14
3/26/2014 1 Going Viral: Emerging Benchmarks for Water Efficiency Water Loss in North America Presented by: William G. “Gus” Simmons, Jr., P.E. VP, Director of Engineering Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A. Relevance Frustrated that revenues are down Upset that critical O&M is deferred Disappointed with current loss control results Worried about a looming rate increase Anxious about the thought of regulation Concerned about staffing gaps Angry about “helpers” pushing conservation

Water Loss in North America - Water Resources …AWWA Tools for Water Loss Control The “M” Series: Manuals of Practice Guidance Manuals: widely recognized around the world as source

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

3/26/2014

1

Going Viral: Emerging

Benchmarks for Water Efficiency

Water Loss in North America

Presented by:

William G. “Gus” Simmons, Jr., P.E.

VP, Director of Engineering

Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A.

Relevance

• Frustrated that revenues are down

• Upset that critical O&M is deferred

• Disappointed with current loss control results

• Worried about a looming rate increase

• Anxious about the thought of regulation

• Concerned about staffing gaps

• Angry about “helpers” pushing conservation

3/26/2014

2

Environmental Drivers

RI

States with Varying Mechanisms for Water Loss

Auditing, Reporting & Performance Targets

DV 65, NRW%(cost) 30%

25% WL (small) 15% (large)

10% Leakage

10% Leakage, 3 year average

10% UFW

10% UFW

10% WL

15% NAW

15% UFW

15% WL

25% WL

Median UFW % of Class

8% UFW

WA

OR

TX

WI

MN

IL IN WV

MD PA NJ

DRBC

MA NH

TN

GA

FL 10% UFW

CA

NM

MO KY

VA

NC

SC

NY

DE

Year 5, improvement or top 20% or below benchmark leakage value

10% UFW

15% UFW

30% Leakage

15% NRW

15% WL

3/26/2014

3

RI

States with Varying Mechanisms for Water Loss

Auditing, Reporting & Performance Targets

DV 65, NRW%(cost) 30%

25% WL (small) 15% (large)

10% Leakage

10% Leakage, 3 year average

10% UFW

10% UFW

10% WL

15% NAW

15% UFW

15% WL

25% WL

Median UFW % of Class

8% UFW

WA

OR

TX

WI

MN

IL IN WV

MD PA NJ

DRBC

MA NH

TN

GA

FL 10% UFW

CA

NM

MO KY

VA

NC

SC

NY

DE

Year 5, improvement or top 20% or below benchmark leakage value

10% UFW

15% UFW

30% Leakage

15% NRW

15% WL

AWWA outreach and education

through NCAWWA, WRRI &

NCDENR

AWWA outreach and education

through DHEC. Sanitary Survey

modified to include AWWA Water

Audit as best-practice

AWWA Water Audits required

annually, no performance

targets

AWWA outreach and

education through VA-AWWA

AWWA Water Audits required

annually, with performance

targets

AWWA outreach and education

through KY-TN AWWA & KY-DoW

Regional Outreach

3/26/2014

4

Political Drivers

$0

$500,000

$1,000,000

$1,500,000

$2,000,000

$2,500,000

$3,000,000

$/

YE

AR

Annualized Cost of Non-Revenue Water - Trailing 12 Month Average

Financial Drivers (Case Study in GA)

3/26/2014

5

Scope of Validated Water Loss Data

Dataset Source(s) n 1. Southeast Data Sets Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A.

2008-2013 Georgia Environmental Protection Division

Georgia Environmental Finance Authority 238

2. Water Audit Data Initiative AWWA Water Loss Control Committee

2011-2013 72

Total = 310

Southeast Dataset

3/26/2014

6

North American Dataset

AWWA Tools for Water Loss Control

The “M” Series: Manuals of Practice Guidance Manuals: widely

recognized around the world as source of best practices in water utility operations and management

AWWA Water Loss Control Committee’s Free Water Audit Software© Originally released 2006; current

Version 4.2 software (2010)

Water Research Foundation Research Reports

Textbooks

www.awwa.org - type “water loss control” in search box; select first item in list

Water Audit Report for: Philadelphia Water Department

Reporting Year:

ALL VOLUMES TO BE ENTERED AS ANNUAL QUANTITIES

WATER SUPPLIED

Volume from own sources: M 95,526.0 million gallons (US) per year

Master meter error adjustment: M 695.4 million gallons (US) per year

Water Imported: M 0.0 million gallons (US) per year

Water Exported: M 7,210.2 million gallons (US) per year.

WATER SUPPLIED: . 89,011.2 million gallons (US) per year..

AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION .

Billed metered: M 57,535.2 million gallons (US) per year

Billed unmetered: M 0.0 million gallons (US) per year

Unbilled metered: M 179.3 million gallons (US) per year

Unbilled unmetered: E 693.6 million gallons (US) per year.

AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION: . 58,408.1 million gallons (US) per year

.

.

WATER LOSSES (Water Supplied - Authorized Consumption) . 30,603.1 million gallons (US) per year.

Apparent Losses .

Unauthorized consumption: E 1,145.2 million gallons (US) per year

Customer metering inaccuracies: E 162.5 million gallons (US) per year

Data handling errors: E 2,751.2 million gallons (US) per year

Apparent Losses: . 4,058.9 million gallons (US) per year

Real Losses .

Real Losses (Water Losses - Apparent Losses): . 26,544.2 million gallons (US) per year.

WATER LOSSES: . 30,603.1 million gallons (US) per year..

NON_REVENUE WATER .

