Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Global Asset Allocation Strategy
September 2019
Investments │ Wealth Management
Waiting for a recharge
Waiting for a
recharge• Overweight Europe with investors being too pessimistic, dovish
package from ECB should be a catalyst, but a continued
deteroriation in manufacturing indicators poses a risk to this call.
• Japan appears cheap, but is still uninspiring on all other
accounts, especially earnings. We keep the underweight.
• We keep the defensive stance in the sector strategy. UW IT and
Industrials, OW Consumer Staples and Health Care.
EQUITY STRATEGY: Keep overweight in Europe
FIXED INCOME STRATEGY: Raise EM bonds to OW
• August proved to be a challenging month with increased
uncertainty around the economic cold war between US and
China. This weighs on the economic outlook which still not has
stabilized. Hopes/expectations on central banks are high, as are
worries about monetary impotency. Fiscal stimulus and falling
yields could provide an economic boost, but has yet to show up.
• Market tension runs high in this environment, where sentiment
can turn on a day. Clarity around trade and monetary/fiscal
policy has the potential to recharge markets going forward.
• Risk/reward is thus limited short term, and we keep our neutral
stance between equities and fixed income.
KEEP EQUITIES NEUTRAL
September 2019
• We recommend increasing the weight in EM bonds and lower
high yield on better risk return and what we see as a mature
credit cycle. Still a decent carry compared to government bonds.
• Overall, we expect modest returns from bonds for the rest of
2019, as spread and yield levels are low. Though it is still an
important part of the overall portfolio composition.
Market performance & recommendations
Central banks lifted equity markets again
Current allocation Previous allocation
ASSET ALLOCATION - N + Comments
Equities
Fixed Income
EQUITY REGIONS - N +
North America
Europe
Japan
Emerging Markets
Denmark
Finland
Norway
Sweden
EQUITY SECTORS - N +
Industrials
Cons Discretionary
Cons Staples
Health Care
Financials
IT
Comm. Services
Utilities
Energy
Materials
Real Estate
BOND SEGMENTS - N +
Government
Investment Grade
High Yield
Emerging MarketsSource: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
Some pick-up lately across the regions, but still early days
Macro risks have increased, but easing may help
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
The slowdown has been visible in relative valuation
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
• Weaker macro has not pushed stocks lower this year, as falling bond yields have done the heavy lifting on relative valuation.
• The global manufacturing sector is tiptoeing around recession due to dampened capex, continued US/China-worries and a deteriorating profit outlook.
• However, services are still holding up, consumer spending remains robust and easier financial conditions and fiscal stimulus will help going forward.
However, real yields are very low this timeInverted yield curve has historically often been followed by recession
Flat yield curve signals recession?
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
• The yield curve has a good track record in predicting recessions. However, this time around real rates have dived lower and should stimulate growth.
• If the yield curve signal turns out to be true, the implications for markets are still uncertain short term.
• The time lag between the signal and the recession in highly variable and equity markets have historically peaked on average 6 months after the signal.
Let’s try again: Central banks liquidity squeeze reversing Monetary impotence? Yield curve inversion after Fed cuts
• The Fed is cutting rates and the ECB is expected to ease policy in September. Is the punchbowl being refilled? Markets are increasingly skeptical.
• US 2-10’s yield curve inverted after the Fed started cutting. Yield curve inversions means tightening financial conditions – the opposite of what the Fed wants.
• Bottom-line: Monetary easing necessary, but not sufficient to reduce recession risks. Effectiveness is reduced amid geopolitics trumping central banks.
Central banks: Refilling the liquidity punchbowl might not be enough
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
Volatility tends to increase in the run-up to and during recessions
Keep a cautious stance, but stay invested
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
Some recessions are more painful for markets than others
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
• Outside of financial crises, stock markets return back to previous peaks relatively fast, and investors should stay invested through the cycle.
• The most reliable investment outcome around recessions has been that markets perform very well after the trough. Before the peak, it’s more 50-50.
• As volatility increases in the run-up to and during a recession, diversification within defensive building blocks becomes increasingly important.
The Bermuda triangle | Fed can mitigate but not insure against geopolitics
Fed
US-China conflict
Economy / markets
• “Cross currents” stemming from the
geopolitical landscape could weaken
the economic outlook forcing the Fed to
cut.
• Should Trump escalate geopolitical
conflicts further the risk is that easier
monetary cannot insure against this
risk.
• The US / China conflict seems to be
dictated partly by the economic /
financial damage of the conflict i.e.
should outlook deteriorate the ”Trump
Put” is probably getting in place.
• Should Fed ease significantly
(insurance cuts, QE) the risk is that
Trump sees a opportunity for escalating
further without creating too much
economic damage.
The economy and the market react to both the
dovish tones from central banks and US/China
conflict. We have to incorporate geopolitics and
monetary response into the equation:
• The market has priced a benign outcome.
Markets has priced Fed rather than the
potential negative effects from geopolitics.
• Accommodative monetary policy can offset
some the of negative “cross currents”, but
has limits should geopolitical tensions
escalate
Insurance?
”Fed put”
”Trump put”
Earnings expectations will continue to slide
2019 estimates still being revised down. 2020 starting now?
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
• Earnings revision ratios are still negative, and 2019 earnings estimates are in a steady downtrend. Reality check for 2020 starting now; expect downgrades.
• Margins seem to turn down. Long term positive drivers from globalization, interest rates and QE, demographics and tax cuts are loosing steam or reversing.
