113
Endodontic Instrumentation Endodontic Instrumentation Endodontic Instrumentation Endodontic Instrumentation With the Virginia Technique With the Virginia Technique With the Virginia Technique With the Virginia Technique Frederick R. Liewehr, DDS, MS

Virginia Technique

  • Upload
    fadimmm

  • View
    124

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Virginia Technique

Endodontic Instrumentation Endodontic Instrumentation Endodontic Instrumentation Endodontic Instrumentation With the Virginia TechniqueWith the Virginia TechniqueWith the Virginia TechniqueWith the Virginia Technique

Frederick R. Liewehr, DDS, MS

Page 2: Virginia Technique

Root Canal Instrumentation

Page 3: Virginia Technique

Aim

After instrumentation the root canal space should be free of bacteria.

This should be achieved without excessively weakening the root or affecting the ability to adequately

restore the tooth.

Page 4: Virginia Technique

Early endodontic access preparation

(No longer practiced at VCU)

Page 5: Virginia Technique

Goerig "Step-down" technique

• Flaring the coronal portion of canal before instrumenting to apex

• Allows deeper penetration of the irrigant

• Eliminates coronal interferences with the files

Christie WH, Peikoff MD. Conservative treatment of apical foramen. J Canad Dent Assn 1980;3:187

Page 6: Virginia Technique

Goerig "Step-down" technique

• Reduces canal curvatures allowing straighter access to the apex

• Removes the bulk of radicular tissue without penetrating apex

• Ideal emergency treatment

Page 7: Virginia Technique

Initial opening• Traditional openings were too small, in the wrong

areas• Canals were missed• Tooth structure misdirected files

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Page 8: Virginia Technique

Let the tooth dictate your access –Simply enlarge access to match pulp chamber

Messing JJ, Stock CJR. A Colour Atalas of Endodontics

Page 9: Virginia Technique

Access improved

Page 10: Virginia Technique

Traditional anterior cingulum access

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Page 11: Virginia Technique

Frequent result – perforation!

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Page 12: Virginia Technique

Missed lingual canal

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Page 13: Virginia Technique

Again - simply enlarge access to match pulp chamber

Again - simply enlarge access to match pulp chamber

Messing JJ, Stock CJR. A Colour Atalas of Endodontics

Page 14: Virginia Technique

Access improved

Page 15: Virginia Technique

Initial openingNeed straight-line access to the apical 1/3

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Page 16: Virginia Technique

File types and File types and File types and File types and techniquestechniquestechniquestechniques

Page 17: Virginia Technique

Stainless Steel K-Files• Square blank twisted to produce the

spiral shaped cutting edges• Flexible in small sizes• Stiffness increases rapidly in larger

sizes• Can be pre-curved

• Excellent for pathfinding, bypassing obstructions and dealing with procedural accidents

•Can cause transportation and perfs

• Square blank twisted to produce the spiral shaped cutting edges

• Flexible in small sizes• Stiffness increases rapidly in larger

sizes• Can be pre-curved

• Excellent for pathfinding, bypassing obstructions and dealing with procedural accidents

•Can cause transportation and perfs

Page 18: Virginia Technique

Stainless Steel Hedstrom Files

• Round blank cut to produce very sharp cutting edges

• Very aggressive, fast dentin removal• Must NEVER be twisted into canal• Insert and cut by pulling outward• Somewhat less strong than K-files due to

cut edges

• Round blank cut to produce very sharp cutting edges

• Very aggressive, fast dentin removal• Must NEVER be twisted into canal• Insert and cut by pulling outward• Somewhat less strong than K-files due to

cut edges

Page 19: Virginia Technique

Nickel Titanium Files•Increased flexibility•Conforms to canal curvature•Memory – straight!•Cannot precurve•Too flexible for pathfinding,

bypassing obstacles, etc.

• Increased flexibility•Conforms to canal curvature•Memory – straight!•Cannot precurve•Too flexible for pathfinding,

bypassing obstacles, etc.

Page 20: Virginia Technique

Stainless Steel K-File

Kink

Page 21: Virginia Technique

Nickel Titanium

No kink

Page 22: Virginia Technique

This can be good or bad, depending on what you are

trying to accomplish• If you are instrumenting a canal,

the file tends to stay centered –good…

• If you are trying to bypass an instrument or ledge, the file tends to stay centered – bad!

Page 23: Virginia Technique

Taper

No, this is not crown and bridge!

Page 24: Virginia Technique

What is Taper?

