GENERAL RULES

1. The research Chapter 1: Introduction will be the Third Quarter Examination.2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Quarter Examination for SH – 3I

and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.3. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your Third Quarterly Examination

composed of seven (7) areas.4. Remember, ALL of the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND

PERFORMANCE TASKS.5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except

for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The

lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before December 18, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Researchers Area

1Area

2Area

3Area

4Area

5Area

6Area

7Total Score

Lead Researcher: ALYSSA GAROTEAsst. Lead Researcher: KENNETH CAMAYResearch Associate: ABEGAIL CABABANResearch Associate: JOHN CHARLIE ANDALESResearch Associate: JOBERT DAHANGResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points Earned

Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework of the Study. (Area 2)The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Scope and Limitations. (Area 5)The scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers have to take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments: _______/210

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

RUBRICS FOR THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES

1. The research Chapter 1: Introduction will be the Third Quarter Examination.2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Quarter Examination for SH – 3I

and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.3. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your Third Quarterly Examination

composed of seven (7) areas.4. Remember, ALL of the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND

PERFORMANCE TASKS.5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except

for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The

lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before December 18, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Researchers Area

1Area

2Area

3Area

4Area

5Area

6Area

7Total Score

Lead Researcher: JOYCE L. PEPITOAsst. Lead Researcher: GLAIZA S. ARDIENTEResearch Associate: JERELITO LOPEZResearch Associate: LYNJIELLE NAPARATEResearch Associate: LIZ KANGResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points Earned

Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework of the Study. (Area 2)The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Scope and Limitations. (Area 5)The scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers have to take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments: _______/210

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

RUBRICS FOR THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES

1. The research Chapter 1: Introduction will be the Third Quarter Examination.2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Quarter Examination for SH – 3I

and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.3. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your Third Quarterly Examination

composed of seven (7) areas.4. Remember, ALL of the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND

PERFORMANCE TASKS.5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except

for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The

lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before December 18, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Researchers Area

1Area

2Area

3Area

4Area

5Area

6Area

7Total Score

Lead Researcher: JHASMIN PARATOAsst. Lead Researcher: LARA MAY A. TIBONResearch Associate: MARIAH PERPETUA CASASResearch Associate: RICA JADE MAINITResearch Associate: STELLA KIMResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

RUBRICS FOR THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points Earned

Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework of the Study. (Area 2)The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Scope and Limitations. (Area 5)The scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers have to take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments: _______/210

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

GENERAL RULES

1. The research Chapter 1: Introduction will be the Third Quarter Examination.2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Quarter Examination for SH – 3I

and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.3. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your Third Quarterly Examination

composed of seven (7) areas.4. Remember, ALL of the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND

PERFORMANCE TASKS.5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except

for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The

lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before December 18, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Total Score

Lead Researcher: ELLEN MAE ABANIDAsst. Lead Researcher: GLAIREV ZHEALO COLONIAResearch Associate: YANNAH MARIE JASMINResearch Associate: LARABEL ARNEJOResearch Associate: JAMES BERNARD EMPINADOResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

RUBRICS FOR THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points Earned

Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework of the Study. (Area 2)The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Scope and Limitations. (Area 5)The scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers have to take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments: _______/210

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES

1. The research Chapter 1: Introduction will be the Third Quarter Examination.2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Quarter Examination for SH – 3I

and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.3. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your Third Quarterly Examination

composed of seven (7) areas.4. Remember, ALL of the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND

PERFORMANCE TASKS.5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except

for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The

lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before December 18, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Researchers Area

1Area

2Area

3Area

4Area

5Area

6Area

7Total Score

Lead Researcher: WELLA CADAMPOGAsst. Lead Researcher: KENT ADRIAN RODRIGUEZResearch Associate: KARYLL ANTOLIJAOResearch Associate: FRANCIS MAPA ABITONAResearch Associate: NHECCY MONDELOResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001RUBRICS FOR THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points Earned

Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework of the Study. (Area 2)The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Scope and Limitations. (Area 5)The scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers have to take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments: _______/210

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

GENERAL RULES

1. The research Chapter 1: Introduction will be the Third Quarter Examination.2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Quarter Examination for SH – 3I

and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.3. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your Third Quarterly Examination

composed of seven (7) areas.4. Remember, ALL of the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND

PERFORMANCE TASKS.5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except

for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The

lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before December 18, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Total Score

Lead Researcher: JAN NICOLE BACAYAsst. Lead Researcher: CAED NICOLE BACASNOResearch Associate: FAEVIE HORTELANOResearch Associate: PRINCESS JHOY TRINIDADResearch Associate: ARLOU TIROResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points Earned

Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework of the Study. (Area 2)The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Scope and Limitations. (Area 5)The scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers have to take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments: _______/210

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

RUBRICS FOR THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES

1. The research Chapter 1: Introduction will be the Third Quarter Examination.2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Quarter Examination for SH – 3I

and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.3. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your Third Quarterly Examination

composed of seven (7) areas.4. Remember, ALL of the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND

PERFORMANCE TASKS.5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except

for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The

lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before December 18, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Total Score

Lead Researcher: JEYA KIRL VILLENAAsst. Lead Researcher: JOVANNE MERCADALResearch Associate: DYNE KELLY BORRESResearch Associate: MARIANNE MONILAResearch Associate: ELLA MAY ELECCIONResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

RUBRICS FOR THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points Earned

Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework of the Study. (Area 2)The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Scope and Limitations. (Area 5)The scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers have to take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments: _______/210

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

GENERAL RULES

1. The research Chapter 1: Introduction will be the Third Quarter Examination.2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Quarte Examination for SH – 3I

and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.3. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your Third Quarterly Examination

composed of seven (7) areas.4. Remember, ALL of the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND

PERFORMANCE TASKS.5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except

for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The

lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before December 18, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Total Score

Lead Researcher: NHOAVEN RAMESOAsst. Lead Researcher: ALLEAH MEA PUTOLResearch Associate: HENSYL – ANNE REYESResearch Associate: JOSEPH TERENCE BALLARESResearch Associate: JHOANA MAE MENDAROSResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points Earned

Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework of the Study. (Area 2)The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Scope and Limitations. (Area 5)The scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers have to take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments: _______/210

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

RUBRICS FOR THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES

1. The research Chapter 1: Introduction will be the Third Quarter Examination.2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Quarter Examination for SH – 3I

and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.3. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your Third Quarterly Examination

composed of seven (7) areas.4. Remember, ALL of the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND

PERFORMANCE TASKS.5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except

for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The

lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before December 18, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Total Score

Lead Researcher: DYNA DAPHNE SALDUAAsst. Lead Researcher: VIZZA MAE LERIOSResearch Associate: ADRIAN OFTANAResearch Associate: FAYE DIOCAMPOResearch Associate: NINIA BIA-ISResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points Earned

Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework of the Study. (Area 2)The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Scope and Limitations. (Area 5)The scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers have to take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments: _______/210

RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001

RUBRICS FOR THIRD QUARTER EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS