27
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation 1

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

  • Upload
    fathia

  • View
    44

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project. Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation. Entry Task. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

1

Washington State Teacher and Principal

Evaluation ProjectPreparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance

Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation

Page 2: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

2

Today, we’ll be working on educator goal setting. Please take a moment to reflect on your own professional and personal experiences with SMART goals. Which of these pieces of a SMART goal do you think presents the most challenges to enact?

S = Specific and StrategicM = MeasurableA = Action-OrientedR = Rigorous, Realistic, and Results-Focused (the 3 Rs)T = Timed and Tracked

Place a sticky note on the chart you think represents the most challenging work of setting SMART goals.

Entry Task

Page 3: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

3

Introductions Logistics Agenda

Agenda Connecting Learning Implementing Reflecting Wrap Up

Welcome!

Page 4: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

4

Introduction to Educator Evaluation in Washington Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in

Educator Evaluation Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures

of Performance: An Introduction to Self-Assessment, Goal Setting, and Criterion Scoring

Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Conducting High-Quality Observations and

Maximizing Rater Agreement Providing High-Quality Feedback for Continuous

Professional Growth and Development Combining Multiple Measures into a Summative

Rating

Modules

Page 5: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

5

Pausing Paraphrasing Posing Questions Putting Ideas on the Table Providing Data Paying Attention to Self and Others Presuming Positive Intentions

What Else?

Session Norms

Page 6: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

6

Connecting

Builds community, prepares the team for learning, and links to prior knowledge, other modules, and

current work

Page 7: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

7

Participants will know and be able to: Support the articulation of goal setting as

part of the educator evaluation process Build connections back to past learning on

multiple measures and self-assessment to support ongoing evaluation planning in alignment with the Washington State Criteria

Overview of Intended Participant Outcomes for Part C

Page 8: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

8

Part A described how using multiple measures strengthens a teacher evaluation system

Part B described how teacher self-assessment contributes to a comprehensive teacher evaluation system

Goal Setting Adds AnotherPiece to the Puzzle

Goal setting is another piece, helping us move closer to enacting TPEP’s Core Principles and the new system

Page 9: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

9

Stand up and step away from your district team.

Take a minute to skim the left-hand side of page 3, then begin networking with other participants.

Your goals are to find someone who fits one of the criteria on the left side AND to have the chance to connect with fellow educators in the room today.

Have them sign their name on the right side for you, then search for another “connection.”

Each person may only sign your sheet once!

Find Someone Who…

Page 10: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

10

Each of the criteria on the left highlighted some the differences we are facing as we work through building our district’s system. How many are using Danielson? Marzano? CEL

5Ds? How many here teach a tested subject or grade

level? Untested? How many teach early childhood? Juniors and

seniors? The goal-setting process allows each educator

to reflect on teaching work in his or her own context and begin to build a personal plan—to set goals and action plans that are meaningful… and SMART!

Connecting Debrief

Page 11: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

11

Learning

Understand best practices in goal setting

Page 12: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

12

Preparing Teachers for Goal Setting

Self-Assessment Step

Step 1: Student Data Analysis

Step 2: Instructional, Leadership, or Professional

Practice Rating

Goal Type

Student Learning Goal

Instructional, Leadership, or Professional Practice Goal

A capital “G!” indicates that the guidance represents Washington State law.

A lowercase “g” indicates that the guidance represents research-based best practice but is not mandated by law.

g

g

Page 13: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

13

Instructional practice goal Focused on improving

specific instructional practices identified in the district framework

Leadership practice goal Focused on improving

specific leadership practices identified in the district framework

Understanding Goal Setting g

Professional practice goal Focused on improving

professional practices tied to district framework (e.g., seeking PD, collaborating with colleagues, etc.)

Page 14: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

14

Connections to Be Made: Rooted in Washington State Teacher Criteria Aligned to the chosen district framework and

informed by recommended best practices and tools within that framework

Coordinated with district, school, team, and grade-level goals

Understanding Goal Setting g

Page 15: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

15

Leadership Practice GoalOur school leadership team will research and become more familiar with proven strategies for improving the partnerships with community-based service organizations and effectively supporting teachers in integrating service learning opportunities in their classrooms. We will implement a minimum of four of the approaches or strategies by the end of the school year. As a result of our efforts, we will see at least 5 additional teachers using service learning opportunities in their classroom.

Instructional Practice GoalOur ninth-grade team will research and become more familiar with strategies proven to help build sustainable and ongoing partnerships with service learning organizations in our community that are willing to be supportive and engaged with our students. We will implement a minimum of three of the approaches or strategies by the end of the school year. As a result of our efforts, we will see at least two partnership that represent either new, or significantly strengthened and improved, relationships with service learning organizations. Our students will experience more meaningful and coherent service learning experiences as a result.

Examples (Handout, page 4)

Page 16: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

16

Individually: Read handout pages 5–7, “What Makes a Goal

‘S.M.A.R.T.’?” Underline one phrase that you find most significant in the

reading, that resonates with or pushes your thinking about goal setting.

In a triad: Share your phrases and discuss any insights about the

reading and implications for your district’s goal setting work.

THEN: Return to page 4-5 in the handout and work together to respond to Part B: “What suggestions do you have for making the goals even SMARTer?”

What Makes Our Goals SMART? g

Page 17: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

17

Effective educator goal setting: Connects back to self-assessment work and

reinforces the process of using multiple measures

Includes a focus on student learning and professional practice

Is a process informed by the SMART goals framework, as well as the structures and tools from Danielson, Marzano, CEL, and AWSP

Coordinates the work of individual teachers and principals with teams, the school, and the district

Learning Wrap Up

Page 18: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

18

Goal-setting a measure of educator performance: How do you incorporate goal-setting as a

source of evidence? Districts should consider two key questions:

1. How will the teacher or principal identify evidence to demonstrate achievement of or progress on goals?

2. How will you measure success of or progress towards achieving the goal using evidence?

One Approach: Evidence Collection

Learning Content II. Goal-Setting as a Measure

Page 19: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

19

Goal-setting as measure of educator performance: Review the “results-oriented path” you

created in the last activity: What sources of evidence could be used to assess

the educator’s progress along that path? Make a list of at least 3 potential sources of evidence.

What evidence statements could you produce from your sources of evidence?

Learning Activity II. Goal-Setting as a Measure

Page 20: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

20

Implementing

Articulate and reflect on current practices around goal setting (self-assess)

Begin to articulate next steps in moving effective goal setting forward (plan)

Page 21: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

21

The Year-Long Evaluation Cycle

• Formal Observation Activities (2)

• Include Student Growth Goals/ Measures

• Additional Evidence Collecting

• Include Student Growth Measures

• Self-Assessment

• Annual Goal Setting

• Include Student Growth Goals

• Summative Scoring• Include Student Growth

Measures

Compiling observational,

multiple measures and student growth

data

Self-assessment

against a rubric, goal

setting with supervisor

Preobservation conference,

incl. goal setting,

observation, postobservation conference

Informal observations, discussions,

artifact collection

G!RCW 28A.405.100

Page 22: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

22

Work with your district team to complete the “Goal Setting in the Teacher Evaluation Process” template Depending on your current work, focus at the

school level or district level, or both levels, if meaningful

Column 1 may need to be completed when you have specific framework resources in hand

After self-assessing current work (Row 1), include your plans (Row 2), to help move goal setting forward Might include learning more (e.g., “find out,” “talk to,”

“gather”) Might include action items (e.g., “convene,”

“distribute,” “organize”)

Implementing Effective Goal Setting within the Evaluation Cycle

Page 23: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

23

Each team share two things to debrief our implementing tasks:1. One current asset you will be building upon, as

you move goal setting forward2. One take-away from today’s work, that you want

to incorporate into your future work with goal setting and teacher evaluation

Implementing Activity Debrief

Page 24: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

24

Reflecting

Page 25: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

25

Team Reflection: What will you do to continue to get SMARTer, as you consider goal setting’s role in teacher and principal evaluation?

Take a few minutes and create at least two sticky notes for the Plus/Delta Chart on your way out. Plus: What was a real “plus” in today’s session?

What went well and should be repeated? Delta: Where is there room for improvement and

change?

Reflecting

Page 26: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

26

Next Session is Part D: Gathering Evidence Homework Options

District: Layer in the resources and tools from your chosen framework to deepen the coherence around the goal-setting experiences you’re planning. Review district-level goals for SMARTness.

School or Teams: Prepare ways to bring student learning and professional practice goal-setting experiences to individual teachers and teams. Review district-level goals for SMARTness.

Individual: Conduct your own SMART goal-setting experience and reflect on the process to inform your understanding and contribution to scaling this work with others.

What’s Next?

Page 27: Washington State  Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project

Thank you!

INSERT PRESENTER’S E-MAIL ADDRESS

27