0.96 mm diameter increase

0.02 taper

D16

0.06 taper

0.32 mm diameter increase

D16 D1

D1

Taper is expressed in mm diameter increase per mm length

Page 25: Virginia Technique

How much is enough?

• Schilder said we need to develop a continuously tapering form for debridement and resistance form

• Black’s principles, modified by Ingle and Bakland, said our form must be dictated by the internal anatomy of the canal

• Some canals do NOT have a continuously tapering form

• So, the taper we select must match the anatomy of the canal.

Page 26: Virginia Technique

Some canals have a lot of taper…

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1mm 40

2mm 60 .20

3mm 100 .40

4mm 110 .10

5mm 100 -.10

6mm 110 .10

7mm 130 .20

8mm 150 .20

Distance from Size Taperapex

Average taper = 0.157 mm/mm

Page 27: Virginia Technique

Some canals have very little

1mm 30

2mm 30 0

3mm 30 0

4mm 30 0

5mm 30 0

6mm 35 .05

7mm 45 .10

8mm 55 .10

9mm 60 .05

10mm 50 -.10

Distance from Size Taperapex

Average taper = 0.027 mm/mm

Page 28: Virginia Technique

Files tend to bind and cut coronally, where they are largest, and not apically where we think they are binding, leaving the coronal

portion overinstrumented and weak, and the apical portion underinstrumented and

infected.

The problem with excessive taper

Binds here

Not here

Page 29: Virginia Technique

All files with a long cutting edge exhibit taper, and the modern trend is to more and

more taper. This, however, is not appropriate for all canals. For those canals a non-tapered (LightSpeed), or minimally tapered (0.02) file

must be used

The problem with excessive taper

Page 30: Virginia Technique

Misconception about Ni-Ti• “Superflexibility” somehow negates

characteristics of other metals– Increasing size -> increasing stiffness– Increasing taper -> increasing stiffness

• Reality – There is no magic!

Page 31: Virginia Technique

Do those look flexible to you?

Page 32: Virginia Technique

How do we create taper if we don’t use very tapered instruments?

Step - Back Technique

By increasing file size in “steps” of 1mm as you “back out” coronally

Taper = 0.05

Page 33: Virginia Technique

Proper taper

• The appropriate taper for a canal is that which it had initially

• Occasionally we have to increase the taper slightly to allow for our obturation technique

• Any dentin we remove, however, will weaken the tooth

• So, we must err toward conservatism

• The appropriate taper for a canal is that which it had initially

• Occasionally we have to increase the taper slightly to allow for our obturation technique

• Any dentin we remove, however, will weaken the tooth

• So, we must err toward conservatism

Page 34: Virginia Technique

Proper taper

• For most molars and some premolars, rotary files having 0.04 and and 0.06 taper will produce approximately the correct taper

• Excessive taper will cause strip perforations

• Insufficient taper is not really a problem• So, err toward less taper

• For most molars and some premolars, rotary files having 0.04 and and 0.06 taper will produce approximately the correct taper

• Excessive taper will cause strip perforations

• Insufficient taper is not really a problem• So, err toward less taper

Page 35: Virginia Technique

Proper file size

• Some rotary systems are available with only small tip sizes (e.g. <40)

• This is due to an erroneous belief that:– All canals are tapering– All canals are small at the apex

• Research shows that these assumptions are not true

• Therefore, the apical portion may need to be prepared with hand instruments or LightSpeed Taper?

Page 36: Virginia Technique

Proper file size

• In rotary systems that are available with tip sizes >40, tapers larger than 0.02 can lead to excessive coronal sizes and resulting strip perfs

Principles & Practice of Endodontics, Walton & Torabinejad, Saunders, 2002

Page 37: Virginia Technique

But I thought more taper was better?

• 0.06 taper means the file size enlarges by 0.06 mm/mm

• If the tip size is 40, and• The length is 16mm, then• 16 x 0.06 = 0.96• Add to tip size 40 = size 136 • A GT 0.12 would be 40 + 1.92 = size 231!

Page 38: Virginia Technique

Proper file size

Since file taper should match canal taper– The only reason to exceed the natural

taper is to facilitate GP cone placement– In larger canal sizes, this is no problem

• Therefore, in teeth with large canals, less tapered files are indicated

Canal is BIG and almost straight!

Page 39: Virginia Technique

Proper file size

• This means that in many maxillary anteriors and many premolars rotary instruments are not indicated or needed

• It is often faster to instrument teeth with large canals with Hedstrom files than with rotary instruments!

Page 40: Virginia Technique

Be sure you instrument to a large enough size apically!

Page 41: Virginia Technique

Why is the preparation size important?

