Vortex Physics Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: Laws in physics have to be accepted 19 th NPA Conference, Albuquerque Friday July 27, 2012, 2:15 PM, 1h

Vortex PhysicsVortex PhysicsProf. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:

Laws in physics have to be acceptedLaws in physics have to be accepted

19th NPA Conference, Albuquerque Friday July 27, 2012, 2:15 PM, 1h

Vortex Physics and its consequences like:

* basic forces,

* derivation of the gravitational force,

* extended field theory,

* big bang nonsense,

* calculation of all particles and atomic cores

Spherical SymmetrySpherical SymmetryProf. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: about vortex physics

The law of “inverse square“ of The law of “inverse square“ of distancedistance

field sourcefield source (E or H):(E or H):

projection screen = x Lprojection screen = x L²²

L = distance to the sourceL = distance to the source

Spherical SymmetrySpherical SymmetryProf. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: about vortex physics

The law of “inverse square“ of The law of “inverse square“ of distancedistance

field sourcefield source (E or H):(E or H):

projection screen = x Lprojection screen = x L²² surface of a sphere = 4 surface of a sphere = 4rr²²

L = distance to the sourceL = distance to the source r = radius of the spherer = radius of the sphere

E E 1/r1/r²²

H H 1/r1/r²²

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory

conclusion:about the speed of lightabout the speed of light

• the field determines the length measures (what is 1 m)the field determines the length measures (what is 1 m)

• the field determines the velocitiesthe field determines the velocities v (in m/s) v (in m/s)

• the field determines the speed of light the field determines the speed of light c [m/s] c [m/s]

• Measurement of the speed of light is made with itselfMeasurement of the speed of light is made with itself

• measured is a constant of measurement measured is a constant of measurement c = 300.000 km/s c = 300.000 km/s

from E, H 1/r2 and r c follows:

the speed of light c is not a constant of nature!

about the Big Bang Theoryabout the Big Bang Theory

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics

problem solvingproblem solving the Doppler-effect is based on the addition theorem of velocities v c - v: c c + v

Big Bang contradicting laws of physicsBig Bang contradicting laws of physics


problem solvingproblem solving fixed stars are without any blue shift? because the galaxies are contracting slowly other galaxies outside our galaxy have to show a red shift? even if they don’t move the red shift increases with an accelerated contraction (Nobelprize 2012 Perlmutter, Schmidt und Riess)

About the light carrying aetherAbout the light carrying aether


If electro-magnetic waves would be bonded

to a stationary aether, we should

measure the proper motion of earth and sun as

a wind of the aether

What determines the What determines the speed of light?speed of light?

earth wind of the aether

sun

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: Wirbelphysik

Potsdam 1881Potsdam 1881

Michelson Michelson InterferometeInterferomete

rr

field-dependent length contractionfield-dependent length contractionProf. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physics

statement of the law in physicsstatement of the law in physics

field sourcefield source

scale of length Lscale of length L

E E 1/L1/L²² H H 1/L1/L²²


Observation of an action of force

one body is in the field of anotherone body is in the field of another

the distance is getting smallerthe distance is getting smaller

the bodies are attracting each otherthe bodies are attracting each other

from follows: E, H 1/L2


curvature of space the earth in the gravitational field of the sunthe earth in the gravitational field of the sun

Orbital curvature depending on the fieldOrbital curvature depending on the fieldE, H 1/r2

R.J. Boscovich: the earth is respiring unobservable! De spatio et tempore, ut a nobis cognoscuntur, 1755.

Ruder Boscovich

17551755 E, H 1/r2

R.J. Boscovich: the earth is respiring

unobservable. De spatio et

tempore, ut a nobis cognoscuntur.


interactions, forces

Examples for auxiliary terms: (Mass or charge)

Auxiliary terms = formalization of our imaginationAuxiliary terms = formalization of our imagination

Gravitational law (central force + centrifugal Gravitational law (central force + centrifugal force)force)

F = G· ——— ~ ——F = G· ——— ~ ——

gravitational mass or inertial mass)gravitational mass or inertial mass)

Coulomb‘s law (force in the electric field)Coulomb‘s law (force in the electric field)