• Leading indicators for earnings like PMIs, ISM and global trade point to further downgrades. A mild 2019 earnings recession is probably already discounted.
Margins under pressure in all regions
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
This material was prepared by Investments |
Valuation: Will TINA lead to repricing?
• PB-ratio for MSCI All Country is a bit higher than average from 2004. The same conclusion would apply for the equivalent PE-ratio over the same time period.
• Relative to bonds, equities seem as cheap as ever. The steep fall in rates and the lack of alternatives might lead investors into equities, causing a repricing.
• However, low rates give a bleak signal for growth, geopolitical uncertainties should increase the risk premia and there are downside risks to earnings estimates.
PB-ratios globally a bit higher than average ..
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
.. but relative to bonds equities look as attractive as ever (S&P500)
Trade worries rattle markets
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
Trade threats rattle markets, but are clearly not the only game in town
• Tariffs and tariff threats have plagued markets from at least the start of 2018. With its ebbs and flows, the situation has deteriorated.
• While the direct economic impact is relatively modest, the fear of a broader tech/currency war and deterioration in sentiment has put a brake on markets.
• Timing the turns of the trade war is next to impossible. Hence, we think for now the best action is to consider it an ongoing risk.
Many political risk factors loomingEconomic policy uncertainty is rising
Trade currently overshadows other geopolitics
Source: iStock Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
• With trade as the centre piece, it’s easy to overlook other potential geopolitical drivers. A more lasting trade truce is most likely after the 2020 election.
• Brexit date is fast approaching, and so far both sides haven’t budged, increasing the risk for a hard Brexit. An extension of the deadline is our base case.
• Italy is mired in (yet another) political crisis. Hong Kong, Iran and possibly North Korea can evolve into larger crisis. Buckle up.
EM hard FX offers attractive risk reward as USD is well supportedYield curve flattening will eventually tighten credit conditions
• We reduce credit risk, moving HY from overweight to neutral amid a slowly turning credit cycle and structurally higher geopolitical uncertainty.
• We do not expect an outright credit crisis in light of policy makers aversion towards volatility, but se potential for further spread widening from here.
• Within risky bonds, EM hard currency debt seems more attractive to us, with EM central banks all easing and EM macro fundamentals relatively sound.
Credits | Overweight EM bonds – reduce High Yield amid a slowly turning credit cycle
Source: Thomson Reuters/ Nordea Source: Thomson Reuters/ Nordea
Earnings are better outside of Japan
Stick to overweight in Europe and underweight in Japan
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
Good returns from all regions this year
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
• Keep the overweight in Europe as investors have given up on the region and ECB is expected to stimulate meaningfully in September.
• Japan, for its part, is uninspiring on all counts aside from valuation which is more attractive in Europe.
• The biggest risks to this view are protracted weakness in European manufacturing and European politics.
Keep the defensive stance in the sector strategy
Sector strategy| Stick to the defensive stance
Weak indications from the semi-cycle indicates downside to IT EPS
Source: Thomson Reuters / Nordea
• We keep the defensive tilt in the sector strategy by underweighting IT and Industrials while overweighting Consumer Staples and Healthcare.
• Continued weakness in the global cycle warrants a defensive stance, and the weak indications from Capex and semiconductors points at IT.
• Consumer Staples is a good overweight candidate as we see upside potential relative to yields while the US consumer seems to hold up.
Sector Recommendation Relative weight
Industrials Underweight -2%
Consumer Discretionary Neutral -
Consumer Staples Overweight +2%
Health Care Overweight +2%
Financials Neutral -
IT Underweight -2%
Communication Services Neutral -
Utilities Neutral -
Energy Neutral -
Materials Neutral -
Real Estate Neutral -
DISCLAIMER
Nordea Investment Center gives advice to private customers and small and medium-sized companies in Nordea regarding investment strategy and concrete
generic investment proposals. The advice includes allocation of the customers’ assets as well as concrete investments in national, Nordic and international
equities and bonds and in similar securities. To provide the best possible advice we have gathered all our competences within analysis and strategy in one
unit - Nordea Investment Center (hereafter “IC”).
This publication or report originates from: Nordea Bank Abp, Nordea Bank Abp, filial i Sverige, Nordea Bank Abp, filial i Norge and Nordea Danmark, Filial af
Nordea Bank Abp, Finland (together the “Group Companies”), acting through their unit Nordea IC. Nordea units are supervised by the Finnish Financial
Supervisory Authority (Finanssivalvonta) and each Nordea unit’s national financial supervisory authority.
The publication or report is intended only to provide general and preliminary information to investors and shall not be construed as the sole basis for an
investment decision. This publication or report has been prepared by IC as general information for private use of investors to whom the publication or report
has been distributed, but it is not intended as a personal recommendation of particular financial instruments or strategies and thus it does not provide
individually tailored investment advice, and does not take into account your particular financial situation, existing holdings or liabilities, investment knowledge
and experience, investment objective and horizon or risk profile and preferences. The investor must particularly ensure the suitability of his/her investment as
regards his/her financial and fiscal situation and investment objectives. The investor bears all the risks of losses in connection with an investment.
Before acting on any information in this publication or report, it is recommendable to consult one’s financial advisor. The information contained in this report
does not constitute advice on the tax consequences of making any particular investment decision. Each investor shall make his/her own appraisal of the tax
and other financial advantages and disadvantages of his/her investment.
Ansvarsreservation