Viva

7/17/2019 Viva

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viva563db972550346aa9a9d6772 1/3

H1: There is no effect of training satisfaction on job satisfaction

H2: There is no effect of training satisfaction on job turnover intention

for his direction, mentorship and continuous support. Under his professional supervision, I found

the fervor of conducting the academic research and develop the needed skills. His priceless

assistance of productive comments and suggestions all through the research ork has contributed

to the achievement of this thesis. I also like to speciall! thank "#I$ for their precious support

and information. "ur genuine gratitude goes to m! beloved parents for their love, pra!ers and

encouragement, ithout hich it is not possible to reach the current position in life. %e are also

thankful to all those ho directl! or indirectl! contributed in this research ith their valuable

information, all their support means a lot to us.

These are null hypothesis means these hypo reject ur claim. And therefore if they

are accepted , which is in ur case, it means that training satisfaction doesn’t result

in job satisfaction , however training satisfaction ki wajah se loog job per rehte hain

becoz now they feel that is job mai hum expert hain

ore than !.!" per ur hypo is rejected but since we have mentioned null hypo

#which is opposite to your hypo$ null is accepted so agar sir pochain so u can tell

him that null is accepted and hypo is reject as both values are above !.!".

$oefficients&a'

Unstandardi(ed$oefficients

)tandardi(ed$oefficients

*odel +

)td.

rror +eta t )ig.

1 &$onstant' -.21 /.100 1.21- /

Traning)atisfaction /./1 /./31 /.114 1.511 /.1/

%elationship is seen with the beta value which is highlighted. As it is

positive it means that positive relation exist between training and job satisfaction

but since sig & !.!" it doesn’t matter

7/17/2019 Viva


$oefficients&a'

Unstandardi(ed

$oefficients

)tandardi(ed

$oefficients

*odel +

)td.

rror +eta t )ig.

1 &$onstant' 4.125 /.-0 1/.0 /

Traning)atisfaction 6/.1 /.1/ 6/.122 61.0-5 /./4

%elationship is seen with the beta value which is highlighted. As it is positive it

means that negative relation exists between training and job turnover but since sig

& !.!" therefore again it doesn’t matter

7dditional info

8our data is non6parametric data as !our data is in ordinal scale. It doesn9t have an! unit such as kilo

gram, foots, dollars, etc.

7/17/2019 Viva


H1: There is no effect of training satisfaction on job satisfaction

H2: There is no effect of training satisfaction on job turnover intention

These are null hypothesis means these hypo reject ur claim. And therefore if they

are accepted , which is in ur case, it means that training satisfaction doesn’t result

in job satisfaction , however training satisfaction ki wajah se loog job per rehte hainbecoz now they feel that is job mai hum expert hain

ore than !.!" per ur hypo is rejected but since we have mentioned null hypo

#which is opposite to your hypo$ null is accepted so agar sir pochain so u can tell

him that null is accepted and hypo is reject as both values are above !.!".

$oefficients&a'



*odel +

)td.

rror +eta t )ig.

1 &$onstant' -.21 /.100 1.21- /

Traning)atisfaction /./1 /./31 /.114 1.511 /.1/

%elationship is seen with the beta value which is highlighted. As it is

positive it means that positive relation exist between training and job satisfaction

but since sig & !.!" it doesn’t matter

$oefficients&a'



*odel +)td.rror +eta t )ig.

1 &$onstant' 4.125 /.-0 1/.0 /

Traning)atisfaction 6/.1 /.1/ 6/.122 61.0-5 /./4

%elationship is seen with the beta value which is highlighted. As it is positive it

means that negative relation exists between training and job turnover but since sig

& !.!" therefore again it doesn’t matter

7dditional info

8our data is non6parametric data as !our data is in ordinal scale. It doesn9t have an! unit such as kilo

gram, foots, dollars, etc.

Documents

Viva