Vibration Theory Hypothetical Discussion on Life Death_08032012

7/31/2019 Vibration Theory Hypothetical Discussion on Life Death_08032012

1/8

Om Shri Guruvay NamahOm Shri Ganeshaya Namah

I start this brief write-up, paying my homage to one of the greatest saint / Yogi that ever walked the face of this earth Sri Sri Mohendronath Dutta (Buroshib). Buroshib was Swami Vivekanandas younger brother. After his Samadhi, hisworks/his preachings, his memory lives on amongst a small select group of individuals that form The MohendroPublishing Committee. I was fortunate enough to have glanced upon a theory postulated by Buroshib, named TheTheory of Vibration. Having read the first few pages, I was intrigued by the clarity of thought process of the yogi andthe power of his observation, knowledge and words. My current write-up and my current hypothesis is stimulated byBuroshibs hypoth esis. I have moulded Buroshibs teachings to end up hypothesizing on the meaning of Life, Death,Nirvana, Genesis etc etc.

Whilst one c annot attempt to comprehend Buroshibs hypothesis in its entirety, a very superficial analysis can allow aperson to arrive at an inference that may be used to answer the above question posed in my mind.

The Theory of vibration as I see it and as I have moulded it to my benefit, basically says that every element hasmolecules that are in a constant state of Kinetic energy or vibration . This is due to its sub-atomic particles vibrating intwo ways vibrating by it-self and vibrating at a level relative to its surrounding sub-atomic/atomic particles. Let sunderstand the atomic structure in a very laymans language -

1) Atom a matter that contains a dense nucleus (comprising of protons and neutrons) surrounded by energycloud containing electrons. This nucleus is not static and neither is the energy cloud. The differential energylevels of the protons, electrons etc comprise of the differential atoms, grouped together into differentialmoleculesforming different elements

An Atom is therefore a concentrated bundle of energy cloud (nucleus) surrounded by another energy cloud that isinterlinked by a force similar to gravitational force, again another form of energy.

I would like to take the freedom to hypothesize the following

Nucleus is vibrating at a certain frequency (let us name this Vn) i.e. there is a kinetic energy here. The energy cloud

surrounding the nucleus is vibrating at a certain frequency (lets name this Vec). These two are interlinked to eachother at a certain relativity co-efficient (say, RCa). This relativity co-efficient is very similar to the gravitational force thatoccurs due to some say warping of space time, some say because of a fine energy cloud linking two other energyclouds etc. Some might even say gravity is nothing but the resultant force generated due to the Vs and RCs between twoenergy cloud that is constant at any point in time and is due to energy exchanges between the 2 Vs.

Molecule A group of Atoms, each with their unique Vs and RCs that are vibrating within it -self (nucleus vselectron/particle cloud) and that are also vibrating at a certain other frequency with a unique relativity coefficient wrtother atoms in the same group can probably be described as a molecule.

Nucleus

eletroncloud

electroncloud

electroncloud

electroncloud

Interlinking energy or gravitation likeforce


2/8

(the diagram below will state the molecular structure in the manner that I am looking at)

Summarizing the above

Atom1 = a function of Vn1+Vec1+RCa1

Atom 2 = a function of Vn2+Vec2+Rca2

Atom 1 and Atom 2 are also linked to each other by a relativity vibrational co-efficient say RCa1a2

It can be hypothesized that over a prolonged period of time, due to repeated interchange of vibrational energy betweennucleus and electrons, between one atom and another, between one molecule and another, a point of singularity mayoccur, wherein, one of the sub-atomic particles or one of the atoms in a molecule starts vibrating with a differentfrequency and their vibrational relativity co-efficient also therefore changes wrt other atoms within the same molecule .The moment this happens, that atom and therefore similar such groups of atoms may become an off-shoot of theprimary molecule thereby forming a separate molecule in it-self. The below mentioned depiction can easily exemplify all

that is mentioned above.

A Molecule M1 having say, 2 atoms i.e. Atom 1 & Atom 2. Lets say Atom 2 changesand forms a separate mono -atomic molecule (just to make the concept easier to visualize).

M1 = [Atom 1 (Vn1+Vec1+RCa1)] + [RCa1a2] + [Atom 2 (Vn2+Vec2+RCa2)]

Now, for a moment imagine that RCa changes and or either of the Vns or Vec changes over prolonged period of time,thereby causing a change in RCa1a2. Atom 2 breaks out from M1 and forms a separate molecule called M2, anothermolecule or another new atom. This forms the very basis of theory of vibration and its effect of transfer and resultantchange in energies to form different sub-atomic particles, atoms and therefore molecules. We all know that different

molecular composition forms different elements and therefore different substances. Everything stems from energy of different vibrational frequencies at times static at a point in time or at times changing to energy with some othervibrational frequencies.

A POINT TO NOTE ALL THIS TRANSFORMATION/CHANGES ETC OCCUR OVER A PERIOD OF TIME. THEREFORE TIME BECOMESUN-SEEN MULTIPLYING FACTOR / MULTIPLIER HERE. Its the time dimension that remains ever constant in its linear progression,in my hypothesis and everything else is changing within this time dimension. Time is considered by me to be always progressinglinearly.

Atom 1 -Vn1+Vec1+RCa1

Atom 2 -Vn2+Vec2+Rca2

Atom 4

Atom 5

Atom 3

RCa1a2 = Vibration relativitycoefficient between two

atoms in a group


3/8

If we are asked to describe how vibration causes differential energy patterns and how it changes anything andeverything as we know it, I would use the very simple process of hearing to describe this.

Hearing process

The human ear has 3 parts Outer Ear (having a Pinna, auditory canal and tympanic membrane [ear drum]), Middle ear(having small bones called auditory ossicles [malleus, incus, stirrup], auditory tube [Eustachian tube]) and Inner Ear(having vestibule, ve stubular ducts and cochlea *basilar membrane, tectoral membrane and hairs stereociia-+).

Sound is captured by the satellite dish like pinna, waves move into the ear canal, makes the tympanic membranevibrate, this is picked up by malleus..which then passes on these vibrations through the stirrup and incus into thecochlea. When stirrup vibrates, it pushes against the fluid of the inner ear that creates waves which then effects thehairs. The hairs bend thereby creating electrical impulses that are sen t to our brain and we hear.

Let us link this vibration theory to our own nervous system. What is the lowest common multiple of our nervous system?The answer is probably Neurons. The exact scientific definition of the neuron is that a neuron *or neuro ne] is anelectrically excitable cell that processes and transmits information by electrical and chemical signaling occurring viasynapses. All neurons are electrically excitable , maintaining voltage gradients across their membranes by means of metabolically driven ion-pumps , which combines with ion channels embedded in the membrane to generateintracellular versus extracellular concentration difference of ions such as calcium, potassium etc. What are calcium andpotassium, Elements. And what are elements made of, Atoms. And what are atoms made of energy clouds thatvibrate.

Theory of Vibration of Genesis, Life, Us, Death

So far, I have tried to take you through a journey comprising of energy manifested in various forms due to difference intheir vibrations, trying to link the sub-atomic particles to molecules to elements to different forms of energy and matter.I will now endeavour to take you through the magical journey of Life, of us Human beings and all forms of life (as weknow it) or non-life beings and eventually to Death. At the outset, please allow me to explain that Death is not the end.

It is merely the beginning (and I apologise for having copied the last works spoken by the mummy, imohteph, in themovie The Mummy. Its co -incidental and not intended to mock at any one)

Let us go back to Genesis in Bible and one particular statement I had heard in the opening credits of one of my favoritemovies The Ten Commandments. And God said, Let there be Light, and There was Light.. Before the formation of light (creation of night and day), there used to darkness and confusion . Genesis describes all life forms to haveoriginated from a primordial source that is God.[Gen1:1 In the beginning God created heaven and earth]; I would liketo describe that primordial source as the Primordial Energy. We have always said that God is omni-present, omni-potent. It exists everywhere, all around us, within us etc. There is another interesting verse in the Bible, John 4:13 -1413 Jesus answered and said to her, "Whoever drinks of this water will thirst again, 14 "but whoever drinks of the

water that I shall give him will never thirst. But the water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain of water springing up into everlasting life

Can I therefore link these age old time-less prophetic statements from great thinkers, saints alike to the primordialenergy source? Is it possible to conceptualize that there existed a Primordial Energy source infinite time ago andbecause of constant interchange of energies within the sub-atomic/atomic particles of that primordial energy source, anoff-shoot must have been formed that enabled the formation of a sub-set of different energy with different vibrationalVs, different vibrational relativity co-efficients within that primordial energy source. This differentiated energy patterncould be hypothesized as formation of life, broadly speaking of-course . It would also mean that the Primordial energy


4/8

source exists within every life and non-life form, more like a residual energy form of the great Energy Source, maybe atthe very core of the form.

