Waste Data Study for the Pilbara Region and Shire of Broome€¦ · Project Number TW12014 . TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 ... for the study with

Waste Data Study for the Pilbara Region and Shire of Broome Waste Data Study For The Pilbara Region And Shire Of Broome Prepared for Microsoft

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c | Version:

[Publish Date] | Page 1

Waste Data Study for the Pilbara

Region and Shire of Broome

Prepared for the Waste Authority

Western Australia

July 2013

Project Number TW12014

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page ii

Waste Data Study for the Pilbara Region and Shire of Broome Prepared for the Waste Authority

Talis Consultants Pty Ltd

8/663 Newcastle St

Leederville WA 6007

Ph: 1300 251 070

www.talisconsultants.com.au

ABN: 85 967 691 321

DOCUMENT CONTROL

Version Author Reviewer Signature

Draft released for Office of Waste Authority comment

Ronan Cullen

Michelle Kent

John King

Draft released for Waste Authority comment

Ronan Cullen

Michelle Kent

John King

Final report Ronan Cullen

Michelle Kent

John King

Copyright of this document or any part of this document remains with the Department of Environment

Regulation and cannot be used, transferred or reproduced in any manner or form without prior written

consent from the Department of Environment Regulation.

Talis Consultants Pty Ltd does not accept any responsibility for any use or reliance on the contents of this report

and its contents by any third party.

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page i


Acknowledgements The Waste Authority and Talis Consultants Pty Ltd would particularly like to acknowledge the Waste

Management Association of Australia (WMAA) Pilbara Sub-branch for their significant assistance in this

study. WMAA Pilbara provided local operational knowledge and strategic input, garnered support

for the study with essential stakeholders and facilitated engagement of key participants who operate

in the Pilbara region.

The Waste Authority and Talis Consultants Pty Ltd also wish to acknowledge the support and input

received from the following bodies in the completion of this significant project:

• Project Steering Committee;

• Department of Environment Regulation;

• Aditya Birla Group;

• Atlas Iron;

• BHP Billiton;

• Chevron Australia;

• Citic Pacific Mining;

• Fortescue Metals Group;

• Instant Waste Management;

• Karratha Environmental Crushing;

• Newcrest Mining;

• New Energy Corporation

• Rio Tinto Australia;

• Shire of Ashburton;

• Shire of Broome;

• Shire of East Pilbara;

• Shire of Roebourne;

• Town of Port Hedland;

• Transpacific Cleanaway;

• Waste Management Association of Australia (WA branch); and

• Woodside.

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page ii


Executive Summary The Western Australian Waste Strategy: “Creating the Right Environment” (2012) (the Waste Strategy)

acknowledges that resource development across the northwest of the State is placing pressure on

existing waste management systems due to difficulties in areas such as transport, infrastructure,

access to markets and funding. However, stakeholders from across the region’s waste

management industry recognise that the current systems may struggle to deal with future growth

and achieve sustainable outcomes for waste management. In order to assist in the development of

sustainable waste management systems it is vital that stakeholders, including the Waste Authority,

local governments and private industry, have access to accurate and consistent data. Talis

Consultants Pty Ltd (Talis) was engaged by the Waste Authority to undertake a Waste Data Study of

the Pilbara region and Shire of Broome (the Study Area).

The Pilbara region covers a total area of approximately 500,000 km2 in the north of Western Australia.

As a result of developments in resources operations, the Pilbara has experienced strong population

and economic growth, particularly in the last decade. The Shire of Broome is located north of the

Pilbara and is expected to undergo future growth as a result of development of oil and gas reserves

in the area along with the continuing growth in tourism.

This Study was undertaken to achieve the following key objectives:

• Assist in infrastructure planning and policy;

• Facilitate the advancement of waste management systems in the Study Area; and

• Provide a framework for the future management of waste data.

Methodology

To achieve the above objectives and to obtain a comprehensive picture of current waste

management systems within the Study Area, Talis reviewed practices across the entire life cycle

(from generation to treatment or disposal) of all key waste streams. A range of stakeholders,

including local governments, resource companies and private waste services providers, were

approached to provide data for the Study. As part of the data gathering process, Talis undertook a

visit of the Study Area and conducted meetings with participating stakeholders.

To assist with the consistency and accuracy of the data gathered, a three-level Waste Classification

System (WCS) was developed based on a review of existing national and international systems. The

WCS classified waste materials according to the following three levels:

• Stream - three traditional waste streams of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), Commercial and

Industrial (C&I) waste and Construction and Demolition (C&D) waste;

• Sector - sector of the economy from which waste was generated; and

• Material Type - describing the composition of the waste.

The classification of waste by Sector is a new approach in Western Australia and was designed to

assist in the assessment of waste generation from different parts of the economy which could be

used to assist in future policy development.

To guide the analysis and presentation of the data, seven Sub-catchment Areas were formed

reflecting the key generation, treatment locations and waste flows within the Study Area. The Sub-

catchment Areas are:

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page iii


• Broome Sub-catchment Area;

• Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area;

• Karratha Sub-catchment Area;

• Onslow Sub-catchment Area;

• Tom Price Sub-catchment Area;

• Newman Sub-catchment Area; and

• Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area.

Key Findings

Waste Generation

In 2011/12, a total of 669,816 tonnes of waste was generated across the Study Area. A breakdown

of generation in each Sub-catchment Area by stream is shown in Table E1.

Table E1: Total Waste Generation 2011/12 within Sub-catchment Area and Study Area (tonnes)

Stream Broome Port

Hedland Newman Karratha Onslow

Tom

Price

Remote

East

Pilbara

Total

Study

Area

MSW 12,485 15,737 10,893 14,104 419 4,098 - 57,736

C&I 17,974 55,870 71,338 45,715 3,418 30,333 12,300 236,948

C&D 8,938 76,886 22,771 242,944 6,903 16,690 - 375,132

TOTAL 39,397 148,493 105,002 302,763 10,740 51,121 12,300 669,816

The top three material types generated within each waste stream is shown in Table E2.

Table E2: Top Material Types generated within each Waste Stream across the Study Area

Stream Top Material Types Tonnage Generated 2011/12

MSW

Kerbside Refuse 34,281

Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 6,437

Greenwaste 6,315

C&I

Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 101,964

Ferrous metals – non-packaging 21,186

Mixed metals – non-packaging 18,478

C&D

Concrete 144,557

Mixed building rubble 113,732

Clean fill 60,230

As shown in Figure E1, the C&D stream was the largest with 56% of the waste generated, followed by

C&I with 35% and MSW with 9%. Other/Mixed commercial sectors generated 36% of total waste,

followed by Mining (26%), Domestic (22%) and Oil and Gas (14%).

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page iv


Figure E1: Total Waste Generation5 broken down by Stream (left) and Sector (right)

A summary of annual per capita waste generation within each Sub-catchment Area and for the

whole Study Area is shown in Table E3. Waste generation per capita including the distribution

between the three streams was found to vary significantly across the Sub-catchment Areas. This was

predominantly due to the amount and phase of activities in the resource sector.

Table E3: Waste Generation Per Capita across the Study Area (tonnes/annum)

Stream Broome Port


Tom

Price

Remote

East

Pilbara

Study

Area

MSW 0.73 0.96 0.81 0.56 0.61 0.87 - 0.70

C&I 1.06 3.41 5.29 1.82 4.96 6.43 2.88 2.86

C&D 0.52 4.70 1.69 9.68 10.02 3.53 - 4.52

TOTAL 2.31 9.07 7.79 12.06 15.59 10.83 2.88 8.08

Waste Treatment

The majority of waste generated within the Study Area was disposed of to landfill, with 47% at public

landfills and 10% at on-site landfills. 38% of the waste generated was recycled, with the vast

majority being inert materials recycled at Karratha, complemented with additional materials

recycled outside of the Study Area such as metals and packaging materials. A breakdown of the

treatment of waste generated within the Study Area is shown in Figure E2.

MSW

9%

C&I

35%C&D

56%

Domestic

22%

Mining

26%Petroleum and

natural gas

processing

14%

Other/mixed

sectors

36%

Employee camps

2%

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page v


Figure E2: Treatment of Waste Generated within the Study Area in 2011/12

Some waste materials were moved between Sub-catchment Areas for treatment, and

approximately 78,811 tonnes was removed from the Study Area for treatment and disposal in Perth,

interstate or overseas.

Projections

Future projections of waste quantities are usually related to population for MSW and to economic

activity and construction activities for C&I and C&D waste respectively. It is very difficult to estimate

future economic and construction related activities, particularly in regional areas where individual

projects can have a significant influence. However, given the geographical isolation, relatively small

population and typically large size of resource development projects within the Study Area,

population is strongly influenced by growth in the resources sector. Population was therefore

considered as the most reliable indicator for growth in waste generation across all three waste

streams despite its acknowledged limitations as an indicator for C&I and C&D wastes. As a

consequence waste generation was projected up to 2035 under the following three population

growth scenarios, based on current per capita waste generation rates:

• High growth rate - based on Pilbara Cities aspirational population, the Broome Community

Profile high growth scenario and additional waste from oil and gas developments in Onslow

and Broome;

• Existing growth rate - based on Australian Bureau of Statistics population data from 2001 to

2011; and

• Low growth rate - based on the Western Australian Planning Commission’s WA Tomorrow

projections.

The waste projections vary greatly between the high and low scenarios, indicating that, by 2035,

waste generation could increase slightly from current figures, or increase to over 1.5 million tonnes

per annum.

Greenwaste

Processing

1.4%

Recycled

38%

Stockpiled

0.9%

Hazardous

Treatment

3.1%

Thermal

Treatment

0.5%

Landfill -

Public

47%

Landfill - On-

site

10%

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page vi


Figure E3: Projection of Waste Generation in the Study Area to 2035

Talis recommends that conservatism is adopted in the utilisation of the waste projections contained

within this report. The uncertainties in the population projections and the low correlation between

population and the generation of C&I and C&D wastes need to be recognised. The low correlation

is illustrated by the variation in the generation rates for these waste streams between the Sub-

catchment Areas.

Conclusions

• Total waste generation within the Study Area in 2011/12 was approximately 669,816 tonnes.

• Across the Study Area, 56% of total waste was generated from the C&D stream, 35% from

the C&I stream and 9% was MSW.

• A breakdown of waste generation by stream across the Study Area is shown in Figure E4. It

can be seen that the distribution of waste generation between key waste streams varies

significantly with the amount and phasing of commercial activities undertaken within each

Sub-catchment Area. A similar proportion to the State average of C&D was generated

across the Study Area, however a greater proportion of C&I waste and less MSW was

generated than the State averages.

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034

Tonnes High

Existing

Low

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page vii


Figure E4: Waste Generation Breakdown by Stream

• A total of 57% (378,162 tonnes) of waste generated within the Study Area was disposed of to

landfill, with 47% sent to public landfills and 10% at on-site facilities (including mine sites).

• The Study Area is therefore achieving an overall landfill diversion rate of 43%. The majority

(38%) is recycled, a large proportion of which occurs at the inert waste processing facility in

Karratha.

• The remaining 5% of total waste is diverted from landfill through greenwaste processing,

stockpiling and hazardous and thermal treatment.

• The landfill diversion rate is currently 16% in the MSW stream, 39% in the C&I stream and 50%

in the C&D stream.

• A total of 78,811 tonnes (12%) was exported from the Study Area for treatment in Perth,

interstate or overseas. The majority of the waste removed was sent for recycling, however

some was also exported for hazardous treatment or disposal.

• Population growth in the Study Area is strongly influenced by activity in the resource sector.

The uncertainty of long term growth projections for those sectors has resulted in growth

scenarios which give a wide range of future population estimates.

• Based on the high growth scenario, waste generation within the Study Area could increase to

1,531,756 tonnes by 2035.

Discussion

• The current waste management systems within the Study Area have a heavy reliance on

local landfills, many of which were established before the generation of modern best

practice siting, design and operating standards.

• There are 36 licenced landfills within the Study Area. The vast majority of these are unlined

isolated landfills on mine sites, with large clusters within the Tom Price and Newman Sub-

catchment Areas.

• The advancement of the resource sector has resulted in a number of issues for the current

waste management systems including a significant increase in the quantity and complexity

of the waste streams. In addition, the resource sector has expressed a desire for more

sustainable waste treatment systems.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Broome Port

Hedland

Newman Karratha Onslow Tom Price Remote

East

Pilbara

Study

Area

WA

09/10

C&D

C&I

MSW

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page viii


• Significant inconsistencies were identified in the terminology and recording systems utilised to

report waste generation and treatment.

• If the high growth projections eventuated, significant alterations to the current waste

management systems would be required to appropriately manage these materials.

• Total per capita waste generation in all Sub-catchment Areas (excluding Broome) currently

exceeds the State average.

• To achieve the 2015 Waste Strategy targets, significant improvements in landfill diversion are

required for the MSW and C&I streams.

• Due to the C&D recycling facility, the Karratha Sub-catchment Area is already exceeding

the 2020 Waste Strategy target for the C&D stream. As a result, the Study Area is already

very close to achieving the 2015 target for the C&D stream.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this Study, it is recommended that the Waste Authority:

• Considers strategies for encouraging the rationalisation of landfills within the Study Area.

• Considers the adoption and support of a Waste Classification System for Western Australia to

establish a framework for waste data gathering and reporting to ensure that there is

consistency across the industry. As part of this process, due consideration should be given to

the Waste Classification System devised as part of this Study.

• Considers improved reporting requirements for all waste facilities across the State to provide

waste data which is in accordance with the adopted Waste Classification System.

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page ix


Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... i

Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... ii

1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 3

2 Project Approach ...................................................................................................................... 4

2.1 Steering Committee ................................................................................................................ 4

2.2 Desktop Review ....................................................................................................................... 4

2.3 Waste Classification System .................................................................................................... 4

2.3.1 Waste Stream ...................................................................................................................... 5

2.3.2 Sector .................................................................................................................................. 5

2.3.3 Material Type ....................................................................................................................... 5

2.4 Development of Consultation Strategy ................................................................................... 7

2.4.1 Selection of Stakeholders .................................................................................................... 7

2.4.2 Data Collection Form .......................................................................................................... 7

2.5 Implementation of Consultation Strategy ............................................................................... 8

2.5.1 Visit to the Study Area .......................................................................................................... 8

2.5.2 Metropolitan Meetings ........................................................................................................ 8

2.5.3 Stakeholder Participation ..................................................................................................... 9

2.6 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 9

2.6.1 Geographical Breakdown ................................................................................................... 9

2.6.2 Extrapolation of Data........................................................................................................... 9

2.6.3 Assumptions ....................................................................................................................... 11

2.6.4 Projections ......................................................................................................................... 11

3 Broome Sub-catchment Area .................................................................................................. 15

3.1 Area Profile ............................................................................................................................ 15

3.2 Waste Data ............................................................................................................................ 15

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page x


3.3 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................... 20

4 Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area ......................................................................................... 21

4.1 Area Profile ............................................................................................................................ 21

4.2 Waste Data ............................................................................................................................ 21

4.3 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................... 26

5 Karratha Sub-catchment Area ................................................................................................ 27

5.1 Area Profile ............................................................................................................................ 27

5.2 Waste Data ............................................................................................................................ 27

5.3 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................... 32

6 Onslow Sub-catchment Area .................................................................................................. 33

6.1 Area Profile ............................................................................................................................ 33

6.2 Waste Data ............................................................................................................................ 33

6.3 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................... 38

7 Tom Price Sub-catchment Area .............................................................................................. 39

7.1 Area Profile ............................................................................................................................ 39

7.2 Waste Data ............................................................................................................................ 39

7.3 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................... 44

8 Newman Sub-catchment Area ................................................................................................ 45

8.1 Area Profile ............................................................................................................................ 45

8.2 Waste Data ............................................................................................................................ 46

8.3 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................... 51

9 Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area .............................................................................. 52

9.1 Area Profile ............................................................................................................................ 52

9.2 Waste Data ............................................................................................................................ 52

9.3 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................... 57

10 Pilbara Region ..................................................................................................................... 58

10.1 Waste Data ............................................................................................................................ 58

11 Total Study Area .................................................................................................................. 62

11.1 Waste Data ............................................................................................................................ 62

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page xi


12 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 66

12.1 Waste Generation ................................................................................................................. 66

12.2 Waste Treatment ................................................................................................................... 67

12.3 Projections ............................................................................................................................. 67

13 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 68

13.1 Waste Management Systems ............................................................................................... 68

13.2 Data Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 69

13.2.1 Waste Classification....................................................................................................... 69

13.2.2 Waste Generation ......................................................................................................... 69

13.2.3 Waste Projections .......................................................................................................... 69

13.3 Waste Strategy Targets .......................................................................................................... 70

14 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 71

Glossary .......................................................................................................................................... 72

Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. 73

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page xii


Tables

Table 1: Waste Classification System Overview ...................................................................................... 6

Table 2: Project Team Visit to the Study Area .......................................................................................... 8

Table 3: Broome Community Profile Population Projection Scenarios .................................................. 13

Table 4: Summary of Population Growth Rate Sources ........................................................................ 14

Table 5: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Broome Sub-catchment Area ......................... 15

Table 6: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area ................. 21

Table 7: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Karratha Sub-catchment Area ........................ 27

Table 8: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Onslow Sub-catchment Area .......................... 33

Table 9: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Tom Price Sub-catchment Area ...................... 39

Table 10: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Newman Sub-catchment Area ..................... 45

Table 11: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area ... 52

Table 12: Per Capita Waste Generation across the Study Area (tonnes/annum) ................................. 69

Table 13: Waste Strategy Landfill Diversion Targets and Comparison of Current Diversion Rates ........ 70

Figures Figure 1: Vision for a Sustainable Waste Management System .............................................................. 2

Figure 2: Study and Sub-catchment Areas ........................................................................................... 10

Figure 3: PPIF Population Projections ..................................................................................................... 12

Figure 4: Broome Sub-catchment Area ................................................................................................ 16

Figure 5: Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area ........................................................................................ 22

Figure 6: Karratha Sub-catchment Area ............................................................................................... 28

Figure 7: Onslow Sub-catchment Area ................................................................................................. 34

Figure 8: Tom Price Sub-catchment Area ............................................................................................. 40

Figure 9: Newman Sub-catchment Area .............................................................................................. 47

Figure 10: Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area .......................................................................... 53

Figure 11: Waste Generation Breakdown by Stream ............................................................................ 66

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page xiii


Appendices Appendix A: Waste Classification System ............................................................................................. 74

Appendix B: Data Collection Form ....................................................................................................... 81

Appendix C: Extrapolation Data ......................................................................................................... 100

Appendix D: Conversion Factors ......................................................................................................... 108

Appendix E: Detailed Waste Data – Broome Sub-catchment Area ................................................... 111

Appendix F: Detailed Waste Data – Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area ........................................... 115

Appendix G: Detailed Waste Data – Karratha Sub-catchment Area ................................................. 119

Appendix H: Detailed Waste Data – Onslow Sub-catchment Area .................................................... 124

Appendix I: Detailed Waste Data – Tom Price Sub-catchment Area ................................................. 128

Appendix J: Detailed Waste Data – Newman Sub-catchment Area ................................................. 132

Appendix K: Detailed Waste Data – Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area ............................... 136

Appendix L: Detailed Waste Data – Pilbara Region ............................................................................ 140

Appendix M: Detailed Waste Data – Study Area ................................................................................ 145

Appendix N: Sector 10 – Employee Camp Data ............................................................................... 150

TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 | Page 1


1 Introduction

1.1 Background

The Pilbara region covers a total area of approximately 500,000 km2 in the north of Western Australia

and, due to the large resources industry in the region, plays a significant role in the Western Australian

economy. As a result of developments in resources operations, the Pilbara has experienced strong

population and economic growth, particularly in the last decade. In conjunction with this

development there has been an increase in the quantity of waste generated within the region and

an increased demand for waste management infrastructure to ensure that waste materials are

managed appropriately.

The Shire of Broome is located in the south west corner of the Kimberley Region and adjoins the

district of the Shire of East Pilbara to the south. The townsite of Broome is a significant tourism centre

providing a gateway to the rest of the Kimberley. Pastoral and pearling industries are also located in

Broome. While these industries have provided the basis of growth in Broome to date, there are

significant oil and gas reserves in the area. The Shire of Broome and the Broome townsite are

expecting to undergo future growth as a result of development of these resources and the

continuing growth in tourism. Development of an oil and gas industry in the Shire of Broome would

have a significant impact on the waste generated in the area. In addition to increasing the quantity

of waste generated it would increase the complexity of the types of wastes needing to be

managed, treated and disposed.

The management of waste in remote and regional areas of Western Australia presents a unique

challenge. The Western Australian Waste Strategy: “Creating the Right Environment” (Waste

Authority, 2012) (the Waste Strategy) acknowledges that resource development across the northwest

of the State is placing pressure on existing waste management systems due to difficulties in areas

such as transport, infrastructure, access to markets and funding. However, stakeholders from across

the region’s waste management industry recognise that the existing infrastructure and current

systems will struggle to deal with future growth and to achieve a more sustainable outcome for

waste management. Change will be necessary to advance waste management practices within

the region. The shift from the current system to a sustainable cycle for waste management is shown

in Figure 1. The role of waste management facilities in a sustainable waste management system is

to divert materials back into production activities, maximising the recovery of valuable materials and

moving away from the current ‘wasteful’ waste management practices of disposal to landfill.

The Waste Strategy recognises that appropriate planning and development of waste infrastructure is

needed as early as possible, particularly in regional and remote Western Australia. In order to assist

in the development of sustainable waste management systems it is vital that stakeholders, including

the Waste Authority, local governments and private industry, have access to accurate and

consistent data. Talis Consultants Pty Ltd (Talis) has been engaged by the Waste Authority to

undertake a Waste Data Study of the Pilbara Region and Shire of Broome (the Study Area).

This Study was undertaken to achieve the following key objectives:

• Assist in infrastructure planning and policy;

• Facilitate the advancement of waste management systems in the Study Area; and

• Provide a framework for the future management of waste data.

To achieve these objectives and to obtain a comprehensive picture of current waste management

systems within the Study Area, current practices across the entire life cycle (from generation to

treatment or disposal) were reviewed for all key waste streams.



F

Figure 1: Vision for a Sustainable Waste Management System



1.2 Scope

The scope of the Study was to identify, capture and present data for all the key waste streams,

including Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), Commercial and Industrial (C&I) and Construction and

Demolition (C&D) across the Study Area for the 2011/12 financial year. It was also necessary to

predict future waste generation quantities up until 2035 for the Study Area to obtain an

understanding of the quantity of materials that may require management in the future.

The report has been structured into the following sections:

• Section 2: Project Approach

• Section 3: Broome Sub-catchment Area

• Section 4: Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area

• Section 5: Karratha Sub-catchment Area

• Section 6: Onslow Sub-catchment Area

• Section 7: Tom Price Sub-catchment Area

• Section 8: Newman Sub-catchment Area

• Section 9: Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area

• Section 10: Pilbara Region

• Section 11: Total Study Area

• Section 12: Conclusions

• Section 13: Discussion

• Section 14: Recommendations



2 Project Approach

The methodology utilised to undertake the Study involved the following tasks:

• Desktop review of waste strategies and policies, data classification systems and available

waste data sets;

• Development of a Waste Classification System to facilitate accurate and consistent

reporting;

• Development and implementation of a Stakeholder Consultation and Data Collection

Strategy;

• Data Entry and Analysis;

• Waste Streams Projections; and

• Reporting.

These tasks are described in the following sections.

2.1 Steering Committee

A Steering Committee was established for the project comprising representatives of the Office of the

Waste Authority and the Waste Management Association of Australia. The Steering Committee

provided government and industry context to the Study throughout and reviewed and endorsed the

Consultation and Data Collection Strategy prior to its implementation.

2.2 Desktop Review

To commence the Study, a detailed review of relevant literature was undertaken. The literature

reviewed included policy documents establishing the strategic framework for the project. A number

of Waste Classification Systems were reviewed including the Australian Waste Database and the

European Union’s Waste Classification Codes. A number of the systems were based on legislative

reporting requirements such as tracking hazardous wastes. More advanced systems focused on all

waste generation and particularly on the various sectors of the economy that generate waste. Such

systems are utilised in the development of waste policy.

Arising from the desktop review it was found that there was robust and reliable waste data on MSW

across the Study Area which was collected from the Local Government Waste Management Census

completed for the 2011/12 financial year. The best source of information for the C&I and C&D

sectors was through the Annual Environmental Reports (AERs) prepared to satisfy the various

conditions of approval governing the resource and waste management activities within the Study

Area. However in the majority of cases, it was found that the AER data was only suitable for providing

background information due to its limited nature.

2.3 Waste Classification System

To assist in the gathering and reporting of the waste data, Talis developed a Waste Classification

System (WCS). The WCS was developed to achieve the following objectives:

1. Reflect existing waste management practices to allow mapping of waste management

activities;

2. Achieve consistency both within the WCS and with standard industry terms and

classifications;

3. Prioritise identification of waste by its source as well as its composition;



4. Identify the sector of the economy from which the waste is generated, to inform future

analysis and policy development;

5. Cover ‘cradle to grave’ as much as possible;

6. Maintain relevance to waste generation within the whole of Western Australia;

7. Ensure the system is user friendly; and

8. Minimise the potential for double counting.

To achieve these objectives, the WCS was developed consisting of a three-level coding system to

classify each waste material. These three tiers include:

1. Waste Stream;

2. Sector; and

3. Material Type.

2.3.1 Waste Stream

The first level of the WCS identifies the source of the waste by stream. To ensure consistency with

existing industry terminology the three traditional waste streams (MSW, C&I and C&D) were adopted.

The codes and definitions of each waste stream are shown in Table 1.

2.3.2 Sector

The second level of the WCS further identifies the source of the waste by the sector of the economy

within which the waste was generated. A total of 13 Sectors were used, based on a similar concept

within the Australian Waste Database (Sub-stream 1 Secondary Source) and also the classification of

economic activities within the European Waste Catalogue. The Sectors used were selected to reflect

the activities both within the Study Area and across Western Australia. The Sectors, their codes and

definitions (where required) are shown in Table 1.

It should be noted that remote Employee Camps established as a direct result of C&I activities (for

example on mine sites) have been included in the definition of the C&I stream, however have been

classified as a separate sector (Sector 10). Waste from Employee Camps within townsites is

generally collected through local government collection systems or private commercial

arrangements. Therefore, this waste was classified as Sector 1 Domestic or Sector 9 Mixed/Other

Sectors depending on the collection method.

2.3.3 Material Type

The third level of the coding system is Material Type, which reflects the composition of the waste.

Each Material Type potentially arising within the Study Area was given a Material Type code within the

range of 100 – 899 and grouped into eight series. For ease of access, the Material Types in the WCS

were grouped and each group was allocated its own range of Material Type codes. As much as

possible, the Material Types adopted were developed to ensure consistency with existing systems.

The 100 series consisted of all wastes classified through the Controlled Waste system.

The list of Material Types is a combination of single substance waste types (eg Paper; Plastic 1 – PET),

and mixed waste types (eg Mixed Paper and Cardboard; Mixed Metals). Users of the WCS were

encouraged to classify waste by single substance waste types as much as possible (where the data

is available), but use mixed types where these materials are collected as a mixed stream. A key

objective of the WCS was to accurately reflect waste management practices and therefore the

system was designed not to necessitate the splitting of comingled waste streams.

Examples of the Material Types are shown in Table 1 and the complete WCS are provided within

Appendix A.



Table 1: Waste Classification System Overview

Waste

Stream Code Definition

MSW A Residential waste typically managed by local governments including:

• Kerbside or vergeside collections, or dropped off waste;

• Waste from public places including from road verges, reserves, beaches, litter bins, events and street cleaning; and

• Incidental commercial waste collected via residential kerbside collections.

C&I B Waste generated from, or as the direct result of, commercial and industrial activities, and that is not MSW or C&D waste.

C&D C Materials generated as a result of construction, refurbishment or demolition activities.

Series Name Examples

Code Material Types Code Material Types

100 Controlled Wastes 103 Biological Wastes – Grease wastes 183 Miscellaneous – Waste Tyres

200 Other Hazardous 201 E-waste 208 Asbestos

300 Local Government Services 301 Kerbside Comingled Recycling 302 Kerbside Refuse

400 Biodegradable 401 Foodwaste 402 Greenwaste

500 Packaging 501 Mixed Paper and Cardboard 504 Glass Packaging

600 Inert and Similar 601 Mixed Building Rubble 602 Concrete

700 Liquid/Solids 702 Drilling Muds 703 Sludges

800 Wastes not otherwise specified 801 Mixed Refuse 807 Waste Gases and Containers

Level 1

Level 3

Level 2

Sector Code

Domestic 01

Mining, exploration, quarrying.. 02

Agriculture, horticulture, aquaculture, forestry.. 03

Wood processing and production of furniture etc.. 04

Petroleum refining, natural gas purification.. 05

Chemical processing 06

Metals processing and thermal processes 07

Human/animal healthcare and/or related research 08

Other/Mixed Sectors 09

Employee camps 10

Public facilities and institutions 11

Public infrastructure networks 12

Solid and Liquid Waste Management Facilities 13

July 2013 | Page 7


TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c

2.4 Development of Consultation Strategy

To govern the data gathering exercise, a Consultation Strategy was prepared which outlined:

• The stakeholders to be consulted;

• The most suitable method of engagement with each of the stakeholders to encourage

stakeholders to participate in the Study; and

• The data gathering process.

2.4.1 Selection of Stakeholders

As it was necessary to capture data on waste generation, collection and treatment/disposal across

a range of waste streams and sectors, a broad group of stakeholders was required to be consulted

as part of the Study. These included waste generators and managers which were grouped into:

• Local governments;

• Private waste service providers; and

• Resource companies (major waste generators).

All five local governments within the Study Area were included as key stakeholders to be consulted to

confirm their local government census data.

Of the private waste services providers, only those which undertake a significant portion of the waste

handling and treatment activities in the Study Area were selected as stakeholders. This group was

considered to hold the most valuable waste data for the waste streams for which there is limited

existing data, being C&D and C&I waste. It was not practicable to consult with all private waste

service providers operating in the Study Area.

Similarly, engaging with all the resource companies operating within the Study Area was not

considered realistic. Therefore, a representative sample of the industry was selected, based on a

number of factors including type of commodity and scale of operation (number of sites, annual

throughput or employee numbers).

2.4.2 Data Collection Form

It was recognised that slightly different data was required from stakeholders, depending on their role

in the waste management systems in the Study Area. Therefore, specific Data Collection Forms were

developed for local governments, private waste service providers and resources companies.

Copies of the data collection forms are provided in Appendix B. All three Data Collection Forms

contained the following common elements:

• Respondent’s Details

To record information on the stakeholder and waste management facilities that they

own/operate. Local governments were also asked to provide current population data and

future projections (to 2035). The mining and resources sector stakeholders were asked for

annual throughput and staff numbers for each of their Areas of Operation (defined as a

particular site or operation such as a mine site or port facility).

• Waste Register

To record the source, quantity, collection method and treatment and/or disposal method for

each waste stream generated by the stakeholder.

• Waste Facility Outputs

To record the source, quantity and treatment and/or disposal method for each output

(product and residue) from waste management facilities operated by the stakeholder.

July 2013 | Page 8



Although stakeholders were encouraged to utilise the Data Collection Form, Talis also accepted raw

data in different forms where that was available. This data was then transcribed into the required

data format by the project team.

2.5 Implementation of Consultation Strategy

Key stakeholders are based in Perth as well as in the Study Area. To maximise the number of face to

face meetings, a visit to the Study Area was undertaken in addition to consulting with stakeholders in

Perth.

2.5.1 Visit to the Study Area

Key members of the Project Team conducted a visit to the Study Area for one week to meet with the

Pilbara Sub Branch of the Waste Management Association of Australia (WMAA) and to undertake

data collection meetings with key waste generators and managers. While visiting the Study Area, the

Project Team met with the organisations identified in Table 2.

