Upload
fadimmm
View
124
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Endodontic Instrumentation Endodontic Instrumentation Endodontic Instrumentation Endodontic Instrumentation With the Virginia TechniqueWith the Virginia TechniqueWith the Virginia TechniqueWith the Virginia Technique
Frederick R. Liewehr, DDS, MS
Root Canal Instrumentation
Aim
After instrumentation the root canal space should be free of bacteria.
This should be achieved without excessively weakening the root or affecting the ability to adequately
restore the tooth.
Early endodontic access preparation
(No longer practiced at VCU)
Goerig "Step-down" technique
• Flaring the coronal portion of canal before instrumenting to apex
• Allows deeper penetration of the irrigant
• Eliminates coronal interferences with the files
Christie WH, Peikoff MD. Conservative treatment of apical foramen. J Canad Dent Assn 1980;3:187
Goerig "Step-down" technique
• Reduces canal curvatures allowing straighter access to the apex
• Removes the bulk of radicular tissue without penetrating apex
• Ideal emergency treatment
Initial opening• Traditional openings were too small, in the wrong
areas• Canals were missed• Tooth structure misdirected files
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
Let the tooth dictate your access –Simply enlarge access to match pulp chamber
Messing JJ, Stock CJR. A Colour Atalas of Endodontics
Access improved
Traditional anterior cingulum access
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
Frequent result – perforation!
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
Missed lingual canal
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
Again - simply enlarge access to match pulp chamber
Again - simply enlarge access to match pulp chamber
Messing JJ, Stock CJR. A Colour Atalas of Endodontics
Access improved
Initial openingNeed straight-line access to the apical 1/3
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
File types and File types and File types and File types and techniquestechniquestechniquestechniques
Stainless Steel K-Files• Square blank twisted to produce the
spiral shaped cutting edges• Flexible in small sizes• Stiffness increases rapidly in larger
sizes• Can be pre-curved
• Excellent for pathfinding, bypassing obstructions and dealing with procedural accidents
•Can cause transportation and perfs
• Square blank twisted to produce the spiral shaped cutting edges
• Flexible in small sizes• Stiffness increases rapidly in larger
sizes• Can be pre-curved
• Excellent for pathfinding, bypassing obstructions and dealing with procedural accidents
•Can cause transportation and perfs
Stainless Steel Hedstrom Files
• Round blank cut to produce very sharp cutting edges
• Very aggressive, fast dentin removal• Must NEVER be twisted into canal• Insert and cut by pulling outward• Somewhat less strong than K-files due to
cut edges
• Round blank cut to produce very sharp cutting edges
• Very aggressive, fast dentin removal• Must NEVER be twisted into canal• Insert and cut by pulling outward• Somewhat less strong than K-files due to
cut edges
Nickel Titanium Files•Increased flexibility•Conforms to canal curvature•Memory – straight!•Cannot precurve•Too flexible for pathfinding,
bypassing obstacles, etc.
• Increased flexibility•Conforms to canal curvature•Memory – straight!•Cannot precurve•Too flexible for pathfinding,
bypassing obstacles, etc.
Stainless Steel K-File
Kink
Nickel Titanium
No kink
This can be good or bad, depending on what you are
trying to accomplish• If you are instrumenting a canal,
the file tends to stay centered –good…
• If you are trying to bypass an instrument or ledge, the file tends to stay centered – bad!
Taper
No, this is not crown and bridge!
What is Taper?
0.96 mm diameter increase
0.02 taper
D16
0.06 taper
0.32 mm diameter increase
D16 D1
D1
Taper is expressed in mm diameter increase per mm length
How much is enough?
• Schilder said we need to develop a continuously tapering form for debridement and resistance form
• Black’s principles, modified by Ingle and Bakland, said our form must be dictated by the internal anatomy of the canal
• Some canals do NOT have a continuously tapering form
• So, the taper we select must match the anatomy of the canal.
Some canals have a lot of taper…
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1mm 40
2mm 60 .20
3mm 100 .40
4mm 110 .10
5mm 100 -.10
6mm 110 .10
7mm 130 .20
8mm 150 .20
Distance from Size Taperapex
Average taper = 0.157 mm/mm
Some canals have very little
1mm 30
2mm 30 0
3mm 30 0
4mm 30 0
5mm 30 0
6mm 35 .05
7mm 45 .10
8mm 55 .10
9mm 60 .05
10mm 50 -.10
Distance from Size Taperapex
Average taper = 0.027 mm/mm
Files tend to bind and cut coronally, where they are largest, and not apically where we think they are binding, leaving the coronal
portion overinstrumented and weak, and the apical portion underinstrumented and
infected.