NON-REVENUE WATER: . 31,476.0 million gallons (US) per year

.

SYSTEM DATA ..

Length of mains: M 3,160.0 miles

Number of active AND inactive service connections: M 548,289

Connection density: . 174 conn./mile main

Average length of private pipe: E 12.0 ft

.

Average operating pressure: E 55.0 psi

.

COST DATA ..

Total annual cost of operating water system: M $167,604,000 $/Year

Customer retail unit cost (applied to apparent losses): M $3.95

Variable production cost (applied to real losses): M $133.58 $/million gallons (US)

DATA REVIEW - Please review the following information and make changes above if necessary:

- Input values should be indicated as either measured or estimated. You have entered:

12 as measured values

6 as estimated values

0 without specifying measured or estimated

- It is important to accurately measure the master meter - you have entered the measurement type as: measured

- Cost Data: No problems identified

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Financial Indicators

Non-revenue water as percent by volume: 35.4%

Non-revenue water as percent by cost: 11.7%

AWWA WLCC Water Audit Software: Reporting Worksheet

2004

under-registered

$/1000 gallons (US)

?

?

?

?

?

? Click to access definition

?

?

?

?

?

?

Back to Instructions

Please enter data in the white cells below. Where possible, metered values should be used; if metered values are unavailable please estimate a value. Indicate this by selecting a choice from the gray box to the left, where M = measured (or accurately known value) and E = estimated.

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

(pipe length between curbstop and

customer meter or property

Copyright © 2006, American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.

3/26/2014

7

Thank You Will Jernigan, P.E.

[email protected]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Water Audit Software Subcommittee (WASS) Members:

WLCC Chair: John Van Arsdel, M.E. Simpson Company, Inc.

WASS Chair: Andrew Chastain-Howley, Black & Veatch

George Kunkel, Philadelphia Water Department

Will Jernigan, Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A.

Alain Lalonde, Veritec Consulting Inc.

Ralph McCord, Louisville Water Company

David Sayers, Delaware River Basin Commission

Brian Skeens, CH2M HILL

Isabel Szendry, Puerto Rico ASA

Other Acknowledgements

Jason Bodwell, Georgia Environmental Finance Authority

Lebone Moeti, Georgia Environmental Protection Division

Steve Cavanaugh, Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A.

Rachel Harris , Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A.

Veronica Jarrin, CH2M HILL

Unaccounted-For No More

3/26/2014

8

Water Audit Validation Methodology

•Primary Focus : “Validation” over “Outputs”

– Assuring valid data, rather than finding the system with the “lowest” losses

•Validation process – standardized by the WLCC:

• A validation checklist of questions was developed to guide the validation telephone interviews

• Evaluation of data for analysis of anomalies and inconsistencies

• Conference call interviews conducted with utility representatives

• Water audit inputs and gradings modified where deemed appropriate

• Utilization of AWWA “Compiler” software developed for the management of water audit data from multiple utilities

Data Validity (unitless, scale of 100)

91.5

31.0

62.5

AVG

3/26/2014

9

Data Validity v System Size

Distribution of Top Priority for Audit Improvement

3/26/2014

10

NRW (% of Water Supplied)

79.6%

2.7%

23.1%

AVG

NRW v System Size

3/26/2014

11

Infrastructure Leakage Index (unitless)

ILI = 3.0

AVG

Customer Retail Unit Cost ($/kgal)

$4.25/KGAL

AVG

3/26/2014

12

Variable Production Cost ($/MG)

$813/MG

AVG-Total

$485/MG

AVG-Own

Real Loss v VPC

3/26/2014

13

Real Loss v Data Validity

The North American Dataset

Key Performance Indicator n AVG

Data Validity Score 310 62.5

Non-Revenue Water as % by Volume 310 23.1%

Non-Revenue Water as % by Cost 310 9.1%

Apparent Loss (gal/connection/day) 310 11.2

Real Loss (gal/connection/day) 248 56.5

Real Loss (gal/mile of main/day) 62 1,932

Infrastructure Leakage Index 283 3.0

North American Validated Dataset

Emerging Water Loss Benchmarks Data Summary (June 2013)

3/26/2014

14

The Future of Validated Water Loss Benchmarking

• The AWWA Water Loss Control Committee intends to continue to

advance the Water Audit Data Initiative, especially seeking participation

from utilities in under-represented geographic regions. This will add a

few dozen audits to the dataset each year.

•Some utilities who have been through the validation process may still

have challenges with their data; continuous improvement of Data Validity

in the industry will be important to the ongoing benchmarking efforts.

•As the regulatory arena continues to encourage or require AWWA Water

Auditing, there will be opportunity for significant enhancement to the

North American Dataset, but will require reliable validation of the data on

a state-by-state basis.

Thank You Gus Simmons, P.E.

[email protected]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Water Audit Software Subcommittee (WASS) Members:

WLCC Chair: John Van Arsdel, M.E. Simpson Company, Inc.

WASS Chair: Andrew Chastain-Howley, Black & Veatch

George Kunkel, Philadelphia Water Department

Will Jernigan, Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A.

Alain Lalonde, Veritec Consulting Inc.

Ralph McCord, Louisville Water Company

David Sayers, Delaware River Basin Commission

Brian Skeens, CH2M HILL

Isabel Szendry, Puerto Rico ASA

Other Acknowledgements

Jason Bodwell, Georgia Environmental Finance Authority

Lebone Moeti, Georgia Environmental Protection Division

Steve Cavanaugh, Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A.

Rachel Harris , Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A.

Veronica Jarrin, CH2M HILL