Vlas Blom

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 Vlas Blom

    1/4

    An Experimental Investigation on Characteristics of a Slurry Pump

    F. NI, W. J. VLASBLOM, A. ZWARTBOL

    ABSTRACT: The presence of very fine solid particles, such as silt, clay, in a flow tends to

    produce favourable effect on pump performance. However, there is little experimentalevidence on performance of a slurry pump transporting mixtures composed of two or more

    sand fractions that differ in size. Effects of various sand sizes and distributions on thecharacteristics of a slurry pump are reported in this paper. Three sorts of narrowly gradedsands and their mixtures were tested in the laboratory DN150mm pump loop of the Delft

    University of Technology, The Netherlands. The investigation reveals that sand size strongly

    affects the pump performance and adding a fraction of the fine sand to a coarse-slurry cansignificantly improve the pump performance.

    1. EXPERIMENTS

    From September 1998 to March 1999 laboratory experiments were carried out. The pump,driven by a 164 kW MAN diesel engine, has a centrifugal impeller of 400mm diameter,100mm width at discharge and 3 logarithmic vanes. A data acquisition system supported byLabview provides on-line observation of all measured quantities in volts and records the data

    on a computer disk. The data are collected at the frequency of 1 Hz for 30 seconds. Three

    sorts of narrowly graded sands with specific density of 2.65 were used: Fine sand (0.10-0.15mm, d50 =0.123mm), Medium sand (0.2-0.5mm, d50=0.372mm) and Coarse sand (1.4-

    2.0mm, d50=1.840mm). Pump tests on the narrowly graded sands were carried out within tworanges of delivered volumetric concentration: Cvd =12-35% for the fine sand, and Cvd =6-42% for the medium and coarse sands. Eight sand mixtures were investigated. The total

    concentration of the mixtures ranged from Cvd =25% to 45%. The experiments were

    executed at 800 rpm, 1000 rpm and 1200 rpm for each concentration. Pump performancecurves were measured for clear water before and after each sand or mixture test to investigatethe effect of wear. This is taken into account in data processing.

    2. EFFECT OF SAND SIZE ON PUMP PERFORMANCE

    A dimensionless plot is a useful presentation of pump characteristics and is used in this paper.

    Dimensionless head H*is defined as H

    *= gH/(

    2D

    2) and dimensionless flow rate as Q

    *=

    Q/( *D3), where g denotes the gravity acceleration in m/s

    2, H either the head developed in

    slurry service Hm, measured in height of slurry, or the head developed in water service Hw,measured in height of water, Q flow rate in m

    3/s, pump speed in radians per second, and D

    impeller diameter in meter. Fig.1 clearly indicates that sand size has a strong influence on theperformance of the slurry pump. Reductions in head and efficiency increase with sand size

    and delivered volumetric concentration. The reductions are rather small for the fine sand butvery significant if the medium or coarse particles are pumped. Fig.1 also reveals that for all

    the three sorts of sand the solids effect or the absolute drop in head Hw-Hmor in efficiency

    Ew-Emat the same concentration is approximately independent of flow rate, and as a resultthe flow rate at the best efficiency point remains unchanged.

    F. NI, Prof., Dr., Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou, 213022,Jiangsu, P.R. China. Tel/Fax +86 519 5120010. E-mail [email protected](o), [email protected](h)

    W.J.VLASBLOM, Prof. ir. and A. ZWARTBOL, Ing, Chair of Dredging Technology, Delft University of

    Technology, The Netherlands. Tel +31 15 2783973. Fax +31 15 2781397.

  • 7/23/2019 Vlas Blom

    2/4

    0.07

    0.08

    0.09

    0.1

    0.11

    0.12

    0.13

    0.14

    0.15

    0.16

    0 0.01 0.02

    water 15/09

    water 30/09

    13-16% 23/09

    23-25% 24/09

    34-35% 28/09

    H* (Dimensionless head)

    (Dimensionless

    flow rate)Q*

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    0 0.01 0.02

    water 15/09

    water 30/09

    13-16% 23/09

    23-25% 24/09

    34-35% 28/09

    E [%] (Efficienc

    (Dimensionless

    flow rate)Q*

    (a) Fine sand, d50=0.123 mm

    0.07

    0.08

    0.09

    0.1

    0.11

    0.12

    0.13

    0.14

    0.15

    0.16

    0 0.01 0.02

    water 30/09

    water 09/10

    12-14% 02/10

    25-27% 06/10

    34-35% 07/10

    44-45% 09/10

    H* (Dimensionless head)

