Upload
mavis-bond
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
VLEKHO-HONIM
Home language and self-reported language difficulties as predictors of academic achievement in higher education
Dries Berings, & Maarten Hulselmans
Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUBrussel)Centre for Corporate Sustainability (CEDON)Centre Internationalisation and Projects (CIP)
ATEE Conference – 25 August 2008
VLEKHO-HONIM
Rationale
• Increasing diversity in student population in Flanders and worldwide
• Language diversity• Language and ethno-cultural diversity: challenges
and opportunities for staff and students in higher education
• Studies reveal lower study results in students with home language different from academic language
• Lecturers in Flanders report increasing language difficulties in students whose home language is Dutch or another language
• Question: is effect of home language on academic achievement = language weakness?
VLEKHO-HONIM
Language difficulties
• Expected language difficulties with students whose home language is not Dutch:– Pace of speaking of lecturers and fellow students– Not tempted to ask for help– Communication problems in teamwork– Tendency to translate to home language– Parents cannot help with homework– Difficulties with academic Dutch– Prejudices of lecturers towards students on the
basis of perceived language weaknesses
VLEKHO-HONIM
Research objectives
• Investigation of the predictive value of home language and self-reported language difficulties with respect to academic achievement in higher education
• Comparison of the effect of language-related factors on academic achievement with the effect of other factors often reported as relevant predictors of academic achievement
VLEKHO-HONIM
Broader research context
Academic achievement
Satisfaction with study
Satisfaction with life
Social-economic
Ethno-cultural
Psycho-social identity
Educational background
Study & learning strategy
Educational context
Life values
Ideology & religion
Openness
VLEKHO-HONIM
Sample (N=1123)
• Freshmen of 13 bachelor programmes in economy, health, education and social work
• Respons rate:– Administrative database (100%)– Survey 1 (74%)– Survey 2 (65%)
VLEKHO-HONIM
Variables
• CRITERION VARIABLE: proportion of credits obtained in January 2008 exam period
• CORE PREDICTOR VARIABLES:– Home language (Home language Dutch? Yes/No)– Self-reported language difficulties (Which of the
following factors influence your study in a negative way? Language weaknesses (Yes/No))
VLEKHO-HONIM
Self-reported constraints
1,4
2,8
4,9
7,6
8,4
10,2
10,7
12,0
24,3
24,8
0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0
Social isolation
Motor
Auditory
Visual
Medical
Psychological
Family
Language difficulties
Secondary education
Learning difficulties
% (functional) constraints
VLEKHO-HONIM
Control variables
• Personal characteristics: sex, age, life satisfaction• Educational background: educational level and
study delay in secondary education • Family background: educational level of parents,
work situation of parents, financial situation of parents, support from parents
• Study-related situational factor: support from lecturers and fellow students
• Study-related personal characteristics: study motivation, fear of failure, dealing with the subject matter
VLEKHO-HONIM
Standardized inventories
• Learning and study Strategies Inventory (LASSI; Lacante et al., 2001; Weinstein et al., 1987)– Motivation– Anxiety– Information processing
• Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Arrindell et al., 1999; Diener, 1985)
VLEKHO-HONIM
HYPOTHESES
• H1: The home language of students has an impact on their academic achievement, even after controlling for two socio-economic parameters, educational level and financial situation of the parents.
• H2: Self-reported language difficulties and home language are factors which both have unique predictive value with respect to academic achievement, even after controlling for their effects reciprocally.
VLEKHO-HONIM
RESULTS (H1)
Dependent Variable: study results
Source Type I I I Sum of Squares
df Mean Square
F p
Main effects
Home language (HL) 19562,80 1 19562,80 13,12 0,000 **
Financial situation (FS) 2966,68 1 2966,68 1,99 0,159
Educational level of parents (EL) 2155,02 2 1077,51 0,72 0,486
Interaction effects
HL * FS 31,14 1 31,14 0,02 0,885
HL * EL 1300,00 2 650,00 0,44 0,647
FS * EL 4290,19 2 2145,10 1,44 0,238
Total 5848331,81 986
VLEKHO-HONIM
Exploration (H1): comparison academic achievement 4 linguistic/ethno-cultural groups
Mean N Std.
Deviation
Dutch 68,6 868 38,0 Francophone 55,9 128 40,4 Turkish-Maghreb 49,7 23 42,8 Other 47,9 28 43,8 Total 66,1 1.047 39,0
VLEKHO-HONIM
RESULTS (H2)
Dependent Variable: study results
Source Type I I I Sum of Squares
df Mean Square F p
Main effects
Home language (HL) 5623,29 1 5623,29 4,02 0,045 *
Language difficulties (LD) 6463,90 1 6463,90 4,62 0,032 *
Interaction effect
HL*LD 151,87 1 151,87 0,11 0,742
Total 5053392,96 816
VLEKHO-HONIM
RESULTS (Multiple Regression Analysis)
B Beta t p
(Constant) 1,744
Study motivation 12,994 0,192 4,683 0,000 **
General Secondary Education 10,967 0,139 3,354 0,001 **
Female 10,490 0,133 3,225 0,001 **
Study delay prior to higher education entry -8,507 -0,101 -2,403 0,017 *
Home language only Dutch 9,873 0,097 2,476 0,014 *
Self-reported language difficulties -10,906 -0,091 -2,355 0,019 *
Reported support from lecturers 6,884 0,085
2,217 0,027 *
VLEKHO-HONIM
Perspectives for further research
• Larger samples to explore differential effects between linguistic/ethno-cultural groups of students
• Evaluation of quasi-experimental research on the effect of remedial language programmes on academic achievement
• Exploration of the interaction between home language and academic language
• A more systematic and differentiated way of diagnosing language difficulties
VLEKHO-HONIM
Perspectives for language policy
• Input research findings and feedback students and lecturers to select, develop and evaluate student- and staff-related language support initiatives including
• Language assessment• Generic and faculty-specific language remedial
programmes• Workshops for lecturers and student
counselors