But is it only Genesis that speaks of such a singularity? We all must have heard of the Big Bang theory. The Big Bangtheory is the prevailing cosmological model that explains the early development of the Universe. According to the BigBang theory, the Universe was once in an extremely hot and dense state which expanded rapidly. This rapid expansioncaused the young Universe to cool and resulted in its present continuously expanding state. According to the mostrecent measurements and observations, this original state existed approximately 13.7 billion years ago, which isconsidered the age of the Universe and the time the Big Bang occurred. After its initial expansion from a singularity, theUniverse cooled sufficiently to allow energy to be converted into various subatomic particles. It would take thousands of years for some of these particles (protons, neutrons, and electrons) to combine and form atoms, the building blocks of matter. The first element produced was hydrogen, along with traces of helium and lithium. Eventually, clouds of hydrogen would coalesce through gravity to form stars, and the heavier elements would be synthesized either withinstars or during supernovae.

What has always intrigued me is that some descriptions of the Big Bang that I have read, describes a great bigexplosion of Light from which debris like substances emerged and one such debris was Earth. I have not heardof anyone use the word sound when describing Big -Bang. Th ats probably because sound does not travel inspace. Another important point to note is that very high end telescopes also analyse light spectrums,frequencies and many more things that I do not have any clue of. All that I am trying to say is that it could belight thereby linking it to Genesis and formation of Life. But, that has been done by many honorable andcapable geniuses. I am not trying to re-state what these great thinkers have said before. I am merely trying tolink Life to energy and therefore to Primordial energy.

How can I exemplify the above and establish the link to theory of vibration? The best examples that I can think of is abucket full of water placed on top of a vibrating machine. Let it be assumed that there is a primordial energy form, like abucket full of water, with the water vibrating at a certain frequency or at a certain energy level. Now lets just assumethat the relative vibration frequencies undergo a change when the vibrating machine keeps vibrating over a prolongedperiod of time. Suddenly we see that part of that water in the bucket has started spilling out into say a Mug. This mug

full of water, I keep on another vibrator and make that mug of water vibrate at different frequency from that of thebucket. Here water does not change to steam or anything else. However the molecules in the water do stretch so thatpart of the water breaks away from the main bucket into a mug. Similar is Genesis. Over prolonged period of time, thechaotic vibrating sub-atomic particles of the primordial energy source (here the water in the bucket) breaks away toform another energy source with different Vns, Vecs, RCas. This is a different energy form, a creation in itself. Genesis isall about creation.

Now lets try and discuss on Life forms a nd Non-life forms very briefly. I am of the firm belief that there is no such thingas a non-life form. How can I believe otherwise? If molecules are nothing but embodiment of and composed of energy(in one form or another), its the differential Vns, RCas etc that allow a molecule or group of molecules to be what they

are. Lets assume that there are two sets of molecules. One comprising of energy vibrating at say, VM -L (having Lifeaccording to us) and the other vibrating at VM-NL (not having a life..). If VM-L means they have life, they have life andvice-versa. Who, by the way, first said a tree has life and a rock does not have? I would be really intrigued to find out theanswer.

According to me, every life or non-life form is different from the other due to its different vibration quotients (differentVs) and every life form can actually feel, hear, see, taste, know etc due to the different energy impulses havingdifferent Vs. The predominance of some Vs over the others decides whether the form is a life form or non life form. Thesame also differentiates a human being from a dog and a stone from water and an animal from a plant. For example why does a dog hear ultrasound and a man cannot? Why does an animal feel pain or pleasure (which is apparent and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_cosmologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_expansion_of_spacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observational_cosmologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Universehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subatomic_particlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutronhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithiumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_tablehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_nucleosynthesishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_nucleosynthesishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova_nucleosynthesishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova_nucleosynthesishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_nucleosynthesishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_nucleosynthesishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_tablehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithiumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutronhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subatomic_particlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Universehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observational_cosmologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_expansion_of_spacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_cosmology


5/8

obvious) but a plant apparently cannot? Its because of the difference in their vibration quotients and predominance of certain Vs with respect to others. Cell biology talks of nucleotides, mitochondria etc. The lowest common multiple in cellbiology is theoretically a part of a genetic sequence or code. This part is broken into chemicals, further intominerals which is broken into atomsand therefore energy . This energy is an off-shoot of the primordial energy.

Getting back into Neurons and Meta-physics

Now that we have hypothetically established that every single entity (be it matter or even thought for that matter) is

nothing but energy having different vibration quotients and different relativity coefficients against each other, we canuse this hypothesis to break down a neuron or nerve cell at a meta-physical level. Re-stating the definition of a neuroneonce again - All neurons are electrically excitable , maintaining voltage gradients across their membranes by means of metabolically driven ion-pumps , which combines with ion channels embedded in the membrane to generateintracellular versus extracellular concentration difference of ions, i.e. energy.

Lets assume that a neuron has 3 different energy sta tes or energy levels

1) The superficial or the upper most level Called Material Level or conscious level 2) The middle level called sub -conscious level or spiritual level and lastly, 3) The core level called the Moksha or primordial level

Description of a persons character and his move from materialistic to spiritual state

The superficial level comprises of a complex mix of energies with different vibration quotients that combine togetherwith a certain co-efficient relative to each other and which are, constant at any point in time. However at differentpoints in time, the Vs and the relativity co-efficients all change. This level decides how a person behaves within himself,what he feels, shaping of his character, how he views his surroundings, his inter-personal skills, his face etc..allsummarized in a nutshell as that persons individuality.

With time a p ersons starting to love more or start being more philanthropic as against to being a miser in his past maybe explained due to changes in the Material energy Vs along with a simultaneous or concurrent change in his relativityco-efficients (RCas)of the different Vs to each other.

With time, it may be possible that a persons Spiritual Level starts gaining in predominance and eventually maycompletely take over the persons material level. This just means that the Vs of the m aterial level along with the RCa of the same becomes one as the Vs and RCa of the Spiritual level. Both starts to vibrate with the same frequencyandtherefore one is said to have attained spirituality.

Since this affects the persons conscious level, the person starts to view life through his spiritual self as his spiritual s elf isnow the most predominant. Its like a circle with 3 concentric rings.


6/8

Now imagine a situation, where the Spiritual expands and completely dominates the Material.

Everything is energy that comprises of sub-atomic particles vibrating at a certain frequency and at a certain relativeposition/frequency or force against each other. This is the basis of Theory of Vibration. The source of all vibrations is theprimordial vibrating energy source of God. If one assumes that God or this primordial energy source exists/existed thenone can understand how all things formed, how life came into being. How one is different from the other etc etc.

Let us ask ourselves, what will happen if the core component of the neuron supersedes all other levels. That meansthe Material and Spiritual level Vs and RCas become same as the one in Core. The speed with which such a change canhappen, the force with which such a change will happen will depend upon the speed of transfer of energy from theMaterial and Spiritual sub- atomic particles/energy clouds to the coreOr even the vice versa may stand true. This speedForce of energy transfers that combines all Vs and RCa s into one with the cores is defined as Bhav, Bhakti (Faith),Gyaan (knowledge), Yogic Discipline *that creates a proper base for these quick transformations to occur+.

Lets quickly summarise the terms Vibration quotient (V); Relativity co-efficient (RCa); A mix of Bhav (Bhv), Bhakti (Bhk),Knowledge (Gyn), Yogic discipline (Yg) = [ f (Bhv,Bhk,Gyn)].

This would mean that when the core supersedes all, the person is said to have become one with the primordial energysource, i.e. his V and RCa has become the same as Primordial Vp and RCap. However since we cannot define thePrimordia Vp and RVCp, nor can we measure it, we assume that this would happen when V and RCa tend to movetowards infinity a nd at the point of Infinity, Vp and RCap exists or IS. Meaning the vibration quotient and each sub -atomic particles relativity coefficient vis-- vis the other at an infinite level is the primordial energy source or God.

I have just come across a very g ood description of Moksha in the net. The author, Mr. Andrew Cohen has said in one of his lectures that the first example of emergence is that the material universe emerged from primordial existence, therewas no space time. Mr. Cohen went on to state that there is a bit of universe in all of us. We are made from the sameelements as the stars, planets, the sun and moon. To understand the self in context of the ever evolving universe, we

need to contemplate on who we are and where we come from. The concept of Moksha is explained in varied manner byvaried spiritual beliefs and ideologies. Vedanta speaks of Moksha as merging with Brahma. Brahma can also beconsidered to be the original word from which brahmin emerged. I say that brahma or brahmin all depictaum/aham that is, my -self or one -self. Therefore when one merges with ones conscious primordial self, one is saidto have attained moksha. Buddhism speaks of moksha as a state achieved, when a person, moves out or breaks free of the cyclical process of birth-death-rebirth.

I would tend to explain moksha and death in a slightly different manner. It can be surely ascertained that all religiousbeliefs, books, authors state one common thing God exists in each and every one of us; Merging with God is achievedthrough either Moksha or Death. I would like to explain this with the use of Vibration theory.

core

Spiritual

Material/conscious


7/8

Death (as per vibration theory)

Let us term the Primordial vibration frequency as Vp and vibration relativity (gravitational like force) co-efficient asRCap. This is the same to that of the core in a neuron. Over period of time (a persons life time), the material (outerlayer) and the spiritual (middle layer) energy starts to vibrate with the same frequency and have the same coefficient asthat of the cores or as that of the primordial energy form. When this happens, according to science (material, life,medical sciences) the material layers and spiritual layer vanish completely. By complete vanishing act I mean that sincethe Vs and RCa has all changed to Vp and RCap, we cannot distinguish the different layers any more. We then say thatthe person has become one with Godmeaning, the person has died and gone to heaven.

{Core} = Summation of different [Vc+RCc] of its atoms and molecules

{Spiritual} = Summation of different [Vs+RCas] of its atoms/molecules

{Matrial} = Summation of different [Vm+RCam] of its atoms/molecules

During Death, 100% of [Vp+RCap] + 100% of [Vm+RCam] changes to [Vc+RCac]. So the energy of the neuron all vibrate intune with the primordial energy source i.e. cores vibration.

Moksha/Nirvana (as per vibration theory) -

Similar is the process of attaining nirvana or moksha. The only difference between death and nirvana would be thatwhilst in death, the material Vs RCas and the spiritual Vs and RCas all change to that of the cores, in case of Nirvana,99% change to core. 1 % (hypothetically only) remains or retains their original Vs and RCas. Therefore we see theindividual, see their skin, see them meditate etc. but these individuals become oblivious to everything in theirsurrounding including losing their sense of touch, feeling, emotions, sight etc. Why do they lose them? They lose thembecause the atomic energy that gives rise to these feelings, sight etc have all changed their vibration to that of thecores. So the person remains (as 1 % vibration still remains) but have merged with God and has known Godandtherefore attained Nirvana or Moksha.

Since we have not been able to define the Vibration frequency (Vp) and relativity co-efficient (RCap) of the primordialenergy source, nor do we know the time frame it had required for genesis to occur / Big Bang to have taken place,neither do we know how long ago primordial energy source existed in its entirety, we put a factor called infinity to thisgodly equation . We can therefore say that the primordial energy source existed infinite time ago . The moment we puttime in the historical perspective as infinity, all other factors associated infinity ago also becomes infinite . Meaning, thevibration frequency and relativity co-efficient of the primordial energy source becomes INFINITE . So comes the term,Infinite entropy is bliss . Death therefore, according to me, is an 100% infinite entropic state whereas Nirvana is say,99% infinite entropic state tending towards a pure infinite level.

We have so far tried to hypothesize that in Death every vibration becomes same as that of the primordial energiesvibration and in Nirvana maximum part becomes the same however, not all. Now Buddhism states Nirvana to be a statethat is free from the cycle of birth-death-rebirth. This definitely means that re-birth comes after death. It surely does.Since time is a continuous progressive linear factor and vibration energy changes o ver time, a molecules vibrationfrequency after having become the same as that of the primordial source, can again change back to another different Vand RCa. This, I am sure, does happen. However no one can state when it happens i.e. no one can state the time periodtaken to affect such changes. So, it all boils down to the one singular statement that matter is a form of energy thatcannot be destroyed. It just changes in form, which is what I have tried to hypothesize in a different manner. The toolused by me or the basis of my hypothesis is the vibration theory.


8/8

My ultimate aim is to further expand and build on this vibration theory, understand and quantify the followingimportant elements of this theory Vibration frequency or intensity of sub-atomic particles, vibration intensity of surrounding energy clouds, the energy that binds two atoms or the nucleus and the surrounding energy cloud in anatom or two molecues, the pattern of force (again an energy source) like bhav, bhakti etc that allows for faster or slowertransfer of vibrational energy between two similar and dis-similar energy forms, time period taken for such a transfer toresult in a singular event of the two similar energy forms changing from each other thereby resulting in formation of adifferent third singular energy form (could be life, could be transmutation of metals) etc. I would also like to eventually

be able to substantiate or quantify the meta-physical breakdown of the neuron to its 3 levels. With the grace of theprimordial energy source (God Almighty) and with the blessings of my Gurudev and Sri Sri Buroshib, I am sure that I willeventually, end up achieving my dream and therefore come one step closer to understanding life, death and mostimportantly, understanding God.

Documents

Vibration Theory Hypothetical Discussion on Life Death_08032012