13
Regulation of water management sector in Latvia Public Utilities Commission of Latvia

Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Regulation of water

management sector in Latvia

Public Utilities Commission of Latvia

Page 2: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Model of public utilities regulation

• Currently in Latvia there is one level regulation system. The public utilities regulation is carried out by Public Utilities Commission (Commission).

• Commission is institutionally and functionally independent regulatory body subordinated to Law On Regulators of Public Utilities

• Before 2009 in Latvia was two-level regulation system:

- In state regulated sector public services were regulate by Commission;

- In municipally regulated sectors public services were regulated by 16

municipal regulators

• Commission regulate 170 water management companies

2

Page 3: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

National Legal framework of the

water management regulation

• Law On Regulators of Public Utilities

• Regulations Regarding Types of Regulated Public Utilities (approved bythe Cabinet of Ministers)

• Regulations regarding the Licensing of Public Utilities (approved by the Cabinet of Ministers)

• Methodology for the Calculation of Tariffs for Water Management Services (approved by Public Utilities Commission)

• Water Management Law (draft)

3

Page 4: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Service providers that are regulated

• According to Law On Regulators of Public Utilities Commission supervisesonly enterprises (mostly municipal enterprises and very few privatecompanies)

• Local government agencies are supervised by local governments

• In accordance with national legal framework there are no restrictionsregarding to provided service amount from which service providers haveto be regulated

4

Page 5: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Water management sector

is being regulated in areas of

• The abstraction, accumulation and preparation of water for the use until delivery to the water supply network

• The water supply from the delivery site in the water supply network to the service user

• The collection and drainage of wastewater to wastewater treatment plants

• The wastewater treatment and drainage in surface water bodies

5

Page 6: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Number of regulated water management companies versus

annual volumes of water supply services

50

1 2862 145

9 016

16 758

36 641

1

12

393056

20

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

thsn

d.

m3

Number of service providers Volume of water supply service total 2011, thsnd.m

below 10 thsnd.

m³ per year

10 - 50 thsnd.

m³ per year

50 - 100 thsnd.

m³ per year

100 - 500 thsnd.

m³ per year

above 500 thsnd.

m³ per year

Riga

(m³ per year)

3

3

3

Total volume of water supply services in 2011 – 65.8 million m

Total volume of sewerage services in 2011 – 68.8 million m 6

Page 7: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Distribution of tariffs for water management services

7

Page 8: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Tariff calculation methodology

• Before 2010, all public service tariffs were set in accordance with theregulations of the Cabinet of Ministers “Public service tariff calculation methodology in municipally regulated sectors”

• In 12.05.2010 Commission approved “Methodology for calculation of water management service tariffs” which specifies the procedure for calculating proposals of water management service tariffs by providers of water management services

• New Methodology:

- provides one-level tariff

- provides one tariff for individual and legal persons

- clearly defines costs what can be included in tariff project

8

Page 9: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Tariff calculation methodology is based on

full cost recovery + profit model

In tariff can be included costs listed below:

• Depreciation on fixed assets (deprecation of those fixed assets which are created using the EU funds can not be included in tariffs)

• Operational costs

- staff costs

- repair costs

- other costs of economic activities (costs of materials, electricity; costs related to the control of the state of the environment; expenditure related to guarding, transport maintenance, insurance, communications and other expenditures)

• Taxes

• Interest payments of long-term loans and repayment of the principal sum

• Profitability (≤7%)

9

Page 10: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Composition of Tariffs

Taxes; 3%

Repair costs; 3%

Transport maintenance

cots; 4%

Costs of materials; 4%

Depreciation; 16%

Costs of electricity;

24%

Staff costs; 36%

Other expenses; 16%

10

Page 11: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Main problems in tariff evaluation process

• Related to the EU water management projects

- Implementing EU water-saving and environmental protection policies

in Latvia is ignored the economic and social situation in the country

- Decreasing amount of provided services compared with the planned

service amount determined in water management projects leads to

growth of tariffs

• Related to other matters

- Low solvency of population

- Large water losses and the amount of infiltration

- Not everywhere there are installed water accounting meters

- Service providers have different experience in tariff project

preparation

11

Page 12: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

Process of tariffs analysis, approval and monitoring

Submitting process

Tariff projects must be submitted together with costs supporting documents, actual costs of the preceding year

and budget for current and next year

Analysis and approval process

In tariff project evaluation there are involved several departments: Municipal Service and Railway Transport

Department, Economic Analysis Department and Legal Department. The tariff project evaluation period is 90

days

Decision about tariff approval is made by Commission Council. Decision making period is 30 days after

evaluation period ends

Since 2011 the time of tariff project evaluation is stopped in case Commission has required supplementary

information

Commission in tariff projects evaluation process organizes meetings with users of public utilities to get their

proposals and recommendations about tariff projects

Monitoring process

Regulated enterprises annually submit information about their performance and expenses of providing service

In case there are changes in factors influencing tariffs Commission may require new tariff project or enterprises

may submit a new one on their own initiative

12

Page 13: Water management regulation LV-korrigeeritud (7).pdfNumber of regulated water management companies versus annual volumes of water supply services 50 1 286 2 145 9 016 16 758 36 641

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

Aigars Mezals,

Public Utilities Commission of LatviaDeputy Director of Municipal Service and Railway Transport Department,Head of Municipal Service Division

,

[email protected]

13