110
2019 VISTA PRINCIPAL SURVEY 1

VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

2019 VISTA PRINCIPAL SURVEY

1

Page 2: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

OverviewSurvey Methodology, Design, and Report StructureThe Views on Instruction, State Standards, Teaching, and Assessment (VISTA) survey is an annual survey sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). VISTA gives educators a voice directly with the state on issues specific to education in Massachusetts. DESE will use educator feedback to improve statewide implementation, inform current and future policies, and better target state resources and supports.

In the 2019 administration, data collection began in mid-January and closed in mid-March. All Massachusetts principals were invited to participate. Principals from 40% (n = 729) of the state’s schools participated in the survey. Superintendents also participated in the 2019 VISTA survey, and a separate report includes results from the superintendent survey. Survey findings are weighted to represent all Massachusetts districts and schools.

The 2019 VISTA Principal Survey included five sections.

1. Demographic Questions 2. Educator Effectiveness 3. State Curriculum Frameworks 4. Social and Emotional Learning, Health, and Safety 5. DESE Overall Support

This report is broken down by section and includes tabular data for all selected-response (e.g., multiple choice) survey questions. Non-numeric open-ended text response questions are not included in this report.

In order to protect respondent confidentiality, the report does not include response data if a survey question had fewer than six respondents and/or if all respondents or all but one respondent selected a single response option.

See the VISTA webpage (MA VISTA Research) for more information about the VISTA study. The VISTA webpage includes more details about the study, additional reports, and copies of the VISTA surveys.

Data TablesThese tables present detailed aggregated data for each survey question in the principal survey, grouped by section. There are multiple rows for each survey item, with a separate row for each possible response to that item; each row in the table is a unique item-response combination. Each table displays

2

Page 3: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

#: Survey question number, which includes a suffix referring to sub-item (e.g., A1a or B2), Matrix_Text: The introductory text for items grouped in a matrix or list (e.g., What grade levels does your school serve? or Thinking

across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.),

Item_Text: The full text of the item (e.g., All or Assessments created or selected by teachers.), Response: Each response option for the item (e.g., Yes or Strongly Aligned), EstType: Estimate type (for categorical and ordinal items, the estimate is the weighted percent; for continuous items, the estimate is the

weighted mean), Est.: The weighted estimate, CI: The 95% confidence interval around the estimate, and N: The total number of participants who responded to the item.

The sum of weighted percentages across all response options within each item sum to approximately 100, with some exceptions due to rounding. These percentages and means have been produced by applying survey weights to the survey responses, and are referred to as “estimates” because they reflect the estimated percentage or mean from the full population (i.e., all districts or schools) even though only a subset of the population completed the survey. Each estimate has associated standard error and confidence interval, which are statistical measures of the reliability of this estimate.

The 95% confidence intervals can be used to approximate tests of statistical significance when comparing results between two items. For example, 26 percent of schools have principals who say, on average, most (51 to 75%) ELA lessons used teacher-created resources (item C2d), while 23 percent have principals who say, on average, most (51 to 75%) math lessons use teacher-created resources (item C4d). These percentages are different, but we know both percentages are estimates. Can we conclude that fewer schools have principals who say most math lessons use teacher-created resources? In other words, is 23 statistically significant from 26? For ELA, the confidence interval ranges from 24 to 29 percent. For mathematics, the confidence interval ranges from 21 to 26 percent. These two ranges overlap, which indicates that 23 is not significantly different from 26. In other words, there are not significantly more schools with principals who say that most ELA lessons used teacher-created resources compared to those who say that most math lessons do so.

3

Page 4: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

Table 1. Demographic QuestionsThe first section of the survey includes questions about survey respondents’ experience in an administrative role and about their schools. Responses from this section may be used to understand how to target resources and supports based on school profile.

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Na1a What grade levels does your school serve? All Grades, Pre-K-12 No Percent 99% 98% - 99% 729a1a What grade levels does your school serve? All Grades, Pre-K-12 Yes Percent 1% 1% - 2% 729a1b What grade levels does your school serve? All Grades, K-12 No Percent 99% 98% - 100% 729a1b What grade levels does your school serve? All Grades, K-12 Yes Percent 1% 0% - 2% 729a1c What grade levels does your school serve? Pre-K No Percent 73% 70% - 76% 729a1c What grade levels does your school serve? Pre-K Yes Percent 27% 24% - 30% 729a1d What grade levels does your school serve? Kindergarten No Percent 50% 46% - 53% 729a1d What grade levels does your school serve? Kindergarten Yes Percent 50% 47% - 54% 729a1e What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 1 No Percent 48% 45% - 51% 729a1e What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 1 Yes Percent 52% 49% - 55% 729a1f What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 2 No Percent 49% 46% - 52% 729a1f What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 2 Yes Percent 51% 48% - 54% 729a1g What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 3 No Percent 50% 47% - 53% 729a1g What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 3 Yes Percent 50% 47% - 53% 729a1h What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 4 No Percent 52% 49% - 55% 729a1h What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 4 Yes Percent 48% 45% - 51% 729a1i What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 5 No Percent 55% 52% - 58% 729a1i What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 5 Yes Percent 45% 42% - 48% 729a1j What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 6 No Percent 71% 68% - 74% 729a1j What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 6 Yes Percent 29% 26% - 32% 729a1k What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 7 No Percent 75% 72% - 77% 729a1k What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 7 Yes Percent 25% 23% - 28% 729a1l What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 8 No Percent 74% 71% - 76% 729a1l What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 8 Yes Percent 26% 24% - 29% 729a1m What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 9 No Percent 78% 75% - 80% 729a1m What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 9 Yes Percent 22% 20% - 25% 729a1n What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 10 No Percent 77% 75% - 80% 729a1n What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 10 Yes Percent 23% 20% - 25% 729a1o What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 11 No Percent 77% 75% - 80% 729a1o What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 11 Yes Percent 23% 20% - 25% 729a1p What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 12 No Percent 77% 75% - 80% 729a1p What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 12 Yes Percent 23% 20% - 25% 729a1q What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 13 (students aged 18-22) No Percent 90% 88% - 92% 729a1q What grade levels does your school serve? Grade 13 (students aged 18-22) Yes Percent 10% 8% - 12% 729a2 Including the current school year (2018- Mean 11 11 - 11 NA

4

Page 5: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl N19), how long have you worked as a school-level administrator?

5

Page 6: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

Table 2. Educator Effectiveness (hiring, developing, evaluating, and retaining effective educators)DESE aims to ensure that all students have access to highly skilled educators by supporting opportunities to identify, develop, support, and retain highly effective educators. The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves:

setting high standards for educators, identifying and evaluating all educators based on those standards through the Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation, ensuring the provision of useful and timely feedback, and providing high quality mentoring and targeted professional development to support ongoing growth and development.

DESE supports educator effectiveness by providing schools and districts with training materials and resources, meaningful guidance, and timely communications, and regularly engages educators in the ongoing refinement of these supports and their implementation.

This section of the survey gathers feedback on respondents’ views on hiring, developing, and retaining effective educators in their school, as well as activities associated with evaluating and supporting educator growth and development.

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nb1a What proportion of your new hires are secured

using the following sources?Grow-your-own models (including internship/apprenticeship route for administrators or an approved district-based licensure program)

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 65% 61% - 68% 645

b1a What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Grow-your-own models (including internship/apprenticeship route for administrators or an approved district-based licensure program)

Some (25 to 50%) Percent 26% 24% - 29% 645

b1a What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Grow-your-own models (including internship/apprenticeship route for administrators or an approved district-based licensure program)

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 6% 5% - 8% 645

b1a What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Grow-your-own models (including internship/apprenticeship route for administrators or an approved district-based licensure program)

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 3% 2% - 4% 645

b1b What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Partnership(s) with traditional teacher/administrator preparation providers

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 54% 50% - 57% 650

b1b What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Partnership(s) with traditional teacher/administrator preparation providers

Some (25 to 50%) Percent 30% 27% - 33% 650

6

Page 7: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nb1b What proportion of your new hires are secured

using the following sources?Partnership(s) with traditional teacher/administrator preparation providers

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 8% 7% - 10% 650

b1b What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Partnership(s) with traditional teacher/administrator preparation providers

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 8% 6% - 10% 650

b1c What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Partnership(s) with alternative teacher/administrator preparation providers

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 86% 83% - 88% 621

b1c What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Partnership(s) with alternative teacher/administrator preparation providers

Some (25 to 50%) Percent 11% 8% - 13% 621

b1c What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Partnership(s) with alternative teacher/administrator preparation providers

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 2% 1% - 4% 621

b1c What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Partnership(s) with alternative teacher/administrator preparation providers

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 2% 1% - 3% 621

b1d What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Individuals placed in our district for student teaching or as administrative interns

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 54% 50% - 57% 661

b1d What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Individuals placed in our district for student teaching or as administrative interns

Some (25 to 50%) Percent 37% 34% - 40% 661

b1d What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Individuals placed in our district for student teaching or as administrative interns

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 7% 6% - 8% 661

b1d What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Individuals placed in our district for student teaching or as administrative interns

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 3% 2% - 4% 661

b1e What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

General recruitment efforts (e.g., online job posting, job fairs)

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 9% 8% - 12% 676

b1e What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

General recruitment efforts (e.g., online job posting, job fairs)

Some (25 to 50%) Percent 17% 15% - 20% 676

b1e What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

General recruitment efforts (e.g., online job posting, job fairs)

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 30% 27% - 33% 676

b1e What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

General recruitment efforts (e.g., online job posting, job fairs)

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 43% 40% - 46% 676

b1f What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Targeted recruitment efforts (e.g., head hunting)

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 83% 80% - 86% 626

b1f What proportion of your new hires are secured Targeted recruitment efforts (e.g., head Some (25 to 50%) Percent 11% 9% - 13% 626

7

Page 8: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nusing the following sources? hunting)

b1f What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Targeted recruitment efforts (e.g., head hunting)

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 4% 3% - 5% 626

b1f What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Targeted recruitment efforts (e.g., head hunting)

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 2% 1% - 4% 626

b1g What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Word of mouth/referral from existing staff Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 36% 34% - 39% 651

b1g What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Word of mouth/referral from existing staff Some (25 to 50%) Percent 49% 46% - 52% 651

b1g What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Word of mouth/referral from existing staff Most (51 to 75%) Percent 10% 8% - 12% 651

b1g What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Word of mouth/referral from existing staff All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 4% 3% - 6% 651

b1h What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Other (specify) Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 89% 84% - 93% 127

b1h What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Other (specify) Some (25 to 50%) Percent 7% 4% - 12% 127

b1h What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Other (specify) Most (51 to 75%) Percent 3% 1% - 6% 127

b1h What proportion of your new hires are secured using the following sources?

Other (specify) All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 1% 1% - 3% 127

b2 How frequently are you able to hire an ideal candidate for a teacher vacancy?

All of the time Percent 12% 10% - 14% 694

b2 How frequently are you able to hire an ideal candidate for a teacher vacancy?

Most of the time Percent 60% 57% - 62% 694

b2 How frequently are you able to hire an ideal candidate for a teacher vacancy?

Some of the time Percent 25% 23% - 28% 694

b2 How frequently are you able to hire an ideal candidate for a teacher vacancy?

I am usually unable to hire an ideal candidate

Percent 3% 2% - 4% 694

b3a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements relative to your own professional development.

I have received sufficient training, resources, and supports to cultivate a culturally responsive school environment.

Disagree Strongly Percent 2% 2% - 4% 693

b3a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements relative to your own professional development.

I have received sufficient training, resources, and supports to cultivate a culturally responsive school environment.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 10% 8% - 12% 693

b3a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements relative to your own professional development.

I have received sufficient training, resources, and supports to cultivate a culturally responsive school environment.

Agree Somewhat Percent 51% 48% - 54% 693

b3a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements relative to your own professional development.

I have received sufficient training, resources, and supports to cultivate a culturally responsive school environment.

Agree Strongly Percent 37% 34% - 40% 693

8

Page 9: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nb3b Please indicate your agreement with the following

statements relative to your own professional development.

I have appropriate content knowledge to evaluate the teaching staff in my school.

Disagree Strongly Percent 0% 0% - 1% 693

b3b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements relative to your own professional development.

I have appropriate content knowledge to evaluate the teaching staff in my school.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 1% 0% - 2% 693

b3b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements relative to your own professional development.

I have appropriate content knowledge to evaluate the teaching staff in my school.

Agree Somewhat Percent 28% 25% - 30% 693

b3b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements relative to your own professional development.

I have appropriate content knowledge to evaluate the teaching staff in my school.

Agree Strongly Percent 71% 69% - 74% 693

b4a Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Individual choice/autonomy in offerings Don't use Percent 5% 4% - 7% 682

b4a Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Individual choice/autonomy in offerings Low use Percent 18% 16% - 21% 682

b4a Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Individual choice/autonomy in offerings Moderate use Percent 43% 39% - 46% 682

b4a Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Individual choice/autonomy in offerings Significant use Percent 34% 31% - 38% 682

b4b Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

District-level coaching support Don't use Percent 11% 10% - 13% 688

b4b Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

District-level coaching support Low use Percent 28% 26% - 31% 688

b4b Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

District-level coaching support Moderate use Percent 32% 29% - 34% 688

b4b Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

District-level coaching support Significant use Percent 29% 26% - 31% 688

b4c Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

School-level coaching support Don't use Percent 6% 5% - 7% 689

b4c Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional

School-level coaching support Low use Percent 18% 15% - 20% 689

9

Page 10: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Ndevelopment for teachers?

b4c Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

School-level coaching support Moderate use Percent 30% 27% - 32% 689

b4c Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

School-level coaching support Significant use Percent 47% 44% - 50% 689

b4d Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Dedicated time during the school year Don't use Percent 1% 0% - 1% 689

b4d Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Dedicated time during the school year Low use Percent 5% 4% - 7% 689

b4d Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Dedicated time during the school year Moderate use Percent 32% 29% - 35% 689

b4d Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Dedicated time during the school year Significant use Percent 62% 60% - 65% 689

b4e Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Dedicated time during the school day Don't use Percent 5% 4% - 6% 688

b4e Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Dedicated time during the school day Low use Percent 26% 24% - 29% 688

b4e Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Dedicated time during the school day Moderate use Percent 39% 36% - 42% 688

b4e Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Dedicated time during the school day Significant use Percent 30% 27% - 33% 688

b4f Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Monetary incentives (e.g., stipends) Don't use Percent 35% 32% - 38% 679

b4f Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Monetary incentives (e.g., stipends) Low use Percent 36% 33% - 40% 679

b4f Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Monetary incentives (e.g., stipends) Moderate use Percent 20% 18% - 22% 679

b4f Which incentives/structures does your school use Monetary incentives (e.g., stipends) Significant use Percent 9% 8% - 11% 679

10

Page 11: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nto support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

b4g Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Professional development points (PDPs) Don't use Percent 2% 1% - 3% 688

b4g Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Professional development points (PDPs) Low use Percent 9% 7% - 11% 688

b4g Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Professional development points (PDPs) Moderate use Percent 28% 25% - 30% 688

b4g Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Professional development points (PDPs) Significant use Percent 62% 59% - 65% 688

b4h Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Connection to educator evaluation system Don't use Percent 4% 3% - 5% 684

b4h Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Connection to educator evaluation system Low use Percent 21% 19% - 24% 684

b4h Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Connection to educator evaluation system Moderate use Percent 41% 39% - 44% 684

b4h Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Connection to educator evaluation system Significant use Percent 34% 31% - 37% 684

b4i Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Teacher-led professional development Don't use Percent 2% 1% - 3% 691

b4i Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Teacher-led professional development Low use Percent 17% 15% - 20% 691

b4i Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Teacher-led professional development Moderate use Percent 49% 46% - 52% 691

b4i Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Teacher-led professional development Significant use Percent 31% 29% - 34% 691

b4j Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Cross-district learning teams/networks Don't use Percent 15% 13% - 18% 681

11

Page 12: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nb4j Which incentives/structures does your school use

to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Cross-district learning teams/networks Low use Percent 35% 32% - 39% 681

b4j Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Cross-district learning teams/networks Moderate use Percent 34% 31% - 38% 681

b4j Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Cross-district learning teams/networks Significant use Percent 15% 13% - 18% 681

b4k Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Other (specify): Don't use Percent 79% 70% - 86% 73

b4k Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Other (specify): Low use Percent 5% 3% - 7% 73

b4k Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Other (specify): Moderate use Percent 8% 3% - 18% 73

b4k Which incentives/structures does your school use to support meaningful, high quality professional development for teachers?

Other (specify): Significant use Percent 8% 4% - 16% 73

b5a1 Please identify the rubric(s) used by your district for principal/school administrator evaluations. Please select all that apply.

2018 updated model rubric No Percent 44% 40% - 47% 687

b5a1 Please identify the rubric(s) used by your district for principal/school administrator evaluations. Please select all that apply.

2018 updated model rubric Yes Percent 56% 53% - 60% 687

b5a2 Please identify the rubric(s) used by your district for principal/school administrator evaluations. Please select all that apply.

2012 original model rubric No Percent 67% 64% - 70% 687

b5a2 Please identify the rubric(s) used by your district for principal/school administrator evaluations. Please select all that apply.

2012 original model rubric Yes Percent 33% 30% - 36% 687

b5a3 Please identify the rubric(s) used by your district for principal/school administrator evaluations. Please select all that apply.

District-specific rubric No Percent 87% 84% - 89% 687

b5a3 Please identify the rubric(s) used by your district for principal/school administrator evaluations. Please select all that apply.

District-specific rubric Yes Percent 13% 11% - 16% 687

b5a4 Please identify the rubric(s) used by your district for principal/school administrator evaluations.

Don't use a specific rubric No Percent 98% 96% - 98% 687

12

Page 13: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl NPlease select all that apply.

b5a4 Please identify the rubric(s) used by your district for principal/school administrator evaluations. Please select all that apply.

Don't use a specific rubric Yes Percent 2% 2% - 4% 687

b6a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the principal/school administrator evaluation system used in your district.

The principal evaluation system is effective in identifying outstanding school leaders.

Disagree Strongly Percent 6% 5% - 8% 686

b6a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the principal/school administrator evaluation system used in your district.

The principal evaluation system is effective in identifying outstanding school leaders.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 18% 16% - 21% 686

b6a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the principal/school administrator evaluation system used in your district.

The principal evaluation system is effective in identifying outstanding school leaders.

Agree Somewhat Percent 63% 60% - 66% 686

b6a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the principal/school administrator evaluation system used in your district.

The principal evaluation system is effective in identifying outstanding school leaders.

Agree Strongly Percent 12% 10% - 15% 686

b6b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the principal/school administrator evaluation system used in your district.

The feedback I receive as part of the evaluation process includes specific ways to improve my practice.

Disagree Strongly Percent 8% 6% - 10% 686

b6b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the principal/school administrator evaluation system used in your district.

The feedback I receive as part of the evaluation process includes specific ways to improve my practice.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 19% 17% - 21% 686

b6b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the principal/school administrator evaluation system used in your district.

The feedback I receive as part of the evaluation process includes specific ways to improve my practice.

Agree Somewhat Percent 52% 48% - 55% 686

b6b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the principal/school administrator evaluation system used in your district.

The feedback I receive as part of the evaluation process includes specific ways to improve my practice.

Agree Strongly Percent 21% 19% - 24% 686

b7a1 Please identify the rubric(s) used by you for classroom teacher evaluations.

2018 updated model rubric No Percent 45% 42% - 49% 687

b7a1 Please identify the rubric(s) used by you for classroom teacher evaluations.

2018 updated model rubric Yes Percent 55% 51% - 58% 687

b7a2 Please identify the rubric(s) used by you for 2012 original model rubric No Percent 66% 63% - 69% 687

13

Page 14: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nclassroom teacher evaluations.

b7a2 Please identify the rubric(s) used by you for classroom teacher evaluations.

2012 original model rubric Yes Percent 34% 31% - 37% 687

b7a3 Please identify the rubric(s) used by you for classroom teacher evaluations.

District-specific rubric No Percent 81% 78% - 84% 687

b7a3 Please identify the rubric(s) used by you for classroom teacher evaluations.

District-specific rubric Yes Percent 19% 16% - 22% 687

b7a4 Please identify the rubric(s) used by you for classroom teacher evaluations.

Don't use a specific rubric No Percent 100% 100% - 100% 687

b7a4 Please identify the rubric(s) used by you for classroom teacher evaluations.

Don't use a specific rubric Yes Percent 0% 0% - 0% 687

b8a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the teacher evaluation system used in your district.

The evaluation system used in my school is effective in identifying outstanding teachers.

Disagree Strongly Percent 2% 1% - 4% 685

b8a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the teacher evaluation system used in your district.

The evaluation system used in my school is effective in identifying outstanding teachers.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 10% 8% - 11% 685

b8a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the teacher evaluation system used in your district.

The evaluation system used in my school is effective in identifying outstanding teachers.

Agree Somewhat Percent 54% 51% - 57% 685

b8a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the teacher evaluation system used in your district.

The evaluation system used in my school is effective in identifying outstanding teachers.

Agree Strongly Percent 34% 31% - 37% 685

b8b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the teacher evaluation system used in your district.

The evaluation system used in my school is an effective tool to support teacher growth and development.

Disagree Strongly Percent 3% 2% - 4% 685

b8b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the teacher evaluation system used in your district.

The evaluation system used in my school is an effective tool to support teacher growth and development.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 11% 9% - 13% 685

b8b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the teacher evaluation system used in your district.

The evaluation system used in my school is an effective tool to support teacher growth and development.

Agree Somewhat Percent 54% 50% - 57% 685

b8b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements about the teacher evaluation system used in your district.

The evaluation system used in my school is an effective tool to support teacher growth and development.

Agree Strongly Percent 33% 29% - 36% 685

b9a Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Most effective Providing them with regular, positive feedback and/or informal critical feedback

Percent 47% 44% - 50% 683

b9a Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective

Most effective Identifying and supporting them in

Percent 10% 8% - 12% 683

14

Page 15: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nteachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

specific areas of professional development

b9a Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Most effective Publicly recognizing their accomplishments

Percent 3% 2% - 5% 683

b9a Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Most effective Informing them that they are high performing and having intentional 'stay' conversations

Percent 5% 4% - 7% 683

b9a Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Most effective Identifying formal opportunities/paths for teacher leader roles or putting them in charge of something

Percent 11% 9% - 13% 683

b9a Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Most effective Providing them with access to additional resources for their classrooms

Percent 2% 2% - 3% 683

b9a Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Most effective Emphasizing collaborative learning/planning time with other effective colleagues

Percent 20% 18% - 23% 683

b9a Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Most effective Other (specify) Percent 1% 1% - 2% 683

b9b Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Second most effective Providing them with regular, positive feedback and/or informal critical feedback

Percent 16% 14% - 19% 680

b9b Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Second most effective Identifying and supporting them in specific areas of professional development

Percent 26% 23% - 28% 680

b9b Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Second most effective Publicly recognizing their accomplishments

Percent 8% 6% - 10% 680

15

Page 16: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nb9b Which of the following retention strategies are

the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Second most effective Informing them that they are high performing and having intentional 'stay' conversations

Percent 8% 6% - 10% 680

b9b Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Second most effective Identifying formal opportunities/paths for teacher leader roles or putting them in charge of something

Percent 16% 14% - 18% 680

b9b Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Second most effective Providing them with access to additional resources for their classrooms

Percent 8% 7% - 11% 680

b9b Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Second most effective Emphasizing collaborative learning/planning time with other effective colleagues

Percent 18% 16% - 20% 680

b9b Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Second most effective Other (specify) Percent 1% 0% - 1% 680

b9c Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Third most effective Providing them with regular, positive feedback and/or informal critical feedback

Percent 13% 11% - 15% 675

b9c Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Third most effective Identifying and supporting them in specific areas of professional development

Percent 16% 14% - 18% 675

b9c Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Third most effective Publicly recognizing their accomplishments

Percent 11% 9% - 13% 675

b9c Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Third most effective Informing them that they are high performing and having intentional 'stay' conversations

Percent 7% 5% - 9% 675

b9c Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective

Third most effective Identifying formal opportunities/paths for teacher leader roles or

Percent 20% 17% - 22% 675

16

Page 17: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nstrategies for your school. putting them in charge of

somethingb9c Which of the following retention strategies are

the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Third most effective Providing them with access to additional resources for their classrooms

Percent 12% 10% - 14% 675

b9c Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Third most effective Emphasizing collaborative learning/planning time with other effective colleagues

Percent 21% 19% - 23% 675

b9c Which of the following retention strategies are the most effective in retaining your most effective teachers? Please select the three most effective strategies for your school.

Third most effective Other (specify) Percent 1% 1% - 2% 675

b10a Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Retirement Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 55% 52% - 58% 645

b10a Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Retirement Some (26 to 50%) Percent 14% 12% - 16% 645

b10a Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Retirement Most (51 to 75%) Percent 12% 10% - 15% 645

b10a Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Retirement All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 19% 17% - 22% 645

b10b Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Personal/family reasons Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 75% 72% - 77% 617

b10b Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Personal/family reasons Some (26 to 50%) Percent 21% 19% - 24% 617

b10b Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Personal/family reasons Most (51 to 75%) Percent 3% 2% - 5% 617

b10b Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Personal/family reasons All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 1% 1% - 2% 617

b10c Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Career switch or pursuing an additional degree

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 91% 89% - 93% 580

17

Page 18: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nb10c Over the last three years, what percentage of

your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Career switch or pursuing an additional degree

Some (26 to 50%) Percent 8% 7% - 11% 580

b10c Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Career switch or pursuing an additional degree

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 1% 0% - 1% 580

b10c Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Career switch or pursuing an additional degree

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 0% 0% - 1% 580

b10d Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Better compensation in another district Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 77% 74% - 80% 595

b10d Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Better compensation in another district Some (26 to 50%) Percent 15% 13% - 18% 595

b10d Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Better compensation in another district Most (51 to 75%) Percent 5% 4% - 7% 595

b10d Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Better compensation in another district All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 2% 2% - 4% 595

b10e Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

School climate/working conditions Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 88% 85% - 89% 591

b10e Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

School climate/working conditions Some (26 to 50%) Percent 10% 8% - 12% 591

b10e Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

School climate/working conditions Most (51 to 75%) Percent 2% 1% - 3% 591

b10e Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

School climate/working conditions All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 1% 0% - 2% 591

b10f Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Intentional conversations about their individual performance

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 71% 68% - 73% 609

b10f Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Intentional conversations about their individual performance

Some (26 to 50%) Percent 22% 20% - 25% 609

b10f Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for

Intentional conversations about their individual performance

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 5% 4% - 6% 609

18

Page 19: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Neach of the following reasons?

b10f Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Intentional conversations about their individual performance

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 2% 2% - 4% 609

b10g Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Other (specify): Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 76% 67% - 83% 86

b10g Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Other (specify): Some (26 to 50%) Percent 13% 8% - 21% 86

b10g Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Other (specify): Most (51 to 75%) Percent 4% 2% - 9% 86

b10g Over the last three years, what percentage of your teachers who departed your school left for each of the following reasons?

Other (specify): All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 7% 4% - 11% 86

b11a Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Recruitment efforts including proactive pipeline development work (e.g., strategically coordinating student teachers, running internship/apprenticeship programs for administrators)

No Need Percent 17% 14% - 20% 660

b11a Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Recruitment efforts including proactive pipeline development work (e.g., strategically coordinating student teachers, running internship/apprenticeship programs for administrators)

Low Priority Percent 25% 23% - 28% 660

b11a Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Recruitment efforts including proactive pipeline development work (e.g., strategically coordinating student teachers, running internship/apprenticeship programs for administrators)

Moderate Priority Percent 31% 29% - 34% 660

b11a Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Recruitment efforts including proactive pipeline development work (e.g., strategically coordinating student teachers, running internship/apprenticeship programs for administrators)

High Priority Percent 27% 24% - 29% 660

b11b Prioritize the areas in which you would like to Hiring the right candidate for a position No Need Percent 26% 23% - 29% 659

19

Page 20: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nreceive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

b11b Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Hiring the right candidate for a position Low Priority Percent 29% 27% - 33% 659

b11b Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Hiring the right candidate for a position Moderate Priority Percent 23% 20% - 25% 659

b11b Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Hiring the right candidate for a position High Priority Percent 22% 19% - 25% 659

b11c Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Induction and mentoring No Need Percent 15% 12% - 17% 665

b11c Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Induction and mentoring Low Priority Percent 26% 23% - 29% 665

b11c Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Induction and mentoring Moderate Priority Percent 36% 34% - 39% 665

b11c Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Induction and mentoring High Priority Percent 23% 21% - 26% 665

b11d Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Teacher placement/assignment No Need Percent 29% 26% - 33% 658

b11d Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Teacher placement/assignment Low Priority Percent 38% 35% - 42% 658

b11d Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Teacher placement/assignment Moderate Priority Percent 23% 20% - 26% 658

b11d Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Teacher placement/assignment High Priority Percent 9% 7% - 11% 658

b11e Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Supervision and evaluation No Need Percent 16% 14% - 18% 668

b11e Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Supervision and evaluation Low Priority Percent 25% 23% - 28% 668

20

Page 21: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nb11e Prioritize the areas in which you would like to

receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Supervision and evaluation Moderate Priority Percent 34% 31% - 37% 668

b11e Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Supervision and evaluation High Priority Percent 25% 22% - 28% 668

b11f Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Professional development No Need Percent 8% 6% - 9% 666

b11f Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Professional development Low Priority Percent 13% 11% - 15% 666

b11f Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Professional development Moderate Priority Percent 35% 32% - 39% 666

b11f Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Professional development High Priority Percent 44% 41% - 47% 666

b11g Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Recognition and advancement No Need Percent 15% 12% - 17% 657

b11g Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Recognition and advancement Low Priority Percent 30% 27% - 32% 657

b11g Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Recognition and advancement Moderate Priority Percent 39% 35% - 42% 657

b11g Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Recognition and advancement High Priority Percent 17% 15% - 20% 657

b11h Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Basic human resource functions (e.g., licensure, payroll, legal)

No Need Percent 20% 17% - 22% 654

b11h Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Basic human resource functions (e.g., licensure, payroll, legal)

Low Priority Percent 35% 32% - 38% 654

b11h Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Basic human resource functions (e.g., licensure, payroll, legal)

Moderate Priority Percent 31% 28% - 34% 654

b11h Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to

Basic human resource functions (e.g., licensure, payroll, legal)

High Priority Percent 14% 12% - 16% 654

21

Page 22: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nfoster workforce effectiveness.

b11i Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Data collection, tracking and analyses specific to your workforce

No Need Percent 16% 14% - 19% 658

b11i Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Data collection, tracking and analyses specific to your workforce

Low Priority Percent 29% 26% - 33% 658

b11i Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Data collection, tracking and analyses specific to your workforce

Moderate Priority Percent 35% 31% - 38% 658

b11i Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Data collection, tracking and analyses specific to your workforce

High Priority Percent 20% 17% - 23% 658

b11j Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Other (specify): No Need Percent 61% 50% - 71% 63

b11j Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Other (specify): Low Priority Percent 6% 3% - 13% 63

b11j Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Other (specify): Moderate Priority Percent 12% 7% - 20% 63

b11j Prioritize the areas in which you would like to receive additional DESE support and resources to foster workforce effectiveness.