The problem with excessive taper
Binds here
Not here
All files with a long cutting edge exhibit taper, and the modern trend is to more and
more taper. This, however, is not appropriate for all canals. For those canals a non-tapered (LightSpeed), or minimally tapered (0.02) file
must be used
The problem with excessive taper
Misconception about Ni-Ti• “Superflexibility” somehow negates
characteristics of other metals– Increasing size -> increasing stiffness– Increasing taper -> increasing stiffness
• Reality – There is no magic!
Do those look flexible to you?
How do we create taper if we don’t use very tapered instruments?
Step - Back Technique
By increasing file size in “steps” of 1mm as you “back out” coronally
Taper = 0.05
Proper taper
• The appropriate taper for a canal is that which it had initially
• Occasionally we have to increase the taper slightly to allow for our obturation technique
• Any dentin we remove, however, will weaken the tooth
• So, we must err toward conservatism
• The appropriate taper for a canal is that which it had initially
• Occasionally we have to increase the taper slightly to allow for our obturation technique
• Any dentin we remove, however, will weaken the tooth
• So, we must err toward conservatism
Proper taper
• For most molars and some premolars, rotary files having 0.04 and and 0.06 taper will produce approximately the correct taper
• Excessive taper will cause strip perforations
• Insufficient taper is not really a problem• So, err toward less taper
• For most molars and some premolars, rotary files having 0.04 and and 0.06 taper will produce approximately the correct taper
• Excessive taper will cause strip perforations
• Insufficient taper is not really a problem• So, err toward less taper
Proper file size
• Some rotary systems are available with only small tip sizes (e.g. <40)
• This is due to an erroneous belief that:– All canals are tapering– All canals are small at the apex
• Research shows that these assumptions are not true
• Therefore, the apical portion may need to be prepared with hand instruments or LightSpeed Taper?
Proper file size
• In rotary systems that are available with tip sizes >40, tapers larger than 0.02 can lead to excessive coronal sizes and resulting strip perfs
Principles & Practice of Endodontics, Walton & Torabinejad, Saunders, 2002
But I thought more taper was better?
• 0.06 taper means the file size enlarges by 0.06 mm/mm
• If the tip size is 40, and• The length is 16mm, then• 16 x 0.06 = 0.96• Add to tip size 40 = size 136 • A GT 0.12 would be 40 + 1.92 = size 231!
Proper file size
Since file taper should match canal taper– The only reason to exceed the natural
taper is to facilitate GP cone placement– In larger canal sizes, this is no problem
• Therefore, in teeth with large canals, less tapered files are indicated
Canal is BIG and almost straight!
Proper file size
• This means that in many maxillary anteriors and many premolars rotary instruments are not indicated or needed
• It is often faster to instrument teeth with large canals with Hedstrom files than with rotary instruments!
Be sure you instrument to a large enough size apically!
Why is the preparation size important?
Why is the preparation size important?
Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!Bacteria!
Apical size chart
• Based on morphological studies• Not a rule but a starting point• Adjust for each individual tooth
Tooth Initial file size Final file size
MAXILLARY ARCH
Central 45 60
Lateral 40 (30 if curved) 55 (45 if curved)
Canine 45 60
Premolar B: 25, P: 30; 1 canal: 40 B: 40, P: 45; 1 canal: 55
Molar MB: 25, DB: 25, P: 40 MB: 40, DB: 40, P: 55
MANDIBULAR ARCH
Anterior B: 25, L: 25; 1 canal 40 B: 40, L: 40; 1 canal 55
Canine 40 55
Premolar B: 25, L: 30; 1 canal 45 B: 40, L: 45; 1 canal 60
Molar MB: 25, ML: 25, D: 40 MB: 40, ML: 40, D: 55
Clinical ProceduresClinical Procedures
Clinical Procedures
1. Determine canal
configuration
Clinical Procedures
1a. Estimate working length
Expose a parallel X- Ray
Pre-op film employs the XCP instrument to produce a parallel radiograph
Why parallel?
Clinical Procedures
Parallel films have the least distortionand allow measurements to be made
with reasonable accuracy
Clinical Procedures
Purple – tooth planeRed – Film planeLight blue – bisecting angle
a b
A - with instrumentB – without instrument
Paralleling requires a film holder
Bisecting angle reduces but does not eliminate distortion
Clinical Procedures
Do not fixate on the apex only!
Evaluate root curvature!
1b. Estimate canal curvature
Clinical Procedures
http://www.gearjammin.com/twisty/
Clinical Procedures
Do NOT use rotaries in highly curved canals!Do NOT use rotaries in highly curved canals!
1c. Determine canal form
Clinical Procedures
http://www.holylandmarket.com/html/731.htm
Determine canal form
Small Medium Large
Rotary - OK Rotary - OK Rotary - NO
2. Obtain straight line access
Clinical Procedures
What burs do we need?