    (Dimensionless

    flow rate)Q*

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    0 0.01 0.02

    water 30/09

    water 09/10

    12-14% 02/10

    25-27% 06/10

    34-35% 07/10

    44-45% 09/10

    E [%] (Efficienc

    (Dimensionless

    flow rate)Q*

    (b) Medium sand, d50=0.372 mm

    0.07

    0.08

    0.09

    0.1

    0.11

    0.12

    0.13

    0.14

    0.15

    0.16

    0 0.01 0.02

    water 09/03

    water 11/03

    6-7% 10/03

    17-19% 10/03

    30% 10/03

    42% 10/03

    H* (Dimensionless head)

    (Dimensionless

    flow rate)Q*

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    0 0.01 0.02

    water 09/03

    water 11/03

    6-7% 10/03

    17-19% 10/03

    30% 10/03

    42% 10/03

    E [%] (Efficiency)

    (Dimensionless

    flow rate)Q*

    (c) Coarse sand, d50=1.840 mm

    Fig.1 Dimensionless head and efficiency as functions of dimensionless flow rate.

    A quantitative analysis can be obtained from Table 1, where the head reduction factor Rhis

    defined as Rh= (Hw- Hm)/Hw and the efficiency reduction factor as Re= (Ew- Em)/Ew. For thefine and medium sands Re Rhholds at concentrations up to 35%. This is different from thegeneral conclusion stated in Wilson (1997) in which a concentration of about 20% isconsidered as the turning-point concentration, above which the efficiency reduction factor Reis more pronounced than the head reduction factor Rh (Sellgren and Vappling, 1986). Withinmost of the range of concentrations of coarse sand tested, the pump efficiency drops muchfaster than the head as the concentration increases. At concentration of 42% the efficiency

    reduction factor and the head reduction factor reach 59% and 40%, respectively.

    Table 1. Average performance reduction factors and power ratioFine sand (d50=0.123 mm) Medium sand (d 50=0.372 mm) Coarse sand (d 50=1.840 mm)

    Cvd(%)

    Rh(%)

    Re(%)

    Pr Cvd(%)

    Rh(%)

    Re(%)

    Pr Cvd(%)

    Rh(%)

    Re(%)

    Pr

    13-16 1.7 4.0 1.03 12-14 5.6 4.7 0.99 6-7 6.8 6.8 1.00

    23-25 4.3 4.0 1.00 25-27 10.1 9.3 0.99 17-19 19.0 22.3 1.04

    34-35 6.8 6.8 1.00 34-35 12.7 12.0 0.99 30 28.3 40.7 1.21

    44-45 20.7 23.4 1.03 42 39.8 58.6 1.45

    Dimensionless power P*as a function of dimensionless flow rate Q

    *is plotted on Fig.2. The

    dimensionless power is defined as P*

    = P/( *3 *D

    5), where P denotes the power input to

    the pump in kW, the density of water or slurry in kg/m3, and D the same parameters as

    defined in the above section. Fig.2 shows that for either the medium sand or the fine sand

    only one curve results for water and all slurry densities, except that data points for

  • 7/23/2019 Vlas Blom

    3/4

    concentration of 44-45% of the medium sand are located a little higher than the curve. Thismeans that the power ratio, defined as Pr = Pm/(Sm*Pw), where Pm and Pw are powerrequirements for slurry service and water service, respectively, and Sm the slurry relative

    density, remains unity (see Table 1). In other words, the power consumption at the same flow

    rate increases directly with the relative density of the slurry. For the coarse sand, however, Pr

    > 1 holds at moderate and high concentrations. At 42% (Sm =1.7), the average powerrequirement Pmfor slurry service of the coarse sand is 1.45 times larger than (Sm*Pw) and 2.5

    times larger than Pwthe power requirement for clear water (Table 1).

    5.00E-07

    1.50E-06

    2.50E-06

    3.50E-06

    0 0.01 0.02

    water 15/09

    water 30/09

    13-16% 23/09

    23-25% 24/09

    34-35% 28/09

    P* (Dimensionless power)

    (Dimensionless

    flow rate)Q*

    5.00E-07

    1.50E-06

    2.50E-06

    3.50E-06

    0 0.01 0.02

    water 30/09

    water 09/10

    12-14% 02/10

    25-27% 06/10

    34-35% 07/10

    44-45% 09/10

    P* (Dimensionless power)

    (Dimensionless

    flow rate)Q*

    5.00E-07

    1.50E-06

    2.50E-06

    3.50E-06

    0 0.01 0.02

    water 09/03

    water 11/03

    6-7% 10/03

    17-19% 10/03

    30% 10/03

    42% 10/03

    P* (Dimensionless power)

    (Dimensionless

    flow rate)Q*

    (a) Fine sand (b) Medium sand (c) Coarse sand

    Fig.2 Dimensionless power as a function of dimensionless flow rate.