Other (specify): High Priority Percent 21% 14% - 31% 63

22

Page 23: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

Table 3. State Curriculum FrameworksThe Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks are designed to increase academic aspirations and raise expectations for learning. DESE aims to support Massachusetts educators in implementing high quality instruction that is aligned to our state’s strong standards by

setting and measuring high expectations, deepening professional learning for educators, and supporting child-first instruction.

The Next Generation Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (NextGen MCAS) is aligned to those high standards and designed to provide feedback on student progress in attaining the standards.

Questions in this section of the survey address respondents’ views on the alignment, instructional support for, and implementation of the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks (English Language Arts, Mathematics, History and Social Science, and Science and Technology/Engineering) in their schools.

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nc1a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully

implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the ELA/Literacy curriculum across each classroom.

No Need Percent 6% 5% - 8% 657

c1a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the ELA/Literacy curriculum across each classroom.

Low Priority Percent 17% 14% - 19% 657

c1a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the ELA/Literacy curriculum across each classroom.

Moderate Priority Percent 36% 33% - 39% 657

c1a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the ELA/Literacy curriculum across each classroom.

High Priority Percent 41% 38% - 44% 657

c1b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

No Need Percent 6% 5% - 8% 657

c1b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

Low Priority Percent 16% 14% - 18% 657

23

Page 24: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nc1b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully

implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

Moderate Priority Percent 39% 35% - 42% 657

c1b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

High Priority Percent 39% 36% - 42% 657

c1c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): No Need Percent 58% 45% - 69% 59

c1c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): Low Priority Percent 0% 0% - 0% 59

c1c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): Moderate Priority Percent 10% 4% - 20% 59

c1c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): High Priority Percent 33% 23% - 44% 59

c2a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 15% 13% - 18% 660

c2a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Some (26 to 50%) Percent 21% 19% - 24% 660

c2a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 33% 30% - 37% 660

c2a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 30% 27% - 33% 660

c2b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 26% 24% - 29% 658

c2b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the

District-developed curriculum Some (26 to 50%) Percent 26% 24% - 29% 658

24

Page 25: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nfollowing instructional materials?

c2b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum Most (51 to 75%) Percent 28% 25% - 31% 658

c2b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 20% 18% - 22% 658

c2c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 14% 12% - 16% 659

c2c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Some (26 to 50%) Percent 46% 43% - 50% 659

c2c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Most (51 to 75%) Percent 28% 25% - 31% 659

c2c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 11% 9% - 13% 659

c2d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 17% 15% - 20% 659

c2d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Some (26 to 50%) Percent 45% 41% - 48% 659

c2d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Most (51 to 75%) Percent 26% 24% - 29% 659

c2d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 12% 10% - 14% 659

25

Page 26: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nc2e Over the course of the school year, on average,

what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 78% 68% - 86% 53

c2e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): Some (26 to 50%) Percent 5% 2% - 14% 53

c2e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): Most (51 to 75%) Percent 6% 2% - 15% 53

c2e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 11% 6% - 18% 53

c3a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the mathematics curriculum across each classroom.

No Need Percent 6% 5% - 8% 655

c3a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the mathematics curriculum across each classroom.

Low Priority Percent 12% 10% - 15% 655

c3a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the mathematics curriculum across each classroom.

Moderate Priority Percent 33% 31% - 36% 655

c3a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the mathematics curriculum across each classroom.

High Priority Percent 48% 46% - 51% 655

c3b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

No Need Percent 5% 4% - 6% 657

c3b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

Low Priority Percent 12% 10% - 14% 657

c3b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

Moderate Priority Percent 39% 35% - 42% 657

26

Page 27: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nc3b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully

implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

High Priority Percent 45% 42% - 48% 657

c3c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): No Need Percent 58% 48% - 67% 58

c3c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): Low Priority Percent 4% 1% - 11% 58

c3c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): Moderate Priority Percent 13% 8% - 21% 58

c3c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): High Priority Percent 25% 19% - 33% 58

c4a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 10% 9% - 12% 655

c4a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Some (26 to 50%) Percent 15% 13% - 17% 655

c4a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 33% 30% - 36% 655

c4a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 42% 39% - 45% 655

c4b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 38% 34% - 41% 650

c4b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum Some (26 to 50%) Percent 25% 22% - 27% 650

c4b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum Most (51 to 75%) Percent 23% 20% - 26% 650

c4b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 15% 13% - 17% 650

c4c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use

Teacher-selected resources Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 20% 18% - 23% 653

27

Page 28: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Neach of the following instructional materials?

c4c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Some (26 to 50%) Percent 45% 42% - 49% 653

c4c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Most (51 to 75%) Percent 25% 22% - 28% 653

c4c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 9% 8% - 11% 653

c4d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 24% 21% - 26% 653

c4d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Some (26 to 50%) Percent 43% 40% - 47% 653

c4d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Most (51 to 75%) Percent 23% 21% - 26% 653

c4d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 10% 8% - 12% 653

c4e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 70% 59% - 79% 57

c4e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): Some (26 to 50%) Percent 11% 6% - 20% 57

c4e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): Most (51 to 75%) Percent 11% 6% - 21% 57

c4e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Mathematics lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 8% 4% - 16% 57

c5a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Which curricula are best aligned. No Need Percent 4% 3% - 5% 646

c5a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Which curricula are best aligned. Low Priority Percent 11% 9% - 14% 646

c5a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully Which curricula are best aligned. Moderate Priority Percent 37% 34% - 40% 646

28

Page 29: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nimplement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

c5a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Which curricula are best aligned. High Priority Percent 48% 45% - 51% 646

c5b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Developing Curriculum that is well aligned. No Need Percent 3% 2% - 5% 647

c5b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Developing Curriculum that is well aligned. Low Priority Percent 9% 7% - 11% 647

c5b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Developing Curriculum that is well aligned. Moderate Priority Percent 33% 30% - 35% 647

c5b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Developing Curriculum that is well aligned. High Priority Percent 56% 53% - 59% 647

c5c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the History and Social Science curriculum across each classroom.

No Need Percent 2% 1% - 4% 646

c5c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the History and Social Science curriculum across each classroom.

Low Priority Percent 8% 6% - 10% 646

c5c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the History and Social Science curriculum across each classroom.

Moderate Priority Percent 36% 33% - 39% 646

c5c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the History and Social Science curriculum across each classroom.

High Priority Percent 54% 51% - 57% 646

c5d Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

No Need Percent 3% 2% - 4% 646

c5d Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

Low Priority Percent 13% 11% - 15% 646

c5d Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

Moderate Priority Percent 38% 34% - 41% 646

29

Page 30: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl NCurriculum Frameworks.

c5d Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

High Priority Percent 46% 43% - 50% 646

c5e Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Other (specify): No Need Percent 56% 44% - 68% 49

c5e Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Other (specify): Low Priority Percent 5% 2% - 12% 49

c5e Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Other (specify): Moderate Priority Percent 12% 6% - 23% 49

c5e Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2018 History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks.

Other (specify): High Priority Percent 27% 18% - 38% 49

c6a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 29% 26% - 32% 651

c6a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Some (26 to 50%) Percent 34% 30% - 37% 651

c6a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 27% 24% - 30% 651

c6a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 10% 8% - 13% 651

c6b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 34% 31% - 38% 651

c6b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum Some (26 to 50%) Percent 32% 29% - 36% 651

c6b Over the course of the school year, on average, District-developed curriculum Most (51 to 75%) Percent 21% 19% - 24% 651

30

Page 31: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nwhat percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

c6b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 12% 10% - 14% 651

c6c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 8% 7% - 10% 651

c6c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Some (26 to 50%) Percent 39% 36% - 43% 651

c6c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Most (51 to 75%) Percent 34% 31% - 38% 651

c6c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 19% 16% - 21% 651

c6d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 12% 10% - 14% 651

c6d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Some (26 to 50%) Percent 37% 34% - 40% 651

c6d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Most (51 to 75%) Percent 33% 30% - 36% 651

c6d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 18% 16% - 21% 651

c6e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science

Other (specify): Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 73% 61% - 83% 49

31

Page 32: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nlessons use each of the following instructional materials?

c6e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): Some (26 to 50%) Percent 5% 2% - 12% 49

c6e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): Most (51 to 75%) Percent 13% 7% - 25% 49

c6e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of History and Social Science lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 9% 5% - 17% 49

c7a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Which curricula are best aligned. No Need Percent 5% 4% - 7% 643

c7a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Which curricula are best aligned. Low Priority Percent 15% 13% - 17% 643

c7a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Which curricula are best aligned. Moderate Priority Percent 37% 34% - 40% 643

c7a Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Which curricula are best aligned. High Priority Percent 44% 41% - 46% 643

c7b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Developing curriculum that is well aligned. No Need Percent 5% 4% - 7% 644

c7b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Developing curriculum that is well aligned. Low Priority Percent 13% 11% - 15% 644

c7b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum

Developing curriculum that is well aligned. Moderate Priority Percent 32% 29% - 35% 644

32

Page 33: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl NFramework.

c7b Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Developing curriculum that is well aligned. High Priority Percent 50% 47% - 53% 644

c7c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the science curriculum across each classroom.

No Need Percent 4% 3% - 5% 642

c7c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the science curriculum across each classroom.

Low Priority Percent 10% 8% - 13% 642

c7c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the science curriculum across each classroom.

Moderate Priority Percent 37% 34% - 40% 642

c7c Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

How to identify resources that support consistent implementation of the science curriculum across each classroom.

High Priority Percent 49% 46% - 51% 642

c7d Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

No Need Percent 4% 3% - 6% 642

c7d Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

Low Priority Percent 13% 12% - 15% 642

c7d Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

Moderate Priority Percent 39% 36% - 42% 642

c7d Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Identifying professional development providers to support implementation.

