Upload
shana-houston
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
VULNERABILITY TO DENGUE FEVER IN JAMAICA
Charmaine Heslop-Thomas, Wilma Bailey, Dharmaratne Amarakoon, Anthony Chen, Samuel Rawlins, David Chadee, Rainaldo Crossbourne, Albert Owino, Karen Polson, Cassandra Rhoden, Roxanne Stennett, Michael Taylor.
HISTORY
Virological evidence of the presence of dengue in the Caribbean in the 1950s.
The disease has been appearing with increasing frequency.
All four viruses are circulating.
The appearance of dengue 1 in Jamaica in 1977 resulted in 60,000 cases.
The last large epidemic appeared about 10 years ago. Increase in temperature will shorten the incubation period of the virus.
.
RISK
Increase in temperature will shorten the incubation period of the virus.
The vector may become more infective more quickly.
Reproduce more rapidly.
Bite more frequently.
There may also be the increased risk of DHF.
EVIDENCE
A.aegypti is already appearing at higher elevations.
Simulations suggest a potential to spread into higher latitudes.
A link between El Nino and the incidence in some Pacific islands.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the vulnerability of the population of Jamaica to dengue.
To identify specific factors that put communities at risk.
BACKGROUND
An upward (but not significant) trend in rainfall indices.
An increase in the incidence of dengue in the corresponding period.
The increase particularly marked in El Nino and El Nino +1 years.
A seasonal peak in occurrence in the latter part of the year, after a few months of warming and when the rainfall is receding.
A lag between climatic parameters, especially temperatures and the epidemics.
In the Caribbean the association of the disease with temperature is stronger and the lag with temperature is greater than that with rainfall
DISTRIBUTION OF EPIDEMICS PEAKS AMONG ENSO PHASES 1981-2001
REGION TOTAL El Nino & +1
La Nina Neutral
Caribbean 8 7 -
1
T & T 8 6 - 2
Barbados 6 5 - 1
Jamaica 5 4 - 1
Belize 4 3 1
Time series graph of reported cases of dengue with rainfall and temperature for Jamaica
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Ra
infa
ll In
cid
en
ce
of
de
ng
ue
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
Te
mp
era
ture
(o
c)
rainfall dengue temp
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
PROJECTIONS
Projections for Jamaica for the years 2020, 2050, 2080 using statistical downscaling methods and two scenarios (SRES A2 AND B2) indicate the possibility of increased warming in the next century.
TO SUMMARISE
Changing climatic conditions may enhance dengue transmission.
Immunity is low.
But individual and contextual circumstances could modify vulnerability.
TWO LEVELS OF ANALYSIS
Generic and Specific Adaptive Capacity
Macro level – current social and economic trends.
Expert interviews in public sector organisations and NGOs. How do they interpret their roles? How prepared are they?
Local level study in communities that had experienced an outbreak. How vulnerable are they to an outbreak?
The Survey
Johns Hall
Irwin
Retirement
Tucker
GranvillePitfour
Dengue Cases 1998 - St James
500 0 1/4 1/2 3/4 1
10500
1000
1000METRES
YARDS
4 KILOMETRES
MILE32
32
URBAN BOUNDARY 2001
DENGUE OCCURANCE
N
river
gully
MONTEGO BAY
URBAN
RURAL
THE MACRO LEVEL
The ending of the bauxite/alumina inspired boom in the 1970s.
IMF and its conditionalities. Their effect felt most keenly by the poor:-Job loss.-Devaluation and price increases.-Removal of subsidies on basic food items.
No real economic growth in more than 30 years.
THE INTERVIEWS
A – THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH
Most saw the possibility of increasing transmission.
No long term strategies are in place.
A resource constraint necessitates prioritising: HIV/AIDS is the priority.
The cost of surveillance, and control, public education is too high.
Environmental sanitation is the responsibility of communities.
The positives:
a well organised system of primary health care built on interlocking system of clinics.
a long tradition of involvement in policy oriented research eg. their involvement in the current climate change project.
A decentralised system of health care.
THE INTERVIEWS
B. OTHER ORGANISATIONS Office of Disaster Preparedness and Emergency
Management; National Environment and Planning Agency; Water Resources Authority; National Meteorological Service.
-Health was not a part of their mandate-Sea level rise posed a greater threat.
The NGOs Long term considerations such as climate change were not on
their agenda.
Vulnerability of Communities
Based on indicators identified in the literature: Immunity, knowledge of symptoms and vectors of disease. Use of
protective measures. Measures of resilience and stress – education, employment, income, female
household headship, room densities, coping strategies, integration into the community.
Source of water, water storage. Distance from the nearest health facility
Community Ranking
Most Vulnerable: Johns Hall - 44 Least Vulnerable: Granville/Pitfour - 26
Vulnerable Groups
Characteristics Group 5
(%)
Group 1
(%)
1.Female Household headship 94 40
2.Unskilled 88 13
3.Primary education or none. 77 7
4.Minimum wage or less 57 0
5.Not Coping 88 0
6.Water storage in drum 88 20
7. Clinic distance 64 13
8. No protection 88 53
9.No knowledge of dengue transmission
94 7
10. No social integration 53 47
11. No knowledge of dengue symptoms
88 13
12. No personal acceptance for dengue control
77 7
Community with highest proportion
Phi coefficient
H/headship-0.6 p<.000
Water storage in drums 0.6 p<.000
Knowledge of dengue transmission 0.9 p<000
Johns Hall -53% Granville/Pitfour – 73%
CONCLUSIONS
Substantial number of people living in informal settlements is vulnerable.
Between 55,000 and 60,000 persons in Montego Bay (over 25 %) live in such settlements.
The poor are vulnerable and many of the poor work.
If communities must take responsibility for environmental sanitation they must be given the tools – education.
Access to water must be tackled on two fronts - the provision of low-cost, secure drums.
-the granting of security of tenure to those who, because of their status, are denied access to running water.
Public sector organisations must be persuaded that:
-The threat of an outbreak of disease is not incompatible with a mandate to mitigate disaster or sustain development.
-Healthy lifestyle is an outcome of sustainable development
-They can incorporate disease control into their education programme.
THANK YOU