Upload
others
View
10
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Warm Up
2
3
4
5
6
Page 249 #4-14 even
4. <PKL
6. <KJL
8. <KPL
10. Yes, two pairs of sides and the included angles are
congruent
12. No, the congruent angles are not the included angles
14. No, <NKM and <KML are congruent by the alternate
interior angles theorem but they are not the
included angles.
7
Homework Solutions:
Page 267 #4, 5, 8, 10, 19, 23a
4. No, you cannot tell for sure from the diagram whetehr
or not segments PS and RS are congruent.
8. Yes, you are given that segments AB and CD are
congruent and that segments AD and CB are
congruent. Also segment BD is congruent to itself by
the Reflexive Property of Congruence. So, the
triangles are congruent by SSS.
10. No, you are given that segments JK, KL, LM, and MJ
are congruent. Also segment JL is congruent to
itself by the Reflexive Property of Congruence. So it
should say that ΔJKL≅ΔLMJ or ΔJKL≅ΔJML.
8
Homework Solutions:
Page 274 #4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 16
4. Yes by AAS
8. <F; <L
16. The included sides are congruent;
∆QRS ≅ ∆VUX by ASA
9
A bit more practice before our DLT
10
DLT 2 (4.3-4.5)
a. SAS b. HL c. SSS d. AAA e. ASA
Bonus Question:
Given the following, why are these two triangles congruent?
11
time practicing writing proofs.
12
13
BEC
14
Page 249 #15-18
Page 267 #13, 14
Page 274 #17, 18, 20
CT
15