High Priority Percent 43% 40% - 46% 642

c7e Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): No Need Percent 67% 55% - 77% 44

33

Page 34: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nc7e Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully

implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): Low Priority Percent 5% 2% - 15% 44

c7e Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): Moderate Priority Percent 8% 3% - 17% 44

c7e Prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework.

Other (specify): High Priority Percent 20% 11% - 33% 44

c8a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 18% 16% - 21% 647

c8a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Some (26 to 50%) Percent 26% 24% - 29% 647

c8a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

Most (51 to 75%) Percent 33% 30% - 36% 647

c8a Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District- or school-procured curriculum (purchase or open source)

All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 22% 20% - 25% 647

c8b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 28% 25% - 31% 647

c8b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum Some (26 to 50%) Percent 29% 27% - 32% 647

c8b Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

District-developed curriculum Most (51 to 75%) Percent 26% 24% - 29% 647

c8b Over the course of the school year, on average, District-developed curriculum All or nearly all (76 to Percent 17% 14% - 19% 647

34

Page 35: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nwhat percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

100%)

c8c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 15% 13% - 18% 648

c8c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Some (26 to 50%) Percent 40% 37% - 43% 648

c8c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources Most (51 to 75%) Percent 33% 30% - 36% 648

c8c Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-selected resources All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 12% 10% - 14% 648

c8d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 20% 18% - 23% 648

c8d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Some (26 to 50%) Percent 37% 34% - 41% 648

c8d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources Most (51 to 75%) Percent 30% 28% - 33% 648

c8d Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Teacher-created resources All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 12% 10% - 14% 648

c8e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): Few or none (0 to 25%) Percent 75% 65% - 83% 50

c8e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and

Other (specify): Some (26 to 50%) Percent 13% 7% - 23% 50

35

Page 36: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl NTechnology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

c8e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): Most (51 to 75%) Percent 8% 4% - 17% 50

c8e Over the course of the school year, on average, what percentage of Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) lessons use each of the following instructional materials?

Other (specify): All or nearly all (76 to 100%)

Percent 4% 2% - 9% 50

c9a Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to embed students' social and emotional learning into the curricula.

No Need Percent 1% 1% - 2% 649

c9a Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to embed students' social and emotional learning into the curricula.

Low Priority Percent 6% 5% - 8% 649

c9a Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to embed students' social and emotional learning into the curricula.

Moderate Priority Percent 23% 20% - 26% 649

c9a Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to embed students' social and emotional learning into the curricula.

High Priority Percent 70% 67% - 73% 649

c9b Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to support English learners in mastering the expectations.

No Need Percent 3% 2% - 4% 648

c9b Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to support English learners in mastering the expectations.

Low Priority Percent 11% 10% - 13% 648

c9b Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to support English learners in mastering the expectations.

Moderate Priority Percent 32% 30% - 35% 648

c9b Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to support English learners in mastering the expectations.

High Priority Percent 53% 50% - 56% 648

c9c Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to support students with disabilities in mastering the expectations.

No Need Percent 1% 1% - 3% 648

c9c Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to support students with disabilities in mastering the expectations.

Low Priority Percent 5% 3% - 6% 648

c9c Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, How to support students with disabilities Moderate Priority Percent 28% 25% - 31% 648

36

Page 37: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nprioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

in mastering the expectations.

c9c Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

How to support students with disabilities in mastering the expectations.

High Priority Percent 66% 63% - 69% 648

c9d Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

Other (specify): No Need Percent 59% 45% - 72% 38

c9d Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

Other (specify): Low Priority Percent 7% 3% - 19% 38

c9d Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

Other (specify): Moderate Priority Percent 4% 1% - 17% 38

c9d Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, prioritize the guidance needed to successfully implement them for the following factors.

Other (specify): High Priority Percent 29% 18% - 43% 38

c10 How concerned are you about having enough Instructional Technology Specialists and Digital Literacy and Computer Science (DLCS) teachers to support teaching the DLCS standards in your school?

Not at all concerned Percent 17% 15% - 20% 648

c10 How concerned are you about having enough Instructional Technology Specialists and Digital Literacy and Computer Science (DLCS) teachers to support teaching the DLCS standards in your school?

Somewhat concerned Percent 32% 29% - 35% 648

c10 How concerned are you about having enough Instructional Technology Specialists and Digital Literacy and Computer Science (DLCS) teachers to support teaching the DLCS standards in your school?

Concerned Percent 25% 22% - 28% 648

c10 How concerned are you about having enough Instructional Technology Specialists and Digital Literacy and Computer Science (DLCS) teachers to support teaching the DLCS standards in your school?

Very concerned Percent 26% 23% - 28% 648

37

Page 38: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nc11a Please indicate the degree to which you think the

following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

English Language Arts textbooks or texts used in your school

Not Sure Percent 4% 3% - 6% 647

c11a Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

English Language Arts textbooks or texts used in your school

Not at all Aligned Percent 3% 2% - 4% 647

c11a Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

English Language Arts textbooks or texts used in your school

Somewhat Aligned Percent 21% 18% - 24% 647

c11a Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

English Language Arts textbooks or texts used in your school

Aligned Percent 37% 34% - 41% 647

c11a Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

English Language Arts textbooks or texts used in your school

Strongly Aligned Percent 35% 32% - 38% 647

c11b Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

English Language Arts curriculum selected or developed by your district

Not Sure Percent 3% 2% - 4% 647

c11b Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

English Language Arts curriculum selected or developed by your district

Not at all Aligned Percent 2% 2% - 4% 647

c11b Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

English Language Arts curriculum selected or developed by your district

Somewhat Aligned Percent 18% 15% - 20% 647

c11b Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

English Language Arts curriculum selected or developed by your district

Aligned Percent 39% 36% - 42% 647

c11b Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 English Language Arts and Literacy (ELA/Literacy) Curriculum Framework.

English Language Arts curriculum selected or developed by your district

Strongly Aligned Percent 37% 35% - 41% 647

c12a Please indicate the degree to which you think the Mathematics textbooks used in your Not Sure Percent 3% 2% - 4% 646

38

Page 39: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nfollowing district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

school

c12a Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Mathematics textbooks used in your school

Not at all Aligned Percent 2% 1% - 3% 646

c12a Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Mathematics textbooks used in your school

Somewhat Aligned Percent 19% 16% - 22% 646

c12a Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Mathematics textbooks used in your school

Aligned Percent 43% 40% - 46% 646

c12a Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Mathematics textbooks used in your school

Strongly Aligned Percent 34% 31% - 37% 646

c12b Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Mathematics curriculum selected or developed by your district

Not Sure Percent 3% 2% - 4% 646

c12b Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Mathematics curriculum selected or developed by your district

Not at all Aligned Percent 2% 2% - 4% 646

c12b Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Mathematics curriculum selected or developed by your district

Somewhat Aligned Percent 16% 14% - 18% 646

c12b Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Mathematics curriculum selected or developed by your district

Aligned Percent 43% 40% - 46% 646

c12b Please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Mathematics curriculum selected or developed by your district

Strongly Aligned Percent 36% 33% - 39% 646

c13a Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

District-wide summative assessments Not Sure Percent 7% 6% - 9% 647

c13a Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

District-wide summative assessments Not at all Aligned Percent 5% 4% - 7% 647

c13a Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

District-wide summative assessments Somewhat Aligned Percent 24% 22% - 27% 647

39

Page 40: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nc13a Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please

indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

District-wide summative assessments Aligned Percent 41% 38% - 44% 647

c13a Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

District-wide summative assessments Strongly Aligned Percent 23% 20% - 25% 647

c13b Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

Assessments created or selected by teachers

Not Sure Percent 3% 2% - 5% 647

c13b Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

Assessments created or selected by teachers

Not at all Aligned Percent 2% 1% - 3% 647

c13b Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

Assessments created or selected by teachers

Somewhat Aligned Percent 33% 30% - 36% 647

c13b Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

Assessments created or selected by teachers

Aligned Percent 46% 43% - 49% 647

c13b Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

Assessments created or selected by teachers

Strongly Aligned Percent 16% 14% - 19% 647

c13c Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

Professional development activities that teachers have or will participate in this school year

Not Sure Percent 2% 2% - 3% 647

c13c Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

Professional development activities that teachers have or will participate in this school year

Not at all Aligned Percent 1% 1% - 2% 647

c13c Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

Professional development activities that teachers have or will participate in this school year

Somewhat Aligned Percent 24% 22% - 27% 647

c13c Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please Professional development activities that Aligned Percent 50% 47% - 53% 647

40

Page 41: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nindicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

teachers have or will participate in this school year

c13c Thinking across all curriculum frameworks, please indicate the degree to which you think the following district or school resources are aligned to the curriculum frameworks.

Professional development activities that teachers have or will participate in this school year

Strongly Aligned Percent 23% 20% - 26% 647

c14a To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on the order in which they should teach content area in the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Not at all Percent 11% 9% - 13% 639

c14a To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on the order in which they should teach content area in the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Small extent Percent 22% 19% - 24% 639

c14a To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on the order in which they should teach content area in the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Moderate extent Percent 38% 35% - 41% 639

c14a To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on the order in which they should teach content area in the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Large extent Percent 30% 27% - 32% 639

c14b To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on how much time they should spend on each content area in the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Not at all Percent 10% 8% - 12% 638

c14b To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on how much time they should spend on each content area in the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Small extent Percent 24% 21% - 27% 638

c14b To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on how much time they should spend on each content area in the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum

Moderate extent Percent 37% 34% - 41% 638

41

Page 42: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl NFramework.

c14b To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on how much time they should spend on each content area in the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Large extent Percent 29% 26% - 32% 638

c14c To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My district has provided teachers in my school with lesson plans aligned with the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Not at all Percent 25% 22% - 28% 639

c14c To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My district has provided teachers in my school with lesson plans aligned with the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Small extent Percent 29% 26% - 32% 639

c14c To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My district has provided teachers in my school with lesson plans aligned with the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Moderate extent Percent 32% 29% - 36% 639

c14c To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My district has provided teachers in my school with lesson plans aligned with the 2017 ELA/Literacy Curriculum Framework.