    3. EFFECT OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ON PUMP PERFORMANCE

    By adding the fine sand into the medium sand or the coarse sand, we tested eight mixtures ofthem to find the influence of particle size distribution on the pump performance. Fig.3(a)

    shows the result of one mixture of the medium sand with the fine sand. By adding 10% of thefine sand into 25% of the medium sand, we get the round black points for the mixture.

    Although the total concentration of the mixture is higher than the medium sand only, the

    efficiency reduction for mixture service is smaller than for the medium sand only. A directimprovement of about 3.0% on the efficiency reduction was obtained. Fig.3(b) shows the

    result of one mixture of the coarse sand with the fine sand. A considerable improvement onpump performance was observed by adding 10% of the fine sand into 25% of the coarse sand.The direct improvement reaches more than 20%! From the figure one can conclude two

    points: (1)the fine sand can improve the pump performance, though it is not very finecompared with particles of silt or clay, and (2)the degree of the influence of adding the fine

    sand into the medium sand is different from that of adding the fine sand into the coarse sand.The fine sand addition to the coarse sand can improve the pump performance significantly.

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    24-25%

    Medium sand

    13-16% Fine

    sand

    25% Medium

    sand + 10%

    Fine sand

    Re (Efficiency reduction factor)

    Cvd [%]

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    21-25%

    Coarse sand

    13-16% Fine

    sand

    25% Coarse

    sand + 10%

    Fine sand

    Re (Efficiency reduction factor)

    Cvd [%]

    (a) 25% Medium sand plus 10% Fine sand (b) 25% Coarse sand plus 10% Fine sand

    Fig.3 Efficiency reduction factor for the mixtures.

    Fig.4 presents the flow behaviour of the medium sand and the coarse sand, respectively, in

    the horizontal DN150 mm pipe. The hydraulic gradient Im is defined as head loss (m water)

    over 1 m length of pipe, and Vm the mean slurry velocity in the horizontal pipe. The figure

  • 7/23/2019 Vlas Blom

    4/4

    flow stratification under changing velocity Vm while the medium-sand slurry behavesregularly with less stratification. Although flow velocities in a pipeline are much smaller thanvelocities in a pump, it is believed that slurry flow through pump passages between vanes

    may experience similar stratification due to impeller rotation instead of gravitational

    sedimentation in a horizontal pipe. Earlier results have shown that the effects of

    concentration, particle size and fine particle content on characteristics of a slurry pump havegreat similarities to those on flow behaviour in a pipeline (Wilson 1997). Adding the fine

    sand to a coarse-slurry may increase the capability of the carrier liquid, formed by water and

    the fine sand, to carry coarse particles. As a result, the flow stratification and the coarse-particle trajectory deviation from the liquid streamline due to inertia in a pump decrease.

    Since the coarse sand has larger inertia than the medium sand and exhibits stronger flowstratification, the favourable effect due to the fine sand on head reduction factor andefficiency factor becomes more significant.

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    water

    11-13%

    25-26%

    Vm [m/s]

    Im (Hydraulic gradient)

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    water

    13-16%

    23-24%

    Vm [m/s]

    Im (Hydraulic gradient)

    (a) Medium sand, d50=0.372 mm (b) Coarse sand, d50=1.840 mm

    Fig.4 Hydraulic gradient versus mean slurry velocity in the horizontal 150 mm pipe

    4. CONCLUSIONS

    1.

    Sand size has a strong influence on characteristics of the slurry pump. For the fine andmedium sand the head reduction equals to the efficiency reduction until Cvd=35%. Thisis different from the existing conclusion. While for the coarse sand, the turning-pointconcentration is only 15%, above which the efficiency drops faster than the head.

    2. Particle size distribution is very important in determining slurry pump characteristics. Amixture composed of broader grading solids exhibits smaller resistance in a slurry pump.

    The fine sand can lessen the flow stratification and thus improve the performance.3. A significant improvement on pump performance was observed by adding the fine sand

    to the coarse sand. This is because the coarse sand slurry exhibits stronger stratification.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    The study is supported by the MOE Supporting Program for National University KeyTeachers and the MOE Visiting Scholars Research Fund (P.R. China).

    REFERENCES

    1. Sellgren, A. and Vappling, L. (1986). Effects of highly concentrated slurries on the performance ofcentrifugal pumps. Proceedings International Symposium on Slurry Flows, FED Vol. 38, ASME,

    USA, pp.143-148.2.

    Wilson, K.C., Addie, G.R. Sellgren, A. and Clift, R. (1997). Slurry Transport Using Centrifugal Pumps,

    Blackie Academic and Professional.

    3.

    Ni, F. and Matousek, V. (1999). Flow of aqueous mixture of sand composed of fractions of different