• #4 or #6 high-speed round carbide
• D11-T equivalent diamond or Endo-Z bur
• #4 or #6 high-speed round carbide
• D11-T equivalent diamond or Endo-Z bur
Access the chamber…Access the chamber…
Then let the internal anatomy dictate your outline formThen let the internal anatomy dictate your outline form
Initial opening• Remove caries and defective
restorations
• High speed round #4 or 6 for penetration into pulp chamber
• Aim for largest canal
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
Watch for procedural errors!
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
Initial opening• After penetration,
enlarge by cutting on withdrawal
• Locate largest canal, follow road map on chamber floor
• Endo explorer to locate canals
Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the Pulp, 7th Ed.
AnteriorsXXXXIncorrect Correct
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
Penetrate, then cut on
withdrawal
Posteriors
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
Penetrate, then cut on
withdrawal
Enlargement
• Access preparation is a dynamic process
• Conservation of tooth structure is SECONDARYto convenience form
• Access opening should NEVER bind or guide instruments
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
Oops!
Binding
Remove the cervical bulge!
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
Pull up
Then smooth
Completed access
• Continuously tapering, conical form desired
• Use a 1 DT diamond for outline form
Ingle JI, Beveridge EE. Endodontics 2nd Ed.
3. Explore canal patency
Clinical Procedures
Pass a small, precurved file to the apex
Clinical Procedures
4. Estimate canal size (use chart + x-ray)
Clinical Procedures
Tooth Initial file size Final file size
MAXILLARY ARCH
Central 45 60
Lateral 40 (30 if curved) 55 (45 if curved)
Canine 45 60
Premolar B: 25, P: 30; 1 canal: 40 B: 40, P: 45; 1 canal: 55
Molar MB: 25, DB: 25, P: 40 MB: 40, DB: 40, P: 55
MANDIBULAR ARCH
Anterior B: 25, L: 25; 1 canal 40 B: 40, L: 40; 1 canal 55
Canine 40 55
Premolar B: 25, L: 30; 1 canal 45 B: 40, L: 45; 1 canal 60
Molar MB: 25, ML: 25, D: 40 MB: 40, ML: 40, D: 55
Apical Size Chart
Notice the variation in canal size
Rotaries are not designed for large canals!
5. Establish initial working length (IWL)
Clinical Procedures
Initial working length• Study pre-op radiographs to determine the
approximate length to the apex• Subtract 4mm; this is the IWL
IWL4mm
Rotary technique
• NEVER force a rotary instrument• Use only light pressure (similar to
writing)• Use intermittent tapping motion• Listen to handpiece, reduce pressure if
it slows down (this does NOT work in non-battery powered handpieces)
• Always use a torque-reverse handpiece
Rotary technique
• All instrumentation is PASSIVE• Instruments are chosen because they
very nearly fit to length (1-2mm)• As they rotate, they clean and smooth• 3 sizes allows sufficient dentin removal
for mechanical disinfection and smoothing without weakening the tooth
• All instrumentation is PASSIVE• Instruments are chosen because they
very nearly fit to length (1-2mm)• As they rotate, they clean and smooth• 3 sizes allows sufficient dentin removal
for mechanical disinfection and smoothing without weakening the tooth
6. Prepare coronal 1/3 with orifice shapers
Clinical Procedures
Prepare coronal 1/3 with Orifice Shapers:
Initial working length minus 4mm (apex – 8 mm)Begin with size that nearly reaches the IWL – 4 mm passively, increase 3 sizes (less if too much binding occurs)
Clinical Procedures
STRAIGHT-LINEACCESS
IWLIWL
IWL - 4IWL - 4
Coronal Flaring: Orifice ShapersCoronal Flaring: Orifice Shapers
Irrigation & RC Prep are essential!
Clinical Procedures
Why irrigate and recapitulate?
Mud here…Causes perf hereAnd failure here!
Recapitulation and Apical clearing
• Canal is like a snow globe• An absorbent point would
remove the liquid but not the snow
• It would pack into the bottom of the globe, or apex of the tooth
• Snow, or dentinal “mud”, must be removed mechanically
Instrument with a “tapping” motionLight pressure (like writing with a pen)NO MORE THAN 1MM AT A TIME !!!!!!!
Clinical Procedures
Prepare coronal 1/3 with Orifice Shapers:Initial Working Length minus 4 mmIrrigation & RC PrepInstrument with a “pecking” motionLight pressure (like writing with a pen)NO MORE THAN 1MM AT A TIME !!!!!!!Small to large orifice openers until largest at approximately IWL - 4
Clinical Procedures
Important note!