Large extent Percent 14% 12% - 16% 639

c14d To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on the order in which they should teach content area in the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Not at all Percent 11% 9% - 13% 639

c14d To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on the order in which they should teach content area in the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Small extent Percent 19% 16% - 22% 639

c14d To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on the order in which they should teach content area in the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Moderate extent Percent 39% 36% - 43% 639

c14d To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on the order in which they should teach content area in the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Large extent Percent 31% 28% - 34% 639

c14e To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on how much time they should spend on each content

Not at all Percent 11% 9% - 13% 639

42

Page 43: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Narea in the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

c14e To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on how much time they should spend on each content area in the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Small extent Percent 22% 19% - 25% 639

c14e To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on how much time they should spend on each content area in the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Moderate extent Percent 39% 36% - 42% 639

c14e To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My teachers have received specific guidance from my district on how much time they should spend on each content area in the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Large extent Percent 28% 25% - 31% 639

c14f To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My district has provided teachers in my school with lesson plans aligned with the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Not at all Percent 24% 21% - 27% 639

c14f To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My district has provided teachers in my school with lesson plans aligned with the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Small extent Percent 29% 26% - 31% 639

c14f To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My district has provided teachers in my school with lesson plans aligned with the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Moderate extent Percent 31% 29% - 34% 639

c14f To what extent do you agree with the following statements?

My district has provided teachers in my school with lesson plans aligned with the 2017 Mathematics Curriculum Framework.

Large extent Percent 16% 14% - 18% 639

c15a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

District leaders publicly reward or recognize principals in this district for exemplary leadership practices aimed at implementing state standards.

Disagree Strongly Percent 27% 24% - 30% 638

c15a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

District leaders publicly reward or recognize principals in this district for exemplary leadership practices aimed at implementing state standards.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 32% 29% - 35% 638

43

Page 44: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nc15a Please indicate your agreement with the following

statements.District leaders publicly reward or recognize principals in this district for exemplary leadership practices aimed at implementing state standards.

Agree Somewhat Percent 35% 32% - 38% 638

c15a Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

District leaders publicly reward or recognize principals in this district for exemplary leadership practices aimed at implementing state standards.

Agree Strongly Percent 6% 5% - 8% 638

c15b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

District leaders publicly reward or recognize principals in this district for exemplary student achievement gains.

Disagree Strongly Percent 23% 21% - 26% 638

c15b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

District leaders publicly reward or recognize principals in this district for exemplary student achievement gains.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 28% 25% - 32% 638

c15b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

District leaders publicly reward or recognize principals in this district for exemplary student achievement gains.

Agree Somewhat Percent 40% 36% - 43% 638

c15b Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

District leaders publicly reward or recognize principals in this district for exemplary student achievement gains.

Agree Strongly Percent 9% 7% - 11% 638

c15c Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

There are negative repercussions for me if students in my school do not perform well on state standardized assessments.

Disagree Strongly Percent 24% 22% - 27% 637

c15c Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

There are negative repercussions for me if students in my school do not perform well on state standardized assessments.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 32% 29% - 36% 637

c15c Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

There are negative repercussions for me if students in my school do not perform well on state standardized assessments.

Agree Somewhat Percent 34% 31% - 37% 637

c15c Please indicate your agreement with the following statements.

There are negative repercussions for me if students in my school do not perform well on state standardized assessments.

Agree Strongly Percent 10% 8% - 12% 637

44

Page 45: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

Table 4. Social and Emotional Learning, Health, and SafetyResearch and experience demonstrate that preparing all students for success (in school, the workplace, civic life, and more) includes attending to their social-emotional and health development. Furthermore, academic and social-emotional competencies are mutually reinforcing. Key levers in this work also include safe and supportive school climate and culture, and effective family engagement.

DESE is committed to building out supports and policies in partnership with practitioners in the field and other state agencies to advance this work in the Commonwealth, both in and out of school. It is our goal to promote systems and strategies that foster safe, positive, healthy, culturally competent, and inclusive learning environments that address students’ varied needs and improve educational outcomes for all.

This section of the survey includes questions about respondents’ views on the social and emotional learning supports and resources in their schools and solicits feedback on DESE’s 2018 school climate surveys.

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nd1a Please rate your agreement with the following

statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing core SEL instruction to all students.

Not Applicable Percent 2% 1% - 3% 625

d1a Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing core SEL instruction to all students.

Disagree Strongly Percent 9% 7% - 12% 625

d1a Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing core SEL instruction to all students.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 25% 22% - 28% 625

d1a Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing core SEL instruction to all students.

Agree Somewhat Percent 46% 42% - 49% 625

d1a Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning

Staff in my school are proficient in providing core SEL instruction to all

Agree Strongly Percent 18% 16% - 21% 625

45

Page 46: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl N(SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

students.

d1b Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing supplemental SEL supports (in addition to core SEL instruction) to students who need them.

Not Applicable Percent 2% 1% - 3% 622

d1b Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing supplemental SEL supports (in addition to core SEL instruction) to students who need them.

Disagree Strongly Percent 8% 6% - 10% 622

d1b Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing supplemental SEL supports (in addition to core SEL instruction) to students who need them.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 22% 20% - 25% 622

d1b Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing supplemental SEL supports (in addition to core SEL instruction) to students who need them.

Agree Somewhat Percent 52% 49% - 54% 622

d1b Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing supplemental SEL supports (in addition to core SEL instruction) to students who need them.

Agree Strongly Percent 16% 14% - 19% 622

d1c Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing and/or connecting intensive SEL supports (in addition to core SEL instruction) to students who need them.

Not Applicable Percent 2% 1% - 3% 622

d1c Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning

Staff in my school are proficient in providing and/or connecting intensive SEL

Disagree Strongly Percent 14% 12% - 16% 622

46

Page 47: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl N(SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

supports (in addition to core SEL instruction) to students who need them.

d1c Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing and/or connecting intensive SEL supports (in addition to core SEL instruction) to students who need them.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 30% 27% - 33% 622

d1c Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing and/or connecting intensive SEL supports (in addition to core SEL instruction) to students who need them.

Agree Somewhat Percent 42% 38% - 45% 622

d1c Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school are proficient in providing and/or connecting intensive SEL supports (in addition to core SEL instruction) to students who need them.

Agree Strongly Percent 12% 10% - 15% 622

d1d Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school implement SEL approaches that are culturally responsive.

Not Applicable Percent 2% 1% - 3% 621

d1d Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school implement SEL approaches that are culturally responsive.

Disagree Strongly Percent 6% 5% - 8% 621

d1d Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school implement SEL approaches that are culturally responsive.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 19% 16% - 21% 621

d1d Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning

Staff in my school implement SEL approaches that are culturally responsive.

Agree Somewhat Percent 57% 53% - 60% 621

47

Page 48: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl N(SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

d1d Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff in my school implement SEL approaches that are culturally responsive.

Agree Strongly Percent 17% 14% - 19% 621

d1e Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school assesses all students' social-emotional competencies (e.g., self-awareness and management, social awareness and relationship skills, responsible decision-making).

Not Applicable Percent 2% 2% - 4% 625

d1e Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school assesses all students' social-emotional competencies (e.g., self-awareness and management, social awareness and relationship skills, responsible decision-making).

Disagree Strongly Percent 18% 15% - 21% 625

d1e Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school assesses all students' social-emotional competencies (e.g., self-awareness and management, social awareness and relationship skills, responsible decision-making).

Disagree Somewhat Percent 23% 21% - 26% 625

d1e Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school assesses all students' social-emotional competencies (e.g., self-awareness and management, social awareness and relationship skills, responsible decision-making).

Agree Somewhat Percent 40% 36% - 43% 625

d1e Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school assesses all students' social-emotional competencies (e.g., self-awareness and management, social awareness and relationship skills, responsible decision-making).

Agree Strongly Percent 17% 14% - 20% 625

d1f Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning

A designated person in my school provides coaching and support to staff related to

Not Applicable Percent 5% 4% - 6% 626

48

Page 49: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl N(SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

building students' social-emotional competencies.

d1f Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

A designated person in my school provides coaching and support to staff related to building students' social-emotional competencies.

Disagree Strongly Percent 17% 14% - 19% 626

d1f Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

A designated person in my school provides coaching and support to staff related to building students' social-emotional competencies.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 18% 15% - 20% 626

d1f Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

A designated person in my school provides coaching and support to staff related to building students' social-emotional competencies.

Agree Somewhat Percent 38% 34% - 42% 626

d1f Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

A designated person in my school provides coaching and support to staff related to building students' social-emotional competencies.

Agree Strongly Percent 23% 20% - 27% 626

d1g Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school has explicit support systems in place that engage and collaborate with families to develop students' SEL competencies.

Not Applicable Percent 3% 2% - 5% 627

d1g Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school has explicit support systems in place that engage and collaborate with families to develop students' SEL competencies.

Disagree Strongly Percent 12% 10% - 14% 627

d1g Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning

My school has explicit support systems in place that engage and collaborate with

Disagree Somewhat Percent 26% 23% - 30% 627

49

Page 50: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl N(SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

families to develop students' SEL competencies.

d1g Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school has explicit support systems in place that engage and collaborate with families to develop students' SEL competencies.

Agree Somewhat Percent 41% 38% - 44% 627

d1g Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school has explicit support systems in place that engage and collaborate with families to develop students' SEL competencies.

Agree Strongly Percent 18% 15% - 21% 627

d1h Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school/district actively supports staff members' social and emotional well-being.

Not Applicable Percent 2% 1% - 3% 626

d1h Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school/district actively supports staff members' social and emotional well-being.

Disagree Strongly Percent 6% 5% - 8% 626

d1h Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school/district actively supports staff members' social and emotional well-being.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 18% 16% - 21% 626

d1h Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My school/district actively supports staff members' social and emotional well-being.

Agree Somewhat Percent 49% 46% - 52% 626

d1h Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning

My school/district actively supports staff members' social and emotional well-being.

Agree Strongly Percent 25% 22% - 28% 626

50

Page 51: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl N(SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

d1i Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

I am comfortable with my level of training and education in supporting students' SEL needs.

Not Applicable Percent 1% 1% - 2% 627

d1i Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

I am comfortable with my level of training and education in supporting students' SEL needs.

Disagree Strongly Percent 4% 3% - 6% 627

d1i Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

I am comfortable with my level of training and education in supporting students' SEL needs.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 21% 18% - 25% 627

d1i Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

I am comfortable with my level of training and education in supporting students' SEL needs.

Agree Somewhat Percent 43% 39% - 47% 627

d1i Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

I am comfortable with my level of training and education in supporting students' SEL needs.

Agree Strongly Percent 30% 28% - 33% 627

d1j Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My superintendent is committed to supporting students' SEL needs.

Not Applicable Percent 1% 0% - 2% 616

d1j Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning

My superintendent is committed to supporting students' SEL needs.