F = ——— · ——— ~ ——F = ——— · ——— ~ ——

mm11 m m2 2 1 1 r² r²r² r²

1 Q1 Q11 Q Q2 2 1 1 44oorr r² r² r² r²


Speed reduction in a field

experimental examples about: E, H 1/c2

observer gravitational field star

x

field dependent speed of lightfield dependent speed of light

field-or gravitational lensesfield-or gravitational lenses

Deflection of light (Einstein, at the eclipse 1919)Deflection of light (Einstein, at the eclipse 1919)


curvature of space

An experimental example: L[m] 1/E,H with c [m/s]

in the gravitational field of a heavenly bodyin the gravitational field of a heavenly body


Length contraction in a field

More experimental examples: E, H 1/L2

Question: is it always the electromagnetic field?

cause: only electric or magnetic fieldonly electric or magnetic field

field- or gravitational lensesfield- or gravitational lenses

deflection of lightdeflection of light

Space curvatureSpace curvature

electrostriction (piezo speaker)electrostriction (piezo speaker)

magnetostrictionmagnetostriction


electromagnetic interaction caused by open field linescaused by open field lines

Example charged mass pointsExample charged mass points (e¯, e+, Ions,...):E, H 1/L2

As a consequence of open field lines: strong attraction or repulsion

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: unified theory Derivation of Gravitation caused by closed loop field linescaused by closed loop field lines

Example: uncharged Mass pointsExample: uncharged Mass points (n°, atoms,...)E, H 1/L2

As a consequence of closed loop field lines: weak attraction, no repulsion


From Subjectivity to Objectivity

SubjectivitySubjectivity Relativity Relativity ObjectivityObjectivity

observal labo-observal labo- mediator rolemediator role not not observalobserval. ratory physics ratory physics transformationtransformation

NewtonNewton PoincaréPoincaré Boscovich Boscovich MaxwellMaxwell EinsteinEinstein MeylMeyl

Galilei-transf.Galilei-transf. Lorentz-transf.Lorentz-transf. new transf.new transf. for c for c c c constant constant c c variable variable

physical standpointsphysical standpoints

the following physical standpoints can be distinguished:the following physical standpoints can be distinguished:

exemplary theories and their representatives:exemplary theories and their representatives:

with the associated transformation:with the associated transformation:


Derivation of the standpoints

approach: r c t (determine distance by signal prop. time)

change: dr cdt + tdc (total differential)

dr cdt dr tdc

r ct r tc

r t r c

two approaches are possible: two approaches are possible:

case 1: c = constantc = constant case 2: t = constantt = constant

theory of relativitytheory of relativity theory of objectivity theory of objectivity

example: a signal in a distance (r) from the sourcea signal in a distance (r) from the source


Relativity versus Objectivity

r ct r tc

r t r cfrom: length contraction variable speed of light

follows: time dilatation dependence of meter measure

with absolute speed of light with absolute time

many paradoxons without paradoxon

a comparison of the physical standpointsa comparison of the physical standpoints

case 1: c c constant constant case 2: t t constant constant

theory of relativitytheory of relativity theory of objectivity theory of objectivity

Observation domainObservation domain model domainmodel domain

(measurable) (can only be calculated) x(r) M{ x (r)}


Relativity - Objectivity

model transformationmodel transformation

Observation domainObservation domain model domainmodel domain

(measurable) (only calculable) x(r) M{ x (r)}

I. approach

V. result

IV. transform back

III. calculate

II. transform

VI. compare

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: the unified field theory

New Transformation I

transformation of the length dependencytransformation of the length dependency

dependency:

S.of L. c [m/s] = 1/c²: [Vs/Am] [As/Vm]

H [A/m]E [V/m]

B=H [Vs/m²]D=E [As/m²]

SRT (observation)

c = co = constant oo = 1/co² o = constant o = constant

H 1/r² E 1/r²

B 1/r² D 1/r²

AOT (model domain)

c r

1/r 1/r

H 1/r E 1/r

B 1/r² D 1/r²

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: the unified field theory

New Transformation II

transformation examplestransformation examples

capacity:charge:energy:

relaxation time:sp. conductivity

SRT (observation)

C [As/V] = 4rQ [As] = CUW [VAs] = Q²/C

1 [s] = / [A/Vm]

AOT (model domain)

C = constant Q = constant W = constant

1 = constant 1/r

derivation of the law of energy conservation: W = const.derivation of the law of energy conservation: W = const.

elementary vortices are indestructible: elementary vortices are indestructible: 1/r 1/r

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: physical particles

Compari-Compari-son of the son of the measured measured with the with the

calculated calculated particle particle mass.mass.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

gemessenberechnet

Elementary particle: – 0 – K0 K¯ 0 – n0 0 + ¯ 0 0 ¯ ¯ – F+

derivations with the theory of objectivity

particle mass related to the electron mass

measuredcalculated

Principle of causality


Vortex as a primary form of causalityVortex as a primary form of causality

cause effect

Quantum Physical Approach: quanta fields

Field theoretical Approach: fields quanta

cause

effect

Principle of causality requires a vortex physics

The vortex term in the science of Demokrit (460-370 BC) was identical with “natural law“ - the first attempt to formulate a unified physics.


Vortex in Nature Ein physikalisches GrundprinzipEin physikalisches Grundprinzip

•Innen: expandierender WirbelInnen: expandierender Wirbel

•Außen: kontrahierender WirbelAußen: kontrahierender Wirbel

•Bedingung für Wirbelablösung: Bedingung für Wirbelablösung: gleich mächtige Wirbel gleich mächtige Wirbel

•Kriterium: ViskositätKriterium: Viskosität

•Folge: röhrenförmige StrukturFolge: röhrenförmige Struktur

•Beispiele in d. Strömungslehre: Beispiele in d. Strömungslehre: Tornado, Windhose,Tornado, Windhose,

Wasser-, AbflusswirbelWasser-, Abflusswirbel

•Beispiel E-Technik: Blitz Beispiel E-Technik: Blitz


another Vortex in Nature Ein physikalisches GrundprinzipEin physikalisches Grundprinzip

•Innen: expandierender WirbelInnen: expandierender Wirbel

•Außen: kontrahierender WirbelAußen: kontrahierender Wirbel

•Bedingung für Wirbelablösung: Bedingung für Wirbelablösung: gleich mächtige Wirbel gleich mächtige Wirbel

•Kriterium: ViskositätKriterium: Viskosität

•Folge: röhrenförmige StrukturFolge: röhrenförmige Struktur

•Beispiele in d. Strömungslehre: Beispiele in d. Strömungslehre: Tornado, Windhose,Tornado, Windhose,

Wasser-, AbflusswirbelWasser-, Abflusswirbel

•Beispiel E-Technik: Blitz Beispiel E-Technik: Blitz


vortex and anti-vortex

•Inside: expanding vortexInside: expanding vortex

•Outside: contracting anti-vortexOutside: contracting anti-vortex

•Condition for coming off: Condition for coming off: equally powerful vorticesequally powerful vortices

•Criterion: viscosityCriterion: viscosity

•Result: tubular structureResult: tubular structure

•Examples in hydrodynamics: Examples in hydrodynamics: tornado, waterspout, tornado, waterspout,

whirlwind, drain vortexwhirlwind, drain vortex

•Example in electricalExample in electricalengineering: lightningengineering: lightning

a physical basic principlea physical basic principle

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: Maxwell approximation

Failure of the Maxwell theory

In conductive materials vortex fields occur, in the insulator however the fields are irrotational.

That is not possible, since at the transition from the conductor to the insulator the laws of refraction are valid and these require continuity!

Hence a failure of the Maxwell theory will occur in the dielectric!

problem of continuity in the case of the coming off of vorticesproblem of continuity in the case of the coming off of vortices

i.e.high-tension

cable

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: vortex physicsVortices in Microcosm and MacrocosmVortices in Microcosm and Macrocosm

spherical structures as a result of contracting potential vorticesspherical structures as a result of contracting potential vortices

examples: expanding vortex contracting vortex

• quantum collision processes Gluons physics (several quarks) (postulate!)

• nuclear repulsion of like strong interaction physics charged particles (postulate!)

• atomic centrifugal force of the electrical attraction physics enveloping electrons Schrödinger-equation

• Newton‘s centrifugal force gravitation physics (inertia) (can not be derived?!)

• astro phys. centrifugal f.(galaxy) dark matter, strings, ...

Vortex physics seminarVortex physics seminar

Albuquerque 2012

Prof. Dr. Konstantin MeylProf. Dr. Konstantin Meyl

Prof. Dr. Konstantin MEYL, Prof. Dr. Konstantin MEYL, www.meyl.eu

Furtwangen University, Germany Furtwangen University, Germany and and 1st 1st Transfer Centre of Scalar wave technology: Transfer Centre of Scalar wave technology: www.etzs.de

• Books available including the Books available including the presentation:presentation:

K. Meyl: Scalar Waves (all we know K. Meyl: Scalar Waves (all we know about)about)

K. Meyl: Self consistent ElectrodynamicsK. Meyl: Self consistent Electrodynamics

(in the shop of (in the shop of www.meyl.eu ) )

Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!

the extended 3the extended 3rdrd Maxwell-equation Maxwell-equation

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: Discovery

self-consistent electrodynamicsself-consistent electrodynamics

With the consequences:With the consequences:

1)1) div div BB ╪╪ 0 0 (offence against the 3(offence against the 3rdrd Maxwell-eq.) Maxwell-eq.)

2)2) Maxwell-equations are only describing a Maxwell-equations are only describing a special case (loosing universality).special case (loosing universality).

3)3) The existence of magnetic monopoles calls The existence of magnetic monopoles calls for field vortices and scalar wavesfor field vortices and scalar waves

4)4) Vector potential Vector potential AA is obsolete ( is obsolete (→ 1)→ 1)

5)5) The new vector of potential density The new vector of potential density bb replaces the vector potential replaces the vector potential AA

solution 2 (field vortices are forming a scalar wave):- prooved by experiments, -reproducible -international

accepted

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: Discovery

electric monopoles (charge carriers)

consitent with the Maxwell-theoryconsitent with the Maxwell-theory

curl H = j + D/t) (Ampère‘s law)(Ampère‘s law)

div curl H = 0 (acc. to the rules of vector (acc. to the rules of vector analysis)analysis)

and:and: 0 = div j + /t (div D) (eq. of (eq. of continuity)continuity)

div D = elel (electric charge density,(electric charge density,

resp. electric monopoles) resp. electric monopoles)

• relation: relation: jj = – = – vvelel = = DD//11

with with 11 time constant of eddy currents (relaxation time)time constant of eddy currents (relaxation time)

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: discovery

magnetic monopoles ?

extension of the Maxwell-theoryextension of the Maxwell-theory

– curl E = b + B/t) (law of induction)(law of induction)

extended by the potential density extended by the potential density bb [V/m²], Meyl [V/m²], Meyl 1990)1990)

– div curl E = 0and:and: 0 = div b + /t (div B) (eq. of (eq. of continuity)continuity)

div B = magnmagn (magnetic monopoles?!(magnetic monopoles?! conflicting the 3 conflicting the 3rdrd Maxwell-eq.) Maxwell-eq.)

• relation: relation: bb = – = – vvmagnmagn = = BB//22

with with 22 time constant of the time constant of the newnew developed developed potential vortex potential vortex

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: discovery

self-consistent calculation

extended Poynting vektor extended Poynting vektor SS

– div S = – div (E x H) = E·rot H – H·rot E

– div S = E·( j + D/t ) + H·( bb + B/t )

– div S = ½·/t E·D + ½·/t H·B + E·j + H·bb

– — divS dV = —(—·C·U² + —·L·I²) + I²·R1 + —

d d 1 1 UU²dt dt 2 2 R2

Self-consistent electrodynamics, if Self-consistent electrodynamics, if bb replaces replaces AA: : New!New!

input = stored power + ohmic + input = stored power + ohmic + dielectricdielectric power (electric + magnetic) losses power (electric + magnetic) losses losseslosses

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:

Summer Semester 2010

Supervisor at the University of Supervisor at the University of KonstanzKonstanz

Experimental Experimental proof of proof of

calculated calculated losses losses

(qualitative (qualitative comparison) comparison) with a MKT with a MKT

capacitor capacitor (Siemens-(Siemens-

Matsushita)Matsushita)

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: potential vortex

vortex structure in HV-capacitor visible proof for the existence of potential vortivesvisible proof for the existence of potential vortives

Measurement set up

(a) and photo of vortex structure in a metallized poly-

propylen layer capacitor (at 450 V/ 60 Hz/ 100OC), A. Yializis, S. W. Cichanowski, D. G. Shaw: Electrode Corrosion in Metallized Polypropylene Capacitors, Proceedings of IEEE, International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, Bosten, Mass., June 1980;

Prof. Dr.-Ing. K. Meyl: potential vortex

Vortex and anti-vortex

Energy of lossesEnergy of losses The power density shown against fre-

quency for noise (a) according to Küpfmüller,

as well as for dielectric losses of a capacitor

(also a) and for eddy current losses

(b) according to Meyl (b in visible duality to a)

Documents

Vortex Physics Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl: Laws in physics have to be accepted 19 th NPA Conference, Albuquerque Friday July 27, 2012, 2:15 PM, 1h