Why is the preparation size important?

Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!

Page 42: Virginia Technique

Apical size chart

• Based on morphological studies• Not a rule but a starting point• Adjust for each individual tooth

Tooth Initial file size Final file size

MAXILLARY ARCH

Central 45 60

Lateral 40 (30 if curved) 55 (45 if curved)

Canine 45 60

Premolar B: 25, P: 30; 1 canal: 40 B: 40, P: 45; 1 canal: 55

Molar MB: 25, DB: 25, P: 40 MB: 40, DB: 40, P: 55

MANDIBULAR ARCH

Anterior B: 25, L: 25; 1 canal 40 B: 40, L: 40; 1 canal 55

Canine 40 55

Premolar B: 25, L: 30; 1 canal 45 B: 40, L: 45; 1 canal 60

Molar MB: 25, ML: 25, D: 40 MB: 40, ML: 40, D: 55

Page 43: Virginia Technique

Clinical ProceduresClinical Procedures

Page 44: Virginia Technique

Clinical Procedures

1. Determine canal

configuration

Page 45: Virginia Technique

Clinical Procedures

1a. Estimate working length

Expose a parallel X- Ray

Page 46: Virginia Technique

Pre-op film employs the XCP instrument to produce a parallel radiograph

Why parallel?

Clinical Procedures

Page 47: Virginia Technique

Parallel films have the least distortionand allow measurements to be made

with reasonable accuracy

Clinical Procedures

Page 48: Virginia Technique

Purple – tooth planeRed – Film planeLight blue – bisecting angle

a b

A - with instrumentB – without instrument

Paralleling requires a film holder

Bisecting angle reduces but does not eliminate distortion

Clinical Procedures

Page 49: Virginia Technique

Do not fixate on the apex only!

Evaluate root curvature!

Page 50: Virginia Technique

1b. Estimate canal curvature

Clinical Procedures

http://www.gearjammin.com/twisty/

Page 51: Virginia Technique

Clinical Procedures

Do NOT use rotaries in highly curved canals!Do NOT use rotaries in highly curved canals!

Page 52: Virginia Technique

1c. Determine canal form

Clinical Procedures

http://www.holylandmarket.com/html/731.htm

Page 53: Virginia Technique

Determine canal form

Small Medium Large

Rotary - OK Rotary - OK Rotary - NO

Page 54: Virginia Technique

2. Obtain straight line access

Clinical Procedures

Page 55: Virginia Technique

What burs do we need?

• #4 or #6 high-speed round carbide

• D11-T equivalent diamond or Endo-Z bur

• #4 or #6 high-speed round carbide

• D11-T equivalent diamond or Endo-Z bur

Page 56: Virginia Technique

Access the chamber…Access the chamber…

Then let the internal anatomy dictate your outline formThen let the internal anatomy dictate your outline form

Page 57: Virginia Technique

Initial opening• Remove caries and defective

restorations

• High speed round #4 or 6 for penetration into pulp chamber

• Aim for largest canal

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Page 58: Virginia Technique

Watch for procedural errors!

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Page 59: Virginia Technique

Initial opening• After penetration,

enlarge by cutting on withdrawal

• Locate largest canal, follow road map on chamber floor

• Endo explorer to locate canals

Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the Pulp, 7th Ed.

Page 60: Virginia Technique

AnteriorsXXXXIncorrect Correct

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Penetrate, then cut on

withdrawal

Page 61: Virginia Technique

Posteriors

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Penetrate, then cut on

withdrawal

Page 62: Virginia Technique

Enlargement

• Access preparation is a dynamic process

• Conservation of tooth structure is SECONDARYto convenience form

• Access opening should NEVER bind or guide instruments

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Oops!

Binding

Page 63: Virginia Technique

Remove the cervical bulge!

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Pull up

Then smooth

Page 64: Virginia Technique

Completed access

• Continuously tapering, conical form desired

• Use a 1 DT diamond for outline form

Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.

Page 65: Virginia Technique

3. Explore canal patency

Clinical Procedures

Page 66: Virginia Technique

Pass a small, precurved file to the apex

Clinical Procedures

Page 67: Virginia Technique

4. Estimate canal size (use chart + x-ray)

Clinical Procedures

Page 68: Virginia Technique

Tooth Initial file size Final file size

MAXILLARY ARCH

Central 45 60

Lateral 40 (30 if curved) 55 (45 if curved)

Canine 45 60

Premolar B: 25, P: 30; 1 canal: 40 B: 40, P: 45; 1 canal: 55

Molar MB: 25, DB: 25, P: 40 MB: 40, DB: 40, P: 55

MANDIBULAR ARCH

Anterior B: 25, L: 25; 1 canal 40 B: 40, L: 40; 1 canal 55

Canine 40 55

Premolar B: 25, L: 30; 1 canal 45 B: 40, L: 45; 1 canal 60

Molar MB: 25, ML: 25, D: 40 MB: 40, ML: 40, D: 55

Apical Size Chart

Page 69: Virginia Technique

Notice the variation in canal size

Rotaries are not designed for large canals!

