Water Resource Management in a Federal Democratic Nepal

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Water Resource Management in a Federal Democratic Nepal

    1/3

    Water Resources Planning and Management in A Federal Democratic Nepal

    INTRODUCTION

    Nepal is gifted with abundant water resources. Water is regarded as the key strategic natural

    resource, which is believed to assist the all round development and economic growth of the

    country. With the far-sighted use of the water resource, Nepal can go through a drastic economic

    development and a real new Nepal could emerge.

    Federalism is a new concept getting ground in the socio-political arena in the path of

    constructing a new system of governance in Nepal. The then Interim Legislature-Parliament

    made the first amendment of the article 138 (1) of the Interim Constitution 2007, with the

    provision that the country would be restructured with a federal system of governance. But this

    topic has not been undisputable. Is federalism really possible in a small country like Nepal? Has

    enough research studies been carried out on the positive and negative aspects of federalism? And

    are the Nepali people aware enough of this new concept? Such debates are being heated up and

    homeworks and brainstorming are being carried out among different sectors to decide upon the

    model of federalism in Nepal.

    In Nepals context, water resource is as important as other issues such as administration, security

    and national integrity. It is very crucial to have a clear vision about the challenges of optimum

    exploitation of water resources, its management and usage of the benefit for the betterment of

    Nepal and Nepali people in the federal context. While deciding on the model of federalism in

    Nepal in the process of drafting the new constitution, it is important to discuss about the

    provisions relating to water resources. Arrangements have to be made for equitable access to and

    utilization of and sharing of benefits from the water resources. It is necessary to hold serious

    discussion on the matters, rights, responsibilities and duties relating to the water resources, and

    incorporate them as basic elements in the constitution. Peoples participation should be made

    more meaningful for equitable access to and utilization of water resources and equitable sharing

    of benefits.

    PROBLEMS AND CONFLICTS

    Despite being one of the natural resources, the nature and forms of utilization and benefiting

    from water resources is entirely different from other natural resources. It is almost impossible todivide the water resources among provinces like other natural resources under federalism. It is

    necessary to identify the existing differences between water resources and other natural resources

    in the context of the federalism.

    After the country is divided into different provinces under the federal system, complexities over

    sharing of natural resources is certain to arise. People have started believing that people of one

  • 8/6/2019 Water Resource Management in a Federal Democratic Nepal

    2/3

    province will not get anything from the other province after federal system is adopted. Therefore,

    it is important to analyze the negative impacts that may result while sharing water resources after

    the adoption of federalism. The benefit from water resources can only be maximized by ensuring

    its optimum exploitation which is likely to be hindered by fragmentation of the country in very

    small units.

    For instance, let us consider the case of diverting water from the Melamchi River of

    Sindhupalchowk district through underground tunnels to address the drinking water problem of

    Kathmandu. If after federalism, these two places fall in different states, different complexities in

    this project will arise. The local people have been putting forward various demands for

    compensation, including sustained source of income for them.

    Similarly, in the context of Hydropower production and use, the Western development region

    produces the highest amount of electricity (about 330 MW) in the country, but it consumes only

    half of what it produces. However, the Eastern development region consumes 20 times more

    electricity than what it produces (14 MW). Even if the existing five development regions aredeclared as the five provinces, this type of sharing will not be possible. Provinces will have the

    choice to shut off power if the price is not right for them. If India is buys power at a higher rate,

    then a province could choose to export it rather than supply to other provinces. Thus, provisions

    should be made in the new constitution to keep the power in the Centre regarding the production,

    sale and distribution of the electricity and give power to local governments for small scale

    hydroelectricity projects.

    Similarly, if a project involves two or more provinces, the people living in the upstream will be

    deprived from the uses of water while people living in the downstream areas will benefit as water

    will become available even during dry season for the purposes of irrigation.

    Other conflicts regarding resettlement of displaced people from areas of implementation of

    projects to other provinces, and problems of delineation of boundaries between provinces sharing

    a common river can also arise.

    Thus, the new constitution should ensure equitable access to and use of water resources,

    equitable sharing of the benefits, participation of local people in policy and decision making,

    and inclusive participation of the poor and the excluded community without any political

    economic, social, cultural, religious discrimination.

    OPTIMUM MANAGEMENT WITH CONSIDERATION OF FEDERALISM

    Nepal can benefit by ensuring optimum exploitation and distributing the benefits from

    multidimensional uses of the water resources through sensible management and benefit

    maximization techniques.

  • 8/6/2019 Water Resource Management in a Federal Democratic Nepal

    3/3

    An approach of dividing the country in different states could be on the basis of river basins or

    catchment areas of the major river systems. The catchment areas of Sapta Koshi, Sapta Gandaki

    and Karnali river systems can be used as the delineations of the possible provinces from the

    eastern part of the country to the western part. Basins of smaller rivers; for instance the Mechi

    and the Mahakali river can be appended with the adjoining large river systems; the Sapta Koshi

    and the Karnali river systems, respectively. The right to decide the maximum use of a river that

    flows through a province should rest with the concerned province. Local people should have the

    priority to obtain rights for the use of river water. They should also be given the opportunity to

    have shared ownership in the projects implemented in the rivers.

    Under the federal system, there will be three levels of governance, the center, the province andthe local government (municipalities or VDCs). Since unlike other resources, water cannot be

    bound within the territory of one province or local government, the power of control over thewater related projects should be given to the centre while the provincial and local governments

    should have the power to mange and regulate it. The federal states should have the authority to

    implement big hydro power, irrigation, drinking water and recreation based projects that arelimited within the province. In addition, the constitution should have a clear provision whether toallow local governments to initiate and implement small scale projects, or to involve the private

    sector to do it. The central, provincial and local governments need to collect revenue from theprojects implemented within their authority to make an equitable distribution of it by the centre

    to the provinces and by the provinces to the the local governments. Commissions on naturalresources on the legislative and the judiciary levels will have to be set up to settle disputes thatmay arise among provinces or among local governments.

    After the model of federalism and the governance system is decided upon, the importance of theequitable use and distribution of benefits of water resources would increase even more. It can be

    expected that there will be serious discussion over it in the Constitutional Assembly and in otherconcerned sectors after the model of federalism is determined.

    Sagar Shiwakoti

    Tribhuvan University

    Institute of Engineering

    Nepal