• The Virginia technique is PASSIVE• NEVER force an instrument• If it doesn’t tap easily to the IWL-4,
accept the new, shorter length• Continue to tap the instruments only as
far as they go without causing the handpiece to autoreverse
Very large, non-tapered canals
• If you can insert all the orifice openers to the IWL-4 or beyond, the canal is too large for rotary instrumentation with a long cutting edge instrument like a ProFile
• Hand instrumentation or the LightSpeed system should be used
• Consult your instructor before proceeding
0.06 taper files
Clinical Procedures
7. Prepare mid 1/3 with 0.06 tapers
IWL
Prepare coronal 2/3 with 0.06 tapersSelect size that passively almost reaches IWL, instrument 3 sizes moreEndpoint is the Initial Working Length
Prepare coronal 2/3 with 0.06 tapersSelect size that passively almost reaches IWL, instrument 3 sizes moreEndpoint is the Initial Working Length
Clinical Procedures
8. Determine the exact length to foramen
Clinical Procedures
How long should we go?
Cementum
Dentin
Mesial view of an anterior tooth
The Apical Foramen
"Natural" constriction in the apical area 0.25 to 0.5 from the
radiographic apex = MINOR FORAMEN
Minor foramen
Mesial view of an anterior tooth
0.5 to 1 mm
Standard radiographic view
The Apical Foramen
Cementum
Dentin
Note: File is long, but it looks
short on the radiograph!
Instrument Length
Aim:As close to minor foramen as
possible. Realize that the radiographic apex is not necessarily
the anatomic apex!
Instrument Length
Ideal
Instrument Length
Final Working length
will be ~1mm from radiographic
apex
Instrument Length
Can I "feel“ the apex?-Only useful with crown-down technique
-Not reliable
-Use only in conjunction with
other techniques
How about apex locators?
Studies suggest ever-increasing accuracy
Still remain technique-sensitive
Do not work in all cases
Useful adjunct, but can be difficult to interpret
Need a combination of techniques for accuracy
Radiographic DeterminationStill the “gold standard”!
“Endo Ray” instrument allows paralleling radiograph with instruments in place
Radiographic Determination
Ideal placement
Radiographic Determination
Short Long
Shift shot
• Always make 2 radiographs from slightly different angles
• Aids in overcoming 2-D limitation
Radiographic Determination
Hedstrom and K files make canal identification easy!
9. Prepare apical 1/3 with 0.04 ISO
tapers from small to large
Clinical Procedures
Working lengthWorking length
Prepare the apical 1/ 3Prepare the apical 1/ 3
Coat a 0.04 hand file the same size as the file you used to take your FWL radiograph with RC PrepPlace it to the FWL using a watch-winding motionRotate it clockwise until it is loose in the canal
Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3
Irrigate copiouslyCoat the next larger file with RC PrepWork it to the FWL using a watch-winding motionRotate it clockwise until it is loose in the canal
Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3
Continue to repeat these steps for three file sizes.Recapitulate – after irrigating, replace the original file size to the FWL and watch wind to place if necessary. Then irrigate.This will remove any accumulated dentinal “mud”
Continue to repeat these steps for three file sizes.Recapitulate – after irrigating, replace the original file size to the FWL and watch wind to place if necessary. Then irrigate.This will remove any accumulated dentinal “mud”
Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3
Now, begin step back as follows:Place the next larger size in the same fashion, but only to the FWL – 1mm.Work the file in the same fashion as previously
Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3
Repeat this twice, with the next larger size, to FWL –2and FWL –3This will give you a “step back” taper
Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3
Finally, recapitulate, irrigate, and smooth the steps by using the last size you took to the FWL in an up-and-down filing motionThis file size is your master apical file, which will dictate the size of your master gutta percha cone
Instrumentation of the apical 1/3Instrumentation of the apical 1/3
Important note…
• Instrumentation near the apex is dangerous• Many endodontists complete the apical 1/3
entirely with hand instruments• However, the use of carefully controlled
rotaries can result in a smoother transition• Once you have sufficient experience, the
alternate technique for finishing should provide a smoother preparation
• After instrumenting to the WL for three file sizes past the file used to determine your FWL, instead of the stepback, simply:
• Place the next larger size 0.04 taper Profile in the handpiece and gently tap it to the WL
• Be careful not to pass the WL!
Instrumentation of the apical 1/3: alternative to step-back
Instrumentation of the apical 1/3: alternative to step-back
Remember:• NEVER attempt to instrument a canal
with a rotary instrument that you have not already instrumented to the FWL with at least a size 25 hand instrument
Remember:• Always use any instrument, hand or
rotary, with RC Prep for lubrication• Be sure to irrigate copiously after each
file
Remember:
• Apical clearing is NOT recapitulation!
• It consists of:– Drying the canal– Rotating (by hand) without
pressure the last size file used(master apical file)
Irrigate copiously, dry, apically clear, and you are…