Page 70: Virginia Technique

5. Establish initial working length (IWL)

Clinical Procedures

Page 71: Virginia Technique

Initial working length• Study pre-op radiographs to determine the

approximate length to the apex• Subtract 4mm; this is the IWL

IWL4mm

Page 72: Virginia Technique

Rotary technique

• NEVER force a rotary instrument• Use only light pressure (similar to

writing)• Use intermittent tapping motion• Listen to handpiece, reduce pressure if

it slows down (this does NOT work in non-battery powered handpieces)

• Always use a torque-reverse handpiece

Page 73: Virginia Technique

Rotary technique

• All instrumentation is PASSIVE• Instruments are chosen because they

very nearly fit to length (1-2mm)• As they rotate, they clean and smooth• 3 sizes allows sufficient dentin removal

for mechanical disinfection and smoothing without weakening the tooth

• All instrumentation is PASSIVE• Instruments are chosen because they

very nearly fit to length (1-2mm)• As they rotate, they clean and smooth• 3 sizes allows sufficient dentin removal

for mechanical disinfection and smoothing without weakening the tooth

Page 74: Virginia Technique

6. Prepare coronal 1/3 with orifice shapers

Clinical Procedures

Page 75: Virginia Technique

Prepare coronal 1/3 with Orifice Shapers:

Initial working length minus 4mm (apex – 8 mm)Begin with size that nearly reaches the IWL – 4 mm passively, increase 3 sizes (less if too much binding occurs)

Clinical Procedures

Page 76: Virginia Technique

STRAIGHT-LINEACCESS

IWLIWL

IWL - 4IWL - 4

Coronal Flaring: Orifice ShapersCoronal Flaring: Orifice Shapers

Page 77: Virginia Technique

Irrigation & RC Prep are essential!

Clinical Procedures

Page 78: Virginia Technique

Why irrigate and recapitulate?

Mud here…Causes perf hereAnd failure here!

Page 79: Virginia Technique

Recapitulation and Apical clearing

• Canal is like a snow globe• An absorbent point would

remove the liquid but not the snow

• It would pack into the bottom of the globe, or apex of the tooth

• Snow, or dentinal “mud”, must be removed mechanically

Page 80: Virginia Technique

Instrument with a “tapping” motionLight pressure (like writing with a pen)NO MORE THAN 1MM AT A TIME !!!!!!!

Clinical Procedures

Page 81: Virginia Technique

Prepare coronal 1/3 with Orifice Shapers:Initial Working Length minus 4 mmIrrigation & RC PrepInstrument with a “pecking” motionLight pressure (like writing with a pen)NO MORE THAN 1MM AT A TIME !!!!!!!Small to large orifice openers until largest at approximately IWL - 4

Clinical Procedures

Page 82: Virginia Technique

Important note!

• The Virginia technique is PASSIVE• NEVER force an instrument• If it doesn’t tap easily to the IWL-4,

accept the new, shorter length• Continue to tap the instruments only as

far as they go without causing the handpiece to autoreverse

Page 83: Virginia Technique

Very large, non-tapered canals

• If you can insert all the orifice openers to the IWL-4 or beyond, the canal is too large for rotary instrumentation with a long cutting edge instrument like a ProFile

• Hand instrumentation or the LightSpeed system should be used

• Consult your instructor before proceeding

Page 84: Virginia Technique

0.06 taper files

Clinical Procedures

7. Prepare mid 1/3 with 0.06 tapers

Page 85: Virginia Technique

IWL

Prepare coronal 2/3 with 0.06 tapersSelect size that passively almost reaches IWL, instrument 3 sizes moreEndpoint is the Initial Working Length

Prepare coronal 2/3 with 0.06 tapersSelect size that passively almost reaches IWL, instrument 3 sizes moreEndpoint is the Initial Working Length

Clinical Procedures

Page 86: Virginia Technique

8. Determine the exact length to foramen

Clinical Procedures

Page 87: Virginia Technique

How long should we go?

