Upload
gregory-lindsey
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Washington State Transit Insurance PoolTarget Fund Balance Review
Strictly Private and Confidential
Final Report PresentationSeptember 27, 2012
Target Fund Balance Process
1. Target Funding Statement
2. Review ALL major risks facing the pool
3. Review the pool’s own risk profile
• coverage, retention, risk management program, etc
• in contrast to formula approach
4. Risk Aggregation
• reflecting correlation
Business Model
Risk
Capital Requirements
2
PwCSeptember 27, 2012
3
Target Funding Statement
“We would like to have enough fund to protect our members from a 1-in-100 to 1-in-200 year event in the next year, under the current retention or the $5m liability retention”
3
Indicator
What are we measuring? (all
options eventually come back to fund
level)
Severity
What is the tolerable level of
this selected “indicator”?
Frequency
What is the tolerable frequency
that the selected indicator hits the selected severity
Time Horizon
What time horizon is the fund supposed
to protect?
Extremity
PwCSeptember 27, 2012
4
Major Risk Categories
What could deteriorate the current fund level?
Most of the asset and liability items are variable, as well as the profitability of the next year’s business, putting the total fund value at risk.
4
Asset Liability + Fund
County Investment Pool
$27.5m Unpaid Reserves $10.9m
Reinsurance recoverable
$0.7m Other Liabilities $0.3m
Other current assets $0.3m TOTAL LIABILITIES
$11.2m
Non-current assets $0.4m
Equity in reinsurer $1.2m TOTAL FUND $18.9m
TOTAL ASSET $30.1m
PwCSeptember 27, 2012
5
Major Risk Categories
5
Underwriting
Risk that the next year’s business
result may deviate from plan
• Catastrophic events
• Systemic losses
• Reinsurance cost
• Market cycle
• Price inadequacy, etc.
Reserving
Risk that the eventual loss &
expense may exceed booked reserves
• Excessive inflation
• Judicial environment on certain claim types
• Latent claims, etc.
Asset & Credit
Risk that the value of investment asset and receivables may
decrease
• County Investment Pool – exposed to interest rate risk and default risk
• Reinsurer failure
Operational
Any other unplanned expense that may arise from
operation
• External events such as an earthquake
• People related (turn over, fraud, reputational)
• System and process failure, etc.
Simulation based approach using historical data
Simulation based approach using historical data
Stress scenario test approach based on
discussions
Stress scenario test approach based on
discussions
PwCSeptember 27, 2012
6
Risk Aggregation
Once all the individual risks are quantified,
• We don’t simply sum across these numbers to get overall funding need, because this assumes that all those events are occurring at the same time (100% correlated), which is an unduly pessimistic assumption.
• Developed a correlation structure (between lines of business, and between risk categories, etc.) to reflect diversification and aggregated the funding level across those components.
6
AL GL
APD
Underwriting Reserving Asset & Credit Operational
Int. rate
Counter-
partyEquity
External
SystemPeopl
e
Total Funding Need
PR
AL GL
APD
PR
PwCSeptember 27, 2012
7
Risk Aggregation
Let’s discuss the level of correlation (degree of two things going bad together)
Asset & Credit Interest Rate Reinsurer failure
Interest Rate 100% Low
Reinsurer failure Low 100%
Risk Categories
UW Reserving Asset+ Credit
Operational
UW 100% High Med Med
Reserving High 100% Med Low
Asset+Credit
Med Med 100% Med
Operational Med Low Med 100%
PwCSeptember 27, 2012
8
High Level Study Result – Target Funding Range
Baseline ($1.5m liab/$250k prop)
$5m Retention $1.5m liab/$500k prop
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
Target (1-in-100 to 1-in-200 year event)
Current Funding
Reinsurance Arrangement
8
PwCSeptember 27, 2012
9
Heatmap
Property
1% of Fund
Need
28 % of
Premium
APD
5% of Fund
Need
76 % of
Premium
261% of
Reserves
GL
14% of Fund Need
204% of Premium
208% of Reserves
AL
67% of Fund Need
150% of premium
126% of Reserves
Reinsurer Relationship
6% of Fund Need
54% of GEM items on B/S
Investment in Bond
4% of Fund Need
3% of TCIP + LGIP
People
1% of Fund Need
System
1% of Fund Need
External
1% of Fund Need
UW and Reserving
87%
Asset and Credit
10%
Operational
3%
PwCSeptember 27, 2012
10
Application of Results to 2013 Rate Level Decision(assuming goal of supporting $5 million SIR)
10
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
Target Surplus Range Historical Fund Balance Regulatory Minimum ProjectedOption 1 - $266,000 Equity Option 2 - $3,600,000
Year End
PwCSeptember 27, 2012
11
Application of Results to 2013 Rate Level Decision(assuming goal of supporting current SIRs)
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
Target Surplus Range Historical Fund Balance Regulatory Minimum ProjectedOption 1 - $266,000 Equity
Year End
PwCSeptember 27, 2012
12
Current Policy Guidance
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
Proj'd Losses Historical Fund Balance 1.5 times Reserves
5 Times SIR 10% Reduction in Equity Regulatory Minimum
10 times SIR
Year End
pwc.com
This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, [insert legal name of the PwC firm], its members, employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.
© 2012 PwC. All rights reserved.“PwC” and “PwC US” refer to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member firm of which is a separate legal entity. This document is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors.