Upload
vivekb67
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
1/12
Filing Information: October 2006, IDC #204157, Volume: 1
Corporate Learning and Performance: Buyer Case Study
B U Y E R C A S E S T U D Y
T h e I n t e g r a t i o n o f P e r f o r m a n c e a n d L e a r n i n g a t W a c h o v i a
Lisa Rowan Peter McStravick
I D C O P I N I O N
In February 2006, Wachovia Corp. rolled out its newly integrated learning and
performance capabilities in the first phase of what will eventually be an enterprisewide
implementation. As IDC has reported previously, the integration of these two
processes can provide organizations with improved visibility into the talent pool,
deliver more targeted learning and development, and improve the overall quality of
manager/employee interactions around performance. IDC believes that the Wachovia
story exemplifies the effort that is required by organizations to successfully integrate
the processes and technologies around learning and performance. Key findings from
this case study include:
! Integrated learning and performance management (PM) can save an
organization a significant amount of time and improve an employee's level of
engagement in the process.
! Amid the war for talent, integrated learning and performance gives employees
more control over their own career development and can thus serve as an
integral part of a company's retention strategy.
! Integrating learning and performance creates a climate for more meaningful
discussions between managers and employees around career development.
! An integrated system helps more accurately demonstrate and quantify the impact
of learning.
! Companies that focus on standardizing their learning and performance
processes first will find the adoption of new and integrated platforms easier.
! Companies should incorporate change management strategies into their rollout.
I N T H I S B U Y E R C A S E S T U D Y
This IDC Buyer Case Study examines Wachovia Corp.'s efforts to integrate learning
and performance management. It observes the company's evolution from being adecentralized organization to being a company with standardized processes and
platforms for learning and performance. This study is based on phone interviews and
product demonstrations with Dean Williams, Wachovia's chief learning officer;
Eleanor Reali, organizational effectiveness consultant with the leadership practices
group; and Michelle Gasiorowski,learning services manager.
GlobalHead
quarters:5SpeenStreetFramingham,
MA
01701USA
P.5
08.8
72.8
200
F.5
08.9
35.4
015
www.i
dc.com
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
2/12
2 #204157 2006 IDC
S I T U A T I O N O V E R V I E W
O r g a n i z a t i o n O v e r v i e w
Wachovia Corp. is one of the nation's largest diversified financial services companies,providing a broad range of retail banking and brokerage, asset and wealth
management, and corporate and investment banking products and services. Including
the Golden West merger, which closed on October 1, 2006, Wachovia has retail and
commercial banking operations in 21 states, with 3,400 retail banking offices from
Connecticut to Florida and west to Texas and California. In addition, two core
businesses operate under the Wachovia Securities brand name: retail brokerage with
737 offices in 49 states and in Latin America, and corporate and investment banking
in selected industries nationwide. Other nationwide businesses include mortgage
lending in 39 states and auto finance covering 46 states. Globally, Wachovia serves
clients through more than 40 international offices. As of September 30, 2006,
Wachovia had assets of $559.9 billion and market capitalization of $88.2 billion.
Not unlike most financial institutions, Wachovia evolved from a number of mergers
with other banks, the most significant being when First Union and Wachovia merged
in 2001, officially becoming the entity it is today.
This merger in particular served as a catalyst for Wachovia because it was at this
time when the company's leadership began to realize that to become better equipped
to manage its projected growth, the company needed to begin to standardize some of
its key processes. Two in particular, which until this time had remained largely
disparate and decentralized, were learning and performance management. The
learning environment, for instance, within both Wachovia and the legacy First Union
bank, were quite different. While neither company had standardized on any one
learning management platform, First Union had operated with a corporate university-based model that was centralized, while Wachovia was more decentralized, with the
bulk of its training functions embedded within the individual lines of business as well
as the Wachovia Center for Learning that focused on leadership, creativity, and other
programs with organizational reach and relevance. Equally dissimilar were the
performance management processes in place across the company. While some
general guidelines had been established by First Union around PM, each line of
business controlled its own performance management system and determined how it
was created, operated, and maintained. A companywide performance management
process, including core competencies and support by a new technology tool, had
been rolled out in legacy Wachovia but was not scalable to the larger merged
organization. From an enterprise perspective, not only did this prevent visibility into
individual and organizational performance across and into the different lines of
business, but as the new Wachovia continued to grow and as people moved between
business units, it became increasingly apparent that the inconsistencies that existed
in these processes could no longer be ignored.
Wachovia CEO Ken Thompson recognized that to move his company forward in how
it performed as an enterprise, Wachovia would need to eliminate the use of multiple
disparate systems. Different types of employee performance, compensation, and
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
3/12
2006 IDC #204157 3
learning information were being stored in different systems, each with its own
interface, creating a confusing experience for Wachovia employees. Thompson and
Shannon McFayden, Wachovia's head of human resources (HR) and corporate
relations, made the decision to centralize the core HR processes and make them
more accessible and user friendly. Specifically within the learning function, Williams,
Wachovia's chief learning officer, picked up the charge by adopting a new five-word
mantra for his team: "Make Learning Easy and Effective."
To achieve this, Wachovia's HR group set several goals:
! Improve the overall quality, efficiency, and consistency of Wachovia's learning
and performance management systems
! Better integrate the two processes and systems
! Standardize on a single learning platform and integrate it with a single
performance management system
! Provide employees with easier access to the performance and development toolsthey need to be successful in their jobs
! Provide training to Wachovia employees while keeping them engaged in their
jobs and interfering as little as possible with their daily responsibilities
! Remove frustration from the system and replace it with fluidity
! Reduce the need to toggle in and out of different applications
! Improve tracking and reporting capabilities
! Take an employee-centric view embed the processes around learning and
performance into the employees' workflow as best as possible
The HR group recognized also that a move in this direction for the company was
going to be a challenge from a cultural standpoint. In many cases, the integration of
technology is easier than the integration of long-established processes and
workflows. To maximize the odds for success, Wachovia made the important decision
to first reengineer and standardize on the processes the company used around
learning and performance management before selecting specific technology
solutions. Once the work on processes was completed, the organization agreed to a
phased approach for implementation. First the company would roll out its learning
management system (LMS) and then it would select and implement a performance
management tool. A critical requirement for selection of a PM tool was the ability to
integrate seamlessly with the LMS.
Business Case for Integrating Learning and Performance in the
Context of the War for Talent
While the primary driver for Wachovia to integrate its learning and performance
technologies was the need to create a more consistent model for its employees
across all business lines, there were other forces driving this decision as well. In
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
4/12
4 #204157 2006 IDC
particular was the current talent shortage affecting the financial services industry. Like
many financial institutions, Wachovia has found that despite its offshoring and
outsourcing strategies, it was still facing a skills shortage. With the company looking
to grow its business further and establish itself as a national franchise, talent
development and retention became key initiatives. Today, Wachovia is shifting its
strategy to grooming its own talent rather than acquiring it from outside the
organization. This shift required that Wachovia reexamine the ways in which it
measured and tracked internal competencies and performance. It also meant that the
bank consider ways in which it could ensure that it remain an employer of choice a
place where people want to work and more importantly want to stay.
Williams, Wachovia's CLO, believes that the integration of learning and performance
played a key role in a couple of ways and standardization made for a much stronger
business case. For example:
! With consistent processes for learning and performance management, enabled
by robust technology, Wachovia would gain greater visibility into its talent pool
across the company and be able to develop and retain top performers more
effectively. These tools, and the leadership behaviors they support, would have a
positive impact on the manager/employee relationship as well as the potential to
lift performance at the individual, team, and organizational levels.
! Similarly, happy employees tend to stay with their companies and so when
feedback from employee surveys told Wachovia that its workers wanted more
control over their careers, the company set out to provide that. The integration of
learning and performance systems not only made the development and
performance functions easier for management, but it empowered Wachovia
employees to be more involved and take greater ownership over their career
plans. The integration of the two functions gives employees greater visibility into
their performance and development goals.
C h a l l e n g e s a n d S o l u t i o n
Hybrid-Solution (Centralized/Decentralized)
While Wachovia's leadership agreed that it made business sense to standardize on
one platform each for learning and performance, the company did not want to lose the
flexibility and freedom the individual business lines had to customize each process to
their own specific needs. As a result, Wachovia chose to apply a hybrid model to the
two functions. Centralization of the learning and performance processes would create
a more consistent and efficient experience across the company and give Wachovia
better tracking and reporting capabilities as well as an ability to address
enterprisewide training needs. However, to address the unique learning needs of
each business line, Wachovia created learning teams embedded within each line of
business whose responsibility it was to identify the specific development goals for
their particular clients, whether the general bank, a retail securities group, a corporate
investment bank, the wealth management group, and so forth.
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
5/12
2006 IDC #204157 5
Vendor Selection Process and Implementation Timeline
Wachovia issued its request for proposal (RFP) for a learning management system in
2001 at which point it began evaluating vendors. Having come up with the functional
requirements it was looking for in a platform, Wachovia's selection committee
narrowed the list down to three vendors and then invited each of those vendors in for
a demonstration. To make comparisons between vendors as accurate as possible,Wachovia used a scripted scenario that it had each vendor perform.
In addition to the demonstration, Wachovia had a number of key criteria that
influenced its decision:
! Product usability. Wachovia performed a number of usability tests with the final
three LMS products with different stakeholders to gain "hands-on" experience
with each product and assess its ease of use.
! Scalability. It was important that the LMS product be able to scale to meet the
demands of Wachovia's growing company as well as be able to provide unique
learning environments for each of the companies' individual business units.
! Reporting capability. Wachovia needed an LMS product that would allow it to
run detailed tracking reports across the entire organization and within each line of
business. In what is a highly regulated industry, it is critical for Wachovia to be
able to quickly determine what training is being delivered as well as who has
taken it and who has not and how much of it has been taken.
! Strategic direction. Wachovia's leadership met with the leadership of each LMS
vendor to ascertain that the two companies were strategically aligned and were
essentially headed in the same direction.
! Financial stability. Wachovia wanted to ensure that it partnered with a learning
company that was financially stable and would be around for the long term.
After completing its evaluation of LMS vendors, Wachovia chose the Docent learning
management platform and began implementing the system throughout its enterprise
in March 2003. Although the LMS platform came with basic performance
management modules, Wachovia chose to leave these turned off and commenced its
search for a best-of-breed performance management system.
During this time also, as part of the company's drive to standardize key processes,
Wachovia began developing and then using a set competency model. Competencies
were defined for the company's three primary job roles: individual contributor, leader,
and executive leader. These competencies were integrated into the company's
existing performance management and learning processes. Reali, Wachovia's
organizational effectiveness consultant, was part of the team that implemented thecore competency strategy and served as the competency lead as part of the
performance management project team. In addition to working on PM design that
integrated learning with effective PM, Reali kept focus on the way competencies
could be used to support employee performance and development as supported by
the two platforms. Joining Reali and the performance management project team was
Gasiorowski, from Wachovia's learning services group, who would help ensure that
the performance management product integrated well with the LMS platform.
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
6/12
6 #204157 2006 IDC
In 2003, Wachovia began the vendor selection process; the first step was to hold a
requirements meeting with key stakeholders. This generated a list of some 800
requirements that Wachovia then put into its RFP. One set of requirements
addressed the integration of PM with learning in detail, including functionality, user
experience, and technology integration.
At the end of the evaluation process, the SuccessFactors performance management
platform was chosen by the selection committee. One thing the committee in
particular liked was the platform's configurability such that it could be tailored to
address the unique performance management needs of Wachovia's different lines of
business.
In 2004, Docent and Click2Learn merged to form SumTotal Systems. The design of
the Docent 6.5 LMS gave Wachovia an integration path to link SumTotal's and
SuccessFactors' tools.
In February 2006, Wachovia rolled out its integrated performance and learning
management system to first-phase participants, which included the human resources
and corporate relations division and parts of the operations, IT, and ecommercegroups. Wachovia recently purchased SumTotal's newest LMS platform, Total LMS
Version 7, which also includes a path for integration to SuccessFactors' PM tool. The
company plans to roll out the integrated systems to the rest of the company in
November 2006.
What Integration Looks LikeToday, the integration of SumTotal and SuccessFactors at Wachovia has changed
the way managers and employees engage around learning and performance. Prior to
the integration of these two platforms, managers typically wrote performance reviews
for each of their direct reports from scratch at the end of the year, using the forms and
tools that were in place for their business area. This meant having to recallemployees' goals and accomplishments for the past year and assign ratings
accordingly. Individual development plans were typically created and managed
separately. Conversations around performance and development typically happened
once a year because managers simply didn't have the time or the tools to do
otherwise. With the new system in place, managers and employees can access an
integrated performance and development plan (PDP) any time from Wachovia's HR
portal. A single sign-on gives prepopulated access to an employee's current plan,
which includes the employee's goals for the year, the appropriate competencies and
behaviors, and a detailed development plan that can include formal and nonformal
development activities. From within the development plan, learning activities housed
in the company's LMS can be searched by competency and added to the plan as
needed by either the manager or the employee at any time. The development plans
keep an up-to-date record of the status of each learning activity, showing when the
employee enrolled and tracking his or her progress and logging when the learning
was completed.
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
7/12
2006 IDC #204157 7
In this way, the performance and development plan has become a dynamic document
used continuously throughout out the year, initially as an ongoing performance journal
and eventually as the final appraisal document. Its accessibility gives managers and
employees:
! A simple means of discussing performance goal and competency expectations,
either in person or virtually at the beginning of the performance cycle
! A way of aligning individual goals to the company's organizational goals
! A method for assessing the employee's current state of proficiency by
competency
! The capability to assign development strategies as needed throughout the year
Figure 1 shows Wachovia's learning and development portal. From this page,
Wachovia employees can access both the SumTotal LMS (rebranded as My Learning
Connection) and the SuccessFactors performance management system.
F I G U R E 1
W a c h o v i a ' s L e a r n i n g a n d D e v e l o p m e n t P o r t a l
Access to
Performance
Management System
Access to Learning
Management System
Access to
Performance
Management System
Access to Learning
Management System
Source: IDC, 2006
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
8/12
8 #204157 2006 IDC
Figure 2 shows Wachovia's My Learning Connection with the navigation link to the
performance management tool. Clicking on this link gives Wachovia employees
access to the performance management tool without the need for a second log-in.
Similarly, employees can navigate seamlessly back to the learning management
platform from within the SuccessFactors platform by clicking on a similar link shown in
Figure 3.
Figure 4 shows how the integration between the learning and performance systems
allows Wachovia employees to search for learning content by competency.
F I G U R E 2
W a c h o v i a ' s M y L e a r n i n g C o n n e c t i o n w i t h N a v i g a t i o n a l L i n k
Source: IDC, 2006
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
9/12
2006 IDC #204157 9
F I G U R E 3
W a c h o v i a ' s N a v i g a t i o n a l L i n k
Navigationallink back to
learningplatform
Navigationallink back to
learningplatform
Source: IDC, 2006
F I G U R E 4
W a c h o v i a ' s M y L e a r n i n g C o n n e c t i o n S e a r c h P a g e
Ability tosearch by
competency
Ability tosearch by
competency
Source: IDC, 2006
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
10/12
10 #204157 2006 IDC
R e s u l t s
While the rollout of the integrated system is still in its first phase, Wachovia does
expect a number of benefits once the system is implemented across the entire
enterprise. These include:
! Time savings for managers. Previously, managers may have taken as much as
two weeks of their work time at the end of each year reviewing files and
employee goals, writing development plans, and delivering appraisals. The
integrated system reduces the amount of time needed to complete the
performance appraisal process, allows for some of the onus for the process to be
pushed down to the employee, and spreads the time required to keep the system
up to date over the entire year. Wachovia CLO Williams estimates that the
automated components of the system alone will save Wachovia management
over 500,000 hours per year.
! Improved quality of engagement between manager and employee. Because
historically many performance reviews occurred during the final weeks before
they were due, this gave managers little time to have quality discussions around
performance and development with their team members and still get the required
materials submitted on time. The automation and integration of their learning and
performance systems now encourages managers and employees to engage
more frequently, allowing for more meaningful discussions throughout the year
regarding individual performance and development.
! Greater visibility into the Wachovia talent pool. Wachovia's executives have a
better ability to identify their top performers so they can support and develop
them for leadership roles within the bank. The integrated approach will help
identify who those people are and enable the learning to take them to the next
level of their careers, within their current business area or as "corporate talent"
that can be leveraged effectively across the company.
! Improved ability to assimilate merging workforces. Typical of many
companies within the financial service industry, Wachovia Corp. has evolved
through a series of mergers and acquisitions. An integrated performance
management and learning system will play an important role in potential future
merger and acquisition activity by assisting the company in more seamlessly
assimilating newly acquired talent into the incumbent talent pool. Because
Wachovia is a public company, this may also have a positive effect on Wall
Street, where financial analysts often weigh a company's reputation around
merger integration in its evaluation.
! Improved career development capability. Management will not be the only groupto benefit from the increased visibility that the integrated learning and performance
management systems will bring to Wachovia. Employees interested in career
advancement will have a better sense of their overall strengths and weaknesses
and be able to benchmark themselves against the competency levels required for
more senior positions within the company. Where development opportunities exist,
employees will be able to access Wachovia's learning catalogue and incorporate
learning into their individual development plans.
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
11/12
2006 IDC #204157 11
! Better measurement of learning's impact. With the two functions linked together,
Wachovia will now be able to better measure the impact learning has had on an
employee's performance. Ratings given prior to the completion of training can be
compared with those that follow, indicating whether there were improvements.
E S S E N T I A L G U I D A N C E
Wachovia's experience in the redesign and implementation of integrated learning and
performance management hold important lessons to buyers and vendors of these
platforms:
! Start with the end in mind. Wachovia CLO Williams believes that companies
should begin the process by envisioning and then articulating the end state or
environment they are trying to create before speaking to vendors about a
potential solution. Ignoring this important step can allow an organization to
become enamored with a technology and its capabilities even though it doesn't
fulfill the necessary business requirements.
! Focus on the processes first. Similarly, Wachovia spent a lot of time
standardizing upon and reengineering its performance management process up
front such that it had a clear idea of what it needed its technological solution to
do. The investment Wachovia made in evaluating and reworking its processes
facilitated the adoption of the integrated system since stakeholders were involved
in the process throughout. The best technology cannot excel around badly
designed processes, so this is a vital step.
! Use business metrics to gain sponsorship. While sponsorship wasn't a
significant challenge at Wachovia because the project had the support of CEO
Thompson, HR used business metrics to build a case for the initiative. Rather
than highlighting the number of employees that would have access to the new
system, HR used metrics such as the number of hours management would saveper year and the impact this kind of system would have on the company's ability
to retain, develop, and attract employees amid the shortage for talent.
! Consider change management issues. Given that Wachovia had largely been
a decentralized organization, the conversion to centralized learning and
performance was a big step for the company. As a result, the Wachovia project
team decided to roll out the integrated system in stages to give itself an
opportunity to address any early issues before the system went full scale.
Similarly, to help managers and employees get used to the practice of linking
learning content to organizational competencies, the system was set up initially
so that employees could retrofit courses that had already been completed with a
development goal. The aim going forward, however, is to have that linkage doneup front before a course is completed.
8/6/2019 Wachovia Case Study
12/12
12 #204157 2006 IDC
L E A R N M O R E
R e l a t e d R e s e a r c h
! 2006 Talent Survey: Candidate Shortages Still Prevalent(IDC #202442, July
2006)
! Plateau Systems: Integrating Learning and Performance (IDC #201774, June
2006)
! Worldwide and U.S. Corporate eLearning 20062010 Forecast(IDC #35032,
March 2006)
! Worldwide Workforce Performance Management 20062010 Forecast(IDC
#34907, February 2006)
C o p y r i g h t N o t i c e
This IDC research document was published as part of an IDC continuous intelligence
service, providing written research, analyst interactions, telebriefings, and
conferences. Visit www.idc.com to learn more about IDC subscription and consulting
services. To view a list of IDC offices worldwide, visit www.idc.com/offices. Please
contact the IDC Hotline at 800.343.4952, ext. 7988 (or +1.508.988.7988) or
[email protected] for information on applying the price of this document toward the
purchase of an IDC service or for information on additional copies or Web rights.
Copyright 2006 IDC. Reproduction is forbidden unless authorized. All rights reserved.
Published Under Services: Corporate Learning and Performance; HR and Talent
Management Services