Table 2: Project Team Visit to the Study Area

Stakeholder Location Meeting Date

Toxfree Broome 4/2/2013

Shire of Broome Broome 4/2/2013

Pilbara Logistics Port Hedland 5/2/2013

WMAA Pilbara Sub Branch Port Hedland 5/2/2013

TPI Cleanaway Port Hedland 5/2/2013

Town of Port Hedland Port Hedland 5/2/2013

Shire of East Pilbara Port Hedland 5/2/2013

Karratha Environmental Crushing (KEC) Karratha 6/2/2013

Shire of Roebourne Karratha 6/2/2013

BHP- Yandi Iron Ore Mine Yandi 7/2/2013

BHP- Mt Whaleback Newman 8/2/2013

2.5.2 Metropolitan Meetings

A series of face to face meetings were held with metropolitan based stakeholders. In some cases, a

face to face meeting was not possible and consultation was undertaken via teleconference. As

part of this process, Talis consulted the following stakeholders:

Resource Companies Private Waste Service Providers

• Aditya Birla Group;

• Atlas Iron;

• BHP Billiton;

• Chevron Australia;

• Citic Pacific Mining;

• Fortescue Metals Group;

• Newcrest Mining;

• Rio Tinto; and

• Woodside.

In addition, some follow up telephone calls were made with stakeholders to finalise the collection of

data and/or respond to questions.

• Instant Waste; and

• TPI Cleanaway.

Local Governments

• Shire of Ashburton.

July 2013 | Page 9



2.5.3 Stakeholder Participation

An extremely high participation rate was recorded for the Study. Most of the stakeholders consulted

provided the data requested for the Study. Others were not able, or chose not to participate.

Reasons provided for not participating included:

• Lack of available data;

• Lack of resources to provide assistance with the Study; and

• Concerns regarding the confidentiality of the data requested.

2.6 Data Analysis

2.6.1 Geographical Breakdown

To guide the analysis and presentation of the data, seven Sub-catchment Areas were formed

reflecting the key generation and treatment locations, and waste flows within the Study Area. The

development of the Sub-catchment Areas was based on the following criteria:

• Major population centres including a surrounding 100km radius; and

• Groupings of isolated waste generation sources.

In addition to identifying the key areas of waste generation, the amalgamation of information into

the Sub-catchment Areas ensures the anonymity of the data provided by Study participants. The

following Sub-catchment Areas have been used and are shown in Figure 2:

• Broome Sub-catchment Area;

• Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area;

• Karratha Sub-catchment Area;

• Onslow Sub-catchment Area;

• Tom Price Sub-catchment Area;

• Newman Sub-catchment Area; and

• Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area.

It is important to note that the Sub-catchment Areas do not cover the entire Study Area. Areas which

fall outside of the Sub-catchment Areas were considered to contribute insignificant quantities of

waste due to the lack of economic or residential development within these areas and were

therefore excluded from the Study. This is illustrated within Figure 2.

2.6.2 Extrapolation of Data

It was not practicable to collect data for all waste generators and managers. Therefore, as

described in Section 2.6.1 a representative sample of waste generators and managers was

surveyed for data. The project team extrapolated this data to estimate the total waste quantities

within each Sub-catchment Area. This was done where possible by applying per capita or similar

waste generation rates from the collected data to operational areas and sites for which data has

not been collected. Also, specific waste data gaps were identified and quantities estimated base

on corresponding collected data and Talis’ industry experience in other regional areas across

Western Australia. The per capita extrapolation data is provided in Appendix C.

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

East Pilbara (S)

Ashburton (S)

Broome (S)

Port Hedland (T)

Roebourne (S)

Looma

Balgo

DerbyWarmun

Bayulu

Onslow

Newman

Broome

WickhamDampier

Jigalong

Karratha

Nullagine

Yungngora

Roebourne

Tom Price

Mindibungu

Marble Bar

Beagle Bay

Paraburdoo

Kiwirrkurra

Pannawonica

Halls Creek

Point SamsonPort Hedland

Fitzroy Crossing

Walungurru (Kintore)

Bidyadanga (Lagrange)

Djarindjin - LombadinaBardi (One Arm Point)

115.00

115.00

116.00

116.00

117.00

117.00

118.00

118.00

119.00

119.00

120.00

120.00

121.00

121.00

122.00

122.00

123.00

123.00

124.00

124.00

125.00

125.00

126.00

126.00

127.00

127.00

128.00

128.00

129.00

129.00

-24.00

-24.00

-23.00

-23.00

-22.00

-22.00

-21.00

-21.00

-20.00

-20.00

-19.00

-19.00

-18.00

-18.00

-17.00

-17.00

Port HedlandPort HedlandYarrieYarrie

Document Path: \\server\Talis\SECTIONS\Waste\PROJECTS\TW2012\TW12014 - Pilbara Waste Data Study\GIS\Maps\TW12014_001a_SCA Study Area.mxd

0 1,000Kilometres

X.XXXXXXXXX.XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX.XXXXXXXX

28/05/2013 A000/00 A Rev A

LEGEND

Figure 2Project No:

PILBARA DATA STUDYStudy and Sub Catchment Areas

0 100 200 300 400 500 60050Kilometers

±Coordinate System: GCS GDA 1994, Datum: GDA 1994, Units: Degree

Reviewed:

Prepared:Checked:

1:4,350,000Date:Scale @ A3:

17/05/2013TW12014R P Cullen

N KingR M Cullen

!( Population Centres (2011)Study AreaLGAs within Study AreaRoadsRailway

Sub Catchment AreasRemote East PilbaraKarrathaNewmanOnslowPort HedlandTom PriceBroome

July 2013 | Page 11



2.6.3 Assumptions

During the Study it was necessary to make a number of assumptions when inputting and analysing

the data. Some of the key assumptions adopted for the Study are as follows:

• Septage waste (Controlled Waste category 1.01) was excluded from the scope of the Study.

• Where required, conversion factors were applied to raw data to ensure all material quantities

were in tonnes. A list of the conversion factors utilised is provided in Appendix D.

• If not provided in the survey data, waste treatment methods and/or location were

completed based on reporting of similar materials by other stakeholders and Talis’

understanding of the waste management systems in the Study Area. In particular there was

limited data provided relating to the treatment and disposal of hazardous waste streams.

Consequently, care should be exercised in using the data relating to the current

hazardous waste treatment and disposal activities.

• Materials that were reused were not considered as waste and were excluded from the Study.

• On-site treatment of organic waste (food or greenwaste) such as food dehydration was not

considered as part of the Study.

• Where waste generation was reported for a period of less than 12 months, the quantity was

factored up to 12 months unless stated by the stakeholders that this was a periodic waste

stream.

• Data from local governments was broken down into the various townsites based on advice

from the relevant local government.

• Where data from different sources was conflicting, more accurate (weighbridge) data was

adopted if available. For conflicting data of similar accuracy, data from waste managers

was utilised over that from generators and/or collectors.

• Only on shore oil and gas infrastructure (such as supply bases) was included as sources of

waste generation. Waste generated from off-shore infrastructure was assumed to be either

brought into the Study Area via the supply bases or discharged to sea.

• Waste from Aboriginal communities (excluding Bidyadanga in the Shire of Broome) was not

included in the Study as it is governed through arrangements made with the

Commonwealth Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous

Affairs.

• Waste rock from hard rock mine sites was excluded from the Study as it is stockpiled on site

for future use in rehabilitation works, or disposed of on-site as part of the mining operations

and is therefore not considered a waste material.

2.6.4 Projections

Traditionally, two methods are used to estimate future waste generation quantities. Population

growth rates combined with per capita waste generation rates are utilised for MSW. Future

forecasting in economic and construction activities are utilised to project future C&I waste and C&D

waste quantities.

In regional and remote areas such as the Study Area, use of past trends to predict future population

and economic activity can be unreliable due to impacts of individual projects. Therefore, scenario

projections, based on a list of known and possible future initiatives and projects, are sometimes used

as an alternative to projecting past trends. However, identifying up-coming projects over an

extended period into the future is also very problematic.

Given the geographical isolation, relatively small population and typically large size of resource

development projects in the Study Area, population is strongly influenced by growth in the resources

sector. Most of the population is involved directly or indirectly in the resources industry. Such growth

July 2013 | Page 12



also results in increases in construction activity, producing C&D waste, and new operating facilities

producing C&I waste.

On balance, it is therefore considered that population provides the most reliable indicator for growth

in waste generation across all three waste streams despite its acknowledged limitations as an

indicator for C&I and C&D wastes. As a consequence waste generation up to 2035 was projected

using published population growth scenarios, based on current per capita waste generation rates.

Pilbara

The Pilbara Planning and Infrastructure Framework (2012) (PPIF) was developed by the Pilbara

Regional Planning Committee on behalf of the Department of Planning to provide a strategic

direction for the Pilbara region over the next 25 years. This document considers three different

methods of projecting the future growth of the Pilbara, from:

• Pilbara Cities Vision;

• Pilbara Industry’s Community Council (PICC); and

• Western Australian Planning Commission’s WA Tomorrow report (2012).

The Pilbara Cities Vision has an aspirational target for a population in the Pilbara of 140,000 by 2035.

This growth scenario is based on the progressive expansion and diversification of the resources

sector, producing an average annual compound growth rate of 5%.

The PICC has developed a “business as usual” growth strategy for the Pilbara region based on

projects that were currently committed or at the prefeasibility stage of development. It projects a

population of 96,200 by 2020. The WA Tomorrow forecasts are based on trends in population since

the 1980s under a range of scenarios (low growth Scenario A up to high growth Scenario E)

incorporating factors such as fertility, mortality and migration. It provides population forecasts for the

Pilbara ranging from 40,000 to 60,000 by 2035, as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: PPIF Population Projections

July 2013 | Page 13



Figure 3 illustrates the difficulties in projecting future growth in regional areas. The achievement of

these growth projections will depend largely on the development and diversification of the resources

sector. The projections within the Pilbara Cities Vision are described as aspirational, and so can be

taken to be a high projection. Both the PICC and WA Tomorrow projections provide conservative

estimates and are therefore considered to be the lower limit of future population growth.

To project waste generation within the Study Area, high, moderate and low growth scenarios for

population were used, producing three scenarios for waste generation. The high and low growth

rates were taken from the Pilbara Cities and WA Tomorrow projections respectively. The average

annual growth rates for 2001-2011, published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics for each of the

local governments in the Pilbara region were used to indicate moderate growth.

Shire of Broome

AEC Group prepared a Broome Community Profile (AEC, 2012) report for the Shire of Broome in late

2012 which includes population projections. The report shows that the population growth of Broome

has matched that of the State over the past decade. Broome is a service centre for the Kimberley

and the local economy has a significant tourism sector, which generated a large number of

seasonal visitors.

AEC describes four population scenarios as shown in Table 3. These scenarios are based on the WA

Tomorrow population projections and incorporating visitors and transient workers, as well as the

potential impact of the Oil and Gas industry.

Table 3: Broome Community Profile Population Projection Scenarios

Population Scenario Description

Scenario 1 (permanent residential population only)

WA Tomorrow medium population projections. No inclusion of visitors or transient workers

Scenario 2 (permanent residents and visitors)

WA Tomorrow medium population projections. Projected future visitors (i.e. tourists)

Scenario 3 (permanent residents, visitors and 35 Mtpa LNG operations)

WA Tomorrow medium population projections 35 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa) of liquefied natural gas (LNG) operations, running up to 10 LNG trains. Projected future visitors (both leisure and business travellers)

Scenario 4 (permanent residents, visitors and maximum LNG development)

WA Tomorrow high population projections. 50 Mtpa LNG operations, running up to 14 LNG trains. Doubling of expected growth in future leisure visitation and increased business visitation from LNG activities

It is important to include visitors and transient workers in the population figures as they generate

waste and are indicators of economic activity. Scenario 2 has been taken as the low projection of

population and Scenario 4 has been taken as the high projection for the Broome Sub-catchment

Area population projections.

Impact of LNG Development

In the Broome and Onslow Sub-catchment Areas, the high growth scenarios include the

development of significant LNG infrastructure. While cancelation of the Woodside development at

James Price Point was recently announced, the large natural reserves in the region are still likely to

result in significant LNG development in the future. This development may include on-shore or

floating processing infrastructure however for the purpose of this Study, on-shore development has

been incorporated into the waste projections. This would increase the quantities of C&I and C&D

waste, over and above the quantities projected according to published population growth.

Therefore, for the C&I and C&D waste streams in these Sub-catchment Areas, waste quantities

equivalent to the anticipated LNG developments were added to the per capita waste projections. If

July 2013 | Page 14



floating LNG processing was undertaken, it is anticipated that the volumes of waste generated

would be significantly less than those projected.

In the Broome Sub-catchment Area, the projected 50 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa) was

considered equivalent to 10 LNG trains, while in the Onslow Sub-catchment Area, future

development was anticipated at 5 LNG trains. Raw data gathered on the C&I and C&D waste

generated per LNG train was utilised to obtain projections for waste generations under the high

growth scenario in these Sub-catchment Areas.

A summary of the sources for the various population growth scenarios in each Sub-catchment Area

is shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Summary of Population Growth Rate Sources

Sub-catchment

Area

Low Existing High

Broome Broome Community Profile - Scenario 2

ABS 2001-2011 recorded population growth rate

Broome Community Profile – Scenario 4 with additional C&I and C&D waste from LNG development

Port Hedland WA Tomorrow ABS 2001-2011 recorded population growth rate

Pilbara Cities

Karratha WA Tomorrow ABS 2001-2011 recorded population growth rate

Pilbara Cities

Onslow WA Tomorrow – Shire of Ashburton


Pilbara Cities with additional C&I and C&D waste from LNG development

Tom Price WA Tomorrow ABS 2001-2011 recorded population growth rate

Pilbara Cities

Newman WA Tomorrow – Shire of East Pilbara


Pilbara Cities

Remote East Pilbara

Average low growth rate within Study Area

ABS 2001-2006 recorded population growth rate for Newman Sub-catchment Area

Pilbara Cities

July 2013 | Page 15



3 Broome Sub-catchment Area

3.1 Area Profile

The Broome Sub-catchment Area (Figure 4) covers an area of approximately 18,890 km2 and is

located north of the Pilbara region along the west coast. The Broome townsite is the major

population centre within the Sub-catchment Area with a population in 2011 of 16,708 (including

seasonal tourists) and a population growth from 2001 – 2011 of 2% (ABS 2012). There is currently very

little mining or other resource activity within the Shire of Broome and therefore the Sub-catchment

Area was centred around the Broome townsite.

Road access from the Pilbara to Broome is provided from Port Hedland via Great Northern Highway,

a distance of approximately 600km.

The key waste management infrastructure currently located within the Broome Sub-catchment Area


Table 5: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Broome Sub-catchment Area

Name Type Operator

Buckley’s Road Refuse Site Category 64 putrescible landfill Shire of Broome

Materials Recovery Facility NA Toxfree

Waste generated from the Bidyadanga Aboriginal community is currently being disposed of at the

Buckley’s Road landfill.

The Buckley’s Road landfill is approaching the end of its operational lifespan. The Shire of Broome is

therefore in the process of developing a Regional Resource Recovery Facility at a new site, including

a Class II (putrescible) landfill cell.

3.2 Waste Data

Data on waste generation, treatment and projections for the Broome Sub-catchment Area is

presented in the following pages. A detailed breakdown of the waste generated within the Broome

Sub-catchment Area is provided in Appendix E.

"/

"/

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

64

MRF

Broome (S)Looma

Derby

Broome

Beagle Bay

Bidyadanga (Lagrange)

121.00

121.00

121.50

121.50

122.00

122.00

122.50

122.50

123.00

123.00

123.50

123.50

124.00

124.00

-18.

50

-18.

50

-18.

00

-18.

00

-17.

50

-17.

50

-17.

00

-17.

00


Document Path: \\server\Talis\SECTIONS\Waste\PROJECTS\TW2012\TW12014 - Pilbara Waste Data Study\GIS\Maps\TW12014_002_SCA_Broome.mxd

0 1,000

Kilometres

X.XXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXX

25/06/2013

A000/00 A Rev A

LEGEND

Figure 4

Project No:

BROOME SUB CATCHMENT AREADemographic, Industrial and Waste Infrastructure Profile

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 14010

Kilometers

±

Coordinate System: GCS GDA 1994, Datum: GDA 1994, Units: Degree

Reviewed:

Prepared:

Checked:

1:1,000,000

!( Population Centres (2011)

LGAs within Study Area

$8 Onshore Oil & Gas Infrastructure

Railway

Road Heirarchy

Access Road

Distributor A

Distributor B

Local Distributor

Primary Distributor

Regional Distributor

"/ Key Waste Management Facilities

Category 13 (Crushing of building material)

Category 39 (Chemical or oil recycling)

Category 60 (Incineration)

Category 61A (Solid waste facility)

Category 62 (Solid waste depot)

Category 63 (Class I inert landfill site)

Category 64 (Class II or III putrescible landfill site)

Category 89 (Putrescible landfill site)

MRF (Materials Recovery Facility)

Date:

Scale @ A3:

17/05/2013

TW12014R P Cullen

N King

R M Cullen



Broome Sub-catchment Area – Waste Generation 2011/12

MSW

32%

C&I

45%

C&D

23%

1. Domestic

32%

9.

Other/mixed

sectors

68%

TOTAL WASTE = 39,397 tonnes

Top 10 Material Types* Tonnage



Kerbside refuse 6,200

Greenwaste 4,500

Kerbside Commingled recyclables 899

Public place refuse 594

Vergeside Hard waste 198

Comingled Recyclables 94

Waste Oil 43

* Only nine Material Types recorded in Broome Sub-catchment Area

Key Findings

• 39,397 tonnes of waste generated

• C&I was the largest stream with 45% of total waste

• Other/Mixed sectors generated 68% and the Domestic sector 32% of total waste

• Mixed Refuse from the C&I stream was the largest material with 17,931 tonnes

Waste Generation by Stream

Waste Generation by Sector

MSW = 12,485 tonnes C&I = 17,974 tonnes C&D = 8,938 tonnes

Top 5 Material Types Tonnage Top 5 Material Types Tonnage Top 5 Material Types Tonnage

Kerbside refuse 6,200 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 17,931 Mixed Building Rubble 8,938

Greenwaste 4,500 Waste Oil 43

Kerbside Commingled recyclables 899


Vergeside Hard waste 198



Broome Sub-catchment Area – Waste Treatment 2011/12

Key Findings

• 86% of waste generated is currently landfilled

• 4,500 tonnes of greenwaste was recovered

• 43 tonnes removed from the Sub-catchment Area for recycling

• Waste generation figures include waste generated from the Bidyadanga Aboriginal community

6,992

17,931

8,938

993

4,500

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

MSW C&I C&D

Greenwaste

Processing

Recycled

Stockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

Thermal Treatment

Landfill - Public

Landfill - On-site

Stream Sector Material Type Tonnage Location Treatment

C&I 9. Other/mixed sectors Waste oil 43 Perth Recycled

No waste brought into the Broome Sub-catchment

Area for treatment.

Waste Generated and Treated within the Sub-catchment Area

Waste In

Waste generated in other

Sub-catchment Areas and

imported for treatment.

Waste Out = 43 tonnes

Waste generated within the Sub-catchment

Area and exported for treatment.

Greenwaste

Processing

11%

Recycled

3%

Landfill -

Public

86%

Total Waste Treatment

Top Materials Exported for Treatment



Broome Sub-catchment Area – Waste Projections

Key Findings

• Population could grow to 30,334 by 2035

• Total waste generation could increase to 94,841 tonnes by 2035

• C&I waste is projected to increase to 50,234 tonnes by 2035

Projection Notes

• Low growth rate – Broome Community Profile Scenario 2

• Existing growth rate – ABS 2001-2011 recorded population growth rate

• High growth rate – Broome Community Profile Scenario 4 with additional C&I and C&D waste to incorporate potential LNG development

Scenario Growth

Rate

Population

by 2035 Stream

Waste Generation (tonnes)

2015 2020 2035

High 3.2% 30,334

MSW 13,738 16,113 25,996

C&I 19,778 25,759 50,234

C&D 21,206 22,906 18,611

TOTAL 54,722 64,778 94,841

Existing 2.0% 26,874

MSW 13,249 14,628 19,688

C&I 19,074 21,059 28,343

C&D 9,485 10,473 14,095

TOTAL 41,808 46,160 62,126

Low 2.5% 26,274

MSW 13,445 15,213 22,036

C&I 19,356 21,901 31,724

C&D 9,626 10,891 15,776

TOTAL 42,427 48,005 69,536

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

110,000

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

31

20

32

20

33

20

34

20

35

Tonnes

High

Existing

Low



3.3 Key Findings

Due to the current lack of significant resource sector activity within the Shire of Broome, MSW

represents a significant proportion of the total waste stream with 32%. C&I is the largest waste

stream with 45% of the total waste stream, and is believed to be generated predominantly from the

tourism industry (classified as Other/Mixed sectors).

Of the waste generated within the Sub-catchment Area, the majority (86%) is disposed of to landfill

giving a landfill diversion rate of 14%. A small proportion (3%) of the waste stream is recycled,

including comingled recyclables (paper, plastic, metals and glass packaging) processed at the

Materials Recovery Facility and waste oil taken to Perth for recycling. The data shows that all waste

generated from the C&D stream and the majority of C&I waste is currently being disposed to landfill.

This situation provides a significant opportunity to increase recycling and recovery of these materials,

thereby increasing the landfill diversion rate.

The projections of waste generation illustrate the potential for waste generation quantities to increase

significantly by 2035, particularly within the C&I and C&D streams from future developments in the oil

and gas industry. By 2035, waste generation could increase to 94,800 tonnes per annum, with

approximately 50,200 tonnes generated from the C&I stream. This further illustrates the need to

increase diversion of these materials from landfill. Even under the low growth scenario, waste

generation is anticipated to increase at greater than the existing rate as a result of increased

tourism.



4 Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area

4.1 Area Profile

The Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area (Figure 5) includes the Town of Port Hedland and an area to

the east in the Shire of East Pilbara. It has an area of approximately 32,565 km2. The major

population centres within the Town of Port Hedland are Port Hedland and South Hedland. The town

of Marble Bar in the Shire of East Pilbara is also located within the Sub-catchment Area. In 2011, the

Town of Port Hedland had a population of 15,832 with an average annual growth rate of 2.1% over

the last ten years. Marble Bar is a small population centre located approximately 200km south-east

of Port Hedland, with a population of 208 in 2011 and a growth rate of 1.4%

Economic activity within the Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area includes predominantly hard rock

mining and port operations.

There are several major roads through the Sub-catchment Area. North-West Coastal Highway

provides access west to Karratha, Great Northern Highway runs south to Tom Price and Newman and

north-east along the coast to Broome. Marble Bar Road runs south-east to Mable Bar and Newman.

The Sub-catchment Area also includes BHP’s Goldsworthy rail line which runs approximately 200km

east from Port Hedland and the BHP rail line connecting Newman to Port Hedland.

The key waste management infrastructure currently located within the Port Hedland Sub-catchment

Area is shown in Table 6.

Table 6: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area

Name Type Operator

South Hedland Landfill Category 64 putrescible landfill Town of Port Hedland

Marble Bar Refuse Site Category 64 putrescible landfill Shire of East Pilbara

Oil Energy Corporation

Category 39 chemical or oil recycling

Category 60 incineration

Category 61A solid waste facility

Oil Energy Corporation (Toxfree)

Yarrie Project Category 64 putrescible landfill BHP Billiton

Nimingarra Iron Ore Mine Category 64 putrescible landfill BHP Billiton

Roy Hill Infrastructure Rail Construction Camps 1 & 3

Category 89 putrescible landfill Hancock Mining JV

4.2 Waste Data

Data on waste generation, treatment and projections for the Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area is

presented in the following pages. A detailed breakdown of the waste generated within the Port

Hedland Sub-catchment Area is provided in Appendix F.

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.

#0

#0

#0#0

#0#0

#0

#0

#0#0

#0

#0

!(

!(

64

89

64

64

6439, 60, 61A

Pardoo

Wodgina Tinstone

Poondano

Cattle Gorge

Spinifex Ridge

Cundaline Ridge

Yarrie/Nimingarra

Port Hedland Salt

Pardoo

Mt Dove

East Pilbara (S)

Port Hedland (T)

Roebourne (S)

Broome (S)

Ashburton (S)

Ashburton (S)

Marble Bar

Port Hedland

118.00

118.00

118.50

118.50

119.00

119.00

119.50

119.50

120.00

120.00

-21.

00

-21.

00

-20.

50

-20.

50

-20.

00

-20.

00


Document Path: \\server\Talis\SECTIONS\Waste\PROJECTS\TW2012\TW12014 - Pilbara Waste Data Study\GIS\Maps\TW12014_003_SCA_Port_Hedland.mxd

0 1,000

Kilometres

X.XXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXX

28/05/2013

A000/00 A Rev A

LEGEND

Figure 5

Project No:

PORT HEDLAND SUB CATCHMENT AREADemographic, Industrial and Waste Infrastructure Profile

0 20 40 60 80 100 12010

Kilometers

±


Reviewed:

Prepared:

Checked:

1:775,000



#0 Mine- Operating

#0 Mine- Under Development

!. Employee Camps


Railway

Road Heirarchy

Access Road

Distributor A

Distributor B

Local Distributor

Primary Distributor











Date:

Scale @ A3:

17/05/2013

TW12014R P Cullen

N King

R M Cullen



Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area – Waste Generation 2011/12


Top 10 Material Types Tonnage


Clean fill 25,905

Mixed Refuse (public drop-off, C&I and C&D waste) 25,266

Mixed Metals - non-packaging 15,268


Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 8,132

Rubbers - mixed 3,129

Mixed Paper and Cardboard 1,047

Waste Oil 993

Waste tyres 976

Key Findings

• Total waste generated was 148,493 tonnes

• C&D waste represented the largest waste stream with 52% of total waste generated followed by the C&I stream with 38% and MSW with 10%

• Other/Mixed sectors generated 47% of total waste, followed by Mining with 24% and Domestic with 28%

• Mixed building rubble was the largest material with 49,927 tonnes

• The next largest waste streams were Clean fill with 25,905 tonnes and Mixed Refuse (public drop-off, C&I and C&D waste) with 25,266 tonnes





Kerbside refuse 12,536 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 25,026 Mixed Building Rubble 49,927

Public place refuse 900 Mixed metals -non-packaging 14,474 Clean Fill 25,905

Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 771 Contaminated soil – hydrocarbon 8,132 Asbestos 959

Waste Oil 500 Rubbers – mixed 3,129 Mixed Inert 67

Special event refuse 450 Mixed paper and cardboard 1,047 Mixed metals (non-packaging) 22

MSW

10%

C&I

38%

C&D

52%

1. Domestic

28%

2. Mining

24%

9.

Other/mixed

sectors

47%

10. Employee

camps

1%



Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area – Waste Treatment 2011/12

Key Findings

• 84% was landfilled, mostly at public facilities

• Significant quantity was imported for treatment or exported for recycling


MSW 1. Domestic Mixed metals – non-packaging 771 Perth Recycled

C&I 2. Mining

Mixed Paper and Cardboard 1,047 Perth Recycled

Mixed metals – non-packaging 14,474 Perth Recycled

Rubbers – mixed 2,741 Karratha Recycled

Waste Oil 469 Perth Recycled

Waste In = 7,946 tonnes

Waste generated in other Sub-catchment

Areas and imported for treatment.


Stream Sector Material Type Tonnage Origin Treatment

C&I 2. Mining..

Oil sludges 1,936 Newman Hazardous Treatment

Oil sludges 1,199 Newman Thermal Treatment

Waste Oil 2,145 Tom Price Recycled

Waste Out = 20,695 tonnes



Recycled

14%

Hazardous

Treatment

Landfill -

Public

84%

Landfill - On-

site

1.5%



Top Materials Imported for Treatment

2,182 5 14,266

33,799

76,857 496

1

37

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

MSW C&I C&D

Greenwaste

ProcessingRecycled

Stockpiled

Hazardous

TreatmentThermal

TreatmentLandfill - Public

Landfill - On-site

0.5%

July 2013 | Page 25 TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c | Version:




Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area – Waste Projections

Key Findings

• Total population could reach 50,382 by 2035

• By 2035, total waste generation could increase to 444,060 per annum

Projection Notes

• Low growth rate – WA Tomorrow Town of Port Hedland population projections


• High growth rate – Pilbara Cities

Scenario Growth

Rate

Population

by 2035 Stream


2015 2020 2035

High 4.9% 50,382

MSW 18,154 23,035 47,061

C&I 64,451 81,781 167,076

C&D 88,695 112,543 229,923

TOTAL 171,300 217,359 444,060


MSW 16,745 18,570 25,329

C&I 59,448 65,929 89,925

C&D 81,810 90,729 123,752

TOTAL 158,004 175,228 239,006

Low 1.2% 19,288

MSW 16,327 17,359 20,865

C&I 57,964 61,629 74,077

C&D 79,767 84,812 101,941

TOTAL 154,058 163,800 196,883

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

31

20

32

20

33

20

34

20

35

Tonnes

High

Existing

Low

July 2013 | Page 26



4.3 Key Findings

The Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area generates the second largest quantity of waste within the

Study Area with almost 148,500 tonnes in 2011/12. The C&D stream contributed significantly to this

total representing 52% followed by the C&I stream with 38%. MSW only represented 10% of total

waste generated. A total of 84% of the waste generated within the Sub-catchment Area was

disposed of to landfill, giving a landfill diversion rate of 16%.

Due to the waste processing facility in Wedgefield (Port Hedland) a significant quantity of waste

(7,946 tonnes) was imported into the Sub-catchment Area for treatment such as recycling,

dewatering (hazardous treatment) or incineration (thermal treatment). These materials were all

generated from the C&I stream and included mostly oils and related wastes, grease wastes and

other hazardous wastes. As the only facility of this type within the Study Area, it reduces the need for

these materials to be exported from the Study Area for treatment.

The projections indicate that waste generation could increase to over 444,060 tonnes per annum by

2035. It would require an average annual growth rate of 4.9% to increase the population to 50,382

by 2035.

July 2013 | Page 27



5 Karratha Sub-catchment Area

5.1 Area Profile

The Karratha Sub-catchment Area (Figure 6) is centred around the Karratha townsite which is the

largest population centre within the Sub-catchment Area. Other towns include Dampier, Roebourne

and Wickham. The Sub-catchment Area covers a large proportion of the Shire of Roebourne, and

also includes an area in the north of the Shire of Ashburton for a total area of 20,840km2. The Shire of

Roebourne has a total population of 23,927 with an annual growth rate of 4.7% between 2001 and

2011 (ABS 2012). In 2011, Karratha’s population was 16,475 with a very high growth rate of 8.1%. In

contrast, the smaller population centres within the Sub-catchment Areas all recorded negative

annual growth rates between -0.4% (Dampier) and -1.9% (Wickham).

The Karratha Sub-catchment Area includes some hard rock mining activity and is currently the

primary on-shore base for the Northwest Shelf oil and gas developments through the Dampier Port.

A Rio Tinto rail line runs through the Sub-catchment Area south-east from the Dampier port through to

Paraburdoo in the Shire of Ashburton. The Sub-catchment Area also includes the Rio Tinto rail line

which extends from the Cape Lambert port facility to Pannawonica. The North-West Coastal

Highway provides road access through the Sub-catchment Area, south-west to Onslow and Perth

and east to Port Hedland.

The key waste management infrastructure currently located within the Karratha Sub-catchment Area


Table 7: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Karratha Sub-catchment Area

Name Type Operator

Wickham Transfer Station Category 62 solid waste depot Shire of Roebourne

Seven Mile Waste Disposal Facility

Category 57 used tyre storage

Category 64 putrescible landfill Shire of Roebourne

Karratha Environmental Crushing

Category 13 crushing facility Karratha Environmental Crushing

Toll Energy Yard Category 61A solid waste facility Toll Energy Logistics

Karratha Waste Transfer Station Category 61A solid waste facility Toxfree (Karratha)

Cleanaway Karratha

Category 39 Chemical or oil recycling

Category 62 solid waste depot

Transpacific Cleanaway

Sino Iron Project Category 64 putrescible landfill Citic Pacific Mining

Cape Lambert Port and Process Facility

Category 63 inert landfill Pilbara Iron

5.2 Waste Data

Data on waste generation, treatment and projections for the Karratha Sub-catchment Area is

presented in the following pages. A detailed breakdown of the waste generated within the Karratha

Sub-catchment Area is provided in Appendix G.

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

$8

$8

$8$8

$8!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

#0

#0

#0

!.

!.

#0 #0

!.

!.

!.!.

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

64

13 62

64

63

61A

61A

39, 62

Dampier Salt

Deepdale Mesa J

Pluto LNG

Gorgon LNG

Woodside LNG

Cape Preston Port

Cape Lambert Jetty A

Deepdale Mesa ARobe River - Deepdale

Sino Iron

Ashburton (S)

Roebourne (S)

Port Hedland (T)

Port Hedland (T)

Port Hedland (T)

Wickham

KarrathaRoebourne

Pannawonica

Point SamsonDampier

115.50

115.50

116.00

116.00

116.50

116.50

117.00

117.00

117.50

117.50

118.00

118.00

-21.

50

-21.

50

-21.

00

-21.

00

-20.

50

-20.

50


Document Path: \\server\Talis\SECTIONS\Waste\PROJECTS\TW2012\TW12014 - Pilbara Waste Data Study\GIS\Maps\TW12014_004_SCA_Karratha.mxd

0 1,000

Kilometres

X.XXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXX

21/05/2013

A000/00 A Rev A

LEGEND

Figure 6

Project No:

KARRATHA SUB CATCHMENT AREADemographic, Industrial and Waste Infrastructure Profile

0 20 40 60 80 100 12010

Kilometers

±


Reviewed:

Prepared:

Checked:

1:810,000



#0 Mine- Operating


!. Employee Camps


Railway

Road Heirarchy

Access Road

Distributor A

Distributor B

Local Distributor

Primary Distributor











Date:

Scale @ A3:

17/05/2013

TW12014R P Cullen

N King

R M Cullen



Karratha Sub-catchment Area – Waste Generation 2011/12



Concrete 144,514

Clean fill 34,325



Ferrous Metals - non-packaging 14,929


Contaminated soils - misc 8,804

Mixed Metals - non-packaging 4,300

Food waste 3,620

Greenwaste 2,760

Key Findings


• 80% of the waste was from the C&D stream

• Other/Mixed sectors generated 35% and the Oil and Gas sector 30% of total waste

• Concrete was the largest material reported with 144,514 tonnes





Kerbside refuse 6,974 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 14,926 Concrete 144,444

Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 6,077 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 12,672 Clean fill 34,325

Greenwaste 591 Contaminated soils – misc. 2,369 Mixed building rubble 29,603

Public place refuse 444 Greenwaste 2,083 Contaminated soils – misc. 6,435

Special event refuse 17 Mixed metals – non-packaging 1,892 Contaminated soil - hydrocarbon 5,351

MSW

5%

C&I

15%

C&D

80%

1. Domestic

23%

2. Mining

11%

5. Petroleum

and natural

gas

processing

30%

9.

Other/mixed

sectors

35%

10. Employee

camps

1%



Karratha Sub-catchment Area – Waste Treatment 2011/12

Key Findings

• 66% of materials recycled mainly through the C&D recycling facility

• 33,128 tonnes of material removed for treatment


Stream Sector Material Type Tonnage Origin Treatment

C&I 2. Mining Rubber - mixed 2,741 Port Hedland Recycled

Waste Oil 867 Tom Price Recycled

C&D 9. Other/Mixed Mixed building rubble 3,900 Onslow Landfill - public

4,003 5,408 13,513 16,650

42,773

303

1,338

4,331

1,264

177,252

591

2,080

-

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

180,000

200,000

220,000

MSW C&I C&D

Greenwaste

Processing

Recycled

Stockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Landfill - Public

Landfill - On-site

Waste In = 8,994 tonnes

Waste generated in other Sub-

catchment Areas and imported for

treatment.


C&I 2. Mining..

Ferrous metals – non-packaging 13,655 Overseas Recycled

Mixed metals – non-packaging 1,623 Overseas Recycled

Waste oil 1,559 Perth Recycled

5. Petroleum.. Industrial waste treatment plant sludges 1,333 Perth Hazardous treatment

C&D 5. Petroleum.. Food waste 2,209 Perth Landfill - public




Greenwaste

Processing

1%

Recycled

66%Stockpiled

2%

Hazardous

Treatment

1%

Landfill -

Public

27%

Landfill - On-

site

3%



Top Materials Imported for Treatment



Karratha Sub-catchment Area – Waste Projections

Key Findings

• Total population could growth to 55,729 by 2035

• Based on current per capita figures, total waste could rise to 672,381 tonnes by 2035

Key Findings

• Low growth rate – WA Tomorrow Shire of Roebourne population projections



Scenario Growth

Rate

Population

by 2035 Stream


2015 2020 2035

High 3.5% 55,729

MSW 17,750 21,112 35,523

C&I 48,630 57,841 97,325

C&D 269,590 320,651 539,533

TOTAL 335,970 399,604 672,381


MSW 17,024 18,889 25,798

C&I 46,643 51,751 70,681

C&D 258,573 286,888 391,830

TOTAL 322,241 357,527 488,309

Low 0.7% 27,300

MSW 14,403 14,916 16,568

C&I 46,686 48,350 53,704

C&D 248,101 256,942 285,398

TOTAL 309,190 320,208 355,670

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

550,000

600,000

650,000

700,000

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

31

20

32

20

33

20

34

20

35

Tonnes

High

Existing

Low



5.3 Key Findings

The Karratha Sub-catchment Area has the largest source of waste generation within the Study Area

with approximately 302,700 tonnes in 2011/12. The majority (80%) of this was generated from the

C&D stream as the result of large construction projects in the Mining and Oil and Gas sectors. This

would be anticipated to continue for the next three to five years, then reduce as these projects enter

their operational phase. The major sources of waste were Other/Mixed sectors with 35% of total

waste, followed by Oil and Gas with 30% and Domestic with 23%.

Almost 9,000 tonnes of material was brought into the Sub-catchment Area for treatment including

recycling and disposal to public landfill. Of the waste generated within the Sub-catchment Area,

66% was recycled, mostly at the inert recycling facility. This has resulted in a high landfill diversion

rate within the Sub-catchment Area of 70%.

Over 10% of the waste generated within the Sub-catchment Area was exported for treatment, the

majority of which was sent overseas for recycling. Approximately 25% of the materials exported

were sent to Perth for recycling, hazardous treatment or disposal, while a small proportion were sent

to Port Hedland for thermal treatment.

Based on current per capita waste generation, the waste projections indicate that generation could

increase to 672,400 tonnes per annum by 2035, with approximately 539,500 tonnes of this from the

C&D stream. However, as mentioned previously, it is anticipated that the current generation of C&D

waste will not be sustained and it is therefore unlikely that the high projection will be reached,

particularly in relation to the C&D stream.



6 Onslow Sub-catchment Area

6.1 Area Profile

The Onslow Sub-catchment Area (Figure 7) is centred around the Onslow townsite within the Shire of

Ashburton and has a total area of 18,547 km2. There are currently only a small number of onshore

resource operations within the Sub-catchment Area, however Oil and Gas facilities are currently

under development in the Ashburton North Strategic Industrial development, 12km west of Onslow.

Onslow is located on the west coast and is connected by road to the North West Coastal Highway

(80km inland) by Onslow Road.

The key waste management infrastructure currently located within the Onslow Sub-catchment Area is

shown in Table 8. The Onslow Refuse Disposal Site is currently near its capacity.

Table 8: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Onslow Sub-catchment Area

Name Type Operator

Onslow Refuse Disposal Site Category 64 landfill Shire of Ashburton

6.2 Waste Data

Data on waste generation, treatment and projections for the Onslow Sub-catchment Area is

presented in the following pages. A detailed breakdown of the waste generated within the Onslow

Sub-catchment Area is provided in Appendix H.

"/

"/

"/

$8

!.#0

!.

!.

!.

#0

#0

!.

!.!.

!.!.

!.

!.

#0 #0

#0

!(

!(

!(

64

63

64

Deepdale Mesa J

Wheatstone LNGOnslow Salt

Deepdale Mesa ARobe River - Deepdale

Sino Iron

Paulsens

Ashburton (S)

Roebourne (S)

Onslow

Exmouth

Pannawonica

114.00

114.00

114.50

114.50

115.00

115.00

115.50

115.50

116.00

116.00

116.50

116.50

-22.

50

-22.

50

-22.

00

-22.

00

-21.

50

-21.

50


Document Path: \\server\Talis\SECTIONS\Waste\PROJECTS\TW2012\TW12014 - Pilbara Waste Data Study\GIS\Maps\TW12014_005_SCA_Onslow.mxd

0 1,000

Kilometres

X.XXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXX

28/05/2013

A000/00 A Rev A

LEGEND

Figure 7

Project No:

ONSLOW SUB CATCHMENT AREADemographic, Industrial and Waste Infrastructure Profile

0 20 40 60 80 100 12010

Kilometers

±


Reviewed:

Prepared:

Checked:

1:850,000



#0 Mine- Operating


!. Employee Camps


Railway

Road Heirarchy

Access Road

Distributor A

Distributor B

Local Distributor

Primary Distributor











Date:

Scale @ A3:

17/05/2013

TW12014R P Cullen

N King

R M Cullen



Onslow Sub-catchment Area – Waste Generation 2011/12





Rubbers - other 251

Oil sludges 230

Kerbside refuse 200

Waste Oil 187

Contaminated soil - hydrocarbon 143

Ferrous metals – non-packaging 137

Mixed organics 117

Engine Coolants 101

Key Findings

• In total, 10,740 tonnes of waste generated

• C&D waste stream was the largest representing 64% in total

• MSW only represented 4% of total waste

• Mixed building rubble was the largest waste stream component at 6,903 tonnes

• Mixed refuse from the C&I stream was the second largest material at 2,094 tonnes



MSW = 419 tonnes C&I = 3,418 tonnes C&D = 6,903 tonnes


Kerbside refuse 200 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 2,094 Mixed building rubble 6,903

Public place refuse 97 Rubbers - other 251

Special event refuse 46 Oil sludges 230

Vergeside Hard waste 37 Waste Oil 187

Greenwaste 37 Contaminated soil - hydrocarbon 143

MSW

4%

C&I

32%

C&D

64%

1. Domestic

26%

2. Mining

17%

9.

Other/mixed

sectors 55%

10. Employee

camps 2%



Onslow Sub-catchment Area – Waste Treatment 2011/12

Key Findings

• 92% of waste generated is disposed of to landfill with 11% at on-site facilities

• There is extremely limited recycling of MSW and C&D waste


C&I 2. Mining

Ferrous Metals – non-packaging 137 Perth Recycled

Waste Oil 181 Perth Recycled

Engine Coolants 101 Perth Hazardous Treatment

C&D 9. Other/Mixed Mixed building rubble 3,900 Karratha Landfill

Waste Generated and Treatment within the Sub-catchment Area

No waste brought into the Onslow Sub-catchment Area for treatment.

1,139

418

1,412

3,003

158

2

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

MSW C&I C&D

Greenwaste

Processing

Recycled

Stockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Landfill - Public

Landfill - On-site

Waste In








Recycled

4%

Hazardous

Treatment

2%

Thermal

Treatment

2%

Landfill -

Public

81%

Landfill - On-

site

11%




Onslow Sub-catchment Area – Waste Projections

Projection Notes

• Low growth rate – WA Tomorrow Shire of Ashburton population projections


• High growth rate – Pilbara Cities with additional data for C&I and C&D waste streams to incorporate potential LNG development

Key Findings

• Population forecasted to rise to 1,804 by 2035

• Total waste generation could increase to 34,274 tonnes by 2035

• C&D waste is forecasted to be the most significant waste stream within the Sub-catchment Area, due to the development of Oil and Gas facilities predicted for the medium term.

Scenario Growth

Rate

Population

by 2035 Stream


2015 2020 2035

High 4.2% 1,804

MSW 475 584 1,088

C&I 5,152 8,605 15,274

C&D 19,187 20,988 17,912

TOTAL 24,814 30,177 34,274

Existing 3.3% 1,454

MSW 462 544 885

C&I 3,768 4,432 7,212

C&D 7,609 8,950 14,566

TOTAL 11,839 13,926 22,663

Low -2.9% 427

MSW 384 331 212

C&I 3,126 2,694 1,725

C&D 6,314 5,441 3,483

TOTAL 9,824 8,466 5,420

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

550,000

600,000

650,000

700,000

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

31

20

32

20

33

20

34

20

35

Tonnes

High

Existing

Low



6.3 Key Findings

In 2011/12, a total of 10,700 tonnes was generated within the Onslow Sub-catchment Area. Due to

the small population, only 4% of this was MSW. The large construction projects currently being

undertaken within the Sub-catchment Area resulted in the majority (64%) of the waste arising within

the C&D stream, with the remaining 32% from the C&I stream. Other/Mixed sectors were the largest

source of waste by sector, with 55% of total waste, followed by the Domestic sector with 26% and

Mining with 17%. It is anticipated that, although arising from the Oil and Gas sector, the C&D waste

generated from that sector was recorded as from Other/Mixed sectors.

Of the waste generated within the Sub-catchment Area, 81% was disposed of to public landfills and

a further 11% to on-site landfills, giving a landfill diversion rate of 8%. None of the waste generated

from the C&D stream was diverted from landfill.

The projections of future waste generation within the Sub-catchment Area indicate that waste could

increase to 34,274 tonnes per annum by 2035. However, this appears to be heavily dependent on

development within the Oil and Gas sector, as according to the WAPC population based projections

which do not consider future resource sector projects, waste generation may decrease to just 1,290

tonnes per annum. Should the projected Oil and Gas developments proceed, C&D waste would

be expected to be the largest waste stream for approximately the next 10 years while projects are

under construction, after which the C&D waste would decrease and C&I waste increase during the

operational phase. It should be noted that, as projections are based on current per capita waste

generation, this change is not reflected in the projections of waste generation to 2035.



7 Tom Price Sub-catchment Area

7.1 Area Profile

The Tom Price Sub-catchment Area (Figure 8) is located in the south-east of the Shire of Ashburton

and covers an area of 35,280km2 surrounding the Tom Price townsite. Tom Price is the largest

population centre in the Shire of Ashburton with approximately 3,100 residents and an average

annual growth rate of 3.3% between 2001 and 2011 (ABS 2012). The other significant town within the

Sub-catchment Area is Paraburdoo (located 80km south of Tom Price), which had a population of

approximately 1,500 in 2011 and an annual growth rate of -1.2% (ABS 2012).

Economic activities within the Sub-catchment Area are dominated by hard rock mining operations.

A Rio Tinto rail line runs through the Sub-catchment area from Paraburdoo, north via Tom Price to the

Dampier Port in the Karratha Sub-catchment Area.

The key waste management infrastructure currently located within the Tom Price Sub-catchment

Area is shown in Table 9.

Table 9: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Tom Price Sub-catchment Area

Name Type Operator

Tom Price Waste Disposal Site Category 64 putrescible landfill Shire of Ashburton

Paraburdoo Waste Disposal Site Category 64 putrescible landfill Shire of Ashburton

Tom Price Iron Ore Mine Category 64 putrescible landfill Rio Tinto

Mt Brockman and Nammuldi Iron Ore Mines

Category 64 putrescible landfill Rio Tinto

Paraburdoo Iron Ore Mine Category 64 putrescible landfill Rio Tinto

Brockman 4 Mine Category 89 putrescible landfill Rio Tinto

Waste Angelas Iron Ore Mine Category 64 inert landfill


Pannawonica Deepdale Landfill Category 64 inert landfill


Mulga Downs East Category 89 putrescible landfill Hancock Prospecting

Marandoo Iron Ore Mine Category 89 putrescible landfill Rio Tinto

7.2 Waste Data

Data on waste generation, treatment and projections for the Tom Price Sub-catchment Area is

presented in the following pages. A detailed breakdown of the waste generated within the Tom

Price Sub-catchment Area is provided in Appendix I.

"/

"/

"/"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/"/

"/"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/"/

"/

!.#0

!.

#0

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.!.!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.!.

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0 #0

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0!(

!(

!( 89

8989

89

89

89

64

64

64

64

8989

89

64

6464

64

64

63, 64

Deepdale Mesa J

Solomon

Channar

Marandoo

Tom Price

Brockman 4

Paraburdoo

Brockman 2 - Nammuldi

Western Turner Syncline

Hope Downs

Cloud Break

Yandicoogina

West Angelas

Mining Area C

Marillana Creek/Yandi

MT Whaleback, Ore Body 29/30/35

Ore Body 24

Hope Downs 4

North Marillana

Paulsens

Ashburton (S)

East Pilbara (S)

Port Hedland (T)

Roebourne (S)

Tom Price

Paraburdoo

Newman

116.00

116.00

116.50

116.50

117.00

117.00

117.50

117.50

118.00

118.00

118.50

118.50

119.00

119.00

119.50

119.50

-23.

50

-23.

50

-23.

00

-23.

00

-22.

50

-22.

50

-22.

00

-22.

00


Document Path: \\server\Talis\SECTIONS\Waste\PROJECTS\TW2012\TW12014 - Pilbara Waste Data Study\GIS\Maps\TW12014_006_SCA_Tom Price.mxd

0 1,000

Kilometres

X.XXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXX

28/05/2013

A000/00 A Rev A

LEGEND

Figure 8

Project No:

TOM PRICE SUB CATCHMENT AREADemographic, Industrial and Waste Infrastructure Profile

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 16010

Kilometers

±


Reviewed:

Prepared:

Checked:

1:1,075,000



!. Employee Camps

#0 Mine- Operating


Railway

Road Heirarchy

Access Road

Distributor A

Distributor B

Local Distributor

Primary Distributor











Category 89 (Putrescible landfill site)Date:

Scale @ A3:

17/05/2013

TW12014R P Cullen

N King

R M Cullen



Tom Price Sub-catchment Area – Waste Generation 2011/12



Mixed Refuse (C&I and C&D waste) 23,904


Rubbers - other 6,482

Waste Oil 3,226


Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 1,729

Oil sludges 1,103


Mixed organics 845

Mixed inert waste 624

Key Findings

• 51,121 tonnes of waste generated in total

• C&I waste comprised 59% of total waste

• The Mining sector contributed 68% of total waste

• Mixed Refuse from C&I and C&D streams was the largest material arising accounting for 23,904 tonnes

• Mixed building rubble was the second largest waste stream with 7,007 tonnes





Kerbside refuse 1,950 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 14,519 Mixed Refuse (C&D waste) 9,385

Public place refuse 953 Rubbers - other 6,482 Mixed building rubble 7,007

Special event refuse 454 Waste Oil 3,226 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 174

Vergeside Hard waste 363 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 1,729 Waste tyres 65

Greenwaste 363 Oil sludges 1,103 Cardboard 25

MSW

8%

C&I

59%

C&D

33%

1. Domestic

19%

2. Mining

68%

9.

Other/mixed

sectors

9%

10. Employee

camps

4%



Tom Price Sub-catchment Area – Waste Treatment 2011/12

Key Findings

• 86% of total waste generated was landfilled

• 19,860 tonnes of waste was disposed of at on-site landfills

• 6,432 tonnes of material was removed from the Sub-catchment Area for treatment

• Landfill diversion rate was 14%.


C&I 2. Mining

Ferrous Metals – non-packaging 1,729 Perth Recycled

Waste Oil 867 Karratha Recycled

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 120 Karratha Recycled

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 173 Karratha Hazardous Treatment

C&D 2. Mining Mixed Metals – non-packaging 174 Perth Recycled


19,860

4,082

3,294

16,392

1,083

65

3

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

MSW C&I C&D

Greenwaste

Processing

Recycled

Stockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Landfill - Public

Landfill - On-site

No waste brought into the Tom Price Sub-catchment Area

for treatment.

Waste In




Total Waste Generated

Recycled

12%

Hazardous

Treatment

2%

Landfill -

Public

47%

Landfill - On-

site

39%







Tom Price Sub-catchment Area – Waste Projections

Projection Notes

• Low growth rate – WA Tomorrow Shire of Ashburton population projections



Key Findings

• It is forecasted that population could grow to 12,837 by 2035

• Total waste generation could rise to 135,402 tonnes by 2035

• C&I waste is forecasted to be the most significant waste stream accounting for 80,342 tonnes by 2035

Scenario Growth

Rate

Population

by 2035 Stream


2015 2020 2035

High 4.3% 12,837

MSW 4,653 5,751 10,855

C&I 34,443 42,565 80,342

C&D 18,950 23,420 44,205

TOTAL 58,046 71,736 135,402

Existing 1.6% 6,852

MSW 4,303 4,666 5,951

C&I 31,845 34,535 44,046

C&D 17,521 19,001 24,234

TOTAL 53,669 58,202 74,231

Low -1.2% 4,173

MSW 3,953 3,722 3,108

C&I 29,258 27,550 23,001

C&D 16,098 15,158 12,655

TOTAL 49,309 46,430 38,764

-

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

31

20

32

20

33

20

34

20

35

Tonnes

High

Existing

Low



7.3 Key Findings

The Tom Price Sub-catchment Area is dominated by activities within the Mining sector which

represented 68% of the 51,120 tonnes of total waste generated. As the majority of these sites are

operational, 59% of total waste was generated from the C&I stream, with 33% C&D and just 8%

MSW. The largest material type generated was mixed refuse, arising from both the C&I and C&D

streams.

A total of 86% of the waste generated within the Sub-catchment Area was disposed of to landfill,

47% at public facilities and 39% at on-site facilities. This corresponds to a landfill diversion rate of

14%. 12% of total waste was recycled, however none of this occurred within the Sub-catchment

Area, with it being transported to either Karratha, Port Hedland or Perth. A total of 6,432 tonnes was

exported from the Sub-catchment Area for recycling, hazardous treatment or disposal.

As with other Sub-catchment Areas, there is significant variance between the high and low waste

generation scenarios. Under the high scenario, total waste generation could increase to 135,402

tonnes per annum, while under the low scenario waste generation could decrease to 38,764 tonnes

by 2035.



8 Newman Sub-catchment Area

8.1 Area Profile

The Shire of East Pilbara is the largest local government in the Pilbara region with an area of

approximately 371,600 km2. The Newman Sub-catchment Area (Figure 9) is located in the south-

west of the Shire of East Pilbara and includes the Newman and Nullagine town centres. The total

area of the Sub-catchment Area is approximately 31,800km2. In 2011, Newman had a population

of approximately 5,480 and a growth rate of 5.8% while Nullagine had a population of just 178,

decreasing at 3.6% per annum over the previous ten years.

The Newman Sub-catchment Area includes a significant proportion of the iron ore mining operations

occurring within the Pilbara region, and includes both operational mines and some under

construction. Newman is located 450km south of Port Hedland via the Great Northern Highway and

is located 276km by road from Tom Price. A BHP Billiton rail line also runs from Newman to Port

Hedland.

The key waste management infrastructure currently located within the Newman Sub-catchment Area


Table 10: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Newman Sub-catchment Area

Name Type Operator

Nullagine Refuse Site Category 64 putrescible landfill Shire of East Pilbara

Windell Refuse Site Category 64 putrescible landfill Shire of East Pilbara

Nimingarra Iron Ore Mine Category 64 putrescible landfill BHP Billiton

Mt Whaleback/ Orebody 29 Category 64 putrescible landfill BHP Billiton

Mining Area C Category 89 putrescible landfill BHP Billiton

Yandi Iron Ore Mine Category 89 putrescible landfill BHP Billiton

Orebody 18 Iron Ore Mine Category 89 putrescible landfill BHP Billiton

Wheelarra Hill (Jimblebar) Iron Ore Mine

Category 64 putrescible landfill BHP Billiton

Orebody 23/25 Iron Ore Mine Category 63 inert landfill BHP Billiton

Yarrie Project Category 64 putrescible landfill BHP Billiton

Yandicoogina Operation Category 64 putrescible landfill Rio Tinto

Mt Whaleback Mine Site Category 64 putrescible landfill Nationwide Oil

Roy Hill Infrastructure Construction Camp 2


Roy Hill Infrastructure Construction Camp 4


Christmas Creek Iron Ore Mine Category 89 putrescible landfill Fortescue Metals Group

Cloudbreak Iron Ore Mine Category 89 putrescible landfill Fortescue Metals Group

Hope Downs Iron Ore Mine Category 89 putrescible landfill Rio Tinto

Bamboo Creek Goldmine Category 89 putrescible landfill Kitchener Mining



8.2 Waste Data

Data on waste generation, treatment and projections for the Newman Sub-catchment Area is

presented in the following pages. A detailed breakdown of the waste generated within the Newman

Sub-catchment Area is provided in Appendix J.

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

"/"/

"/

"/

"/

"/

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.

!.

!.!.!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.

!.!.

!.!.

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0

#0#0

#0

#0

#0#0

#0

!.

!.

!( !(

!(

63

64

89

89

89

89

89

89

89

89

64

64

64

64

64

89

89

63, 64

Marandoo

Orebody 18

Nullagine - Millennium

Wheelarra Hill (Jimblebar)

Hope Downs

Cloud Break

Yandicoogina

West Angelas

Orebody 23/25

Mining Area C

Christmas Creek

Nullagine - Iron Ore

Marillana Creek/Yandi

MT Whaleback, Ore Body 29/30/35 Ore Body 24

Hope Downs 4

North Marillana

East Pilbara (S)

Ashburton (S)

Port Hedland (T)

Newman

Jigalong

Nullagine

118.50

118.50

119.00

119.00

119.50

119.50

120.00

120.00

120.50

120.50

121.00

121.00

-23.

50

-23.

50

-23.

00

-23.

00

-22.

50

-22.

50

-22.

00

-22.

00


Document Path: \\server\Talis\SECTIONS\Waste\PROJECTS\TW2012\TW12014 - Pilbara Waste Data Study\GIS\Maps\TW12014_007_SCA_Newman.mxd

0 1,000

Kilometres

X.XXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXX

28/05/2013

A000/00 A Rev A

LEGEND

Figure 9

Project No:

NEWMAN SUB CATCHMENT AREADemographic, Industrial and Waste Infrastructure Profile

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 14010

Kilometers

±


Reviewed:

Prepared:

Checked:

1:950,000



#0 Mine- Operating


!. Employee Camps


Railway

Road Heirarchy

Access Road

Distributor A

Distributor B

Local Distributor

Primary Distributor











Date:

Scale @ A3:

17/05/2013

TW12014R P Cullen

N King

R M Cullen



Newman Sub-catchment Area – Waste Generation 2011/12






Mixed Inert 6,366

Waste Oil 6,052

Sludges 5,917


Mixed organics 5,214

Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 4,479

Rubbers – mixed 3,908

Key Findings

• It was calculated that 105,002 tonnes of waste was generated in 2011/12

• 68% of total waste was from the C&I stream

• MSW only accounted for 10% of total waste

• The Mining sector directly generated 55% of total waste

• Mixed refuse (mainly from commercial activities) was the largest material at approximately 27,149 tonnes





Kerbside refuse 6,421 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 27,029 Mixed building rubble 11,353

Kerbside Commingled recyclables 1,179 Waste oil 6,050 Mixed inert waste 6,366

Greenwaste 824 Sludges 5,913 Ferrous Metals - non-packaging 1,407

Ferrous Metals – non-packaging 800 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 4,476 Timber - untreated 1,250

Public place refuse 500 Mixed organics 4,127 Mixed organics 1,087

MSW

10%

C&I

68%

C&D

22%

1. Domestic

10%

2. Mining

58%

9.

Other/mixed

sectors

26%

10.

Employee

camps

6%



Newman Sub-catchment Area – Waste Treatment 2011/12

Key Findings

• In 2011/12, 64% of waste generated was landfilled

• 28,795 tonnes was disposed of at on-site landfills

• 10,815 tonnes of material underwent hazardous treatment (including bioremediation and dewatering) within the Sub-catchment Area


C&I 2. Mining

Waste Oil 4,637 Perth Recycled

Ferrous Metals – non-packaging 3,122 Perth Recycled


Oil sludges 1,936 Port Hedland Hazardous Treatment

Oil sludges 1,199 Port Hedland Thermal Treatment


No waste brought

into the Newman

Sub-catchment

Area for treatment.

Waste In




27,404

1,391

9,462

10,666

18,045

10,815

1,375

299

1,250

1,250

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

MSW C&I C&D

Greenwaste

Processing

Recycled

Stockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Landfill - Public

Landfill - On-site





Greenwaste

Processing

2%Recycled

17%

Stockpiled

2%

Hazardous

Treatment

13%

Thermal

Treatment

2%

Landfill -

Public

37%

Landfill - On-

site

27%




Newman Sub-catchment Area – Waste Projections

Key Findings

• Population could rise to 16,491 by 2035

• Total waste generation could be 128,537 tonnes in 2035

• 87,327 tonnes of C&I waste per annum could be generated by 2035

• Projections show a very wide range depending upon mining activity.

• Continuation of current high growth rate is unlikely.

Projection Notes

• Low growth rate – WA Tomorrow Shire of East Pilbara population projections


• Existing growth rate (adjusted) – ABS 2001-2006 recorded population growth rate


Scenario Growth

Rate

Population

by 2035 Stream


2015 2020 2035

High 0.9% 16,491

MSW 11,184 11,687 13,335

C&I 73,244 76,536 87,327

C&D 23,379 24,430 27,875

TOTAL 107,807 112,653 128,537

Existing

(Adjusted) 4.4% 35,992

MSW 12,383 15,332 29,103

C&I 81,093 100,407 190,587

C&D 25,885 32,050 60,835

TOTAL 119,361 147,789 280,525

Low 0.4% 13,212

MSW 11,022 11,239 11,919

C&I 72,180 73,605 78,052

C&D 23,040 23,495 24,914

TOTAL 106,242 108,339 114,885

-

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

31

20

32

20

33

20

34

20

35

Tonnes High

Existing

Existing (adjusted)

Low



8.3 Key Findings

Approximately 105,000 tonnes was generated within the Newman Sub-catchment Area in 2011/12.

Due to the large number of operational mines within the Sub-catchment Area, C&I waste was the

largest stream with 68%. C&D waste represented a further 22% and MSW 10% of total waste. The

largest materials type was mixed refuse with 27,149 tonnes, the majority of which was generated

from the C&I stream. As a result of the quantity and nature of the C&I operations, significant

quantities of hazardous wastes such as waste oil and contaminated soil were generated within the

Sub-catchment Area.

In total, 64% of the waste generated was disposed of to landfill, 37% to public landfills and 27% at

on-site facilities, which corresponds to a landfill diversion rate of 36%. 17% of the waste generated

was recycled including significant quantities of waste oil and non-packaging metals exported to

Perth. 13% of the materials required hazardous treatment, while 2% (2,186 tonnes) was exported to

Port Hedland for thermal treatment.

As was shown in Figure 9, there are a large number of putrescible landfills within the Sub-catchment

Area, making landfill disposal a convenient and cost-effective option for waste managers and

generators. As there are no other waste management facilities within the Sub-catchment Areas, any

materials to be recycled or requiring advanced hazardous treatment must be exported.

As shown by the extremely high projections based on the existing growth rate, Newman is currently

experiencing very strong population growth. According to the ABS population figures, population

growth since 2006 has increased significantly at 12% growth per annum. As it is unreasonable to

assume that this growth rate will continue until 2035, the more moderate growth rate of 4.4%

recorded between 2001 and 2006 was utilised for this Study. Even with this adjustment, the

projections of waste generation under the existing growth rate are significantly greater than those

under the high growth scenario. This indicates that development in the resource sector within the

Newman Sub-catchment Area is expected to stabilise at current levels, rather than continue to grow

at the rates experienced over the past decade.

Under the high growth scenario, waste generation is projected to increase to approximately 128,500

tonnes per annum by 2035. The majority of this waste (87,327 tonnes) is anticipated to be

generated from the C&I stream.



9 Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area

9.1 Area Profile

The Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area (Figure 10) is located approximately 250km north-east

of Newman, 350km south-east of Port Hedland and covers an area of approximately 7,120km2. The

Sub-catchment Area includes no population centres except for the employee camps associated

with several significant hard rock mining operations. These operations are connected by road to

Newman and Port Hedland.

The key waste management infrastructure currently located within the Remote East Pilbara Sub-

catchment Area is shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Key Waste Management Facilities within the Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area

Name Type Operator

Woodie Woodie Manganese Project Category 89 putrescible landfill Pilbara Manganese

Nifty Copper Operation Category 64 putrescible landfill Aditya Birla Group

9.2 Waste Data

Data on waste generation, treatment and projections for the Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment

Area is presented in the following pages. A detailed breakdown of the waste generated within the

Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area is provided in Appendix K.

"/"/!.

!.

!.

#0

#0

#064

89

Nifty

Telfer

Woodie Woodie

East Pilbara (S)

121.00

121.00

121.50

121.50

122.00

122.00

122.50

122.50

-22.

00

-22.

00

-21.

50

-21.

50


Document Path: \\server\Talis\SECTIONS\Waste\PROJECTS\TW2012\TW12014 - Pilbara Waste Data Study\GIS\Maps\TW12014_008_SCA_Remote_East_Pilbara.mxd

0 1,000

Kilometres

X.XXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

X.XXXXXXXX

21/05/2013

A000/00 A Rev A

LEGEND

Figure 10

Project No:

REMOTE EAST PILBARA SUB CATCHMENT AREADemographic, Industrial and Waste Infrastructure Profile

0 20 40 60 80 10010

Kilometers

±


Reviewed:

Prepared:

Checked:

1:600,000



#0 Mine- Operating


!. Employee Camps


Railway

Road Heirarchy

Access Road

Distributor A

Distributor B

Local Distributor

Primary Distributor











Date:

Scale @ A3:

17/05/2013

TW12014R P Cullen

N King

R M Cullen



Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area – Waste Generation 2011/12





Waste mineral oils 1,377


Mixed organics 937

Oil sludges 684

Waste Oil 549

Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 426

Engine Coolants 301

Waste tyres 278

Key Findings


• All materials generated within the C&I stream

• 91% of materials generated from the Mining sector and 9% from remote employee camps

• Rubber was the largest material generated with 3,397 tonnes



MSW = 0 tonnes C&I = 12,300 tonnes C&D = 0 tonnes




Waste mineral oils 1,377

Oil sludges 1,113

Ferrous Metals - non-packaging 937

C&I

100%

2. Mining

91%

10. Employee

camps

9%


July 2013 | Page 55


Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area – Waste Treatment 2011/12

Key Findings

• 89% of waste treated in the Sub-catchment Area is disposed of to on-site landfills

• 2,648 tonnes of rubber material was brought to Perth for recycling

• 1,113 tonnes of ferrous metals was brought to Perth for recycling


C&I 2. Mining

Waste Mineral Oils 1,256 Perth Recycled

Rubbers – mixed 2,648 Perth Recycled

Ferrous metals – non-packaging

1,113 Perth Recycled

Oil Sludges 684 Perth Hazardous Treatment


No waste brought into the Remote East

Pilbara Sub-catchment Area for treatment.

Waste In




4,881

426 158

-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

MSW C&I C&D

Greenwaste Processing

Recycled

Stockpiled

Hazardous Treatment

Thermal Treatment

Landfill - Public

Landfill - On-site





Recycled

47%

Stockpiled

1%

Hazardous

Treatment

12%

Landfill - On-

site

40%




Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area – Waste Projections

Key Findings

• Population could grow to 7,585 by 2035

• Total waste generated could increase to 22,262 tonnes by 2035

• All materials forecasted to come from the C&I stream

• Continuation of current high growth rate is unlikely.

Projection Notes

• Low growth rate – average low growth rate witihin Study Area

• Existing growth rate – ABS 2001-2006 recorded population growth rate for Newman Sub-catchment Area


Scenario Growth

Rate

Population

by 2035 Stream


2015 2020 2035

High 2.6% 7,585

MSW - - -

C&I 13,290 15,119 22,262

C&D - - -

TOTAL 13,290 15,119 22,262


MSW - - -

C&I 14,029 17,466 33,707

C&D - - -

TOTAL 14,029 17,466 33,707

Low 0.9% 5,253

MSW - - -

C&I 12,638 13,222 15,142

C&D - - -

TOTAL 12,638 13,222 15,142

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

31

20

32

20

33

20

34

20

35

Tonnes

High

Existing

Low





9.3 Key Findings

In 2011/12, 12,300 tonnes of waste was generated within the Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment

area, with all of this arising from the C&I stream. No MSW was recorded as there are no townsites

within the Sub-catchment Area, with all workers living in employee camps. The largest materials type

generated was mixed rubber with 3,397 tonnes, as a result of a large quantity of waste mill liners

generated within the reporting period. Approximately 2,694 tonnes of mixed refuse and 1,377

tonnes of waste mineral oils were the next largest material types generated.

The majority of the waste generated within the Sub-catchment Area was diverted from landfill, with

47% recycled. Due to the lack of appropriate infrastructure, all of this material was treated externally.

A total of 6,836 tonnes was exported for recycling or treatment including rubber, waste oils and

metals. Within the Sub-catchment Area, almost all waste was disposed of at on-site landfill facilities,

with small quantities undergoing hazardous treatment or being stockpiled.

Under the high growth scenario, waste generation by 2035 could increase to 22,262 tonnes. As in

the Newman Sub-catchment Area, the high growth rate indicates that future growth is likely to be

less than existing growth. As the projections have been based on current per capita waste

generation, all waste is projected to arise within the C&I stream. However, for the current

commercial operations to continue and expand, it would be expected for C&D waste to be

generated during construction or expansion activities.





10 Pilbara Region

Due to the unique characteristics of the Pilbara Region, the data from the six Sub-catchment Areas

within the Pilbara (ie excluding Broome) have been separately summarised.

10.1 Waste Data

Data on waste generation, treatment and projections for the Pilbara Region is presented in the

following pages. A detailed breakdown of the waste generated within the Pilbara Region is provided

in Appendix L.



Pilbara Region – Waste Generation 2011/12



Concrete 144,763



Clean fill 60,230




Contaminated soil – hydrocarbon 19,121


Waste Oil 12,993

Key Findings

• Total waste generation was 630,419 tonnes

• The largest waste stream was C&D with 58% followed by C&I at 35%


• Other/Mixed sectors generated 34% of total waste and Mining 28%

• Concrete was the largest waste material at 144,763 tonnes

• Mixed building rubble was the second largest material at 104,809 tonnes





Kerbside Refuse 28,081 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 84,033 Concrete 144,557

Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 6,437 Ferrous metals – non-packaging 21,186 Mixed building rubble 104,794

Public place refuse 2,894 Mixed metals – non-packaging 18,478 Clean fill 60,230

Greenwaste 1,815 Rubbers - mixed 16,919 Mixed refuse (C&D waste) 12,001

Special event refuse 1,217 Contaminated soil - hydrocarbon 13,767 Mixed inert waste 7,774

MSW

7%

C&I

35%

C&D

58%

1. Domestic

22%

2. Mining

28%

5. Petroleum

and natural

gas

processing

14%

9.

Other/mixed

sectors

34%

10. Employee

camps

2%



Pilbara Region – Waste Treatment 2011/12

Key Findings

• Within the Pilbara Region 55% of waste was disposed of to landfill, 43% to public and 11% to on-site facilities

• 40% of materials were recycled, with a significant proportion of these being from the C&D recycling in Karratha

• 78,768 tonnes of materials were exported from the Pilbara Region for treatment


C&I 2. Mining


Ferrous metals – non-packaging 6,376 Perth Recycled



C&D 5. Petroleum Contaminated soil - hydrocarbon 4,670 Perth Landfill - public

Waste Generated and Treated within the Pilbara Region

No evidence of waste brought into the

Pilbara Region based on data received.

Waste In

Waste generated outside

the Pilbara Region and



Waste generated within the Pilbara Region

and exported for treatment.

Total Waste Generation


59,469 6,804 41,741

65,819 157,070

13,280

1,346

1,663

4,696

2

1,304

177,252

591

3,330

1,250

-

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

MSW C&I C&D

Tonnes

Greenwaste Processing

Recycled

Stockpiled

Hazardous Treatment

Thermal Treatment

Landfill - Public

Landfill - On-site

Greenwaste

Processing

0.8%

Recycled

40%

Stockpiled

1.0%

Hazardous

Treatment

3.3%

Thermal

Treatment

0.5%

Landfill -

Public

44%

Landfill - On-

site

11%





Pilbara Region – Waste Projections

Key Findings

• Projections show a very wide range depending upon future growth in the resources sector.

• Population across the Pilbara Region could increase to 144,583 by 2035.

• Total waste generation could rise to 1,427,872 tonnes by 2035.

• By 2035, 103,660 tonnes of MSW, 467,403 tonnes of C&I and 856,809 tonnes of C&D waste could be generated.

Projection Notes

• Growth rates utilised are based on those adopted for the Sub-catchment Areas within the Pilbara Region.

Scenario Growth

Rate

Population

by 2035 Stream


2015 2020 2035

High 3.6% 144,583

MSW 50,117 59,672 103,660

C&I 240,028 281,102 467,403

C&D 405,766 489,649 856,809

TOTAL 695,911 830,423 1,427,872

Existing 2.8% 122,821

MSW 48,904 55,767 84,015

C&I 238,840 276,753 439,211

C&D 391,399 437,618 615,218

TOTAL 679,143 770,138 1,139,444

Low 0.2% 64,400

MSW 46,088 47,568 52,671

C&I 221,852 227,050 245,701

C&D 373,320 385,848 428,392

TOTAL 641,260 660,466 726,764

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

900,000

1,000,000

1,100,000

1,200,000

1,300,000

1,400,000

1,500,000

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

31

20

32

20

33

20

34

20

35

Tonnes

High

Existing

Low





11 Total Study Area

To provide a summary of waste generation and treatment within the whole Study Area, data from all

Sub-catchment Areas has been amalgamated.

11.1 Waste Data

Data on waste generation, treatment and projections for the Total Study Area is presented in the

following pages. A detailed breakdown of the waste generated within the Total Study Area is

provided in Appendix M.



Total Study Area – Waste Generation 2011/12

Key Findings

• Total waste generation was 669,816 tonnes

• C&D was the largest waste stream at 56% followed by C&I at 35%


• Other/Mixed sectors generated 36% of total waste and Mining 26%

• Concrete was the largest waste material at 144,763 tonnes

• Mixed Refuse arising from C&I and C&D streams was the second largest material at 120,402 tonnes



MSW

9%

C&I

35%C&D

56%

1. Domestic

22%

2. Mining

26%

5. Petroleum

and natural

gas

processing

14%

9.

Other/mixed

sectors

36%

10. Employee

camps

2%



Concrete 144,763



Clean fill 60,230




Contaminated soil – hydrocarbon 19,121


Waste Oil 13,036



Kerbside Refuse 34,281 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 101,964 Concrete 144,557

Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 6,437 Ferrous metals – non-packaging 21,186 Mixed building rubble 113,732

Greenwaste 6,315 Mixed metals – non-packaging 18,478 Clean fill 60,230

Public place refuse 3,488 Rubbers - mixed 16,919 Mixed refuse (C&D waste) 12,001

Kerbside comingled recyclables 2,078 Contaminated soil – hydrocarbon 13,767 Mixed inert waste 7,774



Study Area – Waste Treatment 2011/12

Key Findings

• 57% of waste was landfilled across the Study Area including 10% at on-site landfills

• 38% of materials were recycled, however a significant proportion of these is from the C&D recycling in Karratha

• 78,811 tonnes of materials were treated outside the Study Area


C&I 2. Mining


Ferrous metals – non-packaging 6,376 Perth Recycled



C&D 5. Petroleum Contaminated soil - hydrocarbon 4,670 Perth Landfill - public

Waste Generated and Treated within the Study Area

59,469 6,804 48,733

83,750 166,008

155

13,280 1,346

1,663

4,696

995

1,304

177,252

5,091

3,330

1,250

-

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

MSW C&I C&D

Tonnes

Greenwaste

Processing

Recycled

Stockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Landfill - Public

Landfill - On-site

No evidence of waste brought into the

Study Area based on data received.

Waste In







Total Waste Generation


Greenwaste

Processing

1.4%

Recycled

38%

Stockpiled

0.9%

Hazardous

Treatment

3.1%

Thermal

Treatment

0.5%

Landfill -

Public

47%

Landfill - On-

site

10%

July 2013 | Page 65



Study Area – Waste Projections

Key Findings

• Population across the Study Area could increase to 174,917 by 2035

• Total waste generation could rise to 1,531,756 tonnes by 2035

• By 2035, 129,656 tonnes of MSW, 524,041 tonnes of C&I and 878,059 tonnes of C&D waste could be generated

Projection Notes

• Growth rates utilised are based on those adopted for the various Sub-catchment Areas

Scenario Growth

Rate

Population

by 2035 Stream


2015 2020 2035

High 3.4% 174,917

MSW 63,856 75,786 129,656

C&I 261,087 310,704 524,041

C&D 441,008 524,938 878,059

TOTAL 765,951 911,428 1,531,756

Existing 2.7% 149,695

MSW 62,153 70,395 103,703

C&I 257,914 297,812 467,554

C&D 400,884 448,090 629,313

TOTAL 720,951 816,297 1,200,570

Low 0.9% 90,674

MSW 59,534 62,781 74,707

C&I 241,208 248,951 277,424

C&D 382,946 396,739 444,168

TOTAL 683,688 708,471 796,299

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

31

20

32

20

33

20

34

20

35

Tonnes

High

Existing

Low

July 2013 | Page 66



12 Conclusions

This section presents the key findings of the Study for both individual Sub-catchment Areas and the

whole Study Area.

12.1 Waste Generation

• Total waste generation within the Study Area in 2011/12 was approximately 669,816 tonnes.

• The largest quantity of waste was generated in the Karratha Sub-catchment Area with

approximately 303,000 tonnes. This was followed by the Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area

with 148,500 tonnes and the Newman Sub-catchment Area with 105,000 tonnes. Total

waste generation was significantly lower within the other Sub-catchment Areas.

• Across the Study Area, 56% of total waste was generated from the C&D stream, 35% from

the C&I stream and 9% was MSW.

• A breakdown of waste generation by stream across the Study Area is shown in Figure 11. It

can be seen that the distribution of waste generation between key waste streams varies

significantly with the amount and phasing of commercial activities undertaken within each

Sub-catchment Area. A similar proportion to the State average of C&D was generated

across the Study Area, however a greater proportion of C&I waste and less MSW was

generated than the State averages.

Figure 11: Waste Generation Breakdown by Stream

• Other/Mixed commercial sectors were the largest in terms of waste generation with 36% of

total waste. The Mining sector represented 26%, Domestic sector 22% and Oil and Gas

sector 14% of waste generated across the Study Area in 2011/12.

• A total of 13,893 tonnes was generated across the Study Area from Employee Camps

(Sector 10). Detailed information in relation to Employee Camps is provided in Appendix N.

• The largest Material Type generated within the Study Area was concrete with 144,763 tonnes,

followed by mixed refuse (public drop-off, C&I and C&D waste) with 120,402 tonnes and

mixed building rubble with 113,748 tonnes.

• Per capita waste generation rates varied within each Sub-catchment Area according to the

amount and phase of activities in the resource sector. Higher per capita waste generation

was recorded in Sub-catchment Areas with significant construction activity.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Broome Port

Hedland

Newman Karratha Onslow Tom

Price

Remote

East

Pilbara

Study

Area

WA

09/10

C&D

C&I

MSW

July 2013 | Page 67



• The Broome Sub-catchment Area had the lowest per capita waste generation with 2.3

tonnes per annum, due to the limited amount of resources sector activity in 2011/12.

Onslow had the highest annual rate with 15.6 tonnes per capita because of its low

population base and significant construction activity.

12.2 Waste Treatment

• A total of 57% (364,764 tonnes) of waste generated within the Study Area was disposed of to

landfill, with 47% sent to public landfills and 10% at on-site facilities.

• The Study Area is therefore currently achieving an overall diversion from landfill rate of 43%.

Across WA, the diversion rate was 31% in 2010/11 and 39% in 2011/12 (Recycling Activity in

Western Australia, Hyder).

• 38% of total waste generated was recycled. The majority of waste recycled was generated

from the C&D stream, which assisted in achieving the 43% landfill diversion rate across the

Study Area. The C&D recycling facility in Karratha contributes significantly to this, with a

landfill diversion rate in the Karratha Sub-catchment Area of 76% in the C&D stream.

• The remaining 5% of total waste generated is diverted from landfill through greenwaste

processing, stockpiling and hazardous and thermal treatment.

• A total of 78,811 tonnes was exported from the Study Area for treatment in Perth, interstate or

overseas. The majority of the waste removed was sent for recycling, however some was also

exported for hazardous treatment or disposal.

12.3 Projections

• Future waste generation was estimated based on future population projections. Population

growth in the Study Area is strongly influenced by activity in the resource sector. The

uncertainty of long term growth projections for that sector has resulted in growth scenarios

which give a wide range of future population estimates. This has a corresponding effect on

the estimates of future waste generation.

• The growth scenarios show that by 2035, population within the Study Area could increase to

178,685, or increase only slightly from current levels to 105,189.

• Based on the high growth scenario, waste generation within the Study Area could increase to

1,531,756 tonnes by 2035. LNG developments in the Onslow and Broome Sub-catchment

Areas were included in the projection of C&I and C&D waste under the high growth

scenario.

• The high growth scenario predicts that across the Study Area, MSW generation could

increase to 129,650 tonnes, C&I waste to 524,000 tonnes and C&D waste 878,000 tonnes

by 2035. These projections are considered to be unrealistically high as they are based on

an optimistic projection of population.

• Should existing growth and waste generation rates continue, waste generation could rise to

1,200,569 tonnes. Under the low growth scenario waste is projected to increase to 796,300

tonnes per annum by 2035.

• The use of current per capita waste generation within each Sub-catchment Area, which vary

significantly, contributes to the very large future waste projections. This is particularly relevant

to Sub-catchment Areas currently experiencing significant construction activities, as

illustrated by the projection of C&D waste in the Karratha Sub-catchment Area. It is

recognised that the transition of the current construction projects to their operational phase

will significantly reduce future waste generation. This effect is not reflected in the high growth

scenario projections and therefore conservatism should be adopted when utilising these

data.

July 2013 | Page 68



13 Discussion

A number of key discussion points have been identified from the study and they can be categorised

as follows:

• Current waste management systems;

• Key issues in the data analysis process; and

• Implications of the Study’s findings.

These aspects are discussed further in the following sections.

13.1 Waste Management Systems

The current waste management systems within the Study Area have a heavy reliance on local

landfills. Many of the facilities were established more than a decade ago, before the generation of

modern best practice siting, design and operational standards. These landfills are all unlined and do

not reflect current best practice. In addition, there is a significant reliance on hazardous waste

treatment facilities located outside of the region.

The advancement of the resource sector, particularly over the past decade, has resulted in a

number of issues for the current waste management systems within the Study Area including:

• Dramatic increase in the quantity of waste material requiring management and treatment;

• Generation of more complex waste streams with materials that require specialist

transportation and treatments; and

• Industry desire for improved services including more sustainable waste treatment options,

particularly for hazardous wastes.

C&I waste currently comprises 35% of all waste generated within the Study Area. This is well above

what is typical for other regional centres in Western Australia. In addition, C&D waste represents 56%

of total waste generation with the vast majority arising as a direct result of the resource sector

construction activities. Furthermore, 10% of total waste generation is either a controlled waste or

other hazardous material, illustrating the complexity of the waste streams being generated.

This Study has identified that there are 36 licensed landfills within the region consisting of 21 Category

64 premises (Class II putrescible landfills) and 15 Category 89 premises (rural putrescible landfills

accepting less than 5,000 tonnes per annum) as defined by the Environmental Protection

Regulations 1987. The vast majority of these consist of unlined, isolated landfills on mine sites. There

are large clusters of these within the Tom Price and Newman Sub-catchment Areas. The

environmental performance of the waste management systems in the Study Area could be

improved if these landfills were consolidated into a few modern facilities developed under best

practice principles.

If the high growth projections for the Study Area were to eventuate then the waste generated could

more than double by 2035 to approximately 1.5 million tonnes per annum. This would coincide with

the existing trend towards more complex waste streams being generated, particularly from the Oil

and Gas sector. Significant alterations would be required to the current waste management systems

across the Study Area to ensure that these materials are dealt with in a sustainable and/or

appropriate manner.

July 2013 | Page 69



13.2 Data Analysis

13.2.1 Waste Classification

The generation of the Waste Classification System was a key aspect of the data collection process

utilised to complete the Study. The WCS assisted in the identification of waste streams and gaining

an understanding of the various materials being generated. In addition, the WCS allowed for the

identification of the various sectors of the economy from which the waste was generated. This data

will greatly assist with gaining an improved understanding of waste streams from these sectors and

could contribute to more tailored policy development.

As this Study focused on gathering data across the life cycle of all wastes, consultation with waste

generators and managers was undertaken. Arising from these activities, significant inconsistencies

were identified in the terminology and recording systems utilised (including time periods and units)

which necessitated clarification being sought from the majority of participants. This highlighted the

need for the consistent use of a common waste classification system in Western Australia.

13.2.2 Waste Generation

With the exception of the Broome Sub-catchment Area (which currently has very little activity in the

resources sector), total per capita waste generation in the Study Area was higher than the State

average of 2.6 tonnes per capita (Waste Strategy 2012). In some Sub-catchment Areas, per capita

waste generation was up to six times greater than the State average. In the majority of Sub-

catchment Areas, this was largely due to the high quantities of C&I or C&D waste associated with

resource sector activities. A summary of per capita waste generation within each Sub-catchment

Area and for the whole Study Area is shown in Table 12.

Table 12: Per Capita Waste Generation across the Study Area (tonnes/annum)

Stream Broome Port


Tom

Price

Remote

East

Pilbara

Study

Area

MSW 0.73 0.96 0.81 0.56 0.61 0.87 - 0.70

C&I 1.06 3.41 5.29 1.82 4.96 6.43 2.88 2.86

C&D 0.52 4.70 1.69 9.68 10.02 3.53 - 4.52

TOTAL 2.31 9.07 7.79 12.06 15.59 10.83 2.88 8.08

As shown in Table 12, the quantity of MSW generated per capita is consistent throughout the Study

Area, excluding Remote East Pilbara.

In the Karratha and Onslow Sub-catchment Areas, significant construction activity, particularly within

the Oil and Gas sector, generates large quantities of C&D waste per capita (9.7 tonnes and 10.0

tonnes, respectively). In the Sub-catchment Areas containing relatively large numbers of existing

mining operations (Newman, and Tom Price), C&I waste is the most significant waste stream per

capita. The Broome Sub-catchment Area, where there is currently minimal activity in the resources

sector, recorded the lowest per capita waste generation rate.

13.2.3 Waste Projections

Due to the uncertainty associated with predicting the number and magnitude of future industrial

projects, difficulty arises in projecting growth in waste generation. As described previously,

population projections were considered to be the most appropriate method for projecting waste

generation for all of the waste streams, due to the correlation between population and economic

activities in the Study Area. However, population forecasts for the Sub-catchment Areas and Study

July 2013 | Page 70



Area vary considerably between the high and low growth scenarios. This leads to a wide range of

waste generation projections. Under a high growth scenario, waste generation over the whole Study

Area may increase to over 1.5 million tonnes per annum by 2035, while under the low growth

scenario it may increase only slightly to approximately 796,300 tonnes per annum.

13.3 Waste Strategy Targets

The overall landfill diversion rate across all three key waste streams is currently 43% within the Study

Area. The Waste Strategy contains State wide landfill diversion targets for the C&I and C&D streams

and metropolitan and Regional centre targets (including Karratha) for MSW. The targets are set for

2015 and 2020. These targets and the current landfill diversion rates in key Stub-catchment Areas

and the Study Area are shown in Table 13.

Table 13: Waste Strategy Landfill Diversion Targets and Comparison of Current Diversion Rates

Waste

Stream Region

2009/10

Diversion

rates

Targets Study Area 2011/12

2015 2020

Bro

om

e

Po

rt H

ed

lan

d

Ne

wm

an

Ka

rra

tha

On

slo

w

Tom

Pric

e

Re

mo

te E

ast

Pilb

ara

Pilb

ara

Tota

l

MSW Regional centres*

15% 30% 50% 44%# 9% 13% 4% 0% 0% - 8% 16%

C&I State wide

29% 60% 75% 0% 36% 46% 54% 25% 23% 60% 43% 39%

C&D State wide

46% 55% 70% 0% 0% 15% 76% 0% 2% - 52% 50%

* Karratha is the only Regional Centre within the Study Area # Broome MSW diversion rate is high due to C&I waste being classified as MSW

Note: Diversion rates include waste exported from the Sub-catchment Areas for treatment

As shown in Table 13, significant improvements in landfill diversion are required to achieve the 2015

target for MSW in the Karratha Sub-catchment Area and the C&I stream across the Study Area. While

the MSW target currently applies only to the Karratha Sub-catchment Area, it is possible that in the

future, State wide landfill diversion targets may be developed for the MSW stream. Across the Study

Area, the MSW stream is currently achieving a landfill diversion rate of 16%.

Improvements in landfill diversion are also required to achieve the 2015 target for the C&I stream

across the Study Area, with the exception of the Remote East Pilbara Sub-catchment Area. Due to

the considerable quantity of C&D waste recycled within the Karratha Sub-catchment Area, the

current landfill diversion rate for the C&D stream in Karratha is already exceeding the Waste Strategy

target for 2020.

July 2013 | Page 71



14 Recommendations

Based on the findings of this Study, it is recommended that the Waste Authority:

• Considers strategies for encouraging the rationalisation of landfills within the Study Area.

• Considers the adoption and support of a Waste Classification System for Western Australia to

establish a framework for waste data gathering and reporting to ensure that there is

consistency across the industry. As part of this process, due consideration should be given to

the Waste Classification System devised as part of this Study.

• Considers improved reporting requirements for all waste facilities across the State to provide

waste data which is in accordance with the adopted Waste Classification System.

July 2013 | Page 72



Glossary Commercial and Industrial Waste generated from, or as the direct result of, commercial and

(C&I) waste industrial activities, and that is not Municipal Solid Waste or

Construction and Demolition waste.

Construction and Demolition Materials generated as a result of construction, refurbishment or

(C&D) waste demolition activities.

Hazardous Treatment A treatment method describing processes for hazardous materials

including bioremediation, dewatering and chemical treatment.

Landfill Diversion Rate Proportion of waste diverted from landfill disposal through

treatment including greenwaste processing, recycling, stockpiling,

hazardous treatment and thermal treatment.

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Natural gas converted to liquid form.

Material Type Description of waste composition as defined within the Waste

Classification System.

Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Residential waste typically managed by local governments

including:


• Waste from public places including from road verges,

reserves, beaches, litter bins, events and street cleaning; and

• Incidental commercial waste collected via residential

kerbside collections.

Pilbara Planning and Document developed by the Pilbara Regional Planning Committee

Infrastructure Framework (PPIF) on behalf of the Department of Planning to provide a strategic

direction for the Pilbara region over the next 25 years.

Pilbara Region A region in the north of Western Australia including the Shires of

Ashburton, East Pilbara and Roebourne and the Town of Port

Hedland.

Recycled A treatment method describing materials processed to generate

useful materials or products with a similar physical form.

Sector Sector of the economy from which waste is generated as defined

within the Waste Classification System.

Study Area The area covered by this Study including the Pilbara Region and

the Shire of Broome.

Sub-catchment Area Section of the Study Area containing key waste generation and

treatment locations based around major population centres and

groupings of isolated waste generation sources.

Waste Classification System Coded system developed for the Study to enable waste to be

(WCS) classified by both source and composition.

Waste Stream Source of waste generation which traditionally include MSW, C&I

and C&D.

July 2013 | Page 73



Abbreviations AER Annual Environmental Report

ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics

DER Department of Environment Regulation

PICC Pilbara Industry’s Community Council

WMAA Waste Management Association of Australia



Appendix A: Waste Classification

System

Waste Classification System Spreadsheet

Residential waste typically managed by local governments including:


• Waste from public places including from road verges, reserves, beaches, litter bins, events and street

cleaning; and

• Incidental commercial waste collected via residential kerbside collections.

C&IWaste generated from, or as the direct result of, commercial and industrial operations, and that is not MSW or

C&D waste.

C&D Materials generated as a result of construction, refurbishment or demolition activities.

The source of the waste is further identified in the second part of the WCS by the Sector of the economy from which the waste was

generated. A total of 13 Sectors have been used, based on a similar concept to the Classification of Economic Activities within the

European Commission’s EWC and also within the AWD (Sub-stream 1 Secondary Source).

To achieve the objectives listed above, each waste type is classified by the WCS using a three level coding system including Stream,

Sector and Material Type. The following pages describe in detail the breakdown of each of these tiers. Each level is colour coded for

ease of reference and has a unique Waste Classification Code allocated.

Waste Stream

The first part of the WCS identifies the source of the waste by stream, and given its own Waste Stream Code.

· Code A. – Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)

· Code B. – Commercial and Industrial (C&I)

· Code C. – Construction and Demolition (C&D)

The first letter of the WCC will be either the A., B. or C. associated with the above STREAM CODE.

Table 1 provides a detailed definition for each of the Waste Streams.

Table 1 Waste Stream Definitions

MSW

Sector

The WCS Structure

To assist in the gathering and reporting of waste data, a Waste Classification System (WCS) has been developed for the Pilbara and

Broome Waste Data Study. The WCS was developed to achieve the following objectives:

1. Reflect existing waste management practices to allow mapping of waste management activities;

2. Achieve consistency both within the WCS and with standard industry terms and classifications;

3. Prioritise identification of waste by its source as well as its composition;

4. Identify the sector of the economy from which the waste is generated, to inform future analysis and policy development;





During the design of the WCS, a range of national and international waste classification systems were reviewed with particular

consideration given to the Australian Waste Database (AWD) and European Waste Catalogue (EWC). A number of systems were

based on legislative reporting requirements such as tracking hazardous wastes. More advanced systems focused on all waste

generation and particularly on the various sectors of the economy that generate waste. The WCS developed allows for a Waste

Classification Code (WCC) to be allocated to each waste material generated in all major waste streams within the Study Area, or

even the State of WA. This is explained in detail in the following sections.

A Waste Data Study has been initiated for the Pilbara region and Shire of Broome (the Study Area).

Pilbara – Broome Waste Data Study

Waste Classification System- Explanatory Guide

Waste Authority

May-13

Introduction

July 2013 | Page 75


The waste in this example is generated in the C&I Stream (Code C.), as part of the ‘Employee Camps’ Sector (Code 10.) and is

identified as Material Type ‘Mixed Refuse' (Code 801).

The WCC for this waste material is C.10.801.

Example 3 – Stockpiled building rubble from the demolition of a school

The waste in this example is generated in the C&D Stream (Code C.), as part of the ‘Public Facilities and Institutions’ Sector (Code 11.)

and is identified as Material Type ‘Mixed Building Rubble’ (Code 601).

The WCC for this waste material is C.11.601.

Example 4 – Kitchen waste from remote employee camp

The WCC for this waste material is B.02.611.

The Sectors used have been selected to reflect the activities within the Study Area and to assist in clarifying the intent of the WCS.

Examples of Sectors are ’01. - Domestic ’, ’02. - Mining, Exploration, quarrying, physical and chemical treatment of Minerals’ and ‘05.

- Petroleum refining, natural gas purification and pyrolytic treatment of coal’ . Sector ’10. - Employee Camps’ has been given its

own Sector, to differentiate it from ’01. - Domestic ’ as it is to be used for remote employee camps directly related to a particular C&I

enterprise (only to be used for C&I waste). Each Sector is given a SECTOR CODE within the range of 01. to 13.

Material Type

The third aspect of the coding system reflects the composition of the waste. Each of the waste Material Types is given a MATERIAL

CODE within the range of 101 – 899. Codes with the range of 101 – 183 are Material Types that were previously identified in the DEC

Controlled Waste Guideline Series. The reference to these guidelines has been incorporated into the WCS to ensure compliance with

previously existing waste management systems. MATERIAL CODE’s within the Range of 201 – 899 are waste Material Types identified

outside of the previously existing Controlled Waste guidelines and by utilising Material Types occurring in the EWC and AWD.

WCC Examples

The colour coding below has been used to show the arrangement of the WCC however it is not a requirement for reporting.

Example1- weekly green-bin kerbside collection

The waste generated in this example is MSW Stream (Code A.), as part of the ’Domestic’ Sector (Code 01.) and is identified as

Material Type ‘Kerbside refuse’ (Code 302).

The WCC for this waste material is A.01.302.

Example 2 - replacing rubber conveyors on an iron ore mine site

The waste in this example is generated in the C&I Stream (Code B.), as part of the ‘Mining , exploration, quarrying…’ Sector (Code 02.)

and is identified as Material Type ‘Rubbers – other’ (Code 611).

July 2013 | Page 76


STREAM CODE Stream Name Definition

SECTOR CODE Sector Name Definition

Waste Classification System- Waste Stream and Sector Descriptions

Public Infrastructure Networks

Solid and Liquid Waste Management Facilities

A.Municipal Solid Waste

(MSW)

Metals processing and thermal processes

Human/animal healthcare and/or related research

Other/Mixed Sectors

Employee camps

C.

B.

Premises where people reside excluding remote employee

camps (only to be used for MSW and C&D)

Waste generated from, or as the direct result of, commercial

and industrial operationsand that is not MSW or C&D waste.

13.

12.

11.

10.

09.

08.

07.

06.

05.

Public Facilities and Institutions

Petroleum refining, natural gas purification and pyrolytic

treatment of coal

Chemical processing

04.

03.

02.Mining, exploration, quarrying, physical and chemical

treatment of minerals

Agriculture, horticulture, aquaculture, forestry, fishing, food

preparation and processing

Wood processing and production of panels, furniture,

pulp, paper and cardboard

Residential waste typically managed by local governments

including:

- kerbside or vergeside collections, or dropped off waste

- waste from public places including from road verges, reserves,

beaches, litter bins, events and street cleaning

- incidental commercial waste collected via kerbside collections

Commercial & Industrial

(C&I)

Construction & Demolition

(C&D)

Materials generated as a result of construction, refurbishment or

demolition activities

01. Domestic

Residue materials from solid and liquid waste management

facilities

Infrastructure networks designed for public use including

transportation (roads, bridges, railways), utility services (power,

water, sewage)

Public institutions (library, schools, universities), recreation

Remote employee camps directly related to a particular C&I

enterprise (only to be used for C&I)

Commercial and industrial activities not defined within Sectors 2-

8 or 10 - 13, and mixed C&I Sectors

July 2013 | Page 77


MATERIAL

CODEMATERIAL TYPE - Controlled Wastes

Category

Group No.Category No.

Category Group

Name

101 Biological Wastes - Animal wastes 1.01

102 Biological Wastes - Septage wastes 1.02

103 Biological Wastes - Grease wastes 1.03

104 Biological Wastes - Vegetable oils and derivatives 1.04

105 Biological Wastes - Sewage waste from the reticulated sewage system 1.05

106 Solid/Sludge Waste Requiring Special Handling - Contaminated soils 2.01

107 Solid/Sludge Waste Requiring Special Handling - Fly ash 2.02

108 Solid/Sludge Waste Requiring Special Handling - Filter cake 2.03

109 Solid/Sludge Waste Requiring Special Handling - containers or drums 2.04

110 Solid/Sludge Waste Requiring Special Handling - Encapsulated, chemically-fixed, solidified or polyerised wastes 2.05

111 Solid/Sludge Waste Requiring Special Handling - Explosive 2.06

112 Solid/Sludge Waste Requiring Special Handling - Industrial waste treatment plant sludge's and residues 2.07

113 Clinical and Pharmaceutical Wastes - Clinical and related wastes (biomedical) 3.01

114 Clinical and Pharmaceutical Wastes - Pathogenic substances 3.02

115 Clinical and Pharmaceutical Wastes - Cytotoxic substances 3.03

116 Clinical and Pharmaceutical Wastes - Waste from the production or use of pharmaceutical products 3.04

117 Pesticide Wastes - Concentrates 4.01

118 Pesticide Wastes - Solutions 4.02

119 Pesticide Wastes - Organochlorine pesticides 4.03

120Paints and Resins - Wastes from the production, formulation or use of inks, dyes, resins, adhesives, glues, latex or

plasticisers5.01

121 Paints and Resins - Oil based paints (all options) 5.02

122 Paints and Resins - Water based and acrylic paints (all options) 5.03

123 Oils and Emulsions - Oil interceptor waste 6.01

124 Oils and Emulsions - Oil/water mixtures 6.02

125 Oils and Emulsions - Oil sludge's ie. Plate separators 6.03

126 Oils and Emulsions - Waste mineral oils unfit for their originally intended use 6.04

127 Solvents - Halogenated aliphatics 7.01

128 Solvents - Non-halogenated aliphatics 7.02

129 Solvents - Halogenated aromatics 7.03

130 Solvents - Non-halogenated aromatics 7.04

131 Other Organic Chemicals - Engine Coolants 8.01

132 Other Organic Chemicals - Ethers 8.02

133 Other Organic Chemicals - Highly odours organic chemicals (including mercaptans and acrylates) 8.03

134 Other Organic Chemicals - Isocyanate compounds 8.04

135 Other Organic Chemicals - Organohalogen compounds other than substances referred to elsewhere in this schedule 8.05

136 Other Organic Chemicals - PBBs (polybrominated biphenyls) 8.06

137 Other Organic Chemicals - PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) 8.07

138 Other Organic Chemicals - PCNs (polychlorinated naphthalene's) 8.08

139 Other Organic Chemicals - PCTs (polychlorinated terphenyls) 8.09

140 Other Organic Chemicals - Phenols and phenol compounds including chlorophenols 8.10

141 Other Organic Chemicals - Phosphorous compounds including chlorophenols 8.11

142 Other Organic Chemicals - Surface acting agent (surfactant) - detergents 8.12

143 Other Organic Chemicals - Surface acting agent (surfactant) - wetting agents 8.13

144 Other Organic Chemicals - Surface acting agent (surfactant) - emulsifiers 8.14

8Other Organic

Chemicals

Biological Waste1

Waste Classification System- Material Descriptions (Controlled Waste 101-144)

Solvents

Paints and Resins

6Oils and

Emulsions

Existing DEC Controlled Waste Guideline Series

7

2

Solid/Sludge

Waste Requiring

Special Handling

3

Clinical and

Pharmaceutical

Wastes

4 Pesticide Wastes

5

July 2013 | Page 78


MATERIAL

CODEMATERIAL TYPE - Controlled Wastes

Category

Group No.Category No.

Category Group

Name

145 Acids 9 9 Acids

146 Alkalis 10 10 Alkalis

147 Chromium 11 11 Chromium

148 Cyanide - Inorganic cyanide 12.01

149 Cyanide - Organic cyanide 12.02

150 Inorganic chemicals - Antimony or antimony compounds 13.01

151 Inorganic chemicals - Arsenic or arsenic compounds 13.02

152 Inorganic chemicals - Barium compounds (excluding barium sulphate) 13.03

153 Inorganic chemicals - Beryllium or beryllium compounds 13.04

154 Inorganic chemicals - Boron 13.05

155 Inorganic chemicals - Cadmium or cadmium compounds 13.06

156 Inorganic chemicals - Chlorates 13.07

157 Inorganic chemicals - Cobalt compounds 13.08

158 Inorganic chemicals - Copper compounds 13.09

159 Inorganic chemicals - Fluorine compounds (excluding calcium fluoride) 13.10

160 Inorganic chemicals - Lead or lead compounds 13.11

161 Inorganic chemicals - Mercury 13.12

162 Inorganic chemicals - Metal carbonyls 13.13

163 Inorganic chemicals - Nickel compounds 13.14

164 Inorganic chemicals - Non toxic salts 13.15

165 Inorganic chemicals - Perchlorates 13.16

166 Inorganic chemicals - Phosphorous compounds 13.17

167 Inorganic chemicals - Photographic waste 13.18

168 Inorganic chemicals - Selenium or selenium compounds 13.19

169 Inorganic chemicals - Sulphides 13.20

170 Inorganic chemicals - Tellurium 13.21

171 Inorganic chemicals - Thallium 13.22

172 Inorganic chemicals - Vanadium compounds 13.23

173 Inorganic chemicals - Zinc compounds 13.24

174 Low strength waste water - Industrial wash waters 14.01

175 Low strength waste water - Storm water 14.02

176 Low strength waste water - Pond water 14.03

177 Low strength waste water - Fire debris and wash water (may vary) 14.04

178 Miscellaneous - Residues from industrial waste treatment or disposal operations 15.01

179 Miscellaneous - Waste from the manufacture, formulation and use of wood preserving chemicals 15.02

180Miscellaneous - Waste chemical substances arising from research and development or teaching activities including

those which are not identified or new, or the effects on environment or human health15.03

181 Miscellaneous - Waste resulting from surface treatment of metals and plastics (potentially various categories) 15.04

182 Miscellaneous - Waste tarry residue arising from refining, distillation or pyrolytic treatment 15.05

183 Miscellaneous - Waste tyres 15.06

Waste Classification System- Material Descriptions (Controlled Waste 145-183)

15 Miscellaneous

Existing DEC Controlled Waste Guideline Series

12 Cyanide

14Low strength

waste water

13

Inorganic

chemicals other

than inorganic

chemicals

referred to in

Category Groups

9 - 12

July 2013 | Page 79


MATERIAL

CODEMATERIAL TYPE - Other Hazardous

201 E-waste 407 Shredded Greenwaste 620 Roadbase

202 Household and Industrial Batteries 499 Other Biodegradable not specified 621 Aggregates

203 Vehicle and marine batteriesMATERIAL

CODEMATERIAL TYPE - Packaging 622 Mixed Inert

204 Fluorescent tubes 501 Mixed Paper and Cardboard 623 Garnet

205 Mixed household hazardous waste 502 Paper 624 Remediated Soil

206 Radioactive waste 503 Cardboard 699 Other Inert no specified

207 Medical and vetinary waste 504 Glass PackagingMATERIAL

CODE

MATERIAL TYPE - Liquid/Solids (not

Controlled Waste)

208 Asbestos 505 Plastic 1 - PET 701 Tailings

209 Contaminated Soil - Hydrocarbon 506 Plastic 2 - HDPE 702 Drilling muds

210 Contaminated Soil - Pesticide 507 Plastic 3 - PVC 703 Sludge's

211 Contaminated Soil - Acid Sulfate 508 Plastic 4 - LDPE 704 Slurry

212 Contaminated Packaging 509 Plastic 5 - PP 799 Other Liquid/Solids not specified

213 Biosecurity Waste - (Quarantine Waste) 510 Plastic 6 - PSMATERIAL

CODE

MATERIAL TYPE - Wastes not otherwise

specified

214 Batteries - Miscellaneous 511 Plastic 7 - Other 801 Mixed Refuse (excluding kerbside)

215 Waste Oil 512 Mixed Plastics 802Comingled Recyclables (excluding

kerbside)

216 Mixed Commercial Hazardous 513 Ferrous Metals - packaging 803 Textiles

217 Hydrocarbon Contaminated Material 514 Non-Ferrous Metals - packaging 804 Mattresses

299 Other Hazardous not specified 515 Mixed metals - packaging 805 Hard waste

MATERIAL

CODE

MATERIAL TYPE - Local Government

Services599 Other Packaging not specified 806 Absorbents

301 Kerbside Commingled recyclablesMATERIAL

CODEMATERIAL TYPE - Inert and Similar 807 Waste gases and containers

302 Kerbside refuse 601 Mixed building rubble 808 Fire extinguishers

303 Kerbside greenwaste 602 Concrete 809 Bottom ash

304Kerbside mixed organics (including kitchen

waste)603 Concrete - reinforced 810 Fly ash

305 Vergeside Greenwaste 604 Bricks 811 Non-composted waste/off-spec compost

306 Vergeside bulk metals 605 Tiles and ceramics 812 Ash - Miscellaneous

307 Vergeside Hard waste 606 Asphalt 813 Printer Cartridges

308 Public place refuse 607 Glazing 899 Waste not otherwise specified

309 Public place recycling 608 Gypsum products

310 Street cleaning residues 609 Insulation

311 Special event refuse 610 Limestone

312 Special event recycling 611 Rubbers - other

399 Other LGA waste not specified 612 Mixed Soil and sand

MATERIAL

CODEMATERIAL TYPE - Biodegradable 613 Clean fill

401 Food waste 614 Rock

402 Greenwaste 615 Mixed crushed rock

403 Mixed organics 616 Tars

404 Timber - untreated 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging)

405 Timber - treated 618 Non-Ferrous Metals (non-packaging)

406 Sawdust 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging)

Waste Classification System- Material Descriptions (201-889)

July 2013 | Page 80



Appendix B: Data Collection Form

Data Collection Sheet- LGAs

Waste Data Study for the Pilbara Region and Shire of

Broome

Data Collection Sheets

LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAs (LGAs)

Waste Authority

July 2013 | Page 82



Broome

Data Collection Sheet- Explanatory notes

Waste Authority

IntroductionThe management of waste in remote and regional areas of Western Australia presents a unique challenge.

The Western Australian Waste Strategy: Creating the Right Environment (2012) (the Waste Strategy)

acknowledges that resource development across the northwest of the State is placing pressure on existing

waste management systems due to difficulties in regional areas such as transport, infrastructure, access to

markets and funding.

The Waste Strategy recognises that appropriate planning and development of waste infrastructure is needed

as early as possible, particularly in the regional and remote areas of the State. In order to ensure that this

occurs, it is vital that the Waste Authority has access to consistent and comparable data.

A Waste Data Study has been initiated for the Pilbara region and Shire of Broome (Study Area).

To assist in the gathering and reporting of waste data, a Data Collection Sheet (DCS) has been developed for

the project. Different versions of the DCS have been developed for local governments, waste generators and

private waste management service providers. The DCS was developed to achieve the following objectives:


2. Identify the sector of the economy from which the waste is generated, to inform future analysis and policy

development;





A description of the DCS structure and user process is provided below.

The DCS StructureThe following gives a breakdown of the DCS structure according to sheet name tabs within the DCS.

Respondent DetailsThis sheet of the DCS requires the respondent to complete details regarding contact information, and,

depending on the industry, details regarding future growth. Data on future growth is to be used in projecting

future waste streams in the study area.

Waste RegistryThe waste registry sheet covers the generation and/or management of waste. The source segment of the

waste registry sheet requires the user to fill in details relating to the source of a waste material and the type of

waste material that has been generated from this source. The red, blue and green columns of this segment

are coloured to correspond with the Waste Classification System (WCS) (see below) that has been developed

for the Waste Data Study. This WCS has been included in the DCS for reference when completing this section.

The segments on quantity, collection, processing/disposal and transfer facility are segments that cover the

quantity and management of the waste types.

July 2013 | Page 83


DCS Waste Facility OutputsThis sheet of the DCS requires the respondent to provide data related to any waste management facilities

over which they have operational control. Data is required on the outputs of these facilities including waste

residues (eg non recyclable waste, sludges) or products that have economic value eg recycling building

products or separated recyclables.

Waste Classification System (WCS)A WCS was developed for the study to assist with the gathering and reporting of data. The DCS has two sheets

relating to the WCS. The first is an explanatory guide and the second sheet contains details of the WCS. The

WCS and DCS have matching colours in order to help explain the coding process.

DCS MethodologyThe DCS sheets are design to be filled in any manner that is deemed easiest for the respondent. The

electronic format of the DCS contains definitions and descriptions of appropriate columns. These are found

by allowing the mouse pointer to hover over the column heading. Many columns also contain drop-down

menus of potential inputs which should be utilised as much as possible.

July 2013 | Page 84


Local Government Area

Details (Respondent

Details)

Name of Person Responding

Respondents' Address

Respondents' Email

Respondents' Phone Number

Facility 1 Facility 2 Facility 3

Name of Facility

Lot and Street Address

Type of Facility

Nominal Annual Capacity

Operational Staff

Capital Value (if known)

Population Source/Method of CalculationEstimated Total Population in

5 years

Estimated Total Population in

year 2035Source/Method of Calculation

Total Local Government

Town 1

Town 2

Town 3

Other

Please provide details on all your Waste Management Facilities

Population

2011/12 Projections

July 2013 | Page 85


Description of Material

Type

Was this material

generated from the

MSW stream?

Was this material

generated from the C&I

stream?

Was this material

generated from the C&D

stream?

In which Sector was the

waste generated?

Who was the

Generator(s)?

Material Type Code (if

known)

What quantity of waste

was accepted?Units Data recording system

Over what time period

was the waste

accepted? (MM/YY -

MM/YY)

What collection method

was utilised?

Frequency of

Collection?

Who delivered the

waste? (If to your waste

management facility)

Name of Treatment

and/or Disposal Facility?

Please provide the Lot

Number and Street

Address of that transfer

facility?

How was the Waste

Treated or Disposed?

Did the waste pass

through a Transfer or

similar facility?

Please name the

transfer facility (name

first if more than one)


Number and Street


facility?

What process was

undertaken at the

transfer facility?

Waste Register

Collection

Transfer Facility 1

Processing/Disposal

Source

Quantity

July 2013 | Page 86


FacilityDescription of

Material Type


known)

What quantity of Output

was generated?Units Data recording system

Over what time period was the

waste generated? (MM/YY -

MM/YY)

Output generated from

which process?

To whom/where was

the Output

sold/disposed?

How was the Output

removed from the

facility?

Frequency of transport off site?

Outputs (products and residues)

Quantity of Outputs

Processing/Disposal

Waste Facility Outputs (please list outputs and residues from the various Waste Facilities

that the Respondant Operates)

July 2013 | Page 87

Data Collection Sheet- Mining


Broome


MINING and RESOURCES SECTOR

Waste Authority

July 2013 | Page 88



Broome


Waste Authority











the project. The DCS was developed to achieve the following objectives:



development;







Respondent DetailsThis sheet of the DCS requires the respondent to complete details regarding contact information, and



Waste RegistryThe waste registry sheet covers the generation and/or management of waste. The source segment of the







July 2013 | Page 89




residues (eg ludges) or products that have economic value eg recycling building products or separated

recyclables.

Waste Classification System (WCS)A WCS was developed for the study to assist with the gathering and reporting of data. The DCS has two sheets

relating to the WCS. The first is an explanatory guide and the second sheet contains the WCS. The WCS and

DCS have matching colours in order to help explain the coding process.




menus which should be utilised as much as possible.

July 2013 | Page 90


Name of company Name of Area of Operation

Current on-site workforce

for Area of Operation

(average per day)

2035 estimated on-site

workforce (average per

day)

Current production output

in Area of Operation (per

annum)

2035 estimated production

output in the Area of

Operation (per annum)

Name of Person Responding Location

Respondents' AddressType eg mine, processing

plant, port

Respondents' Email Phase

Respondents' Phone Number Resource recovered/processed

Waste Management Facility 1 Waste Management Facility 2 Waste Management Facility 3

Name of Facility

Location (coordinates)

Type of Facility


Operational Staff


Resource Company Details (Respondent Details) Future GrowthCompany Area of Operation

Please provide details on all your Waste Management Facilities within this

Area of Operation

July 2013 | Page 91



Type

Was this material


or C&D stream?


waste generated?

Where on site was the

waste generated?


known)




was the waste

accepted? (MM/YY -

MM/YY)


was utilised?

Frequency of

Collection?

Name of Treatment


Please provide the

location of the

treatment/disposal

facility?

How was the Waste


Did the waste pass


similar facility?

Please name the




Number and Street


facility?

What process was

undertaken at the

transfer facility?

Waste Register

Transfer Facility 1

Processing/Disposal

Collection

Quantity

Source

July 2013 | Page 92



Material Type


known)



Over what time period was the waste

generated? (MM/YY - MM/YY)


which process?

To who/where was

the Output

sold/disposed?

How was the Output

removed from the

facility?

Frequency of transportation?


Quantity of Outputs

Processing/Disposal

Waste Facility Outputs (please list outputs and residues from the various Waste Facilities

that the Respondant Operates within the Area of Operation)

July 2013 | Page 93

Data Collection Sheet- Private Service Providers


Broome


Private Waste Service Provider

Waste Authority

July 2013 | Page 94



Broome


Waste Authority











the project to achieve the following objectives:



development;







Respondent Details

This sheet of the DCS requires the respondent to complete details regarding contact information, and



Waste Registry

The waste registry sheet covers the generation and/or management of waste. The source segment of the







July 2013 | Page 95




residues (eg sludges) or products that have economic value eg recycling building products or separated

recyclables.

Waste Classification System (WCS)

A WCS was developed for the study to assist with the gathering and reporting of data. The DCS has two sheets

relating to the WCS. The first is an explanatory guide and the second sheet contains the WCS. The WCS and

DCS have matching colours in order to help explain the coding process.




menus which should be utilised as much as possible.

July 2013 | Page 96


Company Name

Company Area of Operation

Name of Person Responding

Respondents' Address

Respondents' Email

Respondents' Phone Number

Facility 1 Facility 2 Facility 3

Name of Facility

Lot and Street Address

Type of Facility


Operational Staff


Waste Service Provider Details (Respondant Details)

Please provide details on all your Waste Management Facilities

July 2013 | Page 97



Type

Was this material

generated from the

MSW stream?

Was this material


stream?

Was this material

generated from the

C&D stream?


waste generated?

Who was the

Generator(s)?


known)




was the waste

accepted? (MM/YY -

MM/YY)


was utilised?

Frequency of

Collection?

Who was the carrier of

the waste?

Name of Treatment



Number and Street


facility?

How was the Waste


Did the waste pass


similar facility?

Please name the




Number and Street


facility?

What process was

undertaken at the

transfer facility?

Waste Register

Collection

Transfer Facility 1

Processing/Disposal

Source

Quantity

July 2013 | Page 98



Material Type


known)



Over what time period was

the waste generated?

(MM/YY - MM/YY)


which process?

To who/where was

the Output

sold/disposed?

How was the Output

removed from the

facility?

Frequency of

transportation?


Quantity of Outputs

Processing/Disposal

Waste Facility Outputs (please list outputs and residues from the various Waste

Facilities that the Respondant Operates)

July 2013 | Page 99



Appendix C: Extrapolation Data

EXTRAPOLATION DATA - SECTOR 2 C&I WASTE

Quantity

GeneratorDescription of Material

TypeMSW C&I C&D


waste generated?Code Tonnage PER CAPITA Treatment Method

Treatment

Location

Talis General waste Yes

2. Mining, exploration,

quarrying, physical and

chemical treatment of

minerals 801 1.153 Landfill

Sub-catchment

Area

Talis Waste oil Yes




minerals 215 0.355 Recycled Perth

Talis Grease Yes




minerals 103 0.027 Thermal Port Hedland

Talis Tyres Yes





Sub-catchment

Area

Talis Coolant Yes




minerals 131 0.199 Chemical Treatment Perth

Talis Rags/filters Yes





Sub-catchment

Area

Talis scrap metal Yes





Talis Batteries Yes





Talis Contaminated soil Yes




minerals 209 0.281 Bioremediation

Sub-catchment

Area

Talis Cardboard Yes





Talis Wood Yes





Sub-catchment

Area

Talis Aluminium Yes





Talis Aerosol cans Yes





Talis Mixed Plastic Yes





Sub-catchment

Area

Talis Sludge Yes




minerals 703 0.000 Chemical Treatment

Sub-catchment

Area

Talis Oil drums Yes





Talis Paper and Cardboard Yes





Talis Oily sludge Yes




minerals 125 0.452 Chemical Treatment

Sub-catchment

Area

Talis Rubber Yes





Sub-catchment

Area

Source

July 2013 | Page 101

EXTRAPOLATION DATA - SECTOR 2 C&D

Quantity


TypeMSW C&I C&D


waste generated?Code Tonnage PER CAPITA

Treatment

Method

Treatment

Location

Talis Waste oil Yes





Talis Steel Yes





Talis Tyres Yes





Sub-

catchment

Area

Talis Greenwaste Yes




minerals 402 0.065 Shredding

Sub-

catchment

Area

Talis Rags/filters Yes





Sub-

catchment

Area

Talis Batteries Yes





Talis Contaminated soil Yes




minerals 209 0.239 Bioremediation

Sub-

catchment

Area

Talis Cardboard Yes





Talis Wood Yes





Sub-

catchment

Area

Talis Aluminium cans Yes





Talis Aerosol cans Yes





Talis Mixed Plastic Yes





Sub-

catchment

Area

Talis Sludge Yes




minerals 703 0.480

Chemical

Treatment

Sub-

catchment

Area

Talis Textiles Yes





Sub-

catchment

Area

Talis Paper Yes





Talis Mixed inert Yes





Sub-

catchment

Area

Source


EXTRAPOLATION DATA - SECTOR 5 C&I

Quantity


TypeMSW C&I C&D



Treatment

Method

Talis Paper and cardbord Yes

5. Petroleum refining,

natural gas purification

and pyrolytic treatment

of coal 501 0.023 Recycled

Talis Concrete and cement Yes





Talis Wood Yes




of coal 405 0.015 Landfill

Talis

Unsegregated mixed

garbage Yes





Talis Metal Yes





Talis Food Yes





Talis Plastics Yes





Talis Tires and Rubber Yes





Talis clinical waste Yes





Talis Glass Yes





Talis Batteries Yes





Talis Sludge Yes




of coal 703 0.162

Chemical

Treatment

Talis

Contaminated soil -

hydrocarbon Yes




of coal 209 0.341 Bioremediation

Talis

Contaminated

packaging Yes





Talis

Comporessed gas

cyclinders and aerosol

cans Yes





Talis Absorbants Yes





Talis abrasive blasting residue Yes





Talis oils greases and fuels Yes





Talis

filters (non-hydrocarbon

service) Yes





Source


Quantity


TypeMSW C&I C&D



Treatment

Method

Source

Talis

filters (hydrocarbon

service) Yes





Talis cooking oil and grease Yes





Talis ewaste Yes





Talis

filtration media -

hydrocarbon service Yes





Talis

glycol liquids and

sludges Yes




of coal 112 2.189

Chemical

Treatment

Talis

industrial solid waste -

mixed Yes




of coal 299 0.011

Chemical

Treatment

Talis insulation ex asbestos Yes





Talis laboratory wastes - solids Yes




of coal 299 0.023

Chemical

Treatment

Talis light bulbs - mercury Yes




of coal 204 0.023

Chemical

Treatment

Talis light bulbs - non-mercury Yes





Talis

mercury adosoption

media and activated

carbon Yes




of coal 161 0.305

Chemical

Treatment

Talis

amine liquids and

sludges Yes




of coal 112 0.033

Chemical

Treatment


EXTRAPOLATION DATA - SECTOR 5 C&D

Quantity


TypeMSW C&I C&D



Treatment

Method

Talis Paper and cardbord Yes





Talis Concrete and cement Yes





Talis Soil Yes





Talis Wood Yes





Talis Mixed refuse Yes





Talis Metal Yes





Talis Food Yes





Talis Plastics Yes





Talis Tires and Rubber Yes





Talis clinical waste Yes





Talis Glass Yes





Talis Batteries Yes





Talis Oil / water mixture Yes




of coal 124 0.119

Chemical

Treatment

Talis Sludge Yes




of coal 703 0.358

Chemical

Treatment

Talis

Contaminated soil -

hydrocarbon Yes




of coal 209 0.517 Bioremediation

Talis

Contaminated soil - non-

hydrocarbon Yes




of coal 106 0.326

Chemical

Treatment

Talis

Buidling materials -

mixed Yes





Talis

Contaminated

packaging Yes





Talis

Comporessed gas

cyclinders and aerosol

cans Yes





Source


Quantity


TypeMSW C&I C&D



Treatment

Method

Source

Talis chemicals Yes




of coal 216 0.059

Chemical

Treatment

Talis abrasive blasting residue Yes





Talis drill cuttings Yes





Talis oils greases and fuels Yes





Talis

filters (non-hydrocarbon

service) Yes





Talis

filters (hydrocarbon

service) Yes






EXTRAPOLATION DATA - SECTOR 10 C&I

Quantity


TypeMSW C&I C&D



Treatment

Method

Treatment

Location

Talis General waste Yes

10. Employee camps

(C&I only) 801 0.164 Landfill

Sub-catchment

Area

Talis Waste oil Yes

10. Employee camps

(C&I only) 215 0.010 Recycled Perth

Talis Oily water Yes

10. Employee camps

(C&I only) 124 0.025

Chemical

Treatment

Sub-catchment

Area

Talis Mixed organics Yes

10. Employee camps

(C&I only) 403 0.200 Landfill

Sub-catchment

Area

Source




Appendix D: Conversion Factors

Conversion Factors

Material Type

Waste

Classification

System Code

Conversion

Factor Units Source

General Refuse (uncompacted)

801 0.4 t/m3 http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/liquids-densities-d_743.html (oil, lubricating)

General Refuse (compacted)

301 0.5 t/m3 EPA Victoria (food – kitchen, medium density)

Oil 215 0.0009 t/L LGA census- conversion sheet

Foodwaste 401 0.5 t/m3 LGA census- conversion sheet

Paper/cardboard 501 0.1 t/m3 LGA census- conversion sheet

Textiles 803 0.15 t/m3 LGA census- conversion sheet

Greenwaste 402 0.15 t/m3 LGA census- conversion sheet

Wood/timber 404, 405 0.3 t/m3 LGA census- conversion sheet

Mixed inert 622 1.3 t/m3 LGA census- conversion sheet

Soil 612 1.2 t/m3 http://www.soils.wisc.edu/~ss322/lectures/old/Lec%205.pdf

Sand 613 1.6 t/m3 http://www.agriinfo.in/?page=topic&superid=4&topicid=271 (bulk density)

Rubber 611 0.3 t/m3 LGA census- conversion sheet

Tyres (mixed) 183 0.4 t/m3 http://www.epa.gov/region5/waste/solidwaste/tires/miforum/gray.pdf (estimate based on 0.12t/m3 (light) and 0.59t/m3 (heavy), density of loose <10ft whole tire)

Tyres (mixed) 183 0.03 t/unit Talis estimate based on unit weights for light and heavy tyres.

Batteries 214 1.125 t/m3 LGA census- conversion sheet

Sludge 112, 703 0.72 t/m3

http://www.aqua-calc.com/page/density-table/substance/sewage-coma-and-blank-sludge

Oily rags 217 0.2 t/m3 Talis estimate based on density of textiles

Oil filters 217 0.26 t/m3

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/resources/steel/pdfs/report_trp_0041.pdf

Coolant 131 0.0011 t/L http://www.dow.com/ethyleneglycol/about/properties.htm (average converted from pounds per gallon)

Ash 809, 810, 812 0.5 t/m3 http://www.lossinweightfeeder.com/standards/documents/1500-C01-2.pdf (loose fly ash density)

Aerosol cans 807 0.000052 t/L Assumed same as whole steel cans


Material Type

Waste

Classification

System Code

Conversion

Factor Units Source

Tyres (heavy vehicle)

183 0.045 t/unit http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/swfa/tires/ (100 pounds per tyre)

tyres (light vehicle)

183 0.009 t/unit http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/swfa/tires/ (20 pounds per tyre)

Cardboard only (uncompacted)

503 0.055 t/m3

Waste Materials – Density Data, EPA Victoria

Paper only (uncompacted)

502 0.152 t/m3

Waste Materials – Density Data, EPA Victoria

Plastic 512 0.01 t/m3 LGA census- conversion sheet

Aluminium cans (flattened)

514 0.087 t/m3

LGA census- conversion sheet

Grease 103 0.85 t/m3

http://www.varian.com/media/oncology/services_and_support/pdf/ShellAlvaniaGreaseEP2-2009.pdf http://www.skf.com/files/773820.pdf

Steel drum (55 gallon empty)

217 0.015 t/unit http://www.thecarycompany.com/containers/steel_drums.html (33 lbs per drum)

Batteries (Car Battery)

203 0.0125 t/unit LGA census- conversion sheet

Printer Cartridges 813 0.0004 t/unit http://nermsrefill.com/files/c74d97b01eae257e44aa9d5bade97baf_renkser_16.pdf

Steel drum (20L) 217 0.0023 t/unit http://www.nexuspackaging.co.uk/steel-drums.html

Plastic drum/cube (20L)

512 0.0012 t/unit http://www.vippackaging.com.au/catalogue/category.php?id=2

Plastics mixed whole

512 0.00016 t/unit https://deq.state.ms.us/MDEQ.nsf/page/Recycling_MaterialDensityandVolumeConversion?OpenDocument

Mixed Metal 619 0.13 t/m3

Talis estimate based on ferrous and non-ferrous metal densities in Waste Materials – Density Data, EPA Victoria

Clinical waste 113 0.17 t/m3

Waste Materials – Density Data, EPA Victoria (hospital and general waste garbage bags)




Appendix E: Detailed Waste Data –

Broome Sub-catchment Area

Broome Sub-Catchment Area

Total waste = 39,397 tonnes

MSW C&I C&D

32% Total = 12,485 tonnes 46% Total = 17,974 tonnes 23% Total = 8,938 tonnes

Sector Material Type Code Tonnage Sector Material Type Code Tonnage Sector Material Type Code Tonnage

1. Domestic Kerbside comingled recycling 301 899 9. Other/Mixed Waste oil 215 43 9. Other/Mixed

12,485 Kerbside refuse 302 6,200 17,974 8,938

100% Vergeside hardwaste 307 198 100% 100%

Public place refuse 308 594

Greenwaste 402 4,500

Comingled Recyclables 802 94

Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 17,931

Mixed building rubble 601 8,938


Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes) Row Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

1 801 Mixed refuse (public drop off, C&I and C&D waste) 17,931 168 1 302 Kerbside refuse 6,200

2 601 Mixed building rubble 8,938 139 2 402 Greenwaste 4,500

3 302 Kerbside refuse 6,200 105 3 301 Kerbside Commingled recyclables 899

4 402 Greenwaste 4,500 118 4 308 Public place refuse 594

5 301 Kerbside Commingled recyclables 899 104 5 307 Vergeside Hard waste 198

6 308 Public place refuse 594 111 6 802 Comingled Recyclables 94

7 307 Vergeside Hard waste 198 110 7 -

8 802 Comingled Recyclables 94 169 8 -

9 215 Waste Oil 43 100 9 -

10 - 3 10 -

11 - 3

12 - 3

13 - 3 Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

14 - 3 1 801 Mixed reuse (C&I waste) 17,931

15 - 3 2 215 Waste Oil 43

16 - 3 3 -

17 - 3 4 -

18 - 3 5 -

19 - 3 6 -

20 - 3 7 -

TOTAL 39,397 8 -

% of total waste 100% 9 -

10 -

Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

1 601 Mixed building rubble 8,938

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6 -

7 -

8 -

9 -

10 -

Top 10 Material Types - MSW

Top 10 Material Types - C&I

Top 20 Material Types

Top 10 Material Types - C&D

BROOME SUB CATCHMENT AREA


GENERATED AND TREATED WITHIN SUB-CATCHMENT AREA


Total = 12,485 tonnes Total = 17,931 tonnes Total = 8,938 tonnes

Public On-site Public On-site Public On-site

1. Domestic 301 899 - 899 - - - - - 9. Other/Mixed 801 17,931 - - - - - 17,931 - 9. Other/Mixed 601 8,938 - - - - - 8,938 -

12,485 302 6,200 - - - - - 6,200 - 17,931 8,938

100% 307 198 - - - - - 198 - 100% 100%

308 594 - - - - - 594 -

402 4,500 4,500 - - - - - -

802 94 - 94 - - - - -

GENERATED WITHIN AND TREATED OUTSIDE SUB-CATCHMENT AREA

Total waste = 43 tonnes

- tonnes 43 tonnes - tonnes


Perth 9. Other/Mixed 215 43 - 43 - - - - -

Treatment Method Treatment Method

Thermal

TreatmentCodeRecycled Stockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

MSW C&I C&D

Destination

Total = Total =

Sector Landfill

TonnageGreenwaste

ProcessingTonnageTonnage Recycled

Thermal

Treatme

Greenwaste

Processing

Landfill

Stockpiled

StockpiledHazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Landfill


Destination Sector Code

Stockpiled TonnageLandfill

Sector Recycled

LandfillHazardous

TreatmentSector Code Tonnage Recycled

Greenwaste

Processing

Greenwaste

ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

TreatmentCodeSector Stockpiled

CodeGreenwaste

Processing

Total = Treatment Method

StockpiledHazardous

TreatmentDestination

Landfill


Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

MSW C&I C&D

Treatment Method

Sector Code TonnageGreenwaste

ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

Treatment





Appendix F: Detailed Waste Data –

Port Hedland Sub-catchment Area

Port Hedland Sub-Catchment Area


MSW C&I C&D



1. Domestic Batteries - miscellaneous 214 200 2. Mining.. Grease wastes 103 40 1. Domestic Asbestos 208 480

15,737 Waste Oil 215 500 35,787 Clinical waste 113 0.4 25,443 Mixed building rubble 601 24,964

100% Kerbisde refuse 302 12,536 64% Oil sludges 125 270 33%

Vergeside greenwaste 305 140 Engine coolants 131 128 2. Mining.. Waste tyres 183 1.2

Public place refuse 308 900 Waste tyres 183 50 10 Batteries - household and industrial 202 0.02

Special event refuse 311 450 Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 8,132 0.01% Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 0.2

Mixed metals (non-packaging) 619 771 Contaminated packaging 212 2.7 Waste oil 215 0.3

Mixed refuse (public drop off) 801 240 Batteries - misc 214 7.9 Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 0.002

Waste oil 215 469 Greenwaste 402 0.1

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 169 Timber - treated 405 0.7

Other hazardous 299 356 Paper and cardboard 501 0.0003

Paper and cardboard 501 1,047 Paper 502 0.2

Cardboard 503 18 Cardboard 503 0.5

Mixed plastic 512 0.9 Mixed plastic 512 0.03

Non-ferrous metal - packaging 514 0.2 Non-ferrous metal - packaging 514 0.2

Rubber - mixed 611 3,129 Rubber - mixed 611 0.0004

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 161 Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 3.3

Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 14,474 Mixed inert 622 1.0

Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 7,311 Sludges 703 0.5

Waste gases and containers 807 14 Textiles 803 2.0

Ash - misc 812 6.7 9. Other/Mixed Asbestos 208 480

8. Healthcare Medical Waste 207 50 51,433 Mixed building rubble 601 24,964

50 67% Clean fill 613 25,905

0.1% Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 19

9. Other/Mixed Waste tyres 183 925 Mixed inert 622 66

19,162 Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 17,329

34% Waste not otherwise specified 899 908

Oil/water mixtures 124 59

Batteries - misc 214 0.1

871 Waste oil 215 25

2% Mixed organics 403 401

Glass packaging 504 0.1

Non-ferrous metal - packaging 514 0.7

Mixed refuse 801 386

10. Employee

Camps



1 801 Mixed Refuse (public drop-off, C&I and C&D waste) 27,149 168 1 302 Kerbside refuse 6,421

2 601 Mixed building rubble 11,353 139 2 301 Kerbside Commingled recyclables 1,179

3 302 Kerbside refuse 6,421 105 3 402 Greenwaste 824

4 622 Mixed Inert 6,366 160 4 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 800

5 215 Waste Oil 6,052 100 5 308 Public place refuse 500

6 703 Sludges 5,917 166 6 805 Hard waste 400

7 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 5,328 155 7 311 Special event refuse 250

8 403 Mixed organics 5,214 119 8 307 Vergeside Hard waste 168

9 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 4,479 94 9 503 Cardboard 151

10 611 Rubbers - mixed 3,908 149 10 801 Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 120

11 125 Oil Sludges 3,135 27

12 404 Timber - untreated 2,499 120

13 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 2,318 157 Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

14 183 Waste Tyres 2,302 85 1 801 Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 27,029

15 802 Comingled Recyclables 2,089 169 2 215 Waste Oil 6,050

16 217 Hydrocarbon Contaminated Materials 1,905 102 3 703 Sludges 5,913

17 301 Kerbside Commingled recyclables 1,179 104 4 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 4,476

18 131 Engine Coolants 1,033 33 5 403 Mixed organics 4,127

19 103 Grease wastes 946 5 6 611 Rubbers - mixed 3,609

20 402 Greenwaste 825 118 7 125 Oil sludges 3,135

TOTAL 100,419 8 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 3,122

% of total waste 96% 9 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 2,285

10 183 Waste Tyres 2,148



2 622 Mixed Inert 6,366

3 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 1,407

4 404 Timber - untreated 1,250

5 403 Mixed organics 1,087

6 611 Rubbers - mixed 299

7 699 Other Inert 266

8 183 Waste Tyres 154

9 214 Batteries- Miscellaneous 119

10 602 Concrete 113

Newman Sub-Catchment Area

Top 20 Material Types Top 10 Material Types - MSW







1. Domestic 301 1,179 - - - - - 1,179 - 2. Mining. 183 1,565 - - 1,076 - - - 489 2. Mining.. 183 154 - - - - - - 154

9,462 302 6421 - - - - - 6,421 - 36,987 208 13 - - - - - - 13 2,948 209 2.4 - - - 2.4 - - -

100% 307 168 - - - - - 168 - 72% 209 4,476 - - - 4,476 - - - 14% 217 0.02 - - - - - - 0.02

308 500 - - - - - 500 - 217 432 - - - - - 32 400 402 0.6 0.6 - - - - - -

311 250 - - - - - 250 - 403 1,087 - - - - - - 1,087 403 1,087 - - - - - - 1,087

402 824 - - - - - 824 - 404 1,250 1,250 - - - - - - 404 1,250 1,250 - - - - - -

801 120 - - - - - 120 - 504 32 - - - - - - 32 405 7.2 - - - - - - 7.2

512 8.9 - - - - - - 8.9 501 0.003 - 0.003 - - - - -

602 113 - - - - - - 113 512 0.3 - - - - - - 0.3

611 3,609 - - 299 - - - 3,309 602 113 - - - - - - 113

703 5,913 - - - 5,913 - - - 611 299 - - 299 - - - 0.004

801 16,400 - - - - - 2,076 14,325 622 10 - - - - - - 10

802 2,089 - - - - - - 2,089 703 4.8 - - - 4.8 - - -

8. Healthcare 207 97 - - - - - 97 - 803 20 - - - - - - 20

97 9. Other/Mixed 208 70 - - - - - 70 -

0.2% 18,045 601 11,353 - - - - - 11,353 -

9. Other/Mixed 124 47 - - - 46.8 - - - 86% 622 6,356 - - - - - 6,356 -

8,507 183 295 - - - - - 295 - 699 266 - - - - - 266 -

17% 801 8,131 - - - - - 8,131 -

805 35 - - - - - 35 -

124 379 - - - 379 - - -

403 3,040 - - - - - - 3,040

5,918 512 0.6 - - - - - - 0.6

11% 801 2,498 - - - - - - 2,498


1,431 tonnes 19,827 tonnes 1,778 tonnes

Landfill


Perth 1. Domestic 501 70 - 70 - - - - - Perth 2. Mining 131 1,030 - - - 1,030 - - - Perth 2. Mining 201 1.3 - 1.3 - - - - -

1,431 503 151 - 151 - - - - - 14,253 183 289 - 289 - - - - - 1,778 202 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

100% 514 10 - 10 - - - - - 72% 201 1.3 - 1.3 - - - - - 100% 214 119 - - - 119 - - -

617 800 - 800 - - - - - 202 1.4 - 1.4 - - - - - 215 2.5 - 2.5 - - - - -

805 400 - 400 - - - - - 203 50 - 50 - - - - - 502 3.7 - 3.7 - - - - -

204 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - - 503 112 - 112 - - - - -

212 36 - 36 - - - - - 506 52 - 52 - - - - -

214 238 - 118 - 119 - - - 509 31 - 31 - - - - -

215 4,637 - 4,637 - - - - - 512 11 - 11 - - - - -

217 1,433 - 1,321 - - - 112 - 514 2.7 - 2.7 - - - - -

501 370 - 370 - - - - - 515 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - -

502 72 - 72 - - - - - 617 1,407 - 1,407 - - - - -

503 376 - 376 - - - - - 619 33 - 33 - - - - -

504 16 - 16 - - - - - 807 0.4 - - - - 0.4 - -

505 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

506 52 - 52 - - - - -

509 31 - 31 - - - - -

512 91 - 91 - - - - -

514 10 - 10 - - - - -

515 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - -

617 3,122 - 3,122 - - - - -

619 2,285 - 2,285 - - - - -

807 111 - 111 - - 0.4 - -

9. Other/Mixed 131 3.3 - - - 3.3 - - -

563 215 559 - 559 - - - - -

3%

103 1.2 - 1.2 - - - - -

104 6.4 - 6.4 - - - - -

188 214 0.4 - 0.4 - - - - -

1% 215 159 - 159 - - - - -

503 16 - 16 - - - - -

504 0.7 - 0.7 - - - - -

514 4.5 - 4.5 - - - - -

2. Mining 103 463 - - - - 463 - -

4,335 121 0.4 - - - - 0.4 - -

22% 122 1.9 - - - - 1.9 - -

125 3,135 - - - 1,936 1,199 - -

215 695 - 695 - - - - -

217 40 - - - - 40 - -

504 0.5 - 0.5 - - - - -

611 - - - - - - - -

9. Other/Mixed 103 281 - - - - 281 - -

281

1%

10. Employee Camps 103 201 - - - - 201 - -

201

1%

Interstate 2. Mining 214 7 - 7 - - - - -

7

0.0%



Destination Sector CodeGreenwaste

Processing

Total =

Tonnage Recycled

Sector Code


Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Treatment Method

10. Employee

Camps

10. Employee Camps

Port Hedland

Thermal

Treatment

LandfillCode Recycled

Total = Total =

Greenwaste

Processing

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment


C&IMSW

Greenwaste

ProcessingTonnage

C&D

DestinationStockpiledHazardous

TreatmentDestination Stockpiled

Hazardous

TreatmentSector

Hazardous

Treatment

LandfillSector Code Tonnage Recycled Stockpiled

RecycledGreenwaste

Processing

Greenwaste

ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

TreatmentCodeSector

Landfill LandfillStockpiledStockpiledTonnageStockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

Landfill


Thermal

Treatment

MSW C&I C&D

Treatment Method


ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

Treatment


Tonnage




Appendix G: Detailed Waste Data –

Karratha Sub-catchment Area

Karratha Sub-Catchment Area


MSW C&I C&D



1. Domestic Kerbisde refuse 302 6,974 2. Mining.. Grease wastes 103 11 1. Domestic Concrete 602 20,829

14,104 Public place refuse 308 444 19,223 Clinical waste 113 2.6 56,617 Clean fill 613 34,325

100% Special event refuse 311 17 42% Oil based paints 121 0.1 23% Mixed refuse (C&D waste) 801 1,464

Greenwaste 402 591 Oil sludges 125 203 2. Mining.. Waste tyres 183 72

Mixed refuse (public drop-off) 801 6,077 Engine coolants 131 57 13,387 Batteries - household and industrial 202 29

Waste tyres 183 41 6% Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 320

Vehicle and marine batteries 203 122 Waste oil 215 335

Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 83 Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 2.1

Contaminated packaging 212 7.7 Greenwaste 402 86

Batteries - misc 214 3.5 Timber - treated 405 956

Waste oil 215 1,559 Paper and cardboard 501 0.4

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 139 Paper 502 8.0

Timber - treated 405 130 Cardboard 503 22

Paper and cardboard 501 38 Concrete 602 6,564

Paper 502 5.5 Rubber - mixed 611 0.6

Cardboard 503 64 Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 376

Plastic - other 511 0.1 Mixed inert 622 1,342

Mixed plastic 512 3.5 Sludges 703 642

Non-ferrous metal - packaging 514 0.1 Textiles 803 2,631

Mixed metals - packaging 515 0.4 5. Petroleum.. Contaminated soil - misc 106 228

Glazing 607 19 85,422 Batteries - misc 124 83

Rubber - mixed 611 9.3 35% Household and Industrial Batteries 202 3.4

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 13,770 Medical and vetinary waste 207 826

Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 1,623 Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 5,032

Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 1,325 Contaminated packaging 212 5.7

Waste gases and containers 807 6.2 Mixed commercial hazardous 216 199

Printer catridges 813 0.3 Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 0.5

5. Petroleum.. Vegetable oils and derivatives 104 6.2 Food waste 401 2,936

4,611 Industrial waste treatment plant sludges 112 1,333 Timber - treated 405 427

10% Inorganic chemicals - Mercury 161 183 Paper and cardboard 501 603

Ewaste 201 7.0 Glass packaging 504 10

Household and Industrial Batteries 202 24 Mixed plastic 512 1,043

Fluorescent tubes 204 14 Mixed building rubble 601 15

Medical and vetinary waste 207 1.1 Concrete 602 70,825

Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 205 Rubber - mixed 611 164

Contaminated packaging 212 59 Mixed Soil and sand 612 137

Mixed commercial hazardous 216 688 Clean fill 613 -

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 805 Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 3.1

Other hazardous 299 21 Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 1,435

Food waste 401 679 Garnet 623 12

Timber - treated 405 9.3 Drilling muds 702 33

Paper and cardboard 501 14 Sludges 703 251

Glass packaging 504 8.0 Mixed refuse (C&D waste) 801 1,152

Mixed plastic 512 14 Textiles 803 0.1

Concrete 602 70 Waste gases and containers 807 0.7

Insulation 609 57 9. Other/Mixed Conatminated soil - misc 106 6,207

Rubber - mixed 611 42 87,518 Asbestos 208 2,021

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 33 36% Timber - treated 405 1,005

Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 70 Glass packaging 504 57

Garnet 623 14 Mixed building rubble 601 29,588

Sludges 703 97 Concrete 602 46,227

Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 78 Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 797

Textiles 803 74 Garnet 623 1,616

Waste gases and containers 807 7.7

9. Other/Mixed Contaminated soil - misc 106 2,369

18,301 Batteries - misc 124 15

40% Waste Tyres 183 1,113

Medical and vetinary waste 207 13

Quarantine waste 213 79

Batteries - misc 214 60

Waste oil 215 17

Kerbside refuse 302 1,892


Cardboard 503 5.0

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 1,112


Comingled recyclables 802 74

Vegetable oil and derivatives 104 21


3,581 Asbestos 208 0.004

8% Batteries - misc 214 0.2

Waste oil 215 76

Food waste 401 5.3

Greenwaste 402 2.7

Mixed organics 403 1,449


Mixed plastic 512 2.0

Non-ferrous metal - packaging 514 15

Mixed building rubble 601 16

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 10


10. Employee Camps



1 602 Concrete 144,514 140 1 302 Kerbside refuse 6,974

2 613 Clean fill 34,325 151 2 801 Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 6,077

3 601 Mixed building rubble 29,619 139 3 402 Greenwaste 591

4 801 Mixed Refuse (public drop-off, C&D and C&D waste) 21,366 168 4 308 Public place refuse 444


6 302 Kerbside refuse 8,866 105 6 -

7 106 Contaminated Soils - misc 8,804 8 7 -

8 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 5,639 94 8 -

9 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 4,300 157 9 -

10 401 Food waste 3,620 117 10 -

11 402 Greenwaste 2,760 118

12 803 Textiles 2,706 170

13 405 Timber - treated 2,528 121

14 208 Asbestos 2,021 93 Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

15 215 Waste Oil 1,986 100 1 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 14,926

16 623 Garnet 1,642 161 2 801 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 12,672

17 403 Mixed organics 1,449 119 3 106 Contaminated soil - misc 2,369

18 622 Mixed inert 1,342 160 4 402 Greenwaste 2,083

19 112 Industrial waste treatment plant sludges 1,333 14 5 302 Kerbside refuse 1,892

20 183 Waste Tyres 1,226 85 6 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 1,693

TOTAL 294,974 7 215 Waste Oil 1,651

% of total waste 97% 8 403 Mixed organics 1,449

9 112 Industrial waste treatment plant sludges 1,333



1 602 Concrete 144,444

2 613 Clean fill 34,325


4 106 Contaminated soil - misc 6,435

5 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 5,351

6 401 Food waste 2,936

7 803 Mixed Refuse (C&D waste) 2,631

8 801 Mixed Refuse 2,616

9 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 2,608

10 405 Timber - treated 2,388









1. Domestic 302 6,974 - - - - - 6,974 - 2. Mining 113 2.6 - - - - - 2.4 0.2 1. Domestic 602 20,829 - 20,829 - - - - -

14,104 308 444 - - - - - 444 - 1,464 183 41 - - - - - - 41 56,617 613 34,325 - 34,325 - - - - -

100% 311 17 - - - - - 17 - 6% 209 9.3 - - - 9.3 - - - 24% 801 1,464 - - - - - 1,464 -

402 591 591 - - - - - - 217 73 - - - - - 73 - 2. Mining 183 72 - - - - - - 72

801 6,077 - - - - - 6,077 - 405 130 - - 130 - - - - 12,652 202 29 - 29 - - - - -

503 56 - - - - - - 56 5% 209 320 - - - - - - 320

511 0.1 - - - - - 0.1 - 217 2.1 - - - - - 2.1 -

512 3.5 - - - - - 3.1 0.4 402 86 - - - - - - 86

515 0.4 - - - - - 0.4 - 405 956 - - - - - - 956

611 9.3 - - - - - 9.3 - 501 0.4 - - - - - - 0.4

801 1,138 - - - - - 503 635 602 6,564 - 6,564 - - - - -

813 0.3 - - - - - - 0.3 611 0.6 - - - - - - 0.6

5. Petroleum 207 1.1 - - - - - 1.1 - 619 5.7 - 5.7 - - - - -

1,214 212 59 - - - - - 59 - 622 1,342 - - - - - - 1,342

5% 299 21 - - - - - 21 - 703 642 - - - 642 - - -

401 679 - - - - - 679 - 803 2,631 - - - - - - 2,631

405 9.3 - - - - - 9.3 - 5. Petroleum 106 228 - - - - - 228 -

512 14 - - - - - 14 - 74,315 124 83 - - - 83 - - -

602 70 - 70 - - - - - 32% 207 2.5 - - - - - 2.5 -

609 57 - - - - - 57 - 209 362 - - - 362 - - -

611 42 - - - - - 42 - 212 5.7 - - - - - 5.7 -

623 14 - - - - - 14 - 401 727 - - - - - 727 -

703 97 - - - 97 - - - 405 76 - - - - - 76 -

801 78 - - - - - 78 - 217 - - - - - - - -

803 74 - - - - - 74 - 512 243 - - - - - 243 -

9. Other/Mixed 106 2,369 - - - - - 2,369 - 601 15 - - - - - 15 -

18,301 124 15 - - - 15 - - - 602 70,825 - 70,825 - - - - -

75% 183 1,113 - - - - - 1,113 - 611 46 - - - - - 46 -

207 13 - - - - - 13 - 612 137 - 137 - - - - -

213 79 - - - - - 79 - 619 972 - 972 - - - - -

214 60 - 60 - - - - - 623 12 - - - - - 12 -

215 17 - 17 - - - - - 702 33 - - - - - 33 -

302 1,892 - - - - - 1,892 - 703 251 - - - 251 - - -

402 2,080 2,080 - - - - - - 801 299 - - - - - 299 -

503 5.0 - 5.0 - - - - - 803 0.1 - - - - - 0.1 -

617 1,112 - 1,112 - - - - - 9. Other/Mixed 106 6,207 - - - - - 6,207 -

801 9,472 - - - - - 9,472 - 87,518 208 2,021 - - - - - 2,021 -

802 74 - - - - - 74 - 38% 405 1,005 - - - - - 1,005 -

10. Employee Camps 124 181 - - - 181 - - - 504 57 - 57 - - - - -

3,452 208 0.004 - - - - - - 0.004 601 29,588 - - 817 - - 28,771 -

14% 401 5.3 - - - - - - 5.3 602 46,227 - 42,713 3,514 - - - -

402 2.7 - - - - - - 2.7 619 797 - 797 - - - - -

403 1,449 - - - - - - 1,449 623 1,616 - - - - - 1,616 -

514 0.6 - - - - - - 0.6

601 16 - - - - - - 16

801 1,798 - - - - - - 1,798

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

MSW C&I C&D

Treatment Method


ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

TreatmentStockpiled Stockpiled

LandfillLandfill LandfillStockpiled


Greenwaste

ProcessingCodeSector Recycled

Hazardous

Treatment


Hazardous

TreatmentRecycled

Greenwaste

ProcessingTonnageSector Code Tonnage



GENERATED OUTSIDE AND TREATED WITHIN SUB-CATCHMENT AREA


- tonnes 4,033 tonnes 3,900 tonnes


Port Hedland 2. Mining 611 2,741 - 2,741 - - - - - Karratha 9. Other/Mixed 601 3,900 - - - - - 3,900 -

2,741

68%

Tom Price 2. Mining 212 15 - 15 - - - - -

1,292 215 867 - 867 - - - - -

32% 217 293 - 120 - - - 173 -

299 27 - 27 - - - - -

503 86 - 86 - - - - -

507 4.0 - 4.0 - - - - -

807 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -



tonnes 21,286 tonnes 7,172 tonnes


Perth 2. Mining 131 57 - - - 57 - - - Perth 2. Mining 215 335 - 335 - - - - -

2,193 203 122 - 122 - - - - - 735 502 8.0 - 8.0 - - - - -

10% 212 7.7 - 7.7 - - - - - 10% 503 22 - 22 - - - - -

214 3.5 - 3.5 - - - - - 619 370 - 370 - - - - -

215 1,559 - 1,559 - - - - - 5. Petroleum 202 3.4 - 3.4 - - - - -

217 66 - 66 - - - - - 6,437 207 824 - - - - - 824 -

501 38 - 38 - - - - - 90% 216 199 - 157 - 42 - - -

502 5.5 - 5.5 - - - - - 217 0.5 - 0.5 - - - - -

503 8.0 - 8.0 - - - - - 401 2,209 - - - - - 2,209 -

514 0.1 - 0.1 - - - - - 405 351 - - - - - 351 -

607 19 - 19 - - - - - 501 603 - 603 - - - - -

617 115 - 115 - - - - - 504 10 - 10 - - - - -

801 187 - - - - - 187 - 512 800 - 800 - - - - -

807 6.2 - 6.2 - - - - - 611 118 - - - - - 118 -

5. Petroleum.. 104 6.2 - 6.2 - - - - - 613 - - - - - - - -

2,996 112 1,333 - - - 1,333 - - - 617 3.1 - 3.1 - - - - -

14% 201 7.0 - 7.0 - - - - - 619 463 - 463 - - - - -

202 24 - 24 - - - - - 801 853 - - - - - 853 -

216 688 - 688 - - - - - 807 0.7 - 0.7 - - - - -

217 805 - 805 - - - - -

501 14 - 14 - - - - -

504 8.0 - 8.0 - - - - -

617 33 - 33 - - - - -

619 70 - 70 - - - - -

807 7.7 - 7.7 - - - - -

104 21 - 21 - - - - -

214 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

129 215 76 - 76 - - - - -

1% 504 6.3 - 6.3 - - - - -

512 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - -

514 14 - 14 - - - - -

617 10 - 10 - - - - -

Overseas 2. Mining 617 13,655 - 13,655 - - - - -

15,278 619 1,623 - 1,623 - - - - -

72%

5. Petroleum 161 183 - - - 183 - - -

197 204 14 - - - 14 - - -

1%

Port Hedland 2. Mining 103 11 - - - - 11 - -

288 121 0.1 - - - - 0.1 - -

1% 125 203 - - - - 203 - -

209 74 - - - - 74 - -

5. Petroleum 209 205 - - - - 205 - -

205

1%

10. Employee Camps

Treatment Method Total =

DestinationLandfill

CodeGreenwaste

ProcessingTonnage Recycled

Sector

MSW

Tonnage

MSW


C&I

Destination Sector

Hazardous

Treatment

Sector Hazardous

Treatment

LandfillSector Code Tonnage Recycled StockpiledStockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

SourceGreenwaste

ProcessingStockpiled

Total =

Code RecycledDestinationGreenwaste

Processing

Thermal

Treatment

Recycled Tonnage

Treatment Method

StockpiledHazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

C&D

Total =Treatment Method

TonnageGreenwaste

Processing

Landfill

Stockpiled

Treatment Method

C&D

Sector CodeSourceGreenwaste

ProcessingTonnage

Landfill

Treatment MethodTreatment Method

RecycledThermal

Treatment

C&I

Greenwaste

Processing

Thermal

Treatment


Total =Total = Total =

Hazardous

TreatmentSourceCode Stockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

LandfillRecycled

LandfillSector Code




Appendix H: Detailed Waste Data –

Onslow Sub-catchment Area

Onslow Sub-Catchment Area


MSW C&I C&D

4% Total = 419 tonnes 32% Total = 3,418 tonnes 64% Total = 6,903 tonnes


1. Domestic Kerbside refuse 302 200 2. Mining.. Grease wastes 103 14 1. Domestic Mixed building rubble 601 2,402

419 Vergeside Hard waste 307 37 1,772 Oil sludges 125 230 2,402

100% Public place refuse 308 97 52% Engine coolants 131 101 35%

Public place recycling 309 0.1 Waste tyres 183 40 9. Other/Mixed Mixed building rubble 601 4,501

Special event refuse 311 46 Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 143 4,501

Greenwaste 402 37 Contaminated packaging 212 1.8 65%

Comingled Recyclables 802 1.5 Batteries - misc 214 2.3

Waste oil 215 181

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 47

Paper and cardboard 501 10

Cardboard 503 16



Rubber - mixed 611 251


Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 586

Waste gases and containers 807 12

9. Other/Mixed Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 1,412

1,412

41%

10. Employee Oil/water mixtures 124 15

Camps Waste oil 215 6.1

235 Mixed organics 403 117

7% Non-ferrous metal - packaging 514 0.2




1 601 Mixed building rubble 6,903 139 1 302 Kerbside refuse 200

2 801 Mixed Refuse (public drop-off, C&I and C&D waste) 2,094 168 2 308 Public place refuse 97

3 611 Rubber - mixed 251 149 3 311 Special event refuse 46

4 125 Oil sludges 230 27 4 307 Vergeside Hard waste 37

5 302 Kerbside refuse 200 105 5 402 Greenwaste 37

6 215 Waste Oil 187 100 6 802 Comingled Recyclables 1.5

7 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 143 94 7 309 Public place recycling 0.1

8 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 137 155 8 -

9 403 Mixed organics 117 119 9 -

10 131 Engine Coolants 101 33 10 -

11 308 Public place refuse 97 111

12 217 Hydrocarbon Contaminated Materials 47 102

13 311 Special event refuse 46 114 Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

14 183 Waste tyres 40 85 1 801 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 2,094

15 307 Vergeside Hard waste 37 110 2 611 Rubber - mixed 251

16 307 Vergeside Hard waste 37 110 3 125 Oil sludges 230

17 503 Cardboard 16 126 4 215 Waste Oil 187

18 124 Oil/water mixtures 15 26 5 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 143

19 103 Grease wastes 14 5 6 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 137

20 807 Waste gases and containers 12 174 7 403 Mixed organics 117

TOTAL 10,724 8 131 Engine Coolants 101

% of total waste 100% 9 217 Hydrocarbon Contaminated Materials 47

10 183 Waste tyres 40



2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6 -

7 -

8 -

9 -

10 -







Total = 419 tonnes Total = 2,708 tonnes Total = 3,003 tonnes


1. Domestic 302 199.6 - - - - - 200 - 2. Mining.. 183 40 - - - - - - 40 1. Domestic 601 2,402 - - - - - 2,402 -

419 307 37.1 - - - - - 37 - 1,069 209 143 - - - 143 - - - 2,402

100% 308 97.5 - - - - - 97 - 39% 217 47 - - - - - - 47 80%

309 0.1 - 0.1 - - - - - 512 0.8 - - - - - - 0.8 9. Other/Mixed 601 601 - - - - - 601 -

311 46.4 - - - - - 46 - 611 251 - - - - - - 251 601

402 37.1 - - - - - 37 - 801 586 - - - - - - 586 20%

802 1.5 - 1.5 - - - - - 9. Other/Mixed 801 1,412 - - - - - 1,412 -

1,412

52%

10. Employee 124 15 - - - 15 - - -

Camps 403 117 - - - - - - 117

228 801 96 - - - - - - 96

8%


- tonnes 710 tonnes 3,900 tonnes


Perth Perth 2. Mining 131 101 - - - 101 - - - Karratha 9. Other/Mixed 601 3,900 - - - - - 3,900 -

460 212 1.8 - 1.8 - - - - - 3,900

65% 214 2.3 - 2.3 - - - - - 100%

215 181 - 181 - - - - -

501 10 - 10 - - - - -

503 16 - 16 - - - - -

514 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

617 137 - 137 - - - - -

807 12 - 12 - - - - -

10. Employee Camps 215 6.1 - 6.1 - - - - -

6.3 514 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

1%

Port Hedland 2. Mining 103 13.7 - - - - 14 - -

243 125 229.7 - - - - 230 - -

34%

Hazardous

Treatment


LandfillRecycled

Greenwaste


LandfillHazardous

TreatmentCodeSector

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

TreatmentStockpiledTonnage

Greenwaste

ProcessingRecycled

Treatment Method

TonnageGreenwaste

Processing

Hazardous

Treatment

Landfill

LandfillStockpiledRecycled


Hazardous


LandfillSector DestinationCode Tonnage Recycled

Hazardous

Treatment

Landfill Hazardous

Treatment

Thermal

TreatmentStockpiledStockpiled

Greenwaste

Processing

Thermal

TreatmentCode

Total =

CodeSector

Recycled StockpiledTonnageGreenwaste

Processing

MSW C&I

Total = Treatment Method Total =

Sector


C&D

Thermal

Treatment




ProcessingTonnage Recycled

Code Tonnage


Thermal

Treatment

MSW C&I C&D

Sector




Appendix I: Detailed Waste Data –

Tom Price Sub-catchment Area

Tom Price Sub-Catchment Area


MSW C&I C&D



1. Domestic Kerbisde refuse 302 1,950 2. Mining.. Grease wastes 103 7.7 1. Domestic Mixed building rubble 601 5,606

4,098 Vergeside Hard waste 307 363 25,263 Batteries - misc 124 20 5,606

100% Public place refuse 308 953 83% Oil sludges 125 1,103 34%

Public place recycling 309 1.5 Engine coolants 131 36 2. Mining.. Waste Tyres 183 65

Special event refuse 311 454 Waste tyres 183 21 9,682 Batteries - household and industrial 202 0.0

Greenwaste 402 363 Batteries - household and industrial 202 14 58% Batteries - vehicle and marine 203 2.9

Comingled Recyclables 802 15 Vehicle and marine batteries 203 40 Fluorescent tubes 204 0.2

Fluorescent tubes 204 0.4 Paper 502 14

Asbestos 208 22 Cardboard 503 25

Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 302 Mixed Plastics 512 1.6

Contaminated packaging 212 17 Non-ferrous metals - packaging 514 14

Batteries - misc 214 0.6 Mixed Metals - non-packaging 619 174

Waste oil 215 3,163 Mixed Refuse (C&D waste) 801 9,385

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 457 Printer cartridges 813 0.2

Other hazardous 299 27 9. Other/Mixed Mixed building rubble 601 1401

Paper and cardboard 501 143 1,401

Cardboard 503 175 8%

Plastic 3 - PVC 507 4.0

Plastic - other 511 0.5



Rubber - mixed 611 6,482


Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 23

Mixed inert 622 624



Printer catridges 813 0.2

9. Other/Mixed Waste oil 215 16

3,310 Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 3,294

11%

Vegetable oils and derivatives 104 3.0


1,760 Batteries - misc 214 0.1

6% Waste oil 215 47

Mixed organics 403 845

Mixed Paper and Cardboard 501 36

Glass Packaging 504 21

Plastic 1 - PET 505 2.8

Ferrous Metals - packaging 513 1.6



10. Employee

Camps




2 601 Mixed building rubble 7,007 139 2 308 Public place refuse 953

3 611 Rubber - mixed 6,482 149 3 311 Special event refuse 454

4 215 Waste Oil 3,226 100 4 307 Vergeside Hard waste 363


6 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 1,729 155 6 802 Comingled Recyclables 15

7 125 Oil sludges 1,103 27 7 309 Public place recycling 1.5

8 308 Public place refuse 953 111 8 -


10 622 Mixed Inert 624 160 10 -


12 311 Special event refuse 454 114

13 307 Vergeside Hard waste 363 110 Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

14 402 Greenwaste 363 110 1 801 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 14,519

15 807 Waste gases and containers 323 174 2 611 Rubber - mixed 6,482

16 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 302 94 3 215 Waste Oil 3,226

17 503 Cardboard 200 126 4 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 1,729

18 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 197 157 5 125 Oil sludges 1,103

19 501 Mixed Paper and Cardboard 179 124 6 403 Mixed organics 845

20 124 Oil/water mixtures 125 26 7 622 Mixed Inert 624

TOTAL 50,785 8 217 Hydrocarbon Contaminated Materials 457

% of total waste 99% 9 807 Waste gases and containers 323

10 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 302




3 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 174


5 503 Cardboard 25

6 514 Non-Ferrous Metals - packaging 14

7 502 Paper 14

8 203 Vehicle and marine batteries 2.9

9 512 Mixed Plastics 1.6

10 813 Printer cartriges 0.2









1. Domestic 302 1,950 - - - - - 1,950 - 2. Mining 124 8.8 - - - 8.8 - - - 1. Domestic 601 5,606 - - - - - 5,606 -

4,082 307 363 - - - - - 363 - 19,300 125 1,041 - - - 666 - - 375 5,606

100% 308 953 - - - - - 953 - 80% 183 13 - - - - - - 13 34%

311 454 - - - - - 454 - 208 22 - - - - - - 22 2. Mining 183 65 - - 65 - - - -

402 363 - - - - - 363 - 209 302 - - - 302 - - - 9,450 801 9,385 - - - - - 9,385 -

217 13 - - - - - - 13 57%

511 0.3 - - - - - - 0.3 9. Other/Mixed 601 1,401 - - - - - 1,401 -

512 0.2 - - - - - - 0.2 1,401

514 0.1 - 0.1 - - - - - 9%

611 6,422 - - - - - - 6,422

622 624 - - - - - - 624

801 10,531 - - - - - - 10,531

807 323 - 3.2 - - - - 320

9. Other/Mixed 801 3,294 - - - - - 3,294 -

3,294

14%

124 105 - - - 105 - - -

403 845 - - - - - - 845

1,645 801 695 - - - - - - 695

7%


16 tonnes 6,094 tonnes 232 tonnes


Perth 1. Domestic 309 1.5 - 1.5 - - - - - Perth 2. Mining 131 27 - - - 27 - - - Perth 2. Mining 202 0.0 - 0.0 - - - - -

16 802 15 - 15 - - - - - 2,318 183 8.0 - 8.0 - - - - - 232 203 2.9 - 2.9 - - - - -

100% 38% 202 14 - 14 - - - - - 100% 204 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

203 40 - 40 - - - - - 502 14 - 14 - - - - -

204 0.4 - 0.4 - - - - - 503 25 - 25 - - - - -

212 0.5 - 0.5 - - - - - 512 1.6 - 1.6 - - - - -

214 0.6 - 0.6 - - - - - 514 14 - 14 - - - - -

215 151 - 151 - - - - - 619 174 - 174 - - - - -

217 34 - 34 - - - - - 813 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

501 143 - 143 - - - - -

503 89 - 89 - - - - -

611 59 - 59 - - - - -

617 1,729 - 1,729 - - - - -

619 23 - 23 - - - - -

813 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

9. Other/Mixed 215 16 - 16 - - - - -

16

0.3%

104 3.0 - 3.0 - - - - -

214 0.1 - 0.1 - - - - -

115 215 47 - 47 - - - - -

2% 501 36 - 36 - - - - -

504 21 - 21 - - - - -

505 2.8 - 2.8 - - - - -

513 1.6 - 1.6 - - - - -

514 3.0 - 3.0 - - - - -

Karratha 2. Mining 212 15 - 15 - - - - -

1,292 215 867 - 867 - - - - -

21% 217 293 - 120 - - - 173 -

299 27 - 27 - - - - -

503 86 - 86 - - - - -

507 4.0 - 4.0 - - - - -

807 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

2. Mining 103 7.7 - - - - 7.7 - -

2,353 124 11 - - - 11 - - -

39% 125 61 - - - - 61 - -

131 8.8 - - - 8.8 - - -

212 2.2 - 2.2 - - - - -

215 2,145 - 2,145 - - - - -

217 117 - 117 - - - - -

Port

Hedland


Treatment MethodTreatment Method

C&I C&D

Sector Code Tonnage

10. Employee

Camps

Hazardous

TreatmentRecycled

Greenwaste


MSW

Treatment Method

Landfill

Destination

10. Employee

Camps




Hazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Greenwaste


Total =

Sector Hazardous

Treatment

Landfill

Total =


Processing

Treatment Method

Tonnage RecycledThermal

TreatmeStockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

LandfillDestination TonnageSector Code Tonnage Recycled Stockpiled

Greenwaste

Processing

Thermal

Treatment

StockpiledStockpiledTonnageLandfill LandfillGreenwaste

ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

TreatmentCodeSector

Treatment Method

Total =


Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

MSW C&I C&D

Treatment Method


ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

Treatment




Appendix J: Detailed Waste Data –

Newman Sub-catchment Area



MSW C&I C&D



1. Domestic Kerbside Commingled recyclables 301 1,179 2. Mining. Grease wastes 103 463 2. Mining.. Waste tyres 183 154

10,893 Kerbside refuse 302 6,421 55,582 Oil based paints 121 0.4 4,726 Ewaste 201 1.3

100% Vergeside Hard waste 307 168 78% Water based and acrylic paints 122 1.9 21% Household and Industrial Batteries 202 0.2

Public place refuse 308 500 Oil sludges 125 3,135 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 209 2.4

Special event refuse 311 250 Engine Coolants 131 1,030 Batteries- Miscellaneous 214 119

Greenwaste 402 824 Waste tyres 183 1,854 Waste Oil 215 2.5

Mixed Paper and Cardboard 501 70 Ewaste 201 1.3 Hydrocarbon Contaminated Materials 217 0.02

Cardboard 503 151 Household and Industrial Batteries 202 1.4 Greenwaste 402 0.6

Non-ferrous metals - packaging 514 10 Vehicle and marine batteries 203 50 Mixed organics 403 1,087

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 800 Fluorescent tubes 204 0.2 Timber - untreated 404 1,250

Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 801 120 Asbestos 208 13 Timber - treated 405 7.2

Hard waste 805 400 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 209 4,476 Mixed Paper and Cardboard 501 0.003

Contaminated Packaging 212 36 Paper 502 3.7

Batteries- Miscellaneous 214 245 Cardboard 503 112

Waste Oil 215 5,332 Plastic 2 - HDPE 506 52

Hydrocarbon Contaminated Materials 217 1,905 Plastic 5 - PP 509 31

Mixed organics 403 1,087 Mixed Plastics 512 12

Timber - untreated 404 1,250 Non-Ferrous Metals - packaging 514 2.7

Mixed Paper and Cardboard 501 370 Mixed metals - packaging 515 2.0

Paper 502 72 Concrete 602 113

Cardboard 503 376 Rubbers - mixed 611 299

Glass Packaging 504 49 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 617 1,407

Plastic 1 - PET 505 0.2 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 619 33

Plastic 2 - HDPE 506 52 Mixed Inert 622 10

Plastic 5 - PP 509 31 Sludges 703 4.8

Mixed Plastics 512 100 Textiles 803 20

Non-Ferrous Metals - packaging 514 10 Waste gases and containers 807 0.4

Mixed metals - packaging 515 2.0 9. Other/Mixed Asbestos 208 70

Concrete 602 113 18,045 Mixed building rubble 601 11,353

Rubbers - mixed 611 3,609 79% Mixed Inert 622 6,356

Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 617 3,122 Other Inert 699 266

Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 2,285

Sludges 703 5,913

Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 801 16,400

Comingled recyclables 802 2,089


Printer catridges 813 0.1

8. Healthcare Medical and vetinary waste 207 97

97

0.1%

9. Other/Mixed Grease wastes 103 281

9,351 Oil/water mixtures 124 47

13% Waste Tyres 183 295

Engine Coolants 131 3.3

Waste Oil 215 559


Hard waste 805 35

Grease wastes 103 202

Vegetable oils and derivatives 104 6.4


9% Batteries- Miscellaneous 214 0.4

Waste Oil 215 159


Cardboard 503 16

Glass Packaging 504 0.7

Mixed Plastics 512 0.6

Non-Ferrous Metals - packaging 514 4.5


10. Employee

Camps




2 601 Mixed building rubble 11,353 139 2 301 Kerbside Commingled recyclables 1,179


4 622 Mixed Inert 6,366 160 4 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 800

5 215 Waste Oil 6,052 100 5 308 Public place refuse 500

6 703 Sludges 5,917 166 6 805 Hard waste 400


8 403 Mixed organics 5,214 119 8 307 Vergeside Hard waste 168

9 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 4,479 94 9 503 Cardboard 151

10 611 Rubbers - mixed 3,908 149 10 801 Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 120

11 125 Oil Sludges 3,135 27

12 404 Timber - untreated 2,499 120

13 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 2,318 157 Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

14 183 Waste Tyres 2,302 85 1 801 Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 27,029

15 802 Comingled Recyclables 2,089 169 2 215 Waste Oil 6,050

16 217 Hydrocarbon Contaminated Materials 1,905 102 3 703 Sludges 5,913

17 301 Kerbside Commingled recyclables 1,179 104 4 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 4,476

18 131 Engine Coolants 1,033 33 5 403 Mixed organics 4,127

19 103 Grease wastes 946 5 6 611 Rubbers - mixed 3,609

20 402 Greenwaste 825 118 7 125 Oil sludges 3,135

TOTAL 100,419 8 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 3,122

% of total waste 96% 9 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 2,285





3 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 1,407

4 404 Timber - untreated 1,250

5 403 Mixed organics 1,087

6 611 Rubbers - mixed 299

7 699 Other Inert 266


9 214 Batteries- Miscellaneous 119

10 602 Concrete 113









1. Domestic 301 1,179 - - - - - 1,179 - 2. Mining. 183 1,565 - - 1,076 - - - 489 2. Mining.. 183 154 - - - - - - 154

9,462 302 6421 - - - - - 6,421 - 36,987 208 13 - - - - - - 13 2,948 209 2.4 - - - 2.4 - - -

100% 307 168 - - - - - 168 - 72% 209 4,476 - - - 4,476 - - - 14% 217 0.02 - - - - - - 0.02

308 500 - - - - - 500 - 217 432 - - - - - 32 400 402 0.6 0.6 - - - - - -

311 250 - - - - - 250 - 403 1,087 - - - - - - 1,087 403 1,087 - - - - - - 1,087

402 824 - - - - - 824 - 404 1,250 1,250 - - - - - - 404 1,250 1,250 - - - - - -

801 120 - - - - - 120 - 504 32 - - - - - - 32 405 7.2 - - - - - - 7.2

512 8.9 - - - - - - 8.9 501 0.003 - 0.003 - - - - -

602 113 - - - - - - 113 512 0.3 - - - - - - 0.3

611 3,609 - - 299 - - - 3,309 602 113 - - - - - - 113

703 5,913 - - - 5,913 - - - 611 299 - - 299 - - - 0.004

801 16,400 - - - - - 2,076 14,325 622 10 - - - - - - 10

802 2,089 - - - - - - 2,089 703 4.8 - - - 4.8 - - -

8. Healthcare 207 97 - - - - - 97 - 803 20 - - - - - - 20

97 9. Other/Mixed 208 70 - - - - - 70 -

0.2% 18,045 601 11,353 - - - - - 11,353 -

9. Other/Mixed 124 47 - - - 46.8 - - - 86% 622 6,356 - - - - - 6,356 -

8,507 183 295 - - - - - 295 - 699 266 - - - - - 266 -

17% 801 8,131 - - - - - 8,131 -

805 35 - - - - - 35 -

124 379 - - - 379 - - -

403 3,040 - - - - - - 3,040

5,918 512 0.6 - - - - - - 0.6

11% 801 2,498 - - - - - - 2,498



Landfill


Perth 1. Domestic 501 70 - 70 - - - - - Perth 2. Mining 131 1,030 - - - 1,030 - - - Perth 2. Mining 201 1.3 - 1.3 - - - - -

1,431 503 151 - 151 - - - - - 14,253 183 289 - 289 - - - - - 1,778 202 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

100% 514 10 - 10 - - - - - 72% 201 1.3 - 1.3 - - - - - 100% 214 119 - - - 119 - - -

617 800 - 800 - - - - - 202 1.4 - 1.4 - - - - - 215 2.5 - 2.5 - - - - -

805 400 - 400 - - - - - 203 50 - 50 - - - - - 502 3.7 - 3.7 - - - - -

204 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - - 503 112 - 112 - - - - -

212 36 - 36 - - - - - 506 52 - 52 - - - - -

214 238 - 118 - 119 - - - 509 31 - 31 - - - - -

215 4,637 - 4,637 - - - - - 512 11 - 11 - - - - -

217 1,433 - 1,321 - - - 112 - 514 2.7 - 2.7 - - - - -

501 370 - 370 - - - - - 515 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - -

502 72 - 72 - - - - - 617 1,407 - 1,407 - - - - -

503 376 - 376 - - - - - 619 33 - 33 - - - - -

504 16 - 16 - - - - - 807 0.4 - - - - 0.4 - -

505 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

506 52 - 52 - - - - -

509 31 - 31 - - - - -

512 91 - 91 - - - - -

514 10 - 10 - - - - -

515 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - -

617 3,122 - 3,122 - - - - -

619 2,285 - 2,285 - - - - -

807 111 - 111 - - 0.4 - -

9. Other/Mixed 131 3.3 - - - 3.3 - - -

563 215 559 - 559 - - - - -

3%

103 1.2 - 1.2 - - - - -

104 6.4 - 6.4 - - - - -

188 214 0.4 - 0.4 - - - - -

1% 215 159 - 159 - - - - -

503 16 - 16 - - - - -

504 0.7 - 0.7 - - - - -

514 4.5 - 4.5 - - - - -

2. Mining 103 463 - - - - 463 - -

4,335 121 0.4 - - - - 0.4 - -

22% 122 1.9 - - - - 1.9 - -

125 3,135 - - - 1,936 1,199 - -

215 695 - 695 - - - - -

217 40 - - - - 40 - -

504 0.5 - 0.5 - - - - -

611 - - - - - - - -

9. Other/Mixed 103 281 - - - - 281 - -

281

1%

10. Employee Camps 103 201 - - - - 201 - -

201

1%

Interstate 2. Mining 214 7 - 7 - - - - -

7

0.0%




Processing

Total =

Tonnage Recycled

Sector Code


Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Treatment Method

10. Employee

Camps

10. Employee Camps

Port Hedland

Thermal

Treatment


Total = Total =

Greenwaste

Processing

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment


C&IMSW

Greenwaste

ProcessingTonnage

C&D

DestinationStockpiledHazardous

TreatmentDestination Stockpiled

Hazardous

TreatmentSector

Hazardous

Treatment

LandfillSector Code Tonnage Recycled Stockpiled

RecycledGreenwaste

Processing

Greenwaste

ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

TreatmentCodeSector

Landfill LandfillStockpiledStockpiledTonnageStockpiled

Hazardous

Treatment

Landfill


Thermal

Treatment

MSW C&I C&D

Treatment Method


ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

Treatment


Tonnage




Appendix K: Detailed Waste Data –

Remote East Pilbara Sub-

catchment Area

Remote East Pilbara Sub-Catchment Area


MSW C&I C&D

0% Total = - tonnes 100% Total = 12,300 tonnes 0% Total = - tonnes


2. Mining.. Grease wastes 103 41


91% Oil sludges 125 684

Waste mineral oil 126 1,377

Engine coolants 131 301

Waste tyres 183 278

Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 426

Contaminated packaging 212 16


Waste oil 215 538

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 141

Timber - untreated 404 26

Paper and cardboard 501 28

Cardboard 503 102



Concrete 602 23

Rubber - mixed 611 3,397


Non-ferrous metal - non-packaging 618 8.9

Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 2.9





1,139 Waste oil 215 11

9% Mixed organics 403 937




10. Employee

Camps



1 611 Rubber - mixed 3,397 149 1 -

2 801 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 2,694 168 2 -

3 126 Waste mineral oils 1,377 28 3 -

4 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 1,113 155 4 -


6 125 Oil sludges 684 27 6 -

7 215 Waste Oil 549 100 7 -

8 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 426 94 8 -

9 131 Engine Coolants 301 33 9 -

10 183 Waste tyres 278 85 10 -


12 503 Cardboard 102 126

13 124 Oil/water mixtures 75 26 Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

14 103 Grease wastes 41 5 1 611 Rubber - mixed 3,397

15 214 Batteries- Miscellaneous 39 99 2 801 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 2,694

16 807 Waste gases and containers 36 174 3 126 Waste mineral oil 1,377

17 501 Mixed Paper and Cardboard 28 124 4 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 1,113

18 404 Timber - untreated 26 120 5 403 Mixed organics 937

19 602 Concrete 23 140 6 125 Oil sludges 684

20 212 Contaminated Packaging 16 97 7 215 Waste Oil 549

TOTAL 12,284 8 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 426

% of total waste 100% 9 131 Engine Coolants 301



1 -

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6 -

7 -

8 -

9 -

10 -







Total = - tonnes Total = 5,464 tonnes Total = - tonnes


2. Mining.. 126 121 - - - - - - 121

4,361 183 278 - - 158 - - - 120

80% 209 426 - - - 426 - - -

212 11 - - - - - - 11

217 141 - - - - - - 141

404 26 - - - - - - 26

503 56 - - - - - - 56

512 2.2 - - - - - - 2

602 23 - - - - - - 23

611 749 - - - - - - 749

801 2,528 - - - - - - 2,528

10. Employee 403 937 - - - - - - 937

Camps 504 0.2 - - - - - - 0

1,103 801 165 - - - - - - 165

20%


- tonnes 6,836 tonnes - tonnes


Perth 2. Mining.. 124 50 - 50 - - - - -

6,759 125 684 - - - 684 - - -

99% 126 1,256 - 1,256 - - - - -

131 301 - - - 301 - - -

212 5.4 - 5.4 - - - - -

214 39 - 39 - - - - -

215 538 - 538 - - - - -

501 28 - 28 - - - - -

503 46 - 46 - - - - -

514 1.1 - 1.1 - - - - -

611 2,648 - 2,648 - - - - -

617 1,113 - 1,113 - - - - -

618 9 - 9 - - - - -

619 2.9 - 2.9 - - - - -

807 36 - 36 - - - - -

10. Employee Camps 124 25 - - - 25 - - -

36 215 11 - 11 - - - - -

0.5% 514 0.3 - 0.3 - - - - -

2. Mining 103 41 - - - - 41 - -

41

0.6%

Port Hedland




CodeSector LandfillHazardous

TreatmentSector

Total =

Landfill Thermal

TreatmentTonnage

Thermal

TreatmeRecycled


Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

MSW C&I C&D

Treatment Method


ProcessingRecycled


Sector Code TonnageLandfill

StockpiledTonnageLandfill

Recycled StockpiledGreenwaste

Processing

Greenwaste

ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

TreatmentCodeSector Stockpiled

LandfillHazardous

Treatment

Hazardous

Treatment



Processing

Total = Treatment Method Total =

StockpiledHazardous

TreatmentDestination RecycledTonnage Recycled Stockpiled

Greenwaste


Hazardous

TreatmentCode

Greenwaste

Processing

MSW C&I C&D

DestinationThermal

Treatmen

LandfillTonnage




Appendix L: Detailed Waste Data –

Pilbara Region

Pilbara Region


MSW C&I C&D




45,252 Waste Oil 215 500 148,789 Clinical wastes 113 3.0 90,068 Mixed building rubble 601 32,972

100% Kerbside comingled recyclables 301 1,179 68% Oil based paints 121 0.5 25% Concrete 602 20,829

Kerbisde refuse 302 28,081 Water based and acrylic paints 122 1.9 Clean fill 613 34,325

Vergeside greenwaste 305 140 Oil/water mixtures 124 69 Mixed Refuse (C&D waste) 801 1,464

Vergeside hardwaste 307 568 Oil sludges 125 5,625 2. Mining.. Waste tyres 183 292

Public place refuse 308 2,894 Waste mineral oils 126 1,377 27,805 Ewaste 201 1.3

Public place recycling 309 1.6 Engine coolants 131 1,653 8% Batteries - household and industrial 202 30

Special event refuse 311 1,217 Waste tyres 183 2,284 Batteries - vehicle and marine batteries 203 2.9

Greenwaste 402 1,815 Ewaste 201 1.3 Fluorescent tubes 204 0.2

Mixed Paper and Cardboard 501 70 Batteries - household and industrial 202 15 Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 322

Cardboard 503 151 Batteries - vehicle and marine 203 212 Batteries - misc 214 119

Non-ferrous metals - packaging 514 10 Fluorescent tubes 204 0.7 Waste oil 215 338

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 800 Asbestos 208 35 Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 2.1

Mixed metals (non-packaging) 619 771 Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 13,562 Greenwaste 402 87

Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 801 6,437 Contaminated packaging 212 82 Mixed organics 403 1,087

Comingled recyclables 802 16 Batteries - misc 214 298 Timber - untreated 404 1,250

Hard Waste 805 400 Waste oil 215 11,240 Timber - treated 405 964

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 2,858 Paper and cardboard 501 0.4

Other hazardous 299 382 Paper 502 25

Mixed organics 403 1,087 Cardboard 503 159

Timber - untreated 404 1,276 Plastic 2 - HDPE 506 52

Timber - treated 405 130 Plastic 5 - PP 509 31

Paper and cardboard 501 1,636 Mixed plastic 512 13

Paper 502 77 Non-ferrous metal - packaging 514 17

Cardboard 503 751 Mixed metals - packaging 515 2.0

Glass packaging 504 49 Concrete 602 6,677

Plastic 1 - PET 505 0.2 Rubber - mixed 611 300

Plastic 2 - HDPE 506 52 Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 1,407

Plastic 3 - PVC 507 4.0 Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 586

Plastic 5 - PP 509 31 Mixed inert 622 1,353

Plastic 7 - Other 511 0.5 Sludges 703 647

Mixed plastic 512 108 Mixed Refuse (C&D waste) 801 9,385

Non-ferrous metal - packaging 514 12 Textiles 803 2,653

Mixed metals - packaging 515 2.4 Waste gases and containers 807 0.4

Concrete 602 136 Printer cartridges 813 0.2

Glazing 607 19 5. Petroleum.. Contaminated soils - misc 106 228

Rubber - mixed 611 16,878 85,422 Oil/water mixtures 124 83

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 20,031 23% Batteries - household and industrial 202 3.4

Non-ferrous metal - non-packaging 618 8.9 Medical and vetinary waste 207 826

Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 18,408 Contaminated soil - hydrocarbon 209 5,032

Mixed C&D waste 622 624 Contaminated packaging 212 5.7

Sludges 703 5,913 Mixed commercial hazardous 216 199

Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 38,681 Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 0.5

Comingled Recyclables 802 2,089 Food waste 401 2,936

Waste gases and containers 807 503 Timber - treated 405 427

Ash - misc 812 6.7 Mixed Paper and Cardboard 501 603

Printer cartridges 813 0.6 Glass packaging 504 10

5. Petroleum.. Vegetable oils and derivatives 104 6.2 Mixed plastic 512 1,043

4,611 Industrial waste treatment plant sludges 112 1,333 Mixed building rubble 601 15

2% Mercury 161 183 Concrete 602 70,825

Ewaste 201 7.0 Rubber - mixed 611 164

Batteries - household and industrial 202 24 Mixed soil and sand 612 137

Batteries - vehicle and marine 204 14 Clean fill 613 -

Medical and vetinary waste 207 1.1 Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 3.1

Contaminated soil - hydrocarbon 209 205 Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 1,435

Contaminated packaging 212 59 Garnet 623 12

Mixed commercial hazardous 216 688 Drilling muds 702 33

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 805 Sludges 703 251

Other hazardous 299 21 Mixed Refuse (C&D waste) 801 1,152

Food wate 401 679 Textiles 803 0.1

Timber - treated 405 9.3 Waste gases and containers 807 0.7

Mixed Paper and Cardboard 501 14 9. Other/Mixed Contaminated soil - misc 106 6,207

Glass packaging 504 8.0 162,897 Asbestos 208 2,571

Mixed plastic 512 14 44% Timber - treated 405 1,005

Concrete 602 70 Glass packaging 504 57

Insulation 609 57 Mixed building rubble 601 71,807

Rubber - mixed 611 42 Concrete 602 46,227

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 33 Clean fill 613 25,905

Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 70 Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 815

Garnet 623 14 Mixed C&D waste 622 6,422

Sludges 703 97 Garnet 623 1,616

Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 78 Other Inert 699 266

Textiles 803 74



147

0.07%


51,534 Contaminated soils - misc 106 2,369

24% Oil/water mixtures 124 62

Engine coolants 131 3.3

Waste Tyres 183 2,333




Waste oil 215 593



Cardboard 503 5.0




Hard waste 805 35

Waste not otherwise specified 899 908


Vegetable oils and derivatives 104 30


6% Asbestos 208 0.004


Waste oil 215 323

Food wate 401 5.3

Greenwaste 402 2.7



Cardboard 503 16

Glass packaging 504 28



Ferrous metals - packaging 513 1.6





10. Employee

Camps




2 601 Mixed building rubble 104,809 139 2 801 Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 6,437

3 801 Mixed Refuse (public drop-off, C&I and C&D waste) 102,472 168 3 308 Public place refuse 2,894

4 613 Clean fill 60,230 151 4 402 Greenwaste 1,815

5 302 Kerbside refuse 29,973 105 5 311 Special event refuse 1,217

6 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 23,396 155 6 301 Kerbside Commingled recyclables 1,179

7 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 22,086 157 7 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 800

8 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 19,121 94 8 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 771

9 611 Rubbers - mixed 17,383 149 9 307 Vergeside Hard waste 568

10 215 Waste Oil 12,993 100 10 215 Waste Oil 500

11 403 Mixed Organics 8,964 119

12 106 Contaminated Soil - misc 8,804 8

13 622 Mixed Inert 8,398 160 Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

14 703 Sludges 6,908 166 1 801 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 84,033

15 125 Oil sludges 5,625 27 2 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 21,186

16 183 Waste Tyres 4,909 85 3 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 18,478

17 402 Greenwaste 3,985 118 4 611 Rubbers - mixed 16,919

18 217 Hydrocarbon Contaminated Materials 3,666 102 5 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 13,767

19 401 Food waste 3,620 117 6 215 Waste Oil 12,155

20 208 Asbestos 3,085 93 7 403 Mixed Organics 7,877

TOTAL 595,189 8 703 Sludges 6,010

% of total waste 94% 9 125 Oil sludges 5,625

10 183 Waste tyres 4,617


1 602 Concrete 144,557


3 613 Clean fill 60,230



6 106 Contaminated Soil - misc 6,435


8 208 Asbestos 3,050



Pilbara Region





GENERATED AND TREATED WITHIN PILBARA REGION




1. Domestic 301 1,179 - - - - - 1,179 - 2. Mining.. 103 576 - - - - 576 - - 1. Domestic 208 480 - - - - - 480 -

42,333 302 28,081 - - - - - 28,081 - 91,086 113 3.0 - - - - - 2.8 0.2 90,068 601 32,972 - - - - - 32,972 -

100% 305 140 - - - - - 140 - 58% 121 0.5 - - - - 0.5 - - 26% 602 20,829 - 20,829 - - - - -

307 568 - - - - - 568 - 122 1.9 - - - - 1.9 - - 613 34,325 - 34,325 - - - - -

308 2,894 - - - - - 2,894 - 124 20 - - - 20 - - - 801 1,464 - - - - - 1,464 -

309 0.1 - 0.1 - - - - - 125 4,941 - - - 2,872 1,694 - 375 2. Mining.. 183 292 - - 65 - - - 227

311 1,217 - - - - - 1,217 - 126 121 - - - - - - 121 25,055 202 29 - 29 - - - - -

402 1,815 591 - - - - 1,224 - 131 8.8 - - - 8.8 - - - 7% 209 322 - - - 2.6 - - 320

801 6,437 - - - - - 6,437 - 183 1,987 - - 1,233 - - 2.7 752 217 2.1 - - - - - 2.1 0.0

802 1.5 - 1.5 - - - - - 208 35 - - - - - - 35 402 87 0.7 - - - - - 86

209 13,562 - - - 5,524 189 7,849 - 403 1,087 - - - - - - 1,087

212 28 - 17 - - - - 11 404 1,250 1,250 - - - - - -

215 3,706 - 3,706 - - - - - 405 964 - - - - - - 964

217 1,214 - 237 - - 40 336 601 501 0.4 - 0 - - - - 0.4

299 382 - 64 - - - 318 - 512 0.3 - - - - - - 0.3

403 1,087 - - - - - - 1,087 602 6,677 - 6,564 - - - - 113

404 1,276 1,250 - - - - - 26 611 300 - - 299 - - 0 0.6

405 130 - - 130 - - - - 619 5.7 - 5.7 - - - - -

503 198 - 86 - - - - 112 622 1,353 - - - - - - 1,353

504 33 - 0.5 - - - - 32 703 647 - - - 647 - - -

507 4.0 - 4.0 - - - - - 801 9,385 - - - - - 9,385 -

511 0.5 - 0.1 - - - 0.1 0.3 803 2,653 - - - - - - 2,653

512 16 - - - - - 4.0 12 5. Petroleum.. 106 228 - - - - - 228 -

514 0.1 - 0.1 - - - - - 74,315 124 83 - - - 83 - - -

515 0.4 - - - - - 0.4 - 21% 207 2.5 - - - - - 2.5 -

602 136 - - - - - - 136 209 362 - - - 362 - - -

611 14,170 - 2,741 299 - - 9.3 11,120 212 5.7 - - - - - 5.7 -

622 624 - - - - - - 624 401 727 - - - - - 727 -

703 5,913 - - - 5,913 - - - 405 76 - - - - - 76 -

801 38,494 - - - - - 8,874 29,619 512 243 - - - - - 243 -

802 2,089 - - - - - - 2,089 601 15 - - - - - 15 -

807 323 - 3.4 - - - - 320 602 70,825 - 70,825 - - - - -

812 6.7 - - - - - 6.7 - 611 46 - - - - - 46 -

813 0.3 - - - - - - 0.3 612 137 - 137 - - - - -

5. Petroleum.. 207 1.1 - - - - - 1.1 - 619 972 - 972 - - - - -

1,419 209 205 - - - - 205 - - 623 12 - - - - - 12 -

1% 212 59 - - - - - 59 - 702 33 - - - - - 33 -

299 21 - - - - - 21 - 703 251 - - - 251 - - -

401 679 - - - - - 679 - 801 299 - - - - - 299 -

405 9.3 - - - - - 9.3 - 803 0.1 - - - - - 0 -

512 14 - - - - - 14 - 9. Other/Mixed 106 6,207 - - - - - 6,207 -

602 70 - 70 - - - - - 162,879 208 2,571 - - - - - 2,571 -

609 57 - - - - - 57 - 46% 405 1,005 - - - - - 1,005 -

611 42 - - - - - 42 - 504 57 - 57 - - - - -

623 14 - - - - - 14 - 601 71,807 - - 817 - - 70,990 -

703 97 - - - 97 - - - 602 46,227 - 42,713 3,514 - - - -

801 78 - - - - - 78 - 613 25,905 - - - - - 25,905 -

803 74 - - - - - 74 - 619 797 - 797 - - - - -

8. Healthcare.. 207 147 - - - - - 147 - 622 6,422 - - - - - 6,422 -

147 623 1,616 - - - - - 1,616 -

0% 699 266 - - - - - 266 -

9. Other/Mixed 103 281 - - - - 281 - -

50,955 106 2,369 - - - - - 2,369 -

32% 124 62 - - - 62 - - -

183 2,333 - - - - - 2,333 -

207 13 - - - - - 13 -

213 79 - - - - - 79 -

214 60 - 60 - - - - -

215 17 - 17 - - - - -

302 1,892 - - - - - 1,892 -

402 2,080 2,080 - - - - - -

503 5.0 - 5.0 - - - - -

617 1,112 - 1,112 - - - - -

801 39,636 - - - - - 39,636 -

802 74 - - - - - 74 -

805 35 - - - - - 35 -

899 908 - - - - - 908 -

103 201 - - - - 201 - -

124 739 - - - 739 - - -

13,393 208 0.0 - - - - - - 0.0

9% 401 5.3 - - - - - - 5

402 2.7 - - - - - - 2.7

403 6,790 - - - - - - 6,790

504 0.2 - - - - - - 0.2

512 0.6 - - - - - - 0.6

514 0.6 - - - - - - 0.6

601 16 - - - - - - 16

801 5,638 - - - - - 57 5,581

10. Employee

Camps

StockpiledTonnage

Pilbara Region

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

MSW C&I C&D

Treatment Method


ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

Treatment


Sector Code TonnageLandfillLandfill LandfillHazardous

TreatmentRecycled

Greenwaste

Processing

Greenwaste

ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

TreatmentCodeSector Stockpiled Stockpiled





Perth 1. Domestic 214 200 - 200 - - - - - Perth 2. Mining.. 124 50 - 50 - - - - - Perth 2. Mining.. 201 1.3 - 1.3 - - - - -

2,918 215 500 - 500 - - - - - 42,414 125 684 - - - 684 - - - 2,749 202 0.3 - 0.3 - - - - -

100% 309 1.5 - 1.5 - - - - - 68% 126 1,256 - 1,256 - - - - - 20% 203 2.9 - 2.9 - - - - -

501 70 - 70 - - - - - 131 1,645 - - - 1,645 - - - 204 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

503 151 - 151 - - - - - 183 297 - 297 - - - - - 214 119 - - - 119 - - -

514 10 - 10 - - - - - 201 1.3 - 1.3 - - - - - 215 338 - 338 - - - - -

617 800 - 800 - - - - - 202 15 - 15 - - - - - 501 0.0 - 0.0 - - - - -

619 771 - 771 - - - - - 203 212 - 212 - - - - - 502 25 - 25 - - - - -

802 15 - 15 - - - - - 204 0.7 - 0.7 - - - - - 503 159 - 159 - - - - -

805 400 - 400 - - - - - 212 55 - 55 - - - - - 506 52 - 52 - - - - -

214 287 - 168 - 119 - - - 509 31 - 31 - - - - -

215 7,534 - 7,534 - - - - - 512 13 - 13 - - - - -

217 1,644 - 1,532 - - - 112 - 514 17 - 17 - - - - -

501 1,636 - 1,636 - - - - - 515 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - -

502 77 - 77 - - - - - 617 1,407 - 1,407 - - - - -

503 553 - 535 - - 18 - - 619 580 - 580 - - - - -

504 16 - 16 - - - - - 807 0.4 - - - - 0.4 - -

505 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - - 813 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

506 52 - 52 - - - - - Perth 5. Petroleum.. 202 3.4 - 3.4 - - - - -

509 31 - 31 - - - - - 11,107 207 824 - - - - - 824 -

512 91 - 91 - - - - - 80% 209 4,670 - - - - - 4,670 -

514 12 - 12 - - - - - 216 199 - 157 - 42 - - -

515 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - - 217 0.5 - 0 - - - - -

607 19 - 19 - - - - - 401 2,209 - - - - - 2,209 -

611 2,707 - 2,707 - - - - - 405 351 - - - - - 351 -

617 6,376 - 6,376 - - - - - 501 603 - 603 - - - - -

618 8.9 - 8.9 - - - - - 504 10 - 10 - - - - -

619 16,785 - 16,785 - - - - - 512 800 - 800 - - - - -

801 187 - - - - - 187 - 611 118 - - - - - 118 -

807 180 - 179 - - 0.4 - - 617 3.1 - 3.1 - - - - -

813 0.3 - 0.3 - - - - - 619 463 - 463 - - - - -

Perth 5. Petroleum.. 104 6 - 6.2 - - - - - 801 853 - - - - - 853 -

2,996 112 1,333 - - - 1,333 - - - 807 0.7 - 0.7 - - - - -

5% 201 7.0 - 7.0 - - - - - Perth 9. Other/mixed 619 19 - 19 - - - - -

202 24 - 24 - - - - - 19

216 688 - 688 - - - - - 0.1%

217 805 - 805 - - - - -

501 14 - 14 - - - - -

504 8.0 - 8.0 - - - - -

617 33 - 33 - - - - -

619 70 - 70 - - - - -

807 7.7 - 7.7 - - - - -

Perth 9. Other/mixed 131 3.3 - - - 3.3 - - -

579 215 576 - 576 - - - - -

1%

Perth 103 1.2 - 1.2 - - - - -

104 30 - 30 - - - - -

499 124 25 - - - 25 - - -

1% 214 0.8 - 0.8 - - - - -

215 323 - 323 - - - - -

501 36 - 36 - - - - -

503 16 - 16 - - - - -

504 28 - 28 - - - - -

505 2.8 - 2.8 - - - - -

512 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - -

513 1.6 - 1.6 - - - - -

514 23 - 23 - - - - -

617 10 - 10.0 - - - - -

Interstate 2. Mining.. 214 11 - 11 - - - - -

12 299 0.6 - - - - 0.6 - -

0.0%

Overseas 2. Mining.. 617 13,655 - 13,655 - - - - -

15,278 619 1,623 - 1,623 - - - - -

25%

Overseas 5. Petroleum.. 161 183 - - - 183 - - -

197 204 14 - - - 14 - - -

0.3%

GENERATED WITHIN AND TREATED OUTSIDE PILBARA REGION

Greenwaste

Processing


Tonnage Sector Hazardous

Treatment

LandfillStockpiled

Hazardous


Landfill

10. Employee

camps


MSW C&I C&D

Destination

Total = Treatment Method Total = Total =


ProcessingRecycled

Thermal

Treatme

Greenwaste

Processing

Thermal

TreatmentTonnageSector Code Tonnage Recycled Stockpiled

Pilbara Region

StockpiledHazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment




Appendix M: Detailed Waste Data –

Study Area


MSW C&I C&D




57,737 Waste Oil 215 500 148,789 Clinical wastes 113 3.0 90,068 Mixed building rubble 601 32,972

100% Kerbside comingled recyclables 301 2,078 63% Oil based paints 121 0.5 24% Concrete 602 20,829

Kerbisde refuse 302 34,281 Water based and acrylic paints 122 1.9 Clean fill 613 34,325

Vergeside greenwaste 305 140 Oil/water mixtures 124 69 Mixed Refuse (C&D waste) 801 1,464

Vergeside hardwaste 307 766 Oil sludges 125 5,625 2. Mining.. Waste tyres 183 292

Public place refuse 308 3,488 Waste mineral oils 126 1,377 27,805 Ewaste 201 1.3

Public place recycling 309 1.6 Engine coolants 131 1,653 7% Batteries - household and industrial 202 30

Special event refuse 311 1,217 Waste tyres 183 2,284 Batteries - vehicle and marine batteries 203 2.9

Greenwaste 402 6,315 Ewaste 201 1.3 Fluorescent tubes 204 0.2

Mixed Paper and Cardboard 501 70 Batteries - household and industrial 202 15 Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 322

Cardboard 503 151 Batteries - vehicle and marine 203 212 Batteries - misc 214 119

Non-ferrous metals - packaging 514 10 Fluorescent tubes 204 0.7 Waste oil 215 338

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 800 Asbestos 208 35 Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 2.1

Mixed metals (non-packaging) 619 771 Contaminated soils - hydrocarbon 209 13,562 Greenwaste 402 87

Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 801 6,437 Contaminated packaging 212 82 Mixed organics 403 1,087

Comingled recyclables 802 110 Batteries - misc 214 298 Timber - untreated 404 1,250

Hard Waste 805 400 Waste oil 215 11,240 Timber - treated 405 964

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 2,858 Paper and cardboard 501 0.4

Other hazardous 299 382 Paper 502 25

Mixed organics 403 1,087 Cardboard 503 159

Timber - untreated 404 1,276 Plastic 2 - HDPE 506 52

Timber - treated 405 130 Plastic 5 - PP 509 31

Paper and cardboard 501 1,636 Mixed plastic 512 13

Paper 502 77 Non-ferrous metal - packaging 514 17

Cardboard 503 751 Mixed metals - packaging 515 2.0

Glass packaging 504 49 Concrete 602 6,677

Plastic 1 - PET 505 0.2 Rubber - mixed 611 300

Plastic 2 - HDPE 506 52 Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 1,407

Plastic 3 - PVC 507 4.0 Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 586

Plastic 5 - PP 509 31 Mixed inert 622 1,353

Plastic 7 - Other 511 0.5 Sludges 703 647

Mixed plastic 512 108 Mixed Refuse (C&D waste) 801 9,385

Non-ferrous metal - packaging 514 12 Textiles 803 2,653

Mixed metals - packaging 515 2.4 Waste gases and containers 807 0.4

Concrete 602 136 Printer cartridges 813 0.2

Glazing 607 19 5. Petroleum.. Contaminated soils - misc 106 228

Rubber - mixed 611 16,878 85,422 Oil/water mixtures 124 83

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 20,031 23% Batteries - household and industrial 202 3.4

Non-ferrous metal - non-packaging 618 9 Medical and vetinary waste 207 826

Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 18,408 Contaminated soil - hydrocarbon 209 5,032

Mixed C&D waste 622 624 Contaminated packaging 212 5.7

Sludges 703 5,913 Mixed commercial hazardous 216 199

Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 38,681 Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 0.5

Comingled Recyclables 802 2,089 Food waste 401 2,936

Waste gases and containers 807 503 Timber - treated 405 427

Ash - misc 812 6.7 Mixed Paper and Cardboard 501 603

Printer cartridges 813 0.6 Glass packaging 504 10

5. Petroleum.. Vegetable oils and derivatives 104 6.2 Mixed plastic 512 1,043

4,611 Industrial waste treatment plant sludges 112 1,333 Mixed building rubble 601 15

2% Mercury 161 183 Concrete 602 70,825

Ewaste 201 7.0 Rubber - mixed 611 164

Batteries - household and industrial 202 24 Mixed soil and sand 612 137

Batteries - vehicle and marine 204 14 Clean fill 613 -

Medical and vetinary waste 207 1.1 Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 3.1

Contaminated soil - hydrocarbon 209 205 Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 1,435

Contaminated packaging 212 59 Garnet 623 12

Mixed commercial hazardous 216 688 Drilling muds 702 33

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 805 Sludges 703 251

Other hazardous 299 21 Mixed Refuse (C&D waste) 801 1,152

Food wate 401 679 Textiles 803 0.1

Timber - treated 405 9.3 Waste gases and containers 807 0.7

Mixed Paper and Cardboard 501 14 9. Other/Mixed Contaminated soil - misc 106 6,207

Glass packaging 504 8.0 171,836 Asbestos 208 2,571

Mixed plastic 512 14 46% Timber - treated 405 1,005

Concrete 602 70 Glass packaging 504 57

Insulation 609 57 Mixed building rubble 601 80,745

Rubber - mixed 611 42 Concrete 602 46,227

Ferrous metals - non-packaging 617 33 Clean fill 613 25,905

Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 70 Mixed metals - non-packaging 619 815

Garnet 623 14 Mixed C&D waste 622 6,422

Sludges 703 97 Garnet 623 1,616

Mixed refuse (C&I waste) 801 78 Other Inert 699 266

Textiles 803 74



147

0.06%


69,508 Contaminated soils - misc 106 2,369

29% Oil/water mixtures 124 62

Engine coolants 131 3.3

Waste Tyres 183 2,333




Waste oil 215 636



Cardboard 503 5.0




Hard waste 805 35

Waste not otherwise specified 899 908


Vegetable oils and derivatives 104 30


6% Asbestos 208 0.004


Waste oil 215 323

Hydrocarbon contaminated material 217 -

Food wate 401 5.3

Greenwaste 402 2.7



Cardboard 503 16

Glass packaging 504 28


Mixed plastic 512 3

Ferrous metals - packaging 513 1.6





Study Area

10. Employee

Camps




2 801 Mixed Refuse (public drop-off, C&I and C&D waste) 120,402 168 2 801 Mixed Refuse (public drop-off) 6,437

3 601 Mixed building rubble 113,748 139 3 402 Greenwaste 6,315

4 613 Clean fill 60,230 151 4 308 Public place refuse 3,488

5 302 Kerbside refuse 36,173 105 5 301 Kerbside Commingled recyclables 2,078

6 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 23,396 155 6 311 Special event refuse 1,217

7 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 22,086 157 7 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 800

8 209 Contaminated Soi - hydrocarbon 19,121 94 8 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 771

9 611 Rubbers - mixed 17,383 149 9 307 Vergeside Hard waste 766

10 215 Waste Oil 13,036 100 10 215 Waste Oil 500

11 403 Mixed organics 8,964 119

12 106 Contaminated Soil - misc 8,804 8

13 402 Greenwaste 8,485 118 Rank Code Material Type Quantity (tonnes)

14 622 Mixed Inert 8,398 160 1 801 Mixed Refuse (C&I waste) 101,964

15 703 Sludges 6,908 166 2 617 Ferrous Metals (non-packaging) 21,186

16 125 Oil sludges 5,625 27 3 619 Mixed Metals (non-packaging) 18,478

17 183 Waste tyres 4,909 85 4 611 Rubbers - mixed 16,919

18 217 Hydrocarbon Contaminated Materials 3,666 102 5 209 Contaminated Soil- Hydrocarbon 13,767

19 401 Food waste 3,620 117 6 215 Waste Oil 12,198

20 308 Public place refuse 3,488 111 7 403 Mixed organics 7,877

TOTAL 633,205 8 703 Sludges 6,010

% of total waste 95% 9 125 Oil sludges 5,625

10 183 Waste tyres 4,617


1 602 Concrete 144,557


3 613 Clean fill 60,230



6 106 Contaminated Soil - misc 6,435


8 208 Asbestos 3,050



Study Area





GENERATED AND TREATED WITHIN STUDY AREA




1. Domestic 301 2,078 - 899 - - - 1,179 - 2. Mining.. 103 576 - - - - 576 - - 1. Domestic 208 480 - - - - - 480 -

54,818 302 34,281 - - - - - 34,281 - 91,086 113 3.0 - - - - - 2.8 0.2 90,068 601 32,972 - - - - - 32,972 -

100% 305 140 - - - - - 140 - 52% 121 0.5 - - - - 0.5 - - 25% 602 20,829 - 20,829 - - - - -

307 766 - - - - - 766 - 122 1.9 - - - - 1.9 - - 613 34,325 - 34,325 - - - - -

308 3,488 - - - - - 3,488 - 124 20 - - - 20 - - - 801 1,464 - - - - - 1,464 -

309 0.1 - 0.1 - - - - - 125 4,941 - - - 2,872 1,694 - 375 2. Mining.. 183 292 - - 65 - - - 227

311 1,217 - - - - - 1,217 - 126 121 - - - - - - 121 25,055 202 29 - 29 - - - - -

402 6,315 5,091 - - - - 1,224 - 131 8.8 - - - 9 - - - 7% 209 322 - - - 2.6 - - 320

801 6,437 - - - - - 6,437 - 183 1,987 - - 1,233 - - 2.7 752 217 2.1 - - - - - 2.1 0.0

802 95.5 - 95.5 - - - - - 208 35 - - - - - - 35 402 87 0.7 - - - - - 86

209 13,562 - - - 5,524 189 7,849 - 403 1,087 - - - - - - 1,087

212 28 - 17 - - - - 11 404 1,250 1,250 - - - - - -

215 3,706 - 3,706 - - - - - 405 964 - - - - - - 964

217 1,214 - 237 - - 40 336 601 501 0.4 - 0.0 - - - - 0

299 382 - 64 - - - 318 - 512 0.3 - - - - - - 0

403 1,087 - - - - - - 1,087 602 6,677 - 6,564 - - - - 113

404 1,276 1,250 - - - - - 26 611 300 - - 299 - - 0.0 0.6

405 130 - - 130 - - - - 619 5.7 - 5.7 - - - - -

503 198 - 86 - - - - 112 622 1,353 - - - - - - 1,353

504 33 - 0.5 - - - - 32 703 647 - - - 647 - - -

507 4.0 - 4.0 - - - - - 801 9,385 - - - - - 9,385 -

511 0.5 - 0.1 - - - 0.1 0.3 803 2,653 - - - - - - 2,653

512 16 - - - - - 4.0 12 5. Petroleum.. 106 228 - - - - - 228 -

514 0 - 0.1 - - - - - 74,315 124 83 - - - 83 - - -

515 0.4 - - - - - 0.4 - 21% 207 2.5 - - - - - 2.5 -

602 136 - - - - - - 136 209 362 - - - 362 - - -

611 14,170 - 2,741 299 - - 9.3 11,120 212 5.7 - - - - - 5.7 -

622 624 - - - - - - 624 401 727 - - - - - 727 -

703 5,913 - - - 5,913 - - - 405 76 - - - - - 76 -

801 38,494 - - - - - 8,874 29,619 512 243 - - - - - 243 -

802 2,089 - - - - - - 2,089 601 15 - - - - - 15 -

807 323 - 3.4 - - - - 320 602 70,825 - 70,825 - - - - -

812 6.7 - - - - - 6.7 - 611 46 - - - - - 46 -

813 0.3 - - - - - - 0.3 612 137 - 137 - - - - -

5. Petroleum.. 207 1.1 - - - - - 1.1 - 619 972 - 972 - - - - -

1,419 209 205 - - - - 204.6 - - 623 12 - - - - - 12 -

1% 212 59 - - - - - 58.6 - 702 33 - - - - - 33 -

299 21 - - - - - 20.8 - 703 251 - - - 251 - - -

401 679 - - - - - 678.8 - 801 299 - - - - - 299 -

405 9.3 - - - - - 9.3 - 803 0.1 - - - - - 0.1 -

512 14 - - - - - 13.9 - 9. Other/Mixed 106 6,207 - - - - - 6,207 -

602 70 - 69.7 - - - - - 171,817 208 2,571 - - - - - 2,571 -

609 57 - - - - - 56.9 - 48% 405 1,005 - - - - - 1,005 -

611 42 - - - - - 41.8 - 504 57 - 57 - - - - -

623 14 - - - - - 13.9 - 601 80,745 - - 817 - - 79,928 -

703 97 - - - 97.2 - - - 602 46,227 - 42,713 3,514 - - - -

801 78 - - - - - 77.7 - 613 25,905 - - - - - 25,905 -

803 74 - - - - - 74.3 - 619 797 - 797 - - - - -

8. Healthcare.. 207 147 - - - - - 147 - 622 6,422 - - - - - 6,422 -

147 623 1,616 - - - - - 1,616 -

0.1% 699 266 - - - - - 266 -

9. Other/Mixed 103 281 - - - - 281 - -

68,886 106 2,369 - - - - - 2,369 -

39% 124 62 - - - 62 - - -

183 2,333 - - - - - 2,333 -

207 13 - - - - - 13 -

213 79 - - - - - 79 -

214 60 - 60 - - - - -

215 17 - 17 - - - - -

302 1,892 - - - - - 1,892 -

402 2,080 2,080 - - - - - -

503 5.0 - 5 - - - - -

617 1,112 - 1,112 - - - - -

801 57,567 - - - - - 57,567 -

802 74 - - - - - 74 -

805 35 - - - - - 35 -

899 908 - - - - - 908 -

103 201 - - - - 201 - -

124 739 - - - 739 - - -

945 208 0.0 - - - - - - 0.0

1% 217 - - - - - - - -

401 5.3 - - - - - - 5.3

402 2.7 - - - - - - 2.7

403 6,790 - - - - - - 6,790

504 0.2 - - - - - - 0.2

512 0.6 - - - - - - 0.6

514 0.6 - - - - - - 0.6

601 15.6 - - - - - - 16

801 5,638 - - - - - 57 5,581

Sector Code TonnageLandfillLandfill LandfillHazardous

TreatmentRecycled

Greenwaste

Processing

Greenwaste

ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

TreatmentCodeSector Stockpiled Stockpiled

Study Area

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

MSW C&I C&D

Treatment Method


ProcessingRecycled

Hazardous

Treatment


StockpiledTonnage

10. Employee

Camps





Perth 1. Domestic 214 200 - 200 - - - - - Perth 2. Mining.. 124 50 - 50 - - - - - Perth 2. Mining.. 201 1.3 - 1.3 - - - - -

2,918 215 500 - 500 - - - - - 42,414 125 684 - - - 684 - - - 2,749 202 0.3 - 0.3 - - - - -

100% 309 1.5 - 1.5 - - - - - 68% 126 1,256 - 1,256 - - - - - 20% 203 2.9 - 2.9 - - - - -

501 70 - 70 - - - - - 131 1,645 - - - 1,645 - - - 204 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

503 151 - 151 - - - - - 183 297 - 297 - - - - - 214 119 - - - 119 - - -

514 10 - 10 - - - - - 201 1.3 - 1.3 - - - - - 215 338 - 338 - - - - -

617 800 - 800 - - - - - 202 15 - 15 - - - - - 501 0.0 - 0.0 - - - - -

619 771 - 771 - - - - - 203 212 - 212 - - - - - 502 25 - 25 - - - - -

802 15 - 15 - - - - - 204 0.7 - 0.7 - - - - - 503 159 - 159 - - - - -

805 400 - 400 - - - - - 212 55 - 55 - - - - - 506 52 - 52 - - - - -

214 287 - 168 - 119 - - - 509 31 - 31 - - - - -

215 7,534 - 7,534 - - - - - 512 13 - 13 - - - - -

217 1,644 - 1,532 - - - 112 - 514 17 - 17 - - - - -

501 1,636 - 1,636 - - - - - 515 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - -

502 77 - 77 - - - - - 617 1,407 - 1,407 - - - - -

503 553 - 535 - - 18 - - 619 580 - 580 - - - - -

504 16 - 16 - - - - - 807 0.4 - - - - 0.4 - -

505 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - - 813 0.2 - 0.2 - - - - -

506 52 - 52 - - - - - Perth 5. Petroleum.. 202 3.4 - 3.4 - - - - -

509 31 - 31 - - - - - 11,107 207 824 - - - - - 824 -

512 91 - 91 - - - - - 80% 209 4,670 - - - - - 4,670 -

514 12 - 12 - - - - - 216 198.6 - 157 - 42 - - -

515 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - - 217 0.5 - 0.5 - - - - -

607 19 - 19 - - - - - 401 2,209 - - - - - 2,209 -

611 2,707 - 2,707 - - - - - 405 351 - - - - - 351 -

617 6,376 - 6,376 - - - - - 501 603 - 603 - - - - -

618 8.9 - 8.9 - - - - - 504 10 - 10 - - - - -

619 16,785 - 16,785 - - - - - 512 800 - 800 - - - - -

801 187 - - - - - 187 - 611 118.0 - - - - - 118 -

807 180 - 179 - - 0.4 - - 617 3.1 - 3.1 - - - - -

813 0.3 - 0.3 - - - - - 619 463 - 463 - - - - -

Perth 5. Petroleum.. 104 6.2 - 6.2 - - - - - 801 853 - - - - - 853 -

2,996 112 1,333 - - - 1,333 - - - 807 0.7 - 0.7 - - - - -

5% 201 7.0 - 7.0 - - - - - Perth 9. Other/mixed 619 19 - 19 - - - - -

202 24 - 24 - - - - - 19

216 688 - 688 - - - - - 0.1%

217 805 - 805 - - - - -

501 14 - 14 - - - - -

504 8.0 - 8.0 - - - - -

617 33 - 33 - - - - -

619 70 - 70 - - - - -

807 7.7 - 7.7 - - - - -

Perth 9. Other/mixed 131 3.3 - - - 3.3 - - -

622 215 619 - 619 - - - - -

1%

Perth 103 1.2 - 1.2 - - - - -

104 30 - 30 - - - - -

124 25 - - - 25 - - -

499 214 0.8 - 0.8 - - - - -

1% 215 323 - 323 - - - - -

501 36 - 36 - - - - -

503 16 - 16 - - - - -

504 28 - 28 - - - - -

505 2.8 - 2.8 - - - - -

512 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - -

513 1.6 - 1.6 - - - - -

514 23 - 23 - - - - -

617 10 - 10 - - - - -

Interstate 2. Mining.. 214 11 - 11 - - - - -

12 299 0.6 - - - - 0.6 - -

0.0%

Overseas 2. Mining.. 617 13,655 - 13,655 - - - - -

15,278 619 1,623 - 1,623 - - - - -

25%

Overseas 5. Petroleum.. 161 183 - - - 183 - - -

197 204 14 - - - 14 - - -

0.3%

RecycledThermal

Treatme

Greenwaste

Processing

Thermal

TreatmentTonnageSector Code Tonnage Recycled Stockpiled

Study Area

StockpiledHazardous

Treatment

Thermal

Treatment

10. Employee

camps


MSW C&I C&D

Destination

Total = Treatment Method Total = Total =


Processing

GENERATED WITHIN AND TREATED OUTSIDE STUDY AREA

Greenwaste

Processing


Tonnage Sector Hazardous

Treatment

LandfillStockpiled

Hazardous


Landfill




Appendix N: Sector 10 – Employee

Camp Data

Sector 10 – Employee Camps

Total waste generated across Study Area in Sector 10 = 13,893 tonnes

Proportion of C&I waste from Sector 10 = 5.7%

Sector 10 Waste Generation by Sub-catchment Area

Sub-catchment Area Sector 10 Waste Generation 2011/12 (tonnes)

Broome -

Port Hedland 871

Karratha 3,581

Onslow 235

Tom Price 1,760

Newman 6,307

Remote East Pilbara 1,139

Total Study Area 13,893

Typical Composition of Sector 10 C&I waste

Data on the tonnage and treatment method of typical Sector 10 waste is provided in

Appendix C.

General waste,

41.1%

Waste oil, 2.6%

Oily water, 6.2%

Mixed organics,

50.0%

Aluminium, 0.1%


Documents

Waste Data Study for the Pilbara Region and Shire of Broome€¦ · Project Number TW12014 . TW12014 - Pilbara - Broome Waste Data Study Report 1c July 2013 ... for the study with