Page 88: Virginia Technique

Cementum

Dentin

Mesial view of an anterior tooth

The Apical Foramen

"Natural" constriction in the apical area 0.25 to 0.5 from the

radiographic apex = MINOR FORAMEN

Minor foramen

Page 89: Virginia Technique

Mesial view of an anterior tooth

0.5 to 1 mm

Standard radiographic view

The Apical Foramen

Cementum

Dentin

Note: File is long, but it looks

short on the radiograph!

Page 90: Virginia Technique

Instrument Length

Aim:As close to minor foramen as

possible. Realize that the radiographic apex is not necessarily

the anatomic apex!

Page 91: Virginia Technique

Instrument Length

Ideal

Page 92: Virginia Technique

Instrument Length

Final Working length

will be ~1mm from radiographic

apex

Page 93: Virginia Technique

Instrument Length

Can I "feel“ the apex?-Only useful with crown-down technique

-Not reliable

-Use only in conjunction with

other techniques

Page 94: Virginia Technique

How about apex locators?

Studies suggest ever-increasing accuracy

Still remain technique-sensitive

Do not work in all cases

Useful adjunct, but can be difficult to interpret

Need a combination of techniques for accuracy

Page 95: Virginia Technique

Radiographic DeterminationStill the “gold standard”!

“Endo Ray” instrument allows paralleling radiograph with instruments in place

Page 96: Virginia Technique

Radiographic Determination

Ideal placement

Page 97: Virginia Technique

Radiographic Determination

Short Long

Page 98: Virginia Technique

Shift shot

• Always make 2 radiographs from slightly different angles

• Aids in overcoming 2-D limitation

Page 99: Virginia Technique

Radiographic Determination

Hedstrom and K files make canal identification easy!

Page 100: Virginia Technique

9. Prepare apical 1/3 with 0.04 ISO

tapers from small to large

Clinical Procedures

Page 101: Virginia Technique

Working lengthWorking length

Prepare the apical 1/ 3Prepare the apical 1/ 3

Page 102: Virginia Technique

Coat a 0.04 hand file the same size as the file you used to take your FWL radiograph with RC PrepPlace it to the FWL using a watch-winding motionRotate it clockwise until it is loose in the canal

Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3

Page 103: Virginia Technique

Irrigate copiouslyCoat the next larger file with RC PrepWork it to the FWL using a watch-winding motionRotate it clockwise until it is loose in the canal

Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3

Page 104: Virginia Technique

Continue to repeat these steps for three file sizes.Recapitulate – after irrigating, replace the original file size to the FWL and watch wind to place if necessary. Then irrigate.This will remove any accumulated dentinal “mud”

Continue to repeat these steps for three file sizes.Recapitulate – after irrigating, replace the original file size to the FWL and watch wind to place if necessary. Then irrigate.This will remove any accumulated dentinal “mud”

Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3

Page 105: Virginia Technique

Now, begin step back as follows:Place the next larger size in the same fashion, but only to the FWL – 1mm.Work the file in the same fashion as previously

Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3

Page 106: Virginia Technique

Repeat this twice, with the next larger size, to FWL –2and FWL –3This will give you a “step back” taper

Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3

Page 107: Virginia Technique

Finally, recapitulate, irrigate, and smooth the steps by using the last size you took to the FWL in an up-and-down filing motionThis file size is your master apical file, which will dictate the size of your master gutta percha cone

Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3

Page 108: Virginia Technique

Important note…

• Instrumentation near the apex is dangerous• Many endodontists complete the apical 1/3

entirely with hand instruments• However, the use of carefully controlled

rotaries can result in a smoother transition• Once you have sufficient experience, the

alternate technique for finishing should provide a smoother preparation

Page 109: Virginia Technique

• After instrumenting to the WL for three file sizes past the file used to determine your FWL, instead of the stepback, simply:

• Place the next larger size 0.04 taper Profile in the handpiece and gently tap it to the WL

• Be careful not to pass the WL!

Instrumentation of the apical 1/3: alternative to step-back

Instrumentation of the apical 1/3: alternative to step-back

Page 110: Virginia Technique

Remember:• NEVER attempt to instrument a canal

with a rotary instrument that you have not already instrumented to the FWL with at least a size 25 hand instrument

Page 111: Virginia Technique

Remember:• Always use any instrument, hand or

rotary, with RC Prep for lubrication• Be sure to irrigate copiously after each

file

Page 112: Virginia Technique

Remember:

• Apical clearing is NOT recapitulation!

• It consists of:– Drying the canal– Rotating (by hand) without

pressure the last size file used(master apical file)

Page 113: Virginia Technique

Irrigate copiously, dry, apically clear, and you are…