Copyright 2015

Assistive Technology Industry Association

ISSN 1938-7261

Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits

Focused Issue: Knowledge Translation and Technology Transfer in Assistive Technology

Winter 2015 Focused Issue

Focused Issue Editor:

Editor:

Joseph P. Lane

Brian W. Wojcik

Center for Assistive Technology

University of Nebraska at Kearney

University at Buffalo (SUNY)

Publication Coordinator:

Caroline Van Howe

Assistive Technology Industry Association

Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits (ATOB) is a collaborative peer-reviewed publication of the Assistive Technology Industry Association (ATIA).

Editing policies of this special issue are based on the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). The content presented herein does not reflect the position or policy of ATIA and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits

Editorial Policy

Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits is a peer-reviewed, cross-disability, transdisciplinary journal that publishes articles related to the benefits and outcomes of assistive technology (AT) across the lifespan. The journals purposes are to (a) foster communication among vendors, AT Specialists, AT Consultants and other professionals that work in the field of AT, family members, and consumers with disabilities; (b) facilitate dialogue regarding effective AT practices; and (c) help practitioners, consumers, and family members advocate for effective AT practices.

Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits (ATOB) invites submission of manuscripts adhering to the format of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.) and which address a broad range of topics related to outcomes and benefits of AT devices and services. Manuscripts may include (a) findings of original scientific research, including group studies and single subject designs; (b) marketing research conducted relevant to specific devices having broad interest across disciplines and disabilities; (c) technical notes regarding AT product development findings; (d) qualitative studies, such as focus group and structured interview findings with consumers and their families regarding AT service delivery and associated outcomes and benefits; and (e) project/program descriptions in which AT outcomes and benefits have been documented.

ATOB will include a broad spectrum of papers on topics specifically dealing with AT outcomes and benefits issues, in (but NOT limited to) the following areas:

Early Childhood and School-Age Populations

Research and Product Development

Outcomes Research

Transitions

Employment

Innovative Program Descriptions

Government Policy

Regardless of primary focus of any submission, primary consideration will be given by the journal to manuscripts presenting quantifiable results.

Submission Categories

Articles may be submitted under two categoriesVoices from the Field and Voices from the Industry.

Voices from the Field

Articles submitted under this category should come from professionals who are involved in some aspect of AT service delivery with persons having disabilities, or from family members and/or consumers with disabilities.

Voices from the Industry

Articles submitted under this category should come from professionals involved in developing and marketing specific AT devices and services.

Within each of these two categories, authors have a range of options for the type of manuscript submitted. Regardless of the type of article submitted, primary consideration will be given by the journal to work that has quantifiable results.

Types of articles that are appropriate include:

Applied/Clinical Research. This category includes original work presented with careful attention to experimental design, objective data analysis, and reference to the literature.

Case Studies. This category includes studies that involve only one or a few subjects or an informal protocol. Publication is justified if the results are potentially significant and have broad appeal to a cross-disciplinary audience.

Design. This category includes descriptions of conceptual or physical design of new AT models, techniques, or devices.

Marketing Research. This category includes industry-based research related to specific AT devices and/or services.

Project/Program Description. This category includes descriptions of grant projects, private foundation activities, institutes, and centers having specific goals and objectives related to AT outcomes and benefits.

In all categories, authors MUST include a section titled Outcomes and Benefits containing a discussion related to outcomes and benefits of the AT devices/services addressed in the article.

For specific manuscript preparation guidelines, contributors should refer to the Guidelines for Authors at http://www.atia.org/atob/authorguidelines

Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits

Focused Issue, Winter 2015

Table of Contents

introduction to atob focused issue on knowledge translation & technology transfer in assistive technology

vii

Joseph P. Lane

Bridging the persistent gap between r&d and application: a historical review of government efforts in the field of assistive technology

1

Joseph P. Lane

Tools for analysis in assistive technology research, development, and production

20

Jennifer L. Flagg

Michelle M. Lockett

James Condron

Joseph P. Lane

Standards for Assistive Technology Funding: What are the Right Criteria?

38

Don Clayback

Rita Hostak

James A. Leahy

Jean Minkel

Margaret Piper

Roger O. Smith

Todd Vaarwerk

Assessing The Roles Of National Organizations In Research-Based Knowledge Creation, Engagement And Translation: Comparative Results Across Three Assistive Technology Application Areas

54

Amanda R. Nobrega

Joseph P. Lane

Jennifer L. Flagg

Vathsala I. Stone

Michelle M. Lockett

Christine Oddo

James A. Leahy

Douglas J. Usiak

effectively communicating knowledge to assistive technology stakeholders: three randomized controlled case studies

98

Vathsala I. Stone

Joseph P. Lane

Machiko R. Tomita

Jennifer L. Flagg

Amanda R. Nobrega

James A. Leahy

Michelle M. Lockett

Christine Oddo

Douglas J. Usiak

Introduction to ATOB Focused Issue on Knowledge Translation & Technology Transfer in Assistive Technology

Joseph P. Lane, MBPA

This focused issue of Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits (ATOB) contains a set of five papers generated through the work of the Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer (KT4TT). The Center on KT4TT was established in 2008 at the University at Buffalo (SUNY), under sponsorship of the National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitative Research (NIDRR), within the U.S. Department of Education.

The five papers address broad questions arising at the intersection of two processes: a) the Technology Transfer process, which is concerned with conveying ownership and control over enabling knowledge codified as intellectual property, and b) the Knowledge Translation process which is concerned with successfully communicating the value of enabling knowledge between the knowledge creator and some targeted knowledge user.

The three broad questions collectively addressed in this special issue are presented in order as follows:

Question 1: What must government agencies and organizations conducting sponsored R&D projects including NIDRR and its Grantees need to know about the technology transfer process in order to optimize the potential for uptake and use of project outputs by relevant stakeholders?

Three of the five papers address this fundamental question. The first paper recounts the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitative Research (NIDRR) history of sponsoring projects designed to improve the process of technology transfer (TT), and the subsequent introduction of projects designed to apply the process of knowledge translation (KT), all for the sake of generating beneficial impacts for society. These TT and KT projects were necessary adjuncts to the on-going sponsored research and development programs established through the Rehabilitation Act of 1974, because those programs were not demonstrating competency at transforming their scholarly research outputs into beneficial social impacts. The technology transfer projects (commencing in 1998) and the knowledge translation projects (commencing in 2008), were attempts the fill the gap between the university scholars who receive the bulk of NIDRR funding on one side, and the NIDRR goal of improving the quality of life for Persons with Disabilities (PWDs).

This first paper, Bridging the Persistent Gap Between R&D and Application: A Historical Review of Government Efforts in the Field of Assistive Technology, is written by Joseph P. Lane who had entered the Assistive Technology field precisely when technology transfer became a funded priority for NIDRR in 1988. Due to his training in business and public administration he was keenly interested in this topic, specifically because he didnt understand why government funded university-based academics to perform technological product and service improvement tasks normally performed by corporate manufact