PRIME-Flex “value now” threshold: The
use-case is considered favorable if at least
one party scoring deemed it so
• Max Benefit: score ≥ 5
• Min Cost: score ≤ 2
• Max Implementability: score ≥ 4
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Ave
rage
Be
ne
fit
Average Cost
PRIME-Flex PRIME-Strict OTHER11All rights reserved to the author.
“Value now” thresholds can help recognize favorable use-cases on all three scoring metrics
1.1
1.2
13.1
13.2 16.0
49.0
109.0
121.0
133.0
148.0
160.0
205.0
313.0
410.0
458.0
518.0
614.0
725.0
734.0
817.0818.0
830.0
853.0854.0
866.0
1034.01753.0
4.0
31.0
34.037.0
85.0 88.0100.0
112.0
124.0
136.0
208.0
241.0
253.0 256.0
292.0
328.0337.0 340.0413.1
413.2
414.0
425.0
521.0533.0
542.0
545.0
617.0
698.0
746.0
749.0
820.0
821.0
822.0
860.0
872.0
901.0
902.0
925.0926.0937.0938.0
949.0
950.0
952.0
953.0
964.0
976.0977.0
1022.0
1024.0
1025.0
1153.0
1154.0
1226.0
1228.0
1310.0
1430.0
1514.0
1633.01634.0 1636.01637.0
1718.0
1766.0
1.1
1.2
13.1
13.2 16.0
49.0
109.0
121.0
133.0
148.0
160.0
205.0
313.0
410.0
458.0
518.0
614.0
725.0
734.0
817.0818.0
830.0
853.0854.0
866.0
1034.01753.0
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Ave
rage
Be
ne
fit
Average Cost
PRIME-Flex PRIME-Strict OTHER
• Two illustrative “value now” thresholds are
applied to group scoring results:
• PRIME-Strict “value now” threshold: The
use-case is considered favorable if the
average of parties scoring deemed it so
• Average Benefit: score ≥ 5
• Average Cost: score ≤ 2
• Average Implementability: score ≥ 4
• PRIME-Flex “value now” threshold: The
use-case is considered favorable if at least
one party scoring deemed it so
• Max Benefit: score ≥ 5
• Min Cost: score ≤ 2
• Max Implementability: score ≥ 4
12All rights reserved to the author.
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Ave
rage
Be
ne
fit
Average Cost
PRIME-Flex PRIME-Strict OTHER
Data Insights1. “Value now” threshold
• Benefit ≥ 5: at or greater than hundreds of thousands of dollars
• Cost ≤ 2: low or very low cost
• Implementability ≥ 4: easy, or not risky, or both easy and not risky to implement
2. PRIME-Strict: 27 use-cases total• use-case is considered favorable if average of
parties scoring deemed it so
3. PRIME-Flex: 91 use-cases total• use-case is considered favorable if at least one
party scoring deemed it so
4. The “value now” thresholds highlight specific use-cases with conflicting favorability indicators• Lower cost but lower implementability
• Higher cost but higher implementability
5. By design, PRIME-Flex use-cases include all PRIME-Strict use-cases!
13All rights reserved to the author.
“Value now” thresholds can help synthesize insights from the parties’ scoring of three metrics (benefit, cost, implementability)
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Ave
rage
Be
ne
fit
Average Cost
PRIME-Flex PRIME-Strict OTHER
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Ave
rage
Be
ne
fit
Average Cost
Imp = Low (1-2.5) Imp = Neutral (2.6-3.5) Imp = High (3.6-5)
14All rights reserved to the author.
LDV Use-cases In
div
idu
al
asse
ssm
en
t
Gro
up
asse
ssm
en
t
15All rights reserved to the author.
Applying “value now” thresholds helps compare Group scoring to Individual scoring, resulting in four classes of use-cases
C1
C3
C2C4
CTotalTotal set of
scored VGI
use-casesC3
Only Individual organization scored this
use-case above threshold; Group scored
below threshold
Individual Only
C1Neither the Individual organization nor the Group scored
this use-case above the threshold; Individual organization
may not have scored this use-case altogether
None
C4Both the Individual organization and the Group scored
this use-case above the threshold
Both
C2Only Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; Individual organization
scored below threshold or didn’t score
Group Only
Implication on
answering Question A
Safely exclude
these use-cases!
Discuss, to then
decide on these
use-cases
Discuss, to then
decide on these
use-cases
Confidently include
these use-cases!
16All rights reserved to the author.
Illustrative example: Apply the PRIME-Strict threshold to compare Group scoring and PG&E scoring
C1
170
C3
32
C2
19C4
8
CTotal
229scored VGI
use-cases32
Only PG&E scored this use-case above
threshold; Group scored below threshold
Individual Only – PG&E
170Neither PG&E nor the Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; PG&E may not have scored this use-case
altogether
None
8Both PG&E and the Group scored this use-case above
the threshold
Both
19Only Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; PG&E scored below
threshold or didn’t score
Group Only
Safely exclude
these use-cases!
Discuss, to then
decide on these
use-cases
Discuss, to then
decide on these
use-cases
Confidently include
these use-cases!
17All rights reserved to the author.
Clarification: The example below uses publicly available information submitted by PG&E to this Interagency VGI Working Group. This example is not intended to convey,
directly or indirectly, any views, recommendations, or standing on behalf of PG&E, for or beyond this Working Group. This example is for illustrative purposes only.
4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5
4
85
88
136
208
292
413.1
413.2
542
617
698
820
821
901
902
949
950
1022
1024
1025
1154
1226
1228
1310
1430
1514
1633
1634
1636
1637
1718
1766
Group Individual - PG&E
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
4
85
88
136
208
292
413.1
413.2
542
617
698
820
821
901
902
949
950
1022
1024
1025
1154
1226
1228
1310
1430
1514
1633
1634
1636
1637
1718
1766
Group Individual - PG&E
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
4
85
88
136
208
292
413.1
413.2
542
617
698
820
821
901
902
949
950
1022
1024
1025
1154
1226
1228
1310
1430
1514
1633
1634
1636
1637
1718
1766
Group Individual - PG&E
C3
Cla
ss o
f u
se
-ca
ses
Clarification: The example below uses publicly available information submitted by PG&E to this Interagency VGI Working Group. This example is not intended to convey,
directly or indirectly, any views, recommendations, or standing on behalf of PG&E, for or beyond this Working Group. This example is for illustrative purposes only.
Benefit Cost Implementability
Benefit threshold: Despite
variations, both PG&E and
Group scorings meet the
threshold
Cost threshold: Group
scored cost higher than
PG&E for several use-cases
Implementability
threshold: Group scored
implementability lower than
PG&E for several use-cases
Discussions needed to
consider reconciling
those differences
Illustrative example: Apply the PRIME-Strict threshold to compare Group scoring and PG&E scoring
18All rights reserved to the author.
Illustrative example: Apply the PRIME-Flex threshold to compare Group scoring and PG&E scoring
C1
138
C3
0
C2
51C4
40
CTotal
229scored VGI
use-cases0
Only PG&E scored this use-case above
threshold; Group scored below threshold
Individual Only – PG&E
138Neither PG&E nor the Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; PG&E may not have scored this use-case
altogether
None
40Both PG&E and the Group scored this use-case above
the threshold
Both
51Only Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; PG&E scored below
threshold or didn’t score
Group Only
Safely exclude
these use-cases!
Discuss, to then
decide on these
use-cases
Discuss, to then
decide on these
use-cases
Confidently include
these use-cases!
19All rights reserved to the author.
Clarification: The example below uses publicly available information submitted by PG&E to this Interagency VGI Working Group. This example is not intended to convey,
directly or indirectly, any views, recommendations, or standing on behalf of PG&E, for or beyond this Working Group. This example is for illustrative purposes only.
Illustrative example: Apply the PRIME-Flex threshold to compare Group scoring and PG&E scoring
C1
138
C3
0
C2
51C4
40
CTotal
229scored VGI
use-cases0
Only PG&E scored this use-case above
threshold; Group scored below threshold
Individual Only – PG&E
138Neither PG&E nor the Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; PG&E may not have scored this use-case
altogether
None
40Both PG&E and the Group scored this use-case above
the threshold
Both
51Only Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; PG&E scored below
threshold or didn’t score
Group Only
Will always yield same result,
regardless what individual score
is assessed. No party scored
these use-cases favorably!