Disagree Strongly Percent 3% 2% - 4% 616

51

Page 52: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl N(SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

d1j Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My superintendent is committed to supporting students' SEL needs.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 6% 4% - 7% 616

d1j Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My superintendent is committed to supporting students' SEL needs.

Agree Somewhat Percent 31% 28% - 34% 616

d1j Please rate your agreement with the following statements about social and emotional learning (SEL) in your school. If you do not have the resource (e.g., district support team, SEL instruction and/or supports) available in your district/school, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

My superintendent is committed to supporting students' SEL needs.

Agree Strongly Percent 60% 56% - 64% 616

d2a To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Battelle Developmental Inventory (BDI) No Percent 91% 89% - 93% 626

d2a To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Battelle Developmental Inventory (BDI) Yes Percent 9% 7% - 11% 626

d2b To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS)

No Percent 86% 83% - 88% 626

d2b To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS)

Yes Percent 14% 12% - 17% 626

52

Page 53: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nd2c To help inform instruction and supports, have you

or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Behavior Intervention and Monitoring Assessment System (BIMAS)

No Percent 95% 93% - 96% 626

d2c To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Behavior Intervention and Monitoring Assessment System (BIMAS)

Yes Percent 5% 4% - 7% 626

d2d To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA)

No Percent 97% 96% - 98% 626

d2d To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA)

Yes Percent 3% 2% - 4% 626

d2e To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Devereux Student Strengths Assessment (DESSA)

No Percent 95% 94% - 96% 626

d2e To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Devereux Student Strengths Assessment (DESSA)

Yes Percent 5% 4% - 6% 626

d2f To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Panorama Education Climate Survey No Percent 85% 83% - 87% 626

d2f To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Panorama Education Climate Survey Yes Percent 15% 13% - 17% 626

d2g To help inform instruction and supports, have you Panorama Education Social-Emotional No Percent 89% 87% - 91% 626

53

Page 54: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nor do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Learning Survey

d2g To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Panorama Education Social-Emotional Learning Survey

Yes Percent 11% 9% - 13% 626

d2h To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) No Percent 97% 96% - 98% 626

d2h To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Yes Percent 3% 2% - 4% 626

d2i To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)

No Percent 95% 93% - 96% 626

d2i To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)

Yes Percent 5% 4% - 7% 626

d2j To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

School Social Behaviors Scale No Percent 85% 82% - 87% 626

d2j To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

School Social Behaviors Scale Yes Percent 15% 13% - 18% 626

d2k To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following

Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales (SSIS)

No Percent 90% 88% - 92% 626

54

Page 55: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Ninstruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

d2k To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales (SSIS)

Yes Percent 10% 8% - 12% 626

d2l To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Social-Emotional Assets and Resilience Scales (SEARS)

No Percent 96% 94% - 97% 626

d2l To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Social-Emotional Assets and Resilience Scales (SEARS)

Yes Percent 4% 3% - 6% 626

d2m To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Student Approaches to Learning (SAL) Instrument

No Percent 99% 98% - 99% 626

d2m To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Student Approaches to Learning (SAL) Instrument

Yes Percent 1% 1% - 2% 626

d2n To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Survey of Academic and Youth Outcomes (SAYO)

No Percent 93% 90% - 94% 626

d2n To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Survey of Academic and Youth Outcomes (SAYO)

Yes Percent 7% 6% - 10% 626

d2o To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year?

Youth Risk Behavior Survey (local or state level)

No Percent 66% 63% - 69% 626

55

Page 56: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl NPlease use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

d2o To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Youth Risk Behavior Survey (local or state level)

Yes Percent 34% 31% - 37% 626

d2p To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Other, specify No Percent 86% 84% - 88% 626

d2p To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

Other, specify Yes Percent 14% 12% - 16% 626

d2q To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

None of the above No Percent 87% 84% - 88% 626

d2q To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

None of the above Yes Percent 13% 12% - 16% 626

d2r To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

I don't know No Percent 82% 79% - 85% 626

d2r To help inform instruction and supports, have you or do you plan to use any of the following instruments during the 2018-2019 school year? Please use 'Other' to specify/add all other instrument(s) you use in your school.

I don't know Yes Percent 18% 15% - 21% 626

d3a To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your

Integrate the development of social and emotional competencies into their lesson content (e.g., self-awareness and management, social awareness and

Not At All Percent 1% 0% - 2% 625

56

Page 57: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nteacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

relationship skills, and responsible decision-making).

d3a To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your teacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

Integrate the development of social and emotional competencies into their lesson content (e.g., self-awareness and management, social awareness and relationship skills, and responsible decision-making).

Minimal Extent Percent 13% 11% - 15% 625

d3a To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your teacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

Integrate the development of social and emotional competencies into their lesson content (e.g., self-awareness and management, social awareness and relationship skills, and responsible decision-making).

Moderate Extent Percent 45% 42% - 48% 625

d3a To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your teacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

Integrate the development of social and emotional competencies into their lesson content (e.g., self-awareness and management, social awareness and relationship skills, and responsible decision-making).

Large Extent Percent 42% 38% - 45% 625

d3b To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your teacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

Identify and implement curricula that explicitly teaches social-emotional competencies.

Not At All Percent 3% 2% - 4% 624

d3b To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your teacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

Identify and implement curricula that explicitly teaches social-emotional competencies.

Minimal Extent Percent 16% 14% - 18% 624

d3b To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your

Identify and implement curricula that explicitly teaches social-emotional competencies.

Moderate Extent Percent 46% 42% - 49% 624

57

Page 58: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nteacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

d3b To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your teacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

Identify and implement curricula that explicitly teaches social-emotional competencies.

Large Extent Percent 36% 33% - 39% 624

d3c To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your teacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

Support students with different types of social and emotional learning needs within their classroom.

Not At All Percent 1% 0% - 1% 625

d3c To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your teacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

Support students with different types of social and emotional learning needs within their classroom.

Minimal Extent Percent 9% 8% - 12% 625

d3c To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your teacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

Support students with different types of social and emotional learning needs within their classroom.

Moderate Extent Percent 45% 42% - 48% 625

d3c To help students master the Massachusetts' state standards, to what extent could teachers in your school benefit from support in the following instructional strategies? Please think back on your teacher observations (announced and unannounced classroom observations) to form your opinion.

Support students with different types of social and emotional learning needs within their classroom.

Large Extent Percent 45% 42% - 49% 625

d4a To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Availability of social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health services for students that meet their needs clinically, linguistically, culturally, and

Not a Challenge Percent 2% 1% - 3% 619

58

Page 59: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Ndevelopmentally

d4a To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Availability of social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health services for students that meet their needs clinically, linguistically, culturally, and developmentally

Minor Challenge Percent 11% 9% - 13% 619

d4a To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Availability of social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health services for students that meet their needs clinically, linguistically, culturally, and developmentally

Moderate Challenge Percent 37% 33% - 41% 619

d4a To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Availability of social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health services for students that meet their needs clinically, linguistically, culturally, and developmentally

Major Challenge Percent 49% 46% - 53% 619

d4b To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Funding to pay for available services Not a Challenge Percent 2% 1% - 3% 604

d4b To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Funding to pay for available services Minor Challenge Percent 10% 8% - 12% 604

d4b To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Funding to pay for available services Moderate Challenge Percent 29% 26% - 32% 604

d4b To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Funding to pay for available services Major Challenge Percent 60% 57% - 63% 604

d4c To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Transportation to and/or from existing services

Not a Challenge Percent 8% 6% - 10% 562

d4c To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Transportation to and/or from existing services

Minor Challenge Percent 15% 13% - 18% 562

d4c To what extent is each of the following a challenge Transportation to and/or from existing Moderate Challenge Percent 28% 25% - 31% 562

59

Page 60: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nto your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

services

d4c To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Transportation to and/or from existing services

Major Challenge Percent 49% 46% - 53% 562

d4d To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Prevention and promotion efforts that help decrease the need for more intensive services for students

Not a Challenge Percent 3% 2% - 4% 605

d4d To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Prevention and promotion efforts that help decrease the need for more intensive services for students

Minor Challenge Percent 11% 8% - 13% 605

d4d To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Prevention and promotion efforts that help decrease the need for more intensive services for students

Moderate Challenge Percent 44% 41% - 48% 605

d4d To what extent is each of the following a challenge to your school community's efforts to develop and address students' social-emotional, mental, and behavioral health needs?

Prevention and promotion efforts that help decrease the need for more intensive services for students

Major Challenge Percent 42% 39% - 46% 605

d5a To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff. Not Applicable Percent 41% 39% - 44% 621

d5a To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff. Not At All Percent 9% 7% - 11% 621

d5a To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff. Minimal Extent Percent 13% 11% - 15% 621

d5a To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your

Staff. Moderate Extent Percent 20% 18% - 23% 621

60

Page 61: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nschool did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

d5a To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Staff. Large Extent Percent 17% 15% - 19% 621

d5b To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Students. Not Applicable Percent 43% 40% - 46% 621

d5b To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Students. Not At All Percent 26% 24% - 29% 621

d5b To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Students. Minimal Extent Percent 17% 14% - 19% 621

d5b To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Students. Moderate Extent Percent 10% 8% - 13% 621

d5b To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Students. Large Extent Percent 3% 2% - 5% 621

d5c To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Parents. Not Applicable Percent 42% 39% - 45% 621

d5c To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey,

Parents. Not At All Percent 22% 19% - 24% 621

61

Page 62: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nplease use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

d5c To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Parents. Minimal Extent Percent 21% 18% - 24% 621

d5c To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Parents. Moderate Extent Percent 12% 10% - 14% 621

d5c To what extent did you share the 2018 Views of Climate and Learning (VOCAL) school climate results with the following stakeholders? If your school did not participate in the VOCAL survey, please use 'Not Applicable' to respond.

Parents. Large Extent Percent 3% 2% - 5% 621

d6a To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance during the 2018-2019 school year relative to safe and supportive schools?

Provides resources (e.g., guidance, professional development) that helps schools improve students' social and emotional learning and school climate.

Disagree Strongly Percent 4% 3% - 6% 579

d6a To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance during the 2018-2019 school year relative to safe and supportive schools?

Provides resources (e.g., guidance, professional development) that helps schools improve students' social and emotional learning and school climate.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 21% 18% - 24% 579

d6a To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance during the 2018-2019 school year relative to safe and supportive schools?