Discuss, to then
decide on these
use-cases
Always zero, regardless of
Individual organization. By
design, Group scoring already
accommodates all Individual
scoring!
Confidently include
these use-cases!
20All rights reserved to the author.
Clarification: The example below uses publicly available information submitted by PG&E to this Interagency VGI Working Group. This example is not intended to convey,
directly or indirectly, any views, recommendations, or standing on behalf of PG&E, for or beyond this Working Group. This example is for illustrative purposes only.
MHDV Use-cases
21All rights reserved to the author.
Group average scores show limited scatter across VGI use-cases
• Every “bubble” represents a fully
scored use-case; total of 97
• Benefit score: vertical axis
• Cost score: horizontal axis
• Implementability score: color of the
bubble, falling into 1 of 3 categories
• Red = Low implementability, score [1-2.5]
• Yellow = Neutral implementability, score [2.5-3.5]
• Green = High implementability, score [3.6-5]
1984
1877.2
1930.1
1936.2
1937.11948.2
1949.2
1969.3 1972.3
1996
2042.1
20502050
2134
2134
2182
2182
18461846
1843
1843
1876.11877.1
1924.2
1925.2
1972.2
2047
2047
2128
2128
2176
2176
2293
2296 23322332.1
2344
2377.1
2380
2380.1
2536
1837.4
1837.5
1837.6
1840.2
1841.2
1873.1
1873.2
1876.2
1921.3 1924.3
1925.3
1925.4
1930.2 1936.3
1937.2
1945.2 1957.2
1957.3
1958.2 1958.3
20442044
2125 2125
21732173
2248
2329
23772533
2581
1837.2
1837.3
1838.2
1921.2
1969.2
2041
2042
2245
2245.1
2246
2246.1
2248.1
2281
2284
2329.1
2353
2354
2356
2365 2368
2449.1
2450.1
2452.12458.1
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Be
ne
fits
Costs
Imp = Low (1-2.5) Imp = Neutral (2.6-3.5) Imp = High (3.6-5)
22All rights reserved to the author.
Data Insights 1. The majority of the fully scored MHDV use-cases seem to be favorable, with higher implementability and lower cost
2. Limited divergence among parties’ scores, due to two reasons:
• Few parties submitted scores for the use-cases
• Technical variations are accounted for as distinct use-cases
3. Tradeoff of accounting for technical variations as distinct use-cases
• Downside: Limited ability to synthesize insights and have discussions
• Upside: More granularity in use-case assessment
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Be
ne
fits
Costs
Imp = Low (1-2.5) Imp = Neutral (2.6-3.5) Imp = High (3.6-5)
23All rights reserved to the author.
“Value now” thresholds can help recognize favorable use-cases on all three scoring metrics
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Ave
rage
Be
ne
fits
Costs
PRIME-Flex PRIME-Strict Other
• Two illustrative “value now” thresholds are
applied to group scoring results:
• PRIME-Strict “value now” threshold: 41
use-cases
• Average Benefit: score ≥ 5
• Average Cost: score ≤ 2
• Average Implementability: score ≥ 4
• PRIME-Flex “value now” threshold: 43
use-cases
• Max Benefit: score ≥ 5
• Min Cost: score ≤ 2
• Max Implementability: score ≥ 4
24All rights reserved to the author.
MHDV Use-cases In
div
idu
al
asse
ssm
en
t
Gro
up
asse
ssm
en
t
25All rights reserved to the author.
Illustrative example: Apply the PRIME-Strict threshold to compare Group scoring and PG&E scoring
C1
56
C3
0
C2
27C4
14
CTotal
97scored VGI
use-cases0
Only PG&E scored this use-case above
threshold; Group scored below threshold
Individual Only – PG&E
56Neither PG&E nor the Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; PG&E may not have scored this use-case
altogether
None
14Both PG&E and the Group scored this use-case above
the threshold
Both
27Only Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; PG&E scored below
threshold or didn’t score
Group Only
Safely exclude
these use-cases!
Discuss, to then
consider excluding
these use-cases
Discuss, to then
consider including
these use-cases
Confidently include
these use-cases!
26All rights reserved to the author.