Provides resources (e.g., guidance, professional development) that helps schools improve students' social and emotional learning and school climate.

Agree Somewhat Percent 60% 57% - 63% 579

d6a To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance during the 2018-2019 school year relative to safe and supportive schools?

Provides resources (e.g., guidance, professional development) that helps schools improve students' social and emotional learning and school climate.

Agree Strongly Percent 15% 13% - 17% 579

d6b To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance during the 2018-2019 school year relative to safe and supportive schools?

Communicates about the importance of developing students' SEL competencies and a strong school climate in order to help prepare students for success after high school.

Disagree Strongly Percent 3% 2% - 4% 586

d6b To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance during the 2018-2019 school year relative to safe and supportive schools?

Communicates about the importance of developing students' SEL competencies and a strong school climate in order to help prepare students for success after

Disagree Somewhat Percent 15% 13% - 18% 586

62

Page 63: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nhigh school.

d6b To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance during the 2018-2019 school year relative to safe and supportive schools?

Communicates about the importance of developing students' SEL competencies and a strong school climate in order to help prepare students for success after high school.

Agree Somewhat Percent 56% 53% - 60% 586

d6b To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance during the 2018-2019 school year relative to safe and supportive schools?

Communicates about the importance of developing students' SEL competencies and a strong school climate in order to help prepare students for success after high school.

Agree Strongly Percent 26% 23% - 29% 586

63

Page 64: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

Table 5. DESE Overall SupportMassachusetts is a leader in K-12 education, yet great challenges and opportunities remain. As the administrative entity responsible for implementing and administering statewide education policies and reform efforts, DESE partners with schools and districts to promote a culture of continuous improvement and to provide schools with the tools and skills to put improvement into practice. To serve that role more effectively, DESE has been working to align and organize itself to deliver innovative and effective supports to local schools and districts.

This section of the survey includes questions about respondents’ views on the supports and resources that DESE provides.

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Ne1 To what extent has DESE's contact with

your district focused on ensuring compliance as opposed to providing assistance? Base your response on your district's recent experience with DESE.

1 on scale of 1 to 9 (compliance <-> assistance)

Percent 14% 11% - 17% 417

e1 To what extent has DESE's contact with your district focused on ensuring compliance as opposed to providing assistance? Base your response on your district's recent experience with DESE.

2 on scale of 1 to 9 (compliance <-> assistance)

Percent 14% 11% - 17% 417

e1 To what extent has DESE's contact with your district focused on ensuring compliance as opposed to providing assistance? Base your response on your district's recent experience with DESE.

3 on scale of 1 to 9 (compliance <-> assistance)

Percent 14% 12% - 17% 417

e1 To what extent has DESE's contact with your district focused on ensuring compliance as opposed to providing assistance? Base your response on your district's recent experience with DESE.

4 on scale of 1 to 9 (compliance <-> assistance)

Percent 15% 12% - 17% 417

e1 To what extent has DESE's contact with your district focused on ensuring compliance as opposed to providing assistance? Base your response on your district's recent experience with DESE.

5 on scale of 1 to 9 (compliance <-> assistance)

Percent 23% 20% - 27% 417

e1 To what extent has DESE's contact with your district focused on ensuring compliance as opposed to providing assistance? Base your response on your district's recent experience with DESE.

6 on scale of 1 to 9 (compliance <-> assistance)

Percent 6% 4% - 8% 417

e1 To what extent has DESE's contact with 7 on scale of 1 to 9 Percent 7% 5% - 9% 417

64

Page 65: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nyour district focused on ensuring compliance as opposed to providing assistance? Base your response on your district's recent experience with DESE.

(compliance <-> assistance)

e1 To what extent has DESE's contact with your district focused on ensuring compliance as opposed to providing assistance? Base your response on your district's recent experience with DESE.

8 on scale of 1 to 9 (compliance <-> assistance)

Percent 2% 1% - 4% 417

e1 To what extent has DESE's contact with your district focused on ensuring compliance as opposed to providing assistance? Base your response on your district's recent experience with DESE.

9 on scale of 1 to 9 (compliance <-> assistance)

Percent 4% 3% - 6% 417

e2a To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE provides services in a coherent, well-coordinated fashion.

Disagree Strongly Percent 6% 4% - 8% 539

e2a To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE provides services in a coherent, well-coordinated fashion.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 24% 21% - 28% 539

e2a To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE provides services in a coherent, well-coordinated fashion.

Agree Somewhat Percent 56% 53% - 60% 539

e2a To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE provides services in a coherent, well-coordinated fashion.

Agree Strongly Percent 14% 12% - 16% 539

e2b To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE communicates in a coherent, well-coordinated fashion.

Disagree Strongly Percent 3% 2% - 5% 577

e2b To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE communicates in a coherent, well-coordinated fashion.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 21% 18% - 24% 577

e2b To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-

DESE communicates in a coherent, well-coordinated fashion.

Agree Somewhat Percent 54% 51% - 58% 577

65

Page 66: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl N2019 school year?

e2b To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE communicates in a coherent, well-coordinated fashion.

Agree Strongly Percent 21% 19% - 24% 577

e2c To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE is effective in its efforts to improve the overall quality of public K-12 education.

Disagree Strongly Percent 3% 2% - 5% 581

e2c To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE is effective in its efforts to improve the overall quality of public K-12 education.

Disagree Somewhat Percent 18% 15% - 20% 581

e2c To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE is effective in its efforts to improve the overall quality of public K-12 education.

Agree Somewhat Percent 59% 56% - 62% 581

e2c To what extent do you agree with each of the following statements regarding DESE's performance relative to policies and programs during the 2018-2019 school year?

DESE is effective in its efforts to improve the overall quality of public K-12 education.

Agree Strongly Percent 20% 17% - 23% 581

e3a Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Profiles (state data website) Never heard of this resource

Percent 4% 3% - 6% 611

e3a Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Profiles (state data website) Heard of resource but haven't used it

Percent 5% 4% - 8% 611

e3a Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Profiles (state data website) Used resource but found it NOT useful

Percent 7% 6% - 9% 611

e3a Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Profiles (state data website) Found resource useful Percent 60% 56% - 63% 611

e3a Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Profiles (state data website) Found resource very useful

Percent 23% 20% - 26% 611

e3b Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

DART (trends over time, comparisons to similar districts/schools, graphs; now part of Profiles)

Never heard of this resource

Percent 7% 5% - 8% 610

e3b Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's

DART (trends over time, comparisons to similar districts/schools, graphs; now part

Heard of resource but haven't used it

Percent 12% 10% - 15% 610

66

Page 67: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Nplanning and improvement work. of Profiles)

e3b Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

DART (trends over time, comparisons to similar districts/schools, graphs; now part of Profiles)

Used resource but found it NOT useful

Percent 16% 14% - 19% 610

e3b Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

DART (trends over time, comparisons to similar districts/schools, graphs; now part of Profiles)

Found resource useful Percent 51% 47% - 55% 610

e3b Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

DART (trends over time, comparisons to similar districts/schools, graphs; now part of Profiles)

Found resource very useful

Percent 14% 12% - 16% 610

e3c Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

EWIS (Early Warning Indicator System) Never heard of this resource

Percent 9% 8% - 11% 610

e3c Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

EWIS (Early Warning Indicator System) Heard of resource but haven't used it

Percent 20% 18% - 23% 610

e3c Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

EWIS (Early Warning Indicator System) Used resource but found it NOT useful

Percent 18% 16% - 20% 610

e3c Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

EWIS (Early Warning Indicator System) Found resource useful Percent 43% 39% - 46% 610

e3c Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

EWIS (Early Warning Indicator System) Found resource very useful

Percent 10% 9% - 12% 610

e3d Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

RADAR (Resource Allocation and District Action Reports)

Never heard of this resource

Percent 40% 37% - 44% 611

e3d Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

RADAR (Resource Allocation and District Action Reports)

Heard of resource but haven't used it

Percent 27% 24% - 30% 611

e3d Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

RADAR (Resource Allocation and District Action Reports)

Used resource but found it NOT useful

Percent 12% 10% - 15% 611

e3d Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

RADAR (Resource Allocation and District Action Reports)

Found resource useful Percent 18% 16% - 20% 611

e3d Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

RADAR (Resource Allocation and District Action Reports)

Found resource very useful

Percent 3% 2% - 4% 611

e3e Please evaluate the usefulness of the following Student Learning Experience reports Never heard of this Percent 45% 42% - 49% 609

67

Page 68: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl NDESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

resource

e3e Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Student Learning Experience reports Heard of resource but haven't used it

Percent 27% 24% - 30% 609

e3e Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Student Learning Experience reports Used resource but found it NOT useful

Percent 9% 7% - 11% 609

e3e Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Student Learning Experience reports Found resource useful Percent 16% 14% - 19% 609

e3e Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Student Learning Experience reports Found resource very useful

Percent 2% 1% - 3% 609

e3f Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Edwin student assessment reports Never heard of this resource

Percent 4% 3% - 6% 610

e3f Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Edwin student assessment reports Heard of resource but haven't used it

Percent 8% 6% - 10% 610

e3f Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Edwin student assessment reports Used resource but found it NOT useful

Percent 7% 5% - 8% 610

e3f Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Edwin student assessment reports Found resource useful Percent 51% 48% - 54% 610

e3f Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

Edwin student assessment reports Found resource very useful

Percent 30% 27% - 33% 610

e3g Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

VOCAL (Views of Climate and Learning) school climate reports

Never heard of this resource

Percent 26% 23% - 29% 611

e3g Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

VOCAL (Views of Climate and Learning) school climate reports

Heard of resource but haven't used it

Percent 28% 25% - 32% 611

e3g Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

VOCAL (Views of Climate and Learning) school climate reports

Used resource but found it NOT useful

Percent 12% 10% - 14% 611

e3g Please evaluate the usefulness of the following DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

VOCAL (Views of Climate and Learning) school climate reports

Found resource useful Percent 30% 27% - 34% 611

68

Page 69: VISTA 2019 Principal Comprehensive Report  · Web view2019. 6. 10. · The Commonwealth’s approach to educator effectiveness involves: setting high standards for educators, identifying

# Matrix_Text Item_Text Response EstType Est. Cl Ne3g Please evaluate the usefulness of the following

DESE data resources in informing your school's planning and improvement work.

VOCAL (Views of Climate and Learning) school climate reports

Found resource very useful

Percent 4% 3% - 6% 611

69