Clarification: The example below uses publicly available information submitted by PG&E to this Interagency VGI Working Group. This example is not intended to convey,
directly or indirectly, any views, recommendations, or standing on behalf of PG&E, for or beyond this Working Group. This example is for illustrative purposes only.
Illustrative example: Apply the PRIME-Flex threshold to compare Group scoring and PG&E scoring
C1
54
C3
0
C2
29C4
14
CTotal
97scored VGI
use-cases0
Only PG&E scored this use-case above
threshold; Group scored below threshold
Individual Only – PG&E
54Neither PG&E nor the Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; PG&E may not have scored this use-case
altogether
None
14Both PG&E and the Group scored this use-case above
the threshold
Both
29Only Group scored this use-case above
the threshold; PG&E scored below
threshold or didn’t score
Group Only
Resolved!
Discuss, to then
consider excluding
these use-cases
Resolved!
Confidently include
these use-cases!
27All rights reserved to the author.
Clarification: The example below uses publicly available information submitted by PG&E to this Interagency VGI Working Group. This example is not intended to convey,
directly or indirectly, any views, recommendations, or standing on behalf of PG&E, for or beyond this Working Group. This example is for illustrative purposes only.
Process recommendations: to address PUC Question A
Define “value now”
as a PRIME-Flex
threshold:
• Max Benefit ≥ ?
• Min Cost ≤ ?
• Max Imp ≥ ?
Using the PRIME-
Flex threshold,
understand and
compare parties’
Individual scoring
to Group scoring:
C1, C2, C3, C4
Consider necessary
exceptions to include or
exclude use-cases, due
to special considerations
Except for use-cases
in C1 (None), strive to
keep all use-cases as
“favorable”
1
2
3
4
28All rights reserved to the author.
Content recommendations: to address PUC Question A
Answers to PUC Question A – Part 1: What use-cases can provide value now?
Ambitious answer
• LDV: All use-cases that pass the PRIME-Flex threshold (C1 excluded); total of 91 use-cases
• MHDV: All use-cases that pass the PRIME-Flex threshold (C1 excluded); total of 43 use-cases
• Additional use-cases for special considerations
• LDV: Residential SFH, MUD, & Workplace / V2G / Customer & System Backup Resiliency
• MHDV: School Bus / V1G and V2G / Customer Bill Management, System RA, Day-Ahead Energy
Conservative answer
• LDV: All use-cases that pass the PRIME-Strict threshold (C1 excluded); total of 59 use-cases
• MHDV: All use-cases that pass the PRIME-Strict threshold (C1 excluded); total of 41 use-cases
• Additional use-cases for special considerations
• LDV: Residential SFH, MUD, & Workplace / V2G / Customer Backup Resiliency
• MHDV: School Bus / V1G / Customer Bill Management, System RA
Answer to PUC Question A – Part 2: How to capture this value?
• Capturing the value must consider, and is already engraved in, the very definition of the use-case, specifically in dimensions 4 “Approach” and dimension 5 “Resource Alignment”
• Beyond the “Approach” and “Resource Alignment” specs, parties can agree on more detailed ways to capture value
29All rights reserved to the author.
Content recommendations: to address PUC Question A
Answers to PUC Question A – Part 1: What use-cases can provide value now?Ambitious answer
• LDV: All use-cases that pass the PRIME-Flex threshold (C1 excluded); total of 91 use-cases
• MHDV: All use-cases that pass the PRIME-Flex threshold (C1 excluded); total of 43 use-cases
LD
VM
HD
V
Focus should not be on one “dominant” or “winning” Sector or Application, but rather on
the use-cases’ unique combinations and how these pieces “fit” together to create value
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100Commercial - Public, Commute
Commercial - Public, Destination - Rideshare
Commercial - Public, Destination
Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare
Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare
Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare
Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling
Residential - Single Family Home
Commercial - Workplace 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
V2G
V1G
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 System - Real-Time Energy
System - RA, Flex Capacity
Customer - Backup, Resiliency
System - RA, Local Capacity
Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption
System - Grid Upgrade Deferral
Customer - Upgrade Deferral
System - Renewable Integration
System - GHG Reduction
System - Day-Ahead Energy
System - RA, System Capacity
Customer - Bill Management
0
10
20
30
40
50
Commercial - Fleet, School Bus
Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8)
Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5)
Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus0
10
20
30
40
50
System - GHG Reduction
System - Renewable Integration
System - RA, System Capacity
Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption
System - Day-Ahead Energy
Customer - Bill Management
0
10
20
30
40
50
V2G
V1G
30All rights reserved to the author.
Content recommendations: to address PUC Question A
Answers to PUC Question A – Part 1: What use-cases can provide value now?Conservative answer
• LDV: All use-cases that pass the PRIME-Strict threshold (C1 excluded); total of 59 use-cases
• MHDV: All use-cases that pass the PRIME-Strict threshold (C1 excluded); total of 41 use-cases
LD
VM
HD
V
Focus should not be on one “dominant” or “winning” Sector or Application, but rather on
the use-cases’ unique combinations and how these pieces “fit” together to create value
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100Commercial - Public, Commute
Commercial - Public, Destination - Rideshare
Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare
Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare
Commercial - Public, Destination
Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling
Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare
Commercial - Workplace
Residential - Single Family Home 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 System - RA, Local Capacity
System - RA, Flex Capacity
Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption
System - Grid Upgrade Deferral
System - GHG Reduction
System - Renewable Integration
Customer - Upgrade Deferral
System - RA, System Capacity
System - Day-Ahead Energy
Customer - Bill Management0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
V1G
0
10
20
30
40
50
Commercial - Fleet, School Bus
Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8)
Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus
Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5)0
10
20
30
40
50
System - GHG Reduction
System - Renewable Integration
System - RA, System Capacity
Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption
System - Day-Ahead Energy
Customer - Bill Management
0
10
20
30
40
50
V2G
V1G
31All rights reserved to the author.
Content recommendations: to address PUC Question A
Answer to PUC Question A – Part 2: How to capture this value?
• Capturing the value must consider, and is already engraved in, the very definition of the use-case, specifically in
dimensions 4 “Approach” and dimension 5 “Resource Alignment”
• Example 1: A use-case that is “indirect” and “unified aligned” already states that capturing value should focus on: (1) effective price
signaling (e.g. TOU rate design), and (2) ensuring that operational rules are designed such that there is one decision-maker
(owner/operator) for the EV and EVSE.
• Example 2: A use-case that is “direct” and “fragmented aligned” already states that capturing value should focus on: (1) effective
dispatching on the top of price signaling (e.g. DR program design), and (2) ensuring that operational rules are designed such that the
distinct EV and EVSE owners/operators are aligned.
• Beyond the “Approach” and “Resource Alignment” specs, parties can agree on more detailed ways to capture value
32All rights reserved to the author.
Scoring data may be used to address PUC questions A and B
229Fully scored
3Partially scored
12Not scored
97Fully scored
79Partially scored
29Not scored
LDV244
use-cases
MHV205*use-cases
PUC
Question B
PUC
Question A
* NOTE: For MHV, the number of use-cases accounts for several technology variations of the same use-case. Without
distinguishing technology variations, the number of unique use-cases is 109.
33All rights reserved to the author.
Looking ahead: Important to leverage the substantial use-case data available, to address Question B on policy recommendations
Policy Recommendations
Specific: implementation & scaling
Specific: further analysis of value
Broader: testing, piloting, analysis
Broader: testing, piloting, analysis
Broader: testing, piloting, analysis
Broader: testing, piloting, analysis
Very broad recommendations
34All rights reserved to the author.
41 82
326
-
100
200
300
400
500
Scored
Partial Scored
Not Scored
2,652
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400
2,600
2,800
Hypothetical (defined)
672
449
1,592
Screen Pass
Screen Fail
Not Submitted for Screening
120
155
95
515
121
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
Data (S4a, S4b)
Customer (S3a, S3b)
Market Wholesale (S2b)
Market Retail (S2a)
Tech (S1)
1,592
1,060
Submitted for Screening
Not Submitted for Screening
192
134
-
100
200
300
400
Favorable for "value now"(Prime-Flex threshold)
Not Favorable for "valuenow" (Prime-Flex threshold)
Specific: barriers to overcome
THANK YOUDr. Karim Farhat
|T| 628-226-5010
35All rights reserved to the author.
APPENDIX
36
Recommendation to PUC Question A: What use-cases can provide value now?
Ambitious Answer based on PRIME-Flex Threshold // LDV
All rights reserved to the author.
Use case ID Sector Application Type Approach Resource Alignment
1.1 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1.2 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
4.0 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
13.1 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
13.2 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
16.0 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
31.0 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Backup, Resiliency V2G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
34.0 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Backup, Resiliency V2G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
37.0 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
49.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - Grid Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
85.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
88.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
100.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - Real-Time Energy V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
109.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
112.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - Renewable Integration V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
121.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
124.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - GHG Reduction V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
133.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
136.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - RA, System Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
148.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - RA, Flex Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
160.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - RA, Local Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
205.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
208.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
241.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
253.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare System - Grid Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
256.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare System - Grid Upgrade Deferral V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
292.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
313.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
328.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare System - GHG Reduction V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
337.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
340.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare System - RA, System Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
410.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
413.1 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
413.2 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
414.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Misaligned
425.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
458.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling System - Grid Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
518.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
521.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling System - Renewable Integration V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
533.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling System - GHG Reduction V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
542.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
545.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling System - RA, System Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
37
Recommendation to PUC Question A: What use-cases can provide value now?
Ambitious Answer based on PRIME-Flex Threshold // LDV
All rights reserved to the author.
Use case ID Sector Application Type Approach Resource Alignment
614.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
617.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
698.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
725.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare System - Renewable Integration V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
734.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
746.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
749.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare System - RA, System Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
817.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
818.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
820.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
821.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
822.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Misaligned
830.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
853.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
854.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
860.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V2G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
866.0 Commercial - Workplace System - Grid Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
872.0 Commercial - Workplace System - Grid Upgrade Deferral V2G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
901.0 Commercial - Workplace System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
902.0 Commercial - Workplace System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
925.0 Commercial - Workplace System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
926.0 Commercial - Workplace System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
937.0 Commercial - Workplace System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
938.0 Commercial - Workplace System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
949.0 Commercial - Workplace System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
950.0 Commercial - Workplace System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
952.0 Commercial - Workplace System - RA, System Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
953.0 Commercial - Workplace System - RA, System Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
964.0 Commercial - Workplace System - RA, Flex Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
976.0 Commercial - Workplace System - RA, Local Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
977.0 Commercial - Workplace System - RA, Local Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1022.0 Commercial - Public, Destination Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1024.0 Commercial - Public, Destination Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1025.0 Commercial - Public, Destination Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1034.0 Commercial - Public, Destination Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1153.0 Commercial - Public, Destination System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1154.0 Commercial - Public, Destination System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1226.0 Commercial - Public, Destination - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1228.0 Commercial - Public, Destination - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1310.0 Commercial - Public, Destination - Rideshare System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1430.0 Commercial - Public, Commute Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1514.0 Commercial - Public, Commute System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
38
Recommendation to PUC Question A: What use-cases can provide value now?
Ambitious Answer based on PRIME-Flex Threshold // LDV
All rights reserved to the author.
Use case ID Sector Application Type Approach Resource Alignment
1633.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1634.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1636.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1637.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1718.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1753.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1766.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
39
Recommendation to PUC Question A: What use-cases can provide value now?
Ambitious Answer based on PRIME-Flex Threshold // MHDV
All rights reserved to the author.
Use case ID Sector Application Type Approach Resource Alignment Technology option
1837.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1837.3 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus B
1837.4 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus C
1837.5 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Short Range Transit Bus A
1837.6 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Short Range Transit Bus B
1838.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1840.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1841.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1873.1 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1873.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Short Range Transit Bus B
1876.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Short Range Transit Bus B
1921.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1921.3 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Short Range Transit Bus B
1945.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1957.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1969.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
2041 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2042 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
2125 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2125 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2173 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2173 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2245 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2245.1 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2246 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
2246.1 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned Small Truck B
2248.1 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2281 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2284 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
40
Recommendation to PUC Question A: What use-cases can provide value now?
Ambitious Answer based on PRIME-Flex Threshold // MHDV
All rights reserved to the author.
Use case ID Sector Application Type Approach Resource Alignment Technology option
2329 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2329.1 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2353 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2354 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned Small Truck B
2356 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - Renewable Integration V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2365 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2368 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - GHG Reduction V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2377 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2449.1 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Large Truck A
2450.1 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned Large Truck A
2452.1 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Large Truck A
2458.1 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) Customer - Bill Management V2G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Large Truck A
2533 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2581 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
41
Recommendation to PUC Question A: What use-cases can provide value now?
Conservative Answer based on PRIME-Strict Threshold // LDV
All rights reserved to the author.
Use case ID Sector Application Type Approach Resource Alignment
1.1 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1.2 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
4.0 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
13.1 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
13.2 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
16.0 Residential - Single Family Home Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
49.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - Grid Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
85.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
88.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
109.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
121.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
133.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
136.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - RA, System Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
148.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - RA, Flex Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
160.0 Residential - Single Family Home System - RA, Local Capacity V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
205.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
208.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
292.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
313.0 Residential - Single Family Home - Rideshare System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
410.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
413.1 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
413.2 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
458.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling System - Grid Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
518.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
542.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
614.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
617.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
698.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
725.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare System - Renewable Integration V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
42
Recommendation to PUC Question A: What use-cases can provide value now?
Conservative Answer based on PRIME-Strict Threshold // LDV
All rights reserved to the author.
Use case ID Sector Application Type Approach Resource Alignment
734.0 Residential - Multi-Unit Dwelling - Rideshare System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
817.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
818.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
820.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
821.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
830.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
853.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
854.0 Commercial - Workplace Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
866.0 Commercial - Workplace System - Grid Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
901.0 Commercial - Workplace System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
902.0 Commercial - Workplace System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
949.0 Commercial - Workplace System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
950.0 Commercial - Workplace System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1022.0 Commercial - Public, Destination Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1024.0 Commercial - Public, Destination Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1025.0 Commercial - Public, Destination Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1034.0 Commercial - Public, Destination Customer - Upgrade Deferral V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1154.0 Commercial - Public, Destination System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1226.0 Commercial - Public, Destination - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1228.0 Commercial - Public, Destination - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1310.0 Commercial - Public, Destination - Rideshare System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1430.0 Commercial - Public, Commute Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1514.0 Commercial - Public, Commute System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1633.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1634.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1636.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1637.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1718.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
1753.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
1766.0 Commercial - Public, Commute - Rideshare System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
43
Recommendation to PUC Question A: What use-cases can provide value now?
Conservative Answer based on PRIME-Strict Threshold // MHDV
All rights reserved to the author.
Use case ID Sector Application Type Approach Resource Alignment Technology option
1837.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1837.3 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus B
1837.4 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus C
1837.5 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Short Range Transit Bus A
1837.6 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Short Range Transit Bus B
1838.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1873.1 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1873.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Short Range Transit Bus B
1876.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Short Range Transit Bus B
1921.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1921.3 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Short Range Transit Bus B
1945.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1957.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
1969.2 Commercial - Fleet, Transit Bus System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Long Range Transit Bus A
2041 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2042 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
2125 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2125 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2173 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2173 Commercial - Fleet, School Bus System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2245 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2245.1 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2246 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned
2246.1 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned Small Truck B
2248.1 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2281 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2284 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) Customer - Renewable Self-Consumption V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2329 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2329.1 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
44
Recommendation to PUC Question A: What use-cases can provide value now?
Conservative Answer based on PRIME-Strict Threshold // MHDV
All rights reserved to the author.
Use case ID Sector Application Type Approach Resource Alignment Technology option
2353 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2354 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - Renewable Integration V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned Small Truck B
2356 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - Renewable Integration V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2365 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - GHG Reduction V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2368 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - GHG Reduction V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Small Truck B
2377 Commercial - Fleet, Small Truck (class 2-5) System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2449.1 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Large Truck A
2450.1 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) Customer - Bill Management V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Fragmented, Aligned Large Truck A
2452.1 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) Customer - Bill Management V1G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Large Truck A
2458.1 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) Customer - Bill Management V2G Direct EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned Large Truck A
2533 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) System - Day-Ahead Energy V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
2581 Commercial - Fleet, Large Truck (class 6-8) System - RA, System Capacity V1G Indirect EV-EVSE